Capacitive sensors are used for touch detection in many Human Interface Devices (HID) such as laptops, trackpads, MP3 players, computer monitors, and smart-phones. The capacitive sensor senses positioning and proximity of a conductive object such as a conductive stylus or finger used to interact with the HID. The capacitive sensor is often integrated with an electronic display to form a touch-screen. Capacitive sensors include antennas or lines constructed from different media, such as copper, Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) and printed ink. ITO is typically used to achieve transparency. Some capacitive sensors are grid based and operate to detect either mutual capacitance between the electrodes at different junctions in the grid or to detect self-capacitance at lines of the grid.
According to some embodiments of the present disclosure there is a provided a system and method to monitor capacitance between a user and a touch enabled computing device (CBD) while a user is interacting with the computing device by touch. The system and method described herein specifically relate to a touch enabled computing device that includes a capacitive based sensor having electrode junctions, e.g. a digitizer sensor. A physical model relating CBD to detected touch signals on the digitizer sensor is defined and implemented. In some exemplary embodiments, a grounding state machine toggles defines one of a ‘Grounded’ state and ‘Ungrounded’ state of the device based on accumulated averages of CBD.
A computing device's grounding state may change significantly while a user is interacting with the computing device. This is especially the case for mobile devices. Changes may occur when plugging/unplugging the computing device to a power source, moving the computing device from one type of surface to another, connecting/disconnecting the computing device to another device, or when touching/releasing a metallic part of the computing device, e.g. the chassis. Touch signals are typically sensitive to the grounding state of the computing device. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, defined grounding state determines processing schemes applied to the touch signals based on known characteristics of touch signal for that grounding state. Optionally, the adapted processing provides improved performance palm detection and multi-finger touch detection.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and/or scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the disclosure, exemplary methods and/or materials are described below. In case of conflict, the patent specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and are not intended to be necessarily limiting.
Some embodiments of the disclosure are herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of embodiments of the disclosure. In this regard, the description taken with the drawings makes apparent to those skilled in the art how embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced.
In the drawings:
Capacitance between the user and the computing device (CBD) may be highly dynamic. High capacitance may be detected when the computing device is well grounded. For example, capacitance above 500 pF may be detected while a user holds a chassis of the computing device and capacitance above 50 pF may be detected while the computing device is connected to an external power source with two prong plug and above 100 pF while the computing device is connected to an external power source with three prong plug. Low capacitance, e.g. below 30 pF may be detected while the computing device is ungrounded. For example, low capacitance may be detected while a computing device is resting on a pillow and disconnected from an external power source. While the computing device is ungrounded, touch signals detected with the digitizer sensor are prone to produce a lower relative effect (or finger effect) and distortions. These distortions are more prominent during multi-touch detection and palm input. The relative effect as defined herein is a difference between baseline amplitude detected with no touch input and an amplitude detected at a touched location.
According to some exemplary embodiments, a threshold on running averages of detected CBD is used toggle between defining a computing device as grounded or ungrounded. Optionally, CBD below 50 pF is defined as ungrounded and above 50 pF is defined as grounded. While a computing device is ungrounded, processing schemes that account for distortions, lower relative effect or other properties of the touch signal that are typical for an ungrounded state may be applied. Likewise, while a computing device is grounded, processing schemes that are geared to touch signals typically detected during a grounded state are applied.
In some exemplary embodiments, touch signals are first analyzed to determine suitability for CBD detection based on the defined model. Optionally, only frames that meet defined criteria are selected. Typically, a grounding state is first defined by average CBD over a relatively smaller pool of frames, e.g. 2-10 frames or 8 frames and then subsequent determinations are based on larger samples of frames, e.g. 20-50 frames or 32 frames.
Reference is now made to
Digitizer circuitry 25 applies mutual capacitive detection or a self-capacitive detection for sensing a touch signal from touch (or hover) of fingertip 46. Bringing a grounded finger 46 close to the surface of digitizer sensor 50 changes the local electrostatic field and reduces the mutual capacitance at junctions 59 in the touched area. Bringing a conductive floating token 47, close to the surface of digitizer sensor 50 increases the mutual capacitance at junctions 59 of the touched area. A change in mutual capacitance may be detected by a circuit 25 when applying a drive signal along one axis (the drive lines) of the matrix while sampling output on the other axis (the receive lines) to detect a coupled signal. Finger touch has the effect of reducing amplitude of the measured signal while touch by floating token 47 has the effect of increasing amplitude of the measured signal. Output from digitizer sensor 50 may be in the form of a heatmap that maps detected amplitudes of the coupled signals at each junction. In a heatmap, finger touch produces a negative blob at the finger touch location and a floating conductive object produces a positive blob at the location of the floating conductive object.
