The present invention relates to weather forecasting. In particular, the present invention is directed to a system and method of utilizing weather forecasts to provide an indication of the impact of a weather event on a particular category of interest, such as a population base or property.
The impact of weather forecast information on people and property can be substantial. For example, many different types of weather conditions may cause power outages and property damage ranging from sporadic to widespread. Storm events may leave hundreds of thousands of customers without power and the damage to property reaching the millions of dollars.
It is common in broadcast and cable weather presentations to indicate the forecasted track of significant weather events or phenomena. For example, a sector (or other geometric area) typically indicates where a thunderstorm is likely to go in the ensuing 10 to 30 minutes and often depicts the future movement of that storm. Similarly, a hurricane track often depicts the forecasted movement of a hurricane over the coming 2 or 3 days. In each such case, however, the potential impact to safety and property is not presented. This information would be useful to the general public as it conveys the significance of a weather event. This information is also useful to insurance companies, emergency response teams, etc., as it may be used to prioritize response activities.
Thus, there is a need for improvements in weather forecasting that will provide additional information regarding the impact of a storm or other weather event. The present invention provides for such a system.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods for determining the affect of a weather event on a category of interest, such as a population base or property within a geographic area. In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a method is provided that includes obtaining weather data; obtaining data regarding the category of interest, the data being segmented into geographic regions; determining a weather-affected geographical region within a path of the weather event; determining intersections of the weather-affected geographic region and the predetermined geographic regions; and determining a quantity affected by the weather event in accordance with the intersections, the quantity being related to the category of interest.
The weather-affected geographical region may described as a polygon and the method may also include determining vertices of the polygon and geographic areas as latitude, longitude pairs. An area of the intersections of the weather-affected geographic region and the geographic regions may be determined to ascertain the quantity affected by the weather event. In particular, a total of the category of interest (e.g., people or property value) for a predetermined geographic region may be multiplied by a ratio of each intersecting area and a predetermined geographic region to obtain a sub-quantity for each the area and then summing all sub-quantities to determine the quantity.
In addition, the method may further include selecting a map projection that includes the weather-affected geographic region and generating a map of the weather-affected geographic region showing the path of the weather event.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a system for determining the affect of a weather event on a category of interest. The system includes a database that receives weather data and data regarding the category of interest, the data being segmented into geographic regions, a processor for forecasting weather conditions and determining a weather-affected geographic region based on the weather conditions, and a visualization system for outputting a visualization of forecasted weather conditions. Intersections of the weather-affected geographic region and the predetermined geographic regions may be determined to ascertain a quantity related to the category of interest affected by the weather event.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be made apparent from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments that proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings exemplary constructions of the invention where like elements have like reference numerals; however, the invention is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:
Information about the potential impact of a significant weather event on a category of interest such as safety and property is important to determine which weather events are the most important to convey and to properly inform viewers about the severity of the weather event. The present invention uses the information about the forecasted path of a significant weather event in conjunction with census or other data about the location of people and property, and any available information about the typical impact of the particular weather event on people and property to determine the human safety and property risks that are present in the situation. It is noted that the present invention may be used to determine the impact of a weather event on categories of interest other than population or property.
In the preferred embodiment, a severe thunderstorm is identified by examining the reflectivity (rainfall rate) and radial velocity (wind speed and direction relative to the radar site) data from a weather radar volume scan. The severe thunderstorm is tracked by locating it in successive volume scans. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Each county (or other subdivision) may be further subdivided into smaller sections 108, 110, 112 and 114, if such data is available. This may be useful, if for example, a particular region has a higher density of people, infrastructure, property, etc. that may be affected by the severe weather. For example, if County G borders the ocean, it is like that property values in the section 114 may be much higher than the remaining portion of the county. Likewise, if section 112 contains a high density of high-rise apartment buildings, the population in that section 112 may be significantly higher than the remaining portion of County B.
Referring now to
At step 206, the vertices of the geographic regions from step 202 and weather-affected polygons from step 200 are converted from latitude, longitude pairs to meters of Easting and Northing. At step 208, a polygon that represents the intersection of each geographic region with the weather-affected region is determined using, e.g., the Weiler-Atherton polygon intersection algorithm. Geographic regions that do not intersect with the weather affected region are discarded. Information regarding the well-known Weiler-Atherton polygon intersection algorithm may be found in ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, “Hidden surface removal using polygon area sorting,” Kevin Weiler, Peter Atherton, Volume 11, Issue 2, Summer 1977, Pages: 214–222, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
At step 210, for each intersecting geographic region in step 208, the area of the region is calculated, and the area of the intersection of the geographic region and the weather-affected area is calculated using, e.g., a polygon area algorithm. An exemplary polygon area algorithm may be a polygon area calculation based on the 2D version of Green's Theorem, such as that described in “Graphics Gems IV,” Paul Heckbert (editor), Academic Press, 1994, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety (see, Bashein, Gerard, and Detmer, Paul R., “Centroid of a Polygon,” p. 3–6).
