The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for applying treating compounds to agricultural products, and more specifically systems and methods for applying vaporized liquid compounds to fruits, vegetables and livestock.
Fogging is often used to apply liquid compounds to agricultural products for a variety of purposes. For example, fogging may be used to apply disinfectants, fungicides, and insecticides. Previous fogging systems used fogger bottles that required air assistant, like venturi suction up to the compounds to spray it. Other related art systems have provided fans that just spray out in front of the fan blades. Still other related art systems relay on different commercial grade foggers to generate or disperse fog.
Further, in related art research initially only used sanitizers sprayed from systems that use air assist bottles or the fans. Then, combination of fungicides or fungicides and other additives such as organic acids or oxidizers have been added. For example, related art processes may use potentially carcinogenic formaldehyde for sanitizing, but these systems can be difficult or hazardous to operate as the formaldehyde would be turned on and the operator would need to quickly exit the room while avoiding formaldehyde spray. Additionally, the efficacy was moderate to lower for these related art systems. Thus, there is still a need for methods and systems for dispersing combinations of compounds that can provide complete treatment of agricultural products in an efficient process.
Aspects of the present application may include a fluid dispersion system having a plurality of side walls defining a confined volume, an agricultural product receiving area configured to hold a volume of agricultural products, a first fogging fan orientated adjacent to the agricultural product receiving area, the first fogging fan having a fluid spraying system configured to spray a fluid compound at high pressure in front of the first fogging fan.
Other aspects of the present application may include a fluid dispersion method. The method may include placing an agricultural product between a plurality of fogging fans in an enclosed environment, spraying an insecticide compound into each of the plurality of fogging fans at high pressure.
The subject matter described herein is taught by way of example implementations. Various details have been omitted for the sake of clarity and to avoid obscuring the subject matter. The examples shown below are directed to structures and processes for applying compounds, typically liquid compounds, to agricultural products through misting, fogging or vaporizing processes.
In order to address issues with existing systems and methods of applying compound to agricultural products, the present applications describes new systems and methods of applying compounds to agricultural products. Additionally, the application also describes new recipes of compounds that may be applied.
In order to maximize efficacy of the application of a compound using fogging, misting, or vaporizing, it may be important to generate droplets that can move easily through the wall. In some example implementations, it has been found that droplet sizes in a range of 5-15 microns in diameter may have sufficient buoyancy to move easily in the air. To obtain these droplet sizes, example implementations of a dispersion system are described below.
As illustrated, the fogging fans 120 may be arranged in a staggered or offset orientation on opposite sides of the storage bins 130. This configuration may produce a serpentine airflow path (e.g., compound circulation path 140 shown in
The fogging dispersion system 100 may also include one or more circulation fans 150 located at one or both ends of confined space to provide additional circulation and/or cooling to maintain refrigeration conditions.
In some example implementations, the fogging fan may be an industrial grade fan capable of producing air flow of up to 8,000 cubic feet per minute (CFM) or more. Additionally, in some example implementations, the fan blades 320 of each fogging fan may be formed from cast metal, such as cast aluminum, to tolerate high air flow rates of 8,000 CFM or more.
In front of each fogging fan a pair of sprayers may be positioned to inject compounds into the air flow created by the rotating fan blades. Each sprayer may be selected to tolerate high pressure spraying and include hydraulic atomizing spray nozzles 330. For example, in some example implementations, the sprayer may be a fine or hollow cone type sprayer (such as TN3 nozzle produced by SPRAYING SYSTEMS). Other types of sprayers may be used if they produce a similar particle size as discussed below. As illustrated, the sprayer nozzles 330 may be located on the front face of the fogging fan at the right and left sides of the fogging fan. For example, the spraying nozzles 330 may be positioned at roughly the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions of the front face of the fogging fan.
The sprayers may be connected to a compound supply manifold 340 that is fluidly coupled to a fluid pressurization system (discussed in greater detail below) by a fan supply line 350. In order the produce a desired particle size (e.g., 5-15 microns), the fluid may be dispersed through the sprayers at pressures greater than 1000 pounds per in2 (PSI) in some example implementations. Further, in some example implementations the pressure may be maintained at a rate less than 1250 PSI. Further each nozzle 330 may disperse a volume of 7-8 gallons per hour (for example, 7.5 gallons per hour) for a total of 14-16 gallons per hour (for example, 15 gallons per hour) of compound per fogging fan. However, in other example implementations, a different pressure may be used to obtain the desire particle size based on the sprayer nozzle configuration.
In some example implementations, a low-pressure pump 420 as shown in
After the compounds are filtered, they are pumped by a high-pressure pump 440 as shown in
Though separate compound tanks, low-pressure pumps, filtration systems, high pressure pumps for each fan system are illustrated in
As illustrated, the fan 560a of the first fan system 500a may push the vaporized fluid over the agricultural product 570 toward the fan 560b of the second fan system 500b, which may then draw the vaporized fluid into its own airstream and push it back over the agricultural product 570. Similarly, the fan 560b of the second fan system 500b may push the vaporized fluid of the agricultural product toward the fan 560a of the first fan system 500a, which may then draw the vaporized fluid into its own airstream and push it back over the agricultural product 570. By circulating and recirculating the vaporized fluid in this manner, efficacy of the compounds may be improved and the volume of compound required to treat agricultural products may be reduced, saving time and money.
These systems illustrated in
Each of these recipes is based on fogging using at least two fans within a closed space arranged in the configuration described above with respect to
Sanitizer Compounds
Peroxide 1%+Quat 200 ppm
Sanisol or Citrosol—5 oz per gallon
Borax (20 Mule Team) 0.08%+200 ppm chlorine (5¼% household bleach)
Vinegar 1% (Organic Fleischmann's=12%)
Quat (disinfectant) 600 ppm (non-porous rate)
Fungicide Compounds/Combinations of Fungicides with Organic Acids or Oxidizers
Thiabendazole (TBZ) 200 ppm chlorine (≤90% decay control)
TBZ 200 ppm/Chlorine/Borax 0.08% (decay control ≤100%)
Imazalil (IMZ)+¼% Peroxide and/or Peracetic Acid (PAA) 80-100 ppm
IMZ+Citric Acid+Borax+Spray-Aid
Fludioxonil 200+200 ppm chlorine (≤80-85% decay control)
Fludioxonil/200 ppm chlorine/Borax
In some example implementations, these fungicides may also be combined with sodium bicarbonate, potassium sorbate, or sodium propionate on colored fruit.
Adjuvants (Spray-Aid) with all the Fungicides
200 mL Spray-Aid per 100 gallons may also be used with the fungicides in some example implementations.
Insecticides (Such as for Treating Bean Thrips and Other Bugs)
Evergreen (Pyrethrum) insecticide 1:29 dilution (the label specified dilution for treatment of label specified insects).
Alternatively, Evergreen 1:650 dilutions may also be used (a more diluted concentration found to be effective against many insects including Asian Citracilid using the methods described herein).
Additionally, dilutions of 1:900 can also be effective using the methods described herein.
In this process, the fluid compound to be dispersed is placed in a fluid tank at 605. In some example implementations the fluid tank may include a mixing system to mix or maintain a constant dispersion of the fluid compounds within the tank. At 610 fluid is pumped from the supply tank to a filtration system to reduce particulates to prevent clogging or mocking of sprayer nozzles and preserve clean flow. After the supplied fluid has been cleaned of particulates it may be pressurized to at least 1000 psi for spraying. In some example implementations, the pressure may be equal to or less than 1250 psi.
After the fluid has been pressurized, it is ejected through a pair of nozzles positioned on opposite sides of the outlet face of a fogging fan to be blown and dispersed across an agricultural product at 620. In some example implementations, the fighting fans may be high-volume industrial fans capable of producing at least 8000 ft.3 per minute of airflow.
After the air containing the dispersed compounds passes over the agricultural product, it is taken up by a second fogging fan at 625 and the process returns to 620, where additional pressurized fluid is ejected from a pair of nozzles positioned in front of the outlet face of the second fogging fan. 620 and 625 may be repeated between two or more fogging fans to circulate and recirculate air containing dispersed compounds around and through the agricultural products for a period of time sufficient to complete the necessary treatment. By ejecting the fluid at the pressure between 1000 and 1250 psi in front of fogging fans producing airflow of 8000 ft3 per minute, the particle size of the ejected fluid has been found to be between 5 and 15 μm and remain dispersed in the airflow for an extended period of time. This produces high efficacy of the treatments.
For example, experiments using this process used to apply insecticides have been shown to be between 95 and 99% effective in eliminating pests during a 1-3 hour time frame. Further, in one experiment only 3 insects out of 2500 insects placed through 48 bins of produce were found to have survived a 1-3 treatment process. Further, the process can be used for a 14 hour time frame to sanitize and remove fungus from a storage room.
The above description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles described herein can be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is to be understood that the description and drawings presented herein represent a presently preferred embodiment of the invention and are therefore representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention. It is further understood that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments that may become obvious to those skilled in the art and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly not limited.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/742,070, filed Oct. 5, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety as if set forth in full.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62742070 | Oct 2018 | US |