Patent Application
20220391099
The present invention is in the field of computer data encoding, and in particular the usage of encoding for enhanced security and compaction of data.
As computers become an ever-greater part of our lives, and especially in the past few years, data storage has become a limiting factor worldwide. Prior to about 2010, the growth of data storage far exceeded the growth in storage demand. In fact, it was commonly considered at that time that storage was not an issue, and perhaps never would be, again. In 2010, however, with the growth of social media, cloud data centers, high tech and biotech industries, global digital data storage accelerated exponentially, and demand hit the zettabyte (1 trillion gigabytes) level. Current estimates are that data storage demand will reach 175 zettabytes by 2025. By contrast, digital storage device manufacturers produced roughly 1 zettabyte of physical storage capacity globally in 2016. We are producing data at a much faster rate than we are producing the capacity to store it. In short, we are running out of room to store data, and need a breakthrough in data storage technology to keep up with demand.
The primary solutions available at the moment are the addition of additional physical storage capacity and data compression. As noted above, the addition of physical storage will not solve the problem, as storage demand has already outstripped global manufacturing capacity. Data compression is also not a solution. A rough average compression ratio for mixed data types is 2:1, representing a doubling of storage capacity. However, as the mix of global data storage trends toward multi-media data (audio, video, and images), the space savings yielded by compression either decreases substantially, as is the case with lossless compression which allows for retention of all original data in the set, or results in degradation of data, as is the case with lossy compression which selectively discards data in order to increase compression. Even assuming a doubling of storage capacity, data compression cannot solve the global data storage problem. The method disclosed herein, on the other hand, works the same way with any type of data.
Transmission bandwidth is also increasingly becoming a bottleneck. Large data sets require tremendous bandwidth, and we are transmitting more and more data every year between large data centers. On the small end of the scale, we are adding billions of low bandwidth devices to the global network, and data transmission limitations impose constraints on the development of networked computing applications, such as the “Internet of Things”.
Furthermore, as quantum computing becomes more and more imminent, the security of data, both stored data and data streaming from one point to another via networks, becomes a critical concern as existing encryption technologies are placed at risk.
Various encoding, decoding, compression, and compaction schemes rely on using training data very similar to the actual data to be encountered during runtime in order to produce systems that efficiently and accurately encode, decode, compress, and/or compact data during system runtime. However, one problem that can often occur using this approach is that runtime data may occasionally be absent and/or different from the training data set, which can lead to runtime errors during the encoding/decoding processes when such data is encountered.
What is needed is a system and method for compacting data utilizing mismatch probability estimation in order to mitigate encoding and decoding runtime errors.
The inventor has developed a system and method for encoding data utilizing mismatch probability estimates. A training data set can be statistically analyzed to calculate a mismatch probability estimate which is the estimated frequency at which a data packet received during system runtime is not part of (i.e., a mismatch) the training data set. A plurality of tokens may be created, based on the mismatch probability estimate, to represent potential mismatched data that may be encountered during runtime, and an entropy encoder may generate codewords for the tokens using the mismatch probability estimate. An opcode, indicating a mismatch, may be generated and appended to the generated codewords to form a mismatch codeword. During runtime when a mismatch occurs, the system can retrieve a mismatch codeword and assign it to the mismatched data, making the encoder system robust against previously unencountered data.
According to a preferred embodiment, a system for encoding data using mismatch probability estimation is disclosed, comprising: a computing device comprising a processor, a memory, and a non-volatile data storage device; a statistical analyzer comprising a first plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operable on the processor, wherein the first plurality of programming instructions, when operating on the processor, causes the processor to: receive a data set for encoding; perform statistical analysis on the data set to calculate a mismatch probability estimate; and forward the mismatch probability estimate to a mismatch codeword generator; and a mismatch codeword generator comprising a second plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operable on the processor, wherein the second plurality of programming instructions, when operating on the processor, causes the processor to: receive the mismatch probability estimate; create one or more tokens based on the received mismatch probability estimate, wherein the one or more tokens represent one or more probable mismatched sourceblocks; feed the one or more tokens into an entropy encoder to generate a codeword for each of the one or more probable mismatched sourceblocks; append an opcode to each of the one or more generated codewords to form one or more mismatch codewords; and store the one or more mismatch codewords in a codebook; and an encoder comprising a third plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operable on the processor, wherein the third plurality of programming instructions, when operating on the processor, causes the processor to: receive a mismatched sourceblock during runtime; identify a mismatch codeword in the codebook using the opcode and retrieve the identified mismatch codeword; encode the mismatched sourceblock using a mismatch codeword from the codebook and delete the opcode; and store the received mismatched sourceblock and the encoded mismatched sourceblock as a codeword pair in the codebook.
According to another preferred embodiment, a method for encoding data using mismatch probability estimation is disclosed, comprising the steps of: receiving a data set for encoding; performing statistical analysis on the data set to calculate a mismatch probability estimate; forwarding the mismatch probability estimate to a mismatch codeword generator; receiving the mismatch probability estimate; creating one or more tokens based on the received mismatch probability estimate, wherein the one or more tokens represent one or more probable mismatched sourceblocks; feeding the one or more tokens into an entropy encoder to generate a codeword for each of the one or more probable mismatched sourceblocks; appending an opcode to each of the one or more generated codewords to form one or more mismatch codewords; storing the one or more mismatch codewords in a codebook; receiving a mismatched sourceblock during runtime;
identifying a mismatch codeword in the codebook using the opcode and retrieve the identified mismatch codeword; encoding the mismatched sourceblock using a mismatch codeword from the codebook and delete the opcode; and storing the received mismatched sourceblock and the encoded mismatched sourceblock as a codeword pair in the codebook.
According to an aspect of an embodiment, the statistical analysis is performed via a modified exponentially-weighted moving average.
According to an aspect of an embodiment, the entropy encoder is a Huffman binary tree.
The accompanying drawings illustrate several aspects and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention according to the aspects. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that the particular arrangements illustrated in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not to be considered as limiting of the scope of the invention or the claims herein in any way.
The inventor has conceived, and reduced to practice, a system and method for encoding data utilizing mismatch probability estimates. A training data set can be statistically analyzed to calculate a mismatch probability estimate which is the estimated frequency at which a data packet received during system runtime is not part of (i.e., a mismatch) the training data set. A plurality of tokens may be created, based on the mismatch probability estimate, to represent potential mismatched data that may be encountered during runtime, and an entropy encoder may generate codewords for the tokens using the mismatch probability estimate. An opcode, indicating a mismatch, may be generated and appended to the generated codewords to form a mismatch codeword. During runtime when a mismatch occurs, the system can retrieve a mismatch codeword and assign it to the mismatched data, making the encoder system robust against previously unencountered data.
The disclosed data compaction techniques and methodologies described herein typically begin by training on data which is most representative of the kind of data that will be observed during runtime. The training data is ingested by segmenting it into short “sourceblocks,” subwords of lengths typically between 8 and 200 bits, and then counting how many of each sourceblock are present in the training data. These tallies may then be divided by the total number of sourceblocks to obtain empirical frequencies, which can then be used by Huffman coding and/or entropy encoding methods to construct a “codebook” consisting of sourceblock-codeword pairs. At runtime, incoming sourceblocks are replaced by corresponding codewords occurring in the codebook, reducing the average length of sourcepackets (e.g., incoming data packets/files).
However, one problem that can occur using this approach is that runtime sourceblocks may occasionally be absent from the codebook, since they were not observed in the training data (or because the sourceblocks were “pruned” after tallies were obtained to a smaller set of sourceblocks in order to save space and/or time). One method to mediate these types of runtime occurrences is to provide a special context-switching opcode for these “mismatch sourceblocks,” referred to as a “mismatch codeword”. After the mismatch codeword, the sourceblock which originally could not be encoded is either: (a) transmitted/stored unencoded, or (b) encoded using suboptimal but guaranteed-to-work shorter block-length encoding, often (but not always) an 8-bit Huffman code. Then, the encoder and decoder return to normal “primary codebook” operation after the mismatch has been processed.
Because the mismatch codeword must be included in the prefix-free code constructed for the codebook, it is produced by including it as a special token in the Huffman coding (or analogous) process. However, this requires that the encoding be provided with an estimate of the “mismatch probability,” the frequency with which one can expect to observe mismatches when encoding data at runtime. This is a highly non-trivial quantity to estimate, since it is the probability that a sourceblock is not one which was seen in the training data, i.e., the system needs to estimate the probability of the previously-unseen event.
Provided herein, are various mechanisms to estimate the mismatch probability of a given data set such that mismatch handling of compacted data during runtime may be implemented. Mismatch probability is a quantity that will be referred to as q. In one approach, q may be taken to be the number M of times a mismatch occurred during training (i.e., when a previous unobserved sourceblock appeared in the training data), divided by the total number of N sourceblocks observed during training, i.e., q=. However, the statistic
is not an accurate estimate for q, since the mismatch frequency will fall with time as training data is ingested, such that the estimate will be too high. In experimental and theoretical settings, this is indeed what is observed consistently, as long as the training and testing data are drawn from the same data type.
The following is a significant improvement on the statistic. Suppose that sourceblocks S1, S2, . . . , SN are observed during training. For j=1, . . . , N, let the variable Xj denote the indicator of the event that sourceblock Sj is a mismatch, i.e.,
Then we can write M/N=(Σj=1NXj)/N. To improve on this estimate, a modified exponentially-weighted moving average (EWMA) can be employed:
If βj, a quantity between 0 and 1, were constant (i.e., not depending on j), then this is a classical EWMA. However, there are two issues to balance in choosing βj: a value too close to 1 causes extreme volatility in the estimate μj, since it will depend only on very recent occurrences/nonoccurrences of mismatches; and a value too close to 0 will cause difficult round-off errors or else cause the estimate to depend on very early training data (when mismatch frequencies will be misleadingly high). Therefore, set βj=C log(j)/j (and β1=1 to avoid initialization problems), for some constant C. In practice, C=1 has been observed to be a good choice here, though it is by no means the only possibility, and some applications with particularly stable or unstable mismatch distributions will benefit from a different value. The effect of this choice is to cause the mismatch probability estimate μj to depend only on the recent O(1/log (j)) fraction of the data when sourceblock j is observed, a quantity tending to zero slowly.
While the above scheme works well, disclosed are two additional options to deal with a few moderately-unusual circumstances. First, when training begins, the statistic μj is highly volatile, resulting in poor estimates if the training data is very small. Therefore, the system can monitor the sample standard deviation σj of μj and use the aforementioned M/N estimate until σj falls below some pre-set tolerance, perhaps the condition that σj/μj<10%. Again, the value 10% can be replaced with another value if experimentation shows that a difference value is warranted for a particular data type; indeed, this relative value of 10% can also be replaced with a (likely smaller) absolute tolerance. Second, the quantity μj tends to be a slight overestimate because it will fall over time during training, so it may be biased slightly above the true mismatch probability. Therefore, we may choose at times to use the smallest recent value of μj instead of μj itself, i.e.,
where B is a “windowing” parameter reflecting how far back in the history of the training process to incorporate in the estimate, and negative indices are ignored. Again, it may be useful in some circumstances to take a variable value for B=Bj instead of a constant; a reasonable choice could be Bj=j/(C log j), the effective window size for the EWMA discussed above.
One or more different aspects may be described in the present application. Further, for one or more of the aspects described herein, numerous alternative arrangements may be described; it should be appreciated that these are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not limiting of the aspects contained herein or the claims presented herein in any way. One or more of the arrangements may be widely applicable to numerous aspects, as may be readily apparent from the disclosure. In general, arrangements are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice one or more of the aspects, and it should be appreciated that other arrangements may be utilized and that structural, logical, software, electrical and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the particular aspects. Particular features of one or more of the aspects described herein may be described with reference to one or more particular aspects or figures that form a part of the present disclosure, and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific arrangements of one or more of the aspects. It should be appreciated, however, that such features are not limited to usage in the one or more particular aspects or figures with reference to which they are described. The present disclosure is neither a literal description of all arrangements of one or more of the aspects nor a listing of features of one or more of the aspects that must be present in all arrangements.
Headings of sections provided in this patent application and the title of this patent application are for convenience only, and are not to be taken as limiting the disclosure in any way.
Devices that are in communication with each other need not be in continuous communication with each other, unless expressly specified otherwise. In addition, devices that are in communication with each other may communicate directly or indirectly through one or more communication means or intermediaries, logical or physical.
A description of an aspect with several components in communication with each other does not imply that all such components are required. To the contrary, a variety of optional components may be described to illustrate a wide variety of possible aspects and in order to more fully illustrate one or more aspects. Similarly, although process steps, method steps, algorithms or the like may be described in a sequential order, such processes, methods and algorithms may generally be configured to work in alternate orders, unless specifically stated to the contrary. In other words, any sequence or order of steps that may be described in this patent application does not, in and of itself, indicate a requirement that the steps be performed in that order. The steps of described processes may be performed in any order practical. Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously despite being described or implied as occurring non-simultaneously (e.g., because one step is described after the other step). Moreover, the illustration of a process by its depiction in a drawing does not imply that the illustrated process is exclusive of other variations and modifications thereto, does not imply that the illustrated process or any of its steps are necessary to one or more of the aspects, and does not imply that the illustrated process is preferred. Also, steps are generally described once per aspect, but this does not mean they must occur once, or that they may only occur once each time a process, method, or algorithm is carried out or executed. Some steps may be omitted in some aspects or some occurrences, or some steps may be executed more than once in a given aspect or occurrence.
When a single device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that more than one device or article may be used in place of a single device or article. Similarly, where more than one device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that a single device or article may be used in place of the more than one device or article.
The functionality or the features of a device may be alternatively embodied by one or more other devices that are not explicitly described as having such functionality or features. Thus, other aspects need not include the device itself.
Techniques and mechanisms described or referenced herein will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it should be appreciated that particular aspects may include multiple iterations of a technique or multiple instantiations of a mechanism unless noted otherwise. Process descriptions or blocks in figures should be understood as representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of various aspects in which, for example, functions may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art.
The term “bit” refers to the smallest unit of information that can be stored or transmitted. It is in the form of a binary digit (either 0 or 1). In terms of hardware, the bit is represented as an electrical signal that is either off (representing 0) or on (representing 1).
The term “byte” refers to a series of bits exactly eight bits in length.
The term “codebook” refers to a database containing sourceblocks each with a pattern of bits and reference code unique within that library. The terms “library” and “encoding/decoding library” are synonymous with the term codebook.
The terms “compression” and “deflation” as used herein mean the representation of data in a more compact form than the original dataset. Compression and/or deflation may be either “lossless,” in which the data can be reconstructed in its original form without any loss of the original data, or “lossy” in which the data can be reconstructed in its original form, but with some loss of the original data.
The terms “compression factor” and “deflation factor” as used herein mean the net reduction in size of the compressed data relative to the original data (e.g., if the new data is 70% of the size of the original, then the deflation/compression factor is 30% or 0.3.)
The terms “compression ratio” and “deflation ratio,” and as used herein all mean the size of the original data relative to the size of the compressed data (e.g., if the new data is 70% of the size of the original, then the deflation/compression ratio is 70% or 0.7.)
The term “data” means information in any computer-readable form.
The term “data set” refers to a grouping of data for a particular purpose. One example of a data set might be a word processing file containing text and formatting information.
The term “effective compression” or “effective compression ratio” refers to the additional amount data that can be stored using the method herein described versus conventional data storage methods. Although the method herein described is not data compression, per se, expressing the additional capacity in terms of compression is a useful comparison.
The term “sourcepacket” as used herein means a packet of data received for encoding or decoding. A sourcepacket may be a portion of a data set.
The term “sourceblock” as used herein means a defined number of bits or bytes used as the block size for encoding or decoding. A sourcepacket may be divisible into a number of sourceblocks. As one non-limiting example, a 1 megabyte sourcepacket of data may be encoded using 512 byte sourceblocks. The number of bits in a sourceblock may be dynamically optimized by the system during operation. In one aspect, a sourceblock may be of the same length as the block size used by a particular file system, typically 512 bytes or 4,096 bytes.
The term “codeword” refers to the reference code form in which data is stored or transmitted in an aspect of the system. A codeword consists of a reference code or “codeword” to a sourceblock in the library plus an indication of that sourceblock's location in a particular data set.
System 1200 provides near-instantaneous source coding that is dictionary-based and learned in advance from sample training data, so that encoding and decoding may happen concurrently with data transmission. This results in computational latency that is near zero but the data size reduction is comparable to classical compression. For example, if bits are to be transmitted from sender to receiver, the compression ratio of classical compression is C, the ratio between the deflation factor of system 1200 and that of multi-pass source coding is p, the classical compression encoding rate is RC bit/s and the decoding rate is RD bit/s, and the transmission speed is S bit/s, the compress-send-decompress time will be
while the transmit-while-coding time for system 1200 will be (assuming that encoding and decoding happen at least as quickly as network latency):
so that the total data transit time improvement factor is
which presents a savings whenever
This is a reasonable scenario given that typical values in real-world practice are C=0.32, RC=1.1·1012, RD=4.2·1012, S=1011, giving
such mat system 1200 will outperform the total transit time of the best compression technology available as long as its deflation factor is no more than 5% worse than compression. Such customized dictionary-based encoding will also sometimes exceed the deflation ratio of classical compression, particularly when network speeds increase beyond 100 Gb/s.
The delay between data creation and its readiness for use at a receiving end will be equal to only the source word length t (typically 5-15 bytes), divided by the deflation factor up and the network speed S, i.e.
since encoding and decoding occur concurrently with data transmission. On the other hand, the latency associated with classical compression is
where is the packet/file size. Even with the generous values chosen above as well as
=512K, t=10, and p=1.05, this results in delayinvention≈3.3·10−10 while delaypriorart≈1.3·10−7, a more than 400-fold reduction in latency.
A key factor in the efficiency of Huffman coding used by system 1200 is that key-value pairs be chosen carefully to minimize expected coding length, so that the average deflation/compression ratio is minimized. It is possible to achieve the best possible expected code length among all instantaneous codes using Huffman codes if one has access to the exact probability distribution of source words of a given desired length from the random variable generating them. In practice this is impossible, as data is received in a wide variety of formats and the random processes underlying the source data are a mixture of human input, unpredictable (though in principle, deterministic) physical events, and noise. System 1200 addresses this by restriction of data types and density estimation; training data is provided that is representative of the type of data anticipated in “real-world” use of system 1200, which is then used to model the distribution of binary strings in the data in order to build a Huffman code word library 1200.
This prunes low-value data from the word library to trim the size, eliminating large quantities of very-low-frequency key-value pairs such as single-occurrence words that are unlikely to be encountered again in a data set. Pruning eliminates the least-probable entries from word library 1201 up to a given threshold, which will have a negligible impact on the deflation factor since the removed entries are only the least-common ones, while the impact on word library size will be larger because samples drawn from asymptotically normal distributions (such as the log-probabilities of words generated by a probabilistic finite state machine, a model well-suited to a wide variety of real-world data) which occur in tails of the distribution are disproportionately large in counting measure. A delta encoder 1402 may be utilized to apply delta encoding to a plurality of words to store an approximate codeword as a value in the word library, for which each of the plurality of source words is a valid corresponding key. This may be used to reduce library size by replacing numerous key-value pairs with a single entry for the approximate codeword and then represent actual codewords using the approximate codeword plus a delta value representing the difference between the approximate codeword and the actual codeword. Approximate coding is optimized for low-weight sources such as Golomb coding, run-length coding, and similar techniques. The approximate source words may be chosen by locality-sensitive hashing, so as to approximate Hamming distance without incurring the intractability of nearest-neighbor-search in Hamming space. A parametric optimizer 1403 may load configuration parameters for operation to optimize the use of the word library 1201 during operation. Best-practice parameter/hyperparameter optimization strategies such as stochastic gradient descent, quasi-random grid search, and evolutionary search may be used to make optimal choices for all interdependent settings playing a role in the functionality of system 1200. In cases where lossless compression is not required, the delta value may be discarded at the expense of introducing some limited errors into any decoded (reconstructed) data.
Since data drifts involve statistical change in the data, the best approach to detect drift is by monitoring the incoming data's statistical properties, the model's predictions, and their correlation with other factors. After statistical analysis engine 2920 calculates the probability distribution of the test dataset it may retrieve from monitor database 2930 the calculated and stored probability distribution of the current training dataset. It may then compare the two probability distributions of the two different datasets in order to verify if the difference in calculated distributions exceeds a predetermined difference threshold. If the difference in distributions does not exceed the difference threshold, that indicates the test dataset, and therefore the incoming data, has not experienced enough data drift to cause the encoding/decoding system performance to degrade significantly, which indicates that no updates are necessary to the existing codebooks. However, if the difference threshold has been surpassed, then the data drift is significant enough to cause the encoding/decoding system performance to degrade to the point where the existing models and accompanying codebooks need to be updated. According to an embodiment, an alert may be generated by statistical analysis engine 2920 if the difference threshold is surpassed or if otherwise unexpected behavior arises.
In the event that an update is required, the test dataset stored in the cache 2970 and its associated calculated probability distribution may be sent to monitor database 2930 for long term storage. This test dataset may be used as a new training dataset to retrain the encoding and decoding algorithms 2940 used to create new sourceblocks based upon the changed probability distribution. The new sourceblocks may be sent out to a library manager 2915 where the sourceblocks can be assigned new codewords. Each new sourceblock and its associated codeword may then be added to a new codebook and stored in a storage device. The new and updated codebook may then be sent back 2925 to codebook training module 2900 and received by a codebook update engine 2950.
Codebook update engine 2950 may temporarily store the received updated codebook in the cache 2970 until other network devices and machines are ready, at which point codebook update engine 2950 will publish the updated codebooks 2945 to the necessary network devices.
A network device manager 2960 may also be present which may request and receive network device data 2935 from a plurality of network connected devices and machines. When the disclosed encoding system and codebook training system 2800 are deployed in a production environment, upstream process changes may lead to data drift, or other unexpected behavior. For example, a sensor being replaced that changes the units of measurement from inches to centimeters, data quality issues such as a broken sensor always reading 0, and covariate shift which occurs when there is a change in the distribution of input variables from the training set. These sorts of behavior and issues may be determined from the received device data 2935 in order to identify potential causes of system error that is not related to data drift and therefore does not require an updated codebook. This can save network resources from being unnecessarily used on training new algorithms as well as alert system users to malfunctions and unexpected behavior devices connected to their networks. Network device manager 2960 may also utilize device data 2935 to determine available network resources and device downtime or periods of time when device usage is at its lowest. Codebook update engine 2950 may request network and device availability data from network device manager 2960 in order to determine the most optimal time to transmit updated codebooks (i.e., trained libraries) to encoder and decoder devices and machines.
According to an embodiment, the list of codebooks used in encoding the data set may be consolidated to a single codebook which is provided to the combiner 3400 for output along with the encoded sourcepackets and codebook IDs. In this case, the single codebook will contain the data from, and codebook IDs of, each of the codebooks used to encode the data set. This may provide a reduction in data transfer time, although it is not required since each sourcepacket (or sourceblock) will contain a reference to a specific codebook ID which references a codebook that can be pulled from a database or be sent alongside the encoded data to a receiving device for the decoding process.
In some embodiments, each sourcepacket of a data set 3201 arriving at the encoder 3204 is encoded using a different sourceblock length. Changing the sourceblock length changes the encoding output of a given codebook. Two sourcepackets encoded with the same codebook but using different sourceblock lengths would produce different encoded outputs. Therefore, changing the sourceblock length of some or all sourcepackets in a data set 3201 provides additional security. Even if the codebook was known, the sourceblock length would have to be known or derived for each sourceblock in order to decode the data set 3201. Changing the sourceblock length may be used in conjunction with the use of multiple codebooks.
In this embodiment, for each bit location 3402 of the control byte 3401, a data bit or combinations of data bits 3403 provide information necessary for decoding of the sourcepacket associated with the control byte. Reading in reverse order of bit locations, the first bit N (location 7) indicates whether the entire control byte is used or not. If a single codebook is used to encode all sourcepackets in the data set, N is set to 0, and bits 3 to 0 of the control byte 3401 are ignored. However, where multiple codebooks are used, N is set to 1 and all 8 bits of the control byte 3401 are used. The next three bits RRR (locations 6 to 4) are a residual count of the number of bits that were not used in the last byte of the sourcepacket. Unused bits in the last byte of a sourcepacket can occur depending on the sourceblock size used to encode the sourcepacket. The next bit I (location 3) is used to identify the codebook used to encode the sourcepacket. If bit I is 0, the next three bits CCC (locations 2 to 0) provide the codebook ID used to encode the sourcepacket. The codebook ID may take the form of a codebook cache index, where the codebooks are stored in an enumerated cache. If bit I is 1, then the codebook is identified using a four-byte UUID that follows the control byte.
Here, a list of six codebooks is selected for shuffling, each identified by a number from 1 to 6 3501a. The list of codebooks is sent to a rotation or shuffling algorithm 3502, and reorganized according to the algorithm 3501b. The first six of a series of sourcepackets, each identified by a letter from A to E, 3503 is each encoded by one of the algorithms, in this case A is encoded by codebook 1, B is encoded by codebook 6, C is encoded by codebook 2, D is encoded by codebook 4, E is encoded by codebook 13 A is encoded by codebook 5. The encoded sourcepackets 3503 and their associated codebook identifiers 3501b are combined into a data structure 3504 in which each encoded sourcepacket is followed by the identifier of the codebook used to encode that particular sourcepacket.
According to an embodiment, the codebook rotation or shuffling algorithm 3502 may produce a random or pseudo-random selection of codebooks based on a function. Some non-limiting functions that may be used for shuffling include:
1. given a function f(n) which returns a codebook according to an input parameter n in the range 1 to N are, and given t the number of the current sourcepacket or sourceblock: f(t*M modulo p), where M is an arbitrary multiplying factor (1<=M<=p−1) which acts as a key, and p is a large prime number less than or equal to N;
2. f(A{circumflex over ( )}t modulo p), where A is a base relatively prime to p−1 which acts as a key, and p is a large prime number less than or equal to N;
3. f(floor(t*x) modulo N), and x is an irrational number chosen randomly to act as a key;
4. f(t XOR K) where the XOR is performed bit-wise on the binary representations oft and a key K with same number of bits in its representation of N. The function f(n) may return the nth codebook simply by referencing the nth element in a list of codebooks, or it could return the nth codebook given by a formula chosen by a user.
In one embodiment, prior to transmission, the endpoints (users or devices) of a transmission agree in advance about the rotation list or shuffling function to be used, along with any necessary input parameters such as a list order, function code, cryptographic key, or other indicator, depending on the requirements of the type of list or function being used. Once the rotation list or shuffling function is agreed, the endpoints can encode and decode transmissions from one another using the encodings set forth in the current codebook in the rotation or shuffle plus any necessary input parameters.
In some embodiments, the shuffling function may be restricted to permutations within a set of codewords of a given length.
Note that the rotation or shuffling algorithm is not limited to cycling through codebooks in a defined order. In some embodiments, the order may change in each round of encoding. In some embodiments, there may be no restrictions on repetition of the use of codebooks.
In some embodiments, codebooks may be chosen based on some combination of compaction performance and rotation or shuffling. For example, codebook shuffling may be repeatedly applied to each sourcepacket until a codebook is found that meets a minimum level of compaction for that sourcepacket. Thus, codebooks are chosen randomly or pseudo-randomly for each sourcepacket, but only those that produce encodings of the sourcepacket better than a threshold will be used.
System may receive, retrieve, or otherwise obtain a training set input 3601 comprising one or more sourcepackets of data, wherein each of the one or more sourcepackets of data may further comprise a plurality of sourceblocks. Training set input data 3601 may be copied wherein one copy of the training data may be analyzed by frequency calculator 3602 to analyze for word and/or sourceblock frequency (that is, the frequency with which a given word and/or sourceblock occurs in the training data set). Word and/or sourceblock frequency may be analyzed by scanning all substrings of bits and directly calculating the frequency of each substring by iterating over the data set to produce an occurrence frequency, which may then be used to estimate the rate of word and/or sourceblock occurrence in non-training data. A first Huffman binary tree is created based on the frequency of occurrences of each word in the first dataset, and a Huffman codeword is assigned to each observed word in the first dataset according to the first Huffman binary tree. In some embodiments, other entropy encoding methods may be used to construct a codebook instead of using a Huffman binary tree.
Additionally, words and/or sourceblocks may be further analyzed by statistical analyzer 3610 which may employ various statistical techniques and mechanisms to produce mismatch probability estimates based on the results of the statistical analyses. The mismatch probability refers to the number of times a mismatch occurs during system training (i.e., training system encoding/decoding processes and/or mechanisms). According to some embodiments, statistical analyzer 3610 may make use of a modified exponentially-weighted moving average (EWMA) 3611 in order to improve mismatch probability estimates. According to some embodiments, statistical analyzer 3610 may further comprise a parametric adjuster 3612 which allows system users to adjust and tune parameters related to and associated with the modified EWMA 3611. For example, a “windowing” (e.g., effective window size) parameter reflecting how far back in the history of the training process to incorporate in the estimate may be set and adjusted as required by system users. In some embodiments, parametric adjuster 3612 may be configured to autonomously adjust parameters until a pre-set tolerance is met, for example, perhaps the condition that the sampled standard deviation of the EWMA estimate divided by the EWMA estimate is less than some pre-determined threshold (e.g., σj/μj<10%).
Statistical analyzer 3610 may forward the calculated mismatch probability estimate to a mismatch codeword generator 3620. Tokenizer 3621 may receive the mismatch probability estimate and create one or more tokens which are representative of possible mismatch sourceblocks (and/or words) which may be encountered during runtime. The amount of tokens created by tokenizer 3621 may be based on the received mismatch probability estimate, for example, a higher mismatch probability estimate may result in more tokens being created, whereas a low mismatch probability estimate may require tokenizer to create fewer tokens. The tokens may allow a second Huffman tree generator 3622 to generate codewords for the tokens using shorter block-length encoding. In this way, when the second Huffman tree generator 3622 is generating codewords from the training set input (or a copy thereof) 3601 it may take into account the possibility that sourceblocks not a part of the training dataset 3601 may be encountered during system runtime.
Opcode appender 3623 may create a special context-switching opcode that can be used to signal to an encoder/decoder what action to pursue when a “mismatch sourceblock” is encountered. The opcode functions as a mismatch indicator which can alert the system that a mismatched sourceblock has been received. Opcode appender 3623 may append the created opcode as a pre-fix (or suffix) to the codewords that were generated for the tokens, thus forming a “mismatch codeword”. The mismatch codeword and the token can be added as a “mismatch codeword pair” to the codebook library 3603 generated based off the training set input 3601.
During system 3600 runtime, data to be stored or transmitted 3604 is received at transmission encoder/decoder 3630 which checks whether the received data (e.g., sourceblock) is in library 3603. If the received data is in the library then transmission encoder/decoder 3630 retrieves the codeword associated with the received data (sourceblock) and can then transmit the codeword, thus reducing the size of the data packets to be transmitted. If the received data is not found in the library then a mismatch sourceblock has been encountered and transmission encoder/decoder 3630 may scan library 3603 for the opcode in order to retrieve a mismatch codeword pair. The retrieved mismatch codeword pair and the mismatch sourceblock (e.g., original received data) may then be passed to a mismatch handler 3631 for processing. Mismatch handler 3631 may replace the token in the mismatch codeword pair with the received mismatch sourceblock and then delete the opcode pre-fix (or suffix) from the mismatch codeword. What is left as a result of this process is a new codeword pair comprising the received mismatch sourceblock (i.e., data not originally found in library 3603) and its associated codeword. This new codeword pair can be added to library 3603 and transmission encoder/decoder 3630 may then transmit the codeword with the pre-fix removed.
Since the library consists of re-usable building sourceblocks, and the actual data is represented by reference codes to the library, the total storage space of a single set of data would be much smaller than conventional methods, wherein the data is stored in its entirety. The more data sets that are stored, the larger the library becomes, and the more data can be stored in reference code form.
As an analogy, imagine each data set as a collection of printed books that are only occasionally accessed. The amount of physical shelf space required to store many collections would be quite large, and is analogous to conventional methods of storing every single bit of data in every data set. Consider, however, storing all common elements within and across books in a single library, and storing the books as references codes to those common elements in that library. As a single book is added to the library, it will contain many repetitions of words and phrases. Instead of storing the whole words and phrases, they are added to a library, and given a reference code, and stored as reference codes. At this scale, some space savings may be achieved, but the reference codes will be on the order of the same size as the words themselves. As more books are added to the library, larger phrases, quotations, and other words patterns will become common among the books. The larger the word patterns, the smaller the reference codes will be in relation to them as not all possible word patterns will be used. As entire collections of books are added to the library, sentences, paragraphs, pages, or even whole books will become repetitive. There may be many duplicates of books within a collection and across multiple collections, many references and quotations from one book to another, and much common phraseology within books on particular subjects. If each unique page of a book is stored only once in a common library and given a reference code, then a book of 1,000 pages or more could be stored on a few printed pages as a string of codes referencing the proper full-sized pages in the common library. The physical space taken up by the books would be dramatically reduced. The more collections that are added, the greater the likelihood that phrases, paragraphs, pages, or entire books will already be in the library, and the more information in each collection of books can be stored in reference form. Accessing entire collections of books is then limited not by physical shelf space, but by the ability to reprint and recycle the books as needed for use.
The projected increase in storage capacity using the method herein described is primarily dependent on two factors: 1) the ratio of the number of bits in a block to the number of bits in the reference code, and 2) the amount of repetition in data being stored by the system.
With respect to the first factor, the number of bits used in the reference codes to the sourceblocks must be smaller than the number of bits in the sourceblocks themselves in order for any additional data storage capacity to be obtained. As a simple example, 16-bit sourceblocks would require 216, or 65536, unique reference codes to represent all possible patterns of bits. If all possible 65536 blocks patterns are utilized, then the reference code itself would also need to contain sixteen bits in order to refer to all possible 65,536 blocks patterns. In such case, there would be no storage savings. However, if only 16 of those block patterns are utilized, the reference code can be reduced to 4 bits in size, representing an effective compression of 4 times (16 bits/4 bits=4) versus conventional storage. Using a typical block size of 512 bytes, or 4,096 bits, the number of possible block patterns is 24,096, which for all practical purposes is unlimited. A typical hard drive contains one terabyte (TB) of physical storage capacity, which represents 1,953,125,000, or roughly 231, 512 byte blocks. Assuming that 1 TB of unique 512-byte sourceblocks were contained in the library, and that the reference code would thus need to be 31 bits long, the effective compression ratio for stored data would be on the order of 132 times (4,096/31≈132) that of conventional storage.
With respect to the second factor, in most cases it could be assumed that there would be sufficient repetition within a data set such that, when the data set is broken down into sourceblocks, its size within the library would be smaller than the original data. However, it is conceivable that the initial copy of a data set could require somewhat more storage space than the data stored in a conventional manner, if all or nearly all sourceblocks in that set were unique. For example, assuming that the reference codes are 1/10th the size of a full-sized copy, the first copy stored as sourceblocks in the library would need to be 1.1 megabytes (MB), (1 MB for the complete set of full-sized sourceblocks in the library and 0.1 MB for the reference codes). However, since the sourceblocks stored in the library are universal, the more duplicate copies of something you save, the greater efficiency versus conventional storage methods. Conventionally, storing 10 copies of the same data requires 10 times the storage space of a single copy. For example, ten copies of a 1 MB file would take up 10 MB of storage space. However, using the method described herein, only a single full-sized copy is stored, and subsequent copies are stored as reference codes. Each additional copy takes up only a fraction of the space of the full-sized copy. For example, again assuming that the reference codes are 1/10th the size of the full-size copy, ten copies of a 1 MB file would take up only 2 MB of space (1 MB for the full-sized copy, and 0.1 MB each for ten sets of reference codes). The larger the library, the more likely that part or all of incoming data will duplicate sourceblocks already existing in the library.
The size of the library could be reduced in a manner similar to storage of data. Where sourceblocks differ from each other only by a certain number of bits, instead of storing a new sourceblock that is very similar to one already existing in the library, the new sourceblock could be represented as a reference code to the existing sourceblock, plus information about which bits in the new block differ from the existing block. For example, in the case where 512 byte sourceblocks are being used, if the system receives a new sourceblock that differs by only one bit from a sourceblock already existing in the library, instead of storing a new 512 byte sourceblock, the new sourceblock could be stored as a reference code to the existing sourceblock, plus a reference to the bit that differs. Storing the new sourceblock as a reference code plus changes would require only a few bytes of physical storage space versus the 512 bytes that a full sourceblock would require. The algorithm could be optimized to store new sourceblocks in this reference code plus changes form unless the changes portion is large enough that it is more efficient to store a new, full sourceblock.
It will be understood by one skilled in the art that transfer and synchronization of data would be increased to the same extent as for storage. By transferring or synchronizing reference codes instead of full-sized data, the bandwidth requirements for both types of operations are dramatically reduced.
In addition, the method described herein is inherently a form of encryption. When the data is converted from its full form to reference codes, none of the original data is contained in the reference codes. Without access to the library of sourceblocks, it would be impossible to re-construct any portion of the data from the reference codes. This inherent property of the method described herein could obviate the need for traditional encryption algorithms, thereby offsetting most or all of the computational cost of conversion of data back and forth to reference codes. In theory, the method described herein should not utilize any additional computing power beyond traditional storage using encryption algorithms. Alternatively, the method described herein could be in addition to other encryption algorithms to increase data security even further.
In other embodiments, additional security features could be added, such as: creating a proprietary library of sourceblocks for proprietary networks, physical separation of the reference codes from the library of sourceblocks, storage of the library of sourceblocks on a removable device to enable easy physical separation of the library and reference codes from any network, and incorporation of proprietary sequences of how sourceblocks are read and the data reassembled.
It will be recognized by a person skilled in the art that the methods described herein can be applied to data in any form. For example, the method described herein could be used to store genetic data, which has four data units: C, G, A, and T. Those four data units can be represented as 2 bit sequences: 00, 01, 10, and 11, which can be processed and stored using the method described herein.
It will be recognized by a person skilled in the art that certain embodiments of the methods described herein may have uses other than data storage. For example, because the data is stored in reference code form, it cannot be reconstructed without the availability of the library of sourceblocks. This is effectively a form of encryption, which could be used for cyber security purposes. As another example, an embodiment of the method described herein could be used to store backup copies of data, provide for redundancy in the event of server failure, or provide additional security against cyberattacks by distributing multiple partial copies of the library among computers are various locations, ensuring that at least two copies of each sourceblock exist in different locations within the network.
If, instead, the received runtime sourceblock is not found within the codebook then a mismatch sourceblock has been encountered and a transmission encoder/decoder 3630 may scan for an opcode in the library and may retrieve a mismatch codeword pair from the library 3806. Once the mismatch codeword pair has been retrieved, mismatch handler 3631 can replace the token contained within the mismatch codeword pair with the received mismatch sourceblock 3807. Mismatch handler 3631 can then delete the opcode from the mismatch codeword 3808. As a next step, mismatch handler 3631 can add the new codeword-sourceblock pair, comprising the received mismatched sourceblock and the mismatch codeword with the opcode removed, to the codebook library 3603. Once the mismatched sourceblock has been encoded, it may be transmitted and/or stored 3805 and the process repeats itself with the next received runtime sourceblock 3801 until all sourceblocks from a sourcepacket have been processed.
Generally, the techniques disclosed herein may be implemented on hardware or a combination of software and hardware. For example, they may be implemented in an operating system kernel, in a separate user process, in a library package bound into network applications, on a specially constructed machine, on an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or on a network interface card.
Software/hardware hybrid implementations of at least some of the aspects disclosed herein may be implemented on a programmable network-resident machine (which should be understood to include intermittently connected network-aware machines) selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in memory. Such network devices may have multiple network interfaces that may be configured or designed to utilize different types of network communication protocols. A general architecture for some of these machines may be described herein in order to illustrate one or more exemplary means by which a given unit of functionality may be implemented. According to specific aspects, at least some of the features or functionalities of the various aspects disclosed herein may be implemented on one or more general-purpose computers associated with one or more networks, such as for example an end-user computer system, a client computer, a network server or other server system, a mobile computing device (e.g., tablet computing device, mobile phone, smartphone, laptop, or other appropriate computing device), a consumer electronic device, a music player, or any other suitable electronic device, router, switch, or other suitable device, or any combination thereof. In at least some aspects, at least some of the features or functionalities of the various aspects disclosed herein may be implemented in one or more virtualized computing environments (e.g., network computing clouds, virtual machines hosted on one or more physical computing machines, or other appropriate virtual environments).
Referring now to
In one aspect, computing device 10 includes one or more central processing units (CPU) 12, one or more interfaces 15, and one or more busses 14 (such as a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus). When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, CPU 12 may be responsible for implementing specific functions associated with the functions of a specifically configured computing device or machine. For example, in at least one aspect, a computing device 10 may be configured or designed to function as a server system utilizing CPU 12, local memory 11 and/or remote memory 16, and interface(s) 15. In at least one aspect, CPU 12 may be caused to perform one or more of the different types of functions and/or operations under the control of software modules or components, which for example, may include an operating system and any appropriate applications software, drivers, and the like.
CPU 12 may include one or more processors 13 such as, for example, a processor from one of the Intel, ARM, Qualcomm, and AMD families of microprocessors. In some aspects, processors 13 may include specially designed hardware such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and so forth, for controlling operations of computing device 10. In a particular aspect, a local memory 11 (such as non-volatile random access memory (RAM) and/or read-only memory (ROM), including for example one or more levels of cached memory) may also form part of CPU 12. However, there are many different ways in which memory may be coupled to system 10. Memory 11 may be used for a variety of purposes such as, for example, caching and/or storing data, programming instructions, and the like. It should be further appreciated that CPU 12 may be one of a variety of system-on-a-chip (SOC) type hardware that may include additional hardware such as memory or graphics processing chips, such as a QUALCOMM SNAPDRAGON™ or SAMSUNG EXYNOS™ CPU as are becoming increasingly common in the art, such as for use in mobile devices or integrated devices.
As used herein, the term “processor” is not limited merely to those integrated circuits referred to in the art as a processor, a mobile processor, or a microprocessor, but broadly refers to a microcontroller, a microcomputer, a programmable logic controller, an application-specific integrated circuit, and any other programmable circuit.
In one aspect, interfaces 15 are provided as network interface cards (NICs). Generally, NICs control the sending and receiving of data packets over a computer network; other types of interfaces 15 may for example support other peripherals used with computing device 10. Among the interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, graphics interfaces, and the like. In addition, various types of interfaces may be provided such as, for example, universal serial bus (USB), Serial, Ethernet, FIREWIRE™ THUNDERBOLT™, PCI, parallel, radio frequency (RF), BLUETOOTH™, near-field communications (e.g., using near-field magnetics), 802.11 (Wi-Fi), frame relay, TCP/IP, ISDN, fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, Serial ATA (SATA) or external SATA (ESATA) interfaces, high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI), digital visual interface (DVI), analog or digital audio interfaces, asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) interfaces, high-speed serial interface (HSSI) interfaces, Point of Sale (POS) interfaces, fiber data distributed interfaces (FDDIs), and the like. Generally, such interfaces 15 may include physical ports appropriate for communication with appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor (such as a dedicated audio or video processor, as is common in the art for high-fidelity A/V hardware interfaces) and, in some instances, volatile and/or non-volatile memory (e.g., RAM).
Although the system shown in
Regardless of network device configuration, the system of an aspect may employ one or more memories or memory modules (such as, for example, remote memory block 16 and local memory 11) configured to store data, program instructions for the general-purpose network operations, or other information relating to the functionality of the aspects described herein (or any combinations of the above). Program instructions may control execution of or comprise an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. Memory 16 or memories 11, 16 may also be configured to store data structures, configuration data, encryption data, historical system operations information, or any other specific or generic non-program information described herein.
Because such information and program instructions may be employed to implement one or more systems or methods described herein, at least some network device aspects may include nontransitory machine-readable storage media, which, for example, may be configured or designed to store program instructions, state information, and the like for performing various operations described herein. Examples of such nontransitory machine-readable storage media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media such as optical disks, and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM), flash memory (as is common in mobile devices and integrated systems), solid state drives (SSD) and “hybrid SSD” storage drives that may combine physical components of solid state and hard disk drives in a single hardware device (as are becoming increasingly common in the art with regard to personal computers), memristor memory, random access memory (RAM), and the like. It should be appreciated that such storage means may be integral and non-removable (such as RAM hardware modules that may be soldered onto a motherboard or otherwise integrated into an electronic device), or they may be removable such as swappable flash memory modules (such as “thumb drives” or other removable media designed for rapidly exchanging physical storage devices), “hot-swappable” hard disk drives or solid state drives, removable optical storage discs, or other such removable media, and that such integral and removable storage media may be utilized interchangeably. Examples of program instructions include both object code, such as may be produced by a compiler, machine code, such as may be produced by an assembler or a linker, byte code, such as may be generated by for example a JAVA™ compiler and may be executed using a Java virtual machine or equivalent, or files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter (for example, scripts written in Python, Perl, Ruby, Groovy, or any other scripting language).
In some aspects, systems may be implemented on a standalone computing system. Referring now to
In some aspects, systems may be implemented on a distributed computing network, such as one having any number of clients and/or servers. Referring now to
In addition, in some aspects, servers 32 may call external services 37 when needed to obtain additional information, or to refer to additional data concerning a particular call. Communications with external services 37 may take place, for example, via one or more networks 31. In various aspects, external services 37 may comprise web-enabled services or functionality related to or installed on the hardware device itself. For example, in one aspect where client applications 24 are implemented on a smartphone or other electronic device, client applications 24 may obtain information stored in a server system 32 in the cloud or on an external service 37 deployed on one or more of a particular enterprise's or user's premises.
In some aspects, clients 33 or servers 32 (or both) may make use of one or more specialized services or appliances that may be deployed locally or remotely across one or more networks 31. For example, one or more databases 34 may be used or referred to by one or more aspects. It should be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art that databases 34 may be arranged in a wide variety of architectures and using a wide variety of data access and manipulation means. For example, in various aspects one or more databases 34 may comprise a relational database system using a structured query language (SQL), while others may comprise an alternative data storage technology such as those referred to in the art as “NoSQL” (for example, HADOOP CASSANDRA™, GOOGLE BIGTABLE™, and so forth). In some aspects, variant database architectures such as column-oriented databases, in-memory databases, clustered databases, distributed databases, or even flat file data repositories may be used according to the aspect. It will be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art that any combination of known or future database technologies may be used as appropriate, unless a specific database technology or a specific arrangement of components is specified for a particular aspect described herein. Moreover, it should be appreciated that the term “database” as used herein may refer to a physical database machine, a cluster of machines acting as a single database system, or a logical database within an overall database management system. Unless a specific meaning is specified for a given use of the term “database,” it should be construed to mean any of these senses of the word, all of which are understood as a plain meaning of the term “database” by those having ordinary skill in the art.
Similarly, some aspects may make use of one or more security systems 36 and configuration systems 35. Security and configuration management are common information technology (IT) and web functions, and some amount of each are generally associated with any IT or web systems. It should be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art that any configuration or security subsystems known in the art now or in the future may be used in conjunction with aspects without limitation, unless a specific security 36 or configuration system 35 or approach is specifically required by the description of any specific aspect.
In various aspects, functionality for implementing systems or methods of various aspects may be distributed among any number of client and/or server components. For example, various software modules may be implemented for performing various functions in connection with the system of any particular aspect, and such modules may be variously implemented to run on server and/or client components.
The skilled person will be aware of a range of possible modifications of the various aspects described above. Accordingly, the present invention is defined by the claims and their equivalents.
Priority is claimed in the application data sheet to the following patents or patent applications, the entire written description of each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety: Ser. No. 17/727,913Ser. No. 17/404,699Ser. No. 16/455,655Ser. No. 16/200,466Ser. No. 15/975,74162/578,82463/232,050
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62578824 | Oct 2017 | US | |
| 63232050 | Aug 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17727913 | Apr 2022 | US |
| Child | 17884470 | US | |
| Parent | 17404699 | Aug 2021 | US |
| Child | 17727913 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16455655 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Child | 17404699 | US | |
| Parent | 16200466 | Nov 2018 | US |
| Child | 16455655 | US | |
| Parent | 15975741 | May 2018 | US |
| Child | 16200466 | US |
