The present invention relates generally to the field of wireless communication, and more specifically to high efficiency Wi-Fi systems.
Prior to setting forth a short discussion of the related art, it may be helpful to set forth definitions of certain terms that will be used hereinafter. Some of these terms are defined in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11 specification but it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited to systems and methods complying with the IEEE 802.11 specification.
The term “Wi-Fi” is used to refer to technology that allows communication devices to interact wirelessly based on the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11 standards. The wireless communication may use microwave bands, e.g. in the 2.4 GHz to 5 GHz range.
The term “AP” is an acronym for Access Point and is used herein to define a device that allows wireless devices (known as User Equipment or “UE”) to connect to a wired network using Wi-Fi, or related standards. The AP usually connects to a router (via a wired network) as a standalone device, but it can also be an integral component of the router itself.
The term “UE” is an acronym for User Equipment(s) and is an example of a station, e.g. Wi-Fi station (STA) that may attach to an AP.
The term “associated STA” as used herein refers to a STA that is served by a certain AP, for example with a certain Service Set Identifier (SSID).
The term “station” or STA is a term used for any participant on the network, for example as used in the 802.11 specification. Both UEs and APs are considered in this context to be examples of stations. In the following the abbreviation STA is used for stations whose packets are detected by a Wi-Fi RDN station implementing embodiments of the invention.
BSS is acronym for Basic Service Set, which is typically a cluster of Stations associated with an AP dedicated to managing the BSS. A BSS built around an AP is called an infrastructure BSS. The term “backhaul” is used in the following to denote a communication path between two APs or base stations, for example using a different protocol from that used for wireless communication between an AP or base station and supported equipment or STA. The 802.11 specification does not provide for communication between APs. A backhaul link may operate outside a wireless, e.g. Wi-Fi, environment in which APs or base stations and associated UEs or other STAs are operating, or use one or more different channels from those used by APs to communicate with their associated stations. A backhaul link may use any combination of wired and wireless communication including but not limited to a cellular communication network, Ethernet, and the internet.
“Beacon transmission” refers to periodical information transmission which may include system information.
HT-LTF is an acronym for high throughput long training field as defined in the 802.11 specification.
MPDU is an acronym for media access code (MAC) protocol data unit as defined in the 802.11 specification.
NAV is an acronym for network allocation vector as defined in the 802.11 specification.
NDP is an acronym for null data packet.
PPDU is an acronym for physical layer convergence procedure (PLCP) protocol data unit as defined in the 802.11 specification.
The term “sounding” refers to a channel calibration procedure involving the sending of a packet, called a “sounding packet” from one participant on a network to another, for example as defined in the 802.11 specifications.
VHT is an acronym for very high throughput as defined in the 802.11 specification.
The specific Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) mechanism used in the 802.11 Media Access Control (MAC) is referred to as the distributed coordination function (DCF). A station that wishes to transmit first performs a clear channel assessment (CCA) by sensing the medium for a fixed duration, the DCF inter-frame space (DIFS).
SIFS, Short Inter Frame Space, as defined in the 802.11 specifications is the period between reception of the data frame and transmission of the ACK. SIFS is shorter than DIFS.
The term Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) as used herein refers to a CCA function, e.g. as defined in the 802.11 specification.
The term “MIMO” is an acronym for multiple input multiple output and as used herein, is defined as the use of multiple antennas at both the transmitter and receiver to improve communication performance. MIMO offers significant increases in data throughput and link range without additional bandwidth or increased transmit power. It achieves this goal by spreading the transmit power over the antennas to achieve spatial multiplexing that improves the spectral efficiency (more bits per second per Hz of bandwidth) or to achieve a diversity gain that improves the link reliability (reduced fading), or increased antenna directivity.
“Channel estimation” is used herein to refer to estimation of channel state information (CSI) which describes properties of a communication link such as signal to noise ratio “SNR” and signal to interference plus noise ratio “SINR”. Channel estimation may be performed by user equipment or APs as well as other components operating in a communications system.
The term “beamforming” sometimes referred to as “spatial filtering” as used herein, is a signal processing technique used in antenna arrays for directional signal transmission or reception. This is achieved by combining elements in the array in such a way that signals at particular angles experience constructive interference while others experience destructive interference. Beamforming can be used at both the transmitting and receiving ends in order to achieve spatial selectivity. The operation of attempting to achieve destructive interference in order to cancel a signal in a particular direction or angle is referred to as “nulling”. Complete cancellation of a signal is not usually achieved in practice and a “null” in a radiation pattern may refer to a minimum in signal strength. The lower the signal strength, the “deeper” the null is said to be.
The term “beamformer” as used herein refers to analog and/or digital circuitry that implements beamforming and may include combiners and phase shifters or delays and in some cases amplifiers and/or attenuators to adjust the weights of signals to or from each antenna in an antenna array. Digital beamformers may be implemented in digital circuitry such as a digital signal processor (DSP), field-programmable gate array (FPGA), microprocessor or the central processing unit “CPU” of a computer to set the weights as may be expressed by phases and/or amplitudes of the above signals. Various techniques are used to implement beamforming including: Butler matrices, Blass Matrices and Rotman Lenses. In general, most approaches may attempt to provide simultaneous coverage within a sector using multiple beams.
Wi-Fi is a time division duplex system (TDD), where the transmitting and receiving functions use the same channel, implemented with a limited amount of frequency resources that use techniques of collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) to allow multiple stations, user equipment's (UEs) and APs, to share the same channel.
In many deployments APs on the same radio channel are within CCA range of each other. Thus an AP maybe blocked from transmitting to its client STA (typically a UE) due to activity of a nearby AP as noted in
Multi-User MIMO (MU_MIMO) capable APs can develop complex antenna patterns that support simultaneous enhancing and nulling in specific directions. According to embodiments of this invention, nulling at one AP may be set toward a co-channel AP in order to achieve the combined effect of reducing interference to the co-channel AP and reducing interference from the co-channel AP. The quality of this null, e.g. the effectiveness of the interference reduction, can be enhanced through the use of CSI information exchanged between the one AP and the co-channel AP. However it is not provided as part of the over-the-air (OTA) standard for APs to communicate with each other.
According to embodiments of the invention, an access point or components within the AP, e.g., a processor or baseband processor, or radio circuitries, is configured to exchange messages with at least one associated station (STA) over a wireless, or over-the-air channel. The AP may comprise a plurality of antennas, radio circuitry configured to transmit and receive via said antennas and a baseband processor, and may be equipped with beamforming capability. According to embodiments of the invention, the baseband processor is configured to establish a backhaul link with at least one neighboring AP which may be operating within a clear channel assessment (CCA) range of said AP. The AP may then transmit or send a sounding packet to its at least one associated STA over-the-air, or via the wireless channel, and obtain CSI feedback from said at least one neighboring AP via the backhaul link.
A method according to embodiments of the invention may be implemented in or by an AP and may include establishing a backhaul link with at least one co-channel neighboring AP, sending a sounding packet to said at least one associated STA over the wireless channel, and obtaining channel state information (CSI) feedback from said at least one co-channel neighboring AP via the backhaul link.
Embodiments of the invention may also be implemented in the neighboring AP. This may include establishing a backhaul link with at least one neighboring AP, detecting a sounding packet sent by the neighboring AP to at least one associated STA over the wireless channel, and sending channel state information (CSI) to said at least one neighboring AP via the backhaul link.
Embodiments of the invention may also comprise an AP that is configured to implement both methods described above, whereby an AP can transmit or send or receive CSI via a backhaul link with another AP.
An AP according to embodiments of the invention is sometimes referred to in the following as a “beamforming AP” to distinguish it from a neighboring AP. A beamforming AP may also be referred to as a MIMO AP. The neighboring AP may or may not have beamforming capability.
According to embodiments of the invention, an AP equipped with beamforming capability can both enhance its signal to its client STA while simultaneously nulling its signal toward a neighboring AP which may be interfering. According to embodiments of the invention this can be achieved by providing to the beamforming AP CSI relating to the neighboring AP.
CSI can be derived by the neighboring AP either implicitly or explicitly. The use of the term “implicit” or “implicitly” in this context refers to a process used for TDD protocols such as Wi-Fi, where both down and up links share the same spectrum. In the aforementioned process, the uplink channel estimated by an AP is assumed to be identical to the downlink one, based on the reciprocity principle. Therefore, in an example of this process, the channel from an STA towards an AP is considered by the AP to represent the channel from the AP towards the STA. Conversely, the use of the term “explicit” or “explicitly” in this context refers to a procedure where CSI is fed back. In an example of an explicit process between AP and STA, AP transmissions are channel estimated by the STA, and then fed back to the AP, providing the AP with, for example, the magnitude of phase and amplitude differences between the signals as transmitted by the AP vis-à-vis as received by the client/STA. Such information may allow the AP to gauge possible distortions in signals and correct them.
