Patent Grant
11190247
Prior art multi-user wireless systems may include only a single base station or several base stations.
A single WiFi base station (e.g., utilizing 2.4 GHz 802.11b, g or n protocols) attached to a broadband wired Internet connection in an area where there are no other WiFi access points (e.g. a WiFi access point attached to DSL within a rural home) is an example of a relatively simple multi-user wireless system that is a single base station that is shared by one or more users that are within its transmission range. If a user is in the same room as the wireless access point, the user will typically experience a high-speed link with few transmission disruptions (e.g. there may be packet loss from 2.4 GHz interferers, like microwave ovens, but not from spectrum sharing with other WiFi devices), If a user is a medium distance away or with a few obstructions in the path between the user and WiFi access point, the user will likely experience a medium-speed link. If a user is approaching the edge of the range of the WiFi access point, the user will likely experience a low-speed link, and may be subject to periodic drop-outs if changes to the channel result in the signal SNR dropping below usable levels. And, finally, if the user is beyond the range of the WiFi base station, the user will have no link at all.
When multiple users access the WiFi base station simultaneously, then the available data throughput is shared among them. Different users will typically place different throughput demands on a WiFi base station at a given time, but at times when the aggregate throughput demands exceed the available throughput from the WiFi base station to the users, then some or all users will receive less data throughput than they are seeking. In an extreme situation where a WiFi access point is shared among a very large number of users, throughput to each user can slow down to a crawl, and worse, data throughput to each user may arrive in short bursts separated by long periods of no data throughput at all, during which time other users are served. This “choppy” data delivery may impair certain applications, like media streaming.
Adding additional WiFi base stations in situations with a large number of users will only help up to a point. Within the 2.4 GHz ISM band in the U.S., there are 3 non-interfering channels that can be used for WiFi, and if 3 WiFi base stations in the same coverage area are configured to each use a different non-interfering channel, then the aggregate throughput of the coverage area among multiple users will be increased up to a factor of 3. But, beyond that, adding more WiFi base stations in the same coverage area will not increase aggregate throughput, since they will start sharing the same available spectrum among them, effectually utilizing time-division multiplexed access (TDMA) by “taking turns” using the spectrum. This situation is often seen in coverage areas with high population density, such as within multi-dwelling units. For example, a user in a large apartment building with a WiFi adapter may well experience very poor throughput due to dozens of other interfering WiFi networks (e.g. in other apartments) serving other users that are in the same coverage area, even if the user's access point is in the same room as the client device accessing the base station. Although the link quality is likely good in that situation, the user would be receiving interference from neighbor WiFi adapters operating in the same frequency band, reducing the effective throughput to the user.
Current multiuser wireless systems, including both unlicensed spectrum, such as WiFi, and licensed spectrum, suffer from several limitations. These include coverage area, downlink (DL) data rate and uplink (UL) data rate. Key goals of next generation wireless systems, such as WiMAX and LTE, are to improve coverage area and DL and UL data rate via multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology. MIMO employs multiple antennas at transmit and receive sides of wireless links to improve link quality (resulting in wider coverage) or data rate (by creating multiple non-interfering spatial channels to every user). If enough data rate is available for every user (note, the terms “user” and “client” are used herein interchangeably), however, it may be desirable to exploit channel spatial diversity to create non-interfering channels to multiple users (rather than single user), according to multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO) techniques [20-27]. For example, in MIMO 4×4 systems (i.e., four transmit and four receive antennas), 10 MHz bandwidth, 16-QAM modulation and forward error correction (FEC) coding with rate 3/4 (yielding spectral efficiency of 3 bps/Hz), the ideal peak data rate achievable at the physical layer for every user is 4×30 Mbps=120 Mbps, which is much higher than required to deliver high definition video content (which may only require ˜10 Mbps). In MU-MIMO systems with four transmit antennas, four users and single antenna per user, in ideal scenarios (i.e., independent identically distributed, i.i.d., channels) downlink data rate may be shared across the four users and channel spatial diversity may be exploited to create four parallel 30 Mbps data links to the users.
Different MU-MIMO schemes have been proposed as part of the LTE standard [1-3], but they can provide only up to 2× improvement in DL data rate with four transmit antennas. Practical implementations of MU-MIMO techniques in standard and proprietary cellular systems by companies like ArrayComm [4] have yielded up to a ˜3× increase (with four transmit antennas) in DL data rate via space division multiple access (SDMA). A key limitation of MU-MIMO schemes in cellular networks is lack of spatial diversity at the transmit side. Spatial diversity is a function of antenna spacing and multipath angular spread in the wireless links. In cellular systems employing MU-MIMO techniques, transmit antennas at a base station are typically clustered together and placed only one or two wavelengths apart due to limited real estate on antenna support structures (referred to herein as “towers,” whether physically tall or not) and due to limitations on where towers may be located. Moreover, multipath angular spread is low since cell towers are typically placed high up (10 meters or more) above obstacles to yield wider coverage.
Other practical issues with cellular system deployment include excessive cost and limited availability of locations for cellular antenna locations (e.g. due to municipal restrictions on antenna placement, cost of real-estate, physical obstructions, etc.) and the cost and/or availability of network connectivity to the transmitters (referred to herein as “backhaul”). Further, cellular systems often have difficulty reaching clients located deeply in buildings due to losses from walls, ceilings, floors, furniture and other impediments.
Indeed, the entire concept of a cellular structure for wide-area network wireless presupposes a rather rigid placement of cellular towers, an alternation of frequencies between adjacent cells, and frequently sectorization, so as to avoid interference among transmitters (either base stations or users) that are using the same frequency. As a result, a given sector of a given cell ends up being a shared block of DL and UL spectrum among all of the users in the cell sector, which is then shared among these users primarily in only the time domain. For example, cellular systems based on Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) and Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) both share spectrum among users in the time domain. By overlaying such cellular systems with sectorization, perhaps a 2-3× spatial domain benefit can be achieved. And, then by overlaying such cellular systems with a MU-MIMO system, such as those described previously, perhaps another 2-3× space-time domain benefit can be achieved. But, given that the cells and sectors of the cellular system are typically in fixed locations, often dictated by where towers can be placed, even such limited benefits are difficult to exploit if user density (or data rate demands) at a given time does not match up well with tower/sector placement. A cellular smart phone user often experiences the consequence of this today where the user may be talking on the phone or downloading a web page without any trouble at all, and then after driving (or even walking) to a new location will suddenly see the voice quality drop or the web page slow to a crawl, or even lose the connection entirely. But, on a different day, the user may have the exact opposite occur in each location. What the user is probably experiencing, assuming the environmental conditions are the same, is the fact that user density (or data rate demands) is highly variable, but the available total spectrum (and thereby total data rate, using prior art techniques) to be shared among users at a given location is largely fixed.
Further, prior art cellular systems rely upon using different frequencies in different adjacent cells, typically 3 different frequencies. For a given amount of spectrum, this reduces the available data rate by 3×.
So, in summary, prior art cellular systems may lose perhaps 3× in spectrum utilization due to cellularization, and may improve spectrum utilization by perhaps 3× through sectorization and perhaps 3× more through MU-MIMO techniques, resulting in a net 3*3/3=3× potential spectrum utilization. Then, that bandwidth is typically divided up among users in the time domain, based upon what sector of what cell the users fall into at a given time. There are even further inefficiencies that result due to the fact that a given user's data rate demands are typically independent of the user's location, but the available data rate varies depending on the link quality between the user and the base station. For example, a user further from a cellular base station will typically have less available data rate than a user closer to a base station. Since the data rate is typically shared among all of the users in a given cellular sector, the result of this is that all users are impacted by high data rate demands from distant users with poor link quality (e.g. on the edge of a cell) since such users will still demand the same amount of data rate, yet they will be consuming more of the shared spectrum to get it.
Other proposed spectrum sharing systems, such as that used by WiFi (e.g., 802.11b, g, and n) and those proposed by the White Spaces Coalition, share spectrum very inefficiently since simultaneous transmissions by base stations within range of a user result in interference, and as such, the systems utilize collision avoidance and sharing protocols. These spectrum sharing protocols are within the time domain, and so, when there are a large number of interfering base stations and users, no matter how efficient each base station itself is in spectrum utilization, collectively the base stations are limited to time domain sharing of the spectrum among each other. Other prior art spectrum sharing systems similarly rely upon similar methods to mitigate interference among base stations (be they cellular base stations with antennas on towers or small scale base stations, such as WiFi Access Points (APs)). These methods include limiting transmission power from the base station so as to limit the range of interference, beamforming (via synthetic or physical means) to narrow the area of interference, time-domain multiplexing of spectrum and/or MU-MIMO techniques with multiple clustered antennas on the user device, the base station or both. And, in the case of advanced cellular networks in place or planned today, frequently many of these techniques are used at once.
But, what is apparent by the fact that even advanced cellular systems can achieve only about a 3× increase in spectrum utilization compared to a single user utilizing the spectrum is that all of these techniques have done little to increase the aggregate data rate among shared users for a given area of coverage. In particular, as a given coverage area scales in terms of users, it becomes increasingly difficult to scale the available data rate within a given amount of spectrum to keep pace with the growth of users. For example, with cellular systems, to increase the aggregate data rate within a given area, typically the cells are subdivided into smaller cells (often called nano-cells or femto-cells). Such small cells can become extremely expensive given the limitations on where towers can be placed, and the requirement that towers must be placed in a fairly structured pattern so as to provide coverage with a minimum of “dead zones”, yet avoid interference between nearby cells using the same frequencies. Essentially, the coverage area must be mapped out, the available locations for placing towers or base stations must be identified, and then given these constraints, the designers of the cellular system must make do with the best they can. And, of course, if user data rate demands grow over time, then the designers of the cellular system must yet again remap the coverage area, try to find locations for towers or base stations, and once again work within the constraints of the circumstances. And, very often, there simply is no good solution, resulting in dead zones or inadequate aggregate data rate capacity in a coverage area. In other words, the rigid physical placement requirements of a cellular system to avoid interference among towers or base stations utilizing the same frequency results in significant difficulties and constraints in cellular system design, and often is unable to meet user data rate and coverage requirements.
So-called prior art “cooperative” and “cognitive” radio systems seek to increase the spectral utilization in a given area by using intelligent algorithms within radios such that they can minimize interference among each other and/or such that they can potentially “listen” for other spectrum use so as to wait until the channel is clear. Such systems are proposed for use particularly in unlicensed spectrum in an effort to increase the spectrum utilization of such spectrum.
A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_ad_hoc_network) is an example of a cooperative self-configuring network intended to provide peer-to-peer communications, and could be used to establish communication among radios without cellular infrastructure, and with sufficiently low-power communications, can potentially mitigate interference among simultaneous transmissions that are out of range of each other. A vast number of routing protocols have been proposed and implemented for MANET systems (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ad-hoc_routing_protocols for a list of dozens of routing protocols in a wide range of classes), but a common theme among them is they are all techniques for routing (e.g. repeating) transmissions in such a way to minimize transmitter interference within the available spectrum, towards the goal of particular efficiency or reliability paradigms.
All of the prior art multi-user wireless systems seek to improve spectrum utilization within a given coverage area by utilizing techniques to allow for simultaneous spectrum utilization among base stations and multiple users. Notably, in all of these cases, the techniques utilized for simultaneous spectrum utilization among base stations and multiple users achieve the simultaneous spectrum use by multiple users by mitigating interference among the waveforms to the multiple users. For example, in the case of 3 base stations each using a different frequency to transmit to one of 3 users, there interference is mitigated because the 3 transmissions are at 3 different frequencies. In the case of sectorization from a base station to 3 different users, each 180 degrees apart relative to the base station, interference is mitigated because the beamforming prevents the 3 transmissions from overlapping at any user.
When such techniques are augmented with MU-MIMO, and, for example, each base station has 4 antennas, then this has the potential to increase downlink throughput by a factor of 4, by creating four non-interfering spatial channels to the users in given coverage area. But it is still the case that some technique must be utilized to mitigate the interference among multiple simultaneous transmissions to multiple users in different coverage areas.
And, as previously discussed, such prior art techniques (e.g. cellularization, sectorization) not only typically suffer from increasing the cost of the multi-user wireless system and/or the flexibility of deployment, but they typically run into physical or practical limitations of aggregate throughput in a given coverage area. For example, in a cellular system, there may not be enough available locations to install more base stations to create smaller cells. And, in an MU-MIMO system, given the clustered antenna spacing at each base station location, the limited spatial diversity results in asymptotically diminishing returns in throughput as more antennas are added to the base station.
And further, in the case of multi-user wireless systems where the user location and density is unpredictable, it results in unpredictable (with frequently abrupt changes) in throughput, which is inconvenient to the user and renders some applications (e.g. the delivery of services requiring predictable throughput) impractical or of low quality. Thus, prior art multi-user wireless systems still leave much to be desired in terms of their ability to provide predictable and/or high-quality services to users.
Despite the extraordinary sophistication and complexity that has been developed for prior art multi-user wireless systems over time, there exist common themes: transmissions are distributed among different base stations (or ad hoc transceivers) and are structured and/or controlled so as to avoid the RF waveform transmissions from the different base stations and/or different ad hoc transceivers from interfering with each other at the receiver of a given user.
Or, to put it another way, it is taken as a given that if a user happens to receive transmissions from more than one base station or ad hoc transceiver at the same time, the interference from the multiple simultaneous transmissions will result in a reduction of the SNR and/or bandwidth of the signal to the user which, if severe enough, will result in loss of all or some of the potential data (or analog information) that would otherwise have been received by the user.
Thus, in a multiuser wireless system, it is necessary to utilize one or more spectrum sharing approaches or another to avoid or mitigate such interference to users from multiple base stations or ad hoc transceivers transmitting at the same frequency at the same time. There are a vast number of prior art approaches to avoiding such interference, including controlling base stations' physical locations (e.g. cellularization), limiting power output of base stations and/or ad hoc transceivers (e.g. limiting transmit range), beamforming/sectorization, and time domain multiplexing. In short, all of these spectrum sharing systems seek to address the limitation of multiuser wireless systems that when multiple base stations and/or ad hoc transceivers transmitting simultaneously at the same frequency are received by the same user, the resulting interference reduces or destroys the data throughput to the affected user. If a large percentage, or all, of the users in the multi-user wireless system are subject to interference from multiple base stations and/or ad hoc transceivers (e.g. in the event of the malfunction of a component of a multi-user wireless system), then it can result in a situation where the aggregate throughput of the multi-user wireless system is dramatically reduced, or even rendered non-functional.
Prior art multi-user wireless systems add complexity and introduce limitations to wireless networks and frequently result in a situation where a given user's experience (e.g. available bandwidth, latency, predictability, reliability) is impacted by the utilization of the spectrum by other users in the area. Given the increasing demands for aggregate bandwidth within wireless spectrum shared by multiple users, and the increasing growth of applications that can rely upon multi-user wireless network reliability, predictability and low latency for a given user, it is apparent that prior art multi-user wireless technology suffers from many limitations. Indeed, with the limited availability of spectrum suitable for particular types of wireless communications (e.g. at wavelengths that are efficient in penetrating building walls), it may be the case that prior art wireless techniques will be insufficient to meet the increasing demands for bandwidth that is reliable, predictable and low-latency.
What is needed is a multiuser wireless system that does not suffer from the aforementioned limitations:
(a) limitations in aggregate bandwidth in a given amount of spectrum;
(b) lack of reliable, predictable and low-latency communications for a given user;
(c) one user's use of the wireless network negatively impacting another user's use;
(d) lack of flexibility in the placement of transceivers and/or antennas that form the multi-user wireless system;
(e) lack of flexibility allowing transceivers and/or antennas to be installed either by commercial network providers or by individuals; or
(f) impractical or expensive implementations.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained from the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
1. DIDO System Description
One solution to overcome many of the above prior art limitations is an embodiment of Distributed-Input Distributed-Output (DIDO) technology. DIDO technology is described in the following patents and patent applications, all of which are assigned the assignee of the present patent and are incorporated by reference:
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/308,031, filed on May 4, 2021, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/234,699, filed on Apr. 19, 2021, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/340,914, filed on Nov. 1, 2016, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,985,811, Issued on Apr. 20, 2021;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/201,276, filed Jul. 1, 2016, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,333,604, Issued on Jun. 25, 2019;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/156,254, filed Jan. 15, 2014, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,465, Issued on Jul. 5, 2016;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/630,627, filed Dec. 3, 2009, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,654,815, Issued on Feb. 18, 2014;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/894,394, filed Aug. 20, 2007 entitled, “System and Method for Distributed Input Distributed Output Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,599,420, Issued on Oct. 6, 2009;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/143,503, filed Jun. 20, 2008, entitled, “System and Method For Distributed Input-Distributed Output Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,160,121, Issued on Apr. 17, 2012;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/894,362, filed Aug. 20, 2007, entitled, “System and method for Distributed Input-Distributed Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,633,994, Issued on Dec. 15, 2009;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/894,540, filed Aug. 20, 2007, entitled “System and Method For Distributed Input-Distributed Output Wireless; Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,636,831, Issued on Dec. 22, 2009.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/256,478, filed Oct. 21, 2005, entitled “System and Method For Spatial-Multiplexed Tropospheric Scatter; Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,711,030, Issued on May 4, 2010;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/902,978, filed Jul. 30, 2004, entitled “System and Method for Distributed Input Distributed Output Wireless Communication”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,418,053, Issued on Aug. 26, 2008;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,731, filed Apr. 2, 2004, entitled “System and Method For Enhancing Near Vertical Incidence Skywave (“NVIS”) Communication Using Space-Time Coding, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,885,354, Issued on Feb. 8, 2011.
The foregoing patent applications are referred to below as the “related applications.”
DIDO systems are described in the related application U.S. Pat. No. 7,418,053, where multiple antennas of the same DIDO base station in
Recent publications [32,33] analyzed theoretically the performance of cooperative base stations in the context of cellular systems. In practice, when those cooperative base stations are connected to one another via wireless, wired, or optical network (i.e., wide area network, WAN backbone, router) to share precoded data, control information and/or time/frequency synchronization information as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,418,053, 7,599,420, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/894,362 and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/894,540 they function as multiple distributed antennas of a single DIDO base station as shown in
A significant advantage of DIDO systems over prior art systems is that DIDO systems enable the distribution of multiple cooperative distributed antennas, all using the same frequency at the same time in the same wide coverage area, without significantly restricting the physical placement of the distributed antennas. In contrast to prior art multi-user systems, which avoid interference from multiple base transmitters at a given user receiver, the simultaneous RF waveform transmissions from multiple DIDO distributed antennas deliberately interfere with each other at each user's receiver. The interference is a precisely controlled constructive and destructive interference of RF waveforms incident upon each receiving antenna which, rather than impairing data reception, enhances data reception. It also achieves a valuable goal: it results in multiple simultaneous non-interfering channels to the users via space-time precoding techniques, increasing the aggregate throughput in a given coverage area, increasing the throughput to a given user, and significantly increasing the reliability and predictability of throughput to a given user.
Thus, when using DIDO, multiple distributed antenna RF waveform transmission interference and user channel interference have an inverse relationship: multiple distributed antenna RF waveform interference results in simultaneous non-interfering user channels.
With prior art multi-user systems, multiple base station (and/or ad hoc transceivers) RF waveform transmission interference and user channel interference have a direct relationship: multiple base station (and/or ad hoc transceivers) RF waveform interference results in simultaneous interfering user channels.
So, what DIDO utilizes and relies upon to achieve performance far beyond prior art systems is exactly what is avoided by, and results in impairment of, prior art systems.
And, because the number of non-interfering channels (and aggregate throughput) grows largely proportionately with the number of DIDO distributed antennas (unlike MU-MIMO systems, where the aggregate throughput asymptotically levels off as the number of cluster antennas at a base station is increased), the spectrum utilization of a given coverage area can be scaled as the number of users in an area scales, all without subdividing the coverage area by frequency or sector, and without requiring significant restrictions on the placement of DIDO distributed antennas. This results in enormous efficiencies in spectrum utilization and aggregate user downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) data rates, and enormous placement flexibility for either commercial or consumer base station installation.
In this way, DIDO opens the door to a very large increase in multi-user wireless spectrum efficiency by specifically doing exactly what prior art systems had been meticulously designed to avoid doing.
As illustrated in
Depending on the layout of the network interconnecting the DIDO distributed antennas 6113, one or multiple DIDO BTSs can be used in a given coverage area. We define a DIDO cell as the coverage area served by one DIDO BTS. One embodiment with circular topology is depicted in
In one embodiment of the invention, the BSN 6111 is used to deliver precoded baseband data from the BTS 6112 to the DIDO distributed antennas 6113. As shown in
In another embodiment of the invention, the BSN is used to carry modulated signals as illustrated in
In another embodiment, existing cellular towers with antennas, transceivers, and backhaul connectivity are reconfigured such that the backhauls are connected to a DIDO BTS 6112. The backhaul connectivity becomes functionally equivalent to the BSN 6111. Then, as described previously, the cellular transceivers and antennas become functionally equivalent to the DIDO distributed antennas 6113. Depending on the transceivers and antennas installed in existing cellular phone towers, they may need to be reconfigured or replaced, so as to be able to operate in a DIDO configuration. For example, the transmitters may have been configured to transmit at a low power level so as to not cause interference with a nearby cell using the same frequency. With DIDO, there is no need to mitigate such waveform interference, and indeed, such waveform interference increases the spectrum utilization of the coverage area beyond that achievable in a prior art cellular configuration.
In another embodiment, existing cellular towers are partially used for DIDO, as described in the preceding paragraph, and partially used as conventional cellular towers, so as to support compatibility with existing cellular devices. Such a combined system can be implemented in a number of different ways. In one embodiment, TDMA is used to alternate between DIDO use and conventional cellular use. So, at any given time, the cellular towers are used for only DIDO or for conventional cellular communications.
Some key features and benefits of DIDO systems, compared to typical multi-user wireless systems, including cellular systems employing MU-MIMO techniques, are:
2. Methods for Implementation and Deployment of DIDO Systems
The following describes different embodiments of practical deployment of DIDO systems.
a. Downlink Channel
The general algorithm used in one embodiment to enable DIDO communications over wireless links is described as follows.
In DIDO systems, the feedback loop in
As discussed above, a low latency or high latency BSN can be used in DIDO systems depending on the available network. In one embodiment, the DIDO BTS 6112 switches among two or more types of BSN network infrastructure based on the each users' channel coherence time. For example, outdoor clients are typically characterized by more severe Doppler effects due to the potential of fast mobility of clients or objects within the channel (i.e., resulting in low channel coherence time). Indoor clients have generally fixed wireless or low mobility links (e.g., high channel coherence time). In one embodiment, DIDO distributed antennas connected to low latency BSN network infrastructure (e.g., dedicated fiber rings) are assigned to outdoor clients, whereas DIDO distributed antennas connected to high latency BSN network infrastructure (e.g., consumer Internet connections such as DSL or cable modems) are assigned to serve indoor clients. To avoid interference among transmissions to the different types of clients, indoor and outdoor clients can be multiplexed via TDMA, FDMA or CDMA schemes.
Moreover, DIDO distributed antennas connected to low latency BSNs can also be used for delay-sensitive algorithms such as those used for client time and frequency synchronization.
We observe that DIDO provides an inherently secure network when more than one DIDO distributed antenna is used to reach a user. In fact, the precoded streams from the BTS to the DIDO distributed antennas consist of linear combinations of data (for different clients) and DIDO precoding weights. Then, the data stream sent from the BTS to the BSN generally cannot be demodulated at the DIDO distributed antenna, since the DIDO distributed antenna is unaware of the precoding weights used by the BTS. Also, the precoding weights change over time as the complex gain of the wireless channels from DIDO distributed antenna-to-client varies (due to Doppler effects), adding an additional level of security. Moreover, the data stream intended to each client can be demodulated only at the client's location, where the precoded signals from all transmit DIDO distributed antennas recombine to provide user interference-free data. At any other location, demodulation of data intended to one particular user is not possible due to high levels of inter-user interference.
b. Uplink Channel
In the uplink (UL) channel, the clients send data (e.g., to request Web content to the DIDO BTS 6112 from the Internet), CSI and control information (e.g., time/frequency synchronization, channel quality information, modulation scheme, etc.). In one embodiment, there are two alternatives for the UL channel that may be used separately or in combination: i) clients communicate directly to the DIDO BTS 6112 via TDMA, FDMA or CDMA schemes; ii) clients communicate to multiple DIDO distributed antennas by creating spatial channels via MIMO techniques as in
c. Time and Frequency Synchronization
In one embodiment, the DIDO distributed antennas are synchronized in time and frequency. If RF-over-fiber is employed as in
If the DIDO BSN 6111 is used to carry baseband waveforms as in
i. Time and Frequency Synchronization Via GPSDO
In one embodiment time/frequency synchronization is achieved by connecting the transmitter in radio transceiver 6330 to a GPS Disciplined Oscillators (GPSDO). A crystal clock with high frequency stability and low jitter (e.g., Oven-Controlled Crystal Oscillator, OCXO) is used in one embodiment.
ii. Time and Frequency Synchronization Via Power Line Reference
An alternate embodiment utilizes the 60 Hz (in the United States, 50 Hz in other regions) signal available over power lines as a common clock reference for all transmitters. Based on empirical measurements, the jitter of the 60 Hz reference signal (after low pass filtering) can be on the order of 100 nanoseconds. It would be necessary, however, to compensate for deterministic offsets due to variable propagation path length along the power lines at different locations.
iii. Time and Frequency Synchronization with Free-Running Clocks
An alternative embodiment is used to compensate the time and frequency offsets across different DIDO distributed antennas whose clocks are not synchronized to an external clock reference, but rather are free-running as described in the related U.S. Pat. No. 7,599,420 and in
In one embodiment, the time offset is computed from measurements by many users to average out the difference in propagation delay across users. For example,
d. Control Channel Via the BSN
In one embodiment, the DIDO BSN 6111 is used for at least the following three purposes:
Case Study 1: DIDO in UHF Spectrum
a. UHF and Microwave Spectrum Allocation
Different frequency bands are available in the United States as possible candidates for DIDO system deployment: (i) the unused television frequency band between 54-698 MHz (TV Channels 2-51 with 6 MHz channel bandwidth), recommended by the White Spaces Coalition to deliver high speed Internet services; (ii) the 734-746 MHz and 746-756 MHz planned to be used for future developments of LTE systems by AT&T and Verizon, respectively; (iii) the 2.5 GHz band for broadband radio service (BRS), consisting of 67.5 MHz of spectrum split in five channels for future deployment of WiMAX systems.
b. Propagation Channel in UHF Spectrum
We begin by computing the path loss of DIDO systems in urban environments at different frequencies allocated for White Spaces. We use the Hata-Okumura model described in [7], with transmit and receive antenna heights of 1.5 meter (e.g., indoor installation of the DIDO distributed antennas) and 100 W transmit power. To determine the range, we use −90 dBm target receive sensitivity of typical wireless devices.
Some prior art multi-user systems proposed for White Spaces have similar interference avoidance protocols as WiFi, although at UHF frequencies. We compare DIDO UHF results against the path loss for WiFi systems with 250 mW transmit power. The range for WiFi extends only between 60 meters (indoor) and 200 meters (outdoor). Wider range achievable by DIDO systems is due to larger transmit power and lower carrier frequency (subject to generally lower attenuation from obstacles at UHF frequencies). But, we observe that WiFi systems were deliberately limited in power because large transmit power would create harmful interference to other users using WiFi systems (or other users in the 2.4 GHz ISM spectrum) because only one interfering access point can be transmitting at once, and by extending the range, increasingly more WiFi access points would interfere with one another. Contrarily, in DIDO systems inter-user interference is suppressed by multiple DIDO distributed antennas transmitting precoded data to the clients.
Next, we summarize the parameters that characterize time, frequency and space selectivity in UHF channels.
Time selectivity is caused by relative motion of transmitter and receiver that yields shift in the frequency domain of the received waveform, known as the Doppler effect. We model the Doppler spectrum according to the well known Jakes' model for rich scattering environments (e.g., urban areas), and compute the channel coherence time from the maximum Doppler shift according to [14]. As a rule of thumb, the channel complex gain can be considered constant over a period of time corresponding to one tenth of the channel coherence time (Δt=TC/10).
In DIDO systems, Δt provides the constraint to the maximum delay that can be tolerated between estimation of the channel state information (CSI) and data transmission via DIDO precoding. For example, if the constraint is Δt=10 msec, the maximum speed that can be tolerated by DIDO systems is 4 mph at 700 MHz, 7 mph at 400 MHz, and 57 mph at 50 MHz. If a low latency network is used for the BSN and the DIDO BTS 6112 is in the vicinity of the DIDO distributed antennas (so as to minimize network transit delay), far less than 10 msec RTT can be achieved Δt. For example, if Δt=1 msec, at 400 MHz, DIDO can tolerate approximately highway speeds of 70 Mph.
Frequency selectivity depends on the channel delay spread. Typical values of delay spread for indoor environments are below 300 nsec [8-10]. In urban and suburban areas the delay spread ranges between 1 and 10 usec [11,12]. In rural environments it is typically on the order of 10 to 30 usec [11-13].
Space selectivity depends on the channel angular spread and antenna spacing at transmit/receive side. In urban environments, the channel angular spread is typically large due to rich scattering effects. In rich scattering environments, it was shown that the minimum antenna spacing (either at transmitter or receiver sides) to guarantee good spatial selectivity is about one wavelength [15,16].
In
c. Practical Implementation of DIDO Systems in UHF Spectrum
Based on the channel parameters and systems constraints described above, we provide one embodiment of DIDO system design in UHF spectrum as follows:
Another application of DIDO technology is in the HF band. The key advantage of HF systems is extended coverage in the 1-30 MHz frequency band due to reflection off of the ionosphere. One example of propagation via the ionosphere is near-vertical incident skywave (NVIS) where signals sent towards the sky with high elevation angles from the horizon bounce off the ionosphere and return back to Earth. NVIS offers unprecedented coverage over conventional terrestrial wireless systems: NVIS links extend between 20 and 300 miles, whereas typical range of terrestrial systems is between 1 and 5 miles.
Hereafter, we present the characteristics of NVIS links based on results obtained from the literature and our experimental data. Then we present a practical implementation of DIDO systems in NVIS links that were described in the related U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,418,053, 7,599,420, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/894,362, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/894,394 U.S. application Ser. No. 11/143,503 and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/894,540 and in
a. HF Spectrum Allocation
The HF band is divided into several subbands dedicated to different types of services. For example, the Maritime band is defined between 4 MHz and 4.438 MHz. According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licensing database (i.e., universal licensing systems, “ULS”), there are 1,070 licenses authorized to operate in this Maritime band. There are 146 channels of 3 KHz bandwidth each, covering 0.438 MHz bandwidth. Most of the transceiver stations operating in the Maritime band are located along the coast of the US territory as depicted in
Other portions of the HF spectrum are occupied by the Aeronautical band within [3,3.155] MHz and [3.4,3.5] MHz, and the Amateur radio bands defined in the ranges [1.8,2] MHz, [3.5,4] MHz, [5.3305,5.4035] MHz, [7,7.3] MHz, [10.10,10.15] MHz, [14,14.35] MHz, [18.068,18.168] MHz, [21,21.450] MHz, [24.89,24.99] MHz, [28,29.7] MHz. Our experimental measurements have shown that the Amateur radio band is mostly unutilized, particularly during daytime, allowing DIDO-NVIS links without causing harmful interference. Moreover, similarly to the Maritime band, coexistence of DIDO-NVIS systems with Amateur radio transceivers may be enabled by cognitive radio techniques.
b. NVIS Propagation Channel
We provide an overview of radio wave propagation through the ionosphere. Then we describe path loss, noise and time/frequency/space selectivity in typical NVIS channels.
The ionosphere consists of ionized gas or plasma. The plasma behaves as an electromagnetic shield for radio waves propagating from Earth upwards that are refracted and reflected back to Earth as in
Due to the absence of obstacles in NVIS links, the propagation loss is mostly due to free space path loss (i.e., Friis formula), without additional attenuation factors as in standard terrestrial wireless systems. Depending on the time of the day and incident angle to the ionosphere, propagating waveforms may suffer from additional 10-25 dB loss due to attenuation from the D layer (i.e., lowest layer of the ionosphere).
Any wireless system is affected by thermal noise produced internally to radio receivers. In contrast to standard wireless systems, HF links are severely affected by other external noise sources such as: atmospheric noise, man-made noise and galactic noise. Man-made noise is due to environmental sources such as power lines, machinery, ignition systems, and is the main source of noise in the HF band. Its typical values range between −133 and −110 dBm/Hz depending on the environment (i.e., remote versus industrial).
From our Doppler measurements, we observed typical channel coherence time in NVIS links is of the order of seconds, That is about 100 times larger than the Δt=10 msec constraint on the DIDO feedback loop over the DIDO BSN 6111. Hence, in DIDO-NVIS systems a long feedback delay over the DIDO BSN 6111 can be tolerated due to extremely high channel coherence time. Note that our measurements assumed fixed wireless links. In case of mobile stations, the channel coherence time is expected to be of the order of 2 sec in a very high speed scenario (i.e., vehicle or airplane moving at 200 mph) that is still orders of magnitude higher than the latency over the DIDO BSN 6111.
Typical values of delay spreads in NVIS channels are around 2 ms corresponding, corresponding to the roundtrip propagation delay Earth-ionosphere (about 300 Km high). That value may be larger (˜5 msec) in presence of multilayer refractions in the ionosphere.
The angular spread in NVIS links is typically very small (less than 1 degree, based on our measurements and simulations). Hence, large antenna spacing is required to obtain spatially selective channels and exploit spatial diversity via DIDO techniques. Strangeways' simulator points to around twenty wavelengths required for a long distance HF skywave link [34,35]. Some experimental results for HF skywave with a spacing of around 0.7 wavelengths indicated high correlation [36,37]. Similar results were obtained from our measurements in NVIS links.
c. DIDO-NVIS experimental results
We measured the performance of DIDO-NVIS systems with a practical testbed consisting of three DIDO distributed antennas 6113 for transmission and three DIDO clients 6110 for reception. The transmitters are located in the area of Austin, Tex., as depicted in
The three transmitting distributed antennas are locked to the same GPSDO that provide time and frequency reference. The three receiving DIDO clients have free-running clocks and synchronization algorithms are implemented to compensate for time/frequency offsets. The carrier frequency is 3.9 MHz, bandwidth is 3.125 KHz and we use OFDM modulation with 4-QAM.
Typical 4-QAM constellations demodulated at the three DIDO client locations are depicted in
We compute the symbol error rate (SER) performance as a function of the per-user SNR (PU-SNR) over about 1000 channel realizations as in
d. Practical Implementation of DIDO Systems in NVIS Links
Similarly to the case study 1, we provide one embodiment of DIDO-NVIS system design as follows:
The following references are referred to in the above detailed description, as indicated by the numbered brackets:
Before data is transmitted in the MIMO system of
The signal processing subsystem 107 stores the channel characterization received by each receiving antenna 105 and corresponding receiver 106. After all three transmit antennas 104 have completed their training signal transmissions, then the signal processing subsystem 107 will have stored three channel characterizations for each of three receiving antennas 105, resulting in a 3×3 matrix 108, designated as the channel characterization matrix, “H.” Each individual matrix element Hi,j is the channel characterization (which is typically a vector, as described above) of the training signal transmission of transmit antenna 104i as received by the receive antenna 105j.
At this point, the signal processing subsystem 107 inverts the matrix H 108, to produce H−1, and awaits transmission of actual data from transmit antennas 104. Note that various prior art MIMO techniques described in available literature, can be utilized to ensure that the H matrix 108 can be inverted.
In operation, a payload of data to be transmitted is presented to the data Input subsystem 100. It is then divided up into three parts by splitter 101 prior to being presented to coding and modulation subsystem 102. For example, if the payload is the ASCII bits for “abcdef,” it might be divided up into three sub-payloads of ASCII bits for “ad,” “be,” and “cf” by Splitter 101. Then, each of these sub-payloads is presented individually to the coding and modulation subsystem 102.
Each of the sub-payloads is individually coded by using a coding system suitable for both statistical independence of each signal and error correction capability. These include, but are not limited to Reed-Solomon coding, Viterbi coding, and Turbo Codes. Finally, each of the three coded sub-payloads is modulated using an appropriate modulation scheme for the channel. Examples of modulation schemes are differential phase shift key (“DPSK”) modulation, 64-QAM modulation and OFDM. It should be noted here that the diversity gains provided by MIMO allow for higher-order modulation constellations that would otherwise be feasible in a SISO (Single Input-Single Output) system utilizing the same channel. Each coded and modulated signal is then transmitted through its own antenna 104 following D/A conversion by a D/A conversion unit (not shown) and RF generation by each transmitter 103.
Assuming that adequate spatial diversity exists amongst the transmit and receive antennas, each of the receiving antennas 105 will receive a different combination of the three transmitted signals from antennas 104. Each signal is received and converted down to baseband by each RF receiver 106, and digitized by an A/D converter (not shown). If yn is the signal received by the nth receive antenna 105, and xn is the signal transmitted by nth transmit antenna 104, and N is noise, this can be described by the following three equations:
y1=x1H11+x2H12+x3H13+N
y2=x1H21+x2H22+x3H23+N
y3=x1H31+x2H32+x3H33+N
Given that this is a system of three equations with three unknowns, it is a matter of linear algebra for the signal processing subsystem 107 to derive x1, x2, and x3 (assuming that N is at a low enough level to permit decoding of the signals):
x1=y1H−111+y2H−112+y3H−113
x2=y1H−121+y2H−122+y3H−123
x3=y1H−131+y2H−132+y3H−133
Once the three transmitted signals xn are thus derived, they are then demodulated, decoded, and error-corrected by signal processing subsystem 107 to recover the three bit streams that were originally separated out by splitter 101. These bit streams are combined in combiner unit 108, and output as a single data stream from the data output 109. Assuming the robustness of the system is able to overcome the noise impairments, the data output 109 will produce the same bit stream that was introduced to the data Input 100.
Although the prior art system just described is generally practical up to four antennas, and perhaps up to as many as 10, for the reasons described in the Background section of this disclosure, it becomes impractical with large numbers of antennas (e.g. 25, 100, or 1000).
Typically, such a prior art system is two-way, and the return path is implemented exactly the same way, but in reverse, with each side of the communications channels having both transmit and receive subsystems.
Certain details associated with the Base Station 200 and Client Devices 203-207 set forth above are for the purpose of illustration only and are not required for complying with the underlying principles of the invention. For example, the Base Station may be connected to a variety of different types of wide area networks via WAN interface 201 including application-specific wide area networks such as those used for digital video distribution. Similarly, the Client Devices may be any variety of wireless data processing and/or communication devices including, but not limited to cellular phones, personal digital assistants (“PDAs”), receivers, and wireless cameras.
In one embodiment, the Base Station's n Antennas 202 are separated spatially such that each is transmitting and receiving signals which are not spatially correlated, just as if the Base Station was a prior art MIMO transceiver. As described in the Background, experiments have been done where antennas placed within λ/6 (i.e. ⅙ wavelength) apart successfully achieve an increase in throughput from MIMO, but generally speaking, the further apart these Base Station antennas are placed, the better the system performance, and λ/2 is a desirable minimum. Of course, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular separation between antennas.
Note that a single Base Station 200 may very well have its antennas located very far apart. For example, in the HF spectrum, the antennas may be 10 meters apart or more (e.g., in an NVIS implementation mentioned above). If 100 such antennas are used, the Base Station's antenna array could well occupy several square kilometers.
In addition to spatial diversity techniques, one embodiment of the invention polarizes the signal in order to increase the effective throughput of the system. Increasing channel capacity through polarization is a well known technique which has been employed by satellite television providers for years. Using polarization, it is possible to have multiple (e.g., three) Base Station or users' antennas very close to each other, and still be not spatially correlated. Although conventional RF systems usually will only benefit from the diversity of two dimensions (e.g. x and y) of polarization, the architecture described herein may further benefit from the diversity of three dimensions of polarization (x, y and z).
In addition to space and polarization diversity, one embodiment of the invention employs antennas with near-orthogonal radiation patterns to improve link performance via pattern diversity. Pattern diversity can improve the capacity and error-rate performance of MIMO systems and its benefits over other antenna diversity techniques have been shown in the following papers:
Using pattern diversity, it is possible to have multiple Base Station or users' antennas very close to each other, and still be not spatially correlated.
Note that this application uses different terminology than previous applications, so as to better conform with academic and industry practices. In previously cited co-pending application, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENHANCING NEAR VERTICAL INCIDENCE SKYWAVE (“NVIS”) COMMUNICATION USING SPACE-TIME CODING, Ser. No. 10/817,731, Filed Apr. 2, 2004, and application Ser. No. 10/902,978 filed Jul. 30, 2004 for which this is application is a continuation-in-part, the meaning of “Input” and “Output” (in the context of SIMO, MISO, DIMO and MIDO) is reversed from how the terms are used in this application. In the prior applications, “Input” referred to the wireless signals as they are input to the receiving antennas (e.g. antennas 309 in
The MIDO architecture shown in
An example of how a MIDO transmission from the Base Station 300 to the Client Devices 306-308 can be accomplished is illustrated in
In one embodiment of the invention, before a MIDO transmission begins, the channel is characterized. As with a MIMO system, a training signal is transmitted (in the embodiment herein described), one-by-one, by each of the antennas 405.
Each Client Device 406-408 receives a training signal through its antenna 409 and converts the training signal to baseband by Transceiver 410. An A/D converter (not shown) converts the signal to digital where is it processed by each Coding, Modulation, and Signal Processing subsystem 411. Signal characterization logic 320 then characterizes the resulting signal (e.g., identifying phase and amplitude distortions as described above) and stores the characterization in memory. This characterization process is similar to that of prior art MIMO systems, with a notable difference being that the each client device only computes the characterization vector for its one antenna, rather than for n antennas. For example, the Coding Modulation and Signal Processing subsystem 420 of client device 406 is initialized with a known pattern of the training signal (either at the time of manufacturing, by receiving it in a transmitted message, or through another initialization process). When antenna 405 transmits the training signal with this known pattern, Coding Modulation and Signal Processing subsystem 420 uses correlation methods to find the strongest received pattern of the training signal, it stores the phase and amplitude offset, then it subtracts this pattern from the received signal. Next, it finds then second strongest received pattern that correlates to the training signal, it stores the phase and amplitude offset, then it subtracts this second strongest pattern from the received signal. This process continues until either some fixed number of phase and amplitude offsets are stored (e.g. eight), or a detectable training signal pattern drops below a given noise floor. This vector of phase/amplitude offsets becomes element H11 of the vector 413. Simultaneously, Coding Modulation and Signal Processing subsystems for Client Devices 407 and 408 implement the produce their vector elements H21 and H31.
The memory in which the characterization is stored may be a non-volatile memory such as a Flash memory or a hard drive and/or a volatile memory such as a random access memory (e.g., SDRAM, RDAM). Moreover, different Client Devices may concurrently employ different types of memories to store the characterization information (e.g., PDA's may use Flash memory whereas notebook computers may use a hard drive). The underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular type of storage mechanism on the various Client Devices or the Base Station.
As mentioned above, depending on the scheme employed, since each Client Device 406-408 has only one antenna, each only stores a 1×3 row 413-415 of the H matrix.
As indicated in
Although all three antennas 505 are shown receiving the signal in
As the Coding, Modulation and Signal Processing subsystem 503 of Base Station 500 receives the 1×3 row 513-515, from each Client Device 507-508, it stores it in a 3×3 H matrix 516. As with the Client Devices, the Base Station may employ various different storage technologies including, but not limited to non-volatile mass storage memories (e.g., hard drives) and/or volatile memories (e.g., SDRAM) to store the matrix 516.
One embodiment of a MIDO transmission from a Base Station 600 to Client Devices 606-608 will now be described with reference to
The three bit streams, u1-u3, shown in
Before explaining how the bit streams are received by the Client Devices 606-608, the operations performed by the precoding module 630 will be described. Similar to the MIMO example from
However, unlike the MIMO example of
v1=u1H−111+u2H−112+u3H−113
v2=u1H−121+u2H−122+u3H−123
v3=u1H−131+u2H−132+u3H−133
Thus, unlike MIMO, where each xi is calculated at the receiver after the signals have been transformed by the channel, the embodiments of the invention described herein solve for each vi at the transmitter before the signals have been transformed by the channel. Each antenna 609 receives ui already separated from the other un-1 bit streams intended for the other antennas 609. Each Transceiver 610 converts each received signal to baseband, where it is digitized by an A/D converter (now shown), and each Coding, Modulation and Signal Processing subsystem 611, demodulates and decodes the xi bit stream intended for it, and sends its bit stream to a Data Interface 612 to be used by the Client Device (e.g., by an application on the client device).
The embodiments of the invention described herein may be implemented using a variety of different coding and modulation schemes. For example, in an OFDM implementation, where the frequency spectrum is separated into a plurality of sub-bands, the techniques described herein may be employed to characterize each individual sub-band. As mentioned above, however, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular modulation scheme.
If the Client Devices 606-608 are portable data processing devices such as PDAs, notebook computers, and/or wireless telephones the channel characterization may change frequently as the Client Devices may move from one location to another. As such, in one embodiment of the invention, the channel characterization matrix 616 at the Base Station is continually updated. In one embodiment, the Base Station 600 periodically (e.g., every 250 milliseconds) sends out a new training signal to each Client Device, and each Client Device continually transmits its channel characterization vector back to the Base Station 600 to ensure that the channel characterization remains accurate (e.g. if the environment changes so as to affect the channel or if a Client Device moves). In one embodiment, the training signal is interleaved within the actual data signal sent to each client device. Typically, the training signals are much lower throughput than the data signals, so this would have little impact on the overall throughput of the system. Accordingly, in this embodiment, the channel characterization matrix 616 may be updated continuously as the Base Station actively communicates with each Client Device, thereby maintaining an accurate channel characterization as the Client Devices move from one location to the next or if the environment changes so as to affect the channel.
One embodiment of the invention illustrated in
As mentioned above, each signal's characterization may include many factors including, for example, phase and amplitude relative to a reference internal to the receiver, an absolute reference, a relative reference, characteristic noise, or other factors. For example, in a quadrature amplitude modulation (“QAM”)-modulated signal the characterization might be a vector of the phase and amplitude offsets of several multipath images of the signal. As another example, in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (“OFDM”)-modulated signal, it might be a vector of the phase and amplitude offsets of several or all of the individual sub-signals in the OFDM spectrum. The training signal may be generated by each Client Device's coding and modulation subsystem 711, converted to analog by a D/A converter (not shown), and then converted from baseband to RF by each Client Device's transmitter 709. In one embodiment, in order to ensure that the training signals are synchronized, Client Devices only transmit training signals when requested by the Base Station (e.g., in a round robin manner). In addition, training signals may be interleaved within or transmitted concurrently with the actual data signal sent from each client device. Thus, even if the Client Devices 706-708 are mobile, the training signals may be continuously transmitted and analyzed by the upstream channel characterization logic 741, thereby ensuring that the channel characterization matrix 741 remains up-to-date.
The total channel capacity supported by the foregoing embodiments of the invention may be defined as min (N, M) where M is the number of Client Devices and N is the number of Base Station antennas. That is, the capacity is limited by the number of antennas on either the Base Station side or the Client side. As such, one embodiment of the invention employs synchronization techniques to ensure that no more than min (N, M) antennas are transmitting/receiving at a given time.
In a typical scenario, the number of antennas 705 on the Base Station 700 will be less than the number of Client Devices 706-708. An exemplary scenario is illustrated in
In one embodiment, in addition to standard data communications, the Base Station may employ the foregoing techniques to transmit training signals to each of the Client Devices and receive training signals and signal characterization data from each of the Client Devices.
In one embodiment, certain Client Devices or groups of client devices may be allocated different levels of throughput. For example, Client Devices may be prioritized such that relatively higher priority Client Devices may be guaranteed more communication cycles (i.e., more throughput) than relatively lower priority client devices. The “priority” of a Client Device may be selected based on a number of variables including, for example, the designated level of a user's subscription to the wireless service (e.g., user's may be willing to pay more for additional throughput) and/or the type of data being communicated to/from the Client Device (e.g., real-time communication such as telephony audio and video may take priority over non-real time communication such as email).
In one embodiment of the Base Station dynamically allocates throughput based on the Current Load required by each Client Device. For example, if Client Device 804 is streaming live video and the other devices 805-808 are performing non-real time functions such as email, then the Base Station 800 may allocate relatively more throughput to this client 804. It should be noted, however, that the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular throughput allocation technique.
As illustrated in
Alternatively, in one embodiment, the Base Station 900 communicates with both Client Devices 907 and 908 concurrently, but multiplexes the communication channel using known channel multiplexing techniques. For example, the Base Station may employ time division multiplexing (“TDM”), frequency division multiplexing (“FDM”) or code division multiple access (“CDMA”) techniques to divide the single, spatially-correlated signal between Client Devices 907 and 908.
Although each Client Device described above is equipped with a single antenna, the underlying principles of the invention may be employed using Client Devices with multiple antennas to increase throughput. For example, when used on the wireless systems described above, a client with 2 antennas will realize a 2× increase in throughput, a client with 3 antennas will realize a 3× increase in throughput, and so on (i.e., assuming that the spatial and angular separation between the antennas is sufficient). The Base Station may apply the same general rules when cycling through Client Devices with multiple antennas. For example, it may treat each antenna as a separate client and allocate throughput to that “client” as it would any other client (e.g., ensuring that each client is provided with an adequate or equivalent period of communication).
As mentioned above, one embodiment of the invention employs the MIDO and/or MIMO signal transmission techniques described above to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and throughput within a Near Vertical Incidence Skywave (“NVIS”) system. Referring to
The NVIS antennas serving a given station may be physically very far apart from each other. Given the long wavelengths below 10 MHz and the long distance traveled for the signals (as much as 300 miles round trip), physical separation of the antennas by 100s of yards, and even miles, can provide advantages in diversity. In such situations, the individual antenna signals may be brought back to a centralized location to be processed using conventional wired or wireless communications systems. Alternatively, each antenna can have a local facility to process its signals, then use conventional wired or wireless communications systems to communicate the data back to a centralized location. In one embodiment of the invention, NVIS Station 1001 has a broadband link 1015 to the Internet 1010 (or other wide area network), thereby providing the client devices 1003 with remote, high speed, wireless network access.
In one embodiment, the Base Station and/or users may exploit polarization/pattern diversity techniques described above to reduce the array size and/or users' distance while providing diversity and increased throughput. As an example, in MIDO systems with HF transmissions, the users may be in the same location and yet their signals be uncorrelated because of polarization/pattern diversity. In particular, by using pattern diversity, one user may be communicating to the Base Station via groundwave whereas the other user via NVIS.
DIDO-OFDM Precoding with I/Q Imbalance
One embodiment of the invention employs a system and method to compensate for in-phase and quadrature (I/Q) imbalance in distributed-input distributed-output (DIDO) systems with orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM). Briefly, according to this embodiment, user devices estimate the channel and feedback this information to the Base Station; the Base Station computes the precoding matrix to cancel inter-carrier and inter-user interference caused by I/Q imbalance; and parallel data streams are transmitted to multiple user devices via DIDO precoding; the user devices demodulate data via zero-forcing (ZF), minimum mean-square error (MMSE) or maximum likelihood (ML) receiver to suppress residual interference.
As described in detail below, some of the significant features of this embodiment of the invention include, but are not limited to:
Precoding to cancel inter-carrier interference (ICI) from mirror tones (due to I/Q mismatch) in OFDM systems;
Precoding to cancel inter-user interference and ICI (due to I/Q mismatch) in DIDO-OFDM systems;
Techniques to cancel ICI (due to I/Q mismatch) via ZF receiver in DIDO-OFDM systems employing block diagonalization (BD) precoder;
Techniques to cancel inter-user interference and ICI (due to I/Q mismatch) via precoding (at the transmitter) and a ZF or MMSE filter (at the receiver) in DIDO-OFDM systems;
Techniques to cancel inter-user interference and ICI (due to I/Q mismatch) via pre-coding (at the transmitter) and a nonlinear detector like a maximum likelihood (ML) detector (at the receiver) in DIDO-OFDM systems;
The use of pre-coding based on channel state information to cancel inter-carrier interference (ICI) from mirror tones (due to I/Q mismatch) in OFDM systems;
The use of pre-coding based on channel state information to cancel inter-carrier interference (ICI) from mirror tones (due to I/Q mismatch) in DIDO-OFDM systems;
The use of an I/Q mismatch aware DIDO precoder at the station and an IQ-aware DIDO receiver at the user terminal;
The use of an I/Q mismatch aware DIDO precoder at the station, an I/Q aware DIDO receiver at the user terminal, and an I/Q aware channel estimator;
The use of an I/Q mismatch aware DIDO precoder at the station, an I/Q aware DIDO receiver at the user terminal, an I/Q aware channel estimator, and an I/Q aware DIDO feedback generator that sends channel state information from the user terminal to the station;
The use of an I/Q mismatch-aware DIDO precoder at the station and an I/Q aware DIDO configurator that uses I/Q channel information to perform functions including user selection, adaptive coding and modulation, space-time-frequency mapping, or precoder selection;
The use of an I/Q aware DIDO receiver that cancels ICI (due to I/Q mismatch) via ZF receiver in DIDO-OFDM systems employing block diagonalization (BD) precoder;
The use of an I/Q aware DIDO receiver that cancels ICI (due to I/Q mismatch) via pre-coding (at the transmitter) and a nonlinear detector like a maximum likelihood detector (at the receiver) in DIDO-OFDM systems; and
The use of an I/Q aware DIDO receiver that cancels ICI (due to I/Q mismatch) via ZF or MMSE filter in DIDO-OFDM systems.
a. Background
The transmit and receive signals of typical wireless communication systems consist of in-phase and quadrature (I/Q) components. In practical systems, the inphase and quadrature components may be distorted due to imperfections in the mixing and baseband operations. These distortions manifest as I/Q phase, gain and delay mismatch. Phase imbalance is caused by the sine and cosine in the modulator/demodulator not being perfectly orthogonal. Gain imbalance is caused by different amplifications between the inphase and quadrature components. There may be an additional distortion, called delay imbalance, due to difference in delays between the I- and Q-rails in the analog circuitry.
In orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems, I/Q imbalance causes inter-carrier interference (ICI) from the mirror tones. This effect has been studied in the literature and methods to compensate for I/Q mismatch in single-input single-output SISO-OFDM systems have been proposed in M. D. Benedetto and P. Mandarini, “Analysis of the effect of the I/Q baseband filter mismatch in an OFDM modem,” Wireless personal communications, pp. 175-186, 2000; S. Schuchert and R. Hasholzner, “A novel I/Q imbalance compensation scheme for the reception of OFDM signals,” IEEE Transaction on Consumer Electronics, August 2001; M. Valkama, M. Renfors, and V. Koivunen, “Advanced methods for I/Q imbalance compensation in communication receivers,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., October 2001; R. Rao and B. Daneshrad, “Analysis of I/Q mismatch and a cancellation scheme for OFDM systems,” IST Mobile Communication Summit, June 2004; A. Tarighat, R. Bagheri, and A. H. Sayed, “Compensation schemes and performance analysis of IQ imbalances in OFDM receivers,” Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on], vol. 53, pp. 3257-3268, August 2005.
An extension of this work to multiple-input multiple-output MIMO-OFDM systems was presented in R. Rao and B. Daneshrad, “I/Q mismatch cancellation for MIMO OFDM systems,” in Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2004; PIMRC 2004. 15th IEEE International Symposium on, vol. 4, 2004, pp. 2710-2714. R. M. Rao, W. Zhu, S. Lang, C. Oberli, D. Browne, J. Bhatia, J. F. Frigon, J. Wang, P; Gupta, H. Lee, D. N. Liu, S. G. Wong, M. Fitz, B. Daneshrad, and O. Takeshita, “Multiantenna testbeds for research and education in wireless communications,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 72-81, December 2004; S. Lang, M. R. Rao, and B. Daneshrad, “Design and development of a 5.25 GHz software defined wireless OFDM communication platform,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 6-12, June 2004, for spatial multiplexing (SM) and in A. Tarighat and A. H. Sayed, “MIMO OFDM receivers for systems with IQ imbalances,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., vol. 53, pp. 3583-3596, September 2005, for orthogonal space-time block codes (OSTBC).
Unfortunately, there is currently no literature on how to correct for I/Q gain and phase imbalance errors in a distributed-input distributed-output (DIDO) communication system. The embodiments of the invention described below provide a solution to these problems.
DIDO systems consist of one Base Station with distributed antennas that transmits parallel data streams (via pre-coding) to multiple users to enhance downlink throughput, while exploiting the same wireless resources (i.e., same slot duration and frequency band) as conventional SISO systems. A detailed description of DIDO systems was presented in S. G. Perlman and T. Cotter, “System and Method for Distributed Input-Distributed Output Wireless Communications,” Ser. No. 10/902,978, filed Jul. 30, 2004 (“Prior Application”), which is assigned to the assignee of the present application and which is incorporated herein by reference.
There are many ways to implement DIDO precoders. One solution is block diagonalization (BD) described in Q. H. Spencer, A. L. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zero forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., vol. 52, pp. 461-471, February 2004. K. K. Wong, R. D. Murch, and K. B. Letaief, “A joint channel diagonalization for multiuser MIMO antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., vol. 2, pp. 773-786, July 2003; L. U. Choi and R. D. Murch, “A transmit preprocessing technique for multiuser MIMO systems using a decomposition approach,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., vol. 3, pp. 20-24, January 2004; Z. Shen, J. G. Andrews, R. W. Heath, and B. L. Evans, “Low complexity user selection algorithms for multiuser MIMO systems with block diagonalization,” accepted for publication in IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., September 2005; Z. Shen, R. Chen, J. G. Andrews, R. W. Heath, and B. L. Evans, “Sum capacity of multiuser MIMO broadcast channels with block diagonalization,” submitted to IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., October 2005; R. Chen, R. W. Heath, and J. G. Andrews, “Transmit selection diversity for unitary precoded multiuser spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers,” accepted to IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2005. The methods for I/Q compensation presented in this document assume BD precoder, but can be extended to any type of DIDO precoder.
In DIDO-OFDM systems, I/Q mismatch causes two effects: ICI and inter-user interference. The former is due to interference from the mirror tones as in SISO-OFDM systems. The latter is due to the fact that I/Q mismatch destroys the orthogonality of the DIDO precoder yielding interference across users. Both of these types of interference can be cancelled at the transmitter and receiver through the methods described herein. Three methods for I/Q compensation in DIDO-OFDM systems are described and their performance is compared against systems with and without I/Q mismatch. Results are presented based both on simulations and practical measurements carried out with the DIDO-OFDM prototype.
The present embodiments are an extension of the Prior Application. In particular, these embodiments relate to the following features of the Prior Application:
The system as described in the prior application, where the I/Q rails are affected by gain and phase imbalance;
The training signals employed for channel estimation are used to calculate the DIDO precoder with I/Q compensation at the transmitter; and
The signal characterization data accounts for distortion due to I/Q imbalance and is used at the transmitter to compute the DIDO precoder according to the method proposed in this document.
b. Embodiments of the Invention
First, the mathematical model and framework of the invention will be described.
Before presenting the solution, it is useful to explain the core mathematical concept. We explain it assuming I/Q gain and phase imbalance (phase delay is not included in the description but is dealt with automatically in the DIDO-OFDM version of the algorithm). To explain the basic idea, suppose that we want to multiply two complex numbers s=sI+jsQ and h=hI+jhQ and let x=h*s. We use the subscripts to denote inphase and quadrature components. Recall that
xI=sIhI−sQhQ
and
xQ=sIhQ+sQhI.
In matrix form this can be rewritten as
Note the unitary transformation by the channel matrix (H). Now suppose that s is the transmitted symbol and h is the channel. The presence of I/Q gain and phase imbalance can be modeled by creating a non-unitary transformation as follows
The trick is to recognize that it is possible to write
Now, rewriting (A)
Let us define
and
Both of these matrices have a unitary structure thus can be equivalently represented by complex scalars as
he=h11+h22+j(h21−h12)
and
hc=h11+h22+j(h21−h12)
Using all of these observations, we can put the effective equation back in a scalar form with two channels: the equivalent channel he and the conjugate channel hc. Then the effective transformation in (5) becomes
x=hes+hcs*.
We refer to the first channel as the equivalent channel and the second channel as the conjugate channel. The equivalent channel is the one you would observe if there were no I/Q gain and phase imbalance.
Using similar arguments, it can be shown that the input-output relationship of a discrete-time MIMO N×M system with I/Q gain and phase imbalance is (using the scalar equivalents to build their matrix counterparts)
where tis the discrete time index, he, hcϵCM×N, s=[s1, . . . , sN], x=[x1, . . . , xM] and L is the number of channel taps.
In DIDO-OFDM systems, the received signal in the frequency domain is represented. Recall from signals and systems that if FFTK{s[t]}=S[k] then FFTK{s*[t]}=S*[(−k)]=S*[K−k] for k=0, 1, . . . , K−1. With OFDM, the equivalent input-output relationship for a MIMO-OFDM system for subcarrier k is
where k=0, 1, . . . ,K−1 is the OFDM subcarrier index, He and Hc denote the equivalent and conjugate channel matrices, respectively, defined as
and
The second contribution in (1) is interference from the mirror tone. It can be dealt with by constructing the following stacked matrix system (note carefully the conjugates)
where
Using this approach, an effective matrix is built to use for DIDO operation. For example, with DIDO 2×2 the input-output relationship (assuming each user has a single receive antenna) the first user device sees (in the absence of noise)
while the second user observes
where He(m), Hc(m)ϵC1×2 denote the m-th row of the matrices He and Hc, respectively, and WϵC4×4 is the DIDO pre-coding matrix. From (2) and (3) it is observed that the received symbol
There are several different embodiments of the DIDO precoder that can be used here depending on joint detection applied at the receiver. In one embodiment, block diagonalization (BD) is employed (see, e.g., Q. H. Spencer, A. L. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zeroforcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., vol. 52, pp. 461-471, February 2004. K. K. Wong, R. D. Murch, and K. B. Letaief, “A joint—channel diagonalization for multiuser MIMO antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., vol. 2, pp. 773-786, July 2003. L. U. Choi and R. D. Murch, “A transmit preprocessing technique for multiuser MIMO systems using a decomposition approach,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., vol. 3, pp. 20-24, January 2004. Z. Shen, J. G. Andrews, R. W. Heath, and B. L. Evans, “Low complexity user selection algorithms for multiuser MIMO systems with block diagonalization,” accepted for publication in IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., September 2005. Z. Shen, R. Chen, J. G. Andrews, R. W. Heath, and B. L. Evans, “Sum capacity of multiuser MIMO broadcast channels with block diagonalization,” submitted to IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., October 2005, computed from the composite channel [Hw(m), Hc(m)] (rather than He(m)). So, the current DIDO system chooses the precoder such that
where αi,j are constants and Hw(i,j)ϵC2×2. This method is beneficial because using this precoder, it is possible to keep other aspects of the DIDO precoder the same as before, since the effects of I/Q gain and phase imbalance are completely cancelled at the transmitter.
It is also possible to design DIDO precoders that pre-cancel inter-user interference, without pre-cancelling ICI due to IQ imbalance. With this approach, the receiver (instead of the transmitter) compensates for the IQ imbalance by employing one of the receive filters described below. Then, the pre-coding design criterion in (4) can be modified as
and
where
At the receive side, to estimate the transmit symbol vector
ŝm(ZF)[k]=[(Hw(m,m)†Hw(m,m))−1Hwm,m)†]
While the ZF filter is the easiest to understand, the receiver may apply any number of other filters known to those skilled in the art. One popular choice is the MMSE filter where
ŝm(MMSE)[k]=(Hw(m,m)†+p−1I)−1Hw(m,m)Hw(m,m)†
and ρ is the signal-to-noise ratio. Alternatively, the receiver may perform a maximum likelihood symbol detection (or sphere decoder or iterative variation). For example, the first user might use the ML receiver and solve the following optimization
where S is the set of all possible vectors s and depends on the constellation size. The ML receiver gives better performance at the expense of requiring more complexity at the receiver. A similar set of equations applies for the second user.
Note that Hw(1,2) and Hw(2,1) in (6) and (7) are assumed to have zero entries. This assumption holds only if the transmit precoder is able to cancel completely the inter-user interference as for the criterion in (4). Similarly, Hw(1,1) and Hw(2,2) are diagonal matrices only if the transmit precoder is able to cancel completely the inter-carrier interference (i.e., from the mirror tones).
The following three embodiments may be employed to implement this I/Q compensation algorithm:
Method 1—TX compensation: In this embodiment, the transmitter calculates the pre-coding matrix according to the criterion in (4). At the receiver, the user devices employ a “simplified” ZF receiver, where Hw(1,1) and Hw(2,2) are assumed to be diagonal matrices. Hence, equation (8) simplifies as
Method 2—RX compensation: In this embodiment, the transmitter calculates the pre-coding matrix based on the conventional BD method described in R. Chen, R. W. Heath, and J. G. Andrews, “Transmit selection diversity for unitary precoded multiuser spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers,” accepted to IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2005, without canceling inter-carrier and inter-user interference as for the criterion in (4). With this method, the pre-coding matrix in (2) and (3) simplifies as
Method 3 —TX-RX compensation: In one embodiment, the two methods described above are combined. The transmitter calculates the pre-coding matrix as in (4) and the receivers estimate the transmit symbols according to (8).
I/Q imbalance, whether phase imbalance, gain imbalance, or delay imbalance, creates a deleterious degradation in signal quality in wireless communication systems. For this reason, circuit hardware in the past was designed to have very low imbalance. As described above, however, it is possible to correct this problem using digital signal processing in the form of transmit pre-coding and/or a special receiver. One embodiment of the invention comprises a system with several new functional units, each of which is important for the implementation of I/Q correction in an OFDM communication system or a DIDO-OFDM communication system.
One embodiment of the invention uses pre-coding based on channel state information to cancel inter-carrier interference (ICI) from mirror tones (due to I/Q mismatch) in an OFDM system. As illustrated in
The user selector unit 1102 selects data associated with a plurality of users U1-UM, based on the feedback information obtained by the feedback unit 1112, and provides this information each of the plurality of coding modulation units 1104. Each coding modulation unit 1104 encodes and modulates the information bits of each user and send them to the mapping unit 1106. The mapping unit 1106 maps the input bits to complex symbols and sends the results to the DIDO IQ-aware precoding unit 1108. The DIDO IQ-aware precoding unit 1108 exploits the channel state information obtained by the feedback unit 1112 from the users to compute the DIDO IQ-aware precoding weights and precoding the input symbols obtained from the mapping units 1106. Each of the precoded data streams is sent by the DIDO IQ-aware precoding unit 1108 to the OFDM unit 1115 that computes the IFFT and adds the cyclic prefix. This information is sent to the D/A unit 1116 that operates the digital to analog conversion and send it to the RF unit 1114. The RF unit 1114 upconverts the baseband signal to intermediate/radio frequency and send it to the transmit antenna.
The precoder operates on the regular and mirror tones together for the purpose of compensating for I/Q imbalance. Any number of precoder design criteria may be used including ZF, MMSE, or weighted MMSE design. In a preferred embodiment, the precoder completely removes the ICI due to I/Q mismatch thus resulting in the receiver not having to perform any additional compensation.
In one embodiment, the precoder uses a block diagonalization criterion to completely cancel inter-user interference while not completely canceling the I/Q effects for each user, requiring additional receiver processing. In another embodiment, the precoder uses a zero-forcing criterion to completely cancel both inter-user interference and ICI due to I/Q imbalance. This embodiment can use a conventional DIDO-OFDM processor at the receiver.
One embodiment of the invention uses pre-coding based on channel state information to cancel inter-carrier interference (ICI) from mirror tones (due to I/Q mismatch) in a DIDO-OFDM system and each user employs an IQ-aware DIDO receiver. As illustrated in
The RF units 1208 receive signals transmitted from the DIDO transmitter units 1114, downconverts the signals to baseband and provide the downconverted signals to the A/D units 1210. The A/D units 1210 then convert the signal from analog to digital and send it to the OFDM units 1213. The OFDM units 1213 remove the cyclic prefix and operates the FFT to report the signal to the frequency domain. During the training period the OFDM units 1213 send the output to the IQ-aware channel estimate unit 1204 that computes the channel estimates in the frequency domain. Alternatively, the channel estimates can be computed in the time domain. During the data period the OFDM units 1213 send the output to the IQ-aware receiver unit 1202. The IQ-aware receiver unit 1202 computes the IQ receiver and demodulates/decodes the signal to obtain the data 1214. The IQ-aware channel estimate unit 1204 sends the channel estimates to the DIDO feedback generator unit 1206 that may quantize the channel estimates and send it back to the transmitter via the feedback control channel 1112.
The receiver 1202 illustrated in
In one embodiment, an IQ-aware channel estimator 1204 is used to determine the receiver coefficients to remove ICI. Consequently we claim a DIDO-OFDM system that uses pre-coding based on channel state information to cancel inter-carrier interference (ICI) from mirror tones (due to I/Q mismatch), an IQ-aware DIDO receiver, and an IQ-aware channel estimator. The channel estimator may use a conventional training signal or may use specially constructed training signals sent on the inphase and quadrature signals. Any number of estimation algorithms may be implemented including least squares, MMSE, or maximum likelihood. The IQ-aware channel estimator provides an input for the IQ-aware receiver.
Channel state information can be provided to the station through channel reciprocity or through a feedback channel. One embodiment of the invention comprises a DIDO-OFDM system, with I/Q-aware precoder, with an I/Q-aware feedback channel for conveying channel state information from the user terminals to the station. The feedback channel may be a physical or logical control channel. It may be dedicated or shared, as in a random access channel. The feedback information may be generated using a DIDO feedback generator at the user terminal, which we also claim. The DIDO feedback generator takes as an input the output of the I/Q aware channel estimator. It may quantize the channel coefficients or may use any number of limited feedback algorithms known in the art.
The allocation of users, modulation and coding rate, mapping to space-time-frequency code slots may change depending on the results of the DIDO feedback generator. Thus, one embodiment comprises an IQ-aware DIDO configurator that uses an IQ-aware channel estimate from one or more users to configure the DIDO IQ-aware precoder, choose the modulation rate, coding rate, subset of users allowed to transmit, and their mappings to space-time-frequency code slots.
To evaluate the performance of the proposed compensation methods, three DIDO 2×2 systems will be compared:
1. With I/Q mismatch: transmit over all the tones (except DC and edge tones), without compensation for I/Q mismatch;
2. With I/Q compensation: transmit over all the tones and compensate for I/Q mismatch by using the “method 1” described above;
3. Ideal: transmit data only over the odd tones to avoid inter-user and inter-carrier (i.e., from the mirror tones) interference caused to I/Q mismatch.
Hereafter, results obtained from measurements with the DIDO-OFDM prototype in real propagation scenarios are presented.
Moreover, observe that the SER performance with I/Q compensation is very close to the ideal case. The 2 dB gap in TX power between these two cases is due to possible phase noise that yields additional interference between adjacent OFDM tones. Finally, the goodput curves 1502 show that it is possible to transmit twice as much data when the I/Q method is applied compared to the ideal case, since we use all the data tones rather than only the odd tones (as for the ideal case).
Finally, the relative SER performance of the three methods described above is measured in different propagation conditions. For reference, also described is the SER performance in presence of I/Q mismatch.
So far, different methods have been compared by considering only a limited set of propagation scenarios as in
Thus, given the three novel methods to compensate for I/Q imbalance in DIDO-OFDM systems described above, Method 3 outperforms the other proposed compensation methods. In systems with low rate feedback channels, method 2 can be used to reduce the amount of feedback required for the DIDO precoder, at the expense of worse SER performance.
II. Adaptive DIDO Transmission Scheme
Another embodiment of a system and method to enhance the performance of distributed-input distributed-output (DIDO) systems will now be described. This method dynamically allocates the wireless resources to different user devices, by tracking the changing channel conditions, to increase throughput while satisfying certain target error rate. The user devices estimate the channel quality and feedback it to the Base Station (BS); the Base Station processes the channel quality obtained from the user devices to select the best set of user devices, DIDO scheme, modulation/coding scheme (MCS) and array configuration for the next transmission; the Base Station transmits parallel data to multiple user devices via pre-coding and the signals are demodulated at the receiver.
A system that efficiently allocates resources for a DIDO wireless link is also described. The system includes a DIDO Base Station with a DIDO configurator, which processes feedback received from the users to select the best set of users, DIDO scheme, modulation/coding scheme (MCS) and array configuration for the next transmission; a receiver in a DIDO system that measures the channel and other relevant parameters to generate a DIDO feedback signal; and a DIDO feedback control channel for conveying feedback information from users to the Base Station.
As described in detail below, some of the significant features of this embodiment of the invention include, but are not limited to:
Techniques to adaptively select number of users, DIDO transmission schemes (i.e., antenna selection or multiplexing), modulation/coding scheme (MCS) and array configurations based on the channel quality information, to minimize SER or maximize per-user or downlink spectral efficiency;
Techniques to define sets of DIDO transmission modes as combinations of DIDO schemes and MCSs;
Techniques to assign different DIDO modes to different time slots, OFDM tones and DIDO substreams, depending on the channel conditions;
Techniques to dynamically assign different DIDO modes to different users based on their channel quality;
Criteria to enable adaptive DIDO switching based on link quality metrics computed in the time, frequency and space domains;
Criteria to enable adaptive DIDO switching based on lookup tables.
A DIDO system with a DIDO configurator at the Base Station as in
A DIDO system with a DIDO configurator at the Base Station and a DIDO feedback generator at each user device as in
A DIDO system with a DIDO configurator at the Base Station, DIDO feedback generator, and a DIDO feedback control channel for conveying DIDO-specific configuration information from the users to the Base Station.
a. Background
In multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, diversity schemes such as orthogonal space-time block codes (OSTBC) (See V. Tarokh, H. Jafarkhani, and A. R. Calderbank, “Spacetime block codes from orthogonal designs,” IEEE Trans. Info. Th., vol. 45, pp. 1456-467, July 1999) or antenna selection (See R. W. Heath Jr., S. Sandhu, and A. J. Paulraj, “Antenna selection for spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 5, pp. 142-144, April 2001) are conceived to combat channel fading, providing increased link robustness that translates in better coverage. On the other hand, spatial multiplexing (SM) enables transmission of multiple parallel data streams as a means to enhance systems throughput. See G. J. Foschini, G. D. Golden, R. A. Valenzuela, and P. W. Wolniansky, “Simplified processing for high spectral efficiency wireless communication employing multielement arrays,” IEEE Jour. Select. Areas in Comm., vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1841-1852, November 1999. These benefits can be simultaneously achieved in MIMO systems, according to the theoretical diversity/multiplexing tradeoffs derived in L. Zheng and D. N. C. Tse, “Diversity and multiplexing: a fundamental tradeoff in multiple antenna channels,” IEEE Trans. Info. Th., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1073-1096, May 2003. One practical implementation is to adaptively switch between diversity and multiplexing transmission schemes, by tracking the changing channel conditions.
A number of adaptive MIMO transmission techniques have been proposed thus far. The diversity/multiplexing switching method in R. W. Heath and A. J. Paulraj, “Switching between diversity and multiplexing in MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 962-968, June 2005, was designed to improve BER (Bit Error Rate) for fixed rate transmission, based on instantaneous channel quality information. Alternatively, statistical channel information can be employed to enable adaptation as in S. Catreux, V. Erceg, D. Gesbert, and R. W. Heath. Jr., “Adaptive modulation and MIMO coding for broadband wireless data networks,” IEEE Comm. Mag., vol. 2, pp. 108-115, June 2002 (“Catreux”), resulting in reduced feedback overhead and number of control messages. The adaptive transmission algorithm in Catreux was designed to enhance spectral efficiency for predefined target error rate in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems, based on channel time/frequency selectivity indicators. Similar low feedback adaptive approaches have been proposed for narrowband systems, exploiting the channel spatial selectivity to switch between diversity schemes and spatial multiplexing. See, e.g., A. Forenza, M. R. McKay, A. Pandharipande, R. W. Heath. Jr., and I. B. Collings, “Adaptive MIMO transmission for exploiting the capacity of spatially correlated channels,” accepted to the IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., March 2007; M. R. McKay, I. B. Collings, A. Forenza, and R. W. Heath. Jr., “Multiplexing/beamforming switching for coded MIMO in spatially correlated Rayleigh channels,” accepted to the IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., December 2007; A. Forenza, M. R. McKay, R. W. Heath. Jr., and I. B. Collings, “Switching between OSTBC and spatial multiplexing with linear receivers in spatially correlated MIMO channels,” Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 3, pp. 1387-1391, May 2006; M. R. McKay, I. B. Collings, A. Forenza, and R. W. Heath Jr., “A throughput-based adaptive MIMO BICM approach for spatially correlated channels,” to appear in Proc. IEEE ICC, June 2006
In this document, we extend the scope of the work presented in various prior publications to DIDO-OFDM systems. See, e.g., R. W. Heath and A. J. Paulraj, “Switching between diversity and multiplexing in MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 962-968, June 2005.S. Catreux, V. Erceg, D. Gesbert, and R. W. Heath Jr., “Adaptive modulation and MIMO coding for broadband wireless data networks,” IEEE Comm. Mag., vol. 2, pp. 108-115, June 2002; A. Forenza, M. R. McKay, A. Pandharipande, R. W. Heath Jr., and I. B. Collings, “Adaptive MIMO transmission for exploiting the capacity of spatially correlated channels,” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., vol. 56, n. 2, pp. 619-630, March 2007. M. R. McKay, I. B. Collings, A. Forenza, and R. W. Heath Jr., “Multiplexing/beamforming switching for coded MIMO in spatially correlated Rayleigh channels,” accepted to the IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., December 2007; A. Forenza, M. R. McKay, R. W. Heath Jr., and I. B. Collings, “Switching between OSTBC and spatial multiplexing with linear receivers in spatially correlated MIMO channels,” Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 3, pp. 1387-1391, May 2006. M. R. McKay, I. B. Collings, A. Forenza, and R. W. Heath Jr., “A throughput-based adaptive MIMO BICM approach for spatially correlated channels,” to appear in Proc. IEEE ICC, June 2006.
A novel adaptive DIDO transmission strategy is described herein that switches between different numbers of users, numbers of transmit antennas and transmission schemes based on channel quality information as a means to improve the system performance. Note that schemes that adaptively select the users in multiuser MIMO systems were already proposed in M. Sharif and B. Hassibi, “On the capacity of MIMO broadcast channel with partial side information,” IEEE Trans. Info. Th., vol. 51, p. 506522, February 2005; and W. Choi, A. Forenza, J. G. Andrews, and R. W. Heath Jr., “Opportunistic space division multiple access with beam selection,” to appear in IEEE Trans. on Communications. The opportunistic space division multiple access (OSDMA) schemes in these publications, however, are designed to maximize the sum capacity by exploiting multi-user diversity and they achieve only a fraction of the theoretical capacity of dirty paper codes, since the interference is not completely pre-canceled at the transmitter. In the DIDO transmission algorithm described herein block diagonalization is employed to pre-cancel inter-user interference. The proposed adaptive transmission strategy, however, can be applied to any DIDO system, independently on the type of pre-coding technique.
The present patent application describes an extension of the embodiments of the invention described above and in the Prior Application, including, but not limited to the following additional features:
1. The training symbols of the Prior Application for channel estimation can be employed by the wireless client devices to evaluate the link-quality metrics in the adaptive DIDO scheme;
2. The base station receives signal characterization data from the client devices as described in the Prior Application. In the current embodiment, the signal characterization data is defined as link-quality metric used to enable adaptation;
3. The Prior Application describes a mechanism to select the number of transmit antennas and users as well as defines throughput allocation. Moreover, different levels of throughput can be dynamically assigned to different clients as in the Prior Application. The current embodiment of the invention defines novel criteria related to this selection and throughput allocation.
b. Embodiments of the Invention
The goal of the proposed adaptive DIDO technique is to enhance per-user or downlink spectral efficiency by dynamically allocating the wireless resource in time, frequency and space to different users in the system. The general adaptation criterion is to increase throughput while satisfying the target error rate. Depending on the propagation conditions, this adaptive algorithm can also be used to improve the link quality of the users (or coverage) via diversity schemes. The flowchart illustrated in
The Base Station (BS) collects the channel state information (CSI) from all the users in 2102. From the received CSI, the BS computes the link quality metrics in time/frequency/space domains in 2104. These link quality metrics are used to select the users to be served in the next transmission as well as the transmission mode for each of the users in 2106. Note that the transmission modes consist of different combinations of modulation/coding and DIDO schemes. Finally, the BS transmits data to the users via DIDO precoding as in 2108.
At 2102, the Base Station collects the channel state information (CSI) from all the user devices. The CSI is used by the Base Station to determine the instantaneous or statistical channel quality for all the user devices at 2104. In DIDO-OFDM systems the channel quality (or link quality metric) can be estimated in the time, frequency and space domains. Then, at 2106, the Base Station uses the link quality metric to determine the best subset of users and transmission mode for the current propagation conditions. A set of DIDO transmission modes is defined as combinations of DIDO schemes (i.e., antenna selection or multiplexing), modulation/coding schemes (MCSs) and array configuration. At 2108, data is transmitted to user devices using the selected number of users and transmission modes.
In one embodiment, the mode selection is enabled by lookup tables (LUTs) pre-computed based on error rate performance of DIDO systems in different propagation environments. These LUTs map channel quality information into error rate performance. To construct the LUTs, the error rate performance of DIDO systems is evaluated in different propagation scenarios as a function of the SNR. From the error rate curves, it is possible to compute the minimum SNR required to achieve certain pre-defined target error rate. We define this SNR requirement as SNR threshold. Then, the SNR thresholds are evaluated in different propagation scenarios and for different DIDO transmission modes and stored in the LUTs. For example, the SER results in
One embodiment of a system employing DIDO adaptation is illustrated in
The user selector unit 1902 selects data associated with a plurality of users U1-UM, based on the feedback information obtained by the DIDO configurator 1910, and provides this information each of the plurality of coding modulation units 1904. Each coding modulation unit 1904 encodes and modulates the information bits of each user and sends them to the mapping unit 1906. The mapping unit 1906 maps the input bits to complex symbols and sends it to the precoding unit 1908. Both the coding modulation units 1904 and the mapping unit 1906 exploit the information obtained from the DIDO configurator unit 1910 to choose the type of modulation/coding scheme to employ for each user. This information is computed by the DIDO configurator unit 1910 by exploiting the channel quality information of each of the users as provided by the feedback unit 1912. The DIDO precoding unit 1908 exploits the information obtained by the DIDO configurator unit 1910 to compute the DIDO precoding weights and precoding the input symbols obtained from the mapping units 1906. Each of the precoded data streams are sent by the DIDO precoding unit 1908 to the OFDM unit 1915 that computes the IFFT and adds the cyclic prefix. This information is sent to the D/A unit 1916 that operates the digital to analog conversion and sends the resulting analog signal to the RF unit 1914. The RF unit 1914 upconverts the baseband signal to intermediate/radio frequency and send it to the transmit antenna.
The RF units 2008 of each client device receive signals transmitted from the DIDO transmitter units 1914, downconverts the signals to baseband and provide the downconverted signals to the A/D units 2010. The A/D units 2010 then convert the signal from analog to digital and send it to the OFDM units 2013. The OFDM units 2013 remove the cyclic prefix and carries out the FFT to report the signal to the frequency domain. During the training period the OFDM units 2013 send the output to the channel estimate unit 2004 that computes the channel estimates in the frequency domain. Alternatively, the channel estimates can be computed in the time domain. During the data period the OFDM units 2013 send the output to the receiver unit 2002 which demodulates/decodes the signal to obtain the data 2014. The channel estimate unit 2004 sends the channel estimates to the DIDO feedback generator unit 2006 that may quantize the channel estimates and send it back to the transmitter via the feedback control channel 1912.
The DIDO configurator 1910 may use information derived at the Base Station or, in a preferred embodiment, uses additionally the output of a DIDO Feedback Generator 2006 (see
The DIDO Configurator 1910 may use information recovered from a DIDO Feedback Control Channel 1912. The DIDO Feedback Control Channel 1912 is a logical or physical control channel that is used to send the output of the DIDO Feedback Generator 2006 from the user to the Base Station. The control channel 1912 may be implemented in any number of ways known in the art and may be a logical or a physical control channel. As a physical channel it may comprise a dedicated time/frequency slot assigned to a user. It may also be a random access channel shared by all users. The control channel may be pre-assigned or it may be created by stealing bits in a predefined way from an existing control channel.
In the following discussion, results obtained through measurements with the DIDO-OFDM prototype are described in real propagation environments. These results demonstrate the potential gains achievable in adaptive DIDO systems. The performance of different order DIDO systems is presented initially, demonstrating that it is possible to increase the number of antennas/user to achieve larger downlink throughput. The DIDO performance as a function of user device's location is then described, demonstrating the need for tracking the changing channel conditions. Finally, the performance of DIDO systems employing diversity techniques is described.
i. Performance of Different Order DIDO Systems
The performance of different DIDO systems is evaluated with increasing number of transmit antennas N=M, where M is the number of users. The performance of the following systems is compared: SISO, DIDO 2×2, DIDO 4×4, DIDO 6×6 and DIDO 8×8. DIDO N×M refers to DIDO with N transmit antennas at the BS and M users.
Different antenna subsets are active in the 8-element transmit array, depending on the value of N chosen for different measurements. For each DIDO order (N) the subset of antennas that covers the largest real estate for the fixed size constraint of the 8-element array was chosen. This criterion is expected to enhance the spatial diversity for any given value of N.
Based on the comments related to
To compare the relative performance of different order DIDO systems the target BER is fixed to 10−4 (this value may vary depending on the system) that corresponds approximately to SER=10−2 as shown in
ii. Performance with Variable User Location
The goal of this experiment is to evaluate the DIDO performance for different users' location, via simulations in spatially correlated channels. DIDO 2×2 systems are considered with 4QAM and an FEC rate of 1/2. User 1 is at a broadside direction from the transmit array, whereas user 2 changes locations from broadside to endfire directions as illustrated in
iii. Preferred Scenario for DIDO 8×8
Note that, in i.i.d. (ideal) channels, there is −6 dB gap in TX power between the SE of DIDO 8×8 and DIDO 2×2. This gap is due to the fact that DIDO 8×8 splits the TX power across eight data streams, whereas DIDO 2×2 only between two streams. This result is shown via simulation in
In spatially correlated channels, however, the TPT is a function of the characteristics of the propagation environment (e.g., array orientation, user location, angle spread). For example,
Similarly to MIMO systems, the performance of DIDO systems degrades when the users are located at endfire directions from the TX array (due to lack of diversity). This effect has been observed through measurements with the current DIDO prototype. Hence, one way to show that DIDO 8×8 outperforms DIDO 2×2 is to place the users at endfire directions with respect to the DIDO 2×2 arrays. In this scenario, DIDO 8×8 outperforms DIDO 2×2 due to the higher diversity provided by the 8-antenna array.
In this analysis, consider the following systems:
System 1: DIDO 8×8 with 4-QAM (transmit 8 parallel data streams every time slot);
System 2: DIDO 2×2 with 64-QAM (transmit to users X and Y every 4 time slots). For this system we consider four combinations of TX and RX antenna locations: a) T1,T2 U1,2 (endfire direction); b) T3,T4 U3,4 (endfire direction); c) T5,T6 U5,6 (˜30° from the endfire direction); d) T7,T8 U7,8 (NLOS (Non-Line of Sight));
System 3: DIDO 8×8 with 64-QAM; and
System 4: MISO 8×1 with 64-QAM (transmit to user×every 8 time slots).
For all these cases, an FEC rate of 3/4 was used.
The users' locations are depicted in
In
From these results, the following conclusions may be drawn:
One channel scenario was identified for which DIDO 8×8 outperforms DIDO 2×2 (i.e., yields larger SE for lower TX power requirement);
In this channel scenario, DIDO 8×8 yields larger per user SE and DL SE than DIDO 2×2 and MISO 8×1; and
It is possible to further increase the performance of DIDO 8×8 by using higher order modulations (i.e., 64-QAM rather than 4-QAM) at the expense of larger TX power requirements (˜15 dB more).
iv. DIDO with Antenna Selection
Hereafter, we evaluate the benefit of the antenna selection algorithm described in R. Chen, R. W. Heath, and J. G. Andrews, “Transmit selection diversity for unitary precoded multiuser spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers,” accepted to IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2005. We present the results for one particular DIDO system with two users, 4-QAM and FEC rate of 1/2. The following systems are compared in
DIDO 2×2 with T1,2 and U1,2; and
DIDO 3×2 using antenna selection with T1,2,3 and U1,2.
The transmit antenna's and user device locations are the same as in
iv. SNR thresholds for the LUTs
In section [0171] we stated that the mode selection is enabled by LUTs. The LUTs can be pre-computed by evaluating the SNR thresholds to achieve certain predefined target error-rate performance for the DIDO transmission modes in different propagation environments. Hereafter, we provide the performance of DIDO systems with and without antenna selection and variable number of users that can be used as guidelines to construct the LUTs. While
Hereafter, we show the performance of DIDO systems in spatially correlated channels. We simulate each user's channel through the COST-259 spatial channel model described in X. Zhuang, F. W. Vook, K. L. Baum, T. A. Thomas, and M. Cudak, “Channel models for link and system level simulations,” IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group, September 2004. We generate single-cluster for each user. As a case study, we assume NLOS channels, uniform linear array (ULA) at the transmitter, with element spacing of 0.5 lambda. For the case of 2-user system, we simulate the clusters with mean angles of arrival AOA1 and AOA2 for the first and second user, respectively. The AOAs are measured with respect to the broadside direction of the ULA. When more than two users are in the system, we generate the users' clusters with uniformly spaced mean AOAs in the range [−ϕm,ϕm], where we define
with K being the number of users and Δϕ is the angular separation between the users' mean AOAs. Note that the angular range [−ϕm,ϕm] is centered at the 0° angle, corresponding to the broadside direction of the ULA. Hereafter, we study the BER performance of DIDO systems as a function of the channel angle spread (AS) and angular separation between users, with BD and ASel transmission schemes and different numbers of users.
Next, we compute the SNR thresholds, for target BER of 10−2 in different correlation scenarios.
Next, we study the performance of ASel transmission scheme in spatially correlated channels.
We compute the SNR thresholds (assuming usual target BER of 10−2) as a function of the number of users in the system (M), for both BD and ASel transmission schemes. The SNR thresholds correspond to the average SNR, such that the total transmit power is constant for any M. We assume maximum separation between the mean AOAs of each user's cluster within the azimuth range [−ϕm,ϕm]=[−60°, 60° ]. Then, the angular separation between users is Δϕ=120°/(M−1).
To reduce the values of the SNR thresholds and improve the performance of the DIDO system we apply ASel transmission scheme.
We then compute the SNR thresholds for two more channel scenarios: AS=5° in
Finally, we summarize the results presented so far for correlated channels.
Described above is a novel adaptive transmission technique for DIDO systems. This method dynamically switches between DIDO transmission modes to different users to enhance throughput for fixed target error rate. The performance of different order DIDO systems was measured in different propagation conditions and it was observed that significant gains in throughput may be achieved by dynamically selecting the DIDO modes and number of users as a function of the propagation conditions.
Pre-Compensation of Frequency and Phase Offset
a. Background
As previously described, wireless communication systems use carrier waves to convey information. These carrier waves are usually sinusoids that are amplitude and/or phase modulated in response to information to be transmitted. The nominal frequency of the sinusoid is known as the carrier frequency. To create this waveform, the transmitter synthesizes one or more sinusoids and uses upconversion to create a modulated signal riding on a sinusoid with the prescribed carrier frequency. This may be done through direct conversion where the signal is directly modulated on the carrier or through multiple upconversion stages. To process this waveform, the receiver must demodulate the received RF signal and effectively remove the modulating carrier. This requires that the receiver synthesize one or more sinusoidal signals to reverse the process of modulation at the transmitter, known as downconversion. Unfortunately, the sinusoidal signals generated at the transmitter and receiver are derived from different reference oscillators. No reference oscillator creates a perfect frequency reference; in practice there is always some deviation from the true frequency.
In wireless communication systems, the differences in the outputs of the reference oscillators at the transmitter and receivers create the phenomena known as carrier frequency offset, or simply frequency offset, at the receiver. Essentially there is some residual modulation in the received signal (corresponding to the difference in the transmit and receive carriers), which occurs after downconversion. This creates distortion in the received signal resulting in higher bit error rates and lower throughput.
There are different techniques for dealing with carrier frequency offset. Most approaches estimate the carrier frequency offset at the receiver and then apply a carrier frequency offset correction algorithm. The carrier frequency offset estimation algorithm may be blind using offset QAM (T. Fusco and M. Tanda, “Blind Frequency-offset Estimation for OFDM/OQAM Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, pp. 1828-1838,2007); periodic properties (E. Serpedin, A. Chevreuil, G. B. Giannakis, and P. Loubaton, “Blind channel and carrier frequency offset estimation using periodic modulation precoders,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2389-2405, August 2000); or the cyclic prefix in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) structure approaches (J. J. van de Beek, M. Sandell, and P. O. Borjesson, “ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1800-1805, July 1997; U. Tureli, H. Liu, and M. D. Zoltowski, “OFDM blind carrier offset estimation: ESPRIT,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1459-1461, September 2000; M. Luise, M. Marselli, and R. Reggiannini, “Low-complexity blind carrier frequency recovery for OFDM signals over frequency-selective radio channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1182-1188, July 2002).
Alternatively special training signals may be utilized including a repeated data symbol (P. H. Moose, “A technique for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing frequency offset correction,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2908-2914, October 1994); two different symbols (T. M. Schmid) and D. C. Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613-1621, December 1997); or periodically inserted known symbol sequences (M. Luise and R. Reggiannini, “Carrier frequency acquisition and tracking for OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1590-1598, November 1996). The correction may occur in analog or in digital. The receiver can also use carrier frequency offset estimation to precorrect the transmitted signal to eliminate offset. Carrier frequency offset correction has been studied extensively for multicarrier and OFDM systems due to their sensitivity to frequency offset (J. J. van de Beek, M. Sandell, and P. O. Borjesson, “ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems,” Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on], vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1800-1805, July 1997; U. Tureli, H. Liu, and M. D. Zoltowski, “OFDM blind carrier offset estimation: ESPRIT,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1459-1461, September 2000; T. M. Schmidl and D. C. Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613-1621, December 1997; M. Luise, M. Marselli, and R. Reggiannini, “Low-complexity blind carrier frequency recovery for OFDM signals over frequency-selective radio channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1182-1188, July 2002).
Frequency offset estimation and correction is an important issue for multi-antenna communication systems, or more generally MIMO (multiple input multiple output) systems. In MIMO systems where the transmit antennas are locked to one frequency reference and the receivers are locked to another frequency reference, there is a single offset between the transmitter and receiver. Several algorithms have been proposed to tackle this problem using training signals (K. Lee and J. Chun, “Frequency-offset estimation for MIMO and OFDM systems using orthogonal training sequences,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 146-156, January 2007; M. Ghogho and A. Swami, “Training design for multipath channel and frequency offset estimation in MIMO systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3957-3965, October 2006, and adaptive tracking C. Oberli and B. Daneshrad, “Maximum likelihood tracking algorithms for MIMOOFDM,” in Communications, 2004 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 4, Jun. 20-24, 2004, pp. 2468-2472). A more severe problem is encountered in MIMO systems where the transmit antennas are not locked to the same frequency reference but the receive antennas are locked together. This happens practically in the uplink of a spatial division multiple access (SDMA) system, which can be viewed as a MIMO system where the different users correspond to different transmit antennas. In this case the compensation of frequency offset is much more complicated. Specifically, the frequency offset creates interference between the different transmitted MIMO streams. It can be corrected using complex joint estimation and equalization algorithms (A. Kannan, T. P. Krauss, and M. D. Zoltowski, “Separation of cochannel signals under imperfect timing and carrier synchronization,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 79-96, January 2001), and equalization followed by frequency offset estimation (T. Tang and R. W. Heath, “Joint frequency offset estimation and interference cancellation for MIMO-OFDM systems [mobile radio],” 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004 IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1553-1557, Sep. 26-29, 2004; X. Dai, “Carrier frequency offset estimation for OFDM/SDMA systems using consecutive pilots,” IEEE Proceedings—Communications, vol. 152, pp. 624-632, Oct. 7, 2005). Some work has dealt with the related problem of residual phase off-set and tracking error, where residual phase offsets are estimated and compensated after frequency offset estimation, but this work only consider the uplink of an SDMA OFDMA system (L. Haring, S. Bieder, and A. Czylwik, “Residual carrier and sampling frequency synchronization in multiuser OFDM systems,” 2006. VTC 2006-Spring. IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 4, pp. 1937-1941, 2006). The most severe case in MIMO systems occurs when all transmit and receive antennas have different frequency references. The only available work on this topic only deals with asymptotic analysis of estimation error in flat fading channels (O. Besson and P. Stoica, “On parameter estimation of MIMO flat-fading channels with frequency offsets,” Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on], vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 602-613, March 2003).
A case that has not been significantly investigated occurs when the different transmit antennas of a MIMO system do not have the same frequency reference and the receive antennas process the signals independently. This happens in what is known as a distributed input distributed-output (DIDO) communication system, also called the MIMO broadcast channel in the literature. DIDO systems consist of one access point with distributed antennas that transmit parallel data streams (via precoding) to multiple users to enhance downlink throughput, while exploiting the same wireless resources (i.e., same slot duration and frequency band) as conventional SISO systems. Detailed description of DIDO systems was presented in, S. G. Perlman and T. Cotter, “System and method for distributed input-distributed output wireless communications,” United States Patent Application 20060023803, July 2004. There are many ways to implement DIDO precoders. One solution is block diagonalization (BD) described in, for example, Q. H. Spencer, A. L. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zero-forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., vol. 52, pp. 461-471, February 2004; K. K. Wong, R. D. Murch, and K. B. Letaief, “A joint-channel diagonalization for multiuser MIMO antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., vol. 2, pp. 773-786, July 2003; L. U. Choi and R. D. Murch, “A transmit preprocessing technique for multiuser MIMO systems using a decomposition approach,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., vol. 3, pp. 20-24, January 2004; Z. Shen, J. G. Andrews, R. W. Heath, and B. L. Evans, “Low complexity user selection algorithms for multiuser MIMO systems with block diagonalization,” accepted for publication in IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., September 2005; Z. Shen, R. Chen, J. G. Andrews, R. W. Heath, and B. L. Evans, “Sum capacity of multiuser MIMO broadcast channels with block diagonalization,” submitted to IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., October 2005; R. Chen, R. W. Heath, and J. G. Andrews, “Transmit selection diversity for unitary precoded multiuser spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers,” accepted to IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2005.
In DIDO systems, transmit precoding is used to separate data streams intended for different users. Carrier frequency offset causes several problems related to the system implementation when the transmit antenna radio frequency chains do not share the same frequency reference. When this happens, each antenna is effectively transmits at a slightly different carrier frequency. This destroys the integrity of the DIDO precoder resulting in each user experiencing extra interference. Proposed below are several solutions to this problem. In one embodiment of the solution, the DIDO transmit antennas share a frequency reference through a wired, optical, or wireless network. In another embodiment of the solution, one or more users estimate the frequency offset differences (the relative differences in the offsets between pairs of antennas) and send this information back to the transmitter. The transmitter then precorrects for the frequency offset and proceeds with the training and precoder estimation phase for DIDO. There is a problem with this embodiment when there are delays in the feedback channel. The reason is that there may be residual phase errors created by the correction process that are not accounted for in the subsequent channel estimation. To solve this problem, one additional embodiment uses a novel frequency offset and phase estimator that can correct this problem by estimating the delay. Results are presented based both on simulations and practical measurements carried out with a DIDO-OFDM prototype.
The frequency and phase offset compensation method proposed in this document may be sensitive to estimation errors due to noise at the receiver. Hence, one additional embodiment proposes methods for time and frequency offset estimation that are robust also under low SNR conditions.
There are different approaches for performing time and frequency offset estimation. Because of its sensitivity to synchronization errors, many of these approaches were proposed specifically for the OFDM waveform.
The algorithms typically do not exploit the structure of the OFDM waveform thus they are generic enough for both single carrier and multicarrier waveforms. The algorithm described below is among a class of techniques that employ known reference symbols, e.g. training data, to aid in synchronization. Most of these methods are extensions of Moose's frequency offset estimator (see P. H. Moose, “A technique for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing frequency offset correction,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2908-2914, October 1994.). Moose proposed to use two repeated training signals and derived the frequency offset using the phase difference between both received signals. Moose's method can only correct for the fractional frequency offset. An extension of the Moose method was proposed by Schmidl and Cox (T. M. Schmidl and D. C. Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613-1621, December 1997.). Their key innovation was to use one periodic OFDM symbol along with an additional differentially encoded training symbol. The differential encoding in the second symbol enables integer offset correction. Coulson considered a similar setup as described in T. M. Schmidl and D. C. Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613-1621, December 1997, and provided a detailed discussion of algorithms and analysis as described in A. J. Coulson, “Maximum likelihood synchronization for OFDM using a pilot symbol: analysis,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2495-2503, December 2001.; A. J. Coulson, “Maximum likelihood synchronization for OFDM using a pilot symbol: algorithms,”IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2486-2494, December 2001. One main difference is that Coulson uses repeated maximum length sequences to provide good correlation properties. He also suggests using chirp signals because of their constant envelope properties in the time and frequency domains. Coulson considers several practical details but does not include integer estimation. Multiple repeated training signals were considered by Minn et. al. in H. Minn, V. K. Bhargava, and K. B. Letaief, “A robust timing and frequency synchronization for OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 822-839, July 2003, but the structure of the training was not optimized. Shi and Serpedin show that the training structure has some optimality form the perspective of frame synchronization (K. Shi and E. Serpedin, “Coarse frame and carrier synchronization of OFDM systems: a new metric and comparison,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1271-1284, July 2004). One embodiment of the invention uses the Shi and Serpedin approach to perform frame synchronization and fractional frequency offset estimation.
Many approaches in the literature focus on frame synchronization and fractional frequency offset correction. Integer offset correction is solved using an additional training symbol as in T. M. Schmidl and D. C. Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613-1621, December 1997. For example, Morrelli et. al. derived an improved version of T. M. Schmidl and D. C. Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613-1621, December 1997, in M. Morelli, A. N. D'Andrea, and U. Mengali, “Frequency ambiguity resolution in OFDM systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 134-136, April 2000. An alternative approach using a different preamble structure was suggested by Morelli and Mengali (M. Morelli and U. Mengali, “An improved frequency offset estimator for OFDM applications,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 75-77, March 1999). This approach uses the correlations between M repeated identical training symbols to increase the range of the fractional frequency offset estimator by a factor of M. This is the best linear unbiased estimator and accepts a large offset (with proper design) but does not provide good timing synchronization.
System Description
One embodiment of the invention uses pre-coding based on channel state information to cancel frequency and phase offsets in DIDO systems. See
In one embodiment of the invention, each user employs a receiver equipped with frequency offset estimator/compensator. As illustrated in
The RF units 4508 receive signals transmitted from the DIDO transmitter units, downconvert the signals to baseband and provide the downconverted signals to the A/D units 4510. The A/D units 4510 then convert the signal from analog to digital and send it to the frequency offset estimator/compensator units 4512. The frequency offset estimator/compensator units 4512 estimate the frequency offset and compensate for it, as described herein, and then send the compensated signal to the OFDM units 4513. The OFDM units 4513 remove the cyclic prefix and operate the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to report the signal to the frequency domain. During the training period the OFDM units 4513 send the output to the channel estimate unit 4504 that computes the channel estimates in the frequency domain. Alternatively, the channel estimates can be computed in the time domain. During the data period the OFDM units 4513 send the output to the DIDO receiver unit 4502 which demodulates/decodes the signal to obtain the data. The channel estimate unit 4504 sends the channel estimates to the DIDO feedback generator unit 4506 that may quantize the channel estimates and send them back to the transmitter via the feedback control channel, as illustrated.
Description of One Embodiment of an Algorithm for a DIDO 2×2 Scenario
Described below are embodiments of an algorithm for frequency/phase offset compensation in DIDO systems. The DIDO system model is initially described with and without frequency/phase offsets. For the sake of the simplicity, the particular implementation of a DIDO 2×2 system is provided. However, the underlying principles of the invention may also be implemented on higher order DIDO systems.
DIDO System Model w/o Frequency and Phase Offset
The received signals of DIDO 2×2 can be written for the first user as
r1[t]=h11(w11x1[t]+w21x2[t])+h12(w12x1[t]+w22x2[t]) (1)
and for the second user as
r2[t]=h21(w11x1[t]+w21x2[t])+h22(w12x1[t]+w22x2[t]) (2)
where t is the discrete time index, hmn and wmn are the channel and the DIDO precoding weights between the m-th user and n-th transmit antenna, respectively, and xm is the transmit signal to user m. Note that hmn and wmn are not a function of t since we assume the channel is constant over the period between training and data transmission.
In the presence of frequency and phase offset, the received signals are expressed as
r1[t]=ej(ω
and
r2[t]=ej(ω
where Ts is the symbol period, ωTn=2ΠfTn for the n-th transmit antenna, ωUm=2ΠfUm for the m-th user, and fTn and fUm are the actual carrier frequencies (affected by offset) for the n-th transmit antenna and m-th user, respectively. The values tmn denote random delays that cause phase offset over the channel hmn.
For the time being, we use the following definitions:
Δωmn=ωUm−ωTn (5)
to denote the frequency offset between the m-th user and the n-th transmit antenna.
A method according to one embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
(a) Training Period for Frequency Offset Estimation (4701)
During the first training period the base station sends one or more training sequences from each transmit antennas to one of the users (4701a). As described herein “users” are wireless client devices. For the DIDO 2×2 case, the signal received by the m-th user is given by
rm[t]=ejΔω
where p1 and p2 are the training sequences transmitted from the first and second antennas, respectively.
The m-th user may employ any type of frequency offset estimator (i.e., convolution by the training sequences) and estimates the offsets Δωm1 and Δωm2. Then, from these values the user computes the frequency offset between the two transmit antennas as
ΔωT=Δωm2−Δωm1=ωT1−ωT2 (7)
Finally, the value in (7) is fed back to the base station (4701b).
Note that p1 and p2 in (6) are designed to be orthogonal, so that the user can estimate Δωm1 and Δωm2. Alternatively, in one embodiment, the same training sequence is used over two consecutive time slots and the user estimates the offset from there. Moreover, to improve the estimate of the offset in (7) the same computations described above can be done for all users of the DIDO systems (not just for the m-th user) and the final estimate may be the (weighted) average of the values obtained from all users. This solution, however, requires more computational time and amount of feedback. Finally, updates of the frequency offset estimation are needed only if the frequency offset varies over time. Hence, depending on the stability of the clocks at the transmitter, this step 4701 of the algorithm can be carried out on a long-term basis (i.e., not for every data transmission), resulting in reduction of feedback overhead.
(b) Training Period for Channel Estimation (4702)
(c) During the second training period, the base station first obtains the frequency offset feedback with the value in (7) from the m-th user or from the plurality of users. The value in (7) is used to pre-compensate for the frequency offset at the transmit side. Then, the base station sends training data to all the users for channel estimation (4702a).
For DIDO 2×2 systems, the signal received at the first user is given by
r1[t]=ejΔω
and at the second user by
r2[t]=ejΔω
where {tilde over (t)}mn=tmn+Δt and Δt is random or known delay between the first and second transmissions of the base station. Moreover, p1 and p2 are the training sequences transmitted from the first and second antennas, respectively, for frequency offset and channel estimation.
Note that the pre-compensation is applied only to the second antennas in this embodiment.
Expanding (8) we obtain
r1[t]=ejΔω
and similarly for the second user
r2[t]=ejΔω
where θmn=−ΔωmnTs{tilde over (t)}mn.
At the receive side, the users compensate for the residual frequency offset by using the training sequences p1 and p2. Then the users estimate via training the vector channels (4702b)
These channel in (12) or channel state information (CSI) is fed back to the base station (4702b) that computes the DIDO precoder as described in the following subsection.
(d) DIDO Precoding with Pre-Compensation (4703)
The base station receives the channel state information (CSI) in (12) from the users and computes the precoding weights via block diagonalization (BD) (4703a), such that
w1Th2=0,w2Th1=0 (13)
where the vectors h1 are defined in (12) and wm=[wm1,wm2]. Note that the invention presented in this disclosure can be applied to any other DIDO precoding method besides BD. The base station also pre-compensates for the frequency offset by employing the estimate in (7) and phase offset by estimating the delay (Δto) between the second training transmission and the current transmission (4703a). Finally, the base station sends data to the users via the DIDO precoder (4703b).
After this transmit processing, the signal received at user 1 is given by
r1[t]=ejΔω
=ejΔω
=γ1[t]└h11(w11x1[t]+w21x2[t])+ej(Δω
γ1[t][(h11w11+ej(θ
where γ1[t]=ejΔω
r1[t]=γ1[t]w1Th1x1[t]. (15)
Similarly, for user 2 we get
r2[t]=ejΔω
and expanding (16)
r2[t]=γ2[t]w2Th2x2[t] (17)
where γ2[t]=ejΔω
Finally, the users compute the residual frequency offset and the channel estimation to demodulate the data streams x1[t] and x2[t] (4703c).
Generalization to DIDO N×M
In this section, the previously described techniques are generalized to DIDO systems with N transmit antennas and M users.
i. Training Period for Frequency Offset Estimation
During the first training period, the signal received by the m-th user as a result of the training sequences sent from the N antennas is given by
where pn is the training sequences transmitted from the n-th antenna.
After estimating the offsets Δωmn, ∀n=1, . . . N, the m-th user computes the frequency offset between the first and the n-th transmit antenna as
ΔωT,1n=Δωmn−Δωm1=ωT1−ωTn. (19)
Finally, the values in (19) are fed back to the base station.
ii. Training Period for Channel Estimation
During the second training period, the base station first obtains the frequency offset feedback with the value in (19) from the m-th user or from the plurality of users. The value in (19) is used to pre-compensate for the frequency offset at the transmit side. Then, the base station sends training data to all the users for channel estimation.
For DIDO N×M systems, the signal received at the m-th user is given by
where θmn=−ΔωmnTs{tilde over (t)}mn,{tilde over (t)}mn+Δt and Δt is random or known delay between the first and second transmissions of the base station. Moreover, pn is the training sequence transmitted from the n-th antenna for frequency offset and channel estimation.
At the receive side, the users compensate for the residual frequency offset by using the training sequences pn. Then, each users m estimates via training the vector channel
and feeds back to the base station that computes the DIDO precoder as described in the following subsection.
iii. DIDO Precoding with Pre-Compensation
The base station receives the channel state information (CSI) in (12) from the users and computes the precoding weights via block diagonalization (BD), such that
wmThl=0,∀m≠l,m=1, . . . ,M (22)
where the vectors hm are defined in (21) and wm=[wm1, wm2, . . . ,wmN]. The base station also pre-compensates for the frequency offset by employing the estimate in (19) and phase offset by estimating the delay (Δto) between the second training transmission and the current transmission. Finally, the base station sends data to the users via the DIDO precoder.
After this transmit processing, the signal received at user i is given by
Where γi[n]=ejΔω
ri[t]=γi[t]wiThixi[t] (24)
Finally, the users compute the residual frequency offset and the channel estimation to demodulate the data streams xi[t].
Results
Next, we evaluate the sensitivity of the proposed compensation method to frequency offset estimation errors and/or fluctuations of the offset in time. Hence, we re-write (14) as
r1[t]=ejΔω
where ϵ indicates the estimation error and/or variation of the frequency offset between training and data transmission. Note that the effect of ϵ is to destroy the orthogonality property in (13) such that the interference terms in (14) and (16) are not completely pre-canceled at the transmitter. As a results of that, the SER performance degrades for increasing values of ϵ.
f. Description of One Embodiment of an Algorithm for Time and Frequency Offset Estimation
Hereafter, we describe additional embodiments to carry out time and frequency offset estimation (4701b in
s[n]=t[n−Nt] for n=−1, . . . ,−Lcp
s[n]=t[n] for n=0, . . . ,Nt−1
s[n]=t[n−Nt] for n=Nt, . . . ,2Nt−1
s[n]=−t[n−2Nt] for n=2Nt, . . . ,3Nt−1
s[n]=t[n−3Nt] for n=Nt, . . . ,4Nt−1.
Note that the structure of this training signal can be extended to other lengths but repeating the block structure. For example, to use 16 training signals we consider a structure such as:
[CP,B,B,−B,B,B,B,−B,B,−B,−B,B,−B,B,B,−B,B,].
By using this structure and letting Nt=4 Mt all the algorithms to be described can be employed without modification. Effectively we are repeating the training sequence. This is especially useful in cases where a suitable training signal may not be available.
Consider the following received signal, after matched filtering and downsampling to the symbol rate:
where ε is the unknown discrete-time frequency offset, Δ is the unknown frame offset, h[I] are the unknown discrete-time channel coefficients, and v[n] is additive noise. To explain the key ideas in the following sections the presence of additive noise is ignored.
i. Coarse Frame Synchronization
The purpose of coarse frame synchronization is to solve for the unknown frame offset Δ. Let us make the following definitions
r1[n]:=[r[n],r[n+1], . . . ,r[n+Nt−1]]T,
r2[n]:=[r[n+Nt],r[n+1+Nt], . . . ,r[n+2Nt−1]]T,
r3[n]:=[r[n+2Nt],r[n+1+2Nt], . . . ,r[n+3Nt−1]]T,
r4[n]:=[r[n+3Nt],r[n+1+3Nt], . . . ,r[n+4Nt−1]]T,
The proposed coarse frame synchronization algorithm is inspired from the algorithm in K. Shi and E. Serpedin, “Coarse frame and carrier synchronization of OFDM systems: a new metric and comparison,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1271-1284, July 2004, derived from a maximum likelihood criterion.
Method 1—Improved coarse frame synchronization: the coarse frame synchronization estimator solves the following optimization
where
P1[k]=r1*[k]r2[k]−r3*[k]r4[k]−
P2[k]=r2*[k]r4[k]−r1*[k]r3[k]
P3[k]=
Let the corrected signal be defined as
rc[n]=r[n−{circumflex over (Δ)}−┌Lcp/4┐].
The additional correction term is used to compensate for small initial taps in the channel and can be adjusted based on the application. This extra delay will be included henceforth in the channel.
ii. Fractional Frequency Offset Correction
The fractional frequency offset correction follows the coarse frame synchronization block.
Method 2—Improved fractional frequency offset correction: the fractional frequency offset is the solution to
This is known as a fractional frequency offset because the algorithm can only correct for offsets
This problem will be solved in the next section. Let the fine frequency offset corrected signal be defined as
rf[n]=e−j2π{circumflex over (ϵ)}
Note that the Methods 1 and 2 are an improvement to K. Shi and E. Serpedin, “Coarse frame and carrier synchronization of OFDM systems: a new metric and comparison,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1271-1284, July 2004 that works better in frequency-selective channels. One specific innovation here is the use of both r and
iii. Integer Frequency Offset Correction
To correct for the integer frequency offset, it is necessary to write an equivalent system model for the received signal after fine frequency offset correction. Absorbing remaining timing errors into the channel, the received signal in the absence of noise has the following structure:
for n=0, 1, . . , 4Nt−1. The integer frequency offset is k while the unknown equivalent channel is g[l].
Method 3—Improved integer frequency offset correction: the integer frequency offset is the solution to
where
This gives the estimate of the total frequency offset as
Practically, Method 3 has rather high complexity. To reduce complexity the following observations can be made. First of all, the product SS(S*S)−1S* can be precomputed. Unfortunately, this still leaves a rather large matrix multiplication. An alternative is to exploit the observation that with the proposed training sequences, S*S≈I. This leads to the following reduced complexity method.
Method 4—Low-complexity improved integer frequency offset correction: a low complexity integer frequency offset estimator solves
iv. Results
In this section we compare the performance of the different proposed estimators.
First, in
A simulation with a small frequency offset of fmax=2 Hz and no integer offset correction is illustrated in
In the presence of multipath channels, the performance of frequency offset estimators generally degrades. Turning off the integer offset estimator, however, reveals quite good performance in
Adaptive DIDO Transmission Scheme
New systems and methods for adaptive DIDO systems are described below. These systems and methods are extensions to the patent applications entitled “System and Method for Distributed Input-Distributed Output Wireless Communications,” Ser. Nos. 11/894,394, 11/894,362, and 11/894,540, filed Aug. 20, 2007, of which the present application is a continuation-in-part. The content of these applications has been described above. The adaptive DIDO system and method described in the foregoing applications were designed to exploit instantaneous and/or statistical channel quality information. Described below are additional techniques to enable adaptation between different DIDO modes assuming instantaneous channel knowledge.
The following prior art references will be discussed below within the context of the embodiments of the invention. Each reference will be identified by its corresponding bracketed number:
A fundamental concept associated with link adaptation (LA) is to adaptively adjust system parameters such as modulation order, FEC coding rate and/or transmission schemes to the changing channel conditions to improve throughput or error rate performance. These system parameters are often combined in sets of “transmission modes,” referred to herein as DIDO modes. One embodiment of a technique for LA is to measure the channel quality information and predict the best transmission mode based on certain performance criterion. The channel quality consists of statistical channel information, as in slow LA, or (instantaneous) CSI, as in fast LA. One embodiment of the system and method described herein is employed within the context of fast LA systems and the goal is to increase throughput for fixed predefined target error rate.
One embodiment of a method for adaptive DIDO transmission is depicted in
We first define an indicator of channel quality that is used to predict the performance of different DIDO modes and select the optimal one for given transmission. One example of channel quality indicator (CQI) is the mutual information (MI) of DIDO systems defined as [1,2]
where K is the number of users, {tilde over (H)}k=HkTk is the equivalent channel transfer matrix, Hk is the channel matrix for the k-th user, Tk is the DIDO precoding matrix for the k-th user, γk is the per-user SNR and Nk is the number of parallel data streams sent to user k. We observe that the CQI in (1) depends on the SNR and the channel matrix.
The MI in (1) measures the data rate per unit bandwidth that can be transmitted reliably over the DIDO link (i.e., error-free spectral efficiency). When the spectral efficiency (SE) of given DIDO mode is below the MI in (1) the error rate performance is arbitrarily small, whereas when the SE exceeds (1) the error rate approaches 100%. As an example, we plot the spectral efficiency of three DIDO modes as a function of the MI (1) in
In
Next, we define another CQI to reduce this variance. We first expand (1) as
where λk,i is the i-th singular value of the matrix {tilde over (H)}k. We observe that the per-user SER (which is a function of the post-processing SNR) depends on
and the system SER is upper bounded by the user with the smallest singular value
among all the users [2]. Then, we define the following CQI
Finally, we compare the SER and SE performance as a function of SNR for different DIDO modes against the adaptive DIDO algorithm. Results are shown in
The proposed method for fast LA in DIDO systems includes different types of adaptation criteria and CQIs. For example, a similar adaptive DIDO algorithm can be designed to minimize error rate performance for fixed rate transmission, similar to the approach described in [3] for MIMO systems. Moreover, different types of CQIs can be employed such as the minimum singular value of the composite channel matrix as
where
is the total number of data streams sent to the users and H is the composite channel matrix obtained by stacking the channel matrices of all the users as
The proposed method can be extended to multicarrier systems, such as orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. In multicarrier systems the MI in (1) and (2) is computed for each subcarrier and different MCSs are assigned to different subcarriers, thereby exploiting the frequency selectivity of wireless channels. This method, however, may result in large number of control information to share the CQI or DIDO mode number between transmitters and receivers. An alternative method is to group multiple subcarriers with similar channel quality and compute the average of (1) or (2) over each group of subcarrier. Then, different DIDO modes are assigned to different groups of subcarriers based on the criterion described above.
Embodiments of the invention may include various steps as set forth above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform certain steps. For example, the various components within the Base Stations/APs and Client Devices described above may be implemented as software executed on a general purpose or special purpose processor. To avoid obscuring the pertinent aspects of the invention, various well known personal computer components such as computer memory, hard drive, input devices, etc., have been left out of the figures.
Alternatively, in one embodiment, the various functional modules illustrated herein and the associated steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, such as an application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
In one embodiment, certain modules such as the Coding, Modulation and Signal Processing Logic 903 described above may be implemented on a programmable digital signal processor (“DSP”) (or group of DSPs) such as a DSP using a Texas Instruments' TMS320x architecture (e.g., a TMS320C6000, TMS320C5000, . . . etc). The DSP in this embodiment may be embedded within an add-on card to a personal computer such as, for example, a PCI card. Of course, a variety of different DSP architectures may be used while still complying with the underlying principles of the invention.
Elements of the present invention may also be provided as a machine-readable medium for storing the machine-executable instructions. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, flash memory, optical disks, CD-ROMs, DVD ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, propagation media or other type of machine-readable media suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, the present invention may be downloaded as a computer program which may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).
Throughout the foregoing description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details were set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present system and method. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the system and method may be practiced without some of these specific details. Accordingly, the scope and spirit of the present invention should be judged in terms of the claims which follow.
Moreover, throughout the foregoing description, numerous publications were cited to provide a more thorough understanding of the present invention. All of these cited references are incorporated into the present application by reference.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/308,031, filed on May 4, 2021, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, which is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/234,699, filed on Apr. 19, 2021, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/340,914, filed on Nov. 1, 2016, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,985,811, Issued on Apr. 20, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/201,276, filed Jul. 1, 2016, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,333,604, Issued on Jun. 25, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/156,254, filed Jan. 15, 2014, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,465, Issued on Jul. 5, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/630,627, filed Dec. 3, 2009, entitled, “System And Method For Distributed Antenna Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,654,815, Issued on Feb. 18, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,731, filed Apr. 2, 2004 entitled “System and method For Enhancing Near Vertical Incidence Skyway (“NVIS”) Communication Using Space-Time Coding”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,885,354, Issued on Feb. 8, 2011; and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/894,394, filed Aug. 20, 2007 entitled, “System and Method for Distributed Input Distributed Output Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,599,420, Issued on Oct. 6, 2009; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/902,978, filed Jul. 30, 2004, entitled, “System and Method For Distributed Input-Distributed Output Wireless Communications”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,418,053, Issued on Aug. 26, 2008, all of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4003016 | Remley | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4253193 | Kennard et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4564935 | Kaplan | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4771289 | Masak | Sep 1988 | A |
| 5045862 | Alden et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5088091 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5095500 | Tayloe et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5097485 | O'Connor et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5315309 | Rudow et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5377183 | Dent | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5400037 | East | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5483667 | Faruque | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5555257 | Dent | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5600326 | Yu et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5661765 | Ishizu | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5742253 | Conroy et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5809422 | Raleigh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5838671 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5872814 | McMeekin | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5983104 | Wickman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005516 | Reudink et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005856 | Jensen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014107 | Wiesenfarth | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6041365 | Kleinerman | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052582 | Blasing et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6061021 | Zibell | May 2000 | A |
| 6061023 | Daniel et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067290 | Paulraj et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6232921 | Aiken et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6252912 | Salinger | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6275738 | Kasevich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6308080 | Burt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6320853 | Wong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323823 | Wong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6330460 | Wong et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6377782 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6400761 | Smee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411612 | Halford et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6421543 | Molnar | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6442151 | H'mimy et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445910 | Oestreich | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6448937 | Aiken et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453177 | Wong et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459900 | Scheinert | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473467 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6484030 | Antoine et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6519478 | Scherzer et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6611231 | Crilly, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6654590 | Boros et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6668161 | Boros et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6684366 | Trott et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6697644 | Scherzer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6718180 | Lundh et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6718184 | Aiken | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6760388 | Ketchum et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6760599 | Uhlik | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6760603 | Scherzer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6763225 | Farmine et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6771706 | Ling et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6785341 | Walton et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6791508 | Berry et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794939 | Kim et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795413 | Uhlik | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6799026 | Scherzer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6801580 | Kadous | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6804311 | Dabak et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6834043 | Vook et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6836673 | Trott | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6847832 | Wong et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6862271 | Medvedev et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6888795 | Gupta et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6888809 | Foschini et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6888899 | Raleigh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6895258 | Scherzer et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6901062 | Scherzer et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6920192 | Laroia et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6925127 | Dent | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6956537 | Scherzer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6963742 | Boros et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6970682 | Crilly, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6978150 | Hamabe | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6996060 | Dahlby et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7006043 | Nalbandian | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7013144 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016649 | Narasimhan et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020490 | Khatri | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7027415 | Dahlby et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7027523 | Jalali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027837 | Uhlik et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7031336 | Scherzer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7031754 | Scherzer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7068704 | Orr | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072413 | Walton et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7072693 | Farlow et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7075485 | Song et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7079809 | Scherzer | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7085240 | Wu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7095723 | Sezgin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096040 | Scherzer et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7116723 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7117014 | Van Rensburg et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7120440 | Cho et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7139527 | Tamaki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7142154 | Quilter et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7154936 | Bjerke et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7154960 | Liu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7158493 | Uhlik et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7167684 | Kadous et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7181167 | Onggosanusi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184492 | Dent | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7193991 | Melpignano et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194006 | Wong et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197082 | Alexiou et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197084 | Ketchum et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197282 | Dent et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7209511 | Dent | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7218689 | Gupta | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7224942 | Dent | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227855 | Barratt et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7242724 | Alexiou et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7242964 | Aiken et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7248645 | Vialle et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248841 | Agee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248879 | Walton et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7269231 | Ding et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7272294 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7299071 | Barratt et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7310680 | Graham | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7313403 | Gong et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7327795 | Oprea | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333540 | Yee | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7336626 | Barratt et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7339906 | Dahlby et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7339908 | Uhlik et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7352774 | Uhlik et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363376 | Uhlik et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366202 | Scherzer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366245 | Li et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366519 | Jason et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7369841 | Uhlik et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7369876 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7394858 | Sadowsky | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7406315 | Uhlik et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7412212 | Hottinen | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7418053 | Perlman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7430197 | Uhlik | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7437177 | Ozluturk et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7450489 | Sandhu | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7451839 | Perlman | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7471736 | Ding et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7486931 | Cho et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7492743 | Uhlik | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7499548 | Meandzija et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7502420 | Ketchum | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519011 | Petrus et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7548752 | Sampath et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7558575 | Losh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7599420 | Forenza et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7599443 | Ionescu et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606192 | Uhlik | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7609751 | Giallorenzi et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7616698 | Sun et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7630337 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7633944 | Chang et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7633994 | Forenza et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7636381 | Forenza et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7684753 | Ionescu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7688789 | Pan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689639 | Dent | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7719993 | Li et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7729316 | Uhlik | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7729433 | Jalloul et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7747250 | Larsson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7751368 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7751843 | Butala | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7756222 | Chen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7801490 | Scherzer | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7849173 | Uhlik | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7864663 | Dent | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7948444 | Signell et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7961809 | Bourdoux | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7978673 | Uhlik et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7986742 | Ketchum et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7995973 | Dent et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8041362 | Li et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8081944 | Li | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086271 | Dent | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8090320 | Dent et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8116710 | Dent et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8126510 | Samson et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8170081 | Forenza et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8260198 | Yamaura | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8320432 | Chockalingam et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8428177 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8451764 | Chao et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8482462 | Komijani et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8548384 | Lee et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8638880 | Baldemair et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8654815 | Forenza et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8675768 | Xu et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8705484 | Caire et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8731480 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8787469 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8797970 | Xing et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8849339 | Anto et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8902862 | Yu et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8971380 | Forenza et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8989155 | Forenza et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9094180 | Zirwas et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9179495 | Scherzer et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9252858 | Abbasfar et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9307506 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
| 9331882 | Fehri et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9685997 | Forenza et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9698881 | Nammi et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 10205513 | Winters et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
| 10277290 | Forenza et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10349417 | Forenza et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10637554 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10749583 | Park et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10804985 | Ge et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10985811 | Forenza | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 20010031647 | Scherzer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020027985 | Rashid-Farrokhi | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051433 | Affes et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020061004 | Lomp et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020097705 | Sezgin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136169 | Struhsaker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142723 | Foschini et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168017 | Berthet et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177447 | Walton | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181444 | Acampora | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193146 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003863 | Thielecke et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030012315 | Fan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036359 | Dent et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043887 | Hudson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043929 | Sampath | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045297 | Dent | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030048753 | Jalali | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065779 | Malik et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030092456 | Dent | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114165 | Mills | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114193 | Kavak | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125026 | Tsunehara et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125040 | Walton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139196 | Medvedev et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147362 | Dick et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148738 | Das et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156056 | Perry | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030161282 | Medvedev et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211843 | Song et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214431 | Hager et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220112 | Bugeja | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030235146 | Wu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040009755 | Yoshida | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042556 | Medvedev et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043784 | Czaja et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063450 | Uhlik | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082356 | Walton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095907 | Agee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097197 | Juncker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131011 | Sandell et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136349 | Walton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040152480 | Willars et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170430 | Gorokhov | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176097 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040179627 | Ketchum et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040185909 | Alexiou et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040190636 | Oprea | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203347 | Nguyen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203987 | Butala | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209579 | Vaidyanathan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252632 | Bourdoux et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050003865 | Lastinger et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020237 | Alexiou et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024231 | Fincher et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050031047 | Maltsev et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050041750 | Lau | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050041751 | Nir et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042988 | Hoek | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043031 | Cho et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047515 | Walton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050058217 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075110 | Posti et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085267 | Lemson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096058 | Warner et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101259 | Tong et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101352 | Logothetis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111406 | Pasanen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111599 | Walton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148368 | Scheinert et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157683 | Ylitalo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169396 | Baier et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174977 | Pedlar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050186991 | Bateman | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050232135 | Mukai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239406 | Shattil | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259627 | Song et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265273 | Karabinis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271009 | Shirakabe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050287962 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060023803 | Perlman et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060032979 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060046658 | Cruz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050804 | Leclair | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056855 | Nakagawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060062180 | Sayeedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098568 | Oh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098754 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146755 | Pan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159160 | Kim et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159187 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165120 | Karabinis | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198461 | Hayase | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199584 | Bergstrom et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203708 | Sampath et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209979 | Sandell et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060270359 | Karmi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281421 | Pan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287743 | Sampath et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292990 | Karabinis et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004337 | Biswas et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070015526 | Hansen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070025464 | Perlman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054633 | Piirainen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070058590 | Wang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064823 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066331 | Zheng et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070082674 | Pedersen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086400 | Shida et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093273 | Cai | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093274 | Jafarkhani et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099665 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070132653 | Weller et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135125 | Kim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183362 | Mondal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070206504 | Koo et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211747 | Kim | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220151 | Li et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070242782 | Han et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243871 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070249380 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253508 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070254602 | Li et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258531 | Chen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070263736 | Yuda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070280116 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286298 | Choi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080013644 | Hugl et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051150 | Tsutsui | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080080631 | Forenza et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080080635 | Hugl et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080089396 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102881 | Han et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107135 | Ibrahim | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080117961 | Han et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118004 | Forenza et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080125051 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080130790 | Forenza et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080132281 | Kim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165866 | Teo | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181285 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080192683 | Han et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080192697 | Shaheen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205538 | Han et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214185 | Cho et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227422 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232394 | Kozek et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080233902 | Pan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080239938 | Jalloul et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080260054 | Myung et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261587 | Lennartson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080268833 | Huang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292011 | Yang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317014 | Veselinovic et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090010204 | Pratt, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090023467 | Huang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090034636 | Kotecha et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041148 | Li et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041151 | Khan et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090046678 | Lee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090046800 | Xu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090060013 | Ashikhmin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090067402 | Forenza et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069054 | Zangi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075686 | Gomadam et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086648 | Xu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086855 | Jin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135944 | Dyer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090168914 | Chance et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195355 | Mitchell | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090202016 | Seong et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090207822 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209206 | Zou et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227249 | Ylitalo | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227292 | Laroia et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090232245 | Lakkis | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254790 | Pi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262695 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090268675 | Choi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285156 | Huang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090290517 | Rao et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090290632 | Wegener | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090296650 | Venturino et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090316807 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318183 | Hugl et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100008331 | Li et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100034151 | Alexiou et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100068999 | Bangs et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100098030 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100099428 | Bhushan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100119001 | Walton et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100150013 | Hara et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100157861 | Na et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100164802 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172309 | Forenza et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100183099 | Toda et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100189191 | Taoka et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195527 | Gorokhov et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203887 | Kim | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220679 | Abraham et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227562 | Shim et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232336 | Choudhury et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234071 | Shabtay et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238824 | Farajidana et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238984 | Sayana et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260060 | Abraham et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260103 | Guey et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260115 | Frederiksen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265842 | Khandekar et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279625 | Ko et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100290369 | Hui et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100290382 | Hui et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100296591 | Xu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100315966 | Weigand | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316154 | Park et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316163 | Forenza et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322176 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100323611 | Choudhury | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110002371 | Forenza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110002410 | Forenza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110002411 | Forenza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110003606 | Forenza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110003607 | Forenza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110003608 | Forenza et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110007856 | Jang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110019715 | Brisebois | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110038436 | Kim et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110044193 | Forenza et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110051832 | Mergen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069638 | Ishizu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077038 | Montojo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110085610 | Zhuang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110086611 | Klein et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090840 | Lee et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090885 | Safavi | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110105174 | Pelletier et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111781 | Chen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135308 | Tarlazzi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142020 | Kang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142104 | Coldrey et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110149765 | Gorokhov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110164597 | Amini et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110164697 | Liao et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110194504 | Gorokhov et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195670 | Dakshinamurthy et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110199946 | Breit et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205963 | Tang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110207416 | Doi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110211485 | Xu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110216662 | Nie et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110261769 | Ji et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110274053 | Baik et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110294527 | Brueck et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110305195 | Forck et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110306381 | Jia et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310987 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310994 | Ko et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120002743 | Cavalcante et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120014415 | Su et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120014477 | Ko et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120021707 | Forrester et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120039419 | Maddah-Ali et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120046039 | Hagerman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120051257 | Kim et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054172 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076023 | Ko et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076028 | Ko et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076042 | Chun et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076236 | Ko et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120082038 | Xu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120087261 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120087430 | Forenza et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120093078 | Perlman et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120106388 | Shimezawa et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108278 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120114021 | Chung et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120163427 | Kim | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120176982 | Zirwas et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120188988 | Chung et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218968 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120224528 | Tapia et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120230691 | Hui et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236741 | Xu et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236840 | Kim et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120252470 | Wong et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258657 | Scheinert | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120275530 | Olesen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120281555 | Gao et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120281622 | Saban et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120288022 | Guey et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289284 | Kuningas | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120300717 | Cepeda et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314570 | Forenza et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314649 | Forenza et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120328301 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130010840 | Maddah-Ali et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130028109 | Joengren et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130033998 | Seo et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130038766 | Perlman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130039168 | Forenza et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130039332 | Nazar et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130039349 | Ebrahimi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130039387 | Qu | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130058307 | Kim et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130077514 | Dinan | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130077569 | Nam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130083681 | Ebrahimi et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089009 | Li et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089159 | Liu | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130094548 | Park | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130114437 | Yoo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130114763 | Park | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115986 | Mueck et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128821 | Hooli et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130142290 | Farmanbar et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130170360 | Xu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130188567 | Wang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130195047 | Koivisto et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130195086 | Xu et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130195467 | Schmid et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208604 | Lee et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208671 | Royz et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242890 | He et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242956 | Hall | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130272170 | Chatterjee et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130272250 | Shimezawa et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130273950 | Sun et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130286958 | Liang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130286997 | Davydov et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130315189 | Kim et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130315195 | Ko et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130315211 | Balan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130322308 | Yu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329592 | Beale | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140029490 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140038619 | Moulsley | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140064206 | Bao et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140086296 | Badic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140087680 | Luukkala et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094169 | Takano | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140112216 | Seo et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140113677 | Parkvall et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140225 | Wala | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140146756 | Sahin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153427 | Seo et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140185700 | Dong et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140198744 | Wang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140206280 | Nilsson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140219142 | Schulz et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140219152 | Anto et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140219202 | Kim et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140219267 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140225788 | Schulz et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140226570 | Comeau et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140241209 | Pollakowski et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140241218 | Moshfeghi | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140241240 | Kloper et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245095 | Nammi et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140295758 | Pedersen | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140301345 | Kim et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140307630 | Nagata et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140340255 | Meerkerk et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140340260 | Richards | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140341143 | Yang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348077 | Chen et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348090 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348131 | Duan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150003311 | Feuersaenger et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150011197 | Tarraf et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150016317 | Park et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150092416 | Potucek et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150098410 | Jongren et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150117392 | Hammarwall et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150118369 | Hyde et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150131751 | Bayesteh et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150270882 | Shattil | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150271003 | Kuchi et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150296533 | Park | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150304855 | Perlman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305010 | Guan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160013855 | Campos et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160061027 | Gao et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160094318 | Shattil | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160157146 | Karabinis | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160248559 | Guo et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160302028 | Ling et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160353290 | Nammi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160374070 | Ghosh | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20190385057 | Litichever et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2018200832 | Feb 2018 | AU |
| 1307842 | Sep 1992 | CA |
| 2011298 | May 1999 | CA |
| 2856772 | Jan 2006 | CA |
| 1256803 | Jun 2000 | CN |
| 1516370 | Jul 2004 | CN |
| 1538636 | Oct 2004 | CN |
| 1703113 | Nov 2005 | CN |
| 1734972 | Feb 2006 | CN |
| 1820424 | Aug 2006 | CN |
| 1898973 | Jan 2007 | CN |
| 101238648 | Aug 2008 | CN |
| 101291503 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101310454 | Nov 2008 | CN |
| 101405965 | Apr 2009 | CN |
| 101442388 | May 2009 | CN |
| 101536320 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 101542938 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 101682432 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 101873281 | Oct 2010 | CN |
| 101981826 | Feb 2011 | CN |
| 102007707 | Apr 2011 | CN |
| 102185641 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 102186541 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 102439891 | May 2012 | CN |
| 102948085 | Feb 2013 | CN |
| 103069903 | Apr 2013 | CN |
| 103117975 | May 2013 | CN |
| 103797725 | May 2014 | CN |
| 104025684 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 1359683 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1392029 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1597842 | Nov 2005 | EP |
| 2244390 | Oct 2010 | EP |
| 2889957 | Jul 2015 | EP |
| 2904814 | Aug 2015 | EP |
| 3419188 | Dec 2018 | EP |
| 2300547 | Nov 1996 | GB |
| 11-252613 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| 2001-217759 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2002-281551 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-374224 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2003-018054 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003-134013 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003-179948 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2003-284128 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2004-502376 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004-104206 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2005-039822 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 2005-159448 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2006-081162 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2006-245871 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2007-060106 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| 2007-116686 | May 2007 | JP |
| 2008-035287 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2009-213052 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 2009-273167 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2009-540692 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2010-016674 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 2010-021999 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 2010-068496 | Mar 2010 | JP |
| 2010-074520 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| 2010-193189 | Sep 2010 | JP |
| 2010-206794 | Sep 2010 | JP |
| 2010-537577 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2011-035912 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2011-078025 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 2011-097225 | May 2011 | JP |
| 2011-517393 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 2011-524117 | Aug 2011 | JP |
| 2011-176493 | Sep 2011 | JP |
| 2012-124859 | Jun 2012 | JP |
| 2012-175189 | Sep 2012 | JP |
| 2012-521180 | Sep 2012 | JP |
| 2012-532495 | Dec 2012 | JP |
| 2013-502117 | Jan 2013 | JP |
| 2013-507064 | Feb 2013 | JP |
| 2013-102450 | May 2013 | JP |
| 10-2008-0081698 | Sep 2008 | KR |
| 10-2009-0132625 | Dec 2009 | KR |
| 10-2010-0057071 | May 2010 | KR |
| 10-2012-0003781 | Jan 2012 | KR |
| 10-2012-0024836 | Mar 2012 | KR |
| 10-2012-0084243 | Jul 2012 | KR |
| 10-2012-0119175 | Oct 2012 | KR |
| 10-2018-0061394 | Jun 2018 | KR |
| 2330381 | Jul 2008 | RU |
| 2010110620 | Sep 2011 | RU |
| 2012121952 | Feb 2014 | RU |
| 2543092 | Feb 2015 | RU |
| 201031243 | Aug 2010 | TW |
| 201112665 | Apr 2011 | TW |
| 201212570 | Mar 2012 | TW |
| 201220741 | May 2012 | TW |
| 9923767 | May 1999 | WO |
| 0054463 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| 0201732 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 0208785 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 0254626 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| 0293784 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| 0299995 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 0303604 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 0384092 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 0394460 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2003107582 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| 2004017586 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| 2004073210 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2005046081 | May 2005 | WO |
| 2005064871 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| 2006049417 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006063138 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006078019 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006110737 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2006113872 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2007024913 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007027825 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007046621 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| 2007114654 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2008119216 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2009026400 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009099752 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2009125962 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009151989 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2010017482 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010019524 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010067419 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| 2011018121 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011099802 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2011100492 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2011116824 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011155763 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2012001086 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012007837 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012044969 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012058600 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012061325 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012108807 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012108976 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012130071 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| 2013040089 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2013166464 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013173809 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014055294 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2016057304 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/436,864, dated Jun. 11, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/578,265, dated Mar. 31, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,627, dated Sep. 25, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,938, dated Apr. 4, 2013, 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,938, dated May 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 89 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Oct. 4, 2017, 17 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Sep. 13, 2016, 43 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Sep. 25, 2018, 96 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Jun. 27, 2017, 121 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,257, dated May 31, 2013, 12 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Oct. 26, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,682, dated Oct. 2, 2014, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Aug. 14, 2015, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Aug. 25, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Feb. 23, 2016, 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Nov. 30, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Sep. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 23 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Jan. 9, 2015, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,598, dated Feb. 14, 2017, 41 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,702, dated Aug. 15, 2014, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,702, dated Jan. 6, 2015, 27 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,971, dated Jan. 29, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,971, dated May 4, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,971, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 144 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,302, dated Apr. 27, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,302, dated Feb. 5, 2016, 27 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,302, dated Oct. 9, 2015, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated Feb. 28, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated May 18, 2018, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,254, dated Feb. 26, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,254, dated Jul. 8, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,254, dated Mar. 12, 2015, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,254, dated Nov. 3, 2015, 29 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,276, dated Oct. 11, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,276, dated Nov. 27, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/616,817, dated Jun. 26, 2018, 131 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/616,817, dated Oct. 22, 2018, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/616,817, dated Apr. 25, 2018, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/253,028, dated Feb. 25, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/253,028, dated Mar. 12, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowancefrom U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Sep. 19, 2018, 22 pages. |
| Notice of Final Rejection, KR App. No. 10-2020-7002077, dated Oct. 15, 2020, 8 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Original Document). |
| Notice of Grant, CN App. No. 201210464974.6, dated Jul. 1, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal, JP App. No. 2019-074024, dated Aug. 3, 2020, 10 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Original Document). |
| Jose et al. “Pilot Contamination and Precoding in Multi-cell TDD Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2011, vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 2640-2651. |
| Jose J., “Channel Estimation and Linear Precoding in Multiuser Multiple-Antenna TDD Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2011, vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 2102-2116. |
| Jungnickel et al., “Capacity of MIMO systems with closely spaced antennas”, IEEE Comm. Lett., vol. 7, Aug. 2003, pp. 361-363. |
| Kamata et al., “Effects of IQ Imbalance and an Effective Compensation Scheme in the MIMO-OFDM Communication System,” Proceedings of the 2005 Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication General Conference, Mar. 7, 2005, B-5-90, 5 pages. |
| Kang et al., “Water-Filling Capacity and Beamforming Performance of MIMO Systems With Covariance Feedback,” IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, Jun. 2003, pp. 556-560. |
| Kannan et al., “Separation of cochannel signals under imperfect timing and carrier synchronization”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 50, No. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 79-96. |
| Karakayali et al. “Network Coordination for Spectrally Efficient Communications in Cellular Systems,” IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 2006, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 56-61. |
| Karakayali et al., “On the Maximum Common Rate Achievable in a Coordinated Network,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (ICC'06), Mar. 3, 2006, vol. 9, pp. 1-6. |
| Kayama et al., “Demodulation Reference Signal Design and Channel Estimation for LTE-Advanced Uplink,” Advances in Vehicular Networking Technologies, 2011, pp. 418-432. |
| Kellerman F. C., “LDPC OFDM Space-Time Multipath Fading Channel Results,” Proceedings SPIE , Digital Wireless Communications, XP-002672064, 2003, vol. 5100, pp. 19-30. |
| Kent, Adrian, et al., “Quantum Tagging: Authenticating Location via Quantum Information and Relativistic Signaling Constraints”. 2010, 9 pages. Phys. Rev. A84, 012326 (2011), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84 012326, arXiv:1008.2147. |
| Kermoal et al., “A Stochastic MIMO Radio Channel Model With Experimental Validation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas In Communications, 2002, vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 1211-1226. |
| Khaled N., et al., “Interpolation Based Multi-Mode Precoding for MIMO-OFDM Systems with Limited Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 6 (3), Mar. 2007, pp. 1003-1013. |
| Knievel C, “Low Complexity Receiver for Large-MIMO Space Time Coded Systems”, in Proc. IEEE VTC-Fall'2011, Sep. 2011, 5 pages. |
| Knievel C., et al., “On Particle Swarm Optimization for MIMO Channel Estimation”, Article ID 614384, Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2012, vol. 2012, 10 pages. |
| Kouassi B. et al., “Reciprocity-Based Cognitive Transmissions using a MU Massive MIMO Approach”, 2013, pp. 1331-1335. |
| Kountouris M., et al., “HetNets and Massive MIMO: Modeling, Potential Gains, and Performance Analysis,” in Proc. IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications, Sep. 2013, 5 pages. |
| Krim et al., “Two Decades of Array Signal Processing Research,” IEEE Signal Proceedings Magazine, 1996, pp. 67-94. |
| Krishnan et al., “Cellular Systems with Many Antennas: Large System Analysis under Pilot Contamination,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, 2012, pp. 1220-1224. |
| Kumagawa et al., “A Study of Introducing Distributed Transmit Power Control to Distributed Antenna System,” 2011, 30 pages. |
| Kumar et al. “Asymptotic Performance of Linear Receivers in MIMO Fading Channels”, IEEE Information Theory Workshop, Feb. 19, 2009, 48 pages. |
| Lang et al., “Design and development of a 5.25 GHz software defined wireless OFDM communication platform”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, No. 6, Jun. 2004, pp. 6-12. |
| Lee et al., “Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception in LTE-Advanced: Deployment Scenarios and Operational Challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Feb. 2012, pp. 148-155. |
| Lee et al., “Frequency-offset estimation for MIMO and OFDM systems using orthogonal training sequences”, IEEE Trans Veh. Technol., vol. 56, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 146-156. |
| Lee et al., “MIMO Technologies in 3GPP LTE and LTE-Advanced,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2009, 10 pages. |
| Lee et al., “Network Massive MIMO for Cell-Boundary Users: From a Precoding Normalization Perspective”, IEEE Goblecom Workshops, 2012. |
| Lee J., “Introduction of LTE-Advanced DL/UL MIMO,” Samsung Electronics, Sep. 2009, 18 pages. |
| Lee J., et al., “A Compressed Analog Feedback Strategy for Spatially Correlated Massive MIMO Systems,” in Proceedings IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), Quebec, Canada, Sep. 2012, pp. 1-6. |
| Letter Restarting Period for Response from U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, mailed Apr. 15, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Li et al., “MIMO techniques in WiMAX and LTE: a feature overview”, IEEE Communications Magazine, May 2010, pp. 86-92. |
| Li P., et al., Multiple Output Selection-LAS Algorithm in Large MIMO Systems, IEEE Commun., 2010, vol. 14 (5), pp. 399-401. |
| Liang et al., “Asymptotic Performance of MMSE Receivers for Large Systems Using Random Matrix Theory,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2007, vol. 53, No. 11, pp. 4173-4190. |
| Liang et al., “Block-iterative Generalized Decision Feedback Equalizers (BI-GDFE) for Large MIMO Systems: Algorithm Design and Asymptotic Performance Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2006, vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 2035-2048. |
| Liang Y., et al., “Interference Suppression in Wireless Cellular Networks through Picocells,” Annual Conference on Social Studies Communication and Education, 2007, vol. 2007, pp. 1041-1045. |
| Liang Y., et al., “On the Relationship Between MMSE-SIC and Bi-GDFE Receivers for Large Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, vol. 56 (8), pp. 3627-3637. |
| Lindstrom M., (Ericsson), “LTE-Advanced Radio Layer 2 and RRC Aspects,” 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2, Dec. 17-18, 2009, 38 pages. |
| Liu G., “Time and frequency offset estimation for distributed multiple-input multiple-output orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system,” Institute of Engineering and Technology Communications, 2010, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 708-715. |
| Love D J., et al.,“Grassmannian Beamforming for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Wireless Systems”, IEEE Trans, on Info. Theory special issue on MIMO Communication, 2003, vol. 49, pp. 2735-2747. |
| Love et al., “An Overview of Limited Feedback in Wireless Communication Systems,” Special Issue on Exploiting Limited Feedback in Tomorrow's Wireless Communication Networks, IEEE Journal on Sel. Areas in Comm., 2008, vol. 26, No. 8, pp. 1341-1365. |
| Love et al., “Like deck chairs on the Titanic: why spectrum reallocation won't avert the coming data crunch but technology might keep the wireless industry afloat”, Feb. 2012, pp. 705-719. |
| Lozano A., et al., “Fundamental Limits of Cooperation”, Mar. 2012, 27 pages. |
| Luise et al., “Carrier frequency acquisition and tracking for OFDM systems”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 44, No. 11, Nov. 1996, pp. 1590-1598. |
| Luise et al., “Low-complexity blind carrier frequency recovery for OFDM signals over frequency-selective radio channels,” IEEE Transactions. Communications, 2002, vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 1182-1188. |
| M. Baker, “LTE-Advanced physical layer”, Alcatel-Lucent, Dec. 2009, 48 pages. |
| M. Costa, “Writing on dirty paper,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 29, No. 3, May 1983, pp. 439-441. |
| Marek S., “AT&T's Rinne talks about carrier aggregation trials, small cells and more”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http:www.fiercebroadbandwireless.comstoryatts-rinne-talks-about-carrieraggregation-trials-small-cells-and-more2012-11-08, 3 pages. |
| Martinez A. O., et al. “Very Large Aperture Massive MIMO: a Measurement Based Study”, Dec. 8, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Martinez et al., “Energy Detection Using Very Large Antenna Array Receivers,” 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers Proceedings, Nov. 2-5, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Marzetta et al., “Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2010, vol. 9(11), pp. 3590-3600. |
| Masouros et al., “Large-Scale MIMO Transmitters in Fixed Physical Spaces: The Effect of Transmit Correlation and Mutual Coupling”, IEEE Trans Commun., 2013, vol. 61, No. 7, pp. 2794-2804. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated Mar. 4, 2016, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated May 25, 2017, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,254, dated Sep. 11, 2014, 44 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 141 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Apr. 4, 2019, 35 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Feb. 26, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Mar. 25, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,014, dated Feb. 22, 2021, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,014, dated Jun. 8, 2020, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,383, dated Jun. 25, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,383, dated May 22, 2017, 48 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Aug. 8, 2019, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Mar. 25, 2020, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,076, dated Jan. 28, 2019, 20 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,076, dated May 27, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Apr. 18, 2019, 147 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Apr. 29, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Jan. 13, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/188,841, dated Jan. 22, 2020, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/208,895, dated Apr. 26, 2019, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/208,895, dated Jan. 3, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/208,895, dated Jul. 28, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/253,028, dated Oct. 18, 2019, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/578,265, dated May 12, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,169, dated Feb. 4, 2021, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Jun. 23, 2014, 24 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Aug. 1, 2013, 35 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Aug. 14, 2013, 26 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated May 7, 2015, 25 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Apr. 12, 2013, 45 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Jun. 26, 2015, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Mar. 24, 2014, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Nov. 25, 2014, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Nov. 26, 2013, 27 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Apr. 11, 2013, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Jun. 24, 2015, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Apr. 16, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Apr. 28, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Jul. 11, 2018, 29 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Jun. 4, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Sep. 12, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Sep. 24, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,682, dated Feb. 25, 2014, 37 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Feb. 14, 2014, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,598, dated Mar. 23, 2015, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,702, dated Dec. 17, 2013, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Jan. 8, 2015, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,302, dated Jul. 17, 2014, 37 pages. |
| European Search Report, EP App. No. 19159810.1, dated Sep. 25, 2019, 8 pages. |
| Examination Report from counterpart AU Patent App. No. AU2014200745, dated Sep. 25, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1, AU App. No. 2012308632, dated Oct. 11, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Examination report No. 1, AU App. No. 2015214278, dated Jun. 5, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Examination report No. 1, AU App. No. 2015248161, dated Jul. 2, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1, AU App. No. 2019203120, dated Jul. 3, 2020, 4 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1, AU App. No. 2020200070, dated Sep. 8, 2020, 4 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 2, AU App. No. 2012308632, dated Jun. 6, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 2, NZ App. No. 761315, dated Aug. 5, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 3, AU App. No. 2019200838, dated Aug. 4, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Examination report No. 4, AU App. No. 2013347803, dated Jan. 25, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Examination Report, AU App. No. 2016219662, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Examination report, AU App. No. 2018241100, dated Sep. 27, 2019, 2 pages. |
| Examination report, Indian Patent App. No. 3496/CHENP/2013, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Examination Report, NZ App. No. 622137, dated Dec. 21, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Examiner Report, CA App. No. 2885817, dated Jul. 17, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Examiner's Report from counterpart AU Patent App. No. 2013256044, dated May 9, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Examiner's Report, CA App. No. 2539333, dated Dec. 4, 2012, 15 pages. |
| Examiner's Report, CA App. No. 28656772, dated Jan. 7, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Examiner's Report, CA App. No. CA2695799, dated Apr. 1, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Examiner's Report, CA App. No. 2892555, dated Sep. 15, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, EP App. No. 08798313.6, dated Nov. 14, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, EP App. No. 10156950.7, dated Nov. 6, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, EP App. No. 10184659.0, dated Nov. 29, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, EP App. No. 11838640.8, dated May 31, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, EP App. No. 18186156.8, dated Nov. 26, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Extended Search Report, EP App. No. 13843203.4, dated Feb. 15, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Extended Search Report, EP App. No. 13856705.2, dated Mar. 2, 2016, 10 pages. |
| Extended Search Report, EP App. No. 14770916.6, dated Jan. 24, 2017, 12 pages. |
| Extended Search Report, EP App. No. 14779084.4, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Extended Search Report, EP App. No. 15746217.7, dated Jan. 22, 2018, 18 pages. |
| Extended Search Report, EP App. No. 15780522.7, dated Feb. 6, 2018, 13 pages. |
| Extended Search Report, EP App. No. EP13784690.3, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Fakhereddin et al., “Combined effect of polarization diversity and mutual coupling on MIMO capacity,” Proc. IEEE Antennas and Prop. Symp, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 495-498. |
| FCC, “Open commission meeting”, Available Online at <http:reboot.fcc.govopen-meetings2010september>, Sep. 23, 2010, 3 pages. |
| FCC, Broadband action agenda, National Broadband Plan, Available Online at <http://www.broadband.gov/plan/national-broadband-plan-action-agenda.pdf>, 2010, pp. 1-8. |
| Federal Communications Commission, “Authorization of Spread Spectrum Systems under Parts 15 and 90 of the FCC Rules and Regulations”, Jun. 1985, 18 pages. |
| Federal Communications Commission, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,” OET Bulletin 65, Ed. 97-01, Aug. 1997, 84 pages. |
| Fella Adlane, “Adaptive WiMAX Antennas: The promise of higher ROI,” Available Online at <http:www.wimax.comcommentaryspotlightspotlight8-08-2005searchterm=Adlane Fella>, Printed on May 9, 2008, pp. 1-3. |
| Feng et al., “Self-organizing networks (SON) in 3GPP LTE”, Nom or Research, May 2008, pp. 1-15. |
| Final Office Action with partial English translation, JP Patent App. No. 2005223345, dated Feb. 18, 2014, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action, JP App. No. 2005-223345, dated May 12, 2011, 12 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,731, dated Jul. 9, 2008, 21 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,731, dated Sep. 11, 2009, 36 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,627, dated Apr. 2, 2013, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,627, dated Oct. 20, 2011, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Apr. 15, 2015, 24 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Apr. 29, 2016, 33 pages. |
| Visotsky E., et al., “Space-Time Transmit Precoding with Imperfect Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2001, vol. 47, pp. 2632-2639. |
| Visuri et al “Colocated Antenna Arrays: Design Desiderata for Wireless Communications,” 2002, vol. 2002, pp. 580-584. |
| Viswanath et al., “Opportunistic beamforming using dump antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2002, vol. 48, pp. 1277-1294. |
| Viswanath, “Sum Capacity of the Vector Gaussian Broadcast Channel and Uplink-Downlink Duality,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2003, vol. 49, No. 8, pp. 1912-1921. |
| Wagner et al., “Large System Analysis of Linear Precoding in MISO Broadcast Channels with Limited Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012, vol. 58, No. 7, pp. 4509-4537. |
| Waldschmidt et al., “Compact MIMO-arrays based on polarisation-diversity”, Proc. IEEE Antennas and Prop. Symp., 2003, vol. 2, pp. 499-502. |
| Waldschmidt et al., “Complete RF system model for analysis of compact MIMO arrays,” IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technologies, 2004, vol. 53, pp. 579-586. |
| Wallace et al., “Statistical Characteristics of Measured MIMO Wireless Channel Data and Comparison to Conventional Models,” Proceedings IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Oct. 2001, vol. 2 (7-11), pp. 1078-1082. |
| Wallace et al., “Termination-dependent diversity performance of coupled antennas: Network theory analysis,”, IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat., vol. 52, Jan. 2004, pp. 98-105. |
| Wang Z., “Performance of Uplink Multiuser Massive MIMO system,” International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, Florence, Italy, Nov. 6, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Wang Z., et al., “Enhanced downlink MU-Comp schemes for TD-LTE-Advanced,” Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), IEEE, 2010, 6 pages. |
| Wannstrom J., “Carrier Aggregation Explained,” 3GPP, Available Online at <http://www.3gpp.org/Carrier-Aggregation-explained>, Jun. 2013, 6 pages. |
| Warrington et al. “Measurement and Modeling of HF Channel Directional Spread Characteristics For Northerly Paths”, Radio Science, vol. 41, RS2006, DOI:10.1029/2005RS003294, 2006, pp. 1-13. |
| Webpass, Buildings online, Available Online at <http://www.webpass.net/buildings?city=san+francisco&column=address&order=asc>, Retrieved on Sep. 4, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Weedon W.H., et al., “MEMS-switched reconfigurable antennas”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, AP-S International Symposium (Digest), vol. 3, 2001, pp. 654-657. |
| Wen et al.,“On the Sum-Rate of Multiuser MIMO Uplink Channels with Jointly-Correlated Rician fading”, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2011, vol. 59, No. 10, pp. 2883-2895. |
| Wenck et al., “Asymptotic Mutual Information for Rician MIMO-MA Channels with Arbitrary Inputs: A Replica Analysis”, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2010, vol. 58, No. 10, pp. 2782-2788. |
| Wennestrom et al., “An Antenna Solution for MIMO Channels: The Switched Parasitic Antenna,” IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC, vol. 1, 2001, pp. 159-163. |
| Wheeler et al., “Small antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1975, vol. AP-23, No. 4, pp. 462-469. |
| Wi-Fi alliance, Homepage, Available Online at <www.wi-fi.org>, Retrieved on Aug. 14, 2014, pp. 1-3. |
| Wikipedia, “Advanced Mobile Phone System”, Available Online at <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdvancedMobilePhoneSystem>, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Wikipedia, “IS-95” Available Online at <http:en.wikipedia.orgwikilS-95>, 2014, 6 pages. |
| WiMAX forum, Available Online at <http://www.wimaxforum.org/>, Aug. 14, 2014, 1 page. |
| Wired, Has OnLive's Steve Perlman Discovered Holy Grail of Wireless?, Jun. 30, 2011 Retrieved from the Internet: http:www.wired.comepicenter201106perlman-holy-grail-wireless. |
| Wireless Broadband Access Demonstrator, in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), Oct. 2012. |
| Wong et al., “A joint-channel diagonalization for multiuser MIMO antenna systems”, IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm., vol. 2, Jul. 2003, pp. 773-786. |
| Wong et al., “Exploiting Spatia-Temporal Correlations in MIMO Wireless Channel Prediction,” Dec. 2006, IEEE GLOBECOM Conference, 5 pages. |
| Wong et al., “Joint Channel Estimation and Prediction for OFDM Systems,” Proceedings in IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2005, pp. 2255-2259. |
| Wong et al., “Long Range Channel Prediction for Adaptive OFDM Systems,” Proceedings IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems, and Computers, vol. 1, Nov. 7-10, 2004, pp. 723-736. |
| Wong et al., “Performance Enhancement of Multiuser MIMO Wireless Communication Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 1960-1970. |
| Written Opinion, BR App. No. 112014027631-5, dated Jun. 18, 2020, 4 pages of Original document only. |
| Written Opinion, BR App. No. 112015022911-5, dated Jul. 22, 2020, 4 pages of Original Document Only. |
| Written Opinion, BR App. No. 112015023223-0, dated Jul. 22, 2020, 5 pages of Original Document Only. |
| Wu et al., “Approximate Matrix Inversion for High-Throughput Data Detection in the Large-scale MIMO Uplink,” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), May 2013, pp. 2155-2158. |
| Xiao et al., “A Comparative Study of MIMO Capacity with Different Antenna Topologies,” IEEE ICCS'02, vol. 1, Nov. 2002, pp. 431-435. |
| Xu J., “LTE-Advanced Signal Generation and Measurements using SystemVue,” Agilent Technologies, Dec. 23, 2010, 46 pages. |
| Yang et al., “On the Capacity of Large-MIMO Block-Fading Channels,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, No. 2, Feb. 2012, pp. 117-132. |
| Yin et al., “A Coordinated Approach to Channel Estimation in Large-scale Multiple-antenna Systems”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, No. 2, Mar. 2012, pp. 264-273. |
| Yin et al., “Full-Duplex in Large-Scale Wireless System,” Proceeding of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Nov. 2013, 5 pages. |
| Yin et al., “Implementation trade-offs for linear detection in large-scale MIMO systems,” Proceeding Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers International Conference on Acoustics Speech, and Signal Processing, May 2013, 5 pages. |
| Yoo et al., “Multi-Antenna Downlink Channels with Limited Feedback and User Selection,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Sep. 2007, vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 1478-1491. |
| Yu et al., “Sum Capacity of Gaussian Vector Broadcast Channels”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 1875-1892. |
| Yu et al., “Trellis Precoding for the Broadcast Channel,” IEEE GLOBECOM, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 1344-1348. |
| Zaidel et al., “Vector Precoding for Gaussian MIMO Broadcast Channels: Impact of Replica Symmetry Breaking”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, Mar. 2012, vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 1413-1440. |
| Zakhour et al., “Min-Max Fair Coordinated Beamforming via Large Systems Analysis,”, in Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, St. Petersburg, Jul. 2011, pp. 1990-1994. |
| Zamir et al., “Capacity and lattice-strategies for cancelling known interference,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Information Theory, Honolulu, Hawaii, Nov. 2000, pp. 1-32. |
| Zetterberg, Per, “Experimental Investigation of TDD Reciprocity based Zero-Forcing Transmit Precoding”, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2011, Article ID 137541, Jun. 2010, 11 pages. |
| Zhang et al. “On Capacity of Large-Scale MIMO Multiple Access Channels with Distributed Sets of Correlated Antennas,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Sep. 26, 2012, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 1-52. |
| Zhang et al., “Cochannel Interference Mitigation and Cooperative Processing in Downlink Multicell Multiuser MIMO Networks,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2004, No. 2, Jul. 2004, pp. 222-235. |
| Zhang et al., “Coordinated Multi-Cell MIMO Systems With Cellular Block Diagonalization”, IEEE 2007, pp. 1669-1673. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal, JP App. No. 2019-109413, dated Sep. 10, 2020, 8 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection, JP App. No. 2016-234908, dated May 23, 2019, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection, JP App. No. 2016-234908, dated Nov. 22, 2018, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection, JP Patent App. No. 20150510498, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection, JP Patent App. No. 2016-501744, dated Mar. 5, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection, KR App. No. 10-2014-7009876, dated Mar. 25, 2019, 11 pages. |
| Notice to File a Response, KR App. No. 10-2018-7035654, dated Dec. 14, 2018, 10 pages. |
| Notification for Granting Patent Right, Chinese Patent App. No. 201180061132.X, dated Apr. 6, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Notification of Reason for Refusal, KR App. No. 10-2019-7014768, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document). |
| Notification of Reason for Refusal, KR. App. No. 10-2016-7031260, dated Dec. 4, 2020, 12 pages (7 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document). |
| Notification of Reasons for Refusal, JP Patent App. No. 2017-112639, dated Aug. 13, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Notification of the 1st Substantive requirement, MX App. No. MX/A/2017/002906, dated Sep. 13, 2019, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Notification of the 2nd Substantive requirement, MX App. No. MX/A/2017/002906, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document). |
| Notification on Grant of Patent Right for Invention, CN App. No. 201210466082.X, dated Jan. 26, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Oberli et al., “Maximum likelihood tracking algorithms for MIMOOFDM, in Communications,” IEEE International Conference on Networking, Jun. 20-24, 2004, vol. 4, pp. 2468-2472. |
| Oday, “Measured Path Loss and Multipath Propagation Characteristics in UHF and Microwave Frequency Bands for Urban Mobile Communications,” IEEE, 2001, pp. 337-341. |
| Office Action and Examination Search Report, CA App. No. 2885817, dated Jul. 16, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Office Action and Examination Search Report, CA App. No. 2904981, dated May 3, 2019, 6 pages. |
| Office Action and Search Report, Chinese Patent App. No. CN201380035543, dated Jan. 3, 2017, 22 pages. |
| Office Action and Search Report, RU App. No. 2016144927/08(072072), dated Oct. 30, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Office Action and Search Report, RU Patent App. No. 2014148791/28(078479), dated Apr. 13, 2017, 14 pages. |
| Office Action and Search Report, RU Patent App. No. 2015143188/07, dated Dec. 15, 2017, 13 pages. |
| Office Action and Search Report, TW App. No. 103107541, dated Dec. 6, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Office Action and Search Report, TW App. No. 107123446, dated Aug. 8, 2019, 27 pages (10 pages of English Translation and 17 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action and Search Report, TW Patent App. No. 105143637, dated Jan. 19, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Office Action for EP App. No. 08798313.6, dated May 2, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Office Action for EP App. No. 10156950.7, dated May 9, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/642,259, dated May 14, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Office Action, Au App. No. 2004203336, dated Jun. 5, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Office Action, AU App. No. 2019202296, dated May 12, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, CA App. No. 2514383, dated Jul. 26, 2012, 3 pages. |
| Office Action, CA App. No. 2816556, dated May 19, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Office Action, CA App. No. 2816556, dated May 30, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Office Action, CA App. No. 3025857, dated Dec. 8, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, CN App. No. 200510088676.1, dated Feb. 5, 2010, 18 pages. |
| Office Action, CN App. No. 200510088676.1, dated Jan. 25, 2011, 8 pages. |
| Office Action, CN App. No. 200510088676.1, dated Mar. 20, 2009, 24 pages. |
| Office Action, CN App. No. 200510088676.1, dated Oct. 26, 2010, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, CN App. No. 200880102933.4, dated Dec. 7, 2012, 20 pages. |
| Office Action, CN App. No. 201380061515.6, dated Apr. 23, 2019, 2 pages. |
| Office Action, CN Patent App. No. 201180061132.X, dated May 27, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, CN Patent App. No. 201180061132.X, dated Oct. 10, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 05254757.7, dated Dec. 3, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 05254757.7, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 05254757.7, dated Nov. 11, 2019, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 05254757.7, dated Sep. 2, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 08798313.6, dated Oct. 24, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 10156950.7, dated Dec. 12, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 10156950.7, dated Jan. 7, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 10184659, dated Dec. 4, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Huh H., et al., Achieving “Massive MIMO” Spectral Efficiency with a Not-so-Large Number of Antennas. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Sep. 2012, vol. 11 (9), pp. 3226-3239. |
| IEEE 802.22, “IEEE 802.22 Working Group on Wireless Regional Area Networks”, Retrieved on Aug. 14, 2014, Available Online at <http:www.ieee802.org/22/>, 1 page. |
| IntelliCell: A Fully Adaptive Approach to Smart Antennas, ArrayComm, Incorporated, WP-ISA-031502-2.0, 2002, pp. 1-18. |
| Intention to Grant, EP App. No. 13790935.4, dated Jun. 24, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Intention to Grant, EP App. No. 14770916.6, dated Apr. 28, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2013/071749, dated Jun. 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025102, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025108, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025123, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2015/014511, dated Aug. 18, 2016, 5 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability from foreign counterpart PCT/US2013/061493, dated Apr. 16, 2015, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, App. No. PCT/US11/58663, dated May 7, 2013, 26 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, App. No. PCT/US2012/054937, dated Mar. 27, 2014, 13 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, App. No. PCT/US2013/039580, dated Nov. 4, 2014, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, App. No. PCT/US2013/041726, dated Nov. 18, 2014, 6 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT App. No. PCT/052009/06393, dated May 17, 2011, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT App. No. PCT/US06/41009, dated Apr. 23, 2008, 4 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT App. No. PCT/US2005/11033, dated Jun. 3, 2008, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT App. No. PCT/US2008/073780, dated Feb. 24, 2010, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT App. No. PCT/US2015/023436, dated Oct. 27, 2016, 6 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT App. No. PCT/US2017/047963, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT App. No. PCT/US2017/058291, dated May 9, 2019, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US15/14511, dated May 18, 2015, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and the Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2013/061493, dated Dec. 6, 2013, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US13/41726, dated Jul. 16, 2013, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2012/054937, dated Apr. 2, 2013, 17 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2013/039580, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written opinion, App. No. PCT/US2013/071749, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025102, dated Jul. 18, 2014, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025105, dated Jul. 14, 2014, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025108, dated Sep. 19, 2014, 10 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025123, dated Jul. 18, 2014, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2015/023436, dated Aug. 19, 2015, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2017/047963, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2017/058291, dated Mar. 8, 2018, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT App. No. PCT/US 06/41009, dated May 24, 2007, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written opinion, PCT App. No. PCT/US05/11033, dated May 2, 2008, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT App. No. PCT/US11/58663, dated Mar. 29, 2012, 27 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT App. No. PCT/US2008/07378, dated Nov. 19, 2008. |
| ITU, “ISM Band,” Available Online at <http7/www.itu.int/ITUR/terrestrial/faq/index.html#g013>, Aug. 14, 2014, pp. 1-8. |
| ITU, “ISM Band,” Available Online at <http://www.itu.int/ITUR/ terrestrial/faq/index.html#g013>, Aug. 14, 2014, pp. 1-8. |
| J. Duplicity, et al., “MU-MIMO in LTE systems”, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Mar. 2011, 10 pages. |
| J. G. Proakis, Communication System Engineering, Prentice Hall, 1994, 11 pages. |
| Jafar et al., “Channel Capacity and Beamforming for Multiple Transmit and Receive Antennas with Covariance Feedback,” Proc. IEEE Int. Cont. on Comm, Jun. 2001, vol. 7, pp. 2266-2270. |
| Jafar et al., “Transmitter Optimization and Optimality of Beamforming for Multiple Antenna Systems,” IEEE Trans Wireless Comm, Jul. 2004, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 1165-1175. |
| Jakes W. C., Microwave Mobile Communications, IEEE Press, 1974, Table of Contents, 4 pages. |
| Jindal N., et al., “Dirty Paper Coding vs. TDMA for MIMO Broadcast Channels”, IEEE Trans, on Information Theory, vol. 51, May 2005, pp. 1783-1794. |
| Jindal, N , “MIMO Broadcast Channels With Finite-Rate Feedback,” IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, vol. 52, pp. 5045-5060, Nov. 2006. |
| Jing J., et al. “A Downlink Max-SINR Precoding for Massive MIMO System,” International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, Jun. 2014, vol. 7 (3), pp. 107-116. |
| Jorswieck et al., “Channel Capacity and Capacity-Range of Beamforming in MIMO Wireless Systems under Correlated Fading with Covariance Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Sep. 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1543-1553. |
| Supplementary Partial European Search Report, EP App. No. 11838640.8, dated Mar. 2, 2017, 13 pages. |
| Supplementary Partial Search Report, EP App. No. EP14770916, dated Oct. 21, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Supplementary Search Report, EP App. No. 05733294, dated Apr. 5, 2012, 4 pages. |
| Suraweera et al., Multi-Pair Amplify-and-Forward Relaying with Very Large Antenna Arrays, Proceedings in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Budapest, Hungary, Jun. 2013, 7 pages. |
| Suthisopapan et al., “Near Capacity Approaching Capacity of Large MIMO Systems by Non-Binary LDPC Codes and MMSE Detection”, in Proc of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Mar. 2012, 7 pages. |
| Suzuki et al., Large-scale multiple antenna fixed wireless systems for rural areas, Proceedings in IEEE PIMRC, Sep. 2012, 6 pages. |
| Suzuki H., et al., Highly Spectrally Efficient Ngara Rural Wireless Broadband Access Demonstrator, Proceedings in IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), Oct. 2012, 6 pages. |
| Svac et al., Soft-Heuristic Detectors for Large MIMO Systems, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 2013, vol. 61, No. 18, pp. 4573-4586. |
| Svantesson T., et al., “Analysis of Electromagnetic Field Polarizations in Multiantenna Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 3 (2), Mar. 2004, pp. 641-646. |
| Svantesson T., et al., “On Capacity and Correlation of Multi-Antenna Systems Employing Multiple Polarizations,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, 2002, vol. 3, pp. 202-205. |
| Syntonies, “FORAX RF-over-fiber Communications Systems”, , Avaialble Online at <http://www.syntonicscorp.com/products/products-foraxRF.html>, Retreived on Mar. 8, 2011, pp. 1-3. |
| Takeuchi et al., “On an Achievable Rate of Large Rayleigh Block-Fading MIMO Channels with No CSI,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2011, 47 pages. |
| Taluja et al., Diversity Limits of Compact Broadband Multi-Antenna Systems, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Communication, 2013, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 326-337. |
| Tang et al., “Joint frequency offset estimation and interference cancellation for MIMO-OFDM systems [mobile radio],” 2004 IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC2004-Fal, 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1553-1557. |
| Tanumay et al., “A Novel Monte-Carlo-Sampling-Based Receiver for Large-Scale Uplink Multiuser MIMO Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2013, vol. 62, No. 7, pp. 3019-3038. |
| Taricco et al., “Asymptotic Mutual Information Statistics of Separately-Correlated Rician Fading MIMO Channels,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Aug. 2008, vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 3490-3504. |
| Tarighat et al., “Compensation schemes and performance analysis of IQ imbalances in OFDM receivers,” IEEE Signal Processing, Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on], 2005, vol. 53, pp. 3257-3268. |
| Tarighat et al., “MIMO OFDM receivers for systems with IQ imbalances,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Pro, for orthogonal space-time block codes (OSTBC), 2005, vol. 53, pp. 3583-3596. |
| Tarokh et al., “Space-time block codes from orthogonal designs,” IEEE Trans. Info, vol. 45, 1999, pp. 1456-1467. |
| Tarokh et al., “Space-Time Codes for High Data Rate Wireless Communication: Performance Criterion and Code Construction,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1998, vol. 44, pp. 744-765. |
| Teletar I. E., “Capacity of Multi-antenna Gaussian Channels”, European Transactions on Telecommunications, vol. 10, Nov. 1999, pp. 1-28. |
| Teukolsky S. A., “Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing”, Cambridge University Press, 1992, 949 pages. |
| Texas Instruments, “Aspects of Coordinated Multi-Point Transmission for Advanced E-UTRA,” Nov. 11-15, 2008, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #55, R1-084444, 5 pages. |
| The White House, “Presidential Memorandum: Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution”, [retrieved on Jun. 28, 2010] Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/presidential-memorandum-unleashing-wireless-broadband-revolution. |
| Third Office Action, Chinese Patent App. No. 201280044869.5, dated Aug. 31, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Third Office Action, CN App. No. 201480016091.6, dated Jul. 10, 2019, 5 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Third Office Action, MX App. No. MX/a/2014/013795, dated Jul. 27, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Tomlinson M., “New Automatic Equaliser Employing Modulo Arithmetic,” Electronics Letters, 1971, vol. 7 (5/6), pp. 138-139. |
| Tran et al. “A Conic Quadratic Programming Approach to Physical Layer Multicasting for Large-Scale Antenna Arrays,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 1, 2014, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 114-117. |
| Truong K.T., et al. “Effects of Channel Aging in Massive MIMO Systems,” Journal of Communications and Networks, Special Issue on Massive MIMO, 2013, vol. 15 (4), pp. 338-351. |
| Truong K.T., et al., “The Viability of Distributed Antennas for Massive MIMO Systems,” Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, Nov. 3-6, 2013, pp. 1318-1323. |
| Tsakalaki et al., “On the Beamforming Performance of Large-Scale Antenna Arrays”, Proc. Loughborough Antennas and Propagation Conference (LAPC), Nov. 12-13, 2012, 4 pages. |
| Tse et al., “Diversity-multiplexing tradeoff in multiple-access channels”, IEEE Trans. Info. Th., Mar. 2004, vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1859-1874. |
| Tse et al., “Performance Tradeoffs between Maximum Ratio Transmission and Switched-Transmit Diversity”, in Proc. 11 sup.th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communication, vol. 2, Sep. 2000, pp. 1485-1489. |
| Tureli et al., “OFDM blind carrier offset estimation: ESPRIT”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 48, No. 9, Sep. 2000, pp. 1459-1461. |
| Tyler et al., “Adaptive antennas: the Calibration Problem”, IEEE Comm. Mag., Dec. 2004, pp. 114-122. |
| Ubuquiti, “airFiber”, Available Online at <http:f/www.ubnt.com/airfiber>, Retreived on Sep. 4, 2015, 10 pages. |
| Ubuquiti, “airMAX”, Available Online at <http:www.ubnt.comairmax>, 2015, 10 pages. |
| Uthansakul P., et al., MIMO antenna selection using CSI from reciprocal channel, Int. Journal of Elect. and Info. Eng., 2010, vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 482-491. |
| Valkama et al., “Advanced methods for 1/Q imbalance compensation in communication receivers,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 49, No. 10, 2001, pp. 2335-2344. |
| Van De Beek et al., “ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems”, Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions, vol. 45, No. 7, Jul. 1997, pp. 1800-1805. |
| Van et al.,“Beamforming: A Versatile Approach to Spatial Filtering,” IEEE ASSP Magazine, 1988, pp. 4-24. |
| Vance, A., “Steve Perlman's wireless fix”, Businessweek, Available Online at <http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/the-edison-of-silicon-valley-727-2011.html>, Jul. 2011, 10 pages. |
| Vaughan R. G., “On Optimum Combining at the Mobile,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Nov. 1988, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 181-188. |
| Vaughn R., et al., “Switched parasitic elements for antenna diversity,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1999, vol. 47, pp. 399-405. |
| Venkatesan et al., “A WiMAX-Based Implementation of Network MIMO for Indoor Wireless Systems,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2009, vol. 2009, 11 pages. |
| Venkatesan et al., “Network MIMO: Overcoming InterCell Interference In Indoor Wireless Systems,” Asilomar Conference on Signals, 2007, vol. 2007, pp. 83-87. |
| Vieira et al., “A flexible 100-antenna testbed for Massive MIMO,” in Proc IEEE Globecom 2014 Workshop—Massive MIMO: From Theory to Practice, Austin, Texas, USA, Dec. 2014, pp. 287-293. |
| Vishwanath, S, “Duality, Achievable Rates, and Sum-Rate Capacity of Gaussian MIMO Broadcast Channels,” IEEE Trans. Info. Th., vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 2658-2668, Oct. 2003. |
| Robinson, S., “Toward an Optimal Algorithm for Matrix Multiplication,” Nov. 2005, vol. 38, No. 9, 3 pages. |
| Ruckus wireless, “Long-range 802.11 n Wi-Fi point-to-pointmultipoint backhaul,” Sep. 4, 2015, 2 pages, Retrieved from the Internet:<URL: http:www. ruckuswi reless. comproductszaneflex -outdoor7731>. |
| Rusek et al., “Scaling up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays”, IEEE Signal Proces. Mag., Jan. 2012, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-30. |
| Rysavy P., “No silver bullets for FCC, NTIA spectrum challenge”, Daily report for executives, Bloomberg BNA, Aug. 2012, pp. 1-4, http://www.rysavy.com/Articles/2012 09 No Spectrum Silver Bullets.pdf. |
| Saleh et al.,“A Statistical Model for Indoor Multipath Propagation”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 1987, vol. SAC-5 (2), pp. 128-137. |
| Samsung: “Discussion on open-loop CoMP schemes”, 3GPP Draft; R1-093377 Open-Loop Comp, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France, Aug. 19, 2009, 4 pages. |
| Schafhuber D et al., “MMSE and Adaptive Prediction of Time-Varying Channels for OFDM Systems”, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2005, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 593-602. |
| Schmidl et al., “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 1613-1621. |
| Schubert M., et al., “Joint ‘Dirty Paper’ Pre-Coding and Downlink Beamforming,” Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications, 2002 IEEE Seventh International Symposium, Dec. 2002, vol. 2, pp. 536-540. |
| Schuchert et al., “A novel I/O imbalance compensation scheme for the reception of OFDM signals,” IEEE Transaction on Consumer Electronics, 2001, pp. 313-318. |
| Second Examination Report, AU App. No. 2017210619, dated May 31, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Second Office Action and Search Report, Chinese Patent App. No. 201180061132.X, dated Mar. 11, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Second Office Action and Search report, Chinese Patent App. No. 201280044869.5, dated Jan. 17, 2017, 19 pages. |
| Second Office Action and Search Report, CN App. No. 201580007666.2, dated Jul. 30, 2019, 8 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Original Document). |
| Second Office Action, MX App. No. MX/a/2014/013795, dated Feb. 3, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Serpedin et al., “Blind channel and carrier frequency offset estimation using periodic modulation precoders”, Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on]. vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2000, pp. 2389-2405. |
| Sharif et al., “On the capacity of MIMO broadcast channel with partial side information,” IEEE Trans. Info. Th, Feb. 2005, vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 506-522. |
| Shen et al., “Low complexity user selection algorithms for multiuser MIMO systems with block diagonalization,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2005, pp. 1-12. |
| Shen Z., et al., “Sum capacity of multiuser MIMO broadcast channels with block diagonalization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm, 2005, 5 pages. |
| Shepard C., Argos: Practical Many-Antenna Base Stations, in Proc. ACM Int. Conf. Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Aug. 2012, 12 pages. |
| Shepard C., ArgosV2: A Flexible Many-Antenna Research Platform, Extended Abstract for demonstration in Proc. ACM Int. Conf Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Oct. 2013, 3 pages. |
| Shi et al., “Coarse frame and carrier synchronization of OFDM systems: a new metric and comparison”, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, No. 4, Jul. 2004, pp. 1271-1284. |
| Shiu et al., “Fading correlation and its effect on the capacity of multielement antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Comm, 2000, vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 502-513. |
| Shuangqing Wei et al., “On the Asymptoticcapacity of Mimo Systems With Fixed Length Linear Antenna Arrays,” IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003, vol. 4, pp. 2633-2637. |
| Simon et al., “Digital Communication Over Fading Channels”, A Unified Approach to Performance Analysis, Wiley Series in Telecommunications and Signal Processing, 2000, 10 pages. |
| Simon et al., “Optimizing MIMO Antenna Systems with Channel Covariance Feedback,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2003, vol. 2003, pp. 406-417. |
| Spencer et al., “Adaptive Antennas and MIMO Systems for Wireless Communications—An Introduction to the Multi-User MIMI Downlink”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Oct. 2004, pp. 60-67. |
| Spencer et al., “Zero-forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc, 2004, vol. 52, pp. 461-471. |
| Srinidhi et al., “Layered Tabu Search Algorithm for Large-MIMO Detection and a Lower Bound on ML Performance,” IEEE Trans. Commun, 2010, 5 pages. |
| Stancil et al., “Doubling wireless channel capacity using co-polarised, co-located electric and magnetic dipoles”, Electronics Letters, 2002, vol. 38, No. 14, pp. 746-747. |
| Stanley M., “Mobile Data Wave: Who Dares to Invest, Wins,” Jun. 13, 2012, 23 pages. |
| Sternad M., et al., “Channel Estimation and Prediction for Adaptive OFDM Downlinks [Vehicular Applications],” in Proceeding IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 2, Oct. 2003, pp. 1283-1287. |
| Stoytchev et al., “Compact antenna arrays for MIMO applications,” IEEE Proc. IEEE Antennas and Prop. Symp., 2001, vol. 3, pp. 708-711. |
| Strangeways H., “Determination Of The Correlation Distance For Spaced Antennas on Multipath HF Links and Implications For Design of SIMO and MIMO Systems,” School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, IEEE First European Conf, on Antennas and Prop., 2005, 12 pages. |
| Strangways H.J., “Investigation of signal correlation for spaced and co-located antennas on multipath HF links and implications for the design of SIMO and MIMO system,” IEEE First European Conf, on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2006), Nov. 2006, pp. 1-6. |
| Strohmer et al., “Application of Time-Reversal with MMSE Equalizer to UWB Communications”, Proc. of IEEE Globecom, vol. 5, Nov. 2004, pp. 3123-3127. |
| Studer et al., “PAR-Aware Large-Scale Multi-User MIMO-OFDM Downlink”, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., Sep. 4, 2012, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 303-313. |
| Sulonen et al. “Comparison of MIMO Antenna Configurations in Picocell and Microcell Environments,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2003, vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 703-712. |
| Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, EP App. No. 12762167.0, Nov. 29, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, EP App. No. 13784690.3, Jul. 6, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, EP App. No. 13843203.4, Dec. 21, 2020, 9 pages. |
| Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, EP App. No. 13856705.2, Nov. 5, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, EP App. No. 14779084.4, Nov. 29, 2019, 9 pages. |
| Summons to attend oral proceedings, EP App. No. 10156954.9, Jan. 30, 2019, 8 pages. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Oct. 28, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Jan. 13, 2021, 5 pages. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Dec. 3, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report, EP App. No. 13790935, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Supplementary Partial European Search Report and Search Opinion, EP App No. 17864744.2, dated May 13, 2020, 16 pages. |
| Matthaiou et al. “Sum Rate Analysis of ZF Receivers in Distributed MIMO Systems,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, vol. 31 (2), pp. 180-191. |
| Matthaiou et al., “Sum Rate Analysis of ZF Receivers in Distributed MIMO Systems with Rayleigh/Lognormal Fading,” 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2012, Ottawa, Jun. 10-15, pp. 3857-3861. |
| Mattheijssen P., “Antenna-Pattern Diversity versus Space Diversity for use at Handhelds,” IEEE Trans. on Yeh. Technol, 2004, vol. 53 (4), pp. 1035-1042. |
| Mazrouei-Sebdani et al., Vector Perbutation Precoding and User Scheduling for Network MIMO, 2011, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2011 IEEE, pp. 203-208. |
| McKay et al., “Multiplexing/beamforming switching for coded MIMO in spatially correlated channels based on Closed-Form BER Approximations,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2007, vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 2555-2567. |
| McKay MR., et al., “A throughput-based adaptive MIMO BICM approach for spatially—correlated channels,” IEEE to appear in Proc ICC, 2006, 5 pages. |
| McLean et al., “A re-examination of the fundamental limits on the radiation Q of electrically small antennas”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 44, n.5,, (May 1996), pp. 672-676. |
| MikroTik, “Routerboard,” Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http:routerboard.com, 2015, 30 pages. |
| Minn et al., “A robust timing and frequency synchronization for OFDM systems”, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 2, No. 4, Jul. 2003, pp. 822-839. |
| Mitsubishi Electric, “Leakage-based Precoding for CoMP in LTE-A,” 3GPP RAN1 #56, R1-090596, Feb. 9-13, 2009, 14 pages. |
| Miyakawa et al., “A Method of Code Conversion for Digital Communication Channels with Intersymbol Interference,” Transactions of the Institute of Engineers of Japan, vol. 52-A (6), 1969, pp. 272-273. |
| Mohammed et al., “A Low-Complexity Precoder for Large Multiuser MISO Systems”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2008, pp. 797-801. |
| Mohammed et al., “Per-Antenna Constant Envelope Precoding for Large Multi-User MIMO Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Jan. 2012, vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 1-24. |
| Mohammed et al., “Single-User Beamforming in Large-Scale MISO Systems with Per-Antenna Constant-Envelope Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Sep. 2012, vol. 2012, pp. 3992-4005. |
| Mohammed S. K., et al., “Constant-Envelope Multi-User Precoding for Frequency-Selective Massive MIMO Systems,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2013, vol. 2(5), pp. 547-550. |
| Molisch et al., “MIMO Systems with Antenna Selection,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 5, No. 1, Mar. 2004, pp. 46-56. |
| Montgomery B.G., “Analog RF-over-fiber technology, Syntonics LLC,” 2008, pp. 2-51, Available Online at <http:chesapeakebayaoc.orgdocumentsSyntonics_AOC_RF_over-Fiber_19_Jan_08.pdf>. |
| Monziano et al., “Introduction to Adaptive Arrays,” New York, Wiley, 1980, Table of Contents 21 pages. |
| Moose et al., “A technique for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing frequency offset correction”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, No. 10, Oct. 1994, pp. 2908-2914. |
| Morelli et al., “An improved frequency offset estimator for OFDM applications”, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 3, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 75-77. |
| Morelli et al., “Frequency ambiguity resolution in OFDM systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett, 2000, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 134-136. |
| Morgan Stanley, “Mobile data wave: who dares to invest, wins”, Jun. 13, 2012. |
| Morris et al., “Network model for MIMO systems with coupled antennas and noisy amplifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2005, vol. 53, pp. 545-552. |
| Morris et al., “The Impact of Array Configuration on MIMO Wireless Channel Capacity,” Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Symposium, Jun. 2002, vol. 3, pp. 214-217. |
| Motorola, “Long Term Evolution (LTE): A Technical Overview,” 2007, Retrieved from the Internet: http:business.motorola.comexperienceltepdfLTETechnicalOverview.pdf, 15 pages. |
| Moustakas et al., “Optimizing Multiple-Input Single-Output (MISO) Communication Systems with General Gaussian channels: Nontrivial Covariance and Nonzero Mean”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, 2003, vol. 49, pp. 2770-2780. |
| Moustakas et al.,“MIMO Capacity Through Correlated Channels in the Presence of Correlated Interferers and Noise: A (Not so) Large N Analysis”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transformations and Information Theory, 2003, vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 2545-2561. |
| Muharar et al., “Downlink Beamforming with Transmit-Side Channel Correlation: A Large System Analysis,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kyoto, Japan, Jun. 2011, 5 pages. |
| Muller et al., “Blind Pilot Decontamination,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing on Signal Processing for Large-Scale MIMO Communications, 2013, 31 pages. |
| Muller et al., “Vector Precoding for Wireless MIMO Systems and its Replica Analysis,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun, 2008, vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 530-540. |
| Nam J., et al., “Joint Spatial Division and Multiplexing: Realizing Massive MIMO Gains with Limited Channel State Information,” in Proceedings Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, IEEE, Mar. 2012, 6 pages. |
| Narasimhan et al., “M-ary Detection and q-ary Decoding in Large-Scale MIMO: A Non-Binary Belief Propagation Approach,” Oct. 16, 2013, 7 pages. |
| NEC, “Self organizing networks”, White paper, Feb. 2009, 5 pages. |
| Netsukuku, printed on Sep. 30, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http:netsukuku.freaknet.org., 8 pages. |
| Ngo et al., Energy and Spectral Efficiency of Very Large Multiuser MIMO Systems, IEEE Transactions on Communications, May 21, 2012, vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 1436-1449. |
| Ngo et al., EVD-Based Channel Estimations for Multicell Multiuser MIMO with Very Large Antenna Arrays, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speed and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Kyoto, Japan, Mar. 2012, 5 pages. |
| Ngo et al., Massive MU-MIMO Downlink TDD Systems with Linear Precoding and Downlink Pilots, Proceedings in Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, Oct. 2013. |
| Ngo et al., The multicell multiuser MIMO uplink with very large antenna arrays and a finite-dimensional channel, IEEE Transactions Communications, 2013, vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 2350-2361. |
| Ngo et al., Uplink Performance Analysis of Multicell MU-MIMO Systems with ZF Receivers, Jun. 2012, pp. 1-32. |
| Nguyen et al., “Precoding for Multicell MIMO Systems with Compressive Rank-q Channel Approximation”, in Proc. IEEE PIMRC, Fundamentals and Phy Track, London, UK, Sep. 2013, pp. 1227-1232. |
| Nguyen S., et al., “Compressive Sensing-Based Channel Estimation for Massive Multiuser MIMO Systems” in proceeding IEEE WCNC, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Nguyen, et al., “Multiuser Transmit Beamforming via Regularized Channel Inversion: A Large System Analysis” IEEE Global Communications Conference, New Orleans, LO, US, Dec. 2008, pp. 1-4. |
| NICTA, “InterfereX”, Available Online at <http://www.interfereX.com, Jun. 22, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Nokia Siemens Networks, “2020: Beyond 4g, Radio Evolution for the Gigabit Experience”, White Paper, 2011, www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com, 16 pages. |
| Non Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,593, dated Sep. 10, 2020, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Aug. 12, 2019, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,731, dated Jan. 4, 2008, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Aug. 31, 2015, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Mar. 14, 2017, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,014, dated Dec. 30, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,014, dated Jun. 14, 2018, 129 pages. |
| Non-Final office action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,002, dated Oct. 23, 2017, 60 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,276, dated Jan. 25, 2018, 77 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,276, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 107 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Apr. 25, 2018, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Jul. 21, 2017, 114 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/616,817, dated Nov. 1, 2017, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/436,864, dated Mar. 4, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance from foreign counterpart Australian Patent Application No. 20160219662, dated May 5, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance from foreign counterpart Australian Patent Application No. AU20140200745, dated Sep. 19, 2016, 3 page. |
| Notice of Acceptance from foreign counterpart New Zealand Patent Application No. 610463 dated Aug. 5, 2015, 1 page. |
| Notice of Acceptance from foreign counterpart New Zealand Patent Application No. 717370, dated Jan. 10, 2018, 1 page. |
| Notice of Acceptance, AU App. No. 2012308632, dated Sep. 13, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance, AU App. No. 2017210619, dated Oct. 14, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance, AU App. No. 2018201553, dated Nov. 14, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance, AU App. No. 2018253582, dated Nov. 18, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance, AU Patent App. No. 2013327697, dated Feb. 15, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance, AU Patent App. No. 2014248533, dated Jun. 28, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Acceptance, New Zealand Patent App. No. 729017, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 1 page. |
| Notice of Acceptance, NZ App. No. 738000, dated Jun. 4, 2019, 1 page. |
| Notice of Acceptance, NZ App. No. 751530, dated May 1, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance and Search Report, TW Patent App. No. 102134408, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance from counterpart MX Patent App. No. MX/a/2014/002900, dated Nov. 26, 2015, 4 pages. Translation attached. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,976, dated Mar. 14, 2011, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, AU Patent App. No. 2011323559, dated May 13, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, CA App. No. 2,848,355, dated Apr. 3, 2020, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance, CA App. No. 2695799, dated Feb. 9, 2016, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance, Canadian Patent App. No. P14906, dated Jun. 1, 2015, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance, CN App. No. 201480016091.6, dated Apr. 24, 2020, 8 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document). |
| Notice of Allowance, IL App. No. 248265, dated May 7, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, IL App. No. 269145, dated Aug. 23, 2020, 3 pages of Original Document Only. |
| Notice of Allowance, KR App. No. 10-2014-7009876, dated Oct. 4, 2019, 3 pages (1 page of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document). |
| Notice of Allowance, KR App. No. 10-2015-7014235, dated Oct. 28, 2020, 3 pages (1 pages of English Translation and 2 page of Original Document). |
| Notice of Allowance, KR App. No. 10-2017-7002596, dated Feb. 27, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, KR App. No. 10-2018-7035654, dated Oct. 2, 2019, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document). |
| Notice of Allowance, KR Patent App. No. 2015-7002560, dated Feb. 4, 2016, 2 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, KR. App. No. 10-2014-7035524, dated Oct. 14, 2020, 4 pages (1 page of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Notice of Allowance, TW App. No. 107123446, dated Nov. 20, 2019, 3 pages of Original Document Only. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/578,265, dated Jan. 28, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,731, dated Sep. 30, 2010, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 10/902,978, dated Apr. 16, 2008, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 10/902,978, dated Jun. 27, 2008, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,478, dated Jan. 26, 2010, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,478, dated Jul. 30, 2009, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,478, dated Oct. 29, 2009, 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,362, dated Mar. 23, 2009, 10 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Jun. 25, 2013, 48 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Jun. 7, 2017, 18 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Aug. 1, 2014, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Nov. 30, 2015, 22 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Aug. 4, 2014, 40 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Dec. 14, 2015, 26 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Dec. 22, 2016, 29 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Jun. 22, 2018, 27 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Oct. 18, 2019, 21 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Aug. 2, 2013, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Jan. 13, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Jan. 22, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Oct. 21, 2014, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Sep. 5, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Aug. 25, 2015, 24 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Jun. 12, 2014, 17 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Nov. 2, 2016, 14 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Nov. 27, 2012, 12 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Apr. 11, 2017, 149 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Jul. 31, 2013, 12 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Mar. 21, 2018, 20 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Nov. 12, 2015, 14 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Oct. 23, 2014, 15 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Aug. 1, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,598, dated Aug. 27, 2014, 30 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,950, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 74 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,950, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 65 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,971, dated Oct. 9, 2015, 52 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Aug. 20, 2015, 15 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Aug. 12, 2015, 20 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Feb. 7, 2018, 24 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Feb. 21, 2019, 34 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Jun. 3, 2019, 26 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,302, dated Mar. 2, 2015, 5 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated Sep. 2, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated May 10, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Dec. 4, 2019, 19 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Jun. 16, 2016, 22 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 25 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Oct. 25, 2018, 20 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Sep. 3, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,014, dated Oct. 16, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,014, dated Oct. 2, 2019, 10 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,002, dated Jul. 16, 2018, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,383, dated Jan. 11, 2018, 8 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Jan. 3, 2019, 67 pages. |
| Office Action, RU Patent App. No. 2016144927, dated Dec. 21, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, TW App No. 102117728, dated Nov. 29, 2016, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, TW App. No. 094125985, dated Jan. 6, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Office Action, TW App. No. 100139880, dated Jan. 26, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Office Action, TW App. No. 103107541, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Office Action, TW App. No. 108118765, dated Apr. 16, 2020, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, TW App. No. 108130461, dated Oct. 30, 2020, 16 pages (7 pages of English Translation and 9 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, TW App. No. 108148122, dated Jul. 8, 2020, 19 pages (8 pages of English Translation and 11 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, TW App. No. 109105764, dated Sep. 9, 2020, 47 pages (21 pages of English Translation and 26 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, TW Patent App. No. 101133865, dated Oct. 28, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, TW Patent App. No. 102116145, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Aug. 14, 2013, 26 pages. |
| Onggosanusi et al.. High Rate Space-Time Block Coded Scheme: Performance and Improvement in Correlated Fading Channels, Proc. IEEE Wireless Comm. and Net. Conf, Mar. 2002, vol. 1, pp. 194-199. |
| Optimized Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Signal Detection in MIMO Systems: An Analysis of the Stationary Distribution and Mixing Time, Signal Processing, vol. 62, No. 17, Sep. 2014. |
| Ozgur et al., “Spatial Degrees of Freedom of Large Distributed MIMO Systems and Wireless Ad Hoc Networks”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 202-214. |
| Pan, et al., “Precoding and Power allocation for Cooperative MIMO systems”, International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, IEEE, 2006, 4 pages. |
| Panasonic, “Target scenarios for new carrier types,” 3GPP TSG-RAN WGI#72, R1-130684, Jan. 28, 2013-Feb. 1, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Papadogiannis et al. “Efficient Selective Feedback Design for Multicell Cooperative Networks,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2010, vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 196-205. |
| Papadopoulos et al.. Achieving Large Spectral Efficiencies from MU-MIMO with Tens of Antennas Location-Adaptive TDD MU-MIMO Design and User Scheduling, in Proc. IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems, and Computers (ACSSC), Pacific Grove, CA, Nov. 2010, pp. 636-643. |
| Parkvall et al., “LTE Advanced-Evolving LTE Towards IMT-Advanced,” Ericsson, IEEE VTC, Sep. 2008, 5 pages. |
| Partial Supplementary Search Report, EP App. No. 15780522.7, dated Oct. 20, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Paulraj et al., “Introduction to Space-Time Wireless Communications”, 2003, 33 Pages. |
| Paulraj, “Is OFDMA, MIMO and OS the right stuff for mobile broad-band?” 63 pages, http://www ieeevtc.org/vtc2005fal1/presentations/paulraj.pdf, Sep. 2005. |
| Payami et al., Channel Measurements and Analysis for Very Large Array Systems At 2.6 GHz, in Proc. 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP 2012, Prague, Czech Republic, Mar. 26, 2012, 5 pages. |
| Per-Erik et al., “VDSL2: Next Important Broadband Technology”, Ericsson Review No. 1, 2006, pp. 36-47. |
| Perlman et al., “Distributed-Input Distributed-Output (Dido), Wireless Technology: A New Approach to Multiuser Wireless,” Retrieved from http://www.rearden.com/DIDO/DIDO White Paper 110727.pdf, Aug. 2011, 19 pages. |
| Piazza et al., “Design and Evaluation of a Reconfigurable Antenna Array for MIMO Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2008, vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 869-881. |
| Ping-Heng., et al., “Compressive Sensing Based Channel Feedback Protocols for Spatially—Correlated Massive Antenna Arrays”, in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2012), Apr. 2012, pp. 492-497. |
| Pitarokoilis et al., “On the Optimality of Single-Carrier Transmission in Large-Scale Antenna Systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., Aug. 2012, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 276-279. |
| Pitarokoilis, “Effect of Oscillator Phase Noise on Uplink Performance of Large MU-MIMO Systems,” in Proc. of the 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Oct. 2012, 9 pages. |
| Pohl et al., “Antenna spacing in MIMO indoor channels”, Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 2,, Jun. 2002, pp. 749-753. |
| Pollock et al., “Antenna Saturation Effects on MIMO Capacity,” IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003, vol. 4, pp. 2301-2305. |
| Ponnampalam et al., “On DL Preceding for 11ac”, IEEE 802.11-10/01119r0, Medialek, Sep. 2010, 8 pages. |
| Preliminary Report On Patentability and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2014/025105, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 10 pages. |
| Proakis J., “Digital Communications Fourth edition,” 2001, pp. 9, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, ISBN 0-07-232111-3, Cover page, Title page, Table of Contents. |
| Qian, “Partially Adaptive Beamforming for Correlated Interference Rejection”, IEEE Trans. On Sign. Proc., 1995, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 506-515. |
| Qibi, “A Forward Link Performance Study of the 1 xEV-DO Rev. 0 System Using Field Measurements and Simulations,” Lucent Technologies. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cdg.org/resources/white%5Fpapers/files/white_papers/files/Luce-nt%201xEV-DO%20Rev%200%20Mar%2004.pdf, Mar. 2004, 19 pages. |
| Qualcomm Incorporated, “Definition of Virtual Antenna Mapping (VAM) and Applicability of S-CPICH Power Accuracy Requirement”, 3GPP TSG-WG4 Meeting 58Ad hoc #1-2011, R4-112408, Apr. 11-15, 2011, 6 pages. |
| Qualcomm, “The 1000x data challenge, the latest on wireless, voice, services and chipset evolution”, 4G World, Oct. 31, 2012 61 pages submitted as Parts 1-3. |
| Rao et al., “I/Q mismatch cancellation for MIMO-OFDM systems”, In Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC 2004. 15th IEEE International Symposium on, vol. 4, 2004, pp. 2710-2714. |
| Rao et al., “Multi-antenna testbeds for research and education in wireless communications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, No. 12, Dec. 2004, pp. 72-81. |
| Rapajic et al., Information Capacity of Random Signature Multiple-Input Multiple Output Channel, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2000, vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 1245-1248. |
| Rappaport, T, Wireless Communications, Principles and Practice, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, 2002, ISBN 0-13-042232-0, Cover page, Title page, Table of Contents, 13 pages. |
| Ravindran N., et al., “MIMO Broadcast Channels with Block Diagonalization and Finite Rate Feedback”, IEEE, ICASSP Apr. 2007, pp. 111-113-111-16. |
| Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS), Radio Base Station (RBS), Software Defined Radio (SOR), Status Implementations and Costs Aspects Including Future Possibilities, Technical Report, ETSI, No. V1.1.1, 2009, 24 pages. |
| Rejection Decision, JP Patent App. No. JP2014264325, dated Oct. 3, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Requirement for Restriction/Election, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Nov. 29, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Requirement for Restriction/Election, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Jun. 11, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Riegler et al., “Asymptotic Statistics of the Mutual Information for Spatially Correlated Rician Fading MIMO Channels with Interference”, IEEE Trans Inform. Theory, 2010, vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 1542-1559. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 10184659, dated Nov. 11, 2019, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 10184659.0, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 10184659.0, dated Sep. 2, 2020, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 12762167.0, dated Sep. 30, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 13784690.3, dated Apr. 15, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 13784690.3, dated Aug. 23, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 13790935, dated Oct. 23, 2019, 8 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 13790935.4, dated Feb. 4, 2019, 11 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 13843203.4, dated Feb. 25, 2019, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 13843203.4, dated Mar. 23, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 13856705.2, dated Jul. 18, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 14770916.6, dated Mar. 13, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 15746217.7, dated Feb. 1, 2021, 10 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 15780522.7, dated Mar. 19, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 17844265.3, dated May 10, 2021, 9 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 18186156.8, dated Jul. 30, 2019, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, EP App. No. 18186156.8, dated Jun. 12, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, IL App. No. 235518, dated Apr. 7, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, IL App. No. 241319, dated Nov. 26, 2019, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, IL App. No. 248265, dated Feb. 26, 2020, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, IL App. No. 248265, dated Oct. 25, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, IL App. No. 253541, dated Nov. 29, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, IL App. No. 269145, dated Jun. 16, 2020, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, IL App. No. 270106, dated May 19, 2020, 8 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, JP App No. 2019-168511, dated Dec. 24, 2020, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 2007-506302, dated Jan. 11, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 20150162819, dated Oct. 3, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 2016-550718, dated Jan. 10, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 2016-562961, dated Feb. 6, 2020, 7 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 2018-222367, dated Jun. 8, 2020, 7 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 2019-039195, dated Jun. 17, 2019, 8 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 2019-093904, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, JP App. No. 2019-238040, dated Feb. 25, 2021, 7 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, JP Patent App. No. 2012-057351, dated Jul. 1, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, JP Patent App. No. 2012-057351, dated Mar. 10, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Office Action, JP Patent App. No. 2013-156855, dated Apr. 22, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, JP Patent App. No. 2013-537753, dated Sep. 7, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Office Action, KR App. No. 10-2014-7035524, dated Oct. 21, 2019, 11 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, KR App. No. 10-2015-7028298, dated Jul. 27, 2020, 14 pages (8 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, KR App. No. 10-2015-7029455, dated Jul. 27, 2020, 14 pages (8 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, KR App. No. 1020107006265, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 10 pages. |
| Office Action, KR Patent App. No. 20050070079, dated Jul. 29, 2011, 3 pages. |
| Office Action, KR Patent App. No. 2015-7002560, dated May 21, 2015, 10 pages. |
| Office Action, MX Patent App. No. MX/a/2014/002900, dated May 25, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Office Action, MX Patent App. No. MX/a/2014/013377, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 20 pages. |
| Office Action, MX Patent App. No. MX/a/2014/01337, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, MX Patent App. No. Mx/a/2015/002992, dated Nov. 8, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Office Action, New Zealand Patent App. No. 610463, dated Jan. 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Office Action, RU App. No. 2014151216, dated Sep. 30, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Office Action, RU App. No. 2019104259, dated Aug. 20, 2020, 14 pages (7 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Original Document). |
| Dahlman E., et al., “4G: LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband”, Elsevier, 2011, Cover page, Title page, Copyright page, Table of Contents, 21 pages. |
| Dai et al., “Carrier frequency offset estimation for OFDM/SDMA systems using consecutive pilots,” IEEE Proceedings Communications, 2005, vol. 152, pp. 624-632. |
| Dai et al., “Reduced-complexity performance-lossless (quasi-)maximum-likelihood detectors for S-QAM modulated MIMO systems,” Electronics Letters, 2013, vol. 49, No. 11, pp. 724-725. |
| Dai et al., “Reducing the Complexity of Quasi-ML Detectors for MIMO Systems Through Simplified Branch Metric and Accumulated Branch Metric Based Detection,” Communications Letters, 2013, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 916-919. |
| Daniel, J., “Introduction to public safety: RF Signal Distribution Using Fiber Optics”, Available Online at <http://www.rfsolutions.com/fiber.pdf>, 2009, 13 pages. |
| Datta et al., “A Hybrid RTS-BP Algorithm for Improved Detection of Large-MIMO M-QAM Signals,” in Proc. IEEE National Conference on Communication, 2011, 6 pages. |
| Datta et al., “A Novel MCMC Based Receiver for Large-Scale Uplink Multiuser MIMO Systems,” Jan. 2012, 37 pages. |
| Datta et al., “Random-Restart Reactive Tabu Search Algorithm for Detection in Large-MIMO Systems,” IEEE Communications Letters, 2010, vol. 14, No. 12, pp. 1107-1109. |
| Debbah et al., “MIMO Channel Modelling and the Principle of Maximum Entropy,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2005, vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 1667-1690. |
| Decision of Grant a Patent, JP App. No. 2016120928, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Decision of Grant, JP Patent App. No. 2015-510498, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Decision of Grant, RU App. No. 2014151216, dated Jan. 31, 2017, 18 pages. |
| Decision of Grant, RU App. No. 2016144927, dated Nov. 29, 2019, 8 pages of Original Document Only. |
| Decision of Refusal, JP App. No. 2016-562961, dated Oct. 28, 2020, 5 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 1 page of Original Document). |
| Decision of Refusal, KR App. No. 2010-7006265, dated Apr. 23, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Decision of Refusal. JP App. No. 2014530763, dated Dec. 19, 2016, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Decision to grant a European patent, EP App. No. 10156950.7, dated May 8, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Decision to grant a European patent, EP App. No. 11838640.8, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 2 pages. |
| Decision to Grant a Patent, EP App. No. 13790935.4, dated Sep. 24, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Decision to Grant a Patent, JP App. No. 2017-082862, dated Dec. 10, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Decision to Grant a patent, JP App. No. 2017-110950, dated Nov. 15, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Degen et al., “Performance evaluation of MIMO systems using dual-polarized antennas,” International Conference on Telecommunications, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1520-1525. |
| Delfas N., “Mobile Data Wave: Who Dares to Invest, Wins,” Morgan Stanley Research Global, Jun. 13, 2012, pp. 1-62. |
| Derrick et al., “Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation in OFDMA Systems with Large Numbers of Base Station Antennas”, 2011, 30 pages. |
| Devasirvatham, et al., “Time Delay Spread Measurements At 850 MHz and 1 7 GHz Inside A Metropolitan Office Building”, Electronics Letters, Feb. 2, 1989, vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 194-196. |
| Devasirvatham, et al., Radio Propagation Measurements At 850MHz. 1.7GHz and 4GHz Inside Two Dissimilar Office Buildings, Electronics Letter Mar. 29, 1990 vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 445-447. |
| Devasirvatham., “Time Delay Spread and Signal Level Measurements of 850 MHz Radio Waves in Building Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1986, vol. AP-34 (11), pp. 1300-1305. |
| Devillers et al., “Mutual coupling effects in multiuser massive MIMO base stations”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI), Jul. 2012, 2 pages. |
| Dietrich et al., “Spatial, polarization, and pattern diversity for wireless handheld terminals,” Proc. IEEE Antennas and Prop. Symp, 2001, vol. 49, pp. 1271-1281. |
| Dighe et al., “Analysis of Transmit-Receive Diversity in Rayleigh Fading”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 51, No. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 694-703. |
| DigitalAir wireless, “GeoDesy Laser Links 1.25Gbps Full Duplex”, Available Onlibne at <http:www.digitalairwireless.comoutdoor-wireless-networkspoint-to-point-wirelesslaser-fso-linksgeodesy-fso-laser-links.html> , Retreived on Oct. 2, 2015, 4 pages. |
| DigitalAir wireless, “Outdoor Wireless”, Available Online at <URL: http:www.digitalairwireless.comoutdoor-wireless-networks.html>, Retreived on Sep. 29, 2015, 5 pages. |
| Ding et al., “On The Sum Rate of Channel Subspace Feedback for Multi-Antenna Broadcast Channels,” in Proc., IEEE Globecom, vol. 5, Nov. 2005, pp. 2699-2703. |
| Divisional Notification, CN App. No. 201710491990.7, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document). |
| Dohler et al., “A Step towards MIMO: Virtual Antenna Arrays,” European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research, 2003, 9 pages. |
| Dong et al., “Multiple-input multiple-output wireless communication systems using antenna pattern diversity,” Proceedings of IEEE Globe Telecommunications Conference, 2002, vol. 1, pp. 997-1001. |
| Dumont J., et al. “On the Capacity Achieving Transmit Covariance Matrices for MIMO Rician Channels: An Asymptotic Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010, vol. 56 (3), pp. 1048-1069. |
| Dupuy, et al., “On the Capacity Achieving Covariance Matrix for Frequency Selective MIMO Channels Using the Asymptotic Approach”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 2010, pp. 2153-2157. |
| Dupuy, et al.. On the Capacity Achieving Covariance Matrix for Frequency Selective MIMO Channels Using the Asymptotic Approach, IEEE Trans. Inform Theory, 2011, vol. 57 (9), pp. 5737-5753. |
| Durgin, “Space-Time Wireless Channels”, Prentice Hall Communications Engineering and Emerging Technologies Series, 2003, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Cover page, Title pages, Copyright page, Table of Contents, Preface, 16 pages, USA. |
| Eklund et al., “IEEE Standard 802.16: A Technical Overview of the WirelessMAN Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Available Online at <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/02/C80216-02_05.pdf>, Jun. 2002, 12 pages. |
| Ekstrom et al., “Technical Solutions for the 3G Long-Term Evolution”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 2006, pp. 38-45. |
| Erceg et al., “TGn Channel Models,” IEEE 802.11-03940r4, May 2004, 45 pages. |
| Ericsson, “The evolution of EDGE”, Available Online at <http:www.ericsson.com/res/docs/whitepapersevolution_to_edge.pdf>, Feb. 2007, 18 pages. |
| ETSI Reconfigurable Radio Systems: Status and Future Directions on Software Defined Radio and Cognitive Radio Standards, IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Service Center, Sep. 2010, vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 78-86. |
| ETSI, “Mobile Technologies GSM”, Available Online at <http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/Technologies/gsm.asp>, Retreived on Aug. 14, 2014, 2 pages. |
| European Search Report and Search Opinion, EP App. No. 05254757.7, dated Sep. 13, 2005, 9 pages. |
| European Search Report and Search Opinion, EP App. No. 17844265.3, dated Feb. 21, 2020, 12 pages. |
| European Search Report and Search Opinion, EP App. No. 17864744.2, dated Aug. 14, 2020, 15 pages. |
| European Search Report, EP App. No. 10156954.9-2411, dated Sep. 2, 2010, 5 pages. |
| Foschin et al., “Coordinating multiple antenna cellular networks to achieve enormous spectral efficiency”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Aug. 2006, vol. 153, No. 4, pp. 548-555. |
| Foschini et al., “Simplified processing for high spectral efficiency wireless communication employing multi-element arrays”, IEEE Jour. Select. Areas in Comm., vol. 17, No. 11, Nov. 1999, pp. 1841-1852. |
| Foschini et al., “The Value of Coherent Base Station Coordination”, Conference on In-formation Sciences and Systems (CISS 2005), Mar. 16-18, 2005, 6 pages. |
| Fourth Office Action, CN App. No. 201480016091.6, dated Dec. 10, 2019, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document). |
| Further Examination Report (Postponed Acceptance), New Zealand Patent App. No. 728719, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 2 pages. |
| Further Examination Report, New Zealand App. No. 701567, dated Aug. 24, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Further Examination Report, New Zealand App. No. 701691, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Further Examination Report, New Zealand Patent App. No. 717370, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Fusco et al., “Blind Frequency-offset Estimation for OFDM/OQAM Systems,” IEEE Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on], 2007, vol. 55, pp. 1828-1838. |
| Gao et al., “Linear Pre-Coding Performance in Measured Very-Large MIMO Channels,” IEEE Vehicular Technology, 2011, pp. 1-5. |
| Garcia et al., “Channel Model for Train to Train Communication Using the 400 MHz Band”, in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 2008, pp. 3082-3086. |
| Gesbert et al., “From Theory to Practice: An Overview of MIMO Space—Time Coded Wireless Systems,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2003, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 281-302. |
| Gesbert et al., “Multi-Cell MIMO Cooperative Networks: A New Look at Interference,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Dec. 2010, vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 1380-1408. |
| Gesbert et al., “Outdoor MIMO Wireless Channels: Models and Performance Prediction”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 1926-1934. |
| Ghogho et al., “Training design for multipath channel and frequency offset estimation in MIMO systems”, Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on [see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on], vol. 54, No. 10, Oct. 2006, pp. 3957-3965. |
| Glazunov et al., “Experimental Characterization of the Propagation Channel along a Very Large Virtual Array in a Reverberation Chamber”, Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Jan. 2014, vol. 59, pp. 205-217. |
| Goldman D., “Sorry, America: Your Wireless Airwaves are Full”, CNN Money, Available Online at <http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/21/technology/spectrum crunch/index.html>, 2012, 3 pages. |
| Gopalakrishnan et al., “An Analysis of Pilot Contamination on Multi-User MIMO Cellular Systems with Many Antennas,” Proceedings in Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, 2011, pp. 381-385. |
| Govindasamy et al., “Asymptotic Spectral Efficiency of the Uplink in Spatially Distributed Wireless Networks with Multi-Antenna Base Stations,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2013, vol. 61, No. 7, 100 pages. |
| GSMA, “GSM technology” Printed on Aug. 14, 2014, Available Online at <http://www.gsmworld.com/technology/index.htm>, 1 page. |
| Guey et al., “Modeling and Evaluation of MIMO Systems Exploiting Channel Reciprocity in TDD Mode,” VTC 2004-Fall, IEEE 60th, Oct. 2004, pp. 4265-4269. |
| Guillaud et al., “A Practical Method for Wireless Channel Reciprocity Exploitation Through Relative Calibration”, IEEE Proceedings of Sign Processing, Aug. 2005, vol. 1, pp. 403-406. |
| Guillaud et al., “A Specular Approach to MIMO Frequency selective Channel Tracking and Prediction,” Fifth IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, Jul. 11-14, 2004, pp. 59-63. |
| Gunashekar G., “Investigations into the Feasibility of MIMO Techniques within the HF Band: Preliminary Results,” Radio Science, 2009, 33 pages. |
| Guthy et al., “Large System Analysis of Projection Based Algorithms for the MIMO Broadcast Channel”, in Proc. of the IEEE Intl Symp. Inform. Theory, Austin, U.S.A., Jun. 2010, 5 pages. |
| Guthy et al., “Large System Analysis of Sum Capacity in the Gaussian MIMO Broadcast Channel”, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Communication, 2013, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 149-159. |
| Guthy et al., “Large System Analysis of the Successive Encoding Successive Allocation Method for the MIMO BC”, Proc. of the International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas, Bremen, Germany, Feb. 2010. |
| Hachem et al., “A New Approach for Mutual Information Analysis of Large Dimensional Multi-Antenna Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2008, vol. 54, No. 9, pp. 3987-4004. |
| Hakkarainen et al., “Widely-Linear Beamforming and RF Impairment Suppression in Massive Antenna Arrays”, Journal of Communications and Networks, 2013, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 383-397. |
| Hallen H., “Long-Range Prediction of Fading Signals”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Signal Processing Magazine, 2000, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 62-75. |
| Haring, L., “Residual carrier and sampling frequency synchronization in multiuser OFDM systems”, VTC-Spring. IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 4, 2006, pp. 1937-1941. |
| Hazlett et al., “Radio Spectrum for a Hungry Wireless World”, Sep. 22, 2011, 41 pages. |
| Heath et al., “Antenna selection for spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers,” IEEE Trans. Comm, 2001, vol. 5, pp. 142-144. |
| Heath et al., “Switching between diversity and multiplexing in MIMO systems”, IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 53, No. 6, Jun. 2005, pp. 962-968. |
| Heath et al., “Switching between Multiplexing and Diversity Based on Constellation Distance,” Proc. of Allerton Conf on 208, Comm. Control and Comp, Oct. 4-6, 2000, pp. 212-221. |
| Heath Ret al., “Exploiting Limited Feedback in Tomorrow's Wireless Communication Networks,” IEEE Journal on Sel. Areas in Comm., Special Issue on Exploiting Limited Feedback in Tomorrow's Wireless Communication Networks, 2008, vol. 26, No. 8, pp. 1337-1340. |
| Hewlett Packard, “GPS and Precision Timing Applications”, Application Note 1272, May 1996, pp. 1-28. |
| High Frequency Active Auroroal Research Program—Homepage, Available Online at <http:www.haarp.alaska.edu>, Printed on Apr. 9, 2004, 1 page. |
| Hochwald et al., “A Vector-Perturbation Technique for Near-Capacity Multiantenna Multiuser Communication—Part I: Channel Inversion and Regularization”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Communications, 2005, vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 195-202. |
| Hochwald et al., “A Vector-Perturbation Technique for Near-Capacity Multiantenna Multiuser Communication—Part II: Perturbation”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Communications, 2005, vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 537-544. |
| Hochwald et al., “Multi-Antenna Channel Hardening and its Implications for Rate Feedback and Scheduling”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, 2004, vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1893-1909. |
| Hong et al. “Joint Base Station Clustering and Beamformer Design for Partial Coordinated Transmission in Heterogenous Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 226-240. |
| Hosseini et al., “Massive MIMO and Small Cells: How to Densify Heterogeneous Networks,” Wireless Communications Symposium, IEEE ICC, 2013, pp. 5442-5447. |
| Hoydis et al., “Iterative Deterministic Equivalents for the Performance Analysis of Communication Systems,” Dec. 18, 2011, pp. 1-43. |
| http:www.fiercebroadbandwireless.comstoryatts-rinne-talks-about-carrieraggregation-trials-small-cells-and-nore2012-11-08. |
| Huang et al., “Joint Beamforming and Power Control in Coordinated Multicell: Max-Min Duality, Effective Network and Large System Transition,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2013, pp. 1-14. |
| Huawei, et al., “CoMP Clarification of definitions and TP,” R1-084351, Nov. 10-14, 2008, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #55, 7 pages. |
| Huff et al., “A Novel Radiation Pattern and Frequency Reconfigurable Single Turn Square Spiral Microstrip Antenna”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 13, No. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 57-59. |
| Huh et al., Multi-cell MIMO Downlink with Cell Cooperation and Fair Scheduling: A Large—System Limit Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2011, vol. 57, No. 12, pp. 7771-7786. |
| “Electromagnetic-Wave Propagation”, HW Sams Publishers, Reference Data for Radio Engineers, “Electromagnetic-Wave Propagation”, 5th Edition, 1973, Chapter 26., (1973), 1-32. |
| “MIMO System uses SOMA for IEEE802.11”, Available Online at <http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/ime/ime149.html>. Electronicstalk, 2004, pp. 1-3. |
| 3GPP Technical Specification Group, “Spatial channel model, SCM-134 text V6.0”, Spatial Channel Model AHG (Combined ad-hoc from 3GPP and 3GPP2), Apr. 2003, pp. 1-45. |
| 3GPP TR 25.876 V7.0.0 (Mar. 2007), Technical Report, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network”; Multiple Input Multiple Output in UTRA; (Release 7), pp. 2-76. |
| 3GPP TR 25.912, “Feasibility Study for Evolved UTRA and UTRAN”, V9.0.0 (Oct. 2009), Oct. 2009, pp. 1-66. |
| 3GPP TR 25.913, “Requirements for Evolved UTRA (E-UTRA) and Evolved UTRAN (E-UTRAN)”, V8.0.0 (Jan. 2009), Jan. 2009, pp. 1-20. |
| 3GPP TR 36.819, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Coordinated multi-point operation for LTE physical layer aspects (Release 11)”, Dec. 20, 2011, 69 pages. |
| 3GPP TS 36.211 V8.7.0 (May 2009), Technical Specification, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation (Release 8), pp. 1-83. |
| 3GPP, “LTE”, downloaded from http://www.3gpp.org/LTE on Aug. 14, 2014, 4 pages. |
| 3GPP, “UMTS”, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, pp. 1-2, printed on Nov. 17, 2014, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.3gpp.orgarticleumts>. |
| 3GPP, ETS1136 212 V9.1.0 (2010), “Technical Specification LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Multiplexing and Channel Coding (3GPP TS 36.212 VERION 9.1.0 Release 9) 3GPP, ETS1136 212 V9.1.C (2010)” 63 pages. |
| 3GPP, TR 36.808, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Carrier Aggregation (Release 10)”, v10.0.0, Jun. 2012, 28 pages. |
| 3GPP, TS 36.201, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); LTE Physical Layer—General Description (Release 11),” Oct. 2012, pp. 1-14. |
| 3GPP, TS 36.211, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation (Release 11),” pp. 1-107, Oct. 2012, submitted as Part 1 and Part 2. |
| 3GPP, TS 36.212, Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Multiplexing and channel coding (Release 11) pp. 1-80, Oct. 2012, submitted as Part 1 and Part 2. |
| 3GPP, TS 36.212.V8.7.0 (May 2009), “Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Multiplexing and channel Coding (Release 8) 3GPP, TS 36.212.V8.7.0 (May 2009),” May 2009, 60 pages. |
| 3GPP, TS 36.213, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures (Release 11),” Oct. 2012, 145 pages. |
| 3GPP, TS 36.808, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Carrier Aggregation (Release 10)”, v10.0.0, Jun. 2012, 28 pages. |
| 3GPP, TS 36.808, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Carrier Aggregation (Release 1O)”, v10.0.0, Jun. 2012, 28 pages. |
| Abandonment, U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,598, Feb. 8, 2016, 1 page. |
| Abandonment, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, Dec. 26, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Abbasi N., “Capacity estimation of HF-MIMO systems”, International Conference on Ionospheric Systems and Techniques, 2009, 5 pages. |
| Adrian et al., “Quantum Tagging: Authenticating Location via Quantum Information and Relativistic Signalling Constraints,”, Phys. Rev. A84, 012326 (2011), arXiv: 1008.2147, 2010, 9 pages. |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated May 4, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Feb. 7, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Advisory Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,565, dated Nov. 10, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Aggarwal et al., “On the Design of Large Scale Wireless Systems,” IEEE Journal of Selected Areas Communications, 2013, vol. 31. No. 2, pp. 215-225. |
| Airgo, “Homepage: Airgo—Wireless without Limits”, Available Online at <http:www.airgonetworks.com>, printed on Apr. 9, 2004, 1 page. |
| Akbudak et al., “CoMP in Heterogeneous networks: A Low-Complexity Linear Transceiver Design,” Workshop on Cooperative and Cognitive Mobile Networks, Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2012, pp. 5624-5629. |
| Aktas et al., “Scaling Results on the Sum Capacity of Cellular Networks with MIMO Links”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, vol. 52, pp. 3264-3274. |
| Akyildiz et al., “The Evolution to 4G Cellular Systems: LTE-Advanced,” Physical Communication, vol. 3, 2010, pp. 217-244. |
| Alamouti et al., “A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 1998, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 1451-1458. |
| Alrabadi et al., “Beamforming via Large and Dense Antenna Arrays above a Clutter,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 314-325. |
| Andersen et al., “The MIMO Cube—a Compact MIMO Antenna,” IEEE Proceedings of Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications International Symposium, vol. 1, Oct. 2002, pp. 112-114. |
| Andersen J. B., “Antenna Arrays in Mobile Communications: Gain, diversity, and Channel Capacity.1,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 42, No. 2, Apr. 2000, pp. 12-16. |
| Anderson et al., “Beamforming in large-scale MIMO Multiuser Links Under a Per-node Power Constraint,” Proceedings in International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems, Aug. 2012, pp. 821-825. |
| Andrews et al., “Tripling the Capacity of Wireless Communications using Electromagnetic Polarization”, Nature, vol. 409, Jan. 2001, pp. 316-318. |
| Andrews J. G., “Seven Ways That Hetnet are a Cellular Paradigm Shift,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Mar. 2013, [online], Retrieved from the Internet: http://users.ece.utexas.edu/-jandrews/pubs/And HetNet CommMag2012v3.pdf, pp. 136-144. |
| Anritsu, “LTE resource guide”, 18 pages, 2009, www.us.anritsu.com. |
| Araujo et al., “Channel Estimation for Millimeter-Wave Very-Large MIMO Systems,” EUSPICO 2014, in proceedings, Sep. 1-5, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Arnau et al., “Dissection of Multibeam Satellite Communications with a Large-scale Antenna System Toolbox,” European Wireless 2014 (EW2014), May 14-16, 2014, pp. 548-553. |
| ArrayComm, “Field-Proven Results,” Improving wireless economics through MAS software, printed on Mar. 28, 2011, www arraycomm.comserve phppage=proof, 3 pages. |
| Artigue C., et al.,“On the Precoder Design of Flat Fading MIMO Systems Equipped with MMSE Receivers: A Large System Approach”, IEEE Trans Inform. Theory, 2011, vol. 57 (7), pp. 4138-4155. |
| AT&T, “1946: First Mobile Telephone Call” 1 page, Jun. 17, 1946, Available Online at <http:www.corp.att.comattlabsreputationtimeline46mobile.html>. |
| Baker M., “LTE-Advanced Physical Layer,” Alcatel-Lucent, Dec. 2009, 48 pages. |
| Barbieri A., et al., “Coordinated Downlink Multi-point Communications in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks”, (Qualcomm), Information Theory and App. Workshop, Feb. 2012, pp. 7-16. |
| BelAir Networks, “Small cells”, Available Online at <URL:http:www.belairnetworks.comsitesdefaultfilesVVPSmallCells.pdf>, 2007, 4 pages. |
| BelAir Networks, “Small cells”, Available Online at <URL:http:www.belairnetworks.comsitesdefaultfilesWPSmallCells.pdf>, 2007, 4 pages. |
| Benedetto et al., “Analysis of the effect of the l/Q baseband i-lter mismatch in an OFDM modem,” Wireless personal communications, 2000, pp. 175-186. |
| Zhang et al., “Electromagnetic Lens-focusing Antenna Enabled Massive MIMO”, Jun. 6, 2013, pp. 1-7. |
| Zhang et al., “Hermitian Precoding for Distributed MIMO Systems with Individual Channel State Information,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 241-250. |
| Zhang et al., “Networked MIMO with Clustered Linear Precoding”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, No. 4, Apr. 2009, pp. 1910-1921. |
| Zheng et al., “Diversity and multiplexing: a fundamental tradeoff in multiple antenna channels,” IEEE Trans. Info. Th., 2003, vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 1073-1096. |
| Zhou et al., “An Improved LR-aided K-Best Algorithm for MIMO Detection,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Oct. 2012, 5 pages. |
| Zhuang et al., “Channel models for link and system level simulations”, IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group, Sep. 2004, 15 pages. |
| Zogg et al., “Multipath Delay Spread in a Hilly Region at 210 MHz”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. VT-36, No. 4, Nov. 1987, pp. 184-187. |
| Zou et al., “Li Reducing the Complexity of Quasi-Maximum-Likelihood Detectors Through Companding for Coded MIMO Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Mar. 2012, vol. 2012, pp. 1109-1123. |
| Zyren J., “Overview on the 3GPP Long Term Evolution Physical Layer,” Freescale White Paper, Jul. 2007, 27 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,076, dated Oct. 30, 2019, 26 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Dec. 16, 2019, 8 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/188,841, dated Jul. 7, 2020, 17 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/208,895, dated Apr. 6, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Dec. 19, 2017, 114 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Feb. 18, 2014, 18 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Nov. 5, 2015, 10 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Nov. 13, 2018, 9 pages. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 10 pages. |
| First Exam Report, New Zealand App. No. 701567, dated Feb. 3, 2016, 4 pages. |
| First Exam Report, New Zealand Patent App. No. 717370, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 2 pages. |
| First Examination Report from counterpart AU Patent App. No. 2011323559, dated Oct. 12, 2015, 3 pages. |
| First Examination Report, AU App. No. 2018253582, dated Jun. 3, 2019, 3 pages. |
| First Examination Report, AU Patent App. No. 2014248533, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 5 pages. |
| First Examination Report, AU Patent App. No. 2020256510, dated Aug. 10, 2015, 3 pages. |
| First Examination Report, AU Patent App. No. AU2017245425, dated May 9, 2018, 9 pages. |
| First Examination Report, New Zealand App. No. 729017, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 3 pages. |
| First Examination Report, New Zealand App. No. 742186, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 4 pages. |
| First Examination Report, New Zealand App. No. 743604, dated Jul. 10, 2018, 5 pages. |
| First Examination Report, New Zealand Patent App. No. 728719, dated May 31, 2017, 4 pages. |
| First Examination Report, NZ App. No. 622137, dated Aug. 28, 2014, 2 pages. |
| First Examination Report, NZ App. No. 701691, dated Feb. 10, 2016, 4 pages. |
| First Examination Report, NZ App. No. 751530, dated Oct. 18, 2019, 3 pages. |
| First Examination Report, NZ App. No. 757995, dated Nov. 1, 2019, 2 pages. |
| First Examination Report,, AU Patent App. No. AU2011323559, dated Sep. 30, 2015, 3 pages. |
| First Office Action and Search report, Chinese Patent App. No. 201380026522.2, dated Mar. 27, 2017, 20 pages. |
| First Office Action and Search Report, Chinese Patent App. No. 201480016091.6, dated Apr. 25, 2018, 17 pages. |
| First Office Action and Search Report, CN App. No. 201210466082.X, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 26 pages. |
| First Office Action and Search Report, CN App. No. 201580007666.2, dated Jan. 11, 2019, 13 pages. |
| First Office Action and Search Report, CN App. No. 201580019760.X, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 12 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Original Document). |
| First Office Action and Search Report, TW App. No. 100139880, dated Feb. 26, 2016, 27 pages. |
| First Office Action Report, Chinese Patent App. No. 201310407419.4, dated Nov. 20, 2015, 8 pages. |
| First Office Action, EP Patent App. No. 12762167.0, dated Jan. 4, 2016, 4 pages. |
| First Office Action, EP Patent App. No. 201380035543.0, dated Feb. 15, 2016, 8 pages. |
| First Office Action, JP Patent App. No. JP2014264325, dated Nov. 12, 2015, 4 pages. |
| First Office Action, KR Patent App. No. 10-2015-7033311, dated Feb. 16, 2016, 12 pages. |
| First Office Action, MX Patent App. No. MX/a/2014/002900, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 3 pages. |
| First Office Action, MX Patent App. No. MXa2014013795, dated Nov. 1, 2016, 3 pages. |
| First Office Action, MX Patent App. No. MXa2014013795, dated Oct. 30, 2015, 7 pages. |
| First Office Action, RU Patent App. No. 2011131821, dated Jun. 26, 2015, 8 pages. |
| First Office Action, TW Patent App. No. 102117728, dated Aug. 9, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Fletcher et al., “Mutual coupling in multi-element array antennas and its influence on MIMO channel capacity,” IEEE Electronics Letters, 2003, vol. 39 (4), pp. 342-344. |
| Forenza A., et al., “Impact of antenna geometry on MIMO communication in indoor clustered channels,” Proc. IEEE Antennas and Prop. Symp, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1700-1703. |
| Forenza et al., “Adaptive MIMO Transmission for Exploiting the Capacity of Spatially Correlated Channels,” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech, 2007, vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 619-630. |
| Forenza et al., “Adaptive MIMO transmission scheme: Exploiting the spatial selectivity of wireless channels”, Proceedings Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005, vol. 5, pp. 3188-3192. |
| Forenza et al., “Benefit of Pattern Diversity Via 2-element Array of Circular Patch Antennas in Indoor Clustered MIMO Channels”, IEEE Trans. on Communications, vol. 54, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 943-954. |
| Forenza et al., “Link Adaptation and Channel Prediction in Wireless OFDM Systems,” Proceeding of IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2002, pp. 211-214. |
| Forenza et al., “Optimization Methodology for Designing 2-CPAs Exploiting Pattern Diversity in Clustered MIMO Channels”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Communications, 2008, vol. 56, No. 10, pp. 1748-1759. |
| Forenza et al., “Switching Between OSTBC and Spatial Multiplexing with Linear Receivers in Spatially Correlated MIMO Channels”, IEEE, 2006, pp. 1-5. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,731, dated Jan. 21, 2009, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,731, dated Mar. 15, 2010, 26 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,731, dated May 18, 2007, 16 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/902,978, dated Apr. 10, 2008, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/902,978, dated Nov. 6, 2007, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,478, dated Sep. 19, 2008, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,362, dated Oct. 29, 2008, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,394, dated Oct. 28, 2008, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,540, dated Apr. 29, 2009, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,540, dated Oct. 29, 2008, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,503, dated Dec. 9, 2010, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,627, dated Aug. 22, 2012, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,627, dated Mar. 16, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,643, dated Jun. 7, 2012, 25 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,643, dated Sep. 23, 2011, 18 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Aug. 13, 2015, 22 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Jan. 16, 2018, 118 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 19 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,958, dated Nov. 21, 2012, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 27 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,974, dated Dec. 19, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Aug. 1, 2013, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Dec. 19, 2012, 16 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Jan. 14, 2019, 112 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Jul. 1, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Sep. 14, 2017, 23 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Apr. 17, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Aug. 15, 2016, 19 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Sep. 15, 2017, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Jun. 14, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,989, dated Mar. 30, 2016, 35 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Jun. 20, 2016, 30 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Mar. 21, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Nov. 5, 2018, 36 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Sep. 21, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,648, dated Feb. 12, 2013, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,598, dated Dec. 30, 2013, 16 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,950, dated Jan. 11, 2017, 65 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,950, dated May 11, 2015, 61 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,971, dated May 11, 2015, 52 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,971, dated Oct. 4, 2016, 56 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Jan. 14, 2016, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Apr. 18, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Aug. 27, 2018, 39 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 159 pages. |
| Non-final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 31 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,302, dated Jun. 11, 2015, 8 pages. |
| Bengtsson E. L., “UE Antenna Properties and Their Influence on Massive MIMO System Performance,” 2002, 5 pages. |
| Bengtsson, M., “A Pragmatic Approach to Multi-User Spatial Multiplexing”, IEEE 2002, pp. 130-134. |
| Besson et al., “On parameter estimation of MIMO flat-fading channels with frequency offsets,” IEEE Transactions on Transaction, Signal Processing, see also Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 51, No. 3, 2003, pp. 602-613. |
| Bhagavatula R., et al., “Sizing up MIMO Arrays,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2008, vol. 3 (4), pp. 31-38. |
| Bjornson et al., “Massive MIMO and Small Cells: Improving Energy Efficiency by Optimal Soft-Cell Coordination”, ICT, 2013, Wireless Communications Symposium, pp. 5442-5447. |
| Bjornson et al.. Designing Multi-User MIMO for Energy Efficiency: When is Massive MIMO the Answer?, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Istanbul, Turkey, Apr. 2014, 6 pages. |
| Blelloch, “Introduction to Data Compression”, Carnegie Mellon University Tech. Report, Sep. 2010, pp. 1-55. |
| Boche et al., “Analysis of Different Precoding decoding Strategies for Multiuser Beamforming”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 39-43. |
| Boche H., et al., “A General Duality Theory for Uplink and Downlink Beamforming”, 2002, vol. 1, pp. 87-91. |
| Bourdoux et al., “Non-reciprocal transceivers in OFDM/SDMA systems: impact and mitigation”, IEEE, 2003, pp. 183-186. |
| Brodersen et al., “Degrees of Freedom in Multiple Antenna Channels: A Signal Space Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2005, vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 523-536. |
| Bydon, “Silicon Valley Inventor's Radical Rewrite of Wireless”, The Wall Street Journal, Retrieved on Jul. 28, 2011, Available Online at <http:biogs.wsj comdigits20110728silicon-valley-inventors-radical-rewrite-of-wireless>, 2 pages. |
| Caire et al., “On the Achievable Throughput of a Multiantenna Gaussian Broadcast Channel”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Jul. 23, 2001, vol. 49, pp. 1-46. |
| Caire et al., “On the achievable throughput of a multiantenna Gaussian broadcast channel,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 49, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 1691-1706. |
| Caire, “On Achivable Rates in a Multi-Antenna Broadcast Downlink,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2003, vol. 49, pp. 1691-1706. |
| Cannon et al., “Tomographical Imaging Using Uniformly Redundant Arrays,” Applied Optics, vol. 18 No. 7, 1979 pp. 1052-1057. |
| Catreux et al., “Adaptive Modulation and MIMO Coding for Broadband Wireless Data Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 108-115. |
| Cerato et al., Hardware implementation of low-complexity detector for large MIMO, in Proc. IEEE ISCAS'2009, Taipei, May 2009, pp. 593-596. |
| Cetiner et al., “A Reconfigurable Spiral Antenna for Adaptive MIMO Systems,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2005:3, 382-389, plus International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting, Special Issue on: Audio Coding, Indexing, and Effects for Broadcasting Applications, Call for Papers Hindawi Publishing Corporation, http://www.hindawi.com, pp. 1, and Special Issue on: Advances in 3DTV: Theory and Practice, Call for Papers Hindawi Publishing Corporation, http://www.hindawi.com, pp. 1. |
| Cetiner et al., “Multifunctional Reconfigurable MEMS Integrated Antennas for Adaptive MIMO Systems,” Adaptive Antennas and MIMO Systems for Wireless Systems, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, No. 12, Dec. 2004, pp. 62-70. |
| Chae et al., “Adaptive MIMO Transmission Techniques for Broadband Wireless Communication Systems”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 2010, vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 112-118. |
| Chae et al., “Coordinated Beamforming with Limited Feedback in the MIMO Broadcast Channel,” Special Issue on Exploiting Limited Feedback in Tomorrow's Wireless Comm. Networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2008, vol. 26, No. 8, pp. 1505-1515. |
| Chandrasekaran et al., “Near-Optimal Large-MIMO Detection Using Randomized MCMC and Randomized Search Algorithms,” Proceeding in Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers International Conference on Communications, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Chapter 26—Electromagnetic-Wave Propagation, Reference Data for Radio Engineers, 5th Edition, Howard W. Sams & Co., Inc., 1973, pp. 1-32. |
| Chen et al., “Transmit selection diversity for unitary precoded multiuser spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers”, IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2005, pp. 1-30. |
| Chen et al., “Transmit Selection Diversity for Unitary Precoded Multiuser Spatial Multiplexing Systems with Linear Receivers”, IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2007, vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 1159-1171. |
| Chen, R., “Multiuser Space-Time Block Coded MIMO System with Downlink,” IEEE Communications Society, 2004, pp. 2689-2693. |
| Chockalingam, A., “Low-Complexity Algorithms for Large-MIMO Detection,” International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing, 2010, 6 pages. |
| Choi et al., “A transmit preprocessing technique for multiuser MIMO systems using a decomposition approach,” IEEE Trans Wireless Comm, 2004, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 20-24. |
| Choi et al., “Downlink Training Techniques for FDD Massive MIMO Systems: Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Training with Memory,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing on Signal Processing for Large-Scale MIMO Communications, 2013, 13 pages. |
| Choi et al., “Noncoherent Trellis Coded Quantization: A Practical Limited Feedback Technique for Massive MIMO Systems,” Nov. 8, 2013, pp. 1-14. |
| Choi et al., “Opportunistic space division multiple access with beam selection,” IEEE Trans. on Communications, 2006, pp. 1-23. |
| Choi J., et al., “Interpolation Based Transmit Beamforming for MIMO-OFDM with Limited Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2005, vol. 53 (11), pp. 4125-4135. |
| Choi J., et al., “Interpolation Based Unitary Precoding for Spatial Multiplexing MIMO-OFDM with Limited Feedback,” Global Telecommunications Conference 2004 (GLOBECOM '04), IEEE, Dec. 3, 2004, pp. 214-218. |
| Chu et al., “Polyphase codes with good periodic correlation properties (corresp.)”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 18, No. 4, Jul. 1972, pp. 531-532. |
| Chuah C. N., et al.,“Capacity Scaling in MIMO Wireless Systems under Correlated Fading”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 2002, vol. 48 (3), pp. 637-650. |
| Cohn et al., “Group-theoretic Algorithms for Matrix Multiplication”, IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2005, pp. 379-388. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. EP13856705.2, dated Mar. 13, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 10156954, dated Jan. 25, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Coopersmith et al., “Matrix Multiplication via Arithmetic Progression”, Journal of Symbolic Computation, 1990, vol. 9, pp. 251-280. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,002, dated Jun. 3, 2019, 11 pages. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 16/188,841, dated Oct. 28, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 16/436,864, dated Jul. 22, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,950, dated Nov. 13, 2018, 16 pages. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Feb. 8, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,700, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 104 pages. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Oct. 6, 2020, 4 pages. |
| Couillet et al., “A Deterministic Equivalent for the Analysis of Correlated MIMO Multiple Access Channels,” IEEE Trans Inform. Theory, 2011, vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 3493-3514. |
| Coulson et al., “Maximum likelihood synchronization for OFDM using a pilot symbol: analysis,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2001, vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 2495-2503. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,362, dated Nov. 10, 2009, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,362, dated Sep. 3, 2009, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,394, dated Jun. 26, 2009, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,394, dated Jul. 30, 2009, 14 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,394, dated Mar. 6, 2009, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,540, dated Nov. 9, 2009, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,540, dated Sep. 14, 2009, 13 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,503, dated Apr. 11, 2011, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,503, dated Aug. 18, 2011, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,503, dated Dec. 9, 2011, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,643, dated Jan. 17, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,938, dated Dec. 6, 2012, 37 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,938, dated Sep. 19, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Apr. 17, 2020, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,975, dated Aug. 26, 2020, 14 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,976, dated Apr. 14, 2011, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,976, dated Aug. 22, 2011, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,976, dated Dec. 9, 2011, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,976, dated Nov. 29, 2010, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,988, dated Nov. 15, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,257, dated Dec. 6, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,257, dated Feb. 15, 2013, 18 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Jan. 9, 2019, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,996, dated Mar. 20, 2019, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Apr. 3, 2019, 19 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated Jul. 12, 2019, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,006, dated May 30, 2019, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,596, dated Oct. 19, 2015, 29 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,598, dated Oct. 19, 2015, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,950, dated Apr. 16, 2018, 117 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,950, dated Aug. 2, 2018, 23 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Jan. 17, 2018, 146 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,984, dated Oct. 19, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Dec. 16, 2019, 2 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,355, dated Oct. 21, 2019, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,302, dated May 17, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,254, dated Nov. 11, 2015, 29 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,002, dated Apr. 16, 2019, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,002, dated Dec. 19, 2018, 68 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,383, dated Jan. 25, 2019, 87 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,383, dated Mar. 20, 2019, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,276, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 29 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,276, dated May 28, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Dec. 2, 2020, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,914, dated Mar. 15, 2021, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,076, dated Jan. 14, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,076, dated Mar. 24, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Oct. 2, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/188,841, dated Sep. 10, 2020, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/253,028, dated Dec. 27, 2019, 10 pages. |
| Decision to Grant, EP App. No. 14770916.6, dated May 28, 2021, 2 pages. |
| Examination Report, AU App. No. 2020201409, dated Apr. 16, 2021, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT App. No. PCT/US2021/026431, dated Jun. 29, 2021, 6 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/234,699, dated Jul. 15, 2021, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/308,031, dated Jul. 15, 2021, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, CA App. No. 2816556, dated May 18, 2021, 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,610, dated Jul. 13, 2021, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,169, dated Jun. 17, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/719,169, dated Jun. 30, 2021, 2 pages. |
| Notification of Reason for Refusal, KR App. No. 10-2021-7002823, dated Apr. 14, 2021, 06 pages (03 pages of English Translation and 03 pages of Original Document). |
| Office Action, CA App. No. 2945987, dated Apr. 13, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Second Office Action, CN App. No. 201780066182.4, dated May 7, 2021, 13 pages (9 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Original Document). |
| Stevanovic et al., “Smart Antenna Systems for Mobile Communications”, Final Report, Laboratoire d'EIectromagnetisme et d'Acoustique, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne Suisse, Jan. 2003, 120 pages. |
| CMCC, “Discussion on CQI definition for non-PMI/RI reporting”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #70, R1-123739, Aug. 13-17, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/234,699, dated Jul. 28, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/308,031, dated Aug. 4, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal, JP App. No. 2019-093904, dated May 27, 2021, 5 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document). |
| Yoshida, Susumu, “Coherent Coordinated Multipoint Transmission Techniques for Wireless Distributed Networks”, Kyoto University, Available Online at <www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000256555.pdf>, 2013, 5 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document). |
| Werner, Karl, et al., “LTE-Advanced 8x8 MIMO Measurements in an Indoor Scenario”, Proceedings of ISAP2012, pp. 750-753, Nagoya, Japan. Oct. 29, 2012. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210336663 A1 | Oct 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17308031 | May 2021 | US |
| Child | 17317856 | US | |
| Parent | 17234699 | Apr 2021 | US |
| Child | 17308031 | US | |
| Parent | 15340914 | Nov 2016 | US |
| Child | 17234699 | US | |
| Parent | 15201276 | Jul 2016 | US |
| Child | 15340914 | US | |
| Parent | 14156254 | Jan 2014 | US |
| Child | 15201276 | US | |
| Parent | 12630627 | Dec 2009 | US |
| Child | 14156254 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11894394 | Aug 2007 | US |
| Child | 12630627 | US | |
| Parent | 10902978 | Jul 2004 | US |
| Child | 11894394 | US | |
| Parent | 10817731 | Apr 2004 | US |
| Child | 12630627 | US |
