This invention is directed towards digital media transmission, and more particularly towards transmission of digital programs to end viewers.
Cable operators use their infrastructure to carry programming content and deliver (sell) this to their subscribers. As part of their agreements with some programmers, the cable operator can also be allowed to insert commercial messages in those network feeds. The operator is typically allowed to do that only at selective times (sometimes called “local avails”, “avails”, “local breaks”, or “breaks”), typically 1-3 minutes per hour. The operator can choose to either sell this time to advertisers (generating extra revenue), or use the time to insert promotional messages for their own products and services.
Cable operators have used the following set up illustrated in
The receiver at the cable operator receives the satellite signal 20 (decompresses it in case of a digital signal), strips off the audio tone, passes through the (analog) feed 24 to the ad inserters 26, and (separately) passes the Insertion (Control) Signal 25 to the ad inserter as well (triggered by the cue tone in the feed). The Traffic & Billing system 28 is responsible for scheduling the commercial messages across the day, it feeds schedule files to ad inserters 26 (typically once a day) with today's insertion schedules.
Separately (and typically at least one day before airing), the commercial messages are loaded into the ad inserters 26 (this can be encoded from tape, or transcoded from a digital format).
The ad inserter 26 as shown in
Messages can be any length (as long as they fit in the “avails” that are agreed upon between the programmer and operator), but typical lengths are 30 second, 60 seconds, or 15 seconds.
Cable operators typically have the right to insert local messages on a variety of different networks. In addition to this, typical cable systems consist of multiple ad insertion zones (or ad insertion head ends). So if a cable operator serves an area (say a city) that consists of <n> insertion zones, and wants to insert commercial messages on <m> different networks, a total of <n>×<m> ad inserters are needed. This enables the operator to insert unique (different) commercial messages in each zone/network combination, but at a high cost for equipment.
With the introduction of digital television, cable operators now need to upgrade their insertion infrastructure in order to be able to insert commercial messages into already compressed (digital) feeds. This new system (called DPI, or Digital Program Insertion) is illustrated in
The receiver at the cable operator receives the satellite signal and passes it through (including the digital messages) to a new device called a splicer 34. The splicer 34 (among other things) will detect the digital messages in the stream 33, and start an interaction with the digital ad server 36 to get a digitally encoded commercial that is ready for insertion, it will then “splice” that digital commercial into the digital feed 33 during the local avail. The output signal 38 will be a digital signal with a local commercial during the local avail, and is distributed to digital reception devices at the consumers premises (typically a digital set-top box, or a digital TV set).
One of the reasons why digital insertion is more complex, is that insertion (splicing) of a digital commercial in a digital feed is not as straightforward as the simple “switch” that is embedded in the analog ad inserter 26 (see
Scalability for digital insertion is similar to analog insertion, if a cable operator serves <n> insertion zones, and wants to insert commercial messages on <m> different digital networks, a total of <n>×<m> ad inserters and splicers are needed. Again, this enables the operator to insert unique (different) commercial messages in each zone/network combination.
One of the trends in local cable advertising is to combine all ad insertion zones and capabilities into a single “Interconnect”. An Interconnect typically covers a complete city and may consist of one cable operator, or even a combination of multiple cable operators. It essentially connects all ad inserters so that a client (e.g. an advertiser) can approach the whole market as a single entity, can place single orders, and there is a single T&B (traffic and billing) system driving the insertion schedules. In addition the technical part of the interconnect is typically run from a single command location (Master Control Center). If an Interconnect covers <n> zones, it has the ability to (in any given local avail) air <n> different commercials at the same time in the same program.
There is a large cost involved in converting to digital. Cable operators that “go digital” (in other words: start to distribute their signals to their subscribers in digitally compressed format) obviously face significant investments in infrastructure, digital set-top boxes or other CPE, etc. But on top of these, there is another required investment which is sometimes overlooked, namely the equipment that is needed to insert commercial messages into compressed (digital) program feeds. For a market that contains <n> zones and <m> digitally carried networks, this may add up to <n>×<m> splicers and <n>x<m> digital ad servers, which can be a significant investment.
Therefore, many operators consider “collapsing” their insertion zones to save money (e.g. collapse <n> zones into one (or few) big insertion zones). This reduces investment, but also reduces the unique ability to insert different commercials in different zones (which advertisers can use for reasons of better targeting their messages).
The present invention provides some alternative approaches to digital commercial insertion for cable operators and others that not only offer more flexibility and features, but may also be significantly cheaper to implement. In one embodiment, the present invention includes a system where the actual “insert” of the commercial or message into the digital program is actually performed by the digital receiver that sits at the consumer's premises (this can be a set-top box, digital TV set, or other). This strongly reduces the need for sophisticated splicer and ad-server equipment at the head-end, while imposing minimal to no additional cost at the receiver devices.
In another embodiment, the present invention includes a system where the actual “insert” of the commercial is performed upstream (for example, at the head-end), yet the number of unique splicers and ad servers is greatly reduced, while preserving the ability to send insert different commercials in different insertion zones.
The present invention includes a method of inserting local commercials into a local feed, including receiving and distributing a digital media stream to a plurality of digital reception devices (for example, set top boxes), detecting a signal in the digital media stream indicating an insertion point, selecting a digitally encoded commercial for insertion; and sending the digitally encoded commercial to the plurality of digital reception devices, at a time as indicated by the signal indicating an insertion point. It further includes providing a signal to at least some of the plurality of digital reception devices to indicate to the some of the plurality of digital reception devices to switch to the digitally encoded commercial. The digital reception devices will switch back to the digital media stream at a time after an end time of the digitally encoded commercial. The digital reception devices may be provided with software to facilitate switching to and from the digitally encoded commercial, or may be hardcoded with firmware, Asics etc. to allow the switching functionality.
The step of sending the digitally encoded commercial to the plurality of digital reception devices may be performed by multiplexing the digitally encoded commercial into the digital media stream. Alternatively, it can be performed by using a feeder channel, or a combination of these techniques.
Some of the digital reception devices may receives a different digitally encoded commercial, depending on the setup of the system. For example, a plurality of digitally encoded commercials may be sent simultaneously to the plurality of digital reception devices, and a filtering process will filter out at least one digitally encoded commercial to prevent it from being received by a selected group of digital reception devices.
A count may be maintained of a number of times the digital reception devices switch to the digitally encoded commercial, and a different digitally encoded commercial may provided depending upon the count.
The present invention also includes a system for inserting local commercials into a local feed. A client ad server component, receives a digital media stream and distributes the digital media stream to a plurality of digital reception devices. When the client ad server component detects a signal in the digital media stream indicating an insertion point, the client ad server component sends a digitally encoded commercial for insertion to the plurality of digital reception devices, at a time as indicated by the signal indicating an insertion point. The client ad server component provides a signal (which may be the same signal as the signal indicating an insertion point, just passed on through) to at least some of the plurality of digital reception devices to indicate to those plurality of digital reception devices to switch to the digitally encoded commercial. The digital reception devices will switch back to the digital media stream at a time after an end time of the digitally encoded commercial.
Another aspect of the present invention includes a system for allowing a plurality of different local messages to be inserted across a plurality of insertion zones. It includes a plurality of splicing components, one splicing component for each different local message, wherein the plurality of splicing components receiving a common network feed. It also includes a programmable switch, having an input port for each of the plurality of splicing components, and having an output port for each of the plurality of insertion zones, wherein the programmable switch is capable of mapping any input port to one or more output ports. A controller controls the plurality of splicing components and the programmable switch, to allow a different local message to be provided to a selected ones of the plurality of insertion zones. The controller can include a prioritizing function to determine the best allocation of local messages to insertion zones in case there are more local messages than splicing components.
This aspect of the invention may also include a initial switch providing the common network feed to the plurality of splicing components, the initial switch to provide for changing the common network feed to a network feed which will subsequently include an insertion point for inserting local messages. Before a local message is complete, the controller can instruct the programmable switch to cause at least one insertion zone to start receiving media from a different splicing component.
An advantage of the present invention include the ability to use present-day set top boxes with minimal “intelligence”, for example, without any need for a profiler to help such set top box to decide which local commercial to insert.
Other advantages of the present invention include a more cost efficient way of digital commercial insertion for cable operators and others, but also an approach that inherently provides more flexibility (for example, there is no reason anymore why commercial insertion zones need to be “hard wired” and not change-able once they are done).
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention provides a novel solution to allowing local insertion of content, typically local commercials or ads, into the digital feed for cable operators and other distributors. The present invention may be implemented at several different locations along the delivery process, either in one location or distributed along the delivery stream. Although the present invention is described in terms of commercials and ads, the present invention can be used for insertion of any specific media, such as messages intended for a local audience, or even customized parts of generic commercials, such as the insertion of a local store location at the end of a generic commercial.
An illustrative embodiment of the present invention focusing on using Set-top boxes for insertion shall now be described. In this approach, the insertion (splicing) of commercial messages is pushed down to the individual digital set-top boxes 44 as illustrated in
The Client Ad Server 40 stores commercials for later play out. Typically such commercials are already in digital form, and compressed. The Client Ad Server 40 also communicates with the Traffic & Billing system 42 so that it understands which commercials are schedule for each local avail. Whenever the Client Ad Server 40 detects a digital insert message (e.g. SCTE 35 message) in the stream 33, it does the following:
The Set-top boxes 44 are typically ordinary set top boxes, which include special switching logic, typically in the form of an embedded software application. This embedded software may be installed the Set-top boxes 44, or alternatively downloaded to the Set-top boxes 44 through the digital feed 35 or otherwise. The software detects switch messages in the stream 35, and uses them to “switch” to a local commercial during the insertion break. More specifically, in accordance with an illustrative embodiment, at the beginning of an avail the Set-top boxes 44 will switch to the local commercial, and at the end of a specified length of time they will switch back to the program feed 35.
When the Client Ad Server 40 plays out the local commercial exactly in sync with the local avail of the program it needs to be inserted into, there are two options for provided the commercial to the set-top boxes 44. The first option is shown in
This approach requires some bandwidth to be reserved in every multiplex 45 that carries digital programs 46 that need local ad insertion. The amount of bandwidth depends on how many overlapping local breaks 50 can occur amongst the digital program feeds 46 within the multiplex 35, in the example there are two reserved feeds 42 so its is possible to handle up to two overlapping avails 50. Other numbers of reserved feeds 42 are possible and within the scope of the invention. Further, there is some room for optimization beyond the number for reserved feeds 42, for example it may be a good idea to concentrate the most valuable program feeds 46 in few multiplexes 45 that have a relatively high number of reserved feeds (for example, four), whereas the less valuable program feeds 46 are carried in multiplexes 45 with lower number of reserved feeds. This would have the effect that the chances of “losing” an avail on valuable feeds 46 is less than loosing an avail on a less valuable network 46.
The second option is shown in
The regular program feeds contain local avails 50. Precisely during each of these local avails, the feeder channel Mux-4 will carry the local commercial 52 so that the set-top boxes can “switch to” and “switch from” it at the beginning and end of the avail 50 respectively.
The feeder channel can either be a fully dedicated multiplex/QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation), but it can also be a reserved part of a multiplex/QAM that is partly also used for other services. The amount of bandwidth that has to be reserved in the feeder channel depends on how many overlapping local avails the operator wants to be able to handle with this system. This allocation can be fine-tuned by the cable operator as a trade off between bandwidth and returns.
Each of these embodiments has certain advantages. The first embodiment, within the multiplex 45 has the advantage very simple implementation in set-top box, and can do a cleaner (seamless) splice even with basic set-top boxes. However, it tends to use more bandwidth and may require more sophistication at the head-end, because of the need for re-multiplexing instead of simple play out. The second embodiment, using a feeder channel, has optimal bandwidth efficiency. However it may require more integration in set-top box software (for example, the need to access the tuner). Also, a seamless splice is somewhat more difficult, however this can be fixed by having black frames around the commercial. It is also possible to mix both approaches to achieve the best combination of simplicity, bandwidth efficiency, and other features for a general solution, and also specific requirements.
Focusing now on the Client Ad Server 40, there are a number of different options on the number and location of Client Ad Servers 40 in the cable operators network. In a first centralized example, consider a cable operator in a market that has 50 insertion zones, and 40 networks feeds that require local commercial insertion. We assume that the cable operator uses the Feeder Channel approach to preserve bandwidth. The cable operator may decide to use 40 Client Ad Servers (one for each network feed) and place them at a central location in the system (for example the Master Control Center) to feed all insertion zones.
Now let's look at a local avail 50
Turning now to a decentralized option, the system can be implemented with a Client Ad Server 40 per insertion zone (so for this example, fifty in total). In the same local insertion example (ESPN, ten commercials) each of the Client Ad Servers 40 will only insert one commercial 52 in the Feeder Channel (namely the one that is intended for its specific insertion zone), as illustrated in
A final example shown in
An advantage of this setup is only one Client Ad Server 40 is needed per network feed, and the Set Top Box does not need specific (zone dependent) instructions for picking the proper local commercial.
An illustrative implementation is a cascaded approach with a feeder channel. In this implementation, a single Client Ad Server Unit (CASU) 60 is installed at a central location in the cable operators network (e.g. at the Master Control Center). The CASU 60
A second useful component of this system is a Filter Unit 56
Another component of this system is a software application that resides in the set-top box 44. The application can be resident or downloadable, it does not have a user interface, does not need a return channel per se, and performs the following functions:
Another embodiment of the present invention is based on the notion that the current network topology (with individual inserters per insertion zone) is in many cases may be overkill.
This setup gives the cable operator the ability to insert (in a given local avail) a unique and different local commercial in each insertion zone. In reality however, in most cases the cable operator will either insert the same local commercial in all zones, or only a limited set of different local commercials mapped on the various insertion zones (for example in a market with fifty insertion zones, there may be five different commercials, the first going to zones 1-10, the second one going to zones 11-20, etc.). Another way of saying this is that in the traditional setup of ad insertion (such as in
An alternative setup for digital program insertion according on an embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Because of time and scheduling, the controller 76 typically will know in advance when a local avail is coming up, and can ‘preprogram’ the switch 70 to divide up the interzones by appropriate splicer 34. This setup may be left in place until a next local avail comes up which has a different combination of commercials or insertion zones. Since the splicers 34 are passive when not inserting local commercials, the system will run normally during normal broadcast, no matter how switch 70 has mapped the splicers 34 to insertion zones.
This embodiment is flexible with respect to the choice of the maximum number of unique commercials. Obviously a lower number will create greater cost savings but will also limit flexibility. If in a system with fifty insertion zones (n=50) it would be acceptable to set the maximum number of unique commercials to ten (m=10), this system would create an 80% cost savings on splicer/ad-server pairs when compared with the traditional setup. Further, it is expandable on an incremental basis.
In this embodiment, some of the components may be combined into other physical system components. For example the programmable switch 70 may be a separate unit, or integrated with the controller 76, or even be an integral part of the network (depending on what network is used to distribute program feeds to the insertion zones, this may already be a feature that is built into that network). It should be noted that it is also possible to combine these various approaches to create unique trade offs between investment, features, etc. It should be noted that the present invention can be combined with features described in other pending commonly owned patent applications, including U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/735,983, entitled Seamless Switching and filed on Dec. 13, 2000; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/369,047, entitled Seamless Switching and filed on Feb. 19, 2003; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/192,192, entitled System And Method For Seamless Switching Of Compressed Audio Streams and filed on Jul. 9, 2002; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/423,280, entitled System And Method For Optimized Channel Switching In Digital Television Broadcasting and filed on Apr. 25, 2003; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/991,674, entitled System And Method For Optimized Encoding And Transmission Of A Plurality Of Substantially Similar Video Fragments and filed on Nov. 18, 2004; which are fully incorporated here by reference.
Although this description is written from the perspective of a cable operator, it is straightforward to apply the same approaches to other network operators as well (for example broadcast networks with affiliates, cable networks with local reception points at head-ends, etc.).
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to illustrative embodiments thereof, various other changes, omissions and additions in the form and detail thereof may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/600,664 filed on Aug. 11, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3366731 | Wallerstein | Jan 1968 | A |
3639686 | Walker et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
4331974 | Cogswell et al. | May 1982 | A |
4475123 | Dumbauld et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4573072 | Freeman | Feb 1986 | A |
4602279 | Freeman | Jul 1986 | A |
4625235 | Watson | Nov 1986 | A |
4638359 | Watson | Jan 1987 | A |
4703423 | Bado et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4716410 | Nozaki et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4789235 | Borah et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4814883 | Perine et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4847698 | Freeman | Jul 1989 | A |
4847699 | Freeman | Jul 1989 | A |
4847700 | Freeman | Jul 1989 | A |
4850007 | Marino et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4918516 | Freeman | Apr 1990 | A |
5099422 | Foresman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5105184 | Pirani et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5155591 | Wachob | Oct 1992 | A |
5173900 | Miller et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5220501 | Lawlor et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231494 | Wachob | Jul 1993 | A |
RE34340 | Freeman | Aug 1993 | E |
5253940 | Abecassis | Oct 1993 | A |
5260778 | Kauffman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5291395 | Abecassis | Mar 1994 | A |
5305195 | Murphy | Apr 1994 | A |
5343239 | Lappington et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347632 | Filepp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5356151 | Abecassis | Oct 1994 | A |
5361393 | Rossillo | Nov 1994 | A |
5377354 | Scannell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5414455 | Hooper et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422468 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5424770 | Schmelzer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5434678 | Abecassis | Jul 1995 | A |
5442390 | Hooper et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442771 | Filepp et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446919 | Wilkins | Aug 1995 | A |
5448568 | Delpuch et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5499046 | Schiller et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515098 | Carles | May 1996 | A |
5515270 | Weinblatt | May 1996 | A |
5519433 | Lappington et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526035 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537141 | Harper et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548532 | Menand et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550735 | Slade et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566353 | Cho et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584025 | Keithley et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585858 | Harper et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594910 | Filepp et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5610653 | Abecassis | Mar 1997 | A |
5617142 | Hamilton | Apr 1997 | A |
5632007 | Freeman | May 1997 | A |
5634849 | Abecassis | Jun 1997 | A |
5636346 | Saxe | Jun 1997 | A |
5638113 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5652615 | Bryant et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671225 | Hooper et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682196 | Freeman | Oct 1997 | A |
5684918 | Abecassis | Nov 1997 | A |
5696869 | Abecassis | Dec 1997 | A |
5717814 | Abecassis | Feb 1998 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5724091 | Freeman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724472 | Abecassis | Mar 1998 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5734413 | Lappington et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740388 | Hunt | Apr 1998 | A |
5740549 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754939 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758259 | Lawler | May 1998 | A |
5761601 | Nemirofsky et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764275 | Lappington et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768521 | Dedrick | Jun 1998 | A |
5774170 | Hite et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774664 | Hidary et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778181 | Hidary et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784095 | Robbins et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784528 | Yamane et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796945 | Tarabella | Aug 1998 | A |
5802314 | Tullis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805974 | Hite et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825884 | Zdepski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835087 | Herz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5861881 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867208 | McLaren | Feb 1999 | A |
5873068 | Beaumont et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5887243 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903263 | Emura et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907837 | Ferrel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913031 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917830 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929850 | Broadwin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931901 | Wolfe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937331 | Kalluri et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978799 | Hirsch | Nov 1999 | A |
5986692 | Logan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991735 | Gerace | Nov 1999 | A |
6002393 | Hite et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018768 | Ullman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026368 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029045 | Picco et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038000 | Hurst, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038367 | Abecassis | Mar 2000 | A |
6049569 | Radha et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067348 | Hibbeler | May 2000 | A |
6075551 | Berezowski et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6108486 | Sawabe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137834 | Wine et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141358 | Hurst, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160570 | Sitnik | Dec 2000 | A |
6304852 | Loncteaux | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330286 | Lyons et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343287 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357042 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6360234 | Jain et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6408278 | Carney et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411992 | Srinivasan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424991 | Gish | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449657 | Stanbach, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6457010 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463444 | Jain et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463585 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466975 | Sterling et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487721 | Safadi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502076 | Smith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6567980 | Jain et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574793 | Ngo et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588013 | Lumley et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601237 | Ten Kate et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611624 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6671880 | Shah-Nazaroff et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678332 | Gardere et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681395 | Nishi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694482 | Arellano et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6735628 | Eyal | May 2004 | B2 |
6785289 | Ward et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6806909 | Radha et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857024 | Chen et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6877134 | Fuller et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7039932 | Eldering | May 2006 | B2 |
7448063 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8418214 | Schiller et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010013124 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010037500 | Reynolds et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020026359 | Long et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020056093 | Kunkel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057336 | Gaul et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083443 | Eldering et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087976 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092017 | Klosterman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095676 | Knee et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020184047 | Plotnick et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030110500 | Rodriguez | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030177503 | Sull et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040025180 | Begeja et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040111742 | Hendricks et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136698 | Mock | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050086691 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086692 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050166224 | Ficco | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193410 | Eldering | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235318 | Grauch et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60600664 | Aug 2004 | US |