1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to systems and methods for vehicle accident avoidance.
2. Description of Related Art
Vehicles have a variety of systems for slowing down the speed of the vehicle. Vehicles can be slowed down through the use of vehicle brakes which can be either drum style brakes, disc brakes, or other types of brakes that slow down the vehicle. Additionally, the vehicle can be slowed down through adjustments to the vehicles powertrain. These adjustments can include changing the gear selection of the transmission and/or the throttle position of the vehicle.
However, there are certain situations where a vehicle, such as a tractor trailer, is traveling down a stretch of road having a very steep grade. This steep grade alone will affect the vehicle's ability to slow down. Further, large vehicles, such as tractor trailers, have significant weight loads making it even more difficult for these types of vehicles to affectively slow down on any grade of road.
In order to avoid a situation where the vehicle cannot be slowed down to safely travel down a stretch of road, the driver must skillfully determine the appropriate speed to travel down the stretch of road. However, drivers are prone to error and it is very common for drivers to miscalculate the safe maximum speed for the vehicle to travel down a stretch of road. This miscalculation can eventually lead to an unsafe situation, potentially causing harm to the driver and possibly other motorists.
A system and method for determining a safe maximum speed of a vehicle includes a processor and a global positioning system receiver in communication with the processor. The global positioning system receiver has an antenna for receiving global positioning system signals. Additionally, the processor is in communication with a brake temperature sensor, a wheel speed sensor and a grade angle sensor.
The processor is configured to determine a grade and a distance to an end of an upcoming or a current road segment the vehicle is traveling on based on the global positioning system information received from the global positioning system receiver. Further, the processor is configured to determine the safe maximum speed of the vehicle based the grade and the distance to the end of the upcoming or current road segment the vehicle is traveling on and the braking efficiency of the vehicle. The braking efficiency of the vehicle may be based on grade angle of the road the vehicle is on, the wheel speed of at least one wheel of the vehicle and/or the brake temperature of at least one brake of the vehicle.
Further objects, features and advantages of this invention will become readily apparent to persons skilled in the art after a review of the following description, with reference to the drawings and claims that are appended to and form a part of this specification.
Referring to
Here, the vehicle 12 is a tractor trailer. The vehicle 12 is traveling down a road 14 comprised of road segments, such as road segment 16. The road segment 16 has an end 18. Additionally, it can be seen that the road segment 16 has a pitch or grade in relation to a second road segment 20.
Referring to
The processor 26 may also in communication with a brake temperature sensor 30, a wheel speed sensor 32, and a grade angle sensor 34. The brake temperature sensor 30 is configured to monitor the brake temperature of at least one brake of the vehicle. The wheel speed sensor is configured to determine the wheel speed of at least one wheel of the vehicle. Finally, the grade angle sensor 34 is configured to determine the grade angle of the road. Using signals received from the brake temperature sensor 30, the wheel speed sensor 32 and the grade angle sensor 34, the processor 26 may determine the braking efficiency of the vehicle.
The processor 26 may also determine how certain environmental factors can affect the vehicle's ability to brake using environmental sensors. These environmental sensors include an air temperature sensor 36, an altitude sensor 38, and a stability control sensor 40. The air temperature sensor 36 determines the air temperature outside the vehicle. The altitude sensor 38 determines the altitude of the vehicle. Finally, the stability control sensor 40 can determine the stability of the vehicle and any tilting and/or swaying the vehicle may be experiencing.
The processor 26 may also in communication with the powertrain 42 of the vehicle via a powertrain controller 44. The powertrain controller 44 allows the processor 26 to adjust the gear selection and throttle position of the powertrain 42 of the vehicle. Additionally, the processor 26 may also in communication with the brake system 46 via a brake control module 48. By so doing, the processor 26 can engage the braking system 46 of the vehicle 12.
The system 10 also includes an output device 50 in communication with the processor 26. The output device 50 may also include a display 52 and a speaker 54. The display 52 and speaker 54 can then output both visual and audio instructions to a driver of the vehicle regarding what the safe maximum speed of the vehicle should be.
Referring to
In step 68 the processor 26 may be configured to determine a safe maximum speed for the vehicle. This determination may be made based on the distance to an end and grade of the upcoming or current road segment that the vehicle is traveling on and the braking efficiency of the vehicle. The braking efficiency of the vehicle may be determined by using information provided by the brake temperature sensor 30, the wheel speed sensor 32, and the grade angle sensor 34. As stated before, these sensors provide the processor 26 information relating to the brake temperature of the brake of the vehicle, the wheel speed of at least one wheel of the vehicle and the grade angle of the road.
Over time, the processor 26 develops a vehicle-specific model of braking characteristics. The vehicle-specific model of braking characteristics may include how the brakes fade as they heat and maneuverability models for the vehicle 12 taking into account the vehicle's current load size and distribution.
Additionally, the processor 26 may use environmental factors affecting the vehicle in determining the safe maximum speed for the vehicle to be traveling on a current or upcoming road segment. These environmental factors may include the outside air temperature, the road condition, and the altitude of the vehicle.
Finally, in determining the safe maximum speed of the vehicle, the processor 26 may also use vehicle specification data relating to the vehicle. This data can include dimensional information regarding the vehicle, such as the weight of the vehicle, the load distribution of the vehicle, and other dimensional data.
The safe maximum speed of the vehicle is a speed determined by the processor 26 that will allow the driver to maintain full control of the vehicle when traveling on a current or upcoming road segment. In some situations, the processor 26 may determine that an upcoming road segment has too steep a grade over too long a distance, such that the driver will not be able to maintain full control of the vehicle over these segments. The processor 26 may look at potential grade issues, not just on the current segment of road, but also upcoming road segments along the whole route.
In step 70, the processor 26 may inform the driver of the vehicle of the safe maximum speed that the vehicle should be traveling. This may be done by having the processor utilize the output system 50 and output either visual or audio information to the driver via the display 52 and/or the speaker 54. By informing the driver of the safe maximum speed and/or adjusting the powertrain settings and/or braking of the vehicle, the driver will be able to accurately predict what speed the driver should drive the vehicle to prevent any unsafe situations.
Additionally, in step 71, the driver may be informed that upcoming road segments that the vehicle will be traveling down cannot be safely travelled. In that situation, the positioning system 28 could provide information to the driver via the output system 50, such as an alternative route to take to avoid any dangerous situations or stopping and/or rest points along the route the driver should utilize in order to reduce the probability of brake failure. Effectively, the processor 26 is able to determine a driving strategy for the entire trip.
In step 72, the processor 26 may adjust the powertrain control module 44 of the vehicle so that the vehicle will not travel faster than the safe maximum speed. The powertrain control module 44 may adjust the powertrain settings of the vehicle, such as the gear selection and throttle position of the powertrain system 42.
In step 74, a determination is made by the processor 26 if the vehicle is traveling above a safe maximum speed. If the vehicle is not traveling above a safe maximum speed, the method 60 returns back to step 74. Otherwise, the method 60 proceeds to step 76 wherein the brakes of the vehicle are applied by the processor 26 via the brake control module 48.
Additionally or alternatively, in step 76, application or the brakes may be activating engine braking of the powertrain 42 of the vehicle 10. Engine braking is the opening of exhaust valves in the cylinders of the engine, releasing the compressed air trapped in the cylinders, and slowing the vehicle 12. When the powertrain control module 44 adjusts the settings of the powertrain 42 and releases the accelerator on a moving vehicle 12 powered by a diesel engine, the vehicle's forward inertia continues to turn the engine's crankshaft, drawing air into the cylinders as the pistons move down and compressing that air as the pistons move back up. The pressure of the compressed air pushes back on the up-going piston, tending to slow the vehicle 12.
With a gasoline engine, the mechanics are different and a special valve is not necessary for engine braking to happen when the powertrain control module 44 adjusts the settings of the powertrain 42 and releases the accelerator. In the gasoline engine, with the accelerator released, a throttle prevents the free flow of air into the cylinders, so there is little pressure to release at the top of the compression stroke. The throttle itself provides engine braking through friction in the air flowing through it.
While the above description constitutes the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation, and change without departing from the proper scope and fair meaning of the accompanying claims.
In other embodiments, dedicated hardware implementations, such as application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic arrays and other hardware devices, can be constructed to implement one or more of the methods described herein. Applications that may include the apparatus and systems of various embodiments can broadly include a variety of electronic and computer systems. One or more embodiments described herein may implement functions using two or more specific interconnected hardware modules or devices with related control and data signals that can be communicated between and through the modules, or as portions of an application-specific integrated circuit. Accordingly, the present system encompasses software, firmware, and hardware implementations.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, the methods described herein may be implemented by software programs executable by a computer system. Further, in an exemplary, non-limited embodiment, implementations can include distributed processing, component/object distributed processing, and parallel processing. Alternatively, virtual computer system processing can be constructed to implement one or more of the methods or functionality as described herein.
Further, the methods described herein may be embodied in a computer-readable medium. The term “computer-readable medium” includes a single medium or multiple media, such as a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers that store one or more sets of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall also include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by a processor or that cause a computer system to perform any one or more of the methods or operations disclosed herein.
As a person skilled in the art will readily appreciate, the above description is meant as an illustration of the principles of the invention. This description is not intended to limit the scope or application of the invention in that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation and change, without departing from spirit of the invention, as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5043896 | Sol | Aug 1991 | A |
5744707 | Kull | Apr 1998 | A |
5892437 | Scheibe et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5997108 | Claussen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6099085 | Eckert | Aug 2000 | A |
6188316 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199001 | Ohta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6240356 | Lapke | May 2001 | B1 |
6249733 | Smith | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6299263 | Uematsu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332354 | Lalor et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
7134985 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7308352 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7672771 | Nakanishi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7801656 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7835845 | Lin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8014927 | Uematsu | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8131431 | Sabelstrom | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8239078 | Siddappa et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8332119 | Bach et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8386144 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8401753 | Chappell et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20030036839 | Han et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050261818 | Brown et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060069488 | Sychra et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060113833 | Lingman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155447 | Uken et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070004557 | Steen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013228 | Lingman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070112475 | Koebler et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080086248 | Lu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080236269 | Howell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090234550 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090318263 | Yuet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100174484 | Sivasubramaniam et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110054768 | Sullivan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098922 | Ibrahim | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110313647 | Koebler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120089313 | Frashure et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009010199 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 7, 2012, from corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/023134. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120215412 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |