The present invention relates to a vehicle braking system. It finds particular application in conjunction with an anti-lock braking system and will be described with particular reference thereto. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention is also amenable to other applications.
Heavy vehicle braking systems commonly rely on compressed air for operating a vehicle braking system. Compressed air is produced by a compressor and stored in at least one reservoir. Various valves control fluid communication between the at least one reservoir and various brake circuits and individual brake chambers on respective wheels. Opening a valve from a reservoir to a brake circuit or a brake chamber increases the volume available for the compressed air stored in the reservoir. If an increased volume is available for the same amount of compressed air, the pressure of the compressed air in the increased volume drops.
In general, an anti-lock braking system (ABS) applies, holds, and releases pressure at an individual brake or multiple brakes to improve traction of the associated wheel and, furthermore, enhance vehicle control. Applying, holding, and releasing an individual brake is achieved by actuating and deactuating a valve associated with that brake. As discussed above, if the valve is in the apply state, the volume available for the compressed air increases, thereby decreasing the pressure in the reservoir. Decreased pressure in a brake circuit may impact the braking torque available to other brake chambers in the circuit.
The present invention provides a new and improved apparatus and method for addressing a decreased pressure available to brake chambers in a circuit when a valve to one of the brake chambers is in the apply state.
In one embodiment, a controller controls respective braking pressures at wheels on a vehicle. The controller includes a processor electrically communicating with a first switching valve, which controls a first of the braking pressure at a first of the wheels, and a second switching valve, which controls a second of the braking pressures at a second of the wheels. The processor, during a braking control event, controls the switching valve associated with the higher of the braking pressures to maintain the higher braking pressure while switching a state of the switching valve associated with the lower of the braking pressures to increase the lower braking pressure.
In the accompanying drawings which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, embodiments of the invention are illustrated, which, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description given below, serve to exemplify the embodiments of this invention.
With reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, the brake chambers 14a, 14b and respective switching valves 22a, 22b are in a first brake circuit 24. The brake chambers 14c, 14d, 14e, 14f and respective switching valves 22c, 22d are in a second brake circuit 26.
In one embodiment, the controller 20 electronically controls the compressed air delivered to the brake chambers 14a, 14b, 14c, 14d, 14e, 14f, for application of the service brakes during an ABS event, by electronically actuating the respective switching valves 22a, 22b, 22c, 22d. For example, the controller 20 transmits respective signals, via a vehicle communication bus 30, to set the respective switching valves 22 to one of i) an apply state, ii) a release state, and iii) a hold state. In the apply state, the switching valves 22 are normally open so that the brake chambers 14 fluidly communicate with the reservoirs 12. Therefore, in the apply state, the compressed air in the reservoirs 12 passes to the respective brake chambers 14 for applying the service brakes. In the release state, the switching valves 22 close so that the brake chambers 14 do not fluidly communicate with the reservoirs 12. Therefore, in the release state, the compressed air in the reservoirs 12 is prevented from reaching the respective brake chambers 14. At the same time, while in the release state, any compressed air currently in the respective brake chambers 14 is exhausted from the brake chambers 14 to atmosphere to release the service brakes. In the hold state, the switching valves 22 close so that the brake chambers 14 do not fluidly communicate with the reservoirs 12. Therefore, in the hold state, the compressed air in the reservoirs 12 is prevented from reaching the respective brake chambers 14. At the same time, while in the hold state, any compressed air currently in the respective brake chambers 14 is not exhausted from the brake chambers 14 and, instead, is held in the respective brake chambers 14 for maintaining application of the service brakes.
Although the illustrated embodiment shows the controller 20 transmitting signals to the switching valves 22 via the vehicle communication bus 30, other embodiments in which the controller 20 transmits signals directly to the switching valves 22 are also considered.
The controller 20 includes a communication port 32 and an electronic control unit (ECU) 34 (e.g., a processor). The communication port 32 electronically communicates with both the vehicle communication bus 30 and the ECU 34. In one embodiment, the ECU 34 is an anti-lock braking system (ABS) that controls the service brakes during an anti-lock braking event, by electronically actuating selected ones of the switching valves 22a, 22b, 22c, 22d of the respective brake chambers 14a, 14b, 14c, 14d, 14e, 14f to improve vehicle braking during certain conditions (e.g., when the wheels 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f slip during braking due to wet or icy road conditions).
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference again to
Otherwise, if it is determined in the step 216 that the pressure in the service brake chambers 14a, 14b are at the expected pressure, control passes to a step 220 for determining if a brake control event is active at the first wheel 16a. If it is determined in the step 220 that a brake control event is not active at the first wheel 16a, control returns to the step 210. In one embodiment, if it is determined in the step 220 that a brake control event is active at the first wheel 16a, it is to be understood that the first valve 22a is in either the hold state or release state, and the second valve 22b is in the apply state (see t1 in
Then, in a step 222, the ECU 34 determines if a brake control event is active at the second wheel 16b. If it is determined in the step 222 that a brake control event is active at the second wheel 16b, control returns to the step 210. In one embodiment, if it is determined in the step 222 that a brake control event is not active at the second wheel 16b, it is to be understood that the first valve 22a is in either the hold state or release state, and the second valve 22b is in the apply state, which are the same states discussed above with reference to the step 220 when a brake control event is not active at the first wheel 16a.
With reference again to
With reference to
If, on the other hand, it is determined in the step 224 that the pressure difference between the first and second brake chambers 14a, 14b in the brake circuit 24 is greater than the predetermined pressure (see Δp in the graph 212), control passes to a step 226, in which the ECU 34 determines if pressure is to be re-applied to the first brake chamber 14a. The ECU 34 may determine that pressure is to be re-applied to the first brake 14a because, for example, of braking controlled by ABS, ESP, or EBS. If it is determined in the step 226 that pressure is not to be re-applied to the first brake chamber 14a, control returns to the step 210.
If, on the other hand, it is determined in the step 226 that pressure is to be re-applied to the first brake chamber 14a, the ECU 34 causes the second valve 22b to be transitioned to the hold state in a step 230 (at time t2 in
With reference to
After the step 232, control passes to a step 234 in which the ECU 34 sets the first valve 22a from the apply state to either the hold state or the release state (see the time t3 in
Then, in a step 236, the ECU 34 sets the second valve 22b from the hold state to the apply state. Optionally, the ECU 34 causes the second valve 22b to be transitioned the apply state in the step 236 up to about 50 ms after the first valve 22a is transitioned to either the hold state or the release state in the step 234. In other words, the second valve 22b to be transitioned the apply state in the step 236 up to about 50 ms after the time t3. Although the present embodiment is described as the ECU 34 setting the second valve 22b to the apply state up to about 50 ms after the time t3, other embodiments in which the ECU 34 setting the second valve 22b to the apply state based on a pressure in the first brake chamber 14a (e.g., when the pressure in the first brake chamber 14a reaches about the same pressure as the second brake chamber 14b) are also contemplated.
Control then returns to the step 210.
As discussed in more detail below, in one embodiment, the step 232 occurs up to about 50 ms after the step 230. In addition, the step 236 occurs up to about 50 ms after the step 234.
The ECU 34 may act as a means for maintaining a higher braking pressure at the second brake while pressure increases at the first brake during a braking control event, if a braking pressure difference between the first and second brakes is greater than the predetermined threshold pressure. More specifically, the ECU 34 controls the first and second switching valves 22a, 22b as discussed herein to reduce pressure drops in the second brake chamber 14b when pressure is increased in the first brake chamber 14a due to a brake control event (e.g., ABS, ESP, or EBS).
With reference to
With reference to
The optional times (e.g., 50 ms) between the steps 230 and 232 and between the steps 234 and 236 may act to reduce the number of times the second valve 22b switches between states. For example, in
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention, in its broader aspects, is not limited to the specific details, the representative apparatus, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the applicant's general inventive concept.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3988043 | Reinecke | Oct 1976 | A |
4755945 | Kade et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763260 | Sakuma et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4807944 | Weise | Feb 1989 | A |
4881784 | Leppek | Nov 1989 | A |
5281009 | Kidston et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5375919 | Furuhashi | Dec 1994 | A |
5538334 | Kushi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5697682 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5921640 | Mortimer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6116703 | Breipohl et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6312065 | Freitag et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349789 | Nakano et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6704635 | Walenty et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
8276993 | Ripley et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010006306 | Kagawa et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010038243 | Isono | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20040192534 | Nixon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040227396 | Kusano | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050107940 | Higuchi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050264104 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070120418 | Kajita et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080288148 | Amato | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100090058 | Cahill et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120226402 | Minamiura | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130006476 | Yamazaki | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130226429 | Udaka et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140180552 | Giddens et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188363 | Eckert et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4326040 | Feb 1994 | DE |
19504295 | Aug 1995 | DE |
112011103701 | Aug 2013 | DE |
2196076 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2499438 | Aug 2013 | GB |
H1120652 | Jan 1999 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Bendix EC-60 ABS /ATC Controllers (Standard & Premium), Service Data Sheet SD-13-4863, BW2428, 2011. |
Office Action in related co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/459,549 issued Apr. 17, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2014/050039 (1 page), mailed Feb. 23, 2015. |
International Search Report received with the Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2014/050039 (6 pages), mailed Feb. 23, 2015. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority received with The Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2014/050039 (7 pages), mailed Feb. 23, 2015. |
Amendment in related co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/459,549, filed Jul. 17, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for counterpart International Appln. No. PCT/US2015/044566, mailed Oct. 21, 2015. |
International Search Report for counterpart International Appln. No. PCT/US2015/044566, mailed Oct. 21, 2015. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for counterpart International Appln. No. PCT/US2015/044566, mailed Oct. 21, 2015. |
Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 14/459,549, dated Oct. 8, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150051804 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |