The disclosure relates to signal transmission over optical networks, and in particular to techniques for determining skew, such as the skew of a combined transmitter/receiver assembly.
The main drivers for the evolution of optical transmission systems have constantly been the need to increase the capacity of the telecommunication infrastructure and, at the same time, the urge to reduce the cost per signal transmission bit. In terms of optical transponder technology, these trends currently translate into the adoption of higher-order modulation formats with high-spectral efficiency, the increase of the signaling rate, and the replacement of traditional discrete optical components by integrated components.
Modern transponders make use of phase modulation (for example, binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) or quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK)), or a combination of phase and amplitude modulation (for example, quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM)). Commonly, the resulting optical signals are not described by their amplitude and their phase, but rather by two orthogonal components, namely the in-phase component and the quadrature component. However, both representations are equivalent, and the representation in one system of coordinates can be transferred into a representation in the other system of coordinates. Additionally, two orthogonal polarization components of the light are often used to convey two independent QAM (or phase-modulated) signals or, alternatively, the two-dimensional projections of the four-dimensional signal. In summary, the optical transmission signals may be represented as signals with four components, or four independent dimensions: two polarization components each having an in-phase component and a quadrature component.
In order to successfully transmit these signals over a communication channel, the signal components need to be emitted by the optical transmitter unit at the same time, and there must be a similar alignment at the optical receiver unit. For example, if a pulse with four signal components is transmitted, the in-phase and quadrature components of each polarization need to arrive within fractions of picoseconds in order for the signal to be recoverable. The amount of time difference or differential group delay between the in-phase and quadrature components of the signal is generally known as skew. Skew may be due to imperfections both at the transmitter side and at the receiver side of an optical communication channel, and hence one distinguishes between transmitter skew and receiver skew. Skew is a practically very relevant impediment to high-fidelity data transmission over optical networks, in particular at higher modulation formats.
The combined use of high signaling rates, high-order modulation formats and integrated photonics makes it a serious challenge to minimize skew and achieve the required transmission quality. In conjunction with the trend towards integrated photonic solutions, the situation becomes even worse due to the fact that integrated optical devices have not yet achieved the performance of their discrete counterparts. For instance, the next generation of optical transponders is expected to support 64-point dual polarization quadrature amplitude modulation (64 QAM) at roughly 64 Gigasymbols per second, and employ integrated transmitters and receivers realized, e.g. in silicon photonics technology. Therefore, skew is anticipated to have a critical impact on the transmission quality.
Device manufacturers have constantly tried to limit the imperfections of the electronic and photonic components of optical transmitters and optical receivers. This is certainly an effective aspiration, but the approach is subject to a price/quality trade-off and can result in an unnecessarily expensive electrical and optical components.
Static digital pre-distortion based on factory calibration has been proposed by A. Napoli et al., “Novel DAC Digital Pre-Emphasis Algorithm for Next-Generation Flexible Optical Transponders”, published in the Proceedings of the 2015 Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC 2015), Los Angeles, Mar. 22-Mar. 26, 2015. Static digital pre-distortion can mitigate transmitter skew. However, calibration is time-consuming and thus impacts heavily the production costs. Moreover, calibration is unsuitable for systems assembled during deployment using pluggable components.
In their research paper “Low-Cost Transmitter Self-Calibration of Time Delay and Frequency Response for High Band-Rate QAM transceivers”, Proceedings of the 2017 Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC 2017), Los Angeles, Mar. 19-Mar. 23, 2017, C. R. Fludger et al. describe a transmitter calibration method using swept frequency tones and a single feedback photodiode. However, this method requires the transmission of special signals for calibration purposes, and corresponding calibration measurements. G. Khanna et al. in their paper “A Robust Adaptive Pre-Distortion Method for Optical Communication Transmitters”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, volume 28, no. 7, pages 752-755 (April 2016) describe an adaptive pre-distortion based on an auxiliary coherent receiver. This solution avoids the need for factory calibration, but requires an expensive and relatively bulky receiver, which may impact the transponder cost and size.
US 2016/0301520 A1 discloses techniques for determining transmitter and receiver skew between pairs of lanes of an electrical interface of a network element. Transmitter and receiver interfaces are coupled by means of a plurality of loopbacks that can be electrical or optical. The skew values of the electrical signals are calculated from measurement results for several configurations. The delay introduced by the loopback is assumed to be known, and skew is determined from the position of edges of the pulses. These techniques are useful in case direct access to the electrical lanes is feasible, but can be challenging in integrated transmitter and receiver assemblies.
Another technique for distinguishing between transmitter skew and receiver skew is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,855,498 B2. These techniques are based on the perception that setting a skew compensator at the receiver to the sum of both transmitter and receiver skew contributions yields optimum performance if the signal waveform is only slightly distorted, whereas the optimum setting corresponds to the mere receiver skew if there are huge waveform distortions. It is hence proposed to induce strong waveform distortions by operating the system at large dispersion values, where dispersion includes chromatic dispersion, polarization mode dispersion, and differential group delay. The method proceeds in two steps: After sufficiently increasing dispersion, the receiver skew is optimized. In a subsequent step, the skew compensator at the transmit side is set such that the Q factor becomes maximum.
In view of these techniques and their associated shortcomings, what is needed is a reliable and cost-efficient system and method for determining skew, in particular for determining both transmitter skew and receiver skew of an optical transmitter/receiver assembly.
This objective is achieved with a system and method for determining skew according to independent claims 1 and 10, respectively. The dependent claims relate to preferred embodiments.
In a first aspect, the disclosure relates to a system for determining skew, comprising: an optical transmitter unit adapted to generate an optical output signal with a first plurality of signal components, and adapted to feed the optical output signal into an optical output path; an optical receiver unit adapted to receive an optical input signal with a second plurality of signal components from an optical input path; and an optical loopback path adapted to connect the optical output path to the optical input path. The optical loopback path is adapted to couple the first plurality of signal components of the optical output signal at least partly with the second plurality of signal components of the optical input signal. The system further comprises an analysis unit adapted to determine, based on the coupled optical input signal, both a first skew pertaining to the optical transmitter unit, and a second skew pertaining to the optical receiver unit.
In the context of the present disclosure, the term skew can denote a single skew value, or a set of skew values.
By providing an optical loopback path that allows controlled coupling or mixing of the first plurality of signal components pertaining to the optical transmitter unit with the second plurality of signal components pertaining to the optical receiver unit, the system according to the present disclosure allows to generate optical or electrical output signals from which both a first skew pertaining to the optical transmitter unit and a second skew pertaining to the optical receiver unit can be determined. In particular, the system according to the present disclosure may allow determining both the transmitter skew and the receiver skew without the need to change the optical configuration of the loopback path, or the connection of the loopback path. This provides for a quick, efficient and easy way to determine the transmitter skew and the receiver skew. The techniques are particularly advantageous for transmitter/receiver assemblies, and may be employed in a test phase or initialization phase of the transmitter/receiver assembly to determine both the transmitter skew and the receiver skew. These results may then be employed to compensate for the transmitter skew and the receiver skew, such as by means of adaptive digital pre-distortion and equalization. In this way, both the transmission quality and the receiving quality of the transmitter/receiver assembly can be significantly enhanced.
In the sense of the present disclosure the signal components may correspond to different dimensions or degrees-of-freedom of the optical output signal and/or the optical input signal.
In particular, the signal components may comprise polarization directions of the optical output signal and/or the optical input signal.
The signal components may, additionally or alternatively, comprise in-phase and quadrature components of the optical output signal and/or the optical input signal.
For instance, in some examples the optical output signal and/or the optical input signal may comprise four signal components, such as two polarization components each having an in-phase component and a quadrature component.
The optical loopback path may be adapted to mix the first plurality of signal components of the optical output signal at least partly with the second plurality of signal components of the optical input signal, in particular adapted to coherently mix the signal components.
According to an embodiment, the analysis unit is adapted to determine a plurality of delay components that comprise a sum of delays of signal components among the first plurality of signal components and delays of signal components among the second plurality of signal components.
For instance, each delay component may comprise or may be the sum of two summands, wherein the first summand may be or may comprise a delay of signal components pertaining to the transmitter unit, and the second summand may be or may comprise a delay of signal components pertaining to the receiver unit, or vice versa.
According to an example, the delay components comprise the sum of delays of in-phase components and/or quadrature components pertaining to the optical transmitter unit and the optical receiver unit, respectively.
The analysis unit may be adapted to determine the first skew and the second skew from the plurality of delay components.
Determining the first skew and the second skew from the plurality of delay components may comprise generating a plurality of test optical output signals and test optical input signals, such as by means of time modulation.
According to an example, the optical transmitter unit is adapted to modulate a first signal component among the first plurality of signal components over time by means of a first modulation function.
The optical receiver unit may be adapted to demodulate a second signal component among the second plurality of signal components over time, such as by means of a second modulation function.
In some examples, the second modulation function may correspond to the first modulation function, with an additional time delay.
In other examples, the second modulation function is uncorrelated with the first modulation function.
Determining the first skew and the second skew from the plurality of delay components may comprise correlating a modulated first signal component among the first plurality of signal components with a modulated second signal component among the second plurality of signal components.
According to an embodiment, the analysis unit may be adapted to determine the first skew and the second skew with a fixed coupling, i. e., without changing the coupling of the first plurality of signal components with the second plurality of signal components in the optical loopback path.
In particular, the analysis unit may be adapted to determine the first skew and the second skew without any intermediate disconnecting or connecting of signal components among the first plurality of signal components and/or the second plurality of signal components.
Given that the system according to the present invention may not require a switching in the optical loopback path, the transmitter skew and the receiver skew can be determined quickly and with minimum effort even in integrated transmitter/receiver assemblies.
Even though the system may not require a re-switching or re-grouping between the signal components, in some examples the optical loopback path may nevertheless be adapted to adjust the coupling of the first plurality of signal components with the second plurality of signal components, in particular to vary the coupling over time.
According to some examples, the optical loopback path may be adapted to couple some or all signal components among the first plurality of signal components with some or all signal components among the second plurality of signal components.
For instance, according to an embodiment, the optical loopback path may be adapted to couple a first signal component among the first plurality of signal components at least partly with the second signal component among the second plurality of signal components, the second signal component being different from the first signal component.
According to an example, different signal components may correspond to different sub-paths.
For instance, the optical output path may comprise a first plurality of output sub-paths corresponding to the first plurality of signal components, and the optical input path may comprise a second plurality of input sub-paths corresponding to the second plurality of signal components.
The optical loopback path may be adapted to couple a first sub-path corresponding to a first signal component among the first plurality of signal components at least partly with a second sub-path corresponding to a second signal component among the second plurality of signal components, the second signal component being different from the first signal component.
According to an embodiment, the optical loopback path may be adapted to couple a first signal component among the first plurality of signal components at least partly with a second signal component among the first plurality of signal components, the second signal component being different from the first signal component.
Moreover, the optical loopback path may be adapted to couple a first signal component among the second plurality of signal components at least partly with a second signal component among the second plurality of signal components, the second signal component being different from the first signal component.
According to an embodiment, the optical loopback path comprises a coupling unit adapted to couple or mix the first plurality of signal components of the optical output signal at least partly with the second plurality of signal components of the optical input signal, in particular with predetermined respective coupling constants between the respective first plurality of signal components and second plurality of signal components.
According to an example, the coupling unit comprises an interferometer, in particular a Mach-Zehnder interferometer.
According to an embodiment, the system is adapted to selectively connect or couple the optical loopback path to the optical output path and/or to the optical input path.
A selective or controlled coupling allows to activate the optical loopback path selectively for a test mode or configuration mode of the system. During normal operation of the optical transmitter unit and/or optical receiver unit, the optical loopback path may be selectively deactivated in order not to interfere with the signal transmission.
According to an embodiment, the system comprises a first optical coupler adapted to optically connect or couple the optical loopback path to the optical output path, and/or a second optical coupler adapted to optically connect or couple the optical loopback path to the optical input path.
An optical coupler, in the sense of the present disclosure, may be understood to denote any device or mechanism adapted to establish an optical connection between the optical loopback path and the optical output path, and/or between the optical loopback path and the optical input path.
In particular, the optical coupler may be adapted to selectively connect the optical loopback path to the optical output path and/or optical input path, respectively, and/or to selectively disconnect the optical loopback path from the optical output path and/or optical input path, respectively.
According to an example, the first optical coupler and/or the second optical coupler comprises an optical switch.
In other examples, the first optical coupler and/or the second optical coupler may establish a permanent connection between the optical loopback path and the optical output path, and/or between the optical loopback path and the optical input path. In these examples, the optical loopback path may additionally comprise an optical switch for a selective activation and/or deactivation of the optical loopback path.
According to an example, the first optical coupler and/or the second optical coupler comprises an interferometer, in particular a Mach-Zehnder interferometer.
According to an embodiment, the optical transmitter unit may be adapted to convert electrical input signals into the optical output signal.
According to an example, the optical transmitter unit comprises an optical modulator.
The optical transmitter unit may comprise an optical transmitter laser and/or an interferometer.
According to an embodiment, the optical receiver unit is adapted to convert the optical input signal into electrical output signals.
According to an embodiment, the optical receiver unit comprises an optical demodulator.
In an embodiment, the optical receiver unit comprises an optical receiver laser.
According to an embodiment, the optical transmitter unit and the optical receiver unit and the optical loopback path are integrated into a common integrated optical device, in particular integrated into a pluggable module.
According to an embodiment, the pluggable module is integrated into an optical card.
According to another embodiment, the common integrated optical device is integrated into an optical card.
This allows to provide an integrated device with self-testing capabilities to determine the skew pertaining to the optical transmitter unit and the skew pertaining to the optical receiver unit.
In an embodiment, the integrated optical device may also integrate the analysis unit.
In a second aspect, the disclosure relates to a method for determining skew, comprising: generating an optical output signal with a first plurality of signal components, and feeding the optical output signal into an optical output path; receiving an optical input signal with a second plurality of signal components from an optical input path; connecting the optical output path to the optical input path; coupling the first plurality of signal components of the optical output signal at least partly with the second plurality of signal components of the optical input signal; and determining, based on the coupled optical input signal, both a first skew pertaining to the generation of the optical output signal and/or the feeding of the optical output signal into the optical output path, and a second skew pertaining to the receiving of the optical input signal.
According to an embodiment, the method comprises selectively connecting or coupling an optical loopback path to the optical output path and/or to the optical input path.
According to an embodiment, the first plurality of signal components and the second plurality of signal components are directly coupled by means of an optical loopback path.
The direct coupling may be a coupling that directly connects, via the optical loopback path, an optical output port at which the optical output signal is provided to an optical input port to which the optical input signal is provided.
In particular, the direct coupling may be a coupling that does not involve or proceed via further optical transmitter units and/or further optical receiver units of an optical network.
According to an embodiment, determining the first skew and the second skew comprises determining a plurality of delay components that comprise a sum of delays of signal components among the first plurality of signal components, and delays of signal components among the second plurality of signal components.
The first skew and the second skew may be determined from the plurality of delay components.
According to an example, the method further comprises modulating a first signal component among the first plurality of signal components over time with a first modulation function.
Moreover, the method may comprise modulating a second signal component among the second plurality of signal components over time with a second modulation function.
According to an embodiment, the first skew and the second skew may be determined with a fixed coupling, i. e., without changing the coupling of the first plurality of signal components with the second plurality of signal components.
In particular, according to an embodiment, the first skew and the second skew are determined without any intermediate disconnecting or connecting of signal components.
According to an embodiment, the method comprises adjusting the coupling of the first plurality of signal components with the second plurality of signal components, in particular varying the coupling over time.
The disclosure further relates to a computer program or a computer program product comprising computer-readable instructions that are adapted to implement, when executed on a computing system, in particular a computing system communicatively connected to and adapted to control the system with some or all of the features described above, a method with some or all of the features described above.
The particulars and advantages associated with the system and method for determining skew according to the present disclosure will be best apparent from a detailed description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the accompanying Figures, in which:
The optical output signal may be an optical signal for coherent detection comprising a first plurality of signal components. For instance, the optical transmitter unit 12 may be adapted to modulate the electric input signals provided via the electric input path 14 using polarization and quadrature to create the optical output signal for coherent detection fed into the optical output path 16.
In an example, the optical output signal comprises two orthogonal polarization components, wherein each polarization component comprises an in-phase component and a quadrature component. However, in other examples, the optical output signal may comprise a different number of signal components.
In some examples, the electric input signal provided via the electric input path 14 comprises a corresponding plurality of signal components, and the optical transmitter unit 12 may be adapted to amplify these electric component input signals individually so that they serve as driving signals for a dual-polarization optical modulator that up-converts the driving signals into the optical domain.
As can be further taken from
The optical receiver unit 18 may be adapted to convert or demodulate the optical input signal received from the optical input path 20 into an electric output signal, and feed the electric output signal into an electric output path 22. The electric output signal may represent the information received by the optical receiver unit 18 from the optical input signal, and may be forwarded for additional data processing.
In some examples, the optical transmitter unit 12 and the optical receiver unit 18 may be stand-alone optical units. In other examples, the optical transmitter unit 12 and the optical receiver unit 18 may be integrated into a common transmitter/receiver assembly or transceiver unit, as will be explained in further detail below. The transmitter/receiver assembly may serve as an integrated unit for transmitting and receiving optical signals in an optical network. In a routine (non-testing) operation of the optical transmitter unit 12 and the optical receiver unit 18, the optical output signal and the optical input signal may propagate in respective output and input optical channels that are not directly coupled.
However, as can be further taken from
As can be taken from
In the example of
The transmitter skew and receiver skew determined by the analysis unit 26 may be employed to change respective configurations or settings of the optical transmitter unit 12 and/or optical receiver unit 18 so to correct for or compensate for the respective skew components. For instance, the analysis unit 26 may provide respective control signals to the optical transmitter unit 12 via a transmitter unit control path 28, and may provide control signals to the optical receiver unit 18 via a receiver unit control path 30. The control signals provided by the analysis unit 26 in response to the determined transmitter skew and/or receiver skew may be employed for adaptive digital pre-distortion.
The functionality of the optical loopback path 24 will now be described in additional detail with reference to
Mathematically, the operation of the optical loopback path 24 and the resulting coupling of the first plurality of signal components of the optical output signal with the second plurality of signal components of the optical input signal may be described in terms of a rotation matrix:
In Eq. (1), rxi and ryi denote the respective in-phase components of the optical input signal for two orthogonal polarization directions x, y. Similarly, rxq and ryq denote the respective quadrature components for the x and y polarizations of the optical input signal. The corresponding components of the optical output signal are denoted by sxi, syi and sxq, syq, respectively. In Eq. (1), j denotes the imaginary unit, and θ, φ and ψ are rotation angles. An immaterial common phase offset has been neglected in Eq. (1).
Using real instead of complex quantities, Eq. (1) can be equivalently rewritten as
with the rotation matrix
The circuit diagram of
As further illustrated in
The different skew functions and transfer functions are identified by a sequence of three indices, wherein the first index indicates if the respective function relates to the transmitter (index T) or to the receiver (index R). The second index refers to the involved polarization (X or Y) and the third index specifies whether the function relates to the in-phase component (index I) or the quadrature component (index Q).
From Eq. (2) and Eq. (3) we may infer that the separation of the delays τTxx (the x denotes that reference is made to any polarization and any component) at the transmitter side and delays τRxx at the receiver side becomes possible in case the polarization mixing matrix R is not the identity matrix, and is not a column or row permutation of the identity matrix. If this condition is fulfilled, proper polarization mixing occurs. The mixing angles θ, φ and ψ of the polarization mixing matrix R may be chosen accordingly.
In some examples, the polarization mixing may also implement time-varying polarization rotation angles θ, φ and ψ. As long as the polarization rotation is slow compared to the symbol rate, this does not affect the accuracy of the system and method according to the embodiment. On the contrary, a polarization rotation may even be beneficial in order to increase the diversity of the setup.
In some examples, the analysis unit 26 may be incorporated into the digital signal processing unit 34. A corresponding example of a system 10a for determining skew is illustrated schematically in
The system 10a is generally similar to the system 10 described above with reference to
As can be further taken from
The optical receiver unit 18 comprises a demodulator 44 and a plurality of receiver amplifiers 46 that convert the optical input signal r(t) provided via the optical input path 20 into the electrical output signal v(t) provided via the electrical output path 22 to the digital signal processing unit 34 that comprises the analysis unit 26. The optical receiver unit 18 comprises a receiver laser 48 that is different from the transmitter laser 42. However, in other examples the optical transmitter unit 12 and the optical receiver unit 18 may share a common laser unit, emitting a laser signal that is split into two parts that are directed to the optical transmitter unit 12 and the optical receiver unit 18, respectively.
As can be further taken from
When the system 10a is powered on or when an optical module is plugged in, the optical switches 50a, 50b may be closed to direct the transmitter output signal s(t) from the optical output path 16 via the coupling unit 52 and the optical input path 20 to the optical receiver unit 18. The effect of the polarization mixing in the coupling unit 52 may be that the signal received in each one of the second plurality of signal components is a linear combination of some or all of the first plurality of signal components. Thus, a delay in one signal component at the optical transmitter unit 12 may generally affect all signal components at the optical receiver unit 18. For that reason, skew contributions originating from the optical transmitter unit 12 may be separated from skew contributions originating from the optical receiver unit 18, as will be explained in more detail below. The analysis unit 26 may determine these skew contributions, and may employ them for corrective digital pre-distortion in the digital signal processing unit 34.
The analysis unit 26 is not limited to determining skew contributions, but may also be adapted to determine additional imperfections or distortions associated with the optical transmitter unit 12 and/or optical receiver unit 18, and employ them for signal correction.
The only difference is in the optical loopback path 24b. Rather than optical switches 50a, 50b as described above with reference to
The tapping units 54a, 54b may continuously tap small portions of the signals transmitted via the optical output path 16 and optical input path 20, respectively. During a test or calibration mode, the optical switch 56 may be closed to feed the transmitter signal s(t) from the optical transmitter unit 12 via the optical loopback path 24b directly back to the optical receiver unit 18, just as described above with reference to
As can be taken from
As can be further taken from
As can be further taken from
As demonstrated in
The optical demodulator 44a of the optical receiver sub-unit 18a splits up the incoming optical signal from the optical input sub-path 20a into respective in-phase and quadrature components by means of a receiver laser 48a and selective phase shifting. The respective in-phase and quadrature components are detected by means of optical detector units 60a, 60′a that convert them into electrical in-phase and quadrature output signals in the electrical output path 22.
The optical loopback path 24c of the optical transmitter/receiver assembly 36a comprises a coupling unit 52 that may implement a variable coupling between the first plurality of signal components and the second plurality of signal components by means of a variable Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The coupling unit 52 is connected to the optical output path 16 by means of a first optical coupler unit 62. As can be taken from
Similarly, the optical loopback path 24c comprises a second optical coupler unit 64 adapted to couple the optical loopback path 24c to the optical input path 20. As can be taken from FIG. 6, the second optical coupler unit comprises two sub-units 64a, 64b that couple to the respective optical input sub-paths 20a, 20b, respectively.
The configuration and functionality of the second optical coupler sub-units 64a, 64b may generally correspond to the first optical coupler sub-units 62a, 62b, respectively. In particular, each of the second optical coupler sub-units 64a, 64b may comprise a Mach-Zehnder interferometer adapted to implement a variable coupling, and to be employed as a switch for selectively coupling the coupling unit 52 to the respective optical input sub-paths 20a, 20b.
In an example, the coupling unit 52 induces a rotation of 45°, and the polarization beam splitters 58 and 60 have a splitting ratio of 50%. In this way, all the signal components among the first plurality of signal components and the second plurality of signal components may contribute equally to the components detected by means of the optical receiver unit 18.
However, an estimate of the different skew contributions can also be achieved with different rotation angles and different coupling ratios. When using a tunable splitter for coupling the first plurality of signal components with the second plurality of signal components, determination of the skew components can be performed several times for different coupling ratios in order to improve the accuracy.
However, in the optical loopback path 24d of the optical transmitter/receiver assembly 36b, the two transmitter output polarizations provided via the two optical output sub-paths 16a, 16b are not mixed. Similarly, the input polarizations received via the optical input sub-paths 20a, 20b are not mixed. Rather, the optical loopback path 24d is adapted to mix the vertical transmitter polarization component provided in the optical output sub-path 16a via a first mixing line 66 with the horizontal polarization receiver component in the optical input sub-path 20b. Correspondingly, the optical loopback path 24d comprises a second mixing line 66′ adapted to mix the horizontal transmitter polarization component provided in the optical output sub-path 16b with the vertical polarization receiver input component in the optical input sub-path 20a. But it would also be possible to mix the vertical transmitter components with the vertical receiver components, and to mix the horizontal transmitter components with the horizontal receiver components.
As can be taken from
In the optical transmitter/receiver assembly 36b, the receiver lasers 48, 48a may be implemented as free-running local oscillators, such that typically each balanced receiver detects a mixture of the in-phase and the quadrature components. These components may be separated at a later stage by means of digital signal processing.
Preferably, the phase of the local oscillator does not correspond to the phase of one of the in-phase or the quadrature components. In fact, this is a typical case, and hence both optical receiver sub-units 18a, 18b comprise balanced receivers that provide electrical signals comprising contributions from both in-phase and quadrature signal components. In the rare case that the phases are perfectly aligned, it may be sufficient to wait for some time to allow the phases of the lasers, which are usually not perfectly stable, to misalign. Alternatively, the receiver lasers 48, 48a may be turned off and turned on again.
Techniques will now be described for determining the transmitter skew and the receiver skew from the received coupled optical signal. Mathematically, for the assembly 36b illustrated in
R
I=cos Δα·SI+sin Δα·SQ (4)
and
R
Q=−sin Δα·SI+cos Δα·SQ, (5)
where SI and SQ denote the in-phase and quadrature components of the transmit signal generated by one of the transmitter sub-units 12a and 12b, and RI and RQ represent the output signals from one of the balanced receivers 18a, 18b. The parameter Δα denotes the phase difference between the phase of the local oscillator 48a and the in-phase components at the upper balanced receiver.
In the following part of the description, the second index of the skew and transfer functions is of no relevance since only one in-phase component will be considered per transmitter and receiver. The same applies to the quadrature component. In consequence, the second index is not necessary for unambiguously identifying the component and will thus be skipped, for the ease of presentation.
Both contributions to RI according to Eq. (4) suffer from the same delay τRI at the receiver unit 18a, 18b, whereas the first contribution stemming from the in-phase modulator experiences the delay τTI and the contribution from the quadrature modulator experiences the delay τTQ. Since all single components experience the same delay when being looped back, this delay is not considered in the following. In summary, the contribution cos Δφ·SI experiences the delay τTI+τRI and the contribution sin Δφ·SQ experiences the delay τTQ+τRI. Similar considerations apply to the signal RQ of Eq. (5). We hence get the following delays:
From the measured delays, the transmitter skew ΔτT=τTI−τTQ and the receiver skew ΔτR=τRI−τRQ can be determined by means of the following equations:
ΔτT=τTI−τTQ=τII−τQI=τIQ−τQQ (6)
and
ΔτR=τRI−τRQ=τII−τIQ=τQI−τQQ (7)
It remains to measure the delay for the two contributions of each signal separately. For this purpose, different techniques can be employed, as will now be described.
In an embodiment, the in-phase component and the quadrature component may be modulated with signals SI(t) and SQ(t) that are uncorrelated. In other words, their cross correlation function vanishes, i.e. SI(t)*SQ(t)=0. Under this condition, the delay τII can be determined by correlating the signal RI with the signal SI(t). More precisely, the correlation function RI(t)*SI(t)=S (t−τII)*SI(t) becomes maximum at τII.
Similarly, the signal RI(t) can be correlated with the signal SQ(t) in order to determine the delay τQI. Furthermore, similar operation can be performed with the signal RQ(t) for determining the two missing delays.
Signal waveforms used in accordance with another embodiment are shown in
Correlating the signals from the balanced receivers RI and RQ with the pulse shape Spulse(t) yields two peaks for each correlation function. These peaks can be assigned unambiguously to the different contributions such that the required delays can be determined.
In summary, a technique allowing determining the transmitter and receiver skew with only one single loopback configuration and comprising the optical terminals has been described.
An example of a method for determining skew is illustrated in the flow diagram of
In a first step S10, an optical output signal is generated, wherein the optical output signal has a first plurality of signal components, and the optical output signal is fed into an optical output path.
In a second step S12, an optical input signal is received from an optical input path, the optical input signal having a second plurality of signal components.
In a third step S14, the optical output path is connected to the optical input path.
In a fourth step S16, the first plurality of signal components of the optical output signal is coupled or mixed at least partly with the second plurality of signal components of the optical input signal.
In a fifth step S18, both a first skew pertaining to the generating of the optical output signal and/or the feeding of the optical output signal into the optical output path, and a second skew pertaining to the receiving of the optical input signal, are determined from or based on the received coupled optical input signal.
Although
The techniques according to the present disclosure allow to transmit and receive optical data signals with an integrated loopback from the transmitter to the receiver, and to reliably estimate the skew between the various signal components. In particular the techniques according to the present disclosure allow to separate the skew contributions from the transmitter and receiver. This minimizes the effort for calibration and setup, and dispenses with relying on third party measurement results.
The examples and the Figures merely serve to illustrate the invention and the beneficial effects associated therewith, but should not be understood to imply any limitation. The scope is to be determined from the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17210789.8 | Dec 2017 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/085154 | 12/17/2018 | WO | 00 |