Patent Grant
9980458
This invention relates generally to dairy farming and more particularly to a system and method for controlling the position of a robot carriage based on the position of a milking stall of an adjacent rotary milking platform.
Over time, the size and complexity of dairy milking operations has increased. Accordingly, the need for efficient and scalable systems and methods that support dairy milking operations has also increased. Systems and methods supporting dairy milking operations, however, have proven inadequate in various respects.
According to embodiments of the present disclosure, disadvantages and problems associated with previous systems supporting dairy milking operations may be reduced or eliminated.
In certain embodiments, a system includes a carriage track positioned adjacent to a rotary milking platform, a robot carriage mounted to the carriage track such that the robot carriage may move linearly along the carriage track, and a controller. The controller is operable to receive both a first rotary encoder signal indicating a first rotational position of a milking stall of the rotary milking platform (a position corresponding to a starting linear position of the robot carriage on the carriage track) and a second rotary encoder signal indicating a second rotational position of the milking stall of the rotary milking platform. The controller is further operable to determine, based on a difference between the second rotary encoder signal and the first rotary encoder signal, a desired linear position of the robot carriage on the carriage track, the desired linear position being a position corresponding to the second rotational position of the milking stall of the rotary milking platform. The controller is further operable to communicate a position signal to a carriage actuator coupled to the robot carriage and the carriage track, the position signal causing the carriage actuator to move the robot carriage along the carriage track to the desired linear position.
In certain embodiments, a method includes receiving both a first rotary encoder signal indicating a first rotational position of a milking stall of a rotary milking platform (a position corresponding to a starting linear position of a robot carriage on an adjacent carriage track) and a second rotary encoder signal indicating a second rotational position of the milking stall of the rotary milking platform. The method further includes determining, based on a difference between the second rotary encoder signal and the first rotary encoder signal, a desired linear position of the robot carriage on the carriage track, the desired linear position being a position corresponding to the second rotational position of the milking stall of the rotary milking platform. The method further includes communicating a position signal to a carriage actuator coupled to the robot carriage and the carriage track, the position signal causing the carriage actuator to move the robot carriage along the carriage track to the desired linear position.
Particular embodiments of the present disclosure may provide one or more technical advantages. For example, certain embodiments of the present disclosure may provide a system that allows a robot carriage mounted on a linear carriage track to accurately track the movement of a milking stall of an adjacent rotary milking platform. Because the robot carriage may carry an automated system for performing one or more functions associated with the milking of a dairy livestock located in the milking stall of the rotary milking platform (e.g., a robotic arm for applying disinfectant to the teats of the dairy livestock and/or attaching a milking claw to the teats of the dairy livestock), certain embodiments of the present disclosure may facilitate a reduction in the need for human labor to perform certain functions associated with milking dairy livestock using a rotary milking platform. As a result, certain embodiments of the present disclosure may reduce the cost associated with certain dairy milking operations. In addition, the automation facilitated by certain embodiments of the present disclosure may increase the throughput of the rotary milking platform, thereby increasing the overall milk production of the rotary milking platform.
Certain embodiments of the present disclosure may include some, all, or none of the above advantages. One or more other technical advantages may be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the figures, descriptions, and claims included herein.
To provide a more complete understanding of the present invention and the features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In certain embodiments, rotary milking system 100 may facilitate the performance of one or more operations associated with the milking of a dairy cow 106 located in a milking stall 104 of rotary milking platform 102. As particular examples, rotary milking system 100 may facilitate (1) the cleaning and/or stimulation of the teats of a dairy cow 106 prior to the attachment of teat cups of a milking claw to the teats of the dairy cow 106 (e.g., using a preparation tool of robot arm 112), (2) the attachment of the teat cups of the milking claw 107 to the teats of a dairy cow 106 (e.g., using a teat cup attacher of robot arm 112), and/or (3) the application of disinfectant to the teats of a dairy cow 106 (e.g., using a spray tool of robot arm 112).
In association with the performance of one or more of the above-described operations associated with the milking of a dairy cow 106, controller 114 may perform a number of functions. First, controller 114 may control the movement of robot carriage 110 along track 108 such that robot carriage 110 moves along track 108 at a rate corresponding to the rotational speed of rotary milking platform 102. As a result, one or more of the above-described operations may be performed while rotary milking platform 102 is in motion. Second, controller 114 may determine whether enough space exists between the legs of a dairy cow 106 (e.g., based on image signal(s) 146 generated by vision system 142, as described in detail below) to allow a portion of robot arm 112 to extend between the legs and perform one or more of the above-described operations. Third, controller 114 may confirm that the milking claw is detached from the teats of the dairy cow 106 prior to causing a portion of robot arm 112 to extend between the legs of the dairy cow 106 (as one or more of the above-described operations may be performed subsequent to milking of the dairy cow 106).
Although a particular implementation of system 100 is illustrated and primarily described, the present disclosure contemplates any suitable implementation of system 100, according to particular needs. Additionally, although the present disclosure is described with regard to the milking of dairy cows 106, the present disclosure contemplates that system 100 may be applicable to the milking of any suitable dairy livestock (e.g., cows, goats, sheep, water buffalo, etc.).
Rotary milking platform 102 may include any suitable combination of structure and materials forming a platform with a number of stalls 104 positioned around the perimeter such that the stalls 104 rotate about a center point as dairy cows 106 in stalls 104 are milked. In the depicted embodiment, milking stalls 104 are arranged in a side-by-side configuration such that a dairy cow 106 in a milking stall 104 faces the middle of rotary milking platform 102. In this configuration, robot arm 112 may extend and retract from between the hind legs of a dairy cow 106 in order to perform one or more operations associated with the milking of the dairy cow 106. Each milking stall may 104 may have an associated milking claw 107 configured for attachment to the teats of a dairy cow 106 in order to facilitate the milking of a dairy cows 106 in the milking stall 104. The milking claw 107 may be stored at a storage location 115 in or adjacent to the associated milking stall 104 when the milking claw is not is use (i.e., when it is not attached to the teats of a dairy cow 106).
Although a rotary milking platform 102 having a particular configuration, size, and number of stalls 104 is illustrated, the present disclosure contemplates a rotary milking platform 102 having any suitable configuration, size, and number of stalls 104, according to particular needs. For example, in one alternative configuration, milking stalls 104 of rotary milking platform 102 may be arranged in a herringbone configuration (where the milking stalls 104 are oriented on a bias relative to the perimeter of milking platform 102). In this configuration, robot arm 112 may extend and retract from the side of the dairy cow 106 (i.e., between a front leg and a hind leg of a dairy cow 106) in order to perform one or more operations associated with the milking of the dairy cow 106. In another alternative configuration, milking stalls 104 of rotary milking platform 102 may be arranged in a tandem configuration (where the front of a dairy cow 106 in a first milking stall 104 is facing the rear of a dairy cow 106 in an adjacent milking stall 104), and robot arm 112 may extend and retract from the side of the dairy cow 106 (i.e. between a front leg and a hind leg).
In certain embodiments, a rotary encoder 116 may be configured to generate rotary encoder signals 118 corresponding to the rotational position and/or speed of rotary milking platform 102. As illustrated in detail in
In certain embodiments, rotary encoder 116 may comprise any suitable electro-mechanical device operable to convert an angular position of a shaft 122 into an electrical signal comprising a number of pulses (i.e., rotary encoder signals 118). Because the number of pulses generated by rotary encoder 116 per revolution of rotary milking platform 102 may be known (e.g., 1000 pulses), the pulse count generated by rotary encoder 116 at any given time may correspond to the rotational position of rotary milking platform 102. Similarly, the frequency of pulses of generated by rotary encoder 116 may correspond to the rotational speed of rotary milking platform 102.
Returning to
In certain embodiments, an absolute encoder 124 may be coupled to robot carriage 110 and may be configured to generate absolute encoder signals 126 corresponding to the linear position and/or speed of robot carriage 110 on track 108. For example, absolute encoder 124 may have a structure and operation similar to rotary encoder 116 (discussed above). Because absolute encoder 124 may generate a known number of pulses per distance (e.g., meter) traveled by robot carriage 110, the count of pulses generated by absolute encoder 124 at any given time may correspond to the linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108. Similarly, the frequency of pulses generated by absolute encoder 124 may correspond to the linear speed of robot carriage 110 relative to track 108.
In certain embodiments, the robot arm 112 riding on robot carriage 110 may include a number of arm members 136 pivotally attached to one another. Robot arm 112 may additionally include a number of arm actuators 138 each operable to extend and retract in order to cause movement of robot arm 112. The extension/retraction of arm actuators 138 may be governed by actuator drive mechanism 134, described above. Robot arm 112 may additionally include a tool attachment 140 operable to perform one or more functions associated with the milking of a dairy cow 106. For example, tool attachment 140 may comprise a spray head operable to apply disinfectant to the teats of a dairy cow 106. As another example, tool attachment 140 may comprise a preparation tool for cleaning and/or stimulating the teats of the dairy cow 106 prior to the attachment of the teat cups of a milking claw 107. As yet another example, tool attachment 140 may comprise a teat cup attacher operable to attach the teat cups of a milking claw 107 to the teats of a dairy cow 106.
In certain embodiments, tool attachment 140 may include a vision system 142 housing a camera 144. Camera 144 may include any suitable camera operable to generate one or more image signals 146 corresponding to all or a portion of a milking stall 104 and/or all or a portion of a dairy cow 106 located in the milking stall 104. In some embodiments, camera 144 may be operable to generate still images at particular points in time. In other embodiments, camera 144 may be operable to generate a continuous video image signal. As one particular example, camera 144 may be a three-dimensional camera operable to generate a three-dimensional video image signal 146 corresponding to the rear of a dairy cow 106.
As described in further detail below, image signals 146 generated by vision system 142 (1) may be used by controller 114 (e.g., using vision control logic 156, described below) to position all or a portion of robot arm 112 relative to a dairy cow 106 such that tool attachment 140 may perform one or more of the above-described functions (e.g., by determining whether enough space exists between the hind legs of the dairy cow 106 to allow the extension of at least a portion of robot arm 112 between the hind legs), and/or (2) may be used by controller 114 (e.g., using milking claw detection logic 158, described below) to determine whether a milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of dairy cow 106 in milking stall 104 (as it may be desirable to confirm that the milking claw 107 is not attached to the teats of the dairy cow 106 before robot arm 112 performs certain functions associated with the milking of dairy cow 106).
Although track 108, robot carriage 110, robot arm 112, and tool attachment 140 are depicted as having a particular configuration, the present disclosure contemplates these components having any suitable configuration, according to particular needs. Furthermore, although robot arm 112 is depicted as having a particular number of members 136 having a particular structure, the present disclosure contemplates any suitable number of members 136, each having any suitable structure, according to particular needs. Moreover, although robot arm 112 is depicted as having a particular tool attachment 140, the present disclosure contemplates robot arm 112 having any suitable tool attachment 140 for performing operations associated with the milking of a dairy cow 106.
Returning to
Controller 114 may include one or more computer systems at one or more locations. Each computer system may include any appropriate input devices (such as a keypad, touch screen, mouse, or other device that can accept information), output devices, mass storage media, or other suitable components for receiving, processing, storing, and communicating data. Both the input devices and output devices may include fixed or removable storage media such as a magnetic computer disk, CD-ROM, or other suitable media to both receive input from and provide output to a user. Each computer system may include a personal computer, workstation, network computer, kiosk, wireless data port, personal data assistant (PDA), one or more processors within these or other devices, or any other suitable processing device. In short, controller 114 may include any suitable combination of software, firmware, and hardware.
Controller 114 may additionally include one or more processing modules 148. The processing modules 148 may each include one or more microprocessors, controllers, or any other suitable computing devices or resources and may work, either alone or with other components of system 100, to provide a portion or all of the functionality of system 100 described herein. Controller 114 may additionally include (or be communicatively coupled to via wireless or wireline communication) one or more memory modules 150. The memory modules 150 may each include any memory or database module and may take the form of volatile or non-volatile memory, including, without limitation, magnetic media, optical media, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), removable media, or any other suitable local or remote memory component.
In certain embodiments, it may be desirable for robot carriage 110 to translate along track 108 at a speed corresponding to a milking stall 104 of rotary milking platform 102 such that the robot arm 112 riding on robot carriage may perform one or more functions associated with the milking of a dairy cow 106 in the milking stall 104 while the rotary milking platform 102 is in motion. Accordingly, controller 114 may include position control logic 152, which may include any information, logic, and/or instructions stored and/or executed by controller 114 to control the movement of robot carriage 110 on track 108 relative to a stall 104 of rotary milking platform 102. For example, position control logic 152 may be operable to control the movement of robot carriage 110 on track 108 based on one or more rotary encoder signals 118 generated by rotary encoder 116.
In certain embodiments, position control logic 152 may determine a desired linear position for robot carriage 110 (Xdesired) based on a comparison of (1) a first rotary encoder signal 118 corresponding to a rotational position of rotary milking platform 102 at which a particular stall 104 is adjacent to a starting linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108 (Xstart), and (2) a second rotary encoder signal 118 corresponding to a current position of the particular stall 104 (a position at which the particular stall 104 is adjacent to position located between the starting linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108 (Xstart), and an ending linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108 (Xend)). For example, the first rotary encoder signal 118 may comprise a count of pulses generated by rotary encoder 116 at the time when the particular stall 104 triggers a proximity switch (or any other suitable sensor) indicating that the particular stall 104 has reached a position adjacent to a starting linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108 (Xstart), and the second rotary encoder signal 118 may comprise a current count of pulses generated by rotary encoder 116. As a result, the difference between the second rotary encoder signal 118 and the first rotary encoder signal 118 may correspond to a distance traveled by the particular stall 104 through the area adjacent to track 108.
Because the outside circumference of rotary milking platform 102 and the number of pulses generated by rotary encoder 116 per revolution of rotary milking platform 102 may each be known (e.g., 50 meters and 1000 pulses/revolution, respectively), the distance traveled by a milking stall 104 of rotary milking platform 102 per pulse of rotary encoder 116 may also be known (e.g., 50 meters/1000 pulses, or 0.05 meters per pulse). Therefore, the number of pulses generated by rotary encoder 116 between the first rotational position (i.e., the position at which the milking stall 104 is adjacent to Xstart) and the second rotational position may correspond to the total distance traveled by the milking stall 104 after passing the position adjacent Xstart. Because robot carriage 110 will need to move from Xstart the same distance to track the movement of the milking stall 104, the desired linear position for robot carriage 110 (Xdesired) relative to the starting linear position of robot carriage 110 (Xstart) may be determined as follows:
where:
Having determined the desired linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108, position control logic 152 may be further operable to generate a position signal 154 to be communicated to carriage actuator 132 (and/or actuator drive mechanism 134). The position signal 154 may cause extension/retraction of carriage actuator 132 such that robot carriage 108 is moved to the desired linear position (Xdesired). By repeating the above-described calculation of the desired linear position of robot carriage 110 (Xdesired) at regular intervals, position control logic 152 may cause robot carriage 108 to track the movement of the particular stall 104 of milking parlor 102 as the stall moves adjacent to track 108. Moreover, when a next stall 104 reaches a position adjacent to the starting linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108 (Xstart) (e.g., triggering the above-described proximity switch), position control logic 152 may cause robot carriage 108 to track the movement of the next stall 104. As a result, position control logic 152 may allow robot carriage 104 to track the movement of each stall 104 of rotary milking platform 104 as each stall moves through the area adjacent to track 108.
In certain embodiments, position control logic 152 may be further operable to determine an error between the calculated desired linear position for robot carriage 110 (Xdesired) and an actual linear position of robot carriage 110 (Xactual). Position control logic 152 may determine the actual linear position of robot carriage 110 (Xactual) relative to the starting linear position of robot carriage 110 (Xstart) based on the number of pulses of an absolute encoder signal 126 generated by absolute encoder 124 (as absolute encoder 124 may generate a known number of pulses per meter of linear movement of carriage 110). If the determined error exceeds a threshold value (e.g., 0.1 meters), position control logic 152 may cause the rotation of rotary milking platform 102 to stop (e.g., by communicating a stopping signal to a rotary drive motor of rotary milking platform 102).
With robot carriage translating laterally along track 108 at a speed corresponding to that of a milking stall 104 of rotary milking platform 102 (as described above), at least a portion of robot arm 112 may be extended between the legs of a dairy cow 106 in milking stall 104 in order to perform one or more operations associated with the milking of the dairy cow 106. In order to avoid contact between the robot arm 112 and the dairy cow 106, it may be desirable to ensure that the legs of the dairy cow 106, such as the hind legs, are spaced far enough apart to allow for the extension of at least a portion of robot arm 112 there between. Accordingly, controller 114 may additionally include vision control logic 156, which may include any information, logic, and/or instructions stored and/or executed by controller 114 to determine, based on image signal(s) 146 generated by vision system 142, whether the hind legs of a dairy cow 106 are spaced far enough apart to allow for a particular operation by robot arm 112. In a particular embodiment, vision control logic 156 may determine whether the hind legs of a dairy cow 106 are spaced far enough apart by analyzing image signal 146 to find particular edges of the rear of the dairy cow 106. The particular edges may be located by analyzing depth information of the visual data and to determine which portions represent the dairy cow 106 and which portions do not (as the transitions between those portions may represent the particular edges of the rear of the dairy cow 106).
For example, vision control logic 156 may process an image signal 146 to determine the depth of the pixels in the x-dimension (as reflected by the coordinate system illustrated in
After determining the hip location 402a of dairy cow 106, vision control logic 156 may attempt to locate the hind leg of the dairy cow 106. For example, vision control logic 156 may analyze a portion of the image signal 146 below the determined hip location 402a in the y-dimension (as reflected by the coordinate system illustrated in
In certain embodiments, vision control logic 156, having determined inner hind location 406a, may analyze portions of image signal 146 above and below (in the y-dimension, as reflected by the coordinate system illustrated in
Having determined hip location 402a, outer hind location 404a, inner hind location 406a, and the inner edge of the hind leg of the dairy cow 106, vision control logic 156 may process the opposing side of image signal 146 to determine hip location 402b, outer hind location 404b, inner hind location 406b, and the inner edge of the other hind leg of the dairy cow 106 (in a substantially similar manner to that described above).
Once the inner edges of each hind leg of the dairy cow 106 have been located, vision control logic 156 may determine whether the hind legs of the dairy cow 106 are far apart enough to allow for the proper operation of at least a portion of robot arm 112 by calculating the distance between the hind legs. For example, vision control logic 156 may calculate the distance between inner hind locations 406a and 406b. As another example, vision control logic 156 may determine an inner-most point along the inner edge of each hind leg of the dairy cow 106 (e.g., the location along each determined inner edge closest to the center of the image signal 146) and calculate the distance between those two points. In certain embodiments, the inner-most point of each hind leg may be calculated within a working area. For example, the working area may be an area between the inner hind edges where robot arm 112 may operate. The measurements of the working area may be based at least in part upon the width and/or height of a portion of robot arm 112 likely to be operating between the hind legs of the dairy cow 106. In such an embodiment, vision control logic 156 may analyze visual data along the detected inner hind edge in a substantially vertical direction within the working area to determine the inner-most location. If the determined distance between the hind legs exceeds a distance threshold (e.g., a minimum distance allowing for the robot arm 112 to properly operate), vision control logic 156 may determine that the hind legs of the dairy cow 106 are spaced far enough apart to allow for the proper operation of at least a portion of robot arm 112.
If vision control logic 156 determines that the hind legs of the dairy cow 106 are spaced far enough apart, vision control logic 156 may facilitate the communication of signals to one or more of arm actuators 138, the communicated signals causing extension/retraction of arm actuators 138 such that at least a portion of robot arm 112 (e.g., tool attachment 140) extends toward the space between the hind legs of the dairy cow 106 (e.g., at a predetermined height relative to the milking stall in which the dairy cow 106 is located). Because image signal 146 may comprise a three-dimensional video image (as described above), the image signal 146 may change in real time as camera 144 moves toward the dairy cow 106. Accordingly, the present disclosure contemplates that vision control logic 156 may update, either continuously or at predetermined intervals, the determined leg positions as image signal 146 changes. Furthermore, vision control logic 156, or any other suitable component, may be operable to determine whether a portion of robot arm 112 is in contact with the dairy cow 106. In such an instance, vision control logic 156 may facilitate the communication of signals to one or more of arm actuators 138 to cause extension/retraction of arm actuators 138 such that at least a portion of robot arm 112 is no longer in contact with the dairy cow.
Although the above-described example embodiment relates to determining whether there is enough space between the hind legs of a dairy cow 106, the present disclosure contemplates that vision control logic 156 performance may determine, in a similar manner, whether there is enough space between a front leg and a hind leg of a dairy cow 106.
Prior to extending at least a portion of the robot arm 112 between the hind legs of the dairy cow 106 to perform certain functions associated with the milking of the dairy cow 106 (e.g., applying disinfectant to the teats to the dairy livestock 106), it may be desirable to ensure that a milking claw 107 is not attached to the teats of a diary cow 106. Accordingly, controller 114 may additionally include milking claw detection logic 158, which may include any information, logic, and/or instructions stored and/or executed by controller 114 to determine whether to extend robot arm 112 between the hind legs of a dairy cow 106 based on whether a milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow 106.
In certain embodiments, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether a milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow 106 when a milking stall 104 in which the dairy cow 106 is located enters an area adjacent to track 108 and robot arm 112. For example, milking claw detection logic 158 may receive a trigger (e.g. from a proximity switch or any other suitable sensor associated with the rotary milking platform 102) indicating that the milking stall 104 in which the dairy cow 106 is located has entered an area adjacent to track 108, and may determine whether a milking claw 107 is attached in response to that trigger. Moreover, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether a milking claw 107 is attached while rotary milking platform 102 is rotating and while the robot carriage 110 carrying robot arm 112 translates along track 108 at a speed corresponding to that of the stall 104 housing the dairy cow 106 (as described above) Alternatively, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether a milking claw 107 is attached while robot arm 112 remains stationary, and robot carriage 110 may begin to track the movement of the milking stall subsequent to a determination that the milking claw 107 is not attached.
Milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether a milking claw 107 is attached using one of at least three different methods. As a first method, milking claw detection logic 158 may access a milking claw detachment signal 147, the milking claw detachment signal 147 indicating whether the milking claw 107 has detached from the teats of the dairy cow. Milking claw detachment signal 147 may be generated by a computer system associated with the rotary milking platform 102. Alternatively, rather than indicating whether the milking claw 107 has detached, milking claw detachment signal 147 may indicate whether the milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow 106. In other embodiments, milking claw detachment signal 147 may indicate other operational data associated with the rotary milking platform 102 from which milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether milking claw 107 is attached. For example, milking claw detachment signal 147 may indicate whether vacuum pressure is being applied to the milking claw 107 as part of a milking operation, from which milking claw detection logic 158 may determine that milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow. Thus, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether the milking claw 107 is attached based on milking claw detachment signal 147.
As a second method of determining whether milking claw 107 is attached, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether the milking claw 107 is present at a storage location 115 (i.e. no longer attached to the teats of the dairy cow) by processing an image signal 146 (e.g., a three-dimensional video image signal), as described above) representing the storage location 115 of a milking stall 104.
As one way of determining whether the milking claw 107 is present at the storage location 115 based on an accessed image signal 146, milking claw detection logic 158 may compare the accessed image signal 146 to a reference image signal 160. In certain embodiments, the reference image signal 160 may correspond to storage location 115 when the milking claw 107 is present at storage location 115 (e.g., snapshot 500a of
Alternatively, milking claw detection logic 158 may compare an accessed image signal 146 to two reference image signals 160: a first reference image signal 160 that corresponds to storage location 115 when the milking claw 107 is present at storage location 115, and a second reference image signal 160 that corresponds to storage location 115 when the milking claw 107 is not present at storage location 115. Milking claw detection logic 158 may then determine whether image signal 146 is more similar to the first reference image signal 160, in which case milking claw detection logic 158 may determine that milking claw 107 is not attached to the teats of the dairy cow, or to the second reference image signal 146, in which case milking claw detection logic 158 may determine that milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow.
As another way of determining whether the milking claw 107 is present at the storage location 115 based on an accessed image signal 146, milking claw detection logic 158 may compare the plurality of depth values of image signal 146 to a threshold depth value. Because milking claw 107, when present at storage location 115, may be relatively close to camera 144 as compared to the space located around milking claw 107, and as compared to storage location 115 when milking claw 107 is not present, if many depth values in image signal 146 are smaller (i.e. closer to camera 144) than a threshold depth value, it may indicate that milking claw 107 is present at storage location 115. Conversely, if few depth values in image signal 146 are smaller than a threshold depth value, it may indicate that milking claw 107 is not present at storage location 115. In certain embodiments, milking claw detection logic 158 may count the number of depth values in image signal 146 that are smaller than the threshold depth value. If the counted number is greater than a determined triggering count, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine that milking claw 107 is present at storage location 115, and therefore that milking claw 107 is not attached to the teats of the dairy cow. Otherwise, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine that milking claw 107 is not present at storage location 115, and therefore that milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow. The determined triggering count may be set to one, an arbitrary number, a number based on the resolution of camera 144, a number determined by analyzing one or more reference image signals 160, or any other suitable number.
In alternative embodiments, milking claw detection logic 158 may count the number of depth values in image signal 146 that exceed the threshold depth value. If the counted number is greater than a determined triggering count, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine that milking claw 107 is not present at storage location 115, and therefore that milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow. Otherwise, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine that milking claw 107 is present at storage location 115, and therefore that milking claw 107 is not attached to the teats of the dairy cow.
In some embodiments, the threshold depth value may be selected based on the distance between camera 144 and storage location 115. In other embodiments, the threshold depth value may be selected based on a reference image signal 160. For example, using a reference image signal 160 corresponding to storage location 115 when the milking claw 107 is not present at storage location 115, as illustrated in
As a third method of determining whether milking claw 107 is attached, milking claw detection logic 158 may process an image signal 146 (e.g., a three-dimensional video image signal) representing the rear of the dairy cow 106 in order to determine whether the milking claw 107 is attached to the teats of the dairy cow 106. For example, milking claw detection logic 158 may determine whether milking claw 107 is attached by processing the image signal 146 of the rear of the dairy cow 106 using either of the techniques described above—comparing image signal 146 to a reference image signal 160, or comparing the plurality of depth values in image signal 146 to a threshold depth value—or any other suitable technique. In this case, reference image signal 160 may correspond to the rear of the dairy cow when milking claw 107 is attached (i.e. present in the image). Similarity of image signal 146 to reference image signal 160 may then indicate that milking claw 107 is attached. Conversely, reference image signal 160 may correspond to the rear of the dairy cow when milking claw 107 is not attached, in which case similarity to image signal 146 may indicate that milking claw 107 is not attached. Likewise, the threshold depth value may be set based on one or more reference image signals 160 or based on a distance between camera 144 and the expected location of milking claw 107 when attached (e.g. the teats of the cow).
Because camera 144 of vision system 142 may not generate both of the above-described image signals 146 (i.e., the image signal 146 including storage location 115 and the image signal 146 including the rear of the dairy cow 106) with robot arm 112 in the same position (as both locations may not be in the field of view of camera 144), all or a portion of robot arm 112 may be able to articulate between the different imaging positions. For example, as illustrated in
If, based on one or more of the above-described method, milking claw detection logic 158 determines that a milking claw 107 is not attached, controller 114 may initiate performing further desired operations (e.g. the disinfectant application process) by extending robot arm 112 between the hind legs of dairy cow 106 (e.g. using vision control logic 156). Otherwise, no further action may be performed until a next milking stall 104 enters the area adjacent to track 108 and robot arm 112.
Particular embodiments of system 100 may provide one or more technical advantages. For example, certain embodiments of system 100 may allow robot carriage 110 to accurately track the movement of a stall 104 of the adjacent rotary milking platform 102. Because the robot carriage 110 may carry a robot arm 112 configured to perform one or more functions associated with the milking of a dairy cow 106 located in the stall 104 of the rotary milking platform 102 (e.g., a robotic arm for applying disinfectant to the teats of the dairy livestock and/or attaching a milking claw to the teats of the dairy livestock), certain embodiments of system 100 may facilitate a reduction in the need for human labor to perform certain functions associated with milking dairy cows 106 using rotary milking platform 102. As a result, certain embodiments of system 100 may reduce the cost associated with certain dairy milking operations. In addition, the automation facilitated by certain embodiments of system 100 may increase the throughput of rotary milking platform 102, thereby increasing the overall milk production of rotary milking platform 102.
As another example, using vision system 142 may improve the visibility of the dairy cow 106 and may facilitate milking-related operations from a position to the rear of the dairy cow 106. Approaching from the rear of the dairy cow makes it less likely that the cow will be distracted by the milking equipment. Furthermore, approaching from the rear of the dairy cow makes it less likely that the dairy livestock will kick the milking equipment, vision system 142, or any other component of the system of the present disclosure. Additionally, use of vision system 142 may allow for the safe operation of robot arm 112 without disturbing the dairy cow during any portion of the milking operation. For example, vision system 142 may facilitate the detection of a properly spaced working area between the hind legs of the dairy cow, allowing robot arm 112 to extend between the dairy cow's hind legs without coming into contact with the dairy cow. Moreover, by preventing the robot arm 112 from extending between the legs of a dairy cow 106 while a milking claw is attached to the teats of the cow, certain embodiments of system 100 may prevent injury to the cow and/or damage to the robot arm 112 or other components of system 100.
Although a particular implementation of system 100 is illustrated and primarily described, the present disclosure contemplates any suitable implementation of system 100, according to particular needs. For example, although certain of the above-described functions are described as being performed by position control logic 152, vision control logic 156, or milking claw detection logic 158, the present disclosure contemplates the described functionality as being performed by any suitable logic or combination of logic, according to particular needs. Additionally, although the vision system 142 housing camera 144 is depicted and described above as being positioned on tool attachment 140, the present disclosure contemplates vision system 142 being located separate from tool attachment 140, as depicted in the alternative example rotary milking system 700 depicted in
The method begins at step 802. At step 804, controller 114 receives a first rotary encoder signal 118 generated by rotary encoder 116. The first rotary encoder signal 118 may comprise a number of pulses generated by rotary encoder 116 when a particular milking stall 104 of rotary milking platform 102 is located adjacent to the starting linear position of robot carriage 110 on the track 108 positioned adjacent to rotary milking platform 102. At step 806, controller 114 receives a second rotary encoder signal 118 indicating a second rotational position of the particular stall 104 of rotary milking platform 102.
At step 808, controller 114 determines a desired linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108 based on the difference between the second rotary encoder signal 118 and the first rotary encoder signal 118 (as described above with regard to
At step 810, controller 114 communicates a position signal 154 to a carriage actuator 132 coupled to robot carriage 110 and track 108. The position signal 154 may cause extension/retraction of carriage actuator 132 such that robot carriage 110 is moved along track 108 to the desired linear position.
At step 812, controller 114 receives an absolute encoder signal 126 generated by absolute encoder 124. The absolute encoder signal 126 corresponds to the actual linear position of robot carriage 110 on track 108 (as absolute encoder 124 may generate a known number of pulses per meter traveled by robot carriage 110). At step 814, controller 114 determines a position error based on a comparison of the actual linear position of the robot carriage 110 and the previously-calculated desired linear position of robot carriage 110. At step 816, controller 114 determines if the position error exceeds a threshold value. If the position error does exceed the threshold value, controller 114 causes the rotation of rotary milking platform 102 to stop (e.g., by communicating a stopping signal to a rotary drive motor of rotary milking platform 102) and the method ends at step 818. Otherwise, the method returns to step 804.
Although the steps of method 800 have been described as being performed in a particular order, the present disclosure contemplates that the steps of method 800 may be performed in any suitable order, according to particular needs.
Although the present disclosure has been described with several embodiments, diverse changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art, and it is intended that the disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
At step 908, vision control logic 156 may associate the location of the cluster of pixels that are closer to camera 144 with an edge of the dairy cow 106. For example, vision control logic 156 may have determined that the cluster of pixels represents a first edge corresponding to the hip of the dairy cow 106. In certain embodiments, this location may correspond with hip location 402a of
After finding the hip of the dairy cow 106, vision control logic 156 may attempt to locate the hind leg of the dairy cow 106. To do this, at step 912, vision control logic 156 may compare the depth information of pixels in a lower outer area of image signal 146 or any other portion of image signal 146 that may include the hind legs of the dairy cow 106. For example, vision control logic 156 may traverse pixels of image signal 146 in a downward direction trying to locate the outer edge of a hind leg of a dairy cow 106.
Vision control logic 156 may then determine the location of an outer edge of a hind leg at step 916. Vision control logic 156 may do this by determining whether some pixels are closer than other pixels. A portion of image signal 146 which transitions from a cluster of pixels further from camera 144 to a cluster of pixels closer to camera 144 (or vice versa) may signify that an edge of the dairy cow 106 has been found. If vision control logic 156 has determined that some pixels are not closer than other pixels, then the example method may return to step 912 and continue analyzing information captured by camera 144. Otherwise, the example method may proceed to step 920.
At step 920, vision control logic 156 may associate the location of the cluster of pixels that are closer to camera 144 than another cluster of pixels within a portion of visual signal 146 with an edge of the dairy cow 106. For example, vision control logic 156 may have determined that the cluster of pixels represents an edge corresponding to an outer edge of a hind leg of the dairy cow 106. In certain embodiments, this location may correspond with outer edge location 404a of
Vision control logic 156 may then attempt to determine an inner edge location of a hind leg. At step 924, vision control logic 156 may begin to scan the depth information of pixels along a lower inner area of image signal 146. For example, vision control logic 156 may traverse pixels along the z-dimension (as illustrated in
At step 932, vision control logic 156 may associate the location of the cluster of pixels that are closer to camera 144 with an edge of the dairy cow 106. For example, vision control logic 156 may have determined that the cluster of pixels represents an edge corresponding to an inner edge of a hind leg of the dairy cow 106. In certain embodiments, this location may correspond with inner edge location 406a of
After finding the edges corresponding to a side of the dairy cow 106, vision control logic 156 may determine if data points from both sides of the dairy cow 106 have been collected at step 936. If vision control logic 156 determines that data points from only a single side of the dairy cow 106 has been found, vision control logic 156 may proceed to determine the locations of the other hind leg of the dairy cow 106 at step 900. Otherwise, the example method may proceed to step 940.
Once edges of the dairy cow 106 are located, at step 940, vision control logic 156 may determine whether the hind legs of the dairy cow 106 are far apart enough to allow for the proper operation of at least a portion of robot arm 112. For example, after detecting the hind legs of the dairy cow, vision control logic 156 may calculate the distance between the hind legs. Vision control logic 156 may use any portion of image signal 146 to calculate the distance between the hind legs. In certain embodiments, vision control logic 156 may calculate the distance between the two inner hind edges of the dairy cow 106. As an example, vision control logic 156 may calculate the distance between inner edge locations 406a and 406b of
At step 944, vision control logic 156, having determined the positions of each of the hind legs of the dairy cow, may facilitate the communication of signals to one or more of arm actuators 138, the communicated signals causing extension/retraction of arm actuators 138 such that at least a portion of robot arm 112 (e.g., tool attachment 140) extends toward the space between the hind legs of the dairy cow (e.g., at a predetermined height relative to the milking stall in which the dairy cow is located).
Although the steps of method 900 have been described as being performed in a particular order, the present disclosure contemplates that the steps of method 1000 may be performed in any suitable order, according to particular needs.
At step 1006, controller 114 determines whether a milking claw is attached (e.g. milking claw 107, as described in connection with
At step 1010, controller 114 determines whether the hind legs of the dairy cow are far apart enough to allow for the proper operation of at least a portion of the robot arm. If it is not already doing so, the robot arm begins to track the rotational movement of the milking stall by moving laterally along a track (e.g. using position control logic 152). As a result, the robot arm may keep pace with a dairy cow located in a milking stall of the rotary milking platform. The positions of the hind legs of the dairy cow and the distance between them may be determined by processing an image signal from a camera (e.g. image signal 146 generated by vision system 142 housing camera 144, as described in connection with
At step 1012, controller 114, having determined the positions of each of the hind legs of the dairy cow, may communicate signals to one or more of arm actuators 138, the communicated signals causing extension/retraction of arm actuators 138 such that at least a portion of robot arm 112 (e.g., tool attachment 140) extends toward the space between the hind legs of the dairy cow (e.g., at a predetermined height relative to the milking stall in which the dairy cow is located).
At step 1014, controller 114 may control the robot arm to perform the desired operation using the tool attachment. For example, a spray tool attachment may initiate the discharge of a disinfectant to the teats of the dairy cow. Once the function has been performed, controller 114 may, at step 1016, communicate signals to one or more of arm actuators 138, such that the robot arm retracts from between the legs of the dairy cow. In some embodiments, the robot arm may then stop tracking the movement of the stall in order to allow the stall to rotate by. The method then either returns to step 1004 (if there are additional dairy cows on which milking operations are to be performed) or ends at step 1018 (if there are no additional dairy cows on which milking operations are to be performed).
Although the steps of method 1000 have been described as being performed in a particular order, the present disclosure contemplates that the steps of method 1000 may be performed in any suitable order, according to particular needs.
Although the present disclosure has been described with several embodiments, diverse changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art, and it is intended that the disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/922,725 filed Oct. 26, 2015 entitled “System and Method for Controlling the Position of a Robot Carriage Based on the Position of Milking Stall of an Adjacent Rotary Milking Platform,” which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/329,399, filed Jul. 11, 2014 entitled “System and Method for Controlling the Position of a Robot Carriage Based on the Position of Milking Stall of an Adjacent Rotary Milking Platform,” which is now U.S. Pat. No. 9,247,709 issued Feb. 2, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 13/448,897, filed Apr. 17, 2012, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 8,800,487 issued Aug. 12, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part application of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/095,963 entitled “Automated System for Applying Disinfectant to the Teats of Dairy Livestock,” filed Apr. 28, 2011, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 8,707,905 issued Apr. 29, 2014, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of the priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/378,871 entitled “Automated System for Applying Disinfectant to the Teats of Dairy Livestock,” filed Aug. 31, 2010.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2731300 | Jansen | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2830559 | McMurray | Apr 1958 | A |
| 3174457 | Lyttle et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3835814 | Jacobs et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4306454 | Olrik et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4508058 | Jakobson et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4617876 | Hayes | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4726322 | Torsius | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4735172 | Wahlström et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4819875 | Beal | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4867103 | Montalescot et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4941433 | Hanauer | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5069160 | Street et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5088447 | Spencer et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5285746 | Moreau | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5379721 | Dessing et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5479876 | Street et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5553569 | Street et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5596945 | van der Lely | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5666903 | Bull et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5718185 | Pichler et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5722343 | Aurik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5816190 | van der Lely | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5862776 | van den Berg | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5918566 | van den Berg | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5934220 | Hall et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6055930 | Stein et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6105536 | DeWaard | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6167839 | Isaksson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6189486 | Lindholm | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6205949 | van den Berg | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6213051 | Fransen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6227142 | Birk | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6234109 | Andersson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6257169 | Oosterling | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6321682 | Eriksson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6341575 | Forsén | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6363883 | Birk | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6401654 | Hallsten et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6532892 | Nilsson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6543381 | Birk et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553942 | Eriksson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6568352 | Fransen | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6591784 | Eriksson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6626130 | Eriksson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6729262 | Ealy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6864914 | Birk | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6976644 | Troudt | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7039220 | Kriesel | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7128020 | Björk et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7146928 | Ealy et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7246571 | Van Den Berg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7299766 | Van Den Berg et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7377232 | Holmgren et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7690327 | Van Den Berg | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7882802 | Van Den Berg et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8036429 | Doyle, II | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8074600 | Källèn et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8210122 | Pettersson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8800487 | Hofman | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9247709 | Hofman | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 20010024514 | Matsunaga | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020108576 | Lely et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030097990 | Bjork et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20050223997 | Umegard | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060196431 | Kaever et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070137579 | Osthues et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245964 | Van Den Berg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070277737 | Maier et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080035063 | Birk | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202432 | Pederson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20100012039 | Hallstrom | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100031889 | Eriksson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095893 | Kallen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100282172 | Eriksson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100288198 | Liao et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110114024 | Van Den Berg | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110239945 | Van Den Berg | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308467 | Eckhardt | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120000427 | Nilsson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120180729 | Van Dorp | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120222622 | Hofman | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130239897 | Birk | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140331934 | Eriksson | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150264885 | Van der Sluis | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 386 922 | Nov 1988 | AT |
| 387 686 | Feb 1989 | AT |
| 404 537 | Dec 1998 | AT |
| 406 108 | Feb 2000 | AT |
| 2005222545 | Nov 2005 | AU |
| 1 253 956 | May 1989 | CA |
| 2 313 533 | Jun 1999 | CA |
| 2 315 018 | Jul 1999 | CA |
| 37 42 867 | Jul 1989 | DE |
| 39 38 077 | May 1991 | DE |
| 689 19 414 | May 1995 | DE |
| 691 16 926 | Nov 1996 | DE |
| 196 36 551 | Mar 1998 | DE |
| 689 28 489 | Apr 1998 | DE |
| 38 75 414 | Aug 1999 | DE |
| 691 32 321 | Feb 2001 | DE |
| 102 12 676 | Jun 2003 | DE |
| 144542 | May 1980 | DK |
| 147721 | Jul 1981 | DK |
| 218482 | Nov 1983 | DK |
| 328482 | Jan 1984 | DK |
| 169247 | Sep 1994 | DK |
| 173139 | Jun 1998 | DK |
| 0 188 303 | Jul 1986 | EP |
| 0 209 202 | Jan 1987 | EP |
| 0 229 682 | Jul 1987 | EP |
| 0 232 568 | Aug 1987 | EP |
| 0 119 222 | Apr 1988 | EP |
| 0 300 582 | Jan 1989 | EP |
| 0 306 579 | Mar 1989 | EP |
| 0 309 036 | Mar 1989 | EP |
| 0 327 037 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 0 329 248 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 0 349 019 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0 360 354 | Mar 1990 | EP |
| 0 432 148 | Jun 1991 | EP |
| 0 440 313 | Aug 1991 | EP |
| 0 448 132 | Sep 1991 | EP |
| 0 455 305 | Nov 1991 | EP |
| 0 467 489 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 472 247 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0 479 397 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0 511 722 | Nov 1992 | EP |
| 0 511 723 | Nov 1992 | EP |
| 0 516 246 | Dec 1992 | EP |
| 0 541 517 | May 1993 | EP |
| 0 545 916 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0 548 058 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0 553 940 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 565 189 | Oct 1993 | EP |
| 0 574 089 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 0 630 558 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0 634 097 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0 643 907 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0 688 498 | Dec 1995 | EP |
| 0 689 762 | Jan 1996 | EP |
| 0 779 025 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 0 789 995 | Aug 1997 | EP |
| 0 824 857 | Feb 1998 | EP |
| 0 880 889 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0 900 522 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0 951 651 | Oct 1999 | EP |
| 1 089 614 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1 211 928 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| I253 440 | Oct 2002 | EP |
| 1 316 253 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 1 279 327 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1 388 281 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1 447 002 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1 460 453 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1 520 468 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1 537 774 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1 537 775 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1 523 882 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 2 241 179 | Oct 2010 | EP |
| 2 064 892 | Feb 1995 | ES |
| 88099 | Dec 1992 | FI |
| 20002169 | Apr 2002 | FI |
| 2 595 197 | Sep 1987 | FR |
| 2 184 233 | Jun 1987 | GB |
| 2 218 888 | Nov 1989 | GB |
| 62-159078 | Jul 1987 | JP |
| 9-196631 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 9-243315 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 9-275834 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 9-285234 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| 11-276002 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 11-281340 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 2001-504944 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2002-521007 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2002-253075 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 8502039 | Feb 1987 | NL |
| 8503580 | Jul 1987 | NL |
| 8600076 | Aug 1987 | NL |
| 8602699 | May 1988 | NL |
| 8800042 | Aug 1989 | NL |
| 8801785 | Feb 1990 | NL |
| 9101088 | Jan 1993 | NL |
| 9201434 | Mar 1994 | NL |
| 9201902 | Jun 1994 | NL |
| 9400220 | Sep 1995 | NL |
| 9400471 | Nov 1995 | NL |
| 9500276 | Sep 1996 | NL |
| 9500277 | Sep 1996 | NL |
| 9500363 | Oct 1996 | NL |
| 9500566 | Nov 1996 | NL |
| 1 009 632 | Jul 1998 | NL |
| 1006804 | Feb 1999 | NL |
| 1009711 | Jan 2000 | NL |
| 1013026 | Mar 2001 | NL |
| 1018563 | Jan 2003 | NL |
| 419 901 | Aug 1981 | SE |
| 425 821 | Nov 1982 | SE |
| 433 553 | Jun 1984 | SE |
| 512 334 | Feb 2000 | SE |
| WO 9620587 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO 9715183 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9715901 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9737528 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 9801022 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO 9835547 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO 9844782 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9845808 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9847348 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9909430 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9930277 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO 9933020 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 0004763 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO 0004765 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO 0011935 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0011936 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0011940 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0062602 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO 0119171 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0119172 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0152633 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0200011 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 0207098 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 0215676 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 02082201 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 03055297 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005015985 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006038840 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007050012 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008030085 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008030116 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008058723 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008118068 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009093965 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010012625 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010014002 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010046669 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010110663 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011023620 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011098454 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011098994 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011102717 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011117386 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,775,130; 4 pages, dated Jul. 30, 2013. |
| European Communication with European Search Report, for Application No. 14165158.8-1656, 5 pages, dated Jul. 15, 2014. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2012/035074; 19 pages, dated Dec. 12, 2012. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,775,177; 3 pages, dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,783,887; 2 pages, dated Oct. 1, 2012. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,784,070; 3 pages, dated Oct. 1, 2012. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2012/035107; 28 pages, Oct. 16, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,840, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Haman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,873, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,882, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,913, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,929, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,951, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,993, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/449,002, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,056, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,105, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,142, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,162, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,173, filed Apr. 17, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,951, filed Apr. 18, 2012, Henk Holman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/451,248, filed Apr. 19, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,281, filed Apr. 24, 2012 Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,298, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,351, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,386, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,490, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,670, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,716, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,833, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,876, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,913, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,953, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/454,975, filed Apr. 24, 2012, Henk Hofman. |
| Jan W. Weingarten, et al.; A State-of-the-Art 3D Sensor for Robot Navigation; 6 pages, Sep. 2004. |
| PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/NL2010/050154 entitled Robot and Method for Milking a Cow by this Robot; 19 pages, Mar. 25, 2010. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2011/047510; 9 pages, dated Jan. 2, 2012. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2011/047511; 9 pages, dated Jan. 2, 2012. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2012/033894; 11 pages, dated Jul. 23, 2012. |
| PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee and Partial National Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/035077; 7 pages, dated Jul. 25, 2012. |
| PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee and Partial National Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/035079; 8 pages, dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2012/033892; 13 pages, dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2012/035356; 14 pages, dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
| PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee and Partial National Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/035107; 7 pages, dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
| PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee/Partial International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/035074; 7 pages, dated Jul. 16, 2012. |
| First Examination Report from New Zealand Intellectual Property Office, IP No. 605830, 2 pages, dated Oct. 25, 2013. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,775,169; 3 pages, dated Aug. 20, 2012. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,775,177; 2 pages, dated Aug. 20, 2012. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,775,252; 3 pages, dated Aug. 21, 2012. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for Application No. 2,775,130; 2 pages, dated Aug. 20, 2012. |
| Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action for Application No. 2,775,132 3 pages, dated Aug. 20, 2012. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160353700 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61378871 | Aug 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14922725 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15240289 | US | |
| Parent | 14329399 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Child | 14922725 | US | |
| Parent | 13448897 | Apr 2012 | US |
| Child | 14329399 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13095963 | Apr 2011 | US |
| Child | 13448897 | US |
