The present invention relates to data processing, and more particularly relates to a system and method for authorizing financial transactions of online merchants.
The ability to conduct financial and commercial transactions online via the World Wide Web has proven to be a great convenience and a boost to economic activity. Since payments to online merchants generally cannot be done with cash or checks, most online merchants accept payments from their customers via payment accounts such as credit or debit card accounts. However, when using such payment accounts in online transactions, there is an associated risk of counterfeit and fraud because such payment account information can be discovered and pirated by unauthorized parties. For example, if a customer uses a financial presentation device such as a credit card or debit card to make a purchase online, the name of the customer, the credit card number and expiration date, and other sensitive information is entered through the online merchant's web page and passed electronically through a communication channel that may be compromised.
One way to prevent the unauthorized third party use of a financial presentation device is to require the use of dynamic verification data each time a transaction takes place. Dynamic verification data is data that is uniquely associated with a specific financial presentation device, wherein the verification data dynamically changes from transaction to transaction. Therefore, even if a third party was able to steal the account information including the verification data used during a transaction, such information would be insufficient for subsequent unauthorized transactions because they would require different verification data.
Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/032,095 entitled “DYNAMIC PAYMENT DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS”, which is incorporated by reference herein, describes a system and method in which a credit card is embedded with a display and a processor that is adapted to generate a number shown on the display. This number is dynamically generated for each transaction and can be used as a card verification value (CVV). Accordingly, this dynamically generated CVV can be entered as verification data (e.g., via a keyboard) onto a web page provided by a merchant web site during check out.
However, it has been found that providing a financial presentation device with a processor and display is not cost-effective and requires a significant change in the manufacturing process of financial presentation devices. It would be desirable to find an equally secure, convenient and cost-effective system and method for generating dynamic verification data for financial presentation devices.
The present invention provides a system for authorizing a financial transaction of a financial presentation device that is presentable to online merchants. The system comprises a peripheral device that includes: 1) a memory for storing information used to generate a dynamic verification value for the financial presentation device, 2) an I/O interface adapted to be coupled to a user computer; and 3) a processor configured to generate a dynamic verification value for the financial transaction using the information stored in memory and to transmit the dynamic verification value to the user computer via the I/O interface. The system also comprises an authentication computer that includes: 1) a memory for storing information used to generate a comparison verification value, 2) a communication device adapted to receive the dynamic verification value generated by the peripheral device, 3) a processor coupled to the memory and the communication device, and 4) an authentication module executable by the processor and adapted to generate the comparison verification value using the information stored in memory and to determine whether to authorize the financial transaction based on a comparison between the comparison verification value and the dynamic verification value.
For purposes of illustration and clarity, the present invention will be discussed in the context of using a credit card. However, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the novel features disclosed herein apply to all types of portable financial presentation devices including, but not limited to, credit cards, debit cards, prepaid cards, electronic benefit cards, charge cards, smart cards, virtual cards, key chain devices, personal digital assistants, cell phones, stored value devices or the like so long as the device can be presented to a seller of goods or services for payment.
According to the present invention, an electronic peripheral device having an I/O interface for insertion into a port of a computer, such as a universal serial bus (USB) connector, is adapted to store either a series of verification values (e.g., a table of values) or an algorithm that dynamically generates verification values for authorizing a financial presentation device, such as a credit or debit card. During an online transaction, the peripheral device may be used by a customer during checkout to verify that the financial presentation device is being presented by an authorized user. When a customer enters information onto a web form of an online merchant site via a browser program, the peripheral device can generate the dynamic verification data associated with the customer's financial presentation device account and deliver the verification data to the browser program, i.e., by automatically filling in data into a web form of the online merchant site during checkout. During authorization of the transaction, a financial transaction facilitator, such as VISANET™, or the issuer of the financial presentation device, receives the dynamic verification value and compares the verification value against a comparison verification value. The comparison verification value is generated using a series of data that corresponds to the series of dynamic verification values stored in the peripheral device, or by using an algorithm that corresponds to an algorithm stored on the peripheral device. When the dynamic verification value and the comparison verification value match, the customer's financial presentation device is authenticated and the financial transaction facilitator or issuer authorizes the online transaction.
The online merchant web site hosted by server 104 may display details of goods and services which the customer may select to purchase. The merchant web site will typically include a payment details screen (not shown) during “checkout” into which the customer may enter payment details via an input device 108 coupled to computer 102. The customer typically enters name, address and payment instrument information such as the account number and expiration date of a financial presentation device in the payment details screen.
According to the present invention, a peripheral device 114, which in some embodiments may be a USB peripheral device, is insertable into USB port 110 of computer 102 during checkout. The peripheral device 114 is initially configured by a financial presentation device authorizing entity 116 such as VISANET™ or the issuer of the financial presentation device. The peripheral device 114 includes functionality to generate a dynamic verification value (such as a three-digit number) based on stored values and/or an algorithm, and to emulate a keyboard so as to automatically input the generated dynamic verification value into an appropriate field of the payment details screen during checkout. As discussed below, computer 102 includes software (possibly downloaded as an applet from the merchant server 104) which is adapted to monitor for the presence of peripheral device 114 and includes a driver for converting signals received from the peripheral device into keyboard input information.
More specifically, peripheral device 114 is configured to include dynamic verification data that uniquely corresponds with a particular financial presentation device before the financial presentation device is assigned to a particular customer. The peripheral device 114 is then given to the customer along with the financial presentation device when it is issued. The peripheral device 114 is then used by the customer when performing online transactions with the financial presentation device to generate dynamic verification values, as described below. The authorizing entity 116 accordingly stores comparison verification values and/or algorithms corresponding to those stored on peripheral device 114, so that the values generated by peripheral device 114 can be verified by the authorizing entity 116. After verifying that the value generated by the peripheral device 114 matches the value stored by the authorizing entity 116, the associated financial presentation device is authorized by the authorizing entity 116 for that particular transaction.
After the customer has entered all of the requested information including the dynamic verification value into the payment details screen during checkout, the information is transmitted to server 104, which in turn sends the payment information to authorizing entity 116 over a secure private network 118. As discussed above, the authorizing entity 116 may be a financial transaction facilitator, such as VISANET™, which determines whether the dynamic verification value received from server 104 has been generated by an authorized peripheral device 114.
In some embodiments, memory 204 of peripheral device 114 stores a keyboard emulation module 212 and in one embodiment, stores a table 214 of financial presentation device verification values (see
In an exemplary embodiment, memory 204 of peripheral device 114 stores a table 214 which includes a number (e.g., between 10 and 1000) of preset 3-digit dynamic verification values, which are indexed by a transaction number. In other embodiments the dynamic verification values can be 4-digit, 5-digit, or any other number of digits.
In alternative embodiments, memory 204 may store an algorithm or value generation module 216 which generates a new dynamic verification value upon activation based on certain stored kernel information such as the account number of the financial presentation device. Exemplary algorithms that may be used to generate dynamic verification values are discussed below and in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/642,878 entitled “Method and System for Generating a Dynamic Verification Value”. In these embodiments, the keyboard emulation module 212 receives the newly generated dynamic verification value from value generation module 216 and formats the value in the form of keyboard output signals accordingly.
Two example algorithms that may be used to generate dynamic verification values are counter-based and time-based algorithms, both of which use variable data together with customer account information to generate dynamic verification values.
In a counter-based algorithm a transaction counter stored in the peripheral device increments with each transaction. In one example algorithm, a string is constructed by replacing certain digits of the customer's financial presentation device account number with the transaction counter to create an ‘altered account number’. In a second step, the altered account number is concatenated with the expiration date of the account and with other specified digits. The concatenated result is placed into a 128-bit field, and then spit into two blocks, block A and block B. Block A is then encrypted using an encryption key, and the encrypted result (block C) is put through an exclusive OR operation with block B. Resulting block D is then encrypted with the encryption key. After further encryptions, hexadecimal digits are converted into decimal, the blocks are concatenated, and three digits are selected from the concatenated result as the dynamic verification value.
In an example time-based algorithm, the process may be similar, with a time-based number (based on a known time window) used instead of a transaction counter to create the altered account number.
According to these algorithms, even if an unauthorized party was able to obtain financial presentation device account number and expiration date information, there would be no way for the unauthorized party to precisely determine the dynamic verification value without the variable data of a transaction counter or time-based number. Moreover, if an unauthorized party uses a number generating algorithm to continually guess at the dynamic verification value, verification may be disallowed after a certain number (e.g., 2 or 3) of unsuccessful attempts.
Program storage memory 412 and data storage memory 414 may each comprise volatile (RAM) and non-volatile (ROM) memory units and may also comprise hard disk and backup storage capacity. Program storage memory 412 stores software program modules and associated data, and in particular stores a verification module 416. Verification module 416 is adapted to receive the dynamic verification value generated by peripheral device 114 and to match the dynamic verification value against a comparison verification value which is obtained from a set of stored values (e.g., in a table) or generated by an algorithm that corresponds to the algorithm used to generate the dynamic verification value by peripheral device 114. Received dynamic verification values may be stored in data storage memory 414 along with other stored cardholder information, a table of stored dynamic verification values, and/or values/parameters such as a transaction counter used for generating comparison verification values dynamically according to an algorithm.
It is to be appreciated that the computer system 400 can be any computer such as a personal computer, minicomputer, workstation, mainframe, or a combination thereof. While the computer system 400 is shown, for illustration purposes, as a single computer unit, the system may comprise a group/farm of computers which can be scaled depending on the processing load and database size.
In one embodiment, the processor 202 retrieves the last used transaction counter/number and increments it by one and retrieves the verification value corresponding to the new transaction number. For example, if the last used transaction number was 15, the retrieved verification value is 967 (corresponding to transaction number 16) according to the table in
Alternatively, an applet downloaded from the merchant server 104 and running inside the user computer 102 may prompt the user to plug the peripheral device 114 into the computer 102. When the user does so, the processor 202 retrieves an appropriate dynamic verification value from the table 214 as described above and transmits it through the usb port.
In step 510, peripheral device 114 generates a signal that encodes the dynamic verification value as keyboard input and sends the encoded value to user computer 102. In step 512, user computer 102 receives the signal from peripheral device 114 and interprets the signal as keyboard input instructions and enters the dynamic verification value into the dynamic verification value field of the payment details screen.
Upon completion of the payment details screen, in step 514, the online merchant server 104 receives transaction data, including the financial presentation device account number and dynamic verification value. In step 515, merchant server 104 provides the financial presentation device information and dynamic verification value to an acquirer (not shown) using conventional financial presentation device authentication procedures. In step 516, the transaction data is then received from the acquirer by an authorizing computer 400 of the authorizing entity 116. Upon receiving the transaction data including the dynamic verification value, in step 518, the verification module being executed by the processor 404 of authorizing computer 400 generates a comparison verification value to compare with the received dynamic verification value. As explained above, the comparison verification value may be generated using a table corresponding to a table of verification values stored on peripheral device 114, or based on an algorithm that corresponds to an algorithm stored on peripheral device 114.
In the case of using the table, like the peripheral device 114, the verification module 416 maintains the same table and the same last used transaction number. The module 416 increments the last used transaction number by one and retrieves the verification value corresponding to the new transaction number. For example, if the last used transaction number was 15, the retrieved verification value is 967 (corresponding to transaction number 16) according to the table in
In step 520, verification module 416 determines whether the comparison verification value matches the dynamic verification value received from the online merchant server 104.
If it is determined in step 520 that the comparison verification value matches the dynamic verification value, then, in step 522, verification module 416 authorizes the transaction (assuming of course that all other tests such as credit limit pass) and sends a notification to the merchant server 104 according to conventional procedures. The method then ends in step 530.
If it is determined in step 520 that the comparison verification value does not match the dynamic verification value, then, in step 524, verification module 416 sends a notification to the merchant server 104 that the financial transaction is denied. The method then ends in step 530.
The foregoing specific embodiments represent just some of the ways of practicing the present invention. Many other embodiments are possible within the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited to the foregoing specification, but instead is given by the appended claims along with their full range of equivalents.
This application is a non-provisional continuation application of and claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/483,419, entitled, “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTHORIZING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH ONLINE MERCHANTS,” filed Jun. 12, 2009, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/061,936, filed Jun. 16, 2008, entitled, “METHOD AND SYSTEM OF AUTHENTICATING A FINANCIAL PRESENTATION DEVICE USING A TOKEN,” which are fully incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4423287 | Zeidler | Dec 1983 | A |
4578530 | Zeidler | Mar 1986 | A |
4646351 | Asbo et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4701601 | Francini et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4734564 | Boston et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4812628 | Boston et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822985 | Boggan et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4870259 | Boggan et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4906826 | Spencer | Mar 1990 | A |
4908521 | Boggan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4943707 | Boggan | Jul 1990 | A |
5276311 | Hennige | Jan 1994 | A |
5396624 | Campbell, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5450491 | McNair | Sep 1995 | A |
5450537 | Hirai et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5465206 | Hilt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477038 | Levine et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5500512 | Langhans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500513 | Langhans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5621201 | Langhans et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623552 | Lane | Apr 1997 | A |
5627355 | Rahman | May 1997 | A |
5640577 | Scharmer | Jun 1997 | A |
5703344 | Bezy et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5742845 | Wagner | Apr 1998 | A |
5771101 | Bramall | Jun 1998 | A |
5794259 | Kikinis | Aug 1998 | A |
5883810 | Franklin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5920847 | Kolling et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963925 | Kolling et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974430 | Mutschler, III et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
RE36365 | Levine et al. | Nov 1999 | E |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003014 | Lee et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003763 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005942 | Chan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018717 | Lee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019284 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044349 | Tolopka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067621 | Yu et al. | May 2000 | A |
RE37122 | Levine et al. | Apr 2001 | E |
6227447 | Campisano | May 2001 | B1 |
6233683 | Chan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247129 | Keathley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263446 | Kausik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282522 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285991 | Powar | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298336 | Davis et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6341724 | Campisano | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6367011 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385595 | Kolling et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6408284 | Hilt et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421729 | Paltenghe et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438527 | Powar | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6481632 | Wentker et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490601 | Markus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499042 | Markus | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6560581 | Fox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571339 | Danneels et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
RE38255 | Levine et al. | Sep 2003 | E |
6808111 | Kashef et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6850996 | Wagner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6873974 | Schutzer | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6907476 | Wagner | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925562 | Gulcu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6980970 | Krueger et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985583 | Brainard | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7007840 | Davis | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028008 | Powar | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039611 | Devine | May 2006 | B2 |
7051929 | Li | May 2006 | B2 |
7062706 | Maxwell et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096363 | Kon | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099850 | Mann, II et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103576 | Mann, III et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7159180 | Ward | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177848 | Hogan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7210169 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216292 | Snapper et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7227950 | Faith et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231045 | Parrott | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7243853 | Levy et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7247033 | Skowranek | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254569 | Goodman et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257581 | Steele et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7275263 | Bajikar et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280981 | Huang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7328850 | Sines | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334184 | Simons | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343351 | Bishop et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7346587 | Goldstein et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347361 | Lovett | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350139 | Simons | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7356516 | Richey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356706 | Scheurich | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366703 | Gray et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379919 | Hogan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7412420 | Holdsworth | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415443 | Hobson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427033 | Roskind | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7437575 | Dennis et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437757 | Holdsworth | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7483845 | Vetelainen | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7506818 | Beenau | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512975 | Aissi | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7533063 | Kianian | May 2009 | B2 |
7533828 | Ong | May 2009 | B2 |
7568631 | Gibbs et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584153 | Brown | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593875 | Granite | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7627531 | Breck et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7660779 | Goodman et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664699 | Powell | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7689459 | Capurso et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693790 | Lawlor | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716596 | Cao et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740168 | Hammad | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761374 | Sahota | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7849014 | Erikson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7866551 | Manessis et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7891560 | Hammad | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899753 | Everhart | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7922082 | Muscato | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8313022 | Hammad et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313822 | Hatakenaka | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8326759 | Hammad | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8359630 | Manessis | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364594 | Hammad | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8423415 | Sahota | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8504451 | Faith | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8534564 | Hammad | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8602293 | Hammad | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8931691 | Manessis et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9251637 | Ashfield | Feb 2016 | B2 |
10008067 | Manessis | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20010032182 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010054148 | Hoornaert et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020111919 | Weller et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116330 | Hed | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020153424 | Li | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158747 | McGregor | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161704 | Powar | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178112 | Goeller et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180584 | McGregor | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194138 | Dominguez et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194503 | Faith et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030105964 | Brainard | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115142 | Brickell et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120593 | Bansal et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030182241 | Everhart | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195843 | Matsuda et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200184 | Dominguez et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212642 | Weller et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233292 | Richey et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040044621 | Huang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059688 | Dominguez et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040210566 | Smith et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220964 | Shiftan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230489 | Goldthwaite | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050015588 | Lin | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029344 | Davis | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036611 | Seaton, Jr. et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043997 | Sahota | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050077349 | Bonalle | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102234 | Devine | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149455 | Bruesewitz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154877 | Trench | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171898 | Bishop | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177510 | Hilt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246278 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250473 | Brown | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269402 | Spitzer | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060006224 | Modi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060049263 | Ou et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060131393 | Cok et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060152484 | Rolus Borgward | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161789 | Doughty et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167784 | Hoffberg | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179007 | Davis | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218098 | Walker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237528 | Bishop | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060278698 | Lovett | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005613 | Singh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005774 | Singh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055597 | Patel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055630 | Gauthier et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100691 | Patterson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136211 | Brown | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143605 | Metke et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070208671 | Brown et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241183 | Brown | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070278291 | Rans | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080029593 | Hammad | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080029607 | Mullen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034221 | Hammad et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040285 | Wankmueller | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071680 | Sheets | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071682 | Dominguez | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091619 | Perlman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080110983 | Ashfield | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120236 | Faith | May 2008 | A1 |
20080167991 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177796 | Eldering | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080197201 | Manessis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203151 | Dixon et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203152 | Hammad et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203170 | Hammad et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228653 | Holdsworth | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080289022 | Chiu | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306850 | Horvath | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006646 | Duarte | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031407 | Kuang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090055893 | Manessis | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090065571 | Jain | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090134218 | Yuzon | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144556 | Plet et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090173782 | Muscato | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248579 | Kaminski | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090307493 | Smith | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313168 | Manessis | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023453 | Keresman, III et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100084476 | Zellner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114776 | Weller et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100223184 | Perlman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257102 | Perlman | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274692 | Hammad | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274721 | Hammad | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293189 | Hammad | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293382 | Hammad | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306105 | Walker et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110101093 | Ehrensvard | May 2011 | A1 |
20110106601 | Perlman et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110106674 | Perlman et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110106675 | Perlman | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119155 | Hammad et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110186626 | Manessis et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19990078937 | Nov 1999 | KR |
20050089427 | Sep 2005 | KR |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,495 , “Final Office Action”, dated Feb. 4, 2010, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,495 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 10, 2010, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,495 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 26, 2009, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,495 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Sep. 2, 2010, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Final Office Action”, dated May 8, 2012, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Final Office Action”, dated Nov. 13, 2015, 41 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 8, 2017, 52 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Final Office Action”, dated Apr. 24, 2013, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Non Final Office Action”, dated Sep. 11, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated May 29, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Non-Final Office action”, dated Oct. 4, 2011, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated May 7, 2015, 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 6, 2016, 54 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Oct. 18, 2012, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,419 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Feb. 22, 2018, 22 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,446”, filed May 12, 2010, 56 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,459”, filed May 12, 2010, 58 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,485”, filed May 12, 2010, 60 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,963”, filed Nov. 4, 2010, 115 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,191 , “Final Office Action”, dated Oct. 26, 2012, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,191 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 28, 2011, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,191 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Feb. 17, 2012, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,191 , “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jan. 14, 2014, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,191 , “Notice of Allowance”, dated Sep. 15, 2014, 8 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/061,936”, filed Jun. 16, 2008, 14 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/112,124”, filed Nov. 6, 2008, 11 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/178,636”, filed May 15, 2009, 33 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/256,095”, filed Oct. 29, 2009, 40 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/256,136”, filed Oct. 29, 2009, 64 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/256,141”, filed Oct. 29, 2009, 38 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/256,143”, filed Oct. 29, 2009, 29 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/256,147”, filed Oct. 29, 2009, 41 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/258,194”, filed Nov. 4, 2009, 59 pages. |
PCT/US2009/047119 , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Aug. 7, 2009, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180276936 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61061936 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12483419 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 15993196 | US |