The present invention relates in general to video decoding using multiple processors.
An increasing number of applications today make use of digital video for various purposes including, for example, remote business meetings via video conferencing, high definition video entertainment, video advertisements, and sharing of user-generated videos. As technology is evolving, people have higher expectations for video quality and expect high resolution video with smooth playback at a high frame rate.
There can be many factors to consider when selecting a video coder for encoding, storing and transmitting digital video. Some applications may require excellent video quality where others may need to comply with various constraints including, for example, bandwidth or storage requirements. To permit higher quality transmission of video while limiting bandwidth consumption, a number of video compression schemes are noted including proprietary formats such as VPx (promulgated by On2 Technologies, Inc. of Clifton Park, N.Y., H.264 standard promulgated by ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) and the ISO/IEC Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG), including present and future versions thereof. H.264 is also known as MPEG-4 Part 10 or MPEG-4 AVC (formally, ISO/IEC 14496-10).
There are many types of video encoding schemes that allow video data to be compressed and recovered. The H.264 standard, for example, offers more efficient methods of video coding by incorporating entropy coding methods such as Context-based Adaptive Variable Length Coding (CAVLC) and Context-based Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding (CABAC). For video data that is encoded using CAVLC, some modem decompression systems have adopted the use of a multi-core processor or multiprocessors to increase overall video decoding speed.
An embodiment of the invention is disclosed as a method for decoding a stream of encoded video data including a plurality of partitions that have been compressed using at least a first encoding scheme. The method includes selecting at least a first one of the partitions that includes at least one row of blocks that has been encoded using at least a second encoding scheme. A second partition is selected that includes at least one row of blocks encoded using the second encoding scheme. The first partition is decoded by a first processor, and the second partition is decoded by a second processor. The decoding of the second partition is offset by a specified number of blocks so that at least a portion of the output from the decoding of the first partition is used as input in decoding the second partition. Further, the decoding of the first partition is offset by a specified number of blocks so that at least a portion of the output from the decoding of the second partition is used as input in decoding the first partition.
The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
Referring to
Although the description of embodiments are described in the context of the VP8 video coding format, alternative embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in the context of other video coding formats. Further, the embodiments are not limited to any specific video coding standard or format.
Referring to
When input video stream 16 is presented for encoding, each frame 17 within input video stream 16 can be processed in units of macroblocks. At intra/inter prediction stage 18, each macroblock can be encoded using either intra prediction or inter prediction mode. In the case of intra-prediction, a prediction macroblock can be formed from samples in the current frame that have been previously encoded and reconstructed. In the case of inter-prediction, a prediction macroblock can be formed from one or more reference frames that have already been encoded and reconstructed.
Next, still referring to
The reconstruction path in
Referring to
When compressed bitstream 26 is presented for decoding, the data elements can be decoded by entropy decoding stage 25 to produce a set of quantized coefficients. Dequantization stage 27 dequantizes and inverse transform stage 29 inverse transforms the coefficients to produce a derivative residual that is identical to that created by the reconstruction stage in encoder 14. Using the type of prediction mode and/or motion vector information decoded from the compressed bitstream 26, at intra/inter prediction stage 23, decoder 21 creates the same prediction macroblock as was created in encoder 14. At the reconstruction stage 33, the prediction macroblock can be added to the derivative residual to create a reconstructed macroblock. The loop filter 34 can be applied to the reconstructed macroblock to reduce blocking artifacts. A deblocking filter 33 can be applied to video image frames to further reduce blocking distortion and the result can he outputted to output video stream 35.
Current context-based entropy coding methods, such as Context-based Adaptive Arithmetic Coding (CABAC), are limited by dependencies that exploit spatial locality by requiring macroblocks to reference neighboring macroblocks and that exploit temporal localities by requiring macroblocks to reference macroblocks from another frame. Because of these dependencies and the adaptivity, encoder 14 codes the bitstream in a sequential order using context data from neighboring macroblocks. Such sequential dependency created by encoder 14 causes the compressed bitstream 26 to be decoded in a sequential fashion by decoder 21. Such sequential decoding can be adequate when decoding using a single-core processor. On the other hand, if a multi-core processor or a multi-processor system is used during decoding, the computing power of the multi-core processor or the multi-processor system would not be effectively utilized.
Although the disclosure has and will continue to describe embodiments of the present invention with reference to a multi-core processor and the creation of threads on the multi-core processor, embodiments of the present invention can also be implemented with other suitable computer systems, such as a device containing multiple processors.
According to one embodiment, encoder 14 divides the compressed bitstream into partitions 36 rather than a single stream of serialized data. With reference to
Referring to
An alternative grouping mechanism may include, for example, grouping a row of blocks from a first frame and a corresponding row of blocks in a second frame. The row of blocks from the first frame can be packed in the first partition and the corresponding row of blocks in the second frame can be packed in the second partition. A first processor can decode the row of blocks from the first frame and a second processor can decode the row of blocks from the second frame. In this manner, the decoder can decode at least one block in the second partition using information from a block that is already decoded by the first processor.
Each of the partitions 36 can be compressed using two separate encoding schemes. The first encoding scheme can be lossless encoding using, for example, context-based arithmetic coding like CABAC. Other lossless encoding techniques may also be used. Referring back to
Still referring to
Referring to
Once encoder 14 has divided frame 17 into partitions 36, encoder 14 writes data into video frame header 44 to indicate number of partitions 40 and offsets of each partition 42. Number of partitions 40 and offsets of each partition 42 can be represented in frame 17 by a bit, a byte or any other record that can relay the specific information to decoder 21. Decoder 21 reads the number of data partitions 40 from video frame header 44 in order to decode the compressed data. In one example, two bits may be used to represent the number of partitions. One or more bits can be used to indicate the number of data partitions (or partition count). Other coding schemes can also be used to code the number of partitions into the bitstream. The following list indicates how two bits can represent the number of partitions:
If the number of data partitions is greater than one, decoder 21 also needs information about the positions of the data partitions 36 within the compressed bitstream 26. The offsets of each partition 42 (also referred to as partition location offsets) enable direct access to each partition during decoding.
In one example, offset of each partition 42 can be relative to the beginning of the bitstream and can be encoded and written into the bitstream 26. In another example, the offset for each data partition can be encoded and written into the bitstream except for the first partition since the first partition implicitly begins in the bitstream 26 after the offsets of each partition 42. The foregoing is merely exemplary. Other suitable data structures, flags or records such words and bytes, can be used to transmit partition count and partition location offset information.
Although the number of data partitions can be the same for each frame 17 throughout the input video sequence 16, the number of data partitions may also differ from frame to frame. Accordingly, each frame 17 would have a different number of partitions 40. The number of bits that are used to represent the number of partitions may also differ from frame to frame. Accordingly, each frame 17 could be divided into varying numbers of partitions.
Once the data has been compressed into bit stream 26 with the proper partition data information (i.e. number of partitions 40 and offsets of partitions 42), decoder 21 can decode the data partitions 36 on a multi-core processor in parallel. In this manner, each processor core may be responsible for decoding one of the data partitions 36. Since multi-core processors typically have more than one processing core and shared memory space, the workload can be allocated between each core as evenly as possible. Each core can use the shared memory space as an efficient way of sharing data between each core decoding each data partition 36.
For example, if there are two processors decoding two partitions, respectively, the first processor will begin decoding the first partition. The second processor can then decode macroblocks of the second partition and can use information received from the first processor, which has begun decoding macroblocks of the first partition. Concurrently with the second processor, the first processor can continue decoding macroblocks of the first partition and can use information received from the second processor. Accordingly, both the first and second processors can have the information necessary to properly decode macroblocks in their respective partitions.
Furthermore, as discussed in more detail below, when decoding a macroblock row of the second partition that is dependent on the first partition, a macroblock that is currently being processed in the second partition is offset by a specified number of macroblocks. In this manner, at least a portion of the output of the decoding of the first partition can be used as input in the decoding of the macroblock that is currently being processed in the second partition. Likewise, when decoding a macroblock row of the first partition that is dependent on the second partition, a macroblock that is currently being processed in the first partition is offset by a specified number of macroblocks so that at least a portion of the output of the decoding of the second partition can be used as input in the decoding of the macroblock that is currently being processed in the first partition.
When decoding the compressed bitstream, decoder 21 determines the number of threads needed to decode the data, which can be based on the number of partitions 40 in each encoded frame 39. For example, if number of partitions 40 indicates that there are four partitions in encoded frame 39, decoder 21 creates four threads with each thread decoding one of the data partitions. Referring to
As discussed previously, macroblocks 20 within each frame use context data from neighboring macroblocks when being encoded. When decoding macroblocks 20, the decoder will need the same context data in order to decode the macroblocks properly. On the decoder side, the context data can be available only after the neighboring macroblocks have already been decoded by the current thread or other threads. In order to decode properly, the decoder includes a staging and synchronization mechanism for managing the decoding of the multiple threads.
With reference to
As depicted in
Each of
Referring to
Referring to
Previous decoding mechanisms were unable to efficiently use a multi-core processor to decode a compressed bitstream because processing of a macroblock row could not be initiated until the upper adjacent macroblock row had been completely decoded. The difficulty of previous decoding mechanisms stems from the encoding phase. When data is encoded using traditional encoding techniques, spatial dependencies within macroblocks imply a specific order of processing of the macroblocks. Furthermore, once the frame has been encoded, a specific macroblock row cannot be discerned until the row has been completely decoded. Accordingly, video coding methods incorporating entropy coding methods such as CABAC created serialized dependencies which were passed to the decoder. As a result of these serialized dependencies, decoding schemes had limited efficiency because information for each computer processing system (e.g. threads 46, 48 and 50) was not available until the decoding process has been completed on that macroblock row.
Utilizing the parallel processing staging and synchronization mechanism illustrated in
Referring again to
Referring to
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment, the offset can be determined by the specific requirements of the codec. In alternative embodiments, the offset can be specified in the bitstream.
While the invention has been described in connection with certain embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to he limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures as is permitted under the law.
This application is a continuation of U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 13/565,364, filed Aug. 2, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,357,223, which is a divisional of U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 12/329,248, filed Dec. 5, 2008, which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/096,223, filed Sep. 11, 2008, which are incorporated herein in entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3825832 | Frei et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
4719642 | Lucas | Jan 1988 | A |
4729127 | Chan et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4736446 | Reynolds et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4797729 | Tsai | Jan 1989 | A |
4868764 | Richards | Sep 1989 | A |
4891748 | Mann | Jan 1990 | A |
5068724 | Krause et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5083214 | Knowles | Jan 1992 | A |
5091782 | Krause et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5136371 | Savatier et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5136376 | Yagasaki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5164819 | Music | Nov 1992 | A |
5225832 | Wang et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5270812 | Richards | Dec 1993 | A |
5274442 | Murakami et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5313306 | Kuban et al. | May 1994 | A |
5341440 | Earl et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5381145 | Allen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5432870 | Schwartz | Jul 1995 | A |
5452006 | Auld | Sep 1995 | A |
5561477 | Polit | Oct 1996 | A |
5576765 | Cheney et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576767 | Lee et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589945 | Abecassis | Dec 1996 | A |
5604539 | Ogasawara et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5646690 | Yoon | Jul 1997 | A |
5659539 | Porter et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5696869 | Abecassis | Dec 1997 | A |
5734744 | Wittenstein et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737020 | Hall et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748247 | Hu | May 1998 | A |
5774593 | Zick et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5793647 | Hageniers et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794179 | Yamabe | Aug 1998 | A |
5818530 | Canfield | Oct 1998 | A |
5818969 | Astle | Oct 1998 | A |
5828370 | Moeller et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835144 | Matsumura et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5883671 | Keng et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903264 | Moeller et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929940 | Jeannin | Jul 1999 | A |
5930493 | Ottesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963203 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999641 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014706 | Cannon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6041145 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061397 | Ogura | May 2000 | A |
6084908 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108383 | Miller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112234 | Leiper | Aug 2000 | A |
6115501 | Chun et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119154 | Weaver et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141381 | Sugiyama | Oct 2000 | A |
6160846 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167164 | Lee | Dec 2000 | A |
6181742 | Rajagopalan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181822 | Miller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185363 | Dimitrova et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188799 | Tan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6240135 | Kim | May 2001 | B1 |
6292837 | Miller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327304 | Miller et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6366704 | Ribas-Corbera et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370267 | Miller et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400763 | Wee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6496537 | Kranawetter | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522784 | Zlotnick | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529638 | Westerman | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560366 | Wilkins | May 2003 | B1 |
6594315 | Schultz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6687303 | Ishihara | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697061 | Wee et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707952 | Tan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6765964 | Conklin | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6876703 | Ismaeil et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6934419 | Zlotnick | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6985526 | Bottreau et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987866 | Hu | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003035 | Tourapis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7023916 | Pandel et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7027654 | Ameres et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7170937 | Zhou | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7227589 | Yeo et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236524 | Sun et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7330509 | Lu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7499492 | Ameres et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7606310 | Ameres et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7764739 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7813570 | Shen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8175161 | Anisimov | May 2012 | B1 |
8213518 | Wang | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8265144 | Christoffersen | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8401084 | MacInnis | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8520734 | Xu | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8743979 | Lee et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767817 | Xu et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8948267 | Khan | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9100509 | Jia et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9100657 | Jia et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
20020012396 | Pau et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031184 | Iwata | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039386 | Han et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020168114 | Valente | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030023982 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030189982 | MacInnis | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215018 | MacInnis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030219072 | MacInnis | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040028142 | Kim | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066852 | MacInnis | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040120400 | Linzer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040228410 | Ameres | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240556 | Winger et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258151 | Spampinato | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050050002 | Slotznick | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050053157 | Lillevold | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050117655 | Ju | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147165 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169374 | Marpe et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210145 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050259747 | Schumann | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265447 | Park | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050265461 | Raveendran | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276323 | Martemyanov et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060072674 | Saha et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098737 | Sethuraman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109912 | Winger et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114985 | Linzer | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126726 | Lin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126740 | Lin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150151 | Dubinsky | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060215758 | Kawashima | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239345 | Taubman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256858 | Chin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291567 | Filippini et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025441 | Ugur et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053443 | Song | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086528 | Mauchly et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092006 | Malayath | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140342 | Karczewicz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070229704 | Mohapatra et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286288 | Smith et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080056348 | Lyashevsky et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080152014 | Schreier et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159407 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198270 | Hobbs et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198920 | Yang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212678 | Booth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215317 | Fejzo | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240254 | Au | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267295 | Sung | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080298469 | Liu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317364 | Gou | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002379 | Baeza | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003447 | Christoffersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090052529 | Kim | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090080534 | Sekiguchi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090168893 | Schlanger | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090225845 | Veremeev et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238277 | Meehan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245349 | Zhao | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249178 | Ambrosino et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100061455 | Xu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100158109 | Dahlby | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100177826 | Bhaumik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100183076 | Yoon | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189179 | Gu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100215263 | Imanaka | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100239181 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246665 | Brederson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100316132 | MacInnis | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110261884 | Rubinstein et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120014451 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120128069 | Sato | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147958 | Ronca et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120213448 | Malmborg et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120294376 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307892 | Xu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130034150 | Sadafale | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083161 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130259137 | Kuusela | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150043645 | Ventela | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150326888 | Jia et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170188024 | Wang | Jun 2017 | A9 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3510433 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2007-166625 | Jun 2007 | JP |
20080204 70 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008036237 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2010063184 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Armando J. Pinho, “Encoding of Image Partitions Using a Standard Technique for Lossless Image Compression,” Dep. Electrónica e Telecomunicacoes/ INESC Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal (IEEE 1999), 4 pp. |
B. Vasudev & N. Merhav, “DCT Mode Conversions for Field/Frame Coded MPEG Video”, IEEE 2d Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing 605-610 (Dec. 1998). |
Bankoski et al. “Technical Overview of VP8, an Open Source Video Codec for the Web”. Dated Jul. 11, 2011. |
Bankoski et al., “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide”, Independent Submission RFC 6389, Nov. 2011, 305 pp. |
Bankoski et al., “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide draft-bankoski-vp8-bitstream-02”, Network Working Group, Internet-Draft, May 18, 2011, 288 pp. |
Fore June “An Introduction to Digital Video Data Compression in Java”, Chapter 12: DPCM video Codec, CreateSpace, Jan. 22, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in co-pending PCT International Application No. PCT/US2013/034581 dated Jun. 11, 2013. |
Li E Q et al., “Implementation of H.264 encoder on general-purpose processors with hyper-threading technology”, Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 384-395, vol. 5308, No. 1, Jan. 20, 2004. |
“Introduction to Video Coding Part 1: Transform Coding”, Mozilla, Mar. 2012, 171 pp. |
On2 Technologies Inc., White Paper TrueMotion VP7 Video Codec, Jan. 10, 2005, 13 pages, Document Version: 1.0, Clifton Park, New York. |
On2 Technologies, Inc., White Paper On2's TrueMotion VP7 Video Codec, Jul. 11, 2008, pp. 7 pages, Document Version:1.0, Clifton Park, New York. |
“Overview VP7 Data Format and Decoder”, Version 1.5, On2 Technologies, Inc., Mar. 28, 2005, 65 pp. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video, Amendment 2: New profiles for professional applications, International Telecommunication Union, Apr. 2007, 75 pp. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video, Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services, Amendment 1: Support of additional colour spaces and removal of the High 4:4:4 Profile, International Telecommunication Union, Jun. 2006, 16 pp. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video, Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services, Version 3, International Telecommunication Union, Mar. 2005, 343 pp. |
Sharp, “Entropy slices for parallel entropy decoding”, ITU-T SG16 Meeting, Apr. 22, 2008-Feb. 5, 2008, Geneva. |
Sze, “Massively Parallel CABAC”, VCEG meeting, Jan. 7, 2009, London and MPEG meeting, Aug. 7, 2009, Geneva. |
Chen, T, Y.H. Ng; Lossless Color Image Compression Technique for Multimedia Applications; IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin; vol. 37 No. 10, Oct. 1994. |
Tasdizen, et al.; “A High Performance Reconfigurable Motion Estimation Hardware Architecture”, Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, Apr. 20, 2009, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, US pp. 882-885. |
Vos, Luc De and Stegherr, Michael; “Parameterizable VLSI Architectures for the Full-Search Block-Matching Algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 36, No. 10, Oct. 1989 NY US pp. 1309-1316. |
VP6 Bitstream and Decoder Specification, Version 1.03, (On2 Technologies, Inc.), Dated Oct. 29, 2007. |
Wiegand et al, “Overview of the H 264/AVC Video Coding Standard,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 568, 569, Jul. 1, 2003. |
Yao Wang, “Motion Estimation for Video coding”, EE4414: Motion Estimation basics, 2005. |
Youn et al., “Motion Vector Refinement for high-performance Transcoding” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 1, No. 1, Mar. 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61096223 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12329248 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 13565364 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13565364 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 15165577 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15165577 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 17200761 | US |