System and method for archiving objects in an information store

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9164850
  • Patent Number
    9,164,850
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 17, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 20, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates generally to archiving data items in an information store. More particularly, the invention provides a computerized method for identifying, in a first information store, a first data item satisfying retention criteria; copying the first data item to a second information store; creating, in the first information store, a second data item containing a subset of the data of the first data item selected based on the data type of the first data item; and replacing the first data item, in the first information store, with the second data item.
Description
COPYRIGHT NOTICE

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosures, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.


RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to the following pending applications:

    • application Ser. No. 09/610,738, titled MODULAR BACKUP AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A STORAGE AREA NETWORK, filed Jul. 6, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,035,880 issued Apr. 25, 2006;
    • application Ser. No. 09/609,977, titled MODULAR BACKUP AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM WITH AN INTEGRATED STORAGE AREA FILING SYSTEM, filed Aug. 5, 2000;
    • application Ser. No. 09/354,058, titled HIERARCHICAL BACKUP AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, filed Jul. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,282 issued Jul. 1, 2008;
    • application Ser. No. 09/774,302, titled LOGICAL VIEW WITH GRANULAR ACCESS TO EXCHANGE DATA MANAGED BY A MODULAR DATA AND STORAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, filed Jan. 30, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,641 issued Feb. 21, 2006;
    • application Ser. No. 09/876,289, titled APPLICATION SPECIFIC ROLLBACK IN A COMPUTER SYSTEM, filed Jun. 6, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,721,767 issued Apr. 13, 2004;
    • application Ser. No. 09/774,272, titled EMAIL ATTACHMENT MANAGEMENT IN A COMPUTER SYSTEM, filed Jan. 30, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,155,481 issued Dec. 26, 2006;
    • application Ser. No. 09/882,438, titled STORAGE OF APPLICATION SPECIFIC PROFILES CORRELATION TO DOCUMENT VERSIONS, filed Jun. 14, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,434,219 issued Oct. 7, 2008; and
    • application Ser. No. 60/411,202, Titled COMBINED STREAM AUXILIARY COPY SYSTEM AND METHOD, filed Sep. 16, 2002;


      each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in this application in its entirety.


BACKGROUND

The invention disclosed herein relates generally to object archiving and retrieval in computer systems.


Electronic mail (e-mail) has increasingly become a common and accepted manner of exchanging messages for individuals both at home and in the workplace. Indeed, some e-mail users send and receive hundreds or even thousands of messages each day. Managing this large volume of message traffic, however, has become a problem for both individual users and network administrators.


When messages are sent and received by a mail application, they are stored for review in folders which are typically part of a file commonly referred to as an e-mail information store (“IS”) that is designated to hold e-mail stored on the user's local computer or on a network storage device. Other types of applications such as directory services applications also have information stores which contain data specific to particular applications.


Over time, the IS typically grows in size as the user continues to receive and send more e-mail. This constantly increasing growth is problematic. Unless steps are periodically taken to reduce its size, the IS will eventually grow so large that it will use considerable amounts of disk space and also require excessive system resources to access its information. To keep the size of the IS under control and optimize system performance, administrators and users of e-mail systems have had to either delete or archive old or unwanted messages to release disk space. Both of these methods have serious drawbacks.


One problem associated with archiving old messages is that the archived messages are normally stored on the user's workstation in file formats such as .PST files which are difficult to manage. All references to individual messages archived to .PST files no longer appear in the inbox and these individual messages are no longer readily accessible by browsing the e-mail client GUI. In order to review individual archived messages, users must know which archive contains their message and must open the individual archive containing the message before being able to access the message contents. This process is often time-consuming with users frequently resorting to trial-and-error methods of opening archives to locate desired messages.


Deleting old or unwanted messages is an even less desirable solution than archiving such messages. While archive files are difficult to manage and to retrieve messages from, deleting old or unwanted messages makes management and retrieval even more difficult and frequently impossible. If the user has performed a system backup prior to deleting such messages, retrieval is sometimes still possible, but the user must then restore the entire the entire system from the backup to retrieve the messages. In the worst case, the messages are simply lost forever when they are deleted.


Further, even in a networked environment with a central e-mail sever such as, for example, a Microsoft Exchange Server, which contains a central IS, the normal backup process will also not directly help cut down the size of the IS. Backing up the IS will still leave all of the messages in the IS unless the individual users delete or archive messages at their workstations.


There is thus a need for a system which permits users to easily manage archiving and retrieving e-mail messages.


In addition, similar problems relating to archiving of old or unwanted objects exist in other directory services applications such as Microsoft's Active Directory, the University of Michigan's LDAP Servers, Lotus Notes, Microsoft's Sharepoint Portal, and other similar applications. In each of these applications, there exists a database similar to the Exchange IS which is constantly growing over time. System administrators must decide how much data in these databases is actually needed, how much should be archived, etc. One problem with archiving an entire directory services application database is that on restore, the entire database generally needs to be shut down even if only a small portion of the database needs to be restored. More single file restores are done than full system restores which results in inefficient use of system resources among other problems. There is thus also a need for a system which permits users to easily manage archiving and retrieving directory services and other similar application objects.


SUMMARY

The present invention addresses the problems discussed above with the management of archiving and retrieving application specific archiving and retrieval.


In accordance with some aspects of the present invention, computerized methods are provided for archiving data, the methods comprising identifying, in a first information store, a first data item satisfying a retention criterion; copying the first data item from the first information store to a second information store; creating, in the first information store, a second data item containing a subset of the data of the first data item selected based on the data type of the first data item; and replacing the first data item, in the first information store, with the second data item. In some embodiments, the first data item may comprise an electronic mail message, an attachment to an electronic mail message, a directory services entry, or other data objects.


The retention criteria is a property or characteristic of the first data item used by the invention to select the first data item for archiving and other purposes. In some embodiments, the retention criterion comprises a first creation date and identifying the first data item comprises comparing a first creation date of the first data item to the creation date specified as the retention criteria. In some embodiments, the retention criterion comprises a last accessed date and identifying the first data item comprises comparing a last accessed date of the first data item to the last accessed date specified as the retention criteria. In some embodiments, the retention criterion comprises an item size and identifying the first data item comprises comparing an item size of the first data item to the item size specified as the retention criteria.


In some embodiments, the first information store may comprise an electronic mail information store, a directory services information store, or other type of information store. In some embodiments, the second information store is a secondary storage device. In some embodiments, the second data item contains index information identifying a location of the first data item in the second information store.


In some embodiments, the second data item may comprise an electronic mail message, a directory services entry, or other type of data object. In some embodiments, the second data item contains header fields of the first data item which may include, for example, in the case of an electronic mail message, a sender field, a recipient field, a subject field, a date field, and a time field. In some embodiments, the second data item contains a subset of the message body of the first data item. In some embodiments, the second data item contains a message body specified by a user. In some embodiments, replacing the first data item comprises deleting the first data item from the first information store.


In one embodiment, the invention provides a system for archiving data, the system comprising a first information store containing one or more data items; a second information store; and a computer, connectable to the first information store and the second information store; wherein the computer is programmed to identify, in the first information store, a first data item satisfying a retention criteria; to copy the first data item to the second information store; to create, in the first information store, a second data item containing a subset of the data of the first data item selected based on the data type of the first data item; and to replace the first data item from the first information store. In some embodiments, the computer is programmed to identify an electronic mail message, an attachment to an electronic mail message, a directory services entry, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the computer is programmed to replace the first data item from the first information store by deleting the first data item.


In one embodiment, the invention provides a computer usable medium storing program code which, when executed on a computerized device, causes the computerized device to execute a computerized method for archiving data, the method comprising identifying, in a first information store, a first data item satisfying a retention criterion; copying the first data item from the first information store to a second information store; creating, in the first information store, a second data item containing a subset of the data of the first data item selected based on the data type of the first data item; and replacing the first data item, in the first information store, with the second data item.


In one embodiment, the invention provides a system for archiving data comprising a plurality of application-specific data agents each configured to coordinate archiving of first data items used in a particular software application; and a plurality of application-specific stubbing modules each functionally integrated with a corresponding application-specific data agent, each stubbing module being configured to replace a first data item used in the corresponding software application with a second data item used in the corresponding software application and representing a subset of the first data item.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, in which like references are intended to refer to like or corresponding parts, and in which:



FIG. 1 is block diagram of a network architecture for a system to archive and retrieve application specific objects according to embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 2 is high-level flow chart of a method to archive application specific objects according to embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a detailed flow chart of a method to archive application specific objects according to embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method to restore application specific objects according to embodiments of the present invention; and



FIG. 5 is an exemplary screen display of an e-mail message stub from a system to archive and retrieve application specific objects according to embodiments of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of methods and systems according to the present invention are described through references to FIGS. 1 though 5. A network architecture for a system to archive and retrieve application specific objects in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is depicted in FIG. 1. As shown, the system includes a storage manager 125 and one or more of the following: a data agent 105, a client computer 107, a first information store 108, a stubbing module 109, a media agent 110, a secondary storage library 115, and an index cache 120. The system and elements thereof are exemplary of a three-tier backup system such as the CommVault Galaxy backup system, available from CommVault Systems, Inc. of Oceanport, N.J., and further described in application Ser. No. 09/610,738 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


A data agent 105 is a software module that is generally responsible for archiving, migrating, and recovering data of a client computer 107. Each client computer 107 has at least one data agent 105 and the system can support many client computers 107. The system provides a plurality of data agents 105 each of which is intended to backup, migrate, and recover data associated with a different application. For example, different individual data agents 105 maybe designed to handle Microsoft Exchange data, Lotus Notes data, Microsoft Windows 2000 file system data, Microsoft Active Directory Objects data, and other types of data known in the art. If a client computer 107 has two or more types of data, one data agent 105 is required for each data type to archive, migrate, and restore the client computer 107 data. For example, to backup, migrate, and restore all of the data on a Microsoft Exchange 2000 server, the client computer 107 would use one Microsoft Exchange 2000 Mailbox data agent 105 to backup the Exchange 2000 mailboxes, one Microsoft Exchange 2000 Database data agent 105 to backup the Exchange 2000 databases, one Microsoft Exchange 2000 Public Folder data agent 105 to backup the Exchange 2000 Public Folders, and one Microsoft Windows 2000 File System data agent 105 to backup the client computer's 107 file system. These data agents 105 are addressed as four separate data agents 105 by the system even though they reside on the same client computer 107.


The data stubbing module 109 is a component of the media agent that performs stubbing operations on data items as further described herein.


A media agent 110 conducts data between the client computer 107 and one or more storage libraries 115 such as a tape library or other storage device. The media agent 110 is communicatively coupled with and controls the storage library 115. For example, the media agent 110 might instruct the storage library 115 to use a robotic arm or other means to load or eject a media cartridge, and to archive, migrate, or restore application specific data. The media agent 110 generally communicates with the storage library 115 via a local bus such as a SCSI adaptor. In some embodiments, the storage library 115 is communicatively coupled to the data agent 110 via a Storage Area Network (“SAN”).


Each media agent 110 maintains an index cache 120 which stores index data the system generates during backup, migration, and restore storage operations as further described herein. For example, storage operations for Microsoft Exchange data generate index data. Index data is useful because it provides the system with an efficient mechanism for locating user files for recovery operations. Although this index data is generally stored with the data backed up to the storage library 115, the media agent 110 that controls the storage operation also writes an additional copy of the index data to its index cache 120. The data in the index cache 120 is thus readily available to the system for use in storage operations and other activities without having to be first retrieved from the storage library 115.


Each index cache 120 typically resides on the corresponding media agent's 110 hard disk or other fixed storage device. Like any cache, the index cache 120 has finite capacity and the amount of index data that can be maintained directly corresponds to the size of that portion of the disk that is allocated to the index cache 120. In one embodiment, the system manages the index cache 120 on a least recently used (“LRU”) basis as known in the art. When the capacity of the index cache 120 is reached, the system overwrites those files in the index cache 120 that have been least recently accessed with the new index data. In some embodiments, before data in the index cache 120 is overwritten, the data is copied to the index cache 120 copy in the storage library 115. If a recovery operation requires data that is no longer stored in the index cache 120 such as in the case of a cache miss, the system recovers the index data from the index cache 120 copy stored in the storage library 120.


The storage manager 125 is a software module or application that coordinates and controls the system. The storage manager 125 communicates with all elements of the system including media agents 110, client computers 107, and data agents 105 to initiate and manage system backups, migrations, and recoveries.


In some embodiments, components of the system may reside and execute on the same computer. In some embodiments, a client computer 107 component such as a data agent 105, a media agent 110, or a storage manager 125 coordinates and directs local archiving, migration, and retrieval application functions as further described in application Ser. No. 09/610,738. This client computer 107 component can function independently or together with other similar client computer 107 components.



FIG. 2 presents high-level flow chart of a method to archive application specific objects in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. An archive job automatically starts, step 130, according to a pre-defined schedule or as manually directed by a user. In some embodiments, the storage manager 125 instructs the media agent 110 to begin an archive job and the media agent 110 then instructs the data agent 105 to commence an archive process. In other embodiments, the media agent 110 directly instructs the data agent 105 to commence an archive process without instructions from the storage manager 125.


The archive process filters and archives those messages, objects, or other data items in a first information store 108 according to specified retention criteria, step 135. In some embodiments, the retention criteria may be input directly by a user when the archive job is started. In other embodiments, the retention criteria may be pre-defined or calculated automatically according to user preferences or other information and the archive job proceeds autonomously. Those messages, objects, or other data items that fulfill the specified retention criteria are copied from the first information store 108 to a second information store. In some embodiments, the second information store is located on secondary storage media such as a storage library 115.


A stubbing process creates a stub for and deletes each message in the first information store 108 that was copied to the second information store, step 140. As used herein, stubs are data objects that replace messages, objects, and other data items in the first information store 108 that were copied to the second information store. Copying the messages to the second information store frees storage space in the first information store 108. Stubs that replace the copied messages generally require less storage space and indicate which items were copied and deleted from the first information store 108. Stubs also facilitate retrieval of messages that were copied to the second information store.


When all items in the first information store 108 have been archived and stubbed or when directed by a user, the job ends, step 145.



FIG. 3 presents detailed flow chart of a method to archive application specific objects in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. A job manager starts an archiving job beginning with an archiving phase and notifies an archive management daemon on the client computer 107, step 150. The job manager is a software process that is generally a part of the storage manager 125, but in some embodiments the job manager may also be part of the media agent 110, the data agent 105, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the system starts with the archiving phase to ensure that messages, objects, or other data items are only stubbed after they are backed-up to secondary storage. Those skilled in the art will recognize that multiple archiving jobs could be run at one time.


As previously described herein, archive jobs can either be started manually as directed by a user or automatically as a scheduled system management task. In some embodiments, archive jobs may take place according to schedule policies as further described in application Ser. No. 09/882,438 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. For example, a schedule policy may indicate that archive jobs should take place on a specified information store once per day at a particular hour or at other designated times. In some embodiments, the archiving process and stubbing process can also be scheduled at off-peak times to reduce the load to system resources.


The archive management daemon initiates an archiving process of the data agent 105, step 155, which archives messages, objects, or other data items in a first information store 108 according to specified retention criteria.


The archiving process scans an item in the first information store 108 to determine whether the item fulfills the retention criteria, step 160. For example, in an email information store, the archiving process scans the mailboxes in the IS 108 to find candidate messages or objects meeting either the default retention criteria, such as the retention criteria specified in a storage policy, or the retention criteria customized by the user.


As previously described, retention criteria define archiving rules for the archiving process to control the content of stubs, which messages, objects, or other data items get archived, the retention time for stubs and archived messages, objects, or other data items, and other similar filtration criteria. In one embodiment, messages, objects, and other data items are copied to secondary storage according to parameters such as job ID, times, etc. In other embodiments, retention criteria specify additional options to indicate whether a stub should be left behind or not, whether the entire message or object or just the attachment should be archived, and other similar choices. In some embodiments, retention criteria specify a mailbox size threshold and exclusion filter for mailbox(es) or folder(s), so that only mailboxes whose size exceed the threshold and are not in the filter list will be scanned. In some embodiments, retention criteria also specify rules based on message creation time, modification time, size, or attachment(s) to further control the message selection criteria. For example, messages in the IS 108 that satisfy certain retention criteria such as age, size, size of attachments, amount of disk space left, size of mailbox, etc. are archived to secondary storage 115.


Since stubs are usually new small messages or objects with no attachments, they can be difficult to remove from a users mailbox. To facilitate stub management among other things, retention criteria also define the lifetime of a stub in some embodiments. After a stub expires past its lifetime, the next archiving job will either delete the stub from the first information store 108 or archive the stub to secondary storage such as a storage library 115.


The size of index cache 120 may grow over time and in some embodiments, archive pruning-related retention criteria specifies that data should be pruned or deleted in the first information store 108 and also in the index cache 120. In some embodiments, retention criteria may also specify whether archived messages, objects, and other data items in secondary storage 115 should be pruned after additional time has passed or at any desired point.


In some embodiments, retention criteria specifies that there should be no orphan stubs left in the IS 108. In one embodiment, this goal among others is achieved by using retention times, such that stubs always expire before their related messages, objects, or other data items archived in secondary storage 115. In other embodiments, retention criteria specifies that items archived in secondary storage 115 are not pruned if a stub still exists in the first information store 108. In an alternate embodiment, archive pruning of secondary storage 115 items produces a pruned list stored in the index cache 115 or other information store and the system uses this list to then remove the related stubs remaining in the first information store 108. In some embodiments, however, retention criteria may permit messages archived in secondary storage to be pruned even if a related stub still exists in the first information store 108.


If the item scanned fulfills the retention criteria, step 165, the archiving process writes a copy of the message, object, or other data item to secondary storage 115, step 170, as further described in application Ser. No. 09/610,738 and application Ser. No. 09/609,977 which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. To make the restore process faster and to achieve other desirable goals, messages, objects, and other data items can first be archived on a magnetic library. Later these items can be moved to tape or some other storage media for long-term storage. In one embodiment, data may be moved from a magnetic library to tape or some other secondary storage media using auxiliary copy to further conserve system resources, and as described in Application No. 60/411,202, COMBINED STREAM AUXILIARY COPY SYSTEM AND METHOD, filed Sep. 16, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Identifying characteristics and other information about the item copied to secondary storage 115 are recorded to an archiving list stored in a local information store of the data agent 105, step 175. During the archiving phase, a record detailing information about every item successfully copied from the first information store 108 to secondary storage 115 will be stored in the archiving list which serves as input and is used during the stubbing phase as further described herein. The content of items in the archiving list include information for the later stubbing phase and restore process to locate the original archived messages, objects, or other data items. Examples of such information include mailbox name, folder ID, message ID, and link information to the item's secondary storage location. An example of such link information is a Universal Naming Convention (“UNC”) path to the item's index entry in a Galaxy file system.


The system determines whether additional items remain in the first information store 108 to be scanned against the retention criteria, step 180. If additional items remain to be scanned, then control returns to step 160, and the process repeats. Otherwise, the archiving process terminates and the job manager then starts the archiving index phase writing the archive information to the index cache 115 on a media agent 110 or other component, step 185, as further described in application Ser. No. 09/610,738 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


When the archiving index phase is complete, the media agent notifies the job manager which then initiates a stubbing process, step 190. The stubbing process retrieves the archiving list of messages, objects, or other data items created during the archiving process to use as input during the stubbing phase and sequentially processes each item on the archiving list, step 195. While the stubbing process could query the media agent 110 containing the index cache 115 created during the archiving index phase, this option is less desirable due to the network and processor resources required. A more desirable method, as described herein, combines archiving and stubbing into a single job in which the stubbing phase only starts after the archiving phase is successfully completed. In one embodiment, the stubbing phase processes items on the archiving list based on application ID, job status, and other criteria.


In some embodiments, before a stub is created, the system prompts for, step 200, and accepts, step 205, user input of text and other information to display or otherwise associate with a stub.


For each item on the archiving list, the stubbing process then creates a new “stub” message, object, or other data item in the first information store 108, step 210. Each new message has the same data structure as the original message, except the body field of the message is replaced with explanation text or other information indicating that the message is a stub, and a path linking to the archived message.


New stubs are generally created according to stub configuration options specified in the storage policy associated with the first information store 108. Stub configuration options include stub with no body or stub with full body, but no attachment, etc. The subject of the stub can be changed to incorporate a tag or other parsable identifier such as “<archived> original subject” so that subsequent archive operations can identify the stub. In some embodiments, there are also named properties in stubs. In some embodiments, stubs contain an ID and an archive time to assist backup systems such as Galaxy with stub management.


After each stub is successfully created, the stubbing process deletes the original message, step 215, and determines whether there are additional items to process on the archiving list, step 220. If additional items remain to be processed, control returns to step 195. Otherwise, once all messages, objects, and other data items on the archiving list have been processed, the stubbing process returns control to the job manager and the archiving job terminates, step 225.



FIG. 4 presents a flow chart of a method to restore application specific objects according to embodiments of the present invention. The message, object, or other data item to restore is selected, step 230. The item may be selected automatically by the system according to predefined restore criteria stored in the index cache 115, in a storage policy, or in another information store. The system also accepts user input to manually select the item to restore.


Turning to FIG. 5, for example, a sample screen display shows an e-mail message stub from a system to archive and retrieve application specific objects according to embodiments of the present invention. As shown, the stub includes many of the header fields of the original archived message including the sender 260, the recipient 265, the subject 270, and the time/date 275. The stub also includes a message 280 indicating that the body of the original message has been archived, a link 285 to the archived message body, a message 290 indicating that an attachment to the original message has been archived, and a link 295 to the archived attachment.


In one embodiment, items archived in secondary storage, such as the message body, can be restored by manually clicking on the UNC link 285 or other identifying path in the item's related stub. The stub message ID is encoded within the link 285. The media agent 210 or the data agent 205 detects the click, parses the message ID, and passes the ID as a parameter to the restore process, as further described herein.


If an archived e-mail message's corresponding stub is still in a mailbox or other browsable first information store 108, a user can search on the stubs' fields copied from the archived e-mail message including the sender 260, recipient 265, subject 270, time/date 275, and other identifying criteria to find the corresponding stub. In some embodiments, stubs with full bodies can also be located via full-text (index) searching functions of a mail server or other file system.


Sometimes, stubs will no longer be accessible via the first information store 108. For example, stubs may have been pruned or otherwise deleted. In another embodiment, the archived message can be selected via the archived message's index entry in a secondary storage file system such as in the Galaxy system. For example, if the user wants to restore an archived e-mail message whose corresponding stub has been pruned from the first information store 108 mailbox, the user can still restore the archived e-mail via a backup system console browser such as the Galaxy console browser.


As further described in application Ser. No. 09/610,738 and application Ser. No. 09/609,977 which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, selecting an item to restore triggers the media agent 210 mapped storage installable file system, and the media agent 210 sends a restore request to a job manager process on the media agent, step 235. The job manager on the media agent 210 starts a restore job using the information contained in the request and notifies a job manager process of the data agent 205, step 240. The job manager process of the data agent 205 creates a restore process which retrieves the archived message from the secondary storage library 115 returning it to the first information store 108, step 245. After the archived item is restored from secondary storage 115 and copied to the first information store 108, the item's corresponding stub is deleted from the first information store 108, step 250, and the job ends, step 255.


In some embodiments, users are prevented from modifying stubs since the restore process depends on special information contained in each stub to identify it as a stub and to restore the original message.


In one embodiment, if users are moved to another mail server having a different information store than the first information store 108, the system first restores all the stubbed messages, objects, and other data items back to the user's mailbox in the first information store 108, and then deletes all the stubs before the administrator is permitted to move the user. In some embodiments, this is accomplished as an integrated part of the system or as a separate process to scan the mailbox in the first information store 108, find all the stubs, pass the links to the media agent 119 to start a restore job, and then delete the stubs. In some embodiments, stubs contain application type, backup management system console information such as CommVault CommServer information, and other information which ensures compatibility and continued functionality of the invention if a user updates their mail server.


While the system has frequently been described above in the context of electronic mail object archiving, the system also archives and restores general directory services client objects for each entry that exists in a service such as Microsoft's Active Directory, the University of Michigan's LDAP Servers, Lotus Notes, Microsoft's Sharepoint Portal, and other similar applications. Attributes and properties of each archived service entry are retained in the corresponding stub. Client operations are performed using an interface such as the Windows LDAP API, which can interface with Active Directory, as well as any other LDAP compliant directory service. Similarly, the directory services client looks and behaves very much like an e-mail file system agent from a GUI standpoint with backup sets and sub-clients where default sub-clients backup the entire directory service and new sub-clients are defined to limit the scope of the backup. Filters specify retention criteria to archive certain branches of the directory tree, certain entries, and certain attributes. Each entry is stored in a separate file that adheres to the interface format, such as the LDIF (LDAP Data Interchange Format) format, which is an RFC standard format for listing the attributes of an entry.


Systems and modules described herein may comprise software, firmware, hardware, or any combination(s) of software, firmware, or hardware suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules may reside on servers, workstations, personal computers, computerized tablets, PDAs, and other devices suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules may be accessible via local memory, via a network, via a browser or other application in an ASP context, or via other means suitable for the purposes described herein. Data structures described herein may comprise computer files, variables, programming arrays, programming structures, or any electronic information storage schemes or methods, or any combinations thereof, suitable for the purposes described herein. User interface elements described herein may comprise elements from graphical user interfaces, command line interfaces, and other interfaces suitable for the purposes described herein. Screenshots presented and described herein can be displayed differently as known in the art to input, access, change, manipulate, modify, alter, and work with information.


While the invention has been described and illustrated in connection with preferred embodiments, many variations and modifications as will be evident to those skilled in this art may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and the invention is thus not to be limited to the precise details of methodology or construction set forth above as such variations and modification are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions, which when executed by at least one data processing device performs a method for restoring archived data, the method comprising: selecting an indicator, or receiving selection of the indicator, wherein the indictor is associated with a data item, wherein the data item is stored in a secondary storage device,wherein the indicator is stored in a primary storage device,wherein the primary and secondary storage devices are coupled via a network, andwherein the indicator includes information identifying the data item;based on the selected indicator, accessing the data item from the secondary storage device;copying the data item to the primary storage device; andremoving, from the primary storage device, the indicator associated with the copied data item.
  • 2. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein selecting the indicator includes selecting the indicator associated with the data item in response to a manual user input,wherein the indicator is not modifiable by the user,wherein selecting the indicator includes accessing a Universal Naming Convention (UNC) link included in the indicator, andwherein accessing the UNC link includes parsing a tag or other parsable identifier encoded within the indicator.
  • 3. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein selecting the indicator includes selecting the indicator associated with the data item in response to a manual user input, and,wherein selecting the indicator includes accessing a Universal Naming Convention (UNC) link included in the indicator.
  • 4. The computer-readable medium of claim 1 wherein selecting the indicator includes selecting a data object having a same data structure as the data item.
  • 5. The computer-readable medium of claim 1 wherein selecting the indicator includes selecting an electronic mail message having a new message body that replaces a message body included within the data item, wherein the new message body is a subset of the message body of the data item.
  • 6. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the information identifying the data item includes an identifying path to the data item in the secondary storage device, andwherein accessing the data item from the secondary storage device includes accessing at least one of an electronic message and an attachment to the electronic message via the identifying path.
  • 7. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein selecting the indicator includes selecting an electronic mail message having a header field of the data item, wherein the header field includes at least two of a sender field, a recipient field, a subject field, a time field, and a date field.
  • 8. One or more tangible computer-readable memories storing computer-executable instructions to perform a method for moving data items between servers, comprising: extracting at least first data items stored in a secondary storage device, wherein the secondary storage device is associated with a first server;transferring the extracted data items to a primary storage device associated with the first server, wherein indicators associated with the data items stored in the secondary storage device are stored in the primary storage device,wherein the indicators include information associated with the data items, andwherein the primary and secondary storage devices are coupled via a network;deleting the indicators from the primary storage device associated with the first server; andat a time after the transferring and the deleting, moving the data items from the primary storage device associated with the first server to a primary storage device associated with a second server.
  • 9. The one or more tangible computer-readable memories of claim 8, further comprising: copying the data items from the primary storage device associated with the secondary server to the secondary storage device of the second server; andwherein copying the data items from the primary storage device associated with the second server to the secondary storage device includes storing directory services entries in separate files that adhere to an LDIF (LDAP Data Interchange Format) format.
  • 10. The one or more tangible computer-readable memories of claim 8 wherein the data items are electronic mail messages for an electronic mail box for a user and wherein the transferring is done based on an age-based storage policy.
  • 11. The one or more tangible computer-readable memories of claim 8, further comprising copying the data items from the primary storage device associated with the second server to the secondary storage device occurs in response to directory services entries satisfying one or more retention criteria,wherein the retention criteria constitute a defined branch of a directory tree, one or more defined directory services entries, or one or more defined attributes of the directory services entries.
  • 12. The one or more tangible computer-readable memories of claim 8, further comprising: copying the data items from the primary storage device associated with the second server to a secondary storage device of the second server; andcreating in the primary storage device associated with the second server further indicators that include information associated with the data items in the secondary storage device of the second server, wherein copying the data items includes copying directory services entries to the secondary storage device of the second server, wherein attributes and properties of the directory services entries are included in the further indicators stored in the primary storage device associated with the second server.
  • 13. A computer-readable storage medium storing processor-implementable instructions for retrieving a portion of an original electronic mail message, wherein the portion is archived in secondary storage, comprising: displaying a graphical user interface of an electronic mail message stub stored in a primary storage device, wherein the stub has replaced at least the portion of the original electronic mail message in the primary storage device, and,wherein the graphical user interface displays: header fields of the original electronic mail message, including at least two of sender, recipient, subject, time, and date fields of the original electronic mail message;an indication that the portion of the original electronic mail message has been archived; and,a link to the portion of the original electronic mail message that is archived, wherein the link comprises an identifier to the portion in secondary storage; and,restoring the portion of the original electronic mail message from the secondary storage device to the primary storage device in response to a user selecting the link.
  • 14. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the portion of the original electronic mail message is an attachment to the original electronic mail message.
  • 15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the link is a Universal Naming Convention path that cannot be modified by a user.
  • 16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the graphical user interface is displayed in response to a user locating the electronic mail message stub via a full-text search function provided by an electronic mail server.
  • 17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the graphical user interface is displayed in response to a user selecting the electronic mail message stub from a backup system console browser.
  • 18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the primary storage device is browsable, andwherein the graphical user interface is displayed in response to a user manually selecting the electronic mail message stub from the browsable primary storage device.
  • 19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the primary storage device and the secondary storage are coupled via a network.
  • 20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein restoring the portion of the original electronic mail message further comprises: accessing the portion of the original electronic mail message from secondary storage via the identifier;copying the portion of the original electronic mail message to the primary storage device; and,removing, from the primary storage device, the link to the portion of the original electronic mail message.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/250,349, filed Sep. 30, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/252,897, filed Oct. 16, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,055,627, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/497,546, filed Jul. 31, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,472,142, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/260,209, filed Sep. 30, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,107,298, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/326,023, entitled “APPLICATION SPECIFIC OBJECT ARCHIVING AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM”, filed Sep. 28, 2001, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (316)
Number Name Date Kind
4464122 Fuller et al. Aug 1984 A
4686620 Ng Aug 1987 A
4995035 Cole et al. Feb 1991 A
5005122 Griffin et al. Apr 1991 A
5093912 Dong et al. Mar 1992 A
5133065 Cheffetz et al. Jul 1992 A
5193154 Kitajima et al. Mar 1993 A
5212772 Masters May 1993 A
5212784 Sparks May 1993 A
5226157 Nakano et al. Jul 1993 A
5239647 Anglin et al. Aug 1993 A
5241668 Eastridge et al. Aug 1993 A
5241670 Eastridge et al. Aug 1993 A
5276860 Fortier et al. Jan 1994 A
5276867 Kenley et al. Jan 1994 A
5287500 Stoppani, Jr. Feb 1994 A
5321816 Rogan et al. Jun 1994 A
5333315 Saether et al. Jul 1994 A
5347653 Flynn et al. Sep 1994 A
5386545 Gombos, Jr. et al. Jan 1995 A
5410700 Fecteau et al. Apr 1995 A
5448718 Cohn et al. Sep 1995 A
5448724 Hayashi Sep 1995 A
5485606 Midgdey et al. Jan 1996 A
5491810 Allen Feb 1996 A
5495607 Pisello et al. Feb 1996 A
5504873 Martin et al. Apr 1996 A
5517405 McAndrew et al. May 1996 A
5537568 Yanai et al. Jul 1996 A
5544345 Carpenter et al. Aug 1996 A
5544347 Yanai et al. Aug 1996 A
5555371 Duyanovich et al. Sep 1996 A
5559957 Balk Sep 1996 A
5564037 Lam Oct 1996 A
5608865 Midgely et al. Mar 1997 A
5613134 Lucus et al. Mar 1997 A
5619644 Crockett et al. Apr 1997 A
5634052 Morris May 1997 A
5638509 Dunphy et al. Jun 1997 A
5659614 Bailey, III Aug 1997 A
5666501 Jones et al. Sep 1997 A
5673381 Huai et al. Sep 1997 A
5673382 Cannon et al. Sep 1997 A
5699361 Ding et al. Dec 1997 A
5729743 Squibb Mar 1998 A
5740405 DeGraaf Apr 1998 A
5751997 Kullick et al. May 1998 A
5758359 Saxon May 1998 A
5758649 Iwashita et al. Jun 1998 A
5761677 Senator et al. Jun 1998 A
5764972 Crouse et al. Jun 1998 A
5778165 Saxon Jul 1998 A
5778395 Whiting et al. Jul 1998 A
5812398 Nielsen Sep 1998 A
5813009 Johnson et al. Sep 1998 A
5813017 Morris Sep 1998 A
5860073 Ferrel et al. Jan 1999 A
5864846 Voorhees et al. Jan 1999 A
5875478 Blumenau Feb 1999 A
5887134 Ebrahim Mar 1999 A
5896531 Curtis et al. Apr 1999 A
5901327 Ofek May 1999 A
5924102 Perks Jul 1999 A
5950205 Aviani, Jr. Sep 1999 A
5974563 Beeler, Jr. Oct 1999 A
5983239 Cannon Nov 1999 A
5991753 Wilde Nov 1999 A
6012053 Pant et al. Jan 2000 A
6021415 Cannon et al. Feb 2000 A
6026414 Anglin Feb 2000 A
6052735 Ulrich et al. Apr 2000 A
6064821 Shough et al. May 2000 A
6073128 Pongracz et al. Jun 2000 A
6076148 Kedem Jun 2000 A
6091518 Anabuki et al. Jul 2000 A
6094416 Ying Jul 2000 A
6131095 Low et al. Oct 2000 A
6131190 Sidwell Oct 2000 A
6148412 Cannon et al. Nov 2000 A
6154787 Urevig et al. Nov 2000 A
6161111 Mutalik et al. Dec 2000 A
6167402 Yeager Dec 2000 A
6182198 Hubis et al. Jan 2001 B1
6212512 Barney et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226759 Miller et al. May 2001 B1
6239800 Mayhew et al. May 2001 B1
6253217 Dourish et al. Jun 2001 B1
6260069 Anglin Jul 2001 B1
6266679 Szalwinski et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266784 Hsiao et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269431 Dunham Jul 2001 B1
6275953 Vahalia et al. Aug 2001 B1
6298439 Beglin Oct 2001 B1
6301592 Aoyama et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308175 Lang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324581 Xu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327590 Chidlovskii et al. Dec 2001 B1
6327612 Watanabe Dec 2001 B1
6328766 Long Dec 2001 B1
6330570 Crighton Dec 2001 B1
6330642 Carteau Dec 2001 B1
6341287 Sziklai Jan 2002 B1
6343287 Kumar et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343324 Hubis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345288 Reed et al. Feb 2002 B1
RE37601 Eastridge et al. Mar 2002 E
6356801 Goodman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363462 Bergsten Mar 2002 B1
6367073 Elledge Apr 2002 B2
6374363 Wu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389432 Pothapragada et al. May 2002 B1
6418478 Ignatius et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421678 Smiga et al. Jul 2002 B2
6421711 Blumenau et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442706 Wahl et al. Aug 2002 B1
6470332 Weschler Oct 2002 B1
6484162 Edlund et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487561 Ofek et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487644 Huebsch et al. Nov 2002 B1
6502205 Yanai et al. Dec 2002 B1
6519679 Devireddy et al. Feb 2003 B2
6538669 Lagueux, Jr. et al. Mar 2003 B1
6540623 Jackson Apr 2003 B2
6549918 Probert, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557039 Leong et al. Apr 2003 B1
6564228 O'Connor May 2003 B1
6593656 Ahn et al. Jul 2003 B2
6618771 Leja et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629110 Cane et al. Sep 2003 B2
6647399 Zaremba Nov 2003 B2
6658526 Nguyen et al. Dec 2003 B2
6662218 Mighdoll et al. Dec 2003 B2
6675177 Webb Jan 2004 B1
6691232 Wood et al. Feb 2004 B1
6721767 De Meno et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732088 Glance May 2004 B1
6732231 Don et al. May 2004 B1
6732244 Ashton et al. May 2004 B2
6745178 Emens et al. Jun 2004 B1
6795828 Ricketts Sep 2004 B2
6816941 Carlson et al. Nov 2004 B1
6820070 Goldman et al. Nov 2004 B2
6839741 Tsai Jan 2005 B1
6839803 Loh et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850994 Gabryjelski Feb 2005 B2
6860422 Hull et al. Mar 2005 B2
6865568 Chau Mar 2005 B2
6871182 Winnard et al. Mar 2005 B1
6892221 Ricart et al. May 2005 B2
6948038 Berkowitz et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948039 Biessener et al. Sep 2005 B2
6957186 Guheen et al. Oct 2005 B1
6970997 Shibayama et al. Nov 2005 B2
6976039 Chefalas et al. Dec 2005 B2
6995675 Curkendall et al. Feb 2006 B2
6996616 Leighton et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003641 Prahlad et al. Feb 2006 B2
7028079 Mastrianni et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035880 Crescenti et al. Apr 2006 B1
7039860 Gautestad et al. May 2006 B1
7058661 Ciaramitaro et al. Jun 2006 B2
7099901 Sutoh et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107298 Prahlad et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107416 Stuart et al. Sep 2006 B2
7133870 Tripp et al. Nov 2006 B1
7139826 Watanabe et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139846 Rossi Nov 2006 B1
7146387 Russo et al. Dec 2006 B1
7155421 Haldar Dec 2006 B1
7155481 Prahlad et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159081 Suzuki Jan 2007 B2
7171468 Yeung et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171585 Gail et al. Jan 2007 B2
7185152 Takahashi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7188141 Novaes Mar 2007 B2
7240100 Wein et al. Jul 2007 B1
7246207 Kottomtharayil et al. Jul 2007 B2
7269664 Hutsch et al. Sep 2007 B2
7284033 Jhanji Oct 2007 B2
7287047 Kavuri Oct 2007 B2
7290017 Wang et al. Oct 2007 B1
7313659 Suzuki Dec 2007 B2
7315923 Retnamma et al. Jan 2008 B2
7328325 Solis et al. Feb 2008 B1
7343453 Prahlad et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346623 Prahlad et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346676 Swildens et al. Mar 2008 B1
7346751 Prahlad et al. Mar 2008 B2
7376947 Evers May 2008 B2
7379978 Anderson et al. May 2008 B2
7383379 Patterson et al. Jun 2008 B2
7386535 Kalucha et al. Jun 2008 B1
7395282 Crescenti et al. Jul 2008 B1
7421460 Chigusa et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424543 Rice, III Sep 2008 B2
7434219 De Meno et al. Oct 2008 B2
7457790 Kochunni et al. Nov 2008 B2
7472142 Prahlad et al. Dec 2008 B2
7496841 Hadfield et al. Feb 2009 B2
7529782 Prahlad et al. May 2009 B2
7565484 Ghosal et al. Jul 2009 B2
7577689 Masinter et al. Aug 2009 B1
7577694 Nakano et al. Aug 2009 B2
7584469 Mitekura et al. Sep 2009 B2
7587715 Barrett et al. Sep 2009 B1
7593935 Sullivan Sep 2009 B2
7596713 Mani-Meitav et al. Sep 2009 B2
7603626 Williams et al. Oct 2009 B2
7606844 Kottomtharayil Oct 2009 B2
7610285 Zoellner et al. Oct 2009 B1
7617262 Prahlad et al. Nov 2009 B2
7668884 Prahlad et al. Feb 2010 B2
7673175 Mora et al. Mar 2010 B2
7676542 Moser et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689899 Leymaster et al. Mar 2010 B2
7730031 Forster Jun 2010 B2
7734593 Prahlad et al. Jun 2010 B2
7734669 Kottomtharayil et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747579 Prahlad et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751628 Reisman Jul 2010 B1
7761409 Stefik et al. Jul 2010 B2
7792789 Prahlad et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801871 Gosnell Sep 2010 B2
7814118 Kottomtharayil et al. Oct 2010 B2
7827266 Gupta Nov 2010 B2
7831793 Chakravarty et al. Nov 2010 B2
7840537 Gokhale et al. Nov 2010 B2
7844676 Prahlad et al. Nov 2010 B2
7865517 Prahlad et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882077 Gokhale et al. Feb 2011 B2
7882093 Kottomtharayil et al. Feb 2011 B2
7882097 Ogilvie Feb 2011 B1
7937393 Prahlad et al. May 2011 B2
7937420 Tabellion et al. May 2011 B2
7937702 De Meno et al. May 2011 B2
7984063 Kottomtharayil et al. Jul 2011 B2
8037028 Prahlad et al. Oct 2011 B2
8055627 Prahlad et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060514 Arrouye et al. Nov 2011 B2
8078607 Oztekin et al. Dec 2011 B2
8099428 Kottomtharayil et al. Jan 2012 B2
8108427 Prahlad et al. Jan 2012 B2
8140786 Bunte et al. Mar 2012 B2
8156086 Lu et al. Apr 2012 B2
8161003 Kavuri Apr 2012 B2
8170995 Prahlad et al. May 2012 B2
8219524 Gokhale Jul 2012 B2
8229954 Kottomtharayil et al. Jul 2012 B2
8230195 Amarendran et al. Jul 2012 B2
RE43678 Major et al. Sep 2012 E
8285681 Prahlad et al. Oct 2012 B2
8352954 Gokhale et al. Jan 2013 B2
8364652 Vijayan et al. Jan 2013 B2
8578120 Attarde et al. Nov 2013 B2
20020032878 Karpf Mar 2002 A1
20020049883 Schneider et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020120858 Porter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030046313 Leung et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050979 Takahashi Mar 2003 A1
20030101086 San Miguel May 2003 A1
20040039689 Penney et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040267815 De Mes Dec 2004 A1
20050039069 Prahlad et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050097070 Enis et al. May 2005 A1
20050251786 Citron et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278207 Ronnewinkel Dec 2005 A1
20060036619 Fuerst et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060070061 Cox et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060115802 Reynolds Jun 2006 A1
20060116999 Dettinger et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149604 Miller Jul 2006 A1
20060149724 Ritter et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060224846 Amarendran et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060265396 Raman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282900 Johnson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070022145 Kavuri Jan 2007 A1
20070028229 Knatcher Feb 2007 A1
20070043715 Kaushik et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070061266 Moore et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061298 Wilson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070136541 Herz et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156783 Zbogar-Smith et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166674 Kochunni et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185915 Prahlad et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070214330 Minami et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226320 Hager et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070250810 Tittizer et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070296258 Calvert et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080126302 Mora et al. May 2008 A1
20080282048 Miura Nov 2008 A1
20080288947 Gokhale et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288948 Attarde et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080320319 Muller et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090171883 Kochunni et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090319534 Gokhale Dec 2009 A1
20090320029 Kottomtharayil Dec 2009 A1
20090320033 Gokhale et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100031017 Gokhale et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070466 Prahlad et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070474 Lad Mar 2010 A1
20100070725 Prahlad et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070726 Ngo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076932 Lad Mar 2010 A1
20100114837 Prahlad et al. May 2010 A1
20100332456 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110093471 Brockway et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110138225 Gunabalasubramaniam et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110173171 De Meno et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120036108 Prahlad et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120150818 Vijayan Retnamma et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120150826 Vijayan Retnamma et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120254119 Kumarasamy et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265754 Kottomtharayil et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120317085 Green et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130145376 Gokhale et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130262410 Liu et al. Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
0259912 Mar 1988 EP
0405926 Jan 1991 EP
0467546 Jan 1992 EP
0774715 May 1997 EP
0809184 Nov 1997 EP
0899662 Mar 1999 EP
0910019 Apr 1999 EP
0981090 Feb 2000 EP
0986011 Mar 2000 EP
1035690 Sep 2000 EP
2216368 Oct 1989 GB
07-046271 Feb 1995 JP
7073080 Mar 1995 JP
8044598 Feb 1996 JP
2000035969 Feb 2000 JP
2003531435 Oct 2003 JP
WO-9513580 May 1995 WO
WO-9912098 Mar 1999 WO
WO-0058865 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0106368 Jan 2001 WO
WO-0116693 Mar 2001 WO
WO-0180005 Oct 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
“Multi Instancing,” retrieved from http://documentation.commvault.com/hds/release—8—0—0/books—online—1/english—us/deployment/install/misc/multi—instancing.htm[Feb. 18, 2014 11:57:19 AM] on Feb. 18, 2014, 3 pages.
Hutchinson, Norman C., et al. “Logical vs. physical file system backup.” OSDI. vol. 99. 1999.
Matthews, Jeanna, et al. “Data protection and rapid recovery from attack with a virtual private file server and virtual machine appliances.” Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Communication, Network and Information Security (CNIS 2005). 2005.
Quinlan, Sean. “A cached worm file system.” Software: Practice and Experience 21.12 (1991): 1289-1299.
Wu, Chin-Hsien, Tei-Wei Kuo, and Li-Pin Chang. “Efficient initialization and crash recovery for log-based file systems over flash memory.” Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing. ACM, 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/609,977, Prahlad.
Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary Third Edition, “Data Compression,” Microsoft Press, 1997, p. 130.
Veeravalli, B., “Network Caching Strategies for a Shared Data Distribution for a Predefined Service Demand Sequence,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 15, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2003, pp. 1487-1497.
Hennessy et al., “Computer Architecture—A Quantitative Approach”, 2nd Edition, 1996, pp. 246-250.
Rowe et al., “Indexes for User Access to Large Video Databases”, Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases II, IS,& T/SPIE Symp. On Elec. Imaging Sci. & Tech., Feb. 1994, pp. 1-12.
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US09/32325, date of mailing Mar. 17, 2009, 11 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 09767119, Mail date Feb. 11, 2013, 12 pages.
Pitoura et al., “Locating Objects in Mobile Computing”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 13, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2001, pp. 571-592.
Armstead et al., “Implementation of a Campus-wide Distributed Mass Storage Service: The Dream vs. Reality,” IEEE, Sep. 11-14, 1995, pp. 190-199.
Arneson, “Mass Storage Archiving in Network Environments,” Digest of Papers, Ninth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 1988, pp. 45-50, Monterey, CA.
Cabrera et al., “ADSM: A Multi-Platform, Scalable, Backup and Archive Mass Storage System,” Digest of Papers, Compcon '95, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Computer Society International Conference, Mar. 5-9, 1995, pp. 420-427, San Francisco, CA.
Eitel, “Backup and Storage Management in Distributed Heterogeneous Environments,” IEEE, Jun. 12-16, 1994, pp. 124-126.
Jander, M., “Launching Storage-Area Net,” Data Communications, US, McGraw Hill, NY, vol. 27, No. 4 (Mar. 21, 1998), pp. 64-72.
Gait, J., “The Optical File Cabinet: A Random-Access File System for Write-Once Optical Disks,” IEEE Computer, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 11-22 (Jun. 1988).
Rosenblum et al., “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System,” Operating Systems Review SIGOPS, vol. 25, No. 5, New York, US, pp. 1-15 (May 1991).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140108355 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60326023 Sep 2001 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13250349 Sep 2011 US
Child 14108632 US
Parent 12252897 Oct 2008 US
Child 13250349 US
Parent 11497546 Jul 2006 US
Child 12252897 US
Parent 10260209 Sep 2002 US
Child 11497546 US