System and method for data feed acceleration and encryption

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9143546
  • Patent Number
    9,143,546
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 3, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 22, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for providing accelerated transmission of broadcast data, such as financial data and news feeds, over a communication channel using data compression and decompression to provide secure transmission and transparent multiplication of communication bandwidth, as well as reduce the latency associated with data transmission of conventional systems.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


The present invention relates generally to systems and method for providing data transmission, and in particular, to systems and method for providing accelerated transmission of data, such as financial data and news feeds, over a communication channel using data compression and decompression to provide secure data transfer and effectively increase the bandwidth of the communication channel and/or reduce the latency of data transmission.


2. Description of Related Art:


The financial information services industry covers a broad range of financial information ranging from basic stock quotations to analyst reports to detailed pricing of callable bonds. Users of financial information can generally be divided into two segments—Information users and Analytics users. Information users range from non-finance business professionals to curious stock market investors and tend to seek basic financial information and data. Analytical users on the other hand, tend to be finance professionals who require more arcane financial information and utilize sophisticated analytical tools to manipulate and analyze data (e.g. for writing option contracts).


Historically, proprietary systems, such as Bloomberg, Reuters and Bridge Information, have been the primary electronic source for financial information to both the informational and analytical users. These closed systems required dedicated telecommunications lines and product-specific hardware. The most typical installations are land-based networking solutions such as T1 or ISDN, and satellite-based “wireless” solutions at speeds of 384 kbps.


Latency of financial data and news is critical to the execution of financial transactions. Indeed the more timely receipt of financial data from various sources including the New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange, National Association of Securities Dealers (NASDAQ), Options Exchange, Commodities Exchanges, and Futures presents a fundamental advantage to those who trade. Latency is induced by the long time taken to compress and encrypt data prior to transmission, along with the associated time to decrypt and decompress. Often current methods of encryption and compression take as much or substantially more time than the actual time to transmit the uncompressed, unencrypted data. Thus one problem within the current art is the latency induced by the act of encryption, compression, decryption, and decompression.


Modern data compression algorithms suffer from poor compression, high latency, or both. Within the present art algorithms such as Lempel-Ziv, modified/embellished Lempel-Ziv, Binary Arithmetic, and Huffman coding are essentially generic algorithm having a varied effectiveness on different data types. Also small increases in compression to the negentropy limit of the data generally require exponentially greater periods of time and substantially higher latency. Generic algorithms are currently utilized as data types and content format is constantly changed within the financial industry. Many changes are gradual however there are also abrupt changes, such as the recent switch to decimalization that has imposed substantial requirements on data transmission bandwidth infrastructure within the financial industry. Thus another problem within the current art is the high latency and poor compression due to the use of generic data compression algorithms on financial data and news feeds.


Within the financial and news feeds, data is often segregated into packets for transmission. Further, in inquiry response type systems, as found in many financial research systems, the size of request packets and also response packets is quite small. As such, response servers often wait for long periods of time (for example 500 msec) to aggregate data packets prior to transmission back to the inquirer. By aggregating the data and then applying compression, higher compression ratios are often achieved. This then translates to lower data communications costs or more customers served for a given amount of available communications bandwidth. Thus another problem within the current art is the substantial latency caused by aggregating data packets due to poor data compression efficiency and packet overhead.


Thus, given the importance of receiving financial information over computer networks, an improved system and method for providing secure point-to-point solution for transparent multiplication of bandwidth over conventional communication channels is highly desirable.


These and other limitations within the current art are solved by the present invention.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to systems and methods for providing accelerated transmission of data, such as financial data and news feeds, over a communication channel using data compression and decompression to provide secure data transfer and effectively increase the bandwidth of the communication channel. The present invention is preferably applied in broadcast-based systems and inquiry response-based systems in which the data structure of the.


In one aspect of the present invention, a method for providing accelerated transmission of data over a network comprises the steps of:


receiving a data stream for transmission over a communication channel;


compressing, in real-time, the data stream at a compression rate that increases the effective bandwidth of the communication channel;


transmitting the compressed data stream over the communication channel; and


decompressing, in real time, the compressed data stream received over the communication channel.


In another aspect, the step of compressing comprises the steps of compressing the data stream using a statistical compression algorithm, wherein the statistical compression algorithm uses code tables that are derived based on a data model associated with the data stream. The statistical compression algorithm preferably comprises Huffman encoding or Arithmetic encoding.


In yet another aspect, the code tables for the Huffman or Arithmetic encoding comprise a state machine. The state machine comprises one or more global states each having one or more code tables associated therewith. The complexity of the code tables provides a virtual encryption and, thus a level of security that obviates the need to use additional encryption on the data stream.


In another aspect of the present invention, a method for providing accelerated transmission of data over a network comprises the steps of:


receiving a data stream for transmission over a communication channel;


compressing, in real-time, the data stream;


transmitting the compressed data stream over the communication channel; and


decompressing, in real time, the compressed data stream received over the communication channel, wherein a latency associated with the compressing, transmitting and decompression steps is less than a latency associated with transmitting the data stream in uncompressed format.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for providing accelerated transmission of data over a network comprises the steps of:


compressing a data stream using a content-dependent compression system that is constructed based on a data model associated with the data stream;


transmitting the compressed data stream over a communication channel; and


utilizing a content-independent compression system to compress the data stream, when a compression ratio obtained using the content-dependent system falls below a predetermined threshold, or when a latency associated with the data transmission exceeds a predetermined threshold.


These and other aspects, features and advantages, of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments that is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system in which the present invention may be implemented for transmitting broadcast data;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system and method for providing accelerated transmission of data over a communication channel according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for generating compression/decompression state machines according to one aspect of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary encoding table structure used for compressing/decompressing data according to the present invention, which may be generated using the process of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a diagram of a system/method for providing content independent data compression, which may be implemented for providing accelerated data transmission according to the present invention; and



FIG. 6 is a diagram of a system/method for providing content independent data decompression, which may be implemented for providing accelerated data transmission according to the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is directed to systems and methods for providing accelerated transmission of broadcast data, such as financial data and news feeds, over a communication channel using data compression and decompression to provide secure transmission and transparent multiplication of communication bandwidth, as well as reduce the latency associated with data transmission of conventional systems.


In general, the term “accelerated” data transmission refers to a process of receiving a data stream for transmission over a communication channel, compressing the broadcast data stream in real-time (wherein the term “real time” as used herein collectively refers to substantially real time, or at real time, or greater than real time) at a compression rate that increases the effective bandwidth of the communication channel, and transmitting the compressed broadcast data over the communication channel. The effective increase in bandwidth and reduction of latency of the communication channel is achieved by virtue of the faster than real-time, real-time, near real time, compression of a received data stream prior to transmission.


For instance, assume that the communication channel has a bandwidth of “B” megabytes per second. If a data transmission controller is capable of compressing an input data stream with an average compression rate of 3:1, then data can be transmitted over the communication channel at an effective rate of up to 3*B megabytes per second, thereby effectively increasing the bandwidth of the communication channel by a factor of three.


Further, when the receiver is capable of decompressing (in substantially real time, real time, or faster than real time) the compressed data stream at a rate approximately equal to the compression rate, the point-to-point transmission rate between the transmitter and receiver is transparently increased. Advantageously, accelerated data transmission can mitigate the traditional bottleneck associated with, e.g., local and network data transmission.


Additionally, if the compression and decompression are accomplished in real-time or faster, the compressed, transmitted and decompressed data is available before the receipt of an equivalent uncompressed stream. The latency of data transmission over the communication channel is achieved when the total time for compression, transmission, and decompression, is less than the total time for transmitting the data in uncompressed form.


It is to be understood that the present invention may be implemented in various forms of hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. Preferably, the present invention is implemented on a computer platform including hardware such as one or more central processing units (CPU) or digital signal processors (DSP), a random access memory (RAM), and input/output (I/O) interface(s). The computer platform may also include an operating system, microinstruction code, and dedicated processing hardware utilizing combinatorial logic or finite state machines. The various processes and functions described herein may be either part of the hardware, microinstruction code or application programs that are executed via the operating system, or any combination thereof.


It is to be further understood that, because some of the constituent system components described herein are preferably implemented as software modules, the actual system connections shown in the Figures may differ depending upon the manner in that the systems are programmed. General purpose computers, servers, workstations, personal digital assistants, special purpose microprocessors, dedicated hardware, or and combination thereof may be employed to implement the present invention. Given the teachings herein, one of ordinary skill in the related art will be able to contemplate these and similar implementations or configurations of the present invention.



FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a system in which the present invention may be implemented. The system 10 comprises content 11 and data server 12 associated with a service provider of broadcast data. The content 11 comprises information that is processed by the data server 12 to generate a broadcast, e.g., a news feed or financial data feed. As explained in further detail below, the data server 12 employs data compression to encode/encrypt the broadcast data 11 prior to transmission over various communication channels to one or more client site systems of subscribing users, which comprise the necessary software and hardware to decode/decrypt the compressed broadcast data in real-time. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1, the communication channels comprise a landline 13 that feeds the compressed broadcast data to a satellite system comprising modem 14 and an uplink system 15, which provides a data uplink 16 to a relay 17. The relay 17 provides data downlinks 18 to one or more downlink systems 19.


Advantageously, the proprietary software used by the data server 12 to compress the data stream in real-time and software used by the workstations 19 to decompress the data stream in real-time effectively provides a seamless and transparent increase in the transmission bandwidth of the various communication channels used, without requiring modification of existing network infrastructure.


Referring now to FIG. 2, a block diagram illustrates a system/method for providing accelerated transmission of data according to one embodiment of the present invention. More specifically, FIG. 2 illustrates embodiments of a broadcast data server (transmitter) and client system (receiver) for implementing accelerated transmission and real-time processing of broadcast data. Broadcast data 21 (comprising one or more different broadcast types) is processed by data server 22 prior to transmission to client 23 over a communication channel 24. The data server 22 utilizes a processor 25 (e.g., microprocessor, digital signal processor, etc.) for executing one or more compression algorithms 26 for compressing (in real-time) the broadcast data 21 prior to transmission. In preferred embodiments, compression is achieved using Huffman or Arithmetic encoding, wherein one or more state machines 27-27n are constructed based on a-priori knowledge of the structure and content of one or more given broadcast and data feeds.


As explained in further detail below, each state machine 27-27n comprises a set of compression tables that comprise information for encoding the next character (text, integer, etc.) or sequence of characters in the broadcast data feed, as well as pointers which point to the next state (encoding table) based on the character or character sequence. As explained in greater detail below, a skeleton for each state machine 27-27n (nodes and pointers) is preferably built by finding sequences of characters (n-tuples) that frequently appear in a given data input. Once a skeleton has been determined, a large set of data is processed through the system and counts are kept of character n-tuples for each state. These counts are then used to construct the compression tables associated with the state machine to provide statistical compression. The compressed data is transmitted over the communication channel 24 via a communication stack using any suitable protocol (e.g., RTP (real time protocol) using RTCP (real-time control protocol), TCP/IP, UDP, or any real-time streaming protocol with suitable control mechanism).


Similarly, the client 23 comprises a processor 30 for executing one or more decompression algorithms 31. Depending one the data feed type, one of a plurality of decompression state machines 32-32n are used to decompress the compressed data stream received by the client 23 via communication stack 34. Each state machine 32-32n comprises a set of decompression tables 33-33n that comprise information for decode the next encoded character (or symbol) or sequence of symbols in the compressed broadcast data feed, as well as pointers which point to the next state based on the symbol or symbol sequence. For each compression state machine 27-27n in the data server, a corresponding decompression state machine 32-32n is needed in the client 23 to decompress the associated data stream.


Advantageously, a compression/decompression scheme according to the present invention using Huffman or Arithmetic encoding provides secure transmission via de facto or virtual “encryption” in a real-time environment. Indeed, virtual encryption is achieved by virtue of the fast, yet complex, data compression using Huffman tree, for example, without necessarily requiring actual encryption of the compressed data and decryption of the compressed data. Because of the time-sensitive nature of the market data, and the ever-changing and data-dependent nature of the arithmetic scheme, decryption is virtually impractical, or so complex and useless as to render the data worthless upon eventual decoding.


However, data compression using Huffman or Arithmetic encoding yields encoded data that is very difficult to decode than current encryption schemes such as plain text or simple bit shuffling codes as currently used by broadcast service providers. An attacker must have the compression model and the tables used to compress the data stream to be able to obtain useful information from it. Thus, at one level of security, the client-side decompression tables are preferably stored in encrypted form and are decrypted on being loaded into the processor 30 (e.g., general purpose processor, DSP, etc.) using an encryption/decryption key that is validated for a subscribing user. In this manner, a client will be unable to use the tables on other processors or sites or after terminating a service contract.


Since Huffman compression uses the same bit code for a character each time it appears in a given context, an attacker with a very large data set of compressed and uncompressed data could possibly reconstruct the tables, assuming the overall model were known. Arithmetic compression, on the other hand, generates different bit patterns for the same character in the same context depending on surrounding characters. Arithmetic encoding provides at least an order of magnitude more difficult to recover the tables from the compressed and uncompressed data streams.


The following is a detailed discussion of a compression scheme using Huffman or Arithmetic encoding for providing accelerated transmission of broadcast data according to one aspect of the present invention. It is to be appreciated that the present invention is applicable with any data stream whose statistical regularity may be captured and represented in a state machine model. For example, the present invention applies to packetized data streams, in which the packets are limited in type format and content.


In one embodiment using Huffman or Arithmetic encoding, each character or character sequence is encoded (converted to a binary code) based on the frequency of character or character sequence in a given “context”. For a given context, frequently appearing characters are encoded with few bits while infrequently appearing characters are encoded with more bits. High compression ratios are obtained if the frequency distribution of characters in most contexts is highly skewed with few frequently appearing characters and many characters seldomly (or never) appear.


Referring now to FIG. 3, a flow diagram illustrates a method for generating compression/decompression state machines according to one aspect of the present invention. The “context” in which a character (or character sequence) is encoded in a given broadcast stream is based on a “global state” that represents packet type and large-scale structure and the previous few characters. The first step in building a compression scheme involves selecting a global state system based on the packet structure of the broadcast model (step 40). More specifically, a global state system is constructed based on a priori knowledge of the data stream model, e.g., the packet type frequency and structure of the broadcast model. By way of example, one model for financial data may comprise four global states representing: a beginning of packet, an options packet, a NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) packet and some other packet type. Further, additional codes may be added to the encoding tables to indicate global state transitions (e.g., for an end of packet code in the broadcast model). If there is internal structure to packets, such as a header with different statistics than the body, additional global states could be added.


Once a global state system is selected, training samples from an associated data stream are passed through the global model to acquire counts of frequencies of the occurrence of n-tuple character sequences ending in each of the model states (step 41). In a preferred embodiment, the n-tuples comprise character sequences having 1, 2 and 3 characters. Using the acquired counts, sub-states (or “local states”) of the predefined global states are constructed based on previous characters in the data stream. A local state may depend on either none, 1, 2, or 3 (or more) previous characters in the stream. To provide a practical limitation, a predetermined count threshold is preferably applied to the count data (step 42) and only those sequences that occur more often than the count threshold are added as local states (step 43). For example, if a three-character sequence does not occur sufficiently frequently, the count for the last two characters is tested, etc.


It is to be understood that any character sequence length “n” may be implemented depending on the application. The longer the allowed character sequence, the more memory is needed to store the encoding tables and/or the lower the count threshold should be set.


As samples of the data are passed through the state model, character (and transition code) counts for each context are accumulated. These counts are used to build the Huffman or Arithmetic coding tables. The construction of the global and local models is an iterative process. The count threshold for forming local states can be adjusted depending on the application. For instance, a larger threshold will result in less local states but less compression as well. Further, a comparison of statistics in local or global states may suggest adding or deleting global states.


The construction of the global model requires knowledge of the data stream packet structure. The construction of the local states is automatic (once the threshold is set).



FIG. 4 is a diagram of an exemplary encoding table structure according to one aspect of the present invention. As indicated above, a global state 50 is determined from a field within the data stream to be encoded. Various forms of data have different identifiers, for example one type of NYSE data may be identified by 0x00, AMEX 0x01, NASDAQ 0x02, Options Data 0x03, News 0x04, and so forth. The first characters (binary pattern) within the string are utilized as a direct index to the NYSE start table 51. For example, if we are using three character long strings and the characters are “ABC”, the “ABC” table is used. In general all three-character combinations will have start tables, however it is possible that certain strings occur so infrequently as to not warrant tables and may be transmitted in an uncompressed format. It should be mentioned that the tables may use any tuple of characters, three being a convenient value for present processor, memory, compression, and latency considerations.


The next defining three-bit sequence is used as an index from the “ABC” table to the next table. For example for the string “ABCD” the next sequence is “BCD”. It should be noted that all tables are not complete, i.e. only frequently occurring values above a threshold are employed to limit memory usage and achieve an acceptable compression level. Also it should be noted that if the whole string was simply “ABC” a base code value within the start table is used 51.


This process is repeated to the depth of the code tables, i.e. maximum string length matches for compression. An n-tuple indexing system according to the present invention is highly effective for hashing and indexing, optimizing the overall performance of the compression system. It should be noted that this system of organization works equally well for compression systems that concatenate codes from multiple tables or have unique codes per fixed string.


As noted above with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, a compression scheme according to the present invention may be implemented in any system to provide accelerated data transmission to multiple client site systems. Preferably, the client site systems may connect at any time, so minimal immediate history may be used (since a newly connected site must be able to pick up quickly). A system according to an embodiment of the present invention uses statistical compression (Huffman or Arithmetic coding) using fixed (or adaptive) tables based on the statistics of a data feed sample. As noted above, it has been determined that the statistical compression schemes described herein are well adapted for use with structured data streams having repetitive data content (e.g., stock symbols and quotes, etc.) to provide fast and efficient data compression/decompression.


The following discussion provides further details regarding the preparation of statistical-based encoding tables and their use for compression/decompression according to the present invention. During a data compression process, the selection of which encoding table to use for compression is preferably based on up to n (where n is preferably equal to 3) preceding characters of the message. In an exemplary broadcast model tested by the present inventors, a data stream comprises messages that begin with an ID code in the range 0-31 with the remainder of the message being characters in the range 32-127. It was found that approximately half of the messages in a given sample began with ID code 0x0c and half of the remainder began with ID code 0x0f. Thus, a separate encoding table is preferably used for a message ID code. Further, separate table sets are used for messages beginning with 0x0c and with 0x0f, with the remaining messages lumped together in another table.


Each table has an additional termination code. The termination code in a “start table” indicates the end of a compression block. The termination code in all other tables indicates the end of the message. Thus, the start table comprises 33 entries and all other tables have 97 entries.


Using one table for each 3-character context would require prohibitive amounts of memory. For example, a complete one-character context would require 33+3*97=324 tables. Then, a complete two-character context would require 324*97=31,428 tables. And finally, a complete three-character context would require 324*97*97=3,048,516 tables. Preferably, as described above, the application of a count threshold at each context size reduces the amount of tables. Only when a context occurs at greater than the threshold rate in the sample will a table be created for that context.


Each table entry includes a link to the next table to be used. For instance, in an “abc” context table, the entry for next character “d” would point to the “bcd” table, if such table was created. If such table was not created, the entry for next character “d” would point to the “cd” table, if such table existed. If no “cd” table exists, the “d” table would be used and if that fails, a base table for the message type would be used.


For a client site system to pick up the broadcast feed at any time, clearly identifiable synchronization points are preferably included in the compressed data stream. In a preferred embodiment, data is compressed in blocks with each block comprising some number of complete messages. Preferably, each compressed block ends with at least four bytes with each bit being logic 1 and no interior point in the compressed block will comprise 32 consecutive 1 bits. The compressed block preferably begins with two bytes giving the decompressed size of the block shifted to guarantee that the first byte of the compressed block is not all 1's. Thus, to achieve synchronization, the client site system can scan the input compressed data stream for 4 bytes of 0xff, wherein the next byte not equal to 0xff is deemed the start of a compressed block. In other words, the receiver will accumulate the compressed data until at least a sequence of 4 bytes each having a value of 0xff is detected in the input stream, at which point decompression will commence on the compressed input stream.


In another embodiment of the present invention, if a compressed block is more than 6 bytes longer than the uncompressed data, the data block is transmitted uncompressed preceded by the shifted two-byte count with the high bit set and trailed by 4 bytes of 0xff.


The following is discussion of a method for preparing Huffman Tables according to one aspect of the present invention. The Huffman codes generated by a conventional optimal algorithm have been modified in various ways in accordance with the present invention. First, in order that there not be 32 consecutive one bits in the data stream except at the end of a compression block, a termination code in each table comprises all 1 bits.


Further, to reduce space required for decompression tables, and ensure no sequence of 32 1 bits, each code is preferably decoded as follows:


a) The first 7 bits are used to index into a table. If the character code is no more than 7 bits, it can be read directly;


b) otherwise, some number N of initial bits is discarded and the next 7 bits are used to index a second table to find the character.


Based on these steps, preferably, no character code can use more than 14 bits and all codes of more than 7 bits must fit into the code space of the N initial bits. If N is 3, for instance, then no code can use more than 10 bits. To achieve this, the code space required for all optimal codes of more than 7 bits is first determined, following by a determining the initial offset N. Every code comprising more than N+7 bits is preferably shortened, and other codes are lengthened to balance the code tree. It is possible that this may cause the code space for codes over 7 bits to increase so that N may need to be decreased. Preferably, this process is performed in a manner that causes minimal reduction in the efficiency of the codes.


The above modifications to convention optimal algorithm yields codes in which no non-termination code ends in more than 7 1 bits, no non-termination code begins with more than 6 1 bits, no termination code is more than 14 1 bits and no non-termination packet start code begins with more than 5 1 bits. Thus, in the middle of a packet, a sequence of no more than 13 bits of logic 1 can occur, while, at the end of a packet, a sequence of no more than 26 bits of logic 1 can occur.


In another embodiment of the present invention, Arithmetic compression can be used instead of Huffman encoding. The tables for Arithmetic encoding are preferably constructed such that a sequence of 32 bits of logic 1 will not occur in the interior of a message (which is important for a random sign-on in the middle of the stream).


Arithmetic compression provides an advantage of about 6% better compression than Huffman and uses half as much memory for tables, which allows the number of tables to be increased). Indeed, the addition of more tables and/or another level of tables yields more efficient compression. Although Arithmetic compression may take about 6 times as long as Huffman, this can certainly be improved by flattening the subroutine call tree (wherein there is a subroutine call for each output bit.)


In summary, a compression scheme according to one aspect of the invention utilizes a state machine, wherein in each state, there is a compression/decompression table comprising information on how to encode/decode the next character, as well as pointers that indicated which state to go to based on that character. A skeleton of the state machine (nodes and pointers) is preferably built by finding sequences of characters that appear often in the input. Once the skeleton has been determined, a large set of data is run through the system and counts are kept of characters seen in each state. These counts are then used to construct the encode/decode tables for the statistical compression.


Other approaches may be used to build the skeleton of the state machine. A very large fraction of the traffic on a certain feed consists of messages in the digital data feed format, which is fairly constrained. It may be possible to build by hand a skeleton that takes into account this format. For instance, capital letters only appear in the symbol name at the beginning. This long-range context information can be represented with our current approach. Once a basic skeleton is in place, the structure could be extended for sequences that occur frequently.


The above-described statistical compression schemes provide content-dependent compression and decompression. In other words, for a given data stream, the above schemes are preferably structured based on the data model associated with the given stream. It is to be appreciated, however, that other compression schemes may be employed for providing accelerated data transmission in accordance with the present invention for providing effectively increased communication bandwidth and/or reduction in latency. For instance, in another embodiment of the present invention, the data compression/decompression techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,024, issued to J. Fallon on Feb. 27, 2001, entitled “Content Independent Data Compression Method and System” may be used in addition to, or in lieu of, the statistical based compression schemes described above.


In general, a content-independent data compression system is a data compression system that provides an optimal compression ratio for an encoded stream regardless of the data content of the input data stream. A content-independent data compression method generally comprises the steps of compressing an input data stream, which comprises a plurality of disparate data types, using a plurality of different encoders. In other words, each encoder compresses the input data stream and outputs blocks of compressed data. An encoded data stream is then generated by selectively combining compressed data blocks output from the encoders based on compression ratios obtained by the encoders.


Because a multitude of different data types may be present within a given input data stream, or data block, to it is often difficult and/or impractical to predict the level of compression that will be achieved by any one encoding technique. Indeed, rather than having to first identify the different data types (e.g., ASCII, image data, multimedia data, signed and unsigned integers, pointers, etc.) comprising an input data stream and selecting a data encoding technique that yields the highest compression ratio for each of the identified data types, content-independent data compression advantageously applies the input data stream to each of a plurality of different encoders to, in effect, generate a plurality of encoded data streams. The plurality of encoders are preferably selected based on their ability to effectively encode different types of input data. Ultimately, the final compressed data stream is generated by selectively combining blocks of the compressed streams output from the plurality of encoders. Thus, the resulting compressed output stream will achieve the greatest possible compression, regardless of the data content.


In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a compression system may employ both a content-dependent scheme and a content-independent scheme, whereby the content-dependent scheme is used as the primary compression/decompression system and the content-independent scheme is used in place of, or in conjunction with, the content dependent scheme, when periodically checked “compression factor” meets a predetermined threshold. For instance, the compression factor may comprise a compression ratio, wherein the compression scheme will be modified when the compression ration falls below a certain threshold. Further, the “compression factor” may comprise the latency of data transmission, wherein the data compression scheme with be modified when the latency of data transmission exceeds a predetermined threshold.


Indeed, as explained above, the efficiency of the content-dependent compression/decompression schemes described herein is achieved, e.g., by virtue of the fact that the encoding tables are based on, and specifically designed for, the known data model. However, in situations where the data model is may be modified, the efficiency of the content-dependent scheme may be adversely affected, thereby possibly resulting in a reduction in compression efficiency and/or an increase in the overall latency of data transmission. In such a situation, as a backup system, the data compression controller can switch to a content-independent scheme that provides improved compression efficiency and reduction in latency as compared to the primary content-dependent scheme.


In yet another embodiment of the present invention, when the efficiency of a content-dependent scheme falls below a predetermined threshold based on, e.g., a change in the data structure of the data stream, the present invention preferably comprises an automatic mechanism to adaptively modify the encoding tables to generate optimal encoding tables (using the process described above with reference to FIG. 3).



FIG. 5 is a detailed block diagram illustrates an exemplary content-independent data compression system 110 that may be employed herein. Details of this data compression system are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,024, which is fully incorporated herein by reference. In this embodiment, the data compression system 110 accepts data blocks from an input data stream and stores the input data block in an input buffer or cache 115. It is to be understood that the system processes the input data stream in data blocks that may range in size from individual bits through complete files or collections of multiple files. Additionally, the input data block size may be fixed or variable. A counter 120 counts or otherwise enumerates the size of input data block in any convenient units including bits, bytes, words, and double words. It should be noted that the input buffer 115 and counter 120 are not required elements of the present invention. The input data buffer 115 may be provided for buffering the input data stream in order to output an uncompressed data stream in the event that, as discussed in further detail below, every encoder fails to achieve a level of compression that exceeds an a priori specified minimum compression ratio threshold.


Data compression is performed by an encoder module 125 that may comprise a set of encoders E1, E2, E3 . . . En. The encoder set E1, E2, E3 . . . En may include any number “n” (where n may=1) of those lossless encoding techniques currently well known within the art such as run length, Huffman, Lempel-Ziv Dictionary Compression, arithmetic coding, data compaction, and data null suppression. It is to be understood that the encoding techniques are selected based upon their ability to effectively encode different types of input data. It is to be appreciated that a full complement of encoders are preferably selected to provide a broad coverage of existing and future data types.


The encoder module 125 successively receives as input each of the buffered input data blocks (or unbuffered input data blocks from the counter module 120). Data compression is performed by the encoder module 125 wherein each of the encoders E1 . . . En processes a given input data block and outputs a corresponding set of encoded data blocks. It is to be appreciated that the system affords a user the option to enable/disable any one or more of the encoders E1 . . . En prior to operation. As is understood by those skilled in the art, such feature allows the user to tailor the operation of the data compression system for specific applications. It is to be further appreciated that the encoding process may be performed either in parallel or sequentially. In particular, the encoders El through En of encoder module 125 may operate in parallel (i.e., simultaneously processing a given input data block by utilizing task multiplexing on a single central processor, via dedicated hardware, by executing on a plurality of processor or dedicated hardware systems, or any combination thereof). In addition, encoders E1 through En may operate sequentially on a given unbuffered or buffered input data block. This process is intended to eliminate the complexity and additional processing overhead associated with multiplexing concurrent encoding techniques on a single central processor and/or dedicated hardware, set of central processors and/or dedicated hardware, or any achievable combination. It is to be further appreciated that encoders of the identical type may be applied in parallel to enhance encoding speed. For instance, encoder E1 may comprise two parallel Huffman encoders for parallel processing of an input data block.


A buffer/counter module 130 is operatively connected to the encoder module 125 for buffering and counting the size of each of the encoded data blocks output from encoder module 125. Specifically, the buffer/counter 130 comprises a plurality of buffer/counters BC1, BC2, BC3 . . . BCn, each operatively associated with a corresponding one of the encoders E1 . . . En. A compression ratio module 135, operatively connected to the output buffer/counter 130, determines the compression ratio obtained for each of the enabled encoders E1 . . . En by taking the ratio of the size of the input data block to the size of the output data block stored in the corresponding buffer/counters BC1 . . . BCn. In addition, the compression ratio module 135 compares each compression ratio with an a priori-specified compression ratio threshold limit to determine if at least one of the encoded data blocks output from the enabled encoders E1 . . . En achieves a compression that exceeds an a priori-specified threshold. As is understood by those skilled in the art, the threshold limit may be specified as any value inclusive of data expansion, no data compression or expansion, or any arbitrarily desired compression limit. A description module 138, operatively coupled to the compression ratio module 135, appends a corresponding compression type descriptor to each encoded data block which is selected for output so as to indicate the type of compression format of the encoded data block. A data compression type descriptor is defined as any recognizable data token or descriptor that indicates which data encoding technique has been applied to the data. It is to be understood that, since encoders of the identical type may be applied in parallel to enhance encoding speed (as discussed above), the data compression type descriptor identifies the corresponding encoding technique applied to the encoded data block, not necessarily the specific encoder. The encoded data block having the greatest compression ratio along with its corresponding data compression type descriptor is then output for subsequent data processing or transmittal. If there are no encoded data blocks having a compression ratio that exceeds the compression ratio threshold limit, then the original unencoded input data block is selected for output and a null data compression type descriptor is appended thereto. A null data compression type descriptor is defined as any recognizable data token or descriptor that indicates no data encoding has been applied to the input data block. Accordingly, the unencoded input data block with its corresponding null data compression type descriptor is then output for subsequent data processing or transmittal.


Again, it is to be understood that the embodiment of the data compression engine of FIG. 5 is exemplary of a preferred compression system which may be implemented in the present invention, and that other compression systems and methods known to those skilled in the art may be employed for providing accelerated data transmission in accordance with the teachings herein. Indeed, in another embodiment of the compression system disclosed in the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,024, a timer is included to measure the time elapsed during the encoding process against an a priori-specified time limit. When the time limit expires, only the data output from those encoders (in the encoder module 125) that have completed the present encoding cycle are compared to determine the encoded data with the highest compression ratio. The time limit ensures that the real-time or pseudo real-time nature of the data encoding is preserved. In addition, the results from each encoder in the encoder module 125 may be buffered to allow additional encoders to be sequentially applied to the output of the previous encoder, yielding a more optimal lossless data compression ratio. Such techniques are discussed in greater detail in the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,024.


Referring now to FIG. 6, a detailed block diagram illustrates an exemplary content independent decompression system that may be employed herein for accelerated data transmission as disclosed in the above-incorporated U.S. Patent No. 6,195,024. In this embodiment, the data compression engine 180 accepts compressed data blocks received over a communication channel. The decompression system processes the input data stream in data blocks that may range in size from individual bits through complete files or collections of multiple files. Additionally, the input data block size may be fixed or variable.


The data decompression engine 180 comprises an input buffer 155 that receives as input an uncompressed or compressed data stream comprising one or more data blocks. The data blocks may range in size from individual bits through complete files or collections of multiple files. Additionally, the data block size may be fixed or variable. The input data buffer 55 is preferably included (not required) to provide storage of input data for various hardware implementations. A descriptor extraction module 160 receives the buffered (or unbuffered) input data block and then parses, lexically, syntactically, or otherwise analyzes the input data block using methods known by those skilled in the art to extract the data compression type descriptor associated with the data block. The data compression type descriptor may possess values corresponding to null (no encoding applied), a single applied encoding technique, or multiple encoding techniques applied in a specific or random order (in accordance with the data compression system embodiments and methods discussed above).


A decoder module 165 includes one or more decoders D1 . . . Dn for decoding the input data block using a decoder, set of decoders, or a sequential set of decoders corresponding to the extracted compression type descriptor. The decoders D1 . . . Dn may include those lossless encoding techniques currently well known within the art, including: run length, Huffman, Lempel-Ziv Dictionary Compression, arithmetic coding, data compaction, and data null suppression. Decoding techniques are selected based upon their ability to effectively decode the various different types of encoded input data generated by the data compression systems described above or originating from any other desired source.


As with the data compression systems discussed in the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,024, the decoder module 165 may include multiple decoders of the same type applied in parallel so as to reduce the data decoding time. An output data buffer or cache 170 may be included for buffering the decoded data block output from the decoder module 165. The output buffer 70 then provides data to the output data stream. It is to be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the data compression system 180 may also include an input data counter and output data counter operatively coupled to the input and output, respectively, of the decoder module 165. In this manner, the compressed and corresponding decompressed data block may be counted to ensure that sufficient decompression is obtained for the input data block.


Again, it is to be understood that the embodiment of the data decompression system 180 of FIG. 6 is exemplary of a preferred decompression system and method which may be implemented in the present invention, and that other data decompression systems and methods known to those skilled in the art may be employed for providing accelerated data transmission in accordance with the teachings herein.


It is to be appreciated that a data transmission acceleration system according to the present invention offers a business model by which market data vendors and users in the financial information services industry can receive various benefits. For example, the present invention affords transparent multiplication of bandwidth with minimal latency. Experiments have shown that increased bandwidth of up to 3 times can be achieved with minimal latency. Furthermore, proprietary hardware, including chip and board designs, as well as custom embedded and application software and algorithms associated with accelerated data transmission provide a cost-effective solution that can be seamlessly integrated with existing products and infrastructure. Moreover, the data acceleration through real-time compression and decompression affords a dramatic reduction in ongoing bandwidth costs. Further, the present invention provides mechanism to differentiate data feeds from other vendors via enriched content or quantity of the data feed. In addition, a data compression scheme according to the present invention provides dramatically more secure and encrypted feed from current levels, thus, providing the ability to employ a secure and accelerated virtual private network over the Internet for authorized subscribers or clients with proprietary hardware and software installed. Moreover, the present invention offers the ability to reduce a client's ongoing monthly bandwidth costs as an incentive to subscribe to a vendor's data feed service.


The present invention is readily extendable for use on a global computer network such as the Internet. This is significant since it creates a virtual private network and is important for the market data vendors and others due to its reduced cost in closed network/bandwidth solutions. In effect, the data vendors get to “ride for free” over the world's infrastructure, while still providing the same (and enhanced) services to their customers.


Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be affected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of compressing a plurality of data blocks of one or more financial data blocks in sequence to be sent over a network in compressed data packets making up a financial data stream in a broadcast feed using a data compression engine to generate a plurality of compressed data packets, comprising: providing a global state machine having a plurality of global states, the global states storing data used to compress data blocks for a respective data packet based on a priori knowledge of the financial data stream covering multiple data packets;providing an adaptive local state machine having a plurality of local states, the local states storing data used to compress data blocks for a respective data packet based on knowledge of one or more data blocks being compressed in generating the respective data packet, wherein the local states are reset when a message with a different beginning is detected to allow the broadcast feed to be picked up for decompression at a synchronization point;compressing the plurality of data blocks utilizing a compression algorithm of the data compression engine and data from local states of the local state machine and global states of the global state machine; andtransmitting the compressed data blocks in compressed data packets in the financial data stream over a communication channel.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the financial data stream is broadcast to a plurality of client systems.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the compressed data packets are User Datagram Protocol (UDP) data packets.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising including a plurality of synchronization points in the compressed data packets for initiating decompressing the compressed data packets.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein compressing the plurality of data blocks further comprises packet independent data compression such that the data blocks for a packet are compressed independently of data in other packets.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising compressing one or more additional data blocks in the data stream utilizing content independent data compression.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the method of compressing a plurality of data blocks is performed in real-time.
  • 8. A method of decompressing a plurality of compressed data packets in one or more financial data blocks in sequence received over a network in compressed data packets making up a financial data stream in a broadcast feed using a data decompression engine implemented on at least one processor, the method comprising: providing a global state machine having a plurality of global states, the global states storing data to decompress a compressed data packet based on a priori knowledge of the financial data stream covering multiple data packets;providing an adaptive local state machine having a plurality of local states, the local states storing data to decompress a compressed data packet based on knowledge of one or more data blocks being decompressed from the compressed data packet, wherein the local states are reset when a message with a different beginning is detected to allow the broadcast feed to be picked up for decompression at a synchronization point;receiving the plurality of compressed data packets in the financial data stream over a communication channel; anddecompressing the plurality of compressed data packets utilizing a decompression algorithm of the data decompression engine implemented on at least one processor and data from local states of the local state machine and global states of the global state machine.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the financial data stream is broadcast to a plurality of client systems.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the plurality of compressed data packets are User Datagram Protocol (UDP) data packets.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein decompressing the plurality of compressed data packets further comprises packet independent data decompression such that the data blocks for a packet are decompressed independently of data in other packets.
  • 12. The method of claim 8, further comprising decompressing additional compressed data packets in the data stream utilizing content independent data decompression.
  • 13. The method of claim 8, wherein the method of decompressing a plurality of compressed data packets is performed in real-time.
  • 14. A method of decompressing a plurality of compressed data packets in one or more financial data blocks in sequence received over a network in compressed data packets making up a financial data stream in a broadcast feed using a data decompression engine implemented on at least one processor, wherein the financial data stream includes a plurality of messages, the method comprising: providing a global state machine having a plurality of global states, the global states storing data to decompress a compressed data packet based on a priori knowledge of the financial data stream covering multiple data packets;providing an adaptive local state machine having a plurality of local states, the local states storing data to decompress a compressed data packet based on knowledge of one or more data blocks being decompressed from the compressed data packet, wherein at the occurrence of a beginning of each message a plurality of local states are reset in decompression such that local states newly obtained after the respective beginning of each message are the local states constructed and used in decompressing a data block after the respective beginning of each message to allow the broadcast feed to be picked up for decompression at the respective beginning of each message;receiving the plurality of compressed data packets in the financial data stream over a communication channel; anddecompressing the plurality of compressed data packets utilizing a decompression algorithm of the data decompression engine implemented on at least one processor and data from local states of the local state machine and global states of the global state machine.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is based on a United States provisional application Ser. No. 60/237,571, filed on Oct. 3, 2000, which is fully incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (610)
Number Name Date Kind
597483 Talbert Jan 1898 A
3394352 Wernikoff et al. Jul 1968 A
3490690 Apple et al. Jan 1970 A
4021782 Hoerning May 1977 A
4032893 Moran Jun 1977 A
4054951 Jackson et al. Oct 1977 A
4127518 Coy et al. Nov 1978 A
4302775 Widergren et al. Nov 1981 A
4325085 Gooch Apr 1982 A
4360840 Wolfrun et al. Nov 1982 A
4386416 Giltner et al. May 1983 A
4394774 Widergren et al. Jul 1983 A
4464650 Eastman et al. Aug 1984 A
4494108 Langdon et al. Jan 1985 A
4499499 Brickman et al. Feb 1985 A
4574351 Dang et al. Mar 1986 A
4593324 Ohkubo et al. Jun 1986 A
4626829 Hauck Dec 1986 A
4646061 Bledsoe Feb 1987 A
4682150 Mathes et al. Jul 1987 A
4701745 Waterworth Oct 1987 A
4729020 Schaphorst et al. Mar 1988 A
4730348 MacCrisken Mar 1988 A
4745559 Willis et al. May 1988 A
4748638 Friedman et al. May 1988 A
4750135 Boilen Jun 1988 A
4804959 Makansi et al. Feb 1989 A
4813040 Futato Mar 1989 A
4814746 Miller et al. Mar 1989 A
4862167 Copeland, III Aug 1989 A
4866601 DuLac et al. Sep 1989 A
4870415 Van Maren et al. Sep 1989 A
4872009 Tsukiyama et al. Oct 1989 A
4876541 Storer Oct 1989 A
4888812 Dinan et al. Dec 1989 A
4890282 Lambert et al. Dec 1989 A
4897717 Hamilton et al. Jan 1990 A
4906991 Fiala et al. Mar 1990 A
4906995 Swanson Mar 1990 A
4929946 O'Brien et al. May 1990 A
4953324 Hermann Sep 1990 A
4956808 Aakre et al. Sep 1990 A
4965675 Hori et al. Oct 1990 A
4988998 O'Brien Jan 1991 A
5003307 Whiting et al. Mar 1991 A
5016009 Whiting et al. May 1991 A
5027376 Friedman et al. Jun 1991 A
5028922 Huang Jul 1991 A
5045848 Fascenda Sep 1991 A
5045852 Mitchell et al. Sep 1991 A
5046027 Taaffe et al. Sep 1991 A
5049881 Gibson et al. Sep 1991 A
5079630 Golin Jan 1992 A
5091782 Krause et al. Feb 1992 A
5097261 Langdon, Jr. et al. Mar 1992 A
5103306 Weiman Apr 1992 A
5109226 Mac Lean, Jr. et al. Apr 1992 A
5109433 Notenboom Apr 1992 A
5109451 Aono et al. Apr 1992 A
5113522 Dinwiddie et al. May 1992 A
5115309 Hang May 1992 A
5119682 Bellinger Jun 1992 A
5121342 Szymborski et al. Jun 1992 A
5126739 Whiting et al. Jun 1992 A
5128963 Akagiri Jul 1992 A
5132992 Yurt et al. Jul 1992 A
5146221 Whiting et al. Sep 1992 A
5150430 Chu Sep 1992 A
5155484 Chambers, IV Oct 1992 A
5159336 Rabin et al. Oct 1992 A
5167034 MacLean, Jr. et al. Nov 1992 A
5175543 Lantz Dec 1992 A
5179651 Taaffe et al. Jan 1993 A
5187793 Keith et al. Feb 1993 A
5191431 Hasegawa et al. Mar 1993 A
5204756 Chevion et al. Apr 1993 A
5209220 Hiyama et al. May 1993 A
5212742 Normile et al. May 1993 A
5226176 Westaway et al. Jul 1993 A
5227893 Ett Jul 1993 A
5231492 Dangi et al. Jul 1993 A
5237460 Miller et al. Aug 1993 A
5237675 Hannon, Jr. Aug 1993 A
5243341 Seroussi et al. Sep 1993 A
5243348 Jackson Sep 1993 A
5247638 O'Brien et al. Sep 1993 A
5247646 Osterlund et al. Sep 1993 A
5249053 Jain Sep 1993 A
5263168 Toms et al. Nov 1993 A
5267333 Aono et al. Nov 1993 A
5270832 Balkanski et al. Dec 1993 A
5280600 Van Maren et al. Jan 1994 A
5287420 Barrett Feb 1994 A
5289580 Latif et al. Feb 1994 A
5293379 Carr Mar 1994 A
5293576 Mihm et al. Mar 1994 A
5307497 Feigenbaum et al. Apr 1994 A
5309555 Akins et al. May 1994 A
5331425 Ozaki et al. Jul 1994 A
5341440 Earl et al. Aug 1994 A
5347600 Barnsley et al. Sep 1994 A
5353132 Katsuma Oct 1994 A
5354315 Armstrong Oct 1994 A
5355498 Provino et al. Oct 1994 A
5357614 Pattisam Oct 1994 A
5367629 Chu et al. Nov 1994 A
5373290 Lempel et al. Dec 1994 A
5374916 Chu Dec 1994 A
5379036 Storer Jan 1995 A
5379757 Hiyama et al. Jan 1995 A
5381145 Allen et al. Jan 1995 A
5389922 Seroussi et al. Feb 1995 A
5394534 Kulakowski et al. Feb 1995 A
5396228 Garahi Mar 1995 A
5400401 Wasilewski et al. Mar 1995 A
5403639 Belsan et al. Apr 1995 A
5406278 Graybill et al. Apr 1995 A
5406279 Anderson et al. Apr 1995 A
5410671 Elgamal et al. Apr 1995 A
5412384 Chang et al. May 1995 A
5414850 Whiting May 1995 A
5420639 Perkins May 1995 A
5434983 Yaso et al. Jul 1995 A
5437020 Wells et al. Jul 1995 A
5452287 Dicecco Sep 1995 A
5454079 Roper et al. Sep 1995 A
5454107 Lehman et al. Sep 1995 A
5455576 Clark et al. Oct 1995 A
5455578 Bhandari Oct 1995 A
5455680 Shin Oct 1995 A
5461679 Normile et al. Oct 1995 A
5463390 Whiting et al. Oct 1995 A
5467087 Chu Nov 1995 A
5471206 Allen et al. Nov 1995 A
5475388 Gormish et al. Dec 1995 A
5479587 Campbell et al. Dec 1995 A
5479633 Wells et al. Dec 1995 A
5483470 Alur et al. Jan 1996 A
5486826 Remillard Jan 1996 A
5488364 Cole Jan 1996 A
5488365 Seroussi et al. Jan 1996 A
5493244 Je-chang et al. Feb 1996 A
5504842 Gentile Apr 1996 A
5506844 Rao Apr 1996 A
5506872 Mohler Apr 1996 A
5506944 Gentile Apr 1996 A
5521940 Lane et al. May 1996 A
5528628 Park et al. Jun 1996 A
5530845 Hiatt Jun 1996 A
5533051 James Jul 1996 A
5535311 Zimmerman Jul 1996 A
5535356 Kim et al. Jul 1996 A
5535369 Wells et al. Jul 1996 A
5537658 Bakke et al. Jul 1996 A
5539865 Gentile Jul 1996 A
5542031 Douglass et al. Jul 1996 A
5544290 Gentile Aug 1996 A
5546395 Sharma et al. Aug 1996 A
5546475 Bolle et al. Aug 1996 A
5553160 Dawson Sep 1996 A
5557551 Craft Sep 1996 A
5557668 Brady Sep 1996 A
5557749 Norris Sep 1996 A
5561421 Smith et al. Oct 1996 A
5561824 Carreiro et al. Oct 1996 A
5563961 Rynderman et al. Oct 1996 A
5574952 Brady et al. Nov 1996 A
5574953 Rust et al. Nov 1996 A
5576953 Hugentobler Nov 1996 A
5577248 Chambers, IV Nov 1996 A
5581715 Verinsky et al. Dec 1996 A
5583500 Allen et al. Dec 1996 A
5586264 Belknap et al. Dec 1996 A
5586285 Hasbun et al. Dec 1996 A
5590306 Watanabe et al. Dec 1996 A
5596674 Bhandari et al. Jan 1997 A
5598388 Van Maren et al. Jan 1997 A
5604824 Chui et al. Feb 1997 A
5606706 Takamoto et al. Feb 1997 A
5610657 Zhang Mar 1997 A
5611024 Campbell et al. Mar 1997 A
5612788 Stone Mar 1997 A
5613069 Walker Mar 1997 A
5615017 Choi et al. Mar 1997 A
5615287 Fu et al. Mar 1997 A
5619995 Lobodzinski Apr 1997 A
5621820 Rynderman et al. Apr 1997 A
5623623 Kim et al. Apr 1997 A
5623701 Bakke et al. Apr 1997 A
5627534 Craft May 1997 A
5627995 Miller et al. May 1997 A
5629732 Moskowitz et al. May 1997 A
5630092 Carreiro et al. May 1997 A
5635632 Fay et al. Jun 1997 A
5635932 Shinagawa et al. Jun 1997 A
5638498 Tyler et al. Jun 1997 A
5640158 Okayama et al. Jun 1997 A
5642506 Lee Jun 1997 A
5649032 Burt et al. Jul 1997 A
5652795 Dillon et al. Jul 1997 A
5652857 Shimoi et al. Jul 1997 A
5652917 Maupin et al. Jul 1997 A
5654703 Clark, II Aug 1997 A
5655138 Kikinis Aug 1997 A
5666560 Moertl et al. Sep 1997 A
5668737 Iler Sep 1997 A
5671355 Collins Sep 1997 A
5671389 Saliba Sep 1997 A
5671413 Shipman et al. Sep 1997 A
5673370 Laney Sep 1997 A
5675333 Boursier et al. Oct 1997 A
5675789 Ishii et al. Oct 1997 A
5686916 Bakhmutsky Nov 1997 A
5692159 Shand Nov 1997 A
5694619 Konno Dec 1997 A
5696927 MacDonald et al. Dec 1997 A
5703793 Wise et al. Dec 1997 A
5708511 Gandhi et al. Jan 1998 A
5715477 Kikinis Feb 1998 A
5717393 Nakano et al. Feb 1998 A
5717394 Schwartz et al. Feb 1998 A
5719862 Lee et al. Feb 1998 A
5721958 Kikinis Feb 1998 A
5724475 Kirsten Mar 1998 A
5729228 Franaszek et al. Mar 1998 A
5740395 Wells et al. Apr 1998 A
5742773 Blomfield-Brown et al. Apr 1998 A
5748122 Shinagawa et al. May 1998 A
5748904 Huang et al. May 1998 A
5757852 Jericevic et al. May 1998 A
5764774 Liu Jun 1998 A
5765027 Wang et al. Jun 1998 A
5767898 Urano et al. Jun 1998 A
5768445 Troeller et al. Jun 1998 A
5768525 Kralowetz et al. Jun 1998 A
5771340 Nakazato et al. Jun 1998 A
5774715 Madany et al. Jun 1998 A
5778411 DeMoss et al. Jul 1998 A
5781767 Inoue et al. Jul 1998 A
5784572 Rostoker et al. Jul 1998 A
5784631 Wise Jul 1998 A
5787487 Hashimoto et al. Jul 1998 A
5794229 French et al. Aug 1998 A
5796864 Callahan Aug 1998 A
5799110 Israelsen et al. Aug 1998 A
5805834 McKinley et al. Sep 1998 A
5805932 Kawashima et al. Sep 1998 A
5807036 Lostlen Sep 1998 A
5808660 Sekine et al. Sep 1998 A
5809176 Yajima Sep 1998 A
5809299 Cloutier et al. Sep 1998 A
5809337 Hannah et al. Sep 1998 A
5812195 Zhang Sep 1998 A
5812789 Diaz Sep 1998 A
5812883 Rao Sep 1998 A
5818368 Langley Oct 1998 A
5818369 Withers Oct 1998 A
5818530 Canfield et al. Oct 1998 A
5819215 Dobson et al. Oct 1998 A
5822781 Wells et al. Oct 1998 A
5825424 Canfield et al. Oct 1998 A
5825830 Kopf Oct 1998 A
5832037 Park Nov 1998 A
5832126 Tanaka Nov 1998 A
5832443 Kolesnik et al. Nov 1998 A
5835788 Blumer et al. Nov 1998 A
5836003 Sadeh Nov 1998 A
5838821 Matsubara et al. Nov 1998 A
5838927 Gillon et al. Nov 1998 A
5838996 deCarmo Nov 1998 A
5839100 Wegener Nov 1998 A
5841979 Schulhof et al. Nov 1998 A
5847762 Canfield et al. Dec 1998 A
5850565 Wightman Dec 1998 A
5856797 Kawauchi Jan 1999 A
5861824 Ryu et al. Jan 1999 A
5861920 Mead et al. Jan 1999 A
5864342 Kajiya et al. Jan 1999 A
5864678 Riddle Jan 1999 A
5867167 Deering Feb 1999 A
5867602 Zandi et al. Feb 1999 A
5870036 Franaszek et al. Feb 1999 A
5870087 Chau Feb 1999 A
5872530 Domyo et al. Feb 1999 A
5874907 Craft Feb 1999 A
5881104 Akahane Mar 1999 A
5883975 Narita et al. Mar 1999 A
5884269 Cellier et al. Mar 1999 A
5886655 Rust Mar 1999 A
5887165 Martel et al. Mar 1999 A
5889961 Dobbek Mar 1999 A
5892847 Johnson Apr 1999 A
5901278 Kurihara et al. May 1999 A
5907801 Albert et al. May 1999 A
5909557 Betker et al. Jun 1999 A
5909559 So Jun 1999 A
5915079 Vondran, Jr. et al. Jun 1999 A
5917438 Ando Jun 1999 A
5918068 Shafe' Jun 1999 A
5918225 White et al. Jun 1999 A
5920326 Rentschler et al. Jul 1999 A
5923860 Olarig Jul 1999 A
5930358 Rao Jul 1999 A
5936616 Torborg, Jr. et al. Aug 1999 A
5938737 Smallcomb et al. Aug 1999 A
5943692 Marberg et al. Aug 1999 A
5945933 Kalkstein Aug 1999 A
5949355 Panaoussis Sep 1999 A
5949968 Gentile Sep 1999 A
5951623 Reynar et al. Sep 1999 A
5955976 Heath Sep 1999 A
5956490 Buchholz et al. Sep 1999 A
5960465 Adams Sep 1999 A
5964842 Packard Oct 1999 A
5968149 Jaquette et al. Oct 1999 A
5969927 Schirmer et al. Oct 1999 A
5973630 Heath Oct 1999 A
5974235 Nunally et al. Oct 1999 A
5974387 Kageyama Oct 1999 A
5974471 Belt Oct 1999 A
5978483 Thompson et al. Nov 1999 A
5982360 Wu et al. Nov 1999 A
5982723 Kamatani Nov 1999 A
5982937 Accad Nov 1999 A
5987022 Geiger et al. Nov 1999 A
5987432 Zusman et al. Nov 1999 A
5987590 Wing So Nov 1999 A
5990884 Douma et al. Nov 1999 A
5991515 Fall et al. Nov 1999 A
5996033 Chiu-Hao Nov 1999 A
6000009 Brady Dec 1999 A
6002411 Dye Dec 1999 A
6003115 Spear et al. Dec 1999 A
6008743 Jaquette Dec 1999 A
6009491 Roppel et al. Dec 1999 A
6011901 Kirsten Jan 2000 A
6014694 Aharoni et al. Jan 2000 A
6021433 Payne et al. Feb 2000 A
6023755 Casselman Feb 2000 A
6026217 Adiletta Feb 2000 A
6028725 Blumenau Feb 2000 A
6031939 Gilbert et al. Feb 2000 A
6032148 Wilkes Feb 2000 A
6032197 Birdwell et al. Feb 2000 A
6038346 Ratnakar Mar 2000 A
6057790 Igata et al. May 2000 A
6058459 Owen et al. May 2000 A
6061398 Satoh et al. May 2000 A
6061473 Chen et al. May 2000 A
6070179 Craft May 2000 A
6073232 Kroeker et al. Jun 2000 A
6075470 Little et al. Jun 2000 A
6078958 Echeita et al. Jun 2000 A
6091777 Guetz et al. Jul 2000 A
6092123 Steffan et al. Jul 2000 A
6094634 Yahagi et al. Jul 2000 A
6097520 Kadnier Aug 2000 A
6097845 Ng et al. Aug 2000 A
6098114 McDonald et al. Aug 2000 A
6104389 Ando Aug 2000 A
6105130 Wu et al. Aug 2000 A
6115384 Parzych Sep 2000 A
6128412 Satoh Oct 2000 A
6134631 Jennings, III Oct 2000 A
6141053 Saukkonen Oct 2000 A
6145020 Barnett Nov 2000 A
6145069 Dye Nov 2000 A
6169241 Shimizu Jan 2001 B1
6170007 Venkatraman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6170047 Dye Jan 2001 B1
6170049 So Jan 2001 B1
6172936 Kitazaki Jan 2001 B1
6173381 Dye Jan 2001 B1
6175650 Sindhu et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175856 Riddle Jan 2001 B1
6182125 Borella et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185625 Tso et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185659 Milillo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192082 Moriarty et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192155 Fan Feb 2001 B1
6195024 Fallon Feb 2001 B1
6195125 Udagawa et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195391 Hancock et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195465 Zandi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198842 Yeo Mar 2001 B1
6198850 Banton Mar 2001 B1
6208273 Dye et al. Mar 2001 B1
6215904 Lavallee Apr 2001 B1
6216157 Vishwanath et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219754 Belt et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222886 Yogeshwar Apr 2001 B1
6225922 Norton May 2001 B1
6226667 Matthews et al. May 2001 B1
6226740 Iga May 2001 B1
6230223 Olarig May 2001 B1
6237054 Freitag, Jr. May 2001 B1
6243829 Chan Jun 2001 B1
6253264 Sebastian Jun 2001 B1
6257693 Miller et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272178 Nieweglowski et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272627 Mann Aug 2001 B1
6272628 Aguilar et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282641 Christensen Aug 2001 B1
6285458 Yada Sep 2001 B1
6298408 Park Oct 2001 B1
6308311 Carmichael Oct 2001 B1
6309424 Fallon Oct 2001 B1
6310563 Har et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317714 Del Castillo et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317818 Zwiegincew et al. Nov 2001 B1
6330622 Schaefer Dec 2001 B1
6333745 Shimomura et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336153 Izumida et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345307 Booth Feb 2002 B1
6356589 Gebler et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356937 Montville et al. Mar 2002 B1
6374353 Settsu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6388584 Dorward et al. May 2002 B1
6392567 Satoh May 2002 B2
6404931 Chen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421387 Rhee Jul 2002 B1
6434168 Kari Aug 2002 B1
6434695 Esfahani et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442659 Blumenau Aug 2002 B1
6449658 Lafe et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449682 Toorians Sep 2002 B1
6452602 Morein Sep 2002 B1
6452933 Duffield et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459429 Deering Oct 2002 B1
6463509 Teoman et al. Oct 2002 B1
6487640 Lipasti Nov 2002 B1
6489902 Heath Dec 2002 B2
6505239 Kobata Jan 2003 B1
6513113 Kobayashi Jan 2003 B1
6523102 Dye et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526174 Graffagnino Feb 2003 B1
6529633 Easwar et al. Mar 2003 B1
6532121 Rust et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539438 Ledzius et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539456 Stewart Mar 2003 B2
6542644 Satoh Apr 2003 B1
6577254 Rasmussen Jun 2003 B2
6590609 Kitade et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597812 Fallon et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601104 Fallon Jul 2003 B1
6604040 Kawasaki et al. Aug 2003 B2
6604158 Fallon Aug 2003 B1
6606040 Abdat Aug 2003 B2
6606413 Zeineh Aug 2003 B1
6609223 Wolfgang Aug 2003 B1
6618728 Rail Sep 2003 B1
6624761 Fallon Sep 2003 B2
6633244 Avery et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633968 Zwiegincew et al. Oct 2003 B2
6650261 Nelson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6661839 Ishida et al. Dec 2003 B1
6661845 Herath Dec 2003 B1
6704840 Nalawadi et al. Mar 2004 B2
6708220 Olin Mar 2004 B1
6711709 York Mar 2004 B1
6717534 Yokose Apr 2004 B2
6723225 Scheps Apr 2004 B2
6731814 Zeck et al. May 2004 B2
6735195 Mehta May 2004 B1
6745282 Okada Jun 2004 B2
6748457 Fallon Jun 2004 B2
6756922 Ossia Jun 2004 B2
6768749 Osler et al. Jul 2004 B1
6792151 Barnes et al. Sep 2004 B1
6810434 Muthukumaraswamy Oct 2004 B2
6813689 Baxter, III Nov 2004 B2
6819271 Geiger et al. Nov 2004 B2
6822589 Dye et al. Nov 2004 B1
6856651 Singh Feb 2005 B2
6862278 Chang et al. Mar 2005 B1
6879266 Dye et al. Apr 2005 B1
6885316 Mehring Apr 2005 B2
6885319 Geiger et al. Apr 2005 B2
6888893 Li et al. May 2005 B2
6909383 Shokrollahi et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909745 Puri et al. Jun 2005 B1
6938073 Mendhekar et al. Aug 2005 B1
6944740 Abali et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952409 Jolitz Oct 2005 B2
6959110 Danskin Oct 2005 B1
6959359 Suzuki et al. Oct 2005 B1
6963608 Wu Nov 2005 B1
6990247 Schwartz Jan 2006 B2
6993597 Nakagawa et al. Jan 2006 B2
7007099 Donati et al. Feb 2006 B1
7024460 Koopmas et al. Apr 2006 B2
7050639 Barnes et al. May 2006 B1
7054493 Schwartz May 2006 B2
7069342 Biederman Jun 2006 B1
7089391 Geiger et al. Aug 2006 B2
7102544 Liu Sep 2006 B1
7127518 Vange et al. Oct 2006 B2
7129860 Alvarez, II et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130913 Fallon Oct 2006 B2
7161506 Fallon Jan 2007 B2
7181608 Fallon et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190284 Dye et al. Mar 2007 B1
7245636 Hans et al. Jul 2007 B1
7319667 Biederman Jan 2008 B1
7321937 Fallon Jan 2008 B2
RE40092 Kang Feb 2008 E
7327287 Martinian et al. Feb 2008 B2
7330912 Fox et al. Feb 2008 B1
7352300 Fallon Apr 2008 B2
7358867 Fallon Apr 2008 B2
7376772 Fallon May 2008 B2
7378992 Fallon May 2008 B2
7386046 Fallon Jun 2008 B2
7395345 Fallon Jul 2008 B2
7400274 Fallon et al. Jul 2008 B2
7415530 Fallon Aug 2008 B2
7417568 Fallon et al. Aug 2008 B2
7548657 Deaven Jun 2009 B2
7552069 Kepecs Jun 2009 B2
7565441 Romanik et al. Jul 2009 B2
7711938 Wise et al. May 2010 B2
7714747 Fallon May 2010 B2
7777651 Fallon et al. Aug 2010 B2
8004431 Reznik Aug 2011 B2
8054879 Fallon et al. Nov 2011 B2
8073047 Fallon et al. Dec 2011 B2
8090936 Fallon et al. Jan 2012 B2
8112619 Fallon et al. Feb 2012 B2
8275897 Fallon Sep 2012 B2
8502707 Fallon Aug 2013 B2
8504710 Fallon Aug 2013 B2
8553759 Fallon et al. Oct 2013 B2
8643513 Fallon Feb 2014 B2
8692695 Fallon et al. Apr 2014 B2
8717203 Fallon May 2014 B2
8717204 Fallon et al. May 2014 B2
8719438 Fallon May 2014 B2
8723701 Fallon et al. May 2014 B2
8742958 Fallon et al. Jun 2014 B2
8756332 Fallon Jun 2014 B2
8867610 Fallon et al. Oct 2014 B2
8880862 Fallon et al. Nov 2014 B2
8929442 Fallon et al. Jan 2015 B2
8933825 Fallon Jan 2015 B2
8934535 Fallon et al. Jan 2015 B2
9054728 Fallon Jun 2015 B2
20010019630 Johnson Sep 2001 A1
20010031092 Zeck et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010032128 Kepecs Oct 2001 A1
20010047473 Fallon Nov 2001 A1
20010052038 Fallon et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010054131 Alvarez, II et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020037035 Singh Mar 2002 A1
20020069354 Fallon et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078241 Vidal et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080871 Fallon et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020097172 Fallon Jul 2002 A1
20020101367 Geiger et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020104891 Otto Aug 2002 A1
20020126755 Li et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020169950 Esfahani et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020191692 Fallon et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030030575 Frachtenberg et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030034905 Anton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030058873 Geiger et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030084238 Okada et al. May 2003 A1
20030090397 Rasmussen May 2003 A1
20030142874 Schwartz Jul 2003 A1
20030191876 Fallon Oct 2003 A1
20040042506 Fallon et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040056783 Fallon Mar 2004 A1
20040073710 Fallon Apr 2004 A1
20040073746 Fallon Apr 2004 A1
20060015650 Fallon Jan 2006 A1
20060181441 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20060181442 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20060184687 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20060184696 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20060190644 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20060195601 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20070043939 Fallon et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050514 Fallon Mar 2007 A1
20070050515 Fallon Mar 2007 A1
20070067483 Fallon Mar 2007 A1
20070083746 Fallon et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070096954 Boldt et al. May 2007 A1
20070109154 Fallon May 2007 A1
20070109155 Fallon May 2007 A1
20070109156 Fallon May 2007 A1
20070174209 Fallon et al. Jul 2007 A1
20080232457 Fallon Sep 2008 A1
20090125698 Dye May 2009 A1
20090154545 Fallon et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090287839 Fallon et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100011012 Rawson Jan 2010 A1
20100316114 Fallon et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318684 Fallon Dec 2010 A1
20100332700 Fallon Dec 2010 A1
20110037626 Fallon Feb 2011 A1
20110199243 Fallon et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110208833 Fallon Aug 2011 A1
20110231642 Fallon et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110235697 Fallon et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110285559 Fallon Nov 2011 A1
20120194362 Fallon et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120239921 Fallon Sep 2012 A1
20140218220 Fallon Aug 2014 A1
20150009051 Fallon Jan 2015 A1
20150012507 Fallon Jan 2015 A1
20150113182 Fallon Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
4127318 Feb 1992 DE
0164677 Dec 1985 EP
0185098 Jun 1986 EP
0283798 Sep 1988 EP
0405572 Jan 1991 EP
0405572 Mar 1991 EP
0493130 Jul 1992 EP
0587437 Mar 1994 EP
0595406 May 1994 EP
0718751 Jun 1996 EP
0718751 Feb 1997 EP
0 928 070 Jul 1999 EP
2162025 Jan 1986 GB
04-241681 Aug 1992 JP
6051989 Feb 1994 JP
9188009 Jul 1997 JP
11149376 Jun 1999 JP
WO 9414273 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9429852 Dec 1994 WO
WO 9502873 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9529437 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9748212 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9839699 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9908186 Feb 1999 WO
WO 0036754 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0157642 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0157659 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0163772 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0239591 May 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (964)
Entry
K. Murashita et al., High-Speed Statistical Compression sing Self-organized Rules and Predetermined Code Tables, IEEE, 1996 Data compression conference.
J.Anderson et al, “Codec squeezes color teleconferencing through digital telephone lines,” Electronics, 1984. 13-15.
Jack Venbrux, A VLSI Chip Set for High-Speed Lossless Data Compression , IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 1992, pp. 381-391.
Pen-Shu Yeh, The CCSDS Lossless Compression Recommendation for Space Applications. Chapter 16, Lossless Compression Handbook, Elsevier Science (USA), 2003, pp. 311-326.
Robert F. Rice, Some Practical Universal Noiseless Coding Techniques , Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, JPL Publication 79-22, Mar. 15, 1979.
X. Murashita et al., High-Speed Statistical Compression using Self-organized Rules and Predetermined Code Tables, IEEE, 1996 Data Compression conference.
IBM, Fast Dos Soft Boot, Feb. 1, 1994, vol. 37, Issue 2B, pp. 185-186.
J. Anderson et al. Codec squeezes color teleconferencing through digital telephone lines, Electronics 1984, pp. 13-15.
Robert Rice, “Lossless Coding Standards for Space Data Systems”, IEEE 1058-6393/97, pp. 577-585.
Coene, W et al. “A Fast Route for Application of Rate-distortion Optimal Quantization in an MPEG Video Encoder” Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, US., New York, IEEE, Sep. 16, 1996, pp. 825-828.
“Operating System Platform Abstraction Method”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Feb. 1995, vol. 38, Issue No. 2, pp. 343-344.
“IBM boosts your memory”, Geek.com [online], Jun. 26, 2000 [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2007], <URL: http://www.geek.com/ibm-boosts-your-memory/>.
“IBM Research Breakthrough Doubles Computer Memory Capacity”, IBM Press Release [online], Jun. 26, 2000 [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2007], <URL: http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease /1653.wss>.
“ServerWorks to Deliver IBM's Memory eXpansion Technology in Next-Generation Core Logic for Servers”, ServerWorks Press Release [online], Jun. 27, 2000 [retrieved on Jul. 14, 2000], <URL: http://www.serverworks.com/news/press/ 000627.html>.
Franaszek, P. A:, et al., “Algorithms and data structures for compressed-memory machines”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 245-258.
Franaszek, P. A., et al., “On internal organization in compressed random-access memories”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 259-270.
Smith, T.B., et al., “Memory Expansion Technology (MXT) Competitive impact”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vo. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 303-309.
Expand Networks Accelerator 4000 Series User's Guide.
Tridgell, Andrew; “Efficient Algorithms for Sorting and Synchronization”; A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Australian National University; Feb. 1999; pp. iii-106.
Jung, et al.; “Performance optimization of wireless local area networks through VLSI data compression”; Wireless Networks, vol. 4, 1998; pp. 27-39.
Jones, et al.; “Lossless data compression for short duration 3D frames in positron emission tomography”; IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference; vol. 3; pp. 1831-1834.
Maier, Mark W.; “Algorithm Evaluation for the Synchronous Data Compression Standard”; University of Alabama; pp. 1-10.
Bassiouni, et al.; “A Scheme for Data Compression in Supercomputers”; IEEE; 1988; pp. 272-278.
Welch, Terry A.; “A Technique for High-Performance Data Compression”; IEEE; Jun. 1984; pp. 8-19.
ALDC: Adaptive Lossless Data Compression; IBM; 1994.
ALDC-Macro: Adaptive Lossless Data Compression; IBM Corporation; 1994.
ALDC1-20S: Adaptive Lossless Data Compression; IBM Corporation; 1994.
ALDC1-40S: Adaptive Lossless Data Compression; IBM Corporation; 1994.
ALDC1-5S: Adaptive Lossless Data Compression; IBM Corporation; 1994.
Craft, David J.; “Data Compression Choice No Easy Call”; Computer Technology Review; vol. XIV, No. 1; Jan. 1994.
Costlow, Terry; “Sony designs faster, denser tape drive”; Electronic Engineering Times; May 20, 1996, pp. 86-87.
Wilson, Ron; “IBM ups compression ante”; Electronic Engineering Times; Aug. 16, 1993; pp. 1-94.
“IBM Announces New Feature for 3480 Subsystem”; Tucson Today; vol. 12, No. 337, Jul. 25, 1989.
Syngress Media, Inc.; “CCA Citrix Certified Administrator for MetaFrame 1.8 Study Guide”; 2000.
International Telecommunication Union; “Data Compression Procedures for Data Circuit Terminating Equipment (DCE) Using Error Correction Procedures”; Geneva, 1990.
Cheng, et al.; “A fast, highly reliable data compression chip and algorithm for storage systems”; IBM J. Res. Develop.; vol. 40, No. 6, Nov. 1996; pp. 603-613.
Cisco Systems; “Cisco IOS Data Compression”; 1997; pp. 1-10.
Craft, D. J.; “A fast hardware data compression algorithm and some algorithmic extensions”; IBM J. Res. Develop.; vol. 42; No. 6; Nov. 6, 1998; pp. 733-746.
Rustici, Robert; “Enhanced CU-SeeMe”1995, Zero in Technologies, Inc.
White Pine Software; “CU-SeeMe Pro: Quick Start Guide”; Version 4.0 for Windows; 1999.
“CU-SeeMe Reflector”; www.geektimes.com/michael/CU-SeeMe/faqs/reflectors.html; accessed on Dec. 2, 2008.
Daniels, et al.; “Citrix WinFrame 1.6 Beta”; May 1 1996; license.icopyright.net/user/downloadLicense.act?lic=3.7009-9123; accessed Dec. 2, 2008.
Held, et al.; “Data Compression”; Third Edition; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1991.
Data Compression Applications and Innovations Workshop; Proceedings of a Workshop held in Conjunction with the IEEE Data Compression Conference; Snowbird, Utah; Mar. 31, 1995.
Britton, et al.; “Discovery Desktop Conferencing with NetMeeting 2.0”; IDG Books Worldwide, inc.; 1997.
Sattler, Michael; “Internet TV with CU-SeeMe”; Sams.Net Publishing; 1995; First Edition.
IBM Microelectronics Comdex Fall '93 Booth Location.
Disz, et al.; “Performance Model of the Argonne Voyager Multimedia Server”; IEEE; 1997; pp. 316-327.
“Downloading and Installing NetMeeting”; www.w4mq.com/help/h3.htm; accessed on Dec. 2, 2008.
Fox, et al.; “Adapting to Network and Client Variability via On-Demand Dynamic Distillation”; ASPLOS VII; Oct. 1996; pp. 160-170.
Fox, et al.; “Adapting to Network and Client Variation Using Infrastructural Proxies: Lessons and Perceptives”; IEEE Personal Communications, Aug. 1998; pp. 10-19.
Han, et al.; “CU-SeeMe VR Immersive Desktop Teleconferencing”; Department of Computer Science; Cornell University; To appear in ACM Multimedia 1996.
Howard, et al.; “Parallel Lossless Image Compression Using Huffman and Arithmetic Coding”; 1992; pp. 1-9.
Howard, Paul G.; “Text Image Compression Using Soft Pattern Matching”; The Computer Journal; vol. 40, No. 2/3; 1997; pp. 146-156.
Howard, et al.; “The Emerging JBIG2 Standard”; IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 8, No. 7, Nov. 1998; pp. 838-848.
Craft, D. J.; “A fast hardware data compression algorithm and some algorithmic extensions”; Journal of Research and Development; vol. 42, No. 6, Nov. 1998; pp. 733-745.
“Direct Access Storage Device Compression and Decompression Data Flow”; IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin; vol. 38, No. 11; Nov. 1995; pp. 291-295.
ICA Timeline, Sep. 24, 2007.
Converse, et al.; “Low Bandwidth X Extension”; Protocol Version 1.0; X Consortium; Dec. 21, 1996.
Magstar and IBM 3590 High Performance Tape Subsystem Technical Guide; Nov. 1996; IBM International Technical Support Organization.
MetaFrame Administration Student Workbook; Jun. 1998; Citrix Professional Courseware; Citrix Systems, Inc.
NCD WinCenter 3.1: Bringing Windows to Every Desktop; 1998.
Overview NetMeeting 2.1; Microsoft Tech Net; technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc767141(printer).aspx; accessed Dec. 2, 2008.
NetMeeting 2.1 Resource Kit; Microsoft TechNet; technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc767142(printer).aspx; accessed on Dec. 2, 2008.
Conferencing Standards: NetMeeeting 2.1 Resource Kit; Microsoft TechNet; technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc767150(printer).aspx; accessed Dec. 2, 2008.
Summers, Bob; “Official Microsoft NetMeeting Book”; Microsoft Press; 1998.
Zebrose, Katherine L.; “Integrating Hardware Accelerators into Internetworking Switches”; Telco Systems.
Simpson, et al.; “A Multiple Processor Approach to Data Compression”; ACM; 1998; pp. 641-649.
“IBM Technology Products Introduces New Family of High-Performance Data Compression Products”; IBM; Aug. 16, 1993.
ReadMe; PowerQuest Drive Image Pro; Version 3.00; 1994-1999; PowerQuest Corporation; p. 1-6.
Schulzrinne, et al.; “RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control”; Jan. 1996; www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1890.txt; accessed on Dec. 3, 2008.
Zhu, C.; “RTP Payload Format for H.263 Video Streams”; Standards Track; Sep. 1997; pp. 1-12.
Simpson, W.; “The Point-To-Point Protocol (PPP)”; Standards Track; Jul. 1994; pp. i-52.
Reynolds, et al.; “Assigned Numbers”; Standards Track; Oct. 1994; pp. 1-230.
Deutsch, et al.; “ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3”; Informational; May 1996; p. 1-10.
Deutsch, P.; “DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3”; Informational; May 1996; pp. 1-15.
Rand, D.; “The PPP Compression Control Protocol (CCP)”; Standards Track; Jun. 1996; pp. 1-9.
Schneider, et al.; “PPP LZS-DCP Compression Protocol (LZS-DCP)”; Informational; Aug. 1996; pp. 1-18.
Friend, et al.; “PPP Stac LZS Compression Protocol”; Informational; Aug. 1996; pp. 1-20.
Schneider, et al.; “PPP for Data Compression in Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE)”; Informational; Aug. 1996; pp. 1-10.
Atkins, et al.; “PGP Message Exchange Formats”; Informational; Aug. 1996; pp. 1-21.
Castineyra, et al.; “The Nimrod Routing Architecture”; Informational, Aug. 1996; pp. 1-27.
Freed, et al.; “Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Four: Registration Procedures”; Best Current Practice; Nov. 1996; pp. 1-21.
Shacham, et al.; “IP Payload Compression Protocol (IPComp)”; Standards Track; Dec. 1998; pp. 1-10.
Sidewinder 50 Product Manual; Seagate Technology, Inc.; 1997.
IBM RAMAC Virtual Array; IBM; Jul. 1997.
Bruni, et al.; “DB2or OS/390 and Data Compression” IBM Corporation; Nov. 1998.
Smith, Mark; “Thin Client/Server Computing Works”; WindowsITPro; Nov. 1, 1998; pp. 1-13; license.icopyright.net/user/downloadLicense.act?lic=3.7009-8355; accessed Dec. 2, 2008.
International Telecommunication Union; “Information Technology—Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous-Tone Still Images-Requirements and Guidelines”; 1993.
International Telecommunications Union; “Information technology—Lossless and near-lossless compression of continuous-tone still images—Baseline”; 1999.
Davis, Andrew W.; “The Video Answering Machine: Intel ProShare's Next Step”; Advanced Imaging; vol. 12, No. 3; Mar. 1997; pp. 28, 30.
Abbott, III, Walter D.; “A Simple, Low Overhead Data Compression Algoithm for Converting Lossy Compression Processes to Lossless”; Naval Postgraduate School Thesis; Dec. 1993.
Thomborson, Clark; “V.42bis and Other Ziv-Lempel Variants”; IEEE; 1991; p. 460.
Thomborson, Clark; “The V.42bis Standard for Data-Compressing Modems”; IEEE; Oct. 1992; pp. 41-53.
Sun, Andrew; “Using and Managing PPP”; O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.; 1999.
“What is the V42bis Standard?”, www.faqs.org/faqs/compression-faq/part1/section-10.html; accessed on Dec. 2, 2008.
“The WSDC Download Guide: Drive Image Professional for DOS, OS/2, and Windows”; wsdcds01.watson.ibm.com/WSDC.nsf/Guides/Download/Applications-DriveImage.htm; Accessed Nov. 22, 1999.
“The WSDC Download Guide: Drive Image Professional”; wsdcds01.watson.ibm.com/wsdc.nsf/Guides/Download/Applications-DirveImage.htm; accessed on May 3, 2001.
APPNOTE—TXT from pkware.txt; Version 6.3.2; PKWARE Inc., 1989.
CU-SeeMe readme.txt; Dec. 2, 1995.
CU-seeme txt from indstate.txt; README.TXT for CU-SeeMe version 0.90b1; Mar. 23, 1997.
Cuseeme txt 19960221.txt; CUSEEME.TXT; Feb. 21, 1996.
Citrix Technology Guide.
Lettieri, et al.; “Data Compression in the V.42bis Modems”; pp. 398-403.
High Performance x2/V.34+/V.42bis 56K BPS Plug & Play External Voice/FAX/Data Modem User's Manual.
H.323 Protocols Suite; www.protocols.com/pbook/h323.htm.
Hoffman, Roy; “Data Compression in Digital Systems”; Chapman & Hall; 1997; Chapter 14, pp. 344-360.
LBX X Consortium Algorithms; rzdocs.uni-hohenheim.de/aix—4.33/ext—doc/usr/share/man/info/en—US/a—doc—lib/x11 . . . ; X11 R6 Technical Specifications.
Basics of Images; www.geom.uiuc.edu/events/courses/1996/cmwh/Stills/basics.html.
Parties' Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to P.R. 4-3, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/ IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Declaration of Professor James A. Storer, Ph.D. relating to U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Mar. 18, 2009d.
Declaration of Professor James A. Storer, Ph.D. relating to U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Mar. 18, 2009b.
Declaration of Professor James A. Storer, Ph.D. relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, May 4, 2009.
Declaration of Professor James A. Storer, Ph.D. relating to U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, May 4, 2009.
Declaration of Professor James A. Storer, Ph.D. relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, May 20, 2009.
Declaration of Professor James A. Storer, Ph.D., relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, May 26, 2009.
“Video Coding for Low Bit Rate Communication”, International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Recommendation H.263, §3.4 (Mar. 1996) (“ITU H.263”).
“IBM boosts your memory”, Geek.com [online], Jun. 26, 2000 [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2001, www.geek.com/ibm-boosts-your-memory/, 3 pages.
“IBM Research Breakthrough Doubles Computer Memory Capacity”, IBM Press Release [online], Jun. 26, 2000 [retrieved on Jul. 6, 2007], www-03. ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/, 3 pages.
“ServerWorks to Deliver IBM's Memory expansion Technology in Next-Generation Core Logic for Servers”, ServerWorks Press Release [online], Jun. 27, 2000 [retrieved on Jul. 14, 2007], http://www.serverworks.com/news/press/000627.html, 1 page.
Abali, B., et al., “Memory Expansion Technology (MXT) Software support and performance”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 287-301.
Baker, K. et al., “Lossless Data Compression for Short Duration 3D Frames in Positron Emission Tomography,” 0-7803-1487, May 1994, pp. 1831-1834.
Franaszek, P. A,, et al., “On internal organization in compressed random-access memories”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 259-2.
Franaszek, P. A., et al., “Algorithms and data structures for compressed-memory machines”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 245-2.
Smith, T.B., et al., “Memory Expansion Technology (MXT) Competitive impact”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 303-309.
Tremaine, R. B., et al., “IBM Memory Expansion Technology (MXT)”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 45, Issue No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 271-285.
ALDC: Adaptive Lossless Data Compression; IBM; 1994, 2 pgs.
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, Aug. 24, 2009, 2 pgs.
Second Amended Answer filed on behalf of Citrix Systems, Inc, (includes allegations of inequitable conduct on at least pp. 24-43) filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 10, 2009, 45 pgs.
Expert Report of James B. Gambrell on Inequitable Conduct filed on behalf of some of the defendants [Includes Appendices—Exhibits A-I] filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jun. 10, 2009, 199 pgs.
Expert Report of Dr. James A. Storer on Invalidity filed on behalf of some of the defendants [Includes Appendices—Exhibits A-K (Exhibit A has been redacted pursuant to a protective order)] filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jun. 10, 2009 1090 pgs.
Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. James A. Storer on Invalidity filed on behalf of some of the defendants [Includes Appendices—Exhibits 1-8] filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jun. 19, 2009, 301 pgs.
Deposition of Dr. James A. Storer conducted on behalf of the plaintiffs filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 27, 2009, 242 pgs.
Deposition of Brian Von Herzen conducted on behalf of the plaintiffs filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 26, 2009, 241 pgs.
Second Amended Complaint filed on behalf of the Plaintiff in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-ov-00144-LED; U.S, District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 10, 2009, 28 pgs.
Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by Citrix Systems. Inc, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 17, 2009, 46 pgs.
Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by F5 Networks, Inc, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/aIXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 17, 2009, 17 pgs.
Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by Averitt Express, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 17, 2009, 17 pgs.
Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by DHL Express, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/aIXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 17, 2009, 37 pgs.
Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by Expand Networks, Inc, Interstate Battery System of America, Inc., and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 17, 2009, 21 pages.
Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by Blue Coat Systems, Inc., Packeteer, Inc., Packeteer, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Services-South Central, Inc., and Build-A-Bear-Workshop Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Easternt District of Texas, Feb. 18, 2009, 84 pages.
Plaintiff's Response to the Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by Citrix Systems, Inc, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 4, 2009, 24 pgs.
Palintiff's Responses to the Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by F5 Networks, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 4, 2009, 5 pgs.
Plaintiff's Responses to the Answers to the Second Amended Complains and Counterclaims filed by Averitt Express, Inc, in Realtime Data, LLC/d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 4, 2009, 5 pgs.
Plaintiff's Responses to the Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by DHL Express, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 4, 2009, 17 pgs.
Plaintiff's Responses to the Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by Expand Networks. Inc, Interstate Battery System of America, Inc., and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. in Realtime Data. LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 4, 2009, 15 pgs.
Plaintiff's Responses to the Answers to the Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims filed by Blue Coat Sysetms, Inc., Packeteer, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorials Services-South Central Inc., and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 4, 2009, 34 pgs.
Opening Claim Construction Brief filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 5, 2009, 36 pgs.
Declaration of Jordan Adler in support of the Opening Claim Construction Brief filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 5, 2009, 214 pgs.
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for Invalidity of some of the Patents in Suit for Indefiniteness, including the '104 patent, filed on behalf of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 16, 2009, 22 pgs.
Declaration of Michele E. Moreland in support Motion for Partial Summary Judgement for Invalidity of some of the Patents in Suit for Indefiniteness, including the '104 patent, filed on behalf of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LE; Mar. 16, 2009, 168 pgs.
Declaration of James A. Storer in support Motion for Partial Summary Judgement for Invalidity of some of the Patents in Suit for Indefiniteness, including the '104 patent, filed on behalf of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; Mar. 16, 2009, 27 pgs.
Joint Defendants Reply regarding Motion for Partial Summary Judgement for Invalidity of some of the Patents in Suit for Indefiniteness, including the '104 patent, filed on behalf of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LE; Apr. 2, 2009, 20 pgs.
Responsive Briefs in Support of Claim Construction filed by Blue Coats Systems, Inc. Packeteer, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., ABM Industries, Inc. ABM Industries, Inc. ABM Janitorial Services-South Central, Inc. and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 19, 2009, 451 pgs.
Responsive Briefs in Support of Claim Construction filed by F5 Networks, Inc. annd Averitt Express, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 19, 2009, 20 pgs.
Responsive Briefs in Support of Claim Construction filed by Citrix Systems, Inc., Expand Networks, Inc., DHL Express (USA), Inc., Interstate Battery System of America, Inc., and O'Reilly Automotive Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 19, 2009, 377 pages.
Declaration of Dr. James A. Storer filed in Support of the Brief in Support of Claim Construction filed on behalf of F5 Networks, Inc. in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 19, 2009, 778 pgs.
Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Dr. Brian Von Herzen's Opinions Regarding Claim Construction filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 20, 2009, 244 pgs.
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Dr. Brian Von Herzen's Opinions Regarding Claim Construction filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 6, 2009, 20 pgs.
Declaration of Karim Oussayef submitted in support of the Opposition of Plaintiff's Oppostion to Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc's Motion to Exclude Dr. Brian Von Herzen's Opinions Regarding Claim Construction filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 6, 2009, 119 pgs.
Order of the Court Denying Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Dr. Brian Von Herzen'Opinions Regarding Claim Construction, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, Apr. 6, 2009, 1 pg.
Parties Joint Submission of Terms to be Heard at the Markman Hearing filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 24, 2009, 5 pgs.
Order of the Court Regarding the terms to be heard at the Markman hearing in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 24, 2009, 2 pgs.
Transcript of the Markman Hearing held on Apr. 9, 2009 in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 174 pgs.
Plaintiff's Reply Claim Construction Brief filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 30, 209, 30 pgs.
Declaration of Brian von Herzen in Support of the Plaintiff's Reply Claim Construction Brief filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 30, 2009, 25 pgs.
F5 Sur-Reply to Plaintiffs Claim Construction Brief filed by some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 3, 2009, 12 pgs.
Citrix Sur-Reply to Plaintiff'Claim Construction Brief filed by some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 3, 2009, 13 pgs.
Blue Coat Sur-Reply to Plaintiff's Claim Construction Brief filed by some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 3, 2009, 12 pgs.
Declaration of Michele moreland in Support of Sur-Replies to Plaintiff's Claim Construction Brief filed by some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 3, 2009, 8 pgs.
Declaration of James Storer in Support of Sur-Replies to Plaintiff's Claim Construction Brief filed by some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 7, 2009, 6 pgs.
Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to supplement the Parties' Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 8, 2009, 123 pgs.
Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Supplement the Parties' Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 13, 2009, 3 pgs.
Citrix Systems' Opposition to Realtime Data's Motion for Reconsideration of Realtime's Motion for Leave to Supplement the Parties' Joint Claim Construction, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 27, 2009, 6 pgs.
Notice of Agreement to Claim Term between Plaintiff and Defendant filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Apr. 22, 2009, 3 pgs.
Provisional Claim Construction Order Issued by the Court on Jun. 2, 2009 in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 28 pgs.
Citrix Request for Consideration and Objections to the Provisional Claim Construction Order issued by the Court on Jun. 2, 2009 filed on behalf of some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 22 pgs.
Blue Coat Request for Consideration and Objections to the Provisional Claim Construction Order issued by the Court on Jun. 2, 2009 filed on behalf of some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 9 pgs.
F5 Request for Consideration and Objections to the Provisional Claim Construction Order issued by the Court on Jun. 2, 2009 filed on behalf of some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:.08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 15 pgs.
Comtech AHA Corporation's Complaint in Intervention against the Plaintiff filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Apr. 6, 2009, 8 pgs.
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment issued on Jun. 23, 2009, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 22 pgs.
Blue Coat Defendants' Report and Recommendations Regarding Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc, et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-ov-00144-LED; U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 8, 2009, 18 pgs.
Plaintiff's Objections to and Partially Unopposed Motion for Reconsideration of United States Magistrate Judge's Claim Construction Memorandum and Order, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 13, 2009, 11 pgs.
Defendant Citrix Opposition to Realtime's Objections to and Partially Unopposed Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Love's Claim Construction Memorandum and Order filed by Citrix Systmes, Inc., filed on behalf of some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 27, 2009, 8 pgs.
Defendant F5 Networks, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Objections and Partially Unopposed Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Love's Claim Construction and Order, filed on behalf of some of the defenfants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 27, 2009, 4 pgs.
Defendants' Response in Oppostion to Realtime Data's Objections to and Partially Unopposed Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Love's Claim Construction Memorandum and Order, filed on Behalf of some of the defendants in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 27, 2009, 9 pgs.
Realtime Data's Response in Opposition to Defendant Citrix Systems Objections to and Request for Reconsideration of Magistrate's Order Regarding Claim Construction, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 27, 2009, 1 3 pages.
Plaintiff Realtime Data's Response in Opposition to Blue Coat Defendants' Objection to Magistrate's Memorandum Opinion and Order Regarding Claim Construction, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 27, 2009, 9 pgs.
Plaintiff's selected Responses to Defendant Citrix System's Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Admission filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 15, 2009, 151 pgs.
Script for Defendants' Joint Claim Construction Technology Tutorial Presented to the Magistrate Judge in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, no date on document, 95 pgs.
Preliminary Data Sheet, 9600 Data Compressor Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000001-68, 68 pgs.
Data Sheet, 9751 Data Compression processor, 1997-1999, HIFN 000069-187, 119 pgs.
Signal Termination Guide, Application Note, Hi/fn, 1997-1998, HIFN 000188-194, 7 pgs.
How LZS Data Compression Works, Application Note, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000195-207, 13 pgs.
Reference Hardware, 9751 Compression Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000208-221, 14 pgs.
Using 9751 in Big Endian Systems, Application Note, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000222-234, 13 pgs.
Specification Update, 9751 Compression Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-2000, HIFN 000235-245, 11 pgs.
9732AM Product Release, Hi/fn, 1994-1999, HIFN 000246-302, 57 pgs.
Data Sheet, 9732A Data Compression Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000303-353, 51 pgs.
9711 to 7711 Migration, Application Note, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000354-361, 8 pgs.
Specification Update, 9711 Data Compression Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000362-370, 9 pgs.
Differences Between the 9710 & 9711 Processors, Application Note, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000371-77, 7 pgs.
Specification Update, 9710 Data Compression Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 000378-388, 11 pgs.
9706/9706A Data Compression Coprocessor Data Sheet, Stac Electronics, 1991-1997, HIFN 000389-473, 85 pgs.
9705/9705A Data Compression Coprocessor, Stac Electronics, 1988-1996, HIFN 000474-562, 88 pgs.
9705/9705A Data Compression Coprocessor Data Sheet, Stac Electronics, 1988-1996 HIFN 000563-649, 87 pgs.
9700/9701 Compression Coprocessors, Hi/fn, 1997, HIFN 000650-702, 53 pgs.
Data Sheet 9610 Data Compression Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-1998, HIFN 000703-744, 42 pgs.
Specification Update 9610 Data Compression Processor, Hi/fn, 1997-1999, HIFN 00745-751, 7 pgs.
9705 Data Compression Coprocessor, Stac Electronics, 1988-1992, HIFN 000752-831, 80 pgs.
9705 Network Software Design Guide, Application Note, Stac Electronics, 1990-1991, HIFN 000832-861, 30 pgs.
Data Sheet 9601 Data Compression Processor, Hi/fn, May 21, 1998, HIFN 000862-920, 59 pgs.
7751 Encryption Processor Reference Kit, Hi/fn, Apr. 1999, HIFN 000921-1114, 194 pgs.
Hardware Data Book, Hi/fn, Nov. 1998, HIFN 001115-1430, 316 pgs.
Data Compression Data Book, Hi/fn, Jan. 1999, HIFN 001431-1889, 459 pgs.
Reference Software 7751 Encryption Processor, Hi/fn, Nov. 1998, HIFN 002164-2201, 38 pgs.
Interface Specification for Synergize Encoding/Decoding Program, JPB, Oct. 10, 1997, HIFN 002215-2216, 2 pgs.
Anderson, Chip, Extended Memory Specification Driver, 1998, HIFN 002217-2264, 48 pgs.
Whiting, Doug, LZS Hardware API, Mar. 12, 1993, HIFN 002265-68, 4 pgs.
Whiting, Doug, Encryption in Sequoia, Apr. 28, 1997, HIFN 002309-2313, 5 pgs.
LZS221-C Version 4 Data Compression Software, Data Sheet, Hi/fn, 1994-1997, HIFN 002508-2528, 18 pgs.
eXtended Memory Specification (XMS), ver. 2.0, Microsoft, Jul. 19, 1988, HIFN 002670-2683, 14 pgs.
King, Stanley, Just for Your Info—From Microsoft 2, May 4, 1992, HIFN 002684-2710, 27 pgs.
eXtended Memory Specification (XMS), ver. 2.0, Microsoft, Jul. 19, 1988, HIFN 002711-2724, 14 pgs.
Advanced LZS Technology (ALZS), Whitepaper, Hi/fn, Jun. 1, 1998, HIFN 002725-2727, 3 pgs.
Secure Tape Technology (STT) Whitepaper, Hi/fn, Jun. 1, 1998, HIFN 002728-2733, 6 pgs.
SSLRef 3.0 API Details, Netscape, Nov. 19, 1996, HIFN 002734-2778, 45 pgs.
LZS221-C Version 4 Data Compression Software Data Sheet , Hi/fn, 1994-1997, HIFN 002779-2799, 18 pgs.
MPPC-C Version 4 Data Compression Software Data Sheet, Hi/fn, 1994-1997, HIFN 002797-2810, 14 pgs.
Magstar MP Hardware Reference B Series Models Document GA32-0365-01, 1996-1997, [IBM—1—1—601 pp. 1-338], 338 pages.
Magstar MP 3570 Taoe Subsystem, Operator Guide, B-Series Models, 1998-1999, [IBM—1—601 pp. 339-525], 188 pages.
Preview, IBM Magstar 3590 Tape System Enhancements, Hardware Announcement, Feb. 16, 1999, [IBM—1—601 pp. 526-527], 2 pgs.
New IBM Magstar 3590 Models E11 and E1A Enhance Tape Drive Performance, Hardware Announcement, Apr. 20, 1999, [IBM—1—601 pp. 528-540] 13 pgs.
New IBM Magstar 35900 Model A60 Dramatically Enhances Tape Drive Performance, Hardware Announcement Jul. 27, 1999, [IBM—1—601 pp. 541-550] 10 pgs.
The IBM Magstar MP Tape Subsystem Provides Fast Access to Data, Sep. 3, 1996, Announcement No. 196-176, [IBM—1—601 pp. 551-563] 13 pgs.
IBM 3590 High Performance Tape Subsystem, Apr. 10, 1995, Announcement 195-106, [IBM—1—601 pp. 564-581] 18 pgs.
Standard ECMA-222 (Jun. 1995): ECMA—Standardizing Information and Commuinications Systems, Adaptive Lossless Data Compression Algorithm, [IBM—1—601 pp. 582-601] 20 pgs.
IBM 3590 and 3494 Revised Availability, Hardware Announcement Aug. 8, 1995, [IBM—743—1241 p. 1] 1 pg.
Direct Delivery of IBM 3494, 3466, and 3590 Storage Products, Hardware Announcement, Sep. 30, 1997, Announcement 197-297, [IBM—743—1241 pp. 2-3] 2 pgs.
IBM Magstar 3590 Enhances Open Systems, Hardware Announcement Feb. 9, 1996, Announcement 198-014, [IBM—743—1241 pp. 4-7] 4 pgs.
Hardware Withdrawal: IBM Magstar 3590 A00 Controller—Replacement Available, Announcement No. 197-267, Withdrawal Announcement, Dec. 9, 1997, [IBM—743—1241 p. 9] 1 pg.
IBM Magstar 3590 Tape Subsystem, Introduction and Planing Guide, Doc. No. GA32-0329007, [IBM—743—1241 pp. 10-499] 490 pgs.
NetMeeting 2.0 Reviewers Guide, Apr. 1997, [MSCS—298—339] 42 pgs.
Microsoft NetMeeting Compatible Products and Services Directory, Apr. 1997, [MSCS—242—297] 56 pgs.
Microsoft NetMeeting “Try This!” Guide, 1997, [MSCS—340—345] 6 pgs.
The Professional Companion to NetMeeting 2—The Technical Guide to Installing, Configuring, and Supporting NetMeeting 2.0 in Your Organization—Microsoft NetMeeting 2.0, 1996-1997, [MSCS—2—241] 240 pgs.
CUSeeMe 3.1.2 User Guide, Nov. 1998, [RAD—1—220] 220 pgs.
MeetingPoint Conference Server Users Guide 3.0, Nov. 1997, [RAD—221—548] 328 pgs.
MeetingPoint Conference Server Users Guide 4.0.2, Dec. 1999, [RAD—549—818] 270 pgs.
MeetingPoint Conference Service Users Guide 3.5.1, Dec. 1998, [RAD—819—1062] 244 pgs.
Enhanced CUSeeMe—Authorized Guide, 1995-1996, [RAD—1063—1372] 310 pgs.
Meeting Point Reader File, Jun. 1999, [RAD—1437—1445] 9 pgs.
Press Release—White Pine Announces Launch of MeetingPoint Conference Server, Oct. 9, 1997, [RAD—1738—1739] 2 pgs.
Press Release—Leading Network Service providers Line Up to Support White Pine's MeetingPoint Conference Server Technology, Oct. 9, 1997, [RAD—1740—1743] 4 pgs.
Byte—A New MeetingPoint for Videoconferencing, Oct. 9, 1997, [RAD—1744—1750] 7 pgs.
Declaration of Patrick Gogerty, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, executed May 8, 2009, 3 pgs.
Other Responses to Interrogatories, Request for Admission, and Objections to Request for Admission filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document NOT Submitted).
Deposition Transcripts of persons involved in litigation, including inventor James Fallon, and third-party witness Jim Karp, Ke-Chiang Chu, and Frank V. DeRosa filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document NOT Submitted).
Office of Rebuttal Expert Reports of Dr. Brian Von Herzen, Lester L. Hewitt and Dr. James A. Storer, and Expert Reports of Dr. James A. Storer and Dr. Nathaniel Polish filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document NOT Submitted).
Proposed Amended Infringement Contentions filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document NOT Submitted).
Documents Concerning Agreements for Meiations and Mediation Proceedings Between Plaintiffs and Some of the Defendants filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document NOT submitted).
Plaintiff's Oppostion to Joint Defendants' Motion for Parital Summary Judgment of Invalidity of some of the patents in Suit for indefiniteness, including the '104 patent, Blue Coat's response to this objection, Blue Coat's Reply to Plaintiffs response and Plaintiffs Sur-Reply to Blue Coat's Reply filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document Not submitted).
Palintiff's Amended P.R. 3-1 Disclosures and Infringement Contentions , Defendants' Motions to Strick unauthorized portions of these disclosures, and Sur-Replies to these Motions filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document NOT submitted).
Expert Report of Dr. James A. Storer Regarging Non-Infringement that contains positions related to the validity of the patents in suit filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (PTO Notified—Document NOT Submitted).
Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, No. 09 CV 7868 (S.D.N.Y.) Sep. 23, 2009 Order Dismissing Case in Favor of Texas Action, 1 pg.
Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, No. 09 CV 7868 (S.D.N.Y.) Sep. 30, 2009 Response to Order re Transfer, 103 pgs.
Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, No. 09 CV 7868 (S,D.N.Y.) Oct. 7, 2009 Reply Letter regarding Judge Berman Sep. 23, 2009 Order re Transfer, 182 pgs.
Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, No. 09 CV 7868 (S.D.N.Y.) Oct. 15, 2009 Order Staying Case Until TX Action Decided, 3 pgs.
Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, No. 09 CV 7868 (S.D.N.Y.) Sep. 11, 2009 Complaint—DJ SD NY 41 pgs.
Thomson Reuters Corporation V. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, No. 09 CV 7868 (S.D.N.Y.) Sep. 11, 2009 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement for Thomson Reuters, 1 pg.
Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, No. 09 CV 7868 (S.D.N.Y.) Order-Stay Pending Transfer Motion Confirmed 10—15—09, 3 pgs.
Opinion and Order of United States Magistrate Judge regarding Claim Construction, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, issued Jun. 22, 2009, 75 pgs.
Script for Realtimes' Technology Tutorial Presented to the Magistrate Judge in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mar. 16, 2009, 69 pgs.
Opinion and Order of United States Magistrate Judge regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Unauthorized New Invalidity Theories from Defendant Citrix's Opeaning and Reply Briefs in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgement of Invalidity, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, issued Dec. 8, 2009, 10 pgs.
Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc.'s Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 282 Disclosures, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, filed Dec. 11, 2009, 7 pgs.
Blue Coat Defendants' Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 282 Disclosures, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, filed Dec. 11, 2009, 7 pgs.
Expand Networks' 35 U.S.C. Section 282 Disclosures, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv00144, filed Dec. 11, 2009, 4 pgs.
Expanded Networks' 35 U.S.C. Section 282 Disclosures (Amended), Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv00144, filed Dec. 11, 2009, 5 pgs.
Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc.'s Notice of Obviousness Combinations Pursuant to Court Order, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv00144, filed Dec. 11, 2009, 3 pgs.
Order of United States Magistrate Judge regarding Motion to Limit the Number of Prior Art References to be Asserted at Trial, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv00144, filed Dec. 21, 2009, 6 pgs.
Expand Defendants' Notice of Obviousness Combinations Pursuant to Court Order, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv00144, filed Dec. 22, 2009, 3 pgs.
Blue Coat Systems, Inc. and 7-Eleven, Inc.'s Notice of Obviousness Combinations to be Used at Trial, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv00144, filed Dec. 22, 2009, 30 pgs.
Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc's Notice of Other Prior Art References Within the Scope of the References Discussed at the Dec. 17, 2009 Hearing, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, filed Dec. 29, 2009, 6 pgs.
Docket Listing downloaded Mar. 10, 2010 for Realtime Data, LLC D/B/a Ixo v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:08cv144, filed Apr. 18, 2008, 165 pgs.
Notice of Allowance in Commonly-Assigned U.S. Appl. No. 11/651,366, issued Apr. 10, 2009, 7 pgs.
CCITT Draft Recommendation T.4, RFC 804, Jan. 1981, 12 pgs.
SNA Formats, IBM Corporation, 14th Ed., Nov. 1993, 3 pgs.
Munteanu et al, “Wavelet-Based Lossless Compression Scheme with Progressive Transmission Capability,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Int'l J. Imaging Sys. Tech., vol. 10, (1999) pp. 76-85.
Forchhammer and Jensen, “Data Compression of Scanned Halftone Images,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, Feb.-Apr. 1994, pp. 1881-1893.
Christopher Eoyang et al., “The Birth of the Second Generation: The Hitachi S-820/80,” Proceesings of the 1998 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, pp. 296-303 (1998).
Transcript for Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 133 pgs, Nov. 8, 2009.
Transcript for Motions Hearing (Including Supplemental Claim Construction Hearing), Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas, 88 pgs, Nov. 10, 2009.
Nelson, “The Data Compression Book,” M&T Books (2nd Ed. 1996), 283 pgs.
“The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms,” 7th Ed. 2000, p. 273.
Larousse Dictionary of Science and Technology, 1st Ed., 1995, p. 916.
Plaintiff Realtime Data's Motion to Strike Unauthorized New Invalidity Theories from Defendant Citrix's Opening and Reply Briefs in Support Its Motion for Summary Judgement of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300 (Sep. 22, 2009), 14 pgs.
Realtime Data's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Unauthorized New Invalidity Theories from Defendant Citrix's Opening and Reply Briefs in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgement of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300 (Oct 19, 2009), 17 pgs.
Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc.'s Sur-Reply in Opposition to Realtime Data LLC's Motion to Strike Unauthorized New Invalidity Theories from Citrix's Opening and Reply Briefs in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgement of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300 (Oct. 30, 2009), 9 pgs.
Blue Coat Defendants' Respinse to Realtime Data, LLC's Notice Re Proposed Construction of “Data Storage Rate” (Nov. 11, 2009), 3 pgs.
Order for Supplemental Briefing Blue Coat 7-11 Motion for Partial SJ on Non-infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104 (Nov. 13, 2009), 6 pgs.
Memorandum Opinion and Order (Nov. 23, 2009), 15 pgs.
Memorandum Opinion and Order (Dec. 8, 2009), 10 pgs.
Expand's Conclusions of Fact and Law Regarding Defense of Inequitable Conduct Concerning the Unenforceability of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937 (Nov. 12, 2009), 3 pgs.
Realtime Data's Sur-reply Supplemental Claim Construction Brief Concerning Whether the Asserted Claims of the '104 Patent and Product Claims (Dec. 23, 2009), 6 pgs.
Order regarding Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc's Notice of Other Prior Art References Within the Scope of the References Discussed at the Dec. 17, 2009 Hearing (Dec. 30, 2009), 3 pgs.
Network Working group RFC 2068 (Jan. 1997), 163 pgs.
Network Working group RFC 2616 (Jun. 1999), 114 pgs.
Network Working group RFC 1945 (May 1996), 61 pgs.
Network Working group RFC 1950 (May 1996), 10 pgs.
Network Working group RFC 1951 (May 1996), 15 pgs.
Network Working group RFC 1952 (May 1996), 12 pgs.
Notice of Plaintiff Realtime Data LLC's Proposed Supplemental Construction of “Data Storage Rate” In Response to the Court's Comments During the Nov. 10, 2009 Supplemental Claim Construction Hearing (Nov. 10, 2009), 4 pgs.
Citrix's Amended Invalidity Contentions, Including Appendices G2-G8 (Dec. 15, 2009), 509 pgs.
“Plaintiff Realtime Data's Opposition to Defendant F5 Networks' Motion for Summary Judgement that Claims 18-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937 are Invalid (Aug. 25, 2009)” Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED Jury Trial Demanded Filed Under Seal; In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division. [Under Seal—Document NOT Submitted].
Declaration of Dr. James W. Modestino relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Mar. 15, 2010, 49 pgs.
Second Declaration of Dr. George T. Ligler under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 relating to U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, executed May 5, 2010, 3 pgs.
Realtime Data, LLC Complaint for Patent Infringement, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. (II), District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:10-cv-246, filed May 11, 2010, 24 pages.
Realtime Data, LLC Complaint for Patent Infringement, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, et al. (II), District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:10-cv-247, filed May 11, 2010, 15 pages.
Realtime Data, LLC Complaint for Patent Infringement, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al. (II), District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:10-cv-248, filed May 11, 2010, 27 pages.
Declaration of Padmaja Chinta in Support of Realtime Data's Reply Claim Construction Brief (including Exhibits A-S), Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:10-cv-00144-LED, dated Mar. 30, 2009, 217 pgs.
Extended European search report issuing from European Patent Application 09150508.1, Aug. 3, 2010, 5 pgs.
Complaint, Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO Southern District of New York, No. 2:09-cv-7868-RMB, filed Sep. 11, 2009, 6 pages.
Realtime Data, LLC Complaint for Patent Infringement, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 6:10-cv-00493, filed Sep. 23, 2010, 14 pages.
Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated v. Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 09 CV 4486, filed Jul. 24, 2009, 6 pages.
Realtime's Response in Opposition to the Defendants' Joint Objections to Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Regarding Motion for Partial Summary Judgement of Invalidity for Indefiniteness, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 27, 2009, 15 pgs.
Reply to Realtime's Response to Blue Coat Defendants' Objections to Report and Reccommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Regarding Motion for Partial Summary Judgement of Invalidity for Indefiniteness Entered Jun. 23, 2009, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Jul. 31, 2009, 3 pgs.
Realtime Data's Sur-Reply in Opposition to the Defendants' Joint Objections to Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Regarding Motion for Partial Summary Judgement of Invalidity for Indefiniteness, in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Aug. 3, 2009, 3 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/684,624, mailed Nov. 10, 2010, 5 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/123,081, mailed Feb. 17, 2011, 7 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/688,413, mailed Sep. 27, 2010, 13 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,211, mailed Jan. 31, 2011, 4 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,211, mailed Sep. 22, 2010, 4 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,204, mailed Jan. 11, 2011, 4 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed Sep. 22, 2010, 4 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,008, mailed Nov. 23, 2010, 7 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,365, mailed Feb. 4, 2010, 8 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/651,365, mailed Nov. 19, 2009, 8 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,631, mailed Jun. 22, 2010, 5 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,008, mailed Oct. 30, 2009, 7 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,008, mailed May 11, 2010, 7 pgs.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, filed Dec. 30, 2010, 696 pages.
Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, filed Mar. 1, 2011, 357 pages.
L. Gannoun, “RTP Payload Format for X Protocol Media Streams,” Audio-Visual Transport WG Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Mar. 11, 1998, 15 pgs.
International Search Report for PCT/US00/42018, mailed Jul. 31, 2001, 3 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US01/03712, mailed May 10, 2002, 2 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US01/03711, mailed Jan. 28, 2001, 5 pages.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, 5 pgs.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, 14 pgs.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, 5 pgs.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, 12 pgs.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, 14 pgs.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, 14 pgs.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, 14 pgs.
Submission of Prior art under 37 CFR 1.501, for U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, 14 pgs.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, filed Mar. 21, 2011, 2,457 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, filed Feb. 14, 2011, 423 pages.
Order for Reexamination and Non-Final Office Action for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Mar. 25, 2011, 47 pages.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, issued Jul. 24, 2009, 29 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, issued Dec. 15, 2009, 20 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, issued Jun. 22, 2009, 11 pgs.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, issued Jun. 22, 2009, 16 pgs.
Official Action Closing Prosecution for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, issued Dec. 22, 2009, 12 pgs.
Comments by Third Party Requester to Patent Owner's Response Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, filed Nov. 10, 2009, 30 pgs.
Supplemental Declaration of Professor James A. Storer, Ph.D. under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, executed on Nov. 10, 2009, 16 pgs.
Examiner Interview Summary in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, issued Dec. 3, 2009, 3 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, issued Nov. 2, 2009, 13 pgs.
Official Order Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90,009,428, issued Jun. 1, 2009, 12 pgs.
Declaration of Dr. George T. Ligler under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, executed Dec. 28, 2009 16 pgs.
Supplementary Declaration of Dr. George T. Ligler under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, executed Dec. 30, 2009 1 pg.
Declaration of Dr. George T. Ligler under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, executed Aug. 24, 2009 16 pg.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, issued Aug. 14, 2009, 41 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, issued Dec. 15, 2009, 37 pgs.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, issued Aug. 13, 2009, 60 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, issued Dec. 15, 2009, 27 pgs.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158 Control No. 95/000,486, issued Aug. 14, 2009, 35 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/000,486, issued Nov. 12, 2009, 199 pgs.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, issued Jan. 6, 2011, 15 pgs.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, issued Aug. 27, 2010, 25 pgs.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, issued May 24, 2010, 23 pgs.
Final Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, issued Feb. 15, 2010, 16 pgs.
Right of Appeal Notice for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, issued Jan. 27, 2011, 18 pgs.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reeximination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, issued Aug. 27, 2010, 34 pgs.
Right of Appeal Notice for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, issued Jan. 6, 2011, 15 pgs.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, issued Aug. 23, 2010, 31 pgs.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158 Control No. 95/000,486, issued Mar. 7, 2011, 257 pgs.
Patent Owner's reply to Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, mailed Mar. 15, 2010, 23 pages.
Patent Owner's reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Aug. 23, 2010 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, mailed Sep. 23, 2010, 23 pages.
Patent Owner's reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Aug. 27, 2010 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, mailed Sep. 27, 2010, 26 pages.
Patent Owner's reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Aug. 27, 2010 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, mailed Sep. 27, 2010, 20 pages.
Corrected Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, filed Jun. 15, 2009, 241 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, filed May 21, 2009, 255 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, filed May 28, 2009, 455 pages.
“A-T Financial Offers Manipulation, Redistribution of Ticker III”, Inside Market Data, vol. 4 No. 14, Sep. 5, 1989, 1 page.
“Add-on Options for the XpressFiles”, Intelligent Compression Technologies, http://web.archive.org/web/19980518053418/ictcompress.com/options—X.html, 1998, 2 pages.
Andrews et al., “A Mean-Removed Variation of Weighted Universal Vector Quantization for Image Coding”, IEEE, 1993, pp. 302-309.
Asserted Claims Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Realtime Date, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texts Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 4 pages.
Asserted Claims Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Realtime Date, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 5 pages.
Asserted Claims Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Realtime Date, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 6 pages.
Asserted Claims for U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Realtime Date, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 13 pages.
Asserted Claims Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Realtime Date, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 19 pages.
Barton, Rich, S7P ComStock Network Character Set Definition, 19.2 KB Network, Version 1.7.0, Feb. 10, 1995, 29 pages.
Beech et al., AX.25 Link Access Protocol for Amateur Packet Radio, Version 2.2, Revision: Jul. 1998, 143 pages.
Bromann, Carsten, “Providing Integrated Services over Low-bitrate Links”, Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2689, Category: Informational, Sep. 1999, 14 pages.
ComStock Services Pamphlet, McGraw-Hill Financial Services Company, purportedly published by Jul. 19, 1995, 6 pages.
Cormack, Gordon V., “Data Compression on a Database System”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, No. 12, Dec. 1985, pp. 1336-1342.
Court Docket History for 6:10-cv-0043-LED Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., dated Apr. 20, 2011, 8 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:09-cv-04486 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated v. Realtime Data, LLC, dated Apr. 20, 2011, 2010, 7 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:08-cv-00144-LED-JDL Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al, dated Apr. 20, 2011, 119 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:09-cv-00326-LED-JDL Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. Morgan Stanley et al, dated Apr. 20, 2011, 43 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:09-cv-00327-LED-JDL Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/IXO, v. CME Group Inc. et al, dated Apr. 4, 2011, 52 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:09-cv-00333-LED-JDL Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters et al, dated Apr. 20, 2011, 28 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:09-cv-07868-RMB Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC, dated Apr. 20, 2011, 3 pages.
Danskin, John Moffatt, Compressing the X Graphics Protocol: A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Princeton University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Jan. 1995, 147 pages.
“Data Networks and Open System Communications”, Information Technology—Abstract Syntax Notation One (AsSN. 1) Specification of Basic Notation, International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU X.680, Jul. 1994, 105 pages.
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 19 pages.
Degermark, Mikael, “IP Header Compression”, Networking Group Request for Comments: 2507, Category; Standards Track, Feb. 1999, 47 pages.
Developer's Guide, Version 1.0.2, S&P ComStock, Feb. 15, 1994, 186 pages.
Domanski, Dr. Bernie, “All the news you can eat, Department: Dr. Bernie's Digestions and Digressions”, Demand Technology's Capacity Management Review, vol. 25, No. 7, Jul. 1997, pp. 24, 18-22.
Effros, Michelle and Philip A. Chou, “Weighted unversal Transform Coding: Universal Image Compression with the Karhunen-Loeve Transform”, IEEE, 1995, pp. 61-64.
Engan, Mathias, “IP Header Compression over PPP”, Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2509, Category: Standards Track, Feb. 1999, 10 pages.
Exhibit A, Invalidity Claim Charts A1-A45 for U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 616 pages.
Exhibit B, Invalidity Claim Charts B1-B45 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Coiurt for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 1513 pages.
Exhibit C, Invalidity Claim Charts C1-C7, C9-C31, C33-C45 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 1528 pages.
Exhibit D, Invalidity Claim Charts D1-D7, D9-D45 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 2458 pages.
Exhibit E, Invalidity Claim Charts E1-E7, E9, E11, E13-E15, E17-E30, E32-E45 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 3312 pages.
Greene, Tim, “Squeeze your Net links”, NetworkWorld, vol. 14, No. 28, Jul. 14, 1997, pp. 1 and 56.
Helck, Christopher J., “Encapsulated Ticker: Ver 1.0”, Jul. 14, 1993, 22 pages.
“High-performance schema-specific compression for XML data formats.”, XML-Xpress: Produst Overview, Intelligent Compression Technologies, http://web.archive.org/web/20020818002535/www.ictcompress.com/products—xmlxpress, 2001, 2 pages.
Hsu, William H. and Amy E. Zwarico, “Automatic Synthesis of Compression Techniques for Heterogeneous Files”, Software—Practice and Experience, vol. 25 (10), Oct. 1995, pp. 1097-1116.
“ICT's XML-Xpress”, Intelligent Compression Technologies, Dec. 2000, 6 pages.
“Information processing systems—Data communication—High-level data link control procedures—Frame structure”, UNI ISO 3309, 1984, 11 pages.
Installing and Administering PPP, Edition 1, Hewlitt-Packard Company, 1997, 169 pages.
“Introducing XpressFiles”, Intelligent Compression Technologies, http://web.archive.org/web/19980518053310/ictcompress.com/xpressfiles.html, 1998, 1 page.
“Ion's RemoteScript speeds transmission”, Seybold Report on Publishing Systems, vol. 22, No. 5, Nov. 9, 1992, pp. 21-23.
Jacobson, V., “Compressing TCP/IP Headers for Low-Speed Serial Links”, Network Working Group Request for Comments: 1144, Feb. 1990, 45 pages.
Kulkosky, Victor, “Upping the Ante”, Wall Street & Technology, vol. 11 No. 5, Oct. 1993, pp. 8-11.
Liefke, Hartmut and Dan Suciu, “An Extensible Compressor for XML Data”, SIGMOD Record, vol. 29, No. 1, Mar. 2000, pp. 57-62.
Liefke, Hartmut and Dan Suciu, Xmill: an Efficient Compressor for XML Data, 2000, pp. 153-164.
Liefke, Hartmut and Dan Suciu, Xmill: an Efficient Compressor for XML Data, Oct. 18, 1999, 25 pages.
McGregor, Glenn, “The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP)”, Network Working Group Request for Comments: 1332, Obsoletes: RFC 1172, May 1992, 14 pages.
Obviousness Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 19 pages.
Obviousness Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 49 pages.
Obviousness Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 41 pages.
Obviousness Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 75 pages.
Obviousness Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al. , 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 19, 2010, 97 pages.
Open Financial Exchange Specification 2.0, Intuit Inc., Microsoft Corp., Apr. 28, 2000, 537 pages.
Rand, Dave, “The PPP Compression Control Protocol (CCP)”, Network Working Group Request for Comments: 1962, Category: Standards Track, Jun. 1996, 9 pages.
TID Information: Revisions to TID Program Since the Dawn of Time!!! Version 1.0, 23 pages; TID Codes 1, 1 page; TID Codes 2, 1 page, purportedly by Jul. 19, 1995.
Rogers, Amy, “Bandwidth Bargain IT hot on products that squeeze more out of the pipe”, Communication Week, No. 673, Jul. 21, 1997, pp. 1 and 65.
Roth, Mark A. and Scott J. Van Horn, “Database Compression”, SIGMOD Record, vol. 22, No. 3, Sep. 1993, pp. 31-39.
Schmerken, Ivy, “Time Running Out for Old Technologies”, Wall Street Computer Review, Apr. 1990, pp. 14-16, 23-24, 28, 56.
“Scrolling News”, Inside Market Data, Feb. 27, 1995, 2 pages.
Simpson, W., “PPP in HDLC-like Framing”, Network Working Group Request for Comments: 1662, STD 51, Obsoletes 1549, Category: Standards Track, Jul. 1994, 26 pages.
Suciu, Dan, Data Management on the Web, AT&T Labs, Apr. 4, 2000, 52 slides.
Suciu, Dan Data Management on the Web: Abstract, university of Washington Computer Science & Engineering, Apr. 4, 2000, 1 page.
“Telekurs Buys S&P Trading Systems and Its Ticker III Feed”, Inside Market Data, vol. 4, No. 11, Jul. 10, 1989, 1 page.
“Telekurs May Debut 128 KPS Ticker By Year's End”, Inside Market Data, Jul. 18, 1994, 2 pages.
“Telekurs Now Carries All Dow Jones' News on 56-Kbps Ticker”, Inside Market Data, Dec. 20, 1993, 2 pages.
“Telekurs Sells No. American Division in Mgmt. Buyout”, Inside Market Data, Oct. 23, 1995, 2 pages.
“Telekurs to Launch New Int'l Feed/Internet Server”, Wall Street & Technology, vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 1997, p. 14.
“The Technology Behind XpressFiles”, Intelligent Compression Technologies, http://web.archive.org/web/19980518053634/ictcompress.com/technical—X.html, 1998, 1 page.
TypeWorld: The First and Only Newspaper for Electronic Publishing, vol. 16 No. 9, Jun. 17, 1992, 3 pages.
“XpressFiles White Paper”, Intelligent Compression Technologies, 1999-2001, 3 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/309,218, filed Jul. 31, 2001.
Telekurs Manual, Jan. 11, 1993, 184 pages.
Danskin, et al., “Fast Higher Bandwidth X,” Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1995; 8 pages.
Hoffman, Roy, “Data Compression in Digital Systems,” Digital Multimedia Standards Series, Chapman & Hall, 1997, 426 pages.
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, 34 pages.
Appendix A, Obviousness Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, not dated, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-242-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, 466 pages.
Appendix B, § 112 Invalidity Arguments for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, 75 pages.
Exhibit 1, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, 161 pages, citing Aakre et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,956,808.
Exhibit 2, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, 206 pages, citing Albert et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,907,801.
Exhibit 3, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, 95 pages, citing B. Andrews. P. Chou, M. Effros and R. Gray “A Mean-Removed Variation of Weighted Universal Vector Quantization for Image Coding,” IEEE 0-8186-3392-1/93, 302-309 (1993).
Exhibit 4, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 144 pages, Realtime Data, LLC IXO D/B/A v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Barnes et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,792,151.
Exhibit 5, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 216 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Birdwell et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,197.
Exhibit 6, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 257 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Bledsoe, U.S. Pat. No. 4,646,061.
Exhibit 7, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 169 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Brickman, U.S. Pat. No. 4,499,499.
Exhibit 8, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 396 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing C. Bormann et al., “Robust Header Compression (ROHC),” Network Working Group Internet-Draft Sep. 18, 2000.
Exhibit 9, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 253 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Carr, U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,379.
Exhibit 10, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 205 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Cellier et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,269.
Exhibit 11, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 181 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Chu, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,374,916 & 5,467,087.
Exhibit 12, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 175 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Cisco IOS Data Compression White Paper (Cisco Systems Inc., 1997).
Exhibit 13, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 590 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing—S&P ComStock Developers Guides (McGraw-Hill, 1994); Rich Barton, “S&P ComStock Network Character Set Definition” (Feb. 10, 1995).
Exhibit 14, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 186 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing D.J. Craft. “A fast hardware data compression algorithm and some algorithmic extensions,” IBM J. Res. Develop, vol. 42, No. 6 (Nov. 6, 1998).
Exhibit 15, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 142 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Deering, U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,429.
Exhibit 16, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 284 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Dye et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,190,284 and International Publication No. WO 00/45516.
Exhibit 17, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 269 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Earl et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,341,440.
Exhibit 18, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 132 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Eastman et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,464,650.
Exhibit 19, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 125 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Elgmal et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,410,671.
Exhibit 20, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 122 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Enari et al., European Application No. 0,493,130.
Exhibit 21, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 379 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Fascenda, U.S. Pat. No. 5,045,848.
Exhibit 22, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 218 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Frachtenberg et al., U.S. Pat. No. 2003/0030575.
Exhibit 23, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 247 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Franaszek et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5/870,036.
Exhibit 24, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 327 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing French et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,794,229.
Exhibit 25, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 225 pages, Exhibit 24, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 327 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Geiger et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,987,022.
Exhibit 26, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 219 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Gentile, U.S. Pat. No. 5,504,842.
Exhibit 27, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, 167 pages, citing Giltner et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,386,416.
Exhibit 28, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 156 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Gooch et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,325,085.
Exhibit 29, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 132 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Hauck U.S. Pat. No. 4,626,829.
Exhibit 30, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 161 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Heath, U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,976.
Exhibit 31, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 359 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Hewlett-Packard Company et al., “Installing and Administering PPP,” B2355-90137, HP 9000 Networking, E0948 (1st Ed. 1997).
Exhibit 32, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 229 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Hsu & Zwarico, Automatic Synthesis of Compression Techniques for Heterogeneous Files, Sofatware-Practice & Experience, vol. 25(10), pp. 1097-1116 (Oct. 1995).
Exhibit 33, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 206 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing ITC XML-Xpress White Paper (Intelligent Compression Technologies Inc., 2000) & website.
Exhibit 34, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 138 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing ICT XpressFiles White Paper (Intelligent Compression Technologies Inc., 1999) & website.
Exhibit 35, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 128 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Iseda et al., E.P. 0405572 A2.
Exhibit 36, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 205 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing J. Danskin. “Compressing the X Graphics Protocol,” Princeton University (Jan. 1995).
Exhibit 37, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 159 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Kalkstein, U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,933.
Exhibit 28, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 402 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Kari, U.S. Pat. No. 6;434;168; International Publication No. WO97/48212 A1.
Exhibit 39, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 209 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Koopmas et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,024,460.
Exhibit 40, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 214 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Kopf, U.S. Pat. No. 5,825,830.
Exhibit 41, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 281 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Lafe et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,658.
Exhibit 42, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 340 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Lane et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,521,940.
Exhibit 43, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 164 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Langdon, Jr. et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,494,108.
Exhibit 44, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 211 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Lavalle, U.S. Pat. No. 6,215,904.
Exhibit 45, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 103 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing M. Effros, P. Chou & R.M. Gray. “Variable Dimension Weighted Universal Vector Quantization and Noiseless Coding,” IEEE 1068-0314/94 (1994).
Exhibit 46, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 414 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing MacCrisken., U.S. Pat. No. 4,730,384.
Exhibit 47, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 319 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Madany et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,774,715.
Exhibit 48, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 228 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Mark A. Roth and Scott J. Van Horn, “Database Compression” SIGMOD Record, vol. 22, No. 3 (1993).
Exhibit 49, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 235 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Miller et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,814,746.
Exhibit 50, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 172 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing O'Brien et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,929,946.
Exhibit 51, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 284 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Osler et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,768,749.
Exhibit 52, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 103 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing P. G. Howard, F. Kossenti, S. Forchammer, and W. J. Rucklidge [1998]. “The Emerging JBIG2 Standard”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Viedo Technology 8:7, 838-848.
Exhibit 53, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 218 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Panaoussis, U.S. Pat. No. 5,949,355.
Exhibit 54, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 335 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Pyne et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,021,433.
Exhibit 55, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 273 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Reynar et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,951,623.
Exhibit 56, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 399 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing RFC 1144: V. Jacobson, “Compressing TCP/IP Headers for Low-Speed Serial Links,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 1144 (Feb. 1990).
Exhibit 57, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 103 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing RFC 1661: Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group, “The Point-to-Point Protocol,” RFC 1661 (William Simpson ed., Internet Engineering Task Force 1994); RFC 1662: Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group, “PPP in HDLC-like Framing,” RFC 1662 (William Simpson ed., Internet Engineering Task Force 1994); RFC 1962: David Rand, “The PPP compresstion Control Protocol (CCP),” RFC 1962 (Internet Engineering Task Force 1996); RFC 1332: Glenn McGregor, “The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP),” RFC 1332 (Internet Engineering Task Force 1992); RFC 2509: Mathias Engan et al., “IP Header Compression over IP,” RFC 2509 (Internet Society 1999).
Exhibit 58, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 218 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing RFC 2507: Mikael Degermark et al., “IP Header Compression,” RFC 2507 (Internet Society 1999).
Exhibit 16, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 284 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Roper et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,454,079.
Exhibit 16, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 284 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Sebastian, U.S. Pat. No. 6,253,264 and International Publication No. WO/1998/039699.
Exhibit 61, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 399 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Seroussi et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,243,341.
Exhibit 62, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 322 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Seroussi., U.S. Pat. No. 5,389,922.
Exhibit 63, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 102 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Shin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,455,680.
Exhibit 64, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 126 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Taaffe et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,179,651.
Exhibit 65, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 313 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Telekurs Ticker—“Telekurs Ticker Services: Programmer's Reference,” Telekurs (North America), Inc. (Jan. 11, 1993); C. Helck. “Encapsulated Ticker: Ver. 1.0,” Telekurs NA, 1-22 (Jul. 14, 1993); A-T Financial Offers Manipulation, Redistribution of Ticker III, Micro Ticker Report, v 4, n 14 (Sep. 5, 1989); V. Kulkosky, “Upping the Ante” Wall Street & Technology, v11 n5 pp. 8-11 (Oct. 1993); “Telekurs to Launch New Int'l Feed/Internet Server,” Wall Street & Technology, v15 n1 pp. 14 (Jan. 1997); I. Schmerken, “Time running out for old technologies”, Wall Street Computer Review, v7 n7 p. 14(7) (Apr. 1990); Scrolling News, Inside Market Data, v 10, n 11 (Feb. 27, 1995); Telekurs Buys S&P Trading Systems and Its Ticker III Feed, Micro Ticker Report, v 4, n 11 (Jul. 10, 1989); Telekurs May Debut 128 KPS Ticker By Year's End, Inside Market Data, v 9 n 21 (Jul. 18, 1994); Telekurs Now Carries All Dow Jones' News on 56-KBPS Ticker, Inside Market Data, v9, n7 (Dec. 20, 1993); Telekurs Sells No. American Division in MGMT. Buyout, Inside Market Data, v11, n3 (Oct. 23, 1995).
Exhibit 66, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 265 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Tyler et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,638,498.
Exhibit 6, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 284 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing UNI International Standard ISO 3309-1984 (E) [1984]. “Information Processing Systems—Data Communication—High-level Data Link Control Procedres—Frame Structures,” 1-6 (1984).
Exhibit 68, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 236 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Unwired Planet, EP 0928070 A2.
Exhibit 69, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 80 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Vange et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,127,518.
Exhibit 70, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 197 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Wernikoff et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,394,352.
Exhibit 71, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 284 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing Willis et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,745,559; Boilen, U.S. Pat. No. 4,750,135.
Exhibit 72, Prior Art Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, 284 pages, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., 6:09-cv-326-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-248-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-426-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., 6:09-cv-327-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-246-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-424-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:09-cv-333-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-247-LED-JDL, 6:10-cv-425-LED-JDL, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Feb. 4, 2011, citing XMill—Hartmut Liefke & Dan Suciu, “XMill: an Efficient Compressor for XML Data,” University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, MS-CIS-99-26 (Oct. 18, 1999); Hartmut Liefke & Dan Suciu, “XMill: an Efficient Compressor for XML Data,”Proceedings of SIGMOD, 2000; Hartmut Liefke & Dan Suciu, “An Extensible Compressor for XML Data,” SIGMOD Record, vol. 29, No. 1 (Mar. 2000); Dan Suciu, “Data Management on the Web,” Presentation at University of Washington College of Computer Science & Engineering, Seattle, WA (Apr. 4, 2000).
Bormann et al., “Robust Header Compresstion (ROHC),” Network Working Group Internet-Draft, Sep. 18, 2000, 111 pages.
Effros, M., P.A. Chou and R.M. Gray, “Variable Dimension Weighted Universal Vector Quantization and Noiseless Coding,” IEEE 1068-0314/94, 1994, pp. 2-11.
Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Oct. 29, 2010, 17 pages.
Appendix A: U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761 (The “761 Patent”), from Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Oct. 29, 2010, 37 pages.
Appendix B: U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,5061 (The “506 Patent”), from Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Oct. 29, 2010, 63 pages.
Appendix C: U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274 (The 274 Patent), from Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Oct. 29, 2010, 95 pages.
Appendix D: U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568 (The 568 Patent), from Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Oct. 29, 2010, 147 pages.
Appendix E: U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747 (The “747 Patent”), from Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Oct. 29, 2010, 137 pages.
Appendix F: Comparison of FAST to the Prior Art, from Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Oct. 29, 2010, 7 pages.
Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3 Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Feb. 4, 2011, 21 pages.
Appendix G: U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651 (The 651 Patent), Defendant Bloomberg L.P.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3 Regarding U.S. Pat. NO. 7,777,651, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO vs. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., 6:2009-cv-00333 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00247 LED-JDL, 6:2010-cv-00425 LED-JDL, Feb. 4, 2011, 480 pages.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466 issued Dec. 22, 2009, 20 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,204, mailes Sep. 30, 2010, 4 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,204, mailed Jun. 16, 2009, 5 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,204, mailed Jun. 21, 2010, 4 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,204, mailed Sep. 22, 2008, 9 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,204, mailed Jan. 27, 2010, 4 pgs.
Millman, Howard, “Image and video compression”, Computerworld, vol. 33, Issue No. 3, Jan. 18, 1999, pp. 78.
Parties' Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to P.R. 4-3, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Feb. 18, 2009, 168 pages.
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, vs. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, In the United States District Court Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Jun. 17, 2011, 138 pages.
Appendix A, Claim Charts A-1 to A-25, from Invalidity Contentions, Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 173 pages.
Appendix B, Claim Chats B-1 to B-23, from Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 809 pages.
Appendix C, Claim Charts C-1 to C-22, from Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 530 pages.
Appendix D, Claim Charts D-1 to D-16, from Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 253 pages.
Appendix E, Claim Charts E-1 to E-20, from Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 397 pages.
Appendix F, Claim Charts F-1 to F-19, from Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 462 pages.
Appendix G, Claim Charts G-1 to G-18, from Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 548 pages.
Appendix H, Claim Charts H-1 to H-22, from Realtime Data LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., Case No. 6:10-CV-00493-LED, Jun. 17, 2011, 151 pages.
Amir et al., “An Application Level Viedo Gateway,” 1995, 11 page.
Katz, Randy H. and Eric A. Brewer, “The Bay Area Research Wireless Access Network: Towards a Wireless Overlay Internetworking Architecture,” Computer Science Division, EECS Department, U.C. Berkeley, 1995, 56 pages.
Katz, R.H. and E.A. Brewer, “The Bay Area Research Wireless Access Network (BARWAN),” UC Berkeley, 1995, 68 pages.
Bruckman, Alfred and Andreas UHL, “Selective Medical Image Compression Using Wavelet Techniques,” Jun. 1998, 23 pages.
Crowley et al., “Dynamic Compression During System Save Operations,” May 1, 1984, 3 pages.
Hershkovits, “Universal Data Compression with Finite-Memory,” Feb. 1995, 99 pages.
Katz et al., “The Bay Area Research Wireless Access Networks (BARWAN),” 1996, 6 pages.
Klein, “Compression and Coding in Information Retrieval Sysytems,” Jun. 1987, pp. vii-viii, 1-4, 10-15, 22-30, 43-48, 62-66, 86-89, 108-111.
Reghbati, “An Overview of Data Compression Techniques,” Apr. 1981, pp. 71-75.
Defendants' Joint Preliminary Invalidity Contentions filed in Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Dec. 8, 2008, 19 pages.
Appendix A, Claim Charts A-1 to A-46, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 345 pages.
Appendix B, Claim Charts B-1 to B-17, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 1893 pages.
Appendix C, Claim Charts C-1 to C-34, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 1,055 pages.
Appendix D, Claim Charts D-1 to D-14, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 197 pages.
Appendix E, Claim Charts E-1 to E-11, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 735 pages.
Appendix F, Claim Charts F-1 to F-11, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 775 pages.
Appendix G, Claim Charts G-1 to G-8, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 567 pages.
Appendix H, Claim Charts H-1 to H-18, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 97 pages.
Appendix I, Claim Charts I-1 to I-18, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 146 pages.
Appendix J, Prior Art Chart, from Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-144-LED, Dec. 8, 2008, 25 pages.
Realtime Data, LLC's [Corrected] P.R. 3-1 Disclosures and Preliminary Infringement Contentions filed in Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/IXO v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08-cv-00144-LED, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 8, 2008, 591 pages.
Amended Answer and Counterclaims of Defendants Blue Coat Systems, Inc., Packeteer, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Services-South Central, inc., and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/aIXO v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:08cv144-LED,, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division, Oct. 28, 2008, 81 pages.
“Packeteer iShaper, PacketShaper and iShared Apppliances Drive Intelligent Application Acceleration Across Coogee Resources Wide Area Network”, Business Wire, Accessed on Aug. 25, 2008, 2 pages.
Whiting, Doug, “Deflate vs. LZS”, Nov. 2000, 2 pages.
“The Packeteer Q4 2005 Financial Conference Call”, Jan. 26, 2006, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,125, mailes Sep. 21, 2010, 12 pgs.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,427, mailed Mar. 24, 2011, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed May 5, 2011, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,211, mailed May 6, 2011, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed May 20, 2011, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,427, mailed May 31, 2011, 5 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,125, mailed Jun. 7, 2011, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/688,413, mailed Jun. 7, 2011, 15 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,008, mailed Jun. 27, 2011, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl, No. 11/551,204, mailed Jul. 11, 2011, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/684,624, mailed Jul. 25, 2011, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Jul. 28, 2011, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed Aug. 10, 2011, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,994, mailed Aug. 16, 2011, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,211, mailed Aug. 24, 2011, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/684,624, mailed Sep. 1, 2011, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/123,081, mailed Sep. 26, 2011, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,204, mailed Sep. 28, 2011, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,121, mailed Oct. 18, 2011, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,239, mailed Nov. 2, 2011, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Nov. 15, 2011, 8 pages.
Ex Parte Reexamination Interview Summary, mailed Dec. 3, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,428, 4 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed May 20, 2011, 47 pages.
Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Jun. 15, 2011, 22 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,553, mailed May 6, 2011, 105 pages.
Order Granting Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Mar. 9, 2011, 21 pages.
Appeal Brief filed in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, mailed Sep. 2, 2010, 28 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, mailed Jul. 18, 2011, 33 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Jul. 25, 2011, 274 pages.
Non-Final Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Sep. 21, 2011, 29 pages.
Definition of “data packet”, Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology, Copyright 1992, 1996, Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Sep. 21, 2011, 2 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Sep. 26, 2011, 44 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, mailed Sep. 28, 2011, 20 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, mailed Sep. 28, 2011, 25 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, mailed Sep. 29, 2011, 27 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Ex parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104 B1, Control No. 90/009,428, dated Mar. 18, 2011, 14 pages.
“Data Compression Ratio”, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, accessed on Aug. 10, 2011 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data—compression—ratio, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:10-cv-00493-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC et al., dated Nov. 23, 2011, 19 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:09-cv-00326-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. Morgan Stanley et al., dated Nov. 23, 2011, 45 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:09-cv-00327-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/IXO, v. CME Group Inc. et al., dated Nov. 23, 2011, 56 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:09-cv-00333-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters et al., Nov. 23, 2011, 30 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06696-RJH, Realtime Data LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. Morgan Stanley et al., dated, Nov. 23, 2011, 47 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06697-UA, Realtime Data LLC D/B/A/IXO, v. CME Group Inc. et al., dated, Nov. 23, 2011, 53 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06698-UA, Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters et al., dated, Nov. 23, 2011, 32 pages.
“Hard Disk Data Control Method”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin NN9302301, vol. 36, No. 2, Feb. 1993, pp. 301-302.
Defendants' Supplemental Invalidity Contentions, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed May 17, 2012, 54 pages.
Expert Report of Michael Brogioli Regarding Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,417,568 and 7,777,651, with Exhibit A: List of Materials Reviewed, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed May 15, 2012, 26 pages.
Exhibit 1, Curriculum Vitae of Michael C. Brogioli, from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 9 pages.
Exhibit 2, [Proposed] Order Adopting the Parties' Agreed Claim Constructions, from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 6 pages.
Exhibit 3, The Parties' Disputed Claim Constructions, revised May 3, 2012, from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 6 pages.
Exhibit 4, E-Mail Correspondence between James Shalek and Brett Cooper, dated May 17 and 18, 2012, from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 3 pages.
Exhibit 5, Source Code Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568 comparing representative elements of the NQDSLIB source code (Apr. 29, 2002 or earlier), from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 3 pages.
Exhibit 6, Source Code Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568 comparing representative elements of the NQDSLIB source code (May 2, 2002 or earlier), from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 3 pages.
Exhibit 7, Source Code Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651 comparing representative elements of the NQDSLIB source code (Apr. 29, 2002 or earlier), from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 21 pages.
Exhibit 8, Source Code Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651 comparing representative elements of the NQDSLIB source code (May 2, 2002 or earlier), from Expert Report, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 21 pages.
Invalidity Expert Report of Dr. James A. Storer (Redacted), filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 227 pages.
Defendants' Claim Construction Tutorial, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 15, 2012, 54 pages.
Opinion and Order (Markman), filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:122, Jun. 22, 2012, 41 pages.
Opinion and Order (Partial Motion for Summary Judgment re Written Description: “Data Packets”), filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 26, 2012, 8 pages.
Opinion and Order (Partial Motion for Summary Judgment re Data Decompression) filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 27, 2012, 21 pages.
Technology Tutorial (.exe file), presentation filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Jun. 2012 (submitted on accompanying CD-ROM).
Lilley, J., “A Unified Header Compression Framework for Low-Bandwidth Links,” MobiCom 2000, Aug. 6-11, 2000. Boston, MA, 12 pages.
“WAN Link Compression on HP Routers,” Hewlett Packard Application Note, May 7, 1999.
“User Manual for XMill,” 2001, 21 pages.
“High Speed Network, Developer's Guide,” Standard & Poor's Comstock, Version 1.1, 1994, pp. 1-42, and 53-124.
Larmouth, J., “ASN.1 Complete”, Academic Press, 2000, pp. xxi-xxvii, 1-45, 115-130, 168-172, 174, 270-276, and 443-472.
Petty, J., “PPP Hewlett-Packard Packet-by-Packet Compression (HP PPC) Protocol,” draft-ietf-ppext-hpppc-00.txt, Oct. 1993, 7 pages.
Friend, R., et al., “IP Payload Compression Using LZS,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2395, Category: Informational, Dec. 1998; 9 pages.
“Information technology—Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation,” Series X: Data Networks and Open System Communications, OSI networking and systems aspects—Abstract Syntax Notation OCE (ASN.1), International Telecommuncation Union, ITU-T Recommendation X.680, Dec. 1997, 109 pages.
Information technology—ASN.1 encoding rules—Specification of Packard Encoding Rules (PER), Series X: Data Networks and Open System Communcations, OSI neetworking and systems aspects—Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), International Telecommuncation Union, ITU-T Recommendation X.691, Dec. 1997, 51 pages.
Opinion and Order, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Sep. 24, 2012, 48 pages.
Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC. et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Oct. 1, 2012, 22 pages.
T-Mobile's Motion for Leave to Supplement Trial Witness List & Invallidity Contentions, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 16 pages.
Exhibit 2, Defendant T-Mobile's Supplemental Invalidity Contentions, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 13 pages.
Exhibit 3, FNLTD-74478, Flash Networks: Commercial Part Written by Flash Networks for Cegetel, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 6 pages.
Exhibit 4, FNLTD-74444, Response to Cegetel RFP: Technical Section, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 5 pages.
Exhibit 5, FNLTD-74926,Flash Networks Optimization Products Selected by AT&T Wireless, Flash Networks Inc. Press Release, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 3 pages.
Exhibit 6, Flash Networks: Harmony, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 6 pages.
Exhibit 7, Declaration of Adi Weiser, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 4 pages.
Exhibit 8, Declaration of Yoav Weiss, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 4 pages.
Exhibit 9, Declaration of Richard Luthi, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 4 pages.
Exhibit 13, Declaration of Gali Weiss, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 4 pages.
Exhibit 17, P.R. 3-1 Claim Chart for T-Mobile, U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Dec. 17, 2012, 33 pages.
“Flash Networks Introduces Nettgain 1100, New Products for Carriers & Enterprises that Enables Immediate Deployment of Wireless Data Solutions,” Press Release, dated Mar. 20, 2001, 2 pages.
Amended Expert Report of Dr. Cliff Reader, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Jul. 20, 2012, 205 pages.
Final Judgment, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00493, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, filed Mar. 28, 2013, 1 page.
Final Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b), filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-06697, United States District Court Southern District of New York, dated Nov. 9, 2012, 10 pages.
Final Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b), filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-06696, United States District Court Southern District of New York, dated Nov. 9, 2012, 10 pages.
Final Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b), filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-06698, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated Nov. 9, 2012, 6 pages.
Opinion and Order (Motion 10), filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed Aug. 2, 2012, 13 pages.
Supplemental Order, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed filed Nov. 9, 2012, 5 pages.
Memorandun & Order, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed filed Aug. 2, 2012, 13 pages.
Amended Opinion & Order, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6696, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. CME Group Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6697, and Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Thomson Reuters, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-6698, United States District Court Southern District of New York, filed filed Aug. 15, 2012, 48 pages.
ChangeLog filed for zlib, zlib.net/ChangeLog.txt file, accessed on May 23, 2013, with date references Apr. 11, 1995-Apr. 28, 2013, 26 pages.
2.0.39 Kernel Release History, accessed at lwn.net/2001/1018/a/hist-2.0.39.php3, dated Oct. 14, 2001, 8 pages.
“Linus Kernel,” Wikipedia—the Free Encyclopedia, accessed at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux—kernel, accessed on May 9, 2013, 20 pages.
Rubini, A., “Booting the Kernel,” accessed at www.linus.it/˜rubini/docs/boot/, Jun. 1997, 6 pages.
Zadok, E., et al., “Fast Indexing: Support for Size-Changing Algorithms in Stackable File Systems,” Proceedings of the 2001 Annual USENIX Technical Conference, Jun. 2001, 16 pages.
Non-Confidential Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Case Nos. 2013-1092, 2013-1093, 2013-1095, 2013-1097, 2013-1098, 2013-1099, 2013-1100, 2013-1101, and 2013-1103, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, filed Mar. 6, 2013, 80 pages.
Non-Confidential Brief for Defendants—Appellees CME Group, Inc., Broad of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., BATS Trading, Inc., and NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. and NASDAQ OMX PHLZ, Inc., filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. CME Group Inc., et al., Case Nos. 13-1093, 13-1097, and 13-1100, United States Court of Appeals for the Fedaerl Circuit, filed May 20, 2013, 74 pages.
Non-Confidential Reply Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Case Nos. 13-1092, 13-1093, 13-1095, 13-1097, 13-1098, 13-1099, 13-1100, 13-1101, and 13-1103, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, filed Jun. 19, 2013, 53 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/688,413, mailed Nov. 28, 2011, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed Dec. 30, 2011, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,008, mailed Feb. 6, 2012, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,125, mailed Mar. 8, 2012, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Mar. 30, 2012, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed Apr. 23, 2012, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,427, mailed May 7, 2012, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,122, mailed May 16, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,994, mailed May 23, 2012, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed May 29, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,008, mailed Jun. 21, 2012, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,239, mailed Jun. 26, 2012, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed Jul. 12, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Jul. 16, 2012, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,800, mailed Jul. 20, 2012, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,427, mailed Nov. 6, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Nov. 15, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed Nov. 29, 2012, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,994, mailed Dec. 13, 2012, 5 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Dec. 18, 2012, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,125, mailed Dec. 28, 2012, 5 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,122, mailed Jan. 9, 2013, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed Jan. 15, 2013, 4 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,800, mailed Feb. 19, 2013, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Mar. 4, 2013, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/290,125, mailed Apr. 15, 2013, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,239, mailed Apr. 24, 2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,427, mailed May 14, 2013, 6 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,427, mailed May 15, 2013, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed Jun. 17, 2013, 6 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,042, mailed Jun. 18, 2013, 6 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,427, mailed Jul. 2, 2013, 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,211, mailed Jul. 11, 2013, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,122, mailed Jul. 19, 2013, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,239, mailed Aug. 2, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,122, mailed Sep. 19, 2013, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed Oct. 17, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed Oct. 23, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,211, mailed Oct. 24, 2013, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,800, mailed Oct. 25, 2013, 21 pages.
Patent Owner's Rebuttal Brief Under 37 C.F.R § 41.71 Retracting the Arguments Made to Overcome the Claim Rejections and Therby Eliminating the Issues on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95,000,464, dated Oct. 28, 2011, 9 pages.
Patent Owner's Rebuttal Brief Under 37 C.F.R § 41.71 Retracting the Arguments Made to Overcome the Claim Rejections and Therby Eliminating the Issues on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95,000,478, dated Oct. 28, 2011, 10 pages.
Patent Owner's Rebuttal Brief Under 37 C.F.R § 41.71 Retracting the Arguments Made to Overcome the Claim Rejections and Therby Eliminating the Issues on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95,000,479, dated Oct. 28, 2011, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexaminication of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Nov. 18, 2011, 39 pages.
Non-Final Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Dec. 9, 2011, 42 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Nov. 18, 2011 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Dec. 19, 2011, 9 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Dec. 9, 2011 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Dec. 29, 2011, 14 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexaminitaion Certificate in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, mailed Jan. 13, 2012, 5 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, mailed Jan. 18, 2012, 5 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, mailed Jan. 18, 2012, 8 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, mailed Jan. 18, 2012, 5 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, mailed Jan. 18, 2012, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Jan. 27, 2012, 152 pages.
Patent Owner's Respondent Brief on Appeal Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.68 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, filed Feb. 17, 2012, 20 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Second Non-Final Office Action of Jan. 27, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexaminiation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, filed Feb. 24, 2012, 30 pages.
Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,104, Control No. 90/009,428, issued Feb. 28, 2012, 2 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexaminnation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control no. 95/001,517, mailed Mar. 1, 2012, 4 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reeexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Mar. 1, 2012, 8 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Mar. 6, 2012, 7 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, filed Mar. 2, 2012, including accompanying Exhibits PA-A to PA-D to PAT-C, CC-A to CC-D, Oth-A and Form PTO/SB/08a, 2865 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, filed Mar. 2, 2012, including accompanying Exhibits PA-A to PA-D, PAT-A to PAT-B, CC-A to CC-F, Oth-A and Form PTO/SB/08a, 560 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,924, filed Mar. 2, 2012, including accompanying Exhibits PA-A to PA-H, PAT-A to PAT-B, CC-A to CC-F, Oth-A and Form PTO/SB/08a, 1012 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, filed Mar. 2, 2012, including accompanying Exhibits PA-A to PA-C, PAT-A, CC-A to CC-C, Oth-A and Form PTO/SB/08a, 204 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, filed Mar. 2, 2012, including accompanying Exhibits PA-A to PA-C, PAT-A to PAT-C, CC-A to CC-B, Oth-A to Oth-B, and Form PTO/SB/08a, 2651 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, filed Mar. 2, 2012, including accompanying Exhibits PA-A to PA-F, PAT-A to PAT-B, CC-A to CC-O, Oth-A and Form PTO/SB/08a, 700 pages.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, filed Mar. 2, 2012, including accompanying Exhibits PA-A to PA-D, PAT-A to PAT-C, CC-A to CC-B, Oth-A and Form PTO/SB/08a, 2316 pages.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, mailed Mar. 19, 2012, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, mailed Mar. 19, 2012, 20 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, mailed Mar. 21, 2012, 7 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/000,486, mailed Mar. 26, 2012, 253 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, mailed Apr. 3, 2012, 7 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, mailed Apr. 4, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, mailed Apr. 6, 2012, 5 pages.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Apr. 20, 2012, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Apr. 20, 2012, 8 pages.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, mailed Apr. 25, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, mailed Apr. 25, 2012, 7 pages.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, mailed Apr. 25, 2012, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, mailed Apr. 25, 2012, 8 pages.
Official Order Denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, mailed Apr. 27, 2012, 52 pages.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, mailed May 7, 2012, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, mailed May 7, 2012, 8 pages.
Petition Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.181 and 1.182 for Correction of Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, filed May 9, 2012, 8 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/000,466, issued May 15, 2012, 2 pages.
Official Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,924, mailed May 17, 2012, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,924, mailed May 17, 2012, 18 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of Mar. 19, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, filed May 21, 2012, 21 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/000,479, Issued May 22, 2012, 2 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,761, Control No. 95/000,464, issued Jun. 12, 2012, 2 pages.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Jun. 18, 2012, 45 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of Apr. 20, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, filed Jun. 20, 2012, 11 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of Apr. 25, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, filed Jun. 25, 2012, 20 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of Apr. 25, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992 Control No. 95/001,928, filed Jun. 25, 2012, 20 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of May 7, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, filed Jul. 9, 2012, 19 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of May 17, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,924, filed Jul.17, 2012, 31 pages.
New Decision on Appeal after Board Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Jul. 24, 2012, 24 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Aug. 3, 2012, 7 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/000,486, mailed Aug. 30, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, mailed Aug. 3, 2012, 6 pages.
Decision on Petition for Supervisory Review of Rrefusal to Order Reexamination for Claims 1-2, 16-21, and 23 (37 CFR §§ 1.927 and 1.181) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, mailed Aug. 31, 2012, 10 pages.
Decision on Petition Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.181 and 1.182 for Correction of Notice to Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, mailed Sep. 10, 1012, 6 pages.
Decision on Petition for Supervisory Review of Refusal to Order Reexamination for Claims 5-7, 14-16, and 18-19 (37 CFR §§ 1.927 and 1.181) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Sep. 10, 2012, 12 pages.
Decision on Petition for Supervisory Review of Refusal to Order Reexamination for Claims 86, 89, 90, 92-96, and 98 (37 CFR §§ 1.927 and 1.181) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, mailed Sep. 21, 2012, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, mailed Sep. 21, 2012, 15 pages.
Patent Owner's Request to Reopen Prosecution Before the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, filed Sep. 24, 2012, 29 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Oct. 1, 2012, 17 pages.
Inter Partes Reexam Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/000,478, issued Oct. 4, 2012, 2 pages.
Inter Partes Reexam Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/000,486, issued Oct. 10, 2012, 2 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Oct. 15, 2012, 44 pages.
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Oct. 18, 2012, 10 pages.
Patent Owner's Rebuttal Brief Under 37 C.F.R § 41.71 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, filed Nov. 15, 2012, 15 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of Oct. 18, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, filed Nov. 19, 2012, 30 pages.
Patent Owner's Supplemental Amendment Subsequent to Timely Submission of Response to Office Action of Oct. 18, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, filed Nov. 27, 2012, 6 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action of Sep. 21, 2102 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, filed Dec. 21, 2012, 51 pages.
Action Closing Porsecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, mailed Mar. 5, 2013, 23 pages.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, mailed Mar. 5, 2013, 29 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Mar. 14, 2013, 21 pages.
Decision on Petition to Strike Patent Owner's Rebuttal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Mar. 15, 2013, 7 pages.
Order Remanding Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R § 41.77(d) to the Examiner in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Mar. 18, 2013, 3 pages.
Decision on Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.183 to Request Examiner Enter Evidence in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Mar. 20, 2013, 7 pages.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, mailed Apr. 3, 2013, 24 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Mar. 5, 2013 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, filed Apr. 5, 2013, 19 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Mar. 5, 2013 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, filed Apr. 5, 2013, 23 pages.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Apr. 9, 2013, 59 pages.
“Data Transfer Rate (DTR),” accessed at http://searchunifiedcommuncations.techtarget.com/definition/data-transfer-rate, published May 18, 2011, 1 page,
“Bandwidth—technical definition,” accessed at http://computer.yourdictionary.com/bandwidth, accessed on Mar. 7, 2013, 4 pages.
“Bandwidth—Definition,” accessed at http://www.yourdictionary.com/bandwidth, accessed on Mar. 7, 2013, 2 pages.
“Bandwidth” accessed at http://searchenterprisewan.techtarget.com/definitions/bandwidth, published Mar. 24, 2010, 1 page.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,924, mailed Apr. 9, 2013, 30 pages.
Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(d) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Apr. 10, 2013, 7 pages.
Patent Owner's Supplemental Response to Office Action of May 7, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, filed Apr. 29, 2013, 20 pages.
Patent Owner's Supplemental Response to Office Action of Mar. 19, 2012 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, filed May 6, 2013, 24 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Action Closing Prosecution of Apr. 9, 2013 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, filed May 9, 2013, 13 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Action Closing Prosecution of Apr. 9, 2013 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,325,300, Control No. 95/001,924, filed May 9, 2013, 29 pages.
Patent Owner's Comments in Response to Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(e) in inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, filed May 10, 2013, 20 pages.
Patent Owner's Supplemental Response to Action Closing Prosecution of Apr. 9, 2013 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, filed May 15, 2013, 13 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001927, mailed May 31, 2013, 26 pages.
Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.181 to Expunge Third Party Requester's Improper Submission of Declarations Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 and Strike Comments Directed to Examiner's Determination in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, filed Jun. 26, 2013, 6 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, mailed Jul. 19, 2013, 5 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Aug. 15, 2013, 12 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, mailed Aug. 16, 2013, 11 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,530, Control No. 95/001,927, issued Aug. 16, 2013, 2 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, mailed Aug. 16, 2013, 11 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,925, mailed Aug. 29, 2013, 23 pages.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, mailed Sep. 20, 2013, 47 pages.
Decision on Petition(s) Decided Under 37 C.F.R. 1.181 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Sep. 23, 2013, 3 pages.
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, mailed Oct. 2, 2013, 18 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Sep. 20, 2013 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, filed Oct. 21, 2013, 9 pages
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Nov. 1, 2013, 18 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Nov. 1, 2013, 12 pages.
Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Nov. 1, 2013, 15 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Action Closing Prosecution of Oct. 2, 2013 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, filed Nov. 4, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue an Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Nov. 13, 2013, 8 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue an Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 10 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue an Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, mailed Nov. 27, 2013, 10 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,321,937, Control No. 95/001,922, mailed Dec. 5, 2013, 2 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,211, mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,994, mailed Dec. 2, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed Dec. 18, 2013, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,716, mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,712, mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,719, mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,125, mailed Dec. 27, 2013, 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/033,245, Fallon et al., “Systems and Methods for Video and Audio Data Storage and Distribution,” filed Sep. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,712, Fallon et al., “Methods for Encoding and Decoding Data,” filed Sep. 24, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,719, Fallon et al., “Methods for Encoding and Decoding Data,” filed Sep. 24, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,716, Fallon et al., “Methods for Encoding and Decoding Data,” filed Sep. 24, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,561, James J. Fallon, “Data Compression Systems and Methods,” filed Sep. 24, 2013.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06696-KBF, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, v. Morgan Stanley, et al., dated Nov. 25, 2013, 80 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06697-KBF, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, v. CME Group Inc., et al., dated Nov. 25, 2013, 105 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06698-KBF, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, v. Thompson Reuters, et al., dated Nov. 25, 2013, 59 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-00493-RC-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO, v. MetroPCS Texas, et al., dated Nov. 25, 2013, 78 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,122, mailed Feb. 19, 2014, 23 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,994, mailed Feb. 20, 2014, 5 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,238, mailed Feb. 25, 2014, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,933, mailed Feb. 25, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/033,245, mailed Feb. 26, 2014, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,926, mailed Feb. 27, 2014, 16 pages.
Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.79, in Inter Partes Reexamination fo U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, filed Feb. 14, 2013, 11 pages.
Patent Owner's Supplemental Reply to Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, filed Feb. 27, 2014, 10 pages.
Patent Owner's Supplemental Reply to Action Closing Prosectuion in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, filed Feb. 27, 2014, 9 pages.
Declaration of Dr. James W. Modestino under 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, executed Nov. 29, 2013; 51 pages.
Declaration of Dr. James W. Modestino under 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, executed Nov. 29, 2013; 49 pages.
Declaration of Dr. James W. Modestino under 37 C.F.R § 1.132 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, executed Nov. 29, 2013; 50 pages.
Corrected Request to Reopen Prosecution Before the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Mar. 11, 2014, 48 pages.
Corrected Request to Reopen Prosecution Before the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Mar. 11, 2014, 39 pages.
Corrected Request to Reopen Prosecution Before the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Mar. 11, 2014, 67 pages.
Opinion with Errata, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., Case Nos. 13-1092, 13-1093, 13-1095, 13-1097, 13-1098, 13-1099, 13-1100, 13-1101, and 13-1103, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, filed Jan. 27, 2014, 41 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/154,211, mailed Dec. 19, 2013, 4 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed Jan. 14, 2014, 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,561, mailed Jan. 16, 2014, 9 pages.
Notice of Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,419, mailed Jan. 31, 2014, 2 pages.
Patent Owner's Request to Reopen Prosecution Before the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, filed Dec. 2, 2013, 41 pages.
Patent Owner's Request to Reopen Prosecution Before the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, filed Dec. 2, 2013, 57 pages.
Patent Owner's Request to Reopen Prosecution Before the Examiner under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, filed Dec. 2, 2013, 33 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.182 in Opposition to CME Group's Petition to Strike Patent Owner's Proposed New Claims, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Jan. 2, 2014, 8 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.182 in Opposition to CME Group's Petition to Strike Patent Owner's Proposed New Claims, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Jan. 2, 2014, 8 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.182 in Opposition to CME Group's Petition to Strike Patent Owner's Proposed New Claims, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Jan. 2, 2014, 10 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,506, Control No. 95/001,926, mailed Jan. 8, 2014, 2 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,992, Control No. 95/001,928, mailed Jan. 8, 2014, 3 pages.
Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R § 41.77(d) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Jan. 14, 2014, 11 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.181 to Strike Third Party Requester's Improper Response Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(c), in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Jan. 22, 2014, 3 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.181 to Strike Third Party Requester's Improper Response Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(c), in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Jan. 22, 2014, 3 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.181 to Strike Third Party Requester's Improper Response Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(c), in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Jan. 22, 2014, 3 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.181 to Strike Third Party Requester's Improper Response Under 37 C.F.R. §1.132, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Jan. 22, 2014, 3 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.181 to Strike Third Party Requester's Improper Response Under 37 C.F.R. §1.132, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Jan. 22, 2014, 3 pages.
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.181 to Strike Third Party Requester's Improper Response Under 37 C.F.R. §1.132, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Jan. 22, 2014, 3 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,926, Fallon, et al., “System and Methods for Video and Audio Data Distribution,” filed Dec. 19, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,933, Fallon, et al., “System and Methods for Video and Audio Data Distribution,” filed Dec. 19, 2013.
Court Docket History for 6:10-cv-00493-LED-JDL, Realtime Data, LLC b/d/a IXO, v. T-Mobile, USA Inc., downloaded Jan. 30, 2014, 78 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06696-RJH, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Morgan Stanley et al., downloaded Jan. 30, 2014, 80 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06697-UA, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. CME Group Inc. et al., downloaded Jan. 30, 2014, 105 pages.
Court Docket History for 1:11-cv-06698-UA, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Thomson Reuters et al., downloaded Jan. 30, 2014, 59 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/403,785, mailed May 9, 2014, 5 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,122, mailed Jun. 18, 2014, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,453, mailed Jun. 25, 2014; 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,933, mailed Jun. 27, 2014, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,926, mailed Jul. 8, 2014, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/033,245, mailed Jul. 22, 2014, 13 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.953 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, mailed Jun. 9, 2014, 14 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.953 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925 mailed Jun. 10, 2014, 10 pages.
Notice of Intent to issue a Reexamination Certificate Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,924, mailed Jun. 27, 2014, 7 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,352,300, Control No. 95/001,924, mailed Aug. 4, 2014, 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/303,276, James J. Fallon, “Systems and Methods for Data Storage and Retrieval,” filed Jun. 12, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/305,692, James J. Fallon, “Systems and Methods for Data Storage and Retrieval,” filed Jun. 16, 2014.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Actian Corporation, et al., No. 6:15-cv-00463 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 18 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Dropbox Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00465 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 14 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Echostar Corporation, et al., No. 6:15-cv-00466 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 15 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Riverbed Technology, Inc., et al., No. 6:15-cv-00468 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 26 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Software, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00464 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 17 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc., et al., No. 6:15-cv-00467 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 41 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. SAP America, Inc., et al., No. 6:15-cv-00469 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 34 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Teradata Corporation, et al., No. 6:15-cv-00470 (E.D. Texas), May 8, 2015, 17 pages.
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. SAP America, Inc., et al., No. 6:15-cv-00469 (E.D. Texas), Jun. 2, 2015, 50 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/303,276, mailed Jun. 5, 2015, 8 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, issued Apr. 17, 2015; 3 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00463, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Actian Corporation, et al., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00465, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Dropbox, Inc., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00466, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Echostar Corporation, et al., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00468, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Riverbed Technology, Inc., et al., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00464, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. BMC Software, Inc., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00467, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc., et al., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00469, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. SAP America, Inc., et al., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
Court Docket History for 6:15-cv-00470, Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Teradata Corporation, et al., downloaded May 14, 2015, 2 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/727,309, Fallon, “Data Compression Systems and Methods,” filed Jun. 1, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/684,408, Fallon, “System and Methods for Video and Audio Data Distribution,” filed Jun. 8, 2015,
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,574, mailed Oct. 23, 2014; 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/403,785, mailed Dec. 18, 2014; 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/305,692, mailed Feb. 10, 2015, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/303,276, mailed Mar. 12, 2015, 5 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,574, mailed Apr. 7, 2015; 5 pages.
Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(d), in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, mailed Oct. 3, 2014; 10 pages.
Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(d), in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, mailed Oct. 10, 2014; 10 pages.
Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(d), in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, mailed Oct. 10, 2014; 12 pages.
Comments in Response to Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(e) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, filed Nov. 3, 2014; 30 pages.
Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,395,345, Control No. 95/001,925, mailed Nov. 3, 2014; 2 pages.
Comments in Response to Examiner's Determination under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(e) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, filed Nov. 10, 2014; 19 pages.
Comments in Response to Examiner's Determination under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(e) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, filed Nov. 10, 2014; 19 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Third Party Requester's Comments Under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(e) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,568, Control No. 95/001,533, filed Dec. 3, 2014, 6 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Third Party Requester's Comments Under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(e) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,274, Control No. 95/001,544, filed Dec. 10, 2014, 6 pages.
Patent Owner's Reply to Third Party Requester's Comments Under 37 C.F.R. 41.77(e) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,651, Control No. 95/001,581, filed Dec. 10, 2014, 6 pages.
Decision on Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,747, Control No. 95/001,517, mailed Jan. 6, 2015, 7 pages.
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, mailed Jan. 9, 2015, 14 pages.
Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158, Control No. 95/001,923, issued Mar. 9, 2015, 7 pages.
Court Docket Histroy for 4:14-cv-00827, Realtime Data, LLC d/ba/ IXO v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., downloaded Feb. 27, 2015, 3 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed in Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., Case No. 4:14-cv-00827 (E.D. Texas), Dec. 19, 2014, 17 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,974, Fallon et al., “Data Storewidth Accelerator,” filed Nov. 3, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/577,286, Fallon et al., “System and Methods for Video and Audio Data Distribution,” filed Dec. 19, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20020080871 A1 Jun 2002 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60237571 Oct 2000 US