This disclosure relates generally to dispatching drivers for delivering online grocery orders and providing features and user interfaces for electronically tipping the drivers.
With the prevalence of online shopping for years, online grocery shopping is increasing too. Some grocery stores provide online grocery shopping and deliver the purchased groceries to the customers. Drivers for delivering grocery orders, unlike drivers for pizza delivery, generally work with a delivery network and cannot accept cash pursuant to their agreement with the delivery network. Therefore, systems and methods for dispatching drivers for delivery grocery orders and facilitating tipping are desired.
To facilitate further description of the embodiments, the following drawings are provided in which:
For simplicity and clarity of illustration, the drawing figures illustrate the general manner of construction, and descriptions and details of well-known features and techniques may be omitted to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present disclosure. Additionally, elements in the drawing figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. The same reference numerals in different figures denote the same elements.
The terms “first,” “second,” “third,” “fourth,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments described herein are, for example, capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. Furthermore, the terms “include,” and “have,” and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to those elements, but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus.
The terms “left,” “right,” “front,” “back,” “top,” “bottom,” “over,” “under,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing permanent relative positions. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the apparatus, methods, and/or articles of manufacture described herein are, for example, capable of operation in other orientations than those illustrated or otherwise described herein.
The terms “couple,” “coupled,” “couples,” “coupling,” and the like should be broadly understood and refer to connecting two or more elements mechanically and/or otherwise. Two or more electrical elements may be electrically coupled together, but not be mechanically or otherwise coupled together. Coupling may be for any length of time, e.g., permanent or semi-permanent or only for an instant. “Electrical coupling” and the like should be broadly understood and include electrical coupling of all types. The absence of the word “removably,” “removable,” and the like near the word “coupled,” and the like does not mean that the coupling, etc. in question is or is not removable.
As defined herein, two or more elements are “integral” if they are comprised of the same piece of material. As defined herein, two or more elements are “non-integral” if each is comprised of a different piece of material.
As defined herein, “approximately” can, in some embodiments, mean within plus or minus ten percent of the stated value. In other embodiments, “approximately” can mean within plus or minus five percent of the stated value. In further embodiments, “approximately” can mean within plus or minus three percent of the stated value. In yet other embodiments, “approximately” can mean within plus or minus one percent of the stated value.
As defined herein, “real-time” can, in some embodiments, be defined with respect to operations carried out as soon as practically possible upon occurrence of a triggering event. A triggering event can include receipt of data necessary to execute a task or to otherwise process information. Because of delays inherent in transmission and/or in computing speeds, the term “real time” encompasses operations that occur in “near” real time or somewhat delayed from a triggering event. In a number of embodiments, “real time” can mean real time less a time delay for processing (e.g., determining) and/or transmitting data. The particular time delay can vary depending on the type and/or amount of the data, the processing speeds of the hardware, the transmission capability of the communication hardware, the transmission distance, etc. However, in many embodiments, the time delay can be less than approximately one second, five seconds, ten seconds, thirty seconds, one minute, five minutes, ten minutes, or fifteen minutes.
Turning to the drawings,
Continuing with
As used herein, “processor” and/or “processing module” means any type of computational circuit, such as but not limited to a microprocessor, a microcontroller, a controller, a complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, a very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, a graphics processor, a digital signal processor, or any other type of processor or processing circuit capable of performing the desired functions. In some examples, the one or more processors of the various embodiments disclosed herein can comprise CPU 210.
In the depicted embodiment of
In some embodiments, network adapter 220 can comprise and/or be implemented as a WNIC (wireless network interface controller) card (not shown) plugged or coupled to an expansion port (not shown) in computer system 100 (
Although many other components of computer system 100 (
When computer system 100 in
Although computer system 100 is illustrated as a desktop computer in
Turning ahead in the drawings,
In this embodiment, system 310 can comprise delivery decision module 3110, dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, front end 3160, one or more databases 3170, customer management system 3180, and payment system 3190. In this embodiment, Internet 330 is coupled to external delivery service provider system 320, user devices 340, and system 310, at dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, front end 3160, customer management system 3180, and payment system 3190. In this embodiment, one or more databases 3170 are coupled to order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, and payment system 3190.
In many embodiments, system 310 can be in data communication through Internet 330 with one or more external delivery service provider systems, such as external delivery service provider system 320, and/or one or more user computers, such as user devices 340. In some embodiments, user devices 340 can be used by users, which also can be referred to as customers. In some embodiments, system 310 can be in data communication with user devices 340 through front end 3160, and front end 3160 can include one or more websites hosted by a web server that hosts one or more other websites. In many embodiments, an internal network that is not open to the public can be used for communications among delivery decision module 3110, dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, front end 3160, one or more databases 3170, customer management system 3180, and payment system 3190. In these or other embodiments, an operator and/or administrator of system 310 can manage system 310, the processor(s) of system 310, and/or the memory storage unit(s) of system 310 using the input device(s) and/or display device(s) of system 310.
In many embodiments, order management system 3140 can further comprise one or more of: delivery decision module 3110, customer management system 3180, payment system 3190, and/or one or more databases 3170. In many embodiments, dispatcher 3120 also can comprise delivery tracking system 3130, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, and/or database 3170. System 310, delivery decision module 3110, dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, front end 3160, one or more databases 3170, customer management system 3180, and/or payment system 3190 can each be a computer system, such as computer system 100 (
In certain embodiments, user devices 340 can be implemented with desktop computers, laptop computers, a mobile device, and/or other endpoint devices used by one or more users, respectively. A mobile device can refer to a portable electronic device (e.g., an electronic device easily conveyable by hand by a person of average size) with the capability to present audio and/or visual data (e.g., text, images, videos, music, etc.). For example, a mobile device can include at least one of a digital media player, a cellular telephone (e.g., a smartphone), a personal digital assistant, a handheld digital computer device (e.g., a tablet personal computer device), a laptop computer device (e.g., a notebook computer device, a netbook computer device), a wearable user computer device, or another portable computer device with the capability to present audio and/or visual data (e.g., images, videos, music, etc.). Thus, in many examples, a mobile device can include a volume and/or weight sufficiently small as to permit the mobile device to be easily conveyable by hand. For examples, in some embodiments, a mobile device can occupy a volume of less than or equal to approximately 1790 cubic centimeters, 2434 cubic centimeters, 2876 cubic centimeters, 4056 cubic centimeters, and/or 5752 cubic centimeters. Further, in these embodiments, a mobile device can weigh less than or equal to 15.6 Newtons, 17.8 Newtons, 22.3 Newtons, 31.2 Newtons, and/or 44.5 Newtons.
Exemplary mobile devices can include (i) an iPod®, iPhone®, iTouch®, iPad®, MacBook® or similar product by Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California, United States of America, (ii) a Blackberry® or similar product by Research in Motion (RIM) of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, (iii) a Lumia® or similar product by the Nokia Corporation of Keilaniemi, Espoo, Finland, and/or (iv) a Galaxy™ or similar product by the Samsung Group of Samsung Town, Seoul, South Korea. Further, in the same or different embodiments, a mobile device can include an electronic device configured to implement one or more of (i) the iPhone® operating system by Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California, United States of America, (ii) the Blackberry® operating system by Research In Motion (RIM) of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, (iii) the Palm® operating system by Palm, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, United States, (iv) the Android™ operating system developed by the Open Handset Alliance, (v) the Windows Mobile™ operating system by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Washington, United States of America, or (vi) the Symbian™ operating system by Nokia Corp. of Keilaniemi, Espoo, Finland.
Further still, the term “wearable user computer device” as used herein can refer to an electronic device with the capability to present audio and/or visual data (e.g., text, images, videos, music, etc.) that is configured to be worn by a user and/or mountable (e.g., fixed) on the user of the wearable user computer device (e.g., sometimes under or over clothing; and/or sometimes integrated with and/or as clothing and/or another accessory, such as, for example, a hat, eyeglasses, a wrist watch, shoes, etc.). In many examples, a wearable user computer device can include a mobile device, and vice versa. However, a wearable user computer device does not necessarily include a mobile device, and vice versa.
In specific examples, a wearable user computer device can include a head mountable wearable user computer device (e.g., one or more head mountable displays, one or more eyeglasses, one or more contact lenses, one or more retinal displays, etc.) or a limb mountable wearable user computer device (e.g., a smart watch). In these examples, a head mountable wearable user computer device can be mountable in close proximity to one or both eyes of a user of the head mountable wearable user computer device and/or vectored in alignment with a field of view of the user.
In more specific examples, a head mountable wearable user computer device can include (i) Google Glass™ product or a similar product by Google Inc. of Menlo Park, California, United States of America; (ii) the Eye Tap™ product, the Laser Eye Tap™ product, or a similar product by ePI Lab of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and/or (iii) the Raptyr™ product, the STAR 1200™ product, the Vuzix Smart Glasses M100™ product, or a similar product by Vuzix Corporation of Rochester, New York, United States of America. In other specific examples, a head mountable wearable user computer device can include the Virtual Retinal Display™ product, or similar product by the University of Washington of Seattle, Washington, United States of America. Meanwhile, in further specific examples, a limb mountable wearable user computer device can include the iWatch™ product, or similar product by Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California, United States of America, the Galaxy Gear or similar product of Samsung Group of Samsung Town, Seoul, South Korea, the Moto 360 product or similar product of Motorola of Schaumburg, Illinois, United States of America, and/or the Zip™ product, One™ product, Flex™ product, Charge™ product, Surge™ product, or similar product by Fitbit Inc. of San Francisco, California, United States of America.
In many embodiments, system 300, system 310, delivery decision module 3110, dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, front end 3160, one or more databases 3170, customer management system 3180, and/or payment system 3190 can each include one or more input devices (e.g., one or more keyboards, one or more keypads, one or more pointing devices such as a computer mouse or computer mice, one or more touchscreen displays, a microphone, etc.), and/or can each include one or more display devices (e.g., one or more monitors, one or more touch screen displays, projectors, etc.). In these or other embodiments, one or more of the input device(s) can be similar or identical to keyboard 104 (
Meanwhile, in many embodiments, system 300, system 310, delivery decision module 3110, dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, front end 3160, customer management system 3180, and/or payment system 3190 each also can be configured to communicate with and/or include one or more databases, such as databases 3170, and/or other suitable databases. The one or more databases can include an in-house delivery fleet management database that contains information about drivers, vehicles, shifts, delivery status, and so on. The one or more databases can further include an online grocery order database that contains information about orders received, payment status, pickup or delivery, customer information, items associated with the orders, and so on. The one or more databases also can include payment database that contains payment method, amount, associated orders, etc. The one or more databases can be stored on one or more memory storage units (e.g., non-transitory computer readable media), which can be similar or identical to the one or more memory storage units (e.g., non-transitory computer readable media) described above with respect to computer system 100 (
The one or more databases can each include a structured (e.g., indexed) collection of data and can be managed by any suitable database management systems configured to define, create, query, organize, update, and manage database(s). Exemplary database management systems can include MySQL (Structured Query Language) Database, PostgreSQL Database, Microsoft SQL Server Database, Oracle Database, SAP (Systems, Applications, & Products) Database, and IBM DB2 Database.
Meanwhile, communication between system 300, system 310, delivery decision module 3110, dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, front end 3160, one or more databases 3170, customer management system 3180, payment system 3190, external delivery service provider system 320, and/or user devices 340 can be implemented using any suitable manner of wired and/or wireless communication. Accordingly, system 300, system 310, delivery decision module 3110, dispatcher 3120, delivery tracking system 3130, order management system 3140, in-house delivery service provider system 3150, front end 3160, one or more databases 3170, customer management system 3180, and/or payment system 3190 can each include any software and/or hardware components configured to implement the wired and/or wireless communication.
Further, the wired and/or wireless communication can be implemented using any one or any combination of wired and/or wireless communication network topologies (e.g., ring, line, tree, bus, mesh, star, daisy chain, hybrid, etc.) and/or protocols (e.g., personal area network (PAN) protocol(s), local area network (LAN) protocol(s), wide area network (WAN) protocol(s), cellular network protocol(s), powerline network protocol(s), etc.). Exemplary PAN protocol(s) can include Bluetooth, Zigbee, Wireless Universal Serial Bus (USB), Z-Wave, etc.; exemplary LAN and/or WAN protocol(s) can include Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) 802.3 (also known as Ethernet), IEEE 802.11 (also known as WiFi), etc.; and exemplary wireless cellular network protocol(s) can include Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Evolution-Data Optimized (EV-DO), Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT), Digital AMPS (IS-136/Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA)), Integrated Digital Enhanced Network (iDEN), Evolved High-Speed Packet Access (HSPA+), Long-Term Evolution (LTE), WiMAX, etc. The specific communication software and/or hardware implemented can depend on the network topologies and/or protocols implemented, and vice versa. In many embodiments, exemplary communication hardware can include wired communication hardware including, for example, one or more data buses, such as, for example, universal serial bus(es), one or more networking cables, such as, for example, coaxial cable(s), optical fiber cable(s), and/or twisted pair cable(s), any other suitable data cable, etc. Further exemplary communication hardware can include wireless communication hardware including, for example, one or more radio transceivers, one or more infrared transceivers, etc. Additional exemplary communication hardware can include one or more networking components (e.g., modulator-demodulator components, gateway components, etc.).
Turning ahead in the drawings,
In many embodiments, systems 300 and/or 310 (
In many embodiments, method 400 can receive a delivery request from a user device for an online grocery order to a grocery store, the delivery request including a destination (block 4110); and determine whether the delivery request can be fulfilled based on the order, the destination, and the delivery driver available for delivery (block 4200). The user device can be similar or identical to user devices 340 (
In many embodiments, method 400 can determine in block 4200 that the delivery request cannot be fulfilled based on the store policy of the grocery store. For example, in an embodiment, the reason for declining delivery in the store policy can include: when a total amount of the order is less than a minimum delivery amount; when a distance between the destination and the grocery store is more than a maximum delivery distance; and/or the destination is not inside any of one or more predetermined delivery areas.
In many embodiments, method 400 can determine in block 4200 that the order is not eligible for delivery because no driver for delivery is available based on the delivery request. In some embodiments, method 400 can select the delivery driver from a plurality of sources, such as one or more associate drivers of the grocery store, one or more contractor drivers of the grocery store, and/or third-party drivers selected from one or more third-party driver delivery networks, according to one or more driver selection rules of the store policy of the grocery store. In some embodiments, the one or more driver selection rules of the store policy of the grocery store can be that a third-party driver from the one or more third-party driver delivery networks based on a set of criteria has priority over any contractor driver of the grocery store, and that a contractor driver of the grocery store has priority over any associate drivers of the grocery store, when they are all available. In other embodiments, the one or more driver selection rules of the store policy can give different priorities to the candidate drivers than those in the previous embodiments or group the candidate drivers differently by having more than 3 groups of drivers, such as the third-party drivers in one third-party driver delivery network are preferred over the drivers in another third-party driver delivery network. In yet other embodiments, method 400 can provide a user interface and leave the choice of the delivery driver to the user, with the user interface displaying requirements corresponding to each of the options, such as the prices and/or earliest availability of the drivers.
In many embodiments, the set of criteria for selecting a third-party driver from the one or more third-party driver delivery networks can comprise one or more of: an arrival time at the grocery store of the third-party driver matches a projected fulfillment time of the order at the grocery store, as determined from estimates provided by each of one or more drivers from each of the one or more third-party driver delivery networks; an arrival time at the destination of the third-party driver matches a requested delivery time of the delivery request, as determined from estimates by the each of the one or more drivers from the each of the one or more third-party driver delivery networks; a quote of the third-party driver is lowest among one or more quotes of the one or more drivers from each of the one or more third-party driver delivery networks; and/or a customer review score of the third-party driver is at least as high as a minimum acceptable score, as determined from customer review scores of the one or more drivers from the each of the one or more third-party driver delivery networks.
In other embodiments, method 400 can determine that delivery is not possible when a status of the grocery store indicates that the grocery store opts out of delivery service, may be temporarily for other reasons, such as when the grocery store is in the midst of renegotiating contracts with, or searching for substitute for, one or more third-party driver delivery networks, when all drivers in the geographic area of the grocery store are going on strike, or when a natural disaster hits the grocery store. In some embodiments, method 400 can determined that delivery of this order is not available in this grocery store but the order can be fulfilled and delivered in another grocery store, and method 400 can be configured to switch the order to the another grocery store automatically or prompt the user to decide.
In many embodiments, when the order is eligible for delivery, method 400 also can determine a delivery fee (block 4300) based on one or more delivery fee rules of the store policy. In some embodiments, the one or more delivery fee rules can comprise: the delivery fee is a fixed delivery fee based on the order and the destination, according to the store policy, such as $5 for all orders eligible for delivery, or $5 for delivery-eligible orders associated with destination within 10 miles radius of the grocery store, $7 when the destination is within 15 miles radius, and $10 when the destination is within 25 miles, for example. In other embodiments, the one or more delivery fee rules can comprise: when the delivery driver is the associate driver, the delivery is free; and when the delivery driver is not the associate driver, the delivery fee is one of a fixed delivery fee based on the order or a quote by the delivery driver, according to the store policy. In an embodiment, method 400 can be configured to receive the quote from a contractor/third-party driver of the grocery store by providing a user interface for the contractor, the third-party driver, or a supervisor of the third-party driver to enter the quote. In another embodiment, method 400 can communicate with a system of one of the one or more third-party driver delivery networks, such as external delivery service provider system 320 (
In many embodiments, when a payment including the delivery fee is confirmed (block 4400), method 400 can dispatch the delivery driver to deliver the order (block 4500). In many embodiments, method 400 can determine that the payment is received by confirming with a payment system, such as payment system 3190 (
In many embodiments, when the delivery driver is the third-party driver from a selected third-party driver delivery network of the one or more third-party driver delivery networks, method 400 can dispatch the third-party driver (block 4500) by providing a dispatching request to the selected third-party driver delivery network, the dispatching request comprising the grocery store, a projected fulfillment time of the order at the grocery store, and the destination; and receiving a delivery status from the selected third-party driver delivery network. In many embodiments, the delivery status provided by the delivery drivers, the in-house delivery system, and/or the selected third-party driver delivery network can include a pickup of the order, a confirmation of delivery, and/or a real-time tracking of the delivery driver, or the vehicle of the delivery driver, by self-reporting or a tracking device such as GPS devices or any suitable trackers. In many embodiments where the delivery driver, or the selected third-party driver delivery network of the third-party driver, provides the delivery status, such as real-time tracking of the delivery driver or the vehicle of the delivery driver, method 400 can forward the delivery status to the user according to a tracking request from the user. Examples of the tracking request in such embodiments can include the user's access to a user interface, such as webpages or apps, configured to provide the delivery status; and/or the user's signing up for push notifications, including emails, SMS text messages, or in-app notices, of major events of the delivery, such as the dispatching of the delivery driver, store pickup, and/or the completion of the delivery.
In many embodiments, method 400 can determine whether the delivery is completed and whether the completed delivery is eligible for tipping (block 4600) by checking the delivery status of the delivery, as in the aforementioned embodiments, and applying one or more delivery fee rules of the grocery store for the tipping eligibility for the delivery driver. In some embodiments, the one or more delivery rules can comprise one of: when the order is eligible for delivery, the tipping eligibility is always positive, otherwise, the tipping eligibility is negative; when the order is eligible for delivery and when the delivery driver is not the associate driver, the tipping eligibility is positive, otherwise, the tipping eligibility is negative; when the order is eligible for delivery and when the expected delivery time is within a week before holidays, the tipping eligibility is positive; or when the order is eligible for delivery and when the delivery driver is the third-party driver, the tipping eligibility is positive.
In many embodiments, method 400 can provide a tipping request to the user (block 4700) by providing a user interface, such as a webpage, for the user to access and send a tip or sending a push notification, such as an email, an in-app notice, or a SMS message, to the user, inviting a tip to the delivery driver. In some embodiments, the user interface can be similar or identical to user interface 900, as shown in
In some embodiments, method 400 can provided the tipping request with, or after, a review request. In some embodiments, method 400 can determine that the delivery is no longer eligible for tipping when the review result for the delivery from the user fails to meet one or more predetermined customer satisfaction criteria. For example, when the review result of the delivery is a thumb-down, when the review result is a 1 out of 5 stars, or when the review result is determined by a natural language processor to be negative, method 400 in this embodiment can either revoke the tipping request, such as by disabling the link to the payment system in the tipping request, if the tipping request has been provided and accessed, or not send out, or discontinue, any tipping request if the tipping request is not yet provided when the review result is received.
In many embodiments, method 400 can continue by determining that a tip is received for the delivery (block 4800) and then forwarding the tip to the delivery driver who performed the delivery (block 4900). In many embodiments, when a tip is submitted following the link to the payment system in the tipping request or sent with information identifying the delivery, such as an identification of the order or the delivery request, method 400 can determine the delivery driver for such delivery and forward the tip to the delivery driver. In many embodiments, when the delivery is eligible for tipping and the delivery driver is an in-house delivery driver, method 400 can forward the tip to the delivery driver according to the store policy, such as 100% of the tip to the delivery driver, 80% of the tip to the delivery driver and 20% to the delivery department of the grocery store, or 75% of the tip to the delivery driver, 20% to the delivery department, and 5% to the order fulfilment department. In many embodiments, when the delivery driver is the third-party driver from the selected third-party driver delivery network of the one or more third-party driver delivery networks, method 400 can forward the tip to the delivery driver through a system of the selected third-party driver delivery network, such as external delivery service provider system 320 (
Turning ahead in the drawings,
Turning ahead in the drawings,
User interfaces 500, 600, and 900 in
In an embodiment, a system can comprise one or more processors; and one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computing instructions. In this embodiment, the computing instructions can be configured to run on the one more processors and perform a method for dispatching a delivery driver and allowing the user to electronically tip the delivery driver. The method in this embodiment can comprise: receiving a delivery request from a user, the delivery request comprising a destination and being associated with an order to a grocery store; and determining whether the order is eligible for delivery, based on the order, the destination, and a delivery driver selected among multiple delivery service providers. In this embodiment, the delivery driver can be selected, by the system, according to one or more driver selection rules of a store policy of the grocery store. The multiple delivery service providers can be the grocery store with one or more in-house delivery drivers and one or more third-party driver delivery networks.
When the order is eligible for delivery, the method in this embodiment also can comprise: determining a delivery fee for the order based on one or more delivery fee rules of the store policy. According to the one or more delivery fee rules, the delivery fee for the order in this embodiment can be a flat fee based on the order and the store policy or determined by the delivery driver when the delivery driver is from the one or more third-party driver delivery networks. In this embodiment, after the payment of the fees associated with the order and the delivery of the order to the destination is received, the method can further comprise dispatching the delivery driver to deliver the order to the destination. In this embodiment, the method can be configured to provide the user tracking information of the delivery of the order to the destination, upon request by the user or by actively pushing the tracking information to the user's device until the delivery is completed, based on the user's setting.
In this embodiment, the method also can comprise: confirming that the delivery of the order to the destination is completed; and determining whether the completed delivery is eligible for tipping based on the one or more delivery fee rules. In this embodiment, the one or more delivery fee rules can allow tipping only for contractor drivers of the grocery store or third-party drivers from the one or more third-party driver delivery networks. When the completed delivery is eligible for tipping, the method in this embodiment can further comprise: providing a tipping request to the user; and upon receipt of a confirmation of a tip, forwarding the tip to the delivery driver. In this embodiment, when the delivery driver is a third-party driver, the method can forward the tip to the delivery driver through the third-party driver delivery network of the third-party driver. In this embodiment, the system also can provide one or more user interfaces, such as a user interface for the user to request delivery of an online order, another user interface for tracking the delivery, and/or yet another user interface for tipping the delivery driver, when the user receives a tipping request from the system.
In another embodiment, a method for selecting a delivery driver to dispatch among multiple delivery service providers and allowing the user to electronically tip the delivery driver can be implemented via execution of computing instructions configured to run at one or more processors and stored at one or more non-transitory computer-readable media. In this embodiment, the method can comprise one or more of the activities in the previous embodiment, including receiving a delivery request from a user, the delivery request comprising a destination and being associated with an order to a grocery store; determining a delivery eligibility for the order, based on the order, the destination, and a delivery driver selected according to one or more driver selection rules of a store policy of the grocery store, from a single one of an associate driver of the grocery store, a contractor driver of the grocery store, or a third-party driver selected from one or more third-party driver delivery networks; and when the delivery eligibility for the order is positive: determining a delivery fee for the order based on the one or more delivery fees rules of the store policy; and/or upon receipt of a confirmation of a payment for the order including the delivery fee, dispatching the delivery driver to deliver the order to the destination.
In this embodiment, when a delivery is confirmed, the method also can determine a tipping eligibility for the delivery driver based on the one or more delivery fees rules. If the tipping eligibility for the delivery driver is positive, the method of this embodiment can comprise providing a tipping request to the user. In this embodiment, the method can be configured to forward a tip to the delivery driver after the tip for the delivery is received.
In many embodiments, the techniques described herein can advantageously provide a consistent user experience by providing an integrated user interfaces for a customer to tip a delivery driver regardless of which driver delivery network was used to deliver the order, as long as the delivery driver is eligible to receive a tip.
In many embodiments, the techniques described herein can be used continuously at a scale that cannot be handled using manual techniques. For example, the number of delivery drivers in the system, including associate drivers of the grocery store, contractor drivers of the grocery store, and third-party drivers selected from one or more third-party driver delivery networks, can exceed many thousands.
In a number of embodiments, the techniques described herein can solve a technical problem that arises only within the realm of computer networks, as online grocery orders and their deliveries do not exist outside the realm of computer networks. Moreover, the techniques described herein can solve a technical problem that cannot be solved outside the context of computer networks. Specifically, the techniques described herein cannot be used outside the context of computer networks, in view of the enormous amount of orders, deliveries, delivery driver information, and other data that must be received, transmitted, organized, updated, and managed.
Although systems and methods for dispatching a delivery driver for an online grocery order and facilitating digital tipping have been described with reference to specific embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the disclosure of embodiments is intended to be illustrative of the scope of the disclosure and is not intended to be limiting. It is intended that the scope of the disclosure shall be limited only to the extent required by the appended claims. For example, to one of ordinary skill in the art, it will be readily apparent that any element of
Replacement of one or more claimed elements constitutes reconstruction and not repair. Additionally, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described with regard to specific embodiments. The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element or elements that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced, however, are not to be construed as critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all of the claims, unless such benefits, advantages, solutions, or elements are stated in such claim.
Moreover, embodiments and limitations disclosed herein are not dedicated to the public under the doctrine of dedication if the embodiments and/or limitations: (1) are not expressly claimed in the claims; and (2) are or are potentially equivalents of express elements and/or limitations in the claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7263668 | Lentz | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7716091 | Ross | May 2010 | B2 |
7797164 | Junger et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8104682 | Junger | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8429019 | Yeatts | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8831975 | Golden | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8965791 | Bell | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9393981 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9934530 | Iacono | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10127517 | Carr | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10176448 | Rhodes | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10346889 | Reiss | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10348916 | Nagata | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10366381 | Bell | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10410194 | Grassadonia | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10430926 | Cook | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10467601 | Bricca | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10636019 | Abrons | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10754916 | Rehn | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10778598 | Fritz | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10915855 | Sharma | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10997645 | Philbin | May 2021 | B1 |
11074539 | Tiderington | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11120394 | Anderson | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11244299 | Pittack | Feb 2022 | B1 |
11315190 | Brandmaier | Apr 2022 | B1 |
20010037320 | Allport | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007299 | Florence | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020046076 | Baillargeon | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030177072 | Bared | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040205568 | Breuel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050043996 | Silver | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071758 | Ehrich | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060149577 | Stashluk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178951 | Rund | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235739 | Levis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070011017 | Field | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070192200 | Weng | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198339 | Shen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237096 | Vengroff | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080221964 | Berkovitz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090005987 | Vengroff et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090099965 | Grant, IV | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106124 | Yang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100115040 | Sargent et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110004562 | Hennessy et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120066008 | Scudder et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130185124 | Aaron | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198042 | Seifen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246301 | Radhakrishnan | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140025524 | Sims | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052613 | Tavakoli | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067499 | Stepanovich | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140160143 | Ballestad | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164126 | Nicholas et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140278635 | Fulton et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140351033 | Azevedo | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150019384 | Fabian et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039450 | Hernblad | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150100433 | Choy | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150142594 | Lutnick | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154559 | Barbush | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161564 | Sweeney | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178678 | Carr et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178712 | Angrish | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186869 | Winters | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193779 | Lima | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227890 | Bednarek et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150235304 | Vincent | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150262121 | Riel-Dalpe | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150324741 | Parry et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160071056 | Ellison | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160109251 | Thakur | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160148300 | Carr | May 2016 | A1 |
20160171439 | Ladden et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171574 | Paulucci et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180287 | Chan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160210591 | Lafrance | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160232721 | Singh et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160238406 | Burtner et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160247113 | Rademaker | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160257401 | Buchmueller | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160290811 | Watterson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160334797 | Ross | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160343062 | Morton et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160350756 | Shepard et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160379167 | Raman | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160379202 | Turner | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170011340 | Gabbai | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170024621 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170025012 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170039540 | Bell | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170078504 | Nagata | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170103490 | Haparnas | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170116562 | Schroeder | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170124511 | Mueller | May 2017 | A1 |
20170154347 | Bateman | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170236088 | Rao | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170287086 | Lopez et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170356752 | Lobo et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170357617 | Ekanayake | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180012151 | Wang | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025318 | Baggott | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180039936 | Klechner et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180068374 | Turlay | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180081374 | Nimchuk et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180089660 | Elliott | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180095604 | Nguyen | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180158090 | Glynn et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180165630 | Gifford | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180174093 | Perez | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180174101 | Mattingly | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190001 | Napier et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180240181 | Lopez | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180247261 | Smith | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180268462 | Brown et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276602 | Rivalto | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180356823 | Cooper | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180365637 | Smith et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180365638 | Chen et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180365644 | Smith | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180365725 | Smith | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190019244 | Bangash | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190051174 | Haque | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066516 | Kuhara | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190080275 | Brownell | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087778 | Evans, Jr. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190114666 | Kohli | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190121522 | Davis | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190130086 | Tovey | May 2019 | A1 |
20190138983 | Endo | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156358 | Pace | May 2019 | A1 |
20190160994 | Letson | May 2019 | A1 |
20190164118 | Sandberg | May 2019 | A1 |
20190164144 | Hebert | May 2019 | A1 |
20190166009 | Parvin | May 2019 | A1 |
20190205857 | Bell | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190244448 | Alamin | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251504 | Spillman | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251621 | Harmon | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190255573 | Chen | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190287063 | Skaaksrud | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190297467 | Vengroff | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190378080 | Srinivasan | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190378081 | Swartz | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200082459 | Varma | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200151631 | Lamers | May 2020 | A1 |
20200151660 | Warr | May 2020 | A1 |
20200160428 | Calvo | May 2020 | A1 |
20200250721 | Dana | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200273431 | Dong | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210064824 | Ranatunga | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210089995 | Iacono | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210090017 | Reiss et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210097590 | Canseco | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210133724 | Harris | May 2021 | A1 |
20210142391 | van Horne | May 2021 | A1 |
20210255985 | Schneider | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210365885 | Timonen | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220058613 | Maxwell | Feb 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
111369288 | Jul 2020 | CN |
3876173 | Sep 2021 | EP |
WO-0175746 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0198869 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-2005072328 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2012050579 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2015084688 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2017197468 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO-2019198858 | Oct 2019 | WO |
WO-2020054118 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO-2020207418 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO-2020240731 | Dec 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Joseph Pisani, “Should you tip the Uber driver? Here's what to give them”, published by Taiwan News, on Jul. 28, 2016 (Year: 2016). |
21. The closest non-applied art is Joseph Pisani, “should you tip the Uber driver? Here's what to give them”, published by Taiwan News on Jul. 28, 2016, all pages. (Year: 2016). |
Joseph Pisani, “Should you tip the Uber driver? Here's what to give them”, published by AP News, on Jul. 27, 2016, p. 2 (Year: 2016). |
Jean-Francois Rouges, “Crowdsourcing delivery: New Interconnected business models to reinvent delivery”, published by 1st international physical internet conference, in 2014, all pages (Year: 2014). |
Meyersohn, Nathaniel, “Kroger Launches Online Grocery Delivery Service,” Published Aug. 1, 2018, Accessed from Aug. 2, 2018, CNN Money, https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/01/news/companies/kroger-ship-grocery-delivery/index.html (Year: 2018). |
D. Kwak, R. Liu, D. Kim, B. Nath and L. Iftode, “Seeing is Believing: Sharing Real-Time Visual Traffic Information via Vehicular Clouds,” in IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 3617-3631, 2016, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2569585 (Year: 2016) Apr. 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200250613 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |