This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/750,702 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CELL BALANCING AND CHARGING USING A SERIALLY COUPLED INDUCTOR AND CAPACITOR filed on Jun. 25, 2015, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
For a more complete understanding, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings in which:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers are used herein to designate like elements throughout, the various views and embodiments of a system and method for cell balancing and charging are illustrated and described, and other possible embodiments are described. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances the drawings have been exaggerated and/or simplified in places for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the many possible applications and variations based on the following examples of possible embodiments.
Cell balancing and charging systems provide the ability to charge a series connection of battery cells using a single source. Systems using multiple lithium ion or super capacitor cells require balancing of the individual cells in order to maximize the energy available from the batteries and to prolong the life of the system. Resistive balancing systems for charging cells dissipate excess charge as heat are one common solution but these types of systems waste energy. Energy transfer systems which are based on a “nearest neighbor” inductive or capacitive energy transfer reduce the amount of wasted energy but are complex and generally provide less than satisfactory results when transferring charge over a distance of several cells. Thus, there is a need for a cell balancing and charging system that solves the dual problems of balancing the state of charge of cells within a stack of battery cells without dissipating the energy in an associated resistor and further providing efficient transfer of charge to any cell in the stack without a distance penalty. The common way of balancing cells within a multi cell battery is by discharging the highest cell through a pass element or alternatively by passing the charge from a pass element to an adjacent cell.
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A resonant tank circuit consisting of inductor 316 and capacitor 320 is connected between node 312 and node 322. The inductor 316 is connected between node 312 and node 318. The capacitor 320 is connected in series with the inductor 316 between node 318 and node 322. A primary side 324 of a transformer 325 is connected to node 322 and to the ground node 306. The secondary side of the transformer 325 includes a number of secondary portions 326, each of which are connected across the terminals of an associated battery cell 302. The polarity of adjacent secondary side portions 326 of the transformer are reversed from each other. A switching MOSFET 328 has its drain/source path connected between the secondary portion 326 of the transformer 325 and the negative terminal of the associated battery cell 302. The switch 328 would receive control signals from a control circuit (not shown) which also controls switching transistors 310 and 314.
During the charging cycle, the system of
As can be seen in
During the discharge cycle, the input to the primary side 324 of the transformer 325 will comprise the total series voltages of all of the battery cells 302. The energy is circulating from all of the battery cells 302 back to the lowest charged cells.
The main difference between previous solutions and the implementation described herein above with respect to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A primary side 924 of a transformer 925 is connected to node 922 and to the ground node 906. The secondary side of the transformer 925 includes a number of secondary portions 926, each of which are connected across the terminals of the associated battery cell 902. A switch 928 is connected between the secondary portion 926 of the secondary side 926 of the transformer 925 and the negative terminal of the associated battery cell 902. The switch 928 would receive control signals from a control circuit (not shown) which also controls switches 915 and 914. In addition to the switch 928 connected between the transformer secondary portion 926 and the battery cell 902, a capacitor 930 is connected in parallel with the switch 928. In this scheme, current may be directed to individual cells 902 through the selective use of the secondary side switches 928 allowing programmable charge balancing or charge redirection to deliberately produce an unbalanced condition.
Referring now also to
A resonant tank circuit consisting of inductor 1013 and capacitor 1021 is connected between node 1012 and node 1022. The inductor 1013 is connected between node 1012 and node 1018. The capacitor 1021 is connected in series with the inductor 1013 between node 1020 and node 1022. A primary side 1024 of a transformer 1025 is connected to node 1022 and to the ground node 1006. The secondary side of the transformer 1025 includes a number of secondary portions 1026, each of which are connected across the terminals of the associated battery cell stack 1004. A switch 1028 is connected between the secondary portion 1026 of the secondary side 1026 of the transformer 1025 and the negative terminal of the associated battery cell stack 1004. The switch 1028 would receive control signals from a circuit which also controls switches 1016 and 1014.
As mentioned previously, rather than a single cell, a series of cells 1004 are connected across each of the secondary portions 1026 of the secondary side of the transformer. Connected across these cells 1004 is the balancing circuit described previously with respect to
In an alternative embodiment of the circuit of
In yet a further embodiment illustrated in
Referring now to
A primary side 1224 of a first transformer 1225 is connected to node 1222 and to the ground node 1206. The secondary side of the transformer 1225 includes a number of secondary portions 1226, each of which are connected across the terminals of the associated battery cell 1202. A switch 1228 is connected between the secondary portion of the secondary side 1226 of the transformer 1225 and the negative terminal of the associated battery cell 1202. The switch 1228 would receive control signals from a control circuit (not shown) which also controls switches 1215 and 1214. In addition to the switch 1228 connected between the transformer secondary portion 1226 and the battery cell 1202, a capacitor 1230 is connected in parallel with the switch 1228. In this scheme, current may be directed to individual cells 1202 through the selective use of the secondary side switches 1228 allowing programmable charge balancing or charge redirection to deliberately produce an unbalanced condition.
In the second transformer 1223 of the stacked configuration, a primary side 1235 of the transformer 1223 is connected in series with the primary side 1224 of the first transformer 1225. Additionally, a further series of transformer secondaries 1236 are connected across additional battery cells 1202 in series with the transformer secondary portion 1226 of transformer 1225. As in the first portion of the circuit, a switch 1228 would receive control signals from a control circuit (not shown). In addition to the switch 1228 connected between the transformer secondary portion 1236 and the battery cell 1232, a capacitor 1230 is connected in parallel with the switch 1228. The stacked configuration is completely scalable. As many sections as needed may be added in series. Thus, rather than the two illustrated in
Thus, the main difference between previous solutions and the present disclosure is that the energy is taken from the entire cell stack and redistributed based upon the cells that need more energy than the other. The scheme permits very simple systems which automatically charge without the need of a sophisticated control mechanism. More sophisticated implementations are possible in which the balancing may be performed using complex algorithms in a manner that maintains the optimal performance with a variety of systems and over the entire system life.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that this system and method for cell balancing and charging provides an improved manner of charging/balancing a stack of battery cells. It should be understood that the drawings and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner, and are not intended to be limiting to the particular forms and examples disclosed. On the contrary, included are any further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope hereof, as defined by the following claims. Thus, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments.
The present application is a Continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,775, filed Dec. 31, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,397,508; which application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/180,618, filed May 22, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/244,643, filed Sep. 22, 2009; all of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4200830 | Oughton | Apr 1980 | A |
5132889 | Hitchcock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5568036 | Hulsey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5956241 | LoCascio | Sep 1999 | A |
5982143 | Stuart | Nov 1999 | A |
6140800 | Peterson | Oct 2000 | A |
6356055 | Lin et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6670789 | Anzawa et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6801014 | Chitsazan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6841971 | Spee et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7400114 | Anzawa et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7804276 | Roessler | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8541980 | Moussaoui et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8779722 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020109482 | Anzawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030038612 | Kutkut | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030214821 | Giannopoulos | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040212352 | Anzawa | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217735 | Chitsazan | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050140336 | Anzawa et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080272735 | Roessler | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090140694 | Zeng | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090278489 | St-Jacques | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100208499 | Halberstadt | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100295509 | Moussaoui et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20130249476 | Touzani | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140340022 | Kang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150295428 | Moussaoui et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101924382 | Dec 2010 | CN |
104917247 | Sep 2015 | CN |
1737097 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2276140 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2004088878 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004129455 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004328868 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2010288447 | Dec 2010 | JP |
M289925 | Apr 2006 | TW |
201108544 | Mar 2011 | TW |
2009131336 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 10163571.2 dated Apr. 4, 2016”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,775”, Apr. 4, 2016, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP. |
European Search Report, “Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 15202503.7 dated Apr. 8, 2016”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,775”, Apr. 8, 2016, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 15202520.1 dated Apr. 7, 2016”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,775”, Apr. 7, 2016, pp. 1-7, Published in: EP. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action from KR Application No. 10-2010-0048306 dated Mar. 21, 2016”, “from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,775”, Mar. 21, 2016, pp. 1-9, Published in: KR. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action from KR Application No. 10-2015-0092263 dated Mar. 21, 2016”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/779,433”, Mar. 21, 2016, pp. 1-22, Published in: KR. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,775”, dated Mar. 17, 2016, pp. 1-13, Published in: US. |
European Search Report for European application No. EP10163571; dated Oct. 23, 2013, Munich, Germany, 2 pages. |
Taiwanese Office Action issued for Taiwan Patent Application No. 099116271; titled: “System and Method for Cell Balancing and Charging”, Applicant: Intersil Americas Inc.; issued at Taiwan International Patent Office dated Sep. 14, 2013, Taiwan, 15 pages. |
Milan M. Jovanovic, “Merits and Limitations of Resonant and Soft-Switched Converters”, 14th International Telecommunications Energy Conference, Oct. 1992; Washington, DC; Intelec '92., DOI: 10.1109/INTLEC.1992.268463 Publication Year: 1992 , pp. 51-58. |
O.D. Patterson, and D.M. Divan, “Pseudo-Resonant Full Bridge DC/DC Converter”, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf. Rec., Jun. 1987, Blacksburg, VA; pp. 424-430. |
John G. Kassakian, Martin F. Schlecht, and George C. Verghese: “Principles of Power Electronics”, Jul. 1991 by Addison-Wesley Publishing Compan Inc.; 5 pages. |
A. Rajapandian, V. Ramanarayanan, and R. Ramkumar: “A 250 kHz/560 W phase modulated converter”, Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems for Industrial Growth, 1996., Proceedings of the Jan. 1996 International Conference in New Delhi, India; vol. 1; DOI: 10.1109/PEDES.1996.537276 Publication Year: 1996, pp. 20-26. |
Robert W. Erickson, and Dragan Maksimovic: “Fundamentals of Power Electronics”, second edition; published by Springer Science-Business Media, LLC; New York, NY, 2001; 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150295429 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61180618 | May 2009 | US | |
61244643 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12650775 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 14750847 | US |