System and method for customizing note flags

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10366153
  • Patent Number
    10,366,153
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 5, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 30, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A method and system for customizing note flags allows a user to change the look or “feel” of a note flag. A user can be provided with several options in order to create note flags that are visually distinguishable from one another. In this way, the note flags can be used to visually distinguish a first note or first set of notes from a second note or second set of notes. The method and system can also link note flags with a particular action or operation within a document editing module or with action or an operation in another application program relative to a document editing module. In other words, a note flag can initiate an operation in another application program or within the document editing module (or both) when a particular note flag is selected by a user.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to creating notes in electronic documents through typewritten text or handwritten text, and more specifically, it relates to marking notes with note flags and customizing these note flags so that some notes in a group of notes are visually distinguishable from the group.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

One of the simplest methods of recording and communicating information is the traditional method of writing the information down on a piece of paper with a writing instrument such as a pen. Writing information by hand on a piece of paper is inexpensive and can be done quickly and easily with little preparation. The traditional method is also flexible in that a writer can generally write in any format anywhere on the page. One of the limitations with handwritten work is that it is not easily manipulated or transferred to other contexts. In other words, changing or transferring a piece of handwritten text typically requires rewriting the text on another medium.


Handwritten notes are often rewritten with personal computers. Specifically, with the widespread use of personal computers, textual information often is recorded using word processing software running on a personal computer. The advantage of such electronic methods for recording information is that the information can be easily stored and transferred to other remote computing devices and electronic media. Such electronically recorded text can also be easily corrected, modified, and manipulated in a variety of different ways.


Typical computer systems, especially computer systems using graphical user interface (GUI) systems such as Microsoft WINDOWS, are optimized for accepting user input from one or more discrete input devices. Common input devices include a keyboard for entering text and a pointing device, such as a mouse with one or more buttons, for controlling the user interface. The keyboard and mouse interface facilitates creation and modification of electronic documents including text, spreadsheets, database fields, drawings, and photos.


One of the limitations with conventional GUI systems of computers is that a user must generally type the text they are entering into the personal computer using the keyboard. Entering text using a keyboard is generally slower and more cumbersome than handwriting. Although recent advances have been made in reducing the size of personal computers, they are still not as portable and easily accessible as traditional paper and pen. Furthermore, traditional pen and paper provide the user with considerable flexibility for editing a document, recording notes in the margin, and drawing figures and shapes. In some instances, a user may prefer to use a pen to mark-up a document rather than review the document on-screen because of the ability to freely make notes outside of the confines of the keyboard and mouse interface.


To address the shortcomings of traditional keyboard and mouse interfaces, there have been various attempts to create an electronic tablet that can record handwriting. Such electronic tablets typically comprise a screen and a handheld device that is similar to a pen (also referred to as a stylus). A user can manipulate the pen to write on the electronic tablet in a manner similar to the use of traditional pen and paper. The electronic tablet can “read” the strokes of the user's handwriting with the handheld device and render the handwriting in electronic form on the tablet's screen and/or the computer's display as “electronic ink”. This electronic tablet approach can be employed in a variety of ways including, on a personal computer and on a handheld computing device.


While the electronic tablet approach has overcome many of the shortcomings of traditional keyboard and mouse interfaces, the electronic tablet approach has not overcome some of the problems often associated with conventional handwritten techniques that employ pen and paper. For example, when notes are taken during a meeting by a user, the information contained in the notes may not be organized in a manner desired by the user. And the user may not have time during the meeting and during presentation of information to move or position notes being taken according to a user's desired organization. Further, an electronic tablet approach as well as traditional keyboard and mouse approaches also suffer from the problem of being able to visually distinguishing a first set of notes from a second set of notes that may be presented on a display device.


Specifically, while information is being recorded in the notes by a user, some notes of a set of notes may have various degrees of importance. Further, some notes of a set may require follow up actions by the user while the remaining notes are only taken to preserve information that is presented to a user.


With conventional pen and paper approaches, a user will typically develop his or her own personalized system for distinguishing certain types of notes from other types of notes. For example, a user may flag a note that requires further action of the user after the act of taking the note with a special character or symbol or graphical technique in order to make certain that a particular note “stands out” from other notes on a page of notes. Conventional electronic ink tablets and conventional keyboard and mouse approaches do not have a way to visually distinguish a first set of notes from a second set of notes presented on a display device.


The closest conventional technology for visually distinguishing data from other data may include tasks that are part of conventional appointments/task/e-mail management software such as the product Microsoft Outlook (the assignee of the present application). Tasks as well as e-mails in the Microsoft Outlook product can include flags that comprise icons in order to visually separate tasks from other tasks or e-mails from other e-mails. Specifically, for tasks, a check box icon can be marked with an “X” to designate that the task is complete. Alternatively, the check box icon can remain empty to indicate that the task associated with this check box icon is incomplete.


Similarly, e-mails can be associated with one or more predetermined and fixed icons that designate a particular status. For example, an e-mail may be associated with a “flag” icon to indicate to a user that follow up action is required for a particular e-mail. Also, an e-mail may be associated with an exclamation point character to indicate that a particular e-mail has a higher importance relative to other e-mails which may not have an exclamation point.


While tasks and e-mails of the Microsoft Outlook product may include these predetermined and fixed flags to visually distinguish a first set of data from another set of data, e-mails and tasks are usually presented in user interfaces that are separate from one another. That is, if a user is creating a task, then only task data can be displayed to the user. Similarly, if an e-mail is being created, only e-mails can be presented to the user. The conventional technology does not provide a way to present tasks and e-mails on the same page. Also, the conventional technology does not provide a way visually distinguish a first set of notes comprising various different categories of items from a second set of notes that may comprise various different sets of items.


Further, the conventional technology does not permit a user to customize or change the look or “feel” of flags that may be associated with a particular task or an e-mail. With the conventional technology, a user is forced to conform his or her notes to the predefined format of the flags such as the “flags” for following up e-mails and check boxes for task items.


In addition to the lack of customization for flags associated with notes, conventional technology does not link notes taken by a user with corresponding application program that may be needed to perform one or more notes taken by the user. For example, a user may create a note that reminds him or her to e-mail another person as a result of a meeting. After creating such a note, a user later opens up an e-mail application program in order to prepare the e-mail for the person identified in the note. If the user records several notes that pertain to different applications, then the user will need to open up as many corresponding separate application programs relative to the note recording application program.


Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a method and system for customizing note flags such that a user can customize the look or “feel” of a note flag. There is also a need in the art for a method and system that allows customization of note flags by providing a user with several options in order to create note flags that are visually distinguishable from one another. A further need exists in the art for a method and system that can link a note flag with a particular action of another application program. In other words, there is a need in the art for a note flag that can initiate an operation in another application program when the particular note flag is selected by a user.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention can comprise a method and system for customizing note flags. Note flags can include various ways to visually distinguish a first set of notes from a second set of notes presented on a display device. Meanwhile, notes can include type written characters, electronic ink, or any other types of characters that can be presented on a display device.


Exemplary note flags can include, but are not limited to, label names for a graphical icon, the shape or type of a graphical icon, a highlight color for the characters of a note, and a font color for one or more characters of a note. Note flags can visually set apart or identify a first set of notes from a second set of notes such that the first set of notes can have a unique or special meaning relative to other sets of notes that may be present on a particular page of notes on a display device.


For example, when notes are taken during a meeting by a user, the information contained in the notes may not be organized in a manner desired by the user. And the user may not have time during the meeting to move or position the notes according to his or her desired organization. With the present invention, a user can categorize information contained in notes as the notes are generated. Specifically, the user can use note flags as a way to categorize notes as they are created. Alternatively, after notes are created, a user can review existing notes and select notes to be flagged according to the features of the present invention.


With the present invention, a user can select from several different types of note flags. According to one exemplary embodiment, a user can select from nine different types of note flags. However, the present invention is not limited to this number of note flag types. A fewer or greater number of note flag types can be employed without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.


For each note flag type, a user can customize the look or “feel” of a note flag. Specifically, a user can assign a label name for a graphical icon associated with a note flag. A user can also select the highlight color as well as the font color for a particular note flag. And a user can also select and change a graphical icon associated with a particular note flag.


By customizing a note flag, a user can assign a particular meaning for each type of note flag. For example, a user could assign a first note flag type to indicate an action item to be completed by the user. The user could assign a second note flag type to indicate a calendar item that should be recorded on a personal calendar. For the first note flag, a user could select an icon comprising a square box that can be “checked” at a later time to indicate the action item has been completed. For the second note flag, a calendar icon can be assigned such that the user will recognize that any text or into adjacent to this “flag” should be recorded on a calendar.


In this way, as information is being recorded or created, a user can categorize his notes. Alternatively, after a user creates some notes, he can return to the existing notes and assign a particular note flag to them.


According to one exemplary embodiment, a user can customize a note flag by selecting options from a list or table of options. Specifically, a user can select the icon, highlight color, and font color associated with a particular note flag from a drop down menu that lists all available options for each of these note flag features. After selecting an option from a drop down menu, a preview of the selected option can be displayed prior to saving the option for a particular note flag.


A note flag can be activated by striking a predetermined key board combination. Alternatively, a note flag can be activated by selecting a command from a drop down menu. A note flag can also be activated by striking a button of a tool bar that services only note flags. And as another alternative, a note flag could be activated by recognizing an electronic ink gesture or a combination of letters associated with a particular note flag.


According to another aspect of the invention, a note flag can be linked with a particular action that can occur within the program supporting notes and the note flags or the note flag can be linked with action associated with another application, outside the application program supporting the notes and not flags. In other words, when a note flag is activated, it can initiate an operation within the current document supporting the notes or the note flag upon activation can initiate action in another application program.


For example, a user could associate a note flag with an action of taking a note and displaying it in a special window adjacent to a window that is currently receiving note data. As other non-limiting example, a user could associate a note flag with an e-mail operation that occurs in an application program outside of the application program supporting notes and note flags. When a particular note is “flagged” with this e-mail note flag, a new e-mail message could be generated where the note can be copied into the new e-mail message. The user could add more information to the e-mail message, select the recipients intended to receive the note, and then send the e-mail to the recipients.


As another non-limiting example of a note flag linked to an application program outside of the application program supporting note flags and notes, a user could associate a note flag with a calendar operation. When a particular note is marked with this calendar note flag, a new appointment could be generated in a calendar program where the note is copied into the subject of the new appointment. Date information could be automatically extracted from the note such that the new appointment reflects this extracted date information. The user could then identify the location of the appointment and other information as needed to complete the appointment before it is saved in the calendar program.


The aforementioned discussion of an e-mail item and calendar item are for illustrative purposes only. The present invention can link note flags to any type of action or functionality of another application program relative to the document editing program that can capture either electronic ink or typed text or both.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary operating environment for implementing various embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram depicting primary functional components of an exemplary free-form document editor and related input devices used to create notes.



FIG. 3 is an exemplary display screen that illustrates different types of notes that can be created with a stylus and hand movements as well as typewritten text generated with a keyboard.



FIG. 4 is an exemplary display screen that illustrates a note being selected from a set of notes according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary tool bar that lists different types of note flags that can be selected according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is an exemplary drop down menu that lists different types of note flags that can be selected according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 illustrates a keyboard and a combination of keys that can be selected to activate a particular note flag according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary display screen in which a handwritten gesture has been created in order to activate a particular note flag type according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 9 is an exemplary display screen that illustrates placement of a handwritten gesture to activate a particular note flag for a particular note desired by a user according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is an exemplary display screen that illustrates the activation of a particular note flag selected by a user for a particular note that is positioned within a group of notes on a display device according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 11 is an exemplary display screen that illustrates a response by another application program in connection with the activation of an exemplary e-mail note flag according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 12 is an exemplary display screen that illustrates how different types of note flags can visually distinguish a first set of notes from a second set of notes as well as visually distinguishing one set of note flags from another set of note flags according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 13 is an exemplary display screen that illustrates a note flag summary that extracts note flags and their associated text from a page of notes being created by a user according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 14 is an exemplary graphical user interface for customizing note flags according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 15 illustrates various sub menus that can be generated in response to selections made in the graphical user interface of FIG. 14 according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 16 is a logic flow diagram illustrating an overview of an exemplary process for marking notes with flag and for customizing these flags according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 17. is a logic flow diagram illustrating a sub method for formatting flags according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

A method and system for customizing note flags allows a user to change the look or “feel” of a note flag. A user can be provided with several options in order to create note flags that are visually distinguishable from one another. In this way, the note flags can be used to visually distinguish a first note or first set of notes from a second note or a second set of notes. The method and system can also link note flags with a particular action in an application program supporting the notes or the method and system could link note flags with action of another application program relative to a document editing module. In other words, when a note flag is activated, it can initiate an operation within the current document supporting the notes or the note flag upon activation can initiate action in another application program.


Exemplary Operating Environment


Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will hereinafter be described with reference to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements throughout the several figures. FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary operating environment for implementation of the present invention.


The exemplary operating environment includes a general-purpose computing device in the form of a conventional personal computer 120. Generally, the personal computer 120 includes a processing unit 121, a system memory 122, and a system bus 123 that couples various system components including the system memory 122 to the processing unit 121. The system bus 123 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The system memory includes a read-only memory (ROM) 124 and a random access memory (RAM) 125. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 126, containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within personal computer 120, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 124.


Personal computer 120 further includes a hard disk drive 127 for reading from and writing to a hard disk, not shown, a magnetic disk drive 128 for reading from or writing to a removable magnetic disk 129, and an optical disk drive 130 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 131 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media. Hard disk drive 127, magnetic disk drive 128, and optical disk drive 130 are connected to system bus 123 by a hard disk drive interface 132, a magnetic disk drive interface 133, and an optical disk drive interface 134, respectively.


Although the exemplary environment described herein employs hard disk 127, removable magnetic disk 129, and removable optical disk 131, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, Bernoulli cartridges, RAMs, ROMs, and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment. The drives and their associated computer readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-executable instructions, data structures, program modules, and other data for personal computer 120.


A number of program modules may be stored on hard disk 127, magnetic disk 129, optical disk 131, ROM 124, or RAM 125, including an operating system 135, an ink processing module 225, a stylus and ink module 228, and an electronic document 220. Program modules include routines, sub-routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., which perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Aspects of the present invention may be implemented in the form of a ink processing module 225 that can operate in concert with a stylus and ink module 228 to edit an electronic document 220.


A user may enter commands and information into personal computer 120 through input devices, such as a keyboard 140 and a pointing device 142. Pointing devices may include a mouse, a trackball, and an electronic pen that can be used in conjunction with an electronic tablet. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to processing unit 122 through a serial port interface 146 that is coupled to the system bus 123, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, game port, a universal serial bus (USB), or the like. A display device 147 may also be connected to system bus 123 via an interface, such as a video adapter 148. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers.


The personal computer 120 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers 149. Remote computer 149 may be another personal computer, a server, a client, a router, a network PC, a peer device, or other common network node. While a remote computer 149 typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the personal computer 120, only a memory storage device 150 has been illustrated in the Figure. The logical connections depicted in the Figure include a local area network (LAN) 151 and a wide area network (WAN) 152. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and the Internet.


When used in a LAN networking environment, the personal computer 120 is often connected to the local area network 151 through a network interface or adapter 153. When used in a WAN networking environment, the personal computer 120 typically includes a modem 154 or other means for establishing communications over WAN 152, such as the Internet. Modem 154, which may be internal or external, is connected to system bus 123 via serial port interface 146. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to personal computer 120, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device 150. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.


Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be implemented in other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor based or programmable consumer electronics, network person computers, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments, where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.


Referring to FIG. 2, an exemplary architecture 200 is illustrated for editing electronic ink in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 shows typical hardware and software components used in operating the invention from a functional perspective. Conventional input devices are represented by the keyboard 260 and the pointing device (mouse) 265. A user can enter commands and information into the computer 120 using the input devices. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, and scanner.


A conventional output device, such as monitor 270, is used to display information from the computer 120. Other output devices (not shown) can include a printer or speaker. Other hardware components shown in FIG. 2 include an electronic tablet 250 and an accompanying stylus 255. The tablet 250 and stylus 255 are used to input handwriting strokes which are converted to collections of data that can be represented as electronic ink. The electronic ink may be incorporated into an electronic document 220 and may be displayed on either the electronic tablet 250, the monitor 270, or both.


Although the electronic tablet 250 and the monitor 270 are illustrated as being distinct, in the preferred embodiment they are either coupled or form a single component. The joint tablet/monitor component has the ability to display information and receive input from the stylus 255. Also shown among the hardware components is a conventional electronic storage device such as a hard drive 127 or RAM 125.


In the representative architecture 200, all of the hardware components are coupled to an ink processing software module 225. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that FIG. 2 is merely representative and that in practice the hardware components typically are coupled to the elements shown in FIG. 1. The ink processing module 225 is operable for receiving data from the electronic tablet 250 and/or the stylus 255 and rendering that data as electronic ink. In the preferred and exemplary embodiment, the ink processing module 225 is a collection of software modules that perform different tasks for rendering handwriting strokes as electronic ink.


For example, the stylus and ink module 228 can receive data describing the positions and angles of the stylus for a series of handwriting strokes. The stylus and ink module 228 can interpret the data for rendering electronic ink. Other software modules, such as a gesture recognizer 230 and word recognizer 235 can be designed to identify certain handwriting strokes and assign them a particular significance. For example, certain gestures such as a cross-out may be recognized and associated with other editing processes. The ink processing module 225 can also include an erasing functions module 240 for removing electronic ink that has been previously rendered.


Although ink processing modules are known in the art and necessary for an electronic tablet to function, what is needed is a document editing module 205, such as the one shown in FIG. 2, that enhances the performance of an electronic tablet. Specifically, document editing module 205 facilitates the manipulation of electronic ink so that a user can create and manipulate an electronic document 220 with greater ease and sophistication. The document editing module 205 can comprise a table of options 201 for container features. A container can refer to a body of data that comprises the formatting for a particular note flag.


When the document editing module 205 needs to determine the current properties for a particular container comprising the formatting of a particular note flag, the document editing module 205 accesses the registry keys 207 of the windows operating system 135. The registry keys 207 contain the current properties of a particular note flag. The properties of note flags will be discussed in further detail below. The windows operating system 135 can comprise a graphical user interface (GUI) manager 209. The GUI manager 209 in combination with the document editing module 205 comprising the options table 211 can generate the note flag customization GUI 1400 as will be discussed in further detail below.


The document editing module 205 can also be operatively linked to other application programs 211, such as action item programs, e-mail programs, calendar programs and the like. The document editing module can use application programming interfaces (APIs) (not shown) to form this link. With the APIs, the document editing module 205 can make calls to other application programs in response to the “activation” of a note flag as will be discussed in further detail below with respect to one aspect of the present invention.


The document editing module 205 may further comprise a collection of software modules for controlling and manipulating electronic ink rendered on the monitor 270. For example, a parsing module 210 can be used to identify handwriting strokes that are selected by the user for editing. Selected strokes may by highlighted or shaded to assist the user in identifying which strokes are to be edited. A classifier module 215 can identify certain handwriting strokes as being part of a word or drawing. Software modules such as the layout module 216 and the insert space module 217 can be designed to control how electronic ink is rendered and moved. Other modules can include a selection manager 280, a context menu manager 285, a text input manager 295, and a user interface language input processor 297.


The selection manager 280 can monitor how converted text or electronic ink is selected for editing by the user. The context menu manager 285 can monitor the selection of a list of alternate words that can be displayed when a user edits a word in converted text. The text input manager 295 can operate as an interface for a user interface language input processor 297 that uses language rules to assist in the recognition of words through context.


The modules shown in FIG. 2 are representative and those skilled in the art should understand that other modules may also be part of or coupled to the document editing module 205. For example, the document editing module 205 may also work with a rich edit module 275 that provides added functionality such as monitoring and controlling the selection of text and word wrapping.


