The present invention relates generally to a system and method for authentication. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for authentication of an optical pattern produced using a magnetic structure.
For counterfeiting prevention, systems and methods for authenticating of components are known. Counterfeiting of components may involve repurposing, remarking or recycling used components along a supply chain. As such, a counterfeit component may pass all production testing, but its reliability may be affected because the part may be near the end of its useful life when it is installed. For this reason, counterfeit components pose a very high risk especially when such components are used in sensitive applications, such as national defense, military or intelligence.
Known marking, authentication and anti-counterfeiting technologies use taggants comprising chemical or physical markers. Some taggants consist of microscopic particles built up in many layers, which are made of different materials. Other taggants can be engineered particles with unique structures, chemical signatures, photo emission characteristics or combinations of these that can be added to plastics or inks. Unique micro-structures can be read using microscopes. Chemicals or nano-structures that have spectral-shift characteristics can be illuminated and read by specially tuned readers. But readers that must be matched to specific taggants limit the variation that can be applied to components and the options for reading them.
For example, Authentix™ (www.authentix.com) has commercialized several taggant technologies and offers authentication and security solutions for food, pharmaceutical and manufactured goods. Authentix's taggant technology uses magnetic ink that includes magnetic particles that are applied to individual components. InkSure™ (www.inksure.com) has developed a unique chemical signature technology that is recognized by US courts as a viable, forensic method for identifying material sources. Applied DNA Sciences (www.adnas.com) offers marking and authentication solutions based on chemically modified (and inherently randomized) botanical DNA. This technology adds phosphors to marking solutions for low-level authentication and use well-developed DNA sequencing technologies to verify the authenticity of marked components. 3M offers a line of holographic authentication products that can be added to products or packaging.
One known authentication system and method described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,286,551 uses pieces of magnetic material to produce magnetic fields for orienting pigments in ink. Under this prior art, a printing machine has a transfer system for conveying a substrate onto an impression cylinder. A screen of cylindrical or flat shape with a doctor blade, collaborates with the impression cylinder to print the substrate with an ink containing pigments that can be orientated by a magnetic field. An unloading system carries the substrate away. The impression cylinder has a magnetic element on its impression surface, that is positioned at a point corresponding to impression performed by the screen on the substrate.
Currently available authentication techniques, however, offer partial solutions and cannot be broadly deployed across complex supply chains. For example, the processes of creating complex chemical signatures such as DNA occur in centralized facilities in batches. This limits the number of changes that can be made to the marking other than varying concentrations of multiple batches during component marking. Use of magnetic pieces is cumbersome and not easily varied. Ideally, a complete authentication would be changeable more frequently and not require the synthesis of complex chemicals, micro-scale printing or fixed micro-scale structures or magnetic pieces. DNA-based authentication requires removing a sample of the DNA-bearing material to detect the presence of the correct code using laboratory sequencing machines. Further, authentication that requires laboratories limits the ability to increase inspection.
Ideally, a marking technology would contain enough information to provide authentication and be expensive to copy, but not require laboratory analysis. Holographic printing techniques are widely available, but can be mimicked and have costs that are well over 0.01 per component.
Thus, there exists a need to inexpensively deliver secure authentication, rapid, automated screening throughout the supply chain and ultimately facilitate the elimination of purchases containing counterfeit components.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a system and method authenticates an optical pattern created by exposing a magnetically sensitive material, for example a magnetically sensitive coating, to one or more magnetic field sources, such as permanent magnets, electromagnets or electro permanent magnets. The magnetically sensitive material can comprise flexible or rigid material. Magnetically sensitive coatings such as dichroic paint, a colloidal nanocrystal structure, or superparamagnetic photonic crystals may be used for creating the optical pattern by curing, fixing or setting the magnetically sensitive coating. The optical pattern is illuminated by one or more illumination sources to generate sensed optical characteristic data from one or more sensors such as photodetectors, photocells, photodiodes, fiber optics, pyrometers, proximity detectors, or infrared sensors. A memory is configured to store reference optical data. The reference optical data is associated with a reference optical pattern created by exposing a reference magnetically sensitive material to one or more reference magnetic field sources, and corresponds to data generated by one or more reference sensors when the reference optical pattern is illuminated by one or more reference illumination sources. In order to authenticate the optical pattern, the reference optical data is compared to the sensed optical characteristic data by a processor that is configured to access the memory.
According to some of the more detailed features of the invention, the optical characteristic data can correspond to physical attributes of the optical pattern, such as lattice structures of magnetically sensitive particles suspended in the magnetically sensitive material or a dichroic characteristic of the magnetically sensitive material. The optical characteristic data can also correspond to illumination attributes of the one or more illumination sources, such as intensity, propagation direction, frequency, wavelength, polarization or illumination angle. The optical characteristic data can also correspond to magnetic attributes of the one or more magnetic field sources such as position of the one or more magnetic field sources relative to a reference coordinate as well as size, shape, polarity or field strength of the one or more magnetic field sources. In one embodiment, the magnetic attributes of the one or more magnetic field sources can be varied over time for demodulating information conveyed by the optical pattern. The optical characteristic data can also correspond to orientation of the one or more illumination sources or the sensors.
According to other more detailed features of the invention, the optical pattern is created on a surface area that comprises the one or more magnetic field sources. The magnetic field sources can be arranged in a pattern in accordance with a code, such as Barker code, Gold code, Kasami code, Costas code, or pseudorandom code. The surface area can comprise overlapping magnetic field sources or magnetic field sources separated by non-magnetized regions.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.
The present invention will now be described more fully in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention should not, however, be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, they are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
Certain described embodiments may relate, by way of example but not limitation, to systems and/or apparatuses comprising magnetic structures, methods for using magnetic structures, magnetic structures produced via magnetic printing, magnetic structures comprising arrays of discrete magnetic elements, combinations thereof, and so forth. Material presented herein may relate to and/or be implemented in conjunction with systems and methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,681,256 issued Mar. 23, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,750,781 issued Jul. 6, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,755,462 issued Jul. 13, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,800,471 issued on Sep. 21, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,812,698 issued Oct. 12, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 8,115,581 issued on Feb. 14, 2012, U.S. Pat. No. 7,817,002, U.S. Pat. No. 7,817,003, U.S. Pat. No. 7,817,004, U.S. Pat. No. 7,817,005, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,817,006 issued Oct. 19, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,821,367 issued Oct. 26, 2010, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,823,300 and 7,824,083 issued Nov. 2, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,834,729 issued Nov. 16, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,839,247 issued Nov. 23, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,843,295, U.S. Pat. No. 7,843,296, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,843,297 issued Nov. 30, 2010, No. 7,868,721 issued on Jan. 11, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,893,803 issued Feb. 22, 2011, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,956,711 and 7,956,712 issued Jun. 7, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,958,575, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,961,068 and 7,961,069 issued Jun. 14, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,963,818 issued Jun. 21, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,568 issued Jul. 19, 2011, U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,015,752 and 8,016,330 issued Sep. 13, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 8,035,260 issued Oct. 11, 2011, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,222,986 issued on Jul. 17, 2012, which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present invention uses an optical pattern created on magnetically sensitive material for marking components that is impractical, if not virtually impossible, for a counterfeiter to copy. The coating inexpensively withstands normal component handling and usage without significant deterioration while offering a verification process that is not cost or time prohibitive. One such coating system and method is disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/240,335, filed Sep. 22, 2011, titled Magnetic Structure Production, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. As disclosed, a magnetizable material that is non-magnetized is brought into proximity with a magnetic-field-sensitive solution or other substance (e.g., an iron oxide solution of superparamagnetic photonic crystals). Proximity may be achieved by, for example, suspending particles in a liquid or applying a solution to a surface of the panel using, for instance, a paint having photonic crystals. Objects having magnetic paint may be magnetized with a pattern that may then be optically recognized by a camera or other optical recognition device. Light sources may be controlled to cause different magnetic field attributes to appear or be enhanced.
In another embodiment, the physical attributes of the optical pattern 102 are associated with dichroic characteristics of magnetically sensitive coating 104. Such dichroic characteristics act as a very accurate color filter used to selectively pass light of a small range of colors while reflecting other colors. When light strikes the coating at an angle, some of the light is reflected from the top surface of the coating, and some is reflected from the bottom surface where it is in contact with a surface. Because the light reflecting from the bottom travels a slightly longer path, some light wavelengths are reinforced by this delay, while others tend to be canceled, producing visible colors
The system 100 operates under the control of one more processors 112 having access to one or more memory devices 110 that store programs for operating the system as well as data used for authenticating the optical pattern. The system 100 further comprises one or more illumination sources 106, which are configured to illuminate the optical pattern 102. Illumination sources 106 can be located at any location relative to a reference coordinate system, and can be configured to have a particular orientation relative to such reference coordinate system. The illumination sources can be associated with illumination characteristics such as intensity, propagation direction, frequency or wavelength spectrum, illumination angle, and polarization, where one or more illumination characteristics of a given illumination source 106 may or may not be varied. Under one embodiment shown in
One or more sensors 108 sense optical characteristics resulting from reflection of light rays on the optical pattern 102 to generate sensed optical characteristic data. Such data is provided to the processor 112 when the optical pattern is illuminated by illumination sources 106. The sensors 108 may comprise photodetectors (e.g., photocells, photodiodes, transistors, etc.), fiber optic, pyrometer, proximity detector, infrared sensor, or any other optical sensor technology. The sensors 108 can be located at any location relative to the reference coordinate system, and can be and configured to have a particular orientation relative to the reference coordinate system. The sensors 108 may collect information at specific measurement times that may be at regular time intervals, random times, or at times determined using any other data sampling scheme.
The sensed optical characteristic data can correspond to, for example, physical attributes of the optical pattern 102 created on the magnetically sensitive coating 104, illumination attributes of one or more illumination sources 106, magnetic attributes of the one or more magnetic field sources 105, an orientation of at least one of the one or more illumination sources 106 or an orientation of at least one of the one or more sensors 108 relative to the reference coordinates.
According to one embodiment, the memory 110 is configured to store a reference optical data associated with a reference optical pattern 202. As shown in
Referring back to
In some embodiments, the optical pattern 102 can convey such information as an identification code, a bar code, a Quick Response (QR) code, a logo, a number, a letter, or any other identifying symbol or symbols. The information can be used for identification and for other purposes comprising a serial number, a date of manufacturing, a location of manufacturing, etc. Such information could even identify, for example, devices used to create the optical pattern 102, an operator of the devices, the date and time of creation, or any other desired information.
The optical pattern 102 can include, for example, one or more registration marks common to all patterns that are used to determine a geometry of the optical pattern 102, for example the alignment and orientation of the optical pattern relative to a reference coordinate system. The registration marks can be used to determine, for example the relative location of illumination sources 106 or sensors 108.
As shown in
The one or more magnetic field sources 105 can have one or more magnetic attributes. Magnetic attributes may include position or print location, size (e.g., diameter, length, width), shape (e.g., round, square, hexagonal, etc.), polarity, field strength, print order, magnetization time, magnetization angle, or density and may involve overlapping of magnetic field sources 105 and/or magnetic field sources 105 separated by non-magnetized regions. The magnetic attributes of the one or more magnetic field sources can be varied in accordance with a code. A code may belong to a code family, for example Barker code family, Gold code family, Kasami code family, Costas code family or any other code family such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,219, issued May 15, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Alternatively, a code may be a pseudorandom code.
The sensed optical characteristic data can correspond to, for example, physical attributes of optical pattern 102 created on the magnetically sensitive coating 104, illumination attributes of one or more illumination sources 106, magnetic attributes of the one or more magnetic field sources 105, an orientation of at least one of the one or more illumination sources 106 or an orientation of at least one of the one or more sensors 108 relative to the reference coordinate.
As stated above, authentication of the optical pattern 102 can be determined or not based on a comparison of the optical characteristic data with the reference optical data. As an example, if sensed optical characteristic data for an optical pattern 102 matches reference optical data then the optical pattern 102 can be determined by processor 112 to be authentic. However, as another example, if optical characteristic data for another optical pattern also matches reference optical data, then the optical pattern 102 is treated as being counterfeited and the two optical patterns are treated as likely not being authentic.
From the foregoing it would be appreciated that the present invention can be used to create complex signatures based on optical, magnetic and orientation attributes that can for example be used to prevent purchases from unknown suppliers while creating an ability to identify the original source of components. The present invention can further be used to block the harvesting of components from assembled systems.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood, however, that the invention is not limited thereto, since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
This Non-provisional Patent Application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/240,335, filed Sep. 22, 2011, titled “MAGNETIC STRUCTURE PRODUCTION”, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/664,581, filed Jun. 26, 2012, titled “AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD”, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
493858 | Edison | Mar 1893 | A |
687292 | Armstrong | Nov 1901 | A |
996933 | Lindquist | Jul 1911 | A |
1171351 | Neuland | Feb 1916 | A |
1236234 | Troje | Aug 1917 | A |
2243555 | Faus | May 1941 | A |
2389298 | Ellis | Nov 1945 | A |
2438231 | Schultz | Mar 1948 | A |
2471634 | Vennice | May 1949 | A |
2570625 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
2722617 | Cluwen et al. | Nov 1955 | A |
2932545 | Foley | Apr 1960 | A |
3055999 | Lucas | Sep 1962 | A |
3102314 | Alderfer | Sep 1963 | A |
3208296 | Baermann | Sep 1965 | A |
3238399 | Johanees et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3288511 | Tavano | Nov 1966 | A |
3301091 | Reese | Jan 1967 | A |
3382386 | Schlaeppi | May 1968 | A |
3408104 | Raynes | Oct 1968 | A |
3468576 | Beyer et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3474366 | Barney | Oct 1969 | A |
3521216 | Tolegian | Jul 1970 | A |
3645650 | Laing | Feb 1972 | A |
3668670 | Andersen | Jun 1972 | A |
3684992 | Huguet et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3696258 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3790197 | Parker | Feb 1974 | A |
3791309 | Baermann | Feb 1974 | A |
3802034 | Bookless | Apr 1974 | A |
3803433 | Ingenito | Apr 1974 | A |
3808577 | Mathauser | Apr 1974 | A |
3845430 | Petkewicz et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3893059 | Nowak | Jul 1975 | A |
4079558 | Gorham | Mar 1978 | A |
4117431 | Eicher | Sep 1978 | A |
4129846 | Yablochnikov | Dec 1978 | A |
4209905 | Gillings | Jul 1980 | A |
4296394 | Ragheb | Oct 1981 | A |
4352960 | Dormer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4355236 | Holsinger | Oct 1982 | A |
4399595 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4416127 | Gomez-Olea Naveda | Nov 1983 | A |
4453294 | Morita | Jun 1984 | A |
4535278 | Asakawa | Aug 1985 | A |
4547756 | Miller et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4629131 | Podell | Dec 1986 | A |
4645283 | MacDonald et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4680494 | Grosjean | Jul 1987 | A |
381968 | Tesla | May 1988 | A |
4764743 | Leupold et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4837539 | Baker | Jun 1989 | A |
4849749 | Fukamachi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862128 | Leupold | Aug 1989 | A |
H000693 | Leupold | Oct 1989 | H |
4893103 | Leupold | Jan 1990 | A |
4912727 | Schubert | Mar 1990 | A |
4941236 | Sherman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956625 | Cardone et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4993950 | Mensor, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994778 | Leupold | Feb 1991 | A |
4996457 | Hawsey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5013949 | Mabe, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
5020625 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5050276 | Pemberton | Sep 1991 | A |
5062855 | Rincoe | Nov 1991 | A |
5123843 | Van der Zel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5179307 | Porter | Jan 1993 | A |
5213307 | Perrillat-Amede | May 1993 | A |
5302929 | Kovacs | Apr 1994 | A |
5309680 | Kiel | May 1994 | A |
5345207 | Gebele | Sep 1994 | A |
5367891 | Furuyama | Nov 1994 | A |
5383049 | Carr | Jan 1995 | A |
5394132 | Poil | Feb 1995 | A |
5399933 | Tsai | Mar 1995 | A |
5425763 | Stemmann | Jun 1995 | A |
5440997 | Crowley | Aug 1995 | A |
5461386 | Knebelkamp | Oct 1995 | A |
5492572 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495221 | Post | Feb 1996 | A |
5512732 | Yagnik et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5570084 | Ritter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582522 | Johnson | Dec 1996 | A |
5604960 | Good | Feb 1997 | A |
5631093 | Perry et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631618 | Trumper et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633555 | Ackermann et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635889 | Stelter | Jun 1997 | A |
5637972 | Randall et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5730155 | Allen | Mar 1998 | A |
5742036 | Schramm et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5759054 | Spadafore | Jun 1998 | A |
5788493 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5838304 | Hall | Nov 1998 | A |
5852393 | Reznik et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5935155 | Humayun et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956778 | Godoy | Sep 1999 | A |
5983406 | Meyerrose | Nov 1999 | A |
6039759 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047456 | Yao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072251 | Markle | Jun 2000 | A |
6074420 | Eaton | Jun 2000 | A |
6115849 | Meyerrose | Sep 2000 | A |
6118271 | Ely et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120283 | Cousins | Sep 2000 | A |
6142779 | Siegel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6170131 | Shin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187041 | Garonzik | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205012 | Lear | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210033 | Karkos, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224374 | Mayo | May 2001 | B1 |
6234833 | Tsai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241069 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273918 | Yuhasz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275778 | Shimada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285097 | Hazelton et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6387096 | Hyde, Jr. | May 2002 | B1 |
6457179 | Prendergast | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467326 | Garrigus | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6535092 | Hurley et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540515 | Tanaka | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6599321 | Hyde, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607304 | Lake et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6652278 | Honkura et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653919 | Shih-Chung et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6720698 | Galbraith | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747537 | Mosteller | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6842332 | Rubenson et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847134 | Frissen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850139 | Dettmann et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862748 | Prendergast | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864773 | Perrin | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6913471 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927657 | Wu | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6954968 | Sitbon | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6971147 | Halstead | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7016492 | Pan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031160 | Tillotson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033400 | Currier | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038565 | Chell | May 2006 | B1 |
7065860 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066739 | McLeish | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066778 | Kretzschmar | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7101374 | Hyde, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7137727 | Joseph et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7186265 | Sharkawy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224252 | Meadow, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7264479 | Lee | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7276025 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7339790 | Baker et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362018 | Kulogo et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7381181 | Lau et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402175 | Azar | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438726 | Erb | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444683 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453341 | Hildenbrand | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7498914 | Miyashita et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7583500 | Ligtenberg et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7715890 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7775567 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796002 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808349 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7812697 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817004 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7832897 | Ku | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837032 | Smeltzer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839246 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843297 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7868721 | Fullerton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874856 | Schriefer et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7889037 | Cho | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7903397 | McCoy | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905626 | Shantha et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8002585 | Zhou | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8099964 | Saito et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020125977 | VanZoest | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030136837 | Amon et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030170976 | Molla et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179880 | Pan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187510 | Hyde | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003487 | Reiter | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040155748 | Steingroever | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040244636 | Meadow et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251759 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050102802 | Sitbon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050196484 | Khoshnevis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231046 | Aoshima | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240263 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050263549 | Scheiner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283839 | Cowburn | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060066428 | McCarthy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060189259 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198047 | Xue et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060198998 | Raksha et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214756 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060290451 | Prendergast et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293762 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070072476 | Milan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075594 | Sadler | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103266 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138806 | Ligtenberg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070255400 | Parravicini et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080119250 | Cho et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139261 | Cho et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080174392 | Cho | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181804 | Tanigawa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186683 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218299 | Arnold | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224806 | Ogden et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272868 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282517 | Claro | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021333 | Fiedler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090209173 | Arledge et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090250576 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251256 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254196 | Cox et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278642 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289090 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289749 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292371 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100033280 | Bird et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100126857 | Polwart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100167576 | Zhou | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110026203 | Ligtenberg et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110085157 | Bloss et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101088 | Marguerettaz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110210636 | Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234344 | Fullerton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248806 | Michael | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279206 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120064309 | Kwon et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1615573 | May 2005 | CN |
2938782 | Apr 1981 | DE |
0 345 554 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 545 737 | Jun 1993 | EP |
823395 | Jan 1938 | FR |
1 495 677 | Dec 1977 | GB |
S57-055908 | Apr 1982 | JP |
S57-189423 | Dec 1982 | JP |
60-091011 | Jun 1985 | JP |
60-221238 | Nov 1985 | JP |
2001-328483 | Nov 2001 | JP |
05-038123 | Oct 2012 | JP |
WO-0231945 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-2007081830 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2009124030 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2010141324 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Atallah, K., Calverley, S.D., D. Howe, 2004, “Design, analysis and realisation of a high-performance magnetic gear”, IEE Proc.-Electr. Power Appl., vol. 151, No. 2, Mar. 2004. |
Atallah, K., Howe, D. 2001, “A Novel High-Performance Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 4, Jul. 2001, p. 2844-2846. |
Bassani, R., 2007, “Dynamic Stability of Passive Magnetic Bearings”, Nonlinear Dynamics, V. 50, p. 161-68. |
BNS 33 Range, Magnetic safety sensors, Rectangular design, referenced Jun. 2010 http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/36449.pdf, 3 pages, date unknown. |
Boston Gear 221S-4, One-stage Helical Gearbox, http://www.bostongear.com/pdf/product—sections/200—series—helical.pdf. |
Charpentier et al., 2001, “Mechanical Behavior of Axially Magnetized Permanent-Magnet Gears”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 3, May 2001, p. 1110-17. |
Chau et al., 2008, “Transient Analysis of Coaxial Magnetic Gears Using Finite Element Comodeling”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103. |
Choi et al., 2010, “Optimization of Magnetization Directions in a 3-D Magnetic Structure”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 46, No. 6, Jun. 2010, p. 1603-06. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Innovative Magnetics Research in Huntsville”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4m81JjZCJo. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Non-Contact Attachment Utilizing Permanent Magnets”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xUm25CNNgQ. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2010, Company Website, http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com. |
Furlani 1996, “Analysis and optimization of synchronous magnetic couplings”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, No. 8, p. 4692. |
Furlani 2001, “Permanent Magnet and Electromechanical Devices”, Academic Press, San Diego. |
Furlani, E.P., 2000, “Analytical analysis of magnetically coupled multipole cylinders”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 33, No. 1, p. 28-33. |
General Electric DP 2.7 Wind Turbine Gearbox, http://www.gedrivetrain.com/insideDP27.cfm, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Ha et al., 2002, “Design and Characteristic Analysis of Non-Contact Magnet Gear for Conveyor by Using Permanent Magnet”, Conf. Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 1922-27. |
Huang et al., 2008, “Development of a Magnetic Planetary Gearbox”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, No. 3, p. 403-12. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2009, directed to counterpart application No. PCT/US2009/002027. (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US12/61938 dated Feb. 26, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US2013/028095 dated May 13, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2011 issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/049410. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 18, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/036443. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 13, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/021612. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 14, 2009, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/038925. |
Jian et al., “Comparison of Coaxial Magnetic Gears With Different Topologies”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 2009, p. 4526-29. |
Jian, L., Chau, K.T., 2010, “A Coaxial Magnetic Gear With Halbach Permanent-Magnet Arrays”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 25, No. 2, Jun. 2010, p. 319-28. |
Jørgensen et al., “The Cycloid Permanent Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 44, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2008, p. 1659-65. |
Jørgensen et al., 2005, “Two dimensional model of a permanent magnet spur gear”, Conf. Record of the 2005 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 261-5. |
Kim, “A future cost trends of magnetizer systems in Korea”, Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, 1996, vol. 2, Aug. 5, 1996, pp. 991-996. |
Krasil'nikov et al., 2008, “Calculation of the Shear Force of Highly Coercive Permanent Magnets in Magnetic Systems With Consideration of Affiliation to a Certain Group Based on Residual Induction”, Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 44, Nos. 7-8, p. 362-65. |
Krasil'nikov et al., 2009, “Torque Determination for a Cylindrical Magnetic Clutch”, Russian Engineering Research, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 544-547. |
Liu et al., 2009, “Design and Analysis of Interior-magnet Outer-rotor Concentric Magnetic Gears”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105. |
Lorimer, W., Hartman, A., 1997, “Magnetization Pattern for Increased Coupling in Magnetic Clutches”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 33, No. 5, Sep. 1997. |
Mezani, S., Atallah, K., Howe, D. , 2006, “A high-performance axial-field magnetic gear”, Journal of Applied Physics vol. 99. |
Mi, “Magnetreater/Charger Model 580” Magnetic Instruments Inc. Product specification, May 4, 2009, http://web.archive.org/web/20090504064511/http://www.maginst.com/specifications/580—magnetreater.htm, 2 pages. |
Neugart PLE-160, One-Stage Planetary Gearbox, http://www.neugartusa.com/ple—160—gb.pdf, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Series BNS, Compatible Series AES Safety Controllers, http://www.schmersalusa.com/safety—controllers/drawings/aes.pdf, pp. 159-175, date unknown. |
Series BNS-B20, Coded-Magnet Sensorr Safety Door Handle, http://www.schmersalusa.com/catalog—pdfs/BNS—B20.pdf, 2pages, date unknown. |
Series BNS333, Coded-Magnet Sensors with Integral Safety Control Module, http://www.schmersalusa.com/machine—guarding/coded—magnet/drawings/bns333.pdf, 2 pages, date unknown. |
Tsurumoto 1992, “Basic Analysis on Transmitted Force of Magnetic Gear Using Permanent Magnet”, IEEE Translation Journal on Magnetics in Japan, Vo 7, No. 6, Jun. 1992, p. 447-52. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,393 dated Apr. 4, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/236,413 dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,584 dated May 16, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/374,074 dated Feb. 21, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,219 dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Aug. 8, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,520 dated Sep. 28, 2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/530,893 dated Mar. 22, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,519 dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270, dated Aug. 26, 2011. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952, dated Feb. 2, 2011. |
United States Office Action, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270 dated Mar. 12, 2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,280 dated Mar. 9, 2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952 dated Oct. 12, 2011. |
Wikipedia, “Barker Code”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2, 2008, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Bitter Electromagnet”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2011, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Costas Array”, Web article, last modified Oct. 7, 2008, 4 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Gold Code”, Web article, last modified Jul. 27, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Golomb Ruler”, Web article, last modified Nov. 4, 2008, 3 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Kasami Code”, Web article, last modified Jun. 11, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Linear feedback shift register”, Web article, last modified Nov. 11, 2008, 6 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Walsh Code”, Web article, last modified Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US2013/047986 dated Nov. 21, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,584 dated Oct. 15, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Nov. 8, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/530,893 dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130284807 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61664581 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13240335 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13928126 | US |