System and method for controlling access to electronic devices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9489531
  • Patent Number
    9,489,531
  • Date Filed
    Sunday, May 13, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 8, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A computer implemented method for controlling access to an electronic media source is disclosed. An access control system receives achievement goals and degree of access information. Assessment information is also received by the access control system from one or more input data sources. The access control system determines whether the achievement goals are met based on the received assessment information and forwards an access signal to the electronic media source based on the access determination. The access signal, including a grant signal, is forwarded when the achievement goals are met.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to electronic devices. More specifically, the present, invention relates to a system for supporting electronic devices.


BACKGROUND

Gaming, movies, television shows, and friend information have become easier for children to access as more and more electronic media and electronic devices, both mobile and stationary, have allowed access to this content. Today's children spend a large amount of time engaged with television, personal computers, gaming consoles, portable gaming platforms, E-readers, the Internet, content providers such as Netflix™, cell phone voice and messaging communications, and mobile gaming.


Unfortunately for parents of these children, controlling access to electronic media has become very difficult. This is especially true for those parents that implement incentive based access to electronic media, e.g., allowing a child to play a gaming system, such as Wii® and Playstation® only when the child is doing well in school or has completed all of his/her chores.


Currently, the only ways parents are able to control access to electronic media and/or devices is by controlling their child's physical access to the electronic media or using a restricting password when the device allows it. These methods require the parent to monitor the child and the electronic device. Depending on the parent's availability, these methods require a lot of attention and time, resulting sometimes in non-implementation.


Therefore, there exists a need for an improved system and method for controlling access to electronic media and electronic devices.


SUMMARY

A computer implemented method for controlling access to electronic media is disclosed. An access control system receives achievement goals and degree of access information. Assessment information is also received by the access control system from one or more input data sources. An access inquiry is received from the electronic media inquiring whether the electronic media is able to be accessed. The access control system then determines whether the achievement goals are met based on the received assessment information and forwards an access signal to the electronic media based on the access determination. The access signal, including a grant signal, is forwarded when the achievement goals are met. For those media for which there is no ability to control access, the access control system monitors overall usage, determines when all allotted media access has been used, and forwards an alert to a particular party indicating the allotted media access has been used.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING(S)

A more detailed understanding of the disclosed system and method may be had from the following description, given by way of example and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example system for controlling access to electronic media sources;



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a disclosed method for controlling access to electronic media sources; and



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example alternative system for controlling access to electronic media sources.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Although the features and elements are described in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone (without the other feature or elements) or in various combinations with or without other features and elements.


A system and computer-implemented method are disclosed for controlling access to electronic devices and/or electronic media, for example, mobile phones, gaming systems, computers, social media, and Netflix™ online movie service or other content provider. In accordance with this disclosure, one or more electronic devices and/or media will be identified as an electronic media source(s).



FIG. 1 illustrates an example block diagram of a disclosed access control system 100. The access control system 100 comprises an access inquiry processor 101, an aggregation database 102, and a goal database 103. The access control system 100 is coupled to one or more input data sources 120 and one or more electronic media sources 130 via a system interface 105. In accordance with the disclosed system, the access control system 100 receives via the system interface 105 one or more achievement goals, to be disclosed below, from one or more goal setting source(s) 140, and stores the achievement goals in the goal database 103. A goal setting source 140 may include for example a parent, a teacher, a student adviser, and/or a guidance counselor enabled to provide information to the system interface 105 via a suitable client such as a personal computer or mobile communication device.


The goal setting source 140 may define, for example, behavioral, academic, or activity goals that a child must meet in order to have access to the electronic media sources 130. For example, a goal setting source 140, such as a parent, may list the daily or weekly chores that a child must complete before being allowed to play a game or watch television (e.g., wash dishes, take out garbage, feed the dog, finish mowing the lawn by Saturday); activity goals that a child must accomplish in order to play the game (e.g., arrive at school on time, no texting during class); and/or academic goals, daily, weekly or per semester, that must be achieved in order to access the electronic media source (e.g., scoring a B in math class, maintaining an A average across all subjects, making Honor Roll, completing a biology report by the end of the week). Although exemplary achievement goals have been identified above, it should be noted that the types, length, and number of goals may be defined by the goal setting source 140, and are not limited by the disclosed access control system 100. Also, although the term “child” is used to represent the user of the electronic media source 130 for which access is controlled, any person of any age may have his/her access to the electronic media source 130 controlled in accordance with the disclosed system and method.


The access control system 100 then registers one or more input data sources 120. The input data sources 120 are preferably identified by a goal setting source 140. The input data source 120 forwards assessment information to the access control system 100 via the system interface 105 to enable the system 100 to track the child's progress relating to the achievement goal(s). An example data input source 120 may be an automated online grade reporting system, such as Schoolloop.com™ or PowerSchool™, which provide via the internet a daily or weekly record of a child's grades and academic assessments.


Another example of a input data source 120 may be a mobile phone that provides location based information, which can be used to track whether a child is where he/she is supposed to be by a certain time. Although exemplary input data sources have been provided, there are numerous other sources that may be used, for example, a teacher, counselor, parent, or an electronic media source 130.


The access control system 100 also receives from a goal setting source 140 degree of access information that defines the degree of access that the child may have to the electronic media source 130 when the achievement goal(s) are met. Example degree of access information may include time limitations on access to an electronic media source 130, e.g., 1 hour per day, limitations on the types of electronic media source 130, including categorical media limitations, e.g., 1 hour per week of World of Warcraft™ online role-playing game, no mature game titles, no thriller movies, and/or no access to certain themed games.


Time limitations may also be included in the received degree of access information. The time limitations may include limitations, such as, daily or weekly time limits for accessing the electronic media source 130, duration time limits (e.g., limitation of 2 hours of electronic access, with at least 1 hour of some other activity interspersed), and specific day limitations (e.g., access granted only on Saturday or Sunday). The disclosed access control system 100 provides a goal setting source 140 with the ability to incentivize the use of electronic media, and also limit the types of media to which the child is exposed and the time of access.


Once the access control system 100 has received and stored the degree of access information, the goals are then mapped to the degree of access information by the access inquiry processor 101. Depending on the achievement goal and the degree of access information, the access inquiry processor 101 may perform a first order or a second order mapping. A first order mapping may directly link each behavioral/academic goal to a fixed degree of access to electronic media. For example, if a child completes his/her daily chores for the week, then the access control system 100 allows access to the electronic media for one (1) hour on Saturday and Sunday, in another example, the child may be allowed to access the electronic media for one (1) hour of World of Warcraft™ each day for a B grade in Math class.


A second order mapping may link a group of achievement goals to a fixed degree of electronic access. An example of a second order mapping may include allowing the child to watch 3 hours of TV on Saturday when the child has achieved an A grade in Math class and a B grade in English class.


As the access control system 100 receives the assessment information from the input data source(s) 120 through the system interface 105, the aggregation database 102 aggregates the assessment information for each of the achievement goals to then be used by the access inquiry processor 101.


In accordance with the disclosed system, the electronic media sources 130 preferably each have a means of communicating with the system interface 105. For example, an electronic media source 130 can include a mobile phone including an application (“app”), or a gaming system having a program installed, specifically programmed to interface with the access control system's system interface 105. Preferably, an installed program on the electronic media source 130 requires the child to log onto the electronic media source 130 in order for it to operate. If an electronic media source 130 has no means of initiating communication with the access control system 100 through system interface 105, then the access control system 100 determines the state of electronic media source 130 through periodic requests (polling) for the state of the electronic media source 130. The state of the electronic media source 130 can include an indication of whether the child is logged onto the electronic media source 130, whether the electronic media source 130 is operating or network accessible, or other information related to the operation of the electronic media source 130.


Once the user (e.g., child) has logged onto the electronic media source 130, an access inquiry requesting an indication as to whether the child is able to use the electronic media source 130, is preferably forwarded by the electronic media source 130 to the access control system 100 via the interface system 105.


Alternatively, when there is no explicit mechanism for the user (e.g., child) to log into the electronic media source, other mechanisms can be employed to link the user to usage of a particular electronic media source. Such usage can be determined heuristically. For example, if it is known via received information related to electronic media source use that the user is the only member of the household to play World of Warcraft™, and World of Warcraft™ is engaged, the access control system 100 can determine that the user (e.g., child) is the principal engaged with World of Warcraft™. When it is not possible to heuristically deduce the user of an electronic media source, a query can be directed to a parent or other party with oversight responsibility toward the user asking for a determination of whether the user is engaged with a detected electronic media source.


Once the access control system 100 receives the access inquiry from the electronic media source 130, or the access control system 100 has determined the state of the electronic media source 130 through polling, the access inquiry processor 101 determines the degree of access allowed for the user using the aggregated assessment information from the aggregation database 102 and the first, second or higher order mapping. The access inquiry processor 101 compares the aggregated assessment information to the mapped goals to determine whether the user is able to access the electronic media source 130 and any corresponding access restrictions. Further, the amount of time the child has already accessed the electronic media source 130 is factored into this determination: in particular, it is determined whether the child has any allotted time left to access this particular electronic media source 130. Upon making this determination, the access inquiry processor 101 generates an access signal which is provided to the electronic media source 130 if the electronic media source 130 can receive control signals, which access signal can include a grant or deny signal, which grant signal may include access limits.


If it is determined that the child is allowed to access the electronic media source 130 at the time of the inquiry, the access control system 100 forwards to the electronic media source 130 the access signal, including a grant signal if such a grant signal exists for the electronic media source 130.


If it is determined that the child is not able to access the electronic media source 130 based on the access inquiry processor's 101 determination, the access control system 100 forwards the access signal, including a deny signal, preventing the child from using the electronic media source at that time. If the electronic media source 130 does not have a mechanism to constrain usage, an alert will be sent by the access control system 100 to the parent or other party with oversight responsibility toward the user, for example via the goal setting source 140, indicating that the user is attempting to engage with an electronic media for which the user should no longer have access. The access control system 100 can further send request to the parent or other party, for example via the goal setting source 140, to identify the user when the identity of the user attempting to use the electronic media source 130 is not clear or unknown.


A flow diagram of the disclosed computer implemented method 200 of controlling access to electronic media source is illustrated in FIG. 2. An access control system registers the electronic media source selected by a goal setting source, such as a parent or other overseer with oversight responsibility toward a user (e.g., child) (Step 201). Achievement goals and the degree of access information are then received by the access control system (Step 202).


The access control system is then linked to one or more input data sources that provide assessment information used by the access control system in determining the degree of access for the user (Step 203). Assessment information is then received and aggregated by the access control system from the linked input data sources (Step 204).


When the user (e.g., a child) attempts to use the electronic media source, and the electronic: media source is capable of initiating an access inquiry to the access control system, the access control system receives an access inquiry from the electronic media source (Step 205). Alternatively, if the media source is not capable of initiating an access inquiry to the access control system, the access control system periodically initiates a request (polls) for the state of the electronic media source. If the electronic media source can identify the user, the access inquiry provided to the access control system preferably includes the identity of the user. If the electronic media source cannot identify the user, and can initiate an access inquiry to the access control system, the electronic media source forwards the access inquiry with an indication, of use and type of use to the access control system. The access control system will attempt to deduce the identity of the user, preferably through heuristic analysis, based on prior knowledge of the electronic media usage (Step 206). If heuristic analysis is unable to determine the identity of the user, an inquiry is sent to the overseer, e.g., parent, indicating the electronic media source being engaged and the specific content being accessed, and the access control system will ask the overseer to establish the identity of the user of the electronic media source (step 207). The access control system, using the aggregated assessment information, determines whether the identified user is able to access the electronic media source based on the achievement goals and the degree of access information, which degree of access information can include for example a title or description of accessible content (Step 208). Based on a determined access level, if the electronic media source accepts communication from the access control system, the access control system forwards an access signal to the electronic media source. If the determined access level allows the child to access the electronic media source, the access signal includes a grant signal and any limits to the child's access (Step 209). If the electronic media source does not support access prevention, that is does not have a mechanism to constrain usage, notification is provided to the overseer (Step 211). If the user is not able to be identified, a grant signal can be forwarded to the electronic media source (Step 209), or alternatively where the electronic media source does not support access prevention, notification can be provided to the overseer (Step 211).


The access control system determines the time duration in which the user (e.g., child) engages with the particular electronic media source. The access control system periodically receives an access inquiry from the electronic media source inquiring whether the child is able to continue to access the electronic media source and/or a given title supported thereby (Step 205). If the electronic media source is not capable of initiating an access inquiry to the access control system, the access control system will periodically request state from the electronic media source, to determine if the user is still engaged with the electronic media source.


If the determined access level does not allow the child to access the electronic media, the access signal includes a deny signal (Step 210), thereby preventing the child from accessing the electronic media source. If the electronic media source does not support the ability to prevent access, an alert is sent to the overseer notifying the overseer of the user not having access or having exhausted access to the electronic media source (Step 211), whereby an overseeing user can take action such as physically preventing the user's access to the electronic media source. For example, a parent can repossess their child's smart phone.


An access control system according to the invention may store tracking information relating to the child's usage of the electronic media. Another example access control system 300 in accordance with the invention is illustrated in FIG. 3.


The access control system 300 comprises an access inquiry processor 301, an aggregation database 302, a goal database 303, and a usage database 304. The access control system 300 operates similarly to the access control system 100 disclosed above. The usage database 304, coupled to the access inquiry processor 301, collects usage data related to the user. For example, the usage database 304 can store the amount of time a game was played on an electronic media source 330, and time of usage of an electronic media source 330. Upon request by a goal setting source 340, e.g., a parent, the access control system 300 may provide this stored information to the goal setting source 340 via the system interface 305.


Although the systems and computer implemented method of controlling access to electronic media have been disclosed by means of specific example, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the system and method set forth in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method for controlling access to an electronic media source comprising: receiving one or more achievement goals and degree of access information for a first user from a second user, wherein the degree of access information includes limitations of access to the electronic media source including at least one of a time limit, a day of week limit, a media category limit, a content title limit, or a rating limit;receiving assessment information for the first user from one or more 3rd party network-accessible input data sources, the assessment information related to the achievement goals;linking the 3rd party network-accessible input data sources;aggregating the received assessment information;aggregating knowledge of electronic media source usage comprising at least knowledge of electronic media source usage by a first user;determining when the first user attempts to access an electronic media source;receiving information related, to use of the electronic media source;determining that an identity of a user of the electronic media source is that of the first user based on the received information related to use of the electronic media source and based on the aggregated knowledge;determining whether the achievement goals are met by the first user using the received assessment information in response to an access inquiry from the electronic media source; andforwarding an access signal to the electronic media source based on the determination of whether the achievement goals are met; wherein the access signal includes a grant signal when the achievement goals are met.
  • 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the access signal includes a deny signal when the achievement goals are not met.
  • 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the grant signal allows access to the electronic media source, and the deny signal prevents access to the electronic media source.
  • 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, further comprising storing usage information when access to the electronic media source has been allowed.
  • 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the electronic media source includes at least one of a gaming system, a television show, a video game, a movie, a computer, or a movie player.
  • 6. The computer-implemented method, of claim 1, wherein the achievement goals include at least one of academic goals, chores, or activity goals.
  • 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, farther comprising: receiving an indication of usage of the electronic media source from the electronic media source; andproviding an indication to a particular party regarding the indication of usage based on the determination of whether the achievement goals are met.
  • 8. The access control system of claim 1, wherein the one or more 3rd party network-accessible input data sources comprises an automated online grade reporting system.
  • 9. A computer-implemented method for controlling access to an electronic media source comprising: receiving one or more achievement goals and degree of access information for a first user from a second user;receiving assessment information for the first user from one or more 3rd party network-accessible input data sources comprising an automated online grade reporting system, the assessment information related to the achievement goals;aggregating knowledge of electronic media source usage comprising at least knowledge of electronic media source usage by a first user;determining when the first user attempts to access an electronic media source;receiving information related to use of the electronic media source;determining that an identity of a user of the electronic media source is that of the first user based on the received information related to use of the electronic media source and based on the aggregated knowledge;receiving an access inquiry from the electronic media source inquiring whether the electronic media source is able to be accessed by a user;determining whether the achievement goals are met by the first user using the received assessment information; andforwarding an access signal to the electronic media source based on the determination of whether the achievement goals are met; wherein the access signal includes a grant signal when the achievement goals are met.
  • 10. The access control system of claim 9, wherein the access inquiry processor determines whether the achievement goals are met using the received assessment information in response to an access inquiry from the electronic media source.
  • 11. A computer-implemented method for controlling access to an electronic media source comprising: receiving one or more achievement goals and degree of access information wherein the degree of access information includes limitations of access to the electronic media source including at least one of a time limit, a day of week limit, a media category limit, a content tide limit, or a rating limit;receiving assessment information from one or more 3rd party network-accessible input data sources, the assessment information related to the achievement goals;providing an application on an electronic media source configured to enable interface with a network-connectable control system;linking the 3rd party network-accessible input data sources;aggregating the received assessment information;aggregating knowledge of electronic media source usage comprising at least knowledge of electronic media source usage by a particular user;determining an attempt to access an electronic media source;receiving information related to use of the electronic media source;determining that an identity of a user of the electronic media source is that of the particular user based on the received information related to use of the electronic media source and based on the aggregated knowledge;determining whether the achievement goals are met by the determined particular user using the received assessment information in response to an access inquiry from the electronic media source; andforwarding by the network-connectable control system an access signal to the electronic media source as corresponds to the determined user based on the determination of whether the achievement goals are met; wherein the access signal includes a grant signal when the achievement goals are met;receiving the access signal by the electronic media source via the application and constraining usage by the particular use of the electronic media source based on the access signal.
  • 12. A computer-implemented method for controlling access to an electronic media source comprising: receiving one or more achievement goals and degree of access information wherein the degree of access information includes limitations of access to the electronic media source including at least one of a time limit, a day of week limit, a media category limit, a content title limit, or a rating limit;receiving assessment information from one or more 3rd party network-accessible input data sources, the assessment information related to the achievement goals;linking the 3rd party network-accessible input data sources;aggregating the received assessment information;receiving an indication of usage of the electronic media source from the electronic media source;transmitting a query to a particular party for an identity of a user of the electronic media source, the query comprising at least one of an indication of the electronic media source or an indication of content accessed by the electronic media source;receiving an indication of the identity of the user of the electronic media source from the particular party; andproviding an indication to a particular party regarding the indication of usage based on the determination of whether the achievement goals are met by the identified user;determining whether the achievement goals are met using the received assessment information in response to an access inquiry from the electronic media source;forwarding an access signal to the electronic media source based on the determination of whether the achievement goals are met, wherein the access signal includes a grant signal when the achievement goals are met.
  • 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, further comprising providing an indication to the particular party of specific content of the electronic media source accessed.
  • 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein providing the indication to the particular party regarding the indication of usage comprises alerting the particular party that the usage of the electronic media exceeds an allowed amount based on the determination of whether the achievement goals are met.
  • 15. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, further comprising periodically requesting a state of the electronic media source.
  • 16. An access control system for controlling access to an electronic media source comprising: a goal database for storing achievement goals comprising an indication of at least one location and at least one time corresponding to the at least one location and for storing degree of access information wherein the degree of access information includes limitations of access to the electronic media source including at least one of a time limit, a day of week limit, a media category limit, a content title limit, or a rating limit;an aggregation database for storing assessment information from one or more 3rd party network-accessible input data sources input data sources comprising location based information and for linking the 3rd party network-accessible input data sources and aggregating the received assessment information, the assessment information related to the achievement goals, and for aggregating knowledge of electronic media source usage comprising at least knowledge of electronic media source usage by a particular user; andan access inquiry processor for determining whether the achievement goals are met in response to an access inquiry from the electronic media source using the received assessment information by determining whether a mobile device corresponding to a particular user is located at a particular location at a particular time and for determining that an identity of a user of the electronic media source is that of the particular user based on received information related to use of the electronic media source and based on the aggregated knowledge;wherein the access inquiry processor forwards an access signal to the electronic media source based on the determinations.
  • 17. The access control system of claim 16, wherein the access signal includes a grant signal when the achievement goals are met, wherein the grant signal allows access to the electronic media source.
  • 18. The access control system of claim 16, wherein the access signal includes a deny signal when the achievement goals are not met, wherein the deny signal prevents access to the electronic media source.
  • 19. The access control system of claim 16, wherein the degree of access information includes limitations of access to the electronic media source.
  • 20. The access control system of claim 19, wherein the limitations of access include at least one of a time of day limitation, a day of week limitation, a time duration limit, or a type of electronic media source limitation.
  • 21. The access control system of claim 16, wherein the achievement goals include at least one of academic goals, chores, or activity goals.
  • 22. The access control system of claim 16, further comprising a system interface for communicating with the one or more input data sources and the electronic media source.
  • 23. The access control system of claim 16, further comprising a usage database for storing electronic media source usage information when access to the electronic media source is allowed.
US Referenced Citations (251)
Number Name Date Kind
3778809 Hawes Dec 1973 A
4956825 Wilts et al. Sep 1990 A
5434562 Reardon Jul 1995 A
5673691 Abrams Oct 1997 A
5882258 Kelly et al. Mar 1999 A
5907831 Lotvin May 1999 A
5973683 Cragun et al. Oct 1999 A
6011973 Valentine et al. Jan 2000 A
6023692 Nichols Feb 2000 A
6161008 Lee et al. Dec 2000 A
6437696 Lemelson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6529724 Khazaka et al. Mar 2003 B1
6587835 Treyz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6690940 Brown et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701234 Vogelsang Mar 2004 B1
6731746 Usami May 2004 B1
6782266 Baer et al. Aug 2004 B2
6834195 Brandenberg et al. Dec 2004 B2
6873850 Dowling et al. Mar 2005 B2
6895238 Newell et al. May 2005 B2
6961562 Ross Nov 2005 B2
6985696 Bromham et al. Jan 2006 B2
7178720 Strubbe Feb 2007 B1
7181229 Singh et al. Feb 2007 B2
7257367 Etuk et al. Aug 2007 B2
7272633 Malik et al. Sep 2007 B2
7705726 Graves et al. Apr 2010 B2
7729945 Katz et al. Jun 2010 B1
7839891 Allan Nov 2010 B1
7869792 Zhou et al. Jan 2011 B1
7876704 Bims et al. Jan 2011 B1
7899438 Baker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925690 Smith et al. Apr 2011 B2
8010037 Bannwolf Aug 2011 B2
8024290 Yang et al. Sep 2011 B2
8095175 Todd et al. Jan 2012 B2
8095413 Beaven Jan 2012 B1
8107432 Seo Jan 2012 B2
8121879 Cohen Feb 2012 B1
8135392 Marcellino et al. Mar 2012 B2
8145240 Roumeliotis et al. Mar 2012 B2
8160560 Geyer et al. Apr 2012 B2
8175642 Shah May 2012 B2
8193982 Kupfer et al. Jun 2012 B2
8225413 De et al. Jul 2012 B1
8249627 Olincy et al. Aug 2012 B2
8270933 Riemer et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280438 Barbera Oct 2012 B2
8315905 Adair Nov 2012 B1
8351408 Daigle Jan 2013 B2
8384555 Rosen Feb 2013 B2
8401521 Bennett Mar 2013 B2
8412154 Leemet et al. Apr 2013 B1
8417268 Halferty et al. Apr 2013 B1
8428623 Roumeliotis et al. Apr 2013 B2
8527013 Guba et al. Sep 2013 B2
8594065 Polito et al. Nov 2013 B2
8620354 Beasley Dec 2013 B2
8621075 Luna Dec 2013 B2
8635708 Mahan Jan 2014 B2
8731530 Breed et al. May 2014 B1
8738688 Myers et al. May 2014 B2
8761821 Tibbitts et al. Jun 2014 B2
8849095 Hoofien Sep 2014 B2
8971927 Zhou et al. Mar 2015 B2
9019068 Varoglu Apr 2015 B2
9042872 Breed et al. May 2015 B1
9124703 Tadayon et al. Sep 2015 B2
20020012894 Becker Jan 2002 A1
20020116266 Marshall Aug 2002 A1
20020174180 Brown et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178046 Lawrence Nov 2002 A1
20030005306 Hunt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030064788 Walker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030082508 Barney May 2003 A1
20030211889 Walker et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030216138 Higuchi et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030216960 Postrel Nov 2003 A1
20040024569 Camillo Feb 2004 A1
20040030599 Sie Feb 2004 A1
20040039624 Ikezawa Feb 2004 A1
20040083472 Rao et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040166878 Erskine et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040186776 Llach Sep 2004 A1
20040214584 Marinier Oct 2004 A1
20040219493 Phillips Nov 2004 A1
20040267607 Maddux Dec 2004 A1
20050003895 Nara Jan 2005 A1
20050039206 Opdycke Feb 2005 A1
20050096009 Ackley May 2005 A1
20050282559 Erskine et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287502 Southard Dec 2005 A1
20060009234 Freer Jan 2006 A1
20060085419 Rosen Apr 2006 A1
20060085547 Cormier Apr 2006 A1
20060089878 Roberts et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060184792 Berlin Aug 2006 A1
20060270476 Denkewicz, Jr. Nov 2006 A1
20060276180 Henry Dec 2006 A1
20070039624 Roberts et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041545 Gainsboro Feb 2007 A1
20070088610 Chen Apr 2007 A1
20070100595 Earles et al. May 2007 A1
20070142068 Matsuo Jun 2007 A1
20070203872 Flinn et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208802 Barman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070263843 Foxenland Nov 2007 A1
20070282678 Dendi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080070588 Morin Mar 2008 A1
20080119207 Harris May 2008 A1
20080146211 Mikan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080146250 Aaron Jun 2008 A1
20080153511 Mock Jun 2008 A1
20080176585 Eldering Jul 2008 A1
20080183560 Kaplan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080199199 Kato et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201441 Bodic et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201469 Reasor et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080246605 Pfeffer et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080294589 Chu et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080299954 Wright et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090002147 Bloebaum et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090017750 Marcinkiewicz Jan 2009 A1
20090038005 Howarth Feb 2009 A1
20090055938 Samuel Feb 2009 A1
20090064316 Liao et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089876 Finamore et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090181356 Dasgupta Jul 2009 A1
20090203352 Fordon et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204471 Elenbaas et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090247124 De Atley et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248436 Takagi et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090251282 Fitzgerald et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271247 Karelin et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090286218 Johnson et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090298019 Rogan et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090325566 Bell et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100028844 Wiseman Feb 2010 A1
20100037088 Krivopaltsev et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042493 Nino et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100058446 Thwaites Mar 2010 A1
20100100398 Auker et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100618 Kuhlke et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106573 Gallagher et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100113013 Karabinis et al. May 2010 A1
20100116884 Alderucci May 2010 A1
20100125028 Heppert May 2010 A1
20100145976 Higgins et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100154024 Boxmeyer Jun 2010 A1
20100210254 Kelly et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211887 Woollcombe Aug 2010 A1
20100235223 Lyman Sep 2010 A1
20100240399 Roumeliotis et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241496 Gupta et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250352 Moore Sep 2010 A1
20100268768 Kurtenbach et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100285871 Shah Nov 2010 A1
20100317420 Hoffberg Dec 2010 A1
20100330543 Black et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100330972 Angiolillo Dec 2010 A1
20110029598 Arnold et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040586 Murray et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110045868 Sheha et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047078 Ginter et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110055546 Klassen et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110070567 Linton Mar 2011 A1
20110092159 Park et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093161 Zhou et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110117878 Barash et al. May 2011 A1
20110124399 Dutilly et al. May 2011 A1
20110151830 Blanda et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110231280 Farah Sep 2011 A1
20110236872 Taylor Sep 2011 A1
20110244825 Ewell Oct 2011 A1
20110244837 Murata et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252375 Chaudhri Oct 2011 A1
20110275321 Zhou et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110294520 Zhou et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110296014 Cancel et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302003 Shirish et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302024 Gunawardana et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110307434 Rostampour et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320259 Roumeliotis et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120001548 Recker et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120036220 Dare et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120040761 Auterio et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120058744 Felt et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066088 Murset Mar 2012 A1
20120069131 Abelow Mar 2012 A1
20120081500 Border et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120083287 Casto et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120084349 Lee et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120110071 Zhou et al. May 2012 A1
20120131161 Ferris et al. May 2012 A1
20120142379 Park Jun 2012 A1
20120151384 Stass Jun 2012 A1
20120166285 Shapiro et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120171990 Williams et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120172100 Colar Jul 2012 A1
20120179767 Clarke et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120188163 Xiao Jul 2012 A1
20120192016 Gotesdyner et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120195295 Elmaleh Aug 2012 A1
20120214472 Tadayon et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215328 Schmelzer Aug 2012 A1
20120215617 Shah et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120223861 Kupfer et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120226704 Boland et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120244883 Tibbits et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120253918 Marois et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120254949 Mikkonen et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120258740 Mildh et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120260118 Jiang et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271908 Luna et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120280916 Xia et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120315880 Peitrow et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323990 Hayworth Dec 2012 A1
20120330702 Kowalski et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130040629 Sprigg et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130047229 Hoefel Feb 2013 A1
20130054674 Myers et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130082878 Jarvis et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130084847 Tibbitts et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130091453 Kotler et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130104246 Bear et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130111462 Umansky et al. May 2013 A1
20130111510 Baker et al. May 2013 A1
20130143512 Hernandez et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130143521 Hernandez et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130143528 Randazzo et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130145007 Randazzo et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130185411 Martin Jul 2013 A1
20130198272 Shionoya et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130198296 Roy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130217331 Manente Aug 2013 A1
20130217363 Myers Aug 2013 A1
20130303106 Martin Nov 2013 A1
20130316746 Miller et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130332886 Cranfill et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130339345 Soto et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130346333 Hassler et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140108649 Barton et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140148192 Hodges et al. May 2014 A1
20140180438 Hodges et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140310327 Yip et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140310365 Sample et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140310403 Weiss et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140338006 Grkov et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150040246 Yuen et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150163664 Martin Jun 2015 A1
20150188777 Frost Jul 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2863439 Jun 2005 FR
EP 1770969 Apr 2007 GB
WO 2011137279 Nov 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Kohavi, “Emerging Trends in Business Analytics”, Communications of the ACM, Aug. 2002, vol. 45, No. 8, pp. 45-48.
Office Action Dated Mar. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,323.
Advisory Action dated Feb. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,092.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,8388.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/688,142.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/723,119.
Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,302.
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,092.
Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,092.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130305384 A1 Nov 2013 US