At step 212, for each intersecting geographic region in step 208, the population, property value, traffic, infrastructure, etc. affected is calculated by multiplying the total population, property value, traffic, infrastructure, etc. by the ratio of the area of the intersection to the total area of the geographic region. In the exemplary map of
Once the potentially affected counties are identified and the portion of each county potentially affected is calculated, the data for each county (or smaller sections 108–114, if available and affected) is used to calculate the total number of people, property, traffic, infrastructure, etc. threatened by the storm (step 214). This data may be adjusted by the storm path probability (
It may be assumed that the people, property, traffic, infrastructure, etc. of the county is distributed evenly over the county unless more detailed information, such as that in sections 108–114, is available. Furthermore, if there is additional information about the nature of the people, property, traffic, infrastructure, etc. or the vulnerability of the people, property, traffic, infrastructure, etc. to the particular significant weather at hand, additional calculations can be made to estimate information such as number of people who may be injured or killed, the estimated property damage in monetary terms, and/or traffic and infrastructure disruption and damage.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the aforementioned calculations can be made in other coordinate systems without modifying the scope of the invention or its attendant advantages.
Referring now to
The database provides inputs to various components that determine the affected area (area analysis component 316), an impact on the category of interest (impact analysis component 314) and a data interaction processor 306 that provides visualization/presentation outputs. The components 314 and 316, and the processor 306 may be implemented as computer implemented instructions and need not be separate components or separate computer implemented systems within the system 300.
An input subsystem 304 is provided to receive input from a user, such as a geographic position/region selection, formatting inputs, a time selection, and a parameter selection (e.g., weather, warnings, current observations, etc.). The user input may come from a personal computer running the appropriate software to generate inputs that may be received and processed by the system 300 via the data interaction processor 306. For example, this input may come from the user via a mouse, a typed command at a keyboard, from an interactive device such as a computer touch screen, a visual tracking system, etc.
The user inputs may include, but are not limited to, a selection of one or more parameters that are to be extracted from the underlying geographic database 302. The inputs may specify to the processor 306 a specific time or a time range for which the database is to be queried, or a geographic position or region for which the data is to be queried in accordance with the user input. Formatting may be specified that indicates how information is to be displayed. The formatting may include a presentation format (e.g., textual versus iconic), and graphical attributes such as font or line width.
The visualization system 308 for this system 300 can be any computer graphics system capable of generating graphical representations of geographic information such that that representation can be displayed on broadcast television, cable or other transmission media. An example of such a system is WeatherProducer available from WSI Corporation, Andover, Mass. The visualization system 308 is graphical in nature and presents, e.g., a map of a particular geographic area and turns coded information extracted from the database 302 via the data interaction processor 306 into a graphical display. The visualization system 308 includes both video and graphical outputs 310 and 312, which may be used for broadcast television, or to provide a datastream communicated over the Internet or other wide area network for use by visitors to websites (e.g., personal computers running Web Browsers and/or Flash players, etc.).
The system 300 may automatically generate a geographical map display showing a subset of the weather information. Weather information may be overlaid on a geographically accurate map display that may include: elevation shaded terrain data, satellite imagery, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data (e.g., road, buildings, shopping areas, other points of interest). The information may include: an iconic representation of events where each icon is plotted at the appropriate geographic location, a visualization of a weather event, or live video which may be inset on a map. Prior to airtime, the user has the ability to tailor the graphical representation by prioritizing and/or filtering the types of information to be displayed.
As shown in
While the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various Figs., it is to be understood that other similar embodiments may be used or modifications and additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function of the present invention without deviating therefrom. Furthermore, it should be emphasized that a variety of computer platforms, including handheld device operating systems and other application specific operating systems are contemplated. Still further, the present invention may be implemented in or across a plurality of processing chips or devices, and storage may similarly be effected across a plurality of devices. Therefore, the present invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather should be construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5724255 | Smith et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5807113 | Groeber | Sep 1998 | A |
6084510 | Lemelson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6188960 | Baron et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6240369 | Foust | May 2001 | B1 |
6278947 | Baron et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289277 | Feyereisen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6339747 | Daly et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360172 | Burfeind et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6405134 | Smith et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6493633 | Baron et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501392 | Gremmert et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6577947 | Kronfeld et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603405 | Smith | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606553 | Zobell et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6646559 | Smith | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650972 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654689 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6744382 | Lapis et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753784 | Sznaider et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6816878 | Zimmers et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823263 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829536 | Moore | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842737 | Stiles et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845324 | Smith | Jan 2005 | B2 |
20010052847 | Auerbach | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016677 | Baron et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030004780 | Smith et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025627 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040015336 | Kulesz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073482 | Wiggins et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133530 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050086004 | Smith | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050197775 | Smith | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240378 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |