The present invention generally relates to systems and methods of conducting surveys and polling users.
Currently, polling companies and organizations use pop-ups, spam e-mail, and online surveys to conduct polls and surveys over the Internet. Because a pop-up can direct one to a potentially hazardous web site and because pop-ups have become so prevalent as to interfere with normal browsing, state of the art browsers usually include a pop-up blocker capability. A pop-up blocker can prevent survey questions from ever reaching potential poll participants, even participants that might otherwise want to participate in a particular poll. Several Internet security application providers have developed spam filters that intercept suspected spam, often before it enters one's inbox. Bypassing these safeguards to participate in a particular poll often requires a user to take extra steps to defeat/bypass the safeguards, and take extra time to complete a survey.
Consequently, polling companies and organizations that conduct on-line, interactive polls and surveys, e.g., over the Internet, frequently are required to offer incentives to entice users through these counter-measures to encourage users to complete surveys. These incentives add extra costs to the surveying process. Even with appropriate incentives conducting on-line polls through virtual networks present potential poll takers with a nuisance the potential poll taking Internet users would likely rather avoid.
Thus, there is a need for conducting online surveys and polling users that does not detract from the user's online experience, such that polling companies and organizations may save money and avoid offering incentives to willing users completing the surveys.
It is a purpose of the invention to facilitate online polling and surveys;
It is another purpose of the invention to conduct online polling and surveys without detracting from online experience of users taking the poll/survey;
It is yet another purpose of the invention to encourage willing participation in online polls and surveys.
The present invention relates to a polling method, online polling system and program product therefor. A system avatar unit creates, maintains and controls system avatars distributed throughout a virtual world. System avatars receive questions received from polling system clients. A dialogue module manages dialogs between system avatars presenting the questions to user avatars in the virtual world. A report generator generates reports responsive to responses given by user avatars to system avatars.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
Turning now to the drawings and, more particularly,
Each user has an avatar (UCA 108, 110), a virtual character, that they can navigate through the virtual world. Avatars are commonly used in video gaming, e.g. the Wii™ from Nintendo® and the XBOX Live from Microsoft® Corporation. In interactive video gaming on-line users compete over a network such as the Internet. In Second Life®, for example, each user controls an avatar that may interact freely with other avatars in a virtual world. As each user joins the system, the user creates his/her own UCA 108, 110 as a virtual presence within the system. The VAPS 108 allows client organizations 122 to poll users using suitable artificial intelligence communication technology (e.g., neural nets or statistical models that based on Hidden Markov models or Bayesian networks), virtually embodied as system avatars. Thus, the VAPS 108 maintains virtual presences on the system through VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120, that interact with the UCAs 110, 112. The VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120 are randomly distributed throughout the virtual world 106 and interact with UCAs 110, 112 at a predetermined rate. Thus, the randomly distributed VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120 perform random single polling events throughout each user's session unobtrusively polling the users during the session.
A client company 122 creates a series of questions 124 as, for example, a questionnaire 124 that the client company 122 wishes answered by the public. The client company 122 submits the questions 124 over the network 106 to VAPS 108. The VAPS 108 designates a VCA, e.g., 116, or multiple VCAs to interact with UCAs 110, 112, collecting answers to the questions 124. The VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120 may be programmed to question the UCAs 110, 112, e.g., marketing, business, scientific, and public safety questions 124. Thus, the VAPS 108 systematically poses the questions 124 using the various VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120 that interact with UCAs 110, 112, seamlessly and hidden to the user without the user being aware in some cases that his/her responses are being collected. The VAPS 108 also can create dynamic surveys where in one virtual world session, UCAs 110, 112 can interact with many different VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120 answering multiple questions that are related to the same poll or survey.
Questions may be formulated to appear as part of a general conversation or related to some aspect of the virtual world, while masking the true intent of the question and data being collected. For example, VAPS 108 may be collecting information regarding one of two candidates X and Y for which UCA users would vote. The VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120 do not ask directly each UCA's preference. Instead, one VCA 114, 116, 118, 120 tells a story. The story may indicate that the watched TV debates between X and Y. Then, after the story, the VCA may follow with something like “I liked how X performed more than Y,” and ask the UCA how it liked how candidate X performed. The UCA may respond saying, “I think Y made better points” and/or “Y was more presidential.” The VCA follows up with “do you think you would vote Y because he performed better on TV?” By asking these indirect questions, the VCA masks the questioning which appears as part of common conversation rather than polling.
When a user logs in 134, one of the VCAs, e.g., 116, approaches 136 that user's UCA, e.g., 110. In the virtual world, the VCAs 114, 116, 118, 120 appear no different than the UCAs 110, 112. The avatars, 110 and 116 in this example, converse normally, carrying on a dialogue 138 that is no different than a dialogue between two UCAs 110, 112. During the dialogue 138, the VCA 116 poses a question or questions 140 to UCA 110. Optionally, pollster users can enter the virtual world logging in 134, e.g., as UCA 112. Once logged in the, UCA 112 can scan user profiles, e.g., stored in storage 124, for the UCAs of people that match criteria of interest. Once a matching UCA is found, e.g., 110, the pollster UCA 112 teleports itself to online matching UCA 110 and unobtrusively questions the UCA 110.
In another example, a VCA 116 may ask “Who do you think should be president, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?” The UCA 110 responds 142 to the polling question The VCA 116 logs the response 142, and stores 144 logged responses. Responses may be stored 144 locally in the VAPS 108 or remotely, e.g., in the storage 122 with the questions. For multipart questions or questions that depend on a previous response, the response to the current question (e.g., “Did you vote in the last election?”) can terminate the line of questioning or lead to a number of other subsequent follow up questions. In 146 the VAPS 108 decides whether to direct the VCA 110 to the next follow up question. Once the dialogue is complete 148, the conversation terminates 150.
As the selected system avatar(s) 114, 116, 118, 120 communicate through communication interface 1086 with identified UCAs 110, 112, a sentiment interpreter 1088 may monitor UCA answers, e.g., on general mood to determine UCA sentiment. Where the user is a patient, for example, the sentiment interpreter 1088 may monitor possible pain or discomfort indicators. Optionally, the system dialog module 138 may also maintain a patient database 1090 of patients' history and preferences. Preferably, the patient database 1090 also identifies avatar schedules and profiles, matched to visits. Dialog results (e.g., 142 in
Advantageously, the preferred VAPS 108 facilitates creating online surveys and polling users through virtual networks without detracting from the users' online experiences. Because the users' online experiences are not degraded, companies and organizations may find it unnecessary to offer incentives to encourage users to complete online surveys, thus saving money for these organizations. Further, pollsters and testing organizations have access to secure virtual profile(s) in a virtual world populated by residents that are potential customers. Pollsters can enter the virtual world, scan user profiles for the UCAs of people that match criteria of interest, teleport themselves (VCAs or UCAs) to online matching people and unobtrusively question the UCAs of those matching people. Preferably, questioning avatars is based on user profile preferences or optimization based on user classification.
Moreover, questioning patients (or elderly or their avatars) on different subjects may be conducted over virtual networks, with the responses/answers providing a basis for making initial estimates of the patients' mood or state. Thus, the VCAs can detect and monitor minor patient discomforts, for example, even those where the person does not think the discomfort is worth it to go to the doctor. Thus, a preferred system facilitates creating surveys and polling users through virtual networks without detracting from individual user's online experience and that allows companies and organizations to save money by not having to offer incentives for users to complete surveys.
While the invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. It is intended that all such variations and modifications fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The present invention is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/621,488 (Attorney Docket No. YOR920080604US1), “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING NON-NOUISANT SURVEYS OVER VIRTUAL NETWORKS” to Genady Grabarnik et al., filed Nov. 18, 2009, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12621488 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 15294943 | US |