This invention relates generally to the telephony field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for client communication in a distributed telephony network.
In recent years, innovations in the web application and Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) have brought about considerable changes to the capabilities offered through traditional phone services. In some distributed or cloud-based telephony systems, the routing of audio, video, or other media files can be determined or limited by the location and/or availability of the appropriate computing resources. In some instances, some or all of the callers reside in the same region, country, or continent as the bulk of the computing resources, thereby promoting increased call quality. However, if one or more of the parties to the call is located in a different region, country, or continent, then it is not readily apparent which computing resources should be utilized. Similarly, if the platform infrastructure is based in one region, communication outside of that region will be poor quality. For example, if the two callers reside in different countries, it might be unclear which of many computing resources should be allocated to the particular session. Furthermore, as more communication platforms are supported by cloud computing services located in distinct areas, core-computing infrastructure may be limited to particular locations. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for determining the shortest, highest quality, and/or optimized route for session traffic in a globally distributed telephony system. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method, described in detail below with reference to the appended figures.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
Preferred System
As shown in
As shown in
The provider services (P1, P2, P3) preferably receive or initiate communication to an endpoint such as a caller, a mobile or browser client. The provider service is preferably an interface between the communication platform of the system 10 and communication providers. Communication providers preferably include telephony carrier networks, client applications using IP based communication protocols, or any suitable outside network. The system 10 may include a plurality of regions in addition to the first and second regions 12, 14. The provider services are preferably specific to each region as they are determined by the communication service providers, networks, and established contracts with various communication entities.
Incoming communications to a destination endpoint are preferably routed to the provider services in response to the destination endpoint being registered with the system 10. For example, a user dialing a PSTN number belonging to the system 10 will preferably have the communication directed to a provider service (P1, P2, or P3). Another example, a user dialing a SIP based endpoint that specifies a domain registered in DNS to the system 10 will preferably have the communication directed to a provider service (P1, P2, or P3). The provider additionally creates invite requests and responses that are preferably sent to a regional address (e.g., europe.twilio.com) and resolved to a communication gateway. In some variations, communication may be directly connected to a communication gateway to achieve a lower latency audio/video. This may be particularly advantageous to mobile and browser clients. The Domain Name System (DNS), anycast, or any suitable addressing and routing methodology may be used to forward to the closest communication gateway of a particular zone. The provider services preferably use SIP protocol for communication within the system, but the outside connected communication devices may use any suitable communication protocol. Similarly, the medium of the communication can preferably include any suitable combination of possible media mediums such as audio, video, screen-sharing, or other suitable synchronous media mediums.
The communication gateways (X1, X2) are preferably configured for both media and signaling. A communication gateway preferably mediates Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) signaling between at least one endpoint of a communication, from call establishment to termination. SIP is a signaling protocol widely used for controlling communication sessions such as voice and/or video calls over Internet Protocol. Any suitable communication protocol such as RTP or combination of protocols may alternatively be used. As a SIP mediator, the communication gateway preferably creates SIP invites, issues other SIP signaling messages, and facilitates transfer of media (e.g., audio, video) between various end-points. The communication gateways (X1, X2, XN) are preferably logical network elements of a SIP application, and more preferably configured as back-to-back user agents (b2bua) for one or both of media and signaling control. A b2bua, as would be readily understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art, preferably operates between endpoints involved in a communication session (e.g., a phone call, video chat session, or screen-sharing session). The b2bua also divides a communication channel into at least two communication legs and mediates signaling between the involved endpoints from call establishment to termination. As such, the communication gateway can facilitate switching the communication flow from flowing through a remote region (to use remote resources) to flowing just within the local region (e.g., when establishing a call with another endpoint in the local region). The communication gateway may additionally include media processing components/resources such as Dual-tone Multi-frequency (DTMF) detector, media recorder, text-to-speech (TTS), and/or any suitable processor or service. The media processing and signaling components of a communication gateway may alternatively be divided into any suitable number of components or services in cooperative communication. In one variation, the communication gateway is implemented by two distinct components—a signaling gateway that handles the signaling and a media gateway that handles media processing and media communication. In an alternative embodiment, the communication gateways may be configured as a control channel that functions to allow devices to directly communicate peer-to-peer. Browser clients, mobile clients, or any suitable combination of clients may have direct media communication in this variation. This alternative embodiment is preferably used with low-latency media. As an additional security precaution, communication gateways may be configured to allow traffic from only a distinct set of providers. Other providers are preferably firewalled off to protect infrastructure from the public Internet. The communication gateways will preferably respond to communications and/or propagate the communication messages to a communication-processing server. The communication-processing server may be in a different remote region. Load balancers may additionally facilitate a communication propagating from a communication gateway to an optimal communication-processing server. For example, there may be multiple remote regions with available communication-processing servers that can service a communication. A load balancer or alternatively a routing policy engine may direct the communication to an appropriate the region and/or communication-processing server.
The communication-processing servers (H1, H2, H3) function to process communication from a communication gateway. A communication-processing server preferably provides value-added features or services to a communication. A preferred communication-processing server is preferably a call router or telephony application processing component as described in patent application Ser. No. 12/417,630 referenced and incorporated above. A communication-processing server (or more specifically a call router) will preferably retrieve an addressable application resource (e.g., HTTP URI address document) associated with the phone number or communication indicator. In a preferred embodiment, the resource is a telephony application that indicates sequential telephony commands for the communication session of the client(s). The telephony commands may include instructions to call another communication endpoint, to start a conference call, to play audio, to record audio or video, to convert text to speech, to transcribe audio, to perform answering machine detection, to send text or media messages (e.g., SMS or MMS messages), to collect DTMF key entry, to end a call, or perform any suitable action. The telephony instructions are preferably communicated in a telephony instruction markup language such as TwiML. The addressable resource is preferably hosted at the HTTP Server 16. The servers (H1, H2, H3) and HTTP server 16 communications are preferably RESTful in nature in both/all directions. RESTful is understood in this document to describe a Representational State Transfer architecture as is known in the art. The RESTful HTTP requests are preferably stateless, thus each message communicated from any component in the system 10 preferably contains all necessary information for operation and/or performance of the specified function. Signaling will preferably be transferred through the server, but media may not be transferred through the server.
The communication-processing server is preferably part of a telephony application platform and may cooperatively use several other resources in operation. The communication-processing server may be a central component to the service provided by a platform and as such may be associated with considerable stateful data generated in use of the server. The stateful data may be used in internal logic and operation of the platform and/or for providing API accessible data and information. The system 10 is preferably implemented in a multi-tenant environment where multiple accounts share/operate with the same resources. As such, there may be benefits in keeping the communication-processing servers centrally located in a limited number of regions. Since the communication-processing server may not be located in each local region, a local region may call out, bridge or otherwise communicate with a remote region that does hold a communication-processing server. As mentioned above, the communication-processing server may provide any suitable processing services in addition to or as an alternative to the call router variation described above.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Additionally or alternatively, the system can include a registrar proxy and a location registrar service as shown in
As shown in
The SIP API 30 can include one or more additional headers and/or configurations for use in the preferred system 10, including a regional header, an action header, a features header, a support header, and/or a required header. In this example implementation, the regional header can indicate a zone from which the request is originating, including for example a regional or sub-regional zone of Europe, Asia, North America, and/or South America. The example action header can include instructions for the receiver to perform one or more designated actions, such as a “hang up” action. The example features header can include one or more system 10 specific features, such as an instruction to hang up if the user presses the star key on his or her terminal, whether the hardware supports call recording, and the like. The example support/required headers can include information that identify any features, protocols, functions, and/or other features that are desirable, optional, or necessary for properly routing the session through any particular set of communication gateways 20 and servers 40.
As shown in
The system preferably can be configured to perform one or more of the foregoing functions in a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with the one or more communication gateways (X1, X2, XN) in the first region 12, the one or more communication-processing servers (H1, H2, H3, HN) in the second region 14, the HTTP server 16, the SIP API 30, and/or the routing policy server 50. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a processor but the instructions can alternatively or additionally be executed by any suitable dedicated hardware device.
Preferred Methods
As shown in
Block S210, which includes receiving a communication invitation of a first endpoint from a communication provider, functions to initiate a communication session. Preferably a “call” will be directed to the system through a provider service of the first region. The called destination is preferably registered with the system. For example, the telephony endpoint (the phone number, phone number prefix, SIP address, the domain of the SIP address, and the like) is used to route communication to the system in any suitable manner. The provider services preferably ports or provides a network access interface through which outside communication networks connect to the system (and/or conversely, how the system connects to the outside communication networks). A communication will preferably include a call from an endpoint being directed through outside networking to a provider service interface. The provider service will preferably use SIP signaling or any suitable protocol to direct a communication stream to a communication gateway of the first region. A SIP communication invite is preferably received at the communication gateway or more specifically a SIP signaling gateway acting as a b2bua. Herein, “calls” may refer to PSTN phone calls, IP based video calls, screen-sharing sessions, multimedia sessions, and/or any suitable synchronous media communication. Calls can additionally be mixed medium/protocols. For example, a call (i.e., communication session) may have one leg connect to a PSTN telephony device while a second leg connects to a Sip based client application. Calls may alternatively be initiated from within the system such as in response to an API request or any suitable event.
Block S220, which includes signaling the communication invitation to a communication-processing server in a second region, functions to direct the communication to a communication-processing server in another region. The other region (the second region) is preferably spatially separate and remotely located from the first region. The distance of separation is preferably a globally significant distance. Within the US, the distance may be greater than 2000 miles (across country). Across the globe, the distance may be greater than 5000 miles. The communication gateway preferably directs the communication signaling. As shown in
The communication-processing server can provide any suitable communication processing service. Preferably, the communication-processing server acts as a call router that manages execution of a communication session application. Processing a communication application can include operations such as connecting to endpoints, recording media, processing media (converting text-to-speech, transcribing audio to text, transcoding between media codecs), retrieving device inputs (e.g., DTMF capture), sending messages or emails, ending calls, providing answering machine detection, or providing any suitable service. In one preferred variation, the method may additionally include, within the second region, a communication-processing server retrieving application instructions from an internet accessible server at a URI that is associated with a destination endpoint of the communication invitation. In this variation, the communication-processing server is preferably a call router as described in the incorporated patent application Ser. No. 12/417,630. The application instructions are preferably formatted as markup instructions within a document retrieved over HTTP using a web request-response model.
Block S23, which includes dynamically directing signaling and media of the communication according to communication processing instructions and the resources available in at least the first and second regions functions to redirect communication to appropriate regions. The directing of signaling and media is preferably dynamically responsive to the active state of the communication. Preferably, the signal and media direction is responsive to application state of a communication. Application state may include streaming media between two outside endpoints, playing media from the system to an endpoint, processing or recording media of a communication, or any suitable application state. The communication routing is preferably changed to increase the communication performance of the current state of a communication. For example, if a first endpoint is connected to a second endpoint, and the first and second endpoints are in the same region, the communication media stream is preferably kept within the first region. This can preferably reduce the amount of communication latency that might be involved in routing through a second region. In a contrasting situation, if the communication of a first endpoint necessitates particular media processing not available in the first region, a communication flow may be established with a second region. Additionally, an application can be configured with any suitable logic. For example, a call may be responsive to a new connection to an endpoint, to one of two endpoints hanging up, to initiating media processing (e.g., audio recording, transcription, or DTMF detection), or to sending an out of stream communication (e.g., SMS or MMS) and the like.
Block S232, which includes selectively routing media communication exclusively through communication resources of the first region if media resources to execute the processing instructions are available in the first region, functions to route communication within a region. The resources of the region are preferably sufficient to support the current state of the communication session. In a preferred variation, the media communication is exclusively routed through the communication resource of the first region for calls to other endpoints in the region. Block S132 preferably includes a communication-processing server inviting a second gateway, the second communication gateway inviting a second endpoint accessible through a provider service of the first region, and the communication-processing server re-inviting the first and second communication gateways to establish media communication flow between the first and second endpoints. The communication is also directed away from the communication-processing server of the second region. As a slight variation, the media communication flow may even be established to flow directly between the first and second endpoints without passing through a gateway of the first region. The first and second endpoints can be PSTN-based endpoints, SIP based endpoints, RTP based endpoints, and/or any suitable endpoint. An endpoint is preferably any addressable communication destination, which may be a phone, a client application (e.g., desktop or mobile application), an IP based device or any suitable communication device. The endpoints can use any suitable protocol and the first and second endpoints may additionally use different communication protocols or mediums.
Additionally or alternatively, routing media communication exclusively through communication resources of the first region may include selecting a media resource of the first region to facilitate the media communication flow. In some cases, select media resources may be deployed/implemented in the first region. When the current communication media stream transitions to a state where it requires only the media resources of the first region, the media communication flow will preferably utilize the media resources of the first region, rather than those of the remotely located resources in the second region. For example, an application may initiate a media recording instruction. If a recording resource is in the first region, the communication gateway may direct communication flow to go to the local recording server as opposed to a recording server in a different region. In another example, a media transcoding server may be accessed to transcode media for two endpoints. Two endpoints may use different media codecs that are not compatible. The transcoding service will preferably be added as an intermediary in the communication flow so that the media can be transcoded with low latency.
The method may include querying a routing policy service for a selected communication route, which functions to dynamically select a communication route. The routing policy server can use the current state of the system, individual regions, individual resources/services/components of a region, application state, or any suitable parameter as an input. In one variation, the routing policy service is substantially statically defined. A set of rules and/or architecture configuration may be used to select the routes. In another variation, the routing policy service performs an analysis and selects a route that has statistical indications to be an optimal route based on the analysis. The routing policy server is preferably queried by the communication-processing server to select communication gateways. The routing policy server may additionally or alternatively be used by the communication gateway to select a communication-processing server in block S22. There may be one canonical routing policy server or multiple routing policy server instances may be established in multiple regions.
Block S234, which includes selectively routing media communication through at least the communication-processing server if media resources are not in the first region, functions to route communication between the first and second regions. This selective option is preferably taken when the resource needed or preferred for handling the communication session is not within the local region (i.e., the first region). As with the initiation of a call, the communication gateway preferably initially connects to a communication-processing server. As was mentioned above, this default behavior may not be taken if the next state of the communication is known without accessing the communication-processing server. Additional resources within the second region may additionally or alternatively be used with the communication-processing server. For example, media resources such as recording service, text-to-speech servers, transcoding servers, transcription/speech recognition servers, and/or any suitable media resource may be implemented in the second region and may act on the media communication flow.
As mentioned above, the directing of the communication can dynamically change. The method may additionally include re-establishing communication with the communication-processing server upon a second endpoint terminating the media communication flow S236 as shown in
As shown in
In an alternative embodiment, a method of a preferred embodiment can additionally or alternatively utilize regional communication gateways to achieve global low latency platform operation.
As shown in
In block S302, the first communication gateway preferably performs any necessary authentications, security checks, verifications, and/or credential checks for one or both of the caller and the recipient. Block S302 can additionally include looking up and/or identifying a target uniform resource identifier (URI) for the invitation, which designates the next destination for the transmission, i.e., the suitable regional communication-processing server H1 for the request. As shown in
In block S306, the server H1 downloads and/or retrieves the TwiML based on the URI associated with the dialed number (which corresponds to an address in one variation of the preferred system and method). Preferably, block S306 can further include determining if there is any media associated with the session. Preferably, the existence or requirement of a particular media can be determined with reference to the TwiML, which can contain predefined actions or verbs. Suitable actions or verbs can include dialing a number, saying text to the caller, sending an SMS message, playing an audio or video file, getting input from the keypad, recording audio or video, connecting the call to another browser client or device, or any other suitable type or media of communication. In the example implementation, the TwiML would contain the “dial” verb, which requires media. Following a series of mutual acknowledgements, the transmission of media is opened up between the POP and the server H1 in block S306.
As shown in
As shown in
Preferably, the server H1 is not involved in the media flow of block S314. Accordingly, another example implementation can include detecting, at each of the first and second communication gateways X1 and X2, whether each respective side of the session has timed out for some reason. In response to a timeout at the first communication gateway X1, the first communication gateway X1 will alert the server H1, which in turn will hang up both the caller side and the callee side of the session. Alternatively, if it is the second communication gateway X2 that times out, then the server H1 can be configured to only terminate or hang up on the callee side in the event that there are more actions or verbs to execute on the caller side.
The foregoing example implementation illustrates one aspect of the preferred system and method using a single dial verb between two PSTN users in a telephony system. However, the preferred system and method can be readily configured for any suitable combination of verbs, user types, and media types found in a cloud-based communication network system. Some example alternative implementations can include usage of the say verb, the hang up verb, the gather verb, either alone or in combination with the dial verb described above.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
A sixth exemplary implementation of the system and/or method of the preferred embodiment can accommodate timeout scenarios on the caller or callee side. Each communication gateway is preferably responsible for detecting timeouts for their respective leg of the communication. As shown in
One or more aspects of the example embodiment can be configured partially or entirely in a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with one or more APIs, servers, routing policy servers, POP servers, and/or communication gateways. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a processor but the instructions can alternatively or additionally be executed by any suitable dedicated hardware device.
System and Method of Global Media Resources
As shown in
The system and method can be used with any suitable media resource or resources that may benefit from being deployed to local regions. The media resources are preferably configured as a media services. A media service can be easily deployed in a local region and operate independently and consistently integrate with other regions, such as the remote region where API resources and state is maintained. A media service preferably has a defined interface and manages its own high availability load balancing, scalability, redundancy, and other service oriented orchestration considerations. Storage and state can preferably be maintained internally within the media service. For example, a database used to manage the service orchestration of the media service can be kept internally and may, at least in part, not be shared outside of the service. Information, records, and data that is to be shared outside of a media service, is preferably distributed across regions for other services to consume. The media service may include a media service API to facilitate access and integration of the media service with other services and components of a communication platform. Media services are preferably composed of components or computing resources. The components can be software libraries or other services (e.g., a mini-service). The components preferably perform a specific task. Some of these components, which facilitate a particular feature of a service, may or may not be activated or included in a locally deployed media service. For example, for a recording service, transcription may or may not be an included component. Multiple media services may be implemented within a local region, and the media services may target a variety of communication functions. A media service may be a recording service, a text-to-speech (TTS) service, a speech recognition service, a transcoding service, an input detection service, answering machine detection service, a conferencing service, a communication queuing service, and/or any suitable media service.
Recording services preferably enable recording of calls or communication sessions that are routed through communication gateways within the local region. This avoids routing media communication flow through a remote region to access a recording resource. Recording is preferably for audio recording, but may additionally or alternatively include video recording, screen-sharing recording, multimedia recording, or any suitable recording service. The recording service may have additional features that may or may not be integrated into the recording service of the local service. Transcription is one preferred feature of the recording service. Transcription may use algorithmic speech recognition techniques, automated manual transcription, semi-automated techniques, and/or any suitable approach. The audio recording files, the meta data of the recording (e.g., timestamp, time duration, audio quality and format), and/or the recording transcripts are preferably synchronized with a remote region. As shown in
The recording component is preferably responsible for taking a stream (audio, video, etc.), manipulating the stream (e.g., trimming off silence, transcoding it to a different format/codec, etc.,) and writing the recording to a file. Inputs for the recording component may include the audio stream, the file name, and/or arguments for trimming, file format, recording quality, volume adjustment, and/or any suitable parameter of the recording. Outputs of the recording component preferably include an audio stream saved as a file, meta data such as the duration of the saved audio file, and size of the file. The transcription component can include inputs such as the audio stream, transcription arguments, an HTTP callback to call when transcription is complete, and/or any suitable parameter. The transcription arguments may include the accuracy level of the transcription (e.g., level of service), language of transcription, and/or any suitable variable of the transcription process. The transcription component preferably outputs the text of the stream. An interface of the recording service preferably abstracts away the inner-workings of the components of the recording service. The interface of the recording service uses inputs of a recording ID, an audio stream to record, and/or a HTTP callback to call after complete. In one variation the HTTP callback is called after transcoding of the recorded file is complete. Other inputs and parameters may additionally or alternatively be exposed of the recording service. Additional inputs may include transcription inputs such as if a recording should use transcription and the parameters of the transcription. The recording service interface preferably outputs a URI or alternative resources address of a recording, parameters of the recording (e.g., duration of the recording, timestamp), and/or file parameters such as file size.
A Text-to speech service preferably generates, plays, and/or converts text into audible speech. The audible speech is then played within a communication stream. For example, a phone call may connect to a telephony application that specifies a script that should be read to the caller. The script is preferably directed to the TTS service to be played during the phone call. The text-to-speech services are preferably for audio communication. However, a computer generated video simulation or rendering of a speaker may additionally be created for video communication. The text-to-speech service preferably takes text as an input and outputs an audio stream and/or an audio file as an output. The audio file may be cached internally within a local region implementation of a media service. The audio file of a TTS request may additionally be synchronized with a TTS cache of a remote region.
A speech recognition service is preferably a service used in collecting spoken input and converting it into a format for transcription, natural language processing, or interpretation of responses. The speech recognition may use the transcription component described above, but may alternatively use an alternative approach. The input to the speech recognition is preferably an audio stream and parameters of speech recognition. Parameters of speech recognition may include expected language of speech. In one variation, the speech recognition service is used to detect or identify categories of responses. For example, the speech recognition may be used to identify a number with a set number of digits, to identify particular key words, or classes of responses. In one example, classes of responses may include a confirmation class and a cancel/deny response. The output may be the interpretation of the speech. In one variation, an HTTP callback may be specified where the output may be posted after speech recognition is completed. In another variation, the speech recognition service may work in cooperation with the recording service. Alternatively, a speech recognition component may be integrated into the recording service, an input detection service, and/or any suitable service.
A transcoding service functions to convert between formats. The transcoding may convert an active media stream to another format. For example, a call with two endpoints may natively use two different codecs. The transcoding service may convert one or two of the legs of the communication to a common or compatible media stream format. Additionally, the transcoding service may work to convert accessed media resources that are or will be used in a communication session. For example, an MP3 file accessed from a URI may be converted to a wave file for playback during a phone call. The transcoding service preferably accepts a media stream in a first format and outputs a media stream in a second format. The transcoding preferably is used on communication that flows within the local region. The transcoding service may additionally be used if communication flows between two different local regions (as opposed to including a third remote region just for the transcoding service).
An input detection service functions to gather inputs of a communication device. Preferably the input detection service collects DTMF inputs from a user. In the DTMF input detection variation, an audio stream and parameters of detection are preferably an input to the service. Parameters of DTMF detection can include timeout, a key to finish detection on, number of digits, a callback URI to call after input is captured, and/or any suitable input. As an additional service, an answering machine detection service may be used to identify an answering machine. The components of an answering machine detection service may alternatively be integrated into the input detection service or any suitable service.
Conferencing services preferably facilitate calls with more than two endpoints connected. Various features of conference calls may be enabled through components of conferencing services. Additionally, a conferencing service may generate accessible API resources that can be used by applications to programmatically query and modify aspects of in-progress or past conference calls. The API resources are preferably streamed or transmitted to a remote region where consistent representations of API resources are managed for a platform. This preferably functions to make API resources to be regionally/globally consistent despite media services handling communication processing within a local region. For example, a conference call may be in progress in Europe. The communication is preferably routed between multiple European endpoints, possible communication gateways facilitating the signaling, and a conferencing service in the European region. Data for conference call API resources is preferably communicated back to a remote region that is used in managing the API resources. Now if an application anywhere in the world queries for the in-progress conferencing resource and modifies the resource that occurs on a platform consistent version of the API resource. The synchronous communication preferably avoids increased latency that may occur if the communication was routed to a remote region to a conferencing service, but the API resources used to programmatically interact with the conference call are maintained consistent in the platform.
A communication queuing service functions manage phone queues or, in other words, communication holding lines. Similar to the conference call above, API resources for querying and managing a call queue may be accessible within the platform. The data to support such API resources is preferably synchronized with the platform services and components in a remote region.
As mentioned above any suitable services may be implemented within a local region. The media services used within a local region depend on the use-case of the communication platform. While any of the above media services or suitable alternative media services may used, the below method primarily uses a recording service as an exemplary media service but any suitable media service may additionally or alternatively be used.
As shown in
Block S510, which includes providing a communication processing platform with components of at least two regions, functions to dynamically direct communication traffic between two regions. The provided communication processing platform is preferably substantially similar to the system and methods described above. Communication can preferably be routed within a local region if resources are available in that region or communication can be routed between at least a local and remote region to use the resources used during a communication session. Providing communication processing platform may include initializing signaling and media communication flow as described above. The subsequent steps below are preferably used in the context where the media communication flow is established within a local region. In other words, media communication flow is from at least one endpoint through a provider service of a first region and to at least a communication gateway. A one legged variation where only one outside endpoint is connected preferably uses at least one media resource to act as the other endpoint (e.g., play audio and/or collect input). Other variations, preferably involve a communication session having at least two outside endpoints connected. The communication route preferably is from a first endpoint through a provider service to a first communication gateway to a second communication gateway and then through a provider service to the second endpoint. Any suitable number of endpoints may additionally be connected. Additionally, communication is additionally routed to a media service as described below in Block S520.
Block S520, which includes routing communication to at least one media service of the local region, functions to incorporate a media service with active communication. The media service may also be provided by a remote service as well as a local region. A benefit of using the media service of the local region is that latency issues, quality of service, and other issues may be avoided by containing communication flow within a local region. A media service is preferably activated by a communication-processing server (e.g., a call router) of a remote region deciding that a media process should be used. The communication-processing server preferably signals to the communication gateway of the local region to inform the communication gateway that it should use, activate, or enable the media service. Preferably the signal is sent through a SIP control channel using SIP INFO. Additionally, some record within the remote region may initially be created by the communication-processing server. The record may be used in creation of an API resource or for internal logic of the remote region. The record is preferably stored in a database or some other suitable storage mechanism. In initializing the record, some information such as a resource ID or secure ID may be automatically generated before a media service is notified. Record information such as account information, media resource ID, and other instructions may be included in the signal communication to the communication gateway in the local region. For example, if a call router encounters an instruction to record audio. The call router preferably creates a recording resource in the remote region; transmits a SIP INFO signal to a communication gateway managing the endpoint in a remote region, wherein the SIP INFO also includes recording instructions, the resource ID and account information.
The communication gateway preferably activates the media resource by connecting the communication stream to the media service. Depending on the type and use-case of the media service, the media service may be an intermediary service, a side service or an endpoint service. As an intermediary service, the media communication flow passes through the media service. This may include a transformation of the media stream between different legs of the communication. For example, a transcoding service may convert the communication stream to a common compatible media format. A side service is preferably an ancillary service that has a communication stream pushed to the media service. The media service may be passively observing the communication stream such as in the case of a recording service. The media service may alternatively actively interact with the communication stream such as if an input service signals the communication gateway that an input event was detected. The media service may additionally be a communicating endpoint of the communication session. For example, a media service for playing audio files and/or performing speech recognition may act as one leg of a phone call. In the case of a recording service, the two streams of a media communication are preferably merged and pushed to the recording resource over HTTP. The stream is additionally stored in local disc of the local region. The local disc storage functions as a backup in case of failure. In one variation, the media service of the local region is implemented as a static proxy of the media service and the media stream is tunneled from the static proxy to a service proxy and media service of a remote region as shown in
Block S53, which includes tunneling a media stream to the remote region, functions to transfer data for persistent storage in the remote region. Tunneling to the remote region is preferably used to update records in the remote region. There may be several ways to accomplish this. A first variation include tunneling of a media stream may include establishing VPN proxies that function to get around firewalls. A firewall for HTTP is preferably opened to enable servers of the local region push media streams to media services of the remote region. As described above, service proxy servers may be implemented within the remote region to receive incoming SSL-encrypted connections from local regions, terminate the SSL, and forward requests to an appropriate media service of the remote region. Another variation may include cutting database dependence of a media service and promoting a resource of the remote region to update the database. Data generated in the media service is preferably streamed from the local region to the remote region. In one variation, an existing SIP channel may be used as the signaling and media channel for streaming media to the remote region. Special handling of SIP failures or media processing failures may used to ensure updating of the database. Another variation would be to open up firewalls for the databases with records used by a media service. Measures are preferably with the communication link between the regions to avoid a security risk of opening up firewalls for the databases.
Block S540, which includes storing the data of the media service, functions to store the data of the media service in a consistent and accessible manner. The data is preferably stored within a remote region that is used at least in part as a core, central, or main sub-system of the platform. The remote region will preferably be a region where at least part of state data of the platform is kept. There may need to be numerous local regions deployed to service different geographic regions. However, replicating and making the data consistent across each region increases complexity and cost of the platform. A subset of the regions, possibly even one or two regions, is preferably used as the central region where persistent data is stored. The persistent data may be used within logic of the platform or alternatively used as accessible resources available through an API, user interface, or other suitable interface. Once the data from the media service of the local region has completed, the communication-processing server will preferably signal back to the local region over the signaling control channel to stop the recording. Alternatively, a media service in may signal to the communication gateway, which may contact a component of the remote region to indicate that the storing of the persistent data is complete. While storing of persistent data is used for some media services, some media services may not generate persistent data that requires storing outside of the local region.
As shown in
Client Application Methods
As shown in
The method is preferably substantially similar to the one described above. Blocks S620, S630, S632, and S634 can be substantially similar to those described in blocks S220, S230, S232, S234, but method S600 is preferably applied to at least one leg of communication involving a client application. The method can be used for performing low latency routing for a client application communicating with a second client application, with a media service, with a PSTN or other suitable endpoint, or communicating with any suitable endpoint. The method can additionally or alternatively be used with any suitable variations, including the system and method variations described herein. Furthermore, the methods and systems for client communication can include any of the variations of media path variations such as those described in the system and method of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/278,993 filed 12 May 2014, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
The method is preferably used to implement communication instruction processing with a communication stream between the first and second region, and when a media communication stream can flow exclusively through the first region, dynamically establishing the communication flow to not flow through intermediary media resources of the second region, but instead to use media resources of the first region. For example, the method is preferably applied when a client application calls a communication application endpoint in a first region; the relevant application is processed; and the communication application connects the calling client application to a second client application while localizing media flow within the region of the first and second client applications. The method is preferably implemented through a system that preferably includes client gateways and at least one regional border proxies that reside in each supported region and a communication-processing server, a registrar proxy, and a location registrar service.
Block S602, which includes registering client application endpoint routes, functions to create a record of client application locations. A client application endpoint route is preferably registered when a client application associated with a particular endpoint comes online (e.g., becomes active on the communication platform), when the client application changes location/routes, or needs to update route information. The set of client application endpoint routes can include registering at least one instance of a client gateway route for a registered endpoint within the platform. The set of client application endpoint routes can include registration of multiple edge resources (e.g., client gateways) distributed across multiple regions. In the scenario where one endpoint will communication with a second endpoint, the method includes at least registering first and second client gateway route of a first and second endpoint. The first and second client gateway routes can be in the same or different regions. A client application in a first region will preferably establish a media and signaling connection with a client gateway of a local region. DNS or other mechanisms can be employed to direct a client application to an appropriate client gateway. The client application may connect to the client gateway through a load balancer.
The client gateway can then use a system-wide signaling protocol such as SIP to negotiate communication at the appropriate time. The client gateway will preferably communicate with a regional border proxy in interacting with platform resources outside of the local region. The regional border proxy uses internal configuration to communicate with a regional border proxy of a main region. The route information to access the client application can then be stored in the main region. A location registrar service preferably facilitates receiving route information and recording/registering the client application route. The location registrar service is preferably hosted or operable within a main region. The main region is preferably a region that includes a communication-processing server. The communication-processing server preferably maintains state of execution of a communication application, and can be more expensive (from an operational cost, infrastructure complexity, and/or feasibility perspective) to duplicate in every region. Registering the client application route in a centralized location registrar service allows active client applications managed in various infrastructure regions to be integrated into a global communication platform. Route information additionally includes a client destination endpoint identifier that can be used to query and identify the client application as an endpoint.
Client applications in different regions preferably register routes, such that for any valid endpoint identifier a route can be provided. Additionally, the location registrar can maintain the state of endpoints. State of an endpoint can include, active, offline, idle/away, or any suitable status. Additionally, a client application endpoint can be registered for multiple instances. The method will include registering multiple instances of client application endpoint routes for an endpoint. The different instances can be registered with different route information. For example, a user can activate a native application on a mobile device at the same time the user has the same account activated on a browser of a different computing device. When multiple instances are registered dynamically directing signaling and media of the communication S630 can include selecting a client application endpoint instance of the second endpoint according to an instance prioritization policy, which functions to select an appropriate instance for use with a given communication. The instance prioritization policy can depend on prioritizing media path performance (e.g., minimizing latency, increasing call quality, minimizing call cost, etc.), prioritizing user preference of a client application instance (e.g., user history of instance activity, defined rules of where to call first, etc.), or other suitable ways of differentiating between multiple instances. For example, a call directed at the client application endpoint can initiate parallel calls to both instances and the first one to respond gets connected. Similarly, a presence server can be used to dynamically select a preferred instance to receive a call inbound to the endpoint. While the method describes a process to connect a first client application in a first region with a second client application also in the first region, the approach of the method can be generalized to apply to connecting client applications or any type of endpoint in the same or different region.
Block S610, which includes receiving a communication invitation of a first endpoint from a client application in a first region, functions to have a client application initialize a call or communication session. The client application preferably uses a real-time communication protocol to establish signaling and media channels through a client gateway. The client gateway is preferably a local client gateway in the same region as the device of the client application. Route optimizing DNS can be employed or leveraged to select an appropriate client gateway.
In a first variation of a first region, receiving a communication invitation of a client application in a first region can include receiving a connection request from a first client application, verifying at least one parameter of the communication request, merging the real time communication of the client with real time communication of a communication destination (e.g., the communication-processing server). Establishing a connecting between the client application and the gateway is preferably substantially similar to the client described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/054,254, filed 15 Oct. 2013, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
In a second variation of a main region, the communication invitation of the first endpoint is received at the communication-processing server. The communication invitation can include registered route information from the client application in a first region. The communication invitation is preferably received through the regional border proxy of the main region.
Block S640, which includes processing a set of communication instructions associated with the communication invitation and identifying a set of communication resources, functions to process how the communication invitation should be processed. In one preferred variation, the processing of communication instructions is performed at the communication-processing server upon the signaling the communication invitation to the communication-processing server S620. A preferred scenario would have the first client gateway of the first endpoint in a region that is distinct from the region of the communication-processing server—the signaling at least has to initially span to at least a second region. In another variation, the communication invitation may include data that conveys communication instructions. For example, the communication invitation may specify a client endpoint to connect to. Processing a set of communication instructions is preferably mapped to at least a subset of the communication-processing resources. The subset of communication-processing resources includes signaling and/or media resources requested to act on the communication session. The communication-processing resources can include a communication application processor, a media recording service, a transcoding service, a text-to-speech service, a transcription service or any suitable service, and/or any suitable type of communication processing service.
Block S650, which includes querying registered routes of endpoints specified in communication processing instructions, functions to determine a location of a specified destination endpoint. A registrar proxy server is preferably operated within the main region where the communication-processing server is located. The registrar proxy server communicates an identifier of the intended destination communication endpoint. The identifier is preferably a name or number that is used to address or specify the intended communication destination. The identifier can be used to access an associated route if an instance of a client application is active for that identifier. As mentioned before, multiple instances of a client application can be simultaneously active. Multiple routes can be selected. Alternatively a route or routes can be selected according to a suitable heuristic such as application instance prioritization, user preference, location, usage history, presence information, or any suitable type of heuristic. Querying registered routes preferably resolves by identifying at least one regional route of a second endpoint. The second endpoint is preferably a communication destination to which the first endpoint will be connected. The route is preferably used in block S632 to establish a media channel between the original communication endpoint and the destination communication endpoint. The media channel preferably short circuits use of extraneous resources, such as a communication-processing server, which can result in a media channel passing through the main region when not required.
Block S630, which includes dynamically directing signaling and media of the communication according to the regional availability of the communication resources, the client application route of the first endpoint, and the client gateway route of the second endpoint, functions to interpret the communication processing instructions into negotiated signaling and media to appropriately use the resources available in at least regions of the platform. In block S62, an application is preferably processed and executed for the connected client application. Instructions of the application can direct various actions. One type of action is performing media-related action between a service of the platform and the connected endpoint (e.g., a caller connected to an automated phone service). Other types of actions can connect at least two communication endpoints. When an instruction depends on the platform providing a media service, the signaling and media is routed appropriately between regions to provide the media service. For example, TTS instructions can be executed that direct execution of a media action facilitated from a service. In such a state, the media channel can be routed through the first region and a TTS media service in the main region. Signaling and media communication can alternatively be routed in any suitable manner depending on the availability of media services in a region. When an application instruction directs connecting a communication endpoint with a second communication endpoint, the signaling and media channels are directed to take a preferred path through the regions.
Block S630 can result in various signaling and media routing scenarios. The selected scenario preferably depends on required and/or requested communication resources (e.g., media resources and/or signaling resources) and the region location of the client gateway instances to be used for involved endpoints. The signaling can be setup with a topology that differs from the media as shown in
A first mode of signaling and media direction can be multi-regional routing, where media spans multiple regions to access communication processing resources and/or client gateway instances. In a first variation, the multi-regional routing is used to access communication processing resources not available in a region of an involved endpoint. In particular, in a communication application platform one type of communication-processing server may be exclusive to a central region (or regions), and block S630 can include routing media communication through at least the communication-processing server if media resources are not in the first region S634 as shown in the exemplary media topologies of
Block S632, which includes selectively routing media communication exclusively through communication resources of the first region when media resources to execute the processing instructions are available in the first region, functions to isolate media channel communication to relevant regions. The destination communication endpoint can be in any suitable region relative to the original communication endpoint. A general approach, selectively routing media communication exclusively through communication resources of the first region includes establishing, inviting, or re-inviting the original communication endpoint to communicate with the destination communication endpoint through a media channel that passes between the application original client application, a first client gateway, a second client gateway and the destination communication. In a first exemplary scenario, the original client application and the destination communication endpoint are both in the first region. In a second exemplary scenario, the original client application is in the first region, the destination endpoint is in a second region, and the first region and the second region are different from the main region with the communication-processing server. In the first and second exemplary scenarios, the media signaling can short circuit, hop or otherwise avoid routing through the main region. In a third exemplary scenario, the destination communication endpoint is in the main region. In such an exemplary scenario, the media channel can route through the communication-processing server or alternatively route around the communication-processing server.
The registrar proxy can facilitate establishing the media channel. The registrar can use the queried route to invite the destination communication endpoint. The signaling channel is preferably maintained with the communication-processing server after the media channel is routed for regional low latency. The signaling channel can enable API initiated actions established at the platform to be acted on by the communication-processing server. For example, if a call is established between two client applications in the first region and an outside entity makes an API call to redirect the caller to another destination during the call, the signaling channel can be used to tear down the established media channel and establish a new media channel in a substantially a similar manner.
Additionally the method can include registering a set of client application endpoint routes further comprises logging client application information S66, which functions to collect data through which the state of client application status and history can be understood and used in augmenting operation as shown in
The logged client application information can be used in a variety of ways. In one variation, the information is used internally for data analytics and/or setting new routing policies. In another variation, a subset or all of the information can be exposed to appropriate accounts. Client application information and associated communication sessions can be exposed through an application programming interface (API). In another variation, a user interface/dashboard can be used in communicating data concerning the client application information. The amount of data is preferably scoped to only data of one particular account or subaccount. However, global data from across the platform may be exposed in some manner.
As mentioned above, another variation of the method can include setting a routing policy of at least one account in the platform. In this variation dynamically directing signaling and media can include applying the routing policy of the account on routing to communication endpoints and media resources. Routing policies may set what metrics are prioritized when selecting regional media topology. More specifically, routing policies includes rules defining regional resource preference as shown in
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/539,877, filed 12 Nov. 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/902,995, filed on 12 Nov. 2013, both of which are incorporated in their entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5526416 | Dezonno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5581608 | Jreij et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598457 | Foladare et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5934181 | Adamczewski | Aug 1999 | A |
5978465 | Corduroy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026440 | Shrader et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034946 | Roginsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6094681 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6138143 | Gigliotti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6185565 | Meubus et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192123 | Grunsted et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206564 | Adamczewski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223287 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232979 | Shochet | May 2001 | B1 |
6269336 | Ladd et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317137 | Rosasco | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363065 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373836 | Deryugin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425012 | Trovato et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426995 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430175 | Echols et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434528 | Sanders | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445776 | Shank et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459913 | Cloutier | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463414 | Su et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493558 | Bernhart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496500 | Nance et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501739 | Cohen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501832 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507875 | Mellen-Garnett et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6571245 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574216 | Farris et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577721 | Vainio et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600736 | Ball et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606596 | Zirngibl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614783 | Sonesh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625258 | Ram et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625576 | Kochanski et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6661996 | Wiedeman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6704785 | Koo et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707889 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711129 | Bauer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711249 | Weissman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6738738 | Henton | May 2004 | B2 |
6757365 | Bogard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765997 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768788 | Langseth et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771955 | Imura et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778653 | Kallas et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788768 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792086 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792093 | Barak et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798867 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807529 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819667 | Brusilovsky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820260 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829334 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831966 | Tegan et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834265 | Balasuriya | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836537 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850603 | Eberle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873952 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874084 | Dobner et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885737 | Gao et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888929 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895084 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898567 | Balasuriya | May 2005 | B2 |
6912581 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922411 | Taylor | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928469 | Duursma et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931405 | El-Shimi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937699 | Schuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940953 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941268 | Porter et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947417 | Laursen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947988 | Saleh et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961330 | Cattan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6964012 | Zirngibl et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970915 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6977992 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981041 | Araujo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985862 | Strom et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999576 | Sacra | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003464 | Ferrans et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006606 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010586 | Allavarpu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039165 | Saylor et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058042 | Bontempi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062709 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065637 | Nanja | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7076037 | Gonen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076428 | Anastasakos et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089310 | Ellerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103003 | Brueckheimer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103171 | Annadata et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7106844 | Holland | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111163 | Haney | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7136932 | Schneider | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7140004 | Kunins et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143039 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7197331 | Anastasakos et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197461 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197462 | Takagi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197544 | Wang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7225232 | Elberse | May 2007 | B2 |
7227849 | Rasanen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7245611 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260208 | Cavalcanti | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266181 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269557 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272212 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272564 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277851 | Henton | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283515 | Fowler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286521 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7287248 | Adeeb | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7289453 | Riedel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296739 | Mo et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7298732 | Cho | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298834 | Homeier et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7308085 | Weissman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308408 | Stifelman et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7324633 | Gao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324942 | Mahowald et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7328263 | Sadjadi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330463 | Bradd et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330890 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340040 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7349714 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369865 | Gabriel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7370329 | Kumar et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373660 | Guichard et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376223 | Taylor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376586 | Partovi et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376733 | Connelly et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376740 | Porter et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7412525 | Cafarella et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418090 | Reding et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428302 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440898 | Eberle et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7447299 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7457249 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457397 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7473872 | Takimoto | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486780 | Zirngibl et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496054 | Taylor | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496188 | Saha et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496651 | Joshi | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7500249 | Kampe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505951 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519359 | Chiarulli et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522711 | Stein et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7536454 | Balasuriya | May 2009 | B2 |
7542761 | Sarkar | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552054 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7571226 | Partovi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7606868 | Le et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7613287 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7623648 | Oppenheim et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630900 | Strom | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7631310 | Henzinger | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7644000 | Strom | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657433 | Chang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657434 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668157 | Weintraub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672275 | Yajnik et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7672295 | Andhare et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7675857 | Chesson | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7676221 | Roundtree et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685280 | Berry et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685298 | Day et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7715547 | Ibbotson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716293 | Kasuga et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742499 | Erskine et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7779065 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7875836 | Imura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882253 | Pardo-Castellote et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7920866 | Bosch et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926099 | Chakravarty et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7929562 | Petrovykh | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936867 | Hill et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7949111 | Harlow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962644 | Ezerzer et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979555 | Rothstein et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992120 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8023425 | Raleigh | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024785 | Andress et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8045689 | Provenzale et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046378 | Zhuge et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8046823 | Begen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8069096 | Ballaro et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8078483 | Hirose et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8081744 | Sylvain | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081958 | Soderstrom et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103725 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126128 | Hicks, III et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8126129 | Mcguire | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8130750 | Hester | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8139730 | Da Palma et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145212 | Lopresti et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149716 | Ramanathan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150918 | Edelman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8156213 | Deng et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8165116 | Ku et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166185 | Samuel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169936 | Koren et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175007 | Jain et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185619 | Maiocco et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8196133 | Kakumani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204479 | Vendrow et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214868 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233611 | Zettner | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8238533 | Blackwell et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8243889 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8249552 | Gailloux et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8295272 | Boni et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306021 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315198 | Corneille et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315620 | Williamson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8319816 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8326805 | Arous et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8346630 | Mckeown | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8355394 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8413247 | Hudis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429827 | Wetzel | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8438315 | Tao et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462670 | Chien | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467502 | Sureka et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477926 | Jasper et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8503639 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503650 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8509068 | Begall et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8532686 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542805 | Agranovsky et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543665 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547962 | Ramachandran et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565117 | Hilt et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572391 | Golan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576712 | Sabat et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8577803 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8582450 | Robesky | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8594626 | Woodson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8601136 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8611338 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8613102 | Nath | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621598 | Lai et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8649268 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656452 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667056 | Proulx et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675493 | Buddhikot et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8695077 | Gerhard et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8751801 | Harris et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755376 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767925 | Sureka et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781975 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8806024 | Toba Francis et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819133 | Wang | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8825746 | Ravichandran et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8837465 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838707 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843596 | Goel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855271 | Brock et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861510 | Fritz | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8879547 | Maes | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8938053 | Cooke et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948356 | Nowack et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8954591 | Ganesan et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8964726 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8990610 | Bostick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9014664 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015702 | Bhat | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9031223 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9071677 | Aggarwal et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9137127 | Nowack et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141682 | Adoc, Jr. et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9161296 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9204281 | Ramprasad et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9306982 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9307094 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9325624 | Malatack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9338190 | Eng et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9344573 | Wolthuis et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9378337 | Kuhr | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9456008 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9456339 | Hildner et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9553799 | Tarricone et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9596274 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9628624 | Wolthuis et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632875 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10063461 | Tarricone et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20010038624 | Greenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043684 | Guedalia et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020006124 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006125 | Josse et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006193 | Rodenbusch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025819 | Cetusic et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020057777 | Saito et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064267 | Martin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067823 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077833 | Arons et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020126813 | Partovi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133587 | Ensel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136391 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165957 | Devoe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184361 | Eden | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006137 | Wei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012356 | Zino et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014665 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023672 | Vaysman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026426 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046366 | Pardikar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051037 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058884 | Kallner et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059020 | Meyerson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061317 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061404 | Atwal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097330 | Hillmer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097447 | Johnston | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097639 | Niyogi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103620 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123640 | Roelle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149721 | Alfonso-Nogueiro et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162506 | Toshimitsu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030195950 | Huang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195990 | Greenblat et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196076 | Zabarski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204616 | Billhartz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211842 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231647 | Petrovykh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008635 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011690 | Marfino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044953 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052349 | Creamer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071275 | Bowater et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101122 | Da Palma et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102182 | Reith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117788 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136324 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165569 | Sweatman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172482 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199572 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205101 | Radhakrishnan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205689 | Ellens et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213400 | Golitsin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216058 | Chavers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218748 | Fisher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228469 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236696 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240649 | Goel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005109 | Castaldi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005200 | Matenda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010483 | Ling | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015505 | Kruis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021626 | Prajapat et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025303 | Hostetler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038772 | Colrain | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043952 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047579 | Salame | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060411 | Coulombe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083907 | Fishier | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091336 | Dehamer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091572 | Gavrilescu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108770 | Karaoguz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125251 | Berger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125739 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128961 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135578 | Ress et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141500 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147088 | Bao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177635 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181835 | Lau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198292 | Duursma et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228680 | Malik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238153 | Chevalier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240659 | Taylor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243977 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246176 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286496 | Malhotra et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008065 | Longman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008073 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008256 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015467 | Morken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021004 | Moran et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023676 | Whitmore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047666 | Bedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067506 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080415 | Tu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098624 | Morgan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129638 | Deakin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146792 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060146802 | Baldwin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168334 | Potti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060203979 | Jennings | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209695 | Archer, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212865 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215824 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217823 | Hussey | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217978 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222166 | Ramakrishna et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235715 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256816 | Yarlagadda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262915 | Marascio et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270386 | Yu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285489 | Francisco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002744 | Mewhinney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036143 | Alt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038499 | Margulies et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043681 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047709 | Brunson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050306 | McQueen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064672 | Raghav et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070906 | Thakur | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070980 | Phelps et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071223 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074174 | Thornton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088836 | Tai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091907 | Seshadri et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112574 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116191 | Bermudez et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121651 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127691 | Lert | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127703 | Siminoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130260 | Weintraub et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133771 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147351 | Dietrich et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149166 | Turcotte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153711 | Dykas et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167170 | Fitchett et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192629 | Saito | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201448 | Baird | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208862 | Fox et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232284 | Mason et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239761 | Baio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242626 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255828 | Paradise | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265073 | Novi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286180 | Marquette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291734 | Bhatia et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291905 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293200 | Roundtree et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295803 | Levine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005275 | Overton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025320 | Bangalore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037715 | Prozeniuk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037746 | Dufrene et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040484 | Yardley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049617 | Grice et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052395 | Wright et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091843 | Kulkarni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101571 | Harlow et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104348 | Kabzinski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120702 | Hokimoto | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123559 | Haviv et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134049 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139166 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146268 | Gandhi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152101 | Griggs | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154601 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155029 | Helbling et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162482 | Ahern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165708 | Moore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172404 | Cohen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177883 | Hanai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192736 | Jabri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201426 | Darcie | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209050 | Li | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212945 | Khedouri et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222656 | Lyman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229421 | Hudis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232574 | Baluja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235230 | Maes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275741 | Loeffen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307436 | Hamilton | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310599 | Purnadi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313318 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316931 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317222 | Griggs et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317232 | Couse et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037287 | Baitalamal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046838 | Andreasson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052437 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052641 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059894 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063502 | Coimbatore et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074159 | Goldfarb et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075684 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083155 | Tudor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089165 | Sweeney | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089352 | Davis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089699 | Saha et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090092674 | Ingram et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093250 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125608 | Werth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129573 | Gavan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136011 | Goel | May 2009 | A1 |
20090170496 | Bourque | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171659 | Pearce et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171669 | Engelsma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171752 | Galvin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182896 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193433 | Maes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216835 | Jain et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217293 | Wolber et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090022131 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090220057 | Waters | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222341 | Belwadi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225748 | Taylor | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225763 | Forsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228868 | Drukman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232289 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234965 | Viveganandhan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235349 | Lai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241135 | Wong et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252159 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262725 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288012 | Hertel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288165 | Qiu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300194 | Ogasawara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316687 | Kruppa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318112 | Vasten | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027531 | Kurashima | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037204 | Lin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054142 | Moiso et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070424 | Monk | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071053 | Ansari et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082513 | Liu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087215 | Gu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088187 | Courtney et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088698 | Krishnamurthy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094758 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103845 | Ulupinar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107222 | Glasser | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115041 | Hawkins et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138501 | Clinton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142516 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150139 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167689 | Sepehri-Nik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188979 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191915 | Spencer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208881 | Kawamura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217837 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232594 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250946 | Korte et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251329 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265825 | Blair et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100029191 | Sanding et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281108 | Cohen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299437 | Moore | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312919 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332852 | Vembu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110026516 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029882 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029981 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053555 | Cai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078278 | Cui et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081008 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083069 | Paul et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083179 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093516 | Geng et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096673 | Stevenson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110366 | Moore et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131293 | Mori | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138453 | Verma et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143714 | Keast et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145049 | Hertel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149810 | Koren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149950 | Petit-Huguenin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151884 | Zhao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158235 | Senga | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167172 | Roach et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170505 | Rajasekar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176537 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179126 | Wetherell et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191486 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211679 | Mezhibovsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251921 | Kassaei et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253693 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255675 | Jasper et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258432 | Rao et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265168 | Lucovsky et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265172 | Sharma | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267985 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274111 | Narasappa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276892 | Jensen-Horne et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280390 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283259 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289126 | Aikas et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289162 | Furlong et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299672 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310902 | Xu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313950 | Nuggehalli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320449 | Gudlavenkatasiva | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320550 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000903 | Baarman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011274 | Moreman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017222 | May | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023531 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023544 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027228 | Rijken et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028602 | Lisi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036574 | Heithcock et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039202 | Song | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059709 | Lieberman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079066 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083266 | Vanswol et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089572 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094637 | Jeyaseelan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101952 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110564 | Ran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114112 | Rauschenberger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120149404 | Beattie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166488 | Kaushik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170726 | Schwartz | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173610 | Bleau et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174095 | Natchadalingam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179646 | Hinton et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179907 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180021 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180029 | Hill et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185561 | Klein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198004 | Watte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201238 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208495 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221603 | Kothule et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226579 | Ha et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239757 | Firstenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240226 | Li | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246273 | Bornstein et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254828 | Aiylam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266258 | Tuchman et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281536 | Gell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288082 | Segall | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290706 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304245 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304275 | Ji et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316809 | Egolf et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321058 | Eng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321070 | Smith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130029629 | Lindholm et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031158 | Salsburg | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031613 | Shanabrook et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036476 | Roever et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047232 | Tuchman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054517 | Beechuk et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054684 | Brazier et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058262 | Parreira | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067448 | Sannidhanam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130097298 | Ting et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130109412 | Nguyen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110658 | Lyman | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132573 | Lindblom | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139148 | Berg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156024 | Burg | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166580 | Maharajh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179942 | Caplis et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201909 | Bosch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204786 | Mattes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212603 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130244632 | Spence et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268676 | Martins et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130325934 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328997 | Desai | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336472 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140013400 | Warshavsky et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025503 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140058806 | Guenette et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064467 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072115 | Makagon et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073291 | Hildner et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095627 | Romagnino | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101058 | Castel et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101149 | Winters et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105372 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106704 | Cooke et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122600 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140123187 | Reisman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126715 | Lum et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129363 | Lorah et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153565 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177523 | Chang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185490 | Holm et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254600 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258481 | Lundell | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269333 | Boerjesson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274086 | Boerjesson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282473 | Saraf et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289391 | Balaji et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140304054 | Orun et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317640 | Harm et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140355600 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372508 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372509 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372510 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373098 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379670 | Kuhr | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379931 | Gaviria | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004932 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150004933 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023251 | Giakoumelis et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026477 | Malatack et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150066865 | Yara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081918 | Nowack et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082378 | Collison | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100634 | He et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119050 | Liao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150131651 | Tarricone et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150181631 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150236888 | Kemmerer, Jr. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236905 | Bellan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150281294 | Nur et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150365480 | Soto et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370788 | Bareket et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381580 | Graham, III et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160011758 | Dornbush et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160028695 | Binder | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160077693 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160112475 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112521 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119291 | Zollinger et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127254 | Kumar et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160149956 | Birnbaum et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160162172 | Rathod | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160205519 | Patel et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160226937 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160226979 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234391 | Wolthuis et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160239770 | Batabyal et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170093688 | Tarricone et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170339283 | Chaudhary et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190007298 | Tarricone et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1684587 | Mar 1971 | DE |
0282126 | Sep 1988 | EP |
1464418 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1522922 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1770586 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2053869 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2134107 | Sep 1999 | ES |
10294788 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2004166000 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004220118 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2006319914 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO-9732448 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO-2002087804 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-2006037492 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2009018489 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO-2009124223 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2010037064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010040010 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-201 0101935 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-201 1091085 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Aepona's API Monetization Platform Wins Best of 4G Awards for Mobile Cloud Enabler”, 4G World 2012 Conference & Expo, [Online]. [Accessed Nov. 5, 2015]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.realwire.com/releases/%20Aeponas-API-Monetization>, (Oct. 30, 2012), 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,877, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 25, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,877, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2016”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,877, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 14, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,877, Response filed Jul. 20, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,087, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated May 16, 2018”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,087, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2017”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,087, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2018”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,087, Response filed Mar. 14, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 7, 2020”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 25, 2019”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2018”, 23 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2020”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 27, 2018”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, Response filed Apr. 26, 2019 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2018”, 19 pgs. |
“Archive Microsoft Office 365 Email | Retain Unified Archiving”, GWAVA, Inc., Montreal, Canada, [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <http://www.gwava.com/Retain/Retain for_Office_365.php>, (2015), 4 pgs. |
“Complaint for Patent Infringement”, Telinit Technologies, LLC v. Twilio Inc 2:12-cv-663, (Oct. 12, 2012), 17 pgs. |
“Ethernet to Token ring Bridge”, Black Box Corporation, [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <http://blackboxcanada.com/resource/files/productdetails/17044.pdf>, (Oct. 1999), 2 pgs. |
“Twilio Cloud Communications—APIs for Voice, VoIP, and Text Messaging”, Twilio, [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <http://www.twilio.com/docs/api/rest/call-feedback>, (Jun. 24, 2015), 8 pgs. |
Abu-Lebdeh, et al., “A 3GPP Evolved Packet Core-Based Architecture for QoS-Enabled Mobile Video Surveillance Applications”, 2012 Third International Conference on the Network of the Future {NOF), (Nov. 21-23, 2012), 1-6. |
Barakovic, Sabina, et al., “Survey and Challenges of QoE Management Issues in Wireless Networks”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, (2012), 1-29. |
Berners-Lee, T., “RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax”, The Internet Society, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986>, (Jan. 2005), 57 pgs. |
Kim, Hwa-Jong, et al., “In-Service Feedback QoE Framework”, 2010 Third International Conference on Communication Theory. Reliability and Quality of Service, (2010), 135-138. |
Matos, et al., “Quality of Experience-based Routing in Multi-Service Wireless Mesh Networks”, Realizing Advanced Video Optimized Wireless Networks. IEEE, (2012), 7060-7065. |
Mu, Mu, et al., “Quality Evaluation in Peer-to-Peer IPTV Services”, Data Traffic and Monitoring Analysis, LNCS 7754, 302-319, (2013), 18 pgs. |
Subramanya, et al., “Digital Signatures”, IEEE Potentials, (Mar./Apr. 2006), 5-8. |
Tran, et al., “User to User adaptive routing based on QoE”, ICNS 2011: The Seventh International Conference on Networking and Services, (2011), 170-177. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,877, filed Nov. 12, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,553,799, System and Method for Client Communication in a Distributed Telephony Network. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,087, filed Dec. 12, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,461, System and Method for Client Communication in a Distributed Telephony Network. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/054,883, filed Aug. 3, 2018, System and Method for Client Communication in Distributed Telephony Network. |
RFC 3986: Uniform Resourse Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax; T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter; Jan. 2005 The Internet Society. |
NPL, “API Monetization Platform”, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200244568 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61902995 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16054883 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16845085 | US | |
Parent | 15376087 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 16054883 | US | |
Parent | 14539877 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15376087 | US |