This invention relates generally to the flow cytometer field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for creating a flow cytometer network in the flow cytometer field.
In recent years, flow cytometry has seen advances resulting in desktop-sized flow cytometers. These technological advances have also led to flow cytometers becoming more affordable. With this trend, more laboratories and clinical environments can afford to devote the effort and expense to operate one or multiple flow cytometers, enabling more experiments to be conducted and generating more flow cytometry data. Typically, only those using a particular flow cytometer or those in the same facility are able to use data generated by that flow cytometer. Furthermore, even if data from multiple flow cytometers is to be shared, there are problems with interoperability and comparability of data between flow cytometers. Collaboration and use of multiple flow cytometers is problematic in that the calibration of a single conventional flow cytometer is required prior to performing a particular experiment and involves numerous parameters tailored to that particular experiment. Thus, there is a need in the flow cytometer field to create a new and useful system and method for creating a flow cytometer network. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
System for Creating a Flow Cytometer Network
As shown in
The first flow cytometer 110 and the second flow cytometer 120 include an interrogation zone 112 through which a sample passes and provides photonic inputs, and a detection system 114 that collects for the sample a sample data set of the photonic inputs from the interrogation zone. The first and second flow cytometers are preferably substantially similar. For instance, the first and second flow cytometers preferably have comparable fixed gain detection systems that are each calibrated to a calibration solution 150 or fluid. In a preferred embodiment, calibration may be similar to that described in U.S. patent application No. 2010/0302536 entitled “Data collection system and method for a flow cytometer”, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. The fixed gain detection system preferably enables data from different flow cytometers when communicatively coupled to the flow cytometer data center 130. There may be two, three, or any suitable number of flow cytometers used with the system. Any particular two flow cytometers in the plurality of flow cytometers may be the same or different models of flow cytometers. In a preferred embodiment, the first and second flow cytometers are preferably similar to that described in U.S. patent application No. 2006/0219873 entitled “Detection system for a flow cytometer”, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. However, the flow cytometers may be any suitable flow cytometer, preferably with a fixed gain detection system.
As shown in
The detection system 114 preferably has a wide dynamic range, or ability to collect signals across a wide range of inputs. The wide dynamic range is preferably defined as a range of photonic input signals that provides a 1:100,000 ratio, and more preferably a 1:1,000,000 ratio (six decade range), between the faintest objects and the brightest objects. Additionally, the wide dynamic range preferably enables the flow cytometer to detect particles of the sample that are disparate in size, such as ranging from 1 micron up to 100 microns. For example, the wide dynamic range enables co-detection of mammalian cells (average diameter of 10-30 microns) and bacteria (average diameter of 0.5 microns), which have relative diameters that are disparate enough that they generally cannot be properly detected using a single gain setting on a typical flow cytometer. However, the detection system 114 with a wide dynamic range may simultaneously detect both the mammalian cells and bacteria cells. However, the detection system may alternatively allow for any suitable dynamic range such that the gain is substantially fixed. Once a fixed gain detection system has been calibrated (such as during manufacturing and/or for custom fluorochromes, preferably performed once by a user), the output of the detection system preferably represents an absolute photon count (or other suitable photometric unit). A data output is preferably photons/second, watts, or any similar absolute units. This photometric capability functions to allow absolute measurements from other detection systems in other flow cytometers to be directly compared to one another, without compensating for different calibration settings and/or gain settings for the individual flow cytometers. Examples of possible applications include FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) based cytometric assays, absolute MESF (molecules of equivalent soluble fluorophore) measurements or similar metrics for the emission levels of cytometry calibration beads across production lots. For instance, MESF data may be calculated using the calibrated intensity of the excitation laser at the interrogation zone and the output of the fixed gain detection system. The wide dynamic range, along with the fixed gain characteristic, alleviates the need for individual tailored adjustments to the detectors or settings of the detection system.
The first and second flow cytometers are preferably calibrated to have substantially identical gain settings, such as during manufacturing, regular calibration checks, or any suitable time. For instance, both flow cytometers may be calibrated with a calibration solution 150, which functions as a standardized sample with set characteristics. The fixed detection system preferably distinguishes a set number of peaks within each fluorescence channel of the fixed detection system when the calibration solution sample passes through the interrogation zone. The calibration fluid 150 is preferably a pre-diluted fluid solution of calibration beads, such as Spherotech™ 6-peak beads, Spherotech™ 8-peak beads, or any suitable type of calibration beads. Calibration data generated from sampling the calibration solution may be used to validate data in the flow cytometer data center 130, and/or to interpret data accessed from the flow cytometer data center 130 so that data can be compared between flow cytometers with differing calibration data (e.g. for interpolation between data sets from different flow cytometers). Calibration of the flow cytometer may generate a calibration file that includes calibration data and/or any suitable calibration information (e.g. date, time, flow cytometer location) generated during the calibration.
As shown in
The amplifier d14 is preferably coupled to the detector d12 such that the amplifier receives the electrical signal of the detector and amplifies the signal by a predetermined amount, depending upon the strength of the output and the breadth of the detector range. Although the amplifier preferably operates in the electrical domain (e.g. an avalanche photodiode that provides electrical amplification), the amplifier may alternatively operate in the optical domain (e.g. a laser that provides optical amplification). The amplifier may be integrated or partially integrated into the detector. The preferred amplifier has a signal-to-noise ratio ranging between approximately 100 dB and 120 dB.
The compression unit d16 is preferably coupled to the amplifier d14 and functions to reduce the dynamic range of the plurality of electrical signals from the amplifier and compress that data into an electrical signal with a smaller dynamic range, such as one that is appropriate for the ADC. In a preferred embodiment, the detection system incorporates signal compression to obtain better resolution for the input signals in the lower end of the signal range. The compression unit preferably uses a nonlinear compression algorithm, such as a logarithmic compression algorithm, but may use a linear, parametric, or any other suitable approach.
The analog-to-digital converter (ADC) d18 is preferably coupled directly or indirectly to the detector and configured to convert an analog signal to a digital signal that is readily usable by a digital circuit, process, or other computing device. The ADC preferably has a high bit resolution that is greater than or equal to 16 bits, and more preferably greater than or equal to 24 bits, which translates to roughly 16,700,000 levels of information, but the ADC may alternatively have any suitable bit resolution. The ADC preferably includes an SNR ratio of greater than approximately 100 dB, but may alternatively include a SNR of any suitable value.
In a first variation, the detection system 114 may include multiple detectors preferably operate on the same photonic input from the interrogation zone, but cover substantially different (overlapping or non-overlapping) subsets of the dynamic range of the photonic input. This allows one or more detectors to divide the responsibility of a single detector. In this variation, each detector preferably has a smaller dynamic range (e.g. on the order of 50-60 dB), set at different portions (overlapping or non-overlapping) of the dynamic range of the photonic input. Each detector preferably is coupled to a respective amplifier. The multiple amplifiers may have substantially identical gain and/or SNR values, or may have different gain and/or SNR values (e.g. a high-gain amplifier may be matched with one detector, and a low-gain amplifier may be matched with another detector).
In a second variation, the detection system 114 may include multiple amplifiers that operate on the output from the detector (or each of multiple detectors), but amplify the analog signal from the detector at different gain levels. This allows more than one amplifier to divide the responsibility of a single amplifier. In this variation, the amplifiers may be set at distinct gain levels (e.g., one amplifier is set at a higher gain level, and another amplifier is set at a lower gain level). Alternatively, the multiple amplifiers may be set at similar gain levels.
The flow cytometer data center 130 functions to store and manage data from one, or preferably multiple, flow cytometers. The flow cytometer data center 130 is preferably network-accessible and includes a server and a database that stores sample-related data from the flow cytometers. The data center may include a web application interface 132 or any suitable portable, accessible by researchers, clinicians, and other users. The data center preferably implements any suitable security and permission restrictions to restrict access or filter information, such as to comply with patient privacy regulations. In one variation, the flow cytometer data center includes an application programming interface (API), which can be used to target and retrieve particular types of data during the analysis, such as data sets regarding a particular type of sample or experiment, data sets collected by related groups of flow cytometers, data sets collected across a particular geographical region, or any suitable kind of data. Other parties may use the API to implement additional or alternative applications for interacting with the flow cytometer data center. The API is preferably a web API such as a Representational State Transfer (REST) style API or a Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) style API, but may alternatively be any suitable type of API.
The flow cytometer data center 130 preferably stores one or more types of sample-related data. In one variation, the data center 130 stores data analysis information, or analysis data from flow cytometers after the flow cytometers have analyzed sample data after an experiment. The data analysis information may be any suitable data or file generated by analysis/processing for the experiment, such as absolute counts, tables, or plots. Storing the data analysis information preferably enables the analysis and post-processing of raw sample data set to be shared. For example, in this variation, researchers or clinicians can view and incorporate prior analyses performed by other user. The experimental analysis, coupled with the raw data, may additionally be used with a neural network algorithm or other pattern detection algorithm to detect patterns that exist, for instance, in raw data and/or analysis of the raw data of a particular characteristic. The analysis patterns can then be automatically applied to future raw data having the same or similar particular characteristic.
In another variation, as shown in
In another variation, the data center 130 stores the sample experimental data set, including raw flow cytometry data from an experiment. In other variations, the flow cytometer data stores a calibration file, sample information, or laboratory information. The calibration file includes information generated during calibration of the device, such as or day, time, activities performed, calibration readouts, identification information pertaining to the service technician (or in an alternative embodiment, the user) who performed the calibration, and information for identifying the relevant flow cytometer. The sample information may include any information for identifying the relevant sample, such as types of substance (e.g. blood), type of preparation such as an added lysis, descriptions of sample origin such as patient parameters such as age or sex, or any suitable information about the test sample. The laboratory information preferably include any meta data about the lab or clinic, such as operator of the flow cytometer, laboratory name, research project name, geographical location, name of company, time of experiment, references to related batches of experiments, or any suitable parameter or other information. For example, geographical location information stored by the flow cytometer data center 130 can be used to perform geographical analysis of experimental results, such as tracking the spread of diseases. The laboratory information may additionally and/or alternatively be used to create a network of experimental data similar to a social network, with experimental references between data, analysis, and/or research. However, in other variations the flow cytometer data center 130 may store any suitable kind of information and the data may be used in any suitable manner.
The network communication module 140 functions to communicate sample-related data between the flow cytometer and the flow cytometer data center 130, including uploading to and downloading from the data center. The network communication module may communicate any of the types of data stored by the flow cytometer data center, including raw sample data, sample analysis data, calibration files, or laboratory information. The network communication module 140 preferably includes an Ethernet port or other network port, a Wi-Fi modem, or any suitable port to connect to a network. The network communication module preferably communicates through the internet, but may additionally and/or alternatively communicate through an intranet system such as for a system implemented for internal operations. The network communication module preferably communicates with any suitable network protocol, such as a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP). In one variation, the network communication module 140 automatically uploads and/or downloads sample-related data to the flow cytometer data center, such as after every experimental sample run, after a particular number of experimental sample runs, after every experimental sample run of a particular type, at particular time intervals (e.g. every day or every hour) or any suitable event and/or period of time. In another variation, the flow cytometer includes a user interface, coupled to the network communication module, that enables the user to selectively upload and/or download sample-related data at desired times. In some variations, the system may enable both automatic and user-selected uploading to and/or downloading from the flow cytometer data center. The flow cytometer data center may be communicatively coupled to any number of additional data centers or storage sites, such as for data backup purposes.
Method for Creating a Flow Cytometer Network
As shown in
Calibrating a first flow cytometer S210 and calibrating a second flow cytometer S220 function to calibrate a plurality of flow cytometers to a standard reference sample. The first and second flow cytometers each preferably includes a fixed gain detection system that alleviates numerous calibration steps, and functions to allow calibration to a standard calibration fluid, instead of calibrating and adjusting gain to settings tailored for a particular sample and experiment.
Collecting a sample data set S230 for a sample with a fixed gain detection system preferably includes collecting photonic inputs from an interrogation zone of the flow cytometer for a plurality of fluorescence channels, generating an analog signal based on the photonic inputs, and converting the analog signal to a digital signal. Collecting photonic inputs preferably includes collecting photonic inputs from an interrogation zone across a wide dynamic range S232. Collecting a sample data set S230 is preferably performed by a detection system substantially similar to that described above. A fixed gain detection system preferably outputs absolute photometric units (such as an absolute photon count), and collects a sample data set without accepting a gain amplification level selection from the user. An additional step may include calculating an absolute MESF using the intensity of laser excitation at the interrogation zone and the output of the detection system. Generating an analog signal is preferably performed by an analog-to-digital converter substantially similar to the analog-to-digital converter described above. The step of collecting a sample data may additionally and/or alternatively be performed by any suitable system or in any suitable manner.
Step S230 may additionally include performing analysis on the collected data set S234, which functions to provide another layer of accessibility to the data once the data is uploaded to a data center. The analysis and/or processing preferably converts the raw data into a format used by experimenters (e.g. plots). There may be any number of process steps performed on the data. Some exemplary analysis steps performed on data may include the generate of relevant plots, such as enlarged plots of particular fluorescence channels and set gating parameters. The processing and analysis are preferably stored in an application data format created by an application performing the processing. The processing and analysis may alternatively be described in a standardized format such as a markup language. The analysis data is preferably additionally uploaded to the data center in step S240.
Uploading sample-related data S240 functions to send data from the flow cytometers so that the data is accessible through the network from the data center. Data collected from a plurality of flow cytometers is preferably uploaded to the data center, and may include raw sample data, data analysis information, a calibration file, laboratory information, sample information, and/or any suitable data. The uploading preferably occurs in a background processing step, but may additionally and/or alternatively be triggered by a user-selectable action. Sample-related data may be uploaded as changes to the data are made. For example, raw experimental data may be uploaded following collection, and data analysis information may be uploaded after a researcher or clinician performs analysis on the raw experimental data.
Retrieving flow cytometer data from the flow cytometer data center S250 functions to download data from the data center through the flow cytometer network. Data can be fetched and queried through the data center (e.g. through an API). Data querying can be used to target and retrieve particular types of data during the analysis, such as data sets regarding a particular type of sample or experiment, data sets collected by related groups of flow cytometers, data sets collected across a particular geographical region, or any suitable kind of data.
Performing data analysis on flow cytometry data from the flow cytometer data center S260 functions to use data set from one or more flow cytometers for analysis. The substantially similar fixed gain detection systems of the flow cytometers preferably enable the data from the flow cytometers to be easily combined into a single data set prior to performing data analysis. This data combination preferably functions to improve signal-to-noise of rare events and/or difficult to resolve experiments. In one application of analysis, a search is conducted for outliers within a cross-population comparison of a plurality of flow cytometers. Individual flow cytometers may be identified by this comparison as being out-of-spec, being subject to possible experimental error, and/or having any suitable abnormal condition or characteristics. In another application, when the flow cytometers include accurate volume count and/or flow rates, the fixed gain detection systems enable an accurate comparison of concentrations to be performed across experiments from multiple flow cytometers. The data center may alternatively be used to identify an experimental sample that a researcher or clinician does not have access to. The data analysis may use geographic location, patient age, sample type, temporal variables, or any suitable parameter as an additional metric in the analysis. For example, data from across the country may be analyzed to track and/or predict spread of a disease, especially as results of more tests from additional flow cytometers are added to the network. Immunization allocation, research funding, and disease preventative actions can all be more readily controlled using the flow cytometer network and data center. In another variation, large data sets may be used to algorithmically learn analysis processes. Through analysis of large datasets, analysis processes may be linked with raw data patterns using a neural network or any suitable learning algorithm. When raw data is identified to match a particular pattern, analysis on the data may be automatically performed and/or initiated by the user. Furthermore, information on this data analysis on uploaded data may also be uploaded to the data center.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/354,577 filed 14 Jun. 2010, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/040365 | 6/14/2011 | WO | 00 | 12/12/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/159708 | 12/22/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3347273 | Russell | Oct 1967 | A |
3601128 | Hakim | Aug 1971 | A |
3672402 | Bloemer | Jun 1972 | A |
4112735 | Mcknight | Sep 1978 | A |
4138879 | Liebermann | Feb 1979 | A |
4293221 | Kay et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4371786 | Kramer | Feb 1983 | A |
4448538 | Mantel | May 1984 | A |
4559454 | Kramer | Dec 1985 | A |
4570639 | Miodownik | Feb 1986 | A |
4691829 | Auer | Sep 1987 | A |
4755021 | Dyott | Jul 1988 | A |
4774189 | Schwartz | Sep 1988 | A |
4790653 | North, Jr. | Dec 1988 | A |
4818103 | Thomas et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4824641 | Williams | Apr 1989 | A |
4826660 | Smith et al. | May 1989 | A |
4844610 | North, Jr. | Jul 1989 | A |
4933813 | Berger | Jun 1990 | A |
5028127 | Spitzberg | Jul 1991 | A |
5030002 | North | Jul 1991 | A |
5040890 | North, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043706 | Oliver | Aug 1991 | A |
5055556 | Stryer et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5083862 | Rusnak | Jan 1992 | A |
5138868 | Long | Aug 1992 | A |
5139609 | Fields et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5150037 | Kouzuki | Sep 1992 | A |
5150313 | Van Den et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155543 | Hirako | Oct 1992 | A |
5204884 | Leary et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5224058 | Mickaels et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230026 | Ohta et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5270548 | Steinkamp | Dec 1993 | A |
5301685 | Guirguis | Apr 1994 | A |
5308990 | Takahashi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5367474 | Auer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374395 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5395588 | North, Jr. et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403552 | Pardikes | Apr 1995 | A |
5466946 | Kleinschmitt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469375 | Kosaka | Nov 1995 | A |
5539386 | Elliott | Jul 1996 | A |
5552885 | Steen | Sep 1996 | A |
5559339 | Domanik et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5616124 | Hague et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5684480 | Jansson | Nov 1997 | A |
5739902 | Gjelsnes et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5797430 | Becke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798222 | Goix | Aug 1998 | A |
5804507 | Perlov et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5883378 | Irish et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891734 | Gill | Apr 1999 | A |
5920388 | Sandberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5960129 | Kleinschmitt | Sep 1999 | A |
5981180 | Chandler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016376 | Ghaemi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6039078 | Tamari | Mar 2000 | A |
6067157 | Altendorf | May 2000 | A |
6070477 | Mark | Jun 2000 | A |
6091502 | Weigl et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097485 | Lievan | Aug 2000 | A |
6108463 | Herron et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110427 | Uffenheimer | Aug 2000 | A |
6115065 | Yadid-Pecht et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139800 | Chandler | Oct 2000 | A |
6154276 | Mariella, Jr. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156208 | Desjardins et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181319 | Fujita et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183697 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6288783 | Auad | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6377721 | Walt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382228 | Cabuz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403378 | Phi-Wilson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427521 | Jakkula et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6431950 | Mayes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449562 | Chandler | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456769 | Furusawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469787 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473171 | Buttry et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6519355 | Nelson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522775 | Nelson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6568271 | Shah et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6587203 | Colon | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602469 | Maus et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6636623 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6675835 | Gerner et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694799 | Small | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700130 | Fritz | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6710871 | Goix | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718415 | Chu | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6778910 | Vidal et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6809804 | Yount et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816257 | Goix | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825926 | Turner et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852284 | Holl et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859570 | Walt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869569 | Kramer | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872180 | Reinhardt et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890487 | Sklar et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897954 | Bishop et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901964 | Kippe et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908226 | Siddiqui et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912904 | Storm, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6936828 | Saccomanno | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941005 | Lary et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944322 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7009189 | Saccomanno | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012689 | Sharpe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019834 | Sebok et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024316 | Ellison et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7061595 | Cabuz et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7075647 | Christodoulou | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105355 | Kurabayashi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106442 | Silcott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113266 | Wells | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7130046 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7232687 | Lary et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7262838 | Fritz | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274316 | Moore | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7328722 | Rich et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7362432 | Roth | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7403125 | Rich | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7471393 | Trainer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486387 | Fritz | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7520300 | Rich et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7628956 | Jindo | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7738099 | Morrell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739060 | Goebel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776268 | Rich | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780916 | Bair et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7843561 | Rich | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857005 | Rich et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7981661 | Rich | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996188 | Olson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004674 | Ball et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017402 | Rich | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8031340 | Rich et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8077310 | Olson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010014477 | Pelc et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039053 | Liseo et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020028434 | Goix et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049782 | Herzenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059959 | Qatu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080341 | Kosaka | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097392 | Minneman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098115 | Fawcett et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123154 | Burshteyn et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020192113 | Uffenheimer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030035168 | Qian et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048539 | Oostman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054558 | Kurabayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062314 | Davidson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072549 | Facer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078703 | Potts et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030129090 | Farrell | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134330 | Ravkin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148379 | Roitman et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030151741 | Wolleschensky et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030175157 | Micklash et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030202175 | Van Den et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211009 | Buchanan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223061 | Sebok et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235919 | Chandler | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040031521 | Vrane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048362 | Trulson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040112808 | Takagi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119974 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123645 | Storm et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131322 | Ye et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143423 | Parks et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175837 | Bonne et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201845 | Quist et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040246476 | Bevis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050044110 | Herzenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047292 | Park et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057749 | Dietz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069454 | Bell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073686 | Roth et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078299 | Fritz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105091 | Lieberman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050162648 | Auer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163663 | Martino et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195605 | Saccomanno et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195684 | Mayer | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050252574 | Khan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002634 | Riley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015291 | Parks et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023219 | Meyer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060161057 | Weber et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177937 | Kurabayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060219873 | Martin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240411 | Mehrpouyan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060281143 | Liu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286549 | Sohn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003434 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041013 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070059205 | Ganz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079653 | Zuleta et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096039 | Kapoor et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124089 | Jochum et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127863 | Bair et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134089 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144277 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070188737 | Fritz | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212262 | Rich | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224684 | Olson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243106 | Rich | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080055595 | Olson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064113 | Goix et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092961 | Bair et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080152542 | Ball et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080215297 | Goebel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228444 | Olson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240539 | George et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263468 | Cappione et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090104075 | Rich | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090174881 | Rich | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201501 | Bair et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202130 | George et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216478 | Estevez-Labori | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090260701 | Rich et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276186 | Salinas | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293910 | Ball et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012853 | Parks et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100032584 | Dayong et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100118298 | Bair et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119298 | Huang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120059 | Yan et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100271620 | Goebel et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100302536 | Ball et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319469 | Rich | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319786 | Bair et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110008816 | Ball et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110058163 | Rich | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061471 | Rich et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110204259 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
466490 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0602416 | Jun 1994 | EP |
1391611 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1396736 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1521076 | Apr 2005 | EP |
356169978 | Dec 1981 | JP |
04086546 | Mar 1992 | JP |
6194299 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06221988 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7260084 | Oct 1995 | JP |
08201267 | Aug 1996 | JP |
09288053 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10227737 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2001050887 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001170062 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2003262201 | Sep 2003 | JP |
200477484 | Mar 2004 | JP |
4065654 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008197043 | Aug 2008 | JP |
9915905 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9956052 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0194914 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004003504 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2005017499 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005068971 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005073694 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005091893 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006055722 | May 2006 | WO |
2007067577 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007100723 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007103969 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007136749 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008058217 | May 2008 | WO |
2010101623 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011106402 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011159708 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012030740 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Light, 2006, 2 pages. Collins Dictionary of Astronomy. Long, United Kingdom. Retrieved online on Jul. 26, 2015 from <<http://www.credoreference.com>>. |
Rogers et al., “The Benefits of Reducing Unnecessary Variability of Flow Cytometers,” Accuri Cytometers [online], Dec. 2009 [retrieved on Apr. 12, 2011] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://accuricytometers.com/files/Accuri—Reducing—Variability—Poster.pdf>. |
Trotter, Compensation: An Instrumental Perspective, BD Biosciences [online], Sep. 10, 2003 [retrieved on Apr. 12, 2011], Retrieved from the Internet<URL: http://flowcytometry.uchc.edu/resources/pdfs/trotter—instrument—comp.pdf. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130080082 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61354577 | Jun 2010 | US |