The present invention relates generally to mailing systems and methods. More particularly, the present invention is directed to mailing systems and methods that evidence postage payment using digital postage marks.
The field of communication is one of the fastest growing sectors of the economy. Two basic modes of communication are electronic and hardcopy communications. Well known examples of electronic communication are e-mail (Internet), computer facsimile and digital telephony, while a classic example of hardcopy communication is traditional mail delivery. There are also mixed forms of communication combining hardcopy and electronic modes such as traditional facsimile and hybrid mail. Both electronic and hardcopy communications offer advantages and disadvantages to users. The electronic communications, while fast and economical, lack universal coverage of traditional mail and create multiple security and legal concerns, particularly in sensitive transaction-type communications. The hardcopy mail is slower and more expensive, but it covers a vast majority of the population and offers legal proof that is frequently required in business and social endeavors.
Recently, in the United States of America and other countries, new digital methods of payment evidencing for traditional mail have been approved by respective posts. Specifically, Digital Postage Marks (DPM) (a.k.a. digital indicia, a.k.a. information-based indicia) are computerized information printed or otherwise attached to a mail item to provide an evidence of payment to a verification authority (e.g., the United States Postal Service). See for example, PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR INFORMATION-BASED INDICIA AND SECURITY ARCHITECTURE FOR OPEN IBI POSTAGE METERING SYSTEMS, dated Apr. 26, 1999, which is a United States Postal Service specification that defines the requirements for a system which uses a general purpose computer for printing information-based indicia in a two-dimensional barcode. When the majority of the information in the DPM is presented in the form of a two-dimensional barcode (such as DataMatrix or PDF417), the DPM can carry a very substantial amount of information that can be automatically and economically computerized, printed and later scanned using conventional computer-driven scanners. The nature of this information has been application dependent and, typically, has been oriented toward security features for verification of payment evidence. This type of information, generally referred to as postal data, preferably includes identification of the metering device (or licensee) responsible for the payment, unique identification of mail item, value of various accounting registers, location of the mail deposit/mailer's account, postage value and other similar information. Such information is typically protected by a cryptographically generated validation code known as CPVC (Cryptographic Postage Validation Code). Another way to protect DPM is by supplying the verification authority with the value of the validation code (Postage validation Code or PVC) prior to mail submission as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,612,889, assigned to the assignee of this application.
One commonly recognized general purpose of sending a mail item is to solicit a reply message from a recipient or service provider. Such reply message may be a response to the message contained in the mail item. The reply message may also be a service type message relating to sending and/or delivering and/or receiving the mail item by either the mail recipient or the service provider, or both. The circumstance when confirmation of mail acceptance and/or delivery is required is particularly common and normally addressed by certified, registered or insured mail. These types of mail are traditionally organized around a physical proof of acceptance and delivery, such as a physical receipt, which is signed by the service provider's clerks and/or the mail recipient and physically delivered to the mail originator (mailer). The postal services incur considerable cost for such special services and value-added service, and the mailer is charged a fee that is significant in comparison to the cost of regular delivery of the mail item. For example, when a mailer requests a return receipt, the recipient of the mail signs a card stating that the mail has been received. This card is physically delivered back to the original mailer as acknowledgement of mail receipt from the recipient.
Therefore, typical physical proofs of acceptance and delivery are content limited, economically inefficient, and time-consuming. Furthermore, most, if not all, such methods require separate, essentially manual, handling of special services mail by the postal service which costs the postal service significantly more money than automated mail processing based on machine readability of information present on mail items.
As of 1998, almost 20% of the population in USA and industrial world in general have access to electronic mail via Internet. Even a higher number of mailers use facsimile regularly. These numbers are expected to grow dramatically in the future. Although such electronic communications provide speed and efficiency over the physical delivery of mail, there is no indication that such electronic communications will replace the physical delivery of mail. One solution to this problem disclosed in related application Ser. No. 09/33,768 has been to provide e-mail response rather than a physical mail item response. However, these response messages may not allow the recipient the ability to send a recipient signature image and a mail item image combined with a personalized communication to the originator. Such communication would typically require a separate, time-delayed transaction such as, for example, a return receipt mail piece, a separate e-mail message or a phone call or facsimile. Of course, those responses assume the recipient has knowledge of the original mailer's various addresses.
In accordance with the present invention, the machine-readable DPM provides a means to overcome the aforementioned difficulties at least for a considerable portion of mail stream. It has been found that the digital data in the DPM may include information that can be used for other than security and postage payment verification. For example, by including a mailer's e-mail address in the DPM, the present invention provides an opportunity to send an e-mail return receipt, which eliminates the need for a return receipt being physically delivered to the mailer. Thus, the postal service saves on the mail cost by adding this attribute to the DPM, and the savings can be passed along to the mailer.
The present invention realizes that the new digital methods of payment evidencing offer unprecedented opportunities not only to improve postal revenue collection and protection but also to create new user-friendly services that can greatly improve the appeal of traditional mail. Transition to digital methods of payment evidencing, in fact, offer an information-rich interface between mailers, posts and mail recipients that can substantially enhance advantages and features of traditional mail while simultaneously alleviating its disadvantages, such as its relatively high cost. Paradoxically, this information-rich interface can be achieved by integrating traditional hardcopy and electronic communication into one effective communication system that takes advantage of beneficial features of both media and offering end users (i.e. rate paying public) a broad selection of communication choices.
In accordance with the present invention, the DPM is treated as a message that may be used to facilitate the transfer of certain information between the mailer and the mail piece recipient. The DPM message is sent by a mailer to a service provider (carrier or post), mail item recipient and any third party interested in the information encoded in the DPM (such as, for example, a legal authority). In this regard, the DPM message can support any specific application of communication.
The present invention provides the mailer with the ability to receive an image of a mail piece in addition to confirmation of receipt and provides the recipient, upon mail piece receipt, with the ability to submit a response to the original mailer at the time of receipt, in a secure manner. Although the original mailer may receive the return receipt information in an expedited manner, the original mailer does not have the capability to receive an image of the delivered mail piece. This invention integrates electronic communication information, such as an e-mail address or any other electronic address (for example, a facsimile number, separate e-mail address or pager number), into a conventional DPM, any other predetermine identifier, or the information may be printed directly on said mail piece in a predetermined location. The invention provides the creation and communication of messages between the mailer and the recipient. Messages, such as delivery confirmation or personal response messages, are communicated in a more expeditious and effective manner. Essentially, any information about a mail item known to the carrier may be forwarded to the mailer (or other intended recipient) through an alternate electronic communication channel. This concept can be extended to provide an image of the mail item or the actual communication message. In particular, an image of a mail item communication message can be included in an e-mail response to a special service request as an evidence of the nature of delivered message. These messages may be archived at the post office or a third party data center for future access. Through use of well-known security techniques, such as cryptography, the present invention deals effectively with issues of confidentiality, message integrity, authentication and non-repudiation. These and other aspects of the present invention are covered in the detailed description of the invention.
In accordance with the present invention, a system and method is provided for sending a message to the mailer of a mail piece distributed in a postal system using information located at a predetermined location on a mail piece. The information includes the mailer's electronic address and may be located anywhere on the mail piece including the DPM. At delivery of the mailpiece into the recipient's hands, addressing information is captured from the mail piece, and a return message is created by the recipient and sent to the mailer in accordance with the captured address. Upon receipt of the mail piece, the recipient may also be required to sign for the mail piece. The physical signature and/or a copy of the mailpiece may be combined into the returned message.
Therefore, it is now apparent that the present invention substantially overcomes the disadvantages associated with the prior art. Additional advantages of the invention is will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
The present invention provides a system and method for integrating value-added services information into the DPM of a mail item to provide a more economical and efficient method of providing such value-added services. Although the present invention is described below as an e-mail implementation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that a viable alternative includes substituting a mailer's pager number so that a pager notification of mail receipt can be used along with some other receipt data. Other viable alternatives include facsimile or automated voice response notification. Furthermore, the present invention is described for a mail item that is delivered by a postal service. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention can be used with any carrier that physically delivers any item. It will be further understood that for such other carriers, the communication information that is described herein as being integrated in the DPM may be applied in any manner to any part of the item being physically delivered. For example, the information may be part of a bar code or may be in plain text.
Furthermore, the present invention is described as having an e-mail address included in the DPM. However, it may be advantageous to include e-mail address information in the delivery address block of the mail piece, so that it can be captured and computerized during the basic mail processing step of automated mail sorting. For example, if a postal administration/carrier is not always concerned with verification of payment, it may choose to selectively scan DPM's based on some predetermined and adaptive sampling plan. On the other hand, special services, such as proof of deposit, proof of delivery and proof of receipt, require that the e-mail address of the sender be known to the postal operator/carrier. Thus, it may be important to separate postage payment security data (normally included into the DPM) and other data (e.g., special service) and position these different types of data in the different places on the mail item optimized for specific mode of mail processing and operation employed by a given postal operator or carrier. The present invention specifically provides for all different arrangements of this kind. It is noted that the three services (proof of deposit, delivery and receipt) described above are very important types of services desired by mailers, but they are not the only ones allowed by the present invention and are described below as examples only.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
If, however, at step 540, the recipient does decide to respond to the mailer, then the method progresses to step 570, where the recipient composes a response message. The response may compose the message directly, on an electronic data collection device, or on a printed form which would be later scanned into the system for return delivery. At step 580, the recipient signs the electronic data collection device to create a digital image of his/her signature. Again, this may be completed on an electronic data collection device or on a print form which later will be scanned into the postal system for return delivery. At step 590, a message containing the scanned form, including the mail piece image, signature and response message, is created. At step 600, the message may be signed digitally, and at step 610, the signed message may be sent to a postal service file for archiving. At step 620, using the address obtained at step 525, the file is then sent to the originator of the mail piece, and the message response system ends at step 630.
Now turning to
Many features of the embodiments disclosed herein represent design choices selected to exploit the inventive concept as implemented in a particular mailing system environment. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Therefore, the inventive concept in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details of the preferred embodiments described above, but is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation in part of application “System and Method for Employing Digital Postage Marks as Part of Value-Added Services in a Mailing System”, filed Jun. 24, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,532,452, and commonly assigned to the assignee of this application: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/339,768, which is specifically incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4106060 | Chapman, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4800504 | Durst et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5008827 | Sansone et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5058008 | Schumacher | Oct 1991 | A |
5388049 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5586036 | Pintsov | Dec 1996 | A |
5612884 | Haines | Mar 1997 | A |
5612889 | Pintsov et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5648916 | Manduley | Jul 1997 | A |
5699258 | Thiel | Dec 1997 | A |
5712712 | Sayward | Jan 1998 | A |
5726894 | Sansone | Mar 1998 | A |
5737729 | Denman | Apr 1998 | A |
5768132 | Cordery et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794789 | Payson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805810 | Maxwell | Sep 1998 | A |
5826034 | Albal | Oct 1998 | A |
5859967 | Kaufeld et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875302 | Obhan | Feb 1999 | A |
5892909 | Grasso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5918220 | Sansone et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936865 | Pintsov et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978781 | Sansone | Nov 1999 | A |
6018774 | Mayle et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038601 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047264 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047273 | Vaghi | Apr 2000 | A |
6052671 | Crooks et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072862 | Srinivasan | Jun 2000 | A |
6216127 | Gans et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229884 | Toyoda et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233317 | Homan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233318 | Picard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6289323 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9921330 | Apr 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09339768 | Jun 1999 | US |
Child | 09703231 | US |