1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to controlling a point-of-load regulator, or more particularly, to a system and method for using a serial bus to communicate with a point-of-load regulator.
2. Description of Related Art
Point-of-load (“POL”) regulators, which are also referred to as voltage regulators or DC/DC converters, are commonly used in conjunction with electronic circuits. This is because the voltage/current requirements of electronic circuits typically differ from the voltage that is readily available or the current that can practically be delivered. For example, some electronic devices only include a single voltage input (e.g., 12v), but require different voltages for circuits contained within (e.g., 3v, 5v, 9v, etc.). A common solution is to design multiple POL regulators within the device for converting the single input voltage into multiple voltage levels.
Similarly, some electronic devices include circuits that require low voltage (e.g., 1v), high current (e.g., 100A) power supplies. This is problematic in that it is impractical to deliver high current at low voltages over a relatively long distance and still meet desired regulation performances. A common solution is to use a high voltage, low current power supply and design a POL regulator near the internal circuit. This allows low current to travel throughout the device, and provides a low voltage, high current power supply (i.e., using the POL regulator) near the internal circuit.
Traditionally, POL regulators operate in conjunction with a power supply controller (“controller”) that activates, programs, and monitors the POL regulators. Specifically, the controller uses a multi-connection parallel bus (e.g., a six bit parallel bus) to activate and program each POL regulator. The parallel bus includes an enable/disable bit for turning the regulator on and off and VID code bits for programming the output voltage set-point of the regulator. The controller further uses additional connections (e.g., three wires) to monitor the voltage/current that is being delivered by each regulator.
The drawback with such a control system is that it adds complexity and size to the overall electronic device by using, for example, a six bit parallel bus to operate each POL regulator and three additional wires to monitor each POL regulator. In other words, a controller operating in accordance with this control system utilizes twenty-seven connections (i.e., twenty-seven wires or traces) in order to communicate with three POL regulators. Thus, it would be advantageous to have a system and method for communicating with POL regulators that overcomes these drawbacks.
The present invention provides a system and method for using a serial bus to communicate (either passively or actively) with a point-of-load (“POL”) regulator. Embodiments of the present invention operate in accordance with at least one POL regulator and a power supply controller (“controller”) operatively connected to the POL regulator via a serial bus. Specifically, the controller communicates with at least one POL regulator by writing and/or reading data (either synchronously or asynchronous) over a uni-directional or bi-directional serial bus. In other words, the uni or bi-directional serial bus is either a two-wire serial bus that allows data to be transmitted asynchronously or a single-wire serial bus that allows data to be transmitted synchronously. In an alternate embodiment, the serial bus (or a portion thereof) is superimposed over (or coexistent with) a power bus used to deliver power from a front-end converter to at least one POL regulator.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the controller is adapted to write initial-configuration data (e.g., output voltage set-point, current limit set-point, etc.) to at least one POL regulator via the serial bus. At least a portion of the initial-configuration data is then used by the POL regulator to produce a particular output.
In another embodiment of the invention, each POL regulator includes at least one register for maintaining POL information, such as unique identification information, fault protection information, output voltage set-point data, current limit set-point data, etc. The controller is then adapted to read the information contained in the register(s) (i.e., fault-monitoring data). In other words, the controller can monitor and retrieve (or in an alternate embodiment be provided with) POL information, such as unique identification information (e.g., serial number, date of manufacture, etc.) or fault protection information (e.g., temperature, output voltage, and output current information), while the POL regulators are operating.
A more complete understanding of the system and method for using a serial bus to communicate with a POL regulator will be afforded to those skilled in the art, as well as a realization of additional advantages and objects thereof, by a consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment. Reference will be made to the appended sheets of drawings which will first be described briefly.
The present invention provides a system and method for using a serial bus to passively or actively communicate with a point-of-load regulator. In the detailed description that follows, like element numerals are used to describe like elements illustrated in one or more figures.
As shown in
The problem with such a control system 10 is that it adds complexity and size to the overall electronic device (not shown) by using a six bit parallel bus (i.e., 112, 114 and 116) to operate each converter and a separate three-wire output connection (i.e., 122-126, 132-136, 142-146) to monitor each converter. In other words, the controller 110 utilizes twenty-seven connections (i.e., twenty-seven wires or traces) in order to communicate with three DC/DC converters (i.e., 120, 130 and 140).
Referring to
The first and second acknowledgement bits 540, 570 are used to acknowledge the reception of the command set 530 and the data set 560, respectively. It should be appreciated that the device responsible for providing the first and second acknowledgement bits 540, 570 varies depending upon whether the information is being sent to or from the POL regulator (i.e., written, read, or provided).
The command set 530, data set 560, and address set 520 enable the controller and the POL regulators to write, read and provide data. Specifically, (i) the command set 530 is used to identify whether and what the controller is writing, the controller is reading, or the POL regulator is providing, (ii) the address set 520 is used to identify the POL regulator(s) that are being written to or read, or the POL regulator that is providing information, and (iii) the data set 560 is used to identify the actual data that is being written, read, or provided.
The start sequence 510 and address set 520 are used, in part, to identify the sender of the information. For example, the controller uses a different start sequence 510 than the POL regulators. Thus, the controller can determine, by reading the start sequence 510 of a communication cycle 50 as it is being sent, whether a POL regulator is also attempting to send a communication cycle 50 at the same time. Similarly, each POL regulator has a different address set 520. Thus, a POL regulator can determine, by reading the start sequence 510 and address set 520 of a communication cycle 50 as it is being sent, whether another POL regulator is also attempting to send a communication cycle 50 at the same time. If multiple devices are attempting to send a communication cycle 50, default prioritizing information is used to allocate or arbitrate bus use.
Referring back to
In another embodiment of the invention, each POL regulator (e.g., 220) includes at least one register (not shown) for storing POL information, such as unique identification information, fault protection information, output voltage set-point data, current limit set-point data, etc. The controller 110 is then adapted to read the data contained in the register(s) (i.e., fault-monitoring data). In other words, the controller 110 can monitor and retrieve POL information, such as unique identification information (e.g., serial number, date of manufacture, etc.) or fault protection information (e.g., temperature, voltage, and current information), while the POL regulators are operating. The POL regulators (i.e., 220, 230, 240 and 250) may further be adapted to provided fault-monitoring data independent of receiving a read command. In other words, the POL regulators, on their own initiative, can provide the controller 210 with unique identification information and/or fault protection information.
One method of communicating with at least one POL regulator is described in FIG. 6. Specifically, at step 610, the controller begins by writing (i.e., transmitting) digital initial-configuration data (e.g., output voltage set-point, current limit set-point, etc.) to at least one POL regulator. The POL regulator then provides regulated power or voltage in conjunction with at least a portion of the initial-configuration data at step 620. The controller, at step 630, then receives fault-monitoring data (e.g., voltage output data, current output data, temperature data, etc.). The fault-monitoring data is either provided by the POL regulator on its own initiative or in response to receiving a read command. The controller then evaluates the fault-monitoring data at step 640. At step 650, if the fault parameters are acceptable, the controller requests (or receives) additional fault-monitoring data at step 630. Alternatively, if the fault parameters are unacceptable, the controller must decide what action needs to be taken (e.g., closely monitoring the regulator, disabling the regulator, performing a diagnostic check, etc.) at step 660. It should be appreciated that the POL regulator may also be programmed to take certain action (e.g., shut down) if certain fault parameters are found to exist.
Having thus described a preferred embodiment of a system and method for using a serial bus to communicate with a point-of-load regulator, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that certain advantages of the system have been achieved. It should also be appreciated that various modifications, adaptations, and alternative embodiments thereof may be made within the scope and spirit of the present invention. The invention is further defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
27101 | Brown | Feb 1860 | A |
33152 | Knight | Aug 1861 | A |
73347 | Lane | Jan 1868 | A |
122429 | Beidler | Jan 1872 | A |
142513 | Robbins | Sep 1873 | A |
201761 | Edgar et al. | Mar 1878 | A |
3660672 | Berger et al. | May 1972 | A |
4194147 | Payne et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4538073 | Freige et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4538101 | Shimpo et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4622627 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
5053920 | Staffiere et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5073848 | Steigerwald et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5377090 | Steigerwald | Dec 1994 | A |
5481140 | Maruyama et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5917719 | Hoffman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5990669 | Brown | Nov 1999 | A |
6115441 | Douglass et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6191566 | Petricek et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211579 | Blair | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6385024 | Olson | May 2002 | B1 |
6421259 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429630 | Pohlman et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
20020105227 | Nerone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040090219 | Chapuis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093533 | Chapuis et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040123164 | Chapuis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123167 | Chapuis | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040178780 | Chapuis | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040246754 | Chapuis | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040090219 A1 | May 2004 | US |