System and method for content protection based on a combination of a user pin and a device specific identifier

Description

BACKGROUND
1. Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to data protection and more specifically to combining a user PIN with a unique, device-specific identifier.

2. Introduction

As more and more individuals and enterprises rely on smartphones and other mobile devices storing confidential or sensitive information, security is an increasing concern. Because such mobile devices are used as communication centers, they frequently contain sensitive information such as contact information, call logs, emails, pictures, and so forth, of high potential value and/or sensitivity. In certain applications, protecting this information is desirable. In some applications, encryption is used to protect sensitive information.

Encryption is the process of transforming a message into ciphertext that cannot be understood by unintended recipients. A message is encrypted with an encryption algorithm and encryption key. Decryption is the process of transforming ciphertext back to the message in a readable or understandable form.

In many cases, users select short personal identification numbers (PINs) or passwords which an attacker can easily compromise with a brute force attack running on a modestly powerful computer or group of computers. However, users are often reluctant to select a longer password because longer passwords are more difficult to remember, or users are unable to select a longer password because the system limits the password length. What is needed in the art is an improved approach for protecting content based on a user password.

SUMMARY

Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosed principles. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by the practice of the principles set forth herein.

Disclosed are systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable storage media for file-level data protection, specifically encryption and key management. A system practicing the method encrypts each file with a unique file encryption key, encrypts each file encryption key with a class encryption key, and encrypts each class encryption key with an additional encryption key.

In one embodiment, the system encrypts a credential keychain. A credential keychain can be a database or files that store credentials. The system encrypts at least a subset of credentials with a unique credential encryption key, encrypts each unique credential encryption key with a class encryption key and encrypts each credential class encryption key with an additional encryption key.

The system assigns each respective file or credential to one of a set of protection classes, and assigns each protection class a class encryption key. The protection classes allow for certain file behavior and access rights, such as write-only access, read/write access, and read-only, no write access. The system encrypts the class encryption key based on a combination of one or more of a user passcode, a public encryption key and a unique device specific code.

In a second embodiment, the system verifies a password. A system practicing the method decrypts a key bag containing encryption keys with a user entered password. Each encryption key in the key bag is associated with a protection class on a device having file-level data protection. The system retrieves data from one or more encrypted files using a class encryption key from the decrypted key bag. Then the system verifies the entered password based on a comparison of the retrieved data with expected data.

In a third embodiment, the system generates a cryptographic key based on a device-specific identifier. A system practicing the method receives a user-entered passcode on a device and combines the passcode with a non-extractable secret associated with the device to yield a derived master key. The system generates the master key according to an encryption algorithm. Then the system encrypts content on the device with the derived key.

A mobile, stationary, or combination of multiple computing devices can practice the principles disclosed herein. Other applications and combinations of the principles disclosed herein also exist, for example protecting system data based on file-level data protection.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the principles briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principles herein are described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example system embodiment;

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of asymmetric key cryptography;

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of symmetric key cryptography;

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary file-level data protection method embodiment;

FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary credential keychain protection method embodiment;

FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary file system encrypted on a per file basis using class keys;

FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary set of key bags;

FIG. 8 illustrates a first exemplary backup initiation method embodiment for a host device;

FIG. 9 illustrates a second exemplary backup initiation method embodiment for a client device;

FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary backup initiation system configuration;

FIG. 11 illustrates an example backup ticket;

FIG. 12 illustrates a first exemplary backup method embodiment for a client device;

FIG. 13 illustrates a second exemplary backup method embodiment for a host device;

FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary backup system configuration;

FIG. 15 illustrates a first exemplary encrypted backup file restoration method embodiment for a host device;

FIG. 16 illustrates a second exemplary encrypted backup file restoration method embodiment for a client device;

FIG. 17 illustrates an exemplary encrypted backup file restoration file system configuration;

FIG. 18 illustrates a first exemplary data synchronization initialization method embodiment for a host device;

FIG. 19 illustrates a second exemplary data synchronization initialization method embodiment for a client device;

FIG. 20 illustrates an example sync ticket;

FIG. 21 illustrates an exemplary data synchronization initialization system configuration;

FIG. 22 illustrates a first exemplary data synchronization method embodiment for a host device;

FIG. 23 illustrates a second exemplary data synchronization method embodiment for a client device;

FIG. 24 illustrates an exemplary obliteration method embodiment;

FIG. 25 illustrates an exemplary password verification method embodiment;

FIG. 26 illustrates an example PBKDF2 using HMAC-SHA1 embodiment;

FIG. 27 illustrates an example key derivation embodiment;

FIG. 28 illustrates an example device-specific based key generation system embodiment;

FIG. 29 illustrates an exemplary device-specific based key generation method embodiment;

FIG. 30 illustrates an exemplary method embodiment for generating a derived key from a user passcode and a device-specific secret;

FIG. 31 illustrates a first exemplary algorithm for calculating an AES key from a user password; and

FIG. 32 illustrates a second exemplary algorithm for calculating an AES key from a user password.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

The present disclosure addresses the need in the art for improved encryption approaches. The encryption approaches herein are based on a per-file and per-class encryption or data protection scheme. A brief introductory description with reference to these approaches will be provided, followed by a discussion of a basic, general-purpose system or computing device in FIG. 1 which can be employed to practice all or part of the concepts described herein. A more detailed description of the methods and encryption approaches will then follow.

The data protection features disclosed herein can safeguard user data in the event of a stolen device. Current encryption schemes encrypt all data stored on a device with a single symmetric encryption key that is available when the system is running. Thus, if the device is cracked such that the attacker can run his own code on the device, the user's data is accessible to the attacker.

In one aspect, the approaches set forth herein rely on data encrypted with a secret known only to the user to protect the user's data, such as a passcode. As a result, if the user has enabled data protection but has not entered his passcode since a device reboot, his data will not be accessible to the system. However, this approach introduces a number of complications, mostly surrounding processes that access user data in the background, even while the device is locked, such as email and calendar information. Furthermore, this same set of data is necessary to properly backup, sync and potentially restore the user's data.

In one aspect where the system encrypts all new files on a file system, the data protection feature relies on every file on the data partition being individually encrypted with a unique symmetric encryption key. This encryption mechanism can supplant existing hardware encryption features by taking advantage of the hardware acceleration in the kernel without significant performance degradation. The system uses AES in direct memory access (DMA) so that a memory-to-memory encryption operation is not needed. However, the principles disclosed herein can be performed by a general purpose processor executing appropriate encryption instructions, a special purpose processor designed to perform encryption-based calculations, or a combination thereof.

The system can generate a random 256-bit AES key (or other size or type of key) to associate with a file when the file is created. An AES key is a cryptographic key used to perform encryption and decryption using the Advanced Encryption Standard algorithm. All input and output (I/O) operations performed on that file use that AES key so that the raw file data is only written to the file system in encrypted form. This individual file key accompanies the file as metadata, so that the file and key can be backed up and restored without having to access the file contents. The system can tell if a passcode is in compliance based on the metadata even when the passcode is not stored directly. This feature can be useful, for example, when testing passcode compliance with any local and/or server restrictions on the passcode strength such as an Exchange server password policy.

In one variation, the system defines a new mount option to be used for devices that support content encryption. This mount option instructs the kernel that all new files created on the partition should not be encrypted by default. This option can be used for system partitions, as those files do not need to be encrypted, as well as data partitions for older devices that do not support data protection.

When restoring backed up data to a device, a restore daemon can look for a new option in the device tree that indicates the device does not support data protection. In one implementation, the restore daemon is responsible for laying down the fstab file on the system partition at /private/etc/fstab. The fstab file can contain at least two entries. The first entry instructs the kernel to mount the system partition as a read only volume. The second entry instructs the kernel to mount the data partition at /private/var as a writable volume with the new data protection option. In another implementation, instead of using a new mount option that must explicitly be set in the fstab file, a Hierarchical File System (HFS) option is added in the header. The mounter auto detects that data protection should be turned on.

When a user enters a password, the system uses the entered password to derive a key which is used to decrypt the class keys. Alternatively, the system can derive a key from any user controlled source, such as a dongle. A dongle is a small piece of hardware that connects to a device. Each class key is wrapped with integrity, which allows the system to determine whether the unwrapping proceeded correctly. If the system unwraps all keys correctly, the system accepts the password. In one aspect, the system tries to decrypt all keys to maximize the time spent decrypting.

These and other variations shall be discussed herein as the various embodiments are set forth. The disclosure now turns to FIG. 1.

With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary system includes a general-purpose computing device 100, including a processing unit (CPU or processor) 120 and a system bus 110 that couples various system components including the system memory 130 such as read only memory (ROM) 140 and random access memory (RAM) 150 to the processor 120. The system 100 can include a cache 122 of high speed memory connected directly with, in close proximity to, or integrated as part of the processor 120. The system 100 copies data from the memory 130 and/or the storage device 160 to the cache 122 for quick access by the processor 120. In this way, the cache 122 provides a performance boost that avoids processor 120 delays while waiting for data. These and other modules can be configured to control the processor 120 to perform various actions. Other system memory 130 may be available for use as well. The memory 130 can include multiple different types of memory with different performance characteristics. It can be appreciated that the disclosure may operate on a computing device 100 with more than one processor 120 or on a group or cluster of computing devices networked together to provide greater processing capability. The processor 120 can include any general purpose processor and a hardware module or software module, such as module 1162, module 2164, and module 3166 stored in storage device 160, configured to control the processor 120 as well as a special-purpose processor where software instructions are incorporated into the actual processor design. The processor 120 may essentially be a completely self-contained computing system, containing multiple cores or processors, a bus, memory controller, cache, etc. A multi-core processor may be symmetric or asymmetric.

The system bus 110 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. A basic input/output (BIOS) stored in ROM 140 or the like, may provide the basic routine that helps to transfer information between elements within the computing device 100, such as during start-up. The computing device 100 further includes storage devices 160 such as a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disk drive, tape drive or the like. The storage device 160 can include software modules 162, 164, 166 for controlling the processor 120. Other hardware or software modules are contemplated. The storage device 160 is connected to the system bus 110 by a drive interface. The drives and the associated computer readable storage media provide nonvolatile storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computing device 100. In one aspect, a hardware module that performs a particular function includes the software component stored in a tangible and/or intangible computer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardware components, such as the processor 120, bus 110, output device 170, and so forth, to carry out the function. The basic components are known to those of skill in the art and appropriate variations are contemplated depending on the type of device, such as whether the computing device 100 is a small, handheld computing device, a desktop computer, or a computer server.

Although the exemplary embodiment described herein employs flash memory storage 160, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer readable media which can store data that are accessible by a computer, such as a hard disk drive, magnetic cassettes, flash memory, digital versatile disks, cartridges, random access memories (RAMs) 150, read only memory (ROM) 140, a cable or wireless signal containing a bit stream and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment. Tangible computer-readable storage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals, electromagnetic waves, and signals per se.

To enable user interaction with the computing device 100, an input device 190 represents any number of input mechanisms, such as a microphone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphical input, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An output device 170 can also be one or more of a number of output mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodal systems enable a user to provide multiple types of input to communicate with the computing device 100. The communications interface 180 generally governs and manages the user input and system output. There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardware arrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily be substituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they are developed.

For clarity of explanation, the illustrative system embodiment is presented as including individual functional blocks including functional blocks labeled as a “processor” or processor 120. The functions these blocks represent may be provided through the use of either shared or dedicated hardware, including, but not limited to, hardware capable of executing software and hardware, such as a processor 120, that is purpose-built to operate as an equivalent to software executing on a general purpose processor. For example the functions of one or more processors presented in FIG. 1 may be provided by a single shared processor or multiple processors. (Use of the term “processor” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software.) Illustrative embodiments may include microprocessor and/or digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, read-only memory (ROM) 140 for storing software performing the operations discussed below, and random access memory (RAM) 150 for storing results. Very large scale integration (VLSI) hardware embodiments, as well as custom VLSI circuitry in combination with a general purpose DSP circuit, may also be provided.

The logical operations of the various embodiments are implemented as: 1) a sequence of computer implemented steps, operations, or procedures running on a programmable circuit within a general use computer, 2) a sequence of computer implemented steps, operations, or procedures running on a specific-use programmable circuit; and/or 3) interconnected machine modules or program engines within the programmable circuits. The system 100 shown in FIG. 1 can practice all or part of the recited methods, can be a part of the recited systems, and/or can operate according to instructions in the recited tangible computer-readable storage media. Such logical operations can be implemented as modules configured to control the processor 120 to perform particular functions according to the programming of the module. For example, FIG. 1 illustrates three modules Mod1162, Mod2164 and Mod3166 which are modules configured to control the processor 120. These modules may be stored on the storage device 160 and loaded into RAM 150 or memory 130 at runtime or may be stored as would be known in the art in other computer-readable memory locations.

Having disclosed an exemplary computing system, the disclosure now turns to a brief discussion of public-key cryptography. Public-key cryptography is a cryptographic approach that utilizes asymmetric key algorithms in addition to or in place of traditional symmetric key algorithms. FIG. 2 illustrates asymmetric key cryptography and FIG. 3 illustrates symmetric key cryptography. Asymmetric key algorithms differ from symmetric key algorithms in that different keys are used for encryption 210 and decryption 220. Symmetric key algorithms use the same key for encryption 310 and decryption 320 and are based on the notion of a shared secret key between the sender and the receiver of a message. Because public-key cryptography utilizes different keys for encryption and decryption, no secure exchange of a secret key between the sender and the receiver is needed.

In public-key cryptography, a mathematically related key pair is generated, a private key and a public key. Although the keys are related, it is impractical to derive one key based on the other. The private key is kept secret and the public key is published. A sender encrypts a message with the receiver's public key 230, and the receiver of the message decrypts it with the private key 240. Only the receiver's private key can decrypt the encrypted message.

Having disclosed some basic encryption-related concepts and system components, the disclosure now turns to the exemplary method embodiment shown in FIG. 4. For the sake of clarity, the method is discussed in terms of an exemplary system 100 such as is shown in FIG. 1 configured to practice the method.

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary file-level data protection method embodiment. The system 100 encrypts each file in a file system with a unique file encryption key (410), encrypts each file encryption key with a class encryption key (420), and encrypts each class encryption key with an additional encryption key (430). In one aspect, the class encryption key corresponds to the assigned protection class of the file. The protection class can allow for certain file behavior and access rights.

Once each file is encrypted with its own unique key, the system 100 can protect each one of those files with a secret known only to the user. When a file is created and individual file encryption key is generated, the system 100 can wrap that key with a class key. The unique file encryption key is metadata that the system 100 can store in the filesystem or which can exist in user space. The kernel can then cache the key during file access. By always encrypting a file and then wrapping its file key with a class key, the system 100 avoids the cost of encrypting every file already created when the user enables data protection. Instead, the system 100 simply encrypts the set of class keys, which is a bound and relatively inexpensive computational operation. With data protection enabled, if the user has not entered his passcode, then the class keys are not available. If the kernel cannot access the class keys, it cannot decrypt the individual file keys and the raw file data is inaccessible to the system. The efficacy of the feature now depends on how the class keys are managed.

When the device, such as a smartphone or personal computer, is locked, the system explicitly purges keys stored in memory as well as any data protected file contents stored in memory which should be inaccessible when the device is locked. For example, the system 100 can purge keys associated with protection classes A, B, C, but not class D when the device enters or is about to enter a locked state. The device can also purge or otherwise remove access to the contents of files stored in memory which are associated with classes A, B, C.

For example, protection classes can provide different functionality for different levels of authentication. The scenario set forth below illustrates one example application of protection classes. When a device that has data protection enabled first boots, the user has not yet entered his passcode. Thus none of the files are accessible because the class keys themselves are encrypted. Because the system relies on preference and configuration files that live on the data partition, the class keys must be decrypted before the files can be accessed. If those files cannot be read, then certain mission critical components are not able to boot to the point where the user can enter his passcode. One compromise is to separate the types of files that are accessible when the device has first booted from files that should only be accessible when the user has entered his passcode. The files can be separated into protection classes. Protection classes can include many aspects of policy for transformation, such as readability, writability, exportability, and so forth. Some classes are associated with specific user actions, such as generating new keys without erasing the entire device when a user changes his or her password, for example.

One example protection class, known as Class A, is a basic class for data protected files. When the device first boots, Class A files are not accessible until the user enters his passcode. When the device is locked, these files become inaccessible. Some applications and/or system services may need to adapt to Class A because they cannot access their files when the device is locked, even if the application or system service is running in the background.

Another example protection class, known as Class B, is a specialized class for data protected files that require write access even when the device is locked. When the device first boots, Class B files are not accessible until the user enters his passcode. When the device is locked, these files can only be written to and not read. One example use for Class B files is for content downloaded while the device is locked, such as email messages, text messages, cached updates, a cache mail database for messages downloaded while the device is locked, and so forth. When the device is later unlocked, such files can be read. For example, when the device is later unlocked, the cache mail database can be reconciled with the primary mail database.

Another example protection class, known as Class C, is a specialized class for data protected files that require read/write access even when the device is locked. For example, when the device first boots, these files are not accessible until the user enters his passcode. When the device is locked, these files are still accessible. Class C files can be used for databases that need to be accessible while the device is locked. Some other example uses for Class C include data that can always be read once the device has been unlocked once after boot, even if it locks again, such as contacts and a calendar.

Yet another example protection class, known as Class D, is a default class for data protected files. Class D files are accessible regardless of whether the user has entered his passcode.

While four classes are discussed in detail herein, the number of protection classes can be more or less, such as 2 protection classes, 10 protection classes, or more and can include protection classes granting different access rights and performing different sets of functionality than what is discussed herein. Several additional exemplary protection classes follow. For example, one protection class can be a specialized class for files that are tied to a single device using the UID or keys derived from the UID and cannot be migrated to a second device. A second exemplary protection class can be a specialized class associated with a specific application. A third exemplary protection class can generate new keys whenever an escape from previous escrow is needed without the need to erase the whole device, for example a password change. The system 100 can change a passcode for every generation of a system key back, especially when blastable storage contains a key that wraps system key bags, such that former weak key bags (the original that has an empty passcode) become inaccessible on a passcode change.

In one aspect, when the system 100 changes states, such as going from locked to unlocked or vice versa, the system 100 erases certain class keys from memory. For example, if the device has been locked, it can erase the Class A key from memory and treat Class B as read only.

As operating systems are upgraded to use updated sets of classes having new keys and/or entirely new classes, the system 100 can store a new Class A key, for example. In this example, the system 100 uses the new Class A key for newly created files, while the system retains the older Class A key for dealing with older files. This can provide a protection class aware migration path for updating class keys in the event that they are cracked or more efficient algorithms or hardware are developed.

With respect to keychain backup items, the system can consider two dimensions. The first consideration is classes Ak, Ck, Dk and the second consideration is whether or not the keychain item is protected with the device UID, and thus can not be transferred to other devices. If the keychain is protected with the device UID, it can only be restored to the same device it was backed up from. Those classes are known as Aku, Cku, Dku. The additional “u” state is used for backup protection to indicate if it can be transferred to a different device. For example, if “u”, than it can not be restored to a different device. The class (A, C, D) is used at runtime on the device the same, regardless of the “u” state. If the system includes additional classes, the second dimension (whether or not it is also wrapped with the UID and can or cannot be restored to a different device) would also apply to the additional key classes.

In one embodiment, the system 100 encrypts a credential keychain. FIG. 5 illustrates a system performing credential keychain data protection. A credential keychain is a file, set of files or database that contains credentials. A credential can include a password, username, or encryption key, for example. The system 100 encrypts at least a subset of credentials with a unique credential encryption key (510), encrypts each unique credential encryption key with a class encryption key (520), and encrypts each class credential encryption key with an additional encryption key (530). The class encryption key corresponds to the assigned protection class of the file, wherein the protection class allows certain file behavior and access rights. Credential protection classes can be based on all or part of the protection classes set forth above.

FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary file system using file-level data protection which encrypts on a per file and per class basis. It can also illustrate an exemplary credential keychain using data protection. The system assigns each respective file or credential to one of a set of protection classes 610, and assigns each protection class a class encryption key. In one aspect, each class encryption key is unique. The system encrypts each file encryption key with the corresponding class encryption key 620. For example, File 1 and File 5 are part of protection Class A, but have unique encryption keys. File 1 is encrypted with Key 1, while File 5 is encrypted with key 5. Both key 1 and 5 are encrypted with key A. The protection classes allow certain file behavior and access rights. This tiered approach to file or credential access through protection classes allows the system to protect files differently depending on the desired level of security.

The system 100 encrypts the class encryption keys based on a combination of one or more of a user passcode, a public encryption key and a unique device specific code depending on the type of key bag in which the keys are stored. Key bags are a set of keys accessible to the system, such as an operating system kernel. In one variation, each key bag encrypts individual class keys in a unique way based, for example, on a unique combination of the user passcode, the public encryption key, and the unique device specific code. One key bag encrypts class keys based on the user passcode and the unique device specific code, another key bag encrypts class keys based just on the unique device specific code, and yet another key bag encrypts class keys based on all three, for example. The system 100 stores class encryption keys in key bags, such as a default key bag, a protected key bag, an escrow key bag, and a backup key bag.

In one embodiment, the key bags are accessible in user space, but their contents can only be accessed in kernel space by a special kernel extension. A daemon in user space can provide the kernel with the proper key bag and the information necessary to access its contents. Further, backup and sync components on the host generally need to coordinate with the device in order to make data accessible while the device is locked. This coordination can be handled by a lockdown service agent that proxies their requests to a management daemon, which in turn coordinates with the kernel extension.

The system 100 uses the different key bags for different purposes. For example, the backup key bag and/or the escrow key bag can be used in backing up a device or synchronizing devices. A default key bag can protect the device in its initial state before a user enables data protection such as by creating a passcode. In one aspect, the backup key bag is never kept on the device. The backup key bag is part of the backup, and is used to encrypt the files in the actual backup, not any files on the device. When restoring to a device, the backup key bag is sent over, so the restored files from the backup can be decrypted.

In another variation, the escrow key bag is kept on the device, but it can't be used by the device without a secret that is only kept on the backup host. The escrow key bag is used to access files/keychain items on the device so they can be backed up, even if the device is locked where they normally could not be accessed. The backup host can be a computer, another mobile device, a server or collection of servers, a web service, or just a drive. Such a drive, for example, can require some credential from the device to gain access, but once the device can access it, the backup is just stored on the drive which is not an active agent.

Regardless of the type of backup device type, the backed up files do not have to be encrypted with the same file keys as the ones on the device. In one embodiment, the backup device transfers the files as is (with the same encryption), and encrypts the file keys themselves with the backup key bag's class keys. In another embodiment, the files are actually transcrypted (converted from one encryption scheme or key to another encryption scheme or key) using a file key that is different and distinct from the file key used on the device.

More feedback on backup (related to my last note)—sorry I am sending multiple notes, I'm not reading with whole thing at once, and wanted to get you the feedback as soon as I read each section.

FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary set of key bags on a device with file-level data protection. The default key bag 710 contains all class encryption keys encrypted by the unique device specific code. The unique device specific code is the only key available to the hardware, while keys derived from the unique device specific code are available in memory. The system 100 utilizes the default key bag on a device that does not have data protection enabled. In one variation, the default state of the device is to operate with data protection disabled; the user must enable data protection. In one aspect, the user automatically enables data protection by creating a passcode. The system 100 uses the passcode to protect the class encryption keys in the protected key bag. When a user changes his password, the key that protects system key bags is changed. Key bags protected by the former password become inaccessible on a passcode change.

The protected key bag 720 contains all class encryption keys encrypted by the user key and the unique device specific code. The user key can be the same as the user passcode or can be derived from the user passcode. The user key is an encryption key based on the user passcode. When the user enables data protection, such as by creating a passcode, the system 100 converts the user's passcode into a derived secret that can be used to protect the protection class keys. A new key bag, the protected key bag, is generated that contains the protection class keys encrypted by the user key and the unique device specific code.

In one aspect, when a user locks his device or the device automatically places itself in a locked state, the system 100 can grant certain applications a grace period to finalize their data and write it to mass storage before enforcing the class encryption keys for a locked state. For example, if a user is composing an email on a mobile device and leaves mid-composition, the mobile device can automatically lock after a timeout duration. After the mobile device is locked, the system can grant the email application a grace period and/or notify the email application of the grace period duration so that the email application can save the half composed email as a draft despite the mobile device's locked state, for example.

A third key bag 730, the escrow key bag, contains all class encryption keys encrypted by the unique device specific code and a public key 210 relating to an asymmetric key pair. The system 100 utilizes the escrow key bag 730 during synchronization and/or backup operations. Lastly, the backup key bag 740 contains all class encryption keys encrypted by the public key. The system uses the backup key bag 740 during a backup event. It is important to note that the backup key bag 740 contains different class encryption keys than the default, protected and escrow key bags 710, 720, 730. In one variation, the backup and escrow key bags 730, 740 are protected by the public key generated by the device, not the user passcode. Because it may be impractical for a user to enter a passcode each time the system 100 performs a backup or synchronization, the system 100 can protect the protection class keys with a key that does not relate to the user passcode. The backup host can store the backup key bag.

Because the default key bag is not protected by a user passcode, the device is vulnerable to attack. For example, if an attacker steals the device and executes malicious computer code on it, he can access the device specific code and decrypt all class keys. Sensitive user data is no longer protected once an attacker decrypts the class keys because the attacker can decrypt all file encryption keys. The attacker can then decrypt files with the file encryption keys, accessing sensitive user information. As stated above, one initial state of the device is to protect class keys using the default key bag. When file-level data protection for the device is enabled, the system 100 uses the public encryption key to protect the protected, escrow and backup key bags.

In one aspect, each class key is randomly generated. In another aspect, class keys in the default key bag are wrapped with the device's unique device identifier (known as a UID or UDID), which is a unique code associated with the hardware of the device. The UID is only accessible when the device is running in a secure environment and cannot be used by any other device. It should be noted that if the device is cracked such that the attacker can control the kernel, he can decrypt items protected with the UID. This is why one aspect of this disclosure is to also protect key bags with a secret known only to the user.

Having discussed different protections for class encryption keys, the disclosure now turns to the issue of backing up data from a device having file-level data protection. FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary backup initiation method from a first device to a second device having file-level data protection from the perspective of the host device that backs up data from a client device. Before a backup can occur, the first and second devices must initially establish a relationship. As part of the initial establishment of the relationship, the first device sends a backup secret to a second device (810), receives a backup ticket containing encryption keys from the second device (820) and stores the backup ticket on the first device for later use in a backup event (830). In one aspect, the first and second devices are different, such as a mobile device and a desktop computer. The devices can also be, for example, a laptop backing up to a network-based backup service. The first and second devices can be any pair of computing devices, at least one of which has a file system that is at least partially encrypted using file-level data protection. In one implementation, the backup secret and backup ticket are stored separately. For example, the secret is chosen and stored on the client device and the backup ticket is stored on the host device.

FIG. 9 illustrates a second exemplary backup initiation method embodiment from the perspective of a client device to be backed up by a host device and FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary backup initiation system configuration. The first device receives a backup secret 1010 from a second device (910), creates a backup ticket 1020 containing encryption keys (920) and sends the backup ticket 1020 from the first device to the second device (930) for later use in a backup event. In one aspect, the device places itself in a lockdown state or the host instructs the device to place itself in a lockdown state. A lockdown state can include suspending file operations, wireless transfers, file system reads and/or writes, user input, and so forth. Such a lockdown state allows the data on the device to be backed up correctly and without interference or data corruption. Multiple lockdown states can exist which can apply to different hardware or software components and can apply different levels of lockdown. For instance, one level of lockdown can allow read access to stored data but disallow write access for the duration of the backup process. In one lockdown state, user data is locked down but not operating system files. Other variations exist and can be tailored to specific use cases or backup strategies.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example backup ticket 1110. In one variation, the backup ticket 1110 includes a first backup secret encrypting the public key, and a second backup secret encrypting the corresponding private key. The first device creates the backup ticket by encrypting an asymmetric encryption key pair containing a public key and a private key with the backup secret provided by the second device. The system 100 must decrypt the public key and the private key with the backup secret before using them in a backup event.

FIG. 12 illustrates a first exemplary backup method embodiment from the perspective of a client device having file-level data protection. The first device receives a backup ticket containing encryption keys encrypted with a backup secret, and the backup secret from a second device (1210), and retrieves an escrow key bag on the first device (1220). The escrow key bag contains protection class keys for the protection classes encrypted with the public key and the unique device specific code. In one aspect, part of the escrow key bag is stored on the first device and part is stored on the second device. The second device can then combine the locally stored portion of the escrow key bag with the retrieved portion of the escrow key bag received from the first device to reconstitute the escrow key bag. The first device decrypts the protection class keys with the backup ticket (1230) and generates a backup key bag containing new protection class keys (1240). The system generates a backup key bag containing new protection class keys because the system sends the backup key bag to a backup device.

For security reasons, the original protection class keys never leave the device. Instead, this approach rewraps the individual files with a new set of class keys. When the host sends the backup ticket to the device in order to access the original device class keys in the escrow key bag, the system can establish a new set of backup class keys. For enterprise users or other uses, the system can provide an option to disallow the new set of class keys from being backed up. This can allow users to support a zero knowledge backup of the device to a host.

Once the system generates the backup key bag, the first device either automatically selects or selects based on user input a set of encrypted files to back up (1250). The system 100 decrypts the file encryption keys corresponding to the selected set of encrypted files. The system decrypts the file encryption keys with the corresponding decrypted protection class keys (1260) from the escrow key bag. The system 100 re-encrypts the file encryption keys corresponding to the selected set of encrypted files with the new protection class keys (1270). In one aspect, the system directly accesses encrypted data from the filesystem instead of decrypting and re-encrypting the file encryption keys.

Once the system 100 re-encrypts the file encryption keys, they are ready for transfer to the backup device. The first device transfers to the second device the selected set of encrypted files, the backup key bag and metadata associated with the selected set of encrypted files (1280), including the file encryption keys. It is important to note that the system stores the backup files along with the backup key bag, backup ticket and backup secret on the backup device. Since the backup secret decrypts the backup ticket, and the backup ticket decrypts the backup key bag, the class protection keys are accessible. If the class protection keys are accessible, then the backup file keys are accessible, and the backup files can be decrypted. Since the backup class protection keys differ from the class protection keys stored in the default, protected and escrow key bags on a device, an attacker that accesses backup keys can only decrypt backup files on the second device; he cannot access files on the first device. This approach can limit the potential avenues an attacker can take to compromise sensitive user data on a device.

FIG. 13 illustrates a second exemplary backup method embodiment from the perspective of a host device that backs up encrypted data from a client device and FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary backup system configuration. FIGS. 13 and 14 are discussed together below. The second device sends a backup ticket containing encryption keys encrypted with a backup secret, the backup secret 1410 and a host identifier to the first device (1310) and receives the selected set of encrypted files, the backup key bag and metadata 1420 associated with the selected set of encrypted files from the first device (1320), including the file encryption keys.

Having disclosed backup initiation and the backup process on a system with file-level data protection, the disclosure now turns to restoring encrypted backup files to a device with file-level data protection. In one aspect, encrypted backup files can be restored to a device not capable or not configured to encrypt on a per-file and per-class basis. In this case, the restored backup files can retain their respective unique file keys and class keys which can be activated when the files are restored to a device capable of such encryption.

In one backup variation, the host connects on the device to establish a backup relationship. The host generates a backup secret. If the user has chosen to protect his backups with a password, the secret can be derived from this password. If not, the secret can be generated at random and stored on the host. The host sends this backup secret to the device. The device creates a host identity if one does not already exist, and provides it with the backup secret as well. The host constructs the backup ticket based on a host identity and/or the backup secret and transmits it to the device. Unlike a sync ticket, the two elements of the host identity are not encrypted with the device UID, but instead are encrypted with the backup secret. As a result, if the user has chosen to protect his backups with a password, any backup content associated with that backup ticket is essentially tied to the user's password. The host can store a key that can access files backed up from the device. This means that an attacker could access data from a device if he has stolen or compromised the host. In some systems, availability of secure storage mitigates this risk, but other systems, such as Microsoft Windows®, options for such secure storage are limited.

FIG. 15 illustrates a first exemplary encrypted backup file restoration method embodiment from the point of view of a host device. The system 100 sends a backup ticket, a backup secret, and a host identifier to a first device having a file system encrypted on a per file and on a per class basis (1510) and sends to the first device encrypted backup files, the backup key bag, and associated metadata including encrypted file keys (1520). Since the protection class keys protecting the encrypted file keys in the backup key bag differ from those in the default, protected and escrow key bags, the first device must re-encrypt the file keys with the original class keys stored on the device. The first device decrypts the protection class keys in the backup key bag with the backup ticket (1530) and decrypts the file encryption keys with the corresponding decrypted protection class keys from the backup key bag (1540). Once the system decrypts the backup protection class keys and the file encryption keys, the first device retrieves an escrow key bag containing original protection class keys (1550), re-encrypts the decrypted file encryption keys with the original protection class keys (1560) and restores the encrypted backup files on the first device (1570).

FIG. 16 illustrates a second exemplary encrypted backup file restoration method embodiment for a client device and FIG. 17 an exemplary encrypted backup file restoration file system configuration. FIGS. 16 and 17 are discussed together below. The system 100 receives a backup ticket, a backup secret, and a host identifier at a first device (1610). The system also receives encrypted backup files, the backup key bag and associated metadata 1710 including encrypted file keys (1620) at the first device. The system decrypts the protection class keys in the backup key bag with the backup ticket (1630) and decrypts the file encryption keys with the corresponding decrypted protection class keys from the backup key bag (1640) on the first device. Once the device decrypts the protection class keys and the file encryption keys, the first device retrieves an escrow key bag containing original protection class keys (1650), re-encrypts the decrypted file encryption keys with the original protection class keys (1660), and restores the encrypted backup files based on the re-encrypted file keys on the first device (1670).

