System and method for detecting malicious network content using virtual environment components

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11153341
  • Patent Number
    11,153,341
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 28, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 19, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
Malicious network content is identified based on the behavior of one or more virtual environment components which process network content in a virtual environment. Network content can be monitored and analyzed using a set of heuristics. The heuristics identify suspicious network content communicated over a network. The suspicious network content can further be analyzed in a virtual environment that includes one or more virtual environment components. Each virtual environment component is configured to mimic live environment components, for example a browser application component or an operating system component. The suspicious network content is replayed in the virtual environment using one or more of the virtual environment components. The virtual environment component behavior is analyzed in view of an expected behavior to identify malicious network content. The malicious network content is then identified and processed.
Description
BACKGROUND

Presently, malicious network content (e.g., malicious software or malware) can attack various devices via a communication network. For example, malware may include any program or file that is harmful to a computer user, such as bots, computer viruses, worms, Trojan horses, adware, spyware, or any programming that gathers information about a computer user or otherwise operates without permission.


Adware is a program configured to direct advertisements to a computer or a particular user. In one example, adware identifies the computer and/or the user to various websites visited by a browser on the computer. The website may then use the adware to either generate pop-up advertisements or otherwise direct specific advertisements to the user's browser. Spyware is a program configured to collect information regarding the user, the computer, and/or a user's network habits. In an example, spyware may collect information regarding the names and types of websites that the user browses and then transmit the information to another computer. Adware and spyware are often added to the user's computer after the user browses to a website that hosts the adware and/or spyware. The user is often unaware that these programs have been added and are similarly unaware of the adware and/or spyware's function.


Various processes and devices have been employed to prevent the problems that malicious network content can cause. For example, computers often include antivirus scanning software that scans a particular client device for viruses. Computers may also include spyware and/or adware scanning software. The scanning may be performed manually or based on a schedule specified by a user associated with the particular computer, a system administrator, and so forth. Unfortunately, by the time a virus or spyware is detected by the scanning software, some damage on the particular computer or loss of privacy may have already occurred. Additionally, it can take weeks or months for new Anti-Virus signatures to be manually created and for an anti-virus application to be updated. Moreover, polymorphic exploits are also an issue that limits the effectiveness of some anti-virus applications.


In some instances, malicious network content comprises a bot. A bot is a software robot configured to remotely control all or a portion of a digital device (e.g., a computer) without authorization by the digital device's legitimate owner. Bot related activities include bot propagation and attacking other computers on a network. Bots commonly propagate by scanning nodes (e.g., computers or other digital devices) available on a network to search for a vulnerable target. When a vulnerable computer is scanned, the bot may install a copy of itself. Once installed, the new bot may continue to seek other computers on a network to infect. A bot may also be propagated by a malicious web site configured to exploit vulnerable computers that visit its web pages.


A bot may also, without the authority of the infected computer user, establish a command and control communication channel to receive instructions. Bots may receive command and control communication from a centralized bot server or another infected computer (e.g., via a peer-to-peer (P2P) network established by a bot on the infected computer). When a plurality of bots (i.e., a bot net) act together, the infected computers (i.e., zombies) can perform organized attacks against one or more computers on a network, or engage in criminal enterprises. In one example, bot infected computers may be directed to flood another computer on a network with excessive traffic in a denial-of-service attack. In another example, upon receiving instructions, one or more bots may direct the infected computer to transmit spam across a network. In a third example, bots may host illegal businesses such as pharmaceutical websites that sell pharmaceuticals without a prescription.


Malicious network content may be distributed over a network via web sites, e.g., servers operating on a network according to an HTTP standard. Malicious network content distributed in this manner may be actively downloaded and installed on a user's computer, without the approval or knowledge of the user, simply by accessing the web site hosting the malicious network content. The web site hosting the malicious network content may be referred to as a malicious web site. The malicious network content may be embedded within data associated with web pages hosted by the malicious web site. For example, a web page may include JavaScript code, and malicious network content may be embedded within the JavaScript code. In this example, the malicious network content embedded within the JavaScript code may be obfuscated such that it is not apparent until the JavaScript code is executed that the JavaScript code contains malicious network content. Therefore, the malicious network content may attack or infect a user's computer before detection by antivirus software, firewalls, intrusion detection systems, or the like.


SUMMARY

The behavior of one or more virtual environment components which process network content in a virtual environment is used to identify malicious network content. Network content can be monitored and analyzed using a set of heuristics. The heuristics identify suspicious network content communicated over a network. The suspicious network content can further be analyzed in a virtual environment that includes one or more virtual environment components. Each virtual environment component is configured to mimic live environment components, for example a browser application component or an operating system component. The suspicious network content is replayed in the virtual environment using one or more of the virtual environment components. The virtual environment component behavior is analyzed in view of an expected behavior. Malicious network content is detected based on observed component behavior that deviates from an expected behavior. The malicious network content is then identified and processed.


An embodiment detects malicious network content by receiving network content detected to be suspicious. A virtual environment component within a virtual environment is then configured to mimic a real application. The real application is configured to process the suspicious network content. The suspicious network content is then processed by the virtual environment component within a virtual environment. Suspicious network content can be identified as malicious network content based on a behavior for the virtual environment component. A computer readable storage medium can contain instructions executable by a processor for detecting malicious network content.


An embodiment processes network content by receiving suspicious network content. The suspicious network content is detected within a copy of network content communicated over a network. An agent is then configured to monitor processing of the suspicious network content within a virtual environment. At least one virtual environment component is configured to process the suspicious network content within the virtual environment. An agent can detect an anomaly associated with the virtual environment component. A signature is then generated from the suspicious network content to apply to subsequent network content.


An embodiment may include a system including a first module, a pool of virtual environment components, a scheduler and a replayer. The first module can access suspicious network content. The scheduler can retrieve a virtual environment component from the virtual environment pool. The virtual environment component can be configured to mimic a real application. The replayer processes the suspicious network content using the retrieved virtual environment component within a virtual environment





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection environment.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment component pool.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting and processing malicious network content.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for configuring virtual environment components.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for replaying suspicious network content.



FIG. 7 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting malicious network content.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for identifying and processing malicious network content.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present technology utilizes one or more virtual environment components to analyze network content in a virtual environment. Network content can be monitored and analyzed using a set of heuristics. The heuristics can identify suspicious network content communicated over a network between two or more computing devices. The suspicious network content can further be analyzed in a virtual environment. The virtual environment may include one or more virtual environment components configured to mimic live environment components. The virtual environment components may include, for example, an application component such as a browser application component, an operating system component, a network component or some other component. The suspicious network content is replayed in the virtual environment using one or more of the virtual environment components. The virtual environment components can then be analyzed in view of their expected behavior. Malicious network content can be detected based on observed component behavior that deviates from an expected behavior. The malicious network content can then be identified and processed.


In some embodiments, a virtual environment component may be configured as a browser application. The virtual environment browser application can be configured to mimic a real browser application configured to receive and transmit network content being monitored. For example, a virtual environment browser application can be configured with software plug-ins, add-ons, preferences, proxy information, and settings associated with a real browser application that communicates over a network. The behavior of the virtual environment browser application is monitored while it is processing suspicious network content. When the actual or observed behavior of the virtual environment browser application differs from an expected behavior for the browser application, the suspicious network content processed by the virtual environment browser application can be designated as malicious network content. For example, when suspicious network content downloaded to a virtual environment browser application initiates a request to a remote server without using a designated browser application proxy, the network content can be designated as malicious.


In some embodiments, a virtual environment component may be configured as an operating system of a computer. The virtual environment operating system may be configured to mimic the appearance and performance of an operating system of a computer that processes network traffic. The virtual environment operating system can be monitored during processing of suspicious network content to determine if settings or parameters are improperly changed or the virtual environment operating system does not behave as expected. If the observed behavior does not match the expected behavior, the network content processed by the virtual environment operating system is identified as malicious network content. Furthermore, if a setting, parameter, or other aspect of the virtual environment operating system is changed (or attempted to be changed) improperly, the current detection system may immediately generate a signature and apply the signature against future network content. In some embodiments, a virtual environment component can include an agent that monitors and/or observes changes to a virtual operating system component. Details of virtual environment components are discussed in more detail below.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection environment. The environment of FIG. 1 includes server 105 and client 110 communicating over network 120. Network tap 115 is also in communication with network 120 and may intercept communications sent over network 120, for example the communications between client 110 and server 105. Network tap 115 can generate a copy of the intercepted communications and provide the copied communications to malicious network content detection system 125.


Network 120 may be implemented as the Internet or other WAN, a LAN, intranet, extranet, private network, public network, combination of these, or other network or networks.


Server 105 provides a network service over network 120. In some embodiments when network 120 is implemented as the Internet, server 105 can provide a web service. Server 105 may include one or more applications 107 and operating system 109. In some embodiments, application 107 is a web application providing a web service over network 120. Operating system 109 may be an operating system suitable for use by a server, such as WINDOWS, LINUX, or NOVEL NETWARE operating system.


Client 110 may execute one or more applications 112 on operating system 114. In some embodiments, one or more applications on client 110 may utilize a service provided by server 105 over network 120. In some embodiments, client 110 may utilize a web service provided over network 120 by server 105. Application 112 may be any of several types of applications, such as a browser application, instant messaging application, e-mail application, an other application which can communicate over network 120 or is affected by network content communicated to or from client 110 over network 120. Operating system 114 may be any operating system suitable for a client 110, such as WINDOWS, UNIX, or other operating system.


Malicious network content detection system 125 includes heuristic module 130, heuristics database 135, scheduler 140, virtual environment component pool 145 and virtual environments 150. The system 125 receives a copy of network content from network tap 115. The network content may include, for example, network data. The network content is then provided to heuristic module 130 which applies heuristics to received network data. Heuristics module 130 may access the heuristics from heuristics database 135. When application of the heuristics indicates that one or more data packets of the network data have a suspicious characteristic or are otherwise suspicious, heuristic module 130 may provide the suspicious data packets to scheduler 140. In some embodiments, suspicious data packets include data packets that might contain malicious network content. Examples of malicious network content include a worm, virus, trojan horse or other malicious code. Scheduler 140 receives suspicious network content from heuristic module 130 and replays the suspicious network content in virtual environment 150. In some embodiments, “replay” of the suspicious network content includes processing the suspicious network content in a virtual environment 150 that is configured to mimic the real environment in which the network content was or was intended to be processed. Configuring the replay of suspicious network content can include retrieving one or more virtual environment components from virtual environment component pool 145, configuring the virtual components, providing the virtual components to virtual environment 150, and executing playback of the suspicious network data.


Virtual environment component pool 145 contains a pool of different component types, such as applications, operating systems, and other components. Virtual environment component pool 145 is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 3. Virtual environment 150 is used to replay suspicious network content using one or more components. Virtual environment 150 is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 2. The operation of exemplary embodiments of a heuristic module, heuristics database, and scheduler are discussed in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,971, filed on Nov. 3, 2008, titled, “Systems and Methods for Detecting Malicious Network Content”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment component pool. In some embodiments, the virtual environment component pool of FIG. 2 provides more detail for virtual environment component pool 145 illustrated in FIG. 1. Virtual environment component pool 145 includes virtual environment applications 205, virtual environment operating systems 210, virtual environment networks 215, and virtual environment agents 220.


Each of virtual environment applications 205 may be configured to appear and perform as a real application which processes or is affected by network data. Examples of virtual environment applications 205 include a browser application, such as “Internet Explorer” by Microsoft Corporation or “FireFox” by Mozilla, instant messaging application, client e-mail application, other applications that process data communicated over a network, and other applications. The virtual environment applications may be implemented as one or more templates of a type of application, or a specific instance of a particular application. The virtual environment applications can be retrieved, configured and used within one or more virtual environments 150. The behavior of the virtual environment applications can be monitored and compared to an expected behavior to determine whether or not any variances exist which may indicate malicious network content and/or data.


Virtual environment operating system 210 can be implemented to appear and perform as any of several widely known operating systems for computers which process network data, for example WINDOWS, UNIX, or other operating systems. The virtual environment operating system may be configured to mimic a real operating system and monitor to detect attempted changes and actual changes to the operating system which are unexpected.


Virtual environment agent 220 can detect changes in a virtual environment component, such as a virtual environment application or virtual environment operating system. In some embodiments, a virtual environment agent 220 may detect changes to a virtual environment component that are not made using a standard process, changes to virtual environment component settings that should not be changed, and other changes to a virtual environment component. For example, the virtual environment agent 200 may detect when a change is made to an operating system setting using a non-standard process.


Virtual environment network 215 may be implemented to include a virtual switch, an intranet, the Internet, or some other network. The virtual environment network 215 is configured with protocols that mimic the real network in which the network data is communicated.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment. In some embodiments, the exemplary virtual environment of FIG. 3 provides more detail of virtual environment 150 of FIG. 1. Virtual environment 150 includes replayer 305, virtual environment network 310, virtual environment operating system 315, virtual environment applications 320-325, and virtual environment agent 330.


Replayer 305 replays network content in the virtual environment network 310 by receiving and transmitting communications with virtual environment operating system 315 over virtual environment network 310. The communications can be processed by virtual environment operating system 315 as well as by one or more virtual environment applications 320-325. In some embodiments, suspicious network data is processed by operating system 315 and virtual environment applications 320 and/or 325. Virtual environment network 310 may receive suspicious network data from replayer 305 and provide the suspicious network data to virtual environment operating system 315. Virtual operating system 315 may process the suspicious network content and optionally provide the suspicious network content to a virtual environment application. In some embodiments, virtual operating system 315 is configured to mimic a server or server applications, such as server 105, application 107 or operating system 109. Processing suspicious network content in a virtual environment is discussed in more detail below with respect to the method of FIG. 4.


Virtual environment network 310 may be retrieved from virtual environment component pool 145. The virtual environment network 310 may be implemented to include a switch or a gateway, or some other software implementation of a network which mimics an actual communications network. In some embodiments, the virtual environment network 310 may process and implement the transmission of data in a manner that simulates the processing and transmission of data by an actual network. In some embodiments, the communications processed through virtual environment network 310 are monitored. In some embodiments, implementing a virtual environment network 310 is optional, in which case replayer 305 communicates with virtual environment operating system 315 directly.


Virtual environment operating system 315 is configured to mimic (e.g., appear and perform in a similar manner) a real operating system, for example an operating system 114 for client 110 that processes data over network 120. In some embodiments, virtual environment operating system 315 is implemented as code that emulates an operating system and can interact with one or more virtual environment applications as an actual operating system would. In some embodiments, the virtual environment operating system is implemented as an actual operating system executing within a virtual environment.


Virtual environment operating system 315 may communicate data between virtual environment network 210 (or replayer 305) and one or more virtual environment applications. For example, virtual environment operating system 315 may receive requests from a virtual environment application, route the request to replayer 305, and route response data, for example suspicious network content data, from replayer 305 to virtual environment application 220 or 225, respectively. In some embodiments, communications, settings and other parameters aspects of the behavior of virtual environment operating system 315 within virtual environment 150 are monitored. In some embodiments, virtual environment operating system 315 is optional.


Virtual environment applications 320 and 325 are each configured to behave as an application that processes or is affected by network content on a client computer or server. For example, a virtual environment application may be implemented as code that emulates a real application to mimic the behavior of the real application, for example the behavior of application 112 on client 110. In some embodiments, a virtual environment application may be implemented as a copy of the actual application which is executed within the virtual environment.


Virtual environment applications can be configured and controlled to replicate the processing of suspicious content data. For example, when replaying suspicious content data, the virtual environment application can be controlled to submit a request for data over a virtual network. At least a portion of the suspicious content data is transmitted to the virtual environment application in response to the request. Replay of suspicious network data continues until the content data has been replayed in its entirety. The communications, settings and other aspects of the behavior of virtual environment applications within virtual environment 150 can be monitored.


One or more virtual environment agents 330 can be configured to monitor the behavior and/or state of one or more virtual environment components. In some embodiments, virtual environment component behavior can include requests for data, sending or receiving data over a network, processing and/or storing data, or other operations performed the component. In some embodiments, the virtual environment component state may include a “snapshot” of the virtual environment parameters and settings, for example values for components settings, status of a portion component portion (i.e., error conditions, interrupts, availability of a buffer), or values for settings or parameters for the component. For example, a virtual environment agent can monitor changes made to a virtual environment operating system 315. In some embodiments, if a setting is changed to an improper value or an improper procedure is used to change a setting to the operating system, the agent can detect the code associated with suspicious network content which performed the change.


In addition to the network, operating system, application, and agent components illustrated in virtual environment 150, other types of virtual environment components can be used within virtual environment 150 to process suspicious network data. For example, a virtual environment 150 may include virtual environment hardware to mimic a hardware protocol, ports, or other behavior of an actual hardware machine.


The exemplary methods of FIGS. 4-8 relate to detecting and processing malicious network content. Throughout the following discussion of FIGS. 4-8, examples are occasionally discussed which relate to virtual environment components comprising a browser application and an operating system. These exemplary references are for purposes of discussion only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present technology.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting and processing malicious network content. The method of FIG. 4 begins with intercepting network content at step 405. Network tap 115 intercepts network content sent over network 120 between server 105 and client 110. After intercepting network content, suspicious network content is identified at step 410. Suspicious network content can be detected by heuristic module 130 as module 130 applies heuristics to network content provided by network tap 115. For example, if a heuristic applied by heuristic module 130 identifies a suspicious characteristic in the network content, then the network content is considered suspicious. Exemplary methods for detecting suspicious network content using heuristics and other methods are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,971, filed on Nov. 3, 2008, titled, “Systems and Methods for Detecting Malicious Network Content”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


Virtual environment components and agents can be configured at step 415. Once identified, suspicious network data can be processed in a virtual environment by virtual environment components to determine if the suspicious content should be identified as malicious. In some embodiments, one or more virtual environment agents may be used to monitor the state or behavior of the virtual environment components. Scheduler 140 may configure virtual environment components by retrieving components from virtual environment component pool 145 and configuring the retrieved components to mimic real applications and other software. The agents can be configured to monitor the configured components. Configuring virtual environment components and agents is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 5.


Suspicious network content is accessed at step 420. The suspicious network content includes the content identified at step 410 and may include data packets containing suspicious characteristics as well as related data packets. For example, suspicious network content may include data packets comprising the request which resulted in a response having a suspicious characteristic as well as additional data retrieved by the code containing the suspicious characteristic.


Suspicious network content is replayed using the virtual environment components at step 425. The suspicious network content is replayed within virtual environment 150 by replayer 305. In some embodiments, replaying virtual network content includes processing the suspicious network data by one or more virtual environment components within virtual environment 150. For example with respect to web page content having suspicious content, replayer 305 transmits the suspicious network content containing the suspicious characteristic to be processed by a virtual environment operating system and virtual environment browser application. The actual network content copied at step 405 is provided to the one or more of the virtual environment components illustrated in FIG. 3. More detail for replaying suspicious network content is discussed below with respect to the method of FIG. 6.


After replaying the suspicious network content, the virtual environment components are analyzed to detect malicious network content at step 430. In some embodiments, each virtual environment component is associated with an expected behavior. The expected behavior for a component is compared to the behavior observed for the virtual environment component as the component processed the suspicious network content. If there was a difference between the observed behavior and the expected behavior, the suspicious network content is determined to be malicious network content. More detail for detecting malicious network content by analyzing virtual environment component behavior is discussed in more detail below with respect to the method of FIG. 7.


After detecting malicious network content, the malicious network content is identified and processed at step 435. In some embodiments, an identifier is created for the malicious network content and further processing is performed to minimize damage resulting from the malicious network content. The further processing may include blocking subsequent network data that resembles the identified malicious network content, removing the malicious network content from one or more clients within a computer network, and other processing. Identifying and processing malicious network content is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 8.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for configuring virtual environment components. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 5 provides more detail for step 415 of the method of FIG. 4. First, components in a live environment are identified at step 505. The components may be identified on client 110, server 105, or some other machine (real or virtual) or environment that processes or is affected by network data communicated over network 120. The identification can be performed by scheduler 140 based on information in network data, a reporting server with information for one or more computers exposed to the network content (e.g., computers that transmit or receive the suspicious content), data stored locally on malicious network content detection system 125, or from some other source. Examples of real environment components include a browser application, electronic messaging client, instant messaging client, an operating system, or some other software or hardware on a machine that accesses network content.


Each of steps 510-530 can be performed by scheduler 140 within system 125. Virtual environment components are retrieved for the identified real environment components at step 510. The virtual environment component can be associated with types of applications, operating systems, or other code that can be executed in a real environment. The components can be retrieved by scheduler 140 from virtual environment component pool 145.


The one or more virtual environment components may be configured to mimic a real environment application at step 515. Scheduler 140 can configure the component to mimic the appearance and behavior of the real environment application. The configuration can be such that any suspicious code will not be able to detect a difference between the real component and the virtual environment component application. For example, a virtual environment network application 320 can be configured as Microsoft's “Internet Explorer” or Mozilla's “Firefox” browser application, wherein the component is configured with protocols, user preferences, proxy addresses, encryption preferences, add-in code, and other settings that can correspond to an actual browser application executing on client 110.


In some embodiments, rather than execute code that mimics the application, a copy of the actual application is executed within the virtual environment. Thus, the application is executed within a virtual operating system, configured with settings and parameters associated with a real application.


Virtual environment components can be configured to mimic a real environment operating system at step 520. The virtual environment operating system may be configured to mimic an operating system used to process network data communicated over network 120 by server 104 or client 110. For example, the component can be configured to mimic Microsoft's “Windows” operating system. The configuration may include setting a number of port addresses, settings, and other data.


Virtual environment components may then be configured to mimic the real environment network at step 525. Configuring a virtual environment component network may involve setting up protocols, and other features to mimic network 120. In some embodiments, the network may be configured as a virtual switch, relay station, or some other network system for relaying content data. The method of FIG. 5 then ends.


Virtual environment agents are retrieved and configured at step 530. A virtual environment agent can be implemented as code which monitors component behavior and settings in a virtual environment. The virtual environment agents may detect behaviors and changed settings as they occur and may detect whether the behaviors or setting changes are expected or unexpected. If unexpected, the suspicious network content which implemented or caused the change is identified as malicious. Identifying malicious code is discussed in more detail below.


In some embodiments, a virtual machine hardware component may be configured as well. In this case, the virtual machine hardware may be configured to mimic real hardware ports, settings, and other aspects of the actual hardware used to implement an operating system and application components.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for replaying suspicious network content. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 6 provides more detail for step 425 of the method of FIG. 4. The discussion of the method of FIG. 6 will refer to an example regarding replaying network content using a browser application.


An initial request is replayed from a virtual environment application to a virtual environment operating system at step 605. In some embodiments, the initial request is configured based on network content (for example, consisting of network data packets) copied by network tap 115. For example, network content may be stored for period of time. When one or more network content data packets are determined to be suspicious, all network content associated with the suspicious data packets are retrieved and replayed. For example, network content provided to a network browser application in response to a request may contain suspicious data packets. Once data packets in the response are determined to be suspicious, the request which generated the response as well as other communications occurring after the response was received all retrieved in their entirety.


In some embodiments, the initial request is configured by replayer 305 or scheduler 140 and sent from the virtual environment application 320 to the replayer 305. Transmission of the initial request can result in virtual environment application behavior corresponding to the request. For example, for a network browser application, the request may initiate creating of a cookie associated with the request. The cookie can include a timestamp for and an identifier associated with the request, as well as creation of other data.


Suspicious network content is provided to a requesting virtual environment application at step 610. In response to the initial request in step 605, the network content is transmitted to the virtual environment application to replicate transmission of the network content to the requesting client in a real computing environment. For example, in reply to an HTTP request, the response may include HTTP packets, image data packets, and other content comprising a response to the request. The data packets comprising the response are transmitted to virtual operating system 315 by replayer 305 over virtual environment network 310. Virtual operating system 315 receives the content data, optionally processes the data, determines which virtual environment application that will receive the data, and “transmits” the content data to the virtual environment application. For a virtual network browser application, the content data is transmitted to the browser application to be loaded as a web page or other content.


In some embodiments, the network content is not provided to a virtual environment operating system, but rather directly to the virtual environment application.


The suspicious network content is then processed by the virtual environment application at step 615. For example, a virtual environment browser application may load web page data and image data, execute a script, or provide flash video as included in the response data packets.


When the received network content contains code that is malicious (although it may not yet be identified as malicious before it is executed), the content is processed by the virtual environment application just as it would be when the network content and malicious code would be executed by a real application. For example, malicious content may consist of code consisting of an executable. When executed by the virtual environment browser application, the executable code may attempt to transmit a message to a server, retrieve data within the local environment, change a setting in the virtual environment browser application, or perform some other operation.


While processing the suspicious network content, the virtual environment application, operating system, network and other virtual environment components are monitored by one or more virtual environment agents 330 at step 620. As suspicious network data is “replayed” by processing the network data by the virtual environment components, the behavior of each component can be detected, logged, stored, reported and/or otherwise monitored by an agent. One agent may monitor a single component or multiple components.


For example, a virtual environment agent may detect behavior in a virtual environment browser application. When the virtual environment browser receives and processes suspicious content data, the browser application may execute executable code within the data. The executable code may attempt to transmit a message over the virtual network (i.e., to replayer 305) improperly. For example, the executable may attempt to send a message directly to a server instead of using a proxy address specified by the virtual environment browser application. A virtual environment agent monitoring the browser application may detect all requests sent by the virtual browser application, and thereby detect the improper request which did not go to the proxy address.


A virtual environment agent may also detect changes to an operating system which are improper. For example, when executed by a virtual environment application, an executable or other code in received network content may change or attempt to change an operating system setting, value, or otherwise change the virtual environment operating system. The virtual environment agent may detect the change or attempted change by intercepting or monitoring all changes to the virtual environment operating system. As another example, the operating system may receive data to be stored. The data may comprise an executable, which may attempt to access information, control an application, or perform some other function. When data received by the operating system for storage is an executable or other executable code, the execution of the data is monitored by the agent to determine the effects of the data execution.


When monitoring data, a virtual environment agent may record information regarding the effects and identification of the suspicious network data when the data is being processed in the virtual environment. For example, the virtual environment agent may identify application and operating system settings and values affected by the suspicious network content, values before and after they are affected during processing of the suspicious network content, changes to processes such as an operating system “start-up” process, and other changes. The virtual environment agent may also identify a request made by the suspicious network content, including requests to transmit data over a network, requests for local data access, and other requests. This and other data may be stored and/or reported by the virtual environment agent for later processing.



FIG. 7 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting malicious network content. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 7 provides more detail for step 430 of the method of FIG. 4 and is performed by scheduler 140. First, expected behavior for a virtual environment component such as an application, operating system and/or network is accessed at step 705. The expected behavior data can be determined from stored behavior patterns associated with each component. The behavior patterns may be accessed locally or remotely by scheduler 140. For example, a stored behavior pattern for a virtual environment network browser can indicate that all requests to transmit over a network should be directed towards a proxy address specified by the virtual environment network browser. A stored behavior pattern for an operating system can indicate parameter values that should not be changed as well as code that should be invoked when attempting to change a particular parameter.


The actual behavior pattern of the virtual environment application or operating system is then compared with the expected behavior pattern for the application or operating system at step 710. The actual behavior may be retrieved from data stored by one or more virtual environment agents 330. For example, the expected behavior for transmitting a request by a virtual environment network browser can include sending a content request to a proxy address set within the network browser settings. The actual behavior may include a content request initiated by executable code in the suspicious network content that attempts to transmit a network request directly.


If a difference is detected between the actual behavior and expected behavior at step 715, the suspicious network content is identified and processed as malicious network content at step 720. Identifying and processing malicious network content is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 8. After identifying and processing the malicious network content, the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 725. In some embodiments, the suspicious network data is flagged to be identified and processed later and the operation of the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 725.


If no difference is detected between the actual behavior and expected behavior at step 715, the actual behavior for a virtual environment operating system is compared to the expected behavior for the virtual environment operating system at step 725. For example, the expected behavior may involve a particular process changing an operating system parameter value, when the actual behavior may attempt to change the operating system parameter value without using the particular process. The actual behavior may involve an attempt to change the settings by code executed by an application. If any difference is detected between the actual behavior and the expected behavior for the virtual environment operating system, the suspicious network data associated with the actual behavior is identified and processed as malicious network content at step 735 and the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 740. If no difference is detected, the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 740.


The actual behavior is compared with expected behavior for a virtual environment network at step 740. If any difference is detected between the actual behavior and the expected behavior, the network data associated with the behavior is identified and processed as malicious network content and the process of FIG. 7 then ends. If no difference is detected, the suspicious network data is not identified as malicious network content.


In some embodiments, scheduler 140 can detect malicious content from the behavior of a virtual environment application, virtual environment operating system, or virtual environment network “on the fly” or instantly during replay of the suspicious content in the virtual environment rather than waiting until suspicious content replay has been completed. As suspicious content is replayed, scheduler 140 may compare each incremental behavior of a virtual environment application, operating system, or network to the corresponding next expected incremental behavior. If the next actual incremental behavior does not match the next expected incremental behavior, the suspicious content responsible for the actual behavior is immediately identified as malicious network content and the malicious network content is processed. By comparing the expected behavior and actual behavior during replay rather than after replay has completed, malicious network content can be identified during the replay of the suspicious content (i.e., “on the fly”) and subsequent occurrences of the malicious network content can be detected more quickly.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for identifying and processing malicious network content. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 8 provides more detail for step 435 of the method of FIG. 4. First, an identifier is created for malicious network content at step 805. The identifier may be generated at least in part based on information within the malicious network data.


Network content data associated with malicious network content is then collected at step 810. The collected network content data associated with the malicious network content may include the data packets that include the identified malicious network content, code retrieved by the malicious network content, source information that provided the malicious network content, and other data.


After collecting network content data, a heuristic is generated to identify the subsequent malicious network content associated with the malicious content data at step 815. The heuristic is generated such that it may identify network data copied and provided by network tap 115. In some embodiments, the heuristic is a signature of the network content data. In some embodiments, the signature can include or be derived from data packets comprising the malicious network data, an identification of the application that processed the malicious data, a byte sequence of the malicious data, and other data that is capable of identifying the malicious network data within a stream of network data received over a network.


The generated heuristic is then provided to heuristic module 130 within system 125 at step 820. Once provided to heuristic module 130, the heuristic module 130 may apply the heuristic to network data retrieved by network tap 115 and provided to malicious network content detection system 125.


In some embodiments, a signature may be generated immediately upon detecting the malicious network content, such that the signature can be applied to subsequent network content with minimal delay. Generating and applying the signature immediately against subsequent network content enables the present system to provide real-time detection and protection against malicious network content. For example, if a virtual environment agent 330 detects that network content improperly changes a virtual environment operating system setting, the agent, scheduler, or heuristic module (or a combination of these) may generate a signature for the corresponding network content. The heuristic module may then apply the signature to subsequent network traffic copied by network tap 115. If any network content in subsequent network traffic matches the signature, the subsequent network traffic can be blocked or otherwise contained without affecting client 110.


In addition to providing heuristics against subsequent or future malicious network content, measures may be taken to remove the malicious network content from computing systems which have already been infected by the content. Script code is created for disinfecting live environment components at step 825. The script code is generated for the purpose of restoring a real environment component from damage caused by the malicious network content. The created script code is then distributed and executed among computers suspected of receiving the malicious network content at step 830.


Identifying and processing malicious network content is further discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,971, filed on Nov. 3, 2008, entitled, “Systems and Methods for Detecting Malicious Network Content”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection device. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 9 provides more detail for system 125 in FIG. 1. The malicious network content detection system comprises at least one or more processors 905, memory system 910, and storage system 915, each of which can be coupled to a data bus 920. In some embodiments, data bus 920 may be implemented as one or more data buses. The malicious network content detection system may also comprise a communication network interface 925, an input/output (I/O) interface 930, and a display interface 935. The communication network interface 925 may couple with the network 120 via a communication medium 940. In some embodiments, the malicious network content detection system may couple to a network tap, such as the network tap 115, which in turn couples with the communication network 120. The bus 920 provides communications between the communications network interface 925, the processor 905, the memory system 910, the storage system 915, the I/O interface 930, and the display interface 935.


The communications network interface 925 may communicate with other digital devices (not shown) via the communications medium 540. The processor 905 executes instructions which may be stored on a processor readable storage medium. The memory system 910 may store data permanently or temporarily. Some examples of the memory system 910 include RAM and ROM. The storage system 915 also permanently or temporarily stores data. Some examples of the storage system 915 are hard disks and disk drives. The I/O interface 930 may include any device that can receive input and provide output to a user. The I/O interface 930 may include, but is not limited to, a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen, a keypad, a biosensor, a compact disc (CD) drive, a digital versatile disc (DVD) drive, optical disk drive, or a floppy disk drive. The display interface 935 may include an interface configured to support a display, monitor, or screen. In some embodiments, the malicious network content detection system comprises a graphical user interface to be displayed to a user over a monitor in order to allow the user to control the malicious network content detection system.


The foregoing detailed description of the technology herein has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the technology to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The described embodiments were chosen in order to best explain the principles of the technology and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the technology in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the technology be defined by the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A computer implemented method for detecting malicious network content by a system, comprising: receiving content detected to be suspicious;configuring a virtual environment to operate as a virtual machine by at least selecting one or more virtual environment components, operating as part of the virtual environment, based on information within the suspicious content, the one or more virtual environment components include a virtual environment operating system and a virtual environment application that mimic performance characteristics of corresponding components of a client device;processing the suspicious content by a virtual environment component of the one or more virtual environment components; andidentifying the suspicious content as including potential malicious content based on an agent monitoring one or more behaviors associated with the virtual environment component and for changes to settings of the virtual environment component that occur when processing the suspicious content within the virtual environment; andgenerating and distributing information for repairing damage to one or more digital devices caused by the potential malicious content, wherein the one or more digital devices are suspected of receiving the potential malicious content.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the suspicious content includes one or more data packets associated with a suspicious characteristic.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the received content comprises a plurality of related data packets.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the virtual environment application includes information that, when processed by a processor within the system, operates as a browser application.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the virtual environment operating system includes an operating system executed within the virtual environment.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the identifying of the suspicious content comprises monitoring changes to the virtual environment operating system, the suspicious network-content identified as malicious content based on detected improper changes to the virtual environment operating system.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the processing of the suspicious content includes determining that an observed behavior of the virtual environment component differs from an expected behavior of the virtual environment component.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the virtual environment component operates as a virtual machine and is obtained from a virtual environment component pool including a plurality of virtual machines.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein each of the one or more virtual environment components operates as one or more virtual machines and is retrieved from a plurality of virtual machines with different configurations stored within the system.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the configuring of the virtual environment comprises either (i) setting one or more port addresses for the virtual environment operating system or (ii) selecting settings of the virtual environment application including an electronic messaging application.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the configuring of the virtual environment further comprises configuring a plurality of setting that correspond to settings for a browser application, the plurality of settings include one or more of (1) user preferences, (2) proxy addresses, or (3) encryption preferences.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the processing of the suspicious content comprises (1) processing the suspicious content by the virtual environment component, and (2) monitoring one or more behaviors of the virtual environment component based on the processing of the suspicious content.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the processing of the suspicious content comprises (1) processing the suspicious content by the virtual environment application, and (2) monitoring setting changes of the virtual environment application based on the processing of the suspicious content.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the identifying of the suspicious content comprises determining that the changes to the settings of the virtual environment application are improper based on detecting an improper procedure in changing the settings.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the identifying of the suspicious content includes detecting improper changes to the virtual environment operating system that comprises (1) a setting of the virtual environment operating system that is changed to an improper value or (2) a setting of the virtual environment operating system that is changed in accordance with an improper procedure.
  • 16. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium deployed within a controller and having stored thereon instructions executable by a processor for performing operations comprising: receiving network content detected to be suspicious;configuring a virtual environment to operate as a virtual machine by at least selecting one or more virtual environment components, operating as part of the virtual environment, based on information within the suspicious network content, the one or more virtual environment components include a virtual environment operating system and a virtual environment application that mimic performance characteristics of corresponding components of a client device;processing the suspicious network content by the virtual environment component;identifying the suspicious network content as including malicious network content based on an agent monitoring at least one or more behaviors associated with the virtual environment component and for changes to settings of the virtual environment component that occur when processing the suspicious network content within the virtual environment; andgenerating and distributing information for repairing damage to one or more digital devices caused by the malicious network content, wherein the one or more digital devices are suspected of receiving the malicious network content.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the network content comprises a plurality of related data packets.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the configuring of the virtual environment component further comprises configuring the virtual environment application that operates as a browser application in combination with a virtual environment operating system implemented within the virtual environment component.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the virtual environment operating system includes information that, when processed by the processor within a system, appears as and performs operations associated with an operating system, the virtual environment operating system supporting communications with a replayer that controls communications to the virtual environment operating system and the virtual environment application.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the virtual environment operating system includes an operating system executed within the virtual environment.
  • 21. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the configuring of the virtual environment comprises setting one or more port addresses for the virtual environment operating system of the virtual environment component.
  • 22. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the processing of the suspicious network content by comprises (1) processing the suspicious network content, and (2) monitoring the one or more behaviors associated with the virtual environment component based on the processing of the suspicious network content by the virtual environment component.
  • 23. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 22, wherein the identifying of the suspicious network content comprises determining that at least one of the one or more monitored behaviors of the virtual environment component differs from an expected behavior of the virtual environment component.
  • 24. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein: the processing of the suspicious network content based on execution of the instructions by the processor comprises (1) processing the suspicious network content by the virtual environment component, and (2) monitoring setting changes of the virtual environment component based on the processing of the suspicious network content; andthe identifying of the suspicious network content, based on execution of the instructions by the processor, comprises determining that the changes in the settings of the virtual environment component are improper based on conducting an improper procedure in changing the settings.
  • 25. A system for detecting malicious network content, comprising: a processor; anda memory that includes software includingone or more software modules adapted, when executed by the processor, to (i) receive content detected to be suspicious, (ii) configure a virtual environment to operate as a virtual machine by at least selecting one or more virtual environment components, operating as part of the virtual environment, based on information within the suspicious content, the one or more virtual environment components include a virtual environment operating system and a virtual environment application that mimic performance characteristics of corresponding components of a client device, and (iii) processing the suspicious content by a virtual environment component of the one or more virtual environment components, and an agent configured, when executed by the processor, to identify the suspicious content as potential malicious content based on at least monitoring one or more behaviors associated with the virtual environment component and for changes to settings of the virtual environment component that occur when processing the suspicious network content within the virtual environment,wherein the one or more software modules being further adapted, when executed by the processor, to generate and distribute information for repairing damage to one or more digital devices caused by the potential malicious content, wherein the one or more digital devices are suspected of receiving the potential malicious content.
  • 26. The system of claim 25, wherein the agent monitors the one or more behaviors by detecting changes to the virtual environment component of the one or more virtual environment components operating as part of virtual environment.
  • 27. The system of claim 25, wherein the agent detects changes to the virtual environment operating system.
  • 28. The system of claim 26, wherein the agent is configured to detect changes to the virtual environment by at least detecting changes to the settings of the virtual environment application that are improper based on the changes to the settings being conducted in association with ban improper procedure.
  • 29. The system of claim 25, wherein a scheduler, being one of the one or more software modules, retrieves the virtual environment component that corresponds to a browser application.
  • 30. The system of claim 25, wherein the one or more virtual environment components are obtained from a virtual environment component pool stored in a second memory different from the memory, the virtual environment component pool comprises a plurality of virtual environment components corresponding to a plurality of virtual machines with different configurations.
  • 31. The system of claim 25, wherein the one or more software modules to configure the virtual environment by at least setting one or more port addresses for the virtual environment operating system partially forming the virtual environment.
  • 32. The system of claim 25, wherein the one or more software modules configure the virtual environment by at least configuring settings for a browser application corresponding to the virtual execution application partially forming the virtual environment.
  • 33. The system of claim 25, wherein the agent is configured to detect changes to the virtual environment by at least determining that one or more monitored behaviors associated with the virtual environment differ from an expected behavior of the virtual environment.
  • 34. A computer implemented method for detecting malicious network content by a system, comprising: receiving content detected to be suspicious;configuring a virtual machine including one or more virtual environment components that are selected based, at least in part, on information within the suspicious content, the one or more virtual environment components include a virtual environment operating system and a virtual environment application that mimic performance characteristics of corresponding components of a destination device;processing the suspicious content by the virtual machine;identifying the suspicious content as including potential malicious content based on an agent monitoring one or more behaviors associated with the virtual environment component and for changes to settings of the virtual environment component that occur when processing the suspicious content within the virtual environment; andgenerating and distributing information for repairing damage to one or more digital devices caused by the potential malicious content, wherein the one or more digital devices are suspected of receiving the potential malicious content.
  • 35. The method of claim 34, wherein the virtual machine is configured by a scheduler.
  • 36. The method of claim 34, wherein the one or more behaviors include a crashing of the system, a performance of illegal operations by the virtual machine, a performance of abnormal operations, or an allowance of access of data to an unauthorized user.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/359,252 filed on Jan. 23, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,793,787, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (715)
Number Name Date Kind
4292580 Ott et al. Sep 1981 A
5175732 Hendel et al. Dec 1992 A
5319776 Hile et al. Jun 1994 A
5440723 Arnold et al. Aug 1995 A
5490249 Miller Feb 1996 A
5657473 Killean et al. Aug 1997 A
5802277 Cowlard Sep 1998 A
5842002 Schnurer Nov 1998 A
5960170 Chen et al. Sep 1999 A
5978917 Chi Nov 1999 A
5983348 Ji Nov 1999 A
6088803 Tso et al. Jul 2000 A
6092194 Touboul Jul 2000 A
6094677 Capek Jul 2000 A
6108799 Boulay et al. Aug 2000 A
6154844 Touboul et al. Nov 2000 A
6269330 Cidon et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272641 Ji Aug 2001 B1
6279113 Vaidya Aug 2001 B1
6298445 Shostack et al. Oct 2001 B1
6357008 Nachenberg Mar 2002 B1
6424627 Sørhaug et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442696 Wray et al. Aug 2002 B1
6484315 Ziese Nov 2002 B1
6487666 Shanklin et al. Nov 2002 B1
6493756 O'Brien et al. Dec 2002 B1
6550012 Villa et al. Apr 2003 B1
6775657 Baker Aug 2004 B1
6831893 Ben Nun et al. Dec 2004 B1
6832367 Choi et al. Dec 2004 B1
6895550 Kanchirayappa et al. May 2005 B2
6898632 Gordy et al. May 2005 B2
6907396 Muttik et al. Jun 2005 B1
6941348 Petry et al. Sep 2005 B2
6971097 Wallman Nov 2005 B1
6981279 Arnold et al. Dec 2005 B1
7007107 Ivehenko et al. Feb 2006 B1
7028179 Anderson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7043757 Hoefelmeyer et al. May 2006 B2
7058822 Edery et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069316 Gryaznov Jun 2006 B1
7080407 Zhao et al. Jul 2006 B1
7080408 Pak Jul 2006 B1
7093002 Wolff et al. Aug 2006 B2
7093239 van der Made Aug 2006 B1
7096498 Judge Aug 2006 B2
7100201 Izatt Aug 2006 B2
7107617 Hursey et al. Sep 2006 B2
7159149 Spiegel et al. Jan 2007 B2
7213260 Judge May 2007 B2
7231667 Jordan Jun 2007 B2
7240364 Branscomb et al. Jul 2007 B1
7240368 Roesch et al. Jul 2007 B1
7243371 Kasper et al. Jul 2007 B1
7249175 Donaldson Jul 2007 B1
7251215 Turner et al. Jul 2007 B1
7287278 Liang Oct 2007 B2
7308716 Danford et al. Dec 2007 B2
7328453 Merkle, Jr. et al. Feb 2008 B2
7346486 Ivancic et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356736 Natvig Apr 2008 B2
7386888 Liang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392542 Bucher Jun 2008 B2
7418729 Szor Aug 2008 B2
7428300 Drew et al. Sep 2008 B1
7441272 Durham et al. Oct 2008 B2
7448084 Apap et al. Nov 2008 B1
7458098 Judge et al. Nov 2008 B2
7464404 Carpenter et al. Dec 2008 B2
7464407 Nakae et al. Dec 2008 B2
7467408 O'Toole, Jr. Dec 2008 B1
7478428 Thomlinson Jan 2009 B1
7480773 Reed Jan 2009 B1
7487543 Arnold et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496960 Chen et al. Feb 2009 B1
7496961 Zimmer et al. Feb 2009 B2
7519990 Xie Apr 2009 B1
7523493 Liang et al. Apr 2009 B2
7530104 Thrower et al. May 2009 B1
7540025 Tzadikario May 2009 B2
7546638 Anderson et al. Jun 2009 B2
7565550 Liang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7568233 Szor et al. Jul 2009 B1
7584455 Ball Sep 2009 B2
7603715 Costa et al. Oct 2009 B2
7607171 Marsden et al. Oct 2009 B1
7639714 Stolfo et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644441 Schmid et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657419 van der Made Feb 2010 B2
7676841 Sobchuk et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698548 Shelest et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707633 Danford et al. Apr 2010 B2
7712136 Sprosts et al. May 2010 B2
7730011 Deninger et al. Jun 2010 B1
7739740 Nachenberg et al. Jun 2010 B1
7779463 Stolfo et al. Aug 2010 B2
7784097 Stolfo et al. Aug 2010 B1
7832008 Kraemer Nov 2010 B1
7836502 Zhao et al. Nov 2010 B1
7849506 Dansey et al. Dec 2010 B1
7854007 Sprosts et al. Dec 2010 B2
7869073 Oshima Jan 2011 B2
7877803 Enstone et al. Jan 2011 B2
7904959 Sidiroglou et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908660 Bahl Mar 2011 B2
7930738 Petersen Apr 2011 B1
7937387 Frazier et al. May 2011 B2
7937761 Bennett May 2011 B1
7949849 Lowe et al. May 2011 B2
7996556 Raghavan et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996836 McCorkendale et al. Aug 2011 B1
7996904 Chiueh et al. Aug 2011 B1
7996905 Arnold et al. Aug 2011 B2
8006305 Aziz Aug 2011 B2
8010667 Zhang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8020206 Hubbard et al. Sep 2011 B2
8028338 Schneider et al. Sep 2011 B1
8042184 Batenin Oct 2011 B1
8045094 Teragawa Oct 2011 B2
8045458 Alperovitch et al. Oct 2011 B2
8069484 McMillan et al. Nov 2011 B2
8087086 Lai et al. Dec 2011 B1
8171553 Aziz et al. May 2012 B2
8176049 Deninger et al. May 2012 B2
8176480 Spertus May 2012 B1
8201246 Wu et al. Jun 2012 B1
8204984 Aziz et al. Jun 2012 B1
8214905 Doukhvalov et al. Jul 2012 B1
8220055 Kennedy Jul 2012 B1
8225288 Miller et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225373 Kraemer Jul 2012 B2
8233882 Rogel Jul 2012 B2
8234640 Fitzgerald et al. Jul 2012 B1
8234709 Viljoen et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239944 Nachenberg et al. Aug 2012 B1
8260914 Ranjan Sep 2012 B1
8266091 Gubin et al. Sep 2012 B1
8286251 Eker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291499 Aziz et al. Oct 2012 B2
8307435 Mann et al. Nov 2012 B1
8307443 Wang et al. Nov 2012 B2
8312545 Tuvell et al. Nov 2012 B2
8321936 Green et al. Nov 2012 B1
8321941 Tuvell et al. Nov 2012 B2
8332571 Edwards, Sr. Dec 2012 B1
8365286 Poston Jan 2013 B2
8365297 Parshin et al. Jan 2013 B1
8370938 Daswani et al. Feb 2013 B1
8370939 Zaitsev et al. Feb 2013 B2
8375444 Aziz et al. Feb 2013 B2
8381299 Stolfo et al. Feb 2013 B2
8402529 Green et al. Mar 2013 B1
8464340 Ahn et al. Jun 2013 B2
8479174 Chiriac Jul 2013 B2
8479276 Vaystikh et al. Jul 2013 B1
8479291 Bodke Jul 2013 B1
8510827 Leake et al. Aug 2013 B1
8510828 Guo et al. Aug 2013 B1
8510842 Amit et al. Aug 2013 B2
8516478 Edwards et al. Aug 2013 B1
8516590 Ranadive et al. Aug 2013 B1
8516593 Aziz Aug 2013 B2
8522348 Chen et al. Aug 2013 B2
8528086 Aziz Sep 2013 B1
8533824 Hutton et al. Sep 2013 B2
8539582 Aziz et al. Sep 2013 B1
8549638 Aziz Oct 2013 B2
8555391 Demir et al. Oct 2013 B1
8561177 Aziz et al. Oct 2013 B1
8566476 Shiffer et al. Oct 2013 B2
8566946 Aziz et al. Oct 2013 B1
8584094 Dadhia et al. Nov 2013 B2
8584234 Sobel et al. Nov 2013 B1
8584239 Aziz et al. Nov 2013 B2
8595834 Xie et al. Nov 2013 B2
8627476 Satish et al. Jan 2014 B1
8635696 Aziz Jan 2014 B1
8682054 Xue et al. Mar 2014 B2
8682812 Ranjan Mar 2014 B1
8689333 Aziz Apr 2014 B2
8695096 Zhang Apr 2014 B1
8713631 Pavlyushchik Apr 2014 B1
8713681 Silberman et al. Apr 2014 B2
8726392 McCorkendale et al. May 2014 B1
8739280 Chess et al. May 2014 B2
8776229 Aziz Jul 2014 B1
8782792 Bodke Jul 2014 B1
8789172 Stolfo et al. Jul 2014 B2
8789178 Kejriwal et al. Jul 2014 B2
8793278 Frazier et al. Jul 2014 B2
8793787 Ismael et al. Jul 2014 B2
8805947 Kuzkin et al. Aug 2014 B1
8806647 Daswani et al. Aug 2014 B1
8832829 Manni et al. Sep 2014 B2
8850570 Ramzan Sep 2014 B1
8850571 Staniford et al. Sep 2014 B2
8881234 Narasimhan et al. Nov 2014 B2
8881271 Butler, II Nov 2014 B2
8881282 Aziz et al. Nov 2014 B1
8898788 Aziz et al. Nov 2014 B1
8935779 Manni et al. Jan 2015 B2
8949257 Shiffer et al. Feb 2015 B2
8984638 Aziz et al. Mar 2015 B1
8990939 Staniford et al. Mar 2015 B2
8990944 Singh et al. Mar 2015 B1
8997219 Staniford et al. Mar 2015 B2
9009822 Ismael et al. Apr 2015 B1
9009823 Ismael et al. Apr 2015 B1
9027135 Aziz May 2015 B1
9071638 Aziz et al. Jun 2015 B1
9104867 Thioux et al. Aug 2015 B1
9106630 Frazier et al. Aug 2015 B2
9106694 Aziz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9118715 Staniford et al. Aug 2015 B2
9159035 Ismael et al. Oct 2015 B1
9171160 Vincent et al. Oct 2015 B2
9176843 Ismael et al. Nov 2015 B1
9189627 Islam Nov 2015 B1
9195829 Goradia et al. Nov 2015 B1
9197664 Aziz et al. Nov 2015 B1
9223972 Vincent et al. Dec 2015 B1
9225740 Ismael et al. Dec 2015 B1
9241010 Bennett et al. Jan 2016 B1
9251343 Vincent Feb 2016 B1
9262635 Paithane et al. Feb 2016 B2
9268936 Butler Feb 2016 B2
9275229 LeMasters Mar 2016 B2
9282109 Aziz et al. Mar 2016 B1
9292686 Ismael et al. Mar 2016 B2
9294501 Mesdaq et al. Mar 2016 B2
9300686 Pidathala et al. Mar 2016 B2
9306796 Muttik Apr 2016 B1
9306960 Aziz Apr 2016 B1
9306974 Aziz et al. Apr 2016 B1
9311479 Manni et al. Apr 2016 B1
9355247 Thioux et al. May 2016 B1
9356944 Aziz May 2016 B1
9363280 Rivlin et al. Jun 2016 B1
9367681 Ismael et al. Jun 2016 B1
9398028 Karandikar et al. Jul 2016 B1
9413781 Cunningham et al. Aug 2016 B2
9426071 Caldejon et al. Aug 2016 B1
9430646 Mushtaq et al. Aug 2016 B1
9432389 Khalid et al. Aug 2016 B1
9438613 Paithane et al. Sep 2016 B1
9438622 Staniford et al. Sep 2016 B1
9438623 Thioux et al. Sep 2016 B1
9459901 Jung et al. Oct 2016 B2
9467460 Otvagin et al. Oct 2016 B1
9483644 Paithane et al. Nov 2016 B1
9495180 Ismael Nov 2016 B2
9497213 Thompson et al. Nov 2016 B2
9507935 Ismael et al. Nov 2016 B2
9516057 Aziz Dec 2016 B2
9519782 Aziz et al. Dec 2016 B2
9536091 Paithane et al. Jan 2017 B2
9537972 Edwards et al. Jan 2017 B1
9560059 Islam Jan 2017 B1
9565202 Kindlund et al. Feb 2017 B1
9591015 Amin et al. Mar 2017 B1
9591020 Aziz Mar 2017 B1
9594904 Jain et al. Mar 2017 B1
9594905 Ismael et al. Mar 2017 B1
9594912 Thioux et al. Mar 2017 B1
9609007 Rivlin et al. Mar 2017 B1
9626509 Khalid et al. Apr 2017 B1
9628498 Aziz et al. Apr 2017 B1
9628507 Haq et al. Apr 2017 B2
9633134 Ross Apr 2017 B2
9635039 Islam et al. Apr 2017 B1
9641546 Manni et al. May 2017 B1
9654485 Neumann May 2017 B1
9661009 Karandikar et al. May 2017 B1
9661018 Aziz May 2017 B1
9674298 Edwards et al. Jun 2017 B1
9680862 Ismael et al. Jun 2017 B2
9690606 Ha et al. Jun 2017 B1
9690933 Singh et al. Jun 2017 B1
9690935 Shiffer et al. Jun 2017 B2
9690936 Malik et al. Jun 2017 B1
9736179 Ismael Aug 2017 B2
9740857 Ismael et al. Aug 2017 B2
9747446 Pidathala et al. Aug 2017 B1
9756074 Aziz et al. Sep 2017 B2
9773112 Rathor et al. Sep 2017 B1
9781144 Otvagin et al. Oct 2017 B1
9787700 Amin et al. Oct 2017 B1
9787706 Otvagin et al. Oct 2017 B1
9792196 Ismael et al. Oct 2017 B1
9824209 Ismael et al. Nov 2017 B1
9824211 Wilson Nov 2017 B2
9824216 Khalid et al. Nov 2017 B1
9825976 Gomez et al. Nov 2017 B1
9825989 Mehra et al. Nov 2017 B1
9838408 Karandikar et al. Dec 2017 B1
9838411 Aziz Dec 2017 B1
9838416 Aziz Dec 2017 B1
9838417 Khalid et al. Dec 2017 B1
9846776 Paithane et al. Dec 2017 B1
9876701 Caldejon et al. Jan 2018 B1
9888016 Amin et al. Feb 2018 B1
9888019 Pidathala et al. Feb 2018 B1
9910988 Vincent et al. Mar 2018 B1
9912644 Cunningham Mar 2018 B2
9912681 Ismael et al. Mar 2018 B1
9912684 Aziz et al. Mar 2018 B1
9912691 Mesdaq et al. Mar 2018 B2
9912698 Thioux et al. Mar 2018 B1
9916440 Paithane et al. Mar 2018 B1
9921978 Chan et al. Mar 2018 B1
9934376 Ismael Apr 2018 B1
9934381 Kindlund et al. Apr 2018 B1
9946568 Ismael et al. Apr 2018 B1
9954890 Staniford et al. Apr 2018 B1
9973531 Thioux May 2018 B1
10002252 Ismael et al. Jun 2018 B2
10019338 Goradia et al. Jul 2018 B1
10019573 Silberman et al. Jul 2018 B2
10025691 Ismael et al. Jul 2018 B1
10025927 Khalid et al. Jul 2018 B1
10027689 Rathor et al. Jul 2018 B1
10027690 Aziz et al. Jul 2018 B2
10027696 Rivlin et al. Jul 2018 B1
10033747 Paithane et al. Jul 2018 B1
10033748 Cunningham et al. Jul 2018 B1
10033753 Islam et al. Jul 2018 B1
10033759 Kabra et al. Jul 2018 B1
10050998 Singh Aug 2018 B1
10068091 Aziz et al. Sep 2018 B1
10075455 Zafar et al. Sep 2018 B2
10083302 Paithane et al. Sep 2018 B1
10084813 Eyada Sep 2018 B2
10089461 Ha et al. Oct 2018 B1
10097573 Aziz Oct 2018 B1
10104102 Neumann Oct 2018 B1
10108446 Steinberg et al. Oct 2018 B1
10121000 Rivlin et al. Nov 2018 B1
10122746 Manni et al. Nov 2018 B1
10133863 Bu et al. Nov 2018 B2
10133866 Kumar et al. Nov 2018 B1
10146810 Shiffer et al. Dec 2018 B2
10148693 Singh et al. Dec 2018 B2
10165000 Aziz et al. Dec 2018 B1
10169585 Pilipenko et al. Jan 2019 B1
10176321 Abbasi et al. Jan 2019 B2
10181029 Ismael et al. Jan 2019 B1
10191861 Steinberg et al. Jan 2019 B1
10192052 Singh et al. Jan 2019 B1
10198574 Thioux et al. Feb 2019 B1
10200384 Mushtaq et al. Feb 2019 B1
10210329 Malik et al. Feb 2019 B1
10216927 Steinberg Feb 2019 B1
10218740 Mesdaq et al. Feb 2019 B1
10242185 Goradia Mar 2019 B1
20010005889 Albrecht Jun 2001 A1
20010047326 Broadbent et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020018903 Kokubo et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038430 Edwards et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020091819 Melchione et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095607 Lin-Hendel Jul 2002 A1
20020116627 Tarbotton et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020144156 Copeland Oct 2002 A1
20020162015 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020166063 Lachman et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169952 DiSanto et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184528 Shevenell et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188887 Largman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194490 Halperin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030021728 Shame et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030074578 Ford et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030084318 Schertz May 2003 A1
20030101381 Mateev et al. May 2003 A1
20030115483 Liang Jun 2003 A1
20030188190 Aaron et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191957 Hypponen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200460 Morota et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212902 van der Made Nov 2003 A1
20030229801 Kouznetsov et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030237000 Denton et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003323 Bennett et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006473 Mills et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015712 Szor Jan 2004 A1
20040019832 Arnold et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040047356 Bauer Mar 2004 A1
20040083408 Spiegel et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088581 Brawn et al. May 2004 A1
20040093513 Cantrell et al. May 2004 A1
20040111531 Staniford et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111578 Goodman Jun 2004 A1
20040117478 Triulzi et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117624 Brandt et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128355 Chao et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040165588 Pandya Aug 2004 A1
20040236963 Danford et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243349 Greifeneder et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249911 Alkhatib et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040255161 Cavanaugh Dec 2004 A1
20040268147 Wiederin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005159 Oliphant Jan 2005 A1
20050021740 Bar et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033960 Vialen et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033989 Poletto et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050050148 Mohammadioun et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050086523 Zimmer et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091513 Mitomo et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091533 Omote et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091652 Ross et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050108562 Khazan et al. May 2005 A1
20050114663 Cornell et al. May 2005 A1
20050125195 Brendel Jun 2005 A1
20050149726 Joshi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050157662 Bingham et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050172115 Bodorin Aug 2005 A1
20050183143 Anderholm et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050201297 Peikari Sep 2005 A1
20050210533 Copeland et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050238005 Chen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240781 Gassoway Oct 2005 A1
20050262562 Gassoway Nov 2005 A1
20050265331 Stolfo Dec 2005 A1
20050268338 Made Dec 2005 A1
20050283839 Cowburn Dec 2005 A1
20060010495 Cohen et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015416 Hoffman et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015715 Anderson Jan 2006 A1
20060015747 Van de Ven Jan 2006 A1
20060021029 Brickell et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060021054 Costa et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031476 Mathes et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047665 Neil Mar 2006 A1
20060070130 Costea et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075496 Carpenter et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095968 Portolani et al. May 2006 A1
20060101516 Sudaharan et al. May 2006 A1
20060101517 Banzhof et al. May 2006 A1
20060117385 Mester et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123477 Raghavan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143709 Brooks et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060150249 Gassen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161983 Cothrell et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161987 Levy-Yurista Jul 2006 A1
20060161989 Reshef et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060164199 Glide et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173992 Weber et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179147 Tran et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184632 Marino et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060191010 Benjamin Aug 2006 A1
20060221956 Narayan et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060236393 Kramer et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242709 Seinfeld et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060248519 Jaeger et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060248582 Panjwani et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060251104 Koga Nov 2006 A1
20060288417 Bookbinder et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070006288 Mayfield et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070006313 Porras et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011174 Takaragi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016951 Piccard et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019286 Kikuchi Jan 2007 A1
20070033645 Jones Feb 2007 A1
20070038943 FitzGerald et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070064689 Shin et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074169 Chess et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070094730 Bhikkaji et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101435 Konanka et al. May 2007 A1
20070128855 Cho et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142030 Sinha et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070143827 Nicodemus et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156895 Vuong Jul 2007 A1
20070157180 Tillmann et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070157306 Elrod et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168988 Eisner et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070171824 Ruello et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174915 Gribble et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070192500 Lum Aug 2007 A1
20070192858 Lum Aug 2007 A1
20070198275 Malden et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208822 Wang et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220607 Sprosts et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070240218 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070240219 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070240220 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070240222 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250930 Aziz et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070256132 Oliphant Nov 2007 A2
20070271446 Nakamura Nov 2007 A1
20080005782 Aziz Jan 2008 A1
20080018122 Zierler et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080028463 Dagon et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040710 Chiriac Feb 2008 A1
20080046781 Childs et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080066179 Liu Mar 2008 A1
20080072326 Danford et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077793 Tan et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080080518 Hoeflin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086720 Lekel Apr 2008 A1
20080098476 Syversen Apr 2008 A1
20080120722 Sima et al. May 2008 A1
20080134178 Fitzgerald et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080134334 Kim et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080141376 Clausen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080184367 McMillan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080184373 Traut et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189787 Arnold et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201778 Guo et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080209557 Herley et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215742 Goldszmidt et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222729 Chen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080263665 Ma et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080295172 Bohacek Nov 2008 A1
20080301810 Lehane et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080307524 Singh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313738 Enderby Dec 2008 A1
20080320594 Jiang Dec 2008 A1
20090003317 Kasralikar et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090007100 Field et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090013408 Schipka Jan 2009 A1
20090031423 Liu et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036111 Danford et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090037835 Goldman Feb 2009 A1
20090044024 Oberheide et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044274 Budko et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090064332 Porras et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077666 Chen et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083369 Marmor Mar 2009 A1
20090083855 Apap et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089879 Wang et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094697 Provos et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090113425 Ports et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125976 Wassermann et al. May 2009 A1
20090126015 Monastyrsky et al. May 2009 A1
20090126016 Sobko et al. May 2009 A1
20090133125 Choi et al. May 2009 A1
20090144823 Lamastra et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158430 Borders Jun 2009 A1
20090172815 Gu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187992 Poston Jul 2009 A1
20090193293 Stolfo et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198651 Shiffer et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198670 Shiffer et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198689 Frazier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090199274 Frazier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090199296 Xie et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090228233 Anderson et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241187 Troyansky Sep 2009 A1
20090241190 Todd et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090265692 Godefroid et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271867 Zhang Oct 2009 A1
20090300415 Zhang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090300761 Park et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328185 Berg et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328221 Blumfield et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100005146 Drako et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011205 McKenna Jan 2010 A1
20100017546 Poo et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030996 Butler, II Feb 2010 A1
20100031353 Thomas et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037314 Perdisci et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100043073 Kuwamura Feb 2010 A1
20100054278 Stolfo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100058474 Hicks Mar 2010 A1
20100064044 Nonoyama Mar 2010 A1
20100077481 Polyakov et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100083376 Pereira et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100115621 Staniford et al. May 2010 A1
20100132038 Zaitsev May 2010 A1
20100154056 Smith et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100180344 Malyshev et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100192223 Ismael et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100220863 Dupaquis et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235831 Dittmer Sep 2010 A1
20100251104 Massand Sep 2010 A1
20100281102 Chinta et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100281541 Stolfo et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100281542 Stolfo et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287260 Peterson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299754 Amit et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306173 Frank Dec 2010 A1
20110004737 Greenebaum Jan 2011 A1
20110025504 Lyon et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110041179 St Hlberg Feb 2011 A1
20110047594 Mahaffey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047620 Mahaffey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110055907 Narasimhan et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078794 Manni et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110093951 Aziz Apr 2011 A1
20110099620 Stavrou et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099633 Aziz Apr 2011 A1
20110099635 Silberman et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110113231 Kaminsky May 2011 A1
20110145918 Jung et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145920 Mahaffey et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145934 Abramovici et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110167493 Song et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110167494 Bowen et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110173213 Frazier et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110173460 Ito et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110219449 St. Neitzel et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110219450 McDougal et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225624 Sawhney et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225655 Niemela et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110247072 Staniford et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110265182 Peinado et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110289582 Kejriwal et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110302587 Nishikawa et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110307954 Melnik et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110307955 Kaplan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110307956 Yermakov et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110314546 Aziz et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120023593 Puder et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120054869 Yen et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066698 Yanoo Mar 2012 A1
20120079596 Thomas Mar 2012 A1
20120084859 Radinsky et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120096553 Srivastava et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120110667 Zubrilin et al. May 2012 A1
20120117652 Manni et al. May 2012 A1
20120121154 Xue et al. May 2012 A1
20120124426 Maybee et al. May 2012 A1
20120174186 Aziz et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120174196 Bhogavilli et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120174218 McCoy et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120198279 Schroeder Aug 2012 A1
20120210423 Friedrichs et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120222121 Staniford et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120255015 Sahita et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120255017 Sallam Oct 2012 A1
20120260342 Dube et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120266244 Green et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120278886 Luna Nov 2012 A1
20120297489 Dequevy Nov 2012 A1
20120330801 McDougal et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120331553 Aziz et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130014259 Gribble et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130036472 Aziz Feb 2013 A1
20130047257 Aziz Feb 2013 A1
20130074185 McDougal et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130086684 Mohler Apr 2013 A1
20130097699 Balupari et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130097706 Titonis et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130111587 Goel et al. May 2013 A1
20130117852 Stute May 2013 A1
20130117855 Kim et al. May 2013 A1
20130139264 Brinkley et al. May 2013 A1
20130160125 Likhachev et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130160127 Jeong et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130160130 Mendelev et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130160131 Madou et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130167236 Sick Jun 2013 A1
20130174214 Duncan Jul 2013 A1
20130185789 Hagiwara et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185795 Winn et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185798 Saunders et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130191915 Antonakakis et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130196649 Paddon et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227691 Aziz et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130246370 Bartram et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130247186 LeMasters Sep 2013 A1
20130263260 Mahaffey et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130291109 Staniford et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130298243 Kumar et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130318038 Shiffer et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130318073 Shiffer et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325791 Shiffer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325792 Shiffer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325871 Shiffer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325872 Shiffer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140032875 Butler Jan 2014 A1
20140053260 Gupta et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140053261 Gupta et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140130158 Wang et al. May 2014 A1
20140137180 Lukacs et al. May 2014 A1
20140169762 Ryu Jun 2014 A1
20140179360 Jackson et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140181131 Ross Jun 2014 A1
20140189687 Jung et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140189866 Shiffer et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140189882 Jung et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140237600 Silberman et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140280245 Wilson Sep 2014 A1
20140283037 Sikorski et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140283063 Thompson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140328204 Klotsche et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140337836 Ismael Nov 2014 A1
20140344926 Cunningham et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140351935 Shao et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140380473 Bu et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140380474 Paithane et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150007312 Pidathala et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150096022 Vincent et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150096023 Mesdaq et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150096024 Haq et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150096025 Ismael Apr 2015 A1
20150180886 Staniford et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150186645 Aziz et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150199513 Ismael et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150199531 Ismael Jul 2015 A1
20150199532 Ismael Jul 2015 A1
20150220735 Paithane et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150372980 Eyada Dec 2015 A1
20160004869 Ismael et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160006756 Ismael et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160044000 Cunningham Feb 2016 A1
20160127393 Aziz et al. May 2016 A1
20160191547 Zafar et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191550 Ismael et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160261612 Mesdaq et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160285914 Singh et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160301703 Aziz Oct 2016 A1
20160335110 Paithane et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170083703 Abbasi et al. Mar 2017 A1
20180013770 Ismael Jan 2018 A1
20180048660 Paithane et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180121316 Ismael et al. May 2018 A1
20180288077 Siddiqui et al. Oct 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
2439806 Jan 2008 GB
2490431 Oct 2012 GB
0223805 Mar 2002 WO
02006928 Aug 2003 WO
2007117636 Oct 2007 WO
2008041950 Apr 2008 WO
2011084431 Jul 2011 WO
2011112348 Sep 2011 WO
2012075336 Jun 2012 WO
2013067505 May 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (84)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,252, filed Jan. 23, 2009 Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,252, filed Jan. 23, 2009 Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,252, filed Jan. 23, 2009 Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2012.
“Network Security: NetDetector—Network Intrusion Forensic System (NIFS) Whitepaper”, (“NetDetector Whitepaper”), (2003).
“Packet”, Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, (Mar. 2002), 1 page.
“When Virtual is Better Than Real”, IEEEXplore Digital Library, available at, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.isp?reload=true&arnumbe- r=990073, (Dec. 7, 2013).
Abdullah, et al., Visualizing Network Data for Intrusion Detection, 2005 IEEE Workshop on Information Assurance and Security, pp. 100-108.
Adetoye, Adedayo , et al., “Network Intrusion Detection & Response System”, (“Adetoye”), (Sep. 2003).
AltaVista Advanced Search Results. “attack vector identifier”. Http://www.altavista.com/web/results?ltag=ody&pg=aq&aqmode=aqa=Event+Orch- estrator . . . , (Accessed on Sep. 15, 2009).
AltaVista Advanced Search Results. “Event Orchestrator”. Http://www.altavista.com/web/results?ltag=ody&pg=aq&aqmode=aqa=Event+Orch- esrator . . . , (Accessed on Sep. 3, 2009).
Aura, Tuomas, “Scanning electronic documents for personally identifiable information”, Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on Privacy in electronic society. ACM, 2006.
Baecher, “The Nepenthes Platform: An Efficient Approach to collect Malware”, Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (2006), pp. 165-184.
Bayer, et al., “Dynamic Analysis of Malicious Code”, J Comput Virol, Springer-Verlag, France., (2006), pp. 67-77.
Boubalos, Chris , “extracting syslog data out of raw pcap dumps, seclists.org, Honeypots mailing list archives”, available at http://seclists.org/honeypots/2003/q2/319 (“Boubalos”), (Jun. 5, 2003).
Chaudet, C. , et al., “Optimal Positioning of Active and Passive Monitoring Devices”, International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Conference on Emerging Network Experiment and Technology, CoNEXT '05, Toulousse, France, (Oct. 2005), pp. 71-82.
Chen, P. M. and Noble, B. D., “When Virtual is Better Than Real, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science”, University of Michigan (“Chen”).
Cisco, Configuring the Catalyst Switched Port Analyzer (SPAN) (“Cisco”), (1992-2003).
Cohen, M.I. , “PyFlag—An advanced network forensic framework”, Digital investigation 5, Elsevier, (2008), pp. S112-S120.
Crandall, J.R. , et al., “Minos:Control Data Attack Prevention Orthogonal to Memory Model”, 37th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, Portland, Oregon, (Dec. 2004).
Deutsch, P. , “Zlib compressed data format specification version 3.3” RFC 1950, (1996).
Distler, “Malware Analysis: An Introduction”, SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room, SANS Institute, (2007).
Dunlap, George W. , et al., “ReVirt: Enabling Intrusion Analysis through Virtual-Machine Logging and Replay”, Proceeding of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, USENIX Association, (“Dunlap”), (Dec. 9, 2002).
Excerpt regarding First Printing Date for Merike Kaeo, Designing Network Security (“Kaeo”), (2005).
Filiol, Eric , et al., “Combinatorial Optimisation of Worm Propagation on an Unknown Network”, International Journal of Computer Science 2.2 (2007).
Goel, et al., Reconstructing System State for Intrusion Analysis, Apr. 2008 SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 42 Issue 3, pp. 21-28.
Hjelmvik, Erik , “Passive Network Security Analysis with NetworkMiner”, (IN)Secure, Issue 18, (Oct. 2008), pp. 1-100.
IEEE Xplore Digital Library Sear Results for “detection of unknown computer worms”. Http//ieeexplore.ieee.org/searchresult.jsp?SortField=Score&SortOrder=desc- &ResultC . . . , (Accessed on Aug. 28, 2009).
Kaeo, Merike , “Designing Network Security”, (“Kaeo”), (Nov. 2003).
Kim, H. , et al., “Autograph: Toward Automated, Distributed Worm Signature Detection”, Proceedings of the 13th Usenix Security Symposium (Security 2004), San Diego, (Aug. 2004), pp. 271-286.
King, Samuel T., et al., “Operating System Support for Virtual Machines”, (“King”) (2003).
Krasnyansky, Max , et al., Universal TUN/TAP driver, available at https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tuntap.txt (2002) (“Krasnyansky”).
Kreibich, C. , et al., “Honeycomb-Creating Intrusion Detection Signatures Using Honeypots”, 2nd Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-11), Boston, USA, (2003).
Kristoff, J. , “Botnets, Detection and Mitigation: DNS-Based Techniques”, NU Security Day, (2005), 23 pages.
Liljenstam, Michael , et al., “Simulating Realistic Network Traffic for Worm Warning System Design and Testing”, Institute for Security Technology studies, Dartmouth College (“Liljenstam”), (Oct. 27, 2003).
Marchette, David J., “Computer Intrusion Detection and Network Monitoring: A Statistical Viewpoint”, (“Marchette”), (2001).
Margolis, P.E. , “Random House Webster's ‘Computer & Internet Dictionary 3rd Edition’”, ISBN 0375703519, (Dec. 1998).
Moore, D. , et al., “Internet Quarantine: Requirements for Containing Self-Propagating Code”, INFOCOM, vol. 3, (Mar. 30-Apr. 3, 2003), pp. 1901-1910.
Natvig, Kurt , “SANDBOXII: Internet”, Virus Bulletin Conference, (“Natvig”), (Sep. 2002).
NetBIOS Working Group. Protocol Standard for a NetBIOS Service on a TCP/UDP transport: Concepts and Methods. STD 19, RFC 1001, Mar. 1987.
Newsome, J. , et al., “Dynamic Taint Analysis for Automatic Detection, Analysis, and Signature Generation of Exploits on Commodity Software”, In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Network and Distributed System Security, Symposium (NDSS '05), (Feb. 2005).
Newsome, J. , et al., “Polygraph: Automatically Generating Signatures for Polymorphic Worms”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, (May 2005).
Nojiri, D. , et al., “Cooperation Response Strategies for Large Scale Attack Mitigation”, DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition, vol. 1, (Apr. 22-24, 2003), pp. 293-302.
PCT/US2012/021916 filed Jan. 19, 2012, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 10, 2012.
Reiner Sailer, Enriquillo Valdez, Trent Jaeger, Roonald Perez, Leendert van Doom, John Linwood Griffin, Stefan Berger., sHype: Secure Hypervisor Appraoch to Trusted Virtualized Systems (Feb. 2, 2005) (“Sailer”).
Silicon Defense, “Worm Containment in the Internal Network”, (Mar. 2003), pp. 1-25.
Singh, S. , et al., “Automated Worm Fingerprinting”, Proceedings of the ACM/USENIX Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation, San Francisco, California, (Dec. 2004).
Spitzner, Lance , “Honeypots: Tracking Hackers”, (“Spizner”), (Sep. 17, 2002).
The Sniffers's Guide to Raw Traffic available at: yuba.stanford.edu/.about.casado/pcap/section1.html, (Jan. 6, 2014).
Thomas H. Ptacek, and Timothy N. Newsham , “Insertion, Evasion, and Denial of Service: Eluding Network Intrusion Detection”, Secure Networks, (“Ptacek”), (Jan. 1998).
Venezia, Paul , “NetDetector Captures Intrusions”, InfoWorld Issue 27, (“Venezia”), (Jul. 14, 2003).
Whyte, et al., “DNS-Based Detection of Scanning Works in an Enterprise Network”, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, (Feb. 2005), 15 pages.
Williamson, Matthew M., “Throttling Viruses: Restricting Propagation to Defeat Malicious Mobile Code”, ACSAC Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, (Dec. 2002), pp. 1-9.
Apostolopoulos, George; hassapis, Constantinos; “V-eM: A cluster of Virtual Machines for Robust, Detailed, and High-Performance Network Emulation”, 14th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, Sep. 11-14, 2006, pp. 117-126.
Baldi, Mario; Risso, Fulvio; “A Framework for Rapid Development and Portable Execution of Packet-Handling Applications”, 5th IEEE International Symposium Processing and Information Technology, Dec. 21, 2005, pp. 233-238.
Cisco “Intrusion Prevention for the Cisco ASA 5500-x Series” Data Sheet (2012).
Clark, John, Sylvian Leblanc,and Scott Knight. “Risks associated with usb hardware trojan devices used by insiders.” Systems Conference (SysCon), 2011 IEEE International. IEEE, 2011.
Costa, M. , et al., “Vigilante: End-to-End Containment of Internet Worms”, SOSP '05, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., Brighton U.K., (Oct. 23-26, 2005).
FireEye Malware Analysis & Exchange Network, Malware Protection System, FireEye Inc., 2010.
FireEye Malware Analysis, Modern Malware Forensics, FireEye Inc., 2010.
FireEye v.6.0 Security Target, pp. 1-35, Version 1.1, FireEye Inc., May 2011.
Gibler, Clint, et al. AndroidLeaks: automatically detecting potential privacy leaks in android applications on a large scale. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
Gregg Keizer: “Microsoft's HoneyMonkeys Show Patching Windows Works”, Aug. 8, 2005, XP055143386, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20121022220617/http://www.informationweek- .com/microsofts-honeymonkeys-show-patching-wi/167600716 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2014].
Heng Yin et al, Panorama: Capturing System-Wide Information Flow for Malware Detection and Analysis, Research Showcase @ CMU, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007.
Idika et al., A-Survey-of-Malware-Detection-Techniques, Feb. 2, 2007, Department of Computer Science, Purdue University.
Isohara, Takamasa, Keisuke Takemori, and Ayumu Kubota. “Kernel-based behavior analysis for android malware detection.” Computational intelligence and Security (CIS), 2011 Seventh International Conference on. IEEE, 2011.
Kevin A Roundy et al: “Hybrid Analysis and Control of Malware”, Sep. 15, 2010, Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 317-338, XP019150454 ISBN:978-3-642-15511-6.
Leading Colleges Select FireEye to Stop Malware-Related Data Breaches, FireEye Inc., 2009.
Li et al., A VMM-Based System Call Interposition Framework for Program Monitoring, Dec. 2010, IEEE 16th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp. 706-711.
Lindorfer, Martina, Clemens Kolbitsch, and Paolo Milani Comparetti. “Detecting environment-sensitive malware.” Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
Lok Kwong et al: “DroidScope: Seamlessly Reconstructing the OS and Dalvik Semantic Views for Dynamic Android Malware Analysis”, Aug. 10, 2012, XP055158513, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity12/sec12- -final107.pdf [retrieved on Dec. 15, 2014].
Morales, Jose A., et al., ““Analyzing and exploiting network behaviors of malware.””, Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. 20-34.
Mori, Detecting Unknown Computer Viruses, 2004, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Oberheide et al., CloudAV.sub.—N-Version Antivirus in the Network Cloud, 17th USENIX Security Symposium USENIX Security '08 Jul. 28-Aug. 1, 2008 San Jose, CA.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,171,553 filed Apr. 20, 2006, Inter Parties Review Decision dated Jul. 10, 2015.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,499 filed Mar. 16, 2012, Inter Parties Review Decision dated Jul. 10, 2015.
Wahid et al., Characterising the Evolution in Scanning Activity of Suspicious Hosts, Oct. 2009, Third International Conference on Network and System Security, pp. 344-350.
Yuhei Kawakoya et al: “Memory behavior-based automatic malware unpacking in stealth debugging environment”, Malicious and Unwanted Software (Malware), 2010 5th International Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Oct. 19, 2010, pp. 39-46, XP031833827, ISBN:978-1-4244-8-9353-1.
Zhang et al., The Effects of Threading, Infection Time, and Multiple-Attacker Collaboration on Malware Propagation, Sep. 2009, IEEE 28th International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, pp. 73-82.
“Mining Specification of Malicious Behavior”—Jha et al, UCSB, Sep. 2007 https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/.about.chris/research/doc/esec07.sub.--mining.pdf-.
Didier Stevens, “Malicious PDF Documents Explained”, Security & Privacy, IEEE, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US, vol. 9, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2011, pp. 80-82, XP011329453, ISSN: 1540-7993, DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2011.14.
Hiroshi Shinotsuka, Malware Authors Using New Techniques to Evade Automated Threat Analysis Systems, Oct. 26, 2012, http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/, pp. 1-4.
Khaled Salah et al: “Using Cloud Computing to Implement a Security Overlay Network”, Security & Privacy, IEEE, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2013 (Jan. 1, 2013).
Lastline Labs, The Threat of Evasive Malware, Feb. 25, 2013, Lastline Labs, pp. 1-8.
Vladimir Getov: “Security as a Service in Smart Clouds—Opportunities and Concerns”, Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 2012 IEEE 36th Annual, IEEE, Jul. 16, 2012 (Jul. 16, 2012).
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60579910 Jun 2004 US
60579953 Jun 2004 US
60559198 Apr 2004 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12359252 Jan 2009 US
Child 14444943 US
Continuation in Parts (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 11409355 Apr 2006 US
Child 12359252 US
Parent 11151812 Jun 2005 US
Child 11409355 US
Parent 11152286 Jun 2005 US
Child 11151812 US
Parent 11096287 Mar 2005 US
Child 11152286 US