The invention describes a system for capping an abandoned well having production casing and surface casing. The system enables the effective sealing of the production casing volume from the surface casing volume such that any gases leaking from either volume can be independently controlled or released from independent valves. The system is particularly effective in improving the safety of re-entering an abandoned well.
After oil and gas wells have been abandoned after production has ceased, the wells must be properly capped to both return the land where the well is located to its previous state as well as provide a safe and stable cap to the well that minimizes risk to the land owner's subsequent use of their land as well as minimizing risk to personnel who may in the future re-enter the well. The abandoned wells are generally capped by an oil and gas company, licensee or well abandonment service provider.
Regulations in many jurisdictions generally require that in capping an abandoned well that the production and surface casings of the well be trimmed approximately 1 m below the ground surface and a simple steel plate cover system attached to the well casings. As shown in
Unfortunately, the typical oilfield capping system has no allowance for the escape of heated gases during the capping welding process other than where the plate is being welded to the casing. In addition, there is no allowance for the escape of heated or accumulated formation gases upon re-entry of the well without hot tapping. These limitations lead to serious safety risks both during abandonment and/or re-entry.
For example, in approximately 90% of those wells that are ultimately re-entered, modest levels of formation gas will be found to be leaking at the location where the steel plates are attached to the well casing. This leaking gas which passes through the fine pores of the weld is very difficult to detect and provides limited or no information about the composition and/or backside pressure within either the production or surface casing of the well.
Moreover, the current methodologies of capping a well are problematic in a number of ways from a safety and functional perspective. Most importantly, for those wells that have been capped using a continuous fillet weld that fully seals the well, there is a risk of a significant gas pressure build-up within the well such that the procedures to re-enter the well must properly and efficiently release any pressure build-up without risk to personnel. As a result, protocols for re-entering a well are unnecessarily complex for those situations where there is limited or no safety risk but are required to ensure safety for the potentially dangerous situation. In other words, in each case, there is no provision to determine the gas composition and/or rate of leak.
In the case of cap plates that are tack-welded in place, while the unsealed weld may allow gas to dissipate, ground water may leak into the well. Groundwater is un-inhibited and rich in oxygen and micro-organisms; causing the acceleration of internal corrosion.
Moreover, the procedures to install steel cap plates are very inefficient and may not provide the effective sealing. Typically, service personnel will crudely torch cut a cap plate at the site on the back of a welding truck in an uncontrolled environment thus producing an imperfect circle that is used as the capping plate. Imperfect circles will contribute to inferior welds.
As a result, there has been a need for a system and method that addresses the above problems and more specifically provides a system that provides an effective seal to both production and surface casing, that prevents ground water contamination from entering the production and surface casing whilst allowing the release of gas from the system in a controlled manner. In addition, there has been a need for a method of abandoning a well that improves the efficiency of the at-site procedure as well as any subsequent re-entry of the well. Further still, there has been a need for a system that simplifies the re-entry protocols while enhancing the efficiency of hydrostatically killing a well if necessary.
A review of the prior art reveals that such a system has not been provided.
In accordance with the invention, there is provided a system for capping an abandoned well having production casing defining a production casing volume and surface casing defining a surface casing volume, the system comprising: a production casing plate for sealing connection to the production casing, the production casing plate having a first nipple for operative connection to a first valve; a surface casing plate for sealing connection to the surface casing, the surface casing plate having a second nipple for operative connection to a second valve; wherein the first nipple passes through and is sealed with respect to the surface casing plate such that the production casing volume is sealed from the surface casing volume.
In further embodiments, the system includes a cap for placement over and around the surface casing. The first and second valves may also enable operative connection of gas sampling equipment to the valves and/or piping to enable fluids to be pumped into the well to kill the well.
In an alternate embodiment, the invention also provides a method of sealing an abandoned well having production casing defining a production casing volume and surface casing defining a surface casing volume comprising the steps of: sealing a production casing plate to the production casing, the production casing plate having a first nipple for operative connection to a first valve; and, sealing a surface casing plate for sealing connection to the surface casing, the surface casing plate having a second nipple for operative connection to a second valve; wherein the first nipple is passed through and is sealed with respect to the surface casing plate such that the production casing volume is, sealed from the surface casing volume.
The invention is described by the following detailed description and drawings wherein:
In accordance with the invention and with reference to
As shown in
The system further includes a surface casing plate 28 having a surface casing nipple 30 attached to the surface casing plate 28 through an appropriate bore 30a in the surface casing plate 28. Generally, the production casing plate 22 includes a threaded coupling to allow the production casing nipple 26 to be removed to allow welding around the circumference of the production casing plate and then re-installed. The surface casing plate 28 does not require as long a nipple and thus does not interfere with the weld around the circumference of the surface casing plate. The surface casing plate 28 is also provided with a second bore 30b to allow the production casing nipple 26 to pass through the surface casing plate. The surface casing nipple 30 is provided with appropriate threads on the upper outer surface to enable threaded connection with a valve 32b.
Each of valves 32a and 32b may be provided with a rubber stopper 34a, 34b that may be inserted within the valve as an indicator of gas release (as may be required by regulators). The system further includes a surface casing cap 36 dimensioned to fit over the surface casing 12. The casing cap prevents unwanted soils and rocks coming into contact or damaging the valves 32a, 32b after installation. Appropriate labeling 38 may also be provided on the casing cap 36 with information such as a unique well identifier, the licensee of the well, and the surface abandonment date as may be required or desired. In particular, this information may be particularly useful to re-entry personnel to confirm previous operation documentation and/or that the correct well has been identified, if and when an abandoned well is re-entered.
The system is configured to an abandoned well having production 10 and surface 12 casing using the following procedure:
Upon assembly, the system provides an effective system and method to both safely release leaking gas from the well and prevent ground water contamination to the well. The valves 32a and 32b may be pressure release valves (such as a ball valve), burst plates or no-release valves. In either case, personnel re-entering the well can safely release any pressure from within the well by opening both valves. Ball valves having a pressure rating of approximately 2000 psi are preferred. Pressure readings and/or gas composition can be obtained by configuring appropriate pressure reading or gas sampling equipment to the valves after removal of stoppers 34a or 34b. This is particularly important in the event that toxic H2S may be within the leaking gas.
The system also allows the ready connection of a well kill line to allow fluids to be pumped into the well in advance of re-entry. The ability to kill the well through the system while maintaining well control is the most important safety characteristic of the system that is not possible using current oilfield capping systems.
Upon determining that there are no unsafe gases in the well, the service personnel can safely removing the capping system 20 by cutting the production and surface casings below the assembly and removing the assembly and casing stubs.
Importantly, the system allows service personnel to more clearly understand if leaking gases are arising from the production casing or surface casing which may assist in determining the most-appropriate re-entry plan.
Although the present invention has been described and illustrated with respect to preferred embodiments and preferred uses thereof, it is not to be so limited since modifications and changes can be made therein which are within the full, intended scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2,622,531 | Feb 2008 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1106295 | Gail | Aug 1914 | A |
1683173 | Ervin | Sep 1928 | A |
3568769 | Maass | Mar 1971 | A |
4334578 | Labrum | Jun 1982 | A |
4747453 | Howard, Sr. | May 1988 | A |
4971149 | Roberts | Nov 1990 | A |
5010957 | Kenner | Apr 1991 | A |
5107931 | Valka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5372198 | North et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5664626 | Watts, III | Sep 1997 | A |
6502632 | Pittman | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6845815 | Hergarden et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7363969 | Muderlak et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7469742 | Larsen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20080289817 | Smith | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2390393 | Dec 1945 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090211766 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |