The present application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/250,307 entitled “Voting System and Method Using Doppler Aided Navigation” filed by Jinkins et al, on an even date herewith, assigned to the Assignee of the present application and incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of navigation. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a system for and method of navigation using weather radar.
Required navigation performance (RNP) specifications for Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approach procedures require accurate navigation performance. Conventional aircraft often rely on a Global Positioning System (GPS) and Inertial Navigation System (INS) to estimate the aircraft's position (latitude, longitude and altitude) and other flight parameters (e.g., track angle, ground speed, pitch, roll, heading, angular rates and accelerations). In addition, the RNP specifications require redundancy for navigation sources in case of a GPS or other sensor/system outage. In general, conventional systems rely upon an INS and accompanying sensors to provide redundant parameters for navigation. The INS itself is expensive. Sensors for an INS generally must be avionic grade and can also add significant cost. An INS system and associated sensors also increase the weight of the aircraft.
Therefore, there is a need for a system and method that can assist navigation at a low cost and still meet RNP requirements. There is also a need for a system for and a method of determining accurate position to maintain navigation that meets the RNP requirement. Further still, there is a need for a system and method that can determine accurate heading angle, track angle, ground speed and/or other flight parameters that provides continuity in the event of GPS source outage. In case of a GPS outage, aircraft position, track angle and ground speed are no longer provided by the GPS, therefore these parameters have to be provided by another aircraft system. Generally an INS is used to extrapolate the current position using track angle and ground speed that is estimated from integrating angular rates and accelerations that the INS measures. So further still, there is a need for a low cost system and method of determining track angle and ground speed that can be used to extrapolate the current position.
The heading reference from a low cost AHRS does not always meet the accuracy requirements for the heading reference. Therefore still further, there is a need for a system and method that determines accurate heading angle.
Yet further, there is a need for a system and method that determines heading angle, track angle, and ground speed without the addition of significant equipment. Further still, there is a need for a low cost, light weight replacement for an INS or for equipment that estimates accurate heading angle, track angle and ground speed.
An exemplary embodiment relates to a method of using a weather radar on board an aircraft to determine at least one of a drift angle and ground speed. The method includes receiving data associated with at least two radar return provided by the weather radar and striking the Earth's surface.
Another exemplary embodiment relates to aircraft weather radar systems. The aircraft weather radar system includes an antenna and processing electronics. The antenna is configured to receive a radar return based on radar sweeps. The processing electronics is configured to determine at least one of the drift angle and ground speed parameters using Doppler information associated with multiple (e.g., two or more) radar returns from the Earth's surface.
An exemplary embodiment relates to an aircraft sensor system for use with an aircraft weather radar system. The aircraft weather radar system is configured to provide Doppler information associated with two radar returns from the Earth's surface. The Doppler information is used to provide a drift angle and/or a ground speed.
Another exemplary embodiment relates to an aircraft sensor system. The aircraft sensor system includes a processor configured to receive a drift angle parameter from a weather radar system and a track angle parameter from a sensor source. The processor determines a heading angle using the drift angle parameter and the track angle parameter.
Another exemplary embodiment relates to an aircraft sensor system. The aircraft sensor system includes a processor configured to receive a drift angle parameter from a weather radar system and a heading angle parameter from a sensor source. The processor determines a track angle using the drift angle parameter and the heading angle parameter.
Another exemplary embodiment relates to an apparatus. The apparatus includes means for receiving weather radar return data associated with at least two radar signals that strike the Earth's surface. The apparatus also includes means for determining drift angle and/or ground speed from the Doppler information associated with the radar return data from the Earth's surface.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following description, appended claims, and the accompanying exemplary embodiments shown in the drawings, which are briefly described below, wherein like numerals denote like elements.
Before describing in detail the particular improved system and method, it should be observed that the invention includes, but is not limited to a novel structural combination of conventional data/signal processing components and communications circuits, and not in the particular detailed configurations thereof. Accordingly, the structure, methods, functions, control and arrangement of conventional components software, and circuits have, for the most part, been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable block representations and schematic diagrams, in order not to obscure the disclosure with structural details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, having the benefit of the description herein. Further, the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments depicted in the exemplary diagrams, but should be construed in accordance with the language in the claims.
According to one embodiment, a method of using a weather radar on board an aircraft determines at least one of drift angle and ground speed. The method includes receiving first return data associated with a first radar signal provided by the weather radar sensing the Earth's surface, and receiving second return data associated with a second radar signal provided by the weather radar sensing the Earth's surface. The first return data and second return data are provided at different azimuth angles. The method includes determining the drift angle and/or ground speed of the aircraft based on Doppler parameters associated with the first return data and second return data.
In another embodiment, the method includes using another aircraft system for determining heading angle and combining this heading angle with the direction of movement relative to the longitudinal aircraft axis to determine a track angle. In another embodiment, the method can be used to either add redundancy or increase fidelity of position estimation using the ground speed and track angle to allow a degraded aircraft systems derived data set to be used and still meet operational needs. Degradation of the data set could be induced by failure or be the result of a design choice.
Referring to
In a preferred embodiment, aircraft control center 10 can use drift angle and/or ground speed calculated according to the advantageous processes described below. Preferably, drift angle and/or ground speed can be calculated using weather radar returns. The weather radar returns can be received during any phase of flight that is close to the Earth's surface, such as the final phase of flight or approach phase of flight.
In
Referring generally to
Referring further to
In a preferred embodiment, weather radar system 102 includes a transmit/receive circuit 114, a memory 118, an antenna 108 and electronics (e.g., a processor 116). Processor 116 communicates with a drift angle determiner 119 for determining a drift angle or crab angle in response to weather radar return data and a ground speed determiner 121 for determining ground speed in response to weather radar return data. Radar system 102 preferably provides radar signals via antenna 108 and receives radar returns from transmit/receive circuit 114. Although shown as two different modules or units in communication with processor 116, determiners 119 and 121 can be integrated as a single unit with processor 116 or be separate from processor 116 or system 102. With reference to
In a preferred embodiment, processor 116 processes the returns using Doppler techniques to determine Doppler velocity factors or parameters. The Doppler velocity factors or parameters can be used to calculate drift angle and ground speed parameters. The drift angle and ground speed parameters can be provided to a processor 152 of a sensor processing unit 150 coupled to system 102. One exemplary embodiment of such a sensor processing unit may be a processor of a combined Global Positioning System (GPS) and attitude heading reference system (AHRS) unit. Advantageously, weather radar system 102 allows a redundant calculation of ground speed and drift angle to be provided without requiring significant additional equipment or weight.
Velocity parameters associated with the Doppler techniques can be used by determiners 119 and 121 to calculate the drift angle and ground speed parameters determiners 119 and 121 can be embodied as separate units or as part of system 102. Alternatively, system 102 can provide the velocity parameters to sensor processing unit 150 for calculation of ground speed and drift angle parameters by sensor processing unit 150. Further still, other avionic components (e.g., flight navigation computer) can calculate ground speed and drift angle parameters using data from system 102 without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, determiner 119 and/or 121 can be part of unit 150 or other aircraft sensor system instead of system 102.
Advantageously, determiners 119 and 121 are configured to determine a drift angle parameter and a ground speed parameter (or alternatively, a relative ground velocity vector including both speed and direction) as data provided to an aircraft sensor processor 152 that could determine the location and is part of a sensor processing unit 150 such as a GPS/AHRS sensor unit. Determiners 119 and 121 and weather radar system 102 can preferably also be coupled to a sensor processing unit 150 via an avionic bus or a connection capable of communicating avionic data. Sensor processing unit 150 can be integrated as one unit or be separate units, (e.g., a GPS unit and an AHRS unit), or be integrated with other equipment, such as, weather radar system 102, a flight management computer, etc.
Radar system 102 can measure velocities of aircraft 110 relative to the Earth's surface using radar returns that strike the Earth's surface. The aircraft velocities relative to the Earth's surface can be used to determine the drift angle parameter in determiner 119 for use by aircraft sensor processor 152. The estimated heading angle can be used in various aircraft sensor systems including head-up displays. Advantageously, head-up displays can receive the heading angle parameter from aircraft sensor processor 152 and benefit from improved heading. In addition, aircraft sensor processor 152 allows a heading angle parameter to be determined when heading determiner 129 is not functional or does not provide sufficient accuracy. Aircraft sensor processor 152 can include a Kalman filter.
In a preferred embodiment, the aircraft sensor processor 152 can utilize the drift angle parameter from determiner 119 and a track angle parameter from a track angle determiner 127 to determine a heading angle estimate or parameter. Heading determiner 129 can be an electronic compass or GPS multi-antenna based system that provides a heading parameter. Alternatively, the track angle parameter can be provided from a different type of aircraft sensor device. Heading angle is generally mathematically related to track angle and drift angle. In one embodiment, the heading angle may be equal to the difference between track angle and drift angle. The mathematical relation between heading angle and track angle holds whether the heading angle and track angle are related to the true north direction or magnetic north direction.
In one embodiment, aircraft sensor processor 152 of sensor processing unit 150 utilizes the drift angle parameter from determiner 119 and a heading angle parameter from determiner 129 to determine a track angle parameter. Aircraft sensor processor 152 allows a track angle parameter to be determined when track angle determiner 127 is not functional or does not provide sufficient accuracy.
In one embodiment, aircraft sensor processor 152 of sensor processing unit 150 can employ a dead-reckoning algorithm to estimate the location of aircraft 110 using the track angle parameter determined by processor 152 and the ground speed parameter determined by ground speed determiner 121 and a prior location of aircraft 110. The estimated location as well as the other navigation parameters like ground speed, track angle and drift angle can be used in various avionic systems.
Determiners 119 and 121 and processor 152 are preferably embodied as software routines and can be combined as a single circuit or routine. Determiners 119, 121 can be software instructions stored on a non-transitory medium. Determiners 119 and 121 use either vertical, diagonal or horizontal sweeps or both types of sweeps to reliably provide a weather radar derived drift angle parameter or ground speed parameter. The parameters can be used as a real time source for confirmation, replacement or adjustment of other values used in avionic systems on board of aircraft 110.
The drift angle parameter and ground speed parameter from weather radar system 102 can be utilized by sensor processing unit 150 or other navigation or location determining devices to provide an accurate determination of the ground speed, drift angle, heading angle, track angle, position or other parameters at a low cost. Preferably, weather radar system 102 is capable of Doppler functionality for drift angle and ground speed determinations so that aircraft sensor systems (e.g., unit 150) can perform navigation functions in the event of a GPS or other outage. In addition, in the event of a GPS outage or other GPS failure, system 102 in combination with sensor processing unit 150 and heading determiner 129 allows aircraft sensor processor 152 to be used to determine the aircraft location without requiring a separate inertial reference system (INS) and therefore allows a lower cost sensors suite to be utilized while meeting RNP specification. RNP requirements can be very strict requiring location of less than a tenth of a mile (e.g., RNP 0.1 specification).
With reference to
In a preferred embodiment, angles 904 and 908 are each at an azimuth angle of 45 degrees from a central axis of aircraft 110 and directed toward the Earth's surface. Radar signals 902 and 906 are provided at different azimuth angles and are scans that are directed toward the Earth's surface. Many different angles and numbers of radar signals can be utilized without departing from the scope of the invention. In a preferred embodiment, ground speed and drift angle are calculated from Doppler parameters to a usable accuracy in the direction of scan.
With reference to
Sensor processing unit 150 uses a GPS antenna 154 for communication with satellites. Sensor processing unit 150 can provide various sensor data for aircraft sensor processor 152 (
With reference to
The Doppler parameters can be calculated in a Doppler augmentation or Doppler navigator technique. The Doppler navigator technique can determine velocity of aircraft 110 along the ground. Changes in frequency associated with each radar return are used to determine velocity in the direction of the scan in accordance with Doppler theory. In a preferred embodiment, the relative speed in each direction of scan is used to mathematically compute the drift angle and ground speed of aircraft 110. Generally, radar measurements use relative speed with respect to the Earth's surface with respect to the aircraft's own axis. This relative velocity vector can be expressed as a ground speed and a drift angle. To convert the relative ground velocity into an absolute ground velocity an absolute axis reference is needed for the aircraft's own axis. This absolute axis reference can be the true or magnetic heading angle of aircraft 110.
Although only two weather radar signals 902 and 906 are shown in
At a step 1702, a first radar sweep at a first angle is performed to determine a drift angle parameter and ground speed parameter. At a step 1703, a first radar return from the first radar sweep is received. At a step 1704, a second radar sweep at a second angle is performed.
At a step 1706, a second radar return associated with a second sweep is received. At a step 1708, drift angle and ground speed are determined using Doppler measurements. The drift angle together with a heading angle from another sensor can be used to determine track angle. Track angle and ground speed can be used in a dead-reckoning algorithm to estimate the ground track and current position from where the position was last measured.
At step 1708, the velocity on the left side of aircraft 110 and the right side of aircraft 110 is determined using the Doppler information from the radar returns and both relative speeds are determined in order to determine drift angle and ground speed. Drift angle and ground speed can be determined in system 102. Alternatively, sensor processing unit 150 can utilize the radar return data or velocity indicative data derived from the radar return data and determine the ground speed and drift angle parameter. At a step 1710, drift angle and ground speed parameters or data are utilized in an aircraft sensor system such as sensor processing unit 150. The parameters can be used to extrapolate current position in the sensor processing unit 150 or processor 152. The drift angle and ground speed parameters can be used to derive a data set to replace degraded data so that operational needs can be met.
With reference to
With reference to
According to one exemplary embodiment, a switched aperture method or monopulse technique may be used to send and receive radar signals 902 and 906. Weather radar system 102 of the aircraft may operate through radar antenna 108 that toggles between transmitting and receiving on the full aperture and transmitting on the full aperture while receiving on the partial aperture. These techniques can be used to accurately estimate at which angle the target was located within the radar beam. This additional information can be used to improve the accuracy of the Doppler calculations correcting for those angles. Signals 902 and 906 can be provided simultaneously or sequentially.
Weather radar system 102 can be any electronic radar platform with Doppler sensing capabilities utilized. Weather radar system 102 preferably is a Rockwell Collins Multi-scan™ weather radar system, commercially available from Rockwell Collins, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. A radar system manufactured by Honeywell, Inc. can also be configured as described herein to provide drift angle and ground speed parameters without departing from the scope of the invention.
While the detailed drawings, specific examples, detailed algorithms, and particular configurations given describe preferred and exemplary embodiments, they serve the purpose of illustration only. The inventions disclosed are not limited to the specific forms shown. For example, the methods may be performed in any of a variety of sequence of steps, in whole or in part, in various equipment or according to any of a variety of mathematical formulas without departing from the invention. The hardware and software configurations shown and described may differ depending on the chosen performance characteristics and physical characteristics of the radar and processing devices. For example, the type of system components and their interconnections may differ. The systems and methods depicted and described are not limited to the precise details and conditions disclosed. The flow charts show preferred exemplary operations only. The specific data types and operations are shown in a non-limiting fashion. Furthermore, other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2849184 | Fredrick | Aug 1958 | A |
3816718 | Hall | Jun 1974 | A |
4103300 | Gendreu et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4405986 | Gray | Sep 1983 | A |
4598292 | Devino | Jul 1986 | A |
4912477 | Lory et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5045855 | Moreira | Sep 1991 | A |
5166688 | Moreira | Nov 1992 | A |
5202690 | Frederick | Apr 1993 | A |
5442364 | Lee et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5530440 | Danzer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
6205400 | Lin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6427122 | Lin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441773 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448922 | Kelly | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6516272 | Lin | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6516283 | McCall et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6650275 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6720890 | Ezroni et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6977608 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7109912 | Paramore et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109913 | Paramore et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7161525 | Finley et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7242343 | Woodell | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7292178 | Woodell et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7307576 | Koenigs | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307577 | Kronfeld et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7372394 | Woodell et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7379014 | Woodell et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7417578 | Woodell et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7417579 | Woodell | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7486220 | Kronfeld et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7492304 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7492305 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7515087 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7515088 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7528765 | Woodell et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7541970 | Godfrey et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7541971 | Woodell et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7557735 | Woodell et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7576680 | Woodell | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7633428 | McCusker et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7633430 | Wichgers et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7693621 | Chamas | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7696921 | Finley et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7714767 | Kronfeld et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7733264 | Woodell et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7859448 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7859449 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7868811 | Woodell et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7872594 | Vesel | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7889117 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7889118 | Finley et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7965223 | McCusker | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7965225 | Dickerson et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8068984 | Smith et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072368 | Woodell | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8077078 | Woodell | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8140223 | Whitehead et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8159464 | Gribble et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8232917 | Scherzinger et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8296065 | Haynie et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8477062 | Kanellis | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8583315 | Whitehead et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594879 | Roberge et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8634993 | McClure et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639416 | Jones et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8643533 | Woodell | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8909471 | Jinkins | Dec 2014 | B1 |
20020111717 | Scherzinger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116125 | Lin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116126 | Lin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030093187 | Walker | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102999 | Bergin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040072575 | Young et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040145499 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160364 | Regev | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050004748 | Pinto | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050150289 | Osborne | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050230563 | Corcoran, III | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060244636 | Rye et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032951 | Tanenhaus et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070179684 | He | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070279253 | Priest | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090021397 | Wipf et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090152391 | McWhirk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164067 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100312428 | Roberge et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312461 | Haynie et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110037616 | Leutelt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054729 | Whitehead et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110184594 | Manfred | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110304479 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120053831 | Halder | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120150426 | Conway | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120174445 | Jones et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215410 | McClure et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20150211883 | He | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19949737 | Apr 2001 | DE |
814744 | Jun 1959 | GB |
1 092 821 | Nov 1967 | GB |
WO-2009133102 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,307, mail date Nov. 5, 2013, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,307, filed Sep. 30, 2011, Jinkins et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,992, filed Sep. 2, 2011, Hufnagel et al. |
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,307 Dated Jun. 11, 2014, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,282 dated Jan. 29, 2016, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,199 dated Mar. 1, 2016, 11 pages. |
G2000, Garmin, printed from website https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=153&pID=97668 on Jun. 28, 2011, 2 pages. |
G3000, Garmin, printed from website https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=153&pID=66916 on Jun. 28, 2011, 2 pages. |
G5000, Garmin, printed from website https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=153&pID=90821&ra=true on Apr. 20, 2011, 2 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,992, mail date Feb. 28, 2013, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/743,182, mail date Apr. 8, 2013, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/482,681, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 9 pages. |