Public video distribution systems that allow a delayed display of video or audio such as a pause feature, normally delay all video that is being received. However, in some situations, it is not desirable to pause or delay certain data streams. For example, in the case of ‘local content insertion’(LCI) for customers using satellite applications in apartments or planes, additional content can be streamed along with the satellite programs to provide movies and camera feeds. Cable systems also can provide special security streams (high priority data streams) as a service that feeds Set Top Box (STB) Personal Video Recorders (PVR). Even video monitors inside an infant's bedroom in a home can stream MPEG video, and such video might comprise high priority data streams that should not be delayed, paused, or made discontinuous. Internet feeds can also provide remote camera feeds which might be important for security purposes and thus would not be desired to get frozen or delayed along with all of the other data in the event a consumer records/delays or pauses their equipment.
For example, a typical airborne pause system would normally pause or stop the local movies on a plane and all satellite content during pilot announcements. After the announcements, the video would begin to be streamed again in either a real-time or delayed state. If security or safety cameras are included in the LCI content or in a priority satellite channel, pausing these streams or stopping the streams might cause a breach of security or a safety issue, since video would either be lost or not be displayed in real-time. That is, applications such as safety or security video that pass through a system that has a “pause” function activated would be seeing delayed video which would/could be misleading or unsafe.
In one embodiment according to the present principles, a system and method is provided for allowing the processing of selected priority data streams even when a system is paused or stopped. Any transport stream that is, for example, security data can be labeled as a priority channel and treated as a non-pausable stream in any system that anticipates this feature. For example, normally, a security system and satellite/cable/internet system content are independent systems. However, as systems become more versatile, cost reduced, and full featured, the trend is to try to merge these systems. A system and method according to one embodiment of the present principles provides a solution to allow selected priority signals to be processed for display, even when the decoding device is paused or stopped. If the priority signals are interrupted, the viewer can be notified that the video is discontinuous in time to prevent a false sense of security.
Advantageously, the present system shows how selectively display priority data in systems that use a pause function. Accordingly, even when the main system is paused, the priority data is always shown in real-time. The present system also includes an alert notification to the viewer if the priority feed stream is interrupted as a potential tamper warning.
In one aspect of the present principles, a system for processing data stream content in a multi-channel multimedia system is provided, the system comprising a multimedia content decoder having an input priority detector for detecting at least one priority data stream from an input data stream to process a selected data stream when the multimedia content system is paused. The priority detector can include a disruption indicator when a received rate of a priority data stream is compared to an embedded rate.
According to another aspect, a method for processing data stream content in a multi-channel multimedia system is provided, comprising the steps of selectively processing a multimedia content channel while in a pause mode.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of the present principles will be described or become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote similar elements throughout the views:
It should be understood that the drawings are for purposes of illustrating the concepts of the present principles and are not necessarily the only possible configurations for illustrating the present principles.
A method, apparatus and system for displaying priority data through a pausable multimedia content delivery device. The present system also includes an alert indication to a user if the priority feed stream is disrupted as a potential warning to alert the viewer that the priority data stream might have been tampered with.
Although the present principles will be described primarily within the context of permitting priority data to bypass systems having a pause capability, the specific embodiments of the present principles should not be treated as limiting the scope of the invention. It is appreciated by those skilled in the art and informed by the teachings of the present principles that the concepts of the present principles can be advantageously applied in other environments in which uninterrupted display of priority data is desired, e.g., broadcast television/radio, satellite radio, cable, etc. and in systems which may not have any pause function or capability.
The functions of the various elements shown in the figures can be provided through the use of dedicated hardware as well as hardware capable of executing software in association with appropriate software. When provided by a processor, the functions can be provided by a single dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual processors, some of which can be shared. Moreover, explicit use of the term “processor” or “controller” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and can implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (“DSP”) hardware, read-only memory (“ROM”) for storing software, random access memory (“RAM”), and non-volatile storage. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future (i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure).
Thus, for example, it is appreciated by those skilled in the art that the block diagrams presented herein represent conceptual views of illustrative system components and/or circuitry embodying the principles of the invention. Similarly, it is appreciated that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudocode, and the like represent various processes which can be substantially represented in computer readable media and so executed by a computer or processor, whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present principles, a method, apparatus and system is described for sending high-priority data immediately through a system, even in systems having a pause or delay function, for display to a viewer, for detecting possible tampering of the priority data and for notifying the viewer when the priority data is disrupted.
“Priority data” can comprise any data stream that is desired to be viewed in a continuous stream at all times, e.g., security video, data having time-sensitive information, etc. Data streams can be designated as comprising priority data manually by the user or automatically by the system according to pre-defined criteria. For example, priority data streams can be tagged with packets having a unique Packet Identifier (PID) number to identify them as comprising priority data.
“Non-priority data” can comprise any data stream that can be paused or delayed in the system and thus can be viewed in either real-time or delayed-time. Even in systems having a pause function, the use of a pause delay can be optional.
Content delivery systems are typically configured with a head end unit that gathers content and provides it to downstream individual content delivery systems such as, for example, set top boxes (STB). Some of the content gathered can include streaming channels that can be stored and/or sent directly to the individual content delivery systems. Systems and methods are provided herein that accept this type of content delivery and determine its priority for processing purposes at a localized level. This allows priority determination to be made not only on information or channel selection determined by the head end unit, but also on localized information such as, for example, user identity and/or user input and the like. Content determined to be of a priority can then be processed despite system interruptions such as, for example, a system pause mode and the like. Since the priority determination can be made at a localized level and for specific recipients, for example, each seat in an airplane can have customized video for its location to show how to escape from the plane even during a safety announcement (which typically causes a system pause).
The priority detector 104 can utilize, for example, header and/or identifier information to determine priority of incoming content. One such method that it can interact with is described in relation to a head end unit that establishes content priority. A detector assesses incoming packets and detects priority packets (e.g., security packets). Priority packets, for example, can be provided in priority data streams having a special, unique PID number to enable their recognition. That is, special packets can be filtered to become priority packets from a content source, such as a satellite feed by monitoring the packet header of the incoming data. A detector can then check for a new packet start and at the same time, search for a specific priority packet, and then send it to a priority processor for the timestamp and processing. This would allow selection of, e.g., any one channel or transponder to have a non-paused video in a normally paused system. If it is determined that there is a new packet start, a timestamp can be added. The packet can be flagged with an extra ‘start bit’ to show when a packet begins.
The detector can be configured to detect a priority packet under any circumstance, regardless of whether the system includes a pause function or not. A detected priority data stream can accordingly cause an alert indicator (e.g., an icon, symbol or message) to be displayed to a recipient on a screen in addition to any other normal (non-priority) video being watched. Such an alert indicator can be displayed simultaneously with the normal video being watched. For example, a tornado alert can be designated as a priority data stream, which could be superimposed on the video content of a satellite system. This aspect would not require a pause function to be present but it would still be a special priority packet that ends up as a signal on a display even though another channel is being watched. Once priority is established, the priority detector 104 allows the content to be processed by a decoder 106 regardless of the status of a pause mode for the system 102. The decoder 106 then can provide input to a display processor for viewing by a recipient.
The priority detector 104 can also be utilized to determine if a disruption has occurred with regard to priority channels. For example, the priority detector 104 can monitor the rate at which incoming information is arriving and compare that to embedded rate information found within the incoming information. The embedded information can include, but is not limited to, actual rate information and/or timing information such as ingoing and outgoing time stamps which can be used to derive rate information. If the priority detector 104 determines that the priority channel has been and/or is being disrupted, it can provide an indicator to a recipient. The indicator can include, but is not limited to, a visual and/or aural indicator such as, for example, a beeping tone and/or a red flag, etc.
A method 300 of providing priority multimedia channel delivery during a pause mode is illustrated in
Once a content channel has been established as a priority channel, it is allowed to be decoded even if a pause mode is in effect 310. This allows the priority content to be viewed by a recipient even when normal content has been paused. For example, processing of priority content even without a pause mode allows recipients to interact via menus and overlays to make selections such as, for example, food, drinks or other service without having to stop a movie or press a call button. Emergency messages, public announcement icons, fasten seat belt icons, weather conditions and restroom available icons can be imposed on a recipient's display independent of what the passenger is watching. Updates of time, weather, flight information, security cameras can be constantly sent and received to a set top box independent of pause or channel selection of a recipient. High security cameras could continue to operate with or without a pause mode in effect as well.
After decoding of the priority content, the content can be output to be processed by, for example, a video decoder 312. Recipients can, upon viewing priority information or otherwise, decide to input information/feedback associated with a priority channel 314, ending the flow 316. This can include, but is not limited to, inputting security codes for decoding priority content, setting alert/disruption indicator sound/viewing levels, selecting which priority content to decode, and/or establishing priority levels for priority content and the like.
The video processor 510 can then accept inputs from the data/control function to facilitate in displaying icons for alarms, indicators, etc. and/or to provide overlays of priority content and the like to a display. For example, the priority video can be displayed contemporaneously with the non-priority data on a split screen, picture-in-picture (PIP), etc., to display the priority data on screen at all times, in addition to the normal, non-priority video.
Although the embodiment which incorporates the teachings of the present principles has been shown and described in detail herein, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that still incorporate these teachings. Having described preferred embodiments for a system and method for allowing selected priority data streams to be displayed in a pausable multimedia content delivery system (which are intended to be illustrative and not limiting), it is noted that modifications and variations can be made by persons skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that changes can be made in the particular embodiments of the principles disclosed which are within the scope and spirit of the inventive principles as outlined by the appended claims. Having thus described the invention with the details and particularity required by the patent laws, what is claimed and desired protected is set forth in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §365 of International Application PCT/US2008/013712, filed Dec. 15, 2008, which was published in accordance with PCT Article 21(2) on Sep. 24, 2009 in English and which claims the benefit of United States provisional patent application No. 61/070,074, filed Mar. 20, 2008.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/013712 | 12/15/2008 | WO | 00 | 9/9/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/116980 | 9/24/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4646280 | Toyosawa | Feb 1987 | A |
5357250 | Healey et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5418863 | Ando | May 1995 | A |
5510844 | Cash et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5596647 | Wakai et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5801786 | Song | Sep 1998 | A |
5854591 | Atkinson | Dec 1998 | A |
5896129 | Murphy et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5956094 | Chun | Sep 1999 | A |
5973722 | Wakai et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995553 | Crandall et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014381 | Troxel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052384 | Huang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058288 | Reed et al. | May 2000 | A |
6249913 | Galipeau et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262737 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278375 | Hucker | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6323767 | Gropper | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363207 | Duruoz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377188 | Maruyama | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393343 | Frey et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6463273 | Day | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6539548 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559812 | McCarten et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6728269 | Godwin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744967 | Kaminski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6745021 | Stevens | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6762733 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6813777 | Weinberger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6938258 | Weinberger et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6978424 | Safadi | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7003052 | Koike et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7028304 | Weinberger et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7075945 | Arsenault et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7114171 | Brady, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130724 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159230 | Manson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7159231 | Clark | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167639 | Haddad et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174085 | Demas et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177522 | MacInnis | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194611 | Bear et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197234 | Chatterson | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200859 | Perlman et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7230652 | Demas et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257308 | Plourde, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260312 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272298 | Lang et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272300 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7292604 | Godwin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7409140 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7565104 | Brown et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7640566 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7788395 | Bowra et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8049821 | Campbell | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20020024973 | Tavana et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020039481 | Jun et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020118951 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020152470 | Hammond | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177996 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030025599 | Monroe | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037331 | Lee | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030084451 | Pierzga et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093798 | Rogerson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114107 | Aoyagi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115369 | Walter et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117959 | Taranov | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030208764 | Galipeau et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040022236 | Blanco et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073937 | Williams | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040136408 | Tomobe et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155961 | Litwin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040205266 | Regal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050036512 | Loukianov | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050083861 | Van Den Heuvel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050117583 | Uchida et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135787 | Yoo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138659 | Boccon-Gibod et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152406 | Chauveau | Jul 2005 | A2 |
20050201399 | Woodward, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201629 | Karczewicz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020992 | Pugel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029359 | Shigehara et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060136965 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160545 | Goren et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060193454 | Abou-Chakra et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224761 | Howarth et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257099 | Potrebic et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275022 | Perlman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060275023 | Perlman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277316 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003230 | Cho | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011343 | Davis et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021099 | Sato | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070065122 | Chatterton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086488 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092078 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107019 | Romano et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113290 | Charles et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127887 | Yap et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127891 | Demas et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130597 | Parker et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136743 | Hasek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143809 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143813 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162392 | McEnroe et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166001 | Barton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168188 | Choi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180465 | Ou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192613 | Amoroso et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203739 | Williams | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230899 | Shiiyama | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080066073 | Sen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080212525 | Tervonen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240097 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090003225 | Klassen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090069033 | Karstens et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090320075 | Marko | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110007745 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110307548 | Fisk et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1717024 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1893577 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1902697 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1909696 | Feb 2007 | CN |
0813341 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0907281 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1175091 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1283639 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1594317 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1739676 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1781034 | May 2007 | EP |
58131825 | Aug 1983 | JP |
58186237 | Oct 1983 | JP |
01288190 | Nov 1989 | JP |
578043 | Oct 1993 | JP |
7130150 | May 1995 | JP |
2001008200 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001054066 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001160940 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001312992 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002112199 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002135729 | May 2002 | JP |
2002269910 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002335467 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003163892 | Jun 2003 | JP |
200423591 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004248138 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004282644 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005184519 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005244404 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005310365 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005318049 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005535170 | Nov 2005 | JP |
200623748 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006109301 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006186580 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006246297 | Sep 2006 | JP |
200753738 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007158432 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007281922 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008005085 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008193295 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008539638 | Nov 2008 | JP |
100800715 | Feb 2008 | KR |
WO9843376 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO0072592 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO02071756 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO03019932 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03024085 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03032620 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03067594 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO03075574 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03092281 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004034707 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2005045830 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2006114759 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007036833 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007038131 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007056108 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007063430 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007076042 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007130150 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008026187 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO2009117050 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
In'l Search Report, dated Apr. 1, 2009. |
Business Wire, “AMD Powers Up AMD Live!(TM) Home Media Server Introducing Easy, Universal Control of a Home Network”, Nov. 5, 2007. |
AT&T, AT&T Introduces U-Verse in Austin, Business Wire, Nov. 8, 2007. |
Monsoon, “HAVA Video Streaming and Place-Shifting Devices”, Press Release, Nov. 7, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100329637 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61070074 | Mar 2008 | US |