The present invention includes multiple computer programs which embodies the functions described herein and illustrated in the exemplary display screens and the appended flow chart. However, it should be apparent that there could be many different ways of implementing the invention in computer programming, and the invention should not be construed as limited to any one set of computer program instructions. Further, a skilled programmer would be able to write such a computer program to implement the disclosed invention without difficulty based on the exemplary display screens and flow charts and associated description in the application text, for example.


Therefore, disclosure of a particular set of program code instructions is not considered necessary for an adequate understanding how to make and use the invention. The inventive functionality of the claimed computer program will be explained in more detail in the following description in conjunction with the remaining Figures illustrating the functions and program flow.


Exemplary Display Screens in Graphical User Interfaces


Referring now to FIG. 3, this figure illustrates exemplary display screen 300 that comprises different types of notes 305 taken by a user during a meeting. A user can generate the different notes 305 with a stylus 255 and his or her hand 310 or with a keyboard 260 and a pointing device 265 such as mouse 142 or the like. Within the larger group of different types of notes 305 exist a first set of notes 315 and a second set of notes 320. The first set of notes can be generated with the stylus 255 and may comprise electronic ink while the second set of notes 320 can comprise typewritten text that are created with a keyboard 260.


While the large set of various notes 305 pertain to a meeting as illustrated by display screen 300, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other types of notes for recording information pertaining to activities or other purposes are not beyond the scope and spirit of the present invention. That is, the present invention can be used for an infinite number of purposes beyond that of recording information pertaining to a meeting.


Referring now to FIG. 4, this figure illustrates a display screen 300B where a note 400 concerning an e-mail action is selected by a user. The user can select the e-mail note 400 by pointing to it with the stylus 255 or by selecting the c-mail note 400 with a mouse pointer 415. Once the note 400 is selected by the user, a highlight bar 405 envelopes or surrounds the e-mail note 400 in order to inform the user that this note has been selected and is ready for further processing by the document editing module 205.


Once the e-mail note 400 is selected, a user can then select an appropriate note flag to visually distinguish the selected e-mail note 400 from the remaining notes 305 on the display screen 300B. According to the present invention, an appropriate note flag can be selected according to a variety of methods.


Referring now to FIG. 5, this figure illustrates a tool bar 500 that lists different types of note flags that can be selected by a user. Each note flag type can comprise an icon and corresponding text. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the tool bar 500 can comprise either icons alone or text descriptions of note flag types alone.


For the exemplary embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5, three different note flag types 500 have been illustrated. A first note flag type comprises an action item 505 that can include a first icon 510 and a first text description 515. The first icon 510 can comprise a box with a check mark so that a user can form a type of check list with this particular type of note flag.


A second note flag type can comprise an e-mail item 520 that can include a second icon 525 and a second text description 530. The second icon 525 can comprise a graphic that illustrates an envelope so that a user can associate mail with this particular icon. The second text description can comprise the text “e-mail item.”


The third note flag type can comprise a calendar item 535 that can include a third icon 540 and a third text description 545. The third icon 540 can comprise a graphic that represents a calendar while the third text description 545 can comprise the text “calendar item.” Those skilled in the art recognize that a fewer number or a greater number of note flag types can be employed without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. As will be discussed below, the user can customize or change the icon and corresponding textual description of a note flag as well as the highlight color of the characters of a note, as well as the font color of one or more characters of a note that can be flagged with a particular note flag.


The tool bar 500 can be displayed simultaneously within an open electronic document on a display screen 300 which is supported by the document editing module 205. When a user wants to “flag” a particular note, a user can select the note flag type from the tool bar 500.


Alternatively, referring now to FIG. 6, this figure illustrates a drop down menu 600 that lists different types of note flags similar to the note flag types illustrated in FIG. 5. In addition to or as an alternative to a tool bar 500 of FIG. 5, a user can select note flags from the drop down menu 600 where the drop down menu 600 is part of a tool bar of the document editing module 205.


In addition to or alternative to FIG. 5 and FIG. 6, and referring now to FIG. 7, a combination of keys on a keyboard 260 can activate a particular note flag. For example, as illustrated, a control key 705 can be depressed simultaneously with a number one key 710 in order to activate a first type of note flag. The exemplary key combination of “control-one” can be assigned to a first note flag such as the action item note flag 505 illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6. Similarly, other note flag types can be assigned different key combinations such as the “control-two” combination to activate a second note flag type.


According to one exemplary embodiment, a user can select from nine different types of note flags that can be assigned to nine different key combinations. However, the present invention is not limited to this number of note flag types. A fewer or greater number of note flag types can be employed without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. In addition to or in alternative to FIG. 5 through FIG. 7 discussed above, and referring now to FIG. 8, a user can activate a particular note flag by creating a gesture that is recognizable by an ink processing module 225 in order to activate a particular note flag type.


The exemplary embodiment illustrated in FIG. 8, the gesture 800 can be associated with the e-mail note flag 520 where the gesture 800 can comprise the letter “E” that is surrounded or circumscribed by a substantially square shaped box. When the user generates gesture 800 on the display screen 300C of the document editing module 205, the ink processing module 225 can associate this gesture 800 with a corresponding note flag such as the e-mail note flag 520 illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various and numerous types of gestures can be created and assigned by a user for each particular note flag type. According to one exemplary embodiment, a user can assign individual gestures 800 to correspond with respective note flag types that also can be customized or created by the user.


Referring now to FIG. 9, an exemplary display screen 300D is illustrated that shows a gesture 800 created by a user for a selected e-mail note 400. As noted above, a user can select notes and assign note flags to the notes after all the notes have been created or alternatively the user can “flag” notes as they are being created by a user. Therefore, for the example illustrated in FIG. 9, after the “draft document” note 900 is created, a user could then generate gesture 800 on the next line underneath the note 900 to indicate that the note data following the gesture 800 will be assigned this particular note flag that is activated by the gesture 800.


Referring now to FIG. 10, this figure illustrates an exemplary display screen 300E in which an activation of a note flag is illustrated. Specifically, in the exemplary display screen 300E, the selected e-mail note 400 has been “flagged” with the e-mail note flag type 505 by displaying the first icon 525 comprising an envelope adjacent to the selected note 400. The e-mail note flag type 520 has been formatted such that data of the selected note 400 is underlined by the line 1005. And for this particular e-mail note flag type 520, the highlight bar feature has been turned off or deactivated. In other words, a color has not been selected for the highlight bar or background option for this version of the e-mail note flag type 520.


Referring now to FIG. 11, this figure illustrates an exemplary display 1100 that can be generated in response to an activation of a particular note flag. Exemplary display 1100 can comprise a new e-mail message that is generated in response to the activation of the selected e-mail note flag. In other words, exemplary display 1100 that comprises an unsent, new-e-mail can correspond to the activation of an e-mail note flag type such as the ones illustrated in FIGS. 5, 6 and 8. The content of the selected e-mail note 400 that corresponds to the e-mail note flag 520 has been copied and pasted into the subject line 1105 of the unsent, new e-mail message. By generating display 1100 and presenting it immediately after tagging a particular note, a workload of a user can be significantly reduced. Similarly, when a note flag is activated, it can initiate an operation within the current document supporting the notes instead of or in addition to initiating an operation in another application program. For example, a user could associate a note flag with an action of taking a note and displaying it in a special window adjacent to a window that is currently receiving note data.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate that initiating an operation within a document editing application program or in an application program other than a document editing application program with a note flag can be efficient in some instances while in other instances such activation of a note flag may be counter productive. For example, if a user was taking notes during a meeting, it may be counterproductive to initiate an operation in another application program such as an e-mail messaging program or opening a modal feature within the document editing program while the user is trying to record notes of a meeting. Therefore, this particular feature of initiating an operation within the document editing program or in an other application program with a note flag can be turned off or such functionality can be assigned to a special tool bar in which a user can select after notes have been “flagged” in order to initiate the operations.


Those skilled in the art also recognize that the present invention is not limited to associating a note flag with an e-mail operation. As mentioned previously, a user can associate a note flag with a calendar operation or operations within the application program supporting the notes and note flags. The aforementioned e-mail item and calendar item operations associated with a particular note flag are also for illustrative purposes only. The present invention can link note flags to any types of action or functionality of within the document editing module 205 or another application program relative to the document editing module 205 that can capture either electronic ink or typed text or both.


Referring now to FIG. 12, this figure illustrates an exemplary display 300F in which several different notes have been “flagged” with different types of note flags. A “draft document” note 900 has been flagged with the third icon 540 and has been circumscribed or enveloped by a highlight bar 1210 and underlined with a line 1205 to indicate that this first note 900 is a calendar item. This means, for each note that is designated by a user as a calendar item, the corresponding note will be associated with the third icon 540. And the note data for the “calendar item” will be highlighted or enveloped or circumscribed by highlight bar 1210 and underlined with a line 1205.


Similarly, and as noted above, the second e-mail note 400 has been “flagged” with the second icon 525 and has been underlined by a second line 1215 to indicate that the second note 400 is an e-mail item.


For the third note 1220, the first icon 510 has been used to flag this note in order to indicate visually that this third note 1220 is an action item. A fourth icon 1225 has also been used to flag a fourth note 1230 to indicate that this note 1230 is an “open” or “uncompleted” action item meaning that the fourth icon 1225 does not include a “check” mark. After the user completes the action required by the fourth note 1230, the fourth icon 1225 can be “checked” by the user such that it transforms itself into the first icon 510. It is noted that for the second e-mail note 400, the highlight bar or highlight feature is not activated or has been turned off by user. Similarly, for the third note 1220 and fourth note 1230, a user did not activate or the user turned off the highlight bar features as well as the underline feature. While not illustrated in the present figure, the highlight color as well as the text color “particular” note flag type can be selected by a user. Further details of these aspects will be described with respect to FIGS. 14 and 15 discussed below.


Referring now to FIG. 13, this figure illustrates an exemplary display 1300 comprising a note flag summary where only notes that have been flagged by the user are displayed. Exemplary display 1300 is generated by extracting the flagged notes from the exemplary display 300F of FIG. 12 and the associated note data. The other notes which are not flagged in FIG. 12 such as the “attendees” and “various aspects” notes are not displayed in the note flag summary since they were not “flagged” with note flags.


According to one exemplary aspect of the present invention, a user could initiate an operation in another application program by “double clicking” on the notes contained within the note flag summary display 1300. In this way, when a user is generating notes that are part of the display 300F illustrated in FIG. 12, the operations associated with each particular flag selected by the user are only carried out when the user selects the notes or note flags from the note flag summary display 1300. In this way, a user can control the initiation of an operation in another application program while creating a series or set of notes.


Referring now to FIG. 14, this figure illustrates a graphical user interface (GUI) 1400 for customizing note flags that can be generated by the document editing module 205 working with the graphical user interface manager 209. The GUI 1400 can comprise a note flag selection button 1405 in which a user can select a particular note flag out of the nine available note flags in order to customize the note flag icon 540 as well as the textual description 515 of a note flag. To change the text description 515 of a particular note flag, the user can insert text within a box 1412 and then select a change text button 1410.


The graphical user interface may further comprise a symbol change button 1415, a text highlight color change button 1420 and a text color change button 1425. The text highlight color change button 1420 permits a user to select a color of a highlight bar after the note has been “flagged” with a particular note flag. The text color change button 1425 permits a user to select a color of the text of note after the note has been “flagged” with a particular note flag. After selecting a format for a particular feature of a note flag, a preview screen 1430 can illustrate what a particular note flag will look like after the various features have been selected.


Referring now to FIG. 15, this figure illustrates various submenus 1505, 1510, and 1515 that can be generated in response to selecting the symbol of change button 1415, the text highlight color change button 1420, and text color change button 1425 of FIG. 14. Specifically the first submenu 1505 can comprise the various options for changing the symbol or icon associated with a particular note flag. The submenu 1505 can further comprise a “create own” option 1520 in which a user can create his or her own unique symbol or icon to be associated with a particular note flag. Upon selecting the “create own” option 1520, the user can specify a file location for the icon or symbol to be associated with the selected note flag.


The second submenu 1510 can comprise various colors that can be selected by a user for a highlight bar that will be applied to text adjacent to a selected note flag. The third submenu 1515, can comprise various colors for text of a note when a particular note flag is activated. Those skilled in the art will recognize that additional formatting options are not beyond the scope and spirit of the present invention. As explained above with respect to some previous figures, a user could select the font for text when a note is “flagged” with a particular note flag. For example, the text of a particular note could be bolded or underlined when a note flag is activated.


Exemplary Method for Tagging Notes and Customizing Note Flags


Certain steps in the processes described below must naturally precede others for the present invention to function as described. However, the present invention is not limited to the order of the steps described if such order or sequence does not alter the functionality of the present invention. That is, it is recognized that some steps may be performed before or after other steps or in parallel with other steps without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.


Referring now to FIG. 16, this figure illustrates an exemplary method 1600 for marking notes with note flags and customizing note flags. The method or process 1600 starts with a first step 1605 in which a document editing module 205 receives note data from an input device such as a tablet 250 or keyboard 360. Note data can comprise at least one of typewritten text as well as handwritten text in the form of electronic ink. Next, in step 1610, the document editing module 205 can detect whether a flag gesture 800 has been created or if a note flag command has been selected by user. If the inquiry to decision step 1610 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed back to step 1605. If the inquiry to decision step 1610 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1615 in which the document editing module 205 retrieves the particular features of a selected note flag from the registry keys 207 stored within the windows operating system 135.


Next, in step 1620, the document editing module can modify the text or ink as needed corresponding to a selected note or insertion point in accordance with the note flag features retrieved from the registry keys 207. Specifically, note data that already exists can be selected or “flagged”, and then the document editing module 205 can modify the text or ink of the note data according features of the selected note flag. However, if note data does not exist, when a note flag is selected, the subsequent note data positioned after the note flag will be formatted according to the features of the selected note flag.


In step 1625, the documenting editing module 205 can display the icon for the selected note flag adjacent to the existing note data. Alternatively, if note data has not been created, the icon for the selected note flag can be positioned proximate to the last insertion point.


Next in step 1630, the document editing module 205 can update the note flag summary display 1300 with the note data corresponding to the selected note flag. In decision step 1635, the document editing module 205 can determine whether a user has selected to display the note flag summary 1300. If the inquiry to decision step 1635 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1640. In step 1640, the note flag summary 1300 is displayed.


If the inquiry to decision step 1635 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed to decision step 1645 in which it is determined whether the selected note flag is linked to an operation within the document editing module 205 or within another application program (or both). For decision step 1645, this step can also correspond to whether the user desires a particular note flag to initiate an operation within the document editing module 205 or within another application program relative to the document editing module 205. As noted above, according to one aspect of the present invention, the note flags displayed in the note flag summary display 1300 can be “hot” links that can initiate operations within the document editing module 205 or in other application programs relative to the document editing module 205.


If the inquiry to decision step 1645 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1650 in which the document editing module 205 can initiate commands within the document editing module 205 or make calls to APIs for a particular application program outside of the document editing module. The APIs can then initiate the action in another application program relative to the document editing module 205 and corresponding to a selected note flag. If the inquiry to decision step 1645 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed to decision step 1655.


In decision step 1655, the document editing module 205 determines whether a format note flag change command has been selected by a user. If the inquiry to decision step 1655 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed in which the process ends.


If the inquiry to decision step 1655 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1660 in which the note flag customization GUI 1400 as illustrated in FIG. 14 is displayed. Next, in decision step 1665, it is determined whether a particular note flag has been selected. If the inquiry to decision step 1655 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed to decision step 1690. If the inquiry to decision step 1655 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to routine 1670.


In routine 1670, the formatting options for the selected note flag are retrieved by the document editing module 205 and displayed. Selections made by the user are then received by the document editing module 205. Further details of routine 1670 will be discussed below with respect to FIG. 17.


After routine 1670, in step 1675, a preview 1430 of the newly formatted note flag is displayed with the graphical user interface 1400 as illustrated in FIG. 14. Next, in decision step 1680, it is determined whether the changes to the format of the selected note flag are desired to be saved. If the inquiry to decision step 1680 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed to decision step 1690. If the inquiry to decision step 1680 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1685 in which the formatting of the selected note flag is saved on a storage medium such as storage device 125 or 127.


Next, in decision step 1690, the document editing module 205 determines whether a user is finished with formatting note flags. If the inquiry to decision step 1690 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed back to step 1660. If the inquiry to decision step 1690 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed in which the process then ends.


Referring now to FIG. 17, this figure illustrates an exemplary submethod 1670 for display formatting options and receiving selections for formatting note flags according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Routine 1670 starts with decision step 1705 in which it is determined whether a change icon or symbol button 1415 has been selected. If the inquiry to decision step 1705 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1710 in which an icon option table or submenu 1505 is displayed. Next, in step 1715, it is determined whether an icon option has been selected from the submenu 1505. If the inquiry to decision step 1715 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed back to step 1710. If the inquiry to decision step 1715 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1720 in which the process returns to step 1675 in FIG. 16.


If the inquiry to decision step 1705 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed to decision step 1725 in which it is determined whether a change highlight button 1420 has been selected. If the inquiry to decision step 1725 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1730 in which the highlight option table or submenu 1510 is displayed. Next, in decision step 1735 it is determined whether a highlight option has been selected from the submenu 1510. If the inquiry to decision step 1735 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed back to step 1730. If the inquiry to decision step 1735 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1740 in which the process returns to step 1675 of FIG. 16.


If the inquiry to decision step 1725 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed to decision step 1745. In decision step 1745 it is determined whether the change text color button 1425 has been selected. If the inquiry to decision step 1745 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed to step 1760 in which the process returns to step 1675 of FIG. 16.


If the inquiry to decision step 1745 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1750 in which text color option table or submenu 1515 is displayed. Next, in decision step 1755 it is determined whether a text color option has been selected from the submenu 1515. If the inquiry to decision step 1755 is negative, then the “NO” branch is followed back to step 1750. If the inquiry to decision step 1755 is positive, then the “YES” branch is followed to step 1760 in which the process returns to step 1675 of FIG. 16. As noted above, those skilled in the art will recognize that other features or options for customizing the look and “feel” of note flags are not beyond the scope and spirit of the present invention.


Alternative Embodiments

In one exemplary embodiment not illustrated, a user can select or make the association between a note flag and a particular application program in which an operation will be carried out in response to activation of a note flag. That is, a user can assign an operation of an application program to a particular note flag. This means that a user can “customize” the operations associated with a particular note flag. Further, a user could also assign a series of operations similar to macros in response to the activation of a particular note flag. Those skilled in the art will recognize that any number of operations in application programs different from the document editing module 205 could be assigned to a particular note flag.


CONCLUSION

The method and system for customizing note flags allows a user to customize the look or “feel” of a note flag. A user is provided with several options in order to create note flags that are visually distinguishable from one another. The method and system also links note flags with a particular action within a program supporting the note flags such as the document editing module 205 or in another application program relative to a document editing module 205.

Claims
  • 1. A method for customizing note flags comprising: receiving, via a touch user interface coupled to a processing device, handwritten gestures defining a first note that is displayed within a note-taking application executing on the processing device and recognizing the handwritten gestures as text;receiving, via the touch user interface, a second note that is displayed within the note-taking application;receiving input indicating that both the first note and the second note are to be flagged, wherein the received input comprises indication of a first note type for the first note and a second note type, which is different from the first note type, for the second note, and wherein the both the first and second note types are selected from the group comprising a calendar item associated with a calendar application, an e-mail item associated with an e-mail application, and an action item associated with a task application;flagging, by the processing device, the first note with the first note type and the second note with the second note type;when the first and second notes are flagged: automatically linking the flagged first note with the application associated with the first note type;automatically linking the flagged second note with the application associated with the second note type; andautomatically associating the flagged first and second notes with a note flag summary of the note-taking application that comprises a singular listing of the flagged first and second notes;displaying in the singular listing the flagged first and second notes including the flagged first note in a typed text format;receiving a selection of the flagged first note from the singular listing and, when the selection of the flagged first note is received, opening the application associated with the first note type, including opening with the application associated with the first note type a first new content receiving document, and placing the content of the first note in typed text format within the first new content receiving document; andreceiving a selection of the flagged second note from the singular listing and, when the selection of the flagged second note is received, opening the application associated with the second note type, including opening with the application associated with the second note type a second new content receiving document, and placing the content of the second note within the second new content receiving document.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the flagging further comprises displaying an icon that is associated with the flagged note, wherein the icon is indicative of the note type.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising presenting selectable icon options for flagging of the note, and receiving selection of one of the selectable icon options, and wherein the displaying displays a selected icon option for the flagged note.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving selection of the flagged note within the note flag summary.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising initiating an operation in another application in response to the selection within the note flag summary.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving an ink gesture within the application, automatically processing the received ink gesture to determine a shape of the ink gesture, and wherein the flagging flags the note based on a determined shape of the ink gesture.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying, within the application, selectable options within a graphical user interface of the application that when selected are used to customize an operation related to at least one of: an appearance of a flagged note and a formatting of the flagged note.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising receiving selection of at least one of the selectable options, and wherein the flagging further comprises assigning properties to the flagged note based on the at least one of the selectable options that is selected.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the selectable options are presented in a table format.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving input to link the flagged note to a particular action within the application, and wherein the flagging associates the flagged note with the particular action in response to the received input to link the flagged note to the particular action.
  • 11. A processing device comprising: a touch user interface;at least one processor communicatively coupled to the touch user interface; anda memory operatively connected with the at least one processor, wherein the memory stores computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to execute a method that comprises: receiving, via the touch user interface, handwritten gestures defining a first note that is displayed within a note-taking application executing on the processor and recognizing the handwritten gestures as text;receiving, via the touch user interface, a second note that is displayed within the note-taking application;receiving input indicating that both the first note and the second note are to be flagged, wherein the received input comprises indication of a first note type for the first note and a second note type, which is different from the first note type, for the second note, and wherein both the first and second note types are selected from the group comprising a calendar item, an e-mail item, and an action item;flagging the first note with the first note type and the second note with the second note type;when the first and second note type are flagged: automatically linking the flagged first note with the application associated with the first note type;automatically linking the flagged second note with the application associated with the second note type; andautomatically associating the flagged first and second notes with a note flag summary of the note-taking application that comprises a singular listing of the flagged first and second notes;displaying in the singular listing the flagged first and second notes including the flagged first note in a typed text format;receiving a selection of the flagged first note from the singular listing and, when the selection of the flagged first note is received, opening the application associated with the first note type, including opening with the application associated with the first note type a first new content receiving document, and placing the content of the first note in typed text format within the first new content receiving document; andreceiving a selection of the flagged second note from the singular listing and, when the selection of the flagged second note is received, opening the application associated with the second note type, including opening with the application associated with the second note type a second new content receiving document, and placing the content of the second note within the second new content receiving document.
  • 12. The processing device of claim 11, wherein the respective application associated with the first note type or the second note type opens automatically when linked with the flagged first or second note.
  • 13. An article of manufacture in the form of computer readable media storing instructions, wherein when the instruction are executed by a computing device, the computing device performs: receiving, via a touch user interface of the computing device, handwritten gestures defining a first note that is displayed within a note-taking application executing on the processing device and recognizing the handwritten gestures as text;receiving, via the touch user interface, a second note that is displayed within the note-taking application;receiving input indicating that both the first note and the second note are to be flagged, wherein the received input comprises indication of a first note type for the first note and a second note type, which is different from the first note type, for the second note, and wherein the both the first and second note types are selected from the group comprising a calendar item associated with a calendar application, an e-mail item associated with an e-mail application, and an action item associated with a task application;flagging, by the processing device, the first note with the first note type and the second note with the second note type;when the first and second notes are flagged: automatically linking the flagged first note with the application associated with the first note type;automatically linking the flagged second note with the application associated with the second note type; andautomatically associating the flagged first and second notes with a note flag summary of the note-taking application that comprises a singular listing of the flagged first and second notes;displaying in the singular listing the flagged first and second notes including the flagged first note in a typed text format;receiving a selection of the flagged first note from the singular listing and, when the selection of the flagged first note is received, opening the application associated with the first note type, including opening with the application associated with the first note type a first new content receiving document, and placing the content of the first note in typed text format within the first new content receiving document; andreceiving a selection of the flagged second note from the singular listing and, when the selection of the flagged second note is received, opening the application associated with the second note type, including opening with the application associated with the second note type a second new content receiving document, and placing the content of the second note within the second new content receiving document.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to application Ser. No. 10/387,287, filed Mar. 12, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,793,233, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CUSTOMIZING NOTE FLAGS.

US Referenced Citations (340)
Number Name Date Kind
4972496 Sklarew Nov 1990 A
5202828 Vertelney et al. Apr 1993 A
5252951 Tannenbaum et al. Oct 1993 A
5269014 Ogino Dec 1993 A
5493692 Theimer et al. Feb 1996 A
5530794 Luebbert Jun 1996 A
5537628 Luebbert Jul 1996 A
5544321 Theimer et al. Aug 1996 A
5548718 Siegel et al. Aug 1996 A
5555376 Theimer et al. Sep 1996 A
5563996 Tchao Oct 1996 A
5577188 Zhu Nov 1996 A
5596656 Goldberg Jan 1997 A
5603054 Theimer et al. Feb 1997 A
5611050 Theimer et al. Mar 1997 A
5623681 Rivette et al. Apr 1997 A
5625783 Ezekiel et al. Apr 1997 A
5625810 Kurosu et al. Apr 1997 A
5701424 Atkinson Dec 1997 A
5703788 Shei et al. Dec 1997 A
5724595 Gentner Mar 1998 A
5734915 Roewer Mar 1998 A
5745910 Piersol et al. Apr 1998 A
5752254 Sakairi May 1998 A
5760768 Gram Jun 1998 A
5761683 Logan et al. Jun 1998 A
5765156 Guzak et al. Jun 1998 A
5778346 Frid-Nielsen et al. Jul 1998 A
5781192 Kodimer Jul 1998 A
5798760 Vayda et al. Aug 1998 A
5801693 Bailey Sep 1998 A
5812865 Theimer et al. Sep 1998 A
5838321 Wolf Nov 1998 A
5855006 Huemoeller et al. Dec 1998 A
5867150 Bricklin et al. Feb 1999 A
5870522 Strolle et al. Feb 1999 A
5870552 Dozier et al. Feb 1999 A
5884306 Bliss et al. Mar 1999 A
5898434 Small et al. Apr 1999 A
5924099 Guzak et al. Jul 1999 A
5940078 Nagarajayya et al. Aug 1999 A
5958008 Pogrebisky et al. Sep 1999 A
5970455 Wilcox et al. Oct 1999 A
5970466 Detjen et al. Oct 1999 A
5999938 Bliss et al. Dec 1999 A
6002402 Schacher Dec 1999 A
6025837 Matthews, III et al. Feb 2000 A
6034686 Lamb et al. Mar 2000 A
6038378 Kita et al. Mar 2000 A
6057845 Dupouy May 2000 A
6065012 Balsara et al. May 2000 A
6108688 Nielsen Aug 2000 A
6177939 Blish et al. Jan 2001 B1
6232970 Bodnar et al. May 2001 B1
6233591 Sherman et al. May 2001 B1
6243713 Nelson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6243838 Liu et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249283 Ur Jun 2001 B1
6262724 Crow et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269187 Frink et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269389 Ashe Jul 2001 B1
6275940 Edwards et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278450 Arcuri et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279014 Schilit Aug 2001 B1
6282548 Burner et al. Aug 2001 B1
6308201 Pivowar et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309305 Kraft Oct 2001 B1
6310622 Asente Oct 2001 B1
6310634 Bodnar et al. Oct 2001 B1
6321242 Fogg et al. Nov 2001 B1
6389434 Rivette et al. May 2002 B1
6408403 Rodrigues et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411311 Rich et al. Jun 2002 B1
6429882 Abdelnur et al. Aug 2002 B1
6433801 Moon et al. Aug 2002 B1
6448622 Franke et al. Sep 2002 B1
6448987 Easty et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457062 Pivowar et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459219 Antheunes et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459441 Perroux et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466232 Newell et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469722 Kinoe et al. Oct 2002 B1
6490634 Coiner Dec 2002 B2
6499041 Breslau et al. Dec 2002 B1
6513046 Abbott, III et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519730 Ando et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523139 Banning et al. Feb 2003 B1
6549219 Selker Apr 2003 B2
6549915 Abbott, III et al. Apr 2003 B2
6557120 Nicholson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6572660 Okamoto Jun 2003 B1
6606653 Ackermann, Jr. et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615246 Pivowar et al. Sep 2003 B2
6618732 White et al. Sep 2003 B1
6651059 Sundaresan et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665824 Ruhlen et al. Dec 2003 B1
6686938 Jobs et al. Feb 2004 B1
6691250 Chandiramani et al. Feb 2004 B1
6694087 Weaver Feb 2004 B1
6704770 Ramakesavan Mar 2004 B1
6708202 Shuman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6735247 Bates et al. May 2004 B2
6735347 Bates et al. May 2004 B1
6742141 Miller May 2004 B1
6747675 Abbott et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751777 Bates et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757362 Cooper et al. Jun 2004 B1
6763496 Hennings et al. Jul 2004 B1
6789228 Merril et al. Sep 2004 B1
6791580 Abbott et al. Sep 2004 B1
6801223 Abbott et al. Oct 2004 B1
6802041 Rehm Oct 2004 B1
6810405 LaRue et al. Oct 2004 B1
6812937 Abbott et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826729 Giesen et al. Nov 2004 B1
6836270 Du Dec 2004 B2
6842877 Robarts et al. Jan 2005 B2
6848075 Becker et al. Jan 2005 B1
6874099 Balasubramanian et al. Mar 2005 B1
6918091 Leavitt et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924797 MacPhail Aug 2005 B1
6925496 Ingram et al. Aug 2005 B1
6944821 Bates et al. Sep 2005 B1
6970867 Hsu et al. Nov 2005 B1
7000154 LeDuc et al. Feb 2006 B1
7024592 Voas et al. Apr 2006 B1
7032210 Alloing et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039234 Geidl et al. May 2006 B2
7058857 Dallin Jun 2006 B2
7058927 Yenne et al. Jun 2006 B2
7080287 Salem Jul 2006 B2
7096388 Singh et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099797 Richard Aug 2006 B1
7114128 Koppolu et al. Sep 2006 B2
7143338 Bauchot et al. Nov 2006 B2
7165098 Boyer et al. Jan 2007 B1
7168008 de Bonet Jan 2007 B2
7184955 Obrador et al. Feb 2007 B2
7185050 Eld et al. Feb 2007 B2
7188073 Tam et al. Mar 2007 B1
7210107 Wecker et al. Apr 2007 B2
7254785 Reed Aug 2007 B2
7313759 Sinisi Dec 2007 B2
7373603 Yalovsky et al. May 2008 B1
7406501 Szeto et al. Jul 2008 B2
7454763 Veselova et al. Nov 2008 B2
7460713 Lapstun et al. Dec 2008 B2
7490268 Keromytis et al. Feb 2009 B2
7555707 Labarge et al. Jun 2009 B1
7694214 Liu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707255 Satterfield et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707518 Veselova Apr 2010 B2
7712049 Williams et al. May 2010 B2
7716593 Durazo et al. May 2010 B2
7747557 Sareen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747966 Leukart et al. Jun 2010 B2
7774799 Sellers et al. Aug 2010 B1
7777729 Clary Aug 2010 B2
7788589 Frankel et al. Aug 2010 B2
7793233 Sellers et al. Sep 2010 B1
7797638 Dev Sareen et al. Sep 2010 B2
7853877 Giesen et al. Dec 2010 B2
8117542 Radtke et al. Feb 2012 B2
8146016 Himberger et al. Mar 2012 B2
8255828 Harris et al. Aug 2012 B2
8799808 Satterfield et al. Aug 2014 B2
9165290 Wessling Oct 2015 B2
20010032214 Bauchot et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010040590 Abbott et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010040591 Abbott et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010043231 Abbott et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010043232 Abbott et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020026478 Rodgers et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032689 Abbott, III et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044152 Abbott, III et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049785 Bauchot Apr 2002 A1
20020052930 Abbott et al. May 2002 A1
20020052963 Abbott et al. May 2002 A1
20020054130 Abbott, III et al. May 2002 A1
20020054174 Abbott et al. May 2002 A1
20020065074 Cohn et al. May 2002 A1
20020078180 Miyazawa Jun 2002 A1
20020078204 Newell et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080155 Abbott et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080156 Abbott et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083025 Robarts et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083158 Abbott et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087525 Abbott et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087534 Blackman et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087642 Wei et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020088008 Markel Jul 2002 A1
20020089540 Geier et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091739 Ferlitsch et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099777 Gupta et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099817 Abbott et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020120697 Generous et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020133520 Tanner Sep 2002 A1
20020138582 Chandra et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140731 Subramaniam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161800 Eld et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161804 Chiu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169841 Carlson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184264 Berg et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196293 Suppan et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030013483 Ausems et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014395 Ruvolo et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014490 Bates et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030020749 Abu-Hakima et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023755 Harris et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028856 Apuzzo et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046401 Abbott et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050927 Hussam Mar 2003 A1
20030069877 Grefenstette et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070143 Maslov Apr 2003 A1
20030076352 Uhlig et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030084104 Salem et al. May 2003 A1
20030088534 Kalantar et al. May 2003 A1
20030093757 Silverbrook May 2003 A1
20030097361 Huang et al. May 2003 A1
20030100999 Markowitz May 2003 A1
20030103071 Lusen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135565 Estrada Jul 2003 A1
20030154254 Awasthi Aug 2003 A1
20030154476 Abbott, III et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167318 Robbin et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172168 Mak et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172384 Comps Sep 2003 A1
20030182450 Ong et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187930 Ghaffar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030189601 Ben-Shachar Oct 2003 A1
20030196196 Nylander et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212680 Bates et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030222765 Curbow et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030222899 Alvesalo Dec 2003 A1
20040001093 Sellers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010933 Mertens et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039779 Amstrong et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040054736 Daniell et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040060044 Das et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040061716 Cheung et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040063400 Kim Apr 2004 A1
20040073679 Martens et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078686 Toyooka et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040098398 Ahn et al. May 2004 A1
20040109033 Vienneau et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128613 Sinisi Jul 2004 A1
20040139374 Meaney et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153445 Horvitz et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040158611 Daniell et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040168119 Liu et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040168133 Wynn Aug 2004 A1
20040172455 Green et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174392 Bjoernsen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040177122 Appelman et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040177319 Horn Sep 2004 A1
20040189694 Kurtz et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194025 Hubert et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194063 Pereira Sep 2004 A1
20040221243 Twerdahl et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230599 Moore et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243677 Curbow et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040243941 Fish Dec 2004 A1
20040267625 Feng et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267706 Springer et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268231 Tunning Dec 2004 A1
20040268263 Van Dok et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004989 Satterfield et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004990 Durazo et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005235 Satterfield et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005249 Hill et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010871 Ruthfield et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050034078 Abbott et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050055424 Smith Mar 2005 A1
20050064852 Baldursson Mar 2005 A1
20050081118 Cheston et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050097465 Giesen et al. May 2005 A1
20050102365 Moore et al. May 2005 A1
20050102607 Rousselle et al. May 2005 A1
20050102639 Dove May 2005 A1
20050108619 Theall et al. May 2005 A1
20050114521 Lee May 2005 A1
20050119018 Kim Jun 2005 A1
20050125717 Segal et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142528 Veselova Jun 2005 A1
20050149851 Mittal Jul 2005 A1
20050154761 Lee et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165795 Myka et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050166154 Wilson et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168154 Erickson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175089 Jung Aug 2005 A1
20050183008 Crider et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050188269 El-shimi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050208962 Kim Sep 2005 A1
20050233744 Karaoguz Oct 2005 A1
20050240590 Shimizu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245241 Durand Nov 2005 A1
20050262472 Wood et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050286414 Young et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289109 Arrouye et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060036945 Radtke et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036950 Himberger et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036965 Horn et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047704 Gopalakrishnan Mar 2006 A1
20060053379 Henderson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069603 Williams et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069604 Leukart et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069617 Milener et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074844 Frankel Apr 2006 A1
20060075347 Rehm Apr 2006 A1
20060075360 Bixler Apr 2006 A1
20060080609 Marggraff Apr 2006 A1
20060095452 Jansson et al. May 2006 A1
20060139709 Bifano et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060150008 Srinivas et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060150109 Schultz et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060190770 Harding Aug 2006 A1
20060195461 Lo et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070022372 Liu et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070081783 Chen et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070124325 Moore et al. May 2007 A1
20070156627 D'Alicandro Jul 2007 A1
20070156643 Sareen et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168278 Peterson et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168378 Sareen et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070245223 Siedzik et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245229 Siedzik et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245313 Hardy et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070298399 Shao Dec 2007 A1
20080097767 Milman et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098264 Day et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080115048 Veselova et al. May 2008 A1
20080115069 Veselova May 2008 A1
20080184075 Merriman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080184079 Merriman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20140006920 Li Jan 2014 A1
20140334732 Jung Nov 2014 A1
20150160734 Sugimura Jun 2015 A1
20150261919 Shiho Sep 2015 A1
20150317053 Baek Nov 2015 A1
20150338939 Vong Nov 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (51)
Number Date Country
2005202719 Dec 2010 AU
2510387 Dec 2013 CA
200510088531.1 Jul 2011 CN
101366021 Mar 2013 CN
201110127976.1 Dec 2014 CN
0569133 Nov 1993 EP
0986011 Mar 2000 EP
1223503 Jul 2002 EP
1376337 Feb 2004 EP
1420334 May 2004 EP
1536348 Jun 2005 EP
1630694 Mar 2006 EP
2391148 Jan 2004 GB
10-178500 Jun 1998 JP
11-120191 Apr 1999 JP
11259200 Sep 1999 JP
2001265753 Sep 2001 JP
2001-521251 Nov 2001 JP
2003058514 Feb 2003 JP
2004-500635 Jan 2004 JP
2004-178496 Jun 2004 JP
2006-60820 Mar 2006 JP
2006-515138 May 2006 JP
2007242326 Sep 2007 JP
2007-529822 Oct 2007 JP
5456322 Jan 2014 JP
20020029959 Apr 2002 KR
10-1150013 May 2012 KR
10-1292494 Jul 2013 KR
10-2008-7016322 Oct 2013 KR
147117 Oct 2012 MY
509861 Nov 2002 TW
1220722 Sep 2004 TW
1221240 Sep 2004 TW
I375174 Oct 2012 TW
WO9800787 Aug 1998 WO
0228059 Apr 2002 WO
02097672 Dec 2002 WO
WO2004038548 May 2004 WO
WO2004038548 May 2004 WO
WO2004038548 May 2004 WO
WO 2004086254 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2005001709 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005067328 Jul 2005 WO
2005089291 Sep 2005 WO
WO2005110010 Nov 2005 WO
2007080712 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007081783 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007081783 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007081786 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007081786 Jul 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (226)
Entry
“Microsoft: Windows XP-based Tablet PCs arrive with broad industry support; Next-generation mobile PC enables new levels of productivity for information workers”, Nov. 11, 2002. M2 Presswire; Coventry p. 1.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/420,621, filed Apr. 22, 2003, entitled “Creation and Recognition of Specially-Marked Items in Notes”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/387,287, filed Mar. 12, 2003, entitled “System and Method for Customizing Note Flags”.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/397,103.
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 23, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/420,621.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 6, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/664,740.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 12, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/387,287.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 13, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/420,621.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 7, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/387,287.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 20, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/420,621.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 19, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/397,103.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,954.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 13, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/664,740.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 16, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,309.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/387,287.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 5, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/420,621.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 7, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/397,103.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 7, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,309.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 10, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,232.
U.S. Official Action dated May 12, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/397,103.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 21, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/326,110.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/326,583.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 18, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,954.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 9, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/387,287.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 28, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,954.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 12, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,232.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 17, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/326,110.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 10, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/326,583.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,251.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/420,621.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,232.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/387,287.
U.S. Official Action dated May 20, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,598.
U.S. Official Action dated May 21, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/326,583.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,626.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,256.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 15, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/420,621.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 17, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,251.
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 7, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/326,110.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 14, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,232.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,598.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 23, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,251.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 4, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,256.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 7, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,256.
PCT Search Report dated Jun. 22, 2007 in PCT/US2007/000248.
PCT Search Report dated Jun. 22, 2007 in PCT/US2007/000244.
PCT Search Report dated Aug. 27, 2007 in PCT/US2007/007233.
PCT Search Report dated Sep. 21, 2007 in PCT/US2007/007231.
Chinese First Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2008 in 200510088531.1.
European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2009 in 07717882.0-1527/1977340.
European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2009 in 07717837.4-1527/1977339.
Mexican Official Action dated Feb. 20, 2009 in PA/a/2005/007147—English Translation Only.
European Examination Report dated Mar. 25, 2009 in 07717882.0-1527/1977340.
European Examination Report dated Apr. 1, 2009 in 07717837.4-1527/1977339.
Russian Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2009 in 2005120371.
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2009 in 200510088531.1.
European Examination dated Oct. 6, 2009 in 07717882.0-1527.
European Examination dated Oct. 6, 2009 in 07717837.4-1527.
Mexican Official Action dated Oct. 26, 2009 in PA/a/2005/007147.
Chinese First Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2009 in 200780001988.1.
Chinese First Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2009 in 200780001911.4.
Chinese Third Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2010 in 200510088531.1.
“External Style Sheets,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/10.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs.
“ID & Class Selectors, Pseudoclasses”, http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/7.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs.
“ID & Class Selectors, Pseudoclasses”, http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/8.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 2 pgs.
“ID & Class Selectors, Pseudoclasses,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/6.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs.
“Microsoft Office 2003 Editions Product Guide”, Internet Publication, Sep. 2003, 168 pp.
“Separate Structure and Presentation,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/1.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 4 pgs.
“Setting Reminders in Outlook”, California Lutheran University Information Systems and Services, Nov. 2005, 3 pp.
“The Style Attribute and CSS Declarations,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/2, Aug. 20, 1998, 4 pgs.
“The Style Element & CSS Selectors,” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/4.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs.
“What's Hot in Internet Services?” http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/3, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs.
“Accessibility Essentials 2 Authoring Accessible Documents—Inserting Hyperlinks: Linking internally within a document”, http://www.techdis.ac.uk/resources/sites/accessibilityessentials2/modules/authoring%20accessible%20docs/hyperlink%20internally.html, Date Unknown, 4 pp.
“Evermore Integrated Office if the ‘First Real Office’”, Evermore Software Ltd., 2001-2004, retrieved Jan. 24, 2007, http://web.archive.org/web/20040106195344/www.evermoresw.com/weben/product/eio_ . . . , 2 pp.
“Primary Windows,” http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/navigator/guidelines/primary.html, date unknown (printed Feb. 23, 2007, 23 pages.
“SOHO Notes Tour: Note-Taking”, http://www.chronosnet.com/Products/sohonotes/sn_notetaking.html, Date Unknown, 3 pp.
“The Style Element & CSS Selectors”, http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/5.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 pgs.
“Tomboy: Simple Note Taking”, Date: 2004-2006, http://www.beatniksoftware.com/tomboy/, 4 pp.
Apperley, M. et al., “Breaking the Copy/Paste Cycle: The Stretchable Selection Tool”, Computer Science Department, New Zealand, Feb. 2000, pp. 1-8.
Baker, Richard, “Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac in a Snap”, Sams, Aug. 2004, 17 pp.
Billinghurst, et al., An Evaluation of Wearable Information Spaces, Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1998, 8 pages.
Billinghurst, et al., Wearable Devices: New Ways to Manage Information, IEEE Computer Society, Jan. 1999, pp. 57-64.
Billinghurst, Research Directions in Wearable Computing, University of Washington, May 1998, 48 pages.
Boyce, Jim, “Microsoft Outlook Inside Out,” 2001, Redmond, Washington, pp. 67, 68, 109, 110, 230, 231, 310, 316-318, 798.
Boyce, “Microsoft Outlook Version 2002 Inside Out”. 2001, Redmond, Washington, p. 14.
Braun, Owen, “Owen Braun: OneNote 12: Linking related notes together (really)”, Date: Oct. 6, 2005, http://blogs.msdn.com/owen_braun/archive/2005/10/06/477615.aspx, 6 pp.
Braun, Owen, “Owen Braun: OneNote 12: Linking related notes together”, Date: Oct. 6, 2005, http://blogs.msdn.com/owen_braun/archive/2005/10/06/477610.asnx, 2 pp.
Braun, Owen, “Owen Braun: OneNote 12: New Extensibility in OneNote 12”, Date: Oct. 6, 2005, http://blogs.msdn.com/owen_braun/archive/2005/12/15/503879.aspx, 2 pp.
Budinsky, F. et al., “WebSphere Studio Overview,” http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/journal/sj/432/budinsky.html, May 6, 2004, 25 pages.
Chen, et al., A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research, Dartmouth Computer Science Technical Report, 2000, 16 pages.
Dwelly, Andrew, “Functions and Dynamic User Interfaces,” 1989 ACM, pp. 371-381.
Gnome 2.8 Desktop User Guide, Sun Gnome Documentation Team, 2004, 67 pp.
Halvorson, Michael and Young, Michael, “Microsoft Office XP Inside Out,” 2001, Redmond, Washington, pp. 1005-1009, 1015, 1023-1028, 1036-1039, 1093.
Harter, et al., A Distributed Location System for the Active Office, IEEE Network, 1994, pp. 62-70.
Henzinger, Monica, “Link Analysis in Web Information Retrieval”, Date: 2000, http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigmod/disc/disc01/out/websites/deb_september/henzinge.pdf, 6 pp.
Heslop et al., “Microsoft Office Word 2003 Bible”, Wiley Publishing Inc., Chapter 20, 2003, pp. 519-538 (22 pp. total).
Hopkins, “The Design and Implementation of Pie Menu”, Originally published in Dr. Dobb's Journal, 1991, pp. 1-7.
Horvitz, et al., Attention-Sensitive Alerting in Computing Systems, Microsoft Research, Aug. 1999.
Horvitz, et al., In Pursuit of Effective Handsfree Decision Support: Coupling Bayesian Inference, Speech Understanding, and User Models, 1995, 8 pages.
IBM Corporation, “Dragging Marked Data to an Editor Window”, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1992, vol. 34, No. 10B, pp. 202-203.
IBM Corporation, “Multiple Item On-Line Clipboard”, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jul. 1992, No. 2, pp. 425.
IBM Corporation, “Source Dimension Copying Using the Standard Clipboard”, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Aug. 1994, vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 419-420.
International Search Report dated Sep. 29, 2003 for PCT Application Serial No. 00/20685, 3 Pages.
Joachims, Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features, Machine Learning, European Conference on Machine Learning, Apr. 21, 1998, pp. 137-142.
Kamel et al., “Retrieving Electronic Ink by Content”, Multimedia Database Management Systems, 1996., Proceedings of International Workshop on Aug. 14-16, 1996 pp. 54-61.
Khare et al., “The Origin of (Document) Species,” University of California, 1998, 9 pgs.
Kraynak, Joe, “Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Excel 2003”, Que, Sep. 2003, 14 pp.
Kurtenbach, Gordon et al.., “The Hotbox: Efficient Access to a Large Number of Menu-items,” ACM 1999, pp. 231-237.
Landay, et al., “NotePals: Sharing and Synchronizing Handwritten Notes with Multimedia Documents,” EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/˜landay/research/publications/hcscw/HCSCW-NotePals.html, retrieved Jan. 10, 2006, 8 pp.
Leszynski Group, “News Story: Leszynski Group Powers Bill Gates' Tablet PC Launch Keynote”, Nov. 2002, 1 pp.
Leszynski Group, “Tablet PC Solutions”, Nov. 2002, 3 pp.
Lewis, “Easy Microsoft Office 2003”, Sep. 2003, 10 pp.
Long, Jr., et al., “A Prototype User Interface for a Mobile Multimedia Terminal,” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, The University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. http://sigchi.org/chi95/Electronic/documents/intex;/acl_bdy.htm, retrieved Jan. 10, 2006, 4 pp.
Losee, Jr., Minimizing information overload: the ranking of electronic messages, Journal of Information Science 15, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1989, pp. 179-189.
Microsoft Corporation, “Microsoft Snipping Tool for Tablet PC Preview Release Help: Capturing Clips; Capturing Regions; Displaying or Hiding Links”, Nov. 2002, 4 pp.
Microsoft Press, “Microsoft Windows User Experience”, 1999, pp. 51-52.
Padwick, Gordon, Ebook titled “Special Edition Using Microsoft Outlook 2002”, published May 17, 2001, pp. 1-7.
Raman, “Cascaded Speech Style Sheets,” 1997, 7 pgs.
Rhodes, Remembrance Agent: A continuously running automated information retrieval system, The Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi Agent Technology, 1996, pp. 487-495.
Rhodes, The Wearable Remembrance Agent: A System for Augmented Memory, Personal Technologies Journal Special Issue on Wearable Computing, 1997, 12 pages.
Rhodes, The Wearable Remembrance Agent: A System for Augmented Theory, The Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Oct. 1997, pp. 123-128.
Rich, Charles and Sidner, Candace L., “Adding a Collaborative Agent to Graphical User Interfaces,” 1996 ACM, pp. 21-30.
Rich, Charles and Sidner, Candace L., “Segmented Interaction History in a Collaborative Interface Agent,” 1997 ACM, pp. 23-30.
Riggsby, Matt et al., “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6,” 2003, Alameda, California, pp. 135-139.
Riggsby, Matt, et al., “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6,” 2003, Alameda, California, pp. 135-138, 607-612.
Schilit, A System Architecture for Context-Aware Mobile Computing, Columbia University, 1995, 153 pages.
Schilit, et al., Context-Aware Computing Applications, In Proceedings of the Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Dec. 1994. pp. 85-90.
Schilit, et al., Customizing Mobile Applications, Proceedings USENIX Symposium on Mobile and Location Independent Computing, Aug. 1993, 9 pages.
Schilit, et al., Disseminationg Active Map Information to Mobile Hosts, IEEE Network, 1994, pp. 22-32, vol. 8—No. 5.
Schilit, et al., The ParcTab Mobile Computing System, IEEE WWOS-IV, 1993, 4 pages.
Schumaker, Dennis, “User Interface Standards,” http://msdn2.microsoftt.com/en-us/library/aa217660(office.11,d=printer).aspx, Sep. 2001, 5 pages.
Singh, et al., “Collaborative Note Taking Using PDAs” Department of Computer Science, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA—http://www.fxpal.com/people/denoue/publications/jise_2005.pdf, 2005, pp. 835-848.
Slovak, Ken, “Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Outlook 2003”, Que, Oct. 1, 2003; Chapter 1: Personal Information Management, Chapter 2: Working in Outlook's User Interface, Chapter 4: Flagging E-Mails and E-Mail Reminders, Chapter 7, Chapter 12: Using Advanced Find, 6 pp.
Spreitzer et al., Scalable, Secure, Mobile Computing with Location Information, Communications of the ACM, Jul. 1993, 1 page, vol. 36—No. 7.
Spreitzer, et al., Architectural Considerations for Scalable, Secure, Mobile Computing with Location Information, In the 14th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Jun. 1994, pp. 29-38.
Spreitzer, et al., Providing Location Information in a Ubiquitous Computing Environment, SIGOPS '93, 1993, pp. 270-283.
Starner, Wearable Computing and Contextual Awareness, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 1999, 248 pages.
Theimer, et al., Operating System Issues for PDAs, In Fourth Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, 1993, 7 pages.
Want, Active Badges and Personal Interactive Computing Objects, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 1992, 11 pages, vol. 38—No. 1.
Want, et al., The Active Badge Location System, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Jan. 1992, pp. 91-102, vol. 10—No. 1.
Weiser, Some Computer Science Issues in Ubiquitous Computing, Communications of the ACM, Jul. 1993, pp. 75-84, vol. 36—No. 7.
Weiser, The Computer for the 21st Century, Scientific American, Sep. 1991, 8 pages.
Weverka, Microsoft Office OneNote 2003, Step by Step, http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/0735621098, Microsoft Press, Jul. 13, 2004, pp. 1-64.
Workshop on Wearable Computing Systems, Aug. 19-21, 1996.
Young et al., “Microsoft Office System Inside Out: 2003 Edition”, published Sep. 10, 2003, pp. 1-168.
Korean Final Official Action in 10-2005-0057203 dated Jan. 9, 2012.
Chinese Third Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2012 in 200780013627.9 (14917.0380CCW1).
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 13, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,251 (14917.0380US02).
Mexican Official Action dated Mar. 8, 2011 in PA/a/2005/007147.
Malaysian Official Action dated Mar. 15, 2011 in PI 20052960.
Chinese Second Official Action dated Jun. 9, 2011 in 200780001911.4 (14917.0335CCWO).
Chinese Second Official Action dated Jun. 15, 2011 in 200780013627.9 (14917.0380CCW1).
Korean Official Action in 10-2005-0057203 dated Jul. 22, 2011.
Chinese Second Official Action dated Sep. 6, 2011 in 200780013630.0 (14917.0380CCWO).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029, filed Aug. 23, 2010, entitled “Method and System for Improved Electronic Task Flagging and Management”.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,256 (14917.0380US01).
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 7, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,251 (14917.0380US02).
Chinese First Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2010 in 200780013627.9 (14917.0380CCW1).
Chinese First Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2010 in 200780013630.0 (14917.0380CCWO).
Australian Examiner's First Action dated Apr. 30, 2010 in 2005202719.
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2010 in 200780001988.1 (14917.0334CCWO).
Mexican Official Action dated Jun. 22, 2010 in PA/a/2005/007147.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 13, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,251 (14917.0380US02).
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Jun. 1, 2012 in 2008-549569 (14917.0334JP01).
Chiu, P. et al., “NoteLook: Taking Notes in 1-20 Meetings with Digital Video and Ink”, ACM Multimedia, Proceedings of the International Conference, New York, NY, US, Oct. 1, 1999, pp. 149-158. (EP Search Report Mar. 12, 2012, 14917.0380JPW1).
Chiu, P. et al., “LiteMinutes: An Internet-Based System for Multimedia Meeting Minutes”, Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, May 2, 2001, pp. 140-149. (EP Search Report Mar. 12, 2012, 14917.0380JPW1).
Sinitsyn, A., “A Synchronization Framework for Personal Mobile Servers”, Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2004, Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Mar. 14, 2004, pp. 208-212. A34.
Taiwanese Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2012 in 094121470.
Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 21, 2012 in 2009-506499 (14917.0380JPWO).
Korean Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 20, 2012 in 10-2005-0057203.
European Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2012 in 07753827.0-1225 (14917.0380EPW1).
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 30, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029.
Chinese First Official Action dated Apr. 20, 2012 in 201110127976.1.
Chinese Third Official Action dated Apr. 23, 2012 in 200780001911.4 (14917.0335CCWO).
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated May 11, 2012 in 2008-549567 (14917.0335JPWO).
Japanese Official Action dated May 11, 2012 in 2009-506498 (14917.0380JPW1).
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 20, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029.
Chinese Fourth Official Action dated Jul. 25, 2012 in 200780013627.9 (14917.0380CCW1).
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection dated Nov. 30, 2012 in 2008-549569 (14917.0334JP01).
Korean Notice of Prelimiary Rejection dated Jan. 30, 2013 in 10-2012-0024393.
U.S. Official Action dated May 20, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/405,251 (14917.0380US02).
EP Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2013 in Appln No. 05 105 594.5.
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Mar. 4, 2013 in 10-2008-7016322 (14917.0334KSWO).
Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2013 in Appln No. 2011/10127976.1.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 22, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029, 17 pgs.
Chinese Third Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2014 in Appln No. 201110127976.1.
Chinese Notice on Grant dated Sep. 1, 2014 in Appln No. 201110127976.1, 4 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 25, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029, 23 pgs.
Mexican Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2015 in Appln No. PA/a/2005-007147, 35 pgs.
Indian Office Action in Application 1580/DEL/2005, dated Jul. 26, 2016, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029, Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2016, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029, Advisory Action dated Nov. 22, 2017, 3 pgs. (309466-US-CNT).
Brazilian Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2017 in Application No. PI0502556-7, 6 pgs.
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029, 18 pgs.
IEEE 100, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, Seventh Edition, “Application” definition, downloaded by the US Patent & Trademark Office on Feb. 3, 2017, 2 pgs.
Brazilian Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2017 in Application No. PI0501572-3, 5 pgs.
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Apr. 18, 2017 in Application No. 05105594.5, 7 pgs.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,029, 18 pgs.
Honda, M., “Aiming at Improvement in Performance and Operability, Microsoft Office Outlook 2003,”, DOS/V Magazine, Softbank Publishing, Inc., vol. 12, No. 11, Jun. 1, 2033, 6 pp (no English translation).
Chinese Second Official Action dated Jun. 9, 2011 in 200780001911.4.
Chinese Second Official Action dated Jun. 15, 2011 in 200780013627.9.
Japanese Official Action dated Aug. 9, 2011 in 2005-180925.
“Finding the Root Cause of Application Problems is Difficult and Time Consuming”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070404001520/http://www.radview.com:80/Products/RCA-WebLOAD-AnalyzerOverview.aspx, Apr. 04, 2007, 2 Pages.
“Instant Search within PCs—Free from file Management with Desktop Search Software, Noteworthy Desktop Search Software Which is Selected Based on Convenient Functions”, In the Proceedings of ASCII PC, vol. 8, Issue 9, Sep. 1, 2005, pp. 139-147.
Zou, Feng-Zhong, “A Change-Point Perspective on the Software Failure Process”, In Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, Apr. 13, 2003, pp. 85-93.
“Oral Hearings Issued in European Patent Application No. 07717837.4”, dated May 28, 2010, 8 Pages.
“Extended European Search Report Issued in European Patent Application No. 07753829.6”, dated Oct. 5, 2017, 12 Pages.
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/896,384”, dated Dec. 23, 2003, 7 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/664,740”, dated Oct. 24, 2006, 20 Pages.
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056”, dated Apr. 27, 2006, 8 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056”, dated Oct. 19, 2006, 11 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,232”, dated Jul. 25, 2007, 13 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application 10-2012-0024393”, dated Jul. 2, 2012, 5 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/404,679”, dated Sep. 14, 2010, 14 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/701,122”, dated Jun. 10, 2009, 14 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-549567”, dated Oct. 19, 2012, 2 Pages.
Bertolino, et al., “Assessing the Risk Due to Software Faults: Estimates of Failure Rate Versus Evidence of Perfection”, In Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, Sep. 8, 1998, 11 Pages.
Cleve, et al., “Finding Failure Causes through Automated Testing”, Retrieved from: https://www.st.cs.uni-saarland.de/publications/files/cleve-aadebug-2000.pdf, Oct. 6, 2006, 6 Pages.
Donovan, et al., “Total System Reliability: Integrated Model for Growth and Test Termination”, In Proceedings of Quality and Reliability Engineering, Jun. 21, 2005, 16 Pages.
Hangal, et al., “Tracking Down Software Bugs Using Automatic Anomaly Detection”, In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 25, 2002, pp. 291-301.
Orso, et al., “Testing and Debugging: Isolating Relevant Component Interactions with JINSI”, In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Dynamic Systems Analysis, May 23, 2006, pp. 3-10.
“Office Action Issued in Brazil Patent Application No. PI0502556-7”, dated Mar. 20, 2017, 5 Pages.
Sahinoglu, et al., “Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods for the Compound Poisson Software”, In Journal Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, Mar. 7, 1997, 2 Pages.
Tammana, et al., “Software Defect Isolation”, Presented at the High-Performance Computing Users Group, Mar. 1998 and Interworks, Apr. 1, 1998, 11 Pages.
Zeller, Andreas, “Isolating Cause-effect Chains from Computer Programs”, In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, Nov. 18, 2002, pp. 1-10.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100306698 A1 Dec 2010 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10387287 Mar 2003 US
Child 12851453 US