The present invention relates generally to electronic trading and more specifically to a system for apportioning trading orders based on size of displayed quantities.
In recent years, electronic trading systems have gained wide spread acceptance for trading of a wide variety of items, such as goods, services, financial instruments, and commodities. For example, electronic trading systems have been created which facilitate the trading of financial instruments and commodities such as stocks, bonds, currency, futures contracts, oil, and gold.
Many of these electronic trading systems use a bid/offer process in which bids and offers are submitted to the systems by a passive side and then those bids and offers are hit or lifted (or taken) by an aggressive side. For example, a passive trading counterparty may submit a “bid” to buy a particular trading product. In response to such a bid, an aggressive side counterparty may submit a “hit” in order to indicate a willingness to sell the trading product to the first counterparty at the given price. Alternatively, a passive side counterparty may submit an “offer” to sell the particular trading product at the given price, and then the aggressive side counterparty may submit a “lift” (or “take”) in response to the offer to indicate a willingness to buy the trading product from the passive side counterparty at the given price.
In accordance with the present invention, the disadvantages and problems associated with prior electronic trading systems have been substantially reduced or eliminated.
An apparatus for processing trading orders comprises a memory and a processor. The memory stores a first order and a second order. The first order is associated with a product and comprises a displayed quantity and a reserved quantity. The second order is associated with the product and comprises a displayed quantity and a reserved quantity. The processor is coupled to the memory and receives a counterorder associated with the product. The processor fills the displayed quantity of the first order with a corresponding portion of the counterorder, and fills the displayed quantity of the second order with a corresponding portion of the counterorder. The processor allocates a first additional portion of the counterorder to the first order. The first additional portion is based at least in part on a ratio of the displayed quantity of the first order to a sum of the displayed quantity of the first order and the displayed quantity of the second order.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure may benefit from numerous advantages. It should be noted that one or more embodiments may benefit from some, none, or all of the advantages discussed below.
One advantage is that the trading platform of the present system allocates counterorders to the reserved quantities of orders in proportion to the size of the displayed quantity of each order. As a result, the larger the displayed quantity of a particular order, the greater the number of shares allocated to the reserved quantity of that order from a counterorder. Accordingly, the system creates incentives for greater transparency in the marketplace by rewarding traders that display a larger portion of a given order. Greater transparency in the marketplace may lead to greater liquidity in the markets.
Other advantages will be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and its advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
A given trading order 12 may comprise two parts—a “displayed quantity” and a “reserved quantity.” In placing trading order 12, trader 70 may indicate that only a portion of the total quantity of trading order 12 should be displayed to other traders 70. This portion of trading order 12 to be displayed to other traders 70 is referred to as the “displayed quantity.” The remaining portion of trading order 12 is referred to as the “reserved quantity.” Designating a portion of trading order 12 as a “reserved quantity” allows trader 70 to enter a large trading order 12 while only displaying a portion of that trading order 12 to other traders 70. Trading platform 50 may incrementally fill a particular trading order 12 by first filling the displayed quantity of that trading order 12 and then using the reserved quantity to replenish the displayed quantity of that trading order 12.
Trading orders 12 generally comprise orders 12a and counterorders 12b. Orders 12a and counterorders 12b may be buy orders 14 and sell orders 16. Orders 12a and counterorders 12b are complementary actions such as, for example, buying and selling. If an order 12a refers to a buy order 14, then a counterorder 12b refers to a sell order 16. Conversely, if an order 12a refers to a sell order 16, then a counterorder 12b refers to a buy order 14. A buy order 14 is a request to buy a particular quantity of a particular trading product (e.g., bid request). A sell order 16 is a request to sell a particular quantity of a particular trading product (e.g., offer request). In particular embodiments, trading order 12 may specify a target price (e.g., target bid price or target offer price) for the trading product. Although system 10 is exemplified below using equities as the trading product, the trading product that forms the basis of trading order 12 may comprise any goods, services, financial instruments, commodities, etc. Examples of financial instruments include, but are not limited to, stocks, bonds, and futures contracts.
Clients 20 are operable to receive trading orders 12 from traders 70 and to send trading orders 12 to trading platform 50 and/or market centers 40. Clients 20 comprise any suitable local or remote end-user devices that may be used by traders 70 to access one or more elements of trading system 10, such as trading platform 50. A particular client 20 may comprise a computer, workstation, telephone, Internet browser, electronic notebook, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), pager, or any other suitable device (wireless or otherwise), component, or element capable of receiving, processing, storing, and/or communicating information with other components of system 10. Client 20 may also comprise any suitable user interface such as a display, microphone, keypad, keyboard, touch screen, or any other appropriate terminal equipment according to particular configurations and arrangements. It will be understood that there may be any number of clients 20 communicatively connected to trading platform 50. In addition, there may be any number of clients 20 communicatively connected to market centers 40 without using trading platform 50.
Although clients 20 are described herein as being used by “traders” 70, it should be understood that the term “trader” is meant to broadly apply to any user of trading system 10, whether that user is an agent acting on behalf of a principal, a principal, an individual, a legal entity (such as a corporation), or any machine or mechanism that is capable of placing and/or responding to trading orders 12 in system 10.
According to certain embodiments, traders 70 may include market makers. A market maker may include any individual or firm that submits and/or maintains either or both bid and offer trading orders 12 simultaneously for the same instrument. For example, a market maker may include an individual or firm, such as a brokerage or bank, that maintains either a firm bid and/or offer price in a given security by standing ready, willing, and able to buy and/or sell that security at publicly quoted prices. A market maker generally displays bid and/or offer prices for specific numbers of specific securities, and if these prices are met, the market maker will immediately buy for and/or sell from its own accounts. According to certain embodiments, a single trading order 12 may be filled by a number of market makers at potentially different prices.
Networks 30 are communication platforms operable to exchange data or information between clients 20 and trading platform 50 and/or market centers 40. According to certain embodiments, a particular network 30 may represent an Internet architecture which provides clients 20 with the ability to communicate trading or transaction information to trading platform 50 and/or market centers 40. According to certain embodiments, network 30 comprises a plain old telephone system (POTS), which traders 70 may use to perform the same operations and functions. Transactions may be assisted by a broker associated with trading platform 50 or manually keyed into a telephone or other suitable electronic device to request that a transaction be executed. In certain embodiments, network 30 may be any packet data network (PDN) offering a communications interface or exchange between any two nodes in system 10. Network 30 may further comprise any combination of local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), wireless local area network (WLAN), virtual private network (VPN), intranet, or any other appropriate architecture or system that facilitates communications between clients 20 and trading platform 50 and/or market centers 40.
Market centers 40 comprise all manner of order execution venues including exchanges, Electronic Communication Networks (ECNs), Alternative Trading Systems (ATSs), market makers, or any other suitable market participants. Each market center 40 maintains a bid and offer price for a given trading product by standing ready, willing, and able to buy or sell that trading product at publicly quoted prices, also referred to as market center prices. Different market centers 40 may provide different market center prices for particular trading products. For example, a particular market center 40 may offer a particular bid price and/or offer price for a particular trading product, while another market center 40 may offer a different bid price and/or offer price for the same trading product. A particular market center 40 may charge a transaction cost to execute trading orders 12 that remain in the order books of that market center 40 for more than a certain length of time. Different market centers 40 may have different policies regarding the disclosure of various details of trading orders 12. For example, certain market centers 40 referred to as “cooperative” market centers may disclose both the displayed quantities and the reserved quantities of trading orders 12 to trading platform 50. Other market centers 40 referred to as “non-cooperative” market centers may disclose only the displayed quantities of trading orders 12 to trading platform 50.
Trading platform 50 is a trading architecture that facilitates the routing, matching, and otherwise processing of trading orders 12. Trading platform 50 may comprise a management center or a headquartering office for any person, business, or entity that seeks to route, allocate, match, process, or fill trading orders 12. Accordingly, trading platform 50 may include any suitable combination of hardware, software, personnel, devices, components, elements, or objects that may be utilized or implemented to achieve the operations and functions of an administrative body or a supervising entity that manages or administers a trading environment. In certain embodiments, trading platform 50 comprises client interface 52, market interface 54, processor 56, and memory module 60.
Client interface 52 of trading platform 50 is communicatively connected to network 30 and supports communications between clients 20 and the various components of trading platform 50. According to certain embodiments, client interface 52 comprises a transaction server that receives trading orders 12 communicated by clients 20 via network 30.
Market interface 54 is communicatively connected to market centers 40 and supports communications between market centers 40 and the various components of trading platform 50. Market interface 54 may comprise a transaction server that receives trading orders 12 communicated by market centers 40. Market interface 54 may be operable to send to market centers 40 trading orders 12 received from clients 20 connected directly to trading platform 50.
Client interface 52 and market interface 54 are communicatively connected to processor 56. Processor 56 is operable to record trading orders 12 in memory module 60 and route trading orders 12 to market centers 40. Processor 56 is further operable to execute logic 62 stored in memory module 60 to match buy orders 14 and sell orders 16 received by client interface 52 and market interface 54. In addition, processor 56 is operable to incrementally fill a particular trading order 12 by using the reserved quantity of that trading order 12 to replenish the displayed quantity of that trading order 12. Processor 56 may comprise any suitable combination of hardware and software implemented in one or more modules to provide the described function or operation.
Memory module 60 comprises any suitable arrangement of random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), magnetic computer disk, CD-ROM, or other magnetic or optical storage media, or any other volatile or non-volatile memory devices that store one or more files, lists, tables, or other arrangements of information such as trading orders 12. Although
According to certain embodiments, memory module 60 comprises logic 62. Generally, logic 62 comprises software instructions for routing, matching, processing, or filling trading orders 12. Processor 56 is operable to execute logic 62 in memory module 60 to match buy orders 14 and sell orders 16 and to determine the priority of traders 70 associated with those buy orders 14 and sell orders 16. Processor 56 is further operable to execute logic 62 in memory module 60 to determine the manner in which to replenish the displayed quantity of a particular trading order 12. Generally, the manner and sequence in which trading orders 12 are filled is based at least in part on the sequence in which trading platform 50 receives each trading order 12. In certain embodiments, the manner and sequence in which trading orders 12 are filled is also based at least in part on the size of the displayed quantity of a particular trading order 12 relative to the size of the reserved quantity of that trading order 12. By regulating the manner and sequence in which trading orders 12 are filled, trading platform 50 may create incentives for increased disclosure of trading orders 12.
It should be understood that the internal structure of trading platform 50 and the interfaces, processors, and memory devices associated therewith is malleable and can be readily changed, modified, rearranged, or reconfigured in order to achieve the intended operations of trading platform 50.
Trading platform 50 may process trading orders 12 according to logic 62 stored in memory module 60. Logic 62 may dictate the manner and sequence in which trading orders 12 are filled. According to certain embodiments, logic 62 may cause processor 56 to first fill the displayed quantities of trading orders 12 in chronological order. In some embodiments, logic 62 may then cause processor 56 to fill the reserved quantities of trading orders 12 in proportion to the size of the displayed quantity of each trading order 12.
In the present example, logic 62 comprises a second rule. The second rule is to divide and allocate, once the displayed quantities of all orders 12a are filled, any remaining portion of counterorder 12b to orders 12a according to the ratio of the displayed quantity of a given order 12a to the displayed quantities of all orders 12a. In the present example, the displayed quantities of buy orders 14p, 14q, 14r, and 14s total 100 shares (e.g., 10+20+30+40=100). The displayed quantity of buy order 14p is 10% of the total displayed quantities of buy orders 14 (e.g., 10/100=10%). Based on the second rule in logic 62, processor 56 allocates 10% of the remaining 50 shares of sell order 16z—5 shares—to the reserved quantity of buy order 14p, as illustrated in column 112. The displayed quantity of buy order 14q is 20% of the total displayed quantities of buy orders 14 (e.g., 20/100=20%). Accordingly, processor 56 allocates 20% of the remaining 50 shares of sell order 16z—10 shares—to the reserved quantity of buy order 14q. The displayed quantity of buy order 14r is 30% of the total displayed quantities of buy orders 14 (e.g., 30/100=30%). Accordingly, processor 56 allocates 30% of the remaining 50 shares of sell order 16z—15 shares—to the reserved quantity of buy order 14r. The displayed quantity of buy order 14s is 40% of the total displayed quantities of buy orders 14 (e.g., 40/100=40%). Accordingly, processor 56 allocates 40% of the remaining 50 shares of sell order 16z—20 shares—to the reserved quantity of buy order 14s.
The preceding example illustrates one method for apportioning the remaining portion of counterorder 12b among orders 12a in proportion to the displayed quantity of each order 12a. According to other embodiments, the remaining portion of the counterorder 12b may be apportioned based on a fraction or a multiple of the percentage of the displayed quantity of each order 12a.
In some embodiments, in addition or as alternatives to the ratio of the displayed quantity of a given order 12a to the displayed quantities of all orders 12a, processor 56 may use other factors in allocating the remaining portion of counterorder 12b among orders 12a. According to certain embodiments, processor 56 may allocate the remaining portion of counterorder 12b based at least in part on the amount of time a particular order 12a has been in the order books prior to being filled. For example, an order 12a that has been in the order books for a long time may receive more of the remaining portion of counterorder 12b than another order 12a with the same displayed quantity that has not been in the order books for as long. In some embodiments, processor 56 may allocate the remaining portion of counterorder 12b based at least in part on the sequence in which orders 12a were received by trading platform 50. For example, the first order 12a may receive more of the remaining portion of counterorder 12b than another order 12a with the same displayed quantity as the first order 12a. In other embodiments, processor 56 may allocate the remaining portion of counterorder 12b based on any suitable number and combination of factors set forth above or hereinafter discovered (e.g., ratio of displayed quantity to reserved quantity; amount of time for order in order book; sequence that orders are received; etc.).
At step 164, platform 50 allocates a first additional portion of the counterorder 12b to the first order 12a, according to one or more factors described above (e.g., ratio of displayed quantity to reserved quantity; amount of time for order in order book; sequence that orders are received; etc.). Execution proceeds to step 166 where platform 50 determines whether any portion of the counterorder 12b remains unfilled. If not, execution terminates at step 172. If so, execution proceeds to step 168 where platform 50 determines whether any portion of the reserved quantity of a subsequent order 12a remains unfilled. If so, execution proceeds to step 170 where platform 50 allocates an additional portion of the counterorder 12b to the subsequent order 12a, according to one or more factors described above (e.g., ratio of displayed quantity to reserved quantity; amount of time for order in order book; sequence that orders are received; etc.). Steps 168 and 170 are repeated for each subsequent order 12a until step 168 is answered with a negative response, at which time execution terminates at step 172.
System 10 has certain technical advantages. Various embodiments of system 10 may have none, some, or all of these advantages. One advantage is that trading platform 50 allocates counterorder 12b to the reserved quantities of orders 12a in proportion to the size of the displayed quantity of each order 12a. As illustrated in the preceding example, the larger the displayed quantity of a particular order 12a, the greater the number of shares allocated to the reserved quantity of that order 12a from counterorder 12b. Accordingly, system 10 creates incentives for greater transparency in the marketplace by rewarding traders 70 that display a larger portion of a given order 12a. Greater transparency in the marketplace may lead to greater liquidity in the markets.
Although the present invention has been described in several embodiments, a myriad of changes and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art, and it is intended that the present invention encompass such changes and modifications as fall within the scope of the present appended claims.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/499,496 filed Aug. 3, 2006, which claims priority from Patent Application Ser. No. 60/705,769, filed Aug. 5, 2005, entitled: System and Method for Apportioning Trading Orders Based on Size of Displayed Quantities, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5787402 | Potter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5873071 | Ferstenberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5915245 | Patterson, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924083 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930762 | Masch | Jul 1999 | A |
5950177 | Lupien et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970479 | Shepherd | Oct 1999 | A |
6012046 | Lupien et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014643 | Minton | Jan 2000 | A |
6029146 | Hawkins et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058379 | Odom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6098051 | Lupien et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112181 | Shear | Aug 2000 | A |
6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173270 | Cristofich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6236972 | Shkedy | May 2001 | B1 |
6247000 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278982 | Korhammmer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285989 | Shoham | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6393409 | Young et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6405180 | Tilfors et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408282 | Buist | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418419 | Nieboer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421653 | May | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6505175 | Silverman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519571 | Guheen | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532460 | Amanat et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536935 | Parunak et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6601044 | Wallman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615188 | Breen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618707 | Gary | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625583 | Silverman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629082 | Hambrecht et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6731729 | Eng et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6772132 | Kemp, II et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6829589 | Saliba | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847934 | Lin et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6871191 | Kinney, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6909941 | Scott et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6938011 | Kemp, II et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6963856 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983011 | Hara et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6983260 | Hummelgren | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7035819 | Gianakouros et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7035820 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058602 | La Mura et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7110969 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110975 | Marks de Chabris et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113924 | Fishbain | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127424 | Kemp, II et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7152037 | Smith | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162447 | Cushing | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181419 | Mesaros | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7197483 | Brady et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7213000 | Gutierrez et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231363 | Hughes | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7242669 | Bundy et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246092 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7277868 | Terashima | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7310620 | Moore et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7330834 | LaPierre | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7383220 | Keith | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7386497 | Gooch | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392214 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7401044 | Fraser et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7483850 | Fishbain | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7536338 | Guler et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7571132 | Cole | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574395 | Sweeting | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587346 | Malitzis | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7653584 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693775 | Korhammer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7769652 | Monroe | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7835987 | Daley et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840477 | Claus et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7979339 | Claus et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8131630 | Claus et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8463649 | Lutnick et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8484122 | Claus et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494951 | Claus et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8583540 | Claus | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8599213 | DiVerdi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8738498 | Daley et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9805417 | Kemp, II et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20010037284 | Finkelstein et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042040 | Keith | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049651 | Selleck | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051909 | Keith | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056396 | Goino | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010672 | Waelbroeck et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016758 | Grigsby | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023037 | White, Jr. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046127 | Reading et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052822 | Terashima | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052827 | Waelbroeck et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055901 | Gianakouros | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073016 | Furbush et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087451 | Rieger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091606 | Shapiro | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091617 | Keith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099640 | Lange | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020108141 | Kang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120546 | Zajac | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020156719 | Finebaum et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169703 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178104 | Hausman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188548 | Bunda | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198816 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004858 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009411 | Ram | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009412 | Furbush et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009413 | Furbrush et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014351 | Neff et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030093343 | Huttenlocher et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097325 | Friesen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101128 | Abernethy | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101130 | Cliff | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126065 | Eng | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149636 | Lutnick et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149661 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167224 | Periwal | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172024 | Kokis et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177082 | Buckwalter | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177085 | Buckwalter et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177086 | Gomber et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216932 | Foley | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220867 | Goodwin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225646 | Failla et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030225674 | Hughes et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229557 | Richmann et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229569 | Nalbandian et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236729 | Epstein et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019551 | Martyn et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024684 | Montepeque | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034591 | Waelbroeck et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059666 | Walebroeck et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093296 | Phelan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103054 | Singer | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133526 | Shmueli et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143538 | Korhammer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172337 | Spoonhower | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177024 | Bok et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193496 | Hirota | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210505 | Pourhamid | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210511 | Waelbroeck et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210512 | Fraser et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210514 | Kemp et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215538 | Smith et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236636 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236662 | Korhammer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254804 | Peterffy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015323 | Myr | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017710 | Steinich et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027635 | Monroe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044031 | Lebedev | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055304 | Lutnick et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055305 | Lutnick et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075898 | Wasserman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091142 | Renton | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119966 | Sandholm et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125326 | Nangalia et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154630 | Lin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160032 | Lutnick et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171887 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171890 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171891 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222936 | Panariti | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050289043 | Maudlin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015436 | Burns et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015441 | Burkhardt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026090 | Balabon | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059079 | Howorka | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080222 | Lutnick et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085319 | Nangalia et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136318 | Rafieyan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149662 | Nordlicht et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190386 | Levy | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218071 | Sweeting | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253379 | Adcock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253381 | Adock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253382 | Adcock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259404 | Brumfield et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277136 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005481 | Kedia et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005484 | Waelbroeck et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070100734 | Berger et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118464 | Avery | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130050 | Claus et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156574 | Marynowski et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156754 | Busch et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174179 | Avery | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070219898 | Burkhardt et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080015974 | Balabon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080097893 | Walsky et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080319891 | Scheinberg et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20110029335 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071937 | Claus et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110270736 | Claus et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120123925 | Daley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120209758 | Adcock et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130185185 | Tilly et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130304625 | Claus et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140089018 | Lutnick et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140108219 | Claus et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140195402 | Claus et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20190066209 | Claus et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008200781 | Mar 2008 | AU |
0388162 | Mar 1990 | EP |
1081614 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1321870 | Jun 2003 | EP |
2366637 | Mar 2002 | GB |
2389687 | Dec 2003 | GB |
2411492 | Aug 2005 | GB |
2003-524241 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-007707 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-007782 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-063402 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-133113 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-183446 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-197283 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-203112 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-230304 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-259761 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-269349 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-542543 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-05874 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-058733 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-515824 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-522992 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-525480 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-331188 | Nov 2003 | JP |
3493193 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003345987 | Dec 2003 | JP |
WO 95006918 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 0011587 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0026834 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0063814 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO2000067172 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO2000077670 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0104817 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0109757 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0125996 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0148655 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0152150 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0154037 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0155938 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO2001055923 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2001057612 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0175752 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0177946 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 2001088808 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2001093169 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02071297 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02086657 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2003001325 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2004008296 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004008309 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 200468272 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005083603 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2007019404 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2008109224 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/30636; dated Apr. 30, 2007; 8 pages. |
European Patent Office Examination Report for Application No. 05712564.3-1238; dated Nov. 14, 2007 (5 pages). |
European Patent Office Examination Report for Application No. 05712566.8-1238; dated Nov. 14, 2007 (5 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/30638; dated Apr. 20, 2007 (8 pages). |
Vergote, et. al. How to match Trades and Quotes for NYSE Stocks, Mar. 2005 (21 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03166; dated Nov. 4, 2005 (7 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03159; dated Feb. 24, 2006, (11 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03164; dated Dec. 13, 2006 (6 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03163; dated Jan. 4, 2007 (9 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03168; dated Jan. 29, 2007 (6 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US05/03166; dated Jan. 8, 2007 (3 pages). |
Parlour, Christine, Price Dynamics in Limit Order Markets, Queens University, Kingston Ontario Canada, Nov. 1, 1995 (111 pages). |
Weber, Bruce; Screen-Based Trading in Futures Markets: Recent Developments and Research Propositions, Abstract, ISBN 076950013, Jun. 21, 2005 (1 page). |
Balance of Trade, Banking Technology, vol. 20, No. 9 ISSN 0266-0865, Nov. 1, 2004; pp. 42-44. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 05712562.7; dated Jul. 28, 2008 (2 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 05712563.5; dated Jul. 28, 2008 (2 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for AU Application No. 2006278384 dated Aug. 5, 2009 (3 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for Application No. 2005208980, dated Nov. 17, 2009 (2 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for Application No. 2005208978, dated Nov. 26, 2009 (1 page). |
Australian Examiner's Report for Application No. 2005208981, dated Dec. 14, 2009 (3 pages). |
George Simon & Kathryn Trikla, “The Regulation of Specialists and Implications for the Future,” Business Lawyer, Nov. 2005, pp. 217-387. |
The ‘Hybrid Approach’: A review of NYSE's Market Structure Proposal, Mondaq Business Briefing, NA, Dec. 9, 2004. |
Australian Examiner's Report for Application No. 2006278382, dated Jul. 9, 2009 (3 pages). |
New AZX Session, Trader's v10 n130, Oct. 1997, p. 4 (p. 20 of EIC search). |
The New Trading Landscape for Institutional Investors, Institutional Trades Can Be Costly If Investors Aren't Careful, Norman Harris, Institutional Investor 36, 5, S1 (7) May 2002 (p. 21 of EIC search). |
Scientific and Technical Information Center's Search Report EIC 3600, dated Jul. 9, 2009 (88 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03164, dated Jan. 9, 2007 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551589, dated Apr. 20, 2010 (6 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03166, dated Jul. 31, 2006 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551590, dated Apr. 20, 2010 (6 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03163, dated Jan. 23, 2007 (5 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551588, dated Apr. 27, 2010 (8 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03168, dated Feb. 13, 2007 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551591, dated Apr. 20, 2010 (6 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US05/03159, dated Jul. 31, 2006 (6 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 05712558, dated Dec. 5, 2008 (2 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551587, dated Apr. 20, 2010 (6 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/30638, dated Feb. 5, 2008 (5 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/30636, dated Feb. 5, 2008 (5 pages). |
Donald L. Luskin, Index Options & Futures: The Complete Guide, Toyo Keizai, Inc., Aug. 9, 1990, p. 32-35 [translation of an English book, originally published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1987]. |
EPO: “Mitteilung des Europaischen Patentamts vom 1. Oct. 2007 Ober Geschaftsmethoden =Notice from the European Patent Office dated Oct. 1, 2007 concerning business methods =Communique de l'Office europeen des brevets,en date du Oct. 1, 2007, concernant les methodes dans le domaine des activites”Journal Officiel De L'Office Europeen Des Brevets.Official Journal of the European Patent Office.Amtsblattt Des Europaeischen Patentamts, OEB, Munchen, DE, vol. 30, No. 11, Nov. 1, 2007 (Nov. 1, 2007) , pp. 592-593, XP0079055251SSN: 0170-9291 (2 pages). |
European Patent Office Communication and Official Action for Application No. 05712562.7, dated May 18, 2010 (6 pages). |
European Patent Office Communication and Official Action for Application No. 05712563.5, dated May 18, 2010 (6 pages). |
European Patent Office Communication and Official Action for Application No. 05712558.5, dated May 18, 2010 (6 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for Application No. 2005208979, dated Nov. 13, 2009 (2 pages). |
European Patent Office Communication and Extended European Search Report for Application No. 06789488.1, dated Jul. 6, 2010 (10 pages). |
European Patent Office Communication and Extended European Search Report for Application No. 06789490.7, dated Jul. 7, 2010 (8 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for Application No. 2005208977, dated Nov. 20, 2009 (8 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551591, dated Aug. 24, 2010 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551590, dated Aug. 24, 2010 (6 pages). |
Daisuke Ochiai, “Electronic Finance and Security Trading, ‘London Stock Exchange Transfers to New Trading System’”, Capital Market Quarterly, Autumn 1997, vol. 1, No. 2, Nomura Research Institute, Nov. 1, 1997, pp. 102-108. |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551588, dated Aug. 31, 2010 (8 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551589, dated Aug. 31, 2010 (7 pages). |
Australian Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 2005208980, dated Sep. 23, 2010 (3 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2008-525266, dated Sep. 21, 2010 (7 pages). |
Australian Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 2005208978, dated Nov. 30, 2010 (3 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for Application No. 2005208977, dated Dec. 2, 2010 (1 page). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2008-525268, dated Nov. 24, 2010 (7 pages). |
Australian Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 2005208981, dated Dec. 14, 2010 (3 pages). |
Australian Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 2005208979, dated Dec. 20, 2010 (3 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551587, dated Nov. 24, 2010 (6 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551589, dated Dec. 7, 2010 (6 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551590, dated Jan. 11, 2011 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551591, dated Jan. 11, 2011 (4 pages). |
Australian Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 2006278382, dated Apr. 11, 2011 (3 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551588, dated Apr. 26, 2011 (6 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2008-525268, dated Jun. 21, 2011 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2008-525266, dated Jun. 28, 2011 (7 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551587, dated Jul. 12, 2011 (6 pages). |
Australian Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 2005208977, dated Aug. 24, 2011 (3 pages). |
Lee, et. al., “R-Trader: An Automatic Stock Trading System Based on Reinforcement Learning,” The British Library, pp. 785-794, (Abstract translated). |
Tan, “Using genetic algorithm to optimize an oscillator-based market timing system,” The British Library, pp. B115-B122. |
Ye, et. al., Application of Genetic Algorithm to Optimal Portfolio with Risk Control,: The British Library, pp. 351-354. |
Steiner, et. al., “Portfolio optimization with a neural network implementation of the coherent market hypothesis,” The British Library, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 27-40; rev. Nov. 11, 1995. |
Lin, et. al., “The Applications of Genetic Algorithms in Stock Market Data Mining Optimisation,” Faculty of Information Technology, University of Technology, 9 pages; 2000. |
Fukutome, et. al., “Bidding market based on single price model with network constraints,” IEEE, pp. 1245-1250 plus 4 pages; 2004. |
Wachi, et. al., “Application for Single price auction model (SPA) in AC Network,” pp. 81-89; 2005. |
Wallman; Technology Takes to Securities TradingIIEE, Spectrum; pp. 60-65; Feb. 1997. |
Schmerken; Cybercorp to Introduce Trading via CBOE; Wall Street & technology; coversheet plus p. 50; Jan. 2000. |
Zeroual; An Open Distributed Request Propagation Approach for Trading Services; Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Xi'an; pp. 3253-3258; Nov. 2003. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US06/22441; 5 pages; dated May 1, 2007. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US07/07602; 5 pages; dated Sep. 24, 2007. |
Hasbrouck et al.: Limit orders and volatility in a Hybrid Market: The Island ECN, Department of Finance, Stern School, NYU, Sep. 26, 2001, pp. 1-54. |
Market Access Subcommittee: Best Practices for Organized Electronic Markets, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Nov. 27, 2001, pp. 1-22. |
Bongiovanni, et al.: Let's Play Hide- and-Seek: The Location and Size of Undisclosed Limit Order Volume, The Journal of Trading, Summer 2006, pp. 34-46. |
European Communication and Supplementary Search Report for Application No. 06772668.7 dated Aug. 20, 2009; 5 pages; (this app has been Abandoned). |
AU Examination Report for Application No. 2007201453 dated Jul. 30, 2010; 1 page. |
AU Examination Report for Application No. 2006254819 dated Oct. 28, 2010; 2 pages. |
European Communication and Search Report for Application No. 07754165.4 dated May 26, 2011; 9 pages. |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2007-097157; dated Jun. 20, 2011 (4 pages). |
NASDAQ: SuperMontage Release 1.0—Functional Description, Version 2.0, 2001, pp. 1-15. |
Hendershott, T.: Electronic Trading in Financial Market, Jul./Aug. 2003, IT PRO, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1-5. |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2008-515959, dated Sep. 6, 2011 (6 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for AU Application No. 2006278384 dated, May 3, 2011 (2 pages). |
Japanese Notice of Allowance for Application No. 2008-525268, dated Nov. 22, 2011 (3 pages). |
International Preliminary Report for International Application No. PCT/US2006/022441, dated Dec. 11, 2007 (5 pages). |
International Preliminary Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/007602, dated Oct. 8, 2008 (5 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,241 dated Aug. 6, 2012 (4 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,244 dated May 16, 2012 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,179 dated Jan. 18, 2012 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,250 dated Jul. 30, 2012 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,468 dated Jul. 10, 2012 (6 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551587, dated Jan. 31, 2012 (9 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,617,797 dated Feb. 14, 2012 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,617,787 dated Apr. 2, 2012 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2008-515959, dated Jul. 18, 2012 (9 pages). |
European Examination Report for Application No. 07754165.4 dated Apr. 20, 2012 (7 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,583,825 dated Oct. 18, 2012 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551588, dated Nov. 14, 2012 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2006-551587, dated Oct. 2, 2012 (8 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for AU Application No. 2011204904 dated Oct. 15, 2012 (3 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2011-096192, dated Feb. 19, 2013 (6 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2011-231889, dated Feb. 19, 2013 (7 pages). |
Hong, et al., “Strategic Trading and Learning about Liquidity”, 2002, Journal of Financial Markets 5, pp. 419-450. |
Ayanian, et al., “The Search for Best Execution in Today's Market Environment”, Jun. 6, 2002, Morgan Lewis Counselors at Law, pp. 1-18. |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,609,200 dated Aug. 21, 2013 (4 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,617,797 dated Oct. 17, 2013 (2 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2011-231889, dated Sep. 3, 2013 (4 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,179 dated Nov. 14, 2013 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,617,787 dated Nov. 22, 2013 (3 pages). |
Australian Examiner's Report for AU Application No. 2012202466 dated Sep. 26, 2013 (2 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,468, dated Nov. 26, 2013 (4 pages). |
Australian Examination Report for 2012204120, dated Dec. 17, 2013, 3 pages. |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,241 dated Mar. 10, 2014 (4 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,244 dated Mar. 4, 2014 (4 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,250 dated Feb. 18, 2014 (2 pages). |
Australian Examination Report for 2011250751, dated Mar. 13, 2014, 3 pages. |
Australian Examiner's Report for AU Application No. 2012207031 dated Feb. 12, 2014 (2 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,583,825 dated Jan. 14, 2014 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action with English translation for Application No. 2011-231889, dated Mar. 25, 2014 (4 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,179 dated Mar. 10, 2015 (4 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,250 dated Mar. 19, 2015 (8 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,468, dated Feb. 11, 2015 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,617,797 dated Dec. 4, 2014 (4 pages). |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2014203836 dated May 5, 2015 (6 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for Application No. 2,617,787 dated Mar. 26, 2015 (5 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for Application No. 2,609,200 dated Jul. 28, 2014 (5 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for Application No. 2,538,825 dated Jul. 26, 2017 (10 pages). |
Canadian Final Action for Application No. 2,609,200 dated Sep. 18, 2017 (8 pages). |
Notice of Allowance for CA Application No. 2554179; dated Feb. 5, 2018; 1 page. |
Canadian Final Action for Application No. 2,554,241 dated Mar. 1, 2018 (10 pages). |
Canadian Final Action for Application No. 2,554,244 dated Mar. 1, 2018 (8 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,617,797 dated Apr. 26, 2016 (6 pages). |
Australia First Examination Report for Application No. 2015203516 dated Sep. 7, 2016 (2 pages). |
Canadian Final Action for 2617787 dated Sep. 23, 2016 (6 pages). |
Australia First Examination Report for Application No. 2015268685 dated Sep. 21, 2016 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2609200 dated Sep. 12, 2016 (6 pages). |
Australia First Examination Report for Application No. 2015255245 dated Oct. 17, 2016 (3 pages). |
Australia First Examination Report for Application No. 2015227416 dated Nov. 12, 2016 (3 pages). |
Canadian Patent Appeal Board Action for 2617787 dated Mar. 13, 2017 ( 4 pages). |
Canadian Notice of Allowance for 2554250 dated Mar. 22, 2017 ( 1 page). |
Canadian Examiners Report for 2554468 dated Feb. 10, 2017 (6 pages). |
Australia First Examination Report for Application No. 2016202851 dated Aug. 4, 2017 (3 pages). |
Australia Second Examination Report for Application No. 2015203516 dated Aug. 4, 2017 (2 pages). |
Australia Second Examination Report for Application No. 2015255245 dated Aug. 16, 2017 (3 pages). |
Canadian Patent Appeal Office Action for 2609200 dated Apr. 27, 2018, (6 pages). |
SEC.gov: Nasdaq Market Center Systems Desription, Sep. 7, 2004, pp. 1-23 (Year: 2004). |
InteractiveBrokers: Intermarket Sweep, Jun. 29, 2005, pp. 1-12 (Year:2005). |
Australia First Examination Report for Application No. 2017258978 dated Dec. 13, 2018 (3 pages). |
Canadian Examination Report for 2,554,179 dated Jul. 28, 2017 (3 pages). |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2015268685 dated Aug. 30, 2017 (3 pages). |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2015227416 dated Sep. 24, 2017 (4 pages). |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2015227416 dated Nov. 9, 2017 (3 pages). |
Patent Appeal Board Decision for Canadian Application No. 2,617,797 dated Nov. 21, 2017 (3 pages). |
Biais et al.: Imperfect Competition in Financial Market: ISLAND vs NASDAQ, Nov. 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1- 41. (Year: 2003). |
NASDAQ: Top NASDAQ Participants, Jun. 2012, pp. 1-2. (Year: 2012). |
Lipson, Marc L.: Competition Among Market Centers, Dec. 2003, pp. 1-48. (Year: 2003). |
Allen et al.: Electronic Trading and Its Implications for Financial Systems, Nov. 15, 2001, pp. 1-24. (Year: 2001). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140108219 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60705769 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11499496 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 13936789 | US |