According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, digitizer circuitry 25 includes a dedicated engine 252 for estimating a determining CBD from the heatmap or output detected and a state machine 253 for defining a grounding state of the computing device based on the CBD. In some exemplary embodiments, CBD detection engine 252 is associated with memory that stores one or more look-up tables for relating detected touch signals to a level of capacitance between a user with fingertip 46 and device 100. Typically, grounding state machine 253 is also associated with memory for storing parameters, e.g. thresholds, accumulated averages of CBD and instructions for altering processing schemes based on the grounding state defined. Optionally, circuit 25 adapts processing of the touch signals sampled based on output from grounding state detection engine 253.
Typically, output from digitizer circuitry 25 is reported to host 22. Typically, the output provided by digitizer circuitry 25 may include coordinates of one or more fingertips 46. Optionally, a dedicated grounding state is reported or CBD is reported. Typically, digitizer circuitry 25 uses both analog and digital processing to process signals detected with digitizer sensor 50. Optionally, some and/or all of the functionalities of CBD detection engine 252 and state machine 253 is integrated in one or more processing units adapted for controlling operation of digitizer sensor 50. Optionally, some and/or all of the functionalities of digitizer circuitry 25, CBD detection engine 252 and state machine 253 is integrated and/or included in host 22.
Reference is now to
When more than one finger is touching the sensing surface or when part of the hand is also touching the sensing surface, the potential induced on one finger or part of the hand spreads to other parts of the digitizer sensor touched by other fingers or other parts of the hand.
Reference is now made to
CT is typically a function of surface contact between the user and the digitizer sensor as well as physical parameters of the touch-screen. CT increases as more fingers touch the digitizer sensor or due to palm contact and decreases with less contact. In some exemplary embodiments, CT may be estimated from the heat map based on the following relationship:
CT=(NTotal)(CD) Equation (1)
Where NTotal is the number of junctions 59 touched and CD is a constant that represents capacitance of the device due to both physical properties of the conductive strips 58 and display 45 and also due to proximity between the elements. Optionally, Equation (1) may also include parameters that account for palm touch and size of each finger touch.
CBE is typically ranges between 100-300 pF. CDE can differ between devices based on their constructions and components included in the device. CDE also changes with changing conditions in the surrounding environment. As described herein above, CDE can increase significantly when the device is plugged into a power outlet, connected to another device, or when a user grounds the device by touching its chassis. The capacitance (CBD) between the device ground and the user can be defined by:
1/CBD=1/CBE+1/CDE Equation (2)
And the total capacitance (CTotal) between the user and the device can be defined by:
CTotal=CBD+CT Equation (3)
According to some embodiments of the present invention, CTotal may also be estimated based on the detected heatmap using the following relationship:
CTotal=(NH)(NV)(CE)/P Equation (4)
Where:
CE is a second constant and can be obtained with empirical data or simulations and represents capacitive coupling at the junctions due to physical properties of the conductive strips 58 and the geometry between them. P is the peak relative effect at a location with a perceived maximum potential induced on the finger from the drive signal. For single finger touch, P is typically peak amplitude at the touch location. In cases where positive blob ghosts are present, P is peak amplitude of the positive blob ghosts. P may also be defined by the following equation:
P=FEG−FED Equation (5)
Where:
FEG is an ideal relative effect (or finger effect) that is detected when the computing device has a same impedance to earth ground as the user and FED is the detected relative effect; and
NH is a number of touched junctions along a row conductive line crossing the location at which P is detected and Nv is a number of touched junctions along a column conductive line crossing the location of P. CBD can then be estimated based on the following relationship:
CBD=(NH)(NV)(CE)(FEG−FED)−(NTotal)(CD) Equation (6)
Where parameters CE, CD and FEG are pre-determined constants and parameters NH, NV, FED and NTotal are values determined from the sampled heatmap.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
If the frame is accepted, peak amplitudes of the blobs are detected and a representative blob is selected based on which the model for detecting CBD will be applied (block 730). Parameters NV, NH, and NTOTAL may be determined based on characterization of the spread of the detected touch signals (block 740). Typically, NV, NH, and NTOTAL are parameters that can be extracted from the heatmap. CBD may be estimated based on a pre-defined model relating CBD to FE Nv, NH, and NTOTAL (block 750).
Typically, a grounding state of the computing device is determined based on average CBD detected over time. Typically, an adaptive history buffer is used to update the average CBD. CBD may be detected every few frames, e.g. every 3-10 frames during user touch interaction. Optionally, a rate at which CBD is detected depends on a current status of the computing device.
Reference is now made to
Reference is made to
For example, while the computing device is defined as ‘Ungrounded’ multiple touch signals are detected using relatively crude image segmentation schemes and while the computing device is defined as ‘Grounded’ finer image segmentation schemes are applied. Optionally, for ‘Ungrounded’ states processing schemes directed toward detecting close finger touches or separating blobs resulting from close finger touches are not applied.
According to some aspects of the present disclosure there is provided a device comprising: a display; a controller configured to control the display; sensor having electrode junctions and wherein the sensor is configured to sense touch input at a plurality of the junctions; and a circuit configured to: sample output from the sensor; detect capacitance between the device ground and a user touching the sensor (CBD) based on the output sampled and a pre-defined model; define one of two grounding states of the device based on the capacitance detected; process the output based on the grounding state defined; determine touch coordinates based on the output processed; and report the touch coordinates to the controller.
Optionally, the model is a physical model for CBD capacitive estimation based on a number of touched junctions and a relative effect, and wherein the number of touched junction and the relative effect is detected from the output sampled.
Optionally, the CBD is detected per frame of output sampled.
Optionally, the circuit includes a grounding state machine configured to define the grounding state based on accumulated averages of CBD.
Optionally, the grounding state machine defines a grounded state or an ungrounded state.
Optionally, the grounding state machine stores a first threshold on CBD defined to switch from a grounded state to an ungrounded state and a second threshold on CBD defined to switch from the ungrounded state to the grounded state, wherein the first threshold is other than the second threshold.
Optionally, the circuit is configured to perform processing for palm rejection and wherein parameters of a palm rejection processing scheme is adjusted based on the defined grounding state.
Optionally, the circuit is configured to perform processing for finger separation and wherein parameters of a finger separation processing scheme is adjusted based on the defined grounding state.
Optionally, the circuit is configured to perform processing for finger separation and wherein the processing for finger separation is disabled based on defining an ungrounded state.
Optionally, CBD is modeled as total capacitance between the user and the device ground minus touch capacitance between the user and the sensor.
According to some aspects of the present disclosure there is provided a method comprising: sampling output from sensor having electrode junctions integrated on a device including a display; detecting capacitance between the device ground and a user (CBD) based on the output sampled and a pre-defined model; defining one of two grounding states of the device based on the capacitance detected; processing the output based on the grounding state defined; determining touch coordinates based on the output processed; and reporting the touch coordinates to a controller of the display.
Optionally, the model is a physical model for CBD capacitive estimation based on a number of touched junctions and a relative effect, and wherein the number of touched junction and the relative effect is detected from the output sampled.
Optionally, the CBD is detected per frame of output sampled.
Optionally, the one of two grounding states is defined based on accumulated averages of CBD.
Optionally, the two grounding states is grounded and ungrounded.
Optionally, the method includes switching from the grounded state to the ungrounded state based on a first threshold and switching from the ungrounded state to the grounded state based on a second threshold, wherein the first threshold is other than the second threshold.
Optionally, the method includes performing processing for palm rejection and wherein parameters of a palm rejection processing scheme is adjusted based on the defined grounding state.
Optionally, the method includes performing processing for finger separation and wherein parameters of a finger separation processing scheme is adjusted based on the defined grounding state.
Optionally, the method includes performing processing for finger separation and wherein the processing for finger separation is disabled based on defining an ungrounded state.
Optionally, CBD is modeled as total capacitance between the user and the device ground minus touch capacitance between the user and the sensor.
Certain features of the examples described herein, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the examples described herein, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination or as suitable in any other described embodiment of the disclosure. Certain features described in the context of various embodiments are not to be considered essential features of those embodiments, unless the embodiment is inoperative without those elements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4398720 | Jones et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4591710 | Komadina et al. | May 1986 | A |
4672154 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686332 | Greanias et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4707845 | Krein et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4791592 | Burgess | Dec 1988 | A |
4977397 | Kuo et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5117071 | Greanias et al. | May 1992 | A |
5129654 | Bogner | Jul 1992 | A |
5239139 | Zuta | Aug 1993 | A |
5528002 | Katabami | Jun 1996 | A |
5543588 | Bisset et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5574262 | Petty | Nov 1996 | A |
5691512 | Obi | Nov 1997 | A |
5825345 | Takahama et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831600 | Inoue et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841078 | Miller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854881 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859392 | Petty | Jan 1999 | A |
5889511 | Ong et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905489 | Takahama et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923320 | Murakami et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973676 | Kawakura | Oct 1999 | A |
6020849 | Fukuzaki | Feb 2000 | A |
6081259 | Teterwak | Jun 2000 | A |
6229529 | Yano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239389 | Allen | May 2001 | B1 |
6417846 | Lee | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459424 | Resman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6690156 | Weiner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6888536 | Westerman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7244901 | Liao et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7248249 | Kong et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7292229 | Morag et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7372455 | Perski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7643010 | Westerman et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656396 | Bosch et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7725089 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7843439 | Perski et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7868874 | Reynolds | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7995036 | Perski et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8059102 | Rimon et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8130203 | Westerman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8278571 | Orsley | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289289 | Rimon et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305358 | Klinghult et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8402391 | Doray et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8420958 | Lu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8446374 | Westerman | May 2013 | B2 |
8482545 | King-Smith et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8542210 | Westerman | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8660978 | Hinckley et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8810542 | Yousefpor | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8823664 | Kyrynyuk et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8994692 | Yumoto et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9035905 | Saukko et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9110543 | Dabell | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9262010 | Bulea | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9367168 | Ahn | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9495052 | Shepelev | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9626020 | Durojaiye et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632622 | Hotelling et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9823774 | Winebrand | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20020089491 | Willig | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030080946 | Chuang | May 2003 | A1 |
20040027340 | Muraoka et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040100450 | Choi | May 2004 | A1 |
20040155871 | Perski et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160426 | DeGroot et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178995 | Sterling | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050189154 | Perski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050271259 | Lorch et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012580 | Perski et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017709 | Okano | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060097991 | Hotelling | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109252 | Kolmykov-Zotov et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060139339 | Pechman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070103454 | Elias | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152976 | Townsend et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070285404 | Rimon | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080012835 | Rimon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012838 | Rimon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080128180 | Perski et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080238885 | Zachut et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090020343 | Rothkopf et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090095540 | Zachut | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090160787 | Westerman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090251434 | Rimon et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100060608 | Yousefpor | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100155153 | Zachut | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156851 | Kurokawa | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100289752 | Birkler | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321338 | Ely | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012840 | Hotelling et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012855 | Yeh et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110084929 | Chang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110155479 | Oda et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175835 | Wang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110254802 | Philipp | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254807 | Perski et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110284632 | Mullen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291944 | Simmons et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310040 | Ben-Shalom et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120013555 | Maeda | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120050180 | King et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120105362 | Kremin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133616 | Nishihara et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158629 | Hinckley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120182238 | Lee | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120249457 | Chou et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130009896 | Zaliva | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130009907 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027361 | Perski et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130127757 | Mann | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132903 | Krishnaswamy | May 2013 | A1 |
20130176270 | Cattivelli et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130176280 | Wu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130249950 | Mahmoud et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130265258 | Garfinkel | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278543 | Hsu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285973 | Elias et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300668 | Churikov et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300672 | Griffin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300696 | Haran | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130328832 | Boumgarten | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140152620 | Perski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168116 | Sasselli et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176447 | Alameh et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184554 | Walley | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140320445 | Kim | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150049044 | Yousefpor | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150070310 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150109243 | Jun et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150177089 | Ferran et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150193025 | Rebeschi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150363067 | Winebrand | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160041685 | Perski et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160098742 | Minicucci | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160266673 | Dinu | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160274700 | Mishalov | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170177110 | Winebrand | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177138 | Orlovsky et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202092590 | Dec 2011 | CN |
103576997 | Feb 2014 | CN |
0684580 | Nov 1995 | EP |
1422601 | May 2004 | EP |
1717677 | Nov 2006 | EP |
2659832 | Nov 2013 | EP |
05-173698 | Jul 1993 | JP |
07-311647 | Nov 1995 | JP |
09-325852 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-031545 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2002-207563 | Jul 2002 | JP |
201537442 | Oct 2015 | TW |
WO 03019346 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2005081631 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2009108334 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2011154950 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012111010 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012140656 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO 2013171747 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014149243 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014145872 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Official Action dated Apr. 3, 2017 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,656. (23 pages). |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated May 23, 2006 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL05/00229. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 13, 2012 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated May 15, 2014 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jul. 19, 2012 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jun. 20, 2013 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 22, 2013 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search dated Sep. 4, 2013 From the International Searching Authority Re. Application No. PCT/IL2013/050417. |
Decision to Refuse a European Patent Application (Article 97(2) EPC) dated Jul. 3, 2015 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2014 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re. Application No. PCT/IL2013/050417. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Dec. 20, 2013 From the International Searching Authority Re. Application No. PCT/IL2013/050417. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 10, 2015 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,289. |
Official Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,601. |
Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2015 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. |
Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,535. |
Official Action dated Jan. 13, 2016 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. |
Official Action dated Nov. 15, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,601. |
Official Action dated Mar. 18, 2015 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. |
Official Action dated Dec. 22, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,535. |
Official Action dated May 25, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,535. |
Official Action dated May 27, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/063,535. |
Official Action dated Mar. 28, 2013 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,331. |
Proceedings Further With the European Patent Application Pursuant to Rule 70(2) EPC dated Apr. 13, 2012 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC dated Dec. 15, 2014 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2012 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05709125.8. |
Translation of Decision of Rejection dated Jun. 2, 2011 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2007-500353. |
Translation of Notification of Reasons of Rejection dated May 21, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2007-500353. |
Hughes “Apple's Stylus Receiver Concept Would Improve the Precision of Digital Pen-Based Input”, Follow AppleInsider, Quiller Media, 8 P., Jan. 29, 2015. |
Park et al. “A Pen-Pressure-Sensitive Capacitive Touch System Using Electrically Coupled Resonance Pen”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 51(1): 168-176, Jul. 30, 2015. |
Wang et al. “Detecting and Leveraging Finger Orientation for Interaction with Direct-Touch Surfaces”, UIST '09 Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology: 23-32, Jul. 4, 2009. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Jun. 3, 2016 From the International Searching Authority Re. Application No. PCT/US2016/022760. |
Official Action dated Dec. 30, 2016From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. (24 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Feb. 1, 2017 From the International Preliminary Examining Authority Re. Application No. PCT/US2016/022760. (8 Pages). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Sep. 29, 2016 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. |
Official Action dated Jul. 8, 2016 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated May 2, 2017 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. (3 pages). |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Apr. 11, 2017 From the International Searching Authority Re. Application No. PCT/US2016/066737. (14 Pages). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Jul. 19, 2017 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,766. (3 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 6, 2017 From the International Preliminary Examining Authority Re. Application No. PCT/US2016/022760. (9 Pages). |
Restriction Official Action dated Aug. 3, 2017 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 15/070,380. (6 Pages). |
Official Action dated Jun. 1, 2017 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,766. (35 Pages). |
Official Action dated Jun. 14, 2017 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,381. (26 pages). |
Official Action dated Oct. 27, 2017 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,766. (24 pages). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Jan. 4, 2018 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,766. (3 pages). |
Official Action dated Feb. 16, 2018 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,766. (17 pages). |
“AN11623 LPC82x Touch Solution Hardware Design Guide”, Retrieved From: https://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/NXPLPC82xTouchSolutionHardwareDesignGuide.PDF, Dec. 22, 2014, 18 Pages. |
“Capacitive Sensing Solutions from Silicon Labs”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20140831110204/http://www.silabs.com/Support%20Documents/TechnicalDocs/CapacitiveTouchSenseTechnologySPKR.pdf, Aug. 31, 2014, 53 Pages. |
“MTI Instruments Capacitance Measurement Products”, Retrieved From: http://www.mtiinstruments.com/technology/Capacitance.aspx, Retrieved on: Jul. 16, 2015, 9 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/070,380”, dated Jan. 11, 2018, 14 Pages. |
Allan, Roger, “How to Select the Right Touch Sensing Approach for Your Design”, Retrieved From: http://www.digikey.com/es/articles/techzone/2011/aug/how-to-select-the-right-touch-sensing-approach-for-your-design, Aug. 25, 2011, 4 Pages. |
Camacho, et al., “Designing Touch Sensing Electrodes: Electrical Considerations and Recommended Layout Patterns”, In Free Semiconductor Application Note, Document No. AN3863, Rev 4, Jul. 2011, 28 Pages. |
Carey, John, “Smart Phone Design: Projected Capacitance Fueling Innovation”, Retrieved From: https://www.eeweb.com/profile/john-carey/articles/smart-phone-design-projected-capacitance-fueling-innovation, Aug. 18, 2011, 5 Pages. |
Goel, et al., “GripSense: Using Built-In Sensors to Detect Hand Posture and Pressure on Commodity Mobile Phones”, In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 7, 2012, pp. 545-554. |
Harrison, et al., “Capacitive Fingerprinting: Exploring User Differentiation by Sensing Electrical Properties of the Human Body”, In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 7, 2012, pp. 537-544. |
Leigh, et al., “High Rate, Low-Latency Multi-Touch Sensing with Simultaneous Orthogonal Multiplexing”, In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Oct. 5, 2014, pp. 355-364. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170177138 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |