System and method for characterization of multimedia content signals using cores of a natural liquid architecture system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9953032
  • Patent Number
    9,953,032
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 12, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 24, 2018
    6 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • G06F17/3002
  • International Classifications
    • G06F17/30
    • Term Extension
      333
Abstract
A method and system for characterization of multimedia content inputs using cores of a natural liquid architecture are provided. The method comprises receiving at least one multimedia content signal; generating at least a signature respective of the multimedia content signal; matching the generated at least a signature respective of the multimedia content signal to at least a signature from a Signature Database (SDB); identifying a cluster respective of the generated at least a signature; and identifying in a Concept Database (CDB) a concept respective of the cluster.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to pattern recognition and, more particularly, to pattern recognition in multimedia content.


BACKGROUND

Sound and image files, as well as other files featuring multimedia content, may be indexed by their titles. Unfortunately, if a multimedia file is simply an embedded or linked multimedia file on a Web page, there may be no additional information about it. The multimedia files may have some descriptive information included, such as the source. Other metadata can be included in multimedia files, but such inclusion requires more effort on the part of the content producer and, as in the case of images, this may be incomplete or insufficient, to say the least.


Full indexing of the content of sound files generally requires having a transcript of the session in a computer-readable text format to enable text-indexing. With voice recognition software, some automated indexing of audio files is possible and has been successfully used. However, it is widely known that such transcripts rarely match what was spoken exactly. The difficulty is compounded if the spoken words are sung and the search is for the song in a specific tune, or a search for a tune regardless of the words. Analysis of audio signals is desirable for a wide variety of reasons such as speaker recognition, voice command recognition, dictation, instrument or song identification, and the like.


Similarly, video analysis is a growing field alongside image recognition. One application within the field of video analysis is performing a search on a plurality of videos, thereby enabling a user to find a video containing a specific scene or action that the user wishes to view. For example, a user may wish to see a video of a person slipping on a banana peel. However, existing solutions typically only permit a user to find such video content if the video is associated with metadata identifying its content. Metadata associated with the video clips typically describe attributes of the clip, such as length, format type, source and so on. The metadata does not describe the contents of the clip and in particular the contents of each scene.


It would therefore be advantageous to have a system capable of identifying multimedia content elements according to the content contained therein.


SUMMARY

Certain embodiments disclosed herein include a method and system for characterization of multimedia content inputs using cores of a natural liquid architecture. The method comprises receiving at least one multimedia content signal; generating at least a signature respective of the multimedia content signal; matching the generated at least a signature respective of the multimedia content signal to at least a signature from a Signature Database (SDB); identifying a cluster respective of the generated at least a signature; and identifying in a Concept Database (CDB) a concept respective of the cluster.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter disclosed herein is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will be apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for characterization of multimedia content using cores of a natural liquid architecture according to an embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a system for characterization of multimedia content using cores of a natural liquid architecture implemented according to an embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram depicting the basic flow of information in a large-scale multimedia content matching system;



FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the flow of patches generation, response vector generation, and signature generation in a large-scale speech-to-text system; and



FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing identification of a concept based on signatures in a cluster according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is important to note that the embodiments disclosed herein are only examples of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others. In general, unless otherwise indicated, singular elements may be in plural and vice versa with no loss of generality. In the drawings, like numerals refer to like parts through several views.


The various disclosed embodiments include a method and system for identification and classification of multimedia content signals. At least one multimedia content signal input is received. Signatures are generated and a cluster of signatures respective of the at least one multimedia content signal is identified. Signatures may be generated respective of, but not limited to, image or audio portions of a multimedia content. Signatures having at least a partial match form a cluster. The match is referred to as a concept. The concept is then matched to a database that include a plurality of concepts and the identification and classification of the at least one multimedia content signal are performed respective of the match.



FIG. 1 is a non-limiting exemplary flowchart 100 illustrating a method for identification and classification of multimedia content signals using cores of a natural liquid architecture according to an embodiment. At least one multimedia content input is received in S110. The multimedia content input may be a digital representation of a video signal, a digital representation of an audio signal, a digital representation of any multimedia content signal, a direct feed from one or more camera devices, a direct feed from one or more microphone devices, a direct feed from one or more devices capable of capturing and/or storing multimedia content, or the like. In an embodiment, a plurality of multimedia content inputs is received respective of a single source. In another exemplary embodiment, a plurality of multimedia content inputs is received respective of a sound, scene, or event comprising different angles, different spectrums, different musical parameters, different lengths, or any combination thereof.


In S120, a measurement respective of the multimedia content input is generated to produce at least a signature. The measurement may be, for example, respective of an entire multimedia content input, a part of a multimedia content input, combinations of entire or partial multimedia inputs, and the like. A signature may be generated respective of an audio portion of a video signal, an image portion of a video signal, an audio signal, or any combinations thereof. A generated signature may be stored in a memory or a database for storing signatures. Generation of signatures according to various disclosed embodiments is described further in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,775, assigned to common assignee.


Signature generation may be conducted by a system implementing a computational architecture (hereinafter referred to as “the Architecture”) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,655,801, referenced above, assigned to common assignee. Generally, the Architecture includes a large ensemble of randomly and independently generated heterogeneous computational cores, mapping data-segments onto a high-dimensional space in parallel and generating compact signatures for classes of interest. The process of signature generation is discussed further herein below with respect to FIGS. 3 and 4.


In S130, a generated signature is matched to at least another signature from, e.g., a signature database (SDB). A generated signature may have no match to a signature from a SDB. Alternatively, a generated signature may have one or more partial or full matches to one or more signatures from the SDB. A group of signatures having one or more matches forms a cluster of signatures. Signature matching is discussed in more detail herein below with respect to FIGS. 3 and 4.


In S140, a cluster is identified respective of the generated signature. The at least one cluster may be identified respective of the generated signature based on, e.g., a portion of a signature that is common to all signatures in the cluster and to the generated signature. The match that is common to all signatures in the cluster is a concept, as discussed further herein below with respect to S150.


Clusters initially contain a single multimedia data element and exist as an entry in a diagonal two-dimensional matrix. To cluster signatures, matching is performed between each cluster in the matrix and the other clusters, and results of matching are stored in each cluster's respective row in the matrix. Clusters that, for example, demonstrate matching above a predefined threshold may be utilized to form new clusters. Clustering of signatures is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,400, assigned to the common assignee and is hereby incorporated by reference for all it contains.


The clustering process may map a certain content-universe onto a hierarchical structure of clusters. The content-elements of the content-universe are mapped to signatures as appropriate. The signatures of all of the content-elements are matched to each other and, consequently, such matching generates an inter-match matrix. Generation of the inter-match matrix leads to a set of clusters. This results in a highly compressed representation of the content-universe. Content-universe mapping is discussed in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,266,185 assigned to common assignee, which is hereby incorporated by reference for all that it contains.


In S150, at least one concept is identified respective of the cluster. The match common to all the signatures of an identified cluster is a concept or a concept structure. Concepts may be identified based on previously generated concepts, or based on concepts generated in response to identification of clusters. In an embodiment, concepts may also be identified based on an inter-match matrix. Identification of concepts respective of clusters is described in more detail herein below with respect to FIG. 5.


In S155, the at least one multimedia content input is characterized based on the at least one concept identified in S150. The identified concept is a collection of signatures representing elements of the unstructured data and metadata describing the concept. As a non-limiting example, a ‘Superman concept’ is a signature reduced cluster of signatures describing elements (such as multimedia elements) related to, e.g., a Superman cartoon: a set of metadata representing textual representation of the Superman concept. Therefore, the concept can provide a unique identification of the multimedia content input. For example, such an input may be an image of a man wearing a belt with a Superman icon, wherein the image is taken from a video clip commercial for a beer brand. The image will be associated with the Superman concept and the metadata of that concept will describe the belt in the input image. In comparison to prior art solutions, the metadata will identify, for example, the beer brand, length, format type and possibly the name of the beer brand. The prior art metadata does not provide a description at the resolution of each scene or image in the commercial's video clip.


In another non-limiting example, a “folk rock” concept is a signature reduced cluster of signatures describing elements (such as multimedia elements) related to, for example, folk rock music: a set of metadata representing textual representation of the folk rock concept. Therefore, the concept can provide a unique identification of the multimedia content input. For example, such an input may be a digital audio file of Bob Dylan performing “All Along the Watchtower.” The audio is in the example associated with the folk rock concept and the metadata of that concept describes clear vocal harmonies and electric instruments used therein.


In comparison to prior art solutions, the metadata identifies, for example, the singer, length, format type and possibly the name of the song. The prior art metadata does not provide a description at the resolution of each audio segment, such as identification of musical instruments, guitar solo, additional vocals, etc. In a similar non-limiting example, the song “Money for Nothing”, as performed by British rock band “Dire Straits” features English musician Gordon Sumner (a.k.a. Sting) in a cameo part. Typically, in prior art solutions, this would not be included in the metadata for the audio file of the song. In the described embodiments, a concept of “Sting” would be associated with the song “Money for Nothing”, in addition to other concepts which may be determined.


In one embodiment, S155 further includes classification of the signals based on the identified concepts. For example, two concepts can be identified for the belt with the Superman icon: Superman Cartoon and Fashion accessories, thereby the input image will be classified for these two entities.


In S160, it is checked whether additional matching will be performed with signatures from the SDB. If so, execution continues with S130; otherwise, execution terminates.


As a non-limiting example, a multimedia content signal containing multiple multimedia content elements is received. In this example, the multimedia content signal is a video featuring multimedia content elements showing a baby panda at the zoo in the foreground, wherein a man slipping on a banana peel may be seen in the background. In this example, metadata associated with the video only indicates information related to the baby panda. A signature is generated respective of each multimedia content element (the panda, the zoo environment, the banana peel, and the man.


Each generated signature is matched to at least another signature in a database. As a result, at least one cluster is identified respective of each generated signature. A concept is identified respective of each cluster. In this example, such concepts may be an “animal,” a “panda,” the “zoo,” a “banana peel,” a “man,” and the event of “slipping.” Based on these identified concepts, the video may be characterized as, e.g., a “baby panda at the zoo with a man slipping on a banana peel.” This characterization may be useful for, but is not limited to, allowing users searching for videos featuring a man slipping on a banana peel to find this video when the metadata would not characterize it as such.



FIG. 2 is an exemplary and non-limiting schematic illustration of a system 200 for classification of multimedia content inputs using cores of a natural liquid architecture implemented according to an embodiment. The system 200 comprises at least one processing element 210. Processing element 210 may be, for example, a processing unit (PU). In various other embodiments, a plurality of PUs may be used. The at least one PU is coupled via a bus 205 to a memory 220. In an embodiment, the memory 220 further comprises a memory portion 222 containing instructions that, when executed by the processing element 210, performs the method described in more detail herein. The memory may be further used as a working scratch pad for the processing element 210, a temporary storage, and so on. The memory may be a volatile memory such as, but not limited to random access memory (RAM), or a non-volatile memory (NVM) such as, but not limited to, Flash memory.


The memory 220 may further comprise memory portion 224 containing one or more match scores between a cluster and a concept. Memory portion 224 or a secondary memory (not shown) may contain a measurement respective of a multimedia content signal.


The processing element 210 may further be coupled to at least one multimedia content input 250. A plurality of multimedia content inputs may be used to represent different signals, a single signal received from a plurality of locations, or any combination thereof. The processing element 210 may be further coupled to a database 230.


The database 230 is configured to maintain a storage portion 235 containing a plurality of concepts respective of a plurality of languages which form a Concept Database (CDB). The database 230 may also further comprise storage portion 236 containing at least a signature which forms a signature database (SDB). The concept signals may be used to determine a match score between an identified cluster and one or more concepts, or to determine a match score between a signal and one or more concepts.


In an embodiment, the processing element 210 is configured to run or to include a plurality of computational cores that formed the Architecture. As demonstrated herein the Architecture is a large ensemble of randomly and independently generated heterogeneous computational cores, mapping data-segments onto a high-dimensional space in parallel and generating compact signatures for classes of interest. In this embodiment, the processing element 210 can be utilized to generate signatures for multimedia content input and such signatures are stored in the database 230. In another embodiment, the processing element 210 can create concepts respective of generates and compare between concepts either saved locally in the database 230 or in external source.


The processing element 210 is also configured to characterize and classify the multimedia content input based on the identified concept. Specifically, as described above, the characterization of the input is based in part on the metadata associated with the identified concept. The multimedia content input may be a scene from a video clip, an image from a video clip, an audio signal (which may be a portion of a sound track, recorded conversation, a sound sample, a recorded song, etc.).


In an embodiment, the system is connected to a deep-content-classification (DCC) system (not shown). The DCC system is configured to generate concepts, perform inter-matching concepts and find one or more concepts that match at least one generated signature. An exemplary DCC system that can be utilized is disclosed in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,266,185, assigned to common assignee, which is hereby incorporated by reference for all that it contains.


In an embodiment, the system 200 is configured to query the DCC system using a generated signature to find at least one matching concept. In addition, the system 200 can query the DCC system to find a match between two concepts generated by the system to find a matching concept to a concept generated by the system. Matching concepts can be found using a signature representing the concept.


To demonstrate an example of a signature generation process, it is assumed, merely for the sake of simplicity and without limitation on the generality of the disclosed embodiments, that the signatures are based on a single multimedia content frame or a sample, leading to certain simplification of the computational cores generation. The Matching System is extensible for signatures generation capturing the dynamics in-between the frames.



FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate the generation of signatures for the multimedia content elements by a signature generator system according to one embodiment. An exemplary high-level description of the process for large scale matching is depicted in FIG. 3. In this non-limiting example, the matching is for a video content.


Video content segments 2 from a Master database (DB) 6 and a Target DB 1 are processed in parallel by a large number of independent computational Cores 3 that constitute an architecture for generating the Signatures (hereinafter the “Architecture”). Further details on the computational Cores generation are provided below. The independent Cores 3 generate a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4 for Target content-segments 5 and a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 7 for Master content-segments 8. An exemplary and non-limiting process of signature generation for an audio component is shown in detail in FIG. 4. Finally, Target Robust Signatures and/or Signatures are effectively matched, by a matching algorithm 9, to Master Robust Signatures and/or Signatures database to find all matches between the two databases.


The Signatures' generation process will now be described with reference to FIG. 4. The first step in the process of signatures generation from a given speech-segment is to breakdown the speech-segment to K patches 14 of random length P and random position within the speech segment 12. The breakdown is performed by the patch generator component 21. The value of the number of patches K, random length P and random position parameters is determined based on optimization, considering the tradeoff between accuracy rate and the number of fast matches required in the flow process of a server and a signature generation system. Thereafter, all the K patches are injected in parallel into all computational Cores 3 to generate K response vectors 22, which are fed into a signature generator system 23 to produce a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4.


In order to generate Robust Signatures, i.e., Signatures that are robust to additive noise L (where L is an integer equal to or greater than 1) by the Computational Cores 3 a frame ‘i’ is injected into all the Cores 3. Then, Cores 3 generate two binary response vectors: {right arrow over (S)} which is a Signature vector, and {right arrow over (RS)} which is a Robust Signature vector.


For generation of signatures robust to additive noise, such as White-Gaussian-Noise, scratch, etc., but not robust to distortions, such as crop, shift and rotation, etc., a core Ci={ni} (1≤i≤L) may consist of a single leaky integrate-to-threshold unit (LTU) node or more nodes. The node ni equations are:







V
i

=



j











w
ij



k
j










n
i

=



(

Vi
-

Th
x


)






where, Θ is a Heaviside step function; wij is a coupling node unit (CNU) between node i and image component j (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); kj is an image component ‘j’ (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); Thx is a constant Threshold value, where x is ‘S’ for Signature and ‘RS’ for Robust Signature; and Vi is a Coupling Node Value.


The Threshold values Thx are set differently for Signature generation and for Robust Signature generation. For example, for a certain distribution of Vi values (for the set of nodes), the thresholds for Signature (ThS) and Robust Signature (ThRS) are set apart, after optimization, according to at least one or more of the following criteria:

    • 1: For:

      Vi>ThRS
      1−p(V>Ths)−1−(1−ϵ)l<<1


i.e., given that l nodes (cores) constitute a Robust Signature of a certain image l, the probability that not all of these l nodes will belong to the Signature of same, but noisy image, Ĩ is sufficiently low (according to a system's specified accuracy).

    • 2:

      p(Vi>ThRS)≈l/L

      i.e., approximately l out of the total L nodes can be found to generate a Robust Signature according to the above definition.
    • 3: Both Robust Signature and Signature are generated for certain frame i.


It should be understood that the generation of a signature is unidirectional, and typically yields lossless compression, where the characteristics of the compressed data are maintained but the uncompressed data cannot be reconstructed. Therefore, a signature can be used for the purpose of comparison to another signature without the need of comparison to the original data. Detailed description of the Signature generation is discussed in more detail in the co-pending patent applications of which this patent application is a continuation-in-part, which are hereby incorporated by reference.


A Computational Core generation is a process of definition, selection, and tuning of the parameters of the cores for a certain realization in a specific system and application. The process is based on several design considerations, such as:

    • (a) The Cores should be designed so as to obtain maximal independence, i.e., the projection from a signal space should generate a maximal pair-wise distance between any two cores' projections into a high-dimensional space.
    • (b) The Cores should be optimally designed for the type of signals, i.e., the Cores should be maximally sensitive to the spatio-temporal structure of the injected signal, for example, and in particular, sensitive to local correlations in time and space. Thus, in some cases a core represents a dynamic system, such as in state space, phase space, edge of chaos, etc., which is uniquely used herein to exploit their maximal computational power.
    • (c) The Cores should be optimally designed with regard to invariance to a set of signal distortions, of interest in relevant applications.


Detailed description of the Computational Core generation and the process for configuring such cores is discussed in more detail in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 8,655,801, assigned to the common assignee, which is hereby incorporated by reference for all that it contains.



FIG. 5 is an exemplary and non-limiting flowchart illustrating S150 of identification of a concept based on signatures in a cluster according to one. In S510, a cluster is identified and a request to identify a concept respective of the cluster is received. In optional step S520, it is checked whether there is an existing inter-match matrix defining a common concept structure among signatures in the cluster. If so, execution continues with S560; otherwise, execution continues with S530.


In S530, inter-matching is performed among signatures in the identified cluster. In S540, based on results of the inter-matching, a portion or portions of the signatures of the cluster that is common to all signatures in the cluster is identified. In an embodiment, if more than one portion is identified, such identified portions may be concatenated to form a single concatenated portion of signatures.


In another embodiment, if no suitable portion of signatures is common to all signatures in the cluster, a suitable portion of signatures that is present in the highest number of signatures possible may be identified instead. Portions of signatures may be deemed unsuitable if, for example, they are not long enough or do not receive a matching score above a pre-defined threshold. In a further embodiment, upon identification of a suitable portion of signature that is not present in all signatures in the cluster, a message may be returned indicating as such. In another further embodiment, signatures that do not include the suitable portion may be excluded from the cluster.


In S550, a concept structure representing commonality among signatures in the cluster is generated based on identified portions of signatures. This concept structure may include a single portion of a signature, multiple portions of signatures, a concatenated portion of signatures, multiple concatenated portions of signatures, combinations thereof, and the like. In S560, the generated or defined concept structure is returned.


As a non-limiting example, a cluster including several generated signatures is identified. Upon checking whether there is a pre-existing inter-match matrix for the cluster defining a common concept, it is determined that such a matrix exists. Upon determining that such a matrix exists, the concept structure defined in the matrix is returned.


As another non-limiting example, a cluster including several signatures generated based on images of a baseball, a tennis ball, a basketball, and a soccer ball, respectively, is identified. In this example, no inter-match matrix exists at the time of identification. Upon determination that no inter-match matrix exists, inter-matching is performed among all of the signatures in the cluster. The inter-matching process yields certain portions of the signatures that demonstrate matching above a pre-defined threshold. Based on the inter-matching, a portion of each signature identifying the shape of each ball and that each ball is related to a sport is identified as common among all signatures. Based on this identified common signature portion, a concept structure is generated. In this example, the concept structure may be “sports balls.” The concept structure of “sports balls” is then returned.


As yet another non-limiting example, a cluster of signatures that were generated based on an image of monkey next to a bowl of fruit is determined. The cluster is identified and no inter-match matrix already exists. Thus, inter-matching is performed among all signatures in the cluster. In this example, if no concept is common among all signatures in the cluster, the concept that is present in the highest number of signatures is identified. Thus, the portion of the signatures of the fruit in the bowl that identifies each item as a piece of fruit is determined to be the portion of a signature that is common to the highest number of signatures. A concept structure representing the concept of “fruit” is generated and returned.


The various embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented as hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. Moreover, the software is preferably implemented as an application program tangibly embodied on a program storage unit or computer readable medium consisting of parts, or of certain devices and/or a combination of devices. The application program may be uploaded to, and executed by, a machine comprising any suitable architecture. Preferably, the machine is implemented on a computer platform having hardware such as one or more central processing units (“CPUs”), a memory, and input/output interfaces. The computer platform may also include an operating system and microinstruction code. The various processes and functions described herein may be either part of the microinstruction code or part of the application program, or any combination thereof, which may be executed by a CPU, whether or not such a computer or processor is explicitly shown. In addition, various other peripheral units may be connected to the computer platform such as an additional data storage unit and a printing unit. Furthermore, a non-transitory computer readable medium is any computer readable medium except for a transitory propagating signal.


All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the disclosed embodiments and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.

Claims
  • 1. A system for characterization of multimedia content inputs using a plurality of computational cores of a natural liquid architecture, comprising: a processing element, wherein the processing element further comprises an ensemble of randomly and independently generated heterogeneous computational cores;a signature data base (SDB) for storing at least one signature for a multimedia content input and a concept database (CDB) for storing at least one concept, wherein the concept includes a collection of signatures, each signature representing a multimedia content input, and metadata describing the concept;an interface coupled to the processing element, wherein the interface is configured to receive at least one multimedia content input; anda memory communicatively connected to the processing element, wherein the memory contains instructions that, when executed by the processing element, configure the system to:receive a multimedia content input;generate a signature respective of the multimedia content input;match the signature to at least one signature from the SDB;identify a cluster respective of the generated signatures;identify at least one concept respective of the cluster in the CDB; andcharacterize the multimedia content input based in part on metadata describing the at least one identified concept.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one multimedia content input is at least one of: a digital representation of an audio signal, and a direct feed from at least one microphone device.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein a plurality of audio signals is received respective of a single source.
  • 4. The system of claim 2, wherein the signature is generated respective of the entire audio signal, a part of the audio signal, or a combination of entire or partial audio signals.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one multimedia content input is at least one of: a digital representation of a video signal, and a direct feed from at least one camera device.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein a plurality of video signals is received respective of a single source.
  • 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the signature is generated respective of the entire video signal, a part of the video signal, or a combination of entire or partial video signal.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the signature is either partially matched or fully matched to at least one signature from the SDB.
  • 9. A method for characterization of multimedia content inputs using cores of a natural liquid architecture, comprising: receiving at least one multimedia content input;generating at least a signature respective of the multimedia content input, wherein the at least a signature is generated by an ensemble of randomly and independently generated heterogeneous computational cores;matching the generated at least a signature respective of the multimedia content input to at least a signature from a Signature Database;identifying a cluster respective of the generated at least a signature; andidentifying in a Concept Database (CDB) a concept respective of the cluster, wherein the concept includes a collection of signatures, each signature representing an a multimedia content input, and metadata describing the concept; andcharacterizing the multimedia content input based in part on metadata describing the at least one identified concept.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the at least one multimedia content input is at least one of: a digital representation of an audio signal, and a direct feed from at least one microphone device.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein a plurality of audio signals is received respective of a single source.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the signature is generated respective of the entire audio signal, a part of the audio signal, or a combination of entire or partial audio signal.
  • 13. The method of claim 9, wherein the at least one multimedia content input is at least one of: a digital representation of a video signal, and a direct feed from at least one camera device.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein a plurality of video signals is received respective of a single source.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the signature is generated respective of the entire video signal, a part of the video signal, or a combination of entire or partial video signal.
  • 16. The method of claim 9, wherein the signature is either partially matched or fully matched to at least one signature from the SDB.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for causing a processing circuitry to execute a process, the process comprises: receiving at least one multimedia content input;generating at least a signature respective of the multimedia content input, wherein the at least a signature is generated by an ensemble of randomly and independently generated heterogeneous computational cores;matching the generated at least a signature respective of the multimedia content input to at least a signature from a Signature Database;identifying a cluster respective of the generated at least a signature; andidentifying in a Concept Database (CDB) a concept respective of the cluster, wherein the concept includes a collection of signatures, each signature representing a multimedia content input, and metadata describing the concept; and
Priority Claims (3)
Number Date Country Kind
171577 Oct 2005 IL national
173409 Jan 2006 IL national
185414 Aug 2007 IL national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/833,932 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/833,931 both filed on Jun. 12, 2013. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/602,858, filed on Sep. 4, 2012, now pending. The application Ser. No. 13/602,858 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/603,123, filed on Oct. 21, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,266,185. The application Ser. No. 12/603,123 is a continuation-in-part of: (1) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150, having a filing date of Apr. 7, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,655,801, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235, filed Oct. 26, 2006, which claims foreign priority from Israeli Application No. 171577, filed Oct. 26, 2005, and Israeli Application No. 173409, filed on Jan. 29, 2006; (2) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/195,863, filed Aug. 21, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,775, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 from Israeli Application No. 185414, filed Aug. 21, 2007. The application Ser. No. 12/195,863 is also a continuation-in-part of the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150; (3) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/348,888, filed Jan. 5, 2009, now pending, which is a CIP of the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150 and the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/195,863; and (4) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/538,495, filed Aug. 10, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,312,031, which is a continuation-in-part of the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150, the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/195,863, and the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/348,888. All of the applications referenced above are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (358)
Number Name Date Kind
4733353 Jaswa Mar 1988 A
4932645 Schorey et al. Jun 1990 A
4972363 Nguyen et al. Nov 1990 A
5307451 Clark Apr 1994 A
5568181 Greenwood et al. Oct 1996 A
5745678 Herzberg et al. Apr 1998 A
5806061 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 1998 A
5852435 Vigneaux et al. Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5887193 Takahashi et al. Mar 1999 A
5940821 Wical Aug 1999 A
5978754 Kumano Nov 1999 A
5987454 Hobbs Nov 1999 A
6038560 Wical Mar 2000 A
6052481 Grajski et al. Apr 2000 A
6076088 Paik et al. Jun 2000 A
6122628 Castelli et al. Sep 2000 A
6137911 Zhilyaev Oct 2000 A
6144767 Bottou et al. Nov 2000 A
6147636 Gershenson Nov 2000 A
6240423 Hirata May 2001 B1
6243375 Speicher Jun 2001 B1
6243713 Nelson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6275599 Adler et al. Aug 2001 B1
6329986 Cheng Dec 2001 B1
6363373 Steinkraus Mar 2002 B1
6381656 Shankman Apr 2002 B1
6411229 Kobayashi Jun 2002 B2
6422617 Fukumoto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6493692 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493705 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507672 Watkins et al. Jan 2003 B1
6523022 Hobbs Feb 2003 B1
6523046 Liu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524861 Anderson Feb 2003 B1
6526400 Takata et al. Feb 2003 B1
6550018 Abonamah et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560597 Dhillon et al. May 2003 B1
6594699 Sahai et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601026 Appelt et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601060 Tomaru Jul 2003 B1
6611628 Sekiguchi et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611837 Schreiber Aug 2003 B2
6618711 Ananth Sep 2003 B1
6643620 Contolini et al. Nov 2003 B1
6643643 Lee et al. Nov 2003 B1
6675159 Lin et al. Jan 2004 B1
6704725 Lee Mar 2004 B1
6728706 Aggarwal et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732149 Kephart May 2004 B1
6751363 Natsev et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754435 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6763069 Divakaran et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763519 McColl et al. Jul 2004 B1
6774917 Foote Aug 2004 B1
6795818 Lee Sep 2004 B1
6804356 Krishnamachari Oct 2004 B1
6816857 Weissman et al. Nov 2004 B1
6819797 Smith et al. Nov 2004 B1
6836776 Schreiber Dec 2004 B2
6845374 Oliver et al. Jan 2005 B1
6901207 Watkins May 2005 B1
6938025 Lulich et al. Aug 2005 B1
6970881 Mohan et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978264 Chandrasekar et al. Dec 2005 B2
7006689 Kasutani Feb 2006 B2
7013051 Sekiguchi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7043473 Rassool et al. May 2006 B1
7124149 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7158681 Persiantsev Jan 2007 B2
7199798 Echigo Apr 2007 B1
7215828 Luo May 2007 B2
7260564 Lynn et al. Aug 2007 B1
7277928 Lennon Oct 2007 B2
7296012 Ohashi Nov 2007 B2
7302117 Sekiguchi et al. Nov 2007 B2
7313805 Rosin et al. Dec 2007 B1
7346629 Kapur et al. Mar 2008 B2
7392238 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 B1
7406459 Chen et al. Jul 2008 B2
7450740 Shah et al. Nov 2008 B2
7523102 Bjarnestam et al. Apr 2009 B2
7526607 Singh et al. Apr 2009 B1
7536384 Venkataraman et al. May 2009 B2
7542969 Rappaport et al. Jun 2009 B1
7548910 Chu et al. Jun 2009 B1
7555477 Bayley et al. Jun 2009 B2
7555478 Bayley et al. Jun 2009 B2
7562076 Kapur Jul 2009 B2
7574436 Kapur et al. Aug 2009 B2
7574668 Nunez et al. Aug 2009 B2
7577656 Kawai et al. Aug 2009 B2
7657100 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660468 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7694318 Eldering et al. Apr 2010 B2
7836054 Kawai et al. Nov 2010 B2
7920894 Wyler Apr 2011 B2
7921107 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7933407 Keidar et al. Apr 2011 B2
7974994 Li et al. Jul 2011 B2
7987194 Walker et al. Jul 2011 B1
7987217 Long et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991715 Schiff et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000655 Wang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8023739 Hohimer et al. Sep 2011 B2
8036893 Reich Oct 2011 B2
8098934 Vincent et al. Jan 2012 B2
8112376 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2012 B2
8266185 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2012 B2
8312031 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2012 B2
8315442 Gokturk et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316005 Moore Nov 2012 B2
8326775 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 B2
8345982 Gokturk et al. Jan 2013 B2
8548828 Longmire Oct 2013 B1
8655801 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8677377 Cheyer et al. Mar 2014 B2
8682667 Haughay Mar 2014 B2
8688446 Yanagihara Apr 2014 B2
8706503 Cheyer et al. Apr 2014 B2
8775442 Moore et al. Jul 2014 B2
8799195 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8799196 Raichelquaz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8818916 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8868619 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2014 B2
8880539 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8880566 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8886648 Procopio et al. Nov 2014 B1
8898568 Bull et al. Nov 2014 B2
8922414 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2014 B2
8959037 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2015 B2
8990125 Raichelgauz et al. Mar 2015 B2
9009086 Raichelgauz et al. Apr 2015 B2
9031999 Raichelgauz et al. May 2015 B2
9087049 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2015 B2
9104747 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9165406 Gray et al. Oct 2015 B1
9191626 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9197244 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9218606 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2015 B2
9235557 Raichelgauz et al. Jan 2016 B2
9256668 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2016 B2
9323754 Ramanathan et al. Apr 2016 B2
9330189 Raichelgauz et al. May 2016 B2
9384196 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2016 B2
9438270 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2016 B2
9606992 Geisner et al. Mar 2017 B2
20010019633 Tenze et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010038876 Anderson Nov 2001 A1
20010056427 Yoon et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020010682 Johnson Jan 2002 A1
20020019881 Bokhari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038299 Zernik Mar 2002 A1
20020059580 Kalker et al. May 2002 A1
20020072935 Rowse et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087530 Smith et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099870 Miller et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107827 Benitez-Jimenez et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123928 Eldering et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020126872 Brunk et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129140 Peled et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129296 Kwiat et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143976 Barker et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147637 Kraft et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152267 Lennon Oct 2002 A1
20020157116 Jasinschi Oct 2002 A1
20020159640 Vaithilingam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161739 Oh Oct 2002 A1
20020163532 Thomas et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174095 Lulich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178410 Haitsma et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030028660 Igawa et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041047 Chang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050815 Seigel et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078766 Appelt et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030086627 Berriss et al. May 2003 A1
20030089216 Birmingham et al. May 2003 A1
20030105739 Essafi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126147 Essafi et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030182567 Barton et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030191764 Richards Oct 2003 A1
20030200217 Ackerman Oct 2003 A1
20030217335 Chung Nov 2003 A1
20030229531 Heckerman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003394 Ramaswamy Jan 2004 A1
20040025180 Begeja et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040068510 Hayes et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040107181 Rodden Jun 2004 A1
20040111465 Chuang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117367 Smith et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128142 Whitham Jul 2004 A1
20040128511 Sun et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133927 Sternberg Jul 2004 A1
20040153426 Nugent Aug 2004 A1
20040215663 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249779 Nauck et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260688 Gross Dec 2004 A1
20040267774 Lin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021394 Miedema Jan 2005 A1
20050114198 Koningstein et al. May 2005 A1
20050131884 Gross et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144455 Haitsma Jun 2005 A1
20050172130 Roberts Aug 2005 A1
20050177372 Wang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050238238 Ku et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245241 Durand et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262428 Little et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281439 Lange Dec 2005 A1
20050289163 Gordon Dec 2005 A1
20050289590 Cheok et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004745 Kuhn et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013451 Haitsma Jan 2006 A1
20060020860 Tardif et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020958 Allamanche et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026203 Tan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031216 Semple et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041596 Stirbu et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060048191 Xiong Mar 2006 A1
20060064037 Shalon et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060112035 Cecchi et al. May 2006 A1
20060129822 Snijder et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143674 Jones et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153296 Deng Jul 2006 A1
20060159442 Kim et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173688 Whitham Aug 2006 A1
20060184638 Chua et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204035 Guo et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060217818 Fujiwara Sep 2006 A1
20060217828 Hicken Sep 2006 A1
20060224529 Kermani Oct 2006 A1
20060236343 Chang Oct 2006 A1
20060242139 Butterfield Oct 2006 A1
20060242554 Gerace et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247983 Dalli Nov 2006 A1
20060248558 Barton et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253423 McLane et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070009159 Fan Jan 2007 A1
20070011151 Hagar et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019864 Koyama et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070022374 Huang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070033163 Epstein et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038608 Chen Feb 2007 A1
20070038614 Guha Feb 2007 A1
20070042757 Jung et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070061302 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067304 Ives Mar 2007 A1
20070067682 Fang Mar 2007 A1
20070071330 Oostveen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074147 Wold Mar 2007 A1
20070083611 Farago et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091106 Moroney Apr 2007 A1
20070130112 Lin Jun 2007 A1
20070130159 Gulli et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070168413 Barletta et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174320 Chou Jul 2007 A1
20070195987 Rhoads Aug 2007 A1
20070220573 Chiussi et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244902 Seide et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253594 Lu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255785 Hayashi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070268309 Tanigawa et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282826 Hoeber et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070294295 Finkelstein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298152 Baets Dec 2007 A1
20080046406 Seide Feb 2008 A1
20080049629 Morrill Feb 2008 A1
20080072256 Boicey et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080091527 Silverbrook et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080152231 Gokturk et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163288 Ghosal et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165861 Wen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172615 Igelman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201299 Lehikoinen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204706 Magne et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228995 Tan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237359 Silverbrook et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080253737 Kimura et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263579 Mears et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270373 Oostveen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080313140 Pereira et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013414 Washington et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022472 Bronstein et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024641 Quigley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037408 Rodgers Feb 2009 A1
20090043637 Eder Feb 2009 A1
20090043818 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090089587 Brunk et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119157 Dulepet May 2009 A1
20090125544 Brindley May 2009 A1
20090148045 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157575 Schobben et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172030 Schiff et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175538 Bronstein et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090245573 Saptharishi et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090245603 Koruga et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090253583 Yoganathan Oct 2009 A1
20090259687 Mai et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090277322 Cai et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100042646 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100082684 Churchill et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100104184 Bronstein et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100125569 Nair et al. May 2010 A1
20100162405 Cook et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100173269 Puri et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100268524 Nath et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100306193 Pereira et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318493 Wessling Dec 2010 A1
20100322522 Wang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110052063 McAuley et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110055585 Lee Mar 2011 A1
20110145068 King et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110202848 Ismalon Aug 2011 A1
20110246566 Kashef et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110251896 Impollonia et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110296315 Lin et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313856 Cohen et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120082362 Diem et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120131454 Shah May 2012 A1
20120150890 Jeong Jun 2012 A1
20120167133 Carroll et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120185445 Borden et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120197857 Huang et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120239694 Avner et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120299961 Ramkumar et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120330869 Durham Dec 2012 A1
20120331011 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130031489 Gubin et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130066856 Ong et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130067035 Amanat et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130067364 Berntson et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080433 Raichelgauz et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130086499 Dyor et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130089248 Remiszewski et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130104251 Moore Apr 2013 A1
20130159298 Mason et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130173635 Sanjeev Jul 2013 A1
20130226930 Amgren et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130311924 Denker et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325550 Varghese et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332951 Gharaat et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140019264 Wachman et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025692 Pappas Jan 2014 A1
20140147829 Jerauld May 2014 A1
20140152698 Kim et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176604 Venkitaraman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188786 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140193077 Shiiyama et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140250032 Huang et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140282655 Roberts Sep 2014 A1
20140300722 Garcia Oct 2014 A1
20140310825 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140330830 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150154189 Raichelgauz et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150286742 Zhang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150289022 Gross Oct 2015 A1
20160026707 Ong et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160239566 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
0231764 Apr 2002 WO
2003005242 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03067467 Aug 2003 WO
2004019527 Mar 2004 WO
2005027457 Mar 2005 WO
20070049282 May 2007 WO
2014137337 Sep 2014 WO
2016040376 Mar 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (80)
Entry
Jianping Fan et al., “Concept-Oriented Indexing of Video Databases: Toward Semantic Sensitive Retrieval and Browsing”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-19.
Chuan-Yu Cho et al., “Efficient Motion-Vector-Based Video Search Using Query by Clip”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-4.
Wei-Te Li et al., “Exploring Visual and Motion Saliency for Automatic Video Object Extraction”, Jul. 2013, IEEE, pp. 1-11.
Ihab Al Kabary et al., “SportSense: Using Motion Queries to find Scenes in Sports Videos”, Oct. 27, 2013, ACM, pp. 1-3.
Shih-Fu Chang, “VideoQ: A Fully Automated Video Retrieval System Using Motion Sketches”, 1998, IEEE, pp. 1-2.
Burgsteiner et al.: “Movement Prediction From Real-World Images Using a Liquid State Machine”, Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, BE, vol. 3533, Jun. 2005, pp. 121-130.
Cernansky et al., “Feed-forward Echo State Networks”; Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2005; Entire Document.
Fathy et al., “A Parallel Design and Implementation for Backpropagation Neural Network Using NIMD Architecture”, 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Corsfe rersce, 19'96. MELECON '96, Date of Conference: May 13-16, 1996, vol. 3, pp. 1472-1475
Foote, Jonathan et al., “Content-Based Retrieval of Music and Audio”, 1997, Institute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore (Abstract).
Freisleben et al., “Recognition of Fractal Images Using a Neural Network”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993, vol. 6861, 1993, pp. 631-637.
Howlett et al., “A Multi-Computer Neural Network Architecture in a Virtual Sensor System Application”, International Journal of Knowledge-based Intelligent Engineering Systems, 4 (2). pp. 86-93, 133N 1327-2314, Mar. 10, 2000.
International Search Authority: “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis.1) including International Search Report for the related International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/073852; dated Jan. 28, 2009; Entire Document.
International Search Authority: International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) including “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis. 1) for the corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235; dated Jul. 28, 2009.
International Search Report for the corresponding International Patent Application PCT/IL2006/001235; dated Nov. 2, 2008.
IPO Examination Report under Section 18(3) for corresponding UK application No. GB1001219.3, dated May 30, 2012.
Iwamoto, K.; Kasutani, E.; Yamada, A.: “Image Signature Robust to Caption Superimposition for Video Sequence Identification”; 2006 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; pp. 3185-3188, Oct. 8-11, 2006; doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2006.313046.
Jaeger, H.: “The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks”, GMD Report, No. 148, 2001, pp. 1-43, XP002466251. German National Research Center for Information Technology.
Lin, C.; Chang, S.;, “Generating Robust Digital Signature for Image/Video Authentication,”Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Multimedia '98. Bristol, U.K. Sep. 1998, pp. 49-54.
Lyon, Richard F.; “Computational Models of Neural Auditory Processing”; IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP '84, Date of Conference: Mar. 1984, vol. 9, pp. 41-44.
Maass, W. et al.: “Computational Models for Generic Cortical Microcircuits”, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universitaet Graz, Graz, Austria, published Jun. 10, 2003.
Morad, T.Y. et al.: “Performance, Power Efficiency and Scalability of Asymmetric Cluster Chip Multiprocessors”, Computer Architecture Letters, vol. 4, Jul. 4, 2005 (Jul. 4, 2005), pp. 1-4, XP002466254.
Natsclager, T. et al.: “The “liquid computer”: A novel strategy for real-time computing on time series”, Special Issue on Foundations of Information Processing of Telematik, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 39-43, XP002466253.
Ortiz-Boyer et al., “CIXL2: A Crossover Operator for Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Population Features”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24 (2005), pp. 1-48 Submitted Nov. 2004; published Jul. 2005.
Raichelgauz, I. et al.: “Co-evolutionary Learning in Liquid Architectures”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, [Online] vol. 3512, Jun. 21, 2005 (Jun. 21, 2005), pp. 241-248, XP019010280 Springer Berlin / Heidelberg ISSN: 1611-3349 ISBN: 978-3-540-26208-4.
Ribert et al. “An Incremental Hierarchical Clustering”, Visicon Interface 1999, pp. 586-591.
Verstraeten et al., “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”; Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Available online Jul. 14, 2005; Entire Document.
Verstraeten et al.: “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine; a case study”, Information Processing Letters, Amsterdam, NL, col. 95, No. 6, Sep. 30, 2005 (Sep. 30, 2005), pp. 521-528, XP005028093 ISSN: 0020-0190.
Ware et al., “Locating and Identifying Components in a Robot's Workspace using a Hybrid Computer Architecture”; Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 27-29, 1995, pp. 139-144.
Xian-Sheng Hua et al.: “Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure” In: 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP '04; Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China; published Oct. 24-27, 2004, pp. 685-688.
Zeevi, Y. et al.: “Natural Signal Classification by Neural Cliques and Phase-Locked Attractors”, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, IJCNN2006, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2006 (Jul. 2006), XP002466252.
Zhou et al., “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”; National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing Unviersirty, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China; Available online Mar. 12, 2002; Entire Document.
Zhou et al., “Medical Diagnosis With C4.5 Rule Preceded by Artificial Neural Network Ensemble”; IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 7, Issue: 1, pp. 37-42, Date of Publication: Mar. 2003.
Boari et al, “Adaptive Routing for Dynamic Applications in Massively Parallel Architectures”, 1995 IEEE, Spring 1995.
Cococcioni, et al, “Automatic Diagnosis of Defects of Rolling Element Bearings Based on Computational Intelligence Techniques”, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2009.
Emami, et al, “Role of Spatiotemporal Oriented Energy Features for Robust Visual Tracking in Video Surveillance, University of Queensland”, St. Lucia, Australia, 2012.
Garcia, “Solving the Weighted Region Least Cost Path Problem Using Transputers”, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, Dec. 1989.
Mandhaoui, et al, “Emotional Speech Characterization Based on Multi-Features Fusion for Face-to-Face Interaction”, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 2009.
Marti, et al, “Real Time Speaker Localization and Detection System for Camera Steering in Multiparticipant Videoconferencing Environments”, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Spain, 2011.
Nagy et al, “A Transputer, Based, Flexible, Real-Time Control System for Robotic Manipulators”, UKACC International Conference on CONTROL '96, Sep. 2-5, 1996, Conference 1996, Conference Publication No. 427, IEE 1996.
Scheper, et al. “Nonlinear dynamics in neural computation”, ESANN'2006 proceedings—European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), Apr. 26-28, 2006, d-side publi, ISBN 2-930307-06-4.
Theodoropoulos et al, “Simulating Asynchronous Architectures on Transputer Networks”, Proceedings of the Fourth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1996. PDP '96.
Guo et al, “AdOn: An Intelligent Overlay Video Advertising System”, SIGIR, Boston, Massachusetts, Jul. 19-23, 2009.
Mei, et al., “Contextual In-Image Advertising”, Microsoft Research Asia, pp. 439-448, 2008.
Mei, et al., “VideoSense—Towards Effective Online Video Advertising”, Microsoft Research Asia, pp. 1075-1084, 2007.
Semizarov et al. “Specificity of Short Interfering RNA Determined through Gene Expression Signatures”, PNAS, 2003, pp. 6347-6352.
Clement, et al. “Speaker Diarization of Heterogeneous Web Video Files: A Preliminary Study”, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2011, IEEE International Conference on Year: 2011, pp. 4432-4435, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947337 IEEE Conference Publications, France.
Gong, et al., “A Knowledge-based Mediator for Dynamic Integration of Heterogeneous Multimedia Information Sources”, Video and Speech Processing, 2004, Proceedings of 2004 International Symposium on Year: 2004, pp. 467-470, DOI: 10.1109/ISIMP.2004.1434102 IEEE Conference Publications, Hong Kong.
Lin, et al., “Summarization of Large Scale Social Network Activity”, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2009, ICASSP 2009, IEEE International Conference on Year 2009, pp. 3481-3484, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4960375, IEEE Conference Publications, Arizona.
Liu, et al., “Instant Mobile Video Search With Layered Audio-Video Indexing and Progressive Transmission”, Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on Year: 2014, vol. 16, Issue: 8, pp. 2242-2255, DOI: 10.1109/TMM.20142359332 IEEE Journals & Magazines.
Mladenovic, et al., “Electronic Tour Guide for Android Mobile Platform with Multimedia Travel Book”, Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), 2012 20th Year: 2012, pp. 1460-1463, DOI: 10.1109/TELFOR.2012.6419494 IEEE Conference Publication.
Nouza, et al., “Large-scale Processing, Indexing and Search System for Czech Audio-Visual Heritage Archives”, Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2012, pp. 337-342, IEEE 14th Intl. Workshop, DOI: 10.1109/MMSP.2012.6343465, Czech Republic.
Park, et al., “Compact Video Signatures for Near-Duplicate Detection on Mobile Devices”, Consumer Electronics (ISCE 2014), The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Year: 2014, pp. 1-2, DOI: 10.1109/ISCE.2014.6884293 IEEE Conference Publications.
Wang et al. “A Signature for Content-based Image Retrieval Using a Geometrical Transform”, ACM 1998, pp. 229-234.
Zang, et al., “A New Multimedia Message Customizing Framework for Mobile Devices”, Multimedia and Expo, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Year: 2007, pp. 1043-1046, DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2007.4284832 IEEE Conference Publications.
Li, et al., “Matching Commercial Clips from TV Streams Using a Unique, Robust and Compact Signature,” Proceedings of the Digital Imaging Computing: Techniques and Applications, Feb. 2005, vol. 0/7695-2467, Australia.
Lin, et al., “Robust Digital Signature for Multimedia Authentication: A Summary”, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 4th Quarter 2003, pp. 23-26.
May et al., “The Transputer”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1989, teaches multiprocessing system.
Vailaya, et al., “Content-Based Hierarchical Classification of Vacation Images,” I.E.E.E. Multimedia Computing and Systems, vol. 1, 1999, East Lansing, MI, pp. 518-523.
Vallet, et al., “Personalized Content Retrieval in Context Using Ontological Knowledge,” IEEE Transactions on circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 2007, pp. 336-346.
Whitby-Strevens, “The Transputer”, 1985 IEEE, Bristol, UK.
Yanai, “Generic Image Classification Using Visual Knowledge on the Web,” MM'03, Nov. 2-8, 2003, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 167-176.
Brecheisen, et al., “Hierarchical Genre Classification for Large Music Collections”, ICME 2006, pp. 1385-1388.
Gomes et al., “Audio Watermaking and Fingerprinting: For Which Applications?” University of Rene Descartes, Paris, France, 2003.
Nam, et al., “Audio Visual Content-Based Violent Scene Characterization”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 1998, pp. 353-357.
Zhu et al., Technology-Assisted Dietary Assessment. Computational Imaging VI, edited by Charles A. Bouman, Eric L. Miller, Ilya Pollak, Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE vol. 6814, 681411, Copyright 2008 SPIE-IS&T. pp. 1-10.
Lau, et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications Year: 2008, pp. 98-103, DOI: 10.1109/CITISIA.2008.4607342 IEEE Conference Publications.
McNamara, et al., “Diversity Decay in Opportunistic Content Sharing Systems”, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks Year: 2011, pp. 1-3, DOI: 10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986211 IEEE Conference Publications.
Odinaev, et al., “Cliques in Neural Ensembles as Perception Carriers”, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Canada, 2006, pp. 285-292.
Santos, et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for Multimedia and e-Learning”, 2015 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) Year: 2015, pp. 224-228, DOI: 10.1109/SOFTCOM.2015.7314122 IEEE Conference Publications.
Wilk, et al., “The Potential of Social-Aware Multimedia Prefetching on Mobile Devices”, 2015 International Conference and Workshops on Networked Systems (NetSys) Year: 2015, pp. 1-5, DOI: 10.1109/NetSys.2015.7089081 IEEE Conference Publications.
Johnson, John L., “Pulse-Coupled Neural Nets: Translation, Rotation, Scale, Distortion, and Intensity Signal Invariance for Images.” Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 26, 1994, pp. 6239-6253.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/050471, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated May 4, 2017.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/054634 dated Mar. 16, 2017, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/015831, ISA/RU, Moscow, Russia, dated Apr. 20, 2017.
Hua, et al., Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure, Image Processing, 2004. 2004 International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 685-688, 2004.
Queluz, “Content-Based Integrity Protection of Digital Images”, SPIE Conf. on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, San Jose, Jan. 1999, pp. 85-93, downloaded from http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on Aug. 2, 2017.
Schneider, et. al., “A Robust Content Based Digital Signature for Image Authentication”, Proc. ICIP 1996, Laussane, Switzerland, Oct. 1996, pp. 227-230.
Yanagawa, et al., “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts.” Columbia University Advent technical report, 2007, pp. 222-2006-8.
Zou, et al., “A Content-Based Image Authentication System with Lossless Data Hiding”, ICME 2003, pp. 213-216.
Hogue, “Tree Pattern Inference and Matching for Wrapper Induction on the World Wide Web”, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004, pp. 1-106.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140297682 A1 Oct 2014 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61833932 Jun 2013 US
61833931 Jun 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12603123 Oct 2009 US
Child 13602858 US
Continuation in Parts (11)
Number Date Country
Parent 13602858 Sep 2012 US
Child 14302487 US
Parent 12084150 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12195863 Aug 2008 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12084150 Apr 2009 US
Child 12195863 US
Parent 12348888 Jan 2009 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12084150 Apr 2009 US
Child 12348888 US
Parent 12195863 Aug 2008 US
Child 12084150 US
Parent 12538495 Aug 2009 US
Child 12603123 US
Parent 12084150 Apr 2009 US
Child 12538495 US
Parent 12195863 Aug 2008 US
Child 12084150 US
Parent 12348888 Jan 2009 US
Child 12195863 US