System and method for diagnosing a patient based on an analysis of multimedia content

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9747420
  • Patent Number
    9,747,420
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 25, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 29, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
A method for diagnosing a patient based on analysis of multimedia content is provided. The method includes receiving at least one multimedia content element respective of the patient from a user device; generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element; generating at least one identifier respective of the at least one multimedia content element using the at least one generated signature; searching a plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses respective of the one or more identifiers; and providing at least one possible diagnoses respective of the at least one multimedia content element to the user device.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to the analysis of multimedia content, and, more specifically, to a system for diagnosing a patient based on an analysis of multimedia content.


BACKGROUND

The current methods used to diagnose a disease of a medical condition usually rely on a patient's visit to a medical professional who is specifically trained to diagnose specific medical conditions that the patient may suffer from.


Today, an abundance of data relating to such medical condition is likely to be available through various sources in general and the Internet and world-wide web (WWW) in particular. This data allows the patient, if he or she is so inclined, to at least begin to understand the medical condition by searching for information about it.


The problem is that, while a person searches through the web for a self-diagnosis, the person may ignore one or more identifiers which are related to the medical condition and, therefore, may receive information that is inappropriate or inaccurate with respect to the person's specific medical condition. This inappropriate or inaccurate information often leads to a misdiagnosis by the patient, increased anxiety, and waste of a doctor or other caregiver's time as such caregiver needs to correct the misinformed patient's understanding of the medical condition.


As an example, a person may experience a rash and look up medical conditions related to rashes. Without expertise in dermatology, the person may determine that the experienced rash is similar to that caused by poison ivy. An immediate remedy may be cleaning the rash followed by calamine lotion is the only necessary treatment. However, if the rash is caused by an allergic reaction to a food, a different treatment may be require, such as exposure to epinephrine.


Moreover, a patient may receive digital content respective of the medical condition including, but not limited to, medical reports, images, and other multimedia content. However, other than being able to send such content to other advice providers, the patients cannot typically effectively use such content to aid in diagnosis. Rather, the patient can frequently only provide the content to a caregiver or someone else who is capable of adequately understanding the relevance of such content.


It would be therefore advantageous to provide a solution for identifying a plurality of disease characteristics related to patients, and providing diagnoses respective thereof.


SUMMARY

Certain embodiments disclosed herein include a method and system for diagnosing a patient based on analysis of multimedia content. The method includes receiving at least one multimedia content element respective of the patient from a user device; generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element; generating at least one identifier respective of the at least one multimedia content element using the at least one generated signature; searching a plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses respective of the one or more identifiers; and providing at least one possible diagnoses respective of the at least one multimedia content element to the user device.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter disclosed herein is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a system for analyzing multimedia content according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a flowchart describing a method for diagnosing a patient based on an analysis of multimedia content according to an embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram depicting the basic flow of information in the signature generator system.



FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the flow of patches generation, response vector generation, and signature generation in a large-scale speech-to-text system.



FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method for identification of possible diagnoses using identifiers according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is important to note that the embodiments disclosed herein are only examples of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others. In general, unless otherwise indicated, singular elements may be in plural and vice versa with no loss of generality. In the drawings, like numerals refer to like parts through several views


Certain exemplary embodiments disclosed herein enable the possible diagnosis of patients based on the analysis of multimedia content. The diagnosis may be used, for example, as a preliminary diagnostic tool by a patient or as a recommendation tool for a medical specialist. The diagnosis begins with generating signatures for the multimedia content. The generated signatures are analysis one or more identifiers related to a patient are provided. The identifiers are used in order to provide the possible diagnoses. An identifier is an element identified within the multimedia content which may be used for diagnosing the medical condition of a patient. The identifiers may be visual, for example abnormal marks on a body part or vocal, for example, hoarseness in the patient's voice. The multimedia content is analyzed and one or more matching signatures are generated respective thereto. Thereafter, the signatures generated for the identifiers are used for searching possible diagnoses through one or more data sources. The diagnoses are then provided to the user. According to another embodiment, the one or more possible diagnoses are stored in a data warehouse or a database.


As a non-limiting example, an image of a patient's face is received by a user device. One or more signatures are generated respective of the received image. An analysis of the one or more generated signatures is then performed. The analysis may include a process of matching the signatures to one or more signatures existing in a data warehouse and extraction of identifiers respective of the matching process. Identifiers may be extracted if, e.g., such identifiers are associated with signatures from the data warehouse that demonstrated matching with the one or more generated signatures. Based on the analysis of the one or more signatures, the patient is identified as an infant. In addition, abnormal skin redness is identified on the patient's face through the image.


Respective of the identifiers, a search is performed through a plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses. The search may be made by, for example, using the image as a search query as further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/773,112, assigned to common assignee, and is hereby incorporated by reference for all the useful information they contain. While searching through the plurality of data sources for a possible diagnosis, skin redness is identified as a common syndrome of the atopic dermatitis disease among infants. The possible diagnosis is then provided to the user device and then stored in a database for further use.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary and non-limiting schematic diagram of a system 100 utilized to describe the various embodiments disclosed herein. A network 110 may be the Internet, the world-wide-web (WWW), a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a metro area network (MAN), and other networks capable of enabling communication between the elements of the system 100.


Further connected to the network 110 are one or more user devices (UD) 120-1 through 120-n (collectively referred to hereinafter as user devices 120 or individually as a user device 120). A user device 120 may be, for example, a personal computer (PC), a mobile phone, a smart phone, a tablet computer, a wearable device, and the like. The user devices 120 are configured to provide multimedia content elements to a server 130 which is also connected to the network 110.


The uploaded multimedia content can be locally saved in the user device 120 or can be captured by the user device 120. For example, the multimedia content may be an image captured by a camera installed in the user device 120, a video clip saved in the user device 120, and so on. A multimedia content may be, for example, an image, a graphic, a video stream, a video clip, an audio stream, an audio clip, a video frame, a photograph, text or image thereof, and an image of signals (e.g., spectrograms, phasograms, scalograms, etc.), and/or combinations thereof and portions thereof.


The system 100 also includes one or more web sources 150-1 through 150-m (collectively referred to hereinafter as web sources 150 or individually as a web source 150) that are connected to the network 110. Each of the web sources 150 may be, for example, a web server, an application server, a data repository, a database, a professional medical database, and the like. According to one embodiment, one or more multimedia content elements of normal (or baseline) identifiers are stored in a database such as, for example, a database 160. A baseline identifier may be, for example, a clean skin image, a normal voice recording, etc. The baseline identifiers are used as references in order to identify one or more abnormal identifiers while analyzing the generated signatures of an input multimedia content.


The server 130 and a signature generator system (SGS) 140 are core to the embodiments disclosed herein. In an embodiment, the server 130 is to generate one or more identifiers, either visual or vocal, which are used to search for one or more possible diagnoses.


The SGS 140 is configured to generate a signature respective of the multimedia content elements and/or content fed by the server 130. The process of generating the signatures is explained in more detail herein below with respect to FIGS. 3 and 5. Each of the server 130 and the SGS 140 is typically comprised of a processing unit, such as a processor (not shown) that is coupled to a memory. The memory contains instructions that can be executed by the processing unit. The server 130 also includes an interface (not shown) to the network 110. One of ordinary skill in the art would readily appreciate that the server 130 and SGS 140 may have different configurations without departing from the scope of the disclosed embodiments, including an embodiment where the two units are embodied as a single unit providing the functions of both server 130 and SGS 140.


The server 130 is configured to receive at least one multimedia content element from, for example, the user device 120. The at least one multimedia content element is sent to the SGS 140. The SGS 140 is configured to generate at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element or each portion thereof. The generated signature(s) may be robust to noise and distortions as discussed below. The generated signatures are then analyzed and one or more identifiers related to the content provided are generated.


As a non-limiting example, a user captures an image by taking a picture using a smart phone (e.g., a user device 120) and uploads the picture to a server 130. In this example, the picture features an image of the user's eye when the user is infected with pinkeye. The server 130 is configured to receive the image and send the image to an SGS 140. The SGS 140 generates a signature respective of the image.


The signature generated respective of the image is compared to signatures of baseline identifiers stored in a database 160. In this example, the signature is determined to demonstrate sufficient matching with an image of a normal (uninfected) human eye used as a normal identifier. Upon further analysis, it is determined that part of the image (namely, the color of the eye in the pinkeye image) is different and, therefore, is an abnormal identifier. Consequently, this abnormal identifier is provided to a data source so that a search may be performed. When the search has been completed, the server 130 returns the results of the search indicating that the user may have pinkeye.


The signature generated for an image or any multimedia content would enable accurate recognition of abnormal identifiers. This is because the signatures generated for the multimedia content, according to the disclosed embodiments, allow for recognition and classification of multimedia elements, such as by content-tracking, video filtering, multimedia taxonomy generation, video fingerprinting, speech-to-text, audio classification, element recognition, video/image search and any other application requiring content-based signatures generation and matching for large content volumes such as web and other large-scale databases.



FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary and non-limiting flowchart 200 describing the process of diagnosing a patient respective of an input multimedia content according to one embodiment. In S210, at least one multimedia content element is received. In an embodiment, the at least one multimedia content element may be received by, for example, any of the user devices 120. According to one embodiment, in addition to the at least one multimedia content element received, one or more metadata elements describing the patient state may be also received as an input. In S220, at least one signature is generated respective of the at least one multimedia content element. In an embodiment, the at least one signature may be generated by the SGS 140 as described below.


In S230, based on the generated signatures, at least one identifier are generated and/or retrieved. In an embodiment, the identifier(s) may be retrieved from a data warehouse (e.g., the data database 160). The identifiers may be visual or vocal. In S240, respective of the identifiers, one or more possible diagnoses are searched for through one or more data sources. The data sources may be, for example, any one of the one or more web sources 150, the database 160, and so on. According to one embodiment, the identifiers may be converted to one or more text queries which will be used in order to search for possible diagnoses through one or more search engines. In another embodiment, a signature can be generated for the identifier and the search for possible diagnoses may be performed using such signature. For example, if a redness is identified in the portion of the received multimedia content element, a signature is generated for such portion of multimedia content. The search is for possible diagnoses is performed using the signature generated for the portion of the image including the redness. Identification of diagnoses based on identifiers are discussed further herein below with respect to FIG. 5.


In S250, it is checked whether at least one possible diagnosis has been identified and, if so, execution continues with S260; otherwise, execution terminates. In S260, the one or more identified possible diagnoses are returned. According to yet another embodiment, in cases where a plurality of possible diagnosis were identified, the diagnoses may be prioritized by, for example, their commonness, the degree of match between the plurality of identifiers and the possible diagnoses, etc.


As a non-limiting example of diagnosis prioritization, if a user provides an image featuring a discoloration of the skin, the area where skin is discolored may be a visual identifier. It is determined that multiple possible diagnoses are associated with this size of skin discoloration. However, one medical condition may be identified as the highest priority diagnosis due to a high degree of matching as a result of the similarity in color between the provided discoloration and the diagnostic discoloration. As an example, an image featuring a blue discoloration may yield identification of discolorations caused by bruising as closer in color than discolorations caused by medical conditions such as eczema, chicken pox, allergic reaction, and so on, which frequently cause red discolorations. In such an example, diagnoses related to bruising (e.g., sprains, broken bones, etc.) may be prioritized over other causes of skin discoloration. In S270 it is checked whether to continue with the operation and if so, execution continues with S220; otherwise, execution terminates.


As a non-limiting example, an image of a patient's face and a recording of the patient's voice is received. The image and the recording are then analyzed by server 130 and a plurality of signatures are generated by SGS 140 respective thereto. Based on an analysis of the signatures, an abnormal redness is identified in the patient's eye and hoarseness is identified in the patient's voice. Based on the identifiers, a search for possible diagnoses is initiated. Responsive of the search, “Scarlet fever” and “Mumps disease” may be identified as possible diagnoses. As the identifiers related to the patient's eye and hoarseness of the throat are more frequent in cases of the Scarlet fever, the Scarlet fever will be provided as the more likely result. According to one embodiment, one or more advertisements may be provided to the user based on the one or more possible diagnoses. The advertisement may be received from publisher servers (not shown) and displayed together with the one or more possible diagnoses.



FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate the generation of signatures for the multimedia content elements by the SGS 140 according to one embodiment. An exemplary high-level description of the process for large scale matching is depicted in FIG. 3. In this example, the matching is for a video content.


Video content segments 2 from a Master database (DB) 6 and a Target DB 1 are processed in parallel by a large number of independent computational Cores 3 that constitute an architecture for generating the Signatures (hereinafter the “Architecture”). Further details on the computational Cores generation are provided below. The independent Cores 3 generate a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4 for Target content-segments 5 and a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 7 for Master content-segments 8. An exemplary and non-limiting process of signature generation for an audio component is shown in detail in FIG. 4. Finally, Target Robust Signatures and/or Signatures are effectively matched, by a matching algorithm 9, to Master Robust Signatures and/or Signatures database to find all matches between the two databases.


To demonstrate an example of signature generation process, it is assumed, merely for the sake of simplicity and without limitation on the generality of the disclosed embodiments, that the signatures are based on a single frame, leading to certain simplification of the computational cores generation. The Matching System is extensible for signatures generation capturing the dynamics in-between the frames.


The Signatures' generation process is now described with reference to FIG. 4. The first step in the process of signatures generation from a given speech-segment is to break down the speech-segment to K patches 14 of random length P and random position within the speech segment 12. The breakdown is performed by the patch generator component 21. The value of the number of patches K, random length P and random position parameters is determined based on optimization, considering the tradeoff between accuracy rate and the number of fast matches required in the flow process of the profiling server 130 and SGS 140. Thereafter, all the K patches are injected in parallel into all computational Cores 3 to generate K response vectors 22, which are fed into a signature generator system 23 to produce a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4.


In order to generate Robust Signatures, i.e., Signatures that are robust to additive noise L (where L is an integer equal to or greater than 1) by the Computational Cores 3, a frame ‘i’ is injected into all the Cores 3. Then, Cores 3 generate two binary response vectors: {right arrow over (S)} which is a Signature vector, and {right arrow over (RS)} which is a Robust Signature vector.


For generation of signatures robust to additive noise, such as White-Gaussian-Noise, scratch, etc., but not robust to distortions, such as crop, shift and rotation, etc., a core Ci={ni} (1≦i≦L) may consist of a single leaky integrate-to-threshold unit (LTU) node or more nodes. The node ni equations are:







V
i

=



j




w
ij



k
j









n
i=θ(Vi−Thx)  1.


where, θ is a Heaviside step function; wij is a coupling node unit (CNU) between node i and image component j (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); kj is an image component ‘j’ (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); Thx is a constant Threshold value, where x is ‘S’ for Signature and ‘RS’ for Robust Signature; and Vi is a Coupling Node Value.


The Threshold values ThX are set differently for Signature generation and for Robust Signature generation. For example, for a certain distribution of values (for the set of nodes), the thresholds for Signature (ThS) and Robust Signature (ThRS) are set apart, after optimization, according to at least one or more of the following criteria:


ii. 1: For: Vi>ThRS
1−p(V>ThS)−1−(1−ε)l>>1


i.e., given that l nodes (cores) constitute a Robust Signature of a certain image I, the probability that not all of these l nodes will belong to the Signature of a same, but noisy image, Ĩ is sufficiently low (according to a system's specified accuracy).


iii. 2: p(Vi>ThRS)≈l/L


i.e., approximately l out of the total L nodes can be found to generate a Robust Signature according to the above definition.


iv. 3: Both Robust Signature and Signature are generated for certain frame i.


It should be understood that the generation of a signature is unidirectional, and typically yields lossless compression, where the characteristics of the compressed data are maintained but the uncompressed data cannot be reconstructed. Therefore, a signature can be used for the purpose of comparison to another signature without the need of comparison to the original data. The detailed description of the Signature generation can be found U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,326,775 and 8,312,031, assigned to common assignee, and are hereby incorporated by reference for all the useful information they contain.


A Computational Core generation is a process of definition, selection, and tuning of the parameters of the cores for a certain realization in a specific system and application. The process is based on several design considerations, such as:

    • (a) The Cores should be designed so as to obtain maximal independence, i.e., the projection from a signal space should generate a maximal pair-wise distance between any two cores' projections into a high-dimensional space.
    • (b) The Cores should be optimally designed for the type of signals, i.e., the Cores should be maximally sensitive to the spatio-temporal structure of the injected signal, for example, and in particular, sensitive to local correlations in time and space. Thus, in some cases a core represents a dynamic system, such as in state space, phase space, edge of chaos, etc., which is uniquely used herein to exploit their maximal computational power.
    • (c) The Cores should be optimally designed with regard to invariance to a set of signal distortions, of interest in relevant applications.


Detailed description of the Computational Core generation and the process for configuring such cores is discussed in more detail in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 8,655,801, assigned to the common assignee, which is hereby incorporated by reference for all that it contains.



FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating 500 a method for identification of possible diagnoses using identifiers according to an embodiment. In S510, a signature of one or more multimedia content elements is analyzed. This analysis may yield the portions of the signature that are potentially related to one or more existing identifiers. A portion of signature may be potentially relevant if, for example, the length of the portion is above a predetermined threshold.


In S520, the potentially related portions of signatures and/or the full signature are compared to signatures of existing baseline identifiers. In an embodiment, such existing identifiers may be retrieved from a data warehouse (e.g., data warehouse 160). In another embodiment, this comparison may be conducted by performing signature matching between the portions of signatures and the signatures of normal identifiers. Signature matching is described further herein above with respect to FIG. 3.


In S530, signatures of existing baseline identifiers that demonstrated sufficient matching with the portions of signatures are retrieved. Matching may be sufficient if, e.g., the matching score is above a certain threshold, the matching score of one signature is the highest among compared signatures, and so on. Optionally in S535, one or more baseline identifiers may be generated based on the matching. In a further embodiment, generation occurs if no normal identifier demonstrated sufficient matching with the portion of the multimedia content signature.


In S540, one or more baseline identifiers is determined and retrieved. In an embodiment, baseline identifiers may be determined based on differences between the retrieved normal identifier signatures and the portions of multimedia content signatures. In S550, the baseline identifiers are provided to a data source to perform a search. In S560, the results of the search are returned. In S570, it is checked whether additional multimedia content signatures or portions thereof must be analyzed. If so, execution continues with S510; otherwise, execution terminates.


As a non-limiting example, a user provides multimedia content featuring a swollen wrist. Several portions of the signature that may be relevant to diagnosis are determined. In this example, such portions may include a hand, an arm, veins, fingers, a thumb, a patch of skin demonstrating a bump, and a discolored patch of skin. The signatures of the swollen wrist are compared to signatures in a database, and a signature related to a picture of an uninjured wrist is retrieved as a normal identifier.


The portions of the signature identifying the discoloration and disproportionately large segments of the wrist are determined to be differences. Thus, the portions of the multimedia content related to those portions of signatures are determined to be relevant abnormal identifiers. The determined abnormal identifiers are retrieved and provided to a data source. In this example, the data source performs a search based on the abnormal identifiers and determines that the abnormal identifiers are typical for sprained wrists. Thus, the results of the search indicating that the user's wrist may be sprained are returned.


The various embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented as hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. Moreover, the software is preferably implemented as an application program tangibly embodied on a program storage unit or computer readable medium consisting of parts, or of certain devices and/or a combination of devices. The application program may be uploaded to, and executed by, a machine comprising any suitable architecture. Preferably, the machine is implemented on a computer platform having hardware such as one or more central processing units (“CPUs”), a memory, and input/output interfaces. The computer platform may also include an operating system and microinstruction code. The various processes and functions described herein may be either part of the microinstruction code or part of the application program, or any combination thereof, which may be executed by a CPU, whether or not such a computer or processor is explicitly shown. In addition, various other peripheral units may be connected to the computer platform such as an additional data storage unit and a printing unit. Furthermore, a non-transitory computer readable medium is any computer readable medium except for a transitory propagating signal.


All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.

Claims
  • 1. A method for diagnosing a patient based on analysis of multimedia content, comprising: receiving at least one multimedia content element respective of the patient from a user device;generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element by compression of the at least one multimedia element;generating at least one identifier respective of the at least one multimedia content element using the at least one generated signature;converting the at least one identifier to at least one text query;searching a plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses respective of the one or more identifiers using the at least one text query; andproviding at least one possible diagnoses respective of the at least one multimedia content element to the user device.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: storing the at least one possible diagnose in a data warehouse.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the identifiers include any one of: a visual identifier, a vocal identifier and a combination thereof.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving metadata from the user device; and,searching through the plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses of the patient based on the at least one identifier and the received metadata.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: generating at least one signature for the at least one identifier; andsearching through the plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses using the at least signature generated respective of the identifier.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the generation of the at least one identifier of the patient further comprising: matching the generated signatures to the one or more multimedia content element of baseline identifiers; andidentifying at least one abnormal identifier respective of the matching, wherein the at least one abnormal identifier is the generated at least one identifier.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the multimedia content element includes at least one of: an image, graphics, a video stream, a video clip, an audio stream, an audio clip, a video frame, a photograph, images of signals, and portions thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing an advertisement to the user device related to at least one possible diagnosis.
  • 9. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for causing one or more processing units to execute the method according to claim 1.
  • 10. A system for diagnosing a patient based on analysis of multimedia content, comprising: an interface to a network for receiving at least one multimedia content element respective of the patient from a user device;processing circuitry; anda memory communicatively connected to the processing circuitry, the memory containing instructions that, when executed by the processor, configure the system to:receive at least one multimedia content element respective of the patient from a user device;generate at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element by compression of the at least one multimedia element;generate at least one identifier respective of the at least one multimedia content element using the at least one generated signature;convert the at least one identifier into at least one text query;search a plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses respective of the one or more identifiers using the at least one text query; andprovide at least one possible diagnoses respective of the at least one multimedia content element to the user device.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the system is communicatively connected to a signature generator system (SGS), wherein the SGS is configured to generate the at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein any of the processor and the SGS further comprises: a plurality of computational cores configured to receive the at least one multimedia content element, each computational core of the plurality of computational cores having properties that are at least partly statistically independent from other of the plurality of computational cores, the properties are set independently of each other core.
  • 13. The system claim 11, wherein the system is further configured to: generate at least one signature for the at least one identifier; andsearch through the plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses using the at least signature generated respective of the identifier.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the system is further configured: match the generated signatures to the one or more multimedia content element of normal identifiers; andidentify one or more abnormal identifiers.
  • 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one identifier includes any one of: a visual identifier, a vocal identifier, and a combination thereof.
  • 16. The system of claim 10, wherein the interface is further configured to receive metadata elements from the user device.
  • 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the system is further configured to search through the plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses based on the at least one identifier and the metadata.
  • 18. The system of claim 10, wherein the multimedia content element includes at least one of: an image, graphics, a video stream, a video clip, an audio stream, an audio clip, a video frame, a photograph, images of signals, and portions thereof.
  • 19. The system of claim 10, wherein the processor is further configured to provide an advertisement to the user device related to at least one possible diagnosis.
  • 20. A method for diagnosing a patient based on analysis of multimedia content that includes visual and non-visual components, comprising: receiving at least one multimedia content element respective of the patient from a user device;generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element based on its visual and non-visual components generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia content element by compression of the at least one multimedia element;generating at least one identifier respective of the at least one multimedia content element using the at least one generated signature;searching a plurality of data sources for possible diagnoses respective of the one or more identifiers; andproviding at least one possible diagnoses respective of the at least one multimedia content element to the user device.
Priority Claims (3)
Number Date Country Kind
171577 Oct 2005 IL national
173409 Jan 2006 IL national
185414 Aug 2007 IL national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/839,871 filed on Jun. 27, 2013. This application is also a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/624,397 filed on Sep. 21, 2012. The Ser. No. 13/624,397 Application is a continuation-in-part of: (a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/344,400 filed on Jan. 5, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/434,221, filed May 1, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,112,376. The Ser. No. 13/344,400 Application is also a continuation-in-part of the below-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/195,863 and Ser. No. 12/084,150;(b) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/195,863, filed Aug. 21, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,775, which claims priority under 35 USC 119 from Israeli Application No. 185414, filed on Aug. 21, 2007, and which is also a continuation-in-part of the below-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150; and,(c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150 filed on Apr. 7, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,655,801, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235, filed on Oct. 26, 2006, which claims foreign priority from Israeli Application No. 171577 filed on Oct. 26, 2005 and Israeli Application No. 173409 filed on 29 Jan. 2006. All of the applications referenced above are herein incorporated by reference for all that they contain.

US Referenced Citations (221)
Number Name Date Kind
4733353 Jaswa Mar 1988 A
4932645 Schorey et al. Jun 1990 A
4972363 Nguyen et al. Nov 1990 A
5307451 Clark Apr 1994 A
5568181 Greenwood et al. Oct 1996 A
5806061 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 1998 A
5852435 Vigneaux et al. Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5940821 Wical Aug 1999 A
5987454 Hobbs Nov 1999 A
6038560 Wical Mar 2000 A
6122628 Castelli et al. Sep 2000 A
6128651 Cezar Oct 2000 A
6137911 Zhilyaev Oct 2000 A
6144767 Bottou et al. Nov 2000 A
6173068 Prokoski Jan 2001 B1
6240423 Hirata May 2001 B1
6243375 Speicher Jun 2001 B1
6243713 Nelson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6329986 Cheng Dec 2001 B1
6363373 Steinkraus Mar 2002 B1
6381656 Shankman Apr 2002 B1
6493692 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493705 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6523022 Hobbs Feb 2003 B1
6523046 Liu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6526400 Takata et al. Feb 2003 B1
6550018 Abonamah et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560597 Dhillon et al. May 2003 B1
6594699 Sahai et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601060 Tomaru Jul 2003 B1
6611628 Sekiguchi et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611837 Schreiber Aug 2003 B2
6618711 Ananth Sep 2003 B1
6665657 Dibachi Dec 2003 B1
6675159 Lin et al. Jan 2004 B1
6704725 Lee Mar 2004 B1
6728706 Aggarwal et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732149 Kephart May 2004 B1
6751613 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754435 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6774917 Foote et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795818 Lee Sep 2004 B1
6819797 Smith et al. Nov 2004 B1
6836776 Schreiber Dec 2004 B2
6901207 Watkins May 2005 B1
6938025 Lulich et al. Aug 2005 B1
6970881 Mohan et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978264 Chandrasekar et al. Dec 2005 B2
7013051 Sekiguchi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020654 Najmi Mar 2006 B1
7047033 Wyler May 2006 B2
7124149 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7199798 Echigo et al. Apr 2007 B1
7260564 Lynn et al. Aug 2007 B1
7277928 Lennon Oct 2007 B2
7296012 Ohashi Nov 2007 B2
7302117 Sekiguchi et al. Nov 2007 B2
7313805 Rosin et al. Dec 2007 B1
7340458 Vaithilingam et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346629 Kapur et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353224 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376672 Weare May 2008 B2
7376722 Sim et al. May 2008 B1
7392238 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 B1
7406459 Chen et al. Jul 2008 B2
7433895 Li et al. Oct 2008 B2
7450740 Shah et al. Nov 2008 B2
7464086 Black et al. Dec 2008 B2
7523102 Bjarnestam et al. Apr 2009 B2
7526607 Singh et al. Apr 2009 B1
7536384 Venkataraman et al. May 2009 B2
7536417 Walsh et al. May 2009 B2
7542969 Rappaport et al. Jun 2009 B1
7548910 Chu et al. Jun 2009 B1
7555477 Bayley et al. Jun 2009 B2
7555478 Bayley et al. Jun 2009 B2
7562076 Kapur Jul 2009 B2
7574436 Kapur et al. Aug 2009 B2
7574668 Nunez et al. Aug 2009 B2
7657100 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660468 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660737 Lim et al. Feb 2010 B1
7697791 Chan et al. Apr 2010 B1
7769221 Shakes et al. Aug 2010 B1
7788132 Desikan et al. Aug 2010 B2
7860895 Scofield et al. Dec 2010 B1
7904503 Van De Sluis Mar 2011 B2
7920894 Wyler Apr 2011 B2
7921107 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7974994 Li et al. Jul 2011 B2
7987194 Walker et al. Jul 2011 B1
7987217 Long et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991715 Schiff et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000655 Wang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8112376 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2012 B2
8315442 Gokturk et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316005 Moore Nov 2012 B2
8326775 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 B2
8345982 Gokturk et al. Jan 2013 B2
8548828 Longmire Oct 2013 B1
8655801 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8799195 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8799196 Raichelquaz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8818916 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8886648 Procopio et al. Nov 2014 B1
9330189 Raichelgauz et al. May 2016 B2
9438270 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2016 B2
20010019633 Tenze et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020019881 Bokhari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038299 Zernik et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020059580 Kalker et al. May 2002 A1
20020099870 Miller et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020123928 Eldering et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129296 Kwiat et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020152267 Lennon Oct 2002 A1
20020157116 Jasinschi Oct 2002 A1
20020159640 Vaithilingam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161739 Oh Oct 2002 A1
20020163532 Thomas et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174095 Lulich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030041047 Chang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050815 Seigel et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030086627 Berriss et al. May 2003 A1
20030200217 Ackerman Oct 2003 A1
20030217335 Chung et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040003394 Ramaswamy Jan 2004 A1
20040025180 Begeja et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040117367 Smith et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133927 Sternberg et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153426 Nugent Aug 2004 A1
20040215663 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040260688 Gross Dec 2004 A1
20040267774 Lin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050131884 Gross et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050177372 Wang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050238238 Xu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245241 Durand et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281439 Lange Dec 2005 A1
20060004745 Kuhn et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020958 Allamanche et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031216 Semple et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041596 Stirbu et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060048191 Xiong Mar 2006 A1
20060112035 Cecchi et al. May 2006 A1
20060129822 Snijder et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153296 Deng Jul 2006 A1
20060184638 Chua et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060217818 Fujiwara Sep 2006 A1
20060224529 Kermani Oct 2006 A1
20060236343 Chang Oct 2006 A1
20060242554 Gerace et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247983 Dalli Nov 2006 A1
20060248558 Barton et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253423 McLane et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070009159 Fan Jan 2007 A1
20070011151 Hagar et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019864 Koyama et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038608 Chen Feb 2007 A1
20070061302 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067304 Ives Mar 2007 A1
20070074147 Wold Mar 2007 A1
20070091106 Moroney Apr 2007 A1
20070130112 Lin Jun 2007 A1
20070130159 Gulli et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070168413 Barletta et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174320 Chou Jul 2007 A1
20070195987 Rhoads Aug 2007 A1
20070220573 Chiussi et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244902 Seide et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253594 Lu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255785 Hayashi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070268309 Tanigawa et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282826 Hoeber et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070294295 Finkelstein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080040277 DeWitt Feb 2008 A1
20080046406 Seide et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049629 Morrill Feb 2008 A1
20080072256 Boicey et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080152231 Gokturk et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163288 Ghosal et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172615 Igelman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201299 Lehikoinen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201314 Smith et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204706 Magne et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080313140 Pereira et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090022472 Bronstein et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037408 Rodgers Feb 2009 A1
20090089587 Brunk et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125529 Vydiswaran et al. May 2009 A1
20090125544 Brindley May 2009 A1
20090148045 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157575 Schobben et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172030 Schiff et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204511 Tsang Aug 2009 A1
20090216639 Kapczynski et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090245603 Koruga et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090253583 Yoganathan Oct 2009 A1
20100023400 DeWitt Jan 2010 A1
20100088321 Solomon et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106857 Wyler Apr 2010 A1
20100125569 Nair et al. May 2010 A1
20100191567 Lee et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100318493 Wessling Dec 2010 A1
20100322522 Wang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110035289 King et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110106782 Ke et al. May 2011 A1
20110145068 King et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110202848 Ismalon Aug 2011 A1
20110208822 Rathod Aug 2011 A1
20120082362 Diem Apr 2012 A1
20120150890 Jeong et al. Jun 2012 A1
20130089248 Remiszewski Apr 2013 A1
20130104251 Moore et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130159298 Mason et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130173635 Sanjeev Jul 2013 A1
20140176604 Venkitaraman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188786 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140226900 Saban Aug 2014 A1
20140310825 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
0231764 Apr 2002 WO
03005242 Jan 2003 WO
2004019527 Mar 2004 WO
2007049282 May 2007 WO
2014137337 Sep 2014 WO
2016040376 Mar 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (48)
Entry
Boari et al, “Adaptive Routing for Dynamic Applications in Massively Parallel Architectures”, 1995 IEEE, Spring 1995.
Cococcioni, et al, “Automatic Diagnosis of Defects of Rolling Element Bearings Based on Computational Intelligence Techniques”, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2009.
Emami, et al, “Role of Spatiotemporal Oriented Energy Features for Robust Visual Tracking in Video Surveillance, University of Queensland”, St. Lucia, Australia, 2012.
Garcia, “Solving the Weighted Region Least Cost Path Problem Using Transputers”, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, Dec. 1989.
Mahdhaoui, et al, “Emotional Speech Characterization Based on Multi-Features Fusion for Face-to-Face Interaction”, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 2009.
Marti, et al, “Real Time Speaker Localization and Detection System for Camera Steering in Multiparticipant Videoconferencing Environments”, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Spain, 2011.
Nagy et al, “A Transputer, Based, Flexible, Real-Time Control System for Robotic Manipulators”, UKACC International Conference on Control '96, Sep. 2-5, 1996, Conference 1996, Conference Publication No. 427, IEE 1996.
Scheper, et al. “Nonlinear dynamics in neural computation”, ESANN'2006 proceedings—European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), Apr. 26-28, 2006, d-side publi, ISBN 2-930307-06-4.
Theodoropoulos et al, “Simulating Asynchronous Architectures on Transputer Networks”, Proceedings of the Fourth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1996. PDP '96.
Burgsteiner et al.: “Movement Prediction From Real-World Images Using a Liquid State Machine”, Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, BE, vol. 3533, Jun. 2005, pp. 121-130.
Cernansky et al., “Feed-forward Echo State Networks”; Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2005.
Fathy et al., “A Parallel Design and Implementation for Backpropagation Neural Network Using NIMD Architecture”, 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Corsfe rersce, 19'96. MELECON '96, Date of Conference: May 13-16, 1996, vol. 3, pp. 1472-1475.
Foote, Jonathan et al., “Content-Based Retrieval of Music and Audio”, 1997, Institute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore (Abstract).
Freisleben et al., “Recognition of Fractal Images Using a Neural Network”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993, vol. 6861, 1993, pp. 631-637.
Howlett et al., “A Multi-Computer Neural Network Architecture in a Virtual Sensor System Application”, International Journal of Knowledge-based Intelligent Engineering Systems, 4 (2). pp. 86-93, 133N 1327-2314; first submitted Nov. 30, 1999; revised version submitted Mar. 10, 2000.
International Search Authority: “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis.1) including International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/073852; Date of Mailing: Jan. 28, 2009.
International Search Authority: International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) including “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis. 1) for the corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235; Date of Issuance: Jul. 28, 2009.
International Search Report for the corresponding International Patent Application PCT/IL2006/001235; Date of Mailing: Nov. 2, 2008.
IPO Examination Report under Section 18(3) for corresponding UK application No. GB1001219.3, dated Sep. 12, 2011; Entire Document.
Iwamoto, K.; Kasutani, E.; Yamada, A.: “Image Signature Robust to Caption Superimposition for Video Sequence Identification”; 2006 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; pp. 3185-3188, Oct. 8-11, 2006; doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2006.313046.
Jaeger, H.: “The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks”, GMD Report, No. 148, 2001, pp. 1-43, XP002466251. German National Research Center for Information Technology.
Lin, C.; Chang, S.: “Generating Robust Digital Signature for Image/Video Authentication”, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Mutlimedia '98; Bristol, U.K., Sep. 1998; pp. 49-54.
Lyon, Richard F.; “Computational Models of Neural Auditory Processing”; IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP '84, Date of Conference: Mar. 1984, vol. 9, pp. 41-44.
Maass, W. et al.: “Computational Models for Generic Cortical Microcircuits”, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universitaet Graz, Graz, Austria, published Jun. 10, 2003.
Morad, T.Y. et al.: “Performance, Power Efficiency and Scalability of Asymmetric Cluster Chip Multiprocessors”, Computer Architecture Letters, vol. 4, Jul. 4, 2005 (Jul. 4, 2005), pp. 1-4, XP002466254.
Natsclager, T. et al.: “The “liquid computer”: A novel strategy for real-time computing on time series”, Special Issue on Foundations of Information Processing of Telematik, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 39-43, XP002466253.
Ortiz-Boyer et al., “CIXL2: A Crossover Operator for Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Population Features”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24 (2005) 1-48 Submitted Nov. 2004; published Jul. 2005.
Raichelgauz, I. et al.: “Co-evolutionary Learning in Liquid Architectures”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, [Online] vol. 3512, Jun. 21, 2005 (Jun. 21, 2005), pp. 241-248, XP019010280 Springer Berlin / Heidelberg ISSN: 1611-3349 ISBN: 978-3-540-26208-4.
Ribert et al. “An Incremental Hierarchical Clustering”, Visicon Interface 1999, pp. 586-591.
Verstraeten et al., “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”; Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Available online Jul. 14, 2005.
Verstraeten et al.: “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”, Information Processing Letters, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 95, No. 6, Sep. 20, 2005 (Sep. 30, 2005), pp. 521-528, XP005028093 ISSN: 0020-0190.
Ware et al., “Locating and Identifying Components in a Robot's Workspace using a Hybrid Computer Architecture”; Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 27-29, 1995, pp. 139-144.
Xian-Sheng Hua et al.: “Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure” In: 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP '04; Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China; published Oct. 24-27, 2004, pp. 685-688.
Zeevi, Y. et al.: “Natural Signal Classification by Neural Cliques and Phase-Locked Attractors”, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, IJCNN2006, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2006 (Jul. 2006), XP002466252.
Zhou et al., “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”; National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing Unviersirty, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China; Available online Mar. 12, 2002.
Zhou et al., “Medical Diagnosis With C4.5 Rule Preceded by Artificial Neural Network Ensemble”; IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 7, Issue: 1, pp. 37-42, Date of Publication: Mar. 2003.
Chuan-Yu Cho, et al., “Efficient Motion-Vector-Based Video Search Using Query by Clip”, 2004, IEEE, Taiwan, pp. 1-4.
Ihab Al Kabary, et al., “SportSense: Using Motion Queries to Find Scenes in Sports Videos”, Oct. 2013, ACM, Switzerland, pp. 1-3.
Jianping Fan et al., “Concept-Oriented Indexing of Video Databases: Towards Semantic Sensitive Retrieval and Browsing”, IEEE, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2004, pp. 1-19.
Shih-Fu Chang, et al., “VideoQ: A Fully Automated Video Retrieval System Using Motion Sketches”, 1998, IEEE, , New York, pp. 1-2.
Wei-Te Li et al., “Exploring Visual and Motion Saliency for Automatic Video Object Extraction”, IEEE, vol. 22, No. 7, Jul. 2013, pp. 1-11.
Brecheisen, et al., “Hierarchical Genre Classification for Large Music Collections”, ICME 2006, pp. 1385-1388.
Lau, et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications Year: 2008, pp. 98-103, DOI: 10.1109/CITISIA.2008.4607342 IEEE Conference Publications.
McNamara, et al., “Diversity Decay in Opportunistic Content Sharing Systems”, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks Year: 2011, pp. 1-3, DOI: 10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986211 IEEE Conference Publications.
Santos, et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for Multimedia and e-Learning”, 2015 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) Year: 2015, pp. 224-228, DOI: 10.1109/SOFTCOM.2015.7314122 IEEE Conference Publications.
Wilk, et al., “The Potential of Social-Aware Multimedia Prefetching on Mobile Devices”, 2015 International Conference and Workshops on Networked Systems (NetSys) Year: 2015, pp. 1-5, DOI: 10.1109/NetSys.2015.7089081 IEEE Conference Publications.
Odinaev, et al., “Cliques in Neural Ensembles as Perception Carriers”, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Canada, 2006, pp. 285-292.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/054634 dated Mar. 16, 2017, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140310020 A1 Oct 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61839871 Jun 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12434221 May 2009 US
Child 13344400 US
Continuation in Parts (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13624397 Sep 2012 US
Child 14314567 US
Parent 13344400 Jan 2012 US
Child 13624397 US
Parent 12195863 Aug 2008 US
Child 13624397 US
Parent 12084150 US
Child 12195863 US