1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the invention relate to workflow automation and, in particular, computer systems and methods for professional services management.
2. Description of the Related Art
Professional services automation (“PSA”) applications are often used by organizations whose work is project-based and/or human resource intensive to make their operations more efficient and/or their resources more productive. In general, PSA applications comprise enterprise resource planning software usable by individuals and organizations working in a project-oriented environment. For instance, PSA applications can be used by a company's internal service departments (e.g., IT department) and/or can be beneficial to consultants and organizations providing billable services, such as, for example, accounting services, computer system implementation teams and others. Use of a PSA provides specific organizational value in the reduction of job costs associated with the delivery of consulting services to customers.
Many conventional PSA applications are provider-based and directed to provider-specific workflow issues. For example, certain PSA applications manage professional service provider time, expense and billing reports, while other PSA applications identify to a provider which resources and/or personnel are available for a particular project. Such PSA applications are generally focused on the provider's needs and improving workflow and/or efficiency for one or more established projects.
Moreover, professional service providers must often coordinate projects remote to the provider that are distributed in different geographic regions. Certain companies have attempted to address geographic issues in professional services management by turning to a combination of MICROSOFT Office applications (e.g., OUTLOOK, EXCEL, Word, Project). Such solutions, however, limit information sharing between geographic regions or countries within international organizations. Moreover, the lack of integration of these programs between different regions tends to degrade efficiencies associated with the communication of key data points regarding information gained in the field.
In view of the foregoing, a need exists for computer systems and methods for providing a systematic approach to the automation of workflow associated with managing professional services delivery. Moreover, a need exists for improved systems and methods for automating service delivery business processes more efficiently. For instance, there is a need for improved professional services automation and project-lifecycle management in the data management area.
For example, there is a need for an improved services management system that obtains customer validation of a pre-sales effort prior to the post-sale deployment of professional services. For instance, computer systems and methods disclosed herein can obtain customer validation of the customer's product environment prior to the generation and performance of a Statement of Work (SOW), a work breakdown structure or the like in order to provide more efficient and accurate professional services tailored to the needs of the customer.
In certain embodiments of the invention, a network (e.g., internet, intranet) accessible computer system is provided that automates the process by which a professional services group and/or individual scopes or defines a professional services project, engages a customer or client, and/or closes each professional services engagement. In certain embodiments, the computer system includes a network accessible interface in the form of one or more web portals accessible by the services provider and/or the customer.
For example, the network accessible interface can comprise a portal having three subsites: a “Pre-Sales Portal,” a “Client Portal,” and a “Post-Deployment Portal.” The portals are then used to collect relevant site data for each project to be delivered by the professional services provider. For instance, the data can be used to ensure that an onsite engineer has information regarding the customer site product configuration, status, and customer expectations necessary to complete the engagement on time and/or at an appropriate level of customer satisfaction. Information regarding the delivery of professional services can also be collected and maintained in a searchable repository post-deployment, which can assist professional services and customer support organizations to better manage relevant details associated with each deployment's successes and/or issues. In certain embodiments, the three subsites are interconnected, enabling workflow automation and transition validation from potential projects, to those that must be scheduled, to those that are completed and then preserved for audit and organizational shared knowledge.
In certain embodiments, a computer system is disclosed for automatically identifying service recommendations for data management environments. The computer system comprises a plurality of records corresponding to a plurality of data storage system environments and a first portal module configured to receive first data regarding a first data storage system of the plurality of data storage system environments, the first data storage system corresponding to a customer. The computer system further comprises a manager module in communication with the first portal module to receive the first data, the manager module being configured populate a first record of the plurality of records with the first data. The computer system also includes a second portal module in communication with the manager module and configured to transmit the first record for review by the customer, the second portal module being further configured to receive validation input from the customer with respect to the first record, wherein, after receiving said validation input, the manager module is further configured to automatically generate a proposed project description of services to be performed with respect to the first data storage system based at least on the first data from the first record.
In certain embodiments, a computer system is disclosed for automating workflow for services in a data management environment. The computer system comprises means for storing records corresponding to a plurality of data storage system environments and means for receiving first data regarding a first data storage system of the plurality of data storage system environments, the first data storage system corresponding to a customer. The computer system also includes means for populating a first record of the plurality of records with the first data and means for providing the customer with access to the first record, said means for providing being further configured to receive validation input from the customer with respect to the first record, wherein, after receiving said validation input, said means for populating is further configured to generate a proposed project description of services to be performed with respect to the first data storage system based at least on the first data of the first record.
In certain embodiments, a method is disclosed for automating workflow in the performance of professional services. The method comprises receiving first data indicative of a product environment of a customer and storing the first data in one or more records. The method further includes providing the customer with access to the one or more records through a network accessible interface and receiving validation from the customer regarding the first data of the one or more records. The method also includes, following said receiving the validation, automatically generating a description of one or more recommended services to be performed with respect to the product environment based at least in part on the validated first data.
For purposes of summarizing the disclosure, certain aspects, advantages and novel features of the inventions have been described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, embodiments of the invention may be carried out in a manner that achieves one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
In professional services environments, project scope, risk, and site-specific project knowledge are workflow elements that generally require consistency from project concept to project completion. Creation of a common project workflow, per engagement, expedites the transmission of knowledge necessary to scope a project, complete a project and validate the effectiveness of service delivery. In certain embodiments, this expeditious processing of relevant project details substantially decreases the time scales associated with the successful completion of a project thereby reducing per project costs. Whereas certain conventional PSA applications provide some level of pre-sales to post-sales collaboration on project creation and completion, such PSA applications lack means for obtaining customer validation of the pre-sales effort prior to the post-sales deployment. Certain embodiments of the invention address this and other significant drawbacks of conventional PSA applications by including interim validation by the customer of the customer's product environment, which advantageously exposes any gaps between the customer's expectations and the provider's quote of specific professional services before delivery of the services.
Certain embodiments of the invention can also integrate the workflow of a plurality of parties associated with the delivery of professional services, such as those that sell services, those that provide services, and those that receive services. For example, embodiments of the invention can be used to “close the loop” associated with the successful implementation of those services at a customer site. Based on the success of that implementation, secondary systems within the service provider's organization can also become more efficient (e.g., finance department, support department). For example, a stored history of each completed project can be later used by account management teams for reference generation associated with completed projects that match current opportunity requirements, thereby reducing the time to close for sales opportunities.
As disclosed herein, certain embodiments of the invention include a computer system comprising multiple modules, or portals, that obtain information pertaining to the workflow associated with one or more projects. Such portals can comprise network accessible interfaces through which a professional services provider and/or client or customer can input data relating to a particular project. Furthermore, in certain embodiments, a professional services workflow automation process advantageously includes: (1) customer validation of the project scope and deliverables prior to deployment of the associated services, and/or (2) an automated analysis of potential issues within the customer product environment that may impede a successful services engagement, and/or provision of information regarding exception handling relevant to specific projects whereby site specific licensing or services are needed.
Certain embodiments of the invention are advantageously used in connection with professional services relating to data management systems, such as those services and systems provided by CommVault Systems, Inc. (Oceanport, N.J.). For instance, certain embodiments of the invention described herein can be used in connection with CommVault's SIMPANA storage management system or CommVault's QINETIX storage management system, details of which are further included U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/354,058, filed Jul. 15, 1999, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety to be considered a part of this specification. In yet other embodiments, the professional services automation system can be used in connection with a modular storage architecture, such as CommVault's GALAXY, which is more fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,035,880, issued Apr. 5, 2006, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety to be considered a part of this specification. However, it is contemplated that the inventions disclosed herein may also be applicable to other professional services environments, such as, for example, with hardware deployment, accounting services or the like.
The features of the systems and methods will now be described with reference to the drawings summarized above. Throughout the drawings, reference numbers are re-used to indicate correspondence between referenced elements. The drawings, associated descriptions, and specific implementation are provided to illustrate embodiments of the inventions and not to limit the scope of the disclosure.
In addition, methods and functions described herein are not limited to any particular sequence, and the acts or blocks relating thereto can be performed in other sequences that are appropriate. For example, described acts or blocks may be performed in an order other than that specifically disclosed, or multiple acts or blocks may be combined in a single act or block.
Embodiments of the workflow automation environment 100 are designed to obtain customer validation of pre-sales input concerning the customer's product environment. Such validation can be advantageously obtained prior to the post-sale deployment of professional services and/or the generation of a Statement of Work or like project scope definition.
As shown, the workflow automation environment 100 comprises a workflow automation system 102 that provides for retrieval, display, and or analysis in connection with the delivery of one or more professional services to a customer. In certain embodiments, the workflow automation system 102 comprises one or modules, such as one or more software programs executable on one or more processors. In certain embodiments, the workflow automation system 102 executes on a single server or a highly available, clustered web environment, such as the corporate web server provided by CommVault Systems, Inc. (Oceanport, N.J.).
As illustrated in
In certain embodiments, the pre-sales portal 105 receives data regarding a potential sales opportunity for a customer environment. For instance, in certain embodiments, the pre-sales portal 105 receives data from one or more sales personnel 120, or sales engineers, regarding information about a customer's product environment. Such information regarding the product environment in a data management setting can include, for example, the amount of disk memory, the types of storage media, the types of disaster recovery systems, the application(s) running on the customer's computer system, particular services requirement(s), combinations of the same and like information.
In certain embodiments, the pre-sales portal 105 provides the sales personnel 120 with specific questions and/or prompts to obtain the data regarding the customer's product environment. For instance, in certain embodiments, the sales personnel 120 may enter information through the pre-sales portal 105 during an initial meeting with a customer. In addition to the product environment data discussed above, the sales personnel 120 can also obtain and enter data regarding customer contact information, the customer's professional services expectations, customer working hours, combination of the same or the like.
In one example, the pre-sales portal 105 can prompt sales personnel 120 to answer one or more of the following questions or prompts to gather data regarding a customer's data management environment:
As will be understood from the disclosure herein, the sales personnel 120 can advantageously access the pre-sales portal 105 from a location remote to the workflow automation system 102, such as at the customer's site. For instance, the sales personnel 120 can be in network communication with the workflow automation system 102 through a personal computer, workstation, laptop, personal digital assistant (PDA), smart phone, cell phone, portable computing device, combinations of the same or the like in order to enter data into the pre-sales portal 105. For example, one or more of the users of the workflow automation system 102 (e.g., sales personnel 120, personnel services manager 125, customer 130, professional services operations personnel 135 and/or field personnel 140) can access one or more of the portals 105, 110, 115 through the use of a browser of an electronic device. In certain embodiments, the user can also enter information through a disconnected browser or other software that later forwards/uploads the pertinent information to the workflow automation system 102. In yet other embodiments, data regarding the customer product environment can be automatically generated based on one or more monitoring applications and/or records of prior projects or services performed in the customer product environment.
For instance,
With continued reference to
As shown, the manager module 117 further communicates with a professional services manager 125. In certain embodiments, the manager module 117 and/or the professional services manager 125 uses the data obtained by the pre-sales portal 105 to scope and/or generate a quote for applicable professional services based on the customer's product environment data. For instance, the manager module 117 can automatically generate a Statement of Work or other professional services project definition, identify potential risks associated with a particular project, create a timeline, estimate costs, combinations of the same or the like.
The client portal 110 also communicates with the manager module 117. In certain embodiments, the client portal 110 advantageously provides a customer 130 access to the workflow automation system 102. For example, the client portal 110 can provide the customer 130 with an opportunity to review data input by the sales personnel 120 (e.g., through access to the record(s) 119), to input additional data relating to the customer's product environment, validate entered data, combinations of the same or the like. In certain embodiments, access by the customer is provided through a uniform resource locator (URL) address sent to the customer 130 by the workflow automation system 102.
In certain embodiments, the customer 130 accesses the client portal 110 at the time the customer 130 is interested in obtaining professional services from the provider. In such embodiments, the customer 130 can be forwarded a summary of the customer product environment information initially input by the sales personnel 120 into the pre-sales portal 105. This advantageously allows the customer 130 to review the product environment data for accuracy and/or completeness before any deployment of services and without the time-consuming process of back-and-forth revising of a particular Statement of Work or like project description.
The client portal 110 can also communicate with the customer 130 to obtain additional details relating to the status of the customer's product environment. For instance, the client portal 110 can provide the customer 130 with one or more questions in order to obtain data on site readiness, customer contact and location information, additional information regarding the scope of deployment, hours of operation of the customer, which libraries are being used by the customer, customer storage preferences (e.g., magnetic disk or tape), other customer preferences, combinations of the same or the like. Such operation of the client portal 110 advantageously allows the customer 130 to use its own words or phrases with respect to its requirements, which language is later used by field personnel 140 to verify that the customer's expectations have been met.
Thus, unlike conventional PSA applications, which are primarily based on details of the service provider personnel and resources, the workflow automation system 102 provides system access to the customer 130 and requests customer feedback and validation. This customer-specific approach and system advantageously enables a service provider to obtain additional customer input and further customize its services early in the workflow automation process, thereby increasing the degree to which one or more projects later scoped or recommended by the provider to the customer will coincide with the customer's expectations.
For instance,
The client portal 110 also advantageously provides a validation that quoted or recommended services align with the customer expectations. For instance, in certain embodiments, when discrepancies exist between data received by the pre-sales portal 105 and data received from the customer 130 by the client portal 110, the manager module 117 can automatically note the discrepancies and/or alert the services manager 125 and/or professional services operations personnel 135 for review and/or redress. In certain embodiments, other noteworthy issues related to the customer site based on information received through the client portal 110 can also be recorded and/or communicated to the proper personnel. An example of a portal output that includes site issue automated analysis is illustrated below in Table 1.
As can be seen, Table 1 provides an example of a completed report that can be sent (e.g., automatically) to the services manager 125, field personnel 140, and/or field engineers for review after receiving input from the customer 130. In certain embodiments, the report includes a list of items that have been identified as potential risks or problems and/or specifies the project scope prior to the generation of a Statement of Work or like project definition.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the customer input prior to the delivery of the particular service(s) advantageously addresses an “expectation gap,” which often exists in conventional PSA applications, between the services scoped and sold by the professional services provider and the services expected by the customer. As discussed above, such timing of obtaining the customer input advantageously allows for early comparison with the recommended services scoped from the product environment data gathered by the pre-sales portal 105.
As further illustrated in
The post-deployment portal 115 can also receive additional information from field personnel 140 at the completion of a phase of work associated with the recommended professional services. For instance, the post-deployment portal 115 can advantageously obtain data regarding the status of the project at the final day of onsite work, any issues associated with the site deployment/software, the next steps in the project for an account management group, combinations of the same or the like.
For instance,
In certain embodiments, when the post-deployment portal 115 has completed gathering information, a project customer satisfaction survey can be sent to the customer 130 (e.g., automatically via email). In yet other embodiments, the customer 130 can complete the survey through access to the client portal 110. In certain embodiments, a completion notice can also be sent to the manager module 117 and/or the services manager 125 when the customer 130 completes the survey. In yet further embodiments, through the automation of customer satisfaction analysis, post-deployment, the following advantages can be achieved: (1) days sales outstanding (DSO) is reduced as the account receivables department has access to verification that projects were successfully concluded; and (2) support tap out rates for maintenance can be reduced as a complete deployment history regarding the project is accessible to the service provider.
As will be appreciated,
As illustrated in
For ease of explanation, the workflow automation process 700 will be described with reference to the modules of the workflow automation environment 100 of
At Block 710, the data is forwarded to the manager module 117 and/or the services manager 125. For instance, the data can be used to populate one or more records 119 maintained by the manager module 117. After analyzing the data, a quote for recommended services is generated based on the customer's product environment (Block 715).
At Block 720, the client portal 110 provides the customer 130 with an opportunity to review the record(s) 119 based on the data input by the sales personnel 120 and to receive additional data and/or comments from the customer 130 (Block 720). At Block 725, the manager module 117 compares the customer data with the recommended services and alerts the services manager 125 or other professional services personnel 135 of any discrepancies (Block 730).
Once the recommended services are inline with the customer's expectations, the appropriate project description (e.g., Statement of Work, work breakdown) is finalized and field personnel 140 are deployed to the customer site to perform the professional services. At Block 735, the post-deployment portal 115 receives data from the field personnel 140 regarding the completion of a phase of work. This data is then forwarded to the manager module 117 for updating the appropriate record(s) 119 (Block 740). This stored data obtained through each of the portals is then advantageously available for future reference and analysis to improve the delivery of subsequent professional services.
The process 800 begins with Block 805, wherein the pre-sales portal 105 receives data regarding a customer product environment and/or services requirements. For instance, in a data management environment, such data can be input by sales personnel 120 of a professional services provider and relate to, for example, the type of storage being performed (e.g., backup, replication, archive), the types and amount of storage media, the number of computers or servers, the amount of data involved, available recovery systems, combinations of the same or the like.
At Block 810, the pre-sales portal 105 forwards the product environment data to the manager module 117, which populates one or more records 119 (Block 815). At Block 820, the workflow automation system 100 provides the customer 130 with access to the record(s) 119 through the client portal 110. For instance, the workflow automation system 102 (e.g., the client portal 110 or the manager module 117) can provide a URL address to the customer 130, which allows the customer access, such as secure access, to the appropriate record(s) 119. At this point, the customer 130 is prompted to review the product environment data input by the pre-sales personnel 120 for accuracy and/or completeness. Also, the customer portal 110 may prompt the customer 130 for additional details regarding the client's product work environment and/or professional services requirements.
If the customer does not validate the data (Block 825), the client portal 110 receives corrected and/or additional data concerning the product environment through the client portal 110 (Block 830). The manager module 117 then updates the appropriate record(s) 119 with the corrected and/or additional data (Block 835). After updating the records, the process 800 returns to Block 820 to provide the customer access to the updated record(s) 119.
In certain embodiments, if the customer 130 fails to respond to the workflow automation system 102 request for validation (Block 820) in a timely manner, the manager module 117 can alert the professional services operations personnel 135. Professional services operations personnel 135 can then proactively use the manager module 117 to automatically generate a reminder notification, which is automatically transmitted to the customer 130 to assist in resuming the workflow automation process 100.
If at Block 825 the customer validates the data representing its product environment, the manager module 117 and/or manager 125 generates a Statement of Work or like project description, which can be followed by a deployment of corresponding professional services. Thus, the process 800 provides that the generated Statement of Work or like project description is based on a customer-validated description of the applicable project environment.
Although the workflow automation processes 700 and 800 have been described with reference to particular arrangements, it will be understood from the disclosure herein that other embodiments of the processes 700, 800 can vary from the flowcharts depicted in
Moreover, in certain embodiments, the data collected through the portals 105, 110 and 115 regarding the delivery of services can be maintained in a searchable repository, such as one or more databases, post deployment. Such data can be later used in assisting professional services and/or customer support organizations to better manage relevant details associated with each deployment's successes and/or issues. Moreover, the stored data can also be mined by the professional services provider for reference information and additional sales opportunities.
In certain embodiments, the history of the completed project, as collected through each of the portals 105, 110, 115 provides data points that can be used to scope other projects of a similar nature within certain regions or geographies. Such embodiments can be advantageously used to further create a more extensible services organization through information sharing.
For instance, the data collected through portals 105, 110, 115 can further be used to form a knowledge base identifying projects as “successful” or “unsuccessful.” Such information can be later accessed by the services provider to streamline its offerings, focusing on those deployments that generate the largest degree of success and scale. This information can also be used by sales personnel to compile lists of customers, through the contemporaneous capture of detail about each completed project, that may function as references for new sales.
Although certain embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, it is contemplated that other embodiments of workflow automation systems can also be used without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. For example, in certain embodiments of the invention, the workflow automation system 102 can provide a series of logical gates associated with “inbound” services opportunities, logically separating these opportunities into two categories: (1) staff augmentation services (e.g., services that do not require a Statement of Work, advanced design validation and/or specific risk analysis to ensure the success of services delivery); and (2) project-based services (e.g., services that generally require advanced analysis of the opportunity to ensure that the project is delivered in a manner that is deemed successful to the end user recipient of the services).
Systems and modules described herein can comprise software, firmware, hardware, or any combination(s) of software, firmware, or hardware suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules can reside on servers, workstations, personal computers, computerized tablets, PDAs, and other devices suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules can be accessible via local memory, via a network, via a browser, or via other means suitable for the purposes described herein. Data structures described herein can comprise computer files, variables, programming arrays, programming structures, or any electronic information storage schemes or methods, or any combinations thereof, suitable for the purposes described herein. User interface elements described herein can comprise elements from graphical user interfaces, command line interfaces, and other interfaces suitable for the purposes described herein.
Embodiments of the invention are also described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, systems and computer program products. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to operate in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means that implement the acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. The computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operations to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process such that the instructions that execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
While certain embodiments of the inventions have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein can be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein can be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/906,177, entitled “Systems and Methods for Professional Services Automation,” filed Mar. 9, 2007, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety to be considered part of this specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4296465 | Lemak | Oct 1981 | A |
4686620 | Ng | Aug 1987 | A |
4995035 | Cole et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5093912 | Dong et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5133065 | Cheffetz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5193154 | Kitajima et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5212772 | Masters | May 1993 | A |
5226157 | Nakano et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239647 | Anglin et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241668 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241670 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5263154 | Eastridge et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265159 | Kung | Nov 1993 | A |
5276860 | Fortier et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5276867 | Kenley et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287500 | Stoppani, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5301351 | Jippo | Apr 1994 | A |
5311509 | Heddes et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317731 | Dias et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321816 | Rogan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333315 | Saether et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347653 | Flynn et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5369757 | Spiro et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5403639 | Belsan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410700 | Fecteau et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5448724 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455926 | Keele et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5487072 | Kant | Jan 1996 | A |
5491810 | Allen | Feb 1996 | A |
5495607 | Pisello et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504873 | Martin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5544345 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544347 | Yanai et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546536 | Davis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555404 | Torbjornsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559957 | Balk | Sep 1996 | A |
5559991 | Kanfi | Sep 1996 | A |
5598546 | Blomgren | Jan 1997 | A |
5604862 | Midgely et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615392 | Harrison et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619644 | Crockett et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638509 | Dunphy et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642496 | Kanfi | Jun 1997 | A |
5673381 | Huai et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675511 | Prasad et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677900 | Nishida et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682513 | Candelaria et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687343 | Fecteau et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689706 | Rao et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699361 | Ding et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719786 | Nelson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720026 | Uemura et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729743 | Squibb | Mar 1998 | A |
5737747 | Vishlitzky et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742792 | Yanai et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751997 | Kullick et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758359 | Saxon | May 1998 | A |
5761677 | Senator et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761734 | Pfeffer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764972 | Crouse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765173 | Cane et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778395 | Whiting et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790114 | Geaghan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790828 | Jost | Aug 1998 | A |
5805920 | Sprenkle et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812398 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
5829046 | Tzelnic et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5860104 | Witt et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875478 | Blumenau | Feb 1999 | A |
5875481 | Ashton et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878408 | Van Huben et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887134 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
5901327 | Ofek | May 1999 | A |
5907621 | Bachman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907672 | Matze et al. | May 1999 | A |
5924102 | Perks | Jul 1999 | A |
5926836 | Blumenau | Jul 1999 | A |
5933104 | Kimura | Aug 1999 | A |
5933601 | Fanshier et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950205 | Aviani, Jr. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956519 | Wise et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958005 | Thorne et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970233 | Liu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970255 | Tran et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974563 | Beeler, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987478 | See et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991779 | Bejar | Nov 1999 | A |
5995091 | Near et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003089 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009274 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012090 | Chung et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021415 | Cannon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021475 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023710 | Steiner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026414 | Anglin | Feb 2000 | A |
6049889 | Steely, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052735 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061692 | Thomas et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067525 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072490 | Bates et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076148 | Kedem et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094416 | Ying | Jul 2000 | A |
6105129 | Meier et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112239 | Kenner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122668 | Teng et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131095 | Low et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131148 | West et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131190 | Sidwell | Oct 2000 | A |
6137864 | Yaker | Oct 2000 | A |
6148377 | Carter et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148412 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154787 | Urevig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154852 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158044 | Tibbetts | Dec 2000 | A |
6161111 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163856 | Dion et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167402 | Yeager | Dec 2000 | A |
6175829 | Li et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195695 | Cheston et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205450 | Kanome et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212512 | Barney et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212521 | Minami et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230164 | Rikieta et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260069 | Anglin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269431 | Dunham | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275953 | Vahalia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279078 | Sicola et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292783 | Rohler | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301592 | Aoyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304880 | Kishi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311193 | Sekido et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324581 | Xu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328766 | Long | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330570 | Crighton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330642 | Carteau | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350199 | Williams et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
RE37601 | Eastridge et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
6353878 | Dunham | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356801 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363464 | Mangione | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366986 | St. Pierre et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366988 | Skiba et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374336 | Peters et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374363 | Wu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389432 | Pothapragada et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397308 | Ofek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418478 | Ignatius et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421711 | Blumenau et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434681 | Armangau | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473775 | Kusters et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487561 | Ofek et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487644 | Huebsch et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487645 | Clark et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502205 | Yanai et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519679 | Devireddy et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538669 | Lagueux, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539462 | Mikkelsen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542909 | Tamer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542972 | Ignatius et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564228 | O'Connor | May 2003 | B1 |
6581143 | Gagne et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6604118 | Kleinman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604149 | Deo et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615223 | Shih et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631477 | LeCrone et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631493 | Ottesen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647396 | Parnell et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647473 | Golds et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651075 | Kusters et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654825 | Clapp et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658436 | Oshinsy et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6658526 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6662198 | Satyanarayanan et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665815 | Goldstein et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681230 | Blott et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6721767 | De Meno et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728733 | Tokui | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732124 | Koseki et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732125 | Autrey et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742092 | Huebsch et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748504 | Sawdon et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751635 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757794 | Cabrera et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760723 | Oshinsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763351 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6789161 | Blendermann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792518 | Armangau et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799258 | Linde | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6836779 | Poulin | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6871163 | Hiller et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871271 | Ohran et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6880051 | Timpanaro-Perrotta | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886020 | Zahavi et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6892211 | Hitz et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912482 | Kaiser | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925512 | Louzoun et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938135 | Kekre et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938180 | Dysert et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941393 | Secatch | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944796 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952705 | Knoblock et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6952758 | Chron et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954834 | Slater et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6968351 | Butterworth | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973553 | Archibald, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978265 | Schumacher | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981177 | Beattie | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983351 | Gibble et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993539 | Federwisch et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003473 | Curtis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003519 | Biettron et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003641 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7032131 | Lubbers et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035880 | Crescenti et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039661 | Ranade | May 2006 | B1 |
7051050 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062761 | Slavin et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065538 | Aronoff et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082441 | Zahavi et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085787 | Beier et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085904 | Mizuno et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092968 | Ebel et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096315 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103731 | Gibble et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103740 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107298 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107395 | Ofek et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120757 | Tsuge | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130860 | Pachet | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130970 | Devassy et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139932 | Watanabe | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7155465 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155633 | Tuma et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181477 | Saika et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188292 | Cordina et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191198 | Asano et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194454 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203807 | Urabe et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209972 | Ignatius et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7225204 | Manley et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225208 | Midgley et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225210 | Guthrie, II | May 2007 | B2 |
7228456 | Lecrone et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231544 | Tan et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7234115 | Sprauve et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7246140 | Therrien et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246207 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257689 | Baird | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7269612 | Devarakonda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269641 | Powers et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272606 | Borthakur et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275138 | Saika | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275177 | Armangau et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278142 | Bandhole et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287047 | Kavuri | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293133 | Colgrove et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7296125 | Ohran | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315923 | Retnamma et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7343356 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343365 | Farnham et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343453 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343459 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346751 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356657 | Mikami | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359917 | Winter et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370232 | Safford | May 2008 | B2 |
7373364 | Chapman | May 2008 | B1 |
7380072 | Kottomtharayil et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7389311 | Crescenti et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392360 | Aharoni et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7395282 | Crescenti et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7409509 | Devassy et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415488 | Muth et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7430587 | Malone et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433301 | Akahane et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440982 | Lu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7467167 | Patterson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467267 | Mayock | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472238 | Gokhale | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7475284 | Koike | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7490207 | Amarendran | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496589 | Jain et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496690 | Beverly et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500053 | Kavuri et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7500150 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509316 | Greenblatt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512601 | Cucerzan et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7516088 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529748 | Wen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7529782 | Prahlad et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7532340 | Koppich et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536291 | Retnamma et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7539707 | Prahlad et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539835 | Kaiser | May 2009 | B2 |
7543125 | Gokhale | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546324 | Prahlad et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565572 | Yamasaki | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596586 | Gokhale et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7606841 | Ranade | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7606844 | Kottomtharayil | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613748 | Brockway et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7613750 | Valiyaparambil et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617253 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617262 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617541 | Plotkin et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627598 | Burke | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7627617 | Kavuri et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636743 | Erofeev | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7651593 | Prahlad et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7661028 | Erofeev | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668798 | Scanlon et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669029 | Mishra et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7689467 | Belanger et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7702533 | Barnard et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716171 | Kryger | May 2010 | B2 |
7734715 | Hyakutake et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739235 | Rousseau et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7810067 | Kaelicke et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7840533 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7870355 | Erofeev | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7930476 | Castelli et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7962455 | Erofeev | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962709 | Agrawal | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8009820 | Curtis | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8024294 | Kottomtharayil | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8121983 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8204859 | Ngo | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010029517 | De Meno et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032172 | Moulinet et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010035866 | Finger et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042222 | Kedem et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044807 | Kleiman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002557 | Straube et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004883 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023051 | Kunzle et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020040376 | Yamanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042869 | Tate et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049626 | Mathias et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049718 | Kleiman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049738 | Epstein | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049778 | Bell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062230 | Morag et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069324 | Gerasimov et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083055 | Pachet et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103848 | Giacomini et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107877 | Whiting et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133511 | Hostetter et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133512 | Milillo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161753 | Inaba et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174107 | Poulin | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174416 | Bates et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018657 | Monday | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028736 | Berkowitz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033308 | Patel et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030061491 | Jaskiewicz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030097296 | Putt | May 2003 | A1 |
20030131278 | Fujibayashi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135783 | Martin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167380 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177149 | Coombs | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177321 | Watanabe | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187847 | Lubbers et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225800 | Kavuri | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010487 | Prahlad et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015468 | Beier et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039679 | Norton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040098425 | Wiss et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107199 | Dairymple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117572 | Welsh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040139128 | Becker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193953 | Callahan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205206 | Naik et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220819 | Shetty et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230829 | Dogan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236958 | Teicher et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249883 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040250033 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254919 | Giuseppini | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260678 | Verbowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267835 | Zwilling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267836 | Amangau et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027892 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033800 | Kavuri et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050080928 | Beverly et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086443 | Mizuno et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108292 | Burton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114406 | Borthakur et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131900 | Palliyll et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144202 | Chen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187982 | Sato | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187992 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188254 | Urabe et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193026 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198083 | Saika et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246376 | Lu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268068 | Ignatius et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005048 | Osaki et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010154 | Prahlad et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010227 | Atluri | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020616 | Hardy et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047805 | Byrd et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064555 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060120401 | Harada et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129537 | Torii et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136685 | Griv et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060230244 | Amarendran et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242371 | Shono et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070043956 | El Far et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070094467 | Yamasaki | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100867 | Celik et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112897 | Asano et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113006 | Elliott et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124347 | Vivian et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124348 | Claborn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143371 | Kottomtharayil | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143756 | Gokhale | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070179990 | Zimran et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183224 | Erofeev | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185937 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185938 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185939 | Prahland et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185940 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186042 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186068 | Agrawal | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192145 | Hellickson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226438 | Erofeev | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244571 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070288536 | Sen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016126 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016293 | Saika | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080059515 | Fulton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103916 | Camarador et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104357 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080183775 | Prahlad et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080229037 | Bunte et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243879 | Gokhale et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243914 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243957 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243958 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244177 | Crescenti et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306954 | Hornqvist | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090044046 | Yamasaki | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090150462 | McClanahan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182963 | Prahlad et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187944 | White et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090319534 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319585 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005259 | Prahlad | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049753 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094808 | Erofeev | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100529 | Erofeev | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122053 | Prahlad et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131461 | Prahlad et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131467 | Prahlad et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145909 | Ngo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179941 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205150 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211571 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110066599 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110238621 | Agrawal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246416 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006331932 | Dec 2006 | AU |
2632935 | Dec 2006 | CA |
0259912 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0405926 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0 467 546 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 774 715 | May 1997 | EP |
0 809 184 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0 862 304 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 899 662 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 981 090 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1174795 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1349089 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 349 088 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1579331 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1974296 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2256952 | Dec 1992 | GB |
2411030 | Aug 2005 | GB |
05189281 | Jul 1993 | JP |
06274605 | Sep 1994 | JP |
09016463 | Jan 1997 | JP |
11259348 | Sep 1999 | JP |
200347811 | Dec 2000 | JP |
WO 9303549 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9513580 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9839707 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9912098 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9914692 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9912098 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 02095632 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03028183 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2004034197 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2005055093 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005086032 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2007053314 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007075587 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2010068570 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090012828 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60906177 | Mar 2007 | US |