According to embodiments of the invention, CSI is provided that relates to a channel between one AP and another. There is no provision in the Wi-Fi standards for APs to communicate directly with each other. Therefore although one AP may receive, or detect, transmissions from another AP that are not directed to it, no mechanism is provided for it to respond using Wi-Fi protocol.
Explicit feedback is more accurate, and therefore more useful for generating a high quality null toward a STA or an AP. Embodiments of the invention enable explicit CSI measurement between compatible APs so that inter AP interference can be reduced, “compatible” referring to APs according to embodiments of the invention. However high quality of this kind may not always be required and embodiments of the invention may use implicit CSI.
APs having the capability to implement embodiments of the invention may register with a controller via the backhaul, for example in order to obtain the address of a neighboring AP. This controller may take the form of a server, for example, and is referred to in the following as a sounding controller. According to other embodiments of the invention a new procedure is developed that enables an AP to establish a direct peer-to-peer (P2P) backhaul link with a nearby compatible AP which bypasses the sounding controller to reduce CSI feedback delay.
Embodiments of the invention may also comprise a system comprising multiple APs, each configured to implement any of the foregoing methods, as well as a sounding controller for registration of said APs, each AP being configured to register with the sounding controller.
Embodiments of the invention comprise a method whereby an AP may obtain feedback, for example explicit feedback, from a co-channel AP as an extension of the standard procedure of obtaining CSI information from a UE or other STA which it is supporting. According to embodiments of the invention, an AP may transmit or send a sounding packet to its associated STAs, poll feedback from STAs and receive backhaul feedback from one or more neighboring APs. According to embodiments of the invention this may be achieved with no additional Wi-Fi overhead in the physical layer, e.g. channel occupancy. In this manner an AP may have timely CSI, for example based on feedback from a co-channel AP, which by its nature may be explicit, enabling it to develop a high quality null toward that AP.
According to other embodiments of the invention an AP may dynamically adjust any of the sounding rate, the sounding data quality and the specific STA to which sounding is directed, for example based on changes in environment.
According to other embodiments of the invention, when a beamforming AP has data to send to a supported UE or other STA and finds that its own channel is not clear, for example due to the CCA having been set by one or more other APs, then the beamforming AP may determine whether the quality of the CSI data that it possess will enable it to reduce the transmission of the beamforming AP toward one or more of the other APs. This reduction in transmission may be achieved with a pattern that has one or more nulls reduce the transmission of the beamforming AP toward one or more other concurrently operating APs. This may enable the beamforming AP not to interfere with the activity of the one or more other concurrently operating APs. The beamforming AP may then be able to deliver an acceptable signal to a UE or other STA which it is supporting. If a beamformer AP can meet this criteria, it may proceed to send data to the UE or other STA.
As stated above, according to embodiments of the invention, a beamformer AP determines if the CSI data it has at this specific moment is of sufficient quality. The AP's analysis may consider any of (a) how many milliseconds have elapsed since the last CSI update it received, (b) the stability of the CSI data—e.g. how rapidly is it changing and (c) the absolute quality of the CSI data versus what is required for sufficient nulling depth.
For a better understanding of the invention, and in order to show how it may be implemented, references are made, purely by way of example, to the accompanying drawings in which like numerals designate corresponding elements or sections.
The drawings together with the following detailed description are designed make the embodiments of the invention apparent to those skilled in the art.
It is stressed that the particulars shown are for the purpose of example and solely for discussing the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention. The description taken with the drawings makes apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
The invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following descriptions or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is applicable to other embodiments and may be practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
In description that follows, APs are assumed to operate in 40 MHz band, with 4 antennas and use 400 nanosecond inter-symbol spacing. The ideas described can be adjusted for other bandwidths and other AP antenna configurations. In the following, an asterisk, e.g. AP*, indicates that an AP is compatible with backhaul based CSI feedback according to embodiments of the invention. This may mean for example that an AP is equipped with software, for example installed in the baseband processor, so that it can participate in backhaul based CSI feedback, either as a sounder or as a responder. AP*_1 refers to an AP that initiates registration with a sounding controller on its backhaul network, sometimes referred to in the following as a beamforming AP. AP*_i, where i {2 . . . n} is a designator for the different AP*s that are members of backhaul based sounding feedback links with AP*_1, some of which may be referred to as neighboring APs.
APs according to embodiments of the invention may use an unmodified 802.11ac Null Packet Protocol procedure to transmit or send sounding, which may be received by all compatible APs as well as STAs within CCA range. An AP may then receive other APs' CSI feedback from one or more backhaul links. AP*_1 may build or compile a table or other data structure storing most recent CSI values for each AP*_i that has been sounded. When AP*_1 has data to send to a UE and finds one or more AP*_i has triggered CCA, AP*_1 may determine whether an antenna pattern can be created by it that will: null concurrent one or more AP*_i so that AP*_1's radiation toward the one or more AP*_i is below a CCA limit; and create acceptable beam toward UE_1. If such a pattern can be created, AP*_1 may create the pattern and proceed to send data to the UE.
Each of AP*_1, AP*_2 and AP_3 may have a radiation pattern shown in
Baseband processor 30 may be configured to monitor signals received by the radio circuits 20-1 to 20-N and generate a set or list of neighboring co-channel access points that each has plurality of antennas and are further located within a clear channel assessment (CCA) range of the access point. Baseband processor 30 may be further configured to instruct radio circuits 20-1 to 20-N to transmit a sounding sequence to the list of neighboring access points, and receive Channel State Information (CSI) therefrom. The sounding sequence may comprise a sequence of control frames sent to beamformees and data frames indicative of the channel from the beamformee.
As will become clear in the following, the sounding controller 310 may function in a similar manner to a server. The sounding controller 310 does not need to be a stand-alone item and its functions may be incorporated into another component, such as an existing server in the IP network.
802.11n channel sounding has two PPDU formats defined: the regular or staggered PPDU, which carries a MAC frame, and the null data packet (NDP), which does not carry a MAC frame. According to embodiments of the invention, the NDP is used in a sequence from which the addressing and other MAC related information can be obtained from a MAC frame in a preceding PPDU. The normal or staggered PPDU is simply a normal PPDU or a PPDU with additional HT-LTFs that is used to sound the channel. It serves the dual purpose of sounding the channel and carrying a MAC frame. The NDP is only used to sound the channel.
Two sequences of NDP as sounding PPDU are possible for 802.11n channel sounding: The first sequence is that NDP frame may follow another PPDU where the preceding PPDU carries one or more MPDUs which contain the HT Control field with the NDP Announcement bit set to 1. The second possible sequence is when the NDP Announcement PPDU solicits an immediate response then the NDP itself follows the response PPDU from another STA.
Unlike 802.11n, the 802.11ac sounding sequence is separate from the data sequence. Explicit feedback is the mechanism for obtaining CSI (there is no implicit feedback). Only compressed-V (in the singular value decomposition “SVD” of the channel) beamforming weights are permitted (uncompressed-V and CSI are not supported). There is no support for delayed feedback. Rather, in implementations according to 802.11ac, feedback is returned during the SIFS after receiving the VHT NDP. The VHT sounding sequence begins with a VHT NDP Announcement frame sent by the beamformer and addressed to the beamformees. This is followed by a VHT NDP frame for channel sounding. The first beamformee responds SIFS after the VHT NDP with a VHT Compressed Beamforming frame. The remaining STAs are polled in turn with a Beamforming Report Poll frame to which they respond with their VHT Compressed Beamforming frame.
After the neighboring AP*_2 receives a sounding packet, a null data packet (NDP) or a data packet with extension HT-LTFs, from the beamformer AP*_1 in flow 515, in response the neighboring AP*_2 transmits or sends a CSI feedback in flow 517 directly to beamformer AP*_1 through the backhaul link. It should be noted that according to embodiments of the invention, the CSI feedback is transmitted or sent to AP*_1 by AP*_2 regardless of addressed devices for the sounding packet or other packet sent in flow 515. Such packets are usually addressed to STAs served by the sending AP. However they may be detected and decoded by any AP within CCA range of the sending AP. After receiving CSI feedback in flow 517, according to embodiments of the invention AP*_1 may update a CSI table with most recent CSI for AP*_2. The same process may apply to any other AP*_i that sends feedback to AP*_1. Operations 515 and 517 may be repeated once the peer-to-peer link is established. In other words there is no need for operations 501 to 513 to be repeated before AP*_1 sends further sounding packets to its associated stations and AP*_2.
After receiving CSI feedback at the end of the process flow shown in
For the least quantization distortion, CSI feedback uses 8 bits for each real and 8 bits for each imaginary component of the channel complex element between a transmit antenna and a receive antenna per subcarrier which would have less quantization distortion than compressed-V beamforming frame used in 802.11ac. Grouping of two or four subcarriers can be used to reduce CSI feedback overhead.
Some embodiments of the invention do not require a modification to the NDP_announcement and NDP messages. Consequently, the various STAs will see the message flows as standard. AP*_1 receives CSI information from each of the associated UEs that it polls over the Wi-Fi air interface, for example as the standard MU_MIMO sounding procedure. In addition, according to embodiments of the invention, AP*_1 receives CSI information from AP*_2 via an established backhaul link as shown in
AP*_1 performs the enhancement and nulling using CSI on the path 209 (109) between APs and on the path 103 between AP*_1 and UE_1. The baseband processor in an AP according to embodiments of the invention may be configured to apply weights to signals received by or transmitted from AP antennas such that spatial signatures, or radiation patterns, generated in downlink or uplink or both reduce interferences between said Wi-Fi AP and at least one of the N neighboring APs. The application of these weights may be based for example on received CSI feedback from sounding. At the same time the AP may transmit or send a data packet to a station (STA), or a group of stations.
CSI can be developed either implicitly or explicitly. The use of explicit feedback is more accurate, and therefore more useful that implicit feedback for generating a high quality null toward a neighboring AP.
According to embodiments of the invention, AP*_1 is able to recognize nearby APs that are AP* compatible and able to support communication between them. AP* capability can be added in as an information element in the beacon transmission.
According to embodiments of the invention, an AP may obtain explicate feedback from a co-channel AP as an extension of the standard procedure of obtaining CSI information from its supported UE. In this manner the AP will have timely CSI information based on feedback from the co-channel AP, enabling it to develop a high quality null toward that AP. Embodiments of the invention do not require a modification to the standard sounding approach used by AP*_1 when it sends the NDP_announcement message. Consequently, the various STAs will see the message flows as standard. AP*_1 receives CSI information from co-channel neighboring AP, AP*_i, via an established backhaul link between them and from each of its associated UEs over the Wi-Fi air interface that it polls as the standard MU_MIMO sounding procedure, and then AP*_1 generates a pattern as shown in
The methods described for embodiments of this invention can be implemented in hardware, combination of hardware and software or software only. A unique aspect of some embodiments is the possibility for implementation completely in software, for example by augmenting the notational algorithms of the 802.11xx protocol. Thus embodiments of the invention may take the form of one or more computer readable media, e.g. non-transitory computer readable media, which when implemented on one or more processors in an AP system to perform any of the methods described above.
The methods described herein are applicable to all versions of the 802.11 protocol, specifically 802.11a, b, g, n and ac.
As will be appreciated by someone skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or an apparatus. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” In one aspect the invention provides a computer readable medium comprising instructions which when implemented on one or more processors in a computing system causes the system to carry out any of the methods described above. The computer readable medium may be in non-transitory form.
The aforementioned block diagrams illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems and methods according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
In the above description, an embodiment is an example or implementation of the inventions. The various appearances of “one embodiment,” “an embodiment” or “some embodiments” do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiments.
Although various features of the invention may be described in the context of a single embodiment, the features may also be provided separately or in any suitable combination. Conversely, although the invention may be described herein in the context of separate embodiments for clarity, the invention may also be implemented in a single embodiment.
Reference in the specification to “some embodiments”, “an embodiment”, “one embodiment” or “other embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least some embodiments, but not necessarily all embodiments, of the inventions.
It is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is not to be construed as limiting and are for descriptive purpose only.
The principles and uses of the teachings of the present invention may be better understood with reference to the accompanying description, figures and examples. It is to be understood that the details set forth herein do not construe a limitation to an application of the invention. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the invention can be carried out or practiced in various ways and that the invention can be implemented in embodiments other than the ones outlined in the description above.
It is to be understood that the terms “including”, “comprising”, “consisting” and grammatical variants thereof do not preclude the addition of one or more components, features, steps, or integers or groups thereof and that the terms are to be construed as specifying components, features, steps or integers. If the specification or claims refer to “an additional” element, that does not preclude there being more than one of the additional element. It is to be understood that where the claims or specification refer to “a” or “an” element, such reference is not be construed that there is only one of that element.
It is to be understood that where the specification states that a component, feature, structure, or characteristic “may”, “might”, “can” or “could” be included, that particular component, feature, structure, or characteristic is not required to be included.
Where applicable, although state diagrams, flow diagrams or both may be used to describe embodiments, the invention is not limited to those diagrams or to the corresponding descriptions. For example, flow need not move through each illustrated box or state, or in exactly the same order as illustrated and described.
Methods of the present invention may be implemented by performing or completing manually, automatically, or a combination thereof, selected steps or tasks. The term “method” may refer to manners, means, techniques and procedures for accomplishing a given task including, but not limited to, those manners, means, techniques and procedures either known to, or readily developed from known manners, means, techniques and procedures by practitioners of the art to which the invention belongs.
The descriptions, examples, methods and materials presented in the claims and the specification are not to be construed as limiting but rather as illustrative only. Meanings of technical and scientific terms used herein are to be commonly understood as by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention belongs, unless otherwise defined.
The present invention may be implemented in the testing or practice with methods and materials equivalent or similar to those described herein. While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as exemplifications of some of the preferred embodiments. Other possible variations, modifications, and applications are also within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should not be limited by what has thus far been described, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/971,685 filed Mar. 28, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4044359 | Applebaum et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4079318 | Kinoshita | Mar 1978 | A |
4359738 | Lewis | Nov 1982 | A |
4540985 | Clancy et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4628320 | Downie | Dec 1986 | A |
5162805 | Cantrell | Nov 1992 | A |
5363104 | Richmond | Nov 1994 | A |
5444762 | Frey et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5732075 | Tangemann et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5915215 | Williams et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936577 | Shoki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940033 | Locher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6018317 | Dogan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026081 | Hamabe | Feb 2000 | A |
6046655 | Cipolla | Apr 2000 | A |
6094165 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6101399 | Raleigh et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6163695 | Takemura | Dec 2000 | A |
6167286 | Ward et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6215812 | Young et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226507 | Ramesh et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230123 | Mekuria et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6259683 | Sekine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297772 | Lewis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321077 | Saitoh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335953 | Sanderford et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6370378 | Yahagi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377783 | Lo et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393282 | Iimori | May 2002 | B1 |
6584115 | Suzuki | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6697622 | Ishikawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697633 | Dogan et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6834073 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842460 | Olkkonen et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6914890 | Tobita et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6927646 | Niemi | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6975582 | Karabinis et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6987958 | Lo et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7068628 | Li et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7177663 | Axness et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190964 | Damnjanovic et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7257425 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7299072 | Ninomiya | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7391757 | Haddad et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392015 | Farlow et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7474676 | Tao et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7499109 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512083 | Li | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7606528 | Mesecher | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7634015 | Waxman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646744 | Li | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7719993 | Li et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742000 | Mohamadi | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7769107 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7898478 | Niu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904086 | Kundu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7933255 | Li | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7970366 | Arita et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7986718 | Monier | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8078109 | Mulcay | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8103284 | Mueckenheim et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115679 | Falk | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155613 | Kent et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8194602 | Van Rensburg et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8275377 | Nanda et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280443 | Tao et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294625 | Kittinger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306012 | Lindoff et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315671 | Kuwahara et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8369436 | Stirling-Gallacher | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8509190 | Rofougaran | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520657 | Rofougaran | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526886 | Wu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8588844 | Shpak | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8599955 | Kludt et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8599979 | Farag et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611288 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8644413 | Harel et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8649458 | Kludt et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8666319 | Kloper et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8744511 | Jones et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767862 | Abreu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8780743 | Sombrutzki et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797969 | Harel et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8891598 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8942134 | Kludt et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8983548 | Harel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010029326 | Diab et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010038665 | Baltersee et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020024975 | Hendler | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020051430 | Kasami et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065107 | Harel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085643 | Kitchener et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107013 | Fitzgerald | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115474 | Yoshino et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020181426 | Sherman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020181437 | Ohkubo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045241 | Noerpel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030087645 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114162 | Chheda et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030153322 | Burke et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153360 | Burke et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030186653 | Mohebbi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203717 | Chuprun et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203743 | Sugar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040023693 | Okawa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056795 | Ericson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063455 | Eran et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081144 | Martin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121810 | Goransson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125899 | Li et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125900 | Liu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142696 | Saunders et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147266 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156399 | Eran | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166902 | Castellano et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040198292 | Smith et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040228388 | Salmenkaita | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235527 | Reudink et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040264504 | Jin | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050068230 | Munoz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068918 | Mantravadi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075140 | Famolari | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129155 | Hoshino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147023 | Stephens et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163097 | Do et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050245224 | Kurioka | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250544 | Grant et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254513 | Cave et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265436 | Suh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286440 | Strutt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287962 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060041676 | Sherman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060092889 | Lyons et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060094372 | Ahn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098605 | Li | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111149 | Chitrapu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060135097 | Wang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060183503 | Jeffrey Goldberg | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203850 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227854 | McCloud et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264184 | Li et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270343 | Cha et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271969 | Takizawa et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285507 | Kinder et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070041398 | Benveniste | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058581 | Benveniste | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076675 | Chen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093261 | Hou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097918 | Cai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115882 | Wentink | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115914 | Ohkubo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152903 | Lin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070217352 | Kwon | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223380 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223525 | Shah et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249386 | Bennett | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080043867 | Blanz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051037 | Molnar et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081671 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095163 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108352 | Montemurro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125120 | Gallagher et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080144737 | Naguib | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165732 | Kim et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080238808 | Arita et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240314 | Gaal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247370 | Gu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267142 | Mushkin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280571 | Rofougaran et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285637 | Liu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090003299 | Cave et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028225 | Runyon et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090046638 | Rappaport et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058724 | Xia et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090121935 | Xia et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137206 | Sherman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154419 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187661 | Sherman | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190541 | Abedi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090225697 | Solomon | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090227255 | Thakare | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090239486 | Sugar et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090268616 | Hosomi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285331 | Sugar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322610 | Hants et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322613 | Bala et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323608 | Adachi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002656 | Ji et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037111 | Ziaja et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100040369 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067473 | Cave et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100111039 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117890 | Vook et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100135420 | Xu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150013 | Hara et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172429 | Nagahama et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195560 | Nozaki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195601 | Zhang | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208712 | Wax et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222011 | Behzad | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232355 | Richeson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234071 | Shabtay et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100271992 | Wentink et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278063 | Kim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283692 | Achour et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285752 | Lakshmanan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291931 | Suemitsu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303170 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100316043 | Doi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019639 | Karaoguz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032849 | Yeung et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032972 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110085465 | Lindoff et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085532 | Scherzer et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105036 | Rao et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116489 | Grandhi | May 2011 | A1 |
20110134816 | Liu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150050 | Trigui et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150066 | Fujimoto | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151826 | Miller et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163913 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205883 | Mihota | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110205998 | Hart et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110228742 | Honkasalo et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249576 | Chrisikos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110250884 | Brunel et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273977 | Shapira et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281541 | Borremans | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299437 | Mikhemar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310827 | Srinivasa et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310853 | Yin et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014377 | Joergensen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015603 | Proctor et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020396 | Hohne et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027000 | Wentink | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028638 | Mueck et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028655 | Mueck et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028671 | Niu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033761 | Guo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034952 | Lo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045003 | Li et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051287 | Merlin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120064838 | Miao et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069828 | Taki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076028 | Ko et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076229 | Brobston et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120088512 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092217 | Hosoya et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100802 | Mohebbi | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120115523 | Shpak | May 2012 | A1 |
20120155349 | Bajic et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155397 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163257 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163302 | Takano | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170453 | Tiwari | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120170672 | Sondur | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201153 | Bharadia et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201173 | Jain et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207256 | Farag et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212372 | Petersson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120213065 | Koo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218962 | Kishiyama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220331 | Luo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230380 | Keusgen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120251031 | Suarez et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270531 | Wright et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270544 | Shah | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281598 | Struhsaker et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314570 | Forenza et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321015 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327870 | Grandhi et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130010623 | Golitschek | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130017794 | Kloper et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023225 | Weber | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044877 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051283 | Lee et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058239 | Wang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070741 | Li et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079048 | Cai et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094437 | Bhattacharya | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094621 | Luo et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130095780 | Prazan et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101073 | Zai et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130150012 | Chhabra et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130156016 | Debnath et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130156120 | Josiam et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170388 | Ito et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172029 | Chang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130190006 | Kazmi et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130208587 | Bala et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208619 | Kudo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223400 | Seo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229996 | Wang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130229999 | Da Silva et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235720 | Wang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242853 | Seo et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242899 | Lysejko et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242965 | Horn et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242976 | Katayama et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130252621 | Dimou et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130272437 | Eidson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301551 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322509 | Harel et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331136 | Yang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343369 | Yamaura | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140010089 | Cai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140010211 | Asterjadhi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140029433 | Wentink | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140071873 | Wang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086077 | Safavi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086081 | Mack et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098681 | Stager et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140119288 | Zhu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140154992 | Silverman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185501 | Park et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140185535 | Park et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192820 | Azizi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204821 | Seok et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140241182 | Smadi | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140307653 | Liu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150016438 | Harel et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150030094 | Zhang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150085777 | Seok | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150139212 | Wang et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 189 303 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1 867 177 | May 2010 | EP |
2 234 355 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 498 462 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2009-182441 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-278444 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO 03047033 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03073645 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2010085854 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2011060058 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2013192112 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,252 dated Aug. 27, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,844 dated Aug. 29, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,209 dated Sep. 4, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,765 dated Sep. 8, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,580 dated Sep. 8, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,155 dated Sep. 12, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,640 dated Oct. 6, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/449,431 dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,736 dated Oct. 16, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/011,521 dated Oct. 20, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,920 dated Oct. 23, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Nov. 10, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Nov. 17, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,280 dated Nov. 18, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/480,920 dated Nov. 18, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,319 dated Nov. 19, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,866 dated Nov. 28, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/888,057 dated Dec. 3, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,898 dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,358 dated Dec. 16, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,767 dated Dec. 26, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,765 dated Dec. 31, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,844 dated Jan. 5, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,458 dated Jan. 9, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US14/65958 dated Jan. 13, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,155 dated Jan. 26, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,209 dated Jan. 27, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/064346 dated Jan. 29, 2015. |
Mitsubishi Electric, “Discussion on Antenna Calibration in TDD”, 3GPP Draft; R1-090043, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, no. Ljubljana; 20090107, Jan. 7, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell et al., “Antenna Array Calibration for TDD CoMP”, 3GPP Draft; R1-100427, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, Vol. RAN WG1, no. Valencia, Spain; 20100118, Jan. 12, 2010, pp. 1-5. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,640 dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/064185 dated Feb. 5, 2015. |
Kai Yang et al., “Coordinated Dual-Layer Beamforming for Public Safety Network: Architecture and Algorithms”, Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2012, pp. 4095-4099. |
Songtao et al., “A Distributed Adaptive GSC Beamformer over Coordinated Antenna Arrays Network for Interference Mitigation”, Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Conference Record, IEEE Computer Society, US, Nov. 4, 2012, pp. 237-242. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2014/065635 dated Feb. 13, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,736 mailed Feb. 20, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,920 dated Feb. 23, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Mar. 23, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/449,431 dated Mar. 23, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,866 dated Mar. 25, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/517,114 dated Apr. 6, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Apr. 14, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,357 dated Apr. 23, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,625 dated Apr. 28, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,767 dated Apr. 29, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,844 dated May 13, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Jan. 22, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Mar. 27, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,159 dated Apr. 16, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,191 dated May 2, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,188 dated May 15, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated May 21, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,255 dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated Jun. 11, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,159 dated Jun. 20, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,191 dated Jul. 19, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,146 dated Jul. 31, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,188 dated Aug. 19, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,255 dated Sep. 17, 2013. |
Ahmadi-Shokouh et al., “Pre-LNA Smart Soft Antenna Selection for MIMO Spatial Multiplexing/Diversity System when Amplifier/Sky Noise Dominates”, European Transactions on Telecommunications, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, GB, vol. 21, No. 7, Nov. 1, 2010, pp. 663-677. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Sep. 25, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,320 dated Oct. 15, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated Oct. 23, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Oct. 28, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,194 dated Oct. 30, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,190 dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,182 dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,863 dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/011,521 dated Dec. 23, 2013. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,886 dated Jan. 7, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/018,965 dated Jan. 13, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/858,302 dated Jan. 16, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Jan. 16, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,539 dated Jan. 27, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,376 dated Jan. 29, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,204 dated Jan. 31, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/094,644 dated Feb. 6, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,320 dated Feb. 21, 2014. |
Huang et al., “Antenna Mismatch and Calibration Problem in Coordinated Multi-point Transmission System,” IET Communications, 2012, vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 289-299. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/109,904 dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,454 dated Mar. 7, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,500 dated Mar. 26, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,182 dated Mar. 25, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,863 dated Mar. 25, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Apr. 4, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,352 dated Apr. 7, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Apr. 9, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,194 dated Apr. 9, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,765 dated Apr. 22, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,376 dated May 9, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,580 dated May 9, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,068 dated May 13, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,190 dated May 20, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,252 dated Jun. 18, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/094,644 dated Jun. 24, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,539 dated Jun. 24, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/011,521 dated Jul. 1, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/109,904 dated Jul. 2, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,150 dated Jul. 8, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,767 dated Jul. 10, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,352 dated Jul. 23, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,190 dated Jul. 25, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,280 dated Jul. 29, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/010,771 dated Aug. 6, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/306,458 dated Aug. 13, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,898 dated Aug. 15, 2014. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,415 dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,640 dated Oct. 29, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,319 dated Nov. 3, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,986 dated Nov. 4, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,625 dated Nov. 20, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,415 dated Nov. 25, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,634 dated Dec. 4, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,020 dated Dec. 31, 2015. |
Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,767 dated Jan. 5, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/517,114 dated Jan. 6, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150281993 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61971685 | Mar 2014 | US |