The disclosure now turns to a discussion of restoring a backup. The system 100 can restore a backup to the same device that was the original source for the backup data or to another device. In either case, the backup is based on the backup key bag. One example of this scenario is backing up a mobile phone to a desktop computer and restoring the backed up data to the mobile phone, such as after a system erase and reinstall. When the host wants to restore a backup to the device, it needs to do two things. First, the host unlocks the device class keys, and also provides the device with the backup class keys so that restored files can be re-wrapped with the device class keys. The host can provide the backup ticket and backup secret to unlock the escrow key bag as before. When the backup agent on the device restores a file from the host, it will need to rewrap the file encryption key with the original device class key. It receives the file's metadata from the host which includes the wrapped file key. The system unwraps the wrapped key and decrypts the file key using the appropriate backup class key, and then encrypts it with the appropriate device class key.

The backup agent then sets the metadata of the file with the rewrapped file key. If the backup agent is restoring files from multiple backup repositories, such as files that were backed up during an incremental backup, the host is responsible for sending the appropriate backup key bag to the device. In one aspect, the system can only load one backup key bag at a time. This requires a certain level of coordination between the backup component on the host and the agent on the device so that the rewrapping operation does not fail or result in a corrupted file key.

The disclosure now turns to a discussion of restoring a backup to a different device with the backup key bag. One example of this scenario is backing up a mobile device to a desktop computer and restoring the backed up data to a replacement device after the mobile device is lost, stolen, or destroyed. Restoring to a different device follows the exact same mechanism as restoring to the original device with one important distinction: files that are associated with a protection class based on a device-specific identifier or UID. Files associated with a UID are protected with the UID of the new device. One example of this is when a device enrolls with a Virtual Private Network (VPN) server, the device is granted credentials that were only intended for that device, and should not be allowed to migrate to another device, even in the event the original device was lost.

Having discussed the process of backing up a device with file-level data protection, the disclosure now turns to the issue of synchronizing devices with file-level data protection.

FIG. 18 illustrates a first exemplary data synchronization initialization method embodiment for a host device. A first device sends a host identifier and a pairing record to a second device having file-level data protection (1810). A pairing record can include a unique identifier for the host which is known as the Host ID. The first device then receives from the second device a sync ticket containing encryption keys (1820) and stores the sync ticket on the first device (1830). The sync ticket contains encryption keys that protect the protection class keys. FIG. 19 illustrates a second exemplary data synchronization initialization method embodiment for a client device which is complementary to the exemplary method illustrated in FIG. 18. The system 100 receives at a first device a host identifier and a paring record from a second device (1910). The system 100 creates a sync ticket containing encryption keys based on the pairing record (1920). The system 100 then sends the sync ticket to the second device.

FIG. 20 illustrates an example sync ticket. The sync ticket 2010 encrypts a public key and a corresponding private key with the UID or device-specific code. The device to be synced creates the sync ticket by encrypting an asymmetric encryption key pair containing a public key and a private key with the host identifier and pairing record provided by the second device. The system 100 must decrypt the public key and the private key in the sync ticket before it can use them in a synchronization event.

FIG. 21 illustrates a system initiating data synchronization. A first device having a file system encrypted on a per file and on a per class basis receives 2110 a host identifier and a pairing record from a second device (1910), creates a sync ticket 2010 containing encryption keys (1920) and sends 2120 the sync ticket to the second device (1930).

FIG. 22 a first exemplary data synchronization method embodiment for a host device. A first device sends a stored sync ticket to the second device having file-level data protection (2210) and synchronizes data with the second device based on at least one of the stored sync ticket and the decrypted protection class keys (2220). FIG. 23 illustrates a second exemplary data synchronization method embodiment from the perspective of a client device. A first device having file-level data protection receives a sync ticket containing encryption keys from a second device (2310) and retrieves an escrow key bag containing protection class keys (2320). An escrow key bag can be used to unlock a device during sync without the need for a user to enter a passcode. The separate secret is stored on host and device. This approach differs from the approach used with a system key bag, in that the escrow key bag is protected by moving the secret off device. Escrow bags can be stored on a mobile device management server, for example, and used to reset the device from the mobile device management server.

The first device decrypts protection class keys based on the sync ticket (2330). The system decrypts the sync ticket with the unique device specific code stored on the device and decrypts the protection class keys stored in the escrow key bag with the private key stored on the sync ticket. Once the system decrypts the protection class keys, the system can decrypt the file keys, and decrypt the files using the decrypted file keys. Once the system decrypts the files, the system can synchronize data with the second device (2340). This process allows for new keys created between sync events to be escrowed by storing the public key of the sync ticket on the device. Additionally, the synced device may revoke access by removing escrowed keys from the device.

Having discussed synchronizing data between devices having file-level data protection, the disclosure now turns to the issue of obliteration. Obliteration is used to destroy or remove access to data on a device. In one aspect, obliteration can include actually erasing data stored on a device. In another aspect, obliteration does not actually erase data stored on a device, but removes the means for decrypting encrypted data, thereby effectively erasing data stored on the device by removing access to the data in its usable clear form. In one implementation, a NAND flash layer includes an effaceable storage component which is utilized to guarantee a key is deleted from the system during obliteration or a password change. NAND flash is a type of non-volatile computer storage.

FIG. 24 illustrates one exemplary method embodiment outlining the process of obliteration. During the obliteration process a device with file-level data protection destroys all key bags stored on the device (2410), such as keys or key bags stored in memory and key bags stored on mass storage such as a hard disk drive or solid-state drive. The system 100 erases and rebuilds the file system (2420) and creates a new default key bag (2430). The computing device 100 can then reboot to complete the obliteration process. In one aspect, the system 100 can perform obliteration of another device or cause the device to perform obliteration on itself, based on user input for example. In another aspect, the system 100 is a server that instructs, via a set of wireless signals such as cellular telephone signals or wifi signals, a remote device to perform obliteration on itself. A device can send a confirmation to the server that verifies that the obliteration instructions were successfully executed on the remote device. The device can send to the server incremental confirmations of each step in the obliteration process. One such scenario for this approach is erasing a lost or stolen device containing confidential or sensitive information when the device is still reachable via a wireless network.

When the system creates a new default key bag, it generates a new set of protection class keys and stores them in the default key bag. After the system obliterates the device, the device does not contain sensitive user information or does not have any way of accessing, understanding, or decrypting sensitive user information. Obliteration can be useful when a device is refurbished for use by a different user.

In the variations discussed above, the device and host, whether backup host or synchronization host, store different key bags. In one suitable configuration, the various key bags are stored as follows: the device stores the backup key bag secret and the escrow key bag secret. The host stores the backup key bag and the escrow key bag. The host can optionally store the backup key bag secret.

Having discussed synchronizing data between devices having file-level data protection, the disclosure now turns to the issue of passcode verification. Typically, a device stores a user passcode or some derivation of a user passcode, for example a hash. A hash is a mathematical function that accepts a value as input and outputs a hash value. Often, the hash value is used as an array index. In the case when a device stores a passcode, the device compares an entered passcode with the stored passcode on the device. If the passcodes match, a user is granted access. In the case when a device stores a passcode hash, the device compares a hash of the entered passcode with the hash stored on the device. If the hash values match, the user is granted access. A device with file-level data protection does not store the passcode or any derivation of the passcode on the device. For password verification, the device checks an entered passcode by attempting to decrypt data encrypted with the passcode.

FIG. 25 illustrates an exemplary method for password verification on a device having file-level data protection of at least a portion of its file system. A system 100 practicing the method decrypts, based on a password, the class keys stored in the protected key bag with the passcode (2510). The system 100 retrieves data from one or more encrypted files using an encryption key from the decrypted key bag (2520). If the files decrypt correctly or match the decrypted data matches expected data, the entered passcode is valid (2530). If the files do not decrypt correctly, the entered passcode is considered invalid and access is denied. In one aspect, the system 100 can “preheat” the profiled process that checks if a passcode is required to unlock the device (and to act as the go between for the UI to validate the passcode) when waking up the device, to avoid delays for the user. Preheating can include one or more of loading the profiled process into memory first when waking up the device, keeping the profiled process stored in memory even when in a locked or sleeping state, and/or other optimization approaches.

In one modification, the system performs garbage collection on keys to be deprecated. The system can perform the garbage collection by comparing a list of referenced counted class keys with a list of class keys used in the file system, and removing keys which are not referenced or otherwise used. The system can also gradually or incrementally transform wrapping keys when new keys are generated to protect new content.

The principles described herein can be applied in conjunction with other compatible encryption approaches.

One configuration to which any or all of the principles described above can be applied is content protection. Content protection can include any of a number of approaches to restrict reading and writing to protected content, such as media files, system files, folders, keychains, file systems, partitions, and individual blocks. In some cases, a first portion of a file can be content protected while the remaining portion is unprotected. One specific example usage scenario is a mobile device such as a smartphone. A mobile device can be easily lost or stolen, so a user can mitigate the risk to sensitive data stored on the mobile device by enabling content protection for the sensitive data, such as contacts, documents, calendar items, and so forth. Content can be protected based on a user password, for example.

However, one problem with content protection based on a user password is that user-entered passwords tend to be short. A password is only as secure as the amount of entropy, or uncertainty, the password has. For example, a four digit password has ten thousand possible combinations. A brute force attack which simply tries every possible combination of digits can easily discover such a short password and compromise the protected content, especially given the power, speed, and parallel processing available in modern computing devices. Longer passwords are desirable due to the increased entropy, but users have difficulty remembering extremely long passwords.

One exemplary solution presented herein to this problem includes at least two aspects. The first aspect is to combine a user password with a longer string, such as a secret, non-extractable, device-specific unique identifier. The second aspect is to produce a derived cryptographic key from the combined user password and the longer string through an iterative process that can only be performed on the device, such that any brute force attack must step through each iteration and is therefore slowed down. The system can then encrypt or otherwise protect content with the derived key.

In one example configuration, the device receives a user password. The user password can be a set of alphanumeric or other symbols, gestures, stylus input, biometric input, video input, image input, or any combination thereof. The device then combines the user password with a unique, non-extractable code specific to the device to produce a derived key. For example, the device can make a system call passing the password as an argument, and the system call returns the derived key based on the non-extractable device specific code. However, the device is unable to directly access the device-specific code in software. The device can then use that derived key to encrypt content on the device. This approach can increase the required time to brute force attack encrypted content on the device.

In one aspect, the device-specific key in the hardware is roughly the same strength as the key used to encrypt the data. For example, if the key used to encrypt the data is a 256 bit key, the device-specific key can be 256 bits, 128 bits, or 512 bits. The lengths of the keys can be widely disparate as well, such as a 1024 bit device-specific key and a 64 bit derived key for encrypting data. The device can use all or part of the device-specific key and all or part of the user password to generate the derived key. For example, the device can generate the derived key from the entire user password and the first 100 bits of the device-specific key. The derived key can be larger than, smaller than, or the same size as the combination of the user password and the device-specific key.

One algorithm which can be used to produce the derived key is the password-based key derivation function version 2, or PBKDF2. PBKDF2 takes a user password, a known value and the number of iterations to perform as input and produces a key. PBKDF2 in conjunction with the disclosed algorithm produces the master key used for content encryption.

These approaches can limit the speed that an attacker can brute force the user password based on a function of the hardware to which the password is tied. Because the key is based on the non-extractable device identifier, the maximum speed of any brute force attempt is limited to the speed of the device itself. In many scenarios, such as smartphones or other mobile devices, the relatively slow speed of the device severely limits the brute force speed. Typically mobile device processors offer limited performance characteristics to fit within a battery envelope, but other devices such as a set-top box can also practice these principles. A powerful server-class computing device can also practice the principles disclosed herein, but certain aspects may be modified to increase the complexity of the operations and maintain sufficiently limited performance for potential brute force attacks. For example, the unique identifier in a server-class computing device can be 4096 bits instead of 256, or the number of iterations can be 30,000,000 instead of 50,000. Another approach for use with more powerful computing devices, such as a desktop computer or a server, is to limit access to the device specific key to a less powerful processor which is separate from the main processor.

In one implementation, the device takes the password and a known random salt, and runs one round, or iteration, of PBKDF2 using HMAC-SHA1 (Hash-based Message Authentication Code-Secure Hash Algorithm 1) as the PRF (primitive recurse function). The number of rounds corresponds to the number of 16-byte blocks the algorithm produces. FIG. 26 illustrates PBKDF2 using HMAC-SHA1. The device initializes the variables at the beginning 2602 of the process. The variable i represents the current round number, n represents the number of blocks and p represents the user password. The variable t_iis block k represents the key, s represents the salt value and u_iis the HMAC-SHA1 output for block i. While i is not equal to the number of blocks minus one 2604, the first iteration utilizes the user password and salt value to generate an intermediate value u_ifrom the HMAC-SHA1 algorithm. Subsequent iterations utilize the user password and the intermediate value u from the previous round, u_i−12606 to generate the intermediate value u₁. The variable t_istores the exclusive-or (XOR) of all previous intermediate values, u_i2608. The device generates the key by concatenating each round block t_itogether 2610. Once the device generates all blocks, the device outputs an intermediate key 2612.

FIG. 27 illustrates the master key generation process. The device takes the resulting intermediate key 2612 from the PBKDF2 process and uses it as the value to fill an array of 16 byte AES blocks to be encrypted. The device initializes the variables 2702 at the beginning of the process. The variable i represents the current round number, n the number of blocks, b_iblock i, k the master key value and h the non-extractable device-specific key. While i is not equal to the number of blocks minus one 2704, the device XORs the block number i into each block b_i2706, such as by XORing into each word of each block. The device then encrypts those blocks b_iusing a non extractable device-specific, unique AES key 2708, and XORs the encrypted output of each block e_b_itogether to produce the resulting master key, k 2710, 2712. The number of iterations used for this operation is arbitrarily selectable. In one variation, the device chooses a number that causes this entire operation to take around 50 milliseconds on the hardware available. In another variation, the user can indicate a desired security level which corresponds to a particular number of iterations. For example, if the user selects “low security”, the device applies 10,000 iterations; if the user selects “medium security”, the device applies 50,000 iterations; and if the user selects “high security”, the device applies 200,000 iterations. The user can apply different security levels to different files, folders, or portions of a storage device. A flag or other indicator can signal to a protection mechanism how many iterations to apply. Because these operations introduce a variable delay, with the higher security having a longer delay, the user can decide how and where to make the tradeoff between security and performance.

A larger number of iterations will produce a more secure password in the sense that a brute force attack will require more time to complete. For example, an iteration value of 100,000 may correspond to a 100 millisecond delay, meaning that every turn in the brute force attack would require 100 milliseconds. Further, because the device-specific key is required, the speed of the device itself is a limiting factor and the brute force attack cannot easily be parallelized or sped up beyond the computing capacity of the device. This approach increases the difficulty of a brute force attack by several orders of magnitude. One of the only ways to speed up this attack is to physically disassemble and closely examine the chip in the device that stores the device-specific key. While PBKDF2 is discussed herein as one specific example, other suitable algorithms can be applied as well, for example a cryptographic hash function or any other key derivation function. Any algorithm may be used that makes the derived key dependent on a serialized operation using a device-specific or hardware-specific secret key which cannot be directly extracted in software on the device.

The device can then use the derived master key to encrypt data on the device. The device can encrypt data block by block in an independent manner as in electronic codebook (ECB) mode or in a doubly dependent chain of blocks as in cipher-block chaining mode (CBC). In ECB mode, data is divided into blocks and each block is encrypted independently of other blocks. In cipher-block chaining mode, the ciphertext (encrypted block) of a previous round is XOR'd with the plain text (unencrypted block) of a next round. The resulting block is then encrypted. Any encryption mode utilizing the derived master key is acceptable.

FIG. 28 illustrates a system utilizing a device-specific identifier and user password to derive a cryptographic key. A user 2810 enters a password or user PIN 2812 into a device 2802. The device CPU 2804 retrieves a known salt value from storage 2808 and uses it along with the entered password or pin 2812 and a non-recoverable, device-specific secret identifier 2806 to generate a derived cryptographic key. In one aspect, an accessor function or hardware module 2814 provides the CPU with key generation results based on the device-specific identifier and thus provides only indirect access to the device-specific secret identifier 2806.

FIG. 29 illustrates an exemplary block diagram 2900 of how to generate a derived, or combined, key. A user PIN 2902 such as a password or sequence of numbers to unlock a device is combined with a unique, device specific, secret identifier 2904 via an iterative key combiner 2906. The iterative key combiner can be a hardware and/or software implementation of the PBKDF2 algorithm or some other suitable algorithm. The key combiner yields a combined, or derived, key 2908 which the device then uses to encrypt content on the device. In one aspect, the key can be used to encrypt content which is not stored on the device, but which is associated with the device.

The disclosure now turns to the exemplary method embodiment shown in FIG. 30 for generating a cryptographic key. The method is discussed in terms of a system, such as the system 100 shown in FIG. 1, configured to practice the method. The system 100 receives a user passcode on a device (3002). The device can be a mobile device, a personal computer, a smartphone, and so forth. Any device that has a non-extractable, unique secret can practice this method.

The system 100 combines at least part of the user passcode with at least part of a non-extractable secret associated with the device to yield a derived key (3004). The secret can be unique. In one aspect, each such device has a unique secret from all other such devices. The system 100 can combine the passcode and secret according to an encryption algorithm such as PBKDF2. PBKDF2 can be modified to accept or used in conjunction with an algorithm that accepts the device-specific secret in addition to the passcode, the salt, and a number of iterations. PBKDF2 can produce a derived key that is longer or shorter than the sum of the passcode and the non-extractable secret. For example, a passcode of any length and a fixed size secret can always produce a fixed-length derived key, or the variable length passcode and the fixed-size secret can produce a variable length derived key.

The system 100 encrypts content on the device with the derived key (3006). The content can be stored on a volatile or non-volatiles storage medium, such as a hard drive, flash, memory, cache, and so forth. Individual blocks can be encrypted individually as in ECB mode or as part of a double dependency chain of encrypted blocks, as in CBC mode.

Other principles disclosed herein can be applied to the derived or combined key. For example, the derived key can be used as part of an encryption class key scheme, as part of one or more of a default key bag, a protected key bag, an escrow key bag, and a backup key bag, as part of a backup secret or backup ticket, as part of a file key, as part of a sync ticket, and so forth. In one aspect, content protected by derived keys on one device can be migrated to another device having a different unique device specific identifier, such as when a user upgrades to a newer smartphone model, or when a PDA is lost and synced data from the lost PDA is synced to a new PDA. The data to be migrated can be converted into a clear or unprotected version of the data by use of the original device-specific secret, if it is available, or by use of an escrow key bag or other similar approaches. Once the data is no longer protected, a new or replacement device on to which the data is being migrated can reprotect the data with its own device-specific secret.

One advantage of this approach is that user passwords can be short and still retain highly secure attributes. A brute force attack on the key derived from a user passcode in this way is algorithmically rate limited, and limited even for attackers with access to significant computing power, because the device-specific key cannot be easily extracted from the device, if at all.

One exemplary algorithm, illustrated in FIG. 31, is outlined below. This algorithm calculates an AES key from the password. Given the user's password and a salt (which is randomly generated and stored in the clear), the system calculates K₁by performing a single round of PBKDF2 using HMAC_SHA1 as the PRF. This is equivalent to the following steps:

K₁=HMAC_SHA1(P, S∥INT(1))∥HMAC_SHA1(P, S∥INT(2))
TRUNCATE K₁to 32 bytes

A new “tangle with hardware” operation performs i iterations of the following step:

K_n+1=TANGLE_WITH_HARDWARE (K_n, i) where i is the desired number of iterations

For every 128 iterations, the system encrypts one 4096 byte page which starts with K_nas the input and produces K_n+1. The system fills a 4096 byte buffer with a pattern of repeating K_nwhere each 4 byte word in K_nis XORed with the logical AES block number within the page (in little endian byte order) and put in the to-be-encrypted buffer. This 4 kilobyte buffer is then AES encrypted in CBC mode using the built in hardware key. The IV used for the first CBC block is all 0. After encryption, the system XORs together K_nwith each 32 byte regions in the 4 kilobyte buffer to obtain a single 32 byte result K_n+1.

The system continues repeating these steps until it reaches K_nwhere n=i/128. If i is not divisible by 128, the last page will only prefill and encrypt and XOR one 32 byte block per remaining iteration. The output is the AES key used to encrypt content in the system. The output AES key is dependent on both the user's password and the device secret. By choosing an appropriate iteration count, the system rate limits how fast an attacker can attempt to brute force the users password to find the resulting key.

FIG. 32 illustrates a second exemplary algorithm, outlined below. This algorithm calculates an AES key from the password. Given the user's password and a salt (which is randomly generated and stored in the clear), the algorithm first calculates K₁by performing a single round of PBKDF2 using HMAC_SHA1 as the PRF. This is equivalent to the following steps:

K=HMAC_SHA1(P, S∥INT (1))∥HMAC_SHA1(P, S∥INT (2))
TRUNCATE K to 32 bytes

A new “tangle with hardware” operation calculates U₁though U_n, for a given index n using the formula set forth below:

Pleft=first 16 bytes of K XORed with the value (2*n−1) in a 16-byte, big endian representation
Pright=last 16 bytes of K XORed with the value (2*n) in a 16-byte, big endian representation
P_n=Pleft followed by Pright
U_n=AES_EBC(HardwareKey,P_n)

The resulting key R is obtained by XORing together U₁though U_n. These algorithms are exemplary. Other comparable algorithms can be used and may be modified for optimization, speed, security, size, or other considerations.

Embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure may also include tangible and/or non-transitory computer-readable storage media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such computer-readable storage media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer, including the functional design of any special purpose processor as discussed above. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions, data structures, or processor chip design. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or combination thereof) to a computer, the computer properly views the connection as a computer-readable medium. Thus, any such connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of the computer-readable media.

Computer-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Computer-executable instructions also include program modules that are executed by computers in stand-alone or network environments. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, objects, and the functions inherent in the design of special-purpose processors, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of the program code means for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represents examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps.

Those of skill in the art will appreciate that other embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced in network computing environments with many types of computer system configurations, including personal computers, hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Embodiments may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by local and remote processing devices that are linked (either by hardwired links, wireless links, or by a combination thereof) through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.

The various embodiments described above are provided by way of illustration only and should not be construed to limit the scope of the disclosure. The principles herein primarily discuss mobile devices, but can be equally applied to any computing device. For example, a portable mass storage device can apply any or all of these approaches via its controller board when it interfaces with a laptop or desktop computer. Those skilled in the art will readily recognize various modifications and changes that may be made to the principles described herein without following the example embodiments and applications illustrated and described herein, and without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

Claims

1. A method for encrypting content, the method comprising, at a computing device that includes a processor: receiving a user passcode;combining at least part of the user passcode with at least part of a unique identifier associated with the computing device to produce a combined value, wherein the unique identifier is directly accessible only to a hardware module within the computing device, and is stored by the hardware module in a manner that prevents software executing by way of the processor from directly accessing the unique identifier;carrying out an iterative function on the combined value to produce a derived key, wherein a number of iterations performed by the iterative function is based on a speed of the processor; andencrypting content on the computing device with the derived key.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least part of the user passcode represents a subset of the user passcode that omits at least a portion, but not all, of the user passcode.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least part of the unique identifier represents a subset of the unique identifier that omits at least a portion, but not all, of the unique identifier.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the user passcode comprises at least one of alphanumeric data, gesture data, stylus data, biometric data, video data, or image data.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of iterations is further-based on at least one of a class of the computing device or a user-specified security level.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the hardware module comprises a second processor that is distinct from the second processor, and the second processor is less powerful than the processor.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the iterative function is further based on a target time to complete the iterative function.
8. At least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium configured to store instructions that, when executed by a processor included in a computing device, cause the computing device to encrypt content, by carrying out steps that include: receiving a user passcode;combining at least part of the user passcode with at least part of a unique identifier associated with the computing device to produce a combined value, wherein the unique identifier is directly accessible only to a hardware module within the computing device, and is stored by the hardware module in a manner that prevents software executing by way of the processor from directly accessing the unique identifier;carrying out an iterative function on the combined value to produce a derived key, wherein a number of iterations performed by the iterative function is based on a speed of the processor; andencrypting content on the computing device with the derived key.
9. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the at least part of the user passcode represents a subset of the user passcode that omits at least a portion, but not all, of the user passcode.
10. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the at least part of the unique identifier represents a subset of the unique identifier that omits at least a portion, but not all, of the unique identifier.
11. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the user passcode comprises at least one of alphanumeric data, gesture data, stylus data, biometric data, video data, or image data.
12. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the number of iterations is further-based on at least one of a class of the computing device or a user-specified security level.
13. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the hardware module comprises a second processor that is distinct from the second processor, and the second processor is less powerful than the processor.
14. The at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the iterative function is further based on a target time to complete the iterative function.
15. A computing device configured to encrypt content, the computing device comprising: a processor; andat least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computing device to: receive a user passcode;combine at least part of the user passcode with at least part of a unique identifier associated with the computing device to produce a combined value, wherein the unique identifier is directly accessible only to a hardware module within the computing device, and is stored by the hardware module in a manner that prevents software executing by way of the processor from directly accessing the unique identifier;carry out an iterative function on the combined value to produce a derived key, wherein a number of iterations performed by the iterative function is based on a speed of the processor; andencrypt content on the computing device with the derived key.
16. The computing device of claim 15, wherein the at least part of the user passcode represents a subset of the user passcode that omits at least a portion, but not all, of the user passcode.
17. The computing device of claim 15, wherein the at least part of the unique identifier represents a subset of the unique identifier that omits at least a portion, but not all of the unique identifier.
18. The computing device of claim 15, wherein the number of iterations is further-based on at least one of a class of the computing device or a user-specified security level.
19. The computing device of claim 15, wherein the hardware module comprises a second processor that is distinct from the second processor, and the second processor is less powerful than the processor.
20. The computing device of claim 15, wherein the iterative function is further based on a target time to complete the iterative function.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/010,858, filed Jan. 29, 2016, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTENT PROTECTION BASED ON A COMBINATION OF A USER PIN AND A DEVICE SPECIFIC UNIQUE IDENTIFIER”, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,476 issued Mar. 6, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/299,375, filed Jun. 9, 2014, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTENT PROTECTION BASED ON A COMBINATION OF A USER PIN AND A DEVICE SPECIFIC UNIQUE IDENTIFIER”, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,288,047 issued Mar. 15, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/797,587, filed Jun. 9, 2010, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTENT PROTECTION BASED ON A COMBINATION OF A USER PIN AND A DEVICE SPECIFIC UNIQUE IDENTIFIER,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,788,842 issued Jul. 22, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/756,153, filed on Apr. 7, 2010, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FILE-LEVEL DATA PROTECTION,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,510,552 issued Aug. 13, 2013, each of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (181)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
5412723	Canetti et al.	May 1995	A
5699428	McDonnal et al.	Dec 1997	A
5787169	Eldridge et al.	Jul 1998	A
5787175	Carter	Jul 1998	A
5870477	Sasaki et al.	Feb 1999	A
5953419	Lohstroh et al.	Sep 1999	A
6185304	Coppersmith et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6249866	Brundrett et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6367010	Venkatram et al.	Apr 2002	B1
6389555	Purcell et al.	May 2002	B2
6560337	Peyravian et al.	May 2003	B1
6658566	Hazard	Dec 2003	B1
6735313	Bleichenbacher et al.	May 2004	B1
6857076	Klein	Feb 2005	B1
6889210	Vainstein	May 2005	B1
6981138	Douceur et al.	Dec 2005	B2
6985583	Brainard et al.	Jan 2006	B1
7047426	Andrews et al.	May 2006	B1
7178021	Hanna et al.	Feb 2007	B1
7197638	Grawrock et al.	Mar 2007	B1
7350081	Best	Mar 2008	B1
7515717	Doyle et al.	Apr 2009	B2
7536355	Barr et al.	May 2009	B2
7596696	Perlman	Sep 2009	B1
7703140	Nath et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7921284	Kinghom et al.	Apr 2011	B1
8045714	Cross et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8130963	Deaver et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8181028	Hernacki et al.	May 2012	B1
8200964	Perlman et al.	Jun 2012	B2
8254571	Boyen	Aug 2012	B1
8327138	Nath et al.	Dec 2012	B2
8412934	De Atley et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8433901	De Atley et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8510552	De Atley et al.	Aug 2013	B2
8589680	De Atley et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8756419	De Atley et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8788842	Brouwer et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8798272	Cross et al.	Aug 2014	B2
8826023	Harmer	Sep 2014	B1
8995665	Tsaur et al.	Mar 2015	B1
9237016	De Atley et al.	Jan 2016	B2
9288047	Brouwer et al.	Mar 2016	B2
9912476	Brouwer et al.	Mar 2018	B2
20010002487	Grawrock et al.	May 2001	A1
20010021255	Ishibashi	Sep 2001	A1
20010047341	Thoone et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20010056541	Matsuzaki et al.	Dec 2001	A1
20020016912	Johnson	Feb 2002	A1
20020019935	Andrew et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020023215	Wang et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020023232	Serani et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020071563	Kum et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020107877	Whiting et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020138722	Douceur et al.	Sep 2002	A1
20020138750	Gibbs et al.	Sep 2002	A1
20020141588	Rollins	Oct 2002	A1
20030028592	Ooho et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030088783	DiPierro	May 2003	A1
20030097596	Muratov et al.	May 2003	A1
20030108204	Audebert et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030126434	Lim et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030167395	Chang et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030177401	Arnold et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030198351	Foster et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030210791	Binder	Nov 2003	A1
20030229782	Bible, Jr. et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040088592	Rizzo	May 2004	A1
20040091114	Carter et al.	May 2004	A1
20040123127	Teicher et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040146163	Asokan et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040187012	Kohiyama et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040204003	Soerensen	Oct 2004	A1
20040236776	Peace	Nov 2004	A1
20040236958	Teicher et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040260923	Nakai et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050071275	Vainstein et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050071658	Nath et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050081041	Hwang	Apr 2005	A1
20050097509	Rong	May 2005	A1
20050114686	Ball et al.	May 2005	A1
20050138360	Kamalakantha	Jun 2005	A1
20050157880	Kum et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20050172123	Carpentier et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050182952	Shinozaki	Aug 2005	A1
20050191988	Thornton et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050193198	Livowsky	Sep 2005	A1
20050228994	Kasai et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050235143	Kelly	Oct 2005	A1
20050235148	Scheidt	Oct 2005	A1
20050244001	Kitani et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050251866	Kobayashi et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050268107	Harris et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050289347	Ovadia	Dec 2005	A1
20060015745	Sukigara et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060021007	Rensin et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060021059	Brown et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060059344	Mononen	Mar 2006	A1
20060062384	Dondeti	Mar 2006	A1
20060090082	Apostolopoulos	Apr 2006	A1
20060093150	Reddy et al.	May 2006	A1
20060104449	Akkermans et al.	May 2006	A1
20060120520	Suzuki	Jun 2006	A1
20060149962	Fountain et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060159260	Pereira	Jul 2006	A1
20060179309	Cross et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060195692	Kuhlman et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060291660	Gehrmann et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20070005974	Kudou	Jan 2007	A1
20070016958	Bodepudi et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070038857	Gosnell	Feb 2007	A1
20070058807	Marsh	Mar 2007	A1
20070074037	Eckleder	Mar 2007	A1
20070083785	Sutardja	Apr 2007	A1
20070086586	Jakubowski et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070100913	Sumner et al.	May 2007	A1
20070106903	Scheidt	May 2007	A1
20070116286	Yuan et al.	May 2007	A1
20070116287	Rasizade et al.	May 2007	A1
20070116288	Rasizade et al.	May 2007	A1
20070124321	Szydlo	May 2007	A1
20070189540	Tarkkala	Aug 2007	A1
20070195957	Arulambalam	Aug 2007	A1
20070203957	Desai et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070214370	Sato et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070281664	Kaneko et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070294529	Blair et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080010455	Holtzman et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080034205	Alain et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080034224	Ferren et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080052541	Ginter et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080065909	Chen	Mar 2008	A1
20080092239	Sitrick et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080107262	Helfman et al.	May 2008	A1
20080123843	Machani	May 2008	A1
20080123858	Perlman et al.	May 2008	A1
20080130893	Ibrahim et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080137861	Lindmo et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080181412	Acar et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080189549	Hughes	Aug 2008	A1
20080219453	Chang et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080226082	Brunet et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080228821	Mick et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080235772	Janzen	Sep 2008	A1
20080260159	Osaki	Oct 2008	A1
20080310633	Brown et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20090019293	Perlman	Jan 2009	A1
20090067633	Dawson et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090075630	McLean	Mar 2009	A1
20090086964	Agrawal	Apr 2009	A1
20090092252	Noll et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090138948	Calamera	May 2009	A1
20090217056	Malpani	Aug 2009	A1
20090259854	Cox et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20100014676	McCarthy et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100037069	Deierling et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100040231	Jin et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100058055	Hair	Mar 2010	A1
20100058067	Schneider	Mar 2010	A1
20100093308	Cohan	Apr 2010	A1
20100098249	Shin	Apr 2010	A1
20100131775	Jogand-Coulomb et al.	May 2010	A1
20100162000	Masui	Jun 2010	A1
20100169670	Sip	Jul 2010	A1
20100199088	Nath et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100208888	Weber	Aug 2010	A1
20100228989	Neystadt et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100263056	Schull	Oct 2010	A1
20100268948	Matsukawa et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100325051	Etchegoyen	Dec 2010	A1
20100325423	Etchegoyen	Dec 2010	A1
20110191837	Guajardo Merchan et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110208977	Roberts et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20120066738	Cohan	Mar 2012	A1
20120137130	Vainstein et al.	May 2012	A1
20120328149	Chen et al.	Dec 2012	A1
20130034229	Sauerwald et al.	Feb 2013	A1
20130208893	Shablygin et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130290734	Branton et al.	Oct 2013	A1
20140095869	Oltmans et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20160202998	De Atley et al.	Jul 2016	A1

Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)

Entry
Kaliski; “PKCS #5 v2.0: Password-Based Cryptography Standard,” Mar. 25, 1999, RSA Laboratories, Version 2.0, pp. 1-30.
Menezes, Alfred J. et al, “Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” 1997, CRC Press LLC, pp. 228-231.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20180241556 A1	Aug 2018	US

Continuations (3)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	15010858	Jan 2016	US
Child	15884200		US
Parent	14299375	Jun 2014	US
Child	15010858		US
Parent	12797587	Jun 2010	US
Child	14299375		US

Continuation in Parts (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	12756153	Apr 2010	US
Child	12797587		US

System and method for content protection based on a combination of a user pin and a device specific identifier

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract