In the area of dental/periodontology implants, inferior lift technique has been used successfully for many years. In certain cases, the bone thickness in the region where the implant is to be inserted is not of ideal depth. The inferior lift technique involves drilling the bone to the floor of the sinus then breaking the floor of the sinus using osteotomes and exposing the schneiderian membrane. The membrane is then elevated and a bone graft is inserted into the opening. This bone graft eventually ossifies and provides a better thickness to properly support the dental implant.
However, there are at least two drawbacks associated with the present inferior lift technique. First, patients undergoing this procedure always describe it as an uncomfortable process due to the necessary tapping of the osteotomes against the bones involved. For example, even with proper anesthesia, an osteotome is still used to break the floor of the sinus to expose the schneiderian membrane. This tapping reverberates throughout the bone (and neighboring bones) and is uncomfortable.
Additionally, when using osteotomes, the repeated tapping on the sinus floor is somewhat imprecise and thus carries risk of rupturing the schneiderian membrane. If the schneiderian membrane is ruptured it can cause infection and otherwise delay the bone graft/lift procedure.
The present technique minimizes or avoids the above described drawbacks by preparing the opening and breaking the floor of the sinus using a new combination of drill/cutting implements and technique for using the same, thus exposing the schneiderian membrane without the use of osteotomes. The membrane can then be elevated after using this technique and bone is plugged in without any of the uncomfortable tapping on the sinus and with a greatly reduced risk of rupturing the schneiderian membrane.
The present invention can be best understood through the following description and accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following is an exemplary description of the implant procedure described in accordance with the accompanying
In a first step in the inferior lift procedure as shown in
In the prior art, the same bit may be used in multiple iterations until the hole in bone 12 is wide enough and then an osteotome is used to complete the break of sinus floor 16, since such an implement can be used with more precision than the initial drill bit 20 pictured in
In the present arrangement, as shown in
An exemplary sonic drilling implement 30 may be a sonic bone drill as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 2009/0023118, assigned to Piezosurgery, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference.
Such “drilling devices” are advantageous because they provide a significantly more precise cutting ability on bone tissue while simultaneously providing better assurance that nearby soft tissue is not damaged since such sonic cutting tips, such as tip 12, lose their cutting capacity when contacting soft tissue (the soft tissue absorbs the sound vibrations).
In this context, using sonic drilling implement 30 with tip 32, having a diameter substantially corresponding to the initial drill bit 20 (e.g. 2.0 mm), implement 30 is used to remove the remaining 1 mm of bone (sinus floor 16 is a the final portion of bone before schneiderian membrane 18 SM).
In one arrangement, tip 32 of sonic drilling implement 30 may be a specific tip 32 for such inferior lift procedure. It is noted that, in general, sonic cutting tips have an active cutting region and other non-cutting regions as well. In the present
The portion 32B of tip 32 that is not active does not act to cut the neighboring bone 12 which it contacts. The only bone that is cut by tip 32 is bone that is kept in pressing contact with tip 32 via active region 32A. As shown in
As shown in
It is noted that each of the various bone grafts/implants that may be used have different shapes (eg. cylindrical, conical, etc. . . . ). In the next step, as shown in
In one embodiment, the size of tip 60 is dimensioned in diameter to be slightly smaller than the size of the size/diameter of the intended implant, discussed below as implant 74, so as not to inadvertently overly widen the opening which could result in a loose fit for the implant. For example, if the implant is 3.7 mm, the diameter of tip 60 may be 3.4 mm for eliminating ring 52 of sinus floor 16. Alternatively, if the implant is 4.1 mm tip 60 may be or a 3.8 mm, or if the implant is 4.7 mm then tip 60 may be 4.2 mm in diameter.
Once the above drilling procedures are complete, as shown in
As shown in the final
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes or equivalents will now occur to those skilled in the art. It is therefore, to be understood that this application is intended to cover all such modifications and changes that fall within the true spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/117,433, filed on May 27, 2011, which in turn claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Patent Application Nos. 61/349,545, filed on May 28, 2010 and 61/364,461 filed on Jul. 15, 2010, the entirety of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5205817 | Idemoto | Apr 1993 | A |
10123823 | El Chaar | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20070015102 | Vercellotti et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090024118 | Vercellotti et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090136894 | Tomaso et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100167235 | Vercellotti et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110229845 | Chen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190167309 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13117433 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 16185911 | US |