The present invention relates to a system and method for controlling the flow of a fluid in branched wells. More specifically the invention relates to a system and a method as disclosed in the preamble of claims 1 and 6, respectively.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention a plurality of autonomous valves or flow control devices are substantially as those described in WO 2008/004875 A1, belonging to the applicant of the present application.
Devices for recovering of oil and gas from long, horizontal and vertical wells are known from U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,821,801, 4,858,691, 4,577,691 and GB patent publication No. 2169018. These known devices comprise a perforated drainage pipe with, for example, a filter for control of sand around the pipe. A considerable disadvantage with the known devices for oil/and or gas production in highly permeable geological formations is that the pressure in the drainage pipe increases exponentially in the upstream direction as a result of the flow friction in the pipe. Because the differential pressure between the reservoir and the drainage pipe will decrease upstream as a result, the quantity of oil and/or gas flowing from the reservoir into the drainage pipe will decrease correspondingly. The total oil and/or gas produced by this means will therefore be low. With thin oil zones and highly permeable geological formations, there is further a high risk that of coning, i.e. flow of unwanted water or gas into the drainage pipe downstream, where the velocity of the oil flow from the reservoir to the pipe is the greatest.
From World Oil, vol. 212, N. 11 (11/91), pages 73-80, is previously known to divide a drainage pipe into sections with one or more inflow restriction devices such as sliding sleeves or throttling devices. However, this reference is mainly dealing with the use of inflow control to limit the inflow rate for up hole zones and thereby avoid or reduce coning of water and or gas.
WO-A-9208875 describes a horizontal production pipe comprising a plurality of production sections connected by mixing chambers having a larger internal diameter than the production sections. The production sections comprise an external slotted liner which can be considered as performing a filtering action. However, the sequence of sections of different diameter creates flow turbulence and prevent the running of work-over tools.
When extracting oil and or gas from geological production formations, fluids of different qualities, i.e. oil, gas, water (and sand) is produced in different amounts and mixtures depending on the property or quality of the formation. None of the above-mentioned, known devices are able to distinguish between and control the inflow of oil, gas or water on the basis of their relative composition and/or quality.
With the autonomous valve as described in WO 2008/004875 A1 is provided an inflow control device which is self adjusting or autonomous and can easily be fitted in the wall of a production pipe and which therefore provide for the use of work-over tools. The device is designed to “distinguish” between the oil and/or gas and/or water and is able to control the flow or inflow of oil or gas, depending on which of these fluids such flow control is required.
The device as disclosed in WO 2008/004875 A1 is robust, can withstand large forces and high temperatures, needs no energy supply, can withstand sand production, is reliable, but is still simple and very cheap.
A problem with the prior art is that one well will cover a limited reservoir area, and hence that the drainage and oil production from one single well is limited.
The system and method according to the invention seeks to reduce or eliminate the above and other problems or disadvantages by providing a substantially constant volume rate and a phase-filter along wells, even for a multilayered reservoir.
The system and method according to the invention are characterized by the features as disclosed in the characterizing clause of claims 1 and 6, respectively.
Advantageous embodiments are set forth in the dependent claims.
The present invention will be further described in the following by means of examples and with reference to the drawings, where:
a substantially shows an enlarged view of the part of
The present invention exploits the effect of Bernoulli teaching that the sum of static pressure, dynamic pressure and friction is constant along a flow line:
When subjecting the disc 9 to a fluid flow, which is the case with the present invention, the pressure difference over the disc 9 can be expressed as follows:
Due to lower viscosity, a fluid such as gas will “make the turn later” and follow further along the disc towards its outer end (indicated by reference number 14). This makes a higher stagnation pressure in the area 16 at the end of the disc 9, which in turn makes a higher pressure over the disc. And the disc 9, which is freely movable within the space between the disc-shaped bodies 4, 7, will move downwards and thereby narrow the flow path between the disc 9 and inner cylindrical segment 6. Thus, the disc 9 moves dawn-wards or up-wards depending on the viscosity of the fluid flowing through, whereby this principle can be used to control (close/open) the flow of fluid through of the device.
Further, the pressure drop through a traditional inflow control device (ICD) with fixed geometry will be proportional to the dynamic pressure:
where the constant, K is mainly a function of the geometry and less dependent on the Reynolds number. In the control device according to the present invention the flow area will decrease when the differential pressure increases, such that the volume flow through the control device will not, or nearly not, increase when the pressure drop increases. A comparison between a control device according to the present invention with movable disc and a control device with fixed flow-through opening is shown in
This represents a major advantage with the present invention as it can be used to ensure the same volume flowing through each section for the entire horizontal well, which is not possible with fixed inflow control devices.
When producing oil and gas the control device according to the invention may have two different applications: Using it as inflow control device to reduce inflow of water, or using it to reduce inflow of gas at gas break through situations. When designing the control device according to the invention for the different application such as water or gas, as mentioned above, the different areas and pressure zones, as shown in
A4, P4 is the area and pressure (stagnation pressure) behind the movable disc or body 9. The stagnation pressure, at position 16 (
Fluids with different viscosities will provide different forces in each zone depending on the design of these zones. In order to optimize the efficiency and flow through properties of the control device, the design of the areas will be different for different applications, e.g. gas/oil or oil/water flow. Hence, for each application the areas needs to be carefully balanced and optimally designed taking into account the properties and physical conditions (viscosity, temperature, pressure etc.) for each design situation.
The spring element 18 is used to balance and control the inflow area between the disc 9 and the inlet 10, or rather the surrounding edge or seat 19 of the inlet 10. Thus, depending on the spring constant and thereby the spring force, the opening between the disc 9 and edge 19 will be larger or smaller, and with a suitable selected spring constant, depending on the inflow and pressure conditions at the selected place where the control device is provided, constant mass flow through the device may be obtained.
When producing oil and/or gas the conditions may rapidly change from a situation where only or mostly oil is produced to a situation where only or mostly gas is produced (gas breakthrough or gas coning). With for instance a pressure drop of 16 bar from 100 bar the temperature drop would correspond to approximately 20° C. By providing the disc 9 with a thermally responsive element such as a bi-metallic element as shown in
The above examples of a control device as shown in
a show a part of a completed main well 27 having uncompleted branch wells 25 and swell packers or constrictors 26. In
In
The method according to the invention comprises the following steps (not necessarily in said order):
The uncompleted branch wells 25 are provided to increase the drainage area, i.e. maximum reservoir contact (MRC).
With the valve or control device described in WO 2008/004875 A1, due to the constant volume rate, a much better drainage of the reservoir is thus achieved. This result in significant larger production of that reservoir.
By further referring to
As also mentioned in the introductionary part of the description, the autonomous valves 2 preferably are those described in WO 2008/004875 A1 and above, but any type of autonomous valve (e.g. electronically operated) is conceivable within the context of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20081317 | Mar 2008 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2009/000088 | 3/10/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/17/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/113870 | 9/17/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3550616 | Graham et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
4577691 | Huang et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4821801 | Van Laar | Apr 1989 | A |
4858691 | Ilfrey et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5337808 | Graham | Aug 1994 | A |
5732776 | Tubel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6112817 | Voll et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6279660 | Hay | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6951252 | Restarick et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7063162 | Daling et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7819196 | Aakre | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20010013412 | Tubel | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20030024700 | Cavender | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030221834 | Hess et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040055752 | Restarick et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060027377 | Schoonderbeek et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060175065 | Ross | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070193752 | Kim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080035875 | Tai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090218103 | Aakre et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110048732 | Mathiesen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110056700 | Mathiesen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
327432 | Aug 1989 | EP |
327432 | Aug 1989 | EP |
2169018 | Jul 1986 | GB |
WO 9208875 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 2008004875 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Coning”, http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/c/coning.aspx, downloaded Jun. 10, 2013. |
Abstract for NO-307,192-B1, Feb. 21, 2000, 1 page. |
White, “Controlling Flow in Horizontal Wells”, World Oil, Nov. 1991, pp. 73-80, with one sheet attachment. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110048732 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |