The present invention generally relates to a system and method for controlling exterior lights of a controlled vehicle, and more specifically relates to improvements in systems that control exterior lights of a controlled vehicle in response to the detection of other vehicles.
According to one aspect of the present invention, an exterior light control system is provided for controlling exterior lights of a controlled vehicle. The exterior light control system comprises: an imaging system configured to image a scene external and forward of the controlled vehicle and to generate image data corresponding to the acquired images; and a controller configured to receive and analyze the image data and for generating an exterior light control signal that is used to control the exterior lights in response to analysis of the image data, wherein the controller is further configured to analyze the image data to detect a semi-truck, and wherein, when a semi-truck is detected, the controller generates an exterior light control signal that indicates the detection of a semi-truck.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for controlling exterior lights of a controlled vehicle comprising the steps of: imaging a scene external and forward of the controlled vehicle and generating image data corresponding to the acquired images; receiving and analyzing the image data in a processor to detect at least one characteristic of the image data including those of oncoming vehicles and to detect an oncoming semi-truck having headlamps that are not detected; generating a control signal that is used to control the exterior lights in response to analysis of the image data; and generating a control signal for reducing the brightness of the exterior lights if an oncoming semi-truck is detected.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a non-transitory computer readable medium is provided having stored thereon software instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to generate control signals for controlling exterior lights of a controlled vehicle, by executing the steps comprising: imaging a scene external and forward of the controlled vehicle and generating image data corresponding to the acquired images; receiving and analyzing the image data in the processor to detect at least one characteristic of the image data to detect an oncoming semi-truck; and generating a control signal from the processor that is used to control the exterior lights in response to analysis of the image data wherein, when a semi-truck is detected, the control signal indicates the detection of a semi-truck.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numerals will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. In the drawings, the depicted structural elements are not to scale and certain components are enlarged relative to the other components for purposes of emphasis and understanding.
The embodiments described herein relate to an exterior light control system for controlling exterior lights of a controlled vehicle in response to image data acquired from an image sensor, which captures images forward of the vehicle. Prior systems are known for controlling exterior vehicle lights in response to images captured forward of the vehicle. In these prior systems, a controller would analyze the captured images and determine if any preceding or oncoming vehicles were present in a glare area in front of the vehicle employing the system. This “glare area” was the area in which the exterior lights would cause excessive glare to a driver if the exterior lights were in a high-beam state (or some state other than a low-beam state). If a vehicle was present in the glare area, the controller would respond by changing the state of the exterior lights so as to not cause glare for the other driver(s). Examples of such systems are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,837,994, 5,990,469, 6,008,486, 6,049,171, 6,130,421, 6,130,448, 6,166,698, 6,379,013, 6,403,942, 6,587,573, 6,611,610, 6,631,316, 6,774,988, 6,861,809, 7,321,112, 7,417,221, 7,565,006, 7,567,291, 7,653,215, 7,683,326, 7,881,839, 8,045,760, and 8,120,652, as well as in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/432,250 entitled “VEHICULAR IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ROADWAY WIDTH” and filed on Mar. 28, 2012, by Jeremy A. Schut et al., the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/432,250 entitled “VEHICULAR IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ROADWAY WIDTH” filed on Mar. 28, 2012, by Jeremy A. Schut et al. discloses an exterior light control system that improves upon the prior systems by determining a road model based on the roadway width and roadway type (i.e., motorway, two-lane road, multi-lane road, etc.) in order to more accurately discriminate between other vehicles and non-vehicle light sources, reflectors, and road signs and to allow different modes of operation depending upon the type of roadway on which the controlled vehicle is traveling. More specifically, the roadway width may be estimated from various objects detected in the forward scene, including lane markers, reflectors, road signs, and any other objects that may be useful to detect the edges of the road. The roadway type may be determined from the roadway width. Other vehicle parameters such as vehicle speed, yaw, roll, steering wheel position and vehicle direction, may also be used when determining the roadway type and the road model. Then, using the road model, the system may track the positioning (or “world positioning”) relative to the controlled vehicle, the movement, the brightness, the size, the color, and other characteristics of various detected light sources to determine if the light sources appear to be on the roadway. If so, the light sources are more likely to be another vehicle to which the system responds by appropriately controlling the exterior lights.
One of the modes in which the exterior lighting control systems may operate is a motorway mode. The motorway mode is selected when the system determines that the controlled vehicle is traveling on a motorway (i.e., an expressway or divided highway). In the motorway mode, the system may not be responsive to oncoming vehicles because the presence of a guard rail or other barrier in the median blocks the headlamps of oncoming vehicles making them hard to detect. However, such barriers also block light from the controlled vehicle that would otherwise cause glare to drivers of oncoming vehicles. Examples of exterior light control systems that detect motorways and operate in a motorway mode are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,861,809 and 8,045,760, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
A problem has been found to exist in that semi-truck drivers can experience glare from bright exterior lights of oncoming vehicles even when driving on a motorway with a barrier in the median due to the height of the cab of the semi-truck. Thus, the prior systems which did not detect oncoming vehicles if their headlamps were blocked by such a barrier also did not reduce the brightness of the exterior lights, thereby tending to cause excessive glare to the drivers of oncoming semi-trucks whose headlamps are also blocked by the barrier.
Accordingly, the exterior light control system of the present invention is capable of detecting oncoming semi-trucks despite being unable to detect their headlamps due to a barrier, and responds to the presence of an oncoming semi-truck by reducing the brightness of the exterior lights as perceived by the semi-truck driver. More specifically, the system may reduce or suggest the reduction of the brightness of the exterior lights in response to detection of a semi-truck while in a motorway mode even when headlamps of the semi-truck are not detected.
As explained in further detail below, the system looks for lights on the semi-truck cabs and/or trailers by detecting groupings of lights that are in the forward scene and are positioned in such a way within the image frame that they are within a defined range of one another relative to the world surrounding the controlled vehicle and its image sensor. The system may further determine whether the positions of the lights within the group change in position from one image frame to the next in a relative manner suggesting that the lights of the group are moving collectively together. Once such a group of lights is detected, the system may determine if the color and/or brightness of the lights meets certain thresholds that further suggest the presence of a semi-truck (i.e., consistent colors of the lights in the group). The distance to the light sources may then be determined to serve as an indicator as to whether the semi-truck is close enough to justify reducing the perceived brightness of the exterior lights in at least the direction of the detected semi-truck. Further, the relative position of the detected semi-truck may be compared to a road model for oncoming traffic to determine whether the detected semi-truck is, in fact, travelling along the same path as other oncoming vehicles.
Such road models may be determined by analyzing the relative world positions of prior oncoming traffic as detected by the system. Road models may also be determined using the controlled vehicle's navigational system. The road model may also allow the system to determine the relative height of the lights so as to determine if they are likely on a semi-truck cab or trailer. A system for determining a road model is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/432,250 entitled “VEHICULAR IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ROADWAY WIDTH” and filed on Mar. 28, 2012, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
A first embodiment of an exterior light control system 10 is shown in
Controller 30 may be configured to directly connect to the equipment (50) being controlled such that the generated control signals directly control the equipment. Alternatively, controller 30 may be configured to connect to an equipment control (60 and 70), which, in turn, is connected to the equipment being controlled (62 and 80) such that the control signals generated by controller 30 only indirectly control the equipment. For example, in the case of the equipment being exterior lights 80, controller 30 may analyze the image data from imaging system 20 so as to generate control signals that are more of a recommendation for an exterior light control 70 to use when controlling exterior lights 80. The control signals may further include not just a recommendation, but also a code representing a reason for the recommendation so that equipment controls 60 and 70 may determine whether or not to override a recommendation. Further, as described in detail below, the control signal may include an indication of the detection of a semi-truck. Such a semi-truck detection indication is particularly useful when an equipment control (60 and 70) that is separate from controller 30 performs the direct control of the equipment.
By providing a semi-truck detection indication, controller 30 provides additional information to exterior light control 70 and/or equipment control 60 that was not previously made available to such equipment controls. This allows the vehicle manufacturer more flexibility in how they choose to respond to the semi-truck detection indication. Examples of which are to turn the high beam lighting off; extend the delay following a determination that the semi-truck is no longer detected so as to delay turning the high beam lighting back on; only reduce the brightness of the exterior lights in the direction of the semi-truck so as to create a “tunnel” through which the semi-truck is traveling; extend the delay for which time the “tunnel” is created; and/or to simply respond in the same manner as if an oncoming vehicle were otherwise detected. If the system is going to respond in the same manner as to any detected oncoming vehicle, the semi-truck detection indication may instead be a vehicle detection indication.
The present imaging system improves upon the above-mentioned exterior light control systems by providing a system that allows auto manufacturers to respond in a manner of their choosing to the semi-truck detection indication. This also allows one common system to be used for all manufacturers regardless of whether they wish to change or maintain a particular illumination pattern in response to such an indication. Further, different features of equipment control may be enabled or disabled based upon the detection of an oncoming semi-truck. In addition, different equipment may respond differently to the semi-truck detection indication.
As shown in
According to one embodiment, the equipment that system 10 controls may include one or more exterior lights 80 and the control signal generated by controller 30 may be an exterior light control signal. In this embodiment, exterior lights 80 may be controlled directly by controller 30 or by an exterior light control 70, which receives a control signal from controller 30. As used herein, the “exterior lights” broadly include any exterior lighting on the vehicle. Such exterior lights may include headlamps (both low and high beam if separate from one another), tail lights, foul weather lights such as fog lights, brake lights, center-mounted stop lights (CHMSLs), turn signals, back-up lights, etc. The exterior lights may be operated in several different modes including conventional low-beam and high-beam states. They may also be operated as daytime running lights, and additionally as super-bright high beams in those countries where they are permitted.
The exterior light brightness may also be continuously varied between the low, high, and super-high states. Separate lights may be provided for obtaining each of these exterior lighting states or the actual brightness of the exterior lights may be varied to provide these different exterior lighting states. In either case, the “perceived brightness” or illumination pattern of the exterior lights is varied. As used herein, the term “perceived brightness” means the brightness of the exterior lights as perceived by an observer outside the vehicle. Most typically, such observers will be drivers or passengers in a preceding vehicle or in a vehicle traveling along the same street in the opposite direction. Ideally, the exterior lights are controlled such that if an observer is located in a vehicle within a “glare area” relative to the vehicle (i.e., the area in which the observer would perceive the brightness of the exterior lights as causing excessive glare), the beam illumination pattern is varied such that the observer is no longer in the glare area. The perceived brightness and/or glare area of the exterior lights may be varied by changing the illumination output of one or more exterior lights, by steering one or more lights to change the aim of one or more of the exterior lights, selectively blocking or otherwise activating or deactivating some or all of the exterior lights, altering the illumination pattern forward of the vehicle, or a combination of the above.
Imaging system 20 may be any conventional system. Examples of suitable imaging systems are disclosed in published United States Patent Application Publication Nos. US 20080192132 A1 and US 20120072080 A1, and in U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/500,418 entitled “MEDIAN FILTER” filed on Jun. 23, 2011, by Jon H. Bechtel et al.; 61/544,315 entitled “MEDIAN FILTER” and filed on Oct. 7, 2011, by Jon H. Bechtel et al.; and 61/556,864 entitled “HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE CAMERA LOW LIGHT LEVEL FILTERING” filed on Nov. 8, 2011, by Jon H. Bechtel et al., the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The imaging system includes an image sensor (or camera) to capture images that may then be displayed and/or analyzed in order to control vehicle equipment in addition to exterior lights. For example, such imagers have been used for lane departure warning systems, forward collision warning systems, adaptive cruise control systems, pedestrian detection systems, night vision systems, terrain detection systems, parking assist systems, traffic sign recognition systems, and reverse camera display systems. Examples of systems using imagers for such purposes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,837,994, 5,990,469, 6,008,486, 6,049,171, 6,130,421, 6,130,448, 6,166,698, 6,379,013, 6,403,942, 6,587,573, 6,611,610, 6,631,316, 6,774,988, 6,861,809, 7,321,112, 7,417,221, 7,565,006, 7,567,291, 7,653,215, 7,683,326, 7,881,839, 8,045,760, and 8,120,652, and in U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/512,213 entitled “RAISED LANE MARKER DETECTION SYSEM AND METHOD THEREOF” and filed on Jul. 27, 2011, by Brock R. Rycenga et al., and 61/512,158 entitled “COLLISION WARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF” and filed on Jul. 27, 2011, by Brock R. Rycenga et al., the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In the example shown in
Controller 30 can also take advantage of the availability of signals (such as vehicle speed and yaw) communicated via discrete connections or over the vehicle bus 25 in making decisions regarding the operation of the exterior lights 80. In particular, speed input 21 provides vehicle speed information to the controller 30 from which speed can be a factor in determining the control state for the exterior lights 80 or other equipment. The reverse signal 22 informs controller 30 that the vehicle is in reverse, responsive to which the controller 30 may clear an electrochromic mirror element regardless of signals output from light sensors. Auto ON/OFF switch input 23 is connected to a switch having two states to dictate to controller 30 whether the vehicle exterior lights 80 should be automatically or manually controlled. The auto ON/OFF switch (not shown) connected to the ON/OFF switch input 23 may be incorporated with the headlamp switches that are traditionally mounted on the vehicle dashboard or incorporated into steering wheel column levels. Manual dimmer switch input 24 is connected to a manually actuated switch (not shown) to provide a manual override signal for an exterior light control state. Some or all of the inputs 21, 22, 23, 24 and outputs 42a, 42b, and 42c, as well as any other possible inputs or outputs, such as a steering wheel input, can optionally be provided through vehicle bus 25 shown in
Controller 30 can control, at least in part, other equipment 50 within the vehicle which is connected to controller 30 via vehicle bus 42. Specifically, the following are some examples of one or more equipment 50 that may be controlled by controller 30: exterior lights 80, a rain sensor, a compass, information displays, windshield wipers, a heater, a defroster, a defogger, an air conditioning system, a telephone system, a navigation system, a security system, a tire pressure monitoring system, a garage door opening transmitter, a remote keyless entry system, a telematics system, a voice recognition system such as a digital signal processor-based voice actuation system, a vehicle speed control, interior lights, rearview mirrors, an audio system, an engine control system, and various other switches and other display devices that may be located throughout the vehicle.
In addition, controller 30 may be, at least in part, located within a rearview assembly of a vehicle or located elsewhere within the vehicle. The controller 30 may also use a second controller (or controllers), equipment control 60, which may be located in a rearview assembly or elsewhere in the vehicle in order to control certain kinds of equipment 62. Equipment control 60 can be connected to receive via vehicle bus 42 control signals generated by controller 30. Equipment control 60 subsequently communicates and controls equipment 62 via bus 61. For example, equipment control 60 may be a windshield wiper control unit which controls windshield wiper equipment, turning this equipment ON or OFF. Equipment control may also be an electrochromic mirror control unit where controller 30 is programmed to communicate with the electrochromic control unit in order for the electrochromic control unit to change the reflectivity of the electrochromic mirror(s) in response to information obtained from an ambient light sensor, a glare sensor, as well as any other components coupled to the processor. Specifically, equipment control unit 60 in communication with controller 30 may control the following equipment: exterior lights, a rain sensor, a compass, information displays, windshield wipers, a heater, a defroster, a defogger, air conditioning, a telephone system, a navigation system, a security system, a tire pressure monitoring system, a garage door opening transmitter, a remote keyless entry, a telemetry system, a voice recognition system such as a digital signal processor-based voice actuation system, a vehicle speed, interior lights, rearview mirrors, an audio system, a climate control, an engine control, and various other switches and other display devices that may be located throughout the vehicle.
Portions of system 10 can be advantageously integrated into a rearview assembly 200 as illustrated in
Referring to
Controller 30 of
Rearview assembly 200 may include a mirror element or a display that displays a rearward view. The mirror element may be a prismatic element or an electro-optic element, such as an electrochromic element.
Additional details of the manner by which system 10 may be integrated into a rearview mirror assembly 200 are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,610, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Alternative rearview mirror assembly constructions used to implement exterior light control systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,587,573, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The method for controlling exterior lights of a controlled vehicle will now be described with reference to
In step 304, controller 30 determines whether the light in the light list is part of a group of lights. Details of an example how this is determined is described below with respect to
If, in step 306, controller 30 determines that the group of lights does not meet certain color and brightness thresholds, controller 30 advances to step 302. Otherwise, controller 30 advances to step 308 in which it determines whether the group of lights meets certain distance criteria. Such distance criteria may, for example, be that the group of lights is between about 5 meters and about 200 meters. If the group of lights does not meet the distance criteria, controller 30 proceeds to step 302. If the group of lights does meet the distance criteria, controller 30 computes a percent difference calculation between the lights and the road model for oncoming traffic in step 310. This calculation determines the likelihood that the group of lights is within the area where oncoming traffic is expected.
Controller 30 next determines in step 312 (
After looping through steps 300-314 for each light in the detected light list (or perhaps only until the first oncoming vehicle is detected in step 314), controller 30 proceeds to step 316 where it determines if any lights have been detected as oncoming. If not, controller 30 determines that an oncoming vehicle has not been detected in the scene in step 318. If any lights have been detected as oncoming, controller 30 determines in step 320 that an oncoming vehicle in the form of a semi-truck has been detected in the scene and controller 30 responds by generating a control signal indicating the detection of a semi-truck. Exterior light control 70 may respond to this semi-truck detection indication by reducing the brightness of the exterior lights 80 at least as projected in the direction of the detected semi-truck.
As mentioned with respect to step 304 in
If, in step 402, controller 30 determines that the light k is not within a defined range of light j (of, for example, 2.5 meters laterally), controller 30 returns to step 400 to select the next remaining light k within the detected light list and again executes step 402. To compute whether the light k is within a defined range of light j, controller 30 determines whether a tan (Lightj[World_X]+2.5 m/Lightj[World_Z]) and a tan (Lightj[World_X]−2.5 m/Lightj[World_Z]). Controller 30 thus continues to loop through steps 400 and 402 until either a light k is found that is within the defined range of light j, or there are no lights k left in the list. In the latter case, controller 30 then selects a new light j and continues the process of steps 400 and 402 for the new light j and the remaining lights k in the light list.
If a light k is found that is within the defined range of light j, controller 30 proceeds to execute computational steps 404 through 410. In step 404, controller 30 computes a percent difference between the positions of light j and light k in World_X. In step 406, controller 30 computes a percent difference between the positions of light j and light k in World_Z. In step 408, controller 30 computes a percent difference between the positions of light j and light k for the change in image position in the previous frame and in the current frame captured by the image sensor. In step 410, the percent differences computed in steps 404-408 are combined with empirically found feature weights.
After step 410, controller 30 determines whether the combined percent difference is below an empirically defined threshold in step 412. This combined percent difference threshold may, for example, be about 20. If so, controller 30 groups light j and light k in step 414 (
Following step 414, controller 30 then determines whether light j or light k already belongs in a group of lights. If so, controller combines all groups of lights to which lights j and k belong into one group in step 418 before returning to step 400 to process the next light k relative to the current light j. If light j or light k does not already belong in a group of lights, controller returns to step 400.
The routine in
The above description is considered that of the preferred embodiments only. Modifications of the invention will occur to those skilled in the art and to those who make or use the invention. Therefore, it is understood that the embodiments shown in the drawings and described above are merely for illustrative purposes and not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law, including the doctrine of equivalents.
This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/678,658 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING EXTERIOR VEHICLE LIGHTS RESPONSIVE TO DETECTION OF A SEMI-TRUCK,” filed on Aug. 2, 2012, by Jeremy Schut et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2131888 | Harris | Oct 1938 | A |
2632040 | Rabinow | Mar 1953 | A |
2827594 | Rabinow | Mar 1958 | A |
3179845 | Kulwiec | Apr 1965 | A |
3581276 | Newman | May 1971 | A |
3663819 | Hicks et al. | May 1972 | A |
4139801 | Linares | Feb 1979 | A |
4151526 | Hinachi et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4236099 | Rosenblum | Nov 1980 | A |
4258979 | Mahin | Mar 1981 | A |
4286308 | Wolff | Aug 1981 | A |
4357558 | Massoni et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4376909 | Tagami et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4479173 | Rumpakis | Oct 1984 | A |
4599544 | Martin | Jul 1986 | A |
4632509 | Ohmi et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4645975 | Meitzler et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4665321 | Chang et al. | May 1987 | A |
4692798 | Seko et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4716298 | Etoh | Dec 1987 | A |
4727290 | Smith et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4768135 | Kretschmer et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4862037 | Farber et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4891559 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4930742 | Schofield et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934273 | Endriz | Jun 1990 | A |
4967319 | Seko | Oct 1990 | A |
5008946 | Ando | Apr 1991 | A |
5036437 | Macks | Jul 1991 | A |
5072154 | Chen | Dec 1991 | A |
5086253 | Lawler | Feb 1992 | A |
5096287 | Kakinami et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5124549 | Michaels et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5166681 | Bottesch et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5182502 | Slotkowski et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5187383 | Taccetta et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5235178 | Hegyi | Aug 1993 | A |
5289321 | Secor | Feb 1994 | A |
5329206 | Slotkowski et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347261 | Adell | Sep 1994 | A |
5347459 | Greenspan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355146 | Chiu et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5379104 | Takao | Jan 1995 | A |
5396054 | Krichever et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402170 | Parulski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5416318 | Hegyi | May 1995 | A |
5426294 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428464 | Silverbrook | Jun 1995 | A |
5430450 | Holmes | Jul 1995 | A |
5434407 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5451822 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452004 | Roberts | Sep 1995 | A |
5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475441 | Parulski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481268 | Higgins | Jan 1996 | A |
5483346 | Butzer | Jan 1996 | A |
5485155 | Hibino | Jan 1996 | A |
5508592 | Lapatovich et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5537003 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541724 | Hoashi | Jul 1996 | A |
5550677 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554912 | Thayer et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5574463 | Shirai et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5587929 | League et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592146 | Kover, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
5614788 | Mullins et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621460 | Hatlestad et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5660454 | Mori et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666028 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684473 | Hibino et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5707129 | Kobayashi | Jan 1998 | A |
5710565 | Shirai et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714751 | Chen | Feb 1998 | A |
5715093 | Schierbeek et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736816 | Strenke et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751832 | Panter et al. | May 1998 | A |
5781105 | Bitar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786787 | Eriksson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796094 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798727 | Shirai et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811888 | Hsieh | Sep 1998 | A |
5812321 | Schierbeek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5837994 | Stam et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841126 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845000 | Breed et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867214 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877897 | Schofield et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905457 | Rashid | May 1999 | A |
5912534 | Benedict | Jun 1999 | A |
5923027 | Stam et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935613 | Benham et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942853 | Piscart | Aug 1999 | A |
5990469 | Bechtel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008486 | Stam et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018308 | Shirai | Jan 2000 | A |
6049171 | Stam et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6097023 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102546 | Carter | Aug 2000 | A |
6130421 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130448 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140933 | Bugno et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144158 | Beam | Nov 2000 | A |
6166698 | Turnbull et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6184781 | Ramakesavan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6255639 | Stam et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281632 | Stam et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6329925 | Skiver et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349782 | Sekiya et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356376 | Tonar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379013 | Bechtel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396040 | Hill | May 2002 | B1 |
6396397 | Bos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403942 | Stam | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442465 | Breed et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443602 | Tanabe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465962 | Fu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469739 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483438 | DeLine et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491416 | Strazzanti | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507779 | Breed et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6550943 | Strazzanti | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553130 | Lemelson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558026 | Strazzanti | May 2003 | B2 |
6587573 | Stam et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611610 | Stam et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6617564 | Ockerse et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631316 | Stam et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6677986 | Püchmüller | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6772057 | Breed et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774988 | Stam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6861809 | Stam | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6902307 | Strazzanti | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913375 | Strazzanti | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946978 | Schofield | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7012543 | DeLine et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038577 | Pawlicki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7255465 | DeLine et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262406 | Heslin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265342 | Heslin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311428 | DeLine et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321112 | Stam et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7400266 | Haug | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7417221 | Creswick et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7446650 | Scholfield et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467883 | DeLine et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468651 | DeLine et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7533998 | Schofield et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7565006 | Stam et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567291 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7653215 | Stam | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658521 | DeLine et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683326 | Stam et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7719408 | DeWard et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720580 | Higgins-Luthman | May 2010 | B2 |
7815326 | Blank et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7877175 | Higgins-Luthman | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881839 | Stam et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888629 | Heslin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914188 | DeLine et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7972045 | Schofield | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7994471 | Heslin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8045760 | Stam et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8063753 | DeLine et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8063759 | Bos et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8090153 | Schofield et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100568 | DeLine et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116929 | Higgins-Luthman | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120652 | Bechtel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8142059 | Higgins-Luthman et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8162518 | Schofield | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8184159 | Luo | May 2012 | B2 |
8203433 | Deuber et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8217830 | Lynam | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8222588 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8258433 | Byers et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8325028 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20020040962 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030202357 | Strazzanti | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040125905 | Vlasenko et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080044062 | Stam et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080192132 | Bechtel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080294315 | Breed | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20130028473 | Hilldore et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140152826 | Liken et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140198213 | Liken et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2946561 | May 1981 | DE |
2641237 | Jul 1990 | FR |
2726144 | Apr 1996 | FR |
2313973 | Dec 1997 | GB |
5744541 | Mar 1982 | JP |
6015237 | Jan 1985 | JP |
62131837 | Jun 1987 | JP |
01233129 | Sep 1989 | JP |
5139203 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5342901 | Dec 1993 | JP |
6151067 | May 1994 | JP |
6267304 | Sep 1994 | JP |
6276524 | Sep 1994 | JP |
6295601 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6321007 | Nov 1994 | JP |
732936 | Feb 1995 | JP |
747878 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7052706 | Feb 1995 | JP |
769125 | Mar 1995 | JP |
8166221 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8221700 | Aug 1996 | JP |
132010020483 | Jan 2010 | JP |
8605147 | Sep 1986 | WO |
9735743 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9843850 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9947396 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0022881 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Searching Authority, International Search Report, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and Notification of Transmittal, Dec. 19, 2013, 6 Pages. |
Löwenau, J.P. et al., SAE Paper No. 980007, “Adaptive Light Control—A New Light Concept Controlled by Vehicle Dynamics and Navigation,” pp. 33-38. |
Kormanyos, Christopher M., SAE Paper No. 980003, “HID System with Adaptive Vertical Aim Control,” pp. 13-18. |
Kalze, Franz-Josef, SAE Paper No. 980005, “Xenon Light for Main and Dipped Beam,” pp. 23-26. |
Shimizu, Tohru et al., SAE Paper No. 980322, “Development of PWM DRL with Low RF Emissions and Low Heat,” pp. 113-117. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140036080 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61678658 | Aug 2012 | US |