Patent Application
20170136261
The disclosure relates to a system for determining the position of objects in a radiation room for radiation therapy and a corresponding method.
Radiation therapy of patients for cancer treatment takes place in radiation rooms. Tumors are thereby irradiated with ionizing radiation by means of radiation devices. The correct positioning of the patient is decisive so that the ionizing radiation hits the tumor optimally. In a computed tomography (CT) room that is separate from the radiation room, the area to be irradiated is localized based on CT images and markings are applied to the patient's body, based on which the patient is then positioned in the radiation room. For this, so-called room lasers are arranged in the radiation room. Room lasers are laser projectors arranged permanently on the ceiling or wall in the radiation room, which generate one or two light arrays from one or more laser sources. At least three room lasers may be installed, which are pointed at the isocenter of the radiation device. Based on the markings applied to the patient's body and by means of the room lasers, the patient is aligned for the radiation through a suitable moving of a patient table. In particular, the markings applied to the patient's body are brought to overlap with the laser crosses aligned with the isocenter of the radiation device. For the purpose of positioning, only a small area of the respectively projected laser lines around the laser cross is used. Due to the expansion, or planar divergence, of the laser sources, other objects in the radiation room besides the patient are normally also illuminated by the room lasers.
A device for monitoring the position of a patient receiving radiation is known from DE 103 42 202 A1, in which two or more distance measuring devices measure the distance to respectively one point on the skin of the patient. An evaluation apparatus determines from at least two distance values whether the position of the patient has changed with respect to an initial position. So-called off-axis triangulation can be used for the distance measurement. Another device for capturing the position of an object located in a radiation room is known from DE 297 24 767 U1. A collision of components of the medical apparatus, for example a radiation transmitter, with other objects located in the room should thereby be avoided. A triangulating 3D technique can be used. This known device is also structurally complex since the light transmitters and cameras used for the measurements must also be housed in the radiation room.
In DE 103 42 202 A1, only a few individual points on the skin of the patient are captured so that an exact and comprehensive monitoring of the position of the patient body is not satisfactorily possible. Moreover, the device therein is structurally complex, since the distance measuring devices must also be housed in the radiation room. The device in DE 297 24 767 U1 is also structurally complex since the light transmitters and cameras used for the measurements must also be housed in the radiation room.
The above-explained process of patient positioning is based on a subjective assessment by the respective user. The points marked on the skin of the patient for positioning the patient for today's modern radiation therapy no longer meet the accuracy requirements with high doses per radiation fraction and small radiation fields at high field gradients. New imaging methods like cone beam computed tomography (CB-CT), ultrasound or magnetic resonance therapy (MRT) are finding their way into the radiation room and are already being integrated there today. Radiation therapy without multi-modal image registration methods with rigid (RIR) or elastic (deformable DIR) algorithms and image positioning methods is now unthinkable. Nonetheless, current radiation therapy cannot get past the most exact possible initial positioning of the patient with laser lines. Image positioning algorithms use special optimization methods for comparing the three-dimensional (3D) images created before the radiation with a 3D-CT reference position. If the initial patient position is not sufficiently close to the reference position due to faulty patient positioning, these optimization methods can deliver incorrect results. This can lead to incorrect positioning information (displacement vectors) and thus to unplanned irradiation of the patient.
The capturing of CB-CT images before each radiation fraction takes a lot of time and the radiation load on the healthy organs of the patient increases with each image, which can lead to subsequent radiation-induced cancer. Special attention must be paid in this respect to the treatment of children and young adult patients.
There is thus growing need to be able to perform the patient positioning for the radiation and during the radiation with the highest accuracy and without additional radiation load. Moreover, in the case of the modern radiation devices described above with high dose outputs, steep field gradients and short treatment times, there are continuously increasing requirements for the accuracy of the devices used for the radiation. This applies in particular to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT, VMAT) where the head of a linear accelerator (gantry) used for radiation rotates around the patient during the radiation treatment. For example, in the case of VMAT technology, the modulation of the radiation intensity takes place with a change in the rotational speed of the gantry at certain circular positions and through the different openings of the multi-leaf collimators (MLC). If position deviations occur in the course of the circular movement of the gantry, as can be caused for example by the heavy weight of the gantry, this acts in an impermissible manner on the radiation result. It has also been determined that the position accuracy of a patient table supporting the patient also plays a large role. Even the slightest deviations, as can result for example due to different patient weights, have an adverse effect on the quality of the radiation fraction in today's high-precision radiation procedures.
Based on the above concerns, the invention was developed to desirably provide a system and a method with which the position of objects in a radiation room can be determined for radiation therapy in a structurally simple but yet precise manner Moreover, impermissible position deviations are desirably detected and subsequent radiation procedures optimized.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention and their variations are explained below in greater detail.
The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views unless otherwise noted.
The system according to one implementation of the invention can comprise a radiation device and a patient table. A radiation device for cancer therapy of a patient is generally located in a radiation room. The radiation device may be a linear accelerator (LINAC), the head (gantry) of which rotates around the patient table supporting a patient during radiation treatment. According to this implementation, it is suggested that the above-explained room lasers permanently arranged in the radiation room for positioning a patient for radiation be used for further purposes, namely for the position determination of a patient and, if necessary, additional objects in the radiation room. Conventional laser triangulation may be used. At least one laser line, and preferably several laser lines, are at least projected at the patient and at least one laser line, and preferably all laser lines, are recorded by one or more high-resolution cameras. The system is thus structurally simplified through the use of the already present room laser used for patient positioning. Moreover, in contrast to the art described above, not only are few individual points measured on the surface of the patient with respect to their distance from the gantry, but rather the 3D coordinates along the respectively evaluated section of the laser lines are determined by the measuring process of the triangulation. The laser lines can be generated for example by cylindrical lenses. The room lasers can generally transmit laser light in any wavelength ranges, but preferably in the visible range. One or more cameras can be provided in the radiation room so that, in the maximum case, each laser line projected by a room laser is captured by a camera. The field of vision of the cameras is selected such that optionally all laser lines facing the camera are captured by means of a wide angle lens, or only certain sections of interest during use of a lens with correspondingly limited field of vision. In the case of the use of several cameras, a combination of both is also possible.
An evaluation and control apparatus comprises a computer with suitable software, with which performing the evaluation of the camera images is possible. The room lasers or respectively the cameras can also be controlled with the apparatus and measurement data can be downloaded from the cameras. The 3D coordinates of the laser lines projected in particular on the patient as one of the objects in the radiation room can be determined from this by means of the software. The software can also import Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) information such as, for example, DICOM-RT information (that is, the information available through the extension of the DICOM 3.0 standard that handles radiotherapy). They can also have in particular a database system. It is also possible to capture several objects located in the radiation room within the framework of the evaluation and determine their relative position with respect to each other.
Through the teachings herein, the real-time position monitoring and detection of a position change using the room lasers already present in the radiation room are allowed in a structurally simple and cost-effective manner. No additional lasers are required for the measurement. Rather, the room lasers are used for further new functionalities, in particular for monitoring the patient position and, if necessary, the position of additional objects during the radiation treatment. A multi-functional, cost-effective and time-effective system is thereby provided. Based on the comparison of the determined coordinate points along the laser lines with target coordinate points, an impermissible deviation in the patient position can be determined and suitable countermeasures can be taken. As target coordinates, the coordinates measured and saved at the beginning of the radiation treatment after final positioning of the patient can be used. In this case, a change in the patient position with respect to the originally aligned position can thus be determined. Also, the patient positioning, in particular at the beginning of a radiation fraction, is improved herein because the positioning is no longer exclusively based on (relocatable) skin markings but rather on the conformity of entire body contour profiles.
Furthermore, according to the teachings herein, at least the coordinate points determined during the radiation procedure, in particular of patient and gantry, are saved in order to document the radiation procedure. Through the saving of the position data identified during a radiation fraction, exact documentation of the dose received by the patient with each radiation fraction can be compiled with exact localization of the area of affected burden of the radiation. On this basis, the quality of a radiation fraction can be assessed precisely and subsequent radiation fractions can also be adjusted in a suitable manner In particular, deviations from a target dose received in one radiation fraction can be compensated for in a subsequent radiation fraction.
In some embodiments, patient characteristics may be saved in order to document the radiation procedure. Patient characteristics may include patient height, patient weight, patient body contour, other suitable patient characteristics, or a combination thereof. During a radiation fraction, patient characteristics may be measured and/or captured and saved. During a subsequent radiation fraction, patient characteristics may be measured and/or captured and compared to previously-saved patient characteristics. The subsequent radiation fraction may be adjusted in a suitable manner to accommodate changes in patient characteristics between radiation fractions. For example, a patient may lose weight between a first radiation fraction and a subsequent radiation fraction (e.g., a second, third, fourth, or later radiation fraction). The subsequent radiation fraction may be adjusted to account for the patient weight loss. For example, a target dose may be adjusted, a patient position may be adjusted, other suitable radiation fraction adjustments may be made, or a combination thereof.
The measurement of the profile shape of the laser lines lying in the field of vision and/or field of view of the camera(s) can thereby take place for determining the coordinates in the respective sectional plane, preferably in the coordinate system of the radiation device. For this, the existing camera coordinate systems are transformed into a common space coordinate system with the help of a calibration process. As explained, the intersection of three laser planes arranged respectively orthogonally to each other is preferably selected as the point of origin of the space coordinate system. The intersection coordinates determined according to the invention can then be determined in this space coordinate system. If, for example, three laser lines are captured and evaluated with respect to the coordinate points by means of cameras, each of the laser lines delivers one coordinate family For example, the laser planes generated by the room lasers should intersect in the isocenter of the radiation device, which has for example the coordinates (0, 0, 0) in the space coordinate system. A first laser line then delivers the coordinate values (x, y, 0). A second laser line then delivers the coordinate values (x, 0, z). A third laser line then delivers the coordinate values (0, y, z). The patient position can be determined clearly with this coordinate family
Since the eye safety of the people located in the radiation room is important, the maximum possible brightness of the laser lines is limited. A relatively poor contrast between the laser lines and the surrounding objects also captured by the camera can thus result. In order to improve the laser line detection in the camera images, optical bandpass filters can be used, which are synchronized for the respective laser wavelength used. Through the use of an optical bandpass filter, the objects surrounding the laser lines can be hidden to a certain degree.
Alternatively, or additionally, it is possible that the evaluation and control apparatus switches the respectively controlled room lasers on and off such that the cameras see images of the area respectively captured by the camera with projected laser lines and without project laser lines in quickly alternating succession Immediately successive images can then be subtracted from each other by the evaluation and control apparatus, in particular pixel by pixel, so that the laser lines emerge as the difference between two immediately successive camera images with very high contrast.
In the case of several projected and evaluated laser lines, the laser lines themselves for example can be projected in a temporally offset manner—timely multiplexing can thus take place. It can thus be ensured that certain cameras always only see one laser line at a time. This could also be achieved in that the different laser lines of lasers are projected with a different wavelength and the respective cameras detect for example only one wavelength through the provision of suitable filters.
Desirably, if two of the used room lasers generate fan-shaped light planes aligned with each other in a coplanar manner in the target scenario, it is also possible to check the coplanarity of these light planes by means of the cameras provided.
According to a further embodiment, the target coordinate points can be determined based on a CT image of the patient made before the radiation treatment and saved in memory of the evaluation and control apparatus. It is then also possible that the target coordinate points were determined from intersection coordinate points of the surface of the patient determined within the framework of the CT image with at least one plane progressing through the center of the area of the patient to be irradiated, preferably with two or three planes located perpendicular to each other and intersecting in the center of the area of the patient to be irradiated.
According to a further design, it is possible that the target coordinate points are determined after the patient has been positioned in the specified radiation position before a radiation procedure with an imaging process (CB-CT, ultrasound), in that coordinate points along the laser lines projected on the surface of the patient are determined by the evaluation and control apparatus based on the measurement values detected by the camera through a real-time triangulation process. The coordinate points determined in this manner may be saved as target coordinate points in the memory apparatus of the evaluation and control apparatus.
The system can also comprise a display apparatus or device, which shows the actual coordinate points determined during a radiation procedure and, optionally, the target coordinate points in real time. The coordinate points can be shown directly or visualized in a suitable manner For example, fitted lines can be laid through coordinate points.
The evaluation and control apparatus can also be designed to emit a warning signal in the case of an impermissible deviation between the determined coordinate points and the target coordinate points and/or to perform a correction of the patient position by activating movement control of the patient table. The respective parameters are set during patient positioning at the beginning of a radiation fraction. If, in the course of the monitoring of the patient position performed during the subsequent radiation procedure, an impermissible deviation is determined, a warning signal can first be emitted. The warning signal can be optic and/or acoustic and/or haptic. A user can then take manual measures, for example, to reposition the patient or cancel the radiation procedure. Naturally, it is also possible that the evaluation and control apparatus automatically cancels the radiation, for example through an emergency-stop activation. But, fully automatic adjustment of the patient position is also possible where the evaluation and control apparatus activates the travel drives of the patient table based on the measured values such that the measured actual coordinate points and the target coordinate points match again. Tracking thus occurs. A conventional 3D matching algorithm can be used for this tracking.
The evaluation and control apparatus can also be designed to capture a breathing movement or another type of movement of the patient during a radiation procedure through the determination of the 3D coordinates of the laser lines. In this way, the radiation device can be controlled such that radiation only takes place in a specified breathing position or other movement position of the patient. Real-time consideration of how the patient's chest rises during breathing thus takes place during a suitable real-time position evaluation of the flexible patient surface, which allows so-called 4D radiation to be performed. 4D-CT data can also be used to determine the rise of a patient's chest due to breathing from the measured coordinate points.
According to a further design, the evaluation and control apparatus can be designed to determine the coordinates of a laser line intersecting the surface of the patient at the intersection of a central beam of the radiation device and to determine the focus-skin distance from the coordinates. The focus-skin distance is defined by the distance of the focus or focal point of the radiation device to the surface of the patient along a vector from the focus or focal point of the radiation device to the isocenter (generally the point of origin of the coordinate system). The focus-skin distance is an important parameter in radiation therapy.
According to a further design, at least one of the room lasers projects a laser line onto the surface of the patient table and/or radiation device in the radiation room, at least one camera is designed to detect the laser line projected onto the surface of the patient table and/or radiation device by the at least one room laser, and the evaluation and control apparatus is designed to determine the coordinate points along the laser line projected onto the surface of the patient table and/or radiation device during a radiation procedure based on the measurement values detected by the camera through a real-time triangulation process. According to a further related design, the evaluation and control apparatus is further designed to compare the determined coordinate points along the laser line projected onto the surface of the patient table and/or radiation device with target coordinate points and to emit a warning signal, in particular a collision warning signal, in the case of an impermissible deviation (i.e., a deviation outside defined limits) between the determined coordinate points and the target coordinate points. The target coordinate points can be determined, for example, during the course of the planning of the radiation treatment and saved in the memory apparatus. The evaluation and control apparatus may be further designed to save the coordinate points along the laser line projected onto the surface of the patient table and/or radiation device determined during the radiation procedure in the memory apparatus for documentation of the radiation procedure.
As explained, the head of the radiation device, i.e., the gantry, can be rotated 360° in a fixed plane. During this rotational movement, the heavy weight of the gantry has different effects on the accuracy of the rotational movement in different positions. As mentioned initially, such inaccuracies in the rotational movement lead to undesired impacts on the radiation accuracy. The additional weight of a generally extendible X-ray tube and the opposite-lying image detector contribute to further inaccuracies. The patient table can generally perform both translatory movements as well as rotational movements. Depending on the position and weight of a patient located on the table, deviations from the respectively specified positions are possible, which, as initially explained, also have undesired effects on the radiation result.
In the case of the aforementioned designs, a real-time determination of the position of the radiation device and/or the patient table continues to take place by means of the room lasers. Other objects present in the radiation room can also be monitored in this manner and a collision can be prevented, for example. Alone the coordinates of the respectively projected lines determined by the triangulation process do not yet necessarily provide sufficient information on the position of the object in the room. For this reason, for example, the 3D coordinates of the points on the surface of the object to be monitored, for example a gantry, are desirably known, in particular in the form of 3D computer-aided design (3D-CAD) data or from initial measurements. For example, the gantry rotational angle is determined by a mathematical search algorithm stored in the software of the evaluation and control apparatus, in which the theoretically determined coordinates of virtual laser projection lines have the same values as the coordinates of the laser projection lines determined metrologically by the triangulation process. The more projected lines are evaluated, the faster the position determination can take place. The position of the objects in the radiation room can be determined in real time by an evaluation of the known initial position of the objects in the radiation room as well as their also known 3D degree of mobility and 3D surfaces through the software of the evaluation and control apparatus by means of conventional mathematical processes given the teachings herein.
The metrologically determined position of additional objects in the radiation room besides the patient can also be taken into consideration in the documentation in the memory apparatus so that the radiation dose effectively received by the patient in a radiation fraction can be determined precisely and can be taken into consideration, for example, in the setup of additional radiation procedures.
A further problem area is the assignment of the measured 3D coordinates to a certain object, that is, the question of whether the camera measures laser line coordinates on the object to be measured or on another object. This problem area can be solved in two ways. In a first alternative, the object to be measured can be moved to various positions within the framework of a calibration process and the correspondingly projected laser lines can be received and saved. During a subsequent measurement, the measured lines can be compared with the saved lines and the position present during the measurement is concluded through a matching process based on the empirically performed assignment of certain positions of the object to certain laser lines. According to a second alternative, different surface qualities of the objects, for example different reflectivities, can be evaluated. The application of contrast markings of a different type to different objects is also conceivable in order to be able to differentiate between the different objects within the framework of the evaluation.
According to a further design, at least four room lasers are provided. Of the at least four room lasers, two are arranged on opposite-lying sides of the patient table and project respectively one lateral horizontal laser line and one transverse line onto a patient lying on the patient table. Further, of the at least four room lasers, at least two are arranged above the patient table, one of which projects at least one transversal line onto a patient lying on the patient table, and one of which projects a longitudinal line onto a patient lying on the patient table.
The first and second room lasers arranged laterally to the patient table thus generate two fan-shaped, orthogonal laser light planes. The laser light planes emitted by these two room lasers lying opposite each other and arranged on both longitudinal sides of the patient table are respectively arranged in pairs in a coplanar manner The third room laser arranged above the patient table and generating the transversal line can, in addition to the fan-shaped laser light plane generating the transversal line, also generate a fan-shaped laser light plane orthogonal to it, which (like the laser light plane of the fourth room laser arranged above the patient table) also generates a longitudinal line on the patient body. The laser light planes of these three room lasers intersect in the isocenter of the radiation device. These room lasers generate three lines on the patient surface: one longitudinal, one transversal and one line horizontally lateral (coronal) from each side. Three crosses are thereby generated on the surface of the patient (laterally left and right as well as on top). The original points of the first three room lasers (left, right and top) can be coplanar. These three room lasers are then arranged in a plane progressing perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the patient table.
Just like the third room laser, the fourth room laser can be arranged above the patient table. This fourth room laser, which generates in particular just one laser line, is not arranged with its origin in the same plane progressing perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the patient table as the other room lasers. It is rather arranged offset in the longitudinal direction of the patient table. But the laser light plane of the fourth room laser also progresses through the intersection of the laser light planes generated by the other room lasers. Moreover, the laser light plane generated by this fourth room laser lies in the same plane as the laser light plane of the third room laser generating the longitudinal line (ceiling laser).
Due to their large spread, the room lasers thereby also each project laser lines on the objects surrounding the patient in the radiation room, such as the radiation device and the patient table. A cross should be able to be projected onto the patient in any position of the radiation device. Since the gantry in its upper (zero) position shadows the third room laser, the fourth room laser takes over the projection of the longitudinal line in this case, so that a cross can nonetheless be mapped on the top side of the patient's body.
It is possible that the lateral first and second room lasers and/or the upper third room laser comprise respectively one laser source, which generates the two orthogonal laser light planes via suitable lenses. But it is also possible that the lateral first and second room lasers and/or the upper third room laser comprise respectively two laser sources, of which each one laser source generates respectively one of the orthogonal laser light planes. In this case, the two laser sources can be arranged in a common housing or even spatially separated in separate housings.
According to a further design, at least two cameras can be provided, which are respectively designed to detect the laser lines projected by at least two room lasers. Desirably, the cameras are high-resolution cameras. They can be, for example, CCD cameras or similar optical sensors. Naturally, more than two such cameras can also be provided.
The system according to one implementation of the invention shown schematically in
The system according to
The upper third room laser 22 also generates a light plane progressing in a coplanar manner to it and thus forms a so-called transversal line together with the lateral room lasers 18, 20. The laser light plane of the third room laser 22 generating the transversal line lies in a coplanar manner to the laser light planes of the lateral room lasers 18, 20 generating the vertical laser lines 26, 28. Moreover, one horizontal laser line 32 is projected onto the patient's body 12 as well as the radiation device 16 by each of the laterally-arranged first and second room lasers 18, 20. The fan-shaped laser light planes generated for this purpose by the lateral first and second room lasers 18, 20 also lie in a coplanar manner with respect to each other. The upper third room laser 22 also generates a second laser light plane, which generates a longitudinal line 30 on the patient's body 12 and on the patient table 10 as well as the radiation device 16 in this example. The upper fourth room laser 24 projects, together with the third room laser 22, the longitudinal line 30 onto the patient's body 12 and onto the patient table 10 as well as the radiation device 16. The laser light planes of the third and fourth room lasers 22, 24 forming the longitudinal line 30 lie in a coplanar manner with respect to each other. It can be seen that the room lasers 18, 20, 22 with their origin lie in the same plane progressing perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the patient table 10. In contrast, the fourth room laser 24 is arranged in the longitudinal direction of the patient table 10 offset with respect to the other room lasers 18, 20, 22. A laser line cross can thereby be projected onto the patient's body 12 in any rotational position of the radiation device 16. The laser light planes of the room lasers 18, 20, 22, 24 intersect in the isocenter of the radiation device 16.
Two high-resolution cameras 34, 36 are included in the illustrated example. The cameras can be, for example, CCD cameras. The cameras 34, 36 are aligned such that they can jointly detect laser lines projected by the room lasers 18, 20, 22, 24. For example, the cameras 34, 36 may be aligned such that the cameras 34, 36 may jointly detect all laser lines projected by the room lasers 18, 20, 22, 24.
An evaluation and control apparatus 38 is connected with the cameras 34, 36 and the room lasers 18, 20, 22, 24 via suitable wires, cables, or other connectors (not shown in greater detail). The evaluation and control apparatus 38 can control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, 24 in order to generate a laser line in the manner explained above. Moreover, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 can download measurement data recorded by the cameras 34, 36. On this basis, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines the 3D coordinate points along the laser lines projected onto the surface of the patient's body 12 during a radiation procedure through a real-time triangulation process and compares them with target coordinate points. This can occur in the aforementioned manner On this basis, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 can take further measures. For example, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may execute a corrective action. The corrective action may include, for example, visualizing an impermissible deviation in the aforementioned manner or controlling the patient table 10 in a suitable manner via the wires, cables, or other connectors, in order to reposition the patient's body 12.
In some embodiments, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may monitor the 3D coordinate points while the evaluation and control apparatus 38 executes the corrective action. For example, as described above, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may determine initial 3D coordinate points along the laser lines projected onto the surface of the patient's body 12 during an initial radiation procedure through an initial real-time triangulation process. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may compare the initial 3D coordinate points with the target coordinate points. When the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines that an impermissible deviation exists between the initial 3D coordinate points and the target coordinate points, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may take future measures, such as by executing a corrective action to correct the impermissible deviation. For example, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the patient table 10 in order to reposition the patient's body 12 to correct the impermissible deviation, as described above.
Controlling the patient table 10 in order to reposition the patient's body 12, or computing and/or executing any other corrective action, may take a period of time. For example, it may take several minutes for the patient table 10 to be adjusted such that the patient's body 12 is repositioned. During the period in which the patient's body 12 is being repositioned, the patient's body 12 may move. For example, the patient may move a portion of the patient's body 12, such as an arm, leg, other portion of the patient's body 12, or a combination thereof. Accordingly, the initial 3D coordinate points generated prior to the evaluation and control apparatus 38 repositioning the patient's body 12 may no longer be valid. This may result in an incorrect position of the patient's body 12 upon completion of controlling the patient table 10.
As described above, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24. In some embodiments, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 in order to continue to generate laser lines, as described above, during the period of time it takes to reposition the patient's body 12. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may generate updated 3D coordinate points to reflect changes in the patient's body 12 during the time it takes to reposition the patient's body 12. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may monitor the updated 3D coordinate points during the period it takes to reposition the patient's body 12. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may compare the updated 3D coordinate points with the initial 3D coordinate points generated prior to the evaluation and control apparatus 38 repositioning the patient's body 12. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may emit a warning signal or take other further measures, as described above, when the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines an impermissible deviation exists between the updated 3D coordinate points and the initial 3D coordinate points generated prior to the evaluation and control apparatus 38 repositioning the patient's body 12.
An impermissible deviation between the updated 3D coordinate points and the initial 3D coordinate points may include a deviation that is unexpected based on the repositioning of the patient's body 12. For example, as the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the patient table 10 in order to reposition the patient's body 12, the patient's body 12 may move in an expected manner (e.g. with the patient table 10). Accordingly, the updated 3D coordinate points may represent the expected change in position of the patient's body 12. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may ignore a deviation between the updated 3D coordinate points and the initial 3D coordinate points generated when the deviation is within an expected or intended movement of the patient's body 12. For example, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may compare a deviation to a threshold. The threshold may represent an expected deviation representing an expected change in position of the patient's body 12. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may emit a warning signal, or take other further measures, as described above, when the deviation is greater than the threshold. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may ignore a deviation that is less than the threshold.
The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may monitor patient movement during a CB-CT imaging process. As explained above, a patient's body 12 may be subject to CB-CT imaging to determine the target coordinate points, proper target body position, or a combination thereof. A CB-CT process, such as imaging and/or data correlation processes, may take a period of time. For example, it may take several minutes for the CB-CT imaging process to complete. During the period in which the CB-CT process is being executed, the patient's body 12 may move. For example, the patient may move a portion of the patient's body 12, such as an arm, leg, other portion of the patient's body 12, or a combination thereof. This may result in inaccurate CB-CT imaging, inaccurate target coordinate points, inaccurate target body position, or a combination thereof.
As described above, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24. In some embodiments, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 in order to continue to generate laser lines, as described above, during the period of time it takes to complete a CB-CT process. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may generate initial 3D coordinate points to reflect an initial position of the patient's body 12. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may generate updated 3D coordinate points periodically or continuously during the CB-CT process. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may compare the initial 3D coordinate points with updated 3D coordinate points. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may emit a warning signal or take other further measures, as described above, when the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines an impermissible deviation exists (e.g. because of patient movement) between the updated 3D coordinate points and the initial 3D coordinate points.
Additionally, or alternatively, when the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines no impermissible deviation exists (e.g., because the patient's body 12 remains stable, and within permissible tolerances, during the CB-CT process), a valid correction vector may be generated by the CB-CT process and/or by the evaluation and control apparatus 38. The valid correction vector may be a vector that indicates a correct position of the patient table 10 such that, when the patient table 10 is in a position corresponding to the valid correction vector, the patient's body 12 on the patient table 10 will be in a correct position to receive treatment. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may use the valid correction vector to monitor a position of the patient table 10. For example, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may compare the valid correction vector to a measured position of the patient table 10. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may emit a warning signal or take further action, as described above, when the position of the patient table 10 deviates from the valid correction vector.
In some embodiments, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may store target coordinate points corresponding to the position of the patient table 10 when the position of the patient table 10 does not deviate from the value correction vector. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 use the target coordinate points and measured 3D coordinate points, as described above, to adjust and/or monitor a position of the patient table 10 during subsequent treatments (i.e., radiation or treatment fractions) in order to ensure the patient's body 12 is in a correct position. For example, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may compare 3D coordinate points measured during a subsequent treatment with the target coordinate points corresponding to the valid correction vector. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may emit a warning signal or take further action, as described above, when the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines an impermissible deviation exists between the 3D coordinate points and the target coordinate points. By utilizing the valid correction vector generated during an initial CB-CT process, time can be saved during subsequent treatments of the patient. Further, utilizing the valid correction vector generated during an initial CB-CT process can reduce the overall radiation to which a patient is subjected by eliminating the need to repeat the CB-CT process ahead of each treatment fraction.
The room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 may be configured to change color in response to the patient's body 12 being in a correct position. For example, as described above, the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 may project laser lines onto the patient's body 12. The room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 may initially project a first color laser line onto the patient's body 12. For example, a red laser line. The room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 may project a second color laser line when the patient's body 12 is in a correct position. For example, a green laser line.
The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may compare the 3D coordinate points, such as current 3D coordinate points, to the target coordinate points. The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the color of the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 based on whether an impermissible deviation exists between the 3D coordinate points and the target coordinate points. For example, when the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines that an impermissible deviation exists (e.g., the patient's body 12 is in an incorrect position), the evaluation and control apparatus may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 to project the first color laser line. When the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines no impermissible deviation exists between the 3D coordinate points and the target coordinate points, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 to project the second color laser line. Additionally, or alternatively, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 to project the second color laser line in response to completion of repositioning of the patient's body 12 as described above. In some embodiments, additional room lasers may be included. For example, the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 may project one of the first and second color laser lines and additional lasers may project the other of the first and second color laser lines. In some embodiments, a filter may be placed on respective ones of the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 in order to change the color of the laser line projected by the respective ones of the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24. In some embodiments, the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 may include programmable x-y scanning lasers. Programmable x-y scanning lasers may be configured to project static lines, cross-hair lines, one or more shapes, other suitable projections, or a combination thereof.
The evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 to provide a visual instruction to a user for repositioning the patient's body 12. For example, when the evaluation and control apparatus 38 determines an impermissible deviation exists between the 3D coordinate points and the target coordinate points, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may control the room lasers 18, 20, 22, and 24 to project an arrow on the patient's body 12 indicating a direction the patient's body 12 should be repositioned in order to correct the position of the patient's body 12.
Moreover, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 can also evaluate in the aforementioned manner the laser lines projected onto the surface of the patient table 10 and/or onto the surface of the radiation device 16 with respect to their 3D coordinate points. An impermissible deviation can also be determined here and the countermeasures already explained can be used. As mentioned, an impermissible deviation is one that is outside defined limits. The limits would depend upon the procedure being performed and/or the preferences of the treating individual.
As mentioned above, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may be implemented by a computer. More specifically, the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may be implemented by a computing device with a non-transitory memory device 38a and a processor 38b, such as a central processing unit (CPU), coupled by a bus or other communication path. The methods and/or techniques to implement the functions of the evaluation and control apparatus 38 described herein may be implemented in whole or in part, for example, as a software program/application comprising machine-readable instructions that are stored in the memory that, when executed by a processor, cause a server to perform the functions. Some computing devices may have multiple memories and multiple processors, and the steps described herein may in such cases be distributed using different processors and memories. Use of the terms “processor” and “memory” in the singular thus encompasses computing devices that have only one processor or one memory as well as devices having multiple processors or memories that may each be used in the performance of some but not necessarily all steps.
The methods and/or techniques to implement the functions of the evaluation and control apparatus 38 may also be implemented using hardware in whole or in part. The hardware can include, for example, computers, intellectual property (IP) cores, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic arrays such as a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) configured as a special-purpose processor, optical processors, programmable logic controllers, microcode, microcontrollers, servers, microprocessors, digital signal processors or any other suitable circuit. The term “processor” herein should be understood as encompassing any of the foregoing hardware, either singly or in combination.
The memory device 38a of the evaluation and control apparatus 38, in addition to storing instructions to control the system to implement the teachings herein, may also save and/or store the coordinate points determined during a radiation procedure for documentation of the radiation procedure and, if applicable, for adjustment of additional radiation procedures. The memory device 38a can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or any other suitable type of non-transitory storage device. The memory used to store data as described herein may include another type of device, or multiple devices, capable of storing data for processing by a processor in a computing device now-existing or hereafter developed. The display device 39 capable of displaying data measured and/or calculated herein may be integral with the evaluation and control apparatus 38, or may be coupled thereto with a connector as shown in
In the operating state shown in
The impact of a rotation of the radiation device 16 out of the initial position shown partially transparently in
The monitoring of the patient position according to one implementation of the invention will be explained schematically based on
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 196 634.3 | Dec 2013 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/567,593, filed Dec. 11, 2014, which claims priority to EP 13 196 634.3, filed Dec. 11, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14567593 | Dec 2014 | US |
| Child | 15417611 | US |
