System and method for creating virtual interfaces based on network characteristics

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10715634
  • Patent Number
    10,715,634
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 18, 2018
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 14, 2020
    5 years ago
Abstract
A network-configuring system creates stable virtual interfaces for groups of neighboring network nodes. During operation, the system can obtain network-neighborhood information from one or more network neighbors. This network-neighborhood information includes duplex-neighborhood information that indicates at least a set of neighboring devices to the network neighbor, and a set of remote network nodes which are accessible via a respective neighbor. The system can use the network-neighborhood information to determine one or more groups of network neighbors with common network characteristics, such that a respective group includes one or more mutually-connected network peers. The system can then define a virtual interface for a respective group of stable network neighbors, such that the virtual interface's member nodes include the local network node and the respective group's mutually-connected network peers.
Description
BACKGROUND

This disclosure is generally related to computer networks. More specifically, this disclosure is related to a network node that creates a virtual interface based on network and/or device characteristics for a set of mutual-listener devices that have a duplex communication with each other.


RELATED ART

Ad-hoc and multi-hop wireless networks allow mobile devices to communicate with remote devices outside their wireless range, without requiring a fixed network infrastructure. These mobile devices can modify their local network topology as new devices enter their coverage area, or as other devices leave their coverage area. Also, each wireless device can communicate with another device that is outside its direct coverage area by using a path that traverses various network peers.


Some devices in a wireless ad-hoc network have one or more wireless interfaces, such as a Wi-Fi radio or a Bluetooth radio, to communicate with other neighboring devices within its broadcast range. These devices can create a logical interface for each wireless interface, which includes one or more neighbors that the device can communicate with via the wireless interface.


In a Content Centric Network (CCN), a CCN node is not allowed to forward a packet via the same interface that it received the packet. However, it is possible that some of the neighboring devices accessible via the logical interface may not be within each other's broadcast range. Hence, if the CCN node needs to forward a packet between two neighboring nodes, the CCN node may need to forward the packet via the same logical interface that was used to receive the packet, which can have the undesired effect of creating a forwarding loop.


To make matters worse, not all neighbors accessible via a logical interface may be gateways to the some sets of remote network nodes. Hence, forwarding a packet via the logical interface may result in forwarding the packet to a set of neighbors that cannot reach the packet's intended recipient.


SUMMARY

One embodiment provides a network-configuring system that creates stable virtual interfaces for groups of neighboring nodes. During operation, the system can obtain network-neighborhood information from one or more network neighbors. This network-neighborhood information includes duplex-neighborhood information that indicates at least a set of neighboring devices to the network neighbor, and a set of remote network nodes which are accessible via a respective neighbor. The system can use the network-neighborhood information to determine one or more groups of network neighbors with common network characteristics, such that a respective group includes one or more mutually-connected network peers. The system can then define a virtual interface for a respective group of stable network neighbors, such that the virtual interface's member nodes include the local network node and the respective group's mutually-connected network peers.


In some embodiments, the local network node includes a network node of a Content Centric Network (CCN). In CCN, each piece of content is individually named, and each piece of data is bound to a unique name that distinguishes the data from any other piece of data, such as other versions of the same data or data from other sources. This unique name allows a network device to request the data by disseminating a request or an Interest that indicates the unique name, and can obtain the data independent from the data's storage location, network location, application, and means of transportation. The following terms describe elements of a CCN architecture:


Content Object:


A single piece of named data, which is bound to a unique name. Content Objects are “persistent,” which means that a Content Object can move around within a computing device, or across different computing devices, but does not change. If any component of the Content Object changes, the entity that made the change creates a new Content Object that includes the updated content, and binds the new Content Object to a new unique name.


Unique Names:


A name in a CCN is typically location independent and uniquely identifies a Content Object. A data-forwarding device can use the name or name prefix to forward a packet toward a network node that generates or stores the Content Object, regardless of a network address or physical location for the Content Object. In some embodiments, the name may be a hierarchically structured variable-length identifier (HSVLI). The HSVLI can be divided into several hierarchical components, which can be structured in various ways. For example, the individual name components pare, home, ccn, and test.txt can be structured in a left-oriented prefix-major fashion to form the name “/parc/home/ccn/test.txt.” Thus, the name “/parc/home/ccn” can be a “parent” or “prefix” of “/parc/home/ccn/test.txt.” Additional components can be used to distinguish between different versions of the content item, such as a collaborative document.


In some embodiments, the name can include an identifier, such as a hash value that is derived from the Content Object's data (e.g., a checksum value) and/or from elements of the Content Object's name. A description of a hash-based name is described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,978,025, entitled “ORDERED-ELEMENT NAMING FOR NAME-BASED PACKET FORWARDING,” which is hereby incorporated by reference. A name can also be a flat label. Hereinafter, “name” is used to refer to any name for a piece of data in a name-data network, such as a hierarchical name or name prefix, a flat name, a fixed-length name, an arbitrary-length name, or a label (e.g., a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) label).


Interest:


A packet that indicates a request for a piece of data, and includes a name (or a name prefix) for the piece of data. A data consumer can disseminate a request or Interest across CCN, which CCN routers can propagate toward a storage device (e.g., a cache server) or a data producer that can provide the requested data to satisfy the request or Interest.


A description of a CCN architecture is described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,456,054, entitled “CONTROLLING THE SPREAD OF INTERESTS AND CONTENT IN A CONTENT CENTRIC NETWORK,” which is hereby incorporated by reference.


In some embodiments, member network nodes of a respective virtual interface include multiple network neighbors which communicate with the local network node via a common physical or virtual interface of the local network node.


In some variations to these embodiments, the multiple network neighbors include a stable set of network neighbors that communicate with the local network node via a persistent network connection over the common physical or virtual interface of the local network node.


In some embodiments, the network-neighborhood information for a respective network node can include connectivity information for the respective network node, and indication as to whether the respective network node is a gateway to a remote network, and/or a pre-exiting configuration for the respective network node. The network-neighborhood information can also include routing information, link characteristics, a pre-existing link characteristic, historical connectivity information, and/or predicted connectivity information.


In some embodiments, member network nodes of a respective virtual interface include a network neighbor which communicates with the local network node via physical interface or virtual interface for a personal area network (PAN).


In some variations to these embodiments, the physical or virtual interface for the PAN includes a Bluetooth interface, a wireless optical communication interface, a line-of-sight communication interface, and/or a wireless universal serial bus (USB) interface.


In some embodiments, the system can monitor network packets transmitted by one or more neighboring network nodes. If the system determines that a network neighbor has left a network neighborhood of the local network node, the system determines a virtual interface associated with the determined network neighbor, and removes the determined network neighbor from the determined virtual interface.


In some embodiments, the system can monitor network packets transmitted by one or more neighboring network nodes. If the system determines that a network neighbor has entered a network neighborhood of the local network node, the system creates a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.


In some embodiments, the system can receive updated network-neighborhood information from one or more network neighbors. If the system determines that a network neighbor's network characteristics has changed based on the updated network-neighborhood information, the system determines whether the determined network neighbor's network characteristics is compatible with that of a virtual interface to which the network interface belongs. If the system determines that the determined network neighbor's network characteristics is not compatible with that of the virtual interface, the system can remove the


network neighbor from the virtual interface, and creates a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network environment that facilitates forwarding network packets based on characteristics of the available virtual interfaces in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary network node in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 3 presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method for defining one or more virtual interfaces that each includes a set of mutual-listener mutual-network neighbors in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 4 illustrates exemplary adjacency tables for a set of mutual-listener network nodes in accordance with an embodiment.



FIGS. 5A-5B illustrates virtual interface definitions at various network nodes in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 6 presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method for updating a virtual interface definition in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 7 presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method for processing a network packet at a network node in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary apparatus that facilitates forwarding network packets based on characteristics of the available virtual interfaces in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary computer system that facilitates forwarding network packets based on characteristics of the available virtual interfaces in accordance with an embodiment.





In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.


Overview


Embodiments of the present invention provide a network-configuring system that solves the problem of creating one or more stable virtual interfaces based on various network characteristics. For example, a network node can include various physical interfaces, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and/or Ethernet, that each allows the network node to interface with various network neighbors. However, in a content centric network (CCN), a CCN node is not allowed to forward a packet via a face (e.g., a physical interface or virtual interface) from which it received the packet as a way to avoid forwarding loops. Hence, the network-configuring system can define a virtual interface to include a group of duplex neighbors that can listen to each other's packets (hereinafter referred to as mutual-listener network nodes) to avoid having to forward a packet to a member of the virtual interface.


In some embodiments, the system selects the mutual listeners that are grouped for a virtual interface based on the network characteristics of a physical or virtual interface, and/or the characteristics of the mutual-listener nodes. This allows the system to generate the virtual interfaces that include stable groups of mutual listeners to avoid having to modify a virtual interface once it has been created.


Also, the system can configure how it uses the network's topology by defining the virtual interfaces based on the various network characteristics. This allows the system to make forwarding decisions for a packet by picking a virtual interface that is most suitable for the packet. Possible types of network characteristics can include:

    • 1) The types of physical interface used to connect to each neighboring node.
    • 2) A connection stability to each neighboring node.
    • 3) The network neighborhood for each neighboring node.
    • 4) Other networks or remote network nodes that are reachable via each neighboring node.


For example, the network node can configure a set of virtual interfaces to its neighboring nodes so that each virtual interface satisfies one or more of the following criteria:

    • 1) Neighbors in each virtual face communicate with the local node via the same underlying physical or virtual interface.
    • 2) Neighbors in each virtual face are mutual listeners.
    • 3) Neighbors in each virtual face are stable neighbors whose connection state doesn't change (otherwise these unstable neighbors need to be in their own face).
    • 4) Neighbors in each virtual interface forward Interests to the same network(s). They need to be assigned to their own face if they can forward to or reach a different remote network.


Using this criteria, the network node can create one virtual interface for an infrastructure network (e.g., infrastructure Wi-Fi), given that in an infrastructure Wi-Fi network, all members of the Wi-Fi network are expected to be mutual listeners. The network node can create another virtual interface for a broadcast-based Ethernet network, again, because all members of the broadcast-based Ethernet network are expected to be mutual listeners.


However, in a personal area network (PAN) where nodes can go in and out of the network (e.g., over Bluetooth), the network node can assign a virtual interface for each neighboring node accessible via the PAN. This ensures that each virtual interface built on top of the PAN is stable for as long as the corresponding neighboring node is within the PAN. For example, a Bluetooth interface doesn't provide a wide coverage area, which can cause the network node to temporarily lose connection to the neighboring nodes it connects to over Bluetooth. If the local network node were to create a virtual interface for multiple neighbors of a PAN interface, the network node (or another node of the virtual interface) would need to redefine the virtual interface each time another member of the virtual interface leaves or re-enters the PAN neighborhood. However, because the system assigns a virtual interface to each neighboring node of the PAN interface, the local network node just needs to create or tear down the virtual interface to each individual PAN neighbor that enters or leaves the PAN neighborhood, without modifying the definition for virtual interfaces to the other PAN neighbors.


In some embodiments, the network node can treat an unstable broadcast network (e.g., an ad-hoc Wi-Fi network, or a Bluetooth network) as a collection of point-to-point links. Also, the network node can create a virtual interface for each point-to-point link, regardless of the physical interface or virtual interface via which the link is established. This allows the network node to create a new dedicated virtual interface for each new or unstable neighbor that enters (or re-enters) the network node's network neighborhood, without having to modify a definition for an existing virtual interface. Then during operation, the network node just sees the virtual interfaces to these devices when they're available, and is not concerned with the underlying physical interfaces over which these virtual interfaces are established.


For example, if the network node is a part of an ad-hoc network, the network node may create and destroy point-to-point virtual interfaces as neighbors come in and out of the ad-hoc network (e.g., over a Wi-Fi network). The network node may create an “adhoc face 1” virtual interface to one neighbor over the Wi-Fi physical interface, and may create an “adhoc face 2” virtual interface to a different neighbor over the Wi-Fi physical interface. As a further example, the network node can also create a virtual interface for each point-to-point link over any other physical channel, such as over Bluetooth, or via an Internet Protocol (IP) tunnel or Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel that may have been established over Ethernet. The network node uses each of these point-to-point links or tunnels as a dedicated virtual interface to the other endpoint of the point-to-point link or tunnel.


Exemplary Network Environment



FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network environment 100 that facilitates forwarding network packets based on characteristics of the available virtual interfaces in accordance with an embodiment. Computer environment 100 can include a plurality of network nodes that communicate over a shared network 102, which can be realized over one or more physical network interfaces. In some embodiments network 102 includes a Content Centric Network (CCN), and network nodes 104-114 include CCN devices.


During operation, the network nodes of network 102 can form an ad-hoc or multi-hop wireless network by each node dynamically creating and tearing down virtual interfaces over one or more physical interfaces as necessary. More specifically, each network node can automatically detect a set of neighboring nodes, and clusters these neighboring nodes based on various network characteristics to generate a virtual interface for each cluster. This allows each network node to autonomously create a virtual interface without having to explicitly negotiate the member nodes of the virtual interface with other network nodes of network 102.


For example, network nodes 104, 106, 108, and 110 may have a direct duplex network connection with each other. Also, network nodes 106 and 108 may have a direct duplex network connection with a network node 114 that provides access to another network 122. Network node 110 can also have a direct duplex network connection with network node 114, as well as a network node 112 that provides access to a network 120. In some embodiments, these devices of network 102 can exchange duplex-neighborhood information with each other (e.g., an adjacency table) that identifies a network device's set of neighboring nodes, and the other networks to which they can provide access either directly or indirectly.


Because network nodes 104, 106, 108, and 110 can listen to each other over network 102, they are able to obtain duplex-neighborhood information from each other. Network nodes 102, 104, 106, and 108 can each independently analyze each other's duplex-neighborhood information to determine that they can form a group of mutual listeners. However, network nodes 106 and 108 both have a different network reachability than network node 110, because network nodes 106 and 108 can only provide access to network 122, while network node 110 can provide access to network nodes 120 and 122. Hence, network node 104 creates a virtual interface 116 for network nodes 106 and 108 (that provide access to network 122), and creates another virtual interface 118 for network node 110 (that provides access to networks 120 and 122). This ensures that each virtual interface includes a set of mutual-listener mutual-network nodes that have a stable duplex network connection with each other (e.g., have mutual-listener relationship) and provide access to the same remote networks (e.g., have mutual-network relationship).


Once the network nodes of network 102 have created one or more virtual interfaces, they can use their local virtual interfaces to forward packets across network 102 without sending the packet to any member node of the virtual interface from which the packet was received. For example, network node 114 can communicate a packet that is directed toward network devices 106 and 108, and whose header includes an identifier for a virtual interface 120. Network device 106 can receive the packet from device 114, and if device 106 is not the intended target for the packet, forwards the packet to its neighbors. Device 106 analyzes the packet's header to determine that the packet arrived through virtual interface 120, that device 108 has already received the packet from device 114 given that virtual interface 120 includes devices {106, 108, 114} that can each receive each other's packets. Device 106 then proceeds to forward the packet to device 104 via virtual interface 116, and includes an identifier for virtual interface 116 in the packet's header to prevent the packet from flowing back to device 108.


In some embodiments, network node 104 can forward a packet to a target network by selecting a virtual interface associated with the target network. For example, if network node 104 needs to forward a packet to network 120, network node 104 can perform a lookup in a virtual interface table to select a virtual interface associated with network 120. After determining that virtual interface 118 provides access to network 120, device 104 can include interface 118 in the packet's header, and proceeds to forward the packet via virtual interface 118.



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary network node 200 (e.g., a CCN device) in accordance with an embodiment. Network node 200 can include a processor 202, a memory 204, and a set of physical interfaces 206. Physical interfaces 206 can include, for example, a Wi-Fi physical interface 210, one or more Ethernet physical interfaces 220, a Bluetooth physical interface 230, and/or any other physical interfaces now known or later developed.


Network node 200 can also include one or more virtual interfaces 208, which are established on top of an existing physical interface or virtual interface. Virtual interfaces 208 can include an Infrastructure Wi-Fi virtual interface 212 and/or an ad-hoc Wi-Fi virtual interface 214 established over Wi-Fi physical interface 210. Virtual interfaces 208 can include one or more virtual interfaces established over one or more Ethernet physical interface(s) 220, such as a multicast virtual interface 222, a link interface 224, an Internet Protocol (IP) tunnel 226, and/or a Virtual Private Network (VPN) virtual interface 228. Virtual interfaces 208 can also include a Bluetooth neighbor interface 232 for each neighbor with which network node 200 has paired. Network node 200 establishes each Bluetooth neighbor interface 232 as a virtual interface on top of Bluetooth physical interface 230.


In some embodiments, network node 200 can create a virtual interface on top of an existing virtual interface. For example, network node 200 can create a “link” virtual interface 224 over one or more Ethernet physical interfaces 220, and can create one or more other virtual interfaces over link 224. As another example, network node 200 can create a virtual interface for a multicast address of a “multicast channel,” on top of link virtual interface 224.


Establishing Stable Virtual Interfaces


In some embodiments, the system creates a virtual interface for groups of nodes that provide a connection to a common set of remote network nodes or remote networks (e.g., for nodes that behave as a gateway to a VPN, or the Internet). The local network node can leverage gateway-specific virtual interfaces to control which network nodes or remote networks receive a packet (e.g., an Interest packet) by forwarding the packet via a corresponding virtual interface. For example, the network node may be coupled to two gateways that provide access to the Internet, where one gateway provides a better channel to one Internet service (e.g., Amazon.com) and the other gateway provides a better channel to another Internet service (e.g., NYTimes.com). The network node can determine which gateways provide a suitable connection to a remote network or service based on one or more predetermined performance criteria, such as network latency, security, and/or network reliability.


Hence, the network node can configure how it sees and interacts with the network topology by creating a set of virtual faces based on network characteristics. For example, while the network node may communicate with the two services over multiple neighboring nodes (e.g., gateways), the network node can analyze network characteristics to determine which neighboring nodes serve as a suitable gateway to the remote network or service. The network node can generate a virtual interface for the remote network or service so that the virtual interface includes the network nodes that provide a connection to the remote network or service.


In some embodiments, the network node considers the reachability of its neighbors when determining whether to group multiple mutual-listening neighbors into a single face. If two mutual-listening neighbors can forward Interests to different networks, the local network node assigns a different face to each of these two neighbors, even though they are mutual listeners. However, if the two neighbors are mutual listeners and can provide a suitable network connection to the same target networks, the network node can group these two neighbors into a single face, since the network node can use either of these two neighbors to reach the same target networks.


In some embodiments, the network node can create one virtual interface for each of the local gateways, and creates another virtual interface for the entire broadcast domain (e.g., the full set of mutual-listening neighbors of a physical interface). This creates a dedicated virtual interface for each gateway, even though it's possible for the gateways to belong to the face for the entire broadcast domain. This allows the network node to select an explicit gateway to use via its face, without having the Interest reach an unintended gateway. The other gateways will ignore the Interest since it was not sent via a face to which they belong.



FIG. 3 presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method 300 for defining one or more virtual interfaces that each includes a set of mutual-listener mutual-network neighbors in accordance with an embodiment. During operation, the network node can obtain network-neighborhood information from one or more neighboring network nodes (operation 302). This network-neighborhood information can include, for example, connectivity information for a network node, and indication as to whether the network node is a gateway to a remote network, and/or a pre-exiting configuration for the respective network node. The network-neighborhood information can also include routing information, link characteristics, a pre-existing link characteristic, historical connectivity information, and/or predicted connectivity information.


The network node can analyze the network-neighborhood information to determine networks reachable via each of the one or more neighboring network nodes (operation 304), and to determine a set of mutual-listener mutual-network groups (operation 306). Each mutual-listener mutual-network groups includes one or more neighboring nodes that can communicate with each other over a physical interface (e.g., are mutual listeners), and provide a connection to the same set of remote networks or network nodes (e.g., are mutual-network neighbors). The network node then defines a virtual interface for each mutual-listener mutual-network group (operation 308).


Recall that the network node creates each virtual interface to include a stable set of neighboring mutual-listener nodes. In some embodiments, the network node can manage the set of virtual interfaces when network neighbors enter or leave the network node's network neighborhood. For example, the network node can monitor network packets transmitted by the neighboring network nodes (operation 310), and determines whether a neighbor has entered or left the network node's network neighborhood (operation 312).


If a neighbor has not entered or left the network neighborhood, the network node can return to operation 310 to continue monitoring packets transmitted in the network neighborhood. However, if a network neighbor has left the network neighborhood, the network node can determine one or more virtual interfaces associated with this neighbor (operation 314), and removes the neighbor from these virtual interfaces (operation 316). If the neighbor was the only network node of a virtual interface, the network node can tear down the virtual interface.


On the other hand, if a new neighbor has entered the network node can create a new virtual interface for the new neighbor (operation 318). Note that it may be possible for the new neighbor to be incorporated into an existing virtual interface, (e.g., the new node may be a mutual-listener mutual-network neighbor of the other nodes in the virtual interface). However, in some embodiments, the network node may not add the new neighbor to an existing virtual interface while the network node does not know how stable the connection is to new neighbor. The new neighbor may be a mobile computing device that changes location often, or may have a weak signal to the other nodes in the virtual interface that causes the new network node to lose connection to the network node or the other nodes of the virtual interface. Rather, the network node may periodically re-evaluate the various virtual interfaces to merge multiple virtual interfaces that have compatible definitions (e.g., with compatible mutual-listener neighbors and compatible network characteristics).


In some embodiments, the network node can repeat operations 302-308 periodically to re-define mutual-listener mutual-network groups that are expected to have stable neighboring nodes. This way, if the new neighbor that was detected during operation 312 happens to be a stable neighbor, the network node can add this new neighbor to the virtual interface that includes the other mutual-listener mutual-network neighbors. The network node can determine that the new neighbor is a stable neighbor, for example, by requiring an up-time for a connection to the new neighbor to be at least equal to a predetermined minimum up-time threshold. Alternatively or additionally, the network node can determine that a new neighbor is a stable neighbor when an administrator designates the neighbor as a stable neighbor.



FIG. 4 illustrates exemplary adjacency tables for a set of mutual-listener network nodes in accordance with an embodiment. Specifically, Nodes C, D, E, and F of FIG. 1 are mutual listener nodes over a common physical channel. Adjacency table 400 for Node C indicates that Node Chas neighbors Nodes B, D, E, and F, such that Node C can reach a network 120 via Node E, and can reach a network 122 via Nodes B, D, and E. Adjacency table 410 for Node D indicates that Node D has neighbors Nodes B, C, E, and F, and that Node D can reach network 120 via Node E, and can reach network 122 via Nodes B, C, and E. Adjacency table 420 for Node E indicates that Node E has neighbors Nodes A, B, C, D, E, and F, such that Node E can reach network 120 via Node A, and can reach network 122 via Nodes B, C, and D.


In some embodiments, Node F can receive adjacency tables 400, 410, and 420 from its neighboring nodes C, D, and E, respectively, and uses these adjacency tables to determine which networks Node F can reach via Nodes C, D, and E. Node Fuses this information to generate adjacency table 430, which indicates that Node F has neighbors Nodes C, D, and E, and that Node F can reach network 120 via Node E, and can reach network 122 via Nodes C, D, and E.


Note that nodes C, D, E, and Fare mutual listeners, given that adjacency tables 400, 410, 420, and 430 include nodes C, D, E, and F as either a source node or a neighbor. The network nodes can create a virtual interface for the list of mutual-listener neighbors, and can also create a virtual interface for each group of mutual-listener neighbors that serve as a bridge to a remote network (or a predetermined target network node). For example, Node C may create one virtual interface for all mutual-listener neighbors (Nodes C, D, E, and F), and may create a virtual interface for each network accessible via these neighbors (e.g., networks 120 and 1220). The virtual interface for network 120 can include neighboring nodes D and E, but does not include node B since node B is not a mutual listener of the node group {C, D, E, F}. The virtual interface for network 122 can include neighboring node E, the only neighboring node that can serve as a bridge to network 120. As a further example, Node F may create one virtual interface for network 122 that includes the full set of mutual-listener neighboring nodes (e.g., Nodes C, D, and E), and may create a second virtual interface for network 120 that includes node E.



FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate virtual interface definitions at various network nodes in accordance with an embodiment. Specifically, each face table can include a set of columns that specify network information associated with a virtual interface definition. A “source node” column specifies the network node that generated the virtual interface, and a “virtual interface” column specifies a name for the virtual interface created by the source node. The column “member neighbors” specifies one or more neighboring network nodes that are members of the virtual interface, and the column “reachable network” specifies one or more networks that are reachable via the virtual interface. For example, a column entry that includes a network “120” indicates that any member neighbor of the virtual interface can be used to access the network named “120.” In some embodiments, the reachable network can include a named network (e.g., a Virtual Private Network (VPN), the Internet, etc.) or can include a group of one or more remote network nodes (e.g., a Web page, an Internet service, etc.) associated with a CCN name or name prefix (e.g., a routable prefix). Moreover, each face table can also include additional columns to specify additional attributes of a virtual interface, such as a performance metric (e.g., a minimum and/or maximum bandwidth, a minimum and/or maximum round trip delay, a minimum and/or maximum security rating, etc.).


Face table 500 specifies that Node C created a virtual interface “Face 1” for neighbor Node B, and created a second virtual interface “Face 2” for mutual-listener neighbors Node D, Node E, and Node F. Node C also created additional virtual interfaces for each mutual-listener mutual-network group: virtual interface “Face 3” includes Node E that connects to network 120, and virtual interface “Face 4” includes mutual-listener neighboring nodes Node D and Node E that both provide a connection to network 122. Similarly, face table 510 from Node D includes a virtual interface “Face 1” for Node B, includes a virtual interface “Face 2” for the mutual-listener group, includes a virtual interface “Face 3” for the mutual-listener node that provides a connection to network 120 (e.g., Node E), and includes a virtual interface “Face 4” for the mutual-listener nodes that provide a connection to network 122 (e.g., Node C and Node E).


Face table 520 includes a virtual interface “Face 1” for neighbor Node A that provide a connection to network 120, and includes another virtual interface for Node B that provides a connection to network 122. Table 520 also includes a virtual interface “Face 3” for the mutual-listener nodes Node C, Node D, and Node F. Also, since mutual-listener nodes Node C and Node D provide a connection to network 122, Node E created a virtual interface “Face 4” for network 122 that includes neighbors Node C and Node D.


In some embodiments, Node F can use adjacency tables 400, 410, and 420 to generate face table 530. Specifically, face table 530 includes a virtual interface “Face 1” that includes the mutual-listener neighbors Node B, Node C, and Node D. Also, since these mutual-listener neighbors also provide a connection to network 122, Node F can generate face table 530 to specify that Face 1 is associated with network 122. Moreover, since Node E also provides a connection to network 120, Node F can generate another virtual interface “Face 2” that includes Node E as a gateway to network 120.


In some embodiments, a network node can update its face table that defines the virtual interfaces available at the network node. This allows the network node to drop an unstable neighbor from a virtual interface for a set of mutual-listener neighbors, and allows the network node to generate a new virtual interface for a new neighbor or a neighbor with an unstable connection.



FIG. 6 presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method 600 for updating a virtual interface definition in accordance with an embodiment. During operation, the network node can receive updated network information from one or more neighboring nodes (operation 602). This network information can include, for example, adjacency tables, network performance metrics, or any other information that quantifies the performance and security of the neighboring nodes and/or the network connection thereto.


The network node then determines a neighboring node with new network information (operation 604), and determines a local face (e.g., a virtual interface) to which the neighboring node belongs (operation 606). This network node can include, for example, a network node that has left or entered the local network neighborhood, has new reachability information (e.g., is a gateway to a different set of remote nodes or networks), or whose network connection to the local network node has changed. The network connection to the neighboring network node may change when the network connection has degraded (e.g., becomes an unstable network connection) or upgraded (e.g., becomes stable), when the network connection to the local network node has changed to a different physical interface, or when the network node or the network connection thereto has new network performance metrics.


The network node then determines whether the neighboring node's network information is compatible with the face's definition. For example, the network node can determine the network information associated with the neighboring node from adjacency tables received from the neighboring node and/or any other node. The network node can also determine the face's definition from the network node's face table, and compares this with the network information for the neighboring node. If the neighboring node's network information is not compatible with the face's definition, the network node can drop the neighboring node from the face (operation 610), for example, by updating the face table to exclude the neighboring node from the face.


Also, the network node can determine whether the neighboring node is still available (operation 612), and if so, adds the neighboring node to a new face or an existing face whose face definition is compatible with the network information for the neighboring node (operation 614).


In some embodiments, the network node can receive a packet via a physical interface, and processes the packet if the packet was transmitted over a virtual interface to which the network node is a member.



FIG. 7 presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method 700 for processing a network packet at a network node in accordance with an embodiment. During operation, the network node can receive a network packet (operation 702), and identifies a network interface to which the packet is directed (operation 704). For example, the network packet can include a virtual-interface identifier that specifies a set of device identifiers for one or more network devices that belong to a mutual-listener group. Alternatively, the virtual-interface identifier can include a hash of the set of device identifiers, or can include a bloom filter that was generated based on the set of device identifiers.


The network node then determines whether it is a member of the identified virtual interface (operation 706). For example, if the virtual-interface identifier includes a set of device identifiers, the local network node can determine whether the network node is a member of the interface by determining whether the network node's identifier is included in the set of device identifiers. On the other hand, if the virtual-interface identifier includes a hash value for the set of device identifiers, the local network node can use the hash value to perform a lookup on a table of candidate virtual interfaces. If the local network node finds a match, the network node can conclude that the network node is a member of the packet's virtual interface. The network node can also use the matching entry to determine a set of neighboring network nodes that are members of the virtual interface. On the other hand, if the virtual-interface includes a bloom filter, the local network node can query the bloom filter using device identifiers found in the duplex-neighborhood information for the local network node, as well as for all neighboring nodes. The device identifiers that result in a hit on the bloom filter correspond to the set of network nodes that are members of the virtual interface identified by the packet.


If the network node is a member of the identified virtual interface, the network node can proceed to process the packet as an intended recipient for the packet (operation 708). For example, network node may include a CCN node, and the packet can include a CCN Interest or Content Object. If the network packet includes an Interest, the network node can perform a lookup operation on a Forwarding Information Base (FIB) to determine another virtual interface to use to forward the Interest packet. On the other hand, if the packet includes a Content Object, the network node can perform a lookup operation on a Pending Interest Table (PIT) to determine another virtual interface to use to forward the Content Object. The network node can also perform other operations on the packet, such as to cache the packet's payload (e.g., a Content Object).


On the other hand, if the local network node is not a member of the virtual interface identified in the packet's header, the network node can perform a remedial action (operation 710). The remedial action can include, for example, ignoring the packet, or caching the packet's payload (e.g., without forwarding the packet). The remedial action can also include using the virtual-interface identifier in the packet's header to update duplex-neighborhood information for the neighboring node that sent the packet.



FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary apparatus 800 that facilitates forwarding network packets based on characteristics of the available virtual interfaces in accordance with an embodiment. Apparatus 800 can comprise a plurality of modules which may communicate with one another via one or more physical network interfaces. Apparatus 800 may be realized using one or more integrated circuits, and may include fewer or more modules than those shown in FIG. 8. Further, apparatus 800 may be integrated in a computer system, or realized as a separate device which is capable of communicating with other computer systems and/or devices. Specifically, apparatus 800 can comprise a communication module 802, a virtual-interface selecting module 804, a packet-processing module 806, a virtual-interface defining module 808, an identifier-generating module 810, and a virtual-interface maintenance module 812.


In some embodiments, communication module 802 can receive a packet, and virtual-interface selecting module 804 can determine whether the local network device is a member of the virtual interface. Packet-processing module 806 can process the packet in response to determining that the local network device is a member of the virtual interface.


Virtual-interface defining module 808 can define one or more virtual interfaces based on duplex-neighborhood information and network characteristics received from one or more network neighbors, and identifier-generating module 810 can generate an interface identifier for a respective virtual interface. Virtual-interface maintenance module 812 can monitor packets transmitted by one or more network peers to detect a change in a network neighborhood and/or a change in network characteristics of the network neighborhood, and activates a new virtual interface or modifies an existing virtual interface to account for the detected change.



FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary computer system 902 that facilitates forwarding network packets based on characteristics of the available virtual interfaces in accordance with an embodiment. Computer system 902 includes a processor 904, a memory 906, and a storage device 908. Memory 906 can include a volatile memory (e.g., RAM) that serves as a managed memory, and can be used to store one or more memory pools. Furthermore, computer system 902 can be coupled to a display device 910, a keyboard 912, and a pointing device 914. Storage device 908 can store operating system 916, an interface-maintenance system 918, and data 932.


Interface-maintenance system 918 can include instructions, which when executed by computer system 902, can cause computer system 902 to perform methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, interface-maintenance system 918 may include instructions for receiving a packet (communication module 920). Further, interface-maintenance system 918 can include instructions for determining whether the local network device is a member of the virtual interface (virtual-interface selecting module 922), and can include instructions for processing the packet in response to determining that the local network device is a member of the virtual interface (packet-processing module 924).


Interface-maintenance system 918 can include instructions for defining one or more virtual interfaces based on duplex-neighborhood information and network characteristics received from one or more network neighbors (virtual-interface defining module 926), and can include instructions for generating an interface identifier for a respective virtual interface (identifier-generating module 928). Interface-maintenance system 918 can also include instructions for monitoring packets transmitted by one or more network peers to detect a change in a network neighborhood and/or a change in network characteristics of the network neighborhood, and activating a new virtual interface or modifies an existing virtual interface to account for the detected change (virtual-interface maintenance module 930).


Data 932 can include any data that is required as input or that is generated as output by the methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, data 932 can store at least identifiers for one or more virtual interfaces, and duplex-neighborhood information (e.g., adjacency tables) for a set of neighboring network nodes, and face tables that define one or more virtual interfaces for computer system 902.


The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.


The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.


Furthermore, the methods and processes described above can be included in hardware modules. For example, the hardware modules can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules are activated, the hardware modules perform the methods and processes included within the hardware modules.


The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: obtaining, by a local network node, network-neighborhood information from one or more network neighbors of the local network node, wherein the network-neighborhood information includes duplex-neighborhood information that indicates at least a set of neighboring devices to a network neighbor, and a set of remote network nodes accessible via a respective network neighbor;determining, based on the network-neighborhood information, a first group of the network neighbors having first common network characteristics, wherein the first group of the network neighbors includes first mutually-connected network peers;defining, by the local network node, a first virtual interface for the first group of network neighbors, wherein member nodes of the first virtual interface include the local network node and the first mutually-connected network peers;determining, based on the network-neighborhood information, a second group of the network neighbors having second common network characteristics different from the first common network characteristics, wherein the second group of the network neighbors includes second mutually-connected network peers; anddefining, by the local network node, a second virtual interface, different from the first virtual interface, for the second group of network neighbors, wherein member nodes of the second virtual interface include the local network node and the second mutually-connected network peers.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein member nodes of a respective virtual interface include multiple network neighbors which communicate with the local network node via a common physical or virtual interface of the local network node.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the multiple network neighbors include a set of network neighbors that communicate with the local network node via a persistent network connection over the common physical or virtual interface of the local network node.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the network-neighborhood information for a respective network node can include at least one of: connectivity information for the respective network node;whether the respective network node is a gateway to a remote network;a pre-exiting configuration for the respective network node;routing information;link characteristics;a pre-existing link characteristic;historical connectivity information; orpredicted connectivity information.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein member nodes of a respective virtual interface include at least one of the one or more network neighbors which communicates with the local network node via a physical interface or virtual interface for a personal area network.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the physical or virtual interface for the personal area network includes at least one of: a Bluetooth interface;a wireless optical communication interface;a line-of-sight communication interface; ora wireless universal serial bus interface.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: monitoring network packets transmitted by the one or more network neighbors;determining that one of the one or more network neighbors has left a network neighborhood of the local network node;determining a virtual interface associated with the determined network neighbor that has left the network neighborhood of the local network node; andremoving the determined network neighbor from the determined virtual interface.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: monitoring network packets transmitted by the one or more network neighbors;determining that a network neighbor has entered a network neighborhood of the local network node; andcreating a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving updated network-neighborhood information from the one or more network neighbors;determining, from the updated network-neighborhood information, that a network neighbor's network characteristics has changed; andresponsive to determining that the determined network neighbor's network characteristics are not compatible with that of a virtual interface to which the determined network neighbor belongs: removing the determined network neighbor from the virtual interface; andcreating a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.
  • 10. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that when executed by a computer cause the computer to perform a method, the method comprising: obtaining network-neighborhood information from one or more network neighbors of a local network node, wherein the network-neighborhood information includes duplex-neighborhood information that indicates at least a set of neighboring devices to a network neighbor, and a set of remote network nodes accessible via a respective network neighbor;determining, based on the network-neighborhood information, a first group of the network neighbors having first common network characteristics, wherein the first group of the network neighbors includes first mutually-connected network peers;defining a first virtual interface for the first group of network neighbors, wherein member nodes of the first virtual interface include the local network node and the first mutually-connected network peers;determining, based on the network-neighborhood information, a second group of the network neighbors having second common network characteristics different from the first common network characteristics, wherein the second group of the network neighbors includes second mutually-connected network peers; anddefining a second virtual interface, different from the first virtual interface, for the second group of network neighbors, wherein member nodes of the second virtual interface include the local network node and the second mutually-connected network peers.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein member nodes of a respective virtual interface include multiple network neighbors which communicate with the local network node via a common physical or virtual interface of the local network node.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the multiple network neighbors include a set of network neighbors that communicate with the local network node via a persistent network connection over the common physical or virtual interface of the local network node.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises: monitoring network packets transmitted by the one or more network neighbors;determining that one of the one or more network neighbors has left a network neighborhood of the local network node;determining a virtual interface associated with the determined network neighbor that has left the network neighborhood of the local network node; andremoving the determined network neighbor from the determined virtual interface.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises: monitoring network packets transmitted by the one or more network neighbors;determining that a network neighbor has entered a network neighborhood of the local network node; andcreating a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises: receiving updated network-neighborhood information from the one or more network neighbors;determining, from the updated network-neighborhood information, that a network neighbor's network characteristics has changed; andresponsive to determining that the determined network neighbor's network characteristics are not compatible with that of a virtual interface to which the determined network neighbor belongs: removing the determined network neighbor from the virtual interface; andcreating a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.
  • 16. A computer system comprising: one or more processors; anda memory, coupled to the one or more processors, storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computing system to perform a method comprising:obtaining network-neighborhood information from one or more network neighbors of a local network node, wherein the network-neighborhood information includes duplex-neighborhood information that indicates at least a set of neighboring devices to a network neighbor, and a set of remote network nodes accessible via a respective network neighbor;determining, based on the network-neighborhood information, a first group of the network neighbors having first common network characteristics, wherein the first group of the network neighbors includes first mutually-connected network peers;defining a first virtual interface for the first group of network neighbors, wherein member nodes of the first virtual interface include the local network node and the first mutually-connected network peers;determining, based on the network-neighborhood information, a second group of the network neighbors having second common network characteristics different from the first common network characteristics, wherein the second group of the network neighbors includes second mutually-connected network peers; anddefining a second virtual interface, different from the first virtual interface, for the second group of network neighbors, wherein member nodes of the second virtual interface include the local network node and the second mutually-connected network peers.
  • 17. The computer system of claim 16, wherein member nodes of a respective virtual interface include multiple network neighbors which communicate with the local network node via a common physical or virtual interface of the local network node.
  • 18. The computer system of claim 16, wherein the method further comprises: monitoring network packets transmitted by the one or more network neighbors;determining that one of the one or more network neighbors has left a network neighborhood of the local network node;determining a virtual interface associated with the determined network neighbor that has left the network neighborhood of the local network node; andremoving the determined network neighbor from the determined virtual interface.
  • 19. The computer system of claim 16, wherein the method further comprises: monitoring network packets transmitted by the one or more network neighbors;determining that a network neighbor has entered a network neighborhood of the local network node; andcreating a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.
  • 20. The computer system of claim 16, wherein the method further comprises: receiving updated network-neighborhood information from the one or more network neighbors;determining, from the updated network-neighborhood information, that a network neighbor's network characteristics has changed; andresponsive to determining that the determined network neighbor's network characteristics are not compatible with that of a virtual interface to which the determined network neighbor belongs: removing the determined network neighbor from the virtual interface; andcreating a new virtual interface for the determined network neighbor.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/522,479, filed Oct. 23, 2014, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (594)
Number Name Date Kind
817441 Niesz Apr 1906 A
4309569 Merkle Jan 1982 A
4921898 Lenney May 1990 A
5070134 Oyamada Dec 1991 A
5110856 Oyamada May 1992 A
5214702 Fischer May 1993 A
5377354 Scannell Dec 1994 A
5506844 Rao Apr 1996 A
5629370 Freidzon May 1997 A
5845207 Amin Dec 1998 A
5870605 Bracho Feb 1999 A
6047331 Medard Apr 2000 A
6052683 Irwin Apr 2000 A
6085320 Kaliski, Jr. Jul 2000 A
6091724 Chandra Jul 2000 A
6128623 Mattis Oct 2000 A
6128627 Mattis Oct 2000 A
6173364 Zenchelsky Jan 2001 B1
6209003 Mattis Mar 2001 B1
6226618 Downs May 2001 B1
6233617 Rothwein May 2001 B1
6233646 Hahm May 2001 B1
6289358 Mattis Sep 2001 B1
6292880 Mattis Sep 2001 B1
6332158 Risley Dec 2001 B1
6363067 Chung Mar 2002 B1
6366988 Skiba Apr 2002 B1
6574377 Cahill Jun 2003 B1
6654792 Verma Nov 2003 B1
6667957 Corson Dec 2003 B1
6681220 Kaplan Jan 2004 B1
6681326 Son Jan 2004 B2
6732273 Byers May 2004 B1
6769066 Botros Jul 2004 B1
6772333 Brendel Aug 2004 B1
6775258 vanValkenburg Aug 2004 B1
6862280 Bertagna Mar 2005 B1
6901452 Bertagna May 2005 B1
6915307 Mattis Jul 2005 B1
6917985 Madruga Jul 2005 B2
6957228 Graser Oct 2005 B1
6968393 Chen Nov 2005 B1
6981029 Menditto Dec 2005 B1
7007024 Zelenka Feb 2006 B2
7013389 Srivastava Mar 2006 B1
7031308 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Apr 2006 B2
7043637 Bolosky May 2006 B2
7061877 Gummalla Jun 2006 B1
7080073 Jiang Jul 2006 B1
RE39360 Aziz Oct 2006 E
7149750 Chadwick Dec 2006 B2
7152094 Jannu Dec 2006 B1
7177646 ONeill Feb 2007 B2
7206860 Murakami Apr 2007 B2
7206861 Callon Apr 2007 B1
7210326 Kawamoto May 2007 B2
7246159 Aggarwal Jul 2007 B2
7257837 Xu Aug 2007 B2
7287275 Moskowitz Oct 2007 B2
7315541 Housel Jan 2008 B1
7339929 Zelig Mar 2008 B2
7350229 Lander Mar 2008 B1
7362727 ONeill Apr 2008 B1
7382767 Barnes Jun 2008 B2
7395507 Robarts Jul 2008 B2
7430755 Hughes Sep 2008 B1
7444251 Nikovski Oct 2008 B2
7466703 Arunachalam Dec 2008 B1
7472422 Agbabian Dec 2008 B1
7496668 Hawkinson Feb 2009 B2
7509425 Rosenberg Mar 2009 B1
7523016 Surdulescu Apr 2009 B1
7542471 Samuels Jun 2009 B2
7543064 Juncker Jun 2009 B2
7552233 Raju Jun 2009 B2
7555482 Korkus Jun 2009 B2
7555563 Ott Jun 2009 B2
7564812 Elliott Jul 2009 B1
7567547 Mosko Jul 2009 B2
7567946 Andreoli Jul 2009 B2
7580971 Gollapudi Aug 2009 B1
7623535 Guichard Nov 2009 B2
7636767 Lev-Ran Dec 2009 B2
7647507 Feng Jan 2010 B1
7660324 Oguchi Feb 2010 B2
7685290 Satapati Mar 2010 B2
7698463 Ogier Apr 2010 B2
7698559 Chaudhury Apr 2010 B1
7769887 Bhattacharyya Aug 2010 B1
7779467 Choi Aug 2010 B2
7801069 Cheung Sep 2010 B2
7801177 Luss Sep 2010 B2
7816441 Oihana Elizalde Oct 2010 B2
7831733 Sultan Nov 2010 B2
7873619 Faibish Jan 2011 B1
7908337 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Mar 2011 B2
7924837 Shabtay Apr 2011 B1
7953014 Toda May 2011 B2
7953885 Devireddy May 2011 B1
7979912 Roka Jul 2011 B1
8000267 Solis Aug 2011 B2
8010691 Kollmansberger Aug 2011 B2
8069023 Frailong Nov 2011 B1
8074289 Carpentier Dec 2011 B1
8117441 Kurien Feb 2012 B2
8160069 Jacobson Apr 2012 B2
8204060 Jacobson Jun 2012 B2
8214364 Bigus Jul 2012 B2
8224985 Takeda Jul 2012 B2
8225057 Zheng Jul 2012 B1
8271578 Sheffi Sep 2012 B2
8271687 Turner Sep 2012 B2
8312064 Gauvin Nov 2012 B1
8332357 Chung Dec 2012 B1
8386622 Jacobson Feb 2013 B2
8447851 Anderson May 2013 B1
8462781 McGhee Jun 2013 B2
8467297 Liu Jun 2013 B2
8473633 Eardley Jun 2013 B2
8553562 Allan Oct 2013 B2
8572214 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Oct 2013 B2
8654649 Vasseur Feb 2014 B2
8665757 Kling Mar 2014 B2
8667172 Ravindran Mar 2014 B2
8677451 Bhimaraju Mar 2014 B1
8688619 Ezick Apr 2014 B1
8699350 Kumar Apr 2014 B1
8718055 Vasseur May 2014 B2
8750820 Allan Jun 2014 B2
8761022 Chiabaut Jun 2014 B2
8762477 Xie Jun 2014 B2
8762570 Qian Jun 2014 B2
8762707 Killian Jun 2014 B2
8767627 Ezure Jul 2014 B2
8817594 Gero Aug 2014 B2
8826381 Kim Sep 2014 B2
8832302 Bradford Sep 2014 B1
8836536 Marwah Sep 2014 B2
8861356 Kozat Oct 2014 B2
8862774 Vasseur Oct 2014 B2
8868779 ONeill Oct 2014 B2
8874842 Kimmel Oct 2014 B1
8880682 Bishop Nov 2014 B2
8903756 Zhao Dec 2014 B2
8923293 Jacobson Dec 2014 B2
8934496 Vasseur Jan 2015 B2
8937865 Kumar Jan 2015 B1
8972969 Gaither Mar 2015 B2
8977596 Montulli Mar 2015 B2
9002921 Westphal Apr 2015 B2
9032095 Traina May 2015 B1
9071498 Beser Jun 2015 B2
9112895 Lin Aug 2015 B1
9137152 Xie Sep 2015 B2
9253087 Zhang Feb 2016 B2
9270598 Oran Feb 2016 B1
9280610 Gruber Mar 2016 B2
9379979 Solis Jun 2016 B2
20020002680 Carbajal Jan 2002 A1
20020010795 Brown Jan 2002 A1
20020038296 Margolus Mar 2002 A1
20020048269 Hong Apr 2002 A1
20020054593 Morohashi May 2002 A1
20020077988 Sasaki Jun 2002 A1
20020078066 Robinson Jun 2002 A1
20020138551 Erickson Sep 2002 A1
20020152305 Jackson Oct 2002 A1
20020176404 Girard Nov 2002 A1
20020188605 Adya Dec 2002 A1
20020199014 Yang Dec 2002 A1
20030004621 Bousquet Jan 2003 A1
20030009365 Tynan Jan 2003 A1
20030033394 Stine Feb 2003 A1
20030046396 Richter Mar 2003 A1
20030046421 Horvitz et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046437 Eytchison Mar 2003 A1
20030048793 Pochon Mar 2003 A1
20030051100 Patel Mar 2003 A1
20030061384 Nakatani Mar 2003 A1
20030074472 Lucco Apr 2003 A1
20030088696 McCanne May 2003 A1
20030097447 Johnston May 2003 A1
20030099237 Mitra May 2003 A1
20030140257 Paterka Jul 2003 A1
20030229892 Sardera Dec 2003 A1
20040024879 Dingman Feb 2004 A1
20040030602 Rosenquist Feb 2004 A1
20040064737 Milliken Apr 2004 A1
20040071140 Jason Apr 2004 A1
20040073617 Milliken Apr 2004 A1
20040073715 Folkes Apr 2004 A1
20040139230 Kim Jul 2004 A1
20040196783 Shinomiya Oct 2004 A1
20040218548 Kennedy Nov 2004 A1
20040221047 Grover Nov 2004 A1
20040225627 Botros Nov 2004 A1
20040233916 Takeuchi Nov 2004 A1
20040246902 Weinstein Dec 2004 A1
20040252683 Kennedy Dec 2004 A1
20050003832 Osafune Jan 2005 A1
20050028156 Hammond Feb 2005 A1
20050043060 Brandenberg Feb 2005 A1
20050050211 Kaul Mar 2005 A1
20050074001 Mattes Apr 2005 A1
20050132207 Mourad Jun 2005 A1
20050149508 Deshpande Jul 2005 A1
20050159823 Hayes Jul 2005 A1
20050198351 Nog Sep 2005 A1
20050249196 Ansari Nov 2005 A1
20050259637 Chu Nov 2005 A1
20050262217 Nonaka Nov 2005 A1
20050281288 Banerjee Dec 2005 A1
20050286535 Shrum Dec 2005 A1
20050289222 Sahim Dec 2005 A1
20060010249 Sabesan Jan 2006 A1
20060029102 Abe Feb 2006 A1
20060039379 Abe Feb 2006 A1
20060051055 Ohkawa Mar 2006 A1
20060072523 Richardson Apr 2006 A1
20060099973 Nair May 2006 A1
20060129514 Watanabe Jun 2006 A1
20060133343 Huang Jun 2006 A1
20060146686 Kim Jul 2006 A1
20060173831 Basso Aug 2006 A1
20060193295 White Aug 2006 A1
20060203804 Whitmore Sep 2006 A1
20060206445 Andreoli Sep 2006 A1
20060215684 Capone Sep 2006 A1
20060223504 Ishak Oct 2006 A1
20060242155 Moore Oct 2006 A1
20060256767 Suzuki Nov 2006 A1
20060268792 Belcea Nov 2006 A1
20070019619 Foster Jan 2007 A1
20070061427 Vishnia-Shabtai et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073888 Madhok Mar 2007 A1
20070094265 Korkus Apr 2007 A1
20070112880 Yang May 2007 A1
20070124412 Narayanaswami May 2007 A1
20070127457 Mirtorabi Jun 2007 A1
20070160062 Morishita Jul 2007 A1
20070162394 Zager Jul 2007 A1
20070171828 Dalal Jul 2007 A1
20070189284 Kecskemeti Aug 2007 A1
20070195765 Heissenbuttel Aug 2007 A1
20070204011 Shaver Aug 2007 A1
20070209067 Fogel Sep 2007 A1
20070239892 Ott Oct 2007 A1
20070240207 Belakhdar Oct 2007 A1
20070245034 Retana Oct 2007 A1
20070253418 Shiri Nov 2007 A1
20070255677 Alexander Nov 2007 A1
20070255699 Sreenivas Nov 2007 A1
20070255781 Li Nov 2007 A1
20070274504 Maes Nov 2007 A1
20070275701 Jonker Nov 2007 A1
20070276907 Maes Nov 2007 A1
20070283158 Danseglio Dec 2007 A1
20070294187 Scherrer Dec 2007 A1
20080005056 Stelzig Jan 2008 A1
20080005223 Flake Jan 2008 A1
20080010366 Duggan Jan 2008 A1
20080037420 Tang Feb 2008 A1
20080043989 Furutono Feb 2008 A1
20080046340 Brown Feb 2008 A1
20080059631 Bergstrom Mar 2008 A1
20080080440 Yarvis Apr 2008 A1
20080082662 Dandliker Apr 2008 A1
20080095159 Suzuki Apr 2008 A1
20080101357 Iovanna May 2008 A1
20080107034 Jetcheva May 2008 A1
20080107259 Satou May 2008 A1
20080123862 Rowley May 2008 A1
20080133583 Artan Jun 2008 A1
20080133755 Pollack Jun 2008 A1
20080151755 Nishioka Jun 2008 A1
20080159271 Kutt Jul 2008 A1
20080165775 Das Jul 2008 A1
20080186901 Itagaki Aug 2008 A1
20080200153 Fitzpatrick Aug 2008 A1
20080215669 Gaddy Sep 2008 A1
20080216086 Tanaka Sep 2008 A1
20080243992 Jardetzky Oct 2008 A1
20080250006 Dettinger Oct 2008 A1
20080256138 Sim-Tang Oct 2008 A1
20080256359 Kahn Oct 2008 A1
20080270618 Rosenberg Oct 2008 A1
20080271143 Stephens Oct 2008 A1
20080287142 Keighran Nov 2008 A1
20080288580 Wang Nov 2008 A1
20080291923 Back Nov 2008 A1
20080298376 Takeda Dec 2008 A1
20080320148 Capuozzo Dec 2008 A1
20090006659 Collins Jan 2009 A1
20090013324 Gobara Jan 2009 A1
20090022154 Kiribe Jan 2009 A1
20090024641 Quigley Jan 2009 A1
20090030978 Johnson Jan 2009 A1
20090037763 Adhya Feb 2009 A1
20090052660 Chen Feb 2009 A1
20090067429 Nagai Mar 2009 A1
20090077184 Brewer Mar 2009 A1
20090092043 Lapuh Apr 2009 A1
20090097631 Gisby Apr 2009 A1
20090103515 Pointer Apr 2009 A1
20090113068 Fujihira Apr 2009 A1
20090116393 Hughes May 2009 A1
20090117922 Bell May 2009 A1
20090132662 Sheridan May 2009 A1
20090135728 Shen May 2009 A1
20090144300 Chatiey Jun 2009 A1
20090157887 Froment Jun 2009 A1
20090161578 Yeung et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090185745 Momosaki Jul 2009 A1
20090193101 Munetsugu Jul 2009 A1
20090198832 Shah Aug 2009 A1
20090222344 Greene Sep 2009 A1
20090228593 Takeda Sep 2009 A1
20090254572 Redlich Oct 2009 A1
20090268905 Matsushima Oct 2009 A1
20090274158 Sharp Nov 2009 A1
20090276396 Gorman Nov 2009 A1
20090285209 Stewart Nov 2009 A1
20090287835 Jacobson Nov 2009 A1
20090287853 Carson Nov 2009 A1
20090288076 Johnson Nov 2009 A1
20090288143 Stebila Nov 2009 A1
20090288163 Jacobson et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292743 Bigus Nov 2009 A1
20090293121 Bigus Nov 2009 A1
20090296719 Maier Dec 2009 A1
20090300079 Shitomi Dec 2009 A1
20090300407 Kamath Dec 2009 A1
20090300512 Ahn Dec 2009 A1
20090307333 Welingkar Dec 2009 A1
20090323632 Nix Dec 2009 A1
20100005061 Basco Jan 2010 A1
20100027539 Beverly Feb 2010 A1
20100046546 Ram Feb 2010 A1
20100057929 Merat Mar 2010 A1
20100058346 Narang Mar 2010 A1
20100088370 Wu Apr 2010 A1
20100094767 Miltonberger Apr 2010 A1
20100094876 Huang Apr 2010 A1
20100098093 Ejzak Apr 2010 A1
20100100465 Cooke Apr 2010 A1
20100103870 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Apr 2010 A1
20100124191 Vos May 2010 A1
20100125911 Bhaskaran May 2010 A1
20100131660 Dec May 2010 A1
20100150155 Napierala Jun 2010 A1
20100165976 Khan Jul 2010 A1
20100169478 Saha Jul 2010 A1
20100169503 Kollmansberger Jul 2010 A1
20100180332 Ben-Yochanan Jul 2010 A1
20100182995 Hwang Jul 2010 A1
20100185753 Liu Jul 2010 A1
20100195653 Jacobson Aug 2010 A1
20100195654 Jacobson Aug 2010 A1
20100195655 Jacobson Aug 2010 A1
20100217874 Anantharaman Aug 2010 A1
20100217985 Fahrny Aug 2010 A1
20100232402 Przybysz Sep 2010 A1
20100232439 Dham Sep 2010 A1
20100235516 Nakamura Sep 2010 A1
20100246549 Zhang Sep 2010 A1
20100250497 Redlich Sep 2010 A1
20100250939 Adams Sep 2010 A1
20100257149 Cognigni Oct 2010 A1
20100268782 Zombek Oct 2010 A1
20100272107 Papp Oct 2010 A1
20100281263 Ugawa Nov 2010 A1
20100284309 Allan Nov 2010 A1
20100284404 Gopinath Nov 2010 A1
20100293293 Beser Nov 2010 A1
20100322249 Thathapudi Dec 2010 A1
20110013637 Xue Jan 2011 A1
20110019674 Iovanna Jan 2011 A1
20110022812 vanderLinden Jan 2011 A1
20110029952 Harrington Feb 2011 A1
20110055392 Shen Mar 2011 A1
20110055921 Narayanaswamy Mar 2011 A1
20110060716 Forman Mar 2011 A1
20110060717 Forman Mar 2011 A1
20110090908 Jacobson Apr 2011 A1
20110106755 Hao May 2011 A1
20110131308 Eriksson Jun 2011 A1
20110137919 Ryu Jun 2011 A1
20110145597 Yamaguchi Jun 2011 A1
20110145858 Philpott Jun 2011 A1
20110149858 Hwang Jun 2011 A1
20110153840 Narayana Jun 2011 A1
20110158122 Murphy Jun 2011 A1
20110161408 Kim Jun 2011 A1
20110202609 Chaturvedi Aug 2011 A1
20110219093 Ragunathan Sep 2011 A1
20110219427 Hito Sep 2011 A1
20110219727 May Sep 2011 A1
20110225293 Rathod Sep 2011 A1
20110231578 Nagappan Sep 2011 A1
20110239256 Gholmieh Sep 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer Oct 2011 A1
20110264824 Venkata Subramanian Oct 2011 A1
20110265159 Ronda Oct 2011 A1
20110265174 Thornton Oct 2011 A1
20110271007 Wang Nov 2011 A1
20110280214 Lee Nov 2011 A1
20110286457 Ee Nov 2011 A1
20110286459 Rembarz Nov 2011 A1
20110295783 Zhao Dec 2011 A1
20110299454 Krishnaswamy Dec 2011 A1
20110307496 Jones Dec 2011 A1
20120011170 Elad Jan 2012 A1
20120011551 Levy Jan 2012 A1
20120023113 Ferren Jan 2012 A1
20120036180 Thornton Feb 2012 A1
20120045064 Rembarz Feb 2012 A1
20120047361 Erdmann Feb 2012 A1
20120066727 Nozoe Mar 2012 A1
20120106339 Mishra May 2012 A1
20120110159 Richardson May 2012 A1
20120114313 Phillips May 2012 A1
20120120803 Farkas May 2012 A1
20120127994 Ko May 2012 A1
20120136676 Goodall May 2012 A1
20120136936 Quintuna May 2012 A1
20120136945 Lee May 2012 A1
20120137367 Dupont May 2012 A1
20120141093 Yamaguchi Jun 2012 A1
20120144416 Wetzer Jun 2012 A1
20120155464 Kim Jun 2012 A1
20120158973 Jacobson Jun 2012 A1
20120163373 Lo Jun 2012 A1
20120166433 Tseng Jun 2012 A1
20120170913 Isozaki Jul 2012 A1
20120179653 Araki Jul 2012 A1
20120197690 Agulnek Aug 2012 A1
20120198048 Ioffe Aug 2012 A1
20120221150 Arensmeier Aug 2012 A1
20120224487 Hui Sep 2012 A1
20120226902 Kim Sep 2012 A1
20120254910 Donoghue Oct 2012 A1
20120257500 Lynch Oct 2012 A1
20120284791 Miller Nov 2012 A1
20120290669 Parks Nov 2012 A1
20120290919 Melnyk Nov 2012 A1
20120291102 Cohen Nov 2012 A1
20120300669 Zahavi Nov 2012 A1
20120307629 Vasseur Dec 2012 A1
20120314580 Hong Dec 2012 A1
20120317307 Ravindran Dec 2012 A1
20120322422 Frecks Dec 2012 A1
20120323933 He Dec 2012 A1
20120331112 Chatani Dec 2012 A1
20130024560 Vasseur Jan 2013 A1
20130041982 Shi Feb 2013 A1
20130051392 Filsfils Feb 2013 A1
20130054971 Yamaguchi Feb 2013 A1
20130060962 Wang Mar 2013 A1
20130061084 Barton Mar 2013 A1
20130066823 Sweeney Mar 2013 A1
20130073552 Rangwala Mar 2013 A1
20130073882 Inbaraj Mar 2013 A1
20130074155 Huh Mar 2013 A1
20130090942 Robinson Apr 2013 A1
20130091539 Khurana Apr 2013 A1
20130110921 Logan May 2013 A1
20130110987 Kim May 2013 A1
20130111063 Lee May 2013 A1
20130128786 Sultan May 2013 A1
20130132719 Kobayashi May 2013 A1
20130139245 Thomas May 2013 A1
20130151584 Westphal Jun 2013 A1
20130151646 Chidambaram Jun 2013 A1
20130152070 Bhullar Jun 2013 A1
20130163426 Beliveau Jun 2013 A1
20130166668 Byun Jun 2013 A1
20130170490 Kreeger et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130173822 Hong Jul 2013 A1
20130182568 Lee Jul 2013 A1
20130182931 Fan Jul 2013 A1
20130185406 Choi Jul 2013 A1
20130191412 Kitamura Jul 2013 A1
20130197698 Shah Aug 2013 A1
20130198119 Eberhardt, III Aug 2013 A1
20130212185 Pasquero Aug 2013 A1
20130219038 Lee Aug 2013 A1
20130219081 Qian Aug 2013 A1
20130219478 Mahamuni Aug 2013 A1
20130223237 Hui Aug 2013 A1
20130227048 Xie Aug 2013 A1
20130227114 Vasseur Aug 2013 A1
20130227166 Ravindran Aug 2013 A1
20130242996 Varvello Sep 2013 A1
20130250809 Hui Sep 2013 A1
20130262365 Dolbear Oct 2013 A1
20130262698 Schwan Oct 2013 A1
20130282854 Jang Oct 2013 A1
20130282860 Zhang Oct 2013 A1
20130282920 Zhang Oct 2013 A1
20130304758 Gruber Nov 2013 A1
20130304937 Lee Nov 2013 A1
20130325888 Oneppo Dec 2013 A1
20130329696 Xu Dec 2013 A1
20130332971 Fisher Dec 2013 A1
20130336103 Vasseur Dec 2013 A1
20130336323 Srinivasan Dec 2013 A1
20130339481 Hong Dec 2013 A1
20130343408 Cook Dec 2013 A1
20140003232 Guichard Jan 2014 A1
20140003424 Matsuhira Jan 2014 A1
20140006354 Parkison Jan 2014 A1
20140006565 Muscariello Jan 2014 A1
20140029445 Hui Jan 2014 A1
20140032714 Liu Jan 2014 A1
20140033193 Palaniappan Jan 2014 A1
20140040505 Barton Feb 2014 A1
20140040628 Fort Feb 2014 A1
20140043987 Watve Feb 2014 A1
20140047513 vantNoordende Feb 2014 A1
20140074730 Arensmeier Mar 2014 A1
20140075567 Raleigh Mar 2014 A1
20140082135 Jung Mar 2014 A1
20140082661 Krahnstoever Mar 2014 A1
20140089454 Jeon Mar 2014 A1
20140096249 Dupont Apr 2014 A1
20140098685 Shattil Apr 2014 A1
20140108313 Heidasch Apr 2014 A1
20140108474 David Apr 2014 A1
20140115037 Liu Apr 2014 A1
20140122587 Petker et al. May 2014 A1
20140129736 Yu May 2014 A1
20140136814 Stark May 2014 A1
20140140348 Perlman May 2014 A1
20140143370 Vilenski May 2014 A1
20140146819 Bae May 2014 A1
20140149733 Kim May 2014 A1
20140156396 deKozan Jun 2014 A1
20140165207 Engel Jun 2014 A1
20140172783 Suzuki Jun 2014 A1
20140172981 Kim Jun 2014 A1
20140173034 Liu Jun 2014 A1
20140173076 Ravindran Jun 2014 A1
20140181140 Kim Jun 2014 A1
20140192677 Chew Jul 2014 A1
20140192717 Liu Jul 2014 A1
20140195328 Ferens Jul 2014 A1
20140195641 Wang Jul 2014 A1
20140195666 Dumitriu Jul 2014 A1
20140204945 Byun Jul 2014 A1
20140214942 Ozonat Jul 2014 A1
20140233575 Xie Aug 2014 A1
20140237085 Park Aug 2014 A1
20140237095 Bevilacqua-Linn Aug 2014 A1
20140245359 DeFoy Aug 2014 A1
20140254595 Luo Sep 2014 A1
20140280823 Varvello Sep 2014 A1
20140280934 Reagan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140281489 Peterka Sep 2014 A1
20140281505 Zhang Sep 2014 A1
20140282816 Xie Sep 2014 A1
20140289325 Solis Sep 2014 A1
20140289790 Wilson Sep 2014 A1
20140298248 Kang Oct 2014 A1
20140314093 You Oct 2014 A1
20140337276 Iordanov Nov 2014 A1
20140365550 Jang Dec 2014 A1
20140372654 Pelt et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150006896 Franck Jan 2015 A1
20150018770 Baran Jan 2015 A1
20150032892 Narayanan Jan 2015 A1
20150033365 Mellor Jan 2015 A1
20150039890 Khosravi Feb 2015 A1
20150063802 Bahadur Mar 2015 A1
20150089081 Thubert Mar 2015 A1
20150095481 Ohnishi Apr 2015 A1
20150095514 Yu Apr 2015 A1
20150120663 LeScouarnec Apr 2015 A1
20150169758 Assom Jun 2015 A1
20150188770 Naiksatam Jul 2015 A1
20150195149 Vasseur Jul 2015 A1
20150207633 Ravindran Jul 2015 A1
20150207864 Wilson Jul 2015 A1
20150279348 Cao Oct 2015 A1
20150288755 Mosko Oct 2015 A1
20150312300 Mosko Oct 2015 A1
20150349961 Mosko Dec 2015 A1
20150372903 Hui Dec 2015 A1
20150381546 Mahadevan Dec 2015 A1
20160019275 Mosko Jan 2016 A1
20160021172 Mahadevan Jan 2016 A1
20160062840 Scott Mar 2016 A1
20160110466 Uzun Apr 2016 A1
20160119251 Solis et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160171184 Solis Jun 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
103873371 Jun 2014 CN
1720277 Jun 1967 DE
19620817 Nov 1997 DE
0295727 Dec 1988 EP
0757065 Jul 1996 EP
1077422 Feb 2001 EP
1383265 Jan 2004 EP
1384729 Jan 2004 EP
1473889 Nov 2004 EP
2120402 Nov 2009 EP
2120419 Nov 2009 EP
2120419 Nov 2009 EP
2124415 Nov 2009 EP
2214357 Aug 2010 EP
2299754 Mar 2011 EP
2323346 May 2011 EP
2552083 Jan 2013 EP
2894812 Jul 2015 EP
2214356 May 2016 EP
03005288 Jan 2003 WO
03042254 May 2003 WO
03049369 Jun 2003 WO
03091297 Nov 2003 WO
2007113180 Oct 2007 WO
2007122620 Nov 2007 WO
2007144388 Dec 2007 WO
2011049690 Apr 2011 WO
2012077073 Jun 2012 WO
2013123410 Aug 2013 WO
2015084327 Jun 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (176)
Entry
Configuring Cisco Discovery; Cisco; Nov. 21, 2006, Cisco, (6 pages).
CDP Basics; Kelson Lawrence, Feb. 13, 2013; (8 pages).
Boneh, et al., “Collusion Resistant Broadcast Encryption with Short Ciphertexts and Private Keys,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO 2005, Aug. 2005, 19 pages.
Xiong, et al., “CloudSeal: End-to-End Content Protection in Cloud-Based Storage and Delivery Services,” SecureComm 2011: Security and Privacy in Communication Networks, Sep. 2011, 10 pages.
Ateniese, et al., “Improved Proxy Re-encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage,” ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), vol. 9 Issue 1, Feb. 2006, 30 pages.
Biradar, et al., “Review of Multicast Routing Mechanisms in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” Journal of network and Computer Applications, vol. 35, Issue 1, Jan. 2012, 19 pages.
Lynn, “PBC Library—Pairing-Based Cryptography,” retrieved from https://crypto.standford.edu/pbc/, on Apr. 27, 2015, 2 pages.
Google Code Archive, “CCNX-Trace,” https://code.google.com/archive/p/ccnx-trace/, project created on Jul. 23, 2012, retrieved on Mar. 30, 2018, 2 pages.
Extended European Search Report and Written Opinion in counterpart European Application No. 15189861.6, dated Mar. 18, 2016, 8 pages.
Angius, et al., “BLOOGO—BLOOm filter based GOssip algorithm for wireless NDN,” NoM'12, Jun. 2012, 7 pages.
Xie et al. “Collaborative Forwarding and Caching in Content Centric Networks”, Networking 2012.
Lui et al. (A TLV Structured Data Naming Scheme for Content-Oriented Networking, pp. 5822-5827, International Workshop on the Network of the Future, Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on Jun. 10-15, 2012).
Peter Dely et al. “OpenFlow for Wireless Mesh Networks” Computer Communications and Networks, 2011 Proceedings of 20th International Conference on, IEEE, Jul. 31, 2011 (Jul. 31, 2011), pp. 1-6.
Garnepudi Parimala et al “Proactive, reactive and hybrid multicast routing protocols for Wireless Mesh Networks”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, IEEE, Dec. 26, 2013, pp. 1-7.
Tiancheng Zhuang et al. “Managing Ad Hoc Networks of Smartphones”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Oct. 1, 2013.
Amadeo et al. “Design and Analysis of a Transport-Level Solution for Content-Centric VANETs”, University “Mediterranea” of Reggio Calabria, Jun. 15, 2013.
Marc Mosko. “CCNx 1.0 Protocol Introduction” Apr. 2, 2014 [Retrieved from the Internet Aug. 6, 2016] http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.1%20CCNx%201.0%20Protocol%20Introduction.pdf paragraphs [01.3], [002], [02.1], [0003].
Akash Baid et al: “Comparing alternative approaches for networking of named objects in the future Internet”, Computer Communications Workshops (Infocom Wkshps), 2012 IEEE Conference on, IEEE, Mar. 25, 2012, pp. 298-303. Paragraph [002] figure 1.
Priya Mahadevan: “CCNx 1.0 Tutorial”, Mar. 16, 2014, pp. 1-11, Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/hhg/1.2%20CCNx%201.0%20Tutorial.pdf [retrieved on Aug. 6, 2016] paragraphs [003]-[006], [0011], [0013]figures 1.2.
Marc Mosko et al “All-In-One Streams for Content Centric Networks”, May 24, 2015, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ccnx.org/pubs/AllinOne.pdf [downloaded Sep. 6, 2016]*the whole document*.
Cesar Ghali et al. “Elements of Trust in Named-Data Networking”, Feb. 13, 2014 Retrieved from the internet Jun. 17, 2016 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.3332v5.pdf p. 5, col. 1 p. 2, col. 1-2 Section 4.1; p. 4, col. 2 Section 4.2; p. 4, col. 2.
Priya Mahadevan et al. “CCN-KRS”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-Centric Networking, Inc. '14, Sep. 24, 2014.
Flavio Roberto Santos Et al. “Funnel: Choking Polluters in BitTorrent File Sharing Communities”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, IEEE vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 1, 2011.
Liu Wai-Xi et al: “Multisource Dissemination in content-centric networking”, 2013 Fourth International conference on the network of the future (NOF), IEEE, Oct. 23, 2013, pp. 1-5.
Marie-Jose Montpetit et al.: “Network coding meets information-centric networking”, Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop emerging Name-Oriented mobile networking design, architecture, algorithms, and applications, NOM '12, Jun. 11, 2012, pp. 31-36.
Asokan et al.: “Server-Supported Signatures”, Computer Security Esorics 96, Sep. 25, 1996, pp. 131-143, Section 3.
Mandl et al.: “A Fast FPGA Based Coprocessor Supporting Hard Real-Time Search”, New Frontiers of Information Technology. Proceedings of the 23rd Euromicro Conference Budapest, Sep. 1, 1997, pp. 499-506 *The Whole Document*.
Sun et al.: “Content-Based Route Lookup Using CAMs”, Global Communications Conference, IEEE, Dec. 3, 2012 *The Whole Document*.
Wetherall, David, “Active Network vision and reality: Lessons form a capsule-based system”, ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Dec. 1, 1999. pp. 64-79.
Kulkarni A.B. et al., “Implementation of a prototype active network”, IEEE, Open Architectures and Network Programming, Apr. 3, 1998, pp. 130-142.
Ao-Jan Su, David R. Choffnes, Aleksandar Kuzmanovic, and Fabian E. Bustamante. Drafting Behind Akamai; Inferring Network Conditions Based on CDN Redirections. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking [Feb. 2009).
B. Lynn$2E.
C. Gentry and A. Silverberg. Hierarchical ID-Based Cryptography. Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2002. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2002).
D. Boneh, C. Gentry, and B. Waters, 'Collusi.
D. Boneh and M. Franklin. Identity-Based Encryption from the Well Pairing. Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO 2001, vol. 2139, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2001).
G. Ateniese, K. Fu, M. Green, and S. Hohenberger. Improved Proxy Reencryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage. In the 12th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Sympo.
H. Xiong, X. Zhang, W. Zhu, and D. Yao. CloudSeal: End-to$2.
J. Bethencourt, A, Sahai, and B. Waters, ‘Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption,’ in Proc. IEEE Security & Privacy 2007, Berkeley, CA, USA, May 2007, pp. 321-334.
J. Lotspiech, S. Nusser, and F. Pestoni. Anonymous Trust: Digital Rights Management using Broadcast Encryption. Proceedings of the IEEE 92.6 (2004).
J. Shao and Z. Cao. CCA-Secure Proxy Re-Encryption without Pairings. Public Key Cryptography. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5443 (2009).
M. Blaze, G. Bleumer, and M. Strauss, ‘Divertible protocols and atomic prosy cryptography,’ in Proc. EUROCRYPT 1998, Espoo, Finland, May-Jun. 1998, pp. 127-144.
R. H. Deng, J. Weng, S. Liu, and K. Chen. Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-Encryption without Pairings. CANS. Spring Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5339 (2008).
HTMP (2009). Available online at http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/rtmp/ pdf/rtmp specification 1.0.pdf.
S. Chow, J. Weng, Y. Yang, and R. Deng. Efficient Unidirectional Proxy Re-Encryption Progress in Cryptology—AFRICACRYPT 2010. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2010).
S. Kamara and K. Lauter. Cryptographic Cloud Storage. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2010).
Sandvine, Global Internet Phenomena Report—Spring 2012. Located online at http://www.sandvine.com/downloads/ documents/Phenomenal H 2012/Sandvine Global Internet Phenomena Report 1H 2012.pdf.
The Despotify Project (2012). Available online at http://despotify.sourceforge.net/.
V. K. Adhikari, S. Jain, Y. Chen, and Z.-L. Zhang. Vivisecting Youtube:An Active Measurement Study. In INFOVOM12 Mini-conference (2012).
Vijay Kumar Adhikari, Yang Guo, Fang Hao, Matteo Varvello, Volker Hilt, Moritz Steiner, and Zhi-Li Zhang. Unreeling Netflix: Understanding and Improving Multi-CDN Movie Delivery. In the Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2012 (2012).
Jacobson, Van et al. ‘VoCCN: Voice Over Content-Centric Networks.’ Dec. 1, 2009. ACM ReArch'09.
Rosenberg, J. “Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols”, Apr. 2010, pp. 1-117.
Shih, Eugene et al., ‘Wake on Wireless: An Event Driven Energy Saving Strategy for Battery Operated Devices’, Sep. 23, 2002, pp. 160-171.
Fall, K. et al., “DTN: an architectural retrospective”, Selected areas in communications, IEEE Journal on, vol. 28, No. 5, Jun. 1, 2008, pp. 828-835.
Gritter, M. et al., ‘An Architecture for content routing support in the Internet’, Proceedings of 3rd Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, 2001, pp. 37-48.
“CCNx,” http://ccnx.org/, downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“Content Delivery Network”, Wikipedia, Dec. 10, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Content_delivery_network&oldid=465077460.
“Digital Signature” archived on Aug. 31, 2009 at http://web.archive.org/web/20090831170721/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature.
“Introducing JSON,” http://www.json.org/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“Microsoft PlayReady,” http://www.microsoft.com/playready/.downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“Pursuing a pub/sub internet (PURSUIT),” http://www.fp7-pursuit.ew/PursuitWeb/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
“The FP7 4WARD project,” http://www.4ward-project.eu/. downloaded Mar. 11, 2015.
A. Broder and A. Karlin, “Multilevel Adaptive Hashing”, Jan. 1990, pp. 43-53.
Detti, Andrea, et al. “CONET: a content centric inter-networking architecture.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2011.
A. Wolman, M. Voelker, N. Sharma N. Cardwell, A. Karlin, and H.M. Levy, “On the scale and performance of cooperative web proxy caching.” ACM SIGHOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 16-31, Dec. 1999.
Afanasyev, Alexander, et al. “Interest flooding attack and countermeasures in Named Data Networking.” IFIP Networking Conference, 2013. IEEE, 2013.
B. Ahlgren et al., ‘A Survery of Information-centric Networking’ IEEE Commun. Magazine, Jul. 2012, pp. 26-36.
Bari, MdFaizul, et al. ‘A survery of naming and routing in information-centric networks.’ Communications Magazine, IEEE 50.12 (2012): 44-53.
Baugher, Mark et al., “Self-Verifying Names for Read-Only Named Data”, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Mar. 2012, pp. 274-279.
Brambley, Michael, A novel, low-cost, reduced-sensor approach for providing smart remote monitoring and diagnostics for packaged air conditioners and heat pumps. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2009.
C.A. Wood and E. Uzun, “Flexible end-to-end content security in CCN,” in Proc. IEEE CCNC 2014, Las Vegas, CA, USA, Jan. 2014.
Carzaniga, Antonio, Matthew J. Rutherford, and Alexander L. Wolf. ‘A routing scheme for content-based networking.’ INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. vol. 2. IEEE, 2004.
Cho. Jin-Hee, Ananthram Swami, and Ray Chen. “A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 13.4 (2011): 562-583.
Compagno, Alberto, et al. “Poseidon: Mitigating interest flooding DDos attacks in named data networking.” Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2013 IEEE 38th Conference on. IEEE, 2013.
Conner, William, et al. “A trust management framework for service-oriented environments.” Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 2009.
Content Centric Networking Project (CCN) [online], http://ccnx.org/releases/latest/doc/technical/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Content Mediator Architecture for Content-aware Networks (COMET) Project [online], http://www.comet-project.org/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
D.K. Smetters, P. Golle, and J.D. Thornton, “CCNx access control specifications,” PARC, Tech. Rep., Jul. 2010.
Dabirmoghaddam. Ali, Maziar Mirzazad Barijough, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. ‘Understanding optimal caching and opportunistic caching at the edge of information-centric networks.’ Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2014.
Detti et al., “Supporting the Web with an information centric network that routes by name”, Aug. 2012, Computer Networks 56, pp. 3705-3702.
Dijkstra, Edsger W., and Carel S. Scholten. ‘Termination detection for diffusing computations.’ Information Processing Letters 11.1 (1980): 1-4.
Dijkstra, Edsger W., Wim HJ Feijen, and A_ J M. Van Gasteren. “Derivation of a termination detection algorithm for distributed computations.” Control Flow and Data Flow: concepts of distributed programming. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986. 507-512.
E. Rescorla and N. Modadugu, “Datagram transport layer security,” IETF RFC 4347, Apr. 2006.
E.W. Dijkstra, W. Feijen, and A.J.M. Van Gasteren, “Derivation of Termination Detection Algorithm for Distributed Computations,” Information Processing Letter, vol. 16, No. 5, 1983.
Fayazbakhsh, S. K., Lin, Y, Toontoonchian, A., Ghodsi, A., Koponen, T., Maggs, B., & Shenker, S. (Aug. 2013). Less pain, most of the gain: Incrementally deployable ICN. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 147-158), ACM.
G. Tyson, S. Kaune, S. Miles, Y. El-Khatib, A. Mauthe, and A. Taweel. “A trace-driven analysis of caching in content-centric networks,” in Proc. IEEE ICCCN 2012, Munich, Germany, Jul.-Aug. 2012, pp. 1-7.
G. Wang, Q. Liu, and J. Wu, “Hierarchical attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control in cloud storage services,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2010, Chicago, IL, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737.
G. Xylomenos et al., “A Survery of Information-centric Networking Research,” IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials, Jul. 2013.
Garcia, Humberto E., Wen-Chiao Lin, and Semyon M. Meerkov. “A resilient condition assessment monitoring system.” Resilient Control Systems (ISRCS), 2012 5th International Symposium on. IEEE, 2012.
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Jose J. ‘A unified approach to loop-free routing using distance vectors or link states.’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 19. No. 4. ACM, 1989.
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Jose J. ‘Name-Based Content Routing in Information Centric Networks Using Distance Information’ Proc ACM ICN 2014, Sep. 2014.
Ghali, Cesar, GeneTsudik, and Ersin Uzun, “Needle in a Haystack: Mitigating Content Poisoning in Named-Data Networking.” Proceedings of NDSS Workshop on Security of Emerging Networking Technologies (SENT). 2014.
Ghodsi, Ali, et al. “Information-centric networking: seeing the forest for the trees.” Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, 2011.
Ghodsi, Ali, et al. “Naming in content-oriented architectures.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking. ACM, 2011.
Gupta, Anjali, Barbara Liskov, and Rodrigo Rodrigues. “Efficient Routing for Peer-to-Peer Overlays.” NSDI. vol. 4. 2004.
Heckerman, David, John S. Breese, and Koos Rommelse. “Decision-Theoretic Troubleshooting.” Communications of the ACM. 1995.
Heinemeier, Kristin, et al. “Uncertainties in Achieving Energy Savings from HVAC Maintenance Measures in the Field.” ASHRAE Transactions 118.Part 2 {2012).
Herlich, Matthias et al., “Optimizing Energy Efficiency for Bulk Transfer Networks”, Apr. 13, 2010, pp. 1-3, retrieved for the Internet: URL:http://www.cs.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/informationik/ag-karl/publications/miscellaneous/optimizing.pdf (retrieved on Mar. 9, 2012).
Hoque et al., ‘NLSR: Named-data Link State Routing Protocol’, Aug. 12, 2013, ICN 2013, pp. 15-20.
https://code.google.com/p/ccnx-trace/.
I. Psaras, R.G. Clegg, R. Landa, W.K. Chai, and G. Pavlou, “Modelling and evaluation of CCN-caching trees,” in Proc. IFIP Networking 2011, Valencia, Spain, May 2011, pp. 78-91.
Intanagonwiwat, Charlerrnek, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. ‘Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks.’ Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 2000.
J. Aumasson and D. Bernstein, “SipHash: a fast short-input PRF”, Sep. 18, 2012.
J. Hur, “Improving security and efficiency in attribute-based data sharing,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng., vol. 25, No. 10, pp. 2271-2282, Oct. 2013.
V. Jacobson et al., ‘Networking Named Content,’ Proc. IEEE CoNEXT '09, Dec. 2009.
Jacobson, Van et al., “Content-Centric Networking, Whitepaper Describing Future Assurable Global Networks”, Palo Alto Research Center, Inc., Jan. 30, 2007, pp. 1-9.
Jacobson et al., “Custodian-Based Information Sharing,” Jul. 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine: vol. 50 Issue 7 (p. 3843).
Ji, Kun, et al. “Prognostics enabled resilient control for model-based building automation systems.” Proceedings of the 12th Conference on International Buildng Performance Simulation Association. 2011.
K. Liang, L. Fang, W. Susilo, and D.S. Wong, “A Ciphertext-policy attribute-based proxy re-encryption with chosen-ciphertext security,” In Proc. INCoS 2013, Xian, China, Sep. 2013, pp. 552-559.
Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part I.” HVAC&R Research 11.1 (2005): 3-25.
Katipamula, Srinivas, and Michael R. Brambley. “Review article: methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systemsa review, Part II.” HVAC&R Research 11.2 (2005): 169-187.
Koponen, Teemu et al., “A Data-Oriented (and Beyond) Network Architecture”, SIGCOMM '07, Aug. 27-31, 2007, Kyoto, Japan, XP-002579021, p. 181-192.
L. Wang et al., ‘OSPFN: An OSPF Based Routing Protocol for Named Data Networking,’ Technical Report NDN-0003, 2012.
L. Zhou, V. Varadharajan, and M. Hitchens. “Achieving secure role-based access control on encrypted data in cloud storage,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 1947-1960, Dec. 2013.
Li, Wenjia, Anupam Joshi, and Tim Finin. “Coping with node misbehaviors in ad hoc networks: A multi-dimensional trust management approach.” Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2010 Eleventh International Conference on IEEE, 2010.
Lopez, Javier, et al. “Trust management systems for wireless sensor networks: Best practices.” Computer Communications 33.9 (2010): 1086-1093.
M. Green and G. Ateniese, “Indentity-based proxy re-encryption,” in Proc. ACNS 2007, Zhuhai, China, Jun. 2007, pp. 288-306.
M. Ion, J. Zhang, and E.M. Schooler, “Toward content-centric privacy in ICN: Attribute-based encryption and routing,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 39-40.
M. Naor and B. Pinkas “Efficient trace and revoke schemes,” in Proc. FC 2000, Anguilla, British West Indies, Feb. 2000, pp. 1-20.
M. Nystrom, S. Parkinson, A. Rusch, and M. Scott, “PKCS#12: Personal informational exchange syntax v. 1.1,” IETF RFC 7292, K. Moriarty, Ed., Jul. 2014.
M. Parsa and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. “A Protocol for Scalable Loop-free Multicast Routing.” IEEE JSAC, Apr. 1997.
M. Walfish, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Shenker, “Untangling the web from DNS,” in Proc. USENIX NSDI 2004, Oct. 2010, pp. 735-737.
Mahadevan, Priya, et al. “Orbis: rescaling degree correlations to generate annotated internet topologies.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 37. No. 4. ACM, 2007.
Mahadevan, Priya, et al. “Systematic topology analysis and generation using degree correlations.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. vol. 36. No. 4. ACM, 2006.
Matocha, Jeff, and Tracy Camp. ‘A taxonomy of distributed termination detection algorithms.’ Journal of Systems and Software 43.3 (1998): 207-221.
Matteo Varvello et al., “Caesar: A Content Router for High Speed Forwarding”, ICN 2012, Second Edition on Information-Centric Networking, New York, Aug. 2012.
McWilliams, Jennifer A., and Iain S. Walker. “Home Energy Article: A Systems Approach to Retrofitting Residential HVAC Systems.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2005).
Merindol et al., “An efficient algorithm to enable path diversity in link state routing networks”, Jan. 10, Computer Networks 55 (2011), pp. 1132-1140.
Mobility First Project [online], http://mobilityfirst.winlab.rutgers.edu/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Narasimhan, Sriram, and Lee Brownston. “HyDE—A General Framework for Stochastic and Hybrid Modelbased Diagnosis.” Proc. DX 7 (2007): 162-169.
NDN Project [online], http://www.named-data.net/, Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Omar, Mawloud, Yacine Challal, and Abdelmadjid Bouabdallah. “Certification-based trust models in mobile ad hoc networks: A survey and taxonomy.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 35.1 (2012): 268-286.
P. Mahadevan, E. Uzun, S. Sevilla, and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “CCN-krs: A key resolution service for con,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information-centric Networking. Ser. INC 14 New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 97-106 [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2660129.2660154.
S. Deering, “Multicast Routing in Internetworks and Extended LANs,” Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88, Aug. 1988.
S. Deering et al., “The PIM architecture for wide-area multicast routing,” IEEE/ACM Trans, on Networking, vol. 4, No. 2, Apr. 1996.
S. Jahid, P. Mittal, and N. Borisov, “EASIER: Encryption-based access control in social network with efficient revocation,” in Proc. ACM ASIACCS 2011, Hong Kong, China, Mar. 2011, pp. 411-415.
S. Kamara and K. Lauter, “Cryptographic cloud storage,” in Proc. FC 2010, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, Jan. 2010, pp. 136-149.
S. Kumar et al. “Peacock Hashing: Derministic and Updatable Hashing for High Performance Networking,” 2008, pp. 556-564.
S. Misra, R. Tourani, and N.E. Majd, “Secure content delivery in information-centric networks: Design, Implementation, and analyses,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ICN 2013, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2013, pp. 73-78.
S. Yu, C. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou, “Achieving secure, scalable, and fine-grained data access control in cloud computing,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2010, San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2010, pp. 1-9.
S.J. Lee, M. Gerla, and C. Chiang, “On-demand Multicast Routing Protocol in Multihop Wirelss Mobile Networks,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 7, No. 6, 2002.
Scalable and Adaptive Internet Solutions (SAIL) Project [online], http://sail-project.eu/ Downloaded Mar. 9, 2015.
Schein, Jeffrey, and Steven T. Bushby. A Simulation Study of a Hierarchical, Rule-Based Method for System-Level Fault Detection and Diagnostics in HVAC Systems. US Department of Commerce.[Technology Administration]. National Institute of Standards and Technlogy, 2005.
Shani, Guy, Joelle Pineau, and Robert Kaplow. “A survey of point-based POMDP solvers.” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 27.1 (2013): 1-51.
Sheppard, John W., and Stephyn GW Butcher. “A formal analysis of fault diagnosis with d-matrices.” Journal of Electronic Testing 23.4 (2007): 309-322.
Shneyderman, Alex et al., ‘Mobile VPN: Delivering Advanced Services in Next Generation Wireless Systems’, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 3-29.
Solis, Ignacio, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. ‘Robust content dissemination in disrupted environments.’ proceedings of the third ACM workshop on Challenged networks. ACM, 2008.
Sun, Ying, and Daniel S. Weld. “A framework for model-based repair.” AAAI. 1993.
T. Ballardie, P. Francis, and J. Crowcroft, “Core Based Trees (CBT),” Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88, Aug. 1988.
T. Dierts, “The transport layer security (TLS) protocol version 1.2,” IETF RFC 5246, 2008.
T. Koponen, M. Chawla, B.-G. Chun, A. Ermolinskiy, K.H. Kim, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica, ‘A data-oriented (and beyond) network architecture,’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 181-192, Oct. 2007.
V. Goyal, 0. Pandey, A. Sahai, and B. Waters, “Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data,” in Proc. ACM CCS 2006, Alexandria, VA, USA, Oct.-Nov. 2006, pp. 89-98.
V. Jacobson, D.K. Smetters, J.D. Thornton, M.F. Plass, N.H. Briggs, and R.L. Braynard, ‘Networking named content,’ in Proc. ACM CoNEXT 2009, Rome, Italy, Dec. 2009, pp. 1-12.
Varma, Vandi, Joquin Fernandez, and Reid Simmons. “Probabilistic models for monitoring and fault diagnosis.” The Second IARP and IEEE/RAS Joint Workshop on Technical Challenges for Dependable Robots in Human Environments. Ed. Raja Chatila. Oct. 2002.
Vutukury, Srinivas, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A simple approximation to minimum-delay routing. vol. 29. No. 4. ACM, 1999.
W.-G. Tzeng, and Z.-J. Tzeng, “A public-key traitor tracing scheme with revocation using dynamic shares,” in Proc. PKC 2001, Cheju Island, Korea, Feb. 2001, pp. 207-224.
Waldvogel, Marcel “Fast Longest Prefix Matching: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications”, A dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2002.
Walker, Iain S. Best practices guide for residential HVAC Retrofits. No. LBNL-53592. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (US), 2003.
Wang, Jiangzhe et al., “DMND: Collecting Data from Mobiles Using Named Data”, Vehicular Networking Conference, 2010 IEEE, pp. 49-56 . . . .
Xylomenos, George, et al. “A survey of information-centric networking research.” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 16.2 (2014): 1024-1049.
Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘A case for stateful forwarding plane.’0 Computer Communications 36.7 (2013): 779-791.
Yi, Cheng, et al. ‘Adaptive forwarding in named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review 42.3 (2012): 62-67.
Zahariadis, Theodore, et al. “Trust management in wireless sensor networks.” European Transactions on Telecommunications 21.4 (2010): 386-395.
Zhang, et al., “Named Data Networking (NDN) Project”, http://www.parc.com/publication/2709/named-data-networking-ndn-project.html, Oct. 2010, NDN-0001, PARC Tech Report.
Zhang, Lixia, et al. ‘Named data networking.’ ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44.3 (2014): 66-73.
Soh et al., “Efficient Prefix Updates for IP Router Using Lexicographic Ordering and Updateable Address Set”, Jan. 2008, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 57, No. 1.
Beben et al., “Content Aware Network based on Virtual Infrastructure”, 2012 13th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering.
Biradar et al., “Review of multicast routing mechanisms in mobile ad hoc networks”, Aug. 16, Journal of Network$.
D. Trossen and G. Parisis, “Designing and realizing and information-centric internet,” IEEE Communications Magazing, vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 60-67, Jul. 2012.
Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al., “Automatic Routing Using Multiple Prefix Labels”, 2012, IEEE, Ad Hoc and Sensor Networking Symposium.
Gasti, Paolo et al., ‘DoS & DDoS in Named Data Networking’, 2013 22nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Aug. 2013, pp. 1-7.
Ishiyama. “On the Effectiveness of Diffusive Content Caching in Content-Centric Networking”, Nov. 5, 2012, IEEE, Information and Telecommunication Technologies (APSITT), 2012 9th Asia-Pacific Symposium.
J. Hur and D.K. Noh, “Attribute-based access control with efficient revocation in data outsourcing systers,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 1214-1221, Jul. 2011.
Kaya et al., “A Low Power Lookup Technique for Multi-Hashing Network Applications”, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on Emerging VLSI Technologies and Architectures, Mar. 2006.
Hoque et al., “NLSR: Named-data Link State Routing Protocol”, Aug, 12, 2013, ICN'13.
Nadeem Javaid, “Analysis and design of quality link metrics for routing protocols in Wireless Networks”, PhD Thesis Defense, Dec. 15, 2010, Universete Paris-Est.
English Translation of Office Action in counterpart Chinese Application No. 201510671892.2, dated Sep. 25, 2019, 10 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180324280 A1 Nov 2018 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14522479 Oct 2014 US
Child 16038255 US