Reference is made to copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/823,835, filed Jun. 28, 2007, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,917,309 and 7,253,748, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to detection of foreign objects on an aircraft travel surface generally.
The following patent documents are believed to represent the current state of the art:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,185,815; 5,212,547; 5,243,340; 5,375,058; 5,629,691; 5,939,987; 6,064,429; 6,181,261; 6,281,806; 6,295,007; 6,486,825; 6,563,432; 6,606,035; 6,690,295 and 6,956,493;
U.S. Published Patent Application Nos. 2002/0030609; 2002/0080046; 2002/0093433; 2002/0109625 and 2002/0163461;
German Patent No. DE 101 04 950;
European Patent No. EP 1 170 715; and
Published PCT Patent Application No. WO 02/056054.
The present invention seeks to provide a system and method for detection of foreign objects on an aircraft travel surface and ascription of the foreign objects to foreign object sources present on the aircraft travel surface.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for detection of foreign objects on an aircraft travel surface and ascription of the foreign objects present on the aircraft travel surface to foreign object sources, the system including a foreign object detection subsystem operative to detect foreign objects on an aircraft travel surface, a potential foreign object source identifier subsystem operative to indicate the presence of potential foreign object sources at or near the aircraft travel surface and a foreign object to foreign object source correlator operative to receive inputs from the foreign object detection subsystem and from the foreign object source identifier subsystem indicating at least a time relationship between sensed presence of the potential foreign object sources on the aircraft travel surface and detection of the foreign objects and to provide an ascription output indicating the origin of at least some of the foreign objects detected by the foreign object detection subsystem.
Preferably, the foreign object to foreign object source correlator is operative to provide the ascription output indicating the origin of a foreign object detected by the foreign object detection subsystem within one minute of detection of the foreign object by the foreign object detection subsystem. Additionally or alternatively, the foreign object to foreign object source correlator is operative to provide the ascription output indicating the origin of a foreign object, detected by the foreign object detection subsystem, within one minute of presence of the foreign object.
Preferably, the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem includes an optical identification system. Additionally or alternatively, the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem includes a cooperative sensing subsystem for receiving identification data from potential foreign object sources. In another preferred embodiment, the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem includes ADS-B/Multilateration functionality for receiving identification data from potential foreign object sources.
Preferably, the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem includes a flight database. Additionally or alternatively, the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem includes radar functionality for detecting potential foreign object sources. In another preferred embodiment, the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem includes an integrated system employing multiple identification functionalities.
Preferably, the foreign object to foreign object source correlator is operative to receive inputs from the foreign object detection subsystem and from the foreign object source identifier subsystem indicating a time relationship between sensed presence of the potential foreign object sources on the aircraft travel surface and detection of the foreign objects and to provide, based on the time relationship, the ascription output indicating the origin of at least some of the foreign objects detected by the foreign object detection subsystem.
Preferably, the foreign object to foreign object source correlator is operative in real time. Preferably, the foreign object detection subsystem and the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem are directed to at least partially different regions of the aircraft travel surface.
Preferably, the foreign object detection subsystem includes foreign object material identification functionality including remote spectrometry functionality. Additionally or alternatively, the system also includes decision functionality operative to automatically provide a notification to the origin of the at least some of the foreign objects based on the ascription output. Additionally or alternatively, the system also includes a foreign object source identifier database for storing the ascription output.
There is also provided in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for detection of foreign objects on an aircraft travel surface and ascription of the foreign objects to foreign object sources, the method including detecting foreign objects on an aircraft travel surface, indicating the presence of potential foreign object sources at or near the aircraft travel surface at given times and receiving inputs indicating a time relationship between sensed presence of the potential foreign object sources on the aircraft travel surface and detection of the foreign objects and providing an ascription output indicating the origin of at least some of the foreign objects.
Preferably, the ascription output indicating the origin of a foreign object is provided within one minute of detection of the foreign object on the aircraft travel surface. Additionally, the ascription output indicating the origin of a foreign object is provided within one minute of presence of the foreign object on the aircraft travel surface.
Preferably, the method also includes automatically providing a notification to the origin of the at least some of the foreign objects based on the ascription output. Additionally or alternatively, the method also includes storing the ascription output in a foreign object source identifier database.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
As seen in
FOD detectors 110 preferably communicate with a server 112 which may be located in propinquity to an airport control center 114. Additionally, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, FOD identification functionality may be added to the FOD detectors, such as functionality which identifies the material which constitutes the FOD. Remote spectrometry functionality, such as that used in mineral prospecting satellites, may be employed for this purpose. An example of such a product is “FIRST” a hyperspectral-imaging sensor used for standoff chemical identification and mineral and surface studies, which is commercially available from Telops of Quebec, Canada.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the system also includes a potential foreign object source identifier subsystem operative to indicate the presence of potential foreign object sources at or near aircraft travel surfaces. The potential foreign object source identifier subsystem preferably includes potential foreign object source detectors 120 such as a tower-mounted millimeter wave sensor (MWS) detector, commercially available from Transtech Control Ltd. of Herzlia, Israel.
Additionally or alternatively, the potential foreign object source identifier subsystem may employ combined foreign object and potential foreign object source detectors 122, which may comprise the functionality of FOD detectors 110 combined with ground radar and/or one or more optical or electro-optical sensors. The potential foreign object source detectors employed in detectors 122 may be, for example Airport Surface Detection Equipment Model X (ASDE-X) commercially available from Sensis Corporation of E. Syracuse, N.Y., USA or OIS Optical Identification Sensors, commercially available from Transtech Control Ltd. of Herzlia, Israel. The potential foreign object source identifier subsystem preferably also includes a server 124, which communicates with one or more of detectors 120 and/or 122.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the system includes a foreign object to foreign object source correlator 130, typically embodied in a suitably programmed computer, which is operative to receive inputs from the foreign object detection subsystem, preferably via server 112, and from the foreign object source identifier subsystem, preferably via server 124. Foreign object to foreign object source correlator 130 is preferably operative to indicate at least a time relationship between sensed presence of potential foreign object sources, such as aircraft, ground vehicles, wildlife and weather, and detection of foreign objects, such as parts of aircraft or ground vehicles, wildlife, tools, parts of baggage, chunks of ice and loose pieces of pavement, on an aircraft travel surface, such as a runway 102 or taxiway 103. Correlator 130 preferably provides an ascription output indicating the origin of at least some of the foreign objects detected by the foreign object detection subsystem.
The ascription output may be presented to an airport official in an airport control center 114 on a display console 140 which may show on a first portion 142 of a screen, an image of the detected FOD and its location, both preferably in a zoomable format, along with a time stamp, and on a second portion 144 of the screen, an image or other representation of a most probable source of the detected FOD, preferably in a zoomable format, along with its time stamp. Based on this information, the airport official may take appropriate action, such as any one or more of the following typical action options:
1. Immediately notify an aircraft, identified as a possible source of detected FOD, and all other relevant parties that a specific part may have fallen from the aircraft;
2. Notify the operator of a ground vehicle, identified as a possible source of detected FOD, and all other relevant parties that a specific part may have fallen from the vehicle;
3. Actuate bird repelling functionality, to remove birds from the vicinity of the aircraft travel surface;
4. Immediate closing of the aircraft travel surface to aircraft movement and removal of the detected FOD;
5. Await a lapse in aircraft travel surface traffic to remove the detected FOD;
6. Await scheduled closure of the aircraft travel surface to remove the detected FOD; and
7. Take no action.
Additionally or alternatively, the ascription output may be employed by automatic recommendation or decision functionality which automatically provides notification to an aircraft, identified as a possible source of detected FOD, and to all other relevant parties that a specific part may have fallen from the aircraft or to the operator of a ground vehicle, identified as a possible source of detected FOD, and to all other relevant parties that a specific part may have fallen from the vehicle. Such functionality could also recommend that the airport official take any one or more suitable action options, examples of which are listed above.
Reference is made additionally to
In the illustrated example FOD identified by reference numeral 164 is within the field of view 152 of one of detectors 122 and a ground vehicle, here a baggage train, identified by reference numeral 166, within the field of view 162 of another one of detectors 122.
As seen schematically in
In the illustrated example, FOD identified by reference numeral 184 is within the field of view 172 of one of detectors 110 and an airplane about to take off, here identified by reference numeral 186, is within the field of view 178 of another one of detectors 120.
As seen schematically in
Reference is now made to
As seen in
As seen in
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
As seen in
Reference is now made to
The subsystem of
1.) A Flight Data Base 220 such as AMOSS, commercially available from F. S. Walker Hughes, Inc. of Denver, Colo., USA. Data base 220 contains numerous data fields regarding arrivals and departures of aircraft. The Flight Data Base 220 contains a shared view which can be accessed by a remote system.
2.) Optical Identification Sensors, here designated by reference numeral 222, such as OIS commercially available from Transtech Ltd. of Herzlia, Israel. Sensors 222 typically provides a data output on a periodic basis.
Data base 220 and sensors 222 preferably supply data to a Target Identification Module 230, which performs target tagging.
3.) An Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) 232, commercially available from various companies, such as Thales of France, and employing sensing methods including Automatic Dependant Surveillance—Broadcast (ADS-B)/Multilateration, Surface Movement Radar (SMR) and Distributed SMR. ADS-B functionality is commercially available from Era of the Czech Republic and is based on multi-directional communication between multiple base stations located at an airport and a transponder installed on a target, such as an aircraft, ground vehicle, or airport machinery. SMR is commercially available from Raytheon and operates at X-Band frequencies. A distributed SMR system is commercially available from Transtech Ltd. of Herzliya, Israel and includes several Millimeter Wave Radars installed in key locations within an area of coverage.
ASMGCS 232 provides a potential source input to a Target Location and Identification Module 234 with sensed target travel pathways.
4.) A Weather Reporting System 236 such as AWOS 900 commercially available from AWI Inc. of Sacramento, Calif., USA. This system feeds weather data to a Weather Condition Module 238 which is responsible for logging weather conditions such as, Wind Speed, Wind Gusts, Wind Direction, Temperature and Visibility.
Data fusion functionality 240 receives inputs from modules 230, 234 and 238 and provides information regarding potential FOD sources at specified times and locations.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Number of FOD items detected;
Location of each detected FOD item;
Time of detection of each FOD item;
Geometry of each detected FOD item; and
Color of each detected FOD item.
Preferably suitable sensors are provided for additionally indicating the type of material which constitutes the detected FOD item.
Reference is now made to
As seen in
Reference is now made to
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly described hereinabove. The scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of various features described and illustrated hereinabove as well as modifications and variations thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not in the prior art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5185815 | Brandstetter | Feb 1993 | A |
5212547 | Otsuki et al. | May 1993 | A |
5243340 | Norman et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5375058 | Bass | Dec 1994 | A |
5629691 | Jain | May 1997 | A |
5939987 | Cram | Aug 1999 | A |
6064429 | Belk et al. | May 2000 | A |
6181261 | Miles et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6281806 | Smith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6295007 | O'Meara | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6486825 | Smithey | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6563432 | Millgård et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6606035 | Kapadia et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6690295 | De Boer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6917309 | Nitzan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6956493 | Youngblood | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7148815 | Derringer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7253748 | Nitzan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020030609 | Baumgartner et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020080046 | Derringer | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020093433 | Kapadia et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093983 | Newberg et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020109625 | Gouvary | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020163461 | Smithey | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176603 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20070296611 | Nitzan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10104950 | Oct 2001 | DE |
0613111 | Aug 1994 | EP |
1170715 | Jan 2002 | EP |
02056054 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090243881 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |