The present invention relates to electronic devices. More specifically, the present, invention relates to a system for supporting electronic devices.
Gaming, movies, television shows, and friend information have become easier for children to access as more and more electronic media and electronic devices, both mobile and stationary, have allowed access to this content. Today's children spend a large amount of time engaged with television, personal computers, gaming consoles, portable gaming platforms, E-readers, the Internet, content providers such as Netflix™, cell phone voice and messaging communications, and mobile gaming.
Unfortunately for parents of these children, controlling access to electronic media has become very difficult. This is especially true for those parents that implement incentive based access to electronic media, e.g., allowing a child to play a gaming system, such as Wii® and Playstation® only when the child is doing well in school or has completed all of his/her chores.
Currently, the only ways parents are able to control access to electronic media and/or devices is by controlling their child's physical access to the electronic media or using a restricting password when the device allows it. These methods require the parent to monitor the child and the electronic device. Depending on the parent's availability, these methods require a lot of attention and time, resulting sometimes in non-implementation.
Therefore, there exists a need for an improved system and method for controlling access to electronic media and electronic devices.
A computer implemented method for controlling access to electronic media is disclosed. An access control system receives achievement goals and degree of access information. Assessment information is also received by the access control system from one or more input data sources. An access inquiry is received from the electronic media inquiring whether the electronic media is able to be accessed. The access control system then determines whether the achievement goals are met based on the received assessment information and forwards an access signal to the electronic media based on the access determination. The access signal, including a grant signal, is forwarded when the achievement goals are met. For those media for which there is no ability to control access, the access control system monitors overall usage, determines when all allotted media access has been used, and forwards an alert to a particular party indicating the allotted media access has been used.
A more detailed understanding of the disclosed system and method may be had from the following description, given by way of example and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Although the features and elements are described in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone (without the other feature or elements) or in various combinations with or without other features and elements.
A system and computer-implemented method are disclosed for controlling access to electronic devices and/or electronic media, for example, mobile phones, gaming systems, computers, social media, and Netflix™ online movie service or other content provider. In accordance with this disclosure, one or more electronic devices and/or media will be identified as an electronic media source(s).
The goal setting source 140 may define, for example, behavioral, academic, or activity goals that a child must meet in order to have access to the electronic media sources 130. For example, a goal setting source 140, such as a parent, may list the daily or weekly chores that a child must complete before being allowed to play a game or watch television (e.g., wash dishes, take out garbage, feed the dog, finish mowing the lawn by Saturday); activity goals that a child must accomplish in order to play the game (e.g., arrive at school on time, no texting during class); and/or academic goals, daily, weekly or per semester, that must be achieved in order to access the electronic media source (e.g., scoring a B in math class, maintaining an A average across all subjects, making Honor Roll, completing a biology report by the end of the week). Although exemplary achievement goals have been identified above, it should be noted that the types, length, and number of goals may be defined by the goal setting source 140, and are not limited by the disclosed access control system 100. Also, although the term “child” is used to represent the user of the electronic media source 130 for which access is controlled, any person of any age may have his/her access to the electronic media source 130 controlled in accordance with the disclosed system and method.
The access control system 100 then registers one or more input data sources 120. The input data sources 120 are preferably identified by a goal setting source 140. The input data source 120 forwards assessment information to the access control system 100 via the system interface 105 to enable the system 100 to track the child's progress relating to the achievement goal(s). An example data input source 120 may be an automated online grade reporting system, such as Schoolloop.com™ or PowerSchool™, which provide via the internet a daily or weekly record of a child's grades and academic assessments.
Another example of a input data source 120 may be a mobile phone that provides location based information, which can be used to track whether a child is where he/she is supposed to be by a certain time. Although exemplary input data sources have been provided, there are numerous other sources that may be used, for example, a teacher, counselor, parent, or an electronic media source 130.
The access control system 100 also receives from a goal setting source 140 degree of access information that defines the degree of access that the child may have to the electronic media source 130 when the achievement goal(s) are met. Example degree of access information may include time limitations on access to an electronic media source 130, e.g., 1 hour per day, limitations on the types of electronic media source 130, including categorical media limitations, e.g., 1 hour per week of World of Warcraft™ online role-playing game, no mature game titles, no thriller movies, and/or no access to certain themed games.
Time limitations may also be included in the received degree of access information. The time limitations may include limitations, such as, daily or weekly time limits for accessing the electronic media source 130, duration time limits (e.g., limitation of 2 hours of electronic access, with at least 1 hour of some other activity interspersed), and specific day limitations (e.g., access granted only on Saturday or Sunday). The disclosed access control system 100 provides a goal setting source 140 with the ability to incentivize the use of electronic media, and also limit the types of media to which the child is exposed and the time of access.
Once the access control system 100 has received and stored the degree of access information, the goals are then mapped to the degree of access information by the access inquiry processor 101. Depending on the achievement goal and the degree of access information, the access inquiry processor 101 may perform a first order or a second order mapping. A first order mapping may directly link each behavioral/academic goal to a fixed degree of access to electronic media. For example, if a child completes his/her daily chores for the week, then the access control system 100 allows access to the electronic media for one (1) hour on Saturday and Sunday, in another example, the child may be allowed to access the electronic media for one (1) hour of World of Warcraft™ each day for a B grade in Math class.
A second order mapping may link a group of achievement goals to a fixed degree of electronic access. An example of a second order mapping may include allowing the child to watch 3 hours of TV on Saturday when the child has achieved an A grade in Math class and a B grade in English class.
As the access control system 100 receives the assessment information from the input data source(s) 120 through the system interface 105, the aggregation database 102 aggregates the assessment information for each of the achievement goals to then be used by the access inquiry processor 101.
In accordance with the disclosed system, the electronic media sources 130 preferably each have a means of communicating with the system interface 105. For example, an electronic media source 130 can include a mobile phone including an application (“app”), or a gaming system having a program installed, specifically programmed to interface with the access control system's system interface 105. Preferably, an installed program on the electronic media source 130 requires the child to log onto the electronic media source 130 in order for it to operate. If an electronic media source 130 has no means of initiating communication with the access control system 100 through system interface 105, then the access control system 100 determines the state of electronic media source 130 through periodic requests (polling) for the state of the electronic media source 130. The state of the electronic media source 130 can include an indication of whether the child is logged onto the electronic media source 130, whether the electronic media source 130 is operating or network accessible, or other information related to the operation of the electronic media source 130.
Once the user (e.g., child) has logged onto the electronic media source 130, an access inquiry requesting an indication as to whether the child is able to use the electronic media source 130, is preferably forwarded by the electronic media source 130 to the access control system 100 via the interface system 105.
Alternatively, when there is no explicit mechanism for the user (e.g., child) to log into the electronic media source, other mechanisms can be employed to link the user to usage of a particular electronic media source. Such usage can be determined heuristically. For example, if it is known via received information related to electronic media source use that the user is the only member of the household to play World of Warcraft™, and World of Warcraft™ is engaged, the access control system 100 can determine that the user (e.g., child) is the principal engaged with World of Warcraft™. When it is not possible to heuristically deduce the user of an electronic media source, a query can be directed to a parent or other party with oversight responsibility toward the user asking for a determination of whether the user is engaged with a detected electronic media source.
Once the access control system 100 receives the access inquiry from the electronic media source 130, or the access control system 100 has determined the state of the electronic media source 130 through polling, the access inquiry processor 101 determines the degree of access allowed for the user using the aggregated assessment information from the aggregation database 102 and the first, second or higher order mapping. The access inquiry processor 101 compares the aggregated assessment information to the mapped goals to determine whether the user is able to access the electronic media source 130 and any corresponding access restrictions. Further, the amount of time the child has already accessed the electronic media source 130 is factored into this determination: in particular, it is determined whether the child has any allotted time left to access this particular electronic media source 130. Upon making this determination, the access inquiry processor 101 generates an access signal which is provided to the electronic media source 130 if the electronic media source 130 can receive control signals, which access signal can include a grant or deny signal, which grant signal may include access limits.
If it is determined that the child is allowed to access the electronic media source 130 at the time of the inquiry, the access control system 100 forwards to the electronic media source 130 the access signal, including a grant signal if such a grant signal exists for the electronic media source 130.
If it is determined that the child is not able to access the electronic media source 130 based on the access inquiry processor's 101 determination, the access control system 100 forwards the access signal, including a deny signal, preventing the child from using the electronic media source at that time. If the electronic media source 130 does not have a mechanism to constrain usage, an alert will be sent by the access control system 100 to the parent or other party with oversight responsibility toward the user, for example via the goal setting source 140, indicating that the user is attempting to engage with an electronic media for which the user should no longer have access. The access control system 100 can further send request to the parent or other party, for example via the goal setting source 140, to identify the user when the identity of the user attempting to use the electronic media source 130 is not clear or unknown.
A flow diagram of the disclosed computer implemented method 200 of controlling access to electronic media source is illustrated in
The access control system is then linked to one or more input data sources that provide assessment information used by the access control system in determining the degree of access for the user (Step 203). Assessment information is then received and aggregated by the access control system from the linked input data sources (Step 204).
When the user (e.g., a child) attempts to use the electronic media source, and the electronic: media source is capable of initiating an access inquiry to the access control system, the access control system receives an access inquiry from the electronic media source (Step 205). Alternatively, if the media source is not capable of initiating an access inquiry to the access control system, the access control system periodically initiates a request (polls) for the state of the electronic media source. If the electronic media source can identify the user, the access inquiry provided to the access control system preferably includes the identity of the user. If the electronic media source cannot identify the user, and can initiate an access inquiry to the access control system, the electronic media source forwards the access inquiry with an indication, of use and type of use to the access control system. The access control system will attempt to deduce the identity of the user, preferably through heuristic analysis, based on prior knowledge of the electronic media usage (Step 206). If heuristic analysis is unable to determine the identity of the user, an inquiry is sent to the overseer, e.g., parent, indicating the electronic media source being engaged and the specific content being accessed, and the access control system will ask the overseer to establish the identity of the user of the electronic media source (step 207). The access control system, using the aggregated assessment information, determines whether the identified user is able to access the electronic media source based on the achievement goals and the degree of access information, which degree of access information can include for example a title or description of accessible content (Step 208). Based on a determined access level, if the electronic media source accepts communication from the access control system, the access control system forwards an access signal to the electronic media source. If the determined access level allows the child to access the electronic media source, the access signal includes a grant signal and any limits to the child's access (Step 209). If the electronic media source does not support access prevention, that is does not have a mechanism to constrain usage, notification is provided to the overseer (Step 211). If the user is not able to be identified, a grant signal can be forwarded to the electronic media source (Step 209), or alternatively where the electronic media source does not support access prevention, notification can be provided to the overseer (Step 211).
The access control system determines the time duration in which the user (e.g., child) engages with the particular electronic media source. The access control system periodically receives an access inquiry from the electronic media source inquiring whether the child is able to continue to access the electronic media source and/or a given title supported thereby (Step 205). If the electronic media source is not capable of initiating an access inquiry to the access control system, the access control system will periodically request state from the electronic media source, to determine if the user is still engaged with the electronic media source.
If the determined access level does not allow the child to access the electronic media, the access signal includes a deny signal (Step 210), thereby preventing the child from accessing the electronic media source. If the electronic media source does not support the ability to prevent access, an alert is sent to the overseer notifying the overseer of the user not having access or having exhausted access to the electronic media source (Step 211), whereby an overseeing user can take action such as physically preventing the user's access to the electronic media source. For example, a parent can repossess their child's smart phone.
An access control system according to the invention may store tracking information relating to the child's usage of the electronic media. Another example access control system 300 in accordance with the invention is illustrated in
The access control system 300 comprises an access inquiry processor 301, an aggregation database 302, a goal database 303, and a usage database 304. The access control system 300 operates similarly to the access control system 100 disclosed above. The usage database 304, coupled to the access inquiry processor 301, collects usage data related to the user. For example, the usage database 304 can store the amount of time a game was played on an electronic media source 330, and time of usage of an electronic media source 330. Upon request by a goal setting source 340, e.g., a parent, the access control system 300 may provide this stored information to the goal setting source 340 via the system interface 305.
Although the systems and computer implemented method of controlling access to electronic media have been disclosed by means of specific example, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the system and method set forth in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3778809 | Hawes | Dec 1973 | A |
4956825 | Wilts et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5434562 | Reardon | Jul 1995 | A |
5673691 | Abrams | Oct 1997 | A |
5882258 | Kelly et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907831 | Lotvin | May 1999 | A |
5973683 | Cragun et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6011973 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023692 | Nichols | Feb 2000 | A |
6161008 | Lee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6437696 | Lemelson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6529724 | Khazaka et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6690940 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701234 | Vogelsang | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731746 | Usami | May 2004 | B1 |
6782266 | Baer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6834195 | Brandenberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6873850 | Dowling et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6895238 | Newell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6961562 | Ross | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6985696 | Bromham et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7178720 | Strubbe | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181229 | Singh et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7257367 | Etuk et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272633 | Malik et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7705726 | Graves et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7729945 | Katz et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7839891 | Allan | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7869792 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7876704 | Bims et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7899438 | Baker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925690 | Smith et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8010037 | Bannwolf | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8024290 | Yang et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8095175 | Todd et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095413 | Beaven | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8107432 | Seo | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121879 | Cohen | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8135392 | Marcellino et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145240 | Roumeliotis et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160560 | Geyer et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175642 | Shah | May 2012 | B2 |
8193982 | Kupfer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8225413 | De et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8249627 | Olincy et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8270933 | Riemer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280438 | Barbera | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8315905 | Adair | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8351408 | Daigle | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8384555 | Rosen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8401521 | Bennett | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412154 | Leemet et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8417268 | Halferty et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8428623 | Roumeliotis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8527013 | Guba et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8594065 | Polito et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8620354 | Beasley | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621075 | Luna | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8635708 | Mahan | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8731530 | Breed et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8738688 | Myers et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8761821 | Tibbitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8849095 | Hoofien | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8971927 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9019068 | Varoglu | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9042872 | Breed et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9124703 | Tadayon et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020012894 | Becker | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020116266 | Marshall | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174180 | Brown et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178046 | Lawrence | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005306 | Hunt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030064788 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082508 | Barney | May 2003 | A1 |
20030211889 | Walker et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216138 | Higuchi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216960 | Postrel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040024569 | Camillo | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030599 | Sie | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039624 | Ikezawa | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040083472 | Rao et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040166878 | Erskine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186776 | Llach | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040214584 | Marinier | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219493 | Phillips | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267607 | Maddux | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003895 | Nara | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050039206 | Opdycke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050096009 | Ackley | May 2005 | A1 |
20050282559 | Erskine et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287502 | Southard | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009234 | Freer | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060085419 | Rosen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085547 | Cormier | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089878 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060184792 | Berlin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060270476 | Denkewicz, Jr. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276180 | Henry | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070039624 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041545 | Gainsboro | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070088610 | Chen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100595 | Earles et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142068 | Matsuo | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203872 | Flinn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208802 | Barman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070263843 | Foxenland | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282678 | Dendi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080070588 | Morin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080119207 | Harris | May 2008 | A1 |
20080146211 | Mikan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146250 | Aaron | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080153511 | Mock | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080176585 | Eldering | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183560 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199199 | Kato et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201441 | Bodic et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201469 | Reasor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080246605 | Pfeffer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294589 | Chu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299954 | Wright et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002147 | Bloebaum et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017750 | Marcinkiewicz | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090038005 | Howarth | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055938 | Samuel | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064316 | Liao et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089876 | Finamore et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090181356 | Dasgupta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090203352 | Fordon et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204471 | Elenbaas et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090247124 | De Atley et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248436 | Takagi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251282 | Fitzgerald et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271247 | Karelin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286218 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090298019 | Rogan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325566 | Bell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100028844 | Wiseman | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037088 | Krivopaltsev et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042493 | Nino et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058446 | Thwaites | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100398 | Auker et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100618 | Kuhlke et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106573 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113013 | Karabinis et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116884 | Alderucci | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125028 | Heppert | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145976 | Higgins et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154024 | Boxmeyer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100210254 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211887 | Woollcombe | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235223 | Lyman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100240399 | Roumeliotis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241496 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250352 | Moore | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268768 | Kurtenbach et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100285871 | Shah | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317420 | Hoffberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330543 | Black et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330972 | Angiolillo | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029598 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040586 | Murray et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110045868 | Sheha et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047078 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055546 | Klassen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070567 | Linton | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110092159 | Park et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093161 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110117878 | Barash et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124399 | Dutilly et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110151830 | Blanda et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110231280 | Farah | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110236872 | Taylor | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244825 | Ewell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110244837 | Murata et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252375 | Chaudhri | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275321 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110294520 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296014 | Cancel et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302003 | Shirish et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302024 | Gunawardana et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307434 | Rostampour et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320259 | Roumeliotis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001548 | Recker et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036220 | Dare et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040761 | Auterio et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120058744 | Felt et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066088 | Murset | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069131 | Abelow | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081500 | Border et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120083287 | Casto et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120084349 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110071 | Zhou et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131161 | Ferris et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120142379 | Park | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151384 | Stass | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166285 | Shapiro et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120171990 | Williams et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120172100 | Colar | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179767 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188163 | Xiao | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192016 | Gotesdyner et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120195295 | Elmaleh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214472 | Tadayon et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215328 | Schmelzer | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215617 | Shah et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223861 | Kupfer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226704 | Boland et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244883 | Tibbits et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253918 | Marois et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254949 | Mikkonen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120258740 | Mildh et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260118 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271908 | Luna et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280916 | Xia et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120315880 | Peitrow et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323990 | Hayworth | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330702 | Kowalski et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130040629 | Sprigg et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047229 | Hoefel | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054674 | Myers et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130082878 | Jarvis et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130084847 | Tibbitts et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091453 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104246 | Bear et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130111462 | Umansky et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130111510 | Baker et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130143512 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130143521 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130143528 | Randazzo et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145007 | Randazzo et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185411 | Martin | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198272 | Shionoya et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198296 | Roy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217331 | Manente | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217363 | Myers | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130303106 | Martin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316746 | Miller et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332886 | Cranfill et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339345 | Soto et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346333 | Hassler et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140108649 | Barton et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140148192 | Hodges et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180438 | Hodges et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140310327 | Yip et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310365 | Sample et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310403 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140338006 | Grkov et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150040246 | Yuen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150163664 | Martin | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188777 | Frost | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2863439 | Jun 2005 | FR |
EP 1770969 | Apr 2007 | GB |
WO 2011137279 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kohavi, “Emerging Trends in Business Analytics”, Communications of the ACM, Aug. 2002, vol. 45, No. 8, pp. 45-48. |
Office Action Dated Mar. 20, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,323. |
Advisory Action dated Feb. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,092. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/089,8388. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/688,142. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/723,119. |
Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,302. |
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,092. |
Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,092. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130305384 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |