Patent Grant
9084547
The present invention relates to a system and a method for checking the status of a battery located in a sensing device in general and an in-vivo imaging device in particular.
Such a sensing device may be an in-vivo sensing device, such as a capsule used, for example, for sensing of passages or cavities within a body, and for collecting data (e.g., image data, pH data, temperature information, pressure information), as known in the art. Such sensing devices are generally used in conjunction with other equipment that may include, inter alia, various endoscopic imaging systems and equipment for performing imaging in various internal body cavities. Some such sensing devices transmit the collected data to an external receiving unit.
The in-vivo sensing device may include, for example, an imaging system for obtaining images from inside a body cavity or lumen, such as the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The imaging system may include, for example, an illumination unit, such as a set of light emitting diodes (LEDs), or other suitable light sources. The device may include an imaging sensor and an optical system, which focuses the images onto the imaging sensor. A transmitter and antenna may be included for transmitting the images signals. Alternatively, a transceiver may be included so that the in-vivo sensing device may receive signals from an external transmitter. An external receiver/recorder, for example worn by the patient, may record transmitted image data and store image and other data. The recorded data may then be downloaded from the receiver/recorder to a computer or workstation for display and analysis.
The transmitter/transceiver and illumination unit of the in-vivo sensing device may be powered by a battery installed therein during production. The production process involves various stages during which the battery may be intentionally or accidentally activated and consequently use some of its power. After production, the device may be stored for a period of time and then shipped to a customer over another period of time. During these periods of time, the battery may also possibly be accidentally activated and therefore use some of its power. The total time for which the battery was in use prior to the device reaching the customer is a measure of the remaining battery life time.
Sensing of passages or cavities within a body may take several hours. Clearly, it is undesirable to use an in-vivo sensing device having a battery that is inoperative, or that may become inoperative before the in-vivo sensing device has completed imaging the required length of passages or cavities within the body that are under inspection. In general, components of the in-vivo sensing device have specified operating voltage ranges. Situations may arise in which the in-vivo sensing device's battery may become defective before use by the patient, or its voltage may not be constant over a required period of time. Therefore, if the voltage of the battery was to fall below a certain critical voltage, some of the components may not function correctly, if at all.
The in-vivo sensing device may be a closed and sealed unit such as an autonomous swallowable capsule in which the battery was installed during production. Therefore, there is a need for a non-invasive method of checking the status of the battery, prior to use.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided
In accordance with some embodiments, the in-vivo imaging device may be a swallowable capsule.
In accordance with some embodiments, the swallowable capsule may be autonomous.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an in-vivo imaging system, comprising an in-vivo imaging device and a receiver, the in-vivo imaging device being powered by a battery, the receiver and the in-vivo imaging device being separate physically non-connected members;
the in-vivo imaging device comprising:
an imager for capturing image frames;
a frame counter for counting the number of image frames captured; and
a transmitter for wirelessly transmitting at least the number of image frames captured;
the receiver comprising:
at least one antenna for receiving data transmitted by the in-vivo imaging device;
a receiver memory for storing data received by the at least one antenna;
a receiver data processor; and
a receiver indicator for indicating a warning if the number of image frames counted exceeds a critical number of frames.
In accordance with some embodiments, the transmitter is a radio frequency transmitter.
In accordance with some embodiments, the transmitter transmits, inter alia, image data.
In accordance with some embodiments, the imaging device may be a swallowable capsule and may be autonomous.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an in-vivo imaging system, comprising an in-vivo imaging device, a receiver and a workstation, the in-vivo imaging device being powered by a battery, the receiver and the in-vivo imaging device being separate physically non-connected members;
If desired, the workstation indicator may be a workstation display screen or a source of light such as a Light Emitting Diode.
There also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention a method for checking the status of an in-vivo imaging device, comprising the steps of:
In accordance with some embodiments, the warning is indicated by an indicator located in the in-vivo sensing device.
In accordance with other embodiments, the warning is indicated by the in-vivo imaging device shutting down.
In accordance with yet other embodiments, the warning is indicated by the in-vivo imaging device suppressing the operation of illumination sources.
In accordance with another embodiment, there is provided a method for checking the status of an in-vivo imaging device, comprising the steps of:
In accordance with yet another embodiment, there is provided a method for checking the status in-vivo imaging device, comprising the steps of:
In accordance with another embodiment, there is provided a method for checking the status of an in-vivo imaging device powered by a battery installed therein, comprising the steps of:
In accordance with another embodiment, there is provided a method for checking the status of an in-vivo imaging device powered by a battery installed therein, comprising the steps of:
In accordance with yet another embodiment, there is provided a method for checking the status of an in-vivo imaging device powered by a battery installed therein, comprising the steps of:
In the following description, various aspects of the present invention will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without the specific details presented herein. Furthermore, well known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the present invention.
The device, system and method of the present invention may be used with an imaging system or device such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,531 entitled “In Vivo Video Camera System,” which is incorporated herein by reference. A further example of an imaging system and device with which the system and method of the present invention may be used is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2001/0035902 entitled “Device and System for In Vivo Imaging,” which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Reference is made to
In some embodiments, prior to use by a patient, the in-vivo imaging device 10 is retained in a container in a non-operative state so that no power, or only a negligibly small amount of power, is withdrawn from the battery 32. According to one embodiment when the in-vivo imaging device 10 is removed from the container, prior to use, it becomes operative. According to another embodiment, the in-vivo imaging device is activated, i.e. made operative, by other means, prior to use by a patient. Under certain circumstances the in-vivo imaging device 10 may become operative for certain periods of time prior to it being used by a patient. That is, even before reaching the patient. This may happen during production either intentionally in order to check the in-vivo imaging device 10 or accidentally. This may also possibly happen during transportation and possibly during storage of the in-vivo imaging device 10. When the in-vivo imaging device 10 is operative it draws power from the battery 32 to operate, inter alia, the illumination sources 20, the imager 14 as it captures image frames and the transmitter as it transmits, inter alia, image frame data captured by the imager 14. The number of image frames captured by the imager 14 may be representative of the time during which the in-vivo imaging device 10 was operative. Consequently, the number of image frames captured by the imager 14 and transmitted by the in-vivo imaging device 10 prior to it being used by the patient may be indicative of the effective remaining lifetime of the battery.
In some embodiments, if the number of image frames captured and registered by the processor, prior to use of the in-vivo imaging device 10 by a patient, exceeds a critical number of frames, the battery lifetime is determined to be faulty and a faulty battery lifetime indication is generated. If T1 is the lifetime in seconds of an unused battery, T2 is the time in seconds that the battery was in use before the in-vivo imaging device 10 reached the patient, and T3 is the time required for sensing passages or cavities within the body of the patient; then T1−T2=T4 is the remaining lifetime of the battery and clearly T4 has to be greater than T3. If the time, T2, that the battery was in use before the in-vivo imaging device 10 reached the patient, reaches a critical value TC for which T4 is not greater than T3, and the imager 14 captures images at a rate of N frames per second, then the critical number of frames is N×T2. In a nonbinding example, if the imager 14 captures images at a rate of 2 frames per second and it is determined that TC=10 minutes, then the critical number of frames is 1200.
The indicator 30 may indicate a warning that the effective remaining lifetime of the battery 32 is low, that is, lower than the battery lifetime necessary for the in-vivo imaging device to complete imaging the required length of passages or cavities within the body that are under inspection. The indicator 30 may be an auxiliary source of light, such as a LED, and the warning may be a flashing of the auxiliary source of light, flashing on and off. In other embodiments, the warning may be indicated by the illumination sources 20 flashing on and off at a given frequency different to the flashing on and off frequency used when capturing image frames.
The transmitter 24 may transmit data, for example, via an antenna 34. Such data may include for example, image data and possibly the number of image frames captured by the imager 14 and possibly other data. The transmitted data may be received by the receiver 12 which is located outside the patient's body, for example, via a receiver antenna 36 or antenna array.
According to one embodiment, the receiver 12 preferably includes a receiver memory 38, for storing data transmitted by the in-vivo imaging device 10 and a receiver processor 40 for processing at least partially the received data. The receiver 12 may include a display 42, for displaying, inter alia, the image data received from the in-vivo imaging device 10. The receiver 12 may also include a receiver indicator 44 which may issue a warning that the battery power of the in-vivo imaging device's battery 32 is low. In some embodiments, the receiver 12 may also include a transmitter enabling it to transmit data or instructions to the in-vivo imaging device 10 via a transmitter antenna.
In some embodiments, when the in-vivo imaging device 10 is activated, prior to being used by a patient, the number of image frames captured by the imager 14 of the in-vivo imaging device 10, due to intentional or unintentional operation of the in-vivo imaging device 10, may be transmitted by the transmitter 24 and received by the receiver 12. If the receiver processor 40 determines that the received number of image frames exceeds the critical number of frames, the receiver 12 may issue a warning. The warning issued by the receiver 12 may be issued in different forms, depending on the nature of the receiver indicator 44. In some embodiments, the receiver indicator may be a source of light, such as a LED and the warning issued may be a visual signal, for example, in the form of a flashing on and off of the receiver indicator 44. Alternatively, the receiver indicator 44 may be an LCD display, or the like, and the warning issued may be visual signal in the form of an appropriate written warning message indicating that the battery power of the battery 32 may be low. In some embodiments, the receiver indicator 44 may be a loudspeaker, and the warning issued may be an audio signal. In other embodiments, the receiver indicator may be both a loudspeaker and a visual member, so that the warning issued may be either or both audio and visual. The warning issued by the receiver indicator 44 may be in addition to, or instead of, a warning issued by the in-vivo imaging device's indicator 30. In some embodiments, if the receiver processor 40 determines that the received number of image frames exceeds the critical number of frames, the receiver 12 may transmit to the in-vivo imaging device 10 an appropriate signal, indicating that the received number of image frames exceeds the critical number of frames as a result of which a warning is issued by the in-vivo imaging device's indicator 30. In some embodiments, if the receiver processor 40 determines that the received number of image frames exceeds the critical number of frames the in-vivo imaging system electrically shuts down. In such embodiments, inadvertent use of the in-vivo imaging device 10 is prevented. The system shut down may be a shut down of the in-vivo imaging device 10 or of the receiver 12, or of both the in-vivo imaging device 10 and the receiver 12.
Situations may arise in which the in-vivo imaging device's battery 32 may become defective, or its voltage may not be constant over a required period of time. In such cases, the voltage status of the battery 32 may be such that the in-vivo imaging device may not function properly, independent of whether or not the number of image frames captured by the imager 14 exceeds the critical number of frames prior to use of the in-vivo imaging device 10 by the patient.
Prior to use of the in-vivo imaging device 10 the battery voltage may be monitored and may be compared with a critical voltage value in the in-vivo imaging device 10 to determine if it substantially deviates from that value as a function of time. If, prior to use, the monitored battery voltage is determined to deviate from the critical voltage value as a function of time by amounts outside an acceptable limit, then the battery voltage is determined to be faulty and a faulty battery voltage indication is generated. In accordance with some embodiments, on activating the in-vivo imaging device 10, the indicator 30 may indicate a warning. In accordance with other embodiments, on activating the in-vivo imaging device 10, the faulty battery voltage indication may be transmitted to the receiver 12 and the receiver indicator 44 may indicate a warning. In accordance with yet other embodiments, on activating the in-vivo imaging device 10, monitored voltage values may be transmitted to the receiver 12 and may be compared with a critical voltage value in the receiver 12 to determine if they deviate from that value as a function of time by amounts outside an acceptable limit. If, prior to use, the monitored battery voltage is determined to deviate from the critical voltage value as a function of time by amounts outside an acceptable limit, then the receiver indicator 44 may indicate a warning.
In accordance with some embodiments, the number of images frames and the monitored battery voltage received by the receiver 12 may be downloaded from the receiver 12 to a workstation 46 that includes a workstation display 48, a workstation indicator 50 and a workstation processor 52. Determining if the battery has a faulty lifetime and/or a faulty voltage, may be performed at the workstation 46 by the workstation processor 52. If either or both of the two faulty battery conditions is determined to exist then appropriate warning may be indicated by the work station 46, either on the workstation display 48 or by the workstation indicator 50. The warning on the workstation display 48 may be in the form of a written warning. The workstation indicator 50 may be a source of light, such as a LED, for generating a visible warning signal and/or a source of sound, such as a loudspeaker, for generating an audio warning signal. In some embodiments, if it is determined by the workstation processor 52 that either or both of the two faulty battery conditions is determined to exist, the workstation may instruct the receiver 12 to transmit to the in-vivo imaging device 10 an appropriate signal, indicating the existence of a faulty battery condition, as a result of which a warning is issued by the in-vivo imaging device's indicator 30.
Accordingly, if on activating the in-vivo imaging device 10, prior to use by a patient, the battery is determined to be faulty, either by having a low effective remaining lifetime or by having unacceptable voltage characteristics, the patient will be warned of the situation and may decide not swallow the in-vivo imaging device 10.
In some embodiments, if on activating the in-vivo imaging device 10, prior to use by a patient, the battery is determined to be faulty, either by having a low effective remaining lifetime or by having unacceptable voltage characteristics, the in-vivo imaging system electrically shuts down. In such embodiments, inadvertent use of the faulty in-vivo imaging device 10 is prevented. The system shut down may be a shut down of the in-vivo imaging device 10 or of the receiver 12, or of both the in-vivo imaging device 10 and the receiver 12.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Alternate embodiments are contemplated which fall within the scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/787,187, filed on Mar. 30, 2006, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2216974 | Hogan | Oct 1940 | A |
| 3146326 | Thorne | Aug 1964 | A |
| 3683389 | Hollis | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3971362 | Pope et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4278077 | Mizumoto | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4689621 | Kleinberg | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4741327 | Yabe | May 1988 | A |
| 4844076 | Lesho et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 5279607 | Schentag et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5400267 | Denen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5604531 | Iddan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5609561 | Uehara et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5819736 | Avny et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5967969 | Enomoto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5993378 | Iemelson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6204746 | Kane et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6240312 | Alfano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6436032 | Eto et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6516227 | Meadows et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6632175 | Marshall | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6709387 | Glukhovsky et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6712756 | Kura et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 7009634 | Iddan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 20010017649 | Yaron | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010041825 | Shibata et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051766 | Gazdzinski | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020103417 | Gazdzinski | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198439 | Mizuno | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030043263 | Glukhovsky et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114742 | Lewkowicz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117491 | Avni et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171648 | Yokoi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171649 | Yokoi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171652 | Yokoi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040027459 | Segawa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073087 | Glukhovsky et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087832 | Glukhovsky et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138552 | Harel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050261552 | Mori et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060178557 | Mintchev et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224063 | Segawa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252986 | Akagi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070255087 | Minai | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080108868 | Swain et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262313 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080267466 | Fujita et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090326514 | Takizawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3440177 | May 1986 | DE |
| 57-45833 | Mar 1982 | JP |
| 3-289779 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 4-109927 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 1992-144533 | May 1992 | JP |
| 4-180736 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 7289504 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 2001137182 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2001224551 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2001224553 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| WO 9221307 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO 9811816 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO 0108548 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 0135813 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 0150941 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0165995 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0187377 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 02067593 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 03009739 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03010967 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03011103 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03028224 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| PCTIL2004000287 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/493,751, Glukhovsky et al. |
| Wang et al, “Integrated Micro-Instrumentation for Dynamic Monitoring of the Gastro-Intestinal Tract”, Presented at IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, May 2002, Anchorage, Ak, USA, 222.see.ed.ac.uk/Naa.publications.html. |
| “Robots for the future” Shin-ichi, et al, Nov. 29, 2001. |
| “The Radio Pill”, Rowlands et al, British Communications and Electronics, Aug. 1960, pp. 598-601. |
| “Video Camera to “TAKE””—RF System lab, Dec. 25, 2001. |
| “Wellesley company sends body monitors into space”—Crum, Apr. 1998. |
| www.nfnorkia.com—NORIKA3 Dec. 24, 2001. |
| “Wireless transmission of a color television moving image from the stomach using a miniature CCD camera, light source and microwave transmitter”. Swain CP, Gong F, Mills TN, Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45;AB40. |
| BBC News Online—Pill camera to broadcast from the gut, Feb. 21, 2000, www.news.bbc.co.uk. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/695,847 mailed on May 11, 2006. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/695,847 mailed on Jul. 11, 2006. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/695,847 mailed on Jun. 22, 2005. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/695,847 mailed on Mar. 19, 2007. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070232887 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60787187 | Mar 2006 | US |
