This present invention relates to communications between network devices in computer networks. More specifically, it relates to a system and method for adjusting power during initial ranging of network client devices such as cable modems.
Cable television networks such as those provided by Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., of Philadelphia, Pa., Cox Communications of Atlanta, Ga., Tele-Communications, Inc., of Englewood Colo., Time-Warner Cable, of Marietta Ga., Continental Cablevision, Inc., of Boston Mass., and others provide cable television services to a large number of subscribers over a large geographical area. The cable television networks typically are interconnected by cables such as coaxial cables or a Hybrid Fiber/Coaxial (“HFC”) cable system which have data rates of about 10 Mega-bits-per-second (“Mbps”) to about 30+Mbps.
The Internet, a world-wide-network of interconnected computers, provides multi-media content including audio, video, graphics and text that typically requires a large bandwidth for downloading and viewing. Most Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) allow customers to connect to the Internet via a serial telephone line from a Public Switched Telephone Network (“PSTN”) at data rates including 14,400 bps, 28,800 bps, 33,600 bps, 56,000 bps and others that are much slower than the about 10 Mbps to about 30+Mbps available on a coaxial cable or HFC cable system on a cable television network.
With the explosive growth of the Internet, many customers have desired to use the larger bandwidth of a cable television network to connect to the Internet and other computer networks. Cable modems, such as those provided by 3Com Corporation, of Santa Clara, Calif., Motorola Corporation, of Arlington Heights, Ill., Hewlett-Packard Co., of Palo Alto, Calif., Scientific-Atlanta, of Norcross, Ga., General Instruments, of Horsham, Pa., and others offer customers higher-speed connectivity to the Internet, an Intranet, Local Area Networks (“LANs”) and other computer networks via cable television networks. These cable modems currently support a data connection to the Internet and other computer networks via a cable television network with a data rate of up to about 30+Mbps, which is a much larger data rate than can be supported by a modem used over a serial telephone line.
However, many cable television networks provide only unidirectional cable systems, supporting only a “downstream” cable data path. A downstream data path is the flow of data from a cable system “headend” to a customer. A cable system headend is a central location in the cable television network that is responsible for sending cable signals in the downstream direction. A return data path via a telephone network (i.e., a “telephony return”), such as, a Public Switched Telephone Network provided by AT&T, GTE, Sprint, MCI and others, is typically used for an “upstream” data path. An upstream data path is the flow of data from the customer back to the cable system headend. A cable television system with an upstream connection to a telephony network is called a “data-over-cable system with telephony return.”
An exemplary data-over-cable system with telephony return includes customer premise equipment (e.g., a customer computer), a cable modem, a cable modem termination system, a cable television network, a Public Switched Telephone Network, a telephony remote access concentrator and a data network (e.g., the Internet). The cable modem termination system and the telephony remote access concentrator together are called a “telephony return termination system.”
The cable modem termination system receives data packets from the data network and transmits them downstream via the cable television network to a cable modem attached to the customer premise equipment. The customer premise equipment sends response data packets to the cable modem, which sends response data packets upstream via Public Switched Telephone Network to the telephony remote access concentrator, which sends the response data packets back to the appropriate host on the data network.
In a two-way cable system without telephony return, the customer premise equipment sends response data packets to the cable modem, which sends the data packets upstream via the cable television network to the cable modem termination system. The cable modem termination system sends the data packets to appropriate hosts on the data network. The cable modem termination system sends the response data packets back to the appropriate cable modem. Currently, as a cable modem is initialized in a data-over-cable system, it registers with a cable modem termination system to allow the cable modem to receive data over a cable television connection and from a data network (e.g., the Internet or an Intranet). The cable modem forwards configuration information it receives in a configuration file during initialization to the cable modem termination system as part of a registration request message. A cable modem also helps initialize and register any attached customer premise equipment with the cable modem termination system.
A cable modem termination system in a data-over-cable system typically manages connections to tens of thousands of cable modems. Most of the cable modems are attached to host customer premise equipment such as a customer computer. To send and receive data to and from a computer network like the Internet or an Intranet, a cable modem and customer premise equipment and other network devices have a network address dynamically assigned on the data-over-cable system.
Many data-over-cable systems use a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (“DHCP”) as a standard messaging protocol to dynamically allocate network addresses such as Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses. As is known in the art, the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol is a protocol for passing configuration information to the network devices on a network. The Internet Protocol is an addressing protocol designed to route traffic within a network or between networks.
The cable modem makes an Internet Protocol connection to the cable modem termination system so that Internet Protocol data received on the cable modem termination system from the data network can be forwarded downstream to the customer premise equipment via the cable network and the cable modem. Once an Internet Protocol address is obtained on the cable modem termination system, the cable modem obtains the name of a configuration file used to complete initialization. The cable modem downloads a configuration file from a central location in the data-over-cable system using a Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) server. As is known in the art, Trivial File Transfer Protocol is a very simple protocol used to transfer files, where any error during file transfer typically causes a termination of the file transfer.
There are a host of initialization steps that are typically performed to allow the network client device such as a cable modem to receive data over a cable television connection from a data network. A set of parameters must be initialized before the cable modem can be declared operational. Some of these parameters include synchronization, authorization, local address assignment, ranging and power calibration, assignment of default upstream and downstream channels and assignment of encryption information.
Ranging is a process by which the headend determines the round-trip delay of data destined to a specific customer premise equipment or network termination point. It is a process of acquiring the correct timing offset such that the cable modem's transmissions are aligned to the correct mini-slot boundary. Accurate ranging of network client devices permits a Time Division Modulation Application (TDMA) like slotted channel mechanism on the upstream. Further, less guard time is required between network client devices such as a cable modem with precise ranging. All network client device transmitters along the entire length of the cable television system are aligned in terms of timing such that, if every network client device on the channel began transmitting on the upstream channel, the first symbol of each would arrive at the headend receiver at exactly the same instant the first symbol of the downstream frame was leaving the headend transmitter.
During the ranging process, each network client device is transmitter downloaded with a transmit timing offset value. IEEE P802.14 specifies a maximum cable television length of 50 miles (80 km). The ranging process has the effect of positioning each network termination point in a virtual timing space such that all network client devices appear to be within zero propagation delay of the headend. For example, using the difference between its current time and a cable modem's local time at the time a frame is transmitted, the headend can determine a time correction value to be assigned uniquely to each cable modem. The INVITATION and INVITATION—RESPONSE messages between a cable modem and a headend exchange all the data necessary to perform ranging, but additional ranging exchanges may be performed on any cable modem via the RANGE—REQUEST message. The range and power calibration message from the headend to a cable modem is transmitted by the headend to a single cable modem on the cable modem's downstream channel after it has transmitted a local address assign message to the same cable modem. It contains the range offset value and the power control value and is addressed to the cable modem's local address. This message may be transmitted to the same cable modem in response to any received upstream slot to cause it to adjust its power and range offset.
The headend also determines a power level adjustment value to guarantee optimal performance. However, the Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) provides no guidance as to how the power level should be adjusted for successive initial ranging attempts. The specification only specifies a dynamic range from 8 dBmV to 58 dBmV with power level control in 1 dB increments. One solution may be to use linearly increasing increments in power to cover a transmitter dynamic range. The problem with this approach is the considerable length of time required by a cable modem to register with the cable modem termination system. Thus, there is still a need to implement a method to calibrate or adjust the power level of a cable modem transmitter that reduces the initial ranging time to cover the entire cable modem transmitter dynamic range.
The system and method of the present invention facilitates communications between a network client device such as a cable modem and a network device such as a cable modem termination system.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the method for establishing communications between a cable modem and the cable modem termination system includes dividing the dynamic range of the cable modem transmitter into different regions. In a preferred embodiment, the dynamic range of the cable modem transmitter is divided by the dynamic range of the cable modem termination system receiver. The method for establishing communications further includes, attempting one or more initial ranging in each of the different regions, and determining if a range response message is received from the cable modem termination system. If a response is not received, the method further includes adjusting the power level and reattempting one or more initial ranging in each region till a range response message is received from the cable modem termination system. Once a range response message is received, the initial ranging process is complete.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the system and method for calibrating power level during initial ranging of a network client device will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the system and method as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, wherein:
The present invention is directed to a system and method for adjusting power level during a cable modem initial ranging in a data-over-cable system. The system and method of the present invention includes communications between a network device such as, an access router or a cable modem termination system and a network client device such as, but not limited to, a cable modem.
Data-Over-Cable System
However, data-over-cable system 10 of the present invention may also provide a bi-directional data path (i.e., both downstream and upstream) without telephony return as is also illustrated in
Data-over-cable system 10 includes a Cable Modem Termination System (“CMTS”) 12 connected to a cable television network 14, hereinafter cable network 14.
The cable network 14 includes cable television networks such as those provided by Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., of Philadelphia, Pa., Cox Communications, or Atlanta, Ga., Tele-Communications, Inc., of Englewood Colo., Time-Warner Cable, of Marietta, Ga., Continental Cablevision, Inc., of Boston, Mass., and others. The cable network 14 is connected to a Cable Modem (“CM”) 16 with a downstream cable connection. The CM 16 is any cable modem, such as, those provided by 3Com Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif., Motorola Corporation of Arlington Heights, Ill., Hewlett-Packard Co. of Palo Alto, Calif., Scientific-Atlanta, of Norcross, Ga., General Instruments of Horsham, Pa., and others.
The CM 16 is connected to Customer Premise Equipment (“CPE”) 18 such as a personal computer system via a Cable Modem-to-CPE Interface (“CMCI”) 20.
One CPE 18 is illustrated in
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, in a data-over cable system 10 without telephony return, the CM 16 has an upstream connection to the CMTS 12 via a cable television connection, a wireless connection, a satellite connection, or a connection via other technologies to send data upstream outside of the telephony return path. An upstream cable television connection via cable network 14 is also illustrated in
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention of the telephony return, the TRAC 24 is a Total Control Telephony Hub by 3Com Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif. However, the TRAC 24 could also be a telephony hub including those by Lucent Technologies of Murray Hill, N.J., Livingston Enterprises, Inc. of Pleasanton, Calif., Ascend Communications of Alameda, Calif. and others.
The CMTS 12 and the TRAC 24 may be at a “headend” of cable system 10, or the TRAC 24 may be located elsewhere and have routing associations to the CMTS 12. The CMTS 12 and the TRAC 24 together are called a “Telephony Return Termination System” (“TRTS”) 26. The TRTS 26 is illustrated by a dashed box in
The TRAC 24 is connected to a data network 28, for example, the Internet, an Intranet or other LAN by a TRAC-Network System Interface 30 (“TRAC-NSI”). The CMTS 12 is connected to data network 28 by a CMTS-Network System Interface (“CMTS-NSI”) 32. The CMTS 12 may send and receive data to/from a CM 16 or a CPE 18 via the PSTN 22 even if telephony return is not used. The present invention is not limited to data-over-cable system 10 illustrated in
Network Device Protocol Stack
For downstream data transmission, network devices including the CM 16 are connected to the cable network 14 in a physical layer 38 via a Radio Frequency (“RF”) Interface 40. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, RF Interface 40 has an operation frequency range of 50 Mega-Hertz (“MHz”) to 1 Giga-Hertz (“GHz”) and a channel bandwidth of 6 MHz. However, other operation frequencies may also be used and the present invention is not limited to these frequencies. The RF interface 40 uses a signal modulation method, such as Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (“QAM”). As is known in the art, QAM is used as a means of encoding digital information over radio, wire, or fiber optic transmission links. QAM is a combination of amplitude and phase modulation and is an extension of multiphase phase-shift-keying. QAM can have any number of discrete digital levels typically including 4, 16, 64 or 256 levels. In one embodiment of the present invention, QAM-64 is used in the RF interface 40. However, other operating frequencies and modulation methods could also be used (e.g., Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (“QPSK”) modulation). For more information on the RF interface 40 see the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (“IEEE”) standard 802.14 for cable modems, the entire teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference. IEEE standards can be found on the World Wide Web at the URL “www.ieee.org.” However, other RF interfaces 40 could also be used and the present invention is not limited to IEEE 802.14, for example, RF interfaces from MCNS and others could also be used.
Above the RF interface 40 in a data link layer 42 is a Medium Access Control (“MAC”) layer 44. As is known in the art, the MAC layer 44 controls access to a transmission medium via physical layer 38. For more information on the MAC layer protocol 44 see IEEE 802.14 for cable modems. However, other MAC layer protocols 44 could also be used and the present invention is not limited to IEEE 802.14 MAC layer protocols, for example, MCNS MAC layer protocols and others could also be used.
Above the MAC layer 44 is an optional link security protocol stack 46. The link security protocol stack 46 prevents unauthorized users from making a data connection from cable network 14. The RF interface 40 and the MAC layer 44 can also be used for an upstream cable connection in a data-over-cable system 10 without telephony return.
For upstream data transmission with telephony return, the CM 16 is connected to the PSTN 22 in physical layer 38 via telephony interface 48. The International Telecommunications Union-Telecommunication Standardization Sector (“ITU-T”, formerly known as the CCITT) defines standards for communication devices identified by “V.xx” series where “xx” is an identifying number. ITU-T standards can be found on the World Wide Web at the URL “www.itu.ch.”
In one embodiment of the present invention, ITU-T V.34 is used as telephony interface 48. As is known in the art, ITU-T V.34 is commonly used in the data link layer for modem communications and currently allows data rates as high as 33,600 bits-per-second (“bps”). For more information see the ITU-T V.34 standard. However, modem interfaces, for example, V.90 or other telephony interfaces could also be used. For example, an Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Link (“ADSL”), an Integrated Services Digital Network (“ISDN”) or a wireless telephony interface could also be used for the telephony interface 48.
Above the telephony interface 48, in the data link layer 42, is a Point-to-Point Protocol (“PPP”) layer 50, hereinafter PPP 50. As is known in the art, PPP 50 is used to encapsulate network layer datagrams over a serial communications link. For more information on PPP 50 see Internet Engineering Task Force (“IETF”) Request for Comments (“RFC”), RFC-1661, RFC-1662 and RFC-1663, the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. Information for IETF RFCs can be found on the World Wide Web at URLs “ds.internic.net” or “www.ietf.org.”
Above both the downstream and upstream protocol layers in a network layer 52 is an Internet Protocol (“IP”) layer 54. IP layer 54, hereinafter IP 54, roughly corresponds to OSI layer 3, the network layer, but is typically not defined as part of the OSI model. As is known in the art, IP 54 is a routing protocol designed to route traffic within a network or between networks. For more information on IP 54 see, RFC-791, the entire teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Internet Control Message Protocol (“ICMP”) layer 56 is used for network management. The main functions of ICMP layer 56, hereinafter ICMP 56, include error reporting, reachability testing, for example, “pinging”, congestion control, route-change notification, performance, subnet addressing and others. Since IP 54 is an unacknowledged protocol, datagrams may be discarded and ICMP 56 is used for error reporting. For more information on ICMP 56 see, RFC-792, the entire teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Above IP 54 and ICMP 56 is a transport layer 58 with a User Datagram Protocol layer 60 (“UDP”). UDP layer 60, hereinafter UDP 60, roughly corresponds to OSI layer 4, the transport layer, but is typically not defined as part of the OSI model. As is known in the art, UDP 60 provides a connectionless mode of communications with datagrams. For more information on UDP 60 see RFC-768, the entire teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference. Transmission Control Protocol (“TCP”) may also be used in the transport layer 58. For more information on TCP see RFC-793, the entire teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Above the network layer are a Simple Network Management Protocol (“SNMP”) layer 62, Trivial File Transfer Protocol (“TFTP”) layer 64, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (“DHCP”) layer 66 and a UDP manager 68. SNMP layer 62 is used to support network management functions. For more information on SNMP layer 62 see RFC-1157, the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. TFTP layer 64 is a file transfer protocol used to download files and configuration information. For more information on TFTP layer 64 see RFC-1350, the entire teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference. The DHCP layer 66 is a protocol for passing configuration information to hosts on an IP 54 network. For more information on the DHCP layer 66 see, RFC-1541, RFC-2131 and RFC-2132, the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. UDP manager 68 distinguishes and routes packets to an appropriate service, for example, a virtual tunnel. More or few protocol layers could also be used with data-over-cable system 10.
The CM 16 supports transmission and reception of IP 54 datagrams as specified by RFC-791. The CMTS 12 and the TRAC 24 may also perform filtering of IP 54 datagrams. The CM 16 is also configurable for IP 54 datagram filtering to restrict the CM 16 and the CPE 18 to the use of only their assigned IP 54 addresses. The CM 16 is configurable for IP 54 datagram UDP 60 port filtering, for example, deep filtering.
The CM 16 forwards IP 54 datagrams destined to an IP 54 unicast address across the cable network 14 or the PSTN 22. Some routers have security features intended to filter out invalid users who alter or masquerade packets as if sent from a valid user. Since routing policy is under the control of network operators, such filtering is a vendor specific implementation. For example, dedicated interfaces (i.e., Frame Relay) may exist between the TRAC 24 and/or the CMTS 12 which preclude filtering, or various forms of virtual tunneling and reverse virtual tunneling could be used to virtually source upstream packets from the CM 16. For more information on virtual tunneling, see Level 2 Tunneling Protocol (“L2TP”) or Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (“PPTP”) in IETF draft documents by Kory Hamzeh (IETF draft documents are precursors to IETF RFCs and are works in progress), the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The CM 16 also forwards IP 54 datagrams destined to an IP 54 multicast address across the cable network 14 or the PSTN 22. The CM 16 is configurable to keep IP 54 multicast routing tables and to use group membership protocols. The CM 16 is also capable of IP 54 tunneling upstream through the telephony path. A CM 16 that wants to send a multicast packet across a virtual tunnel will prepend another IP 54 header, set the destination address in the new header to be the unicast address of the CMTS 12 at the other end of the tunnel, and set the IP 54 protocol field to be four, which means the next protocol is IP 54.
The CMTS 12 at the other end of the virtual tunnel receives the packet, strips off the encapsulating IP 54 header, and forwards the packet as appropriate. A broadcast IP 54 capability is dependent upon the configuration of the direct linkage, if any, between the TRAC 24 and the CMTS 12. The CMTS 12, the CM 16, and the TRAC 24 are capable of routing IP 54 datagrams destined to an IP 54 broadcast address which is across the cable network 14 or the PSTN 22 if so configured. The CM 16 is configurable for IP 54 broadcast datagram filtering.
An operating environment for the CMTS 12, the CM 16, the CPE 18, the TRAC 24 and other network devices of the present invention includes a processing system with at least one high speed processing unit and a memory system. In accordance with the practices of persons skilled in the art of computer programming, the present invention is described below with reference to acts and symbolic representations of operations or instructions that are performed by the processing system, unless indicated otherwise. Such acts and operations or instructions are sometimes referred to as being “computer-executed”, or “processing unit executed.”
It will be appreciated that the acts and symbolically represented operations or instructions include the manipulation of electrical signals by the processing unit. An electrical system with data bits causes a resulting transformation or reduction of the electrical signal representation, and the maintenance of data bits at memory locations in the memory system to thereby reconfigure or otherwise alter the processing unit's operation, as well as other processing of signals. The memory locations where data bits are maintained are physical locations that have particular electrical, magnetic, optical, or organic properties corresponding to the data bits.
The data bits may also be maintained on a computer readable medium including magnetic disks, optical disks, organic disks, and any other volatile or non-volatile mass storage system readable by the processing unit. The computer readable medium includes cooperating or interconnected computer readable media, which exist exclusively on the processing system or is distributed among multiple interconnected processing systems that may be local or remote to the processing system.
Initialization of a Cable Modem
When the CM 16 is initially powered on, if telephony return is being used, the CM 16 will receive a Telephony Channel Descriptor (“TCD”) from the CMTS 12 that is used to provide dialing and access instructions on downstream channels via cable network 14. Information in the TCD is used by the CM 16 to connect to the TRAC 24. The TCD is transmitted as a MAC management message with a management type value of TRI—TCD at a periodic interval for example, every 2 seconds. To provide for flexibility, the TCD message parameters are encoded in a Type/Length/Value (“TLV”) form. However, other encoding techniques could also be used.
A Termination System Information (“TSI”) message is transmitted by the CMTS 12 at periodic intervals (e.g., every 2 seconds) to report CMTS 12 information to the CM 16 whether or not telephony return is used. The TSI message is transmitted as a MAC management message. The TSI provides a CMTS 12 boot record in a downstream channel to the CM 16 via cable network 14. Information in the TSI is used by the CM 16 to obtain information about the status of the CMTS 12. The TSI message has a MAC management type value of TRI—TSI.
A description of the fields of TSI message 76 are shown in Table 2. However, fewer or more fields could also be used in TSI message 76.
If telephony return is being used, after receiving the TCD message 70 and the TSI message 76, the CM 16 continues to establish access to data network 28 (and resources on the network) by first dialing into the TRAC 24 and establishing a telephony PPP 50 session. Upon the completion of a successful PPP 50 connection, the CM 16 performs PPP 50 Link Control Protocol (“LCP”) negotiation with the TRAC 24.
Once LCP negotiation is complete, the CM 16 requests Internet Protocol Control Protocol (“IPCP”) address negotiation for an upstream telephony return path. For more information on IPCP see RFC-1332, the entire teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference. During IPCP negotiation, the CM 16 negotiates, via PPP 50, an IP 54 address with the TRAC 24 for sending IP 54 data packet responses back to data network 28 via the TRAC 24.
When the CM 16 has established an upstream IP 54 link to TRAC 24, it begins “upstream” communications to the CMTS 12 via the DHCP layer 66 to complete a virtual data connection by attempting to discover network host interfaces available on the CMTS 12, for example, IP 54 host interfaces for a virtual IP 54 connection. The virtual data connection allows the CM 16 to receive data from data network 28 via the CMTS 12 and cable network 14, and send return data to data network 28 via TRAC 24 and PSTN 22. The CM 16 must first determine an address of a network host interface, for example, an IP 54 interface associated with the CMTS 12 that can be used by data network 28 to send data to the CM 16. In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the CM 16 has only a downstream cable connection from the CMTS 12 and will obtain a connection address to the data network 28 using an upstream telephony connection to the TRAC 24. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the CM 16 will obtain a connection address to the cable network using an upstream cable connection to the CMTS 12.
An exemplary data path through cable system 10 is illustrated in Table 3. However other data paths could also be used and the present invention is not limited to the data paths shown in Table 3. For example, the CM 16 may send data upstream back through the cable network 14 (e.g., the CM 16 to cable network 14 to the CMTS 12 and to the data network 28 through CMTS NSI 32) and not use the PSTN 22, the TRAC 24, or the telephony return upstream path at all.
Initial Ranging (IR)
In a preferred embodiment, timer T3 is defined to have a maximum time of 200 milliseconds. A maximum of 16 retries can be issued for each available UCD. An IR attempt must be attempted on all available UCD before resetting the MAC layer and scanning for the next available downstream.
Failure of the CMTS 12 to recognize a CM 16 RNG-REQ can be due to collision and/or attenuation. During the IR process the CM 16 is required to transmit its RNG-REQ in the broadcast region specified in a MAP. The same broadcast region can be used by all unregistered CMs to register with the CMTS 12. This region is primarily used by the CMTS 12 to calculate the timing offset for an RNG-REQ from a CM 16. However, if two CMs attempt to register with the CMTS 12 at the same time a collision could occur. In this case, IR can be retried with random backoff turned on.
In the attenuation case, there may be enough attenuation in the cable plant that the CMTS is unable to detect the RNG-REQ of the CM 16. In this case, IR is retried with adjustments in power.
Because there are no mechanism in place for the CM 16 to determine the reason for not getting a RNG-RSP from the CMTS 12, the CM 16 must turn on random backoff and adjust power with each successive IR for a given UCD.
Per DOCSIS 1.1 section 9.2.4 after the first IR failure for a given Upstream Channel Descriptor (UCD) two adjustments must be made for successive IR. The first adjustment that should be made is to enable binary exponential random backoff. Random backoff used in the case of collision between one or more CM during IR is in the multicast bandwidth allocation region. Random backoff prevents lockstep RNG-REQ contention among several CM that are in the IR state. The second adjustment that must be made is adjustment in the CM transmit power.
This is to overcome impairments in the cable plant that may be attenuating the CM signal enough to make it too weak for the CMTS to receive the request. In DOCSIS 1.1 section 9.2.4.1 power adjustment of the CM transmit is left for vendor implementation.
Once the CMTS 2 receives a RNG-REQ from a CM 16, it responds with an RNG-RSP containing a temporary unicast System Identification number (SID) and upstream adjustments for power, frequency and timing.
From DOCSIS 1.1 there are few restrictions for power control, during IR. The only restriction defined is that the power output of the transmitter must stay within the dynamic range from +8 dBmV to +58 dBmV for QPSK modulation and +8 dBmV to +55 dBmV for 16 QAM modulation. The power level control must have a resolution of 1 dB. No specification is given for adjusting power with successive IR attempts.
To reduce the IR time to cover the entire CM 16 transmitter dynamic range, the system and method of the present invention takes advantage of the fact the CM transmitter power level must typically be within a range of +/−6 dBmV of the CMTS receiver. Thus, the CMTS receiver has a dynamic range of 12 dBmV. The dynamic range of the CM transmitter can be divided by the dynamic range of the CMTS receiver to give 4.25 (51/12) possible CM transmitter regions the CMTS receiver may be located. One or more IR can be attempted in each region before adjusting power for the next region. This requires as many as 5 IR attempts to cover the entire CM transmitter dynamic range. The lower the number of IR attempts to cover the CM transmitter dynamic range the less time needed for IR. If a RNG-RSP message is not received from the CMTS in the first sweep of the transmitter dynamic range a second sweep can be attempted but with a new adjusted power level for each region. Failure in the first sweep is most likely due to collision. As many sweeps as needed can be performed as long as the total number of IR attempts do not exceed 16 as defined by DOCSIS.
Effectively, larger power adjustment steps are taken to cover the CM transmitter dynamic range quickly. An adjustment in each region is interlaced with each sweep of the CM transmitter dynamic range. Assuming collisions are low, as few as 5 IR attempts may be needed, which is a great improvement over linear attempts described earlier.
Instead of power ramping by taking small delta increments to cover the entire dynamic range of the CM transmitter, an IR in each of the possible regions is attempted to cover the entire dynamic range of the CM transmitter quickly. Using only a single pass of the CM transmitter dynamic range is to assume no collision has occurred during the IR in each region. For the possibility that a collision could have occurred during the first sweep, a second IR attempt is performed in each region but with a different power level. This interleaving can be done as many time allowed as long as the total number of IR attempts does not exceed the 16 IR attempts per UCD as defined in DOCSIS. In the case where the CMTS receiver is at 52 dBmV the CM may only have to do as many as 5 IR attempts to register with the CMTS. This is assuming no collision has occurred in the region the CMTS is located in. Even if a collision did occur in the first pass, as many as 10 IR attempts may be needed to register with the CMTS in the second pass. This is still less than the number of IR that are required if linear incremental steps were used. Overall, 16 available IR attempts per UCD are not needed to adequately cover the dynamic range of the CM transmitter.
In view of the wide variety of embodiments to which the principles of the present invention can be applied, it should be understood that the illustrated embodiments are exemplary only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present invention. For example, the steps of the flow diagrams may be taken in sequences other than those described, and more or fewer elements may be used in the block diagrams. While various elements of the preferred embodiments have been described as being implemented in software, other embodiments in hardware or firmware implementations may alternatively be used, and vice-versa.
It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that methods involved in the system and method for calibrating power level during cable modem initial ranging may be embodied in a computer program product that includes a computer usable medium. For example, such a computer usable medium can include a readable memory device, such as, a hard drive device, a CD-ROM, a DVD-ROM, or a computer diskette, having computer readable program code segments stored thereon. The computer readable medium can also include a communications or transmission medium, such as, a bus or a communications link, either optical, wired, or wireless to having program code segments carried thereon as digital or analog data signals.
The claims should not be read as limited to the described order or elements unless stated to that effect. Therefore, all embodiments that come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto are claimed as the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4644533 | Braff et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4881263 | Herbison et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4996685 | Farese et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5014234 | Edwards, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
5138712 | Corbin | Aug 1992 | A |
5301273 | Konishi | Apr 1994 | A |
5347304 | Moura et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5430727 | Callon | Jul 1995 | A |
5442749 | Northcutt et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5488412 | Majeti et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489897 | Inoue | Feb 1996 | A |
5528595 | Walsh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5583931 | Schneider et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586121 | Moura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598410 | Stone | Jan 1997 | A |
5600717 | Schneider et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606606 | Schneider et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608446 | Carr et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610910 | Focsaneanu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623542 | Schneider et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623601 | Vu | Apr 1997 | A |
5636211 | Newlin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5675732 | Majeti et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675742 | Jain et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678041 | Baker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708654 | Arndt et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710885 | Bondi | Jan 1998 | A |
5724510 | Arndt et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5761602 | Wagner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778181 | Hidary et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784597 | Chiu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790198 | Roop et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790548 | Sistanizadeh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790677 | Fox et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790770 | McClure et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790806 | Koperda | Aug 1998 | A |
5793747 | Kline | Aug 1998 | A |
5799086 | Sudia | Aug 1998 | A |
5805804 | Laursen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809252 | Beighe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812819 | Rodwin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815664 | Asano | Sep 1998 | A |
5818845 | Moura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819028 | Manghirmalani et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819042 | Hansen | Oct 1998 | A |
5828655 | Moura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828666 | Focsaneanu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835720 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835727 | Wong et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841777 | Cohen | Nov 1998 | A |
5848233 | Radia et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852721 | Dillon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854901 | Cole et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859852 | Moura et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864679 | Kanai et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870134 | Laubach et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872523 | Dellaverson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884024 | Lim et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892754 | Kompella et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894479 | Mohammed | Apr 1999 | A |
5903558 | Jones et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909549 | Compliment et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913037 | Spofford et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915119 | Cone | Jun 1999 | A |
5922049 | Radia et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922051 | Sidey | Jul 1999 | A |
5923659 | Curry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926458 | Yin | Jul 1999 | A |
5929850 | Broadwin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5941988 | Bhagwat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943604 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954797 | Sidey | Sep 1999 | A |
5958007 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960177 | Tanno | Sep 1999 | A |
5974453 | Andersen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982748 | Yin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987524 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991292 | Focsaneanu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991306 | Burns et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996076 | Rowney et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999536 | Kawafuji et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003077 | Bawden et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005851 | Craddock et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006264 | Colby et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009103 | Woundy | Dec 1999 | A |
6012088 | Li et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013107 | Blackshear et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014545 | Wu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018767 | Fijolek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031841 | Woundy | Feb 2000 | A |
6032019 | Chen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041041 | Ramanathan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046979 | Bauman | Apr 2000 | A |
6049546 | Ramakrishnan | Apr 2000 | A |
6049825 | Yamamoto | Apr 2000 | A |
6049826 | Beser | Apr 2000 | A |
6052724 | Willie et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058421 | Fijolek et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061349 | Coile et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064372 | Kahkoska | May 2000 | A |
6065049 | Beser et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070187 | Subramaniam et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070242 | Wong et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070246 | Beser | May 2000 | A |
6073178 | Wong et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075787 | Bobeck et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091709 | Harrison et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094431 | Yamato et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104700 | Haddock et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112258 | Miller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122254 | Aydemir et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128298 | Wootton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130879 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6130880 | Naudus et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137792 | Jonas et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137793 | Gorman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148410 | Baskey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157965 | Mohammed et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170061 | Beser | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178455 | Schutte et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185624 | Fijolek et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189102 | Beser | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208656 | Hrastar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212563 | Beser | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216171 | Isono et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223222 | Fijolek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230326 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240464 | Fijolek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243369 | Grimwood et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260072 | Rodriguez-Moral | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269099 | Borella et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272150 | Hrastar et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275853 | Beser et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289377 | Lalwaney et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295554 | Karadogan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301223 | Hrastar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301618 | Sitaraman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308328 | Bowcutt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331987 | Beser | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332163 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337858 | Petty et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351773 | Fijolek et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370147 | Beser | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393478 | Bahlmann | May 2002 | B1 |
6442158 | Beser | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449291 | Burns et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453472 | Leano et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490727 | Nazarathy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510162 | Fijolek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6594305 | Roeck et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20020101883 | Ruszczyk et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122050 | Sandberg | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136165 | Ady et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030028891 | Hardt et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0067385 | Nov 2000 | WO |