This disclosure relates generally to printheads for inkjet printers, and more particularly, to systems and methods for the control of the size and location of air bubbles that form in a liquid path for ink in a printhead.
Air bubbles in ink flow paths of inkjet printers can impact the performance of the printers. In printers that use solid ink, air bubbles are formed during the freezing and melting of the solidified ink. Typically, when a solid inkjet printer is not operating, melted ink in the ink flow paths solidifies.
In
In the print head 500, the membrane 560 is an electrostatically actuated diaphragm, in which the membrane 560 is controlled by an electrode 562. The membrane 560 can be made from a structural material such as, for example, polysilicon, as is typically used in a surface micromachining process. An air vent 564 between membrane 560 and wafer 530 can be formed using typical techniques, such as by surface micromachining. The electrode 562 acts as a counterelectrode and is typically either a metal or a doped semiconductor material, such as polysilicon. Alternative inkjet embodiments include a piezoelectric actuator or a thermal actuator.
During operation of an electrostatic or piezoelectric actuator, the electrode 562 receives an electrical signal and the membrane 564 deflects into the pressure chamber 565. The deformation generates pressure on the ink in the pressure chamber 565 and the pressure urges an ink drop, such as the ink drop 582, through the nozzle 570. In some configurations, the membrane 560 deflects toward the electrode 562 prior to deflection into the pressure chamber 565 to draw ink into the pressure chamber 565 for ejection through the nozzle 570. In a thermal inkjet, the electrical signal generates heat in the pressure chamber and the heat produces an air bubble that urges ink in the pressure chamber 565 through the nozzle 570 to eject an ink drop in a similar manner to the arrangement of
The purge vents 590 in the nozzle plate 550 have diameters that are typically smaller than the diameter of the nozzle 570, and are sufficiently narrow to prevent ink from passing through the nozzle plate 550 at a location other than the nozzle 570 during operation of the printhead 500. During operation, a meniscus of liquid ink forms across the opening to each of the purge vents 590 from the nozzle plate 550 to the pressure chamber 565. The strength of the meniscus enables ink to remain in the pressure chamber 565 and to be ejected through the nozzle 570 without being ejected or otherwise leaking through the purge vents 590. In one embodiment, each of the purge vents 590 is formed with a diameter of approximately 3 to 5 microns. In comparison, the diameter of the nozzle 570 is approximately 27.5 microns in the embodiment of
In the prior art embodiment, the vents 590 enable air bubbles to escape from liquid ink in the fluid path 540 and pressure chamber 565. Some air bubble, however, may be formed in portions of the printhead where the air bubbles are unable to be vented easily. For example, in the printhead 500 an air bubble that forms near the nozzle 570 does not escape through the vents 590, but instead escapes through the nozzle 570 where the air bubble disrupts the process of ejecting ink drops. Additionally, while small air bubbles that form near the vents 590 can escape from the printhead 500, larger air bubbles formed within the channel 540 and the pressure chamber 565 can interrupt the flow of ink to the pressure chamber 565 for a longer period of time before escaping from the printhead 500. What is needed is a printhead design that mitigates the formation of air bubbles in locations that are difficult to purge, and mitigates the formation of large air bubbles.
An inkjet printhead has been developed that facilitates the removal of air bubbles from ink flow paths in a printhead and helps reduce the size of air bubbles formed in the ink flow paths. The inkjet printhead includes a member having a channel through the member with a first opening and a second opening to enable melted ink to enter the channel at the first opening and flow through the channel to the second opening, and at least one protrusion extending from the member to position a portion of the protrusion into melted ink in the channel to form a dominant stress concentration in the melted ink.
A method of making an inkjet printhead has been developed that facilitates the removal of air bubbles from ink flow paths in a printhead and helps reduce the size of air bubbles formed in the ink flow paths. The method includes providing a vent in a member having a channel with a first opening and a second opening to enable melted ink to enter the channel at the first opening and flow through the channel to the second opening, and providing at least one protrusion extending from the member into the channel to position a portion of the protrusion into melted ink in the channel to establish a dominant stress concentration in the melted ink for forming air bubbles at a predetermined location in the channel.
The inkjet printhead and method can be used in an inkjet printer to facilitate the removal of air bubbles from ink flow paths in a printhead and help reduce the size of air bubbles formed in the ink flow paths. The inkjet printer includes a printhead having a body, a reservoir, a channel within the printhead body that is fluidly connected to the reservoir, the channel having a first opening and a second opening to enable melted ink to enter the channel at the first opening and flow through the channel to the second opening, and at least one protrusion extending from the printhead body into the channel to position a portion of the protrusion into melted ink in the channel to enable air bubble formation at the protrusion.
Protrusions can be arranged in a printhead flow path to mitigate the formation of large air bubbles that are difficult to remove.
In addition to controlling the size of air bubble formation, protrusions can also be strategically arranged to control the location of air bubble formation.
The protrusions disclosed in this document can be used to mitigate the size of air bubbles formed during a solidifying/melting cycle as well as to control the locations where air bubbles are formed. By applying these concepts to different printhead geometries, printhead designers can establish predictability in the size and locations of air bubble formation. This predictability can be exploited to optimize the size, quantity, and locations of purge vents. An efficient purge vent layout in which air bubbles are properly staged near purge vents and extraneous purge vents are removed, results in a reduction of the amount of ink lost during purges and overall ink costs. Furthermore, the predictability allows printhead geometries to be scaled without substantially altering air bubble purging strategies.
These concepts are of even greater use for complex printhead geometries that can accommodate purge vents in fewer locations than simple geometry printheads. Protrusions can be arranged to control air bubble formation in such a way as to promote the formation of air bubbles in preferable areas, such as those were purge vents can be accommodated, while mitigating the formation of air bubbles in undesirable locations, such as those that will not accommodate a purge vent.
The geometries of the printhead channels shown in
It will be appreciated that variants of the above-disclosed and other features, and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art, which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4998120 | Koto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5041844 | Deshpande | Aug 1991 | A |
5621444 | Beeson | Apr 1997 | A |
5870126 | Kondo et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6007193 | Kashimura et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6276790 | Ikezaki | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7121658 | Platt et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144100 | Hill et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7600850 | Blackburn et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7682008 | Platt et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7762656 | Snyder | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8393715 | Silverbrook | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20070120895 | Padgett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080122913 | Jones | May 2008 | A1 |
20100194835 | Jones | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110298870 | Casella et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120200620 | Limb | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150070448 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |