This disclosure is particularly directed towards a platform for orchestrating and delivering a one-to-one personalized experience across all channels and platforms by which a user can access Internet content, acting as the connective tissue that creates a consistent experience across all points of a user’s experience with a given party online.
Personalization of content to a user’s preference is an area that is used for a number of purposes. Computer companies, such as FACEBOOK for example, collect data about users and use those data to customize a user’s experience with the platform. In the past, that customization has been fairly limited: certain locations on a webpage can accept advertisements and other embedded images, and data are used to customize those locations on the webpage, or data can be used to target advertisements to a user.
This type of customization is fairly limited, though, and can create differences in a user’s experience. For example, a user could receive emails about certain sales, but upon accessing the website those sales are not prominently displayed. Or, a user might receive a text message about a promotion that is not easily accessible on the webpage. What is needed is a method to personalize Internet content to make it more appealing to the user of the website based on the data collected, while maintaining a uniform experience across a variety of channels or platforms. This can be done by creating a system that draws from the same source for all communication with a user, therefore unifying the experience for the user across all platforms and channels of communication. In addition, in one embodiment, the system can be used to create a pageless experience, creating an individualized landing page for each user accessing the website.
The features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the disclosure without undue experimentation. The features and advantages of the disclosure may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out herein.
A purpose of the instant disclosure is to create a system that collects information to orchestrate and deliver a personalized experience to a user accessing internet content across all different channels and on all different platforms, acting as connective tissue that creates a consistent experience across all points of a user’s access to the content.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles in accordance with this disclosure, reference will now be made to illustrative embodiments of the invention. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and any additional applications of the principles of the disclosure as illustrated herein, which would normally occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the disclosure claimed.
Before the devices, systems, processes and methods will be disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular configurations, process steps, and materials disclosed herein, as such configurations, process steps, and materials may vary somewhat. It is also to be understood that the terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular illustrative embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting since the scope of the disclosure will be limited only by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
In describing and claiming the subject matter of the disclosure, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “characterized by,” “having” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.
The system and method disclosed herein solve the problem of creating a customized experience across all different platforms that a user might see, such as advertisements, emails on various subjects, a website, and other communications from a given company user to a number of individual users. Illustrative embodiments of the instant invention create a webservice that can be accessed through multiple channels and platforms, each platform drawing from the same elements customized to a given user. This webservice is used to generate information for all different platforms that the user communicates with, creating a customized experience and customized content that is consistent across all channels through which a user might have contact with a given company. These channels could include text messages, emails, advertisements, and websites, for example.
In one embodiment of a system, method, and product for creating and delivering a personalized one-to-one experience for a user receiving communication from a given company shown in
In an illustrative embodiment of the system, the personalization structure creates customer specific recommended content that is used to create a personalized landing page at the user level 103. A customized landing page is created when requested through a variety of channels. These may be push channels, such as email 104, web notifications 105, or a push through an application 106; or they may be pull channels, such as a web search 107 (as through a search engine such as Google) or a social media request 108 (as through FACEBOOK). While these channels may be accessed in different ways, the system utilizes the same data to create a personalized experience that is unified throughout a variety of different systems and channels to communicate with the system or the company user which utilizes the system.
In an illustrative embodiment of the system, the company user 110 provides events, customer identities, and customer attributes, as well as other necessary information to a Customer Data Platform (CDP) 111, such as mParticle or another similar CDP. The CDP may provide certain events to a data storage and analysis program 112, such as the commercially available Snowflake. This system in turn provides user level data to a machine-learning processing platform 113, such as Databricks. The machine learning data generated by the machine-learning platform is returned to the CDP 111 to give more data about a user and provide a better system for communicating with that user. When operating through push channels, the CDP 111 may provide data, including customer events, to a customer engagement structure 114, such as braze. This structure provides information to and requests the push channels, email, and web notifications.
The CDP 111 may also provide targeted audience information to search engines 107 or social media 108. This information, like that provided to Push channels, is used to generate personalized user-level landing pages. The CDP 111 may also provide information to an advertising and bidding program 115 such as Beeswax, which provides realtime bidding to obtain slots for paid advertising which can be accessed by the user. In addition, the paid advertising may provide real-time engagement data to a linking platform 116. In an illustrative embodiment, Branch is the linking platform and provides identity matched engagement data back to the CDP, which can then be used in the machine learning system to generate a more sophisticated and accurate model for providing information.
In an illustrative embodiment of the invention, the system and method create individualized, personalized communication across multiple channels. In an illustrative embodiment, this system and method comprises a non-transitory computer readable medium that may comprise a company server, a user computer, and a network connection. The company server may be accessible to the user computer through a network connection. It will be appreciated that the company server may comprise multiple servers linked together as in a server farm, and that the user computer may be an access device, which includes a smart phone, a computer, or a server or multiple servers through which a user may communicate with the company user via a network connection, such as the Internet.
Upon receiving a request from a channel or platform 202 to provide information, the personalization structure 201 makes a request to draw the required elements 206 to generate content deliverable to the channel or platform 202. The elements required are generated by element webservices 207, each of which has the logic required to fulfill the request to provide a personalized content deliverable. This may require the element webservice 207 to access outside webservices to provide customer propensities, product services, desired images, and other requirements to provide a fully personalized content deliverable. Each element webservice may have appropriate logic and machine-learning systems required for it to provide personalized content to a given user.
Upon receiving the elements required to create a content deliverable, the personalization structure 201 utilizes element ordering logic and machine learning 205 to create and deliver personalized content in real-time for offsite and onsite channels and platforms. Whichever type of deliverable is required draws on the same element webservices to generate the content for the required deliverable. This creates a unified user experience whether the user is accessing onsite content 203 from the company user’s website, or offsite content 204 that is requested by or directed to an individual user from the company user. The personalization structure uses the provided logic and machine learning 205 to create personalized content from a variety of elements 106 that the structure has access to in order to create a personalized experience that remains uniform across different channels of communication and across different platforms for communication.
The element webservices that generate the required elements for a content deliverable are stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium. This medium is accessible to the personalization structure, and contains in memory a cache of Element Webservices, shown in
An Element Webservice could also pull data from customer propensities 304 based on actual or predicted behavior of the user on other websites 305, or past behavior of the user on that specific website 305. This may include, for example the user’s shopping habits, or other data that may be available either through a commercial source online, or through the data stored by the company user. The Element Webservice 301 can also access information about the source of the user’s inquiry 307: in the case of an e-commerce type use, this could be data about a particular product, which is collected through a system provided by the company user to collect those data 306. Another illustrative example of an Element Webservice would collect information about a particular user 309. This information may be imported into the given Element Webservice 301 through a program 308 created to collect and distribute data about particular customers. This program 308 may be created by the company user, or it may be through a commercially available program, and could include information such as age, interests, or other biographical data. In an illustrative embodiment, the element webservice may be designed to gather information from a commercially available customer data platform (CDP), such as mParticle, or a similar data collection program.
An Element Webservice 301 can also access other additional data 311 determined to be necessary to create a content deliverable. This information may be collected from a variety of databases, accessed through the appropriate application programming interface (API), or from information collected in the databases of the company user 310. None of the given examples are meant to limit the Element Webservice to a particular type of data, or to a given program, as the Element Webservice can be made to access whatever type of data is needed and available to personalize the experience for a given user. An individual element webservice has access to the data needed to create an element for a content deliverable, where the content deliverable is the vehicle by which the company user is communicating with the individual user. For example, and not by limitation, a content deliverable may be sent to a user via email, and may be the particular communication in an email directed at the user. Alternatively, a content deliverable could comprise only a portion of an email that must be inserted to personalize the email to an individual user, such as a pregenerated paragraph encouraging the user to examine items abandoned by the user in a previous visit to the website.
Each element webservice 301 is a self-contained structure that also includes all of the logic structures required to allow the element webservice to access all relevant data to create a content deliverable. The element webservice is accessible to the personalization structure as shown in
A pageless experience, which combines two or more elements, may be requested in a variety of situations. For example, a customized PLA landing page may be generated as a pageless experience. A product listing ad is an advertisement that includes a product image along with a clickable link to direct a user to a landing page for a specific product. Using the personalization structure, a PLA landing page may be generated as a pageless experience customized to an individual user. A pageless experience may also be used to generate an abandonment email or a Pinterest landing page, which is customized to an individual user.
In another illustrative embodiment, the personalization structure may access only a single element to insert that element into a particular place in response to a request from the channel or platform. A variety of Element Webservices are available to personalize the particular communication. One type of Element Webservice may create an individual use element related to a product of the company user. For example, an element may be created that is related to cross sell products or products similar to a product a user has accessed. An element might be created that shows a product featured by the company user, or “Buyer’s Pick” products or “Top Products,” which feature products that are distinguished in other ways. An element might be created to show certain products displayed in the media or that are popular on a social media site. Other elements might be created for specifically when a user accesses content in a certain way. Other elements might be tailored to a user’s particular affiliations, such as an element that gives information on a shopping club or rewards program, or that creates an element based on the history of the user, such as an abandoned cart element. Still other elements might include information for an email or particular events that the company user wishes to promote.
In step 1, ref. no. 501, a request for a content deliverable is made. This request may be a request for a pageless experience, such as a landing page 504 or an email 505, or it may be request for a single element to fit into an already-generated template 506.
In step 2, ref. no. 502, the request for a content deliverable is received by the layout endpoint 511 in the layout structure 510. The layout endpoint 511 provides information to the layout decision structure 512. The layout decision structure 512 draws information from a variety of sources to generate the best layout for a given customer. In the case of a single element request, the structure may be pregenerated for the most effective layout to present a single element. The layout decision structure may draw information from configuration programs or machine learning systems 513 to generate a properly formed layout 520, viewport detection programs 514 to ensure that the created layout fits the size of the user’s screen, and fallback elements 515. The combination of these elements is used to create an optimal layout for the content deliverable for a particular user. In addition, the layout decision structure 512 may draw and provide information from a customer attribute service 507, which draws information from and provides data to external data sources 508 such as commercial customer information services, an example being mParticle. The customer attribute service can also draw information from the element web services 530, and gather that information to provide to the layout decision structure 512. The layout decision structure 512 uses this information to generate a template/page layout 520.
After a template/page layout 520 is generated, the Element web-services 530 are called to provide content for the generated page. This generated page may be an email, a landing page, or any other customized communication between the company user and an individual user. The element webservices may include similar ideas to a current purchase, a featured product, a link to buying guides, an advertisement or standard product, or any other content that would be optimal to have in a given communication with a given user. Each piece of content is generated by a particular element webservice and is located in the template/page layout in a particular location, which is determined by the layout decision structure to be optimal for the given user. Once the element web services 530 have filled in the template, the content deliverable is delivered to the platform that requested it in step 3, ref. no. 503. The content may be provided to a variety of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to create a deliverable that is appropriate for the communication channel and platform. These interfaces may include a communication database 541, such as Oracle database, or to a system that allows voice communication 542, such as OREC engine. The information may be provided to a passive data structure 543, or to other APIs 544, for communication to an appropriate channel. The deliverable may also be provided to an asset data platform 545, which may store the information for later use within the system. Each element webservice 530 is a self-contained structure that also includes all of the logic structures required to allow the element webservice to access all relevant data to create a content deliverable, which can be delivered to whichever channel or method of communication which it must go through.
In addition, the system may receive content to be generated into an email 551. The content is sent through an email image structure 552 that has access both to the element webservices 530 and the asset data platform 545 to obtain specific data on the recipient of the email and generate an email personalized to a particular recipient.
In addition, the image structure 602 may receive a request for real-time email content 614, which is provided to the asset data platform 609 and the element web services 608 to provide an appropriate response for the user interface, in this case a real-time email request. This may be to provide information for an email that is left ungenerated until it is opened, at which point the most timely, customer appropriate information is used to fill in the email. Both the image structure 602 and the layout structure 601 may produce data that can be monitored in real time through a data tracking program such as Kinesis 615. This program tracks the exhaust data from the system and provides it to the data storage and analysis program 607 to better create customized content.
To generate the landing page itself, the request for a landing page also is provided to the layout structure 702. This structure comprises an endpoint 721, which receives the request and provides it to the layout decider 722. The layout decider accesses a viewport detection service 723, which determines the appropriate elements to display the layout on a given screen. The layout decider 722 also has access to a configuration service 724. The configuration is run by logic through the database containing information on a user’s propensities (or propensities of users in general). The database also has a machine learning system and a testing system that take over from the configuration service 724 when there is enough data and training in the machine learning system to do so. The layout decider 722 also has access to fallback elements 726 to use as well. Once the layout of the landing page 727 is generated it may make a URL request 728. The URL request for multiple recs is based on a variety of factors 729. This includes the element used, such as site sales, a featured products, etc. It can also be based on factors such as the asset size and key value pairs. The asset size variable depends on the size of the final assets, which provides one size per element. The key value pairs pass key values pulled from the original request URL. This generates a URL structure of the format =root?FP/1,SS/10&keyvaluepairs.
Once the site is generated it goes through a similar structure 703, starting at a new endpoint 731. From the endpoint another multiple rec request may be made for a URL 732, and the generated page will go through a deduplicating process 733 to eliminate duplicate product Ids across all final recs. The deduplicating process can also deduplicate the page based on other factors as well. After going through the deduplicating process 733, the layout pate may generate a number of rec endpoints 734 as elements. At this point, an a la carte rec request 735 may be made for a URL related to a single rec endpoint. The a la carte request depends on factors such as which element is being accessed (site sales, featured product, etc.), a count of the recs expected in the response, key value pairs, which is contextual values and customer identifiable variables, and the asset sizes, which is the size of the final assets.
The Rec endpoints 734 are provided to the logic layer 736. The logic layer is provided with a series of configurations 737, which control the logic layer until the machine learning system 738 has enough data to control the logic layer. The logic layer consists of individualized components for each rec endpoint. These components can include suppressions, a rec # coefficient, rec logic, and operational controls. The Suppressions may suppress OOS from a given user’s landing page. It may also suppress recently purchased items from the user’s landing page or restricted taxonomies from the user’s landing page. The Rec# Coefficient may ensure that the count of returned recs matches or exceeds the original recs count in the original request. In an illustrative embodiment this may be initially set at 2.0, which leads to a 100% increase in the rec count. The Rec logic is provided to know what each rec endpoint (or element), the requirements for each rec endpoint, and where to access the data for each rec endpoint. This system may also include controls for the viewport to make image size requests of the ADP. Finally, the operational controls may be controlled via configurations programs until the machine learning system has enough data to take over.
Once the layout goes through the logic layer it is a layout provided with the proper elements to fill it in and create a personalized landing page based on the same elements that will be used to create an email or an advertisement to the same user, creating a unified, personalized experience for the user. The finished page may be provided to the asset data platform, a CDP, a passive data structure, other APIs, or a database system, such as Oracle Database.
In an illustrative embodiment of the service, each element’s content shares the same origin, the Element Webservices, which ties together offsite and onsite personalization. In an illustrative embodiment, the service can deliver content for a variety of channels. For example, when an email is sent out, the webservice can generate an image when the email is opened. To do this, the service draws from the elements, which may be personalized based on information on each person accessing the email. When that same user is on a website and the website calls for an ad from the company user, the elements that are drawn from to create the advertisement for the website are the same elements that were used to create the email. Since the elements are accessible across a variety of channels, including the email, the website, advertisement pages, etc., the experience the user gets from the totality of communications with the company user is one that is targeted precisely to each individual user.
In an illustrative embodiment, the elements can also be combined in an order specifically targeted at a given user to create a “pageless” experience, which creates an individualized landing page and individualized display for each user. This individualization uses the user’s preferences, shopping history, and any other elements of information about the user to create the content. The individualized landing page draws from the same cache of elements stored on the server that creates emails, targeted advertisements, and other communications from the company user to an individual user.
In another illustrative embodiment, the elements can be combined in an order specifically targeted at a given user on any channel or platform through which the individual user communicates with the company user. For example, just as an individualized landing page and display can be created for each user, using the user’s preferences, shopping history, and any other information about the user to create the content of the landing page, so too can the same information be used to create an email, ordering the elements of the email dynamically for each individual user. This individualization uses the user’s preferences, shopping history, and any other elements of information about the user to create the content, which can be anything to communicate information, from the website landing page, to an email, to a text message. The content draws from the same cache of elements stored on the server that creates emails, targeted advertisements, and other communications from the company user to an individual user. Any channel or platform that can accept multiple types of content for one experience can be individualized for a specific user, combining the user’s information from the same cache of elements used to create the landing page. This helps create consistency across all channels and platforms used by each particular user.
In an illustrative embodiment, the different elements can be accessed from a variety of channels and platforms. When a given channel or platform must communicate with user, for example through an email or a text message, or on a given website, the channel sends a request to the system. The system then accesses the cached elements. The channel can make a request for a single element, for example, an “item-in-cart” element, for an email following up on an unpurchased item in the user’s cart. The element contains all the logic and data needed to create a deliverable to the given channel. In another illustrative embodiment, for example when the email is more general or when the user accesses the website, the channel can request information from multiple elements, such as user propensities, past purchases, past viewed websites, and other elements and from the logic in the system create a content deliverable that gives a customized page for the user to access, whether by accessing an actual webpage or through content embedded in an email.
In an illustrative embodiment, the system can also include a machine-learning algorithm as known in the art, which incorporates a user’s responses to the displayed content to determine the contents of elements for an individual user. As such, each element can become personalized for an individual user and can contain the content best needed to appeal to the user. In addition, one illustrative embodiment allows the system to use machine learning to determine which elements should be included in a pageless experience for an individual user.
One illustrative embodiment of a system for supporting and creating consistent personalized content to a user of a webservice across multiple channels and platforms of communication with the user comprises: a server capable of responding to requests from multiple platforms and channels; a cache of multiple Element Webservices stored in memory of a server, each Element Webservice having access to all data and logic necessary to build a personalized content deliverable in real-time, the personalized content deliverable being an element; a non-transitory computer readable medium containing in memory instructions, wherein the instructions causing the system to execute the following steps upon receiving a request for a content deliverable:
Another embodiment of the system also incorporates a machine learning algorithm to incorporate past data into the future use of the specific order of elements webservices and appropriate elements to access, as well as incorporating machine learning training, such as using training sets and possible future reactions, as well as other types of machine learning training known in the art.
Another embodiment of the system also comprises an Asset Data Platform, which comprises various assets that can be drawn on by element webservices to create a given element. The asset data platform may comprise data including images, colors, fonts, sounds, colors, specific shapes or interfaces, or other types of assets which are required to create a content deliverable.
Another illustrative embodiment of the system grants Element Webservices access to a database giving information on a user’s propensities based on past behavior and predicted future behavior and creates an element based on those user propensities. This database may be a database compiled by the company user providing the content deliverables, or it may be a commercially available database wherein the company user pays a fee for access to information about users and data.
Another illustrative embodiment of the system allows an Element Webservice to access data on a particular product and creates an element showing information about the particular product.
In yet another illustrative embodiment of the system, an Element Webservice has access to a Customer Data Platform that provides identification of a user and attributes of that user and creates an element based on the information from the Customer Data Platform.
Another illustrative embodiment of the system comprises an Element Webservice, which has access to any API which provides information needed to create a particular element to create a content deliverable. This may include information on a customer, product, or particular channel, as well as geographic information, or other information which can help customize a particular element to a given user.
Another illustrative embodiment of the invention comprises a system for creating consistent personalized content to a user of a webservice across multiple channels and platforms of communication with the user. This system may include a cache of element webservices stored in a computer readable non transitory medium linked to a network to provide accessibility to the other elements of the system, wherein each Element Webservice comprises data and logic needed to build personalized content for a given element in real-time. The system also includes a layout structure, wherein the layout structure receives requests for content and generates an appropriate layout for content built by the Element Webservice to fill and provides the layout to the element webservices. Another part of the system is an image structure, which receives requests for real time email content and generates image requests to be sent to the element webservices. The system also includes a customer attribute service containing information collected by the webservice on individual users.
Upon receiving a request for an individual element, the system takes the following steps: Receive the request for an individual element at the layout structure; Create a template at the layout structure and provide the template to the customer attribute service and the element webservices; Cause the element webservices to generate the requested element and insert the element into the template created; and Provide the filled template to an appropriate API to fulfill the request.
Upon receiving a request for a multiple element experience, such as a customized landing page or another pageless experience the system takes the following steps: Receive the request for an individual element at the layout structure; Create a template at the layout structure by accessing information specific to a user and generating a template customized to the user making the request for a multiple element experience; Provide the template to the customer attribute service and the element webservices; cause the Element Webservices to generate the requested elements and insert the elements into the template created; provide the filled template to an appropriate API to be fulfill the request.
Upon receiving a request for real-time email content, the system takes the following steps: receive the request for real-time email content at the image structure; provide an image and data on the request to the asset data platform and the element webservices; cause the element web service to generate the requested element for an email and provide the requested element and email images to the asset data platform; provide the requested real-time email content, including the image and generated element to the user interface in real-time as the user opens an email.
In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, the layout structure further comprises: A layout endpoint that receives a request for a content deliverable; a layout decision structure that receives the request for a content deliverable from the layout endpoint, collects information, and accesses logic structures to create a layout for a content deliverable; a configuration program containing instructions on how to generate an appropriate layout for a given content deliverable; a viewport detection structure that detects the size of a viewscreen upon which the request will be viewed and ensures that the layout is the appropriate size.
In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, the configuration program further comprises a machine learning structure that is used to generate an appropriate layout for a given content deliverable.
Another illustrative embodiment of the system includes a layout structure that further has access to external data sources, such as a customer information service or a customer database platform; and wherein the layout structure accesses the external data source to contribute to the creation of a layout that is tailored to the user making the request for a content deliverable.
In yet a further illustrative embodiment of the system, each element webservice has access to machine learning programs and external services such as a customer data platform (CDP), which allow it to create personalized content deliverables for the template from the layout structure.
Another illustrative embodiment of the invention is expressed as a method for creating consistent personalized content to a user of a webservice across multiple channels and platforms of communication with the user, wherein the method comprises: providing a cache of element webservices, wherein each element webservice comprises data and logic needed to build personalized content for a given element in real-time; receiving a request for a content deliverable; creating an appropriate layout for the content deliverable, wherein the layout contains space for information for each requested element; generating the requested content from the element webservices, wherein each element webservice uses the data and logic it contains to build personalized content for a given element in real time; inserting the requested content from the element webservices into the layout, creating a finished content deliverable; and providing the content deliverable to the requesting user.
Another illustrative embodiment of this method also comprises the step of determining an optimal order of elements and which elements are best to contain in the deliverable, then further ordering the elements in the proper order and delivering the content.
Another illustrative embodiment of the method also comprises the step of accessing a machine-learning program while creating the layout, allowing for the system to create content layouts and utilize both past and training layouts to create an appropriate layout for a given user.
In yet another illustrative embodiment of the method, each element webservice also has access to machine learning systems, allowing each element webservice to create personalized content using information on the past creation of personalized content and projected user responses to created content for a particular element which factors into the creation of a content deliverable.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/906,378, filed Sep. 26, 2020, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, including but not limited to those portions that specifically appear hereinafter, the incorporation by reference being made with the following exception: In the event that any portion of the above-referenced provisional application is inconsistent with this application, this application supersedes said above-referenced provisional application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808987 | Takeda et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4854516 | Yamada | Aug 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
RE33316 | Katsuta et al. | Aug 1990 | E |
5027110 | Chang et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5053956 | Donald et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063507 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5205200 | Wright | Apr 1993 | A |
5243515 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280422 | Moe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301350 | Rogan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347632 | Filepp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377354 | Scannell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394324 | Clearwater | Feb 1995 | A |
5407433 | Loomas | Apr 1995 | A |
5411483 | Loomas et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5493677 | Balogh et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5557728 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5579471 | Barber et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5598557 | Doner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5621790 | Grossman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5664111 | Nahan et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5706457 | Dwyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721908 | Lagarde et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722418 | Bro | Mar 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737599 | Rowe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760917 | Sheridan | Jun 1998 | A |
5761496 | Hattori | Jun 1998 | A |
5761655 | Hoffman | Jun 1998 | A |
5761662 | Dasan | Jun 1998 | A |
5771291 | Newton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771380 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778367 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794216 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5796395 | de Hond | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803500 | Mossberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5818914 | Fujisaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5870754 | Dimitrova et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873069 | Reuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873080 | Coden et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890175 | Wong et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5907547 | Foladare et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913215 | Rubinstein et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922074 | Richard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924072 | Havens | Jul 1999 | A |
5926794 | Fethe | Jul 1999 | A |
5948040 | DeLorme et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970490 | Morgenstern | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974412 | Hazlehurst et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987446 | Corey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991739 | Cupps et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999915 | Nahan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012053 | Pant et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029141 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035288 | Solomon | Mar 2000 | A |
6035402 | Vaeth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044363 | Mori et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045447 | Yoshizawa et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047264 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049797 | Guha et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055518 | Franklin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058379 | Odom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058417 | Hess et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058428 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061448 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065041 | Lum et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070125 | Murphy et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073117 | Oyanagi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078914 | Redfern | Jun 2000 | A |
6085176 | Woolston | Jul 2000 | A |
6104815 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119137 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128649 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141010 | Hoyle | Oct 2000 | A |
6167382 | Sparks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178408 | Copple et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185558 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192407 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199077 | Inala et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202061 | Khosla et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226412 | Schwab | May 2001 | B1 |
6243691 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269238 | Iggulden | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271840 | Finseth et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275820 | Navin-Chandra et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275829 | Angiulo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6356879 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6356905 | Gershman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356908 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366899 | Kernz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370527 | Singhal | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373933 | Sarkki et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381510 | Amidhozour et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415320 | Hess et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434556 | Levin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452609 | Katinsky et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456307 | Bates et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460020 | Pool et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466917 | Goyal et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484149 | Jammes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489968 | Ortega et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522955 | Colborn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523037 | Monahan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601061 | Holt et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604107 | Wang | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625764 | Dawson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643696 | Davis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661431 | Stuart et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665838 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675178 | Chinchar et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694436 | Audebert | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701310 | Sugiura et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718536 | Dupaquis | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725268 | Jackel et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728704 | Mao et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732161 | Hess et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732162 | Wood et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6801909 | Delgado et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6856963 | Hurwitz | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6889054 | Himmel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907401 | Vittal et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912505 | Linden et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6978273 | Bonneau et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7043450 | Vélez et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7069242 | Sheth et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7076453 | Jammes et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076504 | Handel et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080030 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099891 | Harris et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100111 | McElfresh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117207 | Kerschberg et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127416 | Tenorio | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7165091 | Lunenfeld | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167910 | Farnham et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216115 | Walters et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7240016 | Sturgis et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254547 | Beck et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7305614 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7318037 | Solari | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324966 | Scheer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7340249 | Moran et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349668 | Ilan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353188 | Yim et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366755 | Cuomo et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7379890 | Myr et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380217 | Gvelesiani | May 2008 | B2 |
7383320 | Silberstein et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7401025 | Lokitz | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7447646 | Agarwal et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7451476 | Banks et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454464 | Puthenkulam et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457730 | Degnan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7493521 | Li et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496525 | Mitchell | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496527 | Silverstein et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496582 | Farnham et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7516094 | Perkowski | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539696 | Greener et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7546625 | Kamangar | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7552067 | Nephew et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565615 | Ebert | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7606743 | Orzell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610212 | Klett et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7653573 | Hayes, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7834883 | Adams et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7904348 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912748 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7921031 | Crysel et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941751 | Ebert | May 2011 | B2 |
7979340 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983950 | De Vita | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983963 | Byrne et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991800 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8086643 | Tenorio | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8112303 | Eglen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140989 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8166155 | Rachmeler et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8204799 | Murray et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8214264 | Kasavin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8214804 | Robertson | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8260852 | Cselle | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8312056 | Peng et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8326662 | Byrne et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8370269 | MacDonald-Korth et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8370435 | Bonefas et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8392356 | Stoner et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8452691 | MacDonald Korth et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8473316 | Panzitta et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8494912 | Fraser et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8545265 | Sakamoto et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577740 | Murray et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8583480 | Byrne | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8630960 | Gross | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8676632 | Watson et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8693494 | Fiatal | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719075 | MacDonald Korth et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8793650 | Hilerio et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9047341 | Pan | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047642 | Byrne et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9448692 | Mierau et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9483788 | Martin | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9741080 | Byrne | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9747622 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9805425 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9928752 | Byrne et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9940659 | Behbahani et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10074118 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10102287 | Martin | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10269081 | Byrne | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10423997 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10534845 | Noursalehi et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10769219 | Martin | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10810654 | Robertson et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10853891 | MacDonald-Korth et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10872350 | Hu et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
11061977 | Raskar | Jul 2021 | B1 |
20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034667 | Petersen | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034668 | Whitworth | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044751 | Pugliese, III et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047290 | Petras et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047308 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002513 | Chiasson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007356 | Rice et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013721 | Dabbiere et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019763 | Linden et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022995 | Miller et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023059 | Bari et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026390 | Ulenas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029187 | Meehan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038312 | Donner et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040352 | McCormick | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042738 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049622 | Lettich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056044 | Andersson | May 2002 | A1 |
20020099578 | Eicher, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099579 | Stowell et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099602 | Moskowitz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107718 | Morrill et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107853 | Hofmann et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111826 | Potter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120537 | Morea et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123957 | Notarius et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124100 | Adams | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129282 | Hopkins | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133502 | Rosenthal et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138399 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147625 | Kolke, Jr. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156802 | Takayama et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161648 | Mason et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188777 | Kraft et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194049 | Boyd | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198784 | Shaak et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198882 | Linden et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004855 | Dutta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005046 | Kavanagh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009362 | Cifani et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009392 | Perkowski | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014400 | Siegel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028451 | Ananian | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028605 | Millett et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032409 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035138 | Schilling | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036914 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040970 | Miller | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041008 | Grey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046149 | Wong | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069740 | Zeidman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069790 | Kane | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069825 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083961 | Bezos et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088467 | Culver | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088511 | Karboulonis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093331 | Childs et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097352 | Gutta et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105682 | Dicker et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110100 | Wirth, Jr. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119492 | Timmins et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131095 | Kumhyr et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139969 | Scroggie et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140007 | Kramer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140121 | Adams | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158792 | Perkowski | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163340 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167213 | Jammes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177103 | Ivanov et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187745 | Hobday et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200156 | Roseman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204449 | Kotas et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217002 | Enborg | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220835 | Barnes, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006509 | Mannik et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015416 | Foster et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029567 | Timmins et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041836 | Zaner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044563 | Stein | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055017 | Delpuch et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058710 | Timmins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073476 | Donahue et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078388 | Melman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107136 | Nemirofsky et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117242 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122083 | Pettit et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122681 | Ruvolo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122735 | Meshkin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122855 | Ruvolo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128183 | Challey et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128283 | Wang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128320 | Grove et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143731 | Audebert et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148232 | Fushimi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172323 | Stamm | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172379 | Mott et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174979 | Hutton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186766 | Fellenstein et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199496 | Liu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199905 | Fagin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204989 | Dicker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204991 | Monahan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230989 | Macey et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240642 | Crandell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249727 | Cook, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267717 | Slackman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002166 | Clidaras et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010925 | Khawand et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038733 | Foster et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044254 | Smith | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055306 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060664 | Rogers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097204 | Horowitz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114229 | Ackley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120311 | Thrall | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131837 | Sanctis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144064 | Calabria et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050193333 | Ebert | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197846 | Pezaris et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197950 | Moya et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198031 | Pezaris et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202390 | Allen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203888 | Woosley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216300 | Appelman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262067 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273378 | MacDonald-Korth et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009994 | Hogg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010105 | Sarukkai et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015498 | Sarmiento et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031240 | Eyal et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041638 | Whittaker et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058048 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069623 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085251 | Greene | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060173817 | Chowdhury et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206479 | Mason | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218049 | Walker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230035 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235752 | Kavanagh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259360 | Flinn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271671 | Hansen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282304 | Bedard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005424 | Arauz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027760 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027814 | Tuoriniemi | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073641 | Perry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077025 | Mino | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078726 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078849 | Slothouber | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083437 | Hamor | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094597 | Rostom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100803 | Cava | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130090 | Staib et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160345 | Sakai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162379 | Skinner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174108 | Monster | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192168 | Van Luchene | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192181 | Asdourian | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206606 | Coleman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214048 | Chan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226679 | Jayamohan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233565 | Herzog et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239534 | Liu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245013 | Saraswathy et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260520 | Jha et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282666 | Afeyan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288298 | Gutierrez et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299743 | Staib et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015938 | Haddad et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021763 | Merchant | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052152 | Yufik | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071640 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082394 | Floyd et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103893 | Nagarajan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120342 | Reed et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126205 | Evans et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126476 | Nicholas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133305 | Yates et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140765 | Kelaita et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162574 | Gilbert | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195476 | Marchese et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201218 | Broder et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215456 | West et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080288338 | Wiseman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294536 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300909 | Rikhtverchik et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301009 | Plaster et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305869 | Konforty et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313010 | Jepson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006190 | Lucash et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030755 | Altberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030775 | Vieri | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037355 | Brave et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090106080 | Carrier et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106127 | Purdy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110181 | Koenig et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119167 | Kendall et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157537 | Miller | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164323 | Byrne | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182589 | Kendall et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204848 | Kube et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222348 | Ransom et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222737 | Liesche et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234722 | Evevsky | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240582 | Sheldon-Neal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090276284 | Yost | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276305 | Clopp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292677 | Kim | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293019 | Raffel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313173 | Singh et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100042684 | Broms et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070448 | Omoigui | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076816 | Phillips | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076851 | Jewell, Jr. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094673 | Lobo et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107123 | Sareen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145831 | Esfandiari et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146413 | Yu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100228617 | Ransom et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110010656 | Mokotov | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110055054 | Glasson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060621 | Weller et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110103699 | Ke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131253 | Peukert et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145226 | Gollapudi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153383 | Bhattacharjya et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153663 | Koren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173076 | Eggleston et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191319 | Nie et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196802 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225050 | Varghese | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231226 | Golden | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231383 | Smyth et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271204 | Jones et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276513 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289068 | Teevan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120005187 | Chavanne | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030067 | Pothukuchi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120084135 | Nissan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120158715 | Maghoul et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164619 | Meer | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166299 | Heinstein et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120231424 | Calman et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233312 | Ramakumar et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120278388 | Kleinbart et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284336 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130031470 | Daly, Jr. et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130073392 | Allen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080200 | Connolly et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080426 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085893 | Bhardwaj et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130144870 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145254 | Masuko et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151331 | Avner et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151388 | Falkenborg et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185164 | Pottjegort | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191409 | Zeng et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130254059 | Teo | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268561 | Christie et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140019313 | Hu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019542 | Rao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025509 | Reisz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032544 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140114680 | Mills et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140136290 | Schiestl et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140172652 | Pobbathi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180758 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140200959 | Sarb et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140259056 | Grusd | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289005 | Laing et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140337090 | Tavares | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140372415 | Fernandez-Ruiz | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150019958 | Ying et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150088968 | Wei et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150142543 | Lellouche | May 2015 | A1 |
20150286742 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287066 | Wortley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170344622 | Islam et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20200065357 | Noursalehi et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200293587 | Ayers et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2253543 | Oct 1997 | CA |
2347812 | May 2000 | CA |
0636993 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0807891 | May 2000 | EP |
1241603 | Sep 2002 | EP |
2397400 | Jul 2004 | GB |
2424098 | Sep 2006 | GB |
2001283083 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002318935 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2007021920 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2009505238 | Feb 2009 | JP |
1997017663 | May 1997 | WO |
1998032289 | Jul 1998 | WO |
1998047082 | Oct 1998 | WO |
1998049641 | Nov 1998 | WO |
1999059283 | Nov 1999 | WO |
2000025218 | May 2000 | WO |
2001009803 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2001082135 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2001097099 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2002037234 | May 2002 | WO |
2003094080 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2007021920 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2012093410 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2015116038 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015176071 | Nov 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Onsale joins fray as online shopping pcks up speed: Internet Booms,” Comptuer Reseller News, Jun. 5, 1995. |
“Mediappraise: Mediappraise Receives National Award for Web-Based Technology That Enables Companies to Solve Thorny HR Problem,” Dec. 14, 1998. |
2roam, inc., multiple archived pages of www.2roam.com retrieved via Internet Archive Wayback Machine on Jun. 10, 2008. |
Alex, Neil, “ Optimizing Search Results in Elasticsearch with Scoring and Boosting”, Mar. 18, 2015, Qbox.io, accessed at [https://qbox.io/blog/optimizing-search-results-in-elasticsearch0with-scoring-and-boosting] (year: 2015). |
ALT et al., “Bibliography on Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 5 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
ALT et al., “Computer Integrated Logistics,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 1, No. 3. |
Anonymous, “Image manipulation (image-editing software and image-manipulation systems)(Seybold Special Report, Part II), Seybold Report on Publishing Systems, May 15, 1995, pS35(9), vol. 24, No. 18. |
Auctionwatch.com, multiple pages - including search results for “expedition,” printed Apr. 21, 2011. |
Auctiva.come, multiple pages, undated but website copyright date is “1999-2000.”. |
Ball et al., “Supply chain infrastructures: system integration and information sharing,” ACM Sigmod Record, 2002, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 61-66. |
Berger et al., “Random Ultiple-Access Communication and Group Testing,” IEEE, 1984. |
Braganza, “IS Resarch at Cranfield - A Look at the Future,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Brecht et al., “The IM 2000 Research Programme,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Drives Hertz to the Wireless Web: Number One Car Rental Company to Provide Customers Wireless Access from Any Device,” Business Wire, Aug. 7, 2001. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Partners with Pumatech to Delivery Wireless Alerts,” Business Wire, Dec. 18, 2000. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Takes eHow’s How-to Solutions Wireless: With 2Roam, he Web’s One-Stop Source for getting Things Done is on More Wireless Devices, with Ability to Purchase Its Products from Anywhere,” Business Wire, Oct. 2, 2000. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Expands in Real Estate Market with Adoption of Rimfire on Reator.com,” Business Wire, Nov. 8, 1999. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Shows Strong Revenue Growth in Internet Imaging Business,” Business Wire, Nov. 10, 1999. |
Business Wire business/technology editors, “Sellers Flock to OutletZoo.com as New Automatic Price Drop Method Moves Excess Inventory Online,” Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999. |
Buy.com, www.buy.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004. |
Chen et al., “Detecting Web Page Structure for Adaptive Viewing on Small Form Factor Devices,” ACM, May 20-24, 2003. |
Chen, M. (2007). Knowledge assisted data management and retrieval in multimedia database systems (Order No. 3268643). |
Clarke, “Research Programme in Supra-organizational Systems,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Clemons et al., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities markets,” Proceedings of the twelfth International conference on information systems, New York, New York, United States, pp. 53-64, 1991. |
Fan, J., Keim, F.A., Gao, Y., Luo, H. and Li, Z. (2009). JustClick: Personalized Image Recommendation via Exploratory Search from Large-Scale Flickr Images. Feb. 2009. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 19(2), pp. 2730288. (Year: 2009). |
Friendster.com, homepage and “more info” pages, printed Apr. 29, 2004. |
Gallagher et al. “A framework for targeting banner advertising on the internet. IEEE, pp. 265-274 (Year: 1997). |
Google News archive search for “2Roam marketing” performed over the date range 2000-2003. |
Google News archive search for “2Roam SMS” performed over the date range 2000-2008. |
Grabowski et al., “Mobile-enabled grid middleware and/or grid gateways,” GridLab - A Grid Application Toolkit and Testbed, Work Package 12 - Access for Mobile Users, Jun. 3, 2003. |
Graham, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Jul. 1993, 4 pgs. vol. 8, No. 2. |
Gunthorpe et al., “Portfolio Composition and the Investment Horizon,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan. 1994 -Feb. 1994, pp. 51-56. |
Halperin, “Toward a Process Handbook for Organizational Coordination Processes,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Hess et al., “Computerized Loan Origination Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, pp. 251-275. |
IBM, “Anyonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1996, pp. 363-366, vol. 39, No. 3. |
IBM, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1995, pp. 83-84, vol. 38, No. 1. |
Icrossing, “Icrossing Search Synergy: Natural & Paid Search Symbiosis,” Mar. 2007. |
IEEE 100 - The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms, Seventh Edition, 2000. Entire book cited; table of contents, source list, and terms beginning with A included. ISBN 0-7381-2601-2a. |
Ives et al., “Editor’s Comments - MISQ Central: Creating a New Intellectual Infrastructure,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, pg. xxxv. |
Jbid.com, “Can I track all of my bids from My Page?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208114049/www.ubid. com/help/topic14.asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
Jbid.com, “How do I track my shipment?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010331032659/www.ubid.com/help/ topic27.asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
Jbid.com, “How do I Updated my Address, Phone, Credit Card, Password, etc.?” printed from web.archive.org/ web/20010208113903/www.ubid.com/help/topic13asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
Joshi, “Information visibility and its effect on supply chain dynamics,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000 (fig. 4.5; pg. 45). |
Jvarbelow et al., “Aucnet: Tv Auction Network System,” Harvard Business School 9-190-001, Jul. 19, 1989, Rev. Apr. 12, 1996, pp. 1-15. |
Klein, “Information Logistics,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, pp. 11-12, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Klein, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 4 pgs. vol. 7, No. 4. |
Kubicek, “The Organization Gap,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Kuula, “Telematic Services in Finland,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Lalonde, “The EDI World Institute: An International Approach,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Lee et al., “Electronic Brokerage and Electronic Auction: The Impact of IT on Market Structures,” Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1996, pp. 397-406. |
Lee et al., “Intelligent Electronic Trading for Commodity Exchanges,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Lee, “Aucnet: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions,” Electronic Market - The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 24-28, vol. 7, No. 4. |
Levy, Michael, and Dhruv Grewal. “Supply chain management in a networked economy.” Journal Retailing 76.4 (2000): 415-429. |
LIVE365 press release, “Live365 to Offer Opt-In Advertising on Its Website,” Oct. 15, 2004. |
London Business School, “Overture and Google: Internet Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising Options,” Mar. 2003. |
M2 Presswire, “Palm, Inc.: Palm unveils new web browser optimised for handhelds; HTML browser offers highspeed web-browsing option,” Mar. 13, 2002. |
Malone et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,” Communications of the ACM, Jun. 1987, pp. 484-497, vol. 30, No. 6. |
Mansell et al., “Electronic Trading Networks: The Route to Competitive Advantage?” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Mardesich, “Onsale takes auction gavel electronic,” Computer Reseller News, Jul. 8, 1996, pp. 2, 32. |
Marteau, “Shop with One Click, Anywhere, Anytime,” Information Management and Consulting, 2000, pp. 44-46, vol. 15, No. 4. |
Massimb et al., “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb., 1994, pp. 39-49. |
Mcginnity, “Build Your Weapon,” PC Magazine, Apr. 24, 2011, printed from www.pcmag.com/print_article2?0,1217, a%253D3955,00.asp. |
Meade, “Visual 360: a performance appraisal system that’s ‘fun,’” HR Magazine, 44, 7, 118(3), Jul. 1999. |
Medvinsky et al., “Electronic Currency for the Internet,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Message Passing from Wikipedia, archived May 6, 2016, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ message_passing, 4 pgs. |
Metails.Com, www.metails.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter and pg. 33. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter, back matter, and pp. 479, 486. |
Neches, “Fast - A Research Project in Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 4 pgs. vol. 3., No. 3. |
Neisser, “Which is better for Social Media Monitoring: TweetDeck or SproutSocial” Mar. 17, 2011, Social Media Examiner, https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/which-is-better-for-social-media-monitoring-tweetdeck-or-sproutsocial/. |
Neo, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Dec. 1992, pp. 278-288, vol. 1, No. 5. |
Nicolle et a., “XML Integration and Toolkit for B2B Applications,” by Christophe Nicolle, Kokou Yetongnon, and Jean-Claude Simon, Journal of Database Management, Oct. 2003-Dec. 2003 (Year: 2003). |
O’Mahony, “An X.500-based Product Catalogue,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Palm, Inc., PalmTM Web Pro Handbook, copyright 2002-2003. |
Post et al., “Application of Auctions as a Pricing Mechanism for the Interchange of Electric Power,” IEEE Transactions of Power Systems, Aug. 1995, pp. 1580-1584, vol. 10, No. 3. |
Preist et al., “Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction,” International Conference on Information and Computation, Proceedings of the first international conference on information and computation economies, Oct. 25-28, 1998, Charleston, United States, pp. 11-18. |
Qualcomm, “Brew Developer Support,” printed from web.archive.org/web/20020209194207/http://www.qualcomm. com/brew/developer/support/kb/52.html on Aug. 30, 2007. |
Rcr Wireless News, “Lockheed Martin to use 2Roam’s technology for wireless platform,” Rcr Wireless News, Sep. 10, 2001. |
Reck, “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System,” J. Systems Software, 1993, pp. 245-252, vol. 21. |
Reck, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 17-23, vol. 7, No. 4. |
Repcheck.com, www.repcheck.com homepage, printed from web.archive.org/web/20020330183132/http:// repcheck.com on Sep. 5, 2009. |
Resnick et al., “Reputation Systems,” Communications of the ACM, Dec. 2000, pp. 45-48, vol. 43, No. 12. |
Rockoff et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 1995, pp. 10-16, vol. 5, No. 4. |
Rodriguez, Camille, HootSuite vs. social Oomph vs. Tweekdeck, Jan. 4, 2012, http://polkadotimpressions. com/2012/01/04/hootsuite-vs-social-oopmphvs.tweetdeck/ (Year: 2012). |
Rose, “Vendors strive to undo Adobe lock-hold,” Computer Reseller News, Feb. 5, 1996, n 66669, p. 71(7). |
Ross, David Frederick, Frederick S. Weston, and W. Stephen. Introduction to supply chain management technologies. CRC Press, 2010. |
Rysavy, “Mobile-commerce ASPs do the legwork,” Network Computing, Jan. 22, 2001, pg. 71, 6 pgs., vol. 12, No. 2. |
S. Kulkami, A. M. Sankpal, R.R. Mudholkar and Kirankumari, “Recommendation engine: Matching individual/group profiles for better shopping experience, 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies (ICACT), Rajampet, 2013, pp. 1-6. (Year: 2013). |
Saunders, “AdFlight to Offer WAP Ads,” Oct. 17, 2000, printed from clickz.com/487531/print. |
Schaffer, Neil, The Top 20 Twitter clients - HootSuite, TweetDeck and More, Jan. 31, 2012, https:// maximizesocialbusinss.com/top-20-twitter-clients-2012-9175/ (Year: 2012). |
Schmid, “Electronic Markets,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Schwankert, “Matsushita Taps 2Roam for Wireless Solutions,” www.internetnews.com/bus-news.article. php/674811, Feb. 2, 2001. |
Sen, “Inventory and Pricing Models for Perishable Products,” Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation - University of Southern California, Aug. 2000. |
Siegmann, “Nowhere to go but up,” PC Week, Oct. 23, 1995, 3 pgs. vol. 12, No. 42. |
T.Y. Lee, S. Li and R. Wei, “Needs-Centric Searching and Ranking Based on Customer Reviews,” 2008 10th IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services, Washington, DC, 2008, pp. 128-135. (Year: 2008). |
Telephony Staff, “Air-ASP,” Telephony Online, Oct. 2, 2000, 3 pgs. |
TEO, “Organizational Factors of Success in Using EDIS: A Survey of Tradenet Participants,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Tjostheim et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web,” printed from www.nr.no/gem/elcom/ puplikasjoner/enter98e.html on Jun. 10, 1990, 10 pgs. |
Turban, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 5 pgs. vol. 7, No. 4. |
Ubid.com, “How do I track my shipment?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010331032659/www.ubid.com/help/ topic27.asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
UBID.COM, “How do I Updated my Address, Phone, Credit Card, Password, etc.?” printed from web.archive.org/ web/20010208113903/www.ubid.com/help/topic13asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
V. Aksakalli, Optimizing direct response in Internet display advertising, Elsevier, vol. 11, Issue 3, May-Jun. 2012, pp. 229-240. (Year: 2012). |
Van Heck et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 6 pgs. vol. 7, No. 4. |
Verizon Wireless, “Verizon Wireless Customers Get It NowSM; Get Games, Get Pix, Get Ring Tones and Get Going in Full Color,” press release to PRNEWSWIRE, Sep. 23, 2002. |
Warbelow et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System,” Harvard Business School 9-190-001, Jul. 19, 1989, Rev. Apr. 12, 1996, pp. 1-15. |
Weber, “How Financial Markets are Going On-line,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pgs. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Wireless Internet, “DailyShopper Selects 2Roam to Enable Mobile Customers to Retrieve Nearby Sales and Promotions Information,” Wireless Internet, Apr. 2001. |
Wireless Week, “Verizon Wireless Gets Going on BREW Agenda,” Wireless Week, Sep. 23, 2002. |
Xchanger.net, webpage printed from www.auctiva.com/showcases/as_4sale.asp?uid=exchanger, undated but at least as early as Oct. 12, 2000. |
Y.K. Choi and S. K. Kim, “An auxiliary reccomendation system for repetitively purchasing items in E-commerce,” 2014 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP), Bangkok, 2014, pp. 96-98. (Year 2014). |
Yu et al., “Distributed Reputation Management for Electronic Commerce,” Computational Intelligence, 2002, pp. 535-549, vol. 18, No. 4. |
Zetmeir, Auction Incentive Marketing, print of all pages of website found at home.earthlink.net/~bidpointz/ made Oct. 8, 2004. |
Zimmermann, “Integration of Financial Services: The TeleCounter,” Electronic Markets - The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 pg. vol. 3, No. 3. |
Zwass, “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, pp. 3-23, vol. 1, No. 1. |
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online: Unique Internet retail services debuts with week-long charity auction for The Computer Museum in Boston,” May 24, 1995, printed from www.dialogweb.com/cgi/ dwclient?dwcommand,Dwebprint%20810-489267. |
Di et al., “A New Implementation for Ontology Mapping Based enterprise Semantic Interoperation,” by Xiaofeng Di and Yushun Fan, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 16-19 (2009), pp. 644-648 (Year:2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62906378 | Sep 2019 | US |