Patent Grant
8616967
The present invention relates generally to the field of gaming and, more particularly to a gaming system and method incorporating a wireless network.
On-line casinos are accessible via the Internet. These on-line casinos present a graphical representation of games, such as casino games, to a user on the screen of a computer in communication with the Internet. The user may place wagers, participate in the gaming, and win or lose money. Receipt of winnings, or payment of losses is typically handled through a credit account.
Due to a variety of factors, Internet-based electronic gaming systems may have a number of undesirable aspects. For example, the Internet lacks the security necessary to ensure confidence that operation of an electronic gaming system will proceed without tampering. An operator of an Internet gaming system is prone to hacking, viruses and other shortcomings of conducting business over the Internet. Users of Internet-based systems often lack confidence that their financial transactions are secure and that their privacy will remain intact. Moreover, the use of the Internet does not provide location verification suitable to ensure that a user is within an approved gaming area.
Among other things, certain embodiments of the present invention incorporate non-Internet based technology with respect to a communications network in order to avoid the problems encountered in operating a gaming system via the Internet.
In one embodiment the present invention provides a convenience gaming system, which includes at least one server and at least one gaming communication device connected to the at least one server by a telecommunications network. The at least one gaming communication device is operable to send and receive gaming information to and from the at least one gaming server if the at least one gaming communication device meets at least one predetermined criteria.
In another embodiment, a method is provided for conducting convenience gaming activities on a gaming communication device in communication with a gaming server. The method includes presenting a user of the gaming communication device with one or more gaming activity options. The method further includes accepting a selection of a gaming activity option by the user, transmitting information associated with the selected gaming activity option between the gaming communication device and the server, determining a result associated with the user's selection, and transmitting the result to the user.
Various embodiments of the present invention may benefit from numerous advantages. It should be noted that one or more embodiments may benefit from some, none, or all of the advantages discussed below.
One advantage is that the system enables remote, wireless, mobile gaming over a secure network. Another advantage is that the system enables remote, wireless, mobile, gaming, while preventing gaming by unauthorized users and from unauthorized locations. Another advantage is the enablement of a gaming system accessible by remote, wireless, mobile users, wherein the system includes gaming communication devices used by the users and connected to a communication network, and wherein a portion of the communication network is movable.
Other advantages will be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
A convenience gaming system enables participants to engage in gaming activities from remote and/or mobile locations. The possible gaming activities include gambling, such as that provided by casinos. Gambling activities may include any casino-type gambling activities including, but not limited to, slot machines, video poker, table games (e.g., craps, roulette, blackjack, pai gow poker, Caribbean stud poker, baccarat, etc), the wheel of fortune game, keno, sports betting, horse racing, dog racing, jai alai, and other gambling activities. The gaming activities can also include wagering on any type of event. Events can include, for example, sporting events, such as horse or auto racing, and athletic competitions such as football, basketball, baseball, golf, etc. Events can also include such things that do not normally involve wagering. Such events may include, without limitation, political elections, entertainment industry awards, and box office performance of movies. Gaming can also include non-wagering games and events. Gaming can also include lotteries or lottery-type activities such as state and interstate lotteries. These can include all forms of number-selection lotteries, “scratch-off” lotteries, and other lottery contests. The convenience gaming system may be implemented over a communications network such as a cellular network or a private wireless and/or wireline network. Examples of the latter include WiFi and WiMax networks. In one embodiment, the convenience gaming system communications network is entirely independent of the Internet. In another embodiment, the convenience gaming system operation makes minimal use of the Internet, such that only information for which there is no security issues is transmitted via the Internet and/or information may be encrypted. Preferably, the communications network enables players to participate in gaming from remote locations (e.g., outside of the gaming area of a casino). Also, the system may enable players to be mobile during participation in the convenience gaming activities. Preferably, the system has a location verification or determination feature, which is operable to permit or disallow gaming from the remote location depending upon whether or not the location meets one or more criteria. The criterion may be, for example, whether the location is within a pre-defined area in which gaming is permitted by law.
As shown in
Preferably, software resides on both the gaming communication device 13 and the computer 18. Software resident on gaming communication device 13 is preferably operable to present information corresponding to gaming activities (including gambling and non-gambling activities discussed herein) to the user. The information includes, without limitation, graphical representations of objects associated with the activities, and presentation of options related to the activities and selectable by the user. The gaming communication device software is also preferably operable to receive data from the computer and data input by the user. Software resident on the computer is preferably able to exchange data with the gaming communication device, access additional computers and data storage devices, and perform all of the functions described herein as well as functions common to known electronic gaming systems.
Gaming information transmitted across network 16 may include any information, in any format, which is necessary or desirable in the operation of the gaming experience in which the user participates. The information may be transmitted in whole, or in combination, in any format including digital or analog, text or voice, and according to any known or future transport technologies, which may include, for example, wireline or wireless technologies. Wireless technologies may include, for example, licensed or license-exempt technologies. Some specific technologies which may be used include, without limitation, Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM), General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), WiFi (802.11x), WiMax (802.16x), Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), Digital Subscriber Line (DSL), Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN), or cable modem technologies. These are examples only and one of ordinary skill will understand that other types of communication techniques are within the scope of the present invention. Further, it will be understood that additional components may be used in the communication of information between the users and the gaming server. Such additional components may include, without limitation, lines, trunks, antennas, switches, cables, transmitters, receivers, computers, routers, servers, fiber optical transmission equipment, repeaters, amplifiers, etc.
In at least one embodiment, the communication of gaming information takes place without involvement of the Internet. This has an advantage of avoiding the security problems which typically arise when conducting business over the Internet. However, in certain embodiments, a portion of the gaming information may be transmitted over the Internet. Also, some or all of the gaming information may be transmitted partially over an Internet communications path. In certain embodiments, some information is transmitted entirely or partially over the Internet, but the information is either not gaming information or is gaming information that does not need to be maintained secretly. For instance, data that causes a graphical representation of a table game on the user's gaming communication device might be transmitted at least partially over the Internet, while wagering information transmitted by the user might be transmitted entirely over a non-Internet communications network.
According to one embodiment, as shown in
Users access the convenience gaming system by way of mobile stations which are in communication with, and thus part of, the communications network. The mobile station may be any electronic communication device that is operable in connection with the network as described. For example, in this particular embodiment, the mobile station may comprise a cellular telephone.
Preferably, in the case of a cellular network for example, the convenience gaming system is enabled through the use of a private label carrier network. Each base station is programmed by the cellular carrier to send and receive private secure voice and/or data transmissions to and from mobile station handsets. The handsets are preferably pre-programmed with both gaming software and the carrier's authentication software. The base stations communicate via Private T-1 lines to a switch. A gaming service provider leases a private T-1 or T-3 line, which routes the calls back to gaming servers controlled by the gaming service provider. Encryption can be installed on the telephones if required by a gaming regulation authority, such as a gaming commission.
The cellular network is preferably a private, closed system. Mobile stations communicate with base stations and base stations are connected to a centralized switch located within a gaming jurisdiction. At the switch, voice calls are transported either locally or via long distance. Specific service provider gaming traffic is transported from the central switch to a gaming server at a host location, which can be a casino or other location.
As subscribers launch their specific gaming application, the handset will only talk to certain base stations with cells or sectors that have been engineered to be wholly within the gaming jurisdiction. For example, if a base station is close enough to pick up or send a signal across state lines, it will not be able to communicate with the device. When a customer uses the device for gaming, the system may prohibit, if desired, the making or receiving voice calls. Moreover, voice can be eliminated entirely if required. Further, the devices are preferably not allowed to “connect” to the Internet. This ensures a high level of certainty that bets/wagers originate and terminate within the boundaries of the gaming jurisdiction and the “private” wireless system cannot be circumvented or bypassed. Although in certain embodiments some data and/or voice traffic may be communicated at least partially over the Internet, it is preferred that the communication path does not include the Internet. Alternatively, in some embodiments, certain non-gaming information may be transported over a path which includes the Internet, while other information relating to the gaming activities of the system is transported on a path that does not include the Internet.
As shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
For example, there is shown a combination of private wireless networks 44, a cellular network comprising a multi-channel access unit or sectorized base station 42, and a satellite network comprising one or more satellites 46.
With respect to the private wireless network, because the preferable technology covers smaller areas, (e.g., in the range of 100-300 feet) and provides very high-speed throughput, the private wireless network is particularly well-suited for gaming commission needs of location and identity verification for the gaming service provider products. The gaming spots enabled by networks 41 may include a current casino area 48, new areas such as swimming pools, lakes or other recreational areas 49, guest rooms and restaurants such as might be found in casino 48 or hotels 45 and 47, residential areas 40, and other remote convenience gaming areas 43. The configuration of the overall convenience gaming system depicted in
In one embodiment, the system architecture for the convenience gaming system includes:
(a) CDMA-technology that is secure for over-the-air data protection;
(b) at least two layers of user authentication, (that provided by the mobile carrier and that provided by the gaming service provider);
(c) compulsory tunneling (static routing) to gaming servers;
(d) end-to-end encryption at the application layer; and
(e) state-of-the-art firewall and DMZ technologies;
Each of the “Game Spots” or “Entertainment Spots” is preferably connected via the MWAN/MAN back to central and redundant game servers. For accessing the private wireless networks 41, the gaming communication devices are preferably WiFi- or WiMax-enabled PDAs or mini-laptops, and do not have to be managed by a third-party partner.
Preferably, the convenience gaming system includes a location verification feature, which is operable to permit or disable gaming from a remote location depending upon whether or not the location meets one or more criteria. The criterion may be, for example, whether the location is within a pre-defined area in which gaming is permitted by law. As another example, the criterion may be whether the location is in a no-gaming zone, such as a school. The location verification technology used in the system may include, without limitation, “network-based” and/or “satellite-based” technology. Network-based technology may included such technologies as multilateration, triangulation and geo-fencing, for example. Satellite-based technologies may include global positioning satellite (GPS) technology, for example.
As previously discussed, the cellular approach preferably includes the use of at least one cellular, mobile, voice and data network. For gaming in certain jurisdictions, such as Nevada for example, the technology may involve triangulation, global positioning satellite (GPS) technology, and/or geo-fencing to avoid the potential for bets or wagers to be made outside Nevada state lines. In one embodiment, the network would not cover all of a particular jurisdiction, such as Nevada. For instance, the network would not cover areas in which cellular coverage for a particular base station straddled the state line or other boundary of the jurisdiction. This is done in order to permit the use of location verification to insure against the chance of bets originating or terminating outside of the state. Triangulation may be used as a method for preventing gaming from unapproved locations. Triangulation may be accomplished, for example, by comparing the signal strength from a single mobile station received at multiple base stations, each having GPS coordinates. This technology may be used to pinpoint the location of a mobile station. The location can then be compared to a map or other resource to determine whether the user of the mobile station is in an unapproved area, such as a school. Alternatively, GPS technology may be used for these purposes.
As shown in
Geo-fencing does not specify location. Rather, it ensures that a mobile station is within certain boundaries. For instance, geo-fencing may be used to ensure that a mobile station beyond state lines does not access the convenience gaming system. Triangulation on the other hand specifies a pinpoint, or near-pinpoint, location. For example, as shown in
In another embodiment, location verification is accomplished using channel address checking or location verification using some other identifying number or piece of information indicative of which network or portion of a network is being accessed by the gaming communication device. Assuming the using of an identifying number for this purpose, then according to one method of location checking, as an example, a participant accesses the gaming system via a mobile telephone. The identifying number of the mobile telephone, or of the network component being accessed by the mobile telephone, identifies the caller's connection to the mobile network. The number is indicative of the fact that the caller is in a defined area and is on a certain mobile network. A server application may be resident on the mobile telephone to communicate this information via the network to the gaming service provider. In a related embodiment, the identifying number or information is passed from a first network provider to a second network provider. For example, a caller's home network may be that provided by the second provider, but the caller is roaming on a network (and in a jurisdiction) provided by the first provider. The first provider passes the identifying information through to the second provider to enable the second provider to determine whether the caller is in a defined area that does or does not allow the relevant gaming activity. Preferably the gaming service provider either maintains, or has access to, a database that maps the various possible worldwide mobile network identifying numbers to geographic areas. The invention contemplates using any number or proxy that indicates a network, portion of a network, or network component, which is being connected with a mobile telephone. The identifying number may indicate one or more of a base station or group of base stations, a line, a channel, a trunk, a switch, a router, a repeater, etc.
In another embodiment, when the user connects his mobile telephone to the gaming server, the gaming server draws the network identifying information and communicates that information to the gaming service provider. The software resident on the gaming communication device may incorporate functionality that will, upon login or access by the user, determine the user's location (based at least in part on the identifying information) and send a message to the gaming service provider. The identifying number or information used to determine location may be country-specific, state-specific, town-specific, or specific to some other definable boundaries.
In connection with any of the location determination methods, the gaming system may periodically update the location determination information. This may be done, for example, during a gaming session, at pre-defined time intervals to ensure that movement of the gaming communication device to an unauthorized area is detected during play, and not just upon login or initial access.
Thus, depending on the location determination technology being used, the decision whether to permit or prohibit a gaming activity may be made at the gaming communication device, at the gaming server, or at any of the components of the telecommunication network being used to transmit information between the gaming communication device and the gaming server (such as at a base station, for example).
An aspect of the private wireless network related to preventing gaming in unauthorized areas is the placement of sensors, such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) sensors on the gaming communication devices. The sensors trigger alarms if users take the devices outside the approved gaming areas. Further, the devices may be “tethered” to immovable objects. Users might simply log in to such devices using their ID and password.
In connection with
In the example method shown in
In a next step 604, the user is presented with the gaming environment. The gaming environment may be presented in various stages. For instance, in a first stage, the gaming environment may comprise a casino lobby where the user is presented with certain gaming options including, for example, table games, slots, sports book, video poker, and a casino cashier. In a subsequent stage, the user may be presented with optional instances of the type of activity selected from the casino lobby.
In a next step 606, the user selects an activity, such as a particular casino table game. In step 608, the user is presented with one or more options related to the selected activity. In step 610, the user selects an option. For instance, at this point, the user might place a wager, draw a card, select a restaurant or restaurant menu item, select a news source or a news story, place a buy or sell order on a financial exchange, place a bet on a certain box office performance over/under amount for a given movie, etc. The options for user input are myriad. In step 612, the software resident on the gaming communication device accepts the option input by the user and transmits the input data to the software resident at the gaming server. In step 614, the gaming server software acts on the input data.
Actions at this point, may include, without limitation, determining an outcome and/or amount, accessing another server and/or software application, retrieving information, preparing a response to the user, etc. The action of determining an outcome and/or amount might take place, for example, if the user is using the device to place wagers in connection with a gambling activity. For certain gambling activities, such as a table game or slot machine, a random number generator may be incorporated to determine the outcome (i.e., whether the user won or lost) and the gaming server software would also determine an amount won or lost based on the amount wagered and any applicable odds. The action of accessing another server and/or software application might occur, for example, in the event the user is engaging in a services activity such as accessing news services, making reservations and placing food and beverage orders at a restaurant, or making a retail purchase. The action of retrieving information might occur when the gaming server software is prompted to access another server for the purpose of retrieving a certain type of information requested by the user.
Preferably, the gaming server software prepares a response to the user's input data and in step 616. In step 618, the user acknowledges the response. For example, in the case of gambling, the user might acknowledge that he won a hand of blackjack because the dealer busted and that his payout was $100 based on a $50 bet at even odds. In step 620, the user logs out.
In the situation where the user is gambling, after the series of steps described in connection with
The duration of activation of the gaming communication device, the duration of a particular session, and/or the duration of a particular activity may be controlled according to any number of different parameters. For example, the duration may be based on a predetermined amount of time or period of time. Activation of the gaming communication device may terminate upon the expiration of a predetermined time period. As another example, an activity may only be permitted until the occurrence of a particular time of day. According to an alternative, an administrator, or another party to a transaction within any of the various activities, may determine the time period or amount of time. According to yet another alternative, the duration may end upon the occurrence of an event such as the user entering or leaving a particular location. The duration of activation may be dynamically determined based on a period of non-use. In other words, after a predetermined time without being used, the device may “time out” and be deactivated. The period of time, or amount of time, may be cumulatively determined. For example, an activity may only be permitted for a period of five hours, collectively. Time counting toward the five hours might stop and start depending upon the location of the user. As another example, an activity might only be permitted so long as the user does not enter or leave a particular location for longer than a predetermined period of time.
Similarly, activation of the gaming communication device and/or the ability for a user to engage in a particular activity may only be permitted during a specified time of day, or for a particular period of time prior to an event, or for a particular period of time after notification to the user. Also, activation and/or access may be controlled based upon the location of the user. For example, if a user is in a particular casino in which a particular show will take place that evening, the user might be notified that tickets to the show are available for a specified period of time prior to the show. The user might only be permitted to engage in the activity of purchasing tickets for the show if the user is in the casino and during the specified period of time prior to the show. For example, the user might only be able to purchase tickets while in the casino and up to five minutes before the start time of the show. Similarly, the activation of the device may be restricted based on the location of the user and a corresponding period of time. For example, if a user is in a location where a show is occurring, or is going to occur, the device may be deactivated (either automatically, or by a party other than the user) during a period beginning five minutes prior to the show and ending five minutes after the end of the show.
According to another alternative, the duration or enablement of one activity might be determined by the participation of the user in another activity. For example, a user might be allowed to make dinner reservations at a popular restaurant if the user has been gambling enough at a given casino. In this way, bonuses or comps may be determined or managed based on the activity of the user via the gaming communication device.
Preferably, data is transmitted back and forth during the convenience gaming activities between the gaming communication device and a server controlled by the gaming service provider. An example of the path of communication is shown in
Preferably, the communication from the network 703 to the gateway 704 and to the server 705 is conducted over secure land lines.
With respect to payment and/or receipt of winnings and losses, one possible approach is as follows. Upon check-in at a casino hotel, a hotel representative may query a guest as to whether the guest wants access to a gaming communication device. If the guest does want such access, the hotel representative may provide the guest with a gaming communication device in exchange for a credit-card type deposit or other deposit. The guest then deposits money into an account for wireless gaming. The guest's account balance information is loaded onto the guest's account file, which is preferably maintained on the gaming server. The user may load money into his gaming account by establishing a credit account, for example, at a casino cashier and/or by paying cash to the casino cashier. Many other alternatives exist and this process is an example only. Guest accounts or gaming communication devices may be preloaded with funds. Funds may be deposited during a convenience gaming session. This may occur, for example, if a user selected a casino cashier activity from the gaming environment and instructed the cashier to add funds to the account. The finance subsystem may also utilize account card technology (such as ATM cards, credit cards, stored value cards, gift cards, etc) in order to conduct financial transactions associated with a user's account. Moreover, the user may receive or make payments remotely, by way of inputting instructions via the gaming communication device or by another remote device such as an automatic teller machine (ATM), which is in electronic communication with the gaming server or other server operated by the casino, hotel, gaming service provider or other entity involved in the convenience gaming activities. For example, a user might remotely (via the gaming communication device) place an order at a restaurant. Then, the user might make advance payment for the meal at an ATM-type machine which is operable to receive instructions corresponding to the financial transaction requirements of the convenience gaming activity of ordering food.
A unique aspect of the present invention includes establishing an electronic record of the gaming transactions undertaken by a user. Preferably, this is accomplished by utilization of a keystroke log, which is an electronic record of all keystrokes made by the user. Utilization of a keystroke log in this context allows for unprecedented monitoring of a user's gaming activity. In the event of a dispute, one may refer to the keystroke log and readily determine whether, in fact, a user placed a particular wager, for example.
An additional possible aspect of the electronic record is to allow a gaming control board or other regulatory authority, access to the electronic record in a direct manner in order to conduct periodic independent monitoring of the convenience gaming activities conducted over the system. Another possible aspect is to allow policing against rigged machines. For instance, it is possible that the gaming control board (or other regulatory authority) could obtain a gaming communication device and compare their test results over time against records in the electronic record database (e.g., by comparing the results shown in the keystroke log). This essentially comprises electronic access for testing.
In another embodiment of the invention, as shown in
A corresponding business model involves the gaming service provider contracting with a cruise line, which agrees to allow the gaming service provider to provide coverage throughout the cruise line's ship(s), by using repeaters for example. The gaming service provider may provide a private wireless network, in which case any revenue generated from use of or access to the private wireless network, and revenue from gaming activities, may be allocated among all or any subset of the cruise line and the gaming service provider. Alternatively, the gaming service provider may contract with a mobile carrier and a satellite provider, in which case revenue from the mobile calls, and revenue from gaming activities, may be allocated among all or any subset of the cruise line, the mobile carrier and the gaming service provider.
There are several scenarios for a user's activity relative to transactions conducted over the convenience gaming system. In one example scenario the user is in a fixed, but remote, location from the gaming server, which may be located on the premises of a casino. This may be include, for instance, a situation in which the gaming communication device is a kiosk or some other communication device which is in a fixed position or which is tethered to a fixed position so that the gaming communication device cannot be moved beyond a certain area. In another example scenario, the user starts a convenience gaming transaction at a first location and ends the transaction at a second location different from the first location. In another example scenario, the user is mobile during a single convenience gaming transaction. In another example scenario, the user is mobile within a first approved area then (during the convenience gaming transaction) the user moves outside the first approved area, through an unapproved area, to a remote second approved area.
In an alternative embodiment, the convenience gaming system may be configured to operate as a “curb-to-curb” gaming system. In such a system, a communication path may be established between the device and a particular server, based upon whether the user is in a location corresponding to that particular server. For example, the user might enter a first casino, or an authorized area associated with the first casino, and thereby activate the establishment of a communication path between the device and a server located at and/or controlled by the first casino. While the user is on the premises of the first casino, the user might be able to participate in activities, such as playing blackjack, at the first casino. Then, if the user leaves the first casino, the convenience gaming system might be configured to terminate the first communication path (i.e., between the device and the first casino's server), or otherwise deactivate the device and/or terminate the user's ability to use the device to participate in activities associated with the first casino. When the user enters a second casino, or an authorized area associated with the second casino, a second communication path (e.g., between the device and a second server located at or controlled by the second casino) may be established. Thus, the user would now be able to play blackjack (or engage in other activities) at the second casino, rather than the first casino.
As another example, a particular casino is often related to other casinos within a jurisdiction or specified area. Under such a scenario, if a user entered any of the related casinos, then the appropriate communication path or paths could be established between the gaming communication device and one or more of the casinos in the group of related casinos, thereby enabling the user to play casino games (or engage in other activities) at the one or more casinos in the group of related casinos. Depending on regulatory requirements, the preferred configuration might be to establish a communication path with a server at a particular casino within the group at which the user wants to play. Then, a different communication path could be established at a subsequent casino if the user wants to play at another casino. Under certain circumstances, and again depending on regulatory requirements, some information associated with user activity might be maintained at a centralized server accessible by more than one casino within the group.
In another example embodiment, the convenience gaming system may be used to enable gaming activities involving multiple wireless users who interact with one another. For instance, the system may enable a table game (such as blackjack) in which a first user and a second user are conducting gaming transactions on the same table and in which options selected by the first user directly impact outcomes and options relative to the second user. Preferably, the gaming environment presented on the gaming communication devices of both the first and second users will indicate the existence and activity of the other respective user. Another example of multiple users interacting on the convenience gaming system is the provision of a poker game in which users place bets against one another instead of, or in addition to, placing bets against the house. Another example of interaction between users is when a first user makes restaurant reservations or purchases event tickets, thereby reducing the options available to the second user.
Preferably, the gaming service provider provides at least the following functions. First the gaming service provider provides and controls the one or more gaming servers. These servers may be physically located within the confines of the gaming service provider or may exist at a remote location. As mentioned, the gaming servers may also be located at or near a games provider such as a casino, casino hotel, racino, cruise ship, race track, etc. The gaming service provider may also provide monitoring services such as transaction monitoring and key stroke logging services. The gaming service provider may also provide data management and security services. These services are not intended to be exhaustive and the gaming service provider may provide other services which facilitate the convenience gaming process.
It should be noted that the invention can be implemented in connection with any gaming environment or an environment for any other activity, which may be conducted electronically. The invention is not limited to Nevada or any other particular gaming jurisdiction. For instance, the invention can be employed in connection with casinos in Atlantic City, N.J., international jurisdictions, Native American gaming facilities, and “racinos” which are race tracks that also have slot machines, video lottery terminals, or other gambling devices. For example, in connection with “racinos”, the invention might be used by participants who wish to play slot machine games while they are viewing race horses in the paddock area. This might be desirable in the event that the slot machine area does not allow smoking and a participant wishes to gamble from an outdoor smoking area. Alternatively, the slot machine area might permit smoking and the gambler wishes to play the slot machines from an area where he or she can avoid breathing second-hand smoke. Numerous other scenarios can be envisioned in which the gaming participant can use the invention to participate in remote gaming, while enjoying some other primary activity in a location remote from the gaming facility. Further, the invention is not limited to gaming, but can include other applications, such as trading financial instruments, and wagering on other types of events, such as elections, award events, or any other activity.
Another example embodiment involves the application of one or more of the methods and systems described herein to the activity of conducting financial transactions. Thus, the gaming communication device may be configured to enable a user to conduct such financial transactions, which may include, without limitation, any transaction involving a financial institution, such as banking, trading securities, or managing 401K or other investment fund assets. Preferably, a communication path would be established between the user and any of the servers or other computers necessary to conduct the financial transaction. As with certain other embodiments the ability to engage in this activity may be controlled by one or more parameters including location and/or identity verification and time or duration limits.
Conducting financial transactions may be one of the activities presented to the user of the gaming communication device. Any of the possible financial transactions might be presented as sub-activities. As an example, a user might want to trade securities listed on a particular exchange. Regulations might require the trader to be located within a certain jurisdiction to execute trades on the exchange. The exchange might have its own rules and could require that the trader be located on the premises. With the location verification techniques described elsewhere herein, the particular financial transaction activity might only be enabled if the user is located in a particular geographic area, for example.
As a related feature, the system may be configured to provide a credit verification feature, according to which a user's creditworthiness may be checked by a party to a transaction, or by which the user might apply for credit. For example, if a user wants to purchase $10,000 worth of a particular stock, then a communication path might be established between the user and a server located at and/or controlled by an exchange upon which the stock is being traded. An additional communication path might be established between the exchange server and a server of an account manager that manages the user's account. These communication paths would enable the basic transaction—that of the user purchasing the stock. Yet another communication path, however, might be established between a seller's server, the exchange server, and/or the account manager server and a server located at and/or controlled by a credit agency. This path would enable an interested party to the transaction to check and/or approve the user's credit to prior enabling the transaction.
According to one aspect of certain embodiments, a user of the gaming communication device can connect from the device to a financial service provider's server to provide a “Push to Trade” feature. In order to enable this feature, the device is configured to be capable of facilitating a “Push to Talk” protocol, whereby the device behaves like a walkie-talkie. Thus, the device may include any suitable program or application that enables the Push to Talk feature. As used herein, the phrase “Push to Talk” includes any protocol that allows for a direct connection feature for an end user. Included are all such protocols (e.g. Instant Talk, Fastchat, etc.) within the broad rubric of “Push to Talk” including those that provide wide-area, instantaneous contact.
The Push to Talk protocol allows a given device to instantly connect to any number of other devices, such as any other telephone (mobile or landline-based), personal computer, laptop, etc. The connection for the end user does not have to be spawned by any conventional dialing or by triggering some form of automatic dialing. A simple button can be depressed to provide the requisite connection. In the context of timing, Nextel (who developed the original Push to Talk technology) suggests that their Push to Talk protocol should connect within 2 seconds.
A related technology is Push to Talk Over Cellular (PoC). PoC service is a form of interactive voice messaging that combines walkie-talkie and cellular phone connectivity, allowing users to quickly connect with another person or an entire group of friends and contacts at the push of a button on a PoC-enabled handset.
The Push to Talk protocol allows users to use the walkie-talkie paradigm over an IP or a cellular network, which diminishes the boundary limitations of a conventional two-way radio. The Push to Talk service is based on a disruptive technology. Latency is an issue during some traditional mobile telephone conversations. One appeal of the Push to Talk platform, as compared to executing a traditional telephone call, is being able to talk to an individual or to a group of individuals instantly, without waiting for someone to answer due to latency issues. Another benefit of the Push to Talk feature is a shorter than normal phone call, which cuts down on dialing costs for corresponding end users. Nextel estimates that the average Push to Talk call lasts forty seconds. Push to Talk technology is compatible with virtually any network communications; for example, the Push to Talk protocol may readily be used in conjunction with cellular telephone networks, including GSM and CDMA. The network equipment used for the Push to Talk feature is currently being offered by companies such as Ericsson Motorola, Siemens, Sony Ericsson, and Nextel.
Because Push to Talk effectively turns the handheld device into a walkie-talkie, it not only successfully enables end users to send voice messages, it also enables immediate data texts (commonly referred to as “direct messaging”). Push to Talk messaging represents a significant improvement over short messaging systems in bypassing the slow and clumsy process of entering text via a phone keypad. This makes text messaging quicker and more effective.
According to the “Push to Trade” feature, once the end user initiates the call, the financial service provider is instantly connected to the end user. In one embodiment, the financial service provider has one or more electronic trade desks that are dedicated to this feature for their clients. Thus, all “Push to Trade” requests may be received at this location. In other embodiments, any suitable entity, broker, standard trading desk, or electronic device may receive such Push to Trade communications.
Once the connection has been established, the financial service provider may then simply conduct the trade as prescribed by the end user. For example, upon connection, the end user may be presented with the financial or market environment in which he seeks to participate. The trade desk representative or device can query the end user to execute an electronic or a broker-assisted trade. In addition, the financial environment may be presented in various stages. For instance, in a first stage, the financial environment may comprise a financial summary of all markets where the user is presented with certain financial options including, for example, specific market summaries, specific prices for selected assets (e.g. commodities, stocks, bonds, etc.), current positions, buying power, etc. In a subsequent stage, the user may be presented with optional instances of the type of activity selected from the market platform.
From this platform, the end user can select an activity, such as a particular type of trade. Thus, the user is presented with one or more options related to the selected activity. For instance, at this point, the user might place a buy or a sell order on a financial exchange. The software, which may be resident on the device, on the server, or on a combination of both, accepts the option input by the user and transmits the input data to the financial service provider. Subsequently, the financial service provider acts on the input data. The Push to Talk technology readily accommodates a voice log of the transaction for audit or confirmation purposes. Hence, a digital voice storage may be provided, whereby the transaction (e.g., inclusive of bid and ask prices) is recorded. In addition, the automatic voice log can then relay this information back to the end user (e.g., via his e-mail or via a conventional postal mail service). This could occur as a matter of course such that the end user is routinely provided with a suitable confirmation receipt for all of his trading activity.
Actions at this point may include, without limitation, determining an outcome and/or amount for the trade, accessing another server and/or software application, retrieving additional information, preparing a suitable response to the user, etc. The action of determining an outcome and/or amount might take place, for example, if the user is using the device to place trades in conjunction with his account and a given exchange. Hence, this could include a formal tallying of the executed trade, inclusive of the charged commission, the amount debited from the account to cover the trade, etc. The action of accessing another server and/or software application might occur, for example, in the event the user is engaging in a services activity such as accessing news services. The action of retrieving information might occur when the financial software is prompted to access another server for the purpose of retrieving a certain type of information requested by the user. The financial service provider can then prepare a response to the user's input data. Once this activity has concluded, the user can acknowledge the response and then log out and terminate his session.
It should be noted that the “Push to Trade” feature can be used in other applications of the convenience gaming technology described herein. For example, in an application where the user of the gaming communication device is playing blackjack from an authorized area outside the casino gaming area, the Push to Trade feature would enable the user to participate audibly in the blackjack game actually taking place within the casino gaming area. The Push to Talk technology would allow the user to immediately and virtually “sit down” at an actual blackjack table without the delay caused by the conventional setup and tear down process of certain traditional telecommunication protocols. Also, once the user is participating in the game, the user can communicate orally with the dealer, or other players that are physically at the table, without the latency issues of certain mobile telecommunication systems.
In at least one embodiment, the invention provides jurisdictional controls, which limit gaming to approved geographical areas. The invention may also include an age/identity verification feature. This can be accomplished through any applicable technique including retina scanning, finger print identification, voice print matching, or other biometrics. Identity verification can also be accomplished by having a customer take a picture of himself (e.g., by use of a digital picture phone) and transmitting the picture to the gaming service provider for comparison to a stored picture of the pre-approved user. Identity verification can also be accomplished by way of comparison of participant provided data to stored data, and execution of electronic agreements or contracts by the participant. Identity verification can also be accomplished by monitoring a keystroke characteristic (e.g., rhythm, patterns, or cadence) of the user, or any other method in which a parameter uniquely associated with the user can be observed. The invention may also provide for the logging of keystrokes. In at least one embodiment, all communications are accomplished without accessing the Internet.
Mobile, remote gaming may be desirable for many reasons, some of which have already been described. The invention may allow supplementation of existing in-house gaming revenue by allowing bettors to place bets while enjoying other leisure activities such as golf, swimming, dining and shows. The invention may complement the new coinless wagering environment as bettors can play their favorite games outside the casino. The invention provides a high-speed, reliable, accurate, and secure mobile gaming environment that complies with regulatory requirements for identification and location verification of the bettor with the ability to generate key stroke logs. The invention may restrict unauthorized usage from a geographic perspective and is capable of implementation using location verification technology (e.g., geo-fencing) to conform the gaming activities to legal parameters.
Consumers may benefit from an increased choice of gaming environments. Consumers will be able to bet in whatever surroundings they prefer, benefiting from the knowledge that the product is regulated, fair and secure while enjoying the gaming experience at the speed they choose without external influences, such as that which might occur within the in-house casino environment. The gaming businesses can use the invention to increase their revenue base through a new, regulated, mobile, remote channel. Customers wanting to be entertained during downtime or outside a casino will be able to play games on their gaming communication device and customers intimidated by a traditional casino environment will be able to play in private. The gaming jurisdictions may benefit from an increase in gaming an ancillary revenue growth because customers will have a more enjoyable experience.
The invention may also be used to deliver content at an increased speed compared to traditional telecommunications systems. The content may include, for example, live reports, entertainment, news, promotions and advertising.
As mentioned, the invention provides a mobile gaming environment that complies with regulatory requirements for identification and location verification of the bettor. Moreover, the system is designed to be one hundred percent “clean” from a regulatory perspective. The software is clean in that it has not been and will not be licensed to anyone who does business illegally or otherwise operates in a “gray” area. For example, in a preferred embodiment, the software is not licensed to an entity that will illegally operate the software, or otherwise illegally do business on, the Internet. This may be desirable in that certain gaming jurisdictions will not grant gaming permits or licenses to companies that do business with, or license technology to or from, other entities known to be engaging in illegal operations.
Preferably, the system is designed such that the gaming software (or other application software operating on the system) is also one hundred percent clean from a regulatory perspective. For instance, before granting a license, a gaming jurisdiction may require that the software being used is not tainted in that it has not been used by the license applicant in violation of any laws and has not been licensed or otherwise distributed or disseminated to others who have used the software for illegal purposes, or who have been engaging in illegal activity. Therefore, it is preferred that the gaming software be clean and untainted from this perspective.
The systems and methods described herein may also be used to deliver and/or access “Rich Media” content such as, for example, sports video (live or nearly live) and audio commentary. Such may often only be distributed within specific jurisdictions. Therefore, the distribution may benefit from the inventive aspects discussed herein, particularly the location verification aspect, such as geofencing.
The gaming system and methods described herein may permit, among other things, pari-mutuel wagering, sports betting, and dissemination of news and other content. The invention also enables a casino or other gaming provider to advertise ancillary services such as shows, bars, and restaurants. The invention also enables remote reservations and purchases in connection with such services.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the convenience gaming system provides for the dissemination of real-time odds to users accessing the system.
In another embodiment, an outcome in one transaction can trigger the presentation to the user of options for a second transaction. For example, if a user wins a predetermined amount of money playing blackjack, the user might be presented with an option to purchase retail items at a casino store or to make reservations for certain services at a club. As another example, if a user uses the system to purchase show tickets, the user might be offered to make reservations at one of several restaurants within a certain proximity to the show.
Although this disclosure has been described in terms of certain embodiments and generally associated methods, alterations and permutations of these embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description of example embodiments does not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
This application is a continuation-in-part application claiming the benefit of pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/835,995 filed Apr. 29, 2004, which claims the priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application Ser. No. 60/549,187 filed Mar. 1, 2004 and provisional application Ser. No. 60/547,507 filed Feb. 25, 2004.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3580581 | Raven | May 1971 | A |
| 3838259 | Kortenhaus | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3876208 | Wächtler et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3929338 | Busch | Dec 1975 | A |
| 4101129 | Cox | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4157829 | Goldman et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4206920 | Weatherford et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4216965 | Morrison et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4238127 | Lucero et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4240635 | Brown | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4266214 | Peters, Jr. | May 1981 | A |
| 4335809 | Wain | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4448419 | Telnaes | May 1984 | A |
| 4467424 | Hedges et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4492379 | Okada | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4527798 | Siekierski et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4572509 | Sitrick | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4573681 | Okada | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4614342 | Takashima | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4624459 | Kaufman | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4636951 | Harlick | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4648600 | Olliges | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4652998 | Koza et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4692863 | Moosz | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4760527 | Sidley | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4805907 | Hagiwara | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4810868 | Drexler | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817951 | Crouch et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4838552 | Hagiwara | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4853884 | Brown et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4856787 | Itkis | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4858932 | Keane | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4880237 | Kishishita | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4909516 | Kolinsky | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4926327 | Sidley | May 1990 | A |
| 4959783 | Scott et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4964638 | Ishida | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5007087 | Bernstein et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5024441 | Rousseau | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5048833 | Lamle | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5050881 | Nagao | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5055662 | Hasegawa | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5056141 | Dyke | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5074559 | Okada | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5083785 | Okada | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5096195 | Gimmon | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5096202 | Hesland | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102134 | Smyth | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5192076 | Komori | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5229764 | Matchett et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5242163 | Fulton | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5251165 | James, III | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5251898 | Dickenson et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5263716 | Smyth | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265874 | Dickinson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5280426 | Edmonds | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5280909 | Tracy | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5298476 | Hotta et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5324035 | Morris et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5326104 | Pease et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5344199 | Carstens et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5351970 | Fioretti | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5359183 | Skodlar | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5370306 | Schulze et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5380007 | Travis et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5380008 | Mathis et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5393061 | Manship et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5398932 | Eberhardt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5415416 | Scagnelli et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5421576 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429361 | Raven et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5471044 | Hotta et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476259 | Weingardt | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5505449 | Eberhardt et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5507485 | Fisher | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511784 | Furry et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5524888 | Heidel | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534685 | Takemoto et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5551692 | Pettit et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5569083 | Fioretti | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569084 | Nicastro et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5580309 | Piechowiak et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586937 | Menashe | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5588913 | Hecht | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5613912 | Slater | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618232 | Martin | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5653634 | Hodges | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5654746 | McMullan, Jr. et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5655961 | Acres et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5675828 | Stoel et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5697844 | Von Kohorn | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702302 | Gauselmann | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707286 | Carlson | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5738583 | Comas et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745102 | Bloch et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5762552 | Vuong et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5764789 | Pare, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766076 | Pease et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768382 | Schneier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5772508 | Sugita et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5785595 | Gauselmann | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5816920 | Hanai | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5833536 | Davids et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835722 | Bradshaw et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836817 | Acres et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5851148 | Brune et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857911 | Fioretti | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5871398 | Schneier et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878211 | Delagrange | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889474 | LaDue | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5902983 | Crevelt et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904619 | Scagnelli et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904620 | Kujawa | May 1999 | A |
| 5907282 | Tuorto et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5910047 | Scagnelli et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920640 | Salatino et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5921865 | Scagnelli | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5931764 | Freeman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935005 | Tsuda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951397 | Dickinson | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954583 | Green | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955961 | Wallerstein | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959596 | McCarten et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970143 | Schneier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5977957 | Miller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987611 | Freund | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991431 | Borza et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995630 | Borza et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5999808 | LaDue | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6001016 | Walker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6003013 | Boushy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011973 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012636 | Smith | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012982 | Piechowiak et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019284 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6022274 | Takeda et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027115 | Griswold et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6048269 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6050622 | Gustafson | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6065056 | Bradshaw et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6080061 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6098985 | Moody | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099408 | Schneier et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6100804 | Brady et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104815 | Alcorn | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117011 | Lvov | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6135884 | Hedrick et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139431 | Walker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146270 | Huard et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6148094 | Kinsella | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6178255 | Scott et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178510 | O'Connoe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183366 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193153 | Lambert | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196920 | Spaur et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210274 | Carlson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6212392 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219439 | Burger | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233448 | Alperovich et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6248017 | Roach | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251014 | Stockdale et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251017 | Leason et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6264560 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265973 | Brammall et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272223 | Carlson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277026 | Archer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277029 | Hanley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280325 | Fisk | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287202 | Pascal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290601 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| RE37414 | Harlick | Oct 2001 | E |
| 6309307 | Krause et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6325285 | Baratelli | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6325292 | Sehr | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331148 | Krause et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6386976 | Yamazaki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6409602 | Wiltshire et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6424029 | Giesler | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425828 | Walker et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6428413 | Carlson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| RE37885 | Acres et al. | Oct 2002 | E |
| 6468155 | Zucker | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6507279 | Loof | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6508709 | Karmarkar | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6508710 | Paravia et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6509217 | Reddy | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6524189 | Rautila | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6527641 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542750 | Hendrey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6554705 | Cumbers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6554707 | Sinclair | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556819 | Irvin | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6575834 | Lindo | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6577733 | Charrin | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6582302 | Romero | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6585597 | Finn | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6612928 | Bradford et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6614350 | Lunsford | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6618706 | Rive et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622157 | Heddaya et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6628939 | Paulsen | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6631849 | Blossom | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6634942 | Walker | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6652378 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6676522 | Rowe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682421 | Rowe et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6709333 | Bradford et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6719631 | Tulley et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6721542 | Anttila et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6729956 | Wolf et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743098 | Urie et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745011 | Hendrickson | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6749505 | Kunzle | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754210 | Ofek | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6755742 | Hartman | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6756882 | Benes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6761638 | Narita | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6773350 | Yoshimi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6778820 | Tendler | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6793580 | Sinclair | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800029 | Rowe et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6800031 | Di Cesare | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6801934 | Eranko | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6802772 | Kunzle | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6812824 | Goldinger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6834195 | Brandenberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6837789 | Garahi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6843412 | Sanford | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6843725 | Nelson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6846238 | Wells | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6857959 | Nguyen | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6863610 | Vancraeynest | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6868396 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6884162 | Raverdy | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6884166 | Leen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887151 | Leen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6887159 | Leen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6892218 | Heddaya et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6892938 | Solomon | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6893347 | Zilliacus | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6896618 | Benoy et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6898299 | Brooks | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6899628 | Leen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6904520 | Rosset | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6908387 | Hedrick et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6908391 | Gatto et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6923724 | Williams | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6935952 | Walker et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6935958 | Nelson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6942574 | Lemay et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6945870 | Gatto et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| RE38812 | Acres et al. | Oct 2005 | E |
| 6966832 | Leen et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6979267 | Leen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6984175 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6986055 | Carlson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6997810 | Cole | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7021623 | Leen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7022017 | Halbritter et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7029394 | Leen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7033276 | Walker et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034683 | Ghazarian | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035653 | Simon et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7040987 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7042360 | Light et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7042391 | Meunier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043641 | Martinek et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7047197 | Bennett | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7056217 | Pelkey et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7081815 | Runyon et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7097562 | Gagner | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7102509 | Anders et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7124947 | Storch | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7125334 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128482 | Meyerhofer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7144011 | Asher et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7147558 | Giobbi | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7158798 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168626 | Lerch et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7185360 | Anton et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7194273 | Vaudreuil | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7207885 | Longman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7228651 | Saari | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7229354 | McNutt et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7229385 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7233922 | Asher et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7248852 | Cabrera et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7270605 | Russell et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7284708 | Martin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7288025 | Cumbers | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7288028 | Rodriquez et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7290264 | Powers et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7297062 | Gatto et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7306514 | Amaitis et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7311605 | Moser | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7311606 | Amaitis et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7316619 | Nelson | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7341517 | Asher et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7357717 | Cumbers | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7413513 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7429215 | Rozkin | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7442124 | Asher et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7452273 | Amaitis et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7452274 | Amaitis et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7458891 | Asher et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7460863 | Steelberg et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7479065 | McAllister et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7506172 | Bhakta | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510474 | Carter | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7534169 | Amaitis et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7546946 | Hefner et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7549576 | Alderucci et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7562034 | Asher et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7566270 | Amaitis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7637810 | Amaitis et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7665668 | Phillips | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7686687 | Cannon et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689459 | Capurso et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7736221 | Black et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742972 | Lange et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7744002 | Jones et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7828652 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7867083 | Wells et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7946917 | Kaminkow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7967682 | Huizinga | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8016667 | Benbrahim | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8047914 | Morrow | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8123616 | Wells et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8142283 | Lutnick | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8267789 | Nelson | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8285484 | Lau | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8298078 | Sutton et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 20010018663 | Dussell et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010026610 | Katz | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010026632 | Tamai | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027130 | Namba et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028308 | De La Huerga | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010031663 | Johnson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010036858 | McNutt et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049275 | Pierry et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013827 | Edstrom et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020034978 | Legge et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037767 | Ebin | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049909 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052231 | Fioretti | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065097 | Brockenbrough | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068631 | Raverdy | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073021 | Ginsberg et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020074725 | Stern | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087505 | Smith et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095586 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111210 | Luciano | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111213 | McEntee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119817 | Behm | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123377 | Shulman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124182 | Bacso | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020125886 | Bates et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128057 | Walker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132663 | Cumbers | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142844 | Kerr | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142846 | Paulsen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143960 | Goren | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143991 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147047 | Letovsky et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147049 | Carter, Sr. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151344 | Tanskanen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155884 | Updike | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157090 | Anton, Jr. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160834 | Urie et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160838 | Kim | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165020 | Koyama | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174336 | Sakakibara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183105 | Cannon et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184653 | Pierce et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020191017 | Sinclair | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198044 | Walker | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003988 | Walker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030003997 | Vuong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030006931 | Mages | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030008662 | Stern et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009603 | Ruths et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030013438 | Darby | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030013513 | Rowe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014639 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017871 | Urie et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030027631 | Hedrick et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028567 | Carlson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030031321 | Mages | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032407 | Mages | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032434 | Willner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032474 | Kaminkow et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036425 | Kaminkow et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036428 | Aasland | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040324 | Eldering et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045353 | Paulsen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045358 | Leen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054878 | Benoy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060286 | Walker | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064712 | Gaston | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064798 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064805 | Wells | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064807 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069071 | Britt et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069940 | Kavacheri et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078101 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087652 | Simon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087701 | Paravia et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104865 | Itkis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030109306 | Karmarkar | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030109310 | Heaton et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114218 | McClintic | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130032 | Martinek et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139190 | Steelberg | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030140131 | Chandrashekhar | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148809 | Nelson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148812 | Paulsen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157976 | Simon | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162580 | Cousineau | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162593 | Griswold et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162594 | Rowe | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030173408 | Mosher et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176162 | Planki | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176218 | LeMay | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177187 | Levine et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177347 | Schneier et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190944 | Manfredi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195037 | Vuong et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195043 | Shinners et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195841 | Ginsberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208684 | Camacho et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224855 | Cunningham | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228895 | Edelson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228898 | Rowe | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228907 | Gatto et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228910 | Jawaharlal et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236120 | Reece | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002355 | Spencer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040002383 | Lundy | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040002386 | Wolfe et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040002843 | Robarts | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040009812 | Scott et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040014522 | Walker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040029635 | Giobbi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034775 | Desjardins et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038734 | Adams | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040048613 | Sayers | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053692 | Chatigny et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040061646 | Andrews et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063497 | Gould | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040066296 | Atherton | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068441 | Werbitt | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068532 | Dewing | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083394 | Brebner et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092306 | George et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092311 | Weston | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097283 | Piper | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097287 | Postrel | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104274 | Koti | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104845 | McCarthy | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040110565 | Levesque | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111369 | Lane et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118930 | Berardi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127277 | Walker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127289 | Davis | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040132530 | Rutanen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137983 | Kerr et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137987 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142744 | Atkinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147323 | Cliff et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162124 | Barton | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162144 | Loose | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186768 | Wakim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189470 | Girvin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192438 | Wells et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192442 | Wells et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193469 | Amaitis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193531 | Amaitis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198386 | Dupray | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198396 | Fransioli | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198403 | Pedersen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198483 | Amaitis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209660 | Carlson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209690 | Bruzzese | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219961 | Ellenby | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224769 | Hansen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225565 | Selman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229685 | Smith | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229699 | Gentles et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242297 | Walker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242332 | Walker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243504 | Asher et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248637 | Liebenberg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248653 | Barros et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259626 | Akram | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259631 | Katz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266533 | Gentles et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050001711 | Doughty et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050003881 | Byng | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050003888 | Asher et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050003893 | Hogwood et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009600 | Rowe et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050014554 | Walker et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020336 | Cesare | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020340 | Cannon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050026670 | Lardie | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050026697 | Balahura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027643 | Amaitis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043996 | Silver | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049949 | Asher et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054439 | Rowe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059397 | Zhao | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059485 | Paulsen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064934 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050071481 | Danieli | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086301 | Eichler et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096109 | McNutt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096133 | Hoefelmeyer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101383 | Wells | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107022 | Wichelmann | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108365 | Becker et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113172 | Gong | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050116020 | Smolucha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130728 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131815 | Fung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137014 | Vetelainen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143169 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144484 | Wakayama | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159212 | Romney et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050170886 | Miller | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050170890 | Rowe et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050170892 | Atkinson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181859 | Lind et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181862 | Asher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181870 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187000 | Miller | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187020 | Amaitis et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192077 | Okuniewicz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193118 | Le et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193209 | Saunders et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197189 | Schultz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197190 | Amaitis et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209002 | Blythe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215306 | O'Donnell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234774 | Dupree | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239523 | Longman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239524 | Longman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239546 | Hedrick et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245306 | Asher et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245308 | Amaitis et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261061 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277471 | Russell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277472 | Gillan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050282638 | Rowe | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288937 | Verdiramo | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060005050 | Basson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060009279 | Amaitis et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060016877 | Bonalle et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019745 | Benbrahim | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060035707 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040717 | Lind et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040741 | Griswold et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052153 | Vlazny et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058102 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068917 | Snoddy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069711 | Tsunekawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093142 | Schneier et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095790 | Nguyen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116198 | Leen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116199 | Leen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116200 | Leen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121970 | Khal | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121987 | Bortnik et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121992 | Bortnik et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060131391 | Penuela | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135252 | Amaitis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135259 | Nancke-Krogh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148560 | Arezina et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148561 | Moser | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160626 | Gatto et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163346 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165235 | Carlson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060166740 | Sufuentes | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178216 | Shea et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183522 | Leen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187029 | Thomas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189382 | Muir et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194589 | Sankisa | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199649 | Soltys et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205489 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205497 | Wells et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209810 | Krzyanowski et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224046 | Ramadas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234631 | Dieguez | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234791 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236395 | Barker et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246990 | Downes | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247026 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247039 | Lerner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247041 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247053 | Mattila | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252501 | Little et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252530 | Oberberger et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258429 | Manning et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277308 | Morse et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277413 | Drews | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287098 | Morrow et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001841 | Anders et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070003034 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070015564 | Walker et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021213 | Foe et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026939 | Asher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054739 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060305 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060306 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060312 | Dempsey et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060326 | Juds et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060355 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060358 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066401 | Amaitis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066402 | Amaitis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087834 | Moser et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093296 | Asher et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099697 | Nelson | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099703 | Terebilo | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117634 | Hamilton et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136817 | Nguyen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167237 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168570 | Martin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070181676 | Mateen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070190494 | Rosenberg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213120 | Beal et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233585 | Ben Simon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070235807 | Sobel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238443 | Richardson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241187 | Alderucci et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243927 | Soltys | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243935 | Huizinga | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070257101 | Alderucci et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258507 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275779 | Amaitis | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281782 | Amaitis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281785 | Amaitis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281792 | Amaitis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282959 | Stern | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004121 | Gatto et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009344 | Graham et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015013 | Gelman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022089 | Leedom | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080026829 | Martin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032801 | Brunet de Courssou | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039196 | Walther et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051193 | Kaminkow et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080066111 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080076505 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080076506 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080076572 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080096659 | Kreloff et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102956 | Burman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102957 | Burman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108423 | Benbrahim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113785 | Alderucci et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113786 | Alderucci et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113816 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139306 | Lutnick et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146323 | Hardy et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150678 | Giobbi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182644 | Lutnick et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195664 | Maharajh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080218312 | Asher et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220871 | Asher et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080224822 | Gelman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080254897 | Saunders et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080305856 | Walker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080305867 | Guthrie | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311994 | Amaitis et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318670 | Zinder et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090049542 | DeYonker et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088232 | Amaitis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098925 | Gagner et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117989 | Arezina et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149233 | Strause et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090163272 | Baker et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178118 | Cedo et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090183208 | Christensen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197684 | Arezina et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204905 | Toghia | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209233 | Morrison | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325708 | Kerr | Dec 2009 | A9 |
| 20100062834 | Ryan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069158 | Kim | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113143 | Gagner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100153511 | Lin | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205255 | Alderucci | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211431 | Lutnick | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100240455 | Gagner et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 31 29 550 | Apr 1982 | DE |
| 37 36 770 | May 1989 | DE |
| 43 16 652 | Nov 1994 | DE |
| 19922862 | Dec 2000 | DE |
| 19944140 | Mar 2001 | DE |
| 19952691 | May 2001 | DE |
| 19952692 | May 2001 | DE |
| 10060079 | Jun 2002 | DE |
| 0840639 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 0506873 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1045346 | Oct 2000 | EP |
| 1063622 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1066868 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1120757 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1202528 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1217792 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 1231577 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1291830 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 1475755 | Dec 2003 | EP |
| 1475756 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1480102 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1531646 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1259930 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1480102 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 2 248 404 | Apr 1992 | GB |
| 2 256 594 | Dec 1992 | GB |
| 2391432 | Feb 2004 | GB |
| 2391767 | Feb 2004 | GB |
| 2394675 | May 2004 | GB |
| 2 406 291 | Mar 2005 | GB |
| H11-220766 | Jan 1988 | JP |
| 5-317485 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 2000-69540 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 2000049046 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000-160016 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000218125 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2000326491 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2000345435 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2000387614 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2001-70658 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2001-204971 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001-204972 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001212363 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2001236458 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2001-340656 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2001-344400 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2001-526550 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002032515 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002-049681 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-056270 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002107224 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-661444 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002-109376 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002-66144 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002-135468 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002133009 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002149894 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002189831 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2002-253866 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-263375 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-292113 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003-053042 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003078591 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003-518677 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2003166050 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2003-210852 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2002024979 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2003228642 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2004-261202 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2004-321558 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2004-536638 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2005005936 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005-73711 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2007-011420 | Jan 2007 | JP |
| 2190477 | Oct 2002 | RU |
| WO 8002512 | Nov 1980 | WO |
| WO9310508 | May 1993 | WO |
| WO 9410658 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO 9416416 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO 9524689 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO 9530944 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 9600950 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| WO 9615837 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO9719537 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO9744750 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9809694 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO 9904873 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9908762 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9919027 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO9942964 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 9952077 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 9955102 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 0077753 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0120538 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0117262 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0237246 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 0140978 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 0148712 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0148713 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0148713 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0154091 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0167218 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0182176 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0184817 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0189233 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0210931 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 0221457 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO 0231739 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 0239605 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 0241199 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 0247042 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 02065750 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 02071351 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO 02077931 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO02101486 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 02101486 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 03005743 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 03015299 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03013678 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03021543 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 03027970 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| 03045519 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 03081447 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004000428 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004003810 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004013820 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004014506 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004023253 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2004027689 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004073812 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004095383 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004104763 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004114235 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005001651 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005015458 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005022453 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005026870 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005031627 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005031666 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005036425 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005050574 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005082011 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005098650 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2006023230 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007008601 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008005264 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008016610 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US06/26346; 8 pages, Mar. 29, 2007. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration with attached PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/US06/26343 filed Jul. 7, 2006 (10 pages), mailed Jan. 19, 2007. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration with attached PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/US06/26600 filed Jul. 7, 2006 (8 pages), mailed Jan. 19. 2007. |
| L.M. Amaitis et al., “System and Method for Wireless Gaming System with User Profiles,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,835, pending, filed Aug. 9, 2005. |
| L.M. Amaitis et al., “System and Method for Wireless Gaming System with Alerts,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,831, pending, filed Aug. 9, 2005. |
| L.M. Amaitis et al., “System and Method for Wireless Gaming with Location Determination,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,812, pending, filed Aug. 10, 2005. |
| L.M. Amaitis et al., “SysteM and Method for Providing Wireless Gaming as a Service Application,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,964, pending, filed Aug. 9, 2005. |
| J.M. Asher et al., “System and Method for Wireless Lottery,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,568, pending, filed Oct. 21, 2005. |
| L.M. Amaitis et al., “System and Method for Peer-to-Peer Wireless Gaming,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/210,482, pending, filed Aug. 24, 2005. |
| Business Wire; Home Gambling Network Inc., With U.S. Patent 5,800,268—Business/Gambling—HGN and UUNET, a WorldCom/MCI Company, Reach a Mutually Satisfactory Resolution in Patent Suit; 2 pages, Mar. 19, 1999. |
| PR Newswire; Nokia N-Gage (TM) Mobile Game Deck—The Revolutionary Gaming Experience; Major Global Games Publishers Excited to Publish on Wireless Multiplayer Platform; 3 pages, Feb. 6, 2003. |
| Business Wire; GoldPocket Interactive Launches EM Mobile Matrix, Industry's First Fully Synchronous Interactive Television and Massively Multi-Player Gaming Solution; 2 pages, Mar. 17, 2003. |
| Brand Strategy; The National Lottery has Announced that UK Consumers Will be Able to Purchase Tickets Using the Internet, TV and Mobile Phones; (Launches & Rebrands); ISSN 0965-9390; 1 page, Apr. 2003. |
| PR Newswire; Ideaworks3D Appointed by Eidos Interactive to Develop Blockbuster Line-Up for Nokia N-Gage Mobile Game Deck; 2 pages, May 23, 2003. |
| Telecomworldwide; New Mobile Lottery Service Launched by mLotto; 1 page, Oct. 30, 2003. |
| Singh, et al.; Anywhere, Any-Device Gaming; Human Interface Technology Laboratory; National University of Singapore; 4 pages, 2004. |
| Wu, et al.; The Electronic Library; Real Tournament—Mobile Context-Aware Gaming for the Next Generation; vol. 22; No. 1; ISBN 0-86176-934-1; ISSN 0264-0473; 11 pages, 2004. |
| Precision Marketing, vol. 16; No. 11; ISSN 0955-0836; 2 pages, Jan. 9, 2004. |
| Online Reporter; GTECH Takes Lottery Mobile; 1 page, Feb. 28, 2004. |
| Personal and Ubiquitous Computing; Human Pacman: a Mobile, Wide-Area Entertainment System Based on Physical, Social, and Ubiquitous Computing; 12 pages, May 2004. |
| PR Newswire; M7 Networks Partners With Terraplay to Deliver Real-Time Multiplayer Gaming Functionality to its Community Services Offerings; 2 pages, Jun. 1, 2004. |
| China Telecom; Win Win Gaming Inc. Announces Agreement to Provide Wireless Lottery and Entertainment Content in Shanghai; vol. 11; No. 9; 2 pages, Sep. 2004. |
| Business Wire; EA Announces Next Step Into Mobile Gaming; Digital Bridges Named as Strategic Partner for Distribution of Mobile Interactive Entertainment in Europe; North and South America; 3 pages, Sep. 2, 2004. |
| Wireless News; Mobile Casinos, Lotteries Good News for Mobile Revenues; 2 pages, Feb. 23, 2005. |
| Business Wire; MobileGamingNow, Inc. Announces the Launch of the First Ever Mobile Phone Interactive, Multi-Player Gaming System for Poker; 2 pages, Apr. 4, 2005. |
| Business Wire; InfoSpace's GolfClub 3D Scores Hole-in-One for Exciting and Realistic Game Play; InfoSpace's 3D Golf Captures the Challenge and Realism of the Sport With Real-Time 3D Animation, Weather Effects, and Customizable Characters; 2 pages, Apr. 21, 2005. |
| Business Wire; July Systems' Play2Win Interactive Game Service Launched on UK's MobileGaming.com; Speedy Customer Deployments Now Possible With July's New UK Mobile Retailing Infrastructure; 2 pages, May 4, 2005. |
| Australian Patent Office; Examination Report for Singapore Patent Application No. 0605830-9; 5 pages, Jul. 7, 2008. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US07/66873; 4 pages, Aug. 4, 2008. |
| PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/057239; 8 pages, Aug. 7, 2008. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/418,939, Dec. 17, 2007 (13 pages). |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/418,939, Aug. 20, 2008 (12 pages). |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/418,939, Apr. 10, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/418,939, filed May 5, 2006, entitled “Systems and methods for providing access to wireless gaming devices.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/686,354, filed Mar. 15, 2007, entitled “Game Access Device with Time Varying Signal.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/406,783, filed May 5, 2006 entitled “Systems and methods for providing access to wireless gaming devices.” |
| Janna Lindsjö, et al.; GIGANT—an Interactive, Social, Physical and Mobile Game; PDC 2002 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference; Malmö, Sweden; 5 pages; Jun. 23-25, 2002. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office: Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,835, filed Aug. 9, 2005; in the name of Lee M. Amaitis, 17 pages; Mar. 2, 2007. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application PCT/US06/26599; 7 pages; Sep. 24, 2007. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application PCT/US06/06315; 10 pages; Sep. 24, 2007. |
| USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,812, filed Aug. 10, 2005; 32 pages; Sep. 27, 2007. |
| Australian Patent Office Written Opinion and Search Report for Application No. SG 200605830-9; 11 pages; Nov. 29, 2007. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US06/26348; 9 pages; Dec. 28, 2007. |
| Stephan Neuert, et al.; The British Library; Delivering Seamless Mobile Services over Bluetooth; 11 pages. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 7 pages; Jan. 23, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 7 pages; Jul. 16, 2008. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 14 pages; Aug. 31, 2007. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 16 pages; Feb. 22, 2007. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 17 pages; Aug. 5, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 7 pages; Feb. 6, 2008. |
| AU Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2010202517; 2 pages; Mar. 18, 2012. |
| EPO Examination Report for EP Application No. 05775503.5-1238 dated Jul. 23, 2007; 5; 5 pages. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2005/025722; 051102; 11 pages. |
| Canadian Examination Report for CA Application No. 2613338; 4 pages; Oct. 5, 2009. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US07/84669; 2 pages; Jun. 6, 2008. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,831; 5 pages; Oct. 21, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,125; 10 pages; Nov. 9, 2009. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-500972; Feb. 23, 2010; 3 pages; with translation 3 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-556420; Feb. 23, 2010; 4 pages; with translation 4 pages. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 14 pages; Feb. 4, 2010. |
| EP Communication for Application No. 06735821.8 dated Jan. 17, 2013; 5 pages. |
| AU Examination Report for Au Application No. 2006269418; 2 pages; Oct. 27, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,995; 11 pages; Jul. 12, 2010. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 22 pages; Jul. 2, 2010. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 26 pages; Dec. 18, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 18 pages; Jun. 9, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 16 pages; Jan. 21, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 11 pages; Jul. 21, 2008. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 3 pages; Mar. 10, 2008. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 13 pages; Jan. 8, 2008. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/194,809; 27 pages; Mar. 6, 2013. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 12 pages; Sep. 19, 2007. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 12 pages; Mar. 29, 2007. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,563; 7 pages; May 8, 2006. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,988 ; Jan. 9, 2007; 7 pages. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,988 ; Aug. 15, 2007; 4 pages. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,988 ; Mar. 26, 2008; 4 pages. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/367,566; Jul. 20, 2010; 8 pages. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,988 ; Apr. 28, 2010; 9 pages. |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 4 pages; May 4, 2009. |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 3 pages; Apr. 8, 2008. |
| Examiner Interview Summary Record for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 5 pages; Apr. 7, 2008. |
| Miscellaneous Communication to Applicant for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 2 pages; Oct. 11, 2006. |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 4 pages; Sep. 17, 2009. |
| Examiner Interview Summary Record for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 4 pages; Jun. 13, 2007. |
| AU Examination Report for AU Application No. 2006216723; 2 pages; Jul. 1, 2010. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,412; Jan. 20, 2011; 20 pages. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,404; Jan. 19, 2011; 19 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,125; 7 pages; Jan. 21, 2011. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,418; 15 pages; Feb. 10, 2011. |
| JP Office Action for Application No. 2008-520393; Jan. 24, 2011; 8 pages total with English Translation. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,425; Mar. 3, 2011; 64 pages. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,995; 52 pages; Mar. 15, 2011. |
| Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2006269416 dated Mar. 9, 2011; 3 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application No. 200580009075.5 dated Oct. 26, 2010; 7 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application No. 200580009075.5 dated Sep. 25, 2009; 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,125; 15 pages; May 27, 2011. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,809; May 25, 2011; 35 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2006269418 dated Apr. 8, 2010; 3 pages. |
| Examiners second Report for AU Application No. 2010212329; 2 pages; Aug. 16, 2011. |
| Examination Report for AU Application No. 2010202517; 2 pages; Jun. 23, 2011. |
| JP Office Action for Application No. 2008-520393; Aug. 16, 2011; 16 pages total with English Translation. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application No. 200580009075.5; Aug. 3, 2011; 8 pages. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,412; 24 pages; Sep. 7, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,995; 11 pages; Sep. 2, 2011. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 14 pages; Sep. 28, 2010. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 15 pages; Jan. 12, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,822; 7 pages; Jun. 7, 2011. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,963; 25 pages; Jun. 29, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 20, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,988 ; 4 pages. |
| Canadian Examination Report for CA Application No. 2613338; 4 pages; Aug. 16, 2011. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,425; Sep. 26, 2011; 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,125; Nov. 16, 2011; 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,404; Nov. 3, 2011; 56 pages. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,418; 28 pages; Nov. 9, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,418; Jan. 27, 2012; 8 pages. |
| Examination Report for CA Application No. 2557209 dated Jan. 20, 2012; 6 pages. |
| Examination Report for CA Application No. 2598041 dated Jan. 27, 2012; 6 pages. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,809; Feb. 10, 2012; 19 pages. |
| JP Office Action for Application No. 2007-500972; Jan. 24, 2012; 4 pages (includes English Translation). |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,404; Mar. 5, 2012; 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,418; Mar. 14, 2012; 9 pages. |
| Notice of Panel Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,425; Mar. 28, 2012; 2 pages. |
| AU Examination report for Application No. 2011244922; Jun. 12, 2012; 2 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,418; Jul. 2, 2012; 10 pages. |
| JP Office Action for Application No. 2008-520393; Jul. 3, 2012; 4 pages total with English Translation. |
| US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,279; Oct. 11, 2012; 11 pages. |
| US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,299; Oct. 10, 2012; 11 pages. |
| AU Examiners Report for Application No. 2005216239 dated Nov. 18, 2009; 2 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application No. 200580009075.5; Jun. 5, 2012; 9 pages. |
| European Extended Search Report for Application No. 05723674.7; Dec. 7, 2011; 6 pages. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,412; 17 pages; Oct. 19, 2012. |
| AU Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2006216723; 3 pages; Mar. 20, 2012. |
| European Extended Search Report for Application No. 06735821.8; Dec. 7, 2011; 9 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-186542 ; May 22, 2012; 6 pages. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,809; Nov. 15, 2012; 15 pages. |
| Examination Report for AU Application No. 2010202517; 2 pages; Aug. 16, 2011. |
| European Extended Search Report for Application No. 06786488.4; May 14, 2012; 6 pages. |
| Yampolskiy et al., 2006, “Use of Behavioral Biometrics in Intrusion detection and Online Gaming”, Biometric technology for Human Identification III, edited by Patrick J. Flynn, Sharath Pankanti, Proc. of SPIE vol. 6202, 62020U-1-10. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,425; 11 pages; Jan. 24, 2013. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-186542 ; Jan. 8, 2013; 5 pages. |
| US PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/346,133; 24 pages; Oct. 10, 2012. |
| US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,335; Dec. 28, 2012; 10 pages. |
| US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,268; Dec. 20, 2012; 7 pages. |
| European Extended Search Report for Application No. 05723674.7; Sep. 12, 2012; 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,125; 31 pages; Jan. 2, 2013. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,831; 9 pages; Dec. 19, 2008. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,995; 11 pages; Jan. 22, 2009. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/406,783; Feb. 9, 2009. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US06/26350; 8 pages, Apr. 27, 2007. |
| U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,274; 13 pages; May 10, 2013. |
| Australian Examination Report for AU Application 2006269418; 2 pages; Mar. 12, 2009. |
| Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,404, filed Aug. 15, 2007. |
| Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,412, filed Aug. 15, 2007. |
| Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/683,476, filed Mar. 8, 2007. |
| Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/683,508, filed Mar. 8, 2007. |
| U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,568; 17 pages; Oct. 21, 2008. |
| Solutions for Restaurants, Hotels & Resorts and Clubs—Guestbridge, Inc. (online) Guestbridge, Inc. Feb. 6, 2007 [retrieved on Aug. 21, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20070206134139/www.guestbridge.com/solutions.html, entire document especially p. 1. |
| U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,299; 13 pages; Jun. 7, 2013. |
| CN Notice of Reexamination for Application No. 200580009075.5; 6 pages; May 24, 2013 (w/ English translation). |
| U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,412; 18 pages; Jun. 6, 2013. |
| U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,299; 15 pages; Jun. 19, 2013. |
| US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,335; Jun. 21, 2013; 13 pages. |
| European Extended Search Report for Application No. 06735821.8; Jan. 17, 2013; 5 pages. |
| U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/346,133; 13 pages; Aug. 12, 2013. |
| U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,268; 13; pages; Aug. 15, 2013. |
| U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/839,425; 11; pages; Aug. 15, 2013. |
| Australian Examination Report for AU Application No. 2012203722, 2 pages; Aug. 23, 2013. |
| JP Final Decision for Appeal No. 2012-9549; Sep. 10, 2013; 26 Pages (w/English translation). |
| JP Decision on Appeal for Application No. 2005-520393; Sep. 10, 2013; 45 pages (w/English translation). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050197190 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60549187 | Mar 2004 | US | |
| 60547507 | Feb 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10835995 | Apr 2004 | US |
| Child | 11063311 | US |
