The present invention relates to authorizing vehicle operations, and more particularly to a portable device configured to authorize one or more vehicle operations.
Keyless entry systems for vehicles have become nearly ubiquitous in the automotive realm. In a conventional keyless entry system, a user carries a keyfob having a button that enables the user to initiate a vehicle operation, such as starting the vehicle or mobilizing the vehicle. In response to user activation of the button, the keyfob communicates instructions to the vehicle to initiate the vehicle operation. In one conventional configuration, the vehicle may include a series of RF antennas that allow the vehicle to determine whether the keyfob is present within the vehicle. Because the keyfob in these conventional configurations is carried by the user and serves a singular purpose—operation in conjunction with a keyless entry system—the keyfob is configured to be a simplistic device having limited capabilities. More advanced operations and processing may be performed by the vehicle, rather than the keyfob, so that cost and size of the keyfob may be kept down.
One exemplary operation performed by a conventional keyless entry system is detection inside the vehicle. In keyless entry systems configured to allow mobilization of a vehicle, detection inside the vehicle is often times a concern because there are several scenarios where the driver and the keyfob may be outside the vehicle, but in general proximity thereto. For example, while the driver is refueling the vehicle at a service station, if the vehicle were to be mobilized, a thief, or a young child, may climb into the driver's seat and attempt to drive the vehicle without permission. For at least this reason, conventional keyfob-based vehicle entry systems, in some cases, have utilized a series of RF antennas in the vehicle, so that the vehicle, itself may detect the presence of the keyfob in the vehicle or inside the vehicle cabin, and prevent mobilization, unless the vehicle detects that the keyfob is located in the vehicle.
Portable devices, such as smartphones, as well as smartphone applications (or programs running on the portable devices), have also become nearly ubiquitous. In recent times, there has been some interest in utilizing these portable devices to instruct a vehicle to perform an operation. However, unlike the conventional keyfob, smartphones in use today often times are not specifically configured to communicate with a keyless entry system. Not every smartphone is used in conjunction with a vehicle, so smartphone manufacturers are reluctant to incorporate a keyfob antenna and communication interface into the smartphone, avoiding or reducing unnecessary cost.
For at least these reasons, conventional smartphone applications in the context of vehicle control utilize communication interfaces already present in the device and the vehicle, including, for example, cellular, GPS, and Bluetooth interfaces. These conventional systems, however, are not without downsides. The vehicle, smartphone, and cellular, GPS, or Bluetooth interfaces in the conventional system are not configured to detect presence or location of the smartphone relative to the vehicle, such as presence inside the vehicle. As a result, actual mobilization via the smartphone is not realized.
In accordance with one embodiment, a portable device may be configured to communicate with a vehicle to authorize one or more vehicle operations. For example, the portable device may authorize the vehicle to unlock/lock doors, start the vehicle engine, mobilize the vehicle, or a combination thereof. The vehicle may include a vehicle transmitter system with one or more transmitters disposed at various locations on the vehicle, and the portable device may be configured to monitor a communication strength between the portable device and the one or more transmitters of the transmitter system. Based on the monitored signal strength, the portable device may determine location information about itself relative to the vehicle. For example, based on a monitored strength of communication from each of the one or more transmitters of the vehicle transmitter system, the portable device may determine that the portable device is proximate to but not within the vehicle, or that the portable device is inside the vehicle. As another example, based on the monitored strength of communication, the portable device may determine whether the portable device is located inside the vehicle and in proximity to a vehicle driver seat.
In another embodiment, based on the location information determined by the portable device about itself, the portable device may communicate an authorization code to the vehicle to authorize a vehicle operation. For example, if the portable device determines the portable device is in proximity to but not within the vehicle, the portable device may communicate an authorization code to unlock one or more doors of the vehicle. As another example, if the portable device determines the portable device is located in an area proximate to the vehicle driver seat, the portable device may communicate an authorization code to allow mobilization of the vehicle.
In still another embodiment, the portable device, based on the determined location information, may communicate information in addition to or alternative to the authorization code. For example, the portable device may communicate the location information about itself relative to the vehicle, or may communicate an instruction to perform a vehicle operation, or both.
In yet another embodiment, the vehicle transmitter system may include a plurality of Bluetooth Low Energy (Bluetooth LE) transmitters, and the portable device may monitor the signal strength of these Bluetooth LE transmitters. In particular, the portable device may use the signal strength of each of the Bluetooth LE transmitters as a basis for determining location information about itself relative to the vehicle. For example, based on the relative strength of each Bluetooth LE transmitter from among multiple transmitters disposed at various positions on the vehicle, the portable device may determine that it is present inside the vehicle and located in proximity to the vehicle driver seat. Based on such a determination, the portable device may communicate an authorization code to allow mobilization of the vehicle.
In even another embodiment, the one or more transmitters of the vehicle transmitter system may include a master device and one or more remote beacon devices disposed at various positions on the vehicle. For example, a remote beacon device may be disposed in the door of the vehicle, and the master device may be disposed in the vehicle dash. The master device and the remote beacon devices may be Bluetooth LE capable devices.
In a further embodiment, the master device of the vehicle transmitter system may be operably connected to a vehicle bus of the vehicle, and may be capable of sending messages along the vehicle bus to initiate one or more vehicle operations, such as an instruction to lock/unlock a vehicle door and to enable mobilization of the vehicle. The master device also may control operation of the remote beacon devices, including, for example, waking the remote beacon devices in response to detecting that a portable device is in range. As another example, the master device may wake the remote beacon devices in response to detecting motion of the vehicle door. In yet another example, the remote beacon devices may be motion sensitive, and may be configured to wake themselves in response to detecting motion.
In still a further embodiment, a method of authorizing a vehicle to perform a vehicle operation is provided. The method may include determining, in a portable device, location information about the portable device relative to the vehicle. Based on the location information, the portable device may communicate an authorization code to the vehicle, enabling the vehicle to perform a vehicle operation. In addition to or alternative to the authorization code, the portable device may communicate location information or an instruction to perform a vehicle operation, or both. Optionally, the portable device may monitor signal strength of a plurality of transmitters disposed on the vehicle, and use monitored signal strength as a basis for determining location information about the portable device relative to the vehicle.
In even a further embodiment, systems and methods utilize a portable device, such as a smart phone, to replace a conventional keyless entry system. The keyfob present in many conventional keyless entry systems may be eliminated by configuring a vehicle to include a vehicle transmitter system, and enabling the portable device, carried by many users in recent times, to authorize or initiate, or both, vehicle operations of the vehicle based on communication with the vehicle transmitter system. In this way, users may be freed from carrying or using a separate keyfob to access their vehicle.
These and other objects, advantages, and features of the invention will be more fully understood and appreciated by reference to the description of the current embodiments and the drawings.
Before the embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the details of operation or to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention may be implemented in various other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in alternative ways not expressly disclosed herein. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including” and “comprising” and variations thereof is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items and equivalents thereof. Further, enumeration may be used in the description of various embodiments. Unless otherwise expressly stated, the use of enumeration should not be construed as limiting the invention to any specific order or number of components. Nor should the use of enumeration be construed as excluding from the scope of the invention any additional steps or components that might be combined with or into the enumerated steps or components.
A system and method in accordance with one embodiment includes using a portable device to communicate with a vehicle to authorize one or more vehicle operations. For example, the portable device may authorize the vehicle to unlock/lock doors, start the vehicle engine, or authorize mobilization of the vehicle, or a combination thereof. The vehicle may include a vehicle transmitter system with one or more transmitters disposed at various locations on the vehicle, and the portable device may be configured to monitor a communication strength between the portable device and the one or more transmitters of the vehicle transmitter system. Based on the monitored signal strength, the portable device may determine location information about itself.
A vehicle control system, according to one embodiment, is shown in
The vehicle 1 in the illustrated embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiment of
The plurality of transmitters 10, 12 in the illustrated embodiment of
The one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 may be disposed at various locations on the vehicle, potentially known to the portable device 2, enabling the portable device 2 to determine location information about itself based on a communication signal strength. Example locations include a vehicle dash, a rearview exterior mirror, and a lower portion of the driver side door, or a combination thereof. In the illustrated embodiment of
In one embodiment, the master transmitter 10 may be a Bluetooth LE device, powered by the vehicle system 20, and including an omnidirectional antenna for communicating with the Bluetooth LE transceiver 44 of the portable device 2. With this configuration, the master transmitter 10 may establish a Bluetooth LE connection between itself and the portable device 2, allowing the portable device 2 to communicate with the master transmitter 10 when in proximity to the vehicle 1.
The one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 may be disposed on the vehicle at locations separate from the master transmitter 10, and may be battery powered such that may operate without vehicle power. Alternatively, or additionally, the beacon transmitter devices 12 may receive power from the vehicle. In the illustrated embodiment, the beacon transmitter devices 12 include directional antennas that facilitate determining location information about the portable device. For example, a beacon transmitter device 12 positioned in the driver side door may include a directional antenna aimed toward the driver side seat such that, if the portable device 2 is currently located outside the vehicle, or in a rear seat of the vehicle, the signal strength between the beacon transmitter device 12 in the driver side door and the portable device 2 may be low relative to the signal strength between the portable device 2 and the master transmitter 10 or another beacon transmitter device 12, or both. Based on the signal strength of communication from at least one of the master transmitter 10 and the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12, the portable device 2 may determine location information about itself, such as whether the portable device is in proximity to the driver-side seat.
In one embodiment, a beacon transmitter device 12 disposed on the exterior of the vehicle 1, such as a rearview exterior mirror or a vehicle door handle, may include a user input that enables a user to enter information to unlock the vehicle 1. For example, the user input may be one or more buttons that allow entry of a code to unlock the vehicle. If the user is not carrying the portable device 2, or if the portable device 2 is non-operational (e.g., the battery of the portable device is drained), the user input may provide an alternative way to gain entry to the vehicle 1.
The one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 in the illustrated embodiment of
In one embodiment, each of the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 may transmit a Bluetooth discovery signal, or a received signal strength indicator (RSSI) signal, or both, to the portable device 2 upon waking. The signal transmitted from each of the beacon transmitter devices 12 may be repeatedly transmitted at a rapid rate, so that the portable device 2 may use the RSSI signals to determine location information of the portable device 2 relative to the one or more remote beacons 12. The master transmitter 10 may direct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to adjust the transmission rate based on one or more factors, such as whether a portable device 2 is connected to the master transmitter 10. For example, in response to a portable device 2 connecting to the master transmitter 10, the master transmitter 10 may direct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to increase the transmission rate. If the portable device 2 provides a valid authorization code, and the portable device 2 is no longer determining location information about itself, the master transmitter 10 may direct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to reduce the transmission rate, potentially conserving power. Additionally, or alternatively, the master transmitter 10 may direct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to go to sleep.
As another example, the master transmitter 10 may direct one of the beacon transmitter devices 12 to increase the transmission rate while maintaining the transmission rate of another beacon transmitter device 12. Increased transmission rate from a beacon transmitter device 12 may further facilitate a location determination in the portable device 2. Accordingly, depending on the location information provided by the portable device 2, the master transmitter 10 may direct one beacon transmitter device 12 considered proximate to a location of the portable device 2 to increase its transmission rate, while a beacon transmitter device 12 considered farther away may be directed to maintain or reduce its transmission rate. In yet another example, a beacon transmitter device 12 disposed on an exterior mirror may transmit or advertise at a low rate until the portable device 2 is detected. After the portable device 2 is detected, a beacon transmitter device 12 disposed near an inside of the driver-side door may at least one of wake-up and increase its advertisement rate.
The control unit 40 of the portable device may monitor the signal strength (RSSI data) from each of the remote transmitter devices 12, and determine, based on the monitored signal strength, if the portable device 2 is located in close proximity to the vehicle 1 for unlocking or within the front part of the vehicle 1 for allowing mobilization of the vehicle 1. It should be understood that the portable device 2 may determine location information about itself in a variety of ways. For example, the control unit 40 of the portable device 2 may determine location information based on whether the signal strength from any one of the one or more remote beacons 12 exceeds a threshold. In other words, if the signal strength from one of the remote beacons 12 exceeds a threshold, or is within a range, the control unit 40 of the portable device 2 may determine the portable device 2 is in proximity to that remote beacon 12. In addition to, or alternatively, the control unit 40 may determine location information about the portable device 2 based on the relative signal strength from two or more remote beacons 12. As an example, if the signal strength from a first remote beacon 12 is above or below a first threshold, or within a first range, and the signal strength from a second remote beacon 12 is also above or below a second threshold, or within a second range, the control unit 40 of the portable device 2 may determine the portable device 2 is likely positioned in a particular location relative to the first and second remote beacons 12. As another example, the control unit 40 may determine location information based on a differences among the signal strengths of communication from the two or more remote beacons 12. A difference between the signal strength from the first remote beacon 12 and the signal strength of the second remote beacon 12 may be indicative of location information of the portable device 2 relative to the first and second remote beacons 12.
Accuracy in the determination of a location of the portable device 2 may depend on a variety of factors. For example, the potential accuracy may depend on the number of beacon transmitter devices 12, the positions of the beacon transmitter devices 12, whether a beacon transmitter device 12 includes a directional antenna or an omnidirectional antenna, and the transmission rate of the beacon transmitter device 12.
The thresholds or ranges, or both, utilized by the control unit 40 may be determined during or based on a calibration or setup process implemented by the portable device 2 in order to associate the portable device 2 with the vehicle 1, and to acclimate the portable device 2 to one or more characteristics of the vehicle 1. The physical construction of the vehicle 1 may differ between makes or models, or both. These differences may affect transmission of signals from the one or more transmitters 10, 12. Calibration during the setup process may enable the portable device 2 to tailor the process for determining location information relative to the vehicle 1 in order to reduce the impact of construction differences among vehicles. Calibration may also include adjusting the transmission level of the remote beacon devices. For example, the master device 10 may direct one or more of the remote beacon devices to increase or reduce the transmission power in calibration.
The thresholds, ranges, or both, may be set by the calibration process, and may not change during operation. Alternatively, the calibration process may adjust the threshold, ranges, or both during operation. For example, the portable device 2 may monitor signal strength from the one or more transmitters 10, 12, and adjust a threshold based on changes in signal strength. Put differently, the control unit 40 may dynamically adjust the thresholds or ranges, or both, based on one or more parameters, such as historical strength readings (e.g., RSSI readings). Changes may be implemented periodically during operation or continuously.
In one embodiment, a Bluetooth LE protocol may be used between the portable device 2 and the vehicle 1 to allow communication that enables the portable device 2 to transmit commands and status to the vehicle 1. The low power profile of Bluetooth LE may enable the vehicle control system 100 to provide a connection or link between the portable device 2 in the vehicle 1, while potentially avoiding excessive power drain on the vehicle 1 and the portable device 2.
An agreed-upon protocol including a sequence of messages and events may be established between the portable device 2 and the vehicle 1, such that presence of the portable device 2 inside the vehicle may be confirmed, and the vehicle 2 may be securely started and mobilized. The agreed-upon protocol may include at least one of authentication, authorization, and encrypted communication. For example, messages between the portable device 2 and the vehicle 1 may be encrypted, such that another device listening to Bluetooth LE traffic may be prevented from unauthorized initiation of a vehicle operation. As another example, the agreed-upon protocol may utilize one or more of pre-shared keys, code hopping, and timestamp hashing algorithms. It should be understood that the agreed-upon protocol is not limited to the to the authentication, authorization, and encryption algorithms described herein.
In response to the portable device 2 determining location information related to itself relative to the vehicle 1, the portable device 2 may communicate information to the master transmitter 10 to authorize or initiate, or both, one or more vehicle operations. The communicated information may include a shared secret code that the master transmitter 10 of the vehicle 2 may authenticate to authorize a vehicle operation, such as mobilizing the vehicle 2, or, in other words, starting and enabling the vehicle 2 to be driven.
In an alternative embodiment, the master transmitter 10 may determine location information about the portable device 2 relative to the vehicle 1. The portable device 2 may communicate information to the master transmitter 10 regarding a strength of communication between the portable device 2 and one or more transmitters of the vehicle transmitter system, including, for example, at least one of the master transmitter 10 and one or more of the remote beacons 12. Based on the information communicated from the portable device 2 to the master transmitter 10, the master transmitter 10 may determine a location of the portable device 2 relative to the vehicle 1, such as whether the portable device 2 is in proximity to but exterior to the vehicle 1, or whether the portable device is within the vehicle 1 and in proximity to the vehicle driver seat.
Both the portable device 2 and the vehicle 1 may communicate with an authorization server 3, such as a key server, to obtain a secret code or authorization code. In one embodiment, the authorization server 3 may communicate with the portable device 2 and vehicle 1 via cellular communication, which may be encrypted. The portable device 2, as described above, may include a cellular transceiver 42 that enables the portable device 2 to communicate with the authorization server 3 to obtain a collection of shared secret codes. Likewise, the master transmitter 10 of the vehicle 1 may access a cellular transceiver 28, such as a cellular modem or a telematics unit, of the vehicle system 20 to communicate with the authentication server 3 to obtain the collection of shared secret codes. The collection of shared secret codes may include one or more keys, and may be provided by the authentication server 3 separately or at one time. The collection of the shared secret codes may include a seed for calculating one or more keys.
By providing the same collection of shared secret codes to both the portable device 2 and the vehicle 1, the vehicle control system 100 may provide a degree of security to potentially prevent unauthorized access to one or more vehicle operations, such as unauthorized access to vehicle door locks. For example, after receiving an authorization code from the portable device 2, the master transmitter 10 may compare the received authorization code to one of the shared secret codes received from the authorization server 3. If the received authorization code matches the shared secret code, the master transmitter 10 may successfully authenticate the portable device 2, and authorize mobilization. In one embodiment, to further enhance security and to prevent replay attacks, both the portable device 2 and the master transmitter 10 may be configured to use an authorization code only once. In this context, the collection of shared secret codes received from the authorization server 3 may provide a limited number of authorizations. As a result, the portable device 2 and the master transmitter 10 may communicate with the authorization server 3 to obtain additional shared secret codes. Additionally, or alternatively, the portable device 2 and the master transmitter 10 may use the collection of shared secret codes as a seed to generate additional valid authorization codes.
In one embodiment, the master transmitter 10 and the portable device 2 may utilize asymmetric keys, one public and one private, to securely communicate information, such as an authorization code or a request from the portable device 2 to the master transmitter 10 to authorize or perform a vehicle function. The master transmitter 10 may be provided a private key during manufacture, from the authorization server 3, or the portable device 2, or a combination thereof. To avoid potential compromises in security, such as in case the private key becomes known to or compromised by a potential unauthorized user, the private key may expire or become revoked. The portable device 2 may be responsible for key-management, obtaining public or private keys, or a combination thereof, from the authorization server 3, revoking an existing private key, and providing a private key to the master transmitter 10. A public key obtained from the authorization server 3 and stored in the portable device 2 may allow the portable device 2 to encrypt information communicated to the master transmitter 10. By storing the private key in the master transmitter 10, the master transmitter 10 may be capable of verifying whether the public key provided by the portable device 2 is valid and not expired. By utilizing the portable device 2 for key-management, the master transmitter 10 may not utilize the cellular transceiver 28 to obtain a collection of shared secret codes or a private key.
As described herein, the master transmitter 10 may authorize and initiate a vehicle operation in response to receiving an authorization code from a portable device 2 that matches a stored shared secret code received from an authentication server 3 or generated based on communication from the authentication server 3. In other words, reception of a valid authentication code may enable the master transmitter 10 to authenticate the portable device 2 in terms of presence of the portable device 2 in the vehicle and in terms of authorization from the portable device 2 to start and enable mobilization of the vehicle 1. It should be understood, however, that the vehicle control system 100 is not so limited, and that reception of a valid authorization code may cause any number of operations to occur in the master transmitter 10. For example, the master transmitter 10 may authenticate the portable device 2 based on reception of a valid authorization code, and may wait to initiate one or more vehicle operations until specific instructions to do so are received from the portable device 2.
In one embodiment, the portable device 2 may be configured to notify the user if the portable device 2 is removed from proximity to the vehicle 1, based on monitored signal strength or loss of signal, while the vehicle 1 is running. Additionally, or alternatively, the portable device 2 may notify the user that the vehicle 1 is or has been shut off based on absence of a message or signal transmitted from the vehicle 1.
A method according to one embodiment of the present invention is shown in
The method may include detecting in the portable device 2 an available Bluetooth LE connection to the master transmitter 10 of the vehicle 1. Step 302. After detecting the available Bluetooth LE connection, the portable device 2 may communicate with the master transmitter 10 to negotiate and establish a Bluetooth LE connection. Step 304. Establishment of a Bluetooth LE connection with the portable device 2 may be considered a trigger condition by the master transmitter 10. And, in response to such a trigger condition, the master transmitter 10 may wake one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 via the vehicle transmitter communication interface 30 such that the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 become discoverable by the portable device 2, and rapidly transmit signals capable of being monitored by the portable device 2. Step 306. For example, the transmission rate may be about 30 times per second. The portable device 2 may monitor a strength of a signal received from each of the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12. Based on the monitored strength of each signal, the control unit 40 of the portable device 2 may determine location information regarding the portable device 2 relative to the vehicle 1. For example, the control unit 40 may compare the monitored strength of each signal relative to one another to determine location information, such as whether the portable device 2 is located within or exterior to the vehicle 1. Based on the determined location information, the portable device 2 may communicate an authorization key or code to the master transmitter 10 of the vehicle 1. Step 308. For example, if the control unit 40 determines the portable device 1 is located exterior to the vehicle 1, the control unit 40 may communicate via the Bluetooth LE interface 44 an authorization key to authorize unlocking of a vehicle door. After receiving such an authorization key, the master transmitter 10 may compare the authorization key against a stored key to determine whether the authorization key is valid to unlock a door. If the authorization key is valid, the master transmitter 10 may communicate with the vehicle system 20 to authorize and initiate unlocking of the vehicle door. The master transmitter 10, at this stage, may direct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to discontinue transmission of signals in order to conserve power.
In one embodiment, the master transmitter 10 may monitor the vehicle bus 32 for the occurrence of one or more operating conditions of the vehicle 1, such as if a door has been opened, or if a brake pedal has been depressed. Step 310. In response to the occurrence of one or more operating conditions (e.g., a trigger condition), the master transmitter 10 may instruct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to become discoverable and to transmit signals rapidly to the portable device 2. If the master transmitter 10 does not receive communication from a portable device 2 within a predetermined time period, the master transmitter 10 may instruct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to discontinue transmitting signals, and may wait for another trigger condition, such as occurrence of one or more operating conditions of vehicle 2 or establishment of a Bluetooth LE connection with a portable device 2, or both, before waking the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12.
Based on reception of signals from the beacon transmitter devices 12, the control unit 40 of the portable device 2 may determine location information regarding the portable device 2 relative to the vehicle 1. Step 312. The determination in step 312 may be similar to the process described in step 308. Based on the determined location information being indicative that the portable device 2 is within the vehicle 1, the control unit 40 may transmit an authorization code to the master transmitter 10, authorizing the master transmitter to start and mobilize the vehicle 1. The authorization code may be similar to the authorization code described above to authorize a vehicle operation, such as unlocking the door. For example, the master transmitter 10 may compare the authorization code against a stored authorization code or key to determine whether the authorization code received by the portable device 2 is valid to initiate starting or mobilization of the vehicle 1. If the authorization code received by the portable device 2 is valid, the master transmitter 10 may instruct the vehicle system 20, via the vehicle bus 32, to mobilize and start the vehicle 1. After a valid authorization code is received by the master transmitter 10, the master transmitter 10 may direct the one or more beacon transmitter devices 12 to discontinue transmission of signals. Step 314. The vehicle system 20 may validate that the mobilization command received from the master transmitter 10 is in fact a valid command, and if so, may start and mobilize the vehicle 1. Alternatively, the master transmitter 10 may authorize the vehicle system 20 to mobilize, and the vehicle system 20 may wait until at least one of a start button and a brake pedal are activated to start the vehicle.
Directional terms, such as “vertical,” “horizontal,” “top,” “bottom,” “upper,” “lower,” “inner,” “inwardly,” “outer” and “outwardly,” are used to assist in describing the invention based on the orientation of the embodiments shown in the illustrations. The use of directional terms should not be interpreted to limit the invention to any specific orientation(s).
The above description is that of current embodiments of the invention. Various alterations and changes may be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspects of the invention as defined in the appended claims, which are to be interpreted in accordance with the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents. This disclosure is presented for illustrative purposes and should not be interpreted as an exhaustive description of all embodiments of the invention or to limit the scope of the claims to the specific elements illustrated or described in connection with these embodiments. For example, and without limitation, any individual element(s) of the described invention may be replaced by alternative elements that provide substantially similar functionality or otherwise provide adequate operation. This includes, for example, presently known alternative elements, such as those that might be currently known to one skilled in the art, and alternative elements that may be developed in the future, such as those that one skilled in the art might, upon development, recognize as an alternative. Further, the disclosed embodiments include a plurality of features that are described in concert and that might cooperatively provide a collection of benefits. The present invention is not limited to only those embodiments that include all of these features or that provide all of the stated benefits, except to the extent otherwise expressly set forth in the issued claims. Any reference to claim elements in the singular, for example, using the articles “a,” “an,” “the” or “said,” is not to be construed as limiting the element to the singular. Any reference to claim elements as “at least one of X, Y and Z” is meant to include any one of X, Y or Z individually, and any combination of X, Y and Z, for example, X, Y, Z; X, Y; X, Z; and Y, Z.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4942393 | Waraksa | Jul 1990 | A |
5075632 | Payne | Dec 1991 | A |
6069411 | Charron | May 2000 | A |
6211776 | Rohrl | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218932 | Stippler | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6259168 | Okada | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6437683 | Wolf | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6522027 | Morillon | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6556135 | Attring et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6697024 | Fuerst et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6906612 | Ghabra | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6965295 | Shimonomoto et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980124 | Kong et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7046119 | Ghabra | May 2006 | B2 |
7089035 | Ando et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7106171 | Burgess | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7170998 | McLintock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7224980 | Hara | May 2007 | B2 |
7228122 | Oyagi et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7277007 | John et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7280097 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7321814 | Kanda et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333021 | Ieda et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336151 | Ueda | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7394349 | Marek et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7446644 | Schaffzin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7530113 | Braun | May 2009 | B2 |
7548491 | Macfarlane | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7629873 | Ghabra et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7663502 | Breed | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7710245 | Pickering | May 2010 | B2 |
7751957 | Nagaoka | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7768377 | Brey | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7805169 | Hicks, III | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7850078 | Christenson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7868745 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7904219 | Lowrey et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7911358 | Bos et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912625 | Cahoon | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916021 | Lickfelt et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7932892 | Chen et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7961076 | Kelley et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7999655 | Yoshikawa | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8022808 | Kurpinski et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8048174 | Yamamichi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8050817 | Moinzadeh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8053922 | Müller | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8077011 | McBride et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8089339 | Mikan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8089342 | Sugiura et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8098130 | Baruco et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8102239 | Woo | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115609 | Ketari | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126400 | Jung et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126450 | Howarter et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127984 | Zatloukal et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8159324 | Zellweger et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175657 | Okayasu | May 2012 | B2 |
8193903 | Kraimer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8224313 | Howarter et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8245052 | Bjorn | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8248968 | Handforth et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284022 | Kachouh | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299895 | Harris | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319605 | Hassan et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8334758 | Baruco et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8358197 | Tran | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8421589 | Sultan et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8427289 | Ghabra et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432260 | Talty et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8437886 | Yang | May 2013 | B1 |
8437916 | Fawaz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8482382 | Lickfelt et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494447 | Oesterling et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8527015 | Alrabady et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8610674 | Pryor | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8706143 | Elias | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8744482 | Margalef | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8868254 | Louboutin | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8947202 | Tucker et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9189900 | Penilla | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9241235 | Santavicca | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9478848 | Nagata | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9536364 | Talty et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20010054952 | Desai et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020140545 | Nietupski et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186144 | Meunier | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030095040 | Shimomura | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117293 | Tang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135321 | Kumazaki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040201277 | Hentsch et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040257209 | Yang | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038574 | Gila | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046554 | Attaprasith | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099263 | Ikeda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050225429 | Burzio | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050242923 | Pearson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060061459 | Kawamura | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060135216 | Collavo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060164207 | Wilcox | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060238297 | Tang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070109093 | Matsubara | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138869 | Otani | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142155 | Schumacher | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162191 | Matsubara | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176739 | Raheman | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197261 | Humbel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070281735 | Suzuki | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080048909 | Ioffe | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080068128 | Ghabra et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080136611 | Benco | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143499 | Shimomura | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147268 | Fuller | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080194291 | Martin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080197970 | Fouts | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080197987 | King et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080309453 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090115585 | Minassian | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146830 | Ogiso | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156126 | Willis | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167524 | Chesnutt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195370 | Huffman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212905 | Batz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090289780 | Tenorio-Fox | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291637 | Alrabady et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090328189 | Budyta et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017118 | Doughterty | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063670 | Brzezinski et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087137 | Fischer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097178 | Pisz et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102924 | King et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109914 | Tieman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100136944 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191392 | Juzswik | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100222940 | Pütsch | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265034 | Cap et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100305779 | Hassan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045842 | Rork et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060480 | Mottla et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110086668 | Patel | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112969 | Zaid et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165896 | Stromberg et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169604 | Ghabra et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110215901 | Van Wiemeersch et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110275321 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110309922 | Ghabra | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120040665 | Liu | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120105197 | Kobres | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126943 | Biondo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129493 | Vasudevan | May 2012 | A1 |
20120164989 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120208519 | Seaver | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120229253 | Kolar | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120268259 | Igel et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120282913 | Kaindl et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309314 | Chen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120310446 | Murphy | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313768 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313796 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329445 | Elliott | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130015814 | Kelty et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130082820 | Tieman | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099892 | Tucker et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103200 | Tucker et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130106602 | Lickfelt | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109342 | Welch | May 2013 | A1 |
20130130674 | De Wind et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141212 | Pickering | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154819 | Stefanovski et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130194068 | Mönig et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211623 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130237189 | Nishidai | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130257604 | Mirle et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130259232 | Petel | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271273 | Oesterling | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130332007 | Louboutin | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140025950 | Peeters | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140169564 | Gautama et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188309 | Caratto et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140188348 | Gautama et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140308971 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150050923 | Tu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150105944 | Louboutin | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150141043 | Abramson | May 2015 | A1 |
20150145646 | Seino | May 2015 | A1 |
20150147974 | Tucker et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149042 | Cooper | May 2015 | A1 |
20150235486 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150287257 | Thompson | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Dahlgren, Erik et al., “Evaluation of indoor positioning based on Bluetooth Smart technology”, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jun. 10, 2014, pp. 1-94. |
Faragher, R. et al., “An Analysis of the Accuracy of Bluetooth Low Energy for Indoor Positioning Applications”, Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+2014), Tampa, Florida, Sep. 2014, pp. 201-210. |
Faragher, R., et al., “Location Fingerprinting With Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 33, No. 11 Nov. 2015, pp. 2418-2428. |
Hereman, Willy et al., “Determination of a Position in Three Dimensions Using Trilateration and Approximate Distances”, Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Colorado School of Mines, Sep. 17, 1995, submitted to Decision Sciences, Oct. 1995, pp. 1-22. |
Ryan, Mike, “Bluetooth: With Low Energy comes Low Security”, iSEC Partners, presented at Proceedings of the 7th USENIX conference on Offensive Technologies, Aug. 13, 2013, pp. 1-7. |
Halder, S.J. et al., “Advanced Smoothing Approach of RSSI and LQI for Indoor Localization System”, International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, received Jul. 25, 2014; accepted Nov. 3, 2014, pp. 1-13. |
Lindh, J., “Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons”, Texas Instruments Corporation Application Report, Jan. 2015, pp. 1-13. |
“Real-time locating system”, available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_locating_system as of Feb. 6, 2014. |
http://www.onyxbeacon.com/ available as of Jun. 25, 2014. |
http://developer.estimote.com/ available as of Aug. 13, 2015. |
https://getpixie.com available as of Aug. 23, 2014. |
http://www.slideshare.net/localzco/whats-bestmicrolocationtechnologyibeaconblenfcqrgps available as of Apr. 5, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170228952 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61940128 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14620959 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15496069 | US |