1. Field of the Invention
The invention deals with the field of creating print masters, and more specifically with digital methods and systems for creating a digital flexographic print master on a drum by a fluid depositing printhead.
The invention reduces a problem that may result when a printhead unit is used that comprises more than one nozzle row.
2. Description of the Related Art
In flexographic printing or flexography a flexible cylindrical relief print master is used for transferring a fast drying ink from an anilox roller to a printable substrate. The print master can be a flexible plate that is mounted on a cylinder, or it can be a cylindrical sleeve.
The raised portions of the relief print master define the image features that are to be printed.
Because the flexographic print master has elastic properties, the process is particularly suitable for printing on a wide range of printable substrates including for example, corrugated fiberboard, plastic films, or even metal sheets.
A traditional method for creating a print master uses a light sensitive polymerisable sheet that is exposed by a UV radiation source through a negative film or a negative mask layer (“LAMS”-system) that defines the image features. Under the influence of the UV radiation, the sheet will polymerize underneath the transparent portions of the film. The remaining portions are removed, and what remains is a positive relief printing plate.
In the unpublished applications EP08172281.1 and EP08172280.3, both assigned to Agfa Graphics NV and having a priority date of 2008-12-19, a digital solution is presented for creating a relief print master using a fluid droplet depositing printhead.
The application EP08172280.3 teaches that a relief print master can be digitally represented by a stack of two-dimensional layers and discloses a method for calculating these two-dimensional layers.
The application EP08172281.1 teaches a method for spatially diffusing nozzle related artifacts in the three dimensions of the stack of two-dimensional layers.
Both applications also teach a composition of a fluid that can be used for printing a relief print master, and a method and apparatus for printing such a relief print master.
An example of a printhead is shown in
Because in the apparatus in
In
The lowest value of the nozzle pitch 330 in
The concept of a multiple printhead unit is explained by means of
The use of a multiple printhead unit in an apparatus as shown in
The nozzles with an odd index number are located on a first axis 620 and the nozzles having an even index number are located on a second axis 621, parallel with the first axis 620.
Because these two axes 620 and 621 of the nozzle rows in the multiple printhead unit are not congruent, the spiral paths 610 and 611 are not evenly spaced with regard to each other. For example, in
The uneven spacing of the spiral paths 610 and 611 causes an uneven distribution of the fluid droplets along the Y direction when they are jetted onto the sleeve and this negatively affects the quality of the print master that is printed.
In order to overcome the problems described above, preferred embodiments of the current invention improve the evenness of the distribution of the spiral paths on which the fluid droplets are jetted by a printhead unit that comprises multiple printheads.
Preferred embodiments of the current invention are realized by a system and a method as described below.
By rotating the multiple printhead unit in the plane that is perpendicular with the jetting direction of the nozzles, the unevenness of the distances between the interlaced spiral paths can be reduced or even eliminated.
Various preferred embodiments are also described below.
The above and other elements, features, steps, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
In
The circumference of the sleeve is represented by the variable SleeveCircumference and has a value equal to:
SleeveCircumference=PI*SleeveDiameter
The sleeve rotates in the X direction at a frequency that is represented by the variable NumberofRevolutionsperSecond. The direction and magnitude of this rotation with regard to the printhead defines a first speed vector 670 that is tangential to the cylindrical sleeve and perpendicular to its central axis.
The time of one revolution is represented by the variable RevolutionPeriod. It is equal to:
RevolutionPeriod=1/NumberofRevolutionsperSecond.
The circumferential speed of the sleeve has a value represented by the variable CircumferentialSpeed and is equal to:
CircumferentialSpeed=SleeveCircumference*NumberofRevolutionsperSecond
The distance between two adjacent nozzles along the Y-dimension in the multiple printhead unit in
The movement of the printhead in the Y direction is locked to the rotation of the sleeve by a mechanical coupling (for example a worm and gear) or by an electronic gear (electronically coupled servomotors). During a single revolution of the sleeve, the printhead moves over a distance 650 that is represented by a variable PrintheadPitch. The value of this distance 650 should be an integer multiple of the nozzle pitch 630 and this multiple is represented by a variable IntegerMultiplier:
PrintheadPitch=IntegerMultiplier*P
In
The speed at which the printhead moves in the Y direction is represented by the variable PrintheadSpeed. Its value is equal to:
PrintheadSpeed=PrintheadPitch/RevolutionPeriod
The speed and magnitude of the printhead defines a second speed vector 671.
The sum of the first speed vector 670 and the second speed vector 671 defines a third speed vector 672. This speed vector 672 is tangential to the spiral path on which the liquid droplets are jetted. The angle α between the first speed vector 670 and the sum 672 of the first and second speed vectors is expressed by the following formulas:
tan(α)=PrintheadSpeed/CircumferentialSpeed
α=a tan(PrintheadSpeed/CircumferentialSpeed)
The distance 660 between the two nozzle rows 620 and 621 in
Unlike in the case shown in
In the analysis that follows, it is assumed that the length of the distance D is negligible with regard to the length of the Circumference. In that case the cylindrical surface of the sleeve can be locally approximated by a plane so that conventional (two-dimensional) trigonometry can be used to describe the geometrical relationships between the different variables.
In
The distance dY corresponds with the amount that the distance A is shorter than the nozzle pitch P, and the amount that the distance B is longer than the distance P. This is mathematically expressed as follows:
A=P−dY
B=P+dY
A+B=2*P
The value of dY can be directly expressed as a function the angle α and the nozzle row distance D:
tan(α)=dY/D
dY=D*tan(α)
And hence:
A=P−D*tan(α)
The above expression teaches that:
A=P
under the following two conditions:
The above expression also teaches that dY becomes larger when the distance D between the nozzle rows increases or when the ratio of the PrintheadSpeed over the CircumferentialSpeed increases.
We will now describe by means of
A=B=P
without setting α=0 or setting D=0, but instead by rotating the printhead in a plane that is orthogonal to the jetting direction of the nozzles and under a specific angle β. Such a plane is parallel with the
In
tan(α−β)=dY/D
dY=D*a tan(α−β)
By setting:
β=α
it is obtained that:
A=P=B
In other words, by rotating the printhead over an angle β in a plane that is orthogonal to the jetting direction of the nozzles, whereby the angle β is equal to the angle α, it is obtained that these interlaced paths become equidistant and become spaced at a distance equal to the nozzle pitch.
The above description provides an exemplary preferred embodiment of the current invention on which a number of variations exist.
In the first place it is not required that the value of IntegerMultiplier is equal to 2 as in
In the second place it is not always required that the angle α and angle β are exactly equal to each other. It was already demonstrated by means of
Preferably:
|α−β|<0.5*|α|
Even more preferably
|α−β|<0.1*|α|
And even more preferably:
|α−β|<0.01*|α|
In the third place, preferred embodiments of the invention are not limited to a multiple printhead unit that comprises only two rows of nozzles. The number of rows of nozzles can, in principle, be any integer number M (such as 2, 3, 4 or more). In the case that more than two nozzle rows are present, the rotation of each one of the constituting printheads takes preferably place in a plane that is orthogonal to the direction in which the droplets are ejected by each printhead.
Whereas preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in the context of an apparatus for creating a flexographic print master using a printhead that comprises fluid ejecting nozzles, it can just as well be used for other external drum based recording systems that use parallel rows of marking elements.
A first example of an alternative recording system is a laser imaging system that uses a laserhead with rows of laser elements as marking elements.
A second example of an alternative recording system uses a spatial light modulator with rows of light valves as marking elements. Examples of spatial light modulators are digital micro mirror devices, grating light valves and liquid crystal devices.
All these systems can be used for creating a print master. For example, a laser based marking system, a light valve marking system or a digital micro mirror device marking system can be used to expose an offset print master precursor.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are advantageously used for creating a relief print master by building up the relief layer by layer using a system such as the one that is shown in
In a first preferred embodiment an imaging system according to the current invention is used for imagewise exposing a mask so that that it comprises transparent and non-transparent portions. The mask is than put on top of a flexible, photopolymerizable layer and exposed by a curing source. The areas that exposed through transparent portions of the mask harden out and define the features of the print master that are in relief. The unexposed areas are removed and define the recessed portions of the relief print master.
In a second preferred embodiment, the imaging system according to a preferred embodiment of the current invention selectively exposes a flexible, elastomeric layer, whereby the energy of the exposure directly removes material from the flexible layer upon impingement. In this case the unexposed areas of the flexible layer define the relief features of the print master.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it is to be understood that variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. The scope of the present invention, therefore, is to be determined solely by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10173533 | Aug 2010 | EP | regional |
This application is a 371 National Stage Application of PCT/EP2011/063549, filed Aug. 5, 2011. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/375,248, filed Aug. 20, 2010, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In addition, this application claims the benefit of European Application No. 10173533.0, filed Aug. 20, 2010, which is also incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/063549 | 8/5/2011 | WO | 00 | 2/11/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/022636 | 2/23/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4992890 | Pinard et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5847722 | Hackleman | Dec 1998 | A |
6003969 | Freret, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
6193923 | Leyden et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7726765 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20010017085 | Kubo et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020109741 | Okabe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030189617 | Mott et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040131778 | Verhoest et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040252174 | Baxter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050046651 | Askren et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050179710 | Tatsuta et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060238565 | Jung et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070197119 | Iwata | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080024586 | Barron | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090197013 | Gouch et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100072181 | Maschera et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100149236 | Nishida et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100245455 | Mizes et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 428 666 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2 199 065 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2 199 066 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2012080058 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Official Communication issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2011/063549, mailed on Oct. 21, 2011. |
Gullentops, “System and method for Digital creation of a print master using a multiple printhead unit”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/581.691, filed Aug. 29, 2012. |
Gullentops, “Digital System for creating a flexographic printmaster”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/816,379, filed Feb. 11, 2013. |
Gullentops, “System and method for the digital creation of a print master by means of a liquid droplet deposition apparatus”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/883,622, filed May 6, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130141488 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61375248 | Aug 2010 | US |