The invention relates to offshore structures such as pylons, well heads and other steel structures located offshore including those located underwater. Specifically the invention relates to the means of cutting these structures above or below seabed.
In conducting maintenance or site reparation, it is necessary to cut through steel structures whilst underwater and, for offshore conditions, at significant depth. The cutting may be for the purpose of repairing the structure or for its removal. Further, in order to avoid a structure projecting from the sea bed, it may be necessary to cut below the level of the sea bed.
Several techniques have been used including hydraulic shears, being mechanical severing devices, particularly for relatively thin material such as less than 50 mm. More difficult and complex techniques include shaped explosive charges, laser cutting and chemical attack, however none of these provide an efficient means of cutting underwater structures for various reasons.
The two most popular methods include diamond wire cutting and abrasive water jetting. For offshore applications, both require a significant deck area to support the equipment infrastructure. Further, diamond wire cutting requires divers and remotely operated vehicle, whereas abrasive water jetting requires a considerable amount of time (six to eight hours) in order to effect the cut.
In a first aspect the invention provides a system for cutting an underwater structure, the system comprising: a cutting head, said cutting head comprising: an abrasive water jetting nozzle; a cryogenic nozzle; said abrasive water jetting nozzle and cryogenic nozzle mounted in fixed spaced relation; said cutting head arranged to position tips of the nozzles proximate to a cutting surface, and arranged to form a cutting zone defined by the nozzle tips and cutting surface; wherein a water repelling shield is located about said cutting zone and arranged to hinder water entering said cutting zone.
In a second aspect the invention provides a method for cutting an underwater structure, the method comprising the steps of: placing an abrasive water jetting nozzle and a cryogenic nozzle in fixed spaced relation to form a cutting head positioning said cutting head proximate to a cutting surface of said structure; forming a cutting zone defined by tips of the abrasive water jetting nozzle and a cryogenic nozzle and the cutting surface; locating a water repelling shield about said cutting zone and so; hindering water entering said cutting zone, and; cutting said cutting surface using the abrasive water jet emanating from said abrasive water jetting nozzle.
Thus, a combination of features assist to make abrasive water jetting a viable option. Firstly, using cryogenic assistance to the water jetting by reducing the metal temperature to below the ductile-brittle transition. By making the steel brittle, its ability to absorb energy is reduced making the water jet more effective, and so able to act faster. Further, by introducing an air envelope, the surrounding water is prevented from raising the temperature of the steel, through efficient heat transfer, before the water jet can act.
It will be convenient to further describe the present invention with respect to the accompanying drawings that illustrate possible arrangements of the invention. Other arrangements of the invention are possible and consequently, the particularity of the accompanying drawings is not to be understood as superseding the generality of the preceding description of the invention.
The present invention therefore involves two steps. It is accepted that abrasive water jetting is a useful technique for cutting steel, however the duration required under normal circumstances is problematic. By cryogenically freezing the steel structure just prior to the water jetting, a significant benefit may be achieved leading to a faster cutting process of the cryogenically brittle steel.
However, cryogenically freezing the steel is difficult in an underwater application. The present invention therefore further includes an air envelope and habitat surrounding a cryogenic nozzle and nozzle of the water jetting system.
As discussed, an important consideration in cryogenically assisted water jetting is to ensure the material to be cut 33 remains brittle during cutting. At ambient temperatures, ductility of steel remains relatively constant. As the temperature of the metal is reduced, a ductile-brittle transition (DBT) is reached. As a non-limiting example, this transition may be in the range −90° C. to −130° C. It will be appreciated that the ductile-brittle transition for a material may be different for each material, and so appropriate testing of the material may be required.
Whilst above ground applications of cryogenic assisted water jetting can be carried out relatively simply, heat transfer under water is such that any time lag between the introduction of liquid nitrogen and subsequent water jetting may be sufficient to elevate the temperature of the cutting zone above the ductile-brittle transition temperature.
Accordingly, the introduction of an air envelope 37, which in this case is provided by the introduction of compressed air 45, removes water from the cutting zone 37 and thus limits heat gained through immersion in water, which is a more efficient heat transfer medium than air.
In this embodiment, a second cryogenic nozzle 155 is located circumferentially about the cutting tool from the water jet nozzle 140, the offset 165 between nozzle tips 149, 157 being in the range 100 to 200 mm. Thus, it will be noted that in the position shown in
In the embodiment of
As a note, the ability to place the cutting head 125 inside the jacket 110 means no site preparation is required around the jacket, unlike several of the prior art systems. Whether the cut is to be made above or below the seabed 120 is irrelevant, subject to the depth of the soil plug. In this embodiment, this is also managed by including the soil plug removal device 150.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MYPI2019006497 | Nov 2019 | MY | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/MY2020/050136 | 11/6/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/091368 | 5/14/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3526162 | Willcox | Sep 1970 | A |
4447952 | Elkins | May 1984 | A |
4902168 | Wang | Feb 1990 | A |
7922424 | Clark, II | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20120137846 | Quintard et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140157963 | Von Wirth et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150337634 | O'Leary et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20180291697 | Oag et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
109015391 | Dec 2018 | CN |
WO-0103887 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-2009122203 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Getu H. et al.. Thermal analysis of cryogenically assisted abrasive jet micromachining of PDMS, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, No. 9, (2011), pp. 721-730. |
Herghelegiu E. et al., Influence of the Distance between the Cutting Head and Working Sample on the Geometric Precision in Water Jet Abrasive Cutting Process, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 371, (2013), pp. 240-244. |
Al-Motin, Abdulla; International Search Report; PCT/MY2020/050136; dated Feb. 1, 2021; 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220388119 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |