Patent Grant
7998534
The present disclosure generally relates to multi-layer webs and controlling curl in multi-layer webs, particularly, multi-layer webs in which at least one layer comprises a cured coating.
Some multi-layer webs have a tendency to curl. Curl can be defined as the tendency of a web (or multi-layer web) to deviate from a generally flat or planar orientation when there are no external forces on the web. Curled webs can be viewed as a defective product and can be more difficult to handle in downstream web handling or manufacturing processes than flat webs. For example, processes such as laminating, inspecting, and converting can be more challenging with a curled web than with a flat web. In addition, some multi-layer webs that are formed of a coating applied to an underlying web are used in applications in which the non-coated side of the multi-layer web is coupled to another object such that the coated side of the multi-layer web faces outwardly. Such multi-layer webs tend to curl toward the coated side, which can cause problems with delamination. In such applications, flat multi-layer webs, or webs that tend to curl to the non-coated side may be easier to apply, and may result in better adhesion, less delamination, and longer product lives. In other applications, a particular amount and orientation of curvature is necessary.
As a result, web handling processes and systems that produce a multi-layer web having a desired curvature may reduce the problems described above and improve product quality and reduce manufacturing waste.
An aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a method for reducing strain-induced curl in a multi-layer web. The method can include providing a web of indeterminate length, and applying a coating to the web, the coating being characterized by at least partially shrinking when cured. The method can further include curing the coating to form a multi-layer web, the multi-layer web including a curl induced by curing the coating. The method can further include bending the web prior to curing the coating to induce a pre-curl in the web. The pre-curl can be configured to substantially match and oppose the curl induced by curing.
An aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a method for reducing strain-induced curl in a multi-layer web. The method can include providing a web of indeterminate length, bending the web to induce a strain in the web, applying a coating to the web, and curing the coating to form a multi-layer web, the coating being characterized by at least partially shrinking when cured such that curing the coating induces a curl in the multi-layer web. Bending the web can occur prior to curing the coating, and the strain induced by bending can substantially cancel the curl induced by curing.
An aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a method for producing a multi-layer web having a desired curvature. The method can include providing a web of indeterminate length, bending the web to induce a pre-curl in the web, applying a coating to the web, and curing the coating to form a multi-layer web, the coating being characterized by at least partially shrinking when cured such that curing the coating induces a curl in the multi-layer web. Bending the web can occur prior to curing the coating, and the pre-curl can be configured to at least partially counteract the curl induced by curing to form a multi-layer web having a desired curvature.
An aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a web handling system for producing a multi-layer web having a desired curvature. The web handling system can include a curing section configured to cure a coating applied to a web of indeterminate length to form a multi-layer web. The web handling system can further include a web bending section configured to bend the web to induce a strain in the web. The web bending section can be positioned upstream of the curing section such that the web is bent prior to the coating being cured.
Other features and aspects of the disclosure will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the disclosure are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms “coupled” and “applied to,” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect couplings and applications. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Furthermore, terms such as “front,” “rear,” “top,” “bottom,” “upper,” “lower,” “outer,” “inner,” “side,” and the like are only used to describe elements as they relate to one another, but are in no way meant to recite specific orientations of the apparatus, to indicate or imply necessary or required orientations of the apparatus, or to specify how the embodiments described herein will be used, mounted, displayed, or positioned in use.
The present disclosure generally relates to multi-layer webs and controlling curl in multi-layer webs. In some multi-layer webs, at least one of the layers comprises a cured coating. For example, some multi-layer webs are formed by applying a coating to an underlying web and then curing and/or drying the coating. Many coatings have a tendency to shrink upon drying and curing, while the underlying web remains substantially the same size, which can cause the resulting multi-layer web to curl toward the coated side. This phenomenon is illustrated in
As shown in
Some approaches that have been used to try to control curl in multi-layer webs include (1) reformulating the coating chemistry to reduce shrinkage, (2) under-curing the coating to reduce shrinkage (3) increasing machine direction line tensions, (4) post-cure processes such as shrinking the web, and (5) increasing the thickness of the underlying web to increase the web's resistance to curling. Option 1 generally results in an undesirable compromise between coating functionality and shrinkage, e.g., a hardcoating that is not very hard. Option 2 generally results in a coating of lower strength that is less durable, less hard, and/or less tough. In addition, because at least a portion of the coating is under-cured, it can include unreacted monomers, which can cause undesirable downstream reactions that may affect product quality. Option 3 is not always successful because increasing machine directional tension creates an increased cross-machine directional compression due to the Poisson effect, which can exacerbate cross-machine directional curl. Option 4 can be limited by the type of web used and the amount of shrinkage that is available with a given web. Option 5 can limit the types of webs that can be used and can be a limiting factor in new product design. In addition, thicker webs increase cost and are not always the most desirable for a given application or product.
On the contrary, methods of the present disclosure can be used to control the curl of the resulting multi-layer web such that the resulting multi-layer web has a desired curvature, or is substantially flat. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the multi-layer web has a curvature of less than about 10.0 m−1, particularly, less than about 5.0 m−1, and more particularly, less than about 2.0 m−1. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the multi-layer web has a curvature less than about 1.0 m−1, particularly, less than about 0.5 m−1, and more particularly, less than about 0.1 m−1. In other words, in some embodiments, the multi-layer web has a radius of curvature greater than about 0.1 m, particularly, greater than about 0.2 m, and more particularly, greater than about 0.5 m. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the multi-layer web has a radius of curvature of greater than about 1 m, particularly, greater than about 2 m, and more particularly, greater than about 10 m.
By producing a multi-layer web that is substantially flat, the strains between adjacent layers are better matched such that minimal stresses are exerted on the layers when used in an application requiring a substantially flat web. As a result, multi-layer webs of the present disclosure are generally less susceptible to cracking and have longer products lives. In addition, by controlling the curl of the multi-layer web without necessarily increasing the thickness of the underlying web, a multi-layer web of a desired thickness can be formed. For example, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the multi-layer web has a thickness of less than about 500 μm, particularly, less than about 300 μm, and more particularly, less than about 200 μm. In some embodiments, the multi-layer web has a thickness of less than about 125 μm, particularly, less than about 25 μm, and more particularly, less than about 14 μm.
Co-owned U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0212173 and 2005/0246965, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe removing curl in coated webs by flexing or reverse flexing the coated web after the coating has been cured. However, some coatings become brittle after being cured. Exposing such a coating to bending processes after curing can cause the coating to crack and craze, rather than yield, which can lead to poor product quality and lifespan. As a result, flexing the multi-layer web after the coating has been cured is not necessarily preferred for some coatings and multi-layer webs.
The present disclosure can be applied to a variety of webs and coatings. Examples of webs that can be used include, but are not limited to, webs formed of polymers, composite materials, wood pulp (e.g., paper), and combinations thereof. Polymeric webs can be formed of homopolymers or copolymers and can include, but are not limited to, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polycarbonate (PC), polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), etc.), and combinations thereof. Coatings can be formed of a variety of materials, including polymers, composite materials, and combinations thereof. Examples of polymer coatings include, but are not limited to, acrylate or epoxy coatings (e.g., acrylate or epoxy hardcoats). Examples of composite coatings include, but are not limited to, coatings that include particles or fibers (e.g., colloidal or fibrous metal or metal oxide particles).
Furthermore, a variety of curing processes suitable for curing a coating can be used, depending on the type of coating used. Examples of curing processes can include, but are not limited to, at least one of actinic radiation, UV radiation, visible-light radiation, electron beam radiation, X-ray radiation, IR radiation, heat, and combinations thereof.
The multi-layer webs of the present disclosure can be used in a variety of applications. For example, the multi-layer webs can include light-redirecting films (e.g., brightness enhancement films (e.g., prismatic-structured films), turning films, and diffusing films), multi-layer optical films, polarization films, barrier films, protective films, and combinations thereof, all of which can be used in electronic displays (e.g., liquid crystal displays (LCDs), monitors, touch screens, personal digital assistants (PDAs), cellular telephones, etc.). Particularly, in some embodiments, the multi-layer web includes a light-redirecting film having a thickness of less than about 300 μm and a curvature of less than about 0.1 m−1. Additional examples of applications in which multi-layer webs of the present disclosure can be used include traffic control film applications, graphic film applications, other protective or barrier film application (e.g., applications in the architectural and/or transportation industries), and combinations thereof.
The first and second web handling processes 100, 200 shown in
The multi-layer webs 114, 214 are illustrated in
However, it should be understood that the strain induced in the web 101, 201 by the web bending process 102, 202 can be controlled to at least partially counteract the strain induced by curing the coating 110, 210. That is, it should be understood that the strain induced in the web 101, 201 by the web bending process 102, 202 can match, reduce or reverse the strain that will be induced by the curing process 112, 212. For example, in some applications, a very slight curl in the multi-layer web 114, 214 may be desirable, such that the curl induced by curing the coating 110, 210 needs to be reduced but not cancelled. In some applications, a multi-layer web 114, 214 that curls in the direction opposite the coating 110, 210 may be desirable (e.g., a multi-layer web 114 that at least partially maintains the curl illustrated in the coated web 108 in
The web bending process 102, 202 causes tensile strains on one side of the web 101, 201 and compressive strains on the opposite side of the web 101, 201. A neutral axis exists between the two sides of the web 101, 201 where the strains are zero. As shown in
To match, reduce or reverse the curl induced by the curing process 112, 212, the properties of the coating 110, 210 need to be well-understood so that the web bending process 102, 202 can be controlled to pre-strain the web 101, 201 in the appropriate manner to achieve the desired multi-layer web 114, 214. The amount of pre-curl that needs to be induced in the web 101, 201 during the web bending process 102, 202 increases as the desired multi-layer web 114, 214 goes from having a slight curl in the direction of the coating 110, 210, to being substantially flat, to being curled in the direction opposite the coating 110, 210.
As shown in
By way of further example, the multi-layer webs 114, 214 are illustrated as including two layers, the cured coating 110′, 210′ and the web 101, 201. However, it should be understood that the multi-layer web 114, 214 can include more than two layers, and subsequent or parallel processing can be employed to achieve such multi-layer webs. For example, the coating process 106, 206 can include additional coating steps such that additional coatings are applied to the web 101, 201 on top of the coating 110, 210 shown in
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the second web handling process 200 does not include the coating process 206, but rather the web is provided in the form of the coated web 208. For example, a supplier can supply the coated web 208, and the remainder of the second web handling process 200 can be used to achieve a multi-layer web 214 of desired curvature.
As shown in
The web handling system 400 illustrated in
In
The curing section 324, 424 can include a variety of devices and/or equipment to provide the desired type of curing for a given coating or combinations of coatings. For example, the curing section 324, 424 can include, but is not limited to, at least one of an X-ray tube, an electron beam source, a UV radiation source, a heater, and combinations thereof.
The web bending section 302, 402 can include a variety of web bending assemblies that employ a variety of web bending techniques, depending on the type of web(s) used, and the type of bending that is needed. Because bending the web induces a strain that matches, reduces or reverses the strain induced by curing a coating, the type of bending needed often depends on the type of coatings that are being used. Some coatings tend to shrink uni-directionally upon being cured and/or dried either because of the chemical make-up of the coating or because of an orientation introduced by the coating application process (e.g., some coatings include microreplicated structures from the coating application process that introduce an orientation in the machine direction or the cross-machine direction only). Some coatings, on the other hand, have a tendency to shrink in multiple directions. For example, some coatings have a tendency to shrink equally toward the center of the coating such that the coating shrinks equally in the machine direction and the cross-machine direction upon being cured. For coatings that tend to shrink uni-directionally, a uni-directional web bending process may be sufficient. However, for coatings that tend to shrink in multiple directions, a multi-directional web bending process may be necessary. The web bending section 302, 402 can include multiple web bending assemblies to achieve the desired amount of strain in the desired directions.
One example of a type of web bending that can be employed in the web bending section 320, 420 is generally referred to as reverse flexing. Reverse flexing can occur in the machine direction, the cross-machine direction, or both. Reverse flexing is described in co-owned U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0212173 and 2005/0246965.
Web bending assemblies employing reverse flexing can include first and second web moving assemblies having a gap therebetween. Web moving assemblies can include a variety of devices known in the art for moving a web (i.e., in the machine direction), including roller assemblies, belt assemblies, and combinations thereof. In reverse flexing, first and second web moving assemblies include rotating members (e.g., rolls/rollers, rolls/rollers upon which belts translate, or combinations thereof) that co-rotate, which means they have the same direction of rotation; or in the case of opposed belt assemblies, the opposed belt assemblies have opposite directions of linear travel. As a result of two rotating members being co-rotating, if portions of their respective rotating surfaces are placed in close proximity, the relative linear motion of the surfaces will be in opposite directions. For example, both first and second web moving assemblies could include rotating members that rotate together in a clockwise direction, and the surfaces in close proximity would have opposite directions of travel.
In some embodiments, the first and second web moving assemblies are of the same type; for example, both are roller assemblies or belt assemblies. Upon reading this disclosure, one having the knowledge and skill of one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other web moving assemblies could be used in place of roller or belt assemblies.
The first and second rollers 532, 542 co-rotate, which means they rotate in the same rotational direction A, A′ relative to a fixed axis F, F′ of each roller 532, 542. A web path W is formed through the system 500. The web path W includes a first portion W1 passing over the first roller 532, a second portion W2 passing into or through the gap G, and a third portion W3 passing over the second roller 542. The second portion W2 of the web path W is controlled such that the web 501 includes a radiused portion 545 in the gap G. By passing the web 501 through the second portion W2, the web 501 can be bent and a strain induced in the web 501 in the machine direction, that is, the direction in which the web 501 travels. The amount of strain induced in the web 501 is a function of one or more of the bend radius R of the radiused portion 545 and the thickness of the web 501. The radius R can be selected to impart a predetermined amount of strain on the web 501. The radius R can vary with time, as described in greater detail below.
By bending the web 501 to produce a strain in the web 501 (i.e., a tensile strain in the outer surface and a compressive strain in the inner surface) above its plastic deformation point, which is around 2% strain for many common web materials, a permanent strain can be imparted to the bent portion of the web 501. The web 501 can be bent by varying amounts to achieve the desired pre-curl. For example, the web 501 can be bent to achieve at least about a 2% strain in the web 501 (e.g., in the outer surface of the web 501), particularly, at least about a 5% strain, and more particularly, at least about a 7% strain. As is known in the art, the percentage of strain needed will be at least partially dependent on the rate of deformation of the web 501.
To bend the web 501, the web 501 is passed over the first and second co-rotating rollers 532, 542, and through the gap G. Typically, the web 501 is held against the rollers 532, 542 by holding means such as, for example, an electrostatic pinning wire 548 (as is illustrated in
Generally, the web 501 travels around the first roller 532 and is peeled off at point T in the vicinity of the gap G. The web 501 is then bent back on itself defining the radius R (at the radiused portion 545) and reattached at a point T′ on the second roller 542. In the embodiment illustrated in
The size of the radius R of the web 501 can be varied by controlling the size of the gap G and the distance that the web 501 extends into or through the gap G. In one exemplary embodiment, the web radius R can be controlled by using a sensor 560 to sense the position of the radiused portion 545 in the gap G (for a fixed gap dimension), since the curvature (i.e., radius R) of the radiused portion 545 will depend on at least the distance that the radiused portion 545 extends into the gap G, and the tangent points T, T′ at which the web 501 loses contact with the rollers 532, 542. Once the relationship of the web curvature of the radiused portion 545 is determined, a sensor 560 is used to measure the position of the radiused portion 545 of the web 501 while in the gap G. The sensor 560 can then send a signal to the control system 550, which can then adjust operation of the system to position the radiused portion 545 to obtain the desired curvature.
For example, if the sensor 560 detects that the radiused portion 545 has moved too far into the gap G, it can adjust the relative speed of the rollers to reposition the radiused portion 545 in the gap G. One way would be to increase the speed of the second roller 542 relative to the first roller 532, which would tend to move the radiused portion 545 towards the gap G. Alternatively, the speed of the first roller 532 could be decreased relative to the speed of the second roller 542 until the radiused portion 545 is repositioned as desired. Upon reading this disclosure, other means (e.g., a pacing roll and a follower roll) for properly positioning the radiused portion 545 of the web 501 in the gap G will become apparent to an artisan having ordinary knowledge and skill in the art.
In some embodiments, it may be desirable that the radiused portion 545 of the web 501 extend through the narrowest region between the first and second rollers 532, 542 (i.e., where the distance between the first and second rollers 532, 542 is equal to the gap G), as illustrated by web path W in
As shown in
As shown in
As long as the radiused portion 545 of the web 601 is located between the respective ends of the first and second belts 632, 642 forming the gap G, the curvature of the radiused portion 545 is only a function of the size of the gap G, since the tangents T2, T2′ at which the web 601 leaves the first belt 632 and rejoins the second belt 642 is constant between the ends of the first and second belts 632, 642, as long as the belts are substantially parallel along their respective flat portions. Thus, once the radiused portion 645 is formed while the system is operating, the system can be run without a sensor for detecting the position of the radiused portion 645 of the web 601 in the gap G. However, some drift can occur in the position of the radiused portion 645 of the web 601 in the gap G. Thus, a sensor can be used to detect the position of the radiused portion 645 to keep the radiused portion 645 positioned within the gap G. Such a sensor may, however, require less sensitivity than the sensor 560 used with the web bending assembly 500 illustrated in
The embodiments illustrated in
As shown in
The difference between the web transport assembly pairs 730, 740 and 830, 840 of
By orienting opposing belts with respect to one another, a strain can be induced in the web 701 in a cross-machine direction. By including two web bending assemblies 700, 800, the web 701 can be strained in a first cross-machine direction by the first web bending assembly 700 and strained in a second cross-machine direction by the second web bending assembly 700. In some embodiments, the first cross-machine direction is substantially opposite that of the second cross-machine direction, which can create a more isotropic stress distribution in the web 701. For simplicity and clarity, the following description refers only to the first web bending assembly 700, but it should be understood that the same description applies equally to the second web bending assembly 800.
At the first web bending assembly 700, the web 701 contacts the first belt 732 and travels into the gap between the first and second belts 732, 742 (e.g., see gap G in
Because the belts 732 and 742 are oriented substantially perpendicularly with respect to one another, the radiused portion 745 of the web 701 (and radiused portion 845 in the second web bending assembly 800) is oriented at an angle of about 45 degrees with respect to each of the belts 732, 742, and as a result, at a 45-degree angle with respect to the machine direction and the cross-machine direction. The angle of the radiused portion 745 induces a machine-directional and a cross-machine-directional strain in the web 701, and described below.
The web path created in the first web bending assembly 700 creates a tendency for the web 701 to creep or “walk” along the belt 732 in a direction perpendicular to the line of travel. To minimize the effect of creep, web edge sensors 760 can be used to the laterally position the web 701 exiting both web bending assemblies 700 and 800. Lateral control is accomplished by adjusting the relative speed of belts 732 and 742 on the first web bending assembly 700 and belts 832 and 842 on the second web bending assembly 800. Control system 750, based on feedback from the web edge sensors 760, independently can adjust relative belt speeds.
As shown in
Three web moving assemblies define the web bending assemblies 900 and 1000. Specifically, the first web bending assembly 900 includes a first web transport assembly 930 and a second web transport assembly 940, and the second web bending assembly 1000 includes the second web transport assembly 940 and a third web transport assembly 1040. Each web transport assembly 930, 940 and 1040 is substantially similar to one of the web moving assemblies 630, 640 shown in
Each pair of web moving assemblies (e.g., 930 and 940, or 940 and 1040) is oriented at an angle with respect to one another, such that the respective opposing belts (e.g., 932 and 942, or 942 and 1042) are oriented at an angle with respect to one another. In addition, each successive belt 932, 942, 1042 is oriented at an angle with respect to the belt directly upstream or downstream of it. Particularly, in the embodiment illustrated in
When entering the first web bending assembly 900, the web 901 contacts the first belt 932 and travels into a first gap G1 between the first and second belts 932, 942 where the web 901 is then flipped and turned about 90 degrees. The web 901 then contacts the second belt 942 and travels into a second gap G2 between the second and third belts 942, 1042, where the web 901 is flipped and turned about 90 degrees again. The web 901 then contacts the third belt 1042 and travels along the underside of the third belt 1042 to exit the second web bending assembly 1000.
As shown in
Thus, in the embodiment illustrated in
The web 901 is formed into a first radiused portion 945 in the first gap G1 and a second radiused portion 1045 in the second gap G2. The size of the radius controls the amount of strain induced in the web 901. Because the first and second belts 932 and 942 (and second and third belts 942, 1042) are oriented substantially perpendicularly with respect to one another, the first radiused portion 945 of the web 901 (and the second radiused portion 1045 in the second web bending assembly 1000) is oriented at an angle of about 45 degrees with respect to each of the belts 932, 942 (and 942, 2042), and as a result, at a 45-degree angle with respect to the machine direction and the cross-machine direction. The angle of the radiused portion 945 induces a machine-directional and a cross-machine-directional strain in the web 901.
By passing the web 901 through the first and second web bending assemblies 900, 1000, the web 901 is first bent at a 45-degree angle in one direction and then at a 45-degree angle in the opposite direction to achieve a more isotropic stress distribution in the web 901. As a result, the web bending section 922 can be used to pre-strain the web 901 substantially equally in the machine direction and the cross-machine direction to at least partially counteract the strain induced in the resulting multi-layer web by a coating that shrinks substantially equally in the machine direction and the cross-machine direction upon being cured and/or dried.
While the belts 932, 942 and 1042 are illustrated in
An advantage of the web bending assemblies 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1000 is that a web can be bent without any contact of the surface of the web that is not in contact with the web handling assemblies 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1000. That is, a web path can be created such that the coated side of a coated web does not contact the surface of any web handling equipment. The web is then passed through a web path having a radiused portion. Since the coated side of the web does not contact rollers or belts, there is a reduction in the chance that the coated side of the web will be damaged by contact. Also, since the coated side does not contact any surfaces in the system, the amount of wear is reduced or eliminated (e.g., if the coating is abrasive).
The size (or curvature) of the radiused portion controls the amount of strain that is induced in the web. The radiused portion is sized so that the web material is strained to just beyond its elastic point, thereby insuring the strain induced is a permanent strain. The particular size of the radius will depend on many factors, such as the material properties and thickness of the web. Determining the radius to which the web must be bent to create permanent strain is within the skill and knowledge of one having ordinary skill in the art. The yield strain, that is, the strain at the point where the web undergoes plastic deformation, can be determined by routine testing, such as that done using a mechanical tester, for example Model 4505, available from INSTRON Co., of Canton, Mass.
The web bending section 1122 includes a first web bending assembly 1100 and a second web bending assembly 1200. Each web bending assembly 1100, 1200 includes a bar 1180, 1280. Each bar 1180, 1280 defines a first edge 1182, 1282 and a second edge 1184, 1284 over which the web 1101 is passed to induce a strain in the web 1101. While the bars 1180, 1280 are illustrated as having two edges over which the web 1101 is passed, it should be understood that one or more than two edges can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Also, the edges (or sharp radii) over which the web 1101 is passed need not be formed by a bar or other similar structure, but rather can be defined by a variety of objects or devices, including, for example, a sheet-like element, or any other suitable object or device that defines an adequate edge.
The web bending section 1122 further includes a web transport assembly 1185 over which the web 1101 travels between the first web bending assembly 1100 and the second web bending assembly 1200. In addition, the web bending section 1122 includes a frame 1186 for supporting the web bending assemblies 1100, 1200 and the web transport assembly 1185. In the embodiment illustrated in
As shown in
The web bending assemblies 1100, 1200 are stacked on top of one another, which reduces the footprint of the web bending section 1122; however, it should be understood that the web bending assemblies 1100, 1200 can instead be arranged in a variety of other manners without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. For example, the web bending assemblies 1100, 1200 can instead be positioned side-by-side.
The web 1101 enters the web bending section 1122 from upstream processes moving in a first direction D1′ and then enters the first web bending assembly 1100. The web 1101 is then passed over the first and second edges 1182, 1184 of the bar 1180 at an angle of about 45 degrees with respect to the first direction D1′ (i.e., the machine direction). The web 1101 is then flipped (i.e., by being passed over and under the bar 1180) and turned by about 90 degrees, such that the web 1101 begins moving in a second direction D2′, which is substantially perpendicular to the first direction D1′. The web 1101 is then moved by the web transport assembly 1185, and particularly, is passed over the roller 1188 and enters the second web bending assembly 1200 moving in a third direction D3′, which is substantially opposite the second direction D2′ and substantially perpendicular to the first direction D1′. The web 1101 is then passed over the first and second edges 1282, 1284 of the bar 1280 at an angle of about −45 degrees with respect to the third direction D3′. The web 1101 is flipped (i.e., by being passed over and under the bar 1280) and turned by about −90 degrees, such that the web 1101 begins moving in a fourth direction D4′, which is substantially opposite the first direction D1′ and substantially perpendicular to the second and third directions D2′ and D3′.
The following working examples are intended to be illustrative of the present disclosure and are not meant to be limiting.
A 25-μm thick biaxially oriented (isotropic) polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, having an elastic modulus in the machine direction of about 5000 MPa, was conveyed around a casting roll. This casting roll had grooves in the form of right triangular projections 25 μm high, in a continuous repeat, oriented in a circumferential direction. An acrylate resin having an integral UV initiator was extruded into the nip between the PET film and the casting roll to form a coating on the PET film. The coating was then exposed to ultraviolet radiation through the PET film sufficient to fully polymerize the acrylate resin into acrylic prisms 25 μm high and continuous in the machine direction of the PET film, thereby forming a multi-layer web comprising the PET film and the cured acrylate. The resulting cured coating was found to have an elastic modulus of 2000 MPa in the machine direction.
The multi-layer web was then assessed for flatness using the curl gauge disclosed in the paper “Measurement of Web Curl” published in the Proceedings of the Applied Webhandling Conference, AIMCAL 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein. The multi-layer web was found to have a machine direction radius of curvature of 0.06 m, or a curvature of 16.7 m−1. This would correspond to a curing stress in the coating of 3.1 MPa, according to the equations developed by E. M. Corcoran, “Determining Stresses in Organic Coatings Using Plate Beam Deflection,” J. Paint Technol., 41, 635-40 (1969), which is incorporated herein by reference.
A second experiment was performed generally similar to Example 1, except that before the coating step, the PET film was pre-curled using a web bending section similar to the web bending section 522 shown in
Standard die coating techniques were used to coat a 75-μm-thick polyethylene terephthalate (PET) base film, having an elastic modulus in the machine direction of about 5000 MPa. The coating composition was a photopolymerizable dispersion with solids consisting mainly of 51% by weight pentaerythritoltriacrylate (“SR-444” from Sartomer Company, Inc. of Exton, Pa.) and 37% by weight reaction product of colloidal silica (“Nalco 2327” from Nalco Company of Naperville, Ill.) and 3-trimethoxysilylpropyl methacrylate (“A174” from Momentive Performance Materials of Wilton, Conn.). Other solid additives in PETA were 8% by weight n,n-dimethylacrylamide (“NNDMA” from Sigma-Aldrich Company of St. Louis, Mo.), 2.4% by weight 1-hydroxy-cyclohexyl-phenylketone (“Irgacure 184 from Ciba Specialty Chemicals of Newport, Del.), 2% by weight bis (pentamethyl-1,2,2,6,6 piperidinyl-4) decanoate (“Tinuvin 292” from Ciba Specialty Chemicals of Newport, Del.), 50 ppm phenothiazine (Cytec Industries, Inc. of West Patterson, N.J.) and 400 ppm 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol (Merisol USA, LLC of Houston, Tex.). The coating composition was prepared at 30 wt. % solids from a dispersion of approximately 50 wt. % solids in a 2-propanol diluent. Specifically, the coating composition was prepared according to column 10, lines 25-39 and Example 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,050 to Bilkadi, et. al, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The coated film was passed through a heated air impingement drying process to remove the organic solvent, leaving a 10-μm-thick layer of uncured acrylate hardcoat. The coating was cured by ultraviolet radiation to a level that produced an elastic modulus of 1200 MPa and an effective shrinkage of 0.9%.
The coated film was then assessed for flatness using the curl gauge described in Example 1 and found to have both a machine direction and cross machine direction radii of curvature of about 0.05 m, or expressed differently, curvatures of 20 m−1. This would correspond to a curing stress in the coating of 14 MPa, according to the equations developed by E. M. Corcoran, J. Paint Technol. 41 (1969).
A second experiment was performed generally similar to Example 3, except that before the coating step, the PET film was pre-curled using a web bending apparatus similar to the web bending apparatus 1122 shown in
Standard die coating techniques were used to coat a web comprising 75-μm-thick polyethylene terephthalate (PET) base film, having an elastic modulus in the machine direction of about 5000 MPa. The coating composition used was the same as that of Example 3. The coated film was passed through a heated air impingement drying process to remove the organic solvent, leaving a layer of uncured acrylate hardcoat. The coating was cured by ultraviolet radiation to a level that produced an elastic modulus of 1200 MPa and an effective shrinkage of 0.9%. The coating was applied to three PET films as described above to form a layer of coating that would cure to three different thicknesses of the hardcoat, namely, 2.5 μm, 5 μm, and 7.5 μm. Strips 1201, 1203 and 1205, respectively, were cut from the resulting multi-layer webs, with the long axis aligned with the machine direction of the respective multi-layer web. Each of the strips 1201, 1203, 1205 immediately curled to the extent shown in
An experiment was performed generally similar to Example 5, except that before the coating step, the PET film was pre-curled using a web bending apparatus similar to the web bending section 1122 shown in
The embodiments described above and illustrated in the figures are presented by way of example only and are not intended as a limitation upon the concepts and principles of the present disclosure. As such, it will be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art that various changes in the elements and their configuration and arrangement are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Various features and aspects of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
Priority is hereby claimed to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/827,380 (3M File No. 60656US002), filed Sep. 28, 2006 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/827,378 (3M File No. 62541US002), filed Sep. 28, 2006, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16384 | Hamblen | Jan 1857 | A |
| 236068 | Newcomb | Dec 1880 | A |
| 273040 | Dexter | Feb 1883 | A |
| 478255 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1892 | A |
| 751527 | Marr | Feb 1904 | A |
| 754797 | Ostrander | Mar 1904 | A |
| 1167036 | Witham, Sr. et al. | Jan 1916 | A |
| 1191297 | Gardner | Jul 1916 | A |
| 1238742 | Butler | Sep 1917 | A |
| 1288643 | Mayer | Dec 1918 | A |
| 1432832 | Brockett | Oct 1922 | A |
| 1469875 | Beauregard | Oct 1923 | A |
| 1481866 | Heist | Jan 1924 | A |
| RE16384 | McCrohan et al. | Jul 1926 | E |
| 1654946 | Sinks | Jan 1928 | A |
| 1691023 | Dye | Nov 1928 | A |
| 1792596 | Livingston | Feb 1931 | A |
| 1880451 | Hopkins | Oct 1932 | A |
| 1891782 | Sager | Dec 1932 | A |
| 2027564 | Stein et al. | Jan 1936 | A |
| 2028700 | Guier | Jan 1936 | A |
| 2037825 | Salfisberg | Apr 1936 | A |
| 2066872 | Adams et al. | Jan 1937 | A |
| 2070505 | Beck | Feb 1937 | A |
| 2152101 | Scherer | Mar 1938 | A |
| 2137887 | Abbott | Nov 1938 | A |
| 2141318 | Salfisberg | Dec 1938 | A |
| 2184744 | Jonassen | Dec 1939 | A |
| 2259362 | Young | Oct 1941 | A |
| 2293178 | Stocker | Aug 1942 | A |
| 2307817 | Austin | Jan 1943 | A |
| 2334022 | Minich | Nov 1943 | A |
| 2335190 | Minich | Nov 1943 | A |
| 2339070 | Hayes | Jan 1944 | A |
| 2348162 | Warner | May 1944 | A |
| 2370811 | Osgood, Jr. | Mar 1945 | A |
| 2373040 | Macdonald et al. | Apr 1945 | A |
| 2398822 | Faris et al. | Apr 1946 | A |
| 2403482 | Cloud | Jul 1946 | A |
| 2411774 | Gundelfinger | Nov 1946 | A |
| 2412187 | Wiley et al. | Dec 1946 | A |
| 2434111 | Hawley, Jr. et al. | Jan 1948 | A |
| 2454999 | Eaton | Nov 1948 | A |
| 2468697 | Wiley | Apr 1949 | A |
| 2483339 | Gardner et al. | Sep 1949 | A |
| 2490781 | Cloud | Dec 1949 | A |
| 2505146 | Ryan | Apr 1950 | A |
| 2531619 | Gonia | Nov 1950 | A |
| 2540986 | Klein et al. | Feb 1951 | A |
| 2545868 | Bailey | Mar 1951 | A |
| 2547836 | Pfeiffer | Apr 1951 | A |
| 2559365 | Middleton et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
| 2559705 | Borkland | Jul 1951 | A |
| 2578899 | Pace. Jr. | Dec 1951 | A |
| 2582165 | Rosenfeld | Jan 1952 | A |
| 2597877 | LeClair | May 1952 | A |
| 2600295 | Hommel | Jun 1952 | A |
| 2618012 | Milne | Nov 1952 | A |
| 2658432 | Baumgartner | Nov 1953 | A |
| 2660218 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
| 2698982 | Smith et al. | Jan 1955 | A |
| 2702406 | Reed | Feb 1955 | A |
| 2737089 | Baumgartner | Mar 1956 | A |
| 2745134 | Collins | May 1956 | A |
| 2893053 | Powell | Jul 1959 | A |
| 2918891 | Klabunde | Dec 1959 | A |
| 2918897 | Zernov | Dec 1959 | A |
| 2976924 | Baxter, Jr. | Mar 1961 | A |
| 3044228 | Peterson | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3076492 | Monks | Feb 1963 | A |
| 3215558 | Dascher | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3344493 | Telgheider | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3366298 | Bahrani | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3373288 | Otepka et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3418406 | Ball | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3498878 | Obenshaln | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3510036 | Lewis, Jr.. et al. | May 1970 | A |
| 3552668 | Kanno | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3567093 | Johnson | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3604652 | Sleeper | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3724732 | Bonner | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3774831 | Paradine | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3775129 | Dodwell | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3799038 | Bossons et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3831828 | Royon et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
| 3833973 | Schwarz | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3854441 | Park | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3890547 | Keck | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3913729 | Andrews | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3939025 | Kane | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3974952 | Swanke et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3976528 | James | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4002047 | MacPhee et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4013284 | Demetre | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4015050 | Birchall et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4033492 | Imai | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4043995 | Kitzing et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4060236 | Carstedt | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4069081 | Drower et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4069959 | Bartell et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4119309 | Mayer et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4141735 | Schrader et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4182472 | Peekna | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4187113 | Mathews et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4190245 | Brandes | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4300891 | Bemiss | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4300969 | Frydendal | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4322802 | Lewis et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4342412 | Lorenz et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4343991 | Fujiwara et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4360356 | Hall | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4389455 | Asao | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4467949 | Nakata | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4471816 | Wada | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4539072 | Frye et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4579815 | Kiritani et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4598849 | Frye et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4657614 | Andersson | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4862565 | Damour | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4917844 | Komai et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4925520 | Beaudoin et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4952281 | Akira | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5043036 | Swenson | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5124743 | Shiota | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5141484 | Akira | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5244861 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5290672 | Dunk | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5387501 | Yajima et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5466519 | Shirakura et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5517737 | Viltro et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5536561 | Turi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5560793 | Ruscher et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5677050 | Bilkadi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5738907 | Vaccaro et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5853965 | Haydock et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5866282 | Bourdelais et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874205 | Bourdelais et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888643 | Aylward et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5928124 | Gherardi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5975745 | Oishi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6030742 | Bourdelais et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6152345 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6238448 | Rouse et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6272984 | Kato et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273984 | Bourdelais et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6362020 | Shimoda et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6489015 | Tsuchiya et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6626343 | Crowley et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6637128 | Kuroiwa et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6680084 | Chtourou | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6686031 | Matsufuji et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6820671 | Calvert | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6841254 | Okajima et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 20010051275 | Muraoka | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20030082977 | Kuroiwa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040235380 | Kapik | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050133965 | Yu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212173 | Swanson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246965 | Swanson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060182901 | Takagi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20080081164 | Swanson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 198 08 518 | Aug 1999 | DE |
| 0 140 496 | May 1985 | EP |
| 0 472 393 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0 658 505 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0 672 516 | Sep 1995 | EP |
| 0 688 665 | Dec 1995 | EP |
| 1 066 979 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1 258 555 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 1 317 966 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 456832 | Aug 1935 | GB |
| 63-171755 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| 9732069 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| 9856702 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 2007110484 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2008039820 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080081123 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60827380 | Sep 2006 | US | |
| 60827378 | Sep 2006 | US |
