This invention relates to a system and method for detecting alternator conditions, and more specifically, to a system and method of detecting alternator conditions using an electrical control unit (ECU) to process measurements of the vehicle battery.
A vehicle's alternator is essential to the vehicle's operation. The failure of the alternator can cause significant problems, especially in the labor, down time, and material replacement expenses. Adding to the cost is the expense of towing or repairing the vehicle when a breakdown occurs out in the field. Also, depending on the cargo, late delivery, or damage, can result in significant monetary loss. Early detection of the alternator's impending failure would be helpful in allowing repair and/or replacement of a faulty alternator before the alternator fails when the vehicle is in the field. Early detection is usually possible since alternator failure is typically not a sudden event.
Known methods for detecting alternator condition include the measurement of the voltage from the alternator. Such methods may include detecting the frequency of the waveform generated by the alternator and comparing it to a threshold value, or comparing the absolute voltage measurement to a standardized threshold voltage. However, such methods have proven to be ineffective and difficult to implement. Many of the tools on the market require the vehicle to be stationary and are typically used in the maintenance garage. Frequently the detection of alternator failure is too late, or after the fact. The traditional method of measuring the condition of an alternator includes disassembly of the alternator and testing the individual diodes. This method is not cost effective and does not provide a continuous monitoring system of the alternator condition.
Accordingly, a need exists for a system and method for monitoring the condition of an alternator, wherein reliable data can be obtained in a cost-effective, real time manner.
A system and method for detecting alternator condition is provided. Voltage data is taken from a power supply system and manipulated to determine whether or not the alternator is functioning properly. In one embodiment, voltage data is taken over a predetermined period of time and sent to the vehicle ECU. In one specific embodiment, the ECU is the antilocking brake system ECU. The system voltage is measured at different engine speeds and the difference between the ripple amplitude at the different engine speeds is compared to determine the condition of the alternator.
Another aspect of the present invention is a system for determining alternator condition. In one embodiment, the system includes the alternator, a battery, an ECU and one or more communication buses. The communication buses are used to determine relevant parameters such as engine speed, and also to transmit the status of the alternator condition. In one specific embodiment, the ECU is the vehicle antilocking brake system ECU and the communication bus is either the J1587 Diagnostic, J2497 PLC Communications, or J1939 Controller Area Network buses.
a is a graph plotting battery voltage versus engine speed for a partially faulty alternator.
b is a graph plotting battery voltage versus engine speed for a bad alternator.
The analog voltage from the vehicle battery 20 can be measured at appropriate intervals and processed into a digital sample voltage data U by an A/D converter. The sample voltage data U can then be used in connection with engine RPM data obtained from communication link 45. This information is inputted into an alternator condition determining algorithm, such as the one disclosed in this application, to determine the condition of the alternator. Additionally, if the algorithm detects a faulty or partially faulty alternator, the vehicle ECU 40 can send a signal to the operator indicating the failure or partial failure of the alternator 30. For example, the signal can be sent to the vehicle cabin in the form of an audio signal or a visual signal, or it can be processed into a display that provides a diagnosis on one or more parts of the vehicle. Operator warning can also be provided by the vehicle communication bus 45.
The method for determining the condition of an alternator 30 is based on measurements of the electrical system voltage from the powerline 25 at specified engine RPM values. As shown in
As shown in
As an illustrative example, the algorithm for monitoring and detecting alternator failure can include the following steps. Such an illustrative algorithm is shown in FIG. 4. In step 100, the ABS ECU samples the powerline voltage. In this embodiment, 20 KHZ was determined a sufficient sampling rate. In optional step 110, data can be filtered or weighted to accommodate for changes in battery loads, PLC Communications, or other conditions that may skew the data. For example, the ECU can look for idle line of the PLC before using the data gathered. In step 120, the ECU then determines the average battery voltage Ū, the ripple amplitude ΔU, the maximum battery voltage Umax and the minimum battery voltage Umin during a sample period. Optionally, the ECU can clear these values and obtain a new sample set for a given period of time, every ten seconds, for example.
In step 130, the ECU determines if Ū is below a predetermined threshold value, preferably approximately 12V. If the ECU determines that average battery voltage Ū is less than the threshold value for a predetermined time interval, the ECU proceeds to step 140 wherein a signal is sent to indicate the alternator failure. If the ECU determines that average battery voltage Ū is not less than the threshold value, the ECU then proceeds to step 150 wherein the ECU processes the data related to the engine speed (in RPM). The ECU can receive this signal from the J1939, or J1587 vehicle data buses, or from some other data bus. In step 150, the ECU determines if the data collected was at a different engine RPM than the previous data (or if the data was the first data set). In Step 180, the data set is taken at a different engine speeds. A different engine speed is a predetermined difference, wherein the difference is great enough to provide practical data. In the preferred embodiment, the different engine speeds that should be measured should fall into each of one of the idle engine speed (500-900 RPM) and a midrange engine speed (1,000-1,500 RPM).
If at step 190, the ECU detects two different engine speed data sets, the ECU determines ΔUratio calculated from ripple amplitude ΔU at the second engine RPM (preferably mid-range engine speed) divided by the ripple amplitude ΔU at the first engine RPM (preferably idle engine speed). At step 200, the ECU determines if the ΔUratio is greater than a certain threshold. If ΔUratio is greater than that value, then the ECU signals a partial alternator failure, at step 210, and then starts taking samples again at step 100. Additionally, more than 2 engine RPM values can be measured, or a linear equation could be used to obtain ΔUratio for any given RPM. Optionally, the ECU can store the alternator data and produce a partial alternator signal after processing a given number of alternator failing ΔUratio readings. If ΔUratio is not greater than approximately 2, the algorithm loops back to step 100 and starts to take new data. Optionally, the ECU can send a signal to indicate a good alternator at step 230.
It will be appreciated that the system for determining alternator condition may adopt a wide variety of configurations and the method for determining alternator condition may take into account a number of variations, including additional variables. This invention is intended to include such modifications and alterations in so far as they fall within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4314193 | Mortonson | Feb 1982 | A |
4315204 | Sievers et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4348629 | Sievers | Sep 1982 | A |
4471308 | Gable et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4613808 | Edwards | Sep 1986 | A |
4752751 | Walker | Jun 1988 | A |
4839575 | MacFarlane | Jun 1989 | A |
5281919 | Palanisamy | Jan 1994 | A |
5389870 | Falater | Feb 1995 | A |
5583413 | Proctor et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5703472 | Aoyama et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5780995 | Maggioni et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5982154 | Kanazawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982155 | Rechdan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986439 | Pletta et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018234 | de Savasse | Jan 2000 | A |
6064186 | Pierret et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081103 | Pierret | Jun 2000 | A |
6114952 | Francesangeli et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6275161 | Wan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6339742 | Weisman, II | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6363303 | Bertness | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6445158 | Bertness et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
RE38100 | Rentsch et al. | Apr 2003 | E |
20010054890 | Thibedeau et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020011829 | Thibedeau et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63124965 | May 1988 | JP |
1135136 | May 1989 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040